tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post2996126365074942339..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: The University of Alabama at Birmingham's Football Team Reinstated: All Because the Program was too Black to CancelStuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger126125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-57779273333428029552015-06-06T16:29:47.461-07:002015-06-06T16:29:47.461-07:00Riverside,CA. 1958
How could we whites let them t...Riverside,CA. 1958<br /><br /><i>How could we whites let them take it without a fight.</i><br /><br />Welcome to my world. My country, South Africa, is gone, too.<br /><br />The answer, of course, is that we never recognised the enemy. While they were pumping our heads full of mush like "a better life" and "diversity is our strength" and "tolerance" and "equality" and "Jesus loves everybody", we never realised that they were our deadly enemies, intent on our destruction. They looked like us, they spoke our language, but they were not us.<br /><br /><i>“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”<br /><br />― Marcus Tullius Cicero </i>AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-26081417337235108152015-06-06T07:31:26.164-07:002015-06-06T07:31:26.164-07:00This acted in much the way a powerful drug does. T...<i>This acted in much the way a powerful drug does. They became addicted to being human saints and demi-gods.</i><br /><br />The only man who wasn't irredeemably ruined by being lionized was a certain Hebrew named Daniel.Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-40421737783341988052015-06-06T05:19:01.883-07:002015-06-06T05:19:01.883-07:00"Why would Jews wan't to see this life fo..."Why would Jews wan't to see this life form continue to exist?"<br /><br />Social psychologist Kevin MacDonald hypothesizes that this is a group survival strategy. Remember that judaism is also an ethnicity and has a matriarchal lineage.<br /><br />A notable strategy is to disrupt the established orthodoxy. This causes conflict between competing groups. This disruption is useful in the hard sciences which weed out bad ideas by logic and empirical testing before they can do much harm. (String theory may be an exception). In the social sciences it has been devastating (Feminism, Marxism, Multiculturalism, Freudism etc).<br /><br />By setting everyone else at each other's throats, they elevate their relative strength.<br /><br />You will note that they usually shun the medicine that they prescribe for others. However, this is not entirely possible and there are signs of blowback as in the threats from muslims that were imported during previously advocated immigration in surges.<br /><br />I suspect that this post will not get posted.D-FENSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-46835790446700888762015-06-05T19:46:09.698-07:002015-06-05T19:46:09.698-07:00Wow 11:50 am. I love you Please give us a name t...Wow 11:50 am. I love you Please give us a name to follow. <br />You hit home with me. So thankful you are here. <br /><br />Signed,<br /><br />A native Californian girl who can never go home again. Home was invaded and occupied. Lost. Forever. Oh my fucking God. How chould we whites let them take it without a fight. "What have you done?" It's heart breaking. <br /><br />Riverside,CA. 1958. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-10528400311158629772015-06-05T19:29:44.140-07:002015-06-05T19:29:44.140-07:00Perplexed Woman in NJ:
That's the third rail,...Perplexed Woman in NJ:<br /><br />That's the third rail, here. I'm surprised that your question got published, and sure that a proper answer to it would not be published.<br /><br />Paul has made it clear that this is <b>Stuff Black People Don't Like</b>, a single-focus blog. We had a regular poster who tried to make it Stuff Black People and Muslims Don't Like. I think he must have been censored so often that he eventually lost heart and went to Gates of Vienna instead.<br /><br />However, your question is absolutely essential to understanding the predicament we are in. You should research it further. Paul unfortunately censors links to some racialist blogs, a sad weakness of the "movement" (what Hunter Wallace of Occidental Dissent refers to as a "stuckment") being division and in-fighting. So, rather than try to give you a suggested reading list here, I'll post individual recommendations in subsequent comments, and Paul can allow those he sees fit to allow.<br /><br />Look out for your handle in my comments in the current days' threads. Good luck in your quest.AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-37084995443283209342015-06-05T17:32:21.071-07:002015-06-05T17:32:21.071-07:00Too black to fail.Too black to fail.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-60510981754914389122015-06-05T17:15:58.157-07:002015-06-05T17:15:58.157-07:00Having posted the original query to Californian I ...Having posted the original query to Californian I would like to thank him for his excellent response at June 5, 10:47 a.m.<br /><br />I shall put "Suicide of the West" on my reading list.<br /><br />I do believe "Stockholm Syndrome" is probably the best currently available classification for the black-loving pathology-especially as it presents from the mid-20th century forward.<br /><br />There is, I also believe, (especially at its 19th century) inception a certain admixture of the "messiah" syndrome (perhaps still seen today in an Amy Biehl).<br /><br />In the case of the early advocates for blacks who first began championing them, I think they felt a thrill of self-righteousness, a thrill that flattered their self image of themselves as heroes of the downtrodden. Some of these luminaries were only average in the company of their New-England peers. Of average intellectual gifts. But they strode as Gods amongst the blacks dispensing ideas (Liberty, brotherhood, equality, et al) and literacy.<br /><br />This acted in much the way a powerful drug does. They became addicted to being human saints and demi-gods.<br /><br />Unfortunately, they saddled their country with a Civil War and apparently endless obligation to the black.<br /><br />Thanks again, Californian, for your valued posts!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-66571373279862940612015-06-05T16:08:33.474-07:002015-06-05T16:08:33.474-07:00Goodness. The names. How could a teacher even...Goodness. The names. How could a teacher even begin to teach ? The names alone are intolerable. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-37155665553826464602015-06-05T11:14:56.537-07:002015-06-05T11:14:56.537-07:00Kennard, Khaled and Tamar are normal names. Kenna...Kennard, Khaled and Tamar are normal names. Kennard is an old (but uncommon) English name, Khaled is a widely-used Arabic/Muslim name, and Tamar is a traditional Hebrew biblical name... for a female. Wonder if Tamar's momma knew she was giving her kid the equivalent of A Boy Named Sue?<br /><br />But Uneik? Seriously, who names their kid a misspelled Unique? You just know that he was raised to be a self-centred egotistical monster with a name like that. Even more so than the average negro.Awake in Seattlenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-16513668060144654632015-06-05T10:47:25.938-07:002015-06-05T10:47:25.938-07:00[continued]
Politics is often the expression of u...[continued]<br /><br />Politics is often the expression of underlying psychological factors. Per my last post, <i><b>FEAR</b> </i>is a primary motivation of today's liberalism. <br /><br />From a rational point of view, as blacks become more pathological (whether in Baltimore or Zimbabwe) whites ought to start waking up and start defending themselves. But the way it works is that as blacks get more pathological, the more liberals will rationalize away their aggression and promote the delusion. The reality is that there are fewer and fewer places for white people to be “safe” in the world: not in southern Africa; not in major American cities; not even in London or Malmo. <br /><br />So the liberalism ramps up. <br /><br />From a rational standpoint, the black flashmobs, the black driveby shootings, the black riots in Malmo and London and Baltimore, the black farm attacks in South Africa, the black slaughter of Amy Biehl, etc., etc., ad nauseam, would wake up more liberals. <br /><br />But we are not dealing with rationality. The way liberal psychology works is that these atrocities create an increasing belief in the delusion. If they had to face the reality, liberals would have to realize they were in a world of hurt. <br /> <br /> <br /><i>We further know [liberalism] is highly resistant to evidence of its own failings as a belief system to accurately predict behavior and dynamic social outcomes. We know it acts much as fanatical faith or delusion in the minds of its adherents, needing no proofs. We know it results in behaviors that are highly altruistic, even suicidal.</i><br /><br />I'll make my usual plug for James Burnham's "Suicide of the West." He wrote this back in the early 1960s as an analysis of the liberal syndrome and is something of a classic, at least among oldline conservatives. Burnham dissects liberal ideology, liberal guilt and liberal inanity better than just about anyone else out there. <br /><br />Burnham's point was that liberalism had developed into an ideology to rationalize away the Decline of Western Civilization. e.g., liberals reinterpreted the Communist seizure of power in China as the overthrow of a "corrupt" Nationalist regime; the French loss of Algeria as a victory for "democracy;" the increased use of violence by the civil rights movement as evidence that blacks were reaching their final goal of equality. He was really ahead of his time in seeing where this was all going. <br /><br />Again, it's that Stockholm Syndrome. The aggressor becomes the protector. Those who tell the truth about the threat are ostracized as heretics. <br /><br /><br /><i> A full etiology is required to enable us to inoculate future generations against this most dangerous of delusions.</i><br /><br />Indeed. If we had to tell future generations how to avoid the catastrophe in which the white world currently finds itself, what would we say?<br /><br />What the psychological aspect suggest is that Race Realists/White Nationalists/the Alternative Right/etc., need to stand up and provide leadership when it comes to race. Regardless of the politics, a man or woman who shows strength will eventually rally followers. Right now we are in the first stage of this. Websites like SBPDL are useful for hammering out a political line. Eventually, it will have to be taken to a movement which can get out into the streets and into office. There are such movements now getting active in Europe. <br /><br />White people in America need to learn from them.Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41142838440048477302015-06-05T10:30:27.177-07:002015-06-05T10:30:27.177-07:00What is needed is a full account of this pathology...<i>What is needed is a full account of this pathology [liberal egalitarianism]. We know it is not a pose; is not feigned on their part. We know it is highly satisfying to those who believe in it; they are easily brought to tears with sentimental tales of heroic blacks.</i><br /><br />In its current, early 21st century form, I'd sum up a major underlying motivation behind liberal egalitarianism in one word:<br /><br /><i><b>FEAR!</b> </i><br /><br />Liberals are afraid of blacks. They are afraid of black gangbangers and black militants and black child-soldiers and black looters and black people calling them names. So liberals come up with all sorts of rationalizations to make blacks appear not as aggressors but as victims. It's the Stockholm Syndrome writ civilization-wide.<br /><br />Up until the civil rights revolution (1950s-60s) liberals could argue that black pathologies were the result of oppression (slavery-segregation-colonialism-whatever). The liberal solution was (1) remove the oppression (i.e., de-segregate, de-colonialize); and (2) provide blacks with social services (EO, welfare, "good" schools, tons of foreign aid). The result was expected to be equality.<br /><br />Well, all this was tried -- and failed. Epic fail. We can see the failure whether in Detroit or Zimbabwe. And everywhere you get that African Mean of mindless violence, massive corruption, gangbanging-warlordism, and Big Man rule.<br /><br />This is one reason for the "positive" images of blacks on the telescreens. Liberals can tune in and turn on a virtual world in which the aggressor is converted into a protector. <br /><br />Same as in the Stockholm Syndrome.Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-83550377562211361272015-06-05T08:25:45.106-07:002015-06-05T08:25:45.106-07:00My sense is Jews can't stand Blacks any more t...<i>My sense is Jews can't stand Blacks any more than Christisns can and for the same reasons we can't. Am I missing something?</i><br /><br />Blacks (and mestizos, and S. Asians, and...) are easily controlled, whereas White Christians are independent and have a history of reacting against TWMNBN usury and other sharp practices. Solution: use hostile minorities against Whites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-7710231209023485022015-06-05T07:49:27.714-07:002015-06-05T07:49:27.714-07:00Re Anon at 3:44 comments about Jewish people.
I&#...Re Anon at 3:44 comments about Jewish people.<br /><br />I'm fairly new to this blog and don't have any complete theory or explanation as to why Blacks are such a protected class while being the most vile life form on earth. Blatantly, obviously! Yet people pretend they don't see it or that it's not their fault. The pathology is beyond me and makes me furious every day. I read all comments religiously and give them a lot of thought. I just don't see how Jews are behind this any more than Christians (I'm Catholic). Liberals of any religion are a scourge. But to my way of thinking, Jews would abhor Blacks for being the exact opposite of them - lazy, stupid, uneducable, poor moral character, violent, no respect for marriage and children, no honorable traditions, etc., etc. My sense is Jews can't stand Blacks any more than Christisns can and for the same reasons we can't. Am I missing something? Why would Jews wan't to see this life form continue to exist?<br /><br />Perplexed Woman in NJAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-20389753086662507272015-06-05T04:53:56.003-07:002015-06-05T04:53:56.003-07:00"It happened during the 60's when the gre..."It happened during the 60's when the great society began. When LBJ realized that he could get negros voting democrat for generations, with welfare handouts."<br /><br />This is more symptom than cause of the current state of affairs. I would suggest reading up on the "Frankfurt School". Most,if not all egalitarianism today can be traced to that school of "thought". <br /><br />Scot IrishAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-38323245482363544152015-06-05T01:50:23.587-07:002015-06-05T01:50:23.587-07:00Christianity, both old style and the current Che G...<i> Christianity, both old style and the current Che Guevara style is the source of the white man's soft spot for the negro. </i><br /><br />Blacks are the "noble savage" incarnate to DWLs. It would be interesting to trace the rise of abolitionism and then the agitation of Northerners for civil war to the growth of Enlightenment era ideas of the "noble savage." This continues through to today. No matter how much the last 150 years have demonstrated that blacks can not assimilate into white civilization, DWLs must perforce insist on their great big experiment to equalize humanity.<br /><br />Even when their cities are burned down around them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-53671545843422116802015-06-04T22:42:10.771-07:002015-06-04T22:42:10.771-07:00Anon said
6) your memories...
Funny you should a...Anon said<br /><br /><i>6) your memories...</i><br /><br />Funny you should ask. I was just remembering today something I hadn't thought about for years.<br /><br />Growing up a young Mormon boy in South Africa in the 1960s, there was a government censor board that had to approve all publications - movies, magazines, books. Newspapers were allowed to publish without prior approval on the understanding that all future editions could be banned if they misbehaved.<br /><br />The kind of things that got banned were anything vaguely erotic, communist or anti-racist propaganda, basically anything that our moral guardians considered we were better off not knowing. Of course, the board couldn't actually read all the stuff publishers wanted to import, so we had ridiculous things like the time they banned <i>Black Beauty</i>, a children's story about a black horse. The title was subversive. <br /><br />One time they banned a pantihose packet because the illustration looked like a woman's naked butt. When the company protested that it wasn't even a woman, but a plaster dummy, they relented and allowed it on the grounds that the clear plastic wrapper, which had not been submitted with the original application, would reflect enough light to make it acceptable. Yes, even then, South African bureaucrats were in a special class of stupid.<br /><br />Anyway, one day the Mormon church announced that it had obtained a copy of the banned film, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062376/" rel="nofollow">To Sir, With Love</a>, and would hold a private screening in the church hall (which was legal). Of course, I was happy to attend a free movie, and curious to see what the forbidden fruit looked like. Back then, South Africa didn't have television, and entertainment was rare.<br /><br />The film, about a wise, compassionate black teacher (Sidney Poitier) who gives up the hopeless task of teaching "teens" (mostly White, of course) anything academic, and instead prepares them for "Life" by teaching them basic cookery and so on, left me bemused. What was the point?<br /><br />In retrospect, of course, it's obvious that that was one of the early shots in the cultural war against Apartheid, probably softening us up for the coming "revelation" that negroes are people too, and now worthy of holding the priesthood in the LDS church, just like regular folks.<br /><br />Of course, it's been all downhill since then. I haven't been in a church, except for weddings and funerals, for going on forty years, and I've watched the Mormon church, like all of them, surrender its moral authority and slide leftward year by year. I hold them also responsible for the state of South Africa today. And they're working on doing the same for America.AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-60196660464581549062015-06-04T18:49:24.126-07:002015-06-04T18:49:24.126-07:001) Almost all commercials nowadays have at least o...1) Almost all commercials nowadays have at least one minority, usually an orc.<br /><br />2) Movies that show negroes as the boss or in an intellectual/leadership role.<br /><br />3) Romanticism of the "Civil Rights" movement.<br /><br />Slightly off topic, but last night I was watching O'Reilly. He had on this militant, negro "intellectual". O was practically groveling, practically begging for said negro to say anything negative about black dysfunction. As usual, the negro refused to accept any responsibility and blamed everything on YT.<br /><br />I'm so sick of these shitstains.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-11801256387038612062015-06-04T17:53:03.414-07:002015-06-04T17:53:03.414-07:00Anonymous June 4, 2015 at 4:11 PM said...Those num...<b>Anonymous June 4, 2015 at 4:11 PM said...</b><i>Those numbers omit the Caribbeans and other Latrinos. If they speak Spanish, they don't count as Affen Americans. So for future reference, if you want to gentrify a black neighborhood, all you need is to teach them Spanish.</i><br /><br />Yes, you are right, the roughly 9% negro number in MLB is, I believe, attributed to "African Americans". Those identifying themselves as Hispanic/Latinos are at about 28%, whatever you want to make of that. Even if you were to add those two groups completely together, you are still at a rate roughly half the negro rate of the NFL and the NBA.Mr. Cleannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-21905227574614058692015-06-04T17:35:38.180-07:002015-06-04T17:35:38.180-07:00It happened during the 60's when the great soc...It happened during the 60's when the great society began. When LBJ realized that he could get negros voting democrat for generations, with welfare handouts.<br /><br />It was a brilliant political move. But a very deadly one. But to answer your question about, when did liberal democrats be come so obessed with the negro? When the great society was inplemented for political gain. And of coarse the sheepish liberals bought the political indoctrination hook line and sinker. <br /><br />Mickey NY Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-48115383585358057462015-06-04T17:24:49.078-07:002015-06-04T17:24:49.078-07:00The new mascot will be a dancing EBT card
****
Th...The new mascot will be a dancing EBT card<br />****<br /><br />That there was mighty funny, Anony! :Dbernicegreenbaumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03888412263106436503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-72149957123780627772015-06-04T16:11:54.093-07:002015-06-04T16:11:54.093-07:00Mr. Clean: "Not sure if I understand you corr...Mr. Clean: <i>"Not sure if I understand you correctly, but... the last I checked, negros are less than 10% of MLB players"</i><br />Those numbers omit the Caribbeans and other Latrinos. If they speak Spanish, they don't count as Affen Americans. So for future reference, if you want to gentrify a black neighborhood, all you need is to teach them Spanish.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-83949284591624090662015-06-04T16:02:15.428-07:002015-06-04T16:02:15.428-07:00I think it was state by state but some were probab...I think it was state by state but some were probably universal. SC Nativenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-64038697598329938742015-06-04T15:49:02.889-07:002015-06-04T15:49:02.889-07:00#1 Roots - didn't fool my dad. I had to watch ...#1 Roots - didn't fool my dad. I had to watch it for a high school history class but my dad refused to "watch that crap" so I ended up watching it on a tiny portable TV. After hours of it I agreed with his assessment. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-46957208694563861772015-06-04T15:44:49.872-07:002015-06-04T15:44:49.872-07:00Anonymous said...
[white guilt and obsession with...<i> Anonymous said...<br /><br />[white guilt and obsession with the state of negroes].....<br /><br />My question to you is: where did this mental illness get started? We know the Saturday People have some role in this; but where did the true and real love of the White Liberal for the black begin? Was it in the Abolitionist era? The 1930's? </i><br /><br />Yes. The Saturday People. You characters with your Jew obsession never cease to entertain me. The abolitionist movement that became such a driving factor in public opinion that allowed Lincoln to wage war on his fellow countrymen, originated from that deep Jewish stronghold of protestant New England. Or to put it more simply for you, Christianity, both old style and the current Che Guevara style is the source of the white man's soft spot for the negro. Blame the Jews for the federal reserve or something, this one's not their creation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-43154215743676638582015-06-04T15:36:30.938-07:002015-06-04T15:36:30.938-07:00I suppose you might say that the UAB football prog...I suppose you might say that the UAB football program was "too black to fail".<br /><br />I want to thank the commenter for the tale of the golden rat...its always good to start the day with a laugh.<br /><br />Be well my friends...think about itnoreply@blogger.com