tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post6977821068621155002..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: Black Terrorism in St. Louis: “If Darren Wilson gets off, you all better bring every army you all have got. ’Cause it’s going down.” Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger114125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-20936421884782772842014-09-21T07:21:05.598-07:002014-09-21T07:21:05.598-07:00Somebody should tell that clown to be careful what...Somebody should tell that clown to be careful what he wishes for, cause one day some governor is going to be bringing a Blackwater style private army in to quell the riots.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-8078918955386714552014-09-19T13:41:33.133-07:002014-09-19T13:41:33.133-07:00An "Anonymous" called for the ban. There...An "Anonymous" called for the ban. There are so many anonymous posters here that I have no choice but to take your word for it that it was not you. I actually do understand your need to remain anonymous. (Though one would think that the fact that you have to do this to avoid getting fired would give you some clue about what is going on.) I'll henceforth refrain from calling you a troll in the spirit of trying to maintain white unity of a sort. We can agree to disagree. I'll ignore your posts and you can ignore mine.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-56338313950325301672014-09-19T13:32:57.229-07:002014-09-19T13:32:57.229-07:00Nah, it's raccoon, or opposum. Skull structure...Nah, it's raccoon, or opposum. Skull structure is different. Funny how they hate on rednecks and hillbillies, but eat their cuisine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63106035473627578822014-09-19T13:06:49.125-07:002014-09-19T13:06:49.125-07:00Broken Record Bogolyubski said ”. . . Let's se...Broken Record Bogolyubski said <i>”. . . Let's set the record straight first of all, Anon. I did not call you a troll until you recommended that PK ban myself, 10 MM, Centurion and others here whose posts you (and Anon2 and James) disagree with. . . “</i><br /><br />Apparently you believe that if you keep repeating something often enough that it will become fact. As I stated in a prior topic I have never suggested that you or anyone else should be banned from this blog. Your posts might be worthless to me, but there are others who seem to like them, and because they are so unique in appearance I can skip over them without having to read them. You can believe me when I say that if I thought you should be banned, I would just say so. There are clearly others who believe that you should be banned, and I can understand their point, but I have not called for it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41911560391438900662014-09-19T12:10:54.370-07:002014-09-19T12:10:54.370-07:00Anon (who claims not to be a troll)
I'm the An...Anon (who claims not to be a troll)<br /><i>I'm the Anon who's post AnalogMan is referring to in his comment and I'm the Anon2 in a recent topic. Dishonest and disingenuous posts can certainly be a problem, and it is my opinion that there isn't a good solution. My experience with blogs is limited because I find few of them interesting enough to justify spending the time reading and formulating posts. I agree that trolls should be excluded from the exchanges; however, I have noticed that the term “troll” on this blog appears to be defined in the same manner as chimps define the term “racist” - it's whatever they don't like. All it takes to be a troll in the eyes of several posters on this site is to disagree with any of the high volume posters. It is very clear that I have been deemed a troll by bogolyubski and a couple of other posters because I have criticized bogolyubski and disagree with some of his beliefs. My refusal to agree that the only practical solution to the problem of the undertow is a white homeland and complete destruction of our current society also seems to classify me as a troll in the eyes of several other posters.<br /><br />Frankly, when I first started reading this blog, I thought bogolyubski was a troll. It is impossible to have a meaningful discussion with him, and he is unreasonably harsh in his criticism of other individual's points of view. I deal with people like him on an almost daily basis and his demeanor has no effect on what I post, but I suspect that there are other individuals who are reluctant to contribute to the conversations in anticipation of triggering a bogo rant.<br /><br />This is a Paul Kersey's blog, and he does good of job filtering posts. While I've been on this site I have seen very few posts that I would classify as troll posts although some of them express strong opinions contrary to the opinions held by some of the high volume posters. I certainly have not seen anything that I would categorize as an attack on the blog or undue attack on any poster. Apparently PK hasn't viewed them as troll posts or they would not have appeared as comments. A small number of my more antagonistic posts that fall short of contributing to meaningful conversation have been blocked so I know that PK isn't too bashful to block posts.<br /><br />If PK ever requires a verifiable email address to post comments, I'll be out of the conversation because I have to remain anonymous. I don't like it, but that is just the way it is for me. If PK decides someday that I'm a drag on his blog, all he has to do is reply to a comment that I posted and ask me to leave. I'll be glad to go elsewhere.</i><br /><br />Let's set the record straight first of all, Anon. I did not call you a troll until you recommended that PK ban myself, 10 MM, Centurion and others here whose posts you (and Anon2 and James) disagree with. So, in the interests of trying to keep this place as open as possible (you'll kindly note that I have not referred to Shefali - a non-white from DeBlasio Village who I also disagree with about many things - as a troll), why not retract this demand? If you do, I'll stop calling you a troll. <br /><br />Your recommendations for fighting BRA have consisted of nothing apart from regurgitated Repuke talking-points. You obviously can see that there's a problem, but you fail to see the rigged nature of the system itself. Whites have been attempting to 'work within the system' for more than five solid decades now, and we're closer than ever to being exterminated. (Of course, you probably deny that there are folks, including most negroes, who desire our extermination). I agree with a point someone made previously that whites fight among themselves too much. This is surely counterproductive in many respects and I admit I can be very guilty of it myself, being rather combative in nature when provoked. So here's a chance to sort of bury the hatchet a little, if you're really honest about it.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-20794464562173340352014-09-19T09:07:49.554-07:002014-09-19T09:07:49.554-07:00AnalogMan said ”On an older thread, Anonymous said...AnalogMan said <i>”On an older thread, Anonymous said...<br /><br />AnalogMan said ”. . . It looks as though the contagion has spread here. . . “<br /><br />I have no idea how to verify that anyone is who they say they are. The fact that someone began posting as The real 10mm Auto suggests that something is up. But how can anyone on this blog know which 10MM is real?<br /><br />My apologies for taking this up in the current thread, but it's an important point that has a bearing on the well-being, and ultimately survival, of this blog itself. I've seen this kind of attack before. Pretty soon you have people snapping at each other over comments forged under their names. . . “</i><br /><br />I'm the Anon who's post AnalogMan is referring to in his comment and I'm the Anon2 in a recent topic. Dishonest and disingenuous posts can certainly be a problem, and it is my opinion that there isn't a good solution. My experience with blogs is limited because I find few of them interesting enough to justify spending the time reading and formulating posts. I agree that trolls should be excluded from the exchanges; however, I have noticed that the term “troll” on this blog appears to be defined in the same manner as chimps define the term “racist” - it's whatever they don't like. All it takes to be a troll in the eyes of several posters on this site is to disagree with any of the high volume posters. It is very clear that I have been deemed a troll by bogolyubski and a couple of other posters because I have criticized bogolyubski and disagree with some of his beliefs. My refusal to agree that the only practical solution to the problem of the undertow is a white homeland and complete destruction of our current society also seems to classify me as a troll in the eyes of several other posters.<br /><br />Frankly, when I first started reading this blog, I thought bogolyubski was a troll. It is impossible to have a meaningful discussion with him, and he is unreasonably harsh in his criticism of other individual's points of view. I deal with people like him on an almost daily basis and his demeanor has no effect on what I post, but I suspect that there are other individuals who are reluctant to contribute to the conversations in anticipation of triggering a bogo rant.<br /><br />This is a Paul Kersey's blog, and he does good of job filtering posts. While I've been on this site I have seen very few posts that I would classify as troll posts although some of them express strong opinions contrary to the opinions held by some of the high volume posters. I certainly have not seen anything that I would categorize as an attack on the blog or undue attack on any poster. Apparently PK hasn't viewed them as troll posts or they would not have appeared as comments. A small number of my more antagonistic posts that fall short of contributing to meaningful conversation have been blocked so I know that PK isn't too bashful to block posts.<br /><br />If PK ever requires a verifiable email address to post comments, I'll be out of the conversation because I have to remain anonymous. I don't like it, but that is just the way it is for me. If PK decides someday that I'm a drag on his blog, all he has to do is reply to a comment that I posted and ask me to leave. I'll be glad to go elsewhere.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-5796316839947276622014-09-19T07:39:26.608-07:002014-09-19T07:39:26.608-07:00More threats from blacks with no real substance. T...More threats from blacks with no real substance. These "people" live on EBT and government housing and know real well the consequences of disturbing the peace and bringing LEO & National Guard back. If they have a problem with businesses they need to go and bother businesses, not the government. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-77621564499402192792014-09-19T03:05:05.388-07:002014-09-19T03:05:05.388-07:00@September 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM
Traditionally we&#...@September 18, 2014 at 3:43 PM<br /><br />Traditionally we've used 12 jurors but there's no reason that we have to or do verdicts need to be unanimous, we've just done it this way.<br />In England a person can be convicted by an 11-1 or 10-2 verdict and of course you can also be acquitted by the same.I believe that a in a 10-2 conviction you may have a better chance of an appeal but that's all. There are more appeals in the US as far as I know and for a wider variety of reasons.<br />The reason they have these verdicts 10-2 because it seems that in 12 people there are frequently some dummies or people with axes to grind who will hang juries for no reason and of course this would go both ways either convict or acquit.<br />However, in US cities where the majority are negro this really wouldn't make any difference.<br />Since crimes are tried in the jurisdiction where they are committed.What you're seeing is an example of how the local people interpret laws (assuming they even understand the law)and basically what they want.<br />It's sort of dumb to acquit just because you believe the system is crooked or biased because the people they let go are only going to have an effect on the very same people who acquitted them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-26058634588172382152014-09-19T00:32:27.375-07:002014-09-19T00:32:27.375-07:00On an older thread, Anonymous said...
AnalogMan ...On an older thread, Anonymous said...<br /><br /><i>AnalogMan said ”. . . It looks as though the contagion has spread here. . . “<br /><br /> I have no idea how to verify that anyone is who they say they are. The fact that someone began posting as The real 10mm Auto suggests that something is up. But how can anyone on this blog know which 10MM is real?</i><br /><br />My apologies for taking this up in the current thread, but it's an important point that has a bearing on the well-being, and ultimately survival, of this blog itself. I've seen this kind of attack before. Pretty soon you have people snapping at each other over comments forged under their names.<br /><br />We readers can't know for sure who posted which comment. The trolls responsible often give themselves away by the content, style and tone of their (fake) comments. We just have to be vigilant.<br /><br />The main line of defense has to be the moderators. every comment has to contain the poster's name and his email address. The mods can determine whether a comment under your name contains your email address. There's no easy way to do this, but I think you'll find that the people being targeted this way are just a few of the most prolific posters, and I think their email addresses will stick in a mod's mind with just a little effort. At least, to the extent that the wrong address will raise a red flag.<br /><br />Once you've identified the fake posts, you have the email address of the forger, and you blacklist it.<br /><br />Mods, please just be aware that we are now infested with these trolls and swat them before they multiply.<br />AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-4486821872752051142014-09-18T22:37:57.930-07:002014-09-18T22:37:57.930-07:00This is a giant party for many blacks.. They LOVE ...This is a giant party for many blacks.. They LOVE this stuff.. MO free stuff potentially and bitch and moan. They are the best at the NON productive things.. As the NRA gets more and more members. Any white person at this point who actually thinks "compromise" is the answer needs to be in a psych ward. These people are about destruction too often.. Not all but too many ARE. Meanwhile when I am in an Asian area with literally TONS of them all around me, all I am thinking of is what good chinese food will I be having and looking at their various food markets and their computers. 50 chinese kids could walk right by me and I don't even flinch. Try that with 50 blacks..White Cornerbacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-15956631356380852482014-09-18T21:26:25.008-07:002014-09-18T21:26:25.008-07:00Anonymous:
There is a lot of angry talk about ille...Anonymous:<br /><i>There is a lot of angry talk about illegal aliens from Mexico and Central America but they do have one redeeming characteristic, a violent hatred of Nigerians that they are not afraid to express. The immigrant gangs had some major neighborhood improvement projects which I admired.</i><br /><br />We read this type of remark all the time here. The Mexicans and Central Americans - portrayed as "children" by the lying POS Ministry of Truth - are mostly males in their teens (military age), with some as old as 35 (officers?). They are being bused all over the Banana Empire heartland as I type this, and there has been zero resistance to this full-scale invasion (hundreds of thousands in a year's time, maybe over a million) from the official "opposition" party. The southern border is basically non-existent, by executive and judicial order. Housenigga Hussein promised there would be a DHS army set up in his 2008 campaign. Statements made more than once by Hussein's squid handler, Bill Ayers (son of Com-Ed CEO who ended up a professor with a cushy job despite being involved in hard-core criminal activity like bombings) thinks it will be necessary to kill around 40-50 million whites to establish the NAUSSR type of hard-totalitarian regime envisioned by himself and his fellow oligarchs like Bill Gates, George Soros, Llord Bankfein, etc.<br /><br />If you're white, the mestizos are coming here to imprison and kill you, your family, your children, etc. They might not like negroes, but they're being promised YT's land and belongings. They are not for us and <i>they will never be for us</i>. The NY Times' favorite "White Hispanic", George Zimmerman, is not white by any stretch of the imagination. He's a Peruvian mestizo who is 1/8th black (an octaroon, in the old terminology). Did you notice <b>even one</b> of the numerous professional, well-funded Hispanic groups coming to his defense? <b>No.</b> La Raza (The Race), LULAC, Mecha, Neuvo Atzlan, etc. - were either silent or even expressing pro-forma support for St. Trayvon of Skittles. Why is that? Stop deluding yourself. It could cost you, and your family, their very lives. If you're another damned paid troll of Mark Zuckerberg: Go to Hell.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41807475066267672872014-09-18T20:13:39.431-07:002014-09-18T20:13:39.431-07:00Likely scenario.... NAPAs chimp out, fling poo, co...Likely scenario.... NAPAs chimp out, fling poo, cops use military armaments and vehicles to suppress, .... Precedent is set for treating regular people this way. THIS IS LIKELY THE BEST CASE SCENARIO! Worst case , SIMBAs riot nationwide and Obama gets his excuse he is trying to manufacture to use Marshall law.Left Coast White Guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-34100189414582100822014-09-18T20:12:31.111-07:002014-09-18T20:12:31.111-07:00Funny as hellFunny as hellAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-77479199243818752442014-09-18T20:07:39.184-07:002014-09-18T20:07:39.184-07:00AnalogMan said ”
Here's an article that explai...AnalogMan said <i>”<br />Here's an article that explains it. This site had very good cover of the entire Zimmerman trial, if you want to research it. I expect it will also be a valuable source as the Wilson case develops.<br /><br />Legal Insurrection on Corey's prosecution of George Zimmerman.”</i><br /><br />Very interesting link. So Corey did mislead a judge. Even more damning of her character is the likely reason that she opted to avoid the grand jury. A grand jury could have asked questions and called witnesses so she knew it might uncover the exculpatory and other evidence that she intentionally left out of the affidavit that she presented to a judge. It is my understanding, and I don't claim to be a lawyer, that a judge only looks at the probable cause affidavit and has to make the call based on whether a reasonable jury could convict if the jury believed the allegations contained in the affidavit. By unethically omitting known evidence from an affidavit that would likely sway a jury an unethical DA such as Corey can get a judge to authorize the filing of her charges although there is no chance of a conviction. In my opinion the Zimmerman case is an example of a situation where the State should have to pay a wrongfully prosecuted defendant's attorney fees plus damages. If this happened a few times there would be no tolerance for prosecutors like Corey – well, unless she was elected.<br /><br />If the DA in the Wilson case does actually present everything to the grand jury, I'm more optimistic that Wilson won't be indicted unless the grand jury is spectacularly biased.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-53633637897730634392014-09-18T19:26:23.225-07:002014-09-18T19:26:23.225-07:00Don't run, be a man and stand!Don't run, be a man and stand!Left Coast White Guynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-91571513093472668972014-09-18T18:56:41.224-07:002014-09-18T18:56:41.224-07:00No I am not a racist. I am an anthropologist. I ha...No I am not a racist. I am an anthropologist. I have been observing the behavior of that hominid species for some time now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-51225581747571477672014-09-18T18:39:28.146-07:002014-09-18T18:39:28.146-07:00There is a lot of angry talk about illegal aliens ...There is a lot of angry talk about illegal aliens from Mexico and Central America but they do have one redeeming characteristic, a violent hatred of Nigerians that they are not afraid to express. The immigrant gangs had some major neighborhood improvement projects which I admired.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-43113872907695053872014-09-18T18:28:06.439-07:002014-09-18T18:28:06.439-07:00Promises, promises. The Nigerians and Nigerese (wh...Promises, promises. The Nigerians and Nigerese (what do you call someone from Niger?) keep promising us a race war! What teases! It would be very enjoyable and the low IQ Australopithicines would not stand a chance. If they were lucky they would be shipped back to africa. What a joyful day that would be! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-40954141826438544092014-09-18T16:31:49.718-07:002014-09-18T16:31:49.718-07:00Remember you're talking about Homo sapiens sap...Remember you're talking about Homo sapiens sapiens and not homo africanus. It's like comparing apples and cow sh*t. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-18226122120288437162014-09-18T16:05:52.707-07:002014-09-18T16:05:52.707-07:00"Remember what the Cossacks did to pussy riot..."Remember what the Cossacks did to pussy riot at the winter games? They were brought in as extra security and the moment pussy riot started their protest of decent values out came the whips and in moments they were a bloody mess. Haven't heard anything out of those folks again? Have you?"<br /><br />We have. A couple of them were brought to Australia recently and paraded around through the media as heroes by their TWMNBN handlers. PBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-66276618115339459092014-09-18T16:03:59.997-07:002014-09-18T16:03:59.997-07:00"On the topic of cops.
I was pulled over and..."On the topic of cops.<br /><br />I was pulled over and ticketed a few years back for not wearing my seat belt.<br /><br />I told the cop (white) that he should be ashamed of himself for bothering a citizen for something so trite. I even asked him if it made him feel big and powerful to exercise his authority against such a minor offense. And I even did go on to say "I'm sure there are bigger fish to fry than me". Surprisingly he didn't tell me to shut up. He knew that I was right.<br /><br />And yes. I got a ticket anyway."<br /><br /><br />"Police" the word comes from and relates to "policy". They are not "Peace" officers (as I've seen them referred to in US writings and such). They are "Policy" officers, and they are there to support and enforce the "Policies" of the State (whatever form that State takes). That is there primary mission in life. What they do and how they do it is determined by the priorities of the "State". This is often as bad for them as it often is for us, which I think is what Darren Wilson is finding out.PBnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-33053958588564181332014-09-18T15:49:54.717-07:002014-09-18T15:49:54.717-07:00I tried posting the existence of this article to a...I tried posting the existence of this article to a well-known blogger's site, but have yet to see it there. Even though this article, and those written by PK are always based on facts that are referenced, "ethical" bloggers will not post the truth because it is race specific in identifying black criminality. Whites "must keep neutral" in order to prevent hate- filled Blacks from staging worse race riots? Appeasing the enemy just doesn't work when the racial hate pot is already boiling over.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-23711007813203191142014-09-18T15:43:42.471-07:002014-09-18T15:43:42.471-07:00Shefali said ”I was reading about how, in Baltimor...Shefali said <i>”I was reading about how, in Baltimore, you can't get a black jury to convict a black criminal. I think only 2% of the time will a black jury convict a black criminal. So the crime statistics are down, but people who live there know that it's a horrible place. “</i><br /><br />I am not surprised that blacks won't convict blacks, but I've never been sure whether it is a tribal protection thing or a distrust of the law issue or a combination of the two. Because of the need for a unanimous verdict it might be possible that a single black on a jury would be almost as good as an all black jury. A single black juror could wear down the others to get them to agree to a mild sentence or possibly cause a hung jury which might result in a favorable plea offer by the state to avoid a second trial. This statistic could explain why the arrest records of so many blacks seem extreme compared to the actual prison time they serve. It would be depressing to be a DA prosecuting criminals knowing that 98% would be acquitted if they went to trial. I see no reason why a typical black criminal in Baltimore would accept a plea offer by the state imposing anything harsher than a suspended sentence. The modern legal process is just another aspect of modern society that is incompatible with black genetics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-51674815579528078632014-09-18T14:32:31.426-07:002014-09-18T14:32:31.426-07:00Yet blacks (not all of them, but it seems like the...<i>Yet blacks (not all of them, but it seems like the majority) are willing to riot to defend black hoodlums, then they are upset when those same black hoodlums rape and murder other blacks... is this insanity, stupidity, or what?</i><br /><br />Blacks see "hoodlums" as warriors for their people. This is especially true when those hoodlums are attacking police. It's a tribal war in which they are going after the enemy's army--in this case the police. Add to this various outside agitators who want to undermine the power of law enforcement, and you have a coalition which is at war with white America. <br /><br />The dilemma is that most white Americans do not get there is a war in progress.Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-36447055192401153802014-09-18T13:12:48.694-07:002014-09-18T13:12:48.694-07:00No mercy, and no quarter.
Let's give the cour...No mercy, and no quarter.<br /><br />Let's give the courts a few weeks to find Wilson guilty of nothing...he did all of us a favor, especially the store clerk who is down a case of cigars.<br /><br />Let's wait until it gets colder in the STL area and then clear Wilson of any wrongdoing...<br /><br />Riots begin...cut the fucking electricity and gas services to the rioting jig neighborhoods, but leave the water on. <br /><br />Nogs can't take the cold coming from thousands of years in the African jungles. They already exist in a food desert compared to the suburbs. <br /><br />Their pipes will freeze, and burst, causing even further regression to the African mean. But without food, and with questionable water, we should start moving in the right direction for once!<br /><br />Whites have endured a lot harsher conditions, and still manage to have prosperous and attractive societies...just look at Iceland vs Haiti to put it in perspective...<br /><br />By all means...as many of us have already said...FEEL FREE TO RIOT!!!MEMprospectornoreply@blogger.com