tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post7028585626999440619..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: "Killing, killing is the solution.": Time for a Real "Redeker Plan" in 99% Black Englewood?Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger104125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-77116912910103049592012-10-19T18:49:37.229-07:002012-10-19T18:49:37.229-07:00I hate Walter Jacobson. Every time I see him walki...I hate Walter Jacobson. Every time I see him walking down my street I can only think of crushing that nose just for the damage the piece of shit has done to this country. He lives somewhere very close to me. <br /><br /><i>For a bunch of self proclaimed theives, you would think they would try to get a job on Wall Street.</i><br /><br />You got to be able to do numbers in your head to work on the street, they can't. There are no negros (other than low level exchange employees) at end of La Salle Street in Chicago (CME/CBOT, CBOE). I work there.<br /><br />I made a joke up in my mind a while back when watching a female security guard a BankAmerica play with a calculator: "I bet she is trying to figure out if the -absolute value- of a tertiary derivative can be negative."<br /><br />Get it?<br /><br /><i>Every single gang-banger can get into college, or at least a tech program, should he or she get e GED. They will get full-rides or loans to do so. They need to learn to speak, write, do 9th grade algebra, and behave. This isn't too much to expect, and for tech programs they likely don't need any of this.</i><br /><br />Are you fucking serious? I think maybe, maybe 5% of AA's might be able to do 9th grade algebra. A person has to be at least be able to do that to be a carpenter, plumber, almost any union trade.<br /><br />negroes are natural born janitors. <br /><br />But the illegals came in to sanctuary shities like Shitcago and said we will do it cheaper and we are already unionized via the scumbag SIEU and our pay rate is going to be less and we have benefits like a prepaid debit card.<br /><br />rjphttp://www.paradisegone.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-22802183512954279212012-10-13T01:55:27.110-07:002012-10-13T01:55:27.110-07:00You people need to get your head out of your asses...<i>You people need to get your head out of your asses and realize you all are no effin better!</i><br /><br />"You people"... isn't that "racist" when a White person says it?<br /><br />The Stupid (and the double standard, and everything else)... It Burns.Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-79671065073079249732012-10-12T23:11:11.380-07:002012-10-12T23:11:11.380-07:00Anon at 6:48 PM who thinks that Whites are no bett...Anon at 6:48 PM who thinks that Whites are no better than Blacks: Nobody here thinks that Whites are without sin, but anybody with half a brain can tell at a glance that we are far better than Blacks, in every measurement that matters. About 15 years ago, 800,000 Tutsis were killed by Hutus, using machetes. Imagine how much killing they'd be able to accomplish if they were as smart as Whites. <br /> Blacks as a group are dumb and brutish, on a level with the bottom 5th of Whites. African Blacks are even worse. Pay attention to the world outside rather than your professors. And get off the computer if you don't like the White race that created it and everything else that makes your life so easy. Discardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-86502739609369565272012-10-12T18:48:19.918-07:002012-10-12T18:48:19.918-07:00If black people are obsessed with killing what are...If black people are obsessed with killing what are white people obsessed with? Hello? Who starts wars over oil and invade foreign nations only to decimate an entire race of indigenous people? WHITE RACIST PIGS! All of a sudden you all are so civilized. Sure-until the next object of your desire. What will it be next? Afghan lithium reserves? You people need to get your head out of your asses and realize you all are no effin better! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-50063580395873476322012-10-09T14:44:27.874-07:002012-10-09T14:44:27.874-07:00Loc doesn't know what population density is. H...Loc doesn't know what population density is. He appears to confuse population density with with a demographic ratio.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-21667167375595507562012-10-09T07:28:28.679-07:002012-10-09T07:28:28.679-07:00I think the anti-war movement in the sixties is a ...I think the anti-war movement in the sixties is a likely scenario. Then, youth fear and loathing of the war machine eventually led to burning armed forces' recruiting storefronts. This insurrectionist mentality was taken seriously by the military. It sensed the future for a citizen army looked very bleak were this to continue. It didn't want to sacrifice that, and it didn't want a lurking hostile presence especially amongst the educated white ( potential officer class) people to drag on. We live in a media saturated society. That in itself renders a long dragged out anti government campaign disproportionately effective.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-75261276146254799472012-10-07T16:43:35.587-07:002012-10-07T16:43:35.587-07:00I over heard a young black woman sales clerk in a ...I over heard a young black woman sales clerk in a down town Chicago store tell another black worker that they should let the black women have earlier shifts and white women the later shifts. She mentioned how she feared getting off late and returning to her south side neighborhood at night. It reminded me when I worked for the City of Chicago. I was assigned neighborhoods that the black women were too afraid to venture into. One of the neighborhoods just happened to be Englewood. There are some really good old black folks there but they are trapped by the violent undertow. Several older blacks told me that when they call to complain about crime, they fear for their safety.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-88680534234400352012-10-06T18:36:54.768-07:002012-10-06T18:36:54.768-07:00Silent Running, if you mean your comment from Octo...<b>Silent Running</b>, if you mean your comment from October 3, if you search for your name you'll see it above. I recall reading it in sequence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85845218993787453992012-10-06T16:14:24.896-07:002012-10-06T16:14:24.896-07:00I see neither of my retorts to the expats have bee...I see neither of my retorts to the expats have been posted. Got a soft spot there, Paul?Silent Runningnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-8604522078023601112012-10-05T20:37:07.028-07:002012-10-05T20:37:07.028-07:00Loc said: You're incorrect about Rhodesia. The...<i>Loc said: You're incorrect about Rhodesia. They had a "governing white minority" as it is referred too. The white population were 100,000 at best in a total population of 6,00,000; density wasn't even close. Bad example, it's like saying that if whites of America would've gave newly freed slaves their own country to govern; would be a disaster. Lack of knowledge, enexperience, lack of diplomacy, etc. Creates a bad government. Sad to say but people have to be taught; All third world countries.<br /></i><br /><br />Loc, my point was that the decisive factor was not "population density" but who runs the polity. Rhodesia under white rule was a functional country (despite international sanctions and a guerrilla war). Zimbabwe under black majority rule has been a disaster. Same country, same population, same density, same environment, same resources, plus, after the end of the Ian Smith era, Zimbabwe had the advantage of international support. The results of black rule: despotism, economic collapse, massacre of political undesirables, ethnic cleansing of whites, and etc. <br /><br />There actually were blacks in the Ian Smith days who had education, experience and diplomatic skills, such as Bishop Muzorewa, and who worked with the whites. But because these blacks were not involved with marxist terrorist organizations like ZAPU, the Western world for some perverse reason did not want them running the country (no more than do black leaders or DWLs want a Walter Williams or Thomas Sowell to have too much of a say in the USA). <br /><br />Look at the bigger picture. Population density, environment, resources, etc., are often used to explain away dysfunctions in black run polities. But why is it that when controlling for all these factors, as in Rhodesia versus Zimbabwe, you end up with wildly divergent results between black and white run countries? <br /><br />Or look at America:<br /><br />Detroit, a city that was once a showpiece of American ingenuity, is today disintegrating. Crime, public services, the economy, houses, even the streetlights are going out. Blacks had inherited a fully functional municipality, with plenty of infrastructure, good schools, and a cultural tradition. American blacks had the advantage not only of education, but plenty of governmental programs as well as the full support of the national media. And once the white population (with its alleged ignorance and racism) had been removed from the city, certainly Detroit's potential should have been unleashed. This did not happen. <br /><br />Can it be that race is a determining factor? <br /><br />Race realists claim that racial factors include such things as IQ, future time orientation, impulse control, and individual responsibility. These would appear to be necessary to maintain a civilization. <br /><br />Here is something for you to consider: what if race actually is a reality? Then what? What policies would you recommend to salvage a city such as Detroit?Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-10539802857179395782012-10-05T19:20:35.383-07:002012-10-05T19:20:35.383-07:00With all due respect to Robert S. Oculus and Jay i...<i>With all due respect to Robert S. Oculus and Jay in DC</i><br /><br />Actually, <b>Jay in DC</b> can be safely ignored. He's long been one of the most vocal advocates for fleeing the country in favor of Eastern Europe, and has consistently failed to address any of the points raised in dissent. As I wrote in a retort to AV that was not posted, these people are fanatically strident about the state of their people not because it is objectively true, but because of their own personal desire. They <i>prefer</i> that all of us be doomed so that they can live a guilt-free permanent vacation as foreigners in someone else's country.<br /><br />After all, if it turns out we're not doomed, how will the expats be remembered?<br /><br />Oddly enough, he hasn't picked up and moved yet. But I'm sure he doesn't lack the strength of his convictions. I eagerly await the first report from utopian Hungary, or Belarus, or Latvia, or wherever the poor kid ends up. <br /><br />Mr. Rational replied to Jay with facts based on our own recent history and the greater history of guerrilla warfare. Jay will ignore these facts, and simply pop up in another thread to repeat the same tired message of Doom & Despair. In this, he is indistinguishable from the DWL. Beware.Silent Runningnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-1676091584496714182012-10-05T19:13:45.911-07:002012-10-05T19:13:45.911-07:00I'm black & a non liberal.
I dislike poli...I'm black & a non liberal.<br /><br />I dislike politics & the government.<br /><br />I'm from poverty stricken streets and still reside there; I know what is going on & why it's going on.<br /><br />I see flaws in my race ass a whole as well as all other races as whole; which is why it's just a flaw in humanity altogether.<br /><br />I also think that using arrest data to support an argument that is pro or against races is insufficient & inconclusive due to heavy variables like racial profiling.<br /><br />I'm saying that the white population of Rhodesia was only a small fraction compared to the black population.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-18761432513318701632012-10-05T17:12:09.261-07:002012-10-05T17:12:09.261-07:00we moved to Australia many years ago, somewhat in ...we moved to Australia many years ago, somewhat in anticipation of what was happening to the US.<br /><br />my wife & daughter have citizenship and i will within the year. yes, it also suffers from multiculti BUT it is overwhelmingly white, beautiful and prosperous<br /><br />there are some places to go that are western and civilized<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-55538067063002762402012-10-05T14:03:16.807-07:002012-10-05T14:03:16.807-07:00With all due respect to Robert S. Oculus and Jay i...With all due respect to Robert S. Oculus and Jay in DC, I think they're missing the elephant in the room here. The attack on the Branch Davidians was only possible because they were a tiny sect in a specific place.<br /><br />The US government cannot have Waco on every block; the manpower and resources don't exist. Further, there's a big organizational and logistical tail behind the teeth in an operation like Waco. When the people back there engage in sabotage or just refuse to do their jobs, the teeth rot and fall out.<br /><br />Negro Fatigue is already rampant among Whites and Asians. News of Black mob attacks gets out despite the best efforts of the MSM to suppress them. The government would lose support very quickly if it tried to use police power against Whites defending their families and neighborhoods against Blacks, and it wouldn't take too many burning police stations before the civil authorities would retreat to protecting themselves instead of going on the offensive on behalf of criminals. That leaves the Feds, and if the NG refused orders to call up it would be woefully short of hands even if the regular army would follow orders. Add the discontents among the reservists who would know exactly how the military machine's gears can be brought to a halt with thrown sabots, and I don't see any quick end on Washington's terms. That favors Whites; as in Afghanistan, you win just by not losing.Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-38668631019322445682012-10-05T11:37:28.125-07:002012-10-05T11:37:28.125-07:00Robert S. Oculus III said...
"There will be n...Robert S. Oculus III said...<br />"There will be no Redeker Plan. The Race War will be fought block by block and house by house in the streets of our cities. And whites will lose, because we won't be fighting crackheads, welfare sows, and idiot gangbangers. We'll be fighting the U.S. Army and the federalized National Guard, not to mention Homeland Security and drones and God only knows who and what else.<br /><br />We can't run. There's no place to run, to. We can't fight. All the militiamen in the world will lose against real soldiers equipped with tanks, artillery, automatic weapons, and air support.<br /><br />The only way the Good Guys win is if the military comes in our our side. And what are the odds of that, do you think? Take a look at the Army we have now and tell me you see in them a force that is ready to take the side of the people against the almighty Chain of Command. <br /><br />Then think of Waco... on every block in your neighborhood."<br /><br /><b>Poetry.</b><br /><br />As much as I rabidly agree with most everyone SBPDL there is also this sort of odd feeling there that somehow people are going to rise up and <i>take it all back</i>. That is NOT going to happen for a number of reasons. The largest of which is simply risk analysis. A few posts up someone mentioned that when you have "only after you've lost everything are you free to do anything". In my experience this is a truism with the exception of the highly indoctrinated mind by religion, state-psychosis, etc. but by and large, the biggest risk takers have no real things of value so the stakes of the gamble are generally favorable. <br /><br />So what I see in this forum frequently is an argument predicated on the fact that suddenly White People are going to Riiiiiise up! Yeah, no. It will never happen. We are just going to become Brazil and are in a downhill slide towards it right now. <br /><br />You have a contingent here that welcomes the Race War that will never come and have been prepping for it for decades. You have the contingent that thinks ths viewpoints of most of this site's readership are more than a fraction of 1% of America. You have the contingent that thinks because many White People are starting to "wake up" that they are in fact quite discriminated against on a daily basis, they will act. <br /><br />They will <b>not</b>. Period. People are Sheep. And Americans are some of the most fattened lambs who will do anything to avoid the slaughter. You think Disgusting Fatbody Soccer Dad and his portly Dancing with the Stars watching Sow are going to risk the level of comfort they have for ANYTHING? It is comical to even think about. And as Oculus pointed out even IF this revolution arose it would be summarily crushed under the War Machine that is the US Armed Forces spearheaded by the "Population Control Unit", Dept of Homeland Security. <br /><br />The US is a Police State, has been for a while. Expatriation is the solution of the rational who see the reality that the vast majority of us see every day. Jay in DCnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-1194194787282120452012-10-05T05:53:23.943-07:002012-10-05T05:53:23.943-07:00If you feel so strong about it then why not stand ...If you feel so strong about it then why not stand up for what you think is fair? Fear of suppression? Didn't stop the most notorious advocates who stood up for what they believed in. Anyone who is scared to to stand behind their idea doesn't deserve to be heard.<br />Liberals suppressing ideas is just as bad but all it shows is none are perfect. Humanity as a whole isn't perfect<br /><br />You're incorrect about Rhodesia. They had a "governing white minority" as it is referred too. The white population were 100,000 at best in a total population of 6,00,000; density wasn't even close. Bad example, it's like saying that if whites of America would've gave newly freed slaves their own country to govern; would be a disaster. Lack of knowledge, enexperience, lack of diplomacy, etc. Creates a bad government. Sad to say but people have to be taught; All third world countries.<br /><br />-LocAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-2710837827778918602012-10-05T04:54:38.055-07:002012-10-05T04:54:38.055-07:00Boss Man @IMFakeLaughing
#IfObamaDontWin they are...<i>Boss Man @IMFakeLaughing<br /><br />#IfObamaDontWin they are going to close down every McDonald’s cuz Mitt Romney kno black people like it<br /></i><br /><br />Vote nutrition vote Romney!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-78589633562434620622012-10-05T04:06:15.947-07:002012-10-05T04:06:15.947-07:00We ain't living in Hyde Park...that is funny s...We ain't living in Hyde Park...that is funny since Comrade Sobama the red rat sold his condo he had there for almost 500,000$. You know that great champion of the middle class who is going to bless us with 20 new taxes to pay for the "free" healthcare.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-72937807344938274282012-10-04T23:54:22.953-07:002012-10-04T23:54:22.953-07:00I am going to keep cranking on this because the ar...I am going to keep cranking on this because the arguments used by Loc are quite common, and need to be dealt with. (And I do appreciate his sticking with the dialog.)<br /><br />Some more thoughts:<br /><br />* Detroit under white majority rule and later under black majority rule: same city, same population density; probably the density today is lower than 50 years ago owing to the drop in the city's population with many neighborhoods now abandoned. Has this led to lower crime rates in Detroit?<br /><br />* White flight: this is usually attributed to high crime rates accompanying largescale black migration into white neighborhoods. Why would there be higher crime rates given that the neighborhoods would have the same population density?<br /><br />* Public housing: were crime rates the same when the "projects" were inhabited by whites as opposed to blacks? What about illegitimacy and school drop out rates? Or business start-ups? <br /><br />*Section 8 housing: residents of the inner cities are moved into the suburbs. Surges in crime are then reported matching the neighborhoods into which the Section 8 recipients have moved. Same population density, different crime rates. Is the difference in the racial composition of the populations?<br /><br />* South Africa: ever since the end of its "ignorant" apartheid policy, SA has had one some of the highest murder and violent crime rates in the world. Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of this crime (like just about all), including some really grisly torture-murders. How can this be when the country is now enacting enlightened liberal and marxist policies such as one-man-one-vote, affirmative action, land grabs, and the dismantling of Boer culture? Could it be that apartheid era "ignorant" race based policies were more effective in controlling crime? Or that a white-run police force was more efficient and less corrupt?<br /><br />These are real questions, but how often are they raised or answered in public forums?Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-19111954736724548902012-10-04T23:49:14.670-07:002012-10-04T23:49:14.670-07:00God Bless you, Californian, you nailed it there. I...God Bless you, Californian, you nailed it there. It's coming. More and more people are waking up and realizing the damage done, realizing and accepting this feeling we call 'negro fatigue'.<br />I wish Neil Young would reprise his son "The Damage Done" and mark the negro instead of the needle.<br />"...it's all just part of the liberal plan, I saw a negro shoot another man, oh ohh, the damage done..."<br />Too bad he's a indefatiguable liberal himself.Johnny Seenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85902219308580319682012-10-04T22:36:53.489-07:002012-10-04T22:36:53.489-07:00India has a high concentration of brown ppl, all u...India has a high concentration of brown ppl, all undeducated, and the crime levels are no where near US black ghettos.<br /><br />So you are a lib, making excuses, long long ago, in europe you had, high concentration of poor white people, that didn't self destruct, as evidenced in black communities world wide<br /><br />Their ways are certainly genetic, admit that.anti multicultinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-57517161808953493542012-10-04T20:45:56.597-07:002012-10-04T20:45:56.597-07:00Ignorance to me is being stuck/fixated on a partic...<i>Ignorance to me is being stuck/fixated on a particular idea or belief without being properly educated on the subject.</i><br /><br />You mean the way that liberals are fixated on the belief that "race is just a construct?" Or too many blacks are fixated on the idea that all their problems are the fault of slavery-segregation-apartheid? Or the way that the mainstream media fixates on the narrative of "MLK = good" and "pre-1954 America = bad?"<br /><br />Liberals have gone out of the way to suppress any evidence of the genetic component to race, notably by persecuting scientists such as Dr. Philippe Rushton, or via teaching only Boasian anthropology in the universities. There is also a long history of guest speakers being shouted down on campuses and being subjected to mob violence when they provide views on race which challenge the liberal orthodoxy (see Jared Taylor about this one). <br /><br />Now, don't you think it is "ignorant" for liberals to suppress people and ideas which do not agree with their deeply held beliefs? If as the attorney general tells us we must have a dialog on race, why is only one side to be allowed to speak? <br /><br />Here's another question for you: why was Rhodesia a viable country under white minority rule, but a running debacle under black majority rule? The people are the same, the population density is the same, the environment is the same. What has changed is the race of the ruling elite. Remove responsible white colonialists, replace them with black marxists, and ... <i>voila!</i> Runaway inflation. Massive human rights violations (dwarfing anything which happened during the war). A return of many diseases which white rule had stamped out. White people being ethnically cleansed from the farmlands. And much of the "liberated" black populace having to flee to South Africa out of sheer survival. <br /><br />Is it ignorance to point this out? Or a hard appreciation of reality?Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-38060765668685896992012-10-04T20:22:33.134-07:002012-10-04T20:22:33.134-07:00A question for Loc: why is it that blacks, despite...A question for Loc: why is it that blacks, despite being given everything they have demanded -- desegregation, civil rights legislation, affirmative action, busing, black studies, minority grants, minority business programs, "hate crime" laws, disparate impact court decisions, MLK Day, Title 8 housing, the fawning adulation over Oprah, the overthrow of white-run South Africa, an end to voter ID laws, Obama in the Oval Office -- still have abnormally high rates of illegitimacy, violent crime and school drop outs? To what do you attribute the failure of too many blacks to assimilate into mainstream American culture? <br /><br />And why do too many black majority run cities such as Detroit end up disintegrating financially, culturally and even physically? Why can't blacks use all of the above (especially the government funded contracts and funding) to create economically viable cities without relying on the white tax base (as SBPDL duly concludes)? Or at least keep the basic infrastructure running and maintain a modicum of law and order? <br /><br /><br /><i>Show me an area where a high concentration of poor whites live that match urban population numbers that are crime free then you'll make a point.</i><br /><br />Again, look at the crime figures for New York City (cited above). The vast majority of violent crimes in NYC (and many other major cities) are committed by "people of color." Whites commit only a fraction of these crimes, despite living as concentrated. <br /><br />If your thesis were correct, then you could test it against black criminality versus white criminality in rural areas. Here's one example: there's an abnormal amount of black-on-white assault and murder in the rainbow nation of South Africa. There's low population concentration, but incredible amounts of black crime, often accompanied by torture of white victims. (By the way, were you aware of these farm torture-murders in SA, or doesn't your media or diversity program cover them?)<br /><br /><br /><i>Poverty breeds criminals...</i><br /><br />This was the progressive/liberal thesis for most of the 20th century. The US did in fact have a "war on poverty" to end the "socio-economic conditions" which supposedly bred criminals. What has been the result? We now have inner cities dominated by gangs composed largely of peoples of color who have turned them into warzones. It just may be that some criminality is preempted by raising the standard of living, but this does not seem to be apparent in the inner cities. Again, why don't blacks take advantage of affirmative action and the government's minority business programs to create the employment which would end the poverty which you claim creates crime? <br /><br />Another question for LOC: again, look at Detroit; the city has been largely purged of those ignorant racist privileged white people. So why didn't black majority rule turn Detroit into a showpiece for economic development, civil order and cultural leadership?Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-77618437299050248582012-10-04T15:04:48.053-07:002012-10-04T15:04:48.053-07:001. Show me an area where a high concentration of p...1. Show me an area where a high concentration of poor whites live that match urban population numbers that are crime free then you'll make a point. Low concentrated mountain dwellers, are you kidding me? Don't turn it into a joke.<br /><br />2. I have a Russian friend; tell of how we have it easy and how horrible crimes don't even get recorded a times.<br /><br />3. I dislike hearing about people travel experiences because they almost never step foot in the poorest part of those countries or interact with the poor on a personal level.<br /><br />4. Ignorance to me is being stuck/fixated on a particular idea or belief without being properly educated on the subject. In this case, educated doesn't mean what you hear and see on the news but knowing and living through the circumstances/hardships that these people face.<br /><br />5. Poverty breeds criminals, criminals get locked up & the ones that don't spread their destructive ideas/ways to these young children, the children then in turn adopt these ideas without understanding that there is a choice or not having faith in that choice by having a set mind state; ofcourse there a variables. That's their ignorance.<br /><br />Blaming crime on one people then saying its their nature is ignorant. <br /><br />-LocAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-24701712499307276272012-10-04T09:52:02.186-07:002012-10-04T09:52:02.186-07:00I can understand the desire to abandon what appear...I can understand the desire to abandon what appears to be a sinking ship here in the USA. But some thoughts...<br /><br /><i>If he/she has kids, they will be with a brown Nicaraguan and then your line has zero hope of escaping devastating poverty that most there live - don't fool yourself. </i><br /><br />Some of us here are old enough to remember when "Nicaragua" was synonymous with "war." You had the Sandinistas fighting the Somozas, then the Contras tearing up the country against the Sandinistas. Peasant wars get nasty, with death squads and people being shot in the back of the head and dumped in ditches after suitable unpleasantness. Right now Central America appears peaceful, but you have to consider that you are putting yourself into a part of the world where things can get volatile and you will not have the constitutional protections (as eroded as they might be) in the US of A. If nothing else, the endless US war on drugs is moving around the region and may wreck havoc where you decide to settle. <br /><br /><i><br />That country is only nice for you because of your relative wealth, which you take for granted. But that won't last intergenerationally. I don't even think that it's smart for whites to move to much poorer but whiter fly-over states, because the same mechanism will be in effect. </i><br /><br />I had a cousin who did his 20 as an LAPD officer and then moved to the Pacific Northwest to get away from the degeneration of the city. For him, it was paradise, but then again, he had spent two decades of his life in the worst of the urban jungle. And up north, he was drawing his civil service pension which made life comfortable. He had no kids and his wife had long since divorced him. I lost track of him years ago, but he had done his part to keep things under control in LA so one could understand his bailing. <br /><br />I had a friend who also moved out of his big city and to the Pacific Northwest. At first it was paradise to him. No rat race, no minority race hustlers. And being from the big city, he was at first a novelty to the locals as he was known for giving big parties. <br /><br />After six months, the novelty wore off. He now complains about the clannish ways of those same locals, the lack of world class fine arts, and the blue laws which crimp his lifestyle. But for various reasons he is stuck there. <br /><br />A third friend moved to the Czech Republic and married a woman there. He speaks the language and has a job which allows him to move about. They are now raising a family. The Czech Republic is a civil place. But then again, you are in a small country in Europe which has been occupied several times by the bigger powers. And there is no guarantee that the European malady of multicultism will not take over, though for now the Eastern Europeans appear to be resisting it. <br /><br />My point is, there are a lot of long term considerations to be made before heading out to another country.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com