tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post7730911302854732495..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: Donald Trump, "The Blacks" and Mein ObamaStuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger122125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-14166366225033335752011-05-10T09:56:12.820-07:002011-05-10T09:56:12.820-07:00If Michelle Obama got slave blood running through ...If Michelle Obama got slave blood running through her veins she also has slave owner blood as there was a huge African African slave owner percentage in the slave owning states. (But you are not meant to read about that)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-935787240843666012011-04-21T22:44:11.320-07:002011-04-21T22:44:11.320-07:00Anonymous at 5:58PM said:
Fallacy of false dilemma...Anonymous at 5:58PM said:<br /><i>Fallacy of false dilemma.<br /><br />Sophistry, indeed.<br /><br />I could go on, but I won't.</i><br /><br />Hirsch's assertion was that the MAOA-L gene - the "warrior" gene - and McDermott's study was a rebuttal to my claim that there was no black predisposition to crime. I have disproved his nonsense, citing two important facts: (1) Chinese males have the highest occurrence of MAOA-L, although East Asians have lower crime rates than blacks here in the US, which suggests that this "gene" has nothing to do with crime; and (2) that the "more aggressive" tendency of MAOA-L is <i>only</i> expressed with significant stressors, which can easily be controlled by adjusting environmental variables. <br /><br />If you can disprove this, by all means, have at. I think these are very rational and logical extrapolations of the studies. I did not even mention the fact that the McDermott study only had less than 80 participants, which is hardly exhaustive.<br /><br />Accusing me of a false dilemma fallacy is specious; I'd suggest you go about refuting me in lieu of vomiting such a baseless charge. Accusing me of sophistry is simply a diversion from the fact you are without rebuttal.<br /><br />If you feel you can fisk through my post, by all means, go ahead. This seems to be an open forum and I enjoy reading.<br /><br /><i>It seems like Snape is written by Disarray working with somebody else. She writes the parts meant to antagonize Hirsch, and her friend fills in the pseudo-science babble that she's not smart enough to manufacture herself.</i><br /><br />Wrong. <br /><br />I guess you have agreed with me that their "quarrels" seem intimate. I didn't mention it but that he assumed his encounter with Desiree would mean ending up helplessly bed-ridden in the house of a female psychotic, instead of, say, being beaten up by someone who found his views repugnant, makes me wonder about those two.<br /><br />For all we know, they could be going back and forth for show...<br /><br />How do I know you are not one of Hirsch's pseudonyms used when he wants to ignore my posts and cause a distraction from the debate at hand?<br /><br />As for the "pseudoscience babble" charge, forgive me if I find that unbearably ironic. The very notion of racism - and the lengths to which people go to defend it - is based in pseudoscience. <br /><br />Please entertain me when you have something better to offer.Professor Snapenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85142338754095296472011-04-21T17:58:22.473-07:002011-04-21T17:58:22.473-07:00"I do argue in "good faith" and I d..."I do argue in "good faith" and I disagree that I am employing sophistry."<br /><br />Well, let's see now.<br /><br />"But let's argue against the data and say blacks had a "crime gene" (apparently, this is still untrue). We'd only have two options..."<br /><br />Fallacy of false dilemma.<br /><br />Sophistry, indeed.<br /><br />I could go on, but I won't.<br /><br />It seems like Snape is written by Disarray working with somebody else. She writes the parts meant to antagonize Hirsch, and her friend fills in the pseudo-science babble that she's not smart enough to manufacture herself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41545668520349162792011-04-21T04:55:48.318-07:002011-04-21T04:55:48.318-07:00(2 of 2)
Indeed, Hirsch, most people do not under...(2 of 2)<br /><br />Indeed, Hirsch, most people do not understand gene expression and regulation. As a simple example (related to this particular gene and its regulation because it is catabolic), lets say Promoter BAD lies upstream of genes B, A, D on DNA; this means that at the stage of transcription, RNA polymerase - which transcribes DNA - will bind to this promoter and synthesize these genes which will later become expressed proteins. However, in order for Promoter BAD to work, there must be an essential environmental component to "get it going" so it can initiate transcription of these genes. Let's call that Q, which is what genes B, A, D catabolize. <br /><br />In sum, only in the presence of Q can genes B, A, D be transcribed and, thus, made into functional proteins. The McDermott study compounds this simple genetic fact, since significant stressors increase the likelihood of aggression. So, what you have here is only in the right environment can the variant MAOA-L gene "work" and have the individual display aggression. In general, the nature of most human genes are that relative environmental advantageousness is directly proportional to expression. This is why whites have light skin; it would be disadvantageous to have dark skin in cold climates where sun is considerably less and melanin is a natural sunblock, inhibiting needed Vitamin D absorption (unless sunshine is great). <br /><br />A question raised by the McDermott study could be why would more aggression be needed in a peaceful society? Whites have lower rates (the link to sociopathy has only been studied in white Americans, by the way) of MAOA-L than blacks (and blacks much less than East Asians!); so, one could hypothesize that - let's say we're measuring in America - black elevated levels relative to whites is due to the fact blacks occupy a much lower social and economic strata than whites, where survival (read: aggression) is a must. This would obviously compound the fact that antisocial personality is seen in lower-socioeconomic and urban settings (as mentioned by the DSM-IV).<br /><br />It's very fascinating stuff. <br /><br />But let's argue against the data and say blacks had a "crime gene" (apparently, this is still untrue). We'd only have two options: (1) Leave them be, as it is cruel to penalize people for their "inalienable" DNA, or (2) Exercise eugenics and excise them from the human population for the betterment of the world.<br /><br />Fortunately, no scientific evidence exists to do either. All one would need to do is alter <i>environment</i>.<br /><br />Hirsch, you misjudge me. I don't dispute numbers, I contextualize. Although it is not always the case, I agree with you that criminality and relative IQ is linked, for it seems that good educational opportunity can also ameliorate one's economic status (which is linked with crime rates). I also acknowledge that blacks have scored under whites and Asians in IQ measurements. Where we differ is on the "why": you state DNA; I state environment (the tests themselves, notwithstanding). There was a study back in 1991 that demonstrated that a child can lose up to 6 points on an IQ test if educational environment is substandard. IQ test scores improve with education.<br /><br />As we know, blacks are more likely than whites and Asians to attend schools in areas with high concentrations of poverty.<br /><br />*<br /><br />Silent Running said:<br /><i>You are Thrasymachus, but less honest. And you will never convince anyone here that you argue in good faith or that your arguments are correct. We've simply too much firsthand experience with the object of your worship for that.</i><br /><br />I do argue in "good faith" and I disagree that I am employing sophistry. I respect your experiences with blacks, but you should at least be honest enough to admit that not all blacks should be relegated to "subhuman" status, just like not all whites should be considered "human".Professor Snapenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-76723614278726938452011-04-20T02:23:28.127-07:002011-04-20T02:23:28.127-07:00And, I might add, he'd do well to improve his ...<i>And, I might add, he'd do well to improve his debate skills; I went easy on him.</i><br /><br />And here you're doing exactly what he said you do, declaring victory without regard for your interlocutor's position. The state of "higher education" being what it is (an archipelago of sophistry factories), this is to be expected. You are Thrasymachus, but less honest. And you will never convince anyone here that you argue in good faith or that your arguments are correct. We've simply too much firsthand experience with the object of your worship for that.<br /><br />SBPDL, for my part, two essay-writing gadflies are one too many. You should consider removing one or the other permanently.Silent Runningnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-91735015723283261982011-04-19T19:44:22.366-07:002011-04-19T19:44:22.366-07:00Snape-
"Next time, Hirsch, do not prove my p...Snape-<br /><br />"Next time, Hirsch, do not prove my points about you for me. I like a little bit of a brain workout but, with you, this is basically calisthenics at the old age home."<br /><br />Thank you for proving my point. I deduced that no matter the content of the exchange, you would, in the spirit of a keyboard commando, declare yourself the defacto winner in a debate that you admitted had yet to even occur.<br /><br />Announcing yourself the victor in an internet argument ranks somewhere on the scale of awards below "world's greatest grandpa." I'll happily provide you a mesh trucker hat emblazoned with the words "I Won," and you can display it proudly and without a sense of irony.<br /><br />Brown University Professor Emeritus Rose McDermott has shown that black males are twice as likely as whites to exhibit the MOAO "warrior gene" which is responsible for behavioral aggression in response to provocation:<br /><br />ie: two white guys are walking down the street. White guy one: "Hey man, you stepped on my shoe."<br /><br />White Guy two: "Woops, sorry."<br /><br />ie: two black guys are walking down the street: Black Guy One: "Hey nigga you betta watch where the fuck you walking, mane!"<br /><br />Black Guy Two: "Nigga, break yoself!!"<br /><br />(Gunfire ensues)<br /><br />End scene. The latter scenario involves what blacks themselves candidly describe as a "nigga moment."<br /><br />Assuming you're able to accept a correlation between poverty and incarceration rates, then you would have to concede that any study using the same transparent methodology which proved another correlation (even one that bridles your liberalism) would be valid.<br /><br />Forget race and the propensity for crime for a moment, and focus on IQ and crime. The link between the two is well-established, and since it would suit your arguments as much as mine, you would be willing to concede the point, I assume. The same methodology was used by Professor Emeritus of the University of Ulster Richard Lynn and many others to prove that blacks have, on average, the lowest IQ.Hirschnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-79530720839620287562011-04-19T19:30:59.672-07:002011-04-19T19:30:59.672-07:00Snape:
It's not supposed to mention genetic p...Snape:<br /><br />It's not supposed to mention genetic predisposition. Therefore, I did prove my case. Stop using strawmen arguments.<br /><br />As for Brother Hirsch, your arguments with him have the air of a lover's spat. You squabble like a middle-eastern woman at the market. Show some dignity, shmuck.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-3252327754764014482011-04-19T18:21:04.110-07:002011-04-19T18:21:04.110-07:00Hey, Snape. Dumbass. Those numbers that show women...Hey, Snape. Dumbass. Those numbers that show women earn less than men? Those are statistics. Statistics lie. And they don't show causation. <br /><br />Those numbers that show blacks are discriminated against in hiring? Those are statistics. Statistics lie. And they don't show causation. <br /><br />Those numbers that show blacks don't do as well in school? Those are statistics. Statistics lie. And they don't show causation. <br /><br />Therefore, no action should be taken based on any of them. <br /><br />Repeat ad infinitum.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-16904414764219933892011-04-18T22:27:48.147-07:002011-04-18T22:27:48.147-07:00Here you go, Snape: http://www.colorofcrime.com/co...<i>Here you go, Snape: http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html<br /><br />Next time learn to google.</i><br /><br />I have read that before - I actually have the .pdf on my computer - and there's nothing that mentions genetic predisposition. Therefore, you did not prove your case. Recall the old statistical truism: "Correlation does not always equal causation."<br /><br />Next time, try harder. <br /><br />As for Brother Hirsch, his treatment was of his own doing. And, I might add, he'd do well to improve his debate skills; I went easy on him. I like the way he ascribes to me reactions indicative of how I'd respond to his earth-shattering "proofs" disproving me (if he can find any). <br /><br />I suggest he not whine, but show his proofs. If he cannot, he should at least have the honesty to admit as much.Professor Snapenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-83121669346693762362011-04-18T21:56:34.916-07:002011-04-18T21:56:34.916-07:00Snape - I put down the wrong quote from your posts...Snape - I put down the wrong quote from your posts when sending you to the color of crime website. It was intended as a response to your request for proof that, when controlling for poverty, blacks are still more likely to be criminals. That is exactly what that report proves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-50425968017942103782011-04-18T19:18:48.075-07:002011-04-18T19:18:48.075-07:00"Third grade name-calling is more acceptable ..."Third grade name-calling is more acceptable than actual debate here"<br /><br />Until you bring something new to the table, you get what you deserve, shitstain.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-128833339468453522011-04-18T19:08:51.597-07:002011-04-18T19:08:51.597-07:00"Here you go, Snape: http://www.colorofcrime...."Here you go, Snape: http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html"<br /><br />Dude...that won't work. Remember, statistics lie, and anyway, they don't explain anything. Even if black crimes rates are higher, that only illustrates the magnitude of whitey's evil. EVERYTHING comes back to that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-72291225059320304002011-04-18T17:51:21.983-07:002011-04-18T17:51:21.983-07:00Disarray wrote:
"The reality is that there is...Disarray wrote:<br />"The reality is that there is a dearth of rational and logical responses to someone like me because I am black. No one even tries with any of the black commenters."<br /><br />Disarry, I have tried to reason with you in the past. However, you are a troll, and your trolling technique is to be very dense. So, seeing that reasoning with you was futile, I instead proceeded to humiliate you every day. And, I must say, you are a glutton for punishment.<br /><br />Snape wrote:<br />"I also asked you to link to literature proving that there was a gene existent in blacks predisposing them to criminality"<br /><br />Here you go, Snape: http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html<br /><br />Next time learn to google.<br /><br />By the way, your pissing match with Brother Hirsch is pathetic. You assign words and sentiments to him (and, indeed, to all of us) that were never made, then self-righteously whine at him. How disgraceful.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-34861157847018510032011-04-18T16:49:02.705-07:002011-04-18T16:49:02.705-07:00"Third grade name-calling is more acceptable ..."Third grade name-calling is more acceptable than actual debate here, which tells me something about the intellectual prowess of this audience."<br /><br />At least there is debate here. Which is more than any of the afro-centric sites which moderate with a machete.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-52890515953103373622011-04-18T15:11:59.656-07:002011-04-18T15:11:59.656-07:00Snape -- defying the white racists through the she...Snape -- defying the white racists through the sheer power of his obliviousness.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-43579641624615455982011-04-18T13:39:12.855-07:002011-04-18T13:39:12.855-07:00(2 of 2)
Hirsch said:
You don't want debate, ...(2 of 2)<br /><br />Hirsch said:<br /><i>You don't want debate, and even if you did, would declare yourself the victor regardless of the outcome. If I post a study that shows the correlation between race and crime is stronger than the one between poverty and crime, you'll predictably respond with "Bullshit"</i><br /><br />This is untrue (and you have no study to cite, unfortunately for you). You misjudge me: if you can point to an infallible study disproving me, by all means, provide it. I will not respond with "bullshit". I will thank you for being a man of intellectual integrity.<br /><br /><i>hector me about how you are my moral superior, leavening your soapbox oratory with old hat about nurture vs nature, etc.</i><br /><br />The "Nurture" argument is a truism in many cases, such as this one. You have not provided me with any unequivocal data to change my opinion on that one. As for "moral superiority", well, that is all in your head, man.<br /><br /><i>You'll attempt to infer my motives, misconstrue them, and then, in spite of accusing me of attacking instead of furnishing proof, will resort to cheap swipes about "cleaning my mirror."</i><br /><br />This is naked hypocrisy. Don't feign some moral indignation, Hirsch, when everyone else here, as well as you, sees "black skin" and "infers motives", infers quality or worth. And I did not attack you, but gave you a suggestion, which you've proven is still apropos. If you want to bring up "cheap swipes", what you undoubtedly consider a "dismount" of Desiree in your later comment was uncalled for and you delivered it - unpredictably - in lieu of an actual response. I find you cowardly. Every black who trickles in is quickly shouted down with "fucking moron", or, infamously, in the case of Desiree, "Diarrhea". <br /><br />Third grade name-calling is more acceptable than actual debate here, which tells me something about the intellectual prowess of this audience.<br /><br />Next time, Hirsch, do not prove my points about you for me. I like a little bit of a brain workout but, with you, this is basically calisthenics at the old age home. <br /><br />I hope you don't misconstrue that as a "cheap swipe".Professor Snapenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-67319924314819972242011-04-18T13:37:58.467-07:002011-04-18T13:37:58.467-07:00Hirsch:
You opted for an easy way out. If you had...Hirsch:<br /><br />You opted for an easy way out. If you had had the testicular fortitude in those "previous threads" to refute at that time, you should have made your move.<br /><br /><i>As for blacks being genetically predisposed to crime, google "race and psychopathic personality." It has an inordinately high rate among blacks.</i><br /><br />"Psychopathy" has not been established as heritable and gene-based; if you have research to say it is, then by all means, provide it. Otherwise, I suggest you take notice that the DSM-IV notes when a professional is evaluating a patient, "antisocial personality disorder" - which is what I'm sure you are referring to - should be applied only when social and economic contexts are first understood.<br /><br />We can debate about the politics of the American Psychiatric Association another time.<br /><br />What you've done there is assume a causation due to a correlation; the DSM-IV states this is a common diagnosis in lower socioeconomic and urban environments. You should also know that many disorders are largely cultural and some do not translate. <br /><br />Plainly, Hirsch, you've not proven your case. How can we be sure what you say is true? If I removed the socioeconomic and urban factors, would blacks still be affected at a "high rate"? <br /><br />One more note: "sociopathy" is considered the "male prisoner personality"; virtually all male inmates, regardless of color, are sociopathic to a degree. If a researcher gets most of his data from a prison - where blacks make up a high proportion of the population - what does that tell you? Can that be accurately applied to all blacks, the majority of whom are not imprisoned? And if poverty greatly increases the propensity for crime, and blacks are more likely to be poor and in sweltering urban ghettos, what do you have?<br /><br />Definitely not a glowing endorsement for a "crime gene" inherent in blacks.<br /><br />Regarding Jensen, Hirsch, I suggest you remember that 'pseudoscience' was a hard science 200 years ago. Again, if you have the proof to disprove me, please link to the literature. <br /><br />(1 of 2)Professor Snapenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-34330926921300143842011-04-18T10:57:28.013-07:002011-04-18T10:57:28.013-07:00"why does everybody worship the fucking flag ..."why does everybody worship the fucking flag anyway?"<br /><br />Oh, what to do with the Negro, the eternal question. I don't expect blacks to either:<br /><br />1. love America <br />2. understand the purpose of the founding documents or comprehend the ideas of freedom and liberty<br />3. pledge allegiance to the flag or <br />4. show even an ounce of patriotism for America, the country who freed them from slavery<br /><br />I wish that the Africans would have never sold the black slaves to Americans. Then we would not have had a Negro problem to deal with for the last 150 years. I wish that we had found another way. <br /><br />Are the blacks willing to go if we send them, once and for all, back to the African motherland? I wish we would have sent them back directly following abolition. Lincoln tried, but his life was cut short. Maybe that would be a good policy to work on for the future of white America. It would be a win-win situation for all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-84618465879521773902011-04-18T10:49:04.386-07:002011-04-18T10:49:04.386-07:00peeplez needs ta cees an disiss on the butiful nub...peeplez needs ta cees an disiss on the butiful nubian princess Desiree. <br /><br />Hey Desi re - re what up shorti. yous gots ta keeps whitey frum makin noize. <br /><br />da blacka da juise da betta da frutes. whites peeplez is frum da devils. blak be back in da stile of da day.<br /><br />Desiree keepin it real up in da feeld aight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-89221797771308349512011-04-18T10:29:27.939-07:002011-04-18T10:29:27.939-07:00Desiree,
I'm sorry you feel left out. If you...Desiree, <br /><br />I'm sorry you feel left out. If you could please pass your message about the KKK being nothing but rednecks on to the SPLC and the NAACP and to any other black caucus or organizations that use the phantom of what is actually some gaggle of dumb rednecks to justify their marches, powwows, and massive budgets, that would be peachy keen.<br /><br />Also, you're not a diversion because you're black, you're a diversion because you have two moves:<br /><br />Shake- LOL at the white people who you say are are obsessed with this site.<br /><br />Bake- Desperately try to conceal the fact that, as your sister let slip and was always patently obvious, you are the most obsessive of all the posters here.<br /><br />Shake and bake. It got old fast. And now it's getting sad. Please stop because it is really starting to be awkward. If the site is worthless, racist, ignorant, etc. then why do you keep peeking in and asking SBPDL to approve your comments as if he was a doorman with his hand on the velvet rope to some club you desperately wanted to enter?<br /><br />Now, assuming you are a woman of your word and you have posted your last comment, a song to commemorate the tornado surreptitiously flinging the house on top of the witch:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsaTElBljOEHirschnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-21522554033397392282011-04-18T10:12:25.040-07:002011-04-18T10:12:25.040-07:00"The rebuttal to most, if not all, of your ar..."The rebuttal to most, if not all, of your arguments can be found in previous threads."<br /><br />Every fucking word Snape types has been discussed, refuted, and obliterated countless times on this blog, but because he's a clueless newbie under the delusion that he's smarter than everyone else, he insists on torturing us all with the same old tired bullshit over and over. He brings absolutely nothing new, he just repeats his "Santa Claus is real" mantra, please ban this fucking loser!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-47187663027529892742011-04-18T07:43:18.402-07:002011-04-18T07:43:18.402-07:00Das da problym. In Merica a mofucka like da donald...Das da problym. In Merica a mofucka like da donald trump can git awy with dat. But when da brotha is speekin for his den its like peeplez gots to git da rope and lynch da brotha. Ifs peeplze wants da truf den thay can jus looks outsides da windos. blacks be gettin lynches by whitey and we ain gots ta takes it no moor wit Obama. Obama be puttin whitey in his plase. Weh we gits da cash muny den its blak folk turns to builds da buidlings and have da tv show and da donall tru,ps be da door mans.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-5019641575451258342011-04-18T06:07:37.332-07:002011-04-18T06:07:37.332-07:00Snape,
The rebuttal to most, if not all, of your ...Snape,<br /><br />The rebuttal to most, if not all, of your arguments can be found in previous threads. For evidence of black middle class enclaves being several orders magnitude worse than those of poor whites, google "Dekalb County Crime rate" or "Prince George county" and then compare those to rural, mostly white West Virginia or Appalachia.<br /><br />As for blacks being genetically predisposed to crime, google "race and psychopathic personality." It has an inordinately high rate among blacks. If you study race and IQ, race and crime, etc. you will begin to notice a trend, that the nobel laureates and PhDs and Darwin fellowships are all bunched on one side of the teeter, while the "white hat" anti-racists have BAs, and not even in hard sciences. Arthur Jensen, as wicked and racist as they might try to paint him, still has intellectual currency and is still publishing decades after his naysayers tried to silence him.<br /><br />You don't want debate, and even if you did, would declare yourself the victor regardless of the outcome. If I post a study that shows the correlation between race and crime is stronger than the one between poverty and crime, you'll predictably respond with "Bullshit" and then hector me about how you are my moral superior, leavening your soapbox oratory with old hat about nurture vs nature, etc.<br /><br />You'll attempt to infer my motives, misconstrue them, and then, in spite of accusing me of attacking instead of furnishing proof, will resort to cheap swipes about "cleaning my mirror."<br /><br />Men who've done far more than either of us could accomplish in three lifetimes, from Schopenhauer to Lovecraft, to FDR, to Kipling, to Churchill, have publicly said much worse than any comment on here that has you blushing so haughtily. Every one of your posts can essentially be summed up as an affronted "Why I never!"<br /><br />Try not to look so shocked.Hirschnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-18709618228309117452011-04-18T01:17:23.645-07:002011-04-18T01:17:23.645-07:00(SBPDL, please let this through! Totally will be m...(SBPDL, please let this through! Totally will be my last, last comment!)<br /><br />@ Hirsch:<br /><br /><i>As for Desiree, she's pathological, not political. As long as I don't break my leg on some snowy road and end up at her Annie Wilkes-like abode, she's not really a problem, just a diversion.</i><br /><br />You're right. I'm not into politics at all--I used to be--but you are insinuating that I am 'insane', which is totally unfair and just pathetic. Unscrupulous, actually.<br /><br />It is so funny to me, Mr. Dan "SBPDL is now asking for donations to take his charade to the next level" Burros, that you can call a black person a 'diversion' when this blog TALKS ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE. <i>Excuse me</i> for stumbling upon this 'holiest of holy' Temple to Odin from Google! If he hadn't had a post about Michael Jackson, the sanctity of this hallowed place would not have been disturbed by 'Diarrhea'. So... blame Mr. Kersey.<br /><br />The reality is that there is a dearth of rational and logical responses to someone like me because I am black. No one even tries with any of the black commenters. Hell, I've said some of the same things as Snape but, because he's white, he at least gets responded to like a human being. How are any of you going to get any respect by a mainstream audience if a black person comes on and you all resort to mocking, 'Ooo-ooo ahh-ahh' gibberish as a response? LOL, really?<br /><br />Why doesn't SBPDL talk about white liberals if they are the 'enemy'? He doesn't because most of his readers are here because they want to talk shit about black people. That's his audience; it's not some higher moral crusade for these people. Most of the people on this site are the same ones who'd rather focus on nebulous Muslim birth certificates than actual issues. This is like the KKK: a disorganized bunch of rednecks.<br /><br />If I put every one of these commenters in a room, the sheer lack of rational thought would cause a black hole.<br /><br />As for your 'Misery' scenario, I would have to be a fan of yours, wouldn't I? That, I am not. I respect you as a human being, not as a caricature of a serious intellectual.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-22512952939108053052011-04-17T23:33:51.116-07:002011-04-17T23:33:51.116-07:00Trump is just a sad clown with a reality show. The...Trump is just a sad clown with a reality show. The 'birther' issue is a joke. There are a billion better reasons to oppose the blame-whitey, never hold blacks accountable bs (which , btw, would be around no matter who be da prez-o-dent)than this. Amazing Trump is just hollering about it now.It's called shameless self-promotion, folks....<br />http://reason.com/archives/2011/04/15/trump-is-a-laughing-matterjoehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14265714175711996082noreply@blogger.com