tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post7869318571961593239..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: A Story so Impossibly Absurd it Could Only Happen Courtesy of Black People...Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger116125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-23217018393616217302014-12-23T09:36:11.106-08:002014-12-23T09:36:11.106-08:00The fact that two animals can breed fertile offspr...<i>The fact that two animals can breed fertile offspring does<b> not</b> make them the same species. In fairness, I don't think I was just splitting hairs.<br /><br />I believe even those Galapagos finches that gave Darwin his inspiration could interbreed; they just chose not to. By that criterion, I'm certainly not the same species as any black woman!</i><br /><br />The UK went through great lengths to get rid of the Ruddy duck because it was breeding with the White-headed duck leading to a population decline.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-82298042669958387202014-12-22T22:41:03.801-08:002014-12-22T22:41:03.801-08:00Pat, I'll have to take your word that you know...Pat, I'll have to take your word that you know a lot about species. I don't claim to know much about the subject, "but what I do know, I know real good".<br /><br />You're a smart guy, and I have the greatest respect for both your intelligence and your erudition. I'm sorry that you apparently think it was impertinent of me to contradict you, but when you said<br /><br /><i>In standard biological taxonomy the mark that distinguishes one species from another in (sic) the ability to interbreed,</i><br /><br />that's just flat out wrong. The fact that two animals can breed fertile offspring does <i>not</i> make them the same species. In fairness, I don't think I was just splitting hairs.<br /><br />I believe even those Galapagos finches that gave Darwin his inspiration could interbreed; they just chose not to. By that criterion, I'm certainly not the same species as any black woman!AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-52428743030541934952014-12-22T14:45:04.082-08:002014-12-22T14:45:04.082-08:00To Pat Boyle:
I respect your opinions on many mat...To Pat Boyle:<br /><br />I respect your opinions on many matters, especially in the areas which I know nothing about.<br /><br />But in the arena of genetics, Pat I believe that you are in way over your head and don't really have the background nor the solid evidence to back up your statements regarding species.<br /><br />Scientific knowledge is not fixed and permanent. It's fluid in its nature. The theories, the premises, the conclusions change with the advancement research. In some areas of science, what was held as the unshakable truth 100 years ago would be held as erroneous and antiquated today.<br /><br />I understand your concern that rash statements will be used against realists. But to flat out reject a concept that has valid arguments and may very well be up for debate in the near future is no worse than the suppression exerted upon the masses by the PC machine.<br /><br />Philly Mike is right. Jack of all trades, master of none. Leave the genetics to the geneticists and don't waive around a banner of unwarranted authority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-67468325825756744092014-12-22T14:43:50.716-08:002014-12-22T14:43:50.716-08:00" For the first time ever I think someone her..." For the first time ever I think someone here has disputed me on some scientific issue."<br /><br />You just haven't been paying attention.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63422363992823330492014-12-22T07:57:15.234-08:002014-12-22T07:57:15.234-08:00Pat Boyle said ”. . . Right now the prospect of ra...Pat Boyle said <i>”. . . Right now the prospect of racial tranquility seems very distant. All modern history has been turning away from black survival but I expected black Africans to last a few more decades before they went the way of the Tasmanians. <b>As of today I think I was too optimistic</b>.”</i><br /><br />For some reason I interpreted one of your earlier comments to mean that you had accelerated your anticipated date of demise for the black Africans as a result of the recent developments, but your reassessment of your earlier optimism has confused me. Are you saying that you now expect blacks to survive beyond a few decades?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-47565406344420369962014-12-22T00:39:16.727-08:002014-12-22T00:39:16.727-08:00They also cost taxpayers 30,000 dollars a year eac...They also cost taxpayers 30,000 dollars a year each to house and feed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-38152588332024541492014-12-21T20:03:49.856-08:002014-12-21T20:03:49.856-08:00Melanie,
Sorry to hear about your husband, but the...Melanie,<br />Sorry to hear about your husband, but there are options available. Check out Dr. Lorraine Day at www.drday.com. Also check on the Cancer Control Society in Los Angeles. They have a web site also. Some good information on Royal Rife is on the internet also. I watched several relatives wither away by being treated by the medical "profession", which is barbaric. Best wishes to you both.<br /><br />Just got an email that included the following statement: "The difference between the Supreme Court and the Ku Klux Klan is that the members of the Supreme Court dress in black robes and scare white people."Samnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-7073015338083167842014-12-21T15:34:11.981-08:002014-12-21T15:34:11.981-08:00"I'm not arguing that we are different sp..."I'm not arguing that we are different species, just that you have not made the case that we are not."<br /><br />No, Pat's saying that it's "ignorant" to argue that blacks and whites differ at the species level, since they can interbreed. But then he goes on to contradict himself when he points out that early <i>Homo sapiens</i> interbred with <i>Homo neanderthalensis</i>, a different species. <br /><br />Certainly it's true that any professional biologist or anthropologist who wants to keep his job won't say that blacks and whites are different species. But a good case could be made for it by anyone not so intimidated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-23956393438324679202014-12-21T14:49:36.548-08:002014-12-21T14:49:36.548-08:00Well this is new. For the first time ever I think ...Well this is new. For the first time ever I think someone here has disputed me on some scientific issue.<br /><br />Trust me, I am well read on the question of species. I was simplifying. But if you want to engage in minutia I suppose we could do that too.<br /><br />The first point is that the concept of species is not like what many of the general public think. There is an article somewhere on the Web that I read a month or so ago that gives twenty five separate and distinct definitions for species. My favorite is - 'a species is what a qualified taxonomists says is a species'.<br /><br />My point wasn't so much biological as polemical. If you are going to be a race realist you have to be careful as what you say. Unfriendly eyes view these pages. If you are going to call blacks monkeys or chimpanzees or whatever you empower the liberals who will use that usage to discredit you. Similarly if you are - for whatever reason - going to call blacks a different species you are going to make yourself vulnerable to being discredited as ignorant of biology. <br /><br />That's why I don't engage in name calling. The mainstream taxonomic position today is that there are about five major races of humans - one of which is the black Sub-Saharan Africans. No major biologist calls blacks a separate species. So I don't. <br /><br />If you want to make a case that Africans are a separate species not just a separate sub-species - go ahead. I simply don't see what that effort gains you and it cost you credibility. I may understand your reasons but our mutual enemies won't. <br /><br />The mainstream science on these questions is not very controversial. Humans evolved in Africa. There was a major migration around a million years ago of Homo Erectus out of Africa and another of Homo Sapiens around fifty thousand years ago.<br /><br />This is the theory of Luigi Cavalli-Sforza. When I was a kid this was controversial but not now. Those new tropical people are called Anatomically Modern Humans (AMH). Everyone today has this gracile human body. That is to say we are all tall and slim like African blacks but not at all like Neanderthals.<br /><br />But these AMHs were not as yet fully sapient. There was also some event about 37,500 to 40,000 years ago to the brains of the recent emigrants. This is believed to have occurred in the Middle East. People got smarter and their artifacts got more complex. Whatever caused this 'Great Leap Forward' to 'Behavioral Modernity' it soon spread everywhere including back into Africa. This is the basis for considering all human beings to be one species.<br /><br />That doesn't mean that all peoples are equally smart. Tropical people are considerably less intelligent than people who developed in more northerly climes. (Take that Jared Diamond).<br /><br />Black Africans are plenty stupid but they are still classified as human as are the also very stupid Australian Aborigines. A lot of liberals hate the work of Lynn and Vanhanen but no one can refute it.<br /><br />Human evolution these days is not very controversial at least among scientists. But of course in the political arena no one dares to speak the truth. You won't get tenure anywhere if you simply say as much as I've written here. <br /><br />But things are changing fast. We all may be wearing necklaces of black ears soon. Obama has managed get black people to shoot cops. Cops will shoot back. <br /><br />Right now the prospect of racial tranquility seems very distant. All modern history has been turning away from black survival but I expected black Africans to last a few more decades before they went the way of the Tasmanians. As of today I think I was too optimistic.<br /><br />Pat Boyle <br /><br />Pat Boylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13477950851915567863noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-32113736651757439162014-12-21T14:41:52.451-08:002014-12-21T14:41:52.451-08:00Stuntin'Stuntin'lipistanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02544665731690137848noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-32856154639400270722014-12-21T12:54:58.646-08:002014-12-21T12:54:58.646-08:00@ Anonymous
The question of differing species is ...@ Anonymous<br><br><br /><br /><i>The question of differing species is interesting, and I would like to know the definitive scientific answer, but I'm not sure that knowing the answer would change much. If I had no notion of the concept of species, I would easily recognize blacks as being very different from whites. Perhaps if it became a widespread accepted scientific fact that blacks and whites are different species, that more people would become realists. For purposes of developing a strategy for dealing with blacks I tend to view them as a problematic branch of the same species. Learning that they are actually a separate species would give me a reason to say “I told you they were different.”<br><br><br /><br />December 21, 2014 at 9:40 AM</i><br><br><br /><br />That is also a very good point. I don't need to know whether or not they're a different species to know that they are indeed different. I do like to have my facts as straight as possible for a layman, in these arguments.Melanienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-36716058251435010912014-12-21T12:43:53.249-08:002014-12-21T12:43:53.249-08:00@ Pat Boyle December 20, 2014 at 3:47 PM
Pat, I a...@ Pat Boyle December 20, 2014 at 3:47 PM<br /><br />Pat, I always enjoy your informative posts. I also consider it to be important that we have our facts straight so as to not discredit and undermine our own arguments. You bring the facts, and none, that I can recall, of the irrational fantasy scenarios. I don't always understand your more esoteric points, but at least your posts inform me as to what is and isn't true regarding racial reality, which is important to me, as a racial realist. Truth is everything.Melanienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-70571860940798000442014-12-21T12:31:08.882-08:002014-12-21T12:31:08.882-08:00@RexHymens December 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM
...but I...@RexHymens December 20, 2014 at 10:35 AM<br><br><br /><br /><i>...but I just don't see anything funny</i><br><br><br /><br />I'm afraid that's howI feel about it. Not to rain on anyone else's parade, but I just can't summon up any amusement regarding the destruction of the civilised world by Homo Africanus and their enablers.The recent "win" by the R jerseys-I might say, the defensive side of the team-brought me no joy, either, and I didn't expect it to do so.<br><br><br /><br />There's a lot going on in my personal life, including the diagnosis of terminal cancer in my beloved husband-I think it was a mistake to visit here again right now.Melanienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-73054163388358732762014-12-21T09:43:08.396-08:002014-12-21T09:43:08.396-08:00Do they accept EBTs at the shooting range?Do they accept EBTs at the shooting range?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-87107031725260910542014-12-21T09:40:46.931-08:002014-12-21T09:40:46.931-08:00AnalogMan said ”. . . I'm not arguing that we ...AnalogMan said <i>”. . . I'm not arguing that we are different species, just that you have not made the case that we are not. Less than a century ago, chimps and bonobos were considered one species. I believe that, in any other species, the difference between us and Africans would have resulted at least in classification as different subspecies. I think, when this insane egalitarian PC ideology is finally purged from what passes for science, it's by no means inconceivable that we will in future be classified as different species. Then, we can finally start to frame rational policies.”</i><br /><br />The question of differing species is interesting, and I would like to know the definitive scientific answer, but I'm not sure that knowing the answer would change much. If I had no notion of the concept of species, I would easily recognize blacks as being very different from whites. Perhaps if it became a widespread accepted scientific fact that blacks and whites are different species, that more people would become realists. For purposes of developing a strategy for dealing with blacks I tend to view them as a problematic branch of the same species. Learning that they are actually a separate species would give me a reason to say “I told you they were different.”Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-90039256855358254872014-12-21T07:01:11.149-08:002014-12-21T07:01:11.149-08:00THERE WAS A FIREFIGHT!!! - I absolutely love the ...THERE WAS A FIREFIGHT!!! - I absolutely love the Boondock Saints reference there! Great stuff great stuff.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-71471024285033767062014-12-21T00:27:47.737-08:002014-12-21T00:27:47.737-08:00I once overheard a 50-ish black man on the bus tal...I once overheard a 50-ish black man on the bus talking about a game he and his friends would play as 9 and 10 year olds in the hood. When their parents were away, they would take their parents' loaded guns and use them to play cops and robbers on the streets. They would actually shoot at each other, not really trying to hit the other guy, but getting close enough to scare him. <br /><br />The moral of the story: "Nobody got hurt, and everybody had a good time. A really good time." <br /><br />It was at that moment I finally realized what a huge and unabridgeable gap there is between us. They are not like us, at all. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-70473517065695767302014-12-21T00:19:12.869-08:002014-12-21T00:19:12.869-08:00And being human criminals, they avoided shooting s...And being human criminals, they avoided shooting small children. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-48649557248240605482014-12-20T21:17:36.373-08:002014-12-20T21:17:36.373-08:00Pat Boyle said:
In standard biological taxonomy ...Pat Boyle said:<br /><br /><i> In standard biological taxonomy the mark that distinguishes one species from another in the ability to interbreed.</i><br /><br />No, no, no! That is not correct.<br /><br />The rule is, if two populations can NOT interbreed, then they are NOT the same species. That's very different from saying that if they CAN interbreed, then they ARE the same species.<br /><br />Many species can interbreed. All canids (wolves, coyotes, dogs, foxes, jackals etc) can interbreed, and moreover produce fertile offspring, but are nevertheless different species.<br /><br />As you mention, bonobos and chimpanzees could probably interbreed, but have not because of the barrier of the Congo River between them. For many centuries Babuntus and humans didn't interbreed for similar reasons. <br /><br /> If the Congo dried up and the apes were to interbreed, that would not suddenly make them the same species. Nor do boats and planes make Africans and humans the same.<br /><br />I'm not arguing that we are different species, just that you have not made the case that we are not. Less than a century ago, chimps and bonobos were considered one species. I believe that, in any other species, the difference between us and Africans would have resulted at least in classification as different subspecies. I think, when this insane egalitarian PC ideology is finally purged from what passes for science, it's by no means inconceivable that we will in future be classified as different species. Then, we can finally start to frame rational policies.AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-12332651759615006682014-12-20T20:49:34.760-08:002014-12-20T20:49:34.760-08:00They will never be satisfied, ever, with anything....They will never be satisfied, ever, with anything. They're just as insatiable as their black pets. They are insane. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-78655549121186941152014-12-20T20:47:52.261-08:002014-12-20T20:47:52.261-08:00Yes, Highland, and many other hospitals near ghett...Yes, Highland, and many other hospitals near ghetto neighborhoods in Chicago, Maryland, and elsewhere. It's been going on for decades. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-21868071425689000532014-12-20T20:43:59.679-08:002014-12-20T20:43:59.679-08:00Anonymous said...
Sharpton is scared outta his wit...Anonymous said...<br />Sharpton is scared outta his wits by what he and his flunkies have started now. He is separating himself from this act so fast, he's turning White.<br /><br />_______________________<br /><br />It won't be the first time. I watched him get stabbed back in the day. When he saw that knife, he DID turn white. Then he turned red.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14372396462127767526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-28753528758441375642014-12-20T20:33:05.059-08:002014-12-20T20:33:05.059-08:00I do remember that mailman. He was a good guy, and...I do remember that mailman. He was a good guy, and I miss him. <br /><br />The USP guys I see nowadays all look like bikers, Ferguson looters, or Cambodian refugees. No wonder they're going broke. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-59404611263222743022014-12-20T20:20:56.867-08:002014-12-20T20:20:56.867-08:00WINWINAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-73604752584687460222014-12-20T19:13:40.426-08:002014-12-20T19:13:40.426-08:00Using R vs. K evolutionary theory Whites and east ...Using R vs. K evolutionary theory Whites and east Asians had K pressure to evolve higher IQ to build/store/plan in order to survive winters with no food growing along with smaller families that are easier to support. High IQ wouldn't help much in sub sahara Africa but outbreeding disease and running faster when hyenas are around would. Sickle cell is an evolutionary adaption that lets blacks survive malaria without YTs meds but gives them significant heart/lung/kidney drawbacks. R style is where a single mom can feed all the kids that survive with no help from a dad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com