tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post82792263245573181..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: White High School Teacher Fired Because He Tried to Make Black Student - who doesn't believe in USA - Stand for Pledge of Allegiance Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger77125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-33503771082004929132017-03-29T20:16:12.426-07:002017-03-29T20:16:12.426-07:00Lincoln changed his mind, and called for giving ne...Lincoln changed his mind, and called for giving negroes citizenship and the vote.<br /><br /><i>"The amount of constituency, so to speak, on which the new Louisiana government rests, would be more satisfactory to all, if it contained fifty, thirty, or even twenty thousand, instead of only about twelve thousand, as it does. It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers. ... The colored man too, in seeing all united for him, is inspired with vigilance, and energy, and daring, to the same end. Grant that he desires the elective franchise, will he not attain it sooner by saving the already advanced steps toward it, than by running backward over them?"</i><br />- Abraham Lincoln, last public address, Washington, D.C., April 11, 1865<br /><br />Furthermore, the people themselves, through their representatives, approved of giving negroes citizenship and the vote just a few years later, which they did by amending the Constitution. From this it can be concluded that Lincoln's harsh remarks about negroes cited above were nothing more than political doubletalk, and weren't the majority views of the day.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-74936382726034264972017-03-29T20:01:36.300-07:002017-03-29T20:01:36.300-07:00OT. Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders ...<i>OT. Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders with an AR-15.</i><br /><br />The first articles I found had no pictures (that would display with Javascript disabled) but <a href="http://www.vdare.com/posts/masked-home-invaders-not-the-victims-of-citizen-armed-with-ar-15" rel="nofollow">VDARE has published pics of the perps and one is DEFINITELY a dindu.</a> The other two appear to have been stupid White kids along to get drugs or money for drugs.<br /><br />As the estimable editor of New Nation News likes to say, "Don't do drugs. Especially don't buy from, sell to and/or share drugs with blacks."<br /><br /><i>Perps were wiggers.</i><br /><br />Yup. Had these kids' parents practiced race realism, their sons would probably be alive today.Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41344713797329692892017-03-29T17:45:17.487-07:002017-03-29T17:45:17.487-07:00Lincoln summed up the anthropological conclusions ... Lincoln summed up the anthropological conclusions of the day when he said that the Negro "is not my equal in many respects:--<br />certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment." Lincoln held that the Negro is "entitled to all the natural rights enumerated in the Declaration of Independence---the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.t'e- He expected this to be realized within the framework of social segregation of whites and negroes. (Abraham Lincoln Complete Works, edited by John G. Nicolay lind John Hay,<br />Vol. I, Century Company, 1894, N. Y., all the above quotes can be found in page 289)<br /><br /><br />In the midst of the Civil War, Lincoln probably summed up this anthropological attitude when he told a Negro audience:<br />"We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence.<br />In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted it affords a reason at least why we should be separated."<br /><br />Abraham Lincoln's plan of colonizing the Negroes in suitable tropical areas was probably the most logical and humane solution.<br />He urged Negroes to colonize in Central America "especially because of the similarity of climate with your native land -thus suited to your physical condition. <br />New York Daily Tribune, Aug. 15, 1862, "Colonization of People of African Descent" (Interview with President Lincoln)".<br /><br />President Lincoln had called together a group of free Negroes and asked them to start a movement for colonizing America...by saying: <br /><br />"I ask you then to consider seriously not pertaining to yourselves merely, nor for your race, and ours, for the present time, but as one of the things, if successfully managed, for the good of mankind...<br />'From age to age descends the lay,<br />To millions yet to be,<br />Till far its echoes roll away,<br />Into eternity'."<br /> p. 1170 John G. Nicolay and John Hay, Abraham Lincoln, The Century Co.,n.Y., 1894.Vol. I, p, 289. <br />(All this in THE GREAT DECEIT :SOCIAL PSEUDO-SCIENCES. Veritas foundation study 1965) from archive.org Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12239791522344795823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-46043912450238026162017-03-29T07:33:50.967-07:002017-03-29T07:33:50.967-07:00To Anonymous at 3/27 18:44: Perps were wiggers. To Anonymous at 3/27 18:44: Perps were wiggers. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04723458474462663244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-18856882564833513422017-03-29T04:22:00.946-07:002017-03-29T04:22:00.946-07:00Plus, the founders couldn't have foresaw the (...Plus, the founders couldn't have foresaw the (((Frankfurt school of cultural marxism))). Hit YouTube and watch " antiracist hitler".<br />Mr TurnerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-61349407234196206702017-03-28T18:40:00.297-07:002017-03-28T18:40:00.297-07:00Noticed the civil war mentioned. The south was on...Noticed the civil war mentioned. The south was on its way to freeing the slaves with modern farming practices the need for slave labor would have faded out around 1920-30. We wouldn't put up with what is going on today and I think the north would be 10x worse than Detroit and Chicago because I think blacks would honestly flee the south for up north. I also imagine the south would have been 80% white with few Spanish and black. Most of those would be good blacks that farm and the like. The Spanish would have been more akin to the Texas natives that helped fight for the independence of Texas and anti illegal/Mexico. I honestly believe it would have been a Utopia as we have oil, farming, water, great fishing, beaches, ports, hospitality, food, culture and I think it would have been amazing. Instead Yankees are moving down here by the millions because they have screwed up the northern cities and we are starting to get an influx of immigrants in the small southern cities places that never had any diversity. Hell I was in Mobile not long ago and a group of Muslims walked up talking as loud as they could in arabic while at the pet store with my kids, walked up no shit 1 foot behind me... I could have been a war vet for all they knew. They don't think about others, I ask yall to think about your fellow white men and women and try and do what you can for neighbors. And to many of yall on here get out of the cities up north and feel free to venture down to LA Lower Alabama if yall want to, its still nice here in some spots for the next twenty+ years. LA "lower Alabama" <br /><br />LA lower AlabamaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-49754615417277213342017-03-28T11:10:33.360-07:002017-03-28T11:10:33.360-07:00Screw that kid.
I can't stand these little &q...Screw that kid. <br />I can't stand these little "Shenar's" who cause nothing but problems. <br />Why not just go along to get along, considering what you're getting from the school, even though your mother is likely not even paying more taxes than she receives in benefits!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16659355301685625871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-55042007400944429202017-03-28T08:22:04.456-07:002017-03-28T08:22:04.456-07:00Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders with...<i>Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders with an AR-15. Homeowners fine, perps dead.</i><br /><br /><sniff> I love happy endings!Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-52948593397616672712017-03-28T05:53:47.098-07:002017-03-28T05:53:47.098-07:00"They didn't write that because they thou..."They didn't write that because they thought that it was obvious and didn't imagine future generations importing third worlders. "<br /><br />Nope"<br /><br />Lol.<br /><br />Yep.<br /><br />"And that it was made exclusively for the white race is, in my opinion"<br /><br />Exactly.<br /><br />This country was founded by White men, who had every intention of it being for Whites. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-58060740246172270222017-03-28T05:48:40.808-07:002017-03-28T05:48:40.808-07:00I have to admit, that's how I'm starting t...I have to admit, that's how I'm starting to see it. Allegiance to a piece of cloth whose ideals have been compromised, or my people? I choose my people.<br />Mr TurnerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-30634726348067903392017-03-28T05:42:09.024-07:002017-03-28T05:42:09.024-07:00The ideas and moral rudder put forth by the consti...The ideas and moral rudder put forth by the constitution can only work in a homogeneous society of European peoples. "Democracy " "democratic "republics have been and are a failure. No? Just look at this country today. These systems simply do not work. Everything in recent American history shows this. Everything has broken down around tribal and ethnic lines. That is why "multiculturalism " is a total failure. IMO the way out of this mess will have precious very little to do with the "constitution ".<br />Mr TurnerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-4301078090687942832017-03-27T22:12:52.694-07:002017-03-27T22:12:52.694-07:00"The writers of the Constitution did not cons..."The writers of the Constitution did not consider the negro to be "man" nor of "the people". They were not people. They were farm animals."<br /><br />Writers such as Jefferson, for example? Thomas Jefferson referred to them as people, writing in his autobiography that "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these <b>people</b> are to be free," and also, in his draft of the Declaration of Independence, vituperated against the slave trade in harsh language, calling it a “cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant <b>people</b>.” So it was clear that he thought the slaves had rights as a matter of natural law, if nothing else.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63105441947151881232017-03-27T21:05:07.228-07:002017-03-27T21:05:07.228-07:00Not a (((white guy))). Now let's not make the ...Not a (((white guy))). Now let's not make the same mistake twice. Meshuggenah!<br /><br />General RipperAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-33171498967239671302017-03-27T19:46:38.336-07:002017-03-27T19:46:38.336-07:00Picture of driver now-Rodriguez is last name but s...Picture of driver now-Rodriguez is last name but she's pretty pale. I'm guessing Mexicans based on knife and brass knuckles-Mexicans are real knife happy. But I could be wrong. <br /><br />Medal and a case of ammo for the 23 year old who did the shooting. Saved us all a bunch of money and aggravation and possibly saved his and future victims lives.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-48524257578823287112017-03-27T19:44:50.844-07:002017-03-27T19:44:50.844-07:00"As a matter of interpretation of the word &q..."As a <b>matter of interpretation of the word "person" </b>in the Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. courts have extended certain constitutional protections to corporations....<br /><br />....In this view, treating corporations as "persons" is a convenient legal fiction...<br /><br />....Since the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, upholding the rights of corporations to make political expenditures under the First Amendment, there have been several calls for a Constitutional amendment to abolish corporate personhood."<br /><br />https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood<br /><br />I'm going to make a W.A.G here and assume you are against giving corporations constitutional protection comparable to a "person". Now, why else is there such a media circus anytime a SCOTUS appointment is in the air other than the fact lawyers base their entire careers on twisting whatever meaning out of words suits their purpose, and thus, interpret and tease whatever meaning out of the constitution suits their political purpose? More importantly, what is your purpose here? What point are you trying to make? <br /><br />- TiredAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-15345916475371117002017-03-27T18:44:35.667-07:002017-03-27T18:44:35.667-07:00OT. Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders...OT. Oklahoma homeowner greets three home invaders with an AR-15. Homeowners fine, perps dead. Cops arrested a 21 year old woman suspected of being the driver, but so far no pictures or names of the woman or the dead perps. Perps were “teens” armed with a knife and brass knuckles. <br /><br />http://ktul.com/news/local/wagoner-co-sheriffs-office-investigating-triple-homicide-in-broken-arrow-areaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-4946214550179344752017-03-27T18:27:55.621-07:002017-03-27T18:27:55.621-07:00"The very first citizenship Law passed by the..."The very first citizenship Law passed by the first Congress in 1790 states that Citizenship would be limited to "White men of good character"."<br /><br />You are referring to the <b>Naturalization</b> Act of 1790. It didn't apply to those negroes who were already citizens of the various states, or to anyone who was already a citizen by virtue of having been born in this country. It also didn't apply to the populations of states such as Texas, which already contained lots of mestizos when it joined the Union. Those non-whites automatically became citizens when Texas acquired statehood. It only applied to immigrants who were seeking to be naturalized as a citizen of the USA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-26406907638526313752017-03-27T18:19:16.721-07:002017-03-27T18:19:16.721-07:00"They didn't write that because they thou..."They didn't write that because they thought that it was obvious and didn't imagine future generations importing third worlders. "<br /><br />Nope.<br /><br />"It has been often asserted that the Constitution was made exclusively by and for the white race. It has already been shown that in five of the thirteen original States, colored persons then possessed the elective franchise, and were among those by whom the Constitution was ordained and established. If so, it is not true, in point of fact, that the Constitution was made exclusively by the white race. And that it was made exclusively for the white race is, in my opinion, not only an assumption not warranted by anything in the Constitution, but contradicted by its opening declaration, that it was ordained and established by the people of the United States, for themselves and their posterity. And as free colored persons were then citizens of at least five States, and so in every sense part of the people of the United States, they were among those for whom and whose posterity the Constitution was ordained and established. "<br />-Justice Curtis, opinion in dissent, in Dred Scott v. SandfordAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-59413314695840747152017-03-27T17:31:13.854-07:002017-03-27T17:31:13.854-07:00Social Privilege vs Genetic Privilege
White folks ...Social Privilege vs Genetic Privilege<br />White folks are indeed privileged. And it's about time race-ists admitted it. <br /><br />White people really are privileged with genetic traits that give them an advantage over others in certain areas.<br /><br />This privilege was bestowed on whites by evolution and nature. It is genetic. Whites can't do anything about it since it's inborn. <br /><br />It's like blacks are privileged when it comes to sprinting, jumping, and punching. No matter how much blacks apologize for their genetic privilege in athletics, they will run faster than others. They can't help themselves.<br />A black guy, upon winning the sprinting competition, can say he's sorry, mope about about it, and speak in favor of sports-equality. But in the next race, he will beat other races once again due to his genetic privilege that makes him faster than other races. <br /><br />Likewise, Ashkenazi Jews are genetically privileged with higher IQ. Evolution made them that way. So, no matter how many times Jews apologize for this genetic privilege/advantage and no matter how badly they may feel about it(or may try to deny it), they are going to outperform gentiles, particularly blacks, in academic endeavors. <br /><br />Nature is all about genetic privileges. Just look at birds. They got wings, so they are privileged in flight, something most animals cannot do. Look at fish. They got fins and gills, and that means they are privileged to thrive in water. Even a dumb shark has great advantage over a smart human in water because genetic privilege makes shark master over man.<br /><br />Genetic privileging is what nature is all about. Without these natural privileges, organisms wouldn't have their niche advantages that allow them to survive. Turtles may be slow, but they are privileged with shells that offer them protection. Thus, their chance of survival is improved. A skunk isn't big or fast, but it is privileged with musk odor that can send predators running. Imagine a 'progressive' animal speaking ill of a turtle for its shell-privilege and of a skunk for its stink-privilege. <br /><br />Different organisms have different privileges. <br /><br />Likewise, different races have different genetic privileges that persist even when social privileges are removed from society. <br />Sometimes, social privileges and genetic privileges may be aligned. Suppose there is a social law in America that says ONLY BLACKS can play in NBA or NFL. So, blacks would be socially privileged in sports and totally monopolize both sports. But suppose other races denounce this privilege and call for end of such privileges. But will the change of policy really change the sports scene all that much? NO, because black genetic privilege in sports will remain despite the removal of social privilege. So, even as some whites who are exceptionally good might make it into NBA and NFL, both leagues will remain predominantly black, and there is fat chance of Asian, Mexican, Hindu, or Arab getting in. <br /><br />This is the problem with blacks and academics. It is true that blacks were effectively denied entry into many intellectual institutions that once socially privileged whites. But even once those social privileges were removed, white genetic privilege in brain power remained effectively in play. <br />In contrast, the removal of social privilege for whites in sports had a huge impact since blacks have natural genetic privilege in athletics. So, change in social policy led to huge changes in sports based on biological factors. <br /><br />If people understood the concept of social privilege vs genetic privilege better, they wouldn't be so confused and partial to PC.Midgardianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13696107904800668193noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-1051029626614588052017-03-27T17:30:39.470-07:002017-03-27T17:30:39.470-07:00Sure have, and it's why we're well on the ...Sure have, and it's why we're well on the way to the sequel. This is how antinomies are resolved - one or the other triumphs. That's why race equality and gender equality and all the other equality movements conclude by declaring themselves equal to the oppressor through oppression. <br /><br />- TiredAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-58854213892579167952017-03-27T16:57:32.679-07:002017-03-27T16:57:32.679-07:00The writers of the Constitution did not consider t...The writers of the Constitution did not consider the negro to be "man" nor of "the people". They were not people. They were farm animals.<br /><br />(Same with the red skins. They were savages, ignorant and really stupid. They never invented the wheel, forged steel, etc. In the lake Superior region was the world's largest copper deposits. In Michigan? The world's largest Iron deposits.......)<br /><br />If anything, they were 3/5 "man". (They were being generous)CENTURIONnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-6259137076323293402017-03-27T16:41:52.577-07:002017-03-27T16:41:52.577-07:00Since you mentioned liberals that almost call Thom...Since you mentioned liberals that almost call Thomas Jefferson a twoface liar bastard Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63363023414728556082017-03-27T16:39:08.215-07:002017-03-27T16:39:08.215-07:00Just a 21st century DNA test Just a 21st century DNA test Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-50586269369874548552017-03-27T08:28:43.980-07:002017-03-27T08:28:43.980-07:00Nope.
The rights of the Constitution are guarante...<b>Nope.<br /><br />The rights of the Constitution are guaranteed to "the people", not any particular race. Note well that the Founders could have written "applies to white men only" into the Constitution, but didn't.</b><br /><br />They didn't write that because they thought that it was obvious and didn't imagine future generations importing third worlders. <br /><br />Their laws involving tribes disprove the belief that the constitution was supposed to apply to any person within the US.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-74295807354264279272017-03-27T04:54:38.375-07:002017-03-27T04:54:38.375-07:00It's an uphill battle now, but do everything y...It's an uphill battle now, but do everything you personally can, each and every day, to segregate your life from the North American Pavement Apes.<br /><br />They must be isolated, then removed. Peacefully, if possible.<br /><br />We're well into Stage One.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com