tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post8903886371806622577..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: Black People + Southern Poverty = Violence in Montgomery?Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger90125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-36341873566924567482011-11-14T19:59:08.390-08:002011-11-14T19:59:08.390-08:00I am hardly making excuses for or downplaying the ...I am hardly making excuses for or downplaying the guilt of the growing menace of black crime, just notice the severity of it it certain places and not as much others(while keeping in mind the naturally higher occurrence of criminal behavior of blacks in general).<br /><br />I would like to point out how easy one could fake a black profile on a social networking site and use it to rile up the animal inside other real blacks that one could befriend online over time, also to steer them into certain directed actions after bringing out the ape in them.<br /><br />I would keep my eyes out for a hidden hand in guiding some of the flash mob attacks and other jungle-land eruptions around the nation.<br /><br />Just sayin'Grim Jimnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-54852889185001626672011-11-13T10:27:34.938-08:002011-11-13T10:27:34.938-08:00Anonymous (November 12, 2011 5:34 PM): You keep at...<b>Anonymous</b> (November 12, 2011 5:34 PM): <i>You keep attacking strawmen.</i><br /><br /><i>The <a href="http://mywebsite.com" rel="nofollow">Straw Man</a> is a type of Red Herring because the arguer is attempting to refute his opponent's position, and in the context is required to do so, but instead attacks a position—the "straw man"—not held by his opponent. In a Straw Man argument, the arguer argues to a conclusion that denies the "straw man" he has set up, but misses the target. There may be nothing wrong with the argument presented by the arguer when it is taken out of context, that is, it may be a perfectly good argument against the straw man. It is only because the burden of proof is on the arguer to argue against the opponent's position that a Straw Man fallacy is committed. So, the fallacy is not simply the argument, but the entire situation of the argument occurring in such a context.</i><br /><br />How is it a red herring to insist upon accuracy when identifying the historical roots of Political Correctness?<br /><br />How is it a strawman argument to note that the Obama administration is actively implementing Political Correctness in America in a manner similar to that of the Soviet style?<br /><br /><b>Anonymous</b> (November 11, 2011 7:58 PM) asserted that:<br /><br /><i>"The most favored kind of anti-Americanism is what is exported from the US media and academia. The origins of the tactics may lie in antiquity, but the talking points are made in the USA.</i><br /><br />There is nothing antique about ― or obfuscatory upon my part in noting how ― Obama and the MSM so heartily embrace Communism and all of its Politically Correct trappings.<br /><br />The so-called American brand of anti-Americanism being alluded to is nothing but pure, dyed-in-the-wool Soviet style disinformation complete with the sanitizing, bias, code speech and every other grand tradition of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/07/31/world/russia-s-purveyor-of-truth-pravda-dies-after-84-years.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm" rel="nofollow">Pravda</a>. It may march under the new banner of "Social Justice" but it is not one whit different from the unproductive, murderous and totalitarian Communism of old.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-13775958501202036652011-11-13T10:01:25.025-08:002011-11-13T10:01:25.025-08:00There are similar instances happening in Britain w...There are similar instances happening in Britain where members of the anti-shari’a EDL (English Defense League) have been placed in prisons with high populations of Muslim prisoners. We have already seen attempts to stifle Freedom of Speech and expression here in America as well. New Jersey Transit worker <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/09/bonfire-of-lawbooks.html" rel="nofollow">Derek Fenton</a> was fired from his job of eleven years after burning pages from a Koran during a peaceful demonstration commemorating the 9-11 atrocity. Destroying a person’s livelihood is just as effective as imprisoning someone. Fortunately, Fenton was reinstated by court order but what do you think his chances for advancement at his job are now?<br /><br />US Attorney General Eric “My People” Holder has essentially refused to investigate charges of <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/08/eric-holder-vs-nation-of-cowards.html" rel="nofollow">blatant voter intimidation by Black Panthers</a> at a Philadelphia precinct. This represents a legal enforcement of the “only Whites can be racist” mentality that pervades Liberal thought.<br /><br />Notice how the vast majority of MSM coverage concerning Mahogany Mobs and flash robs are sanitized of all references to race? Are you aware of what happened when <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/10/molly-norris-moment-for-juan-williams.html" rel="nofollow">Juan Williams</a> spoke honestly about Muslims? Here is what he said:<br /><br /><i>“It’s an honest experience that when I’m in an airport and I see people who are in Muslim garb who identify themselves first and foremost as Muslims... I have a moment of anxiety or fear, given what happened on 9/11 -- that’s just a reality,” he says. Juan Williams stands by his comments that he’s afraid of Muslims in an airport -- even though he was fired as an NPR analyst Wednesday for expressing those thoughts. “It’s an honest experience that when I’m in an airport and I see people who are in Muslim garb who identify themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I do a double take. I have a moment of anxiety or fear, given what happened on 9/11--that’s just a reality,” Williams said Thursday on the Fox News Channel, where he also regularly appears as a talking head.<br /><br /><b>Williams said he was fired without talking to his bosses face-to-face, despite the fact that he’d been at the company for 10 years.</b></i> [emphasis added]<br /><br />How about the Office of Residence Life Diversity Education Training document from the <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=44291" rel="nofollow">University of Delaware</a> where students were told:<br /><br /><i>"A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. 'The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, <b>people of color cannot be racists</b>, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….'" <br /><br />The education program also notes that <b>"reverse racism" is "a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege</b>." And "a non-racist" is called "a non-term," because, the program explains, "The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called 'blaming the victim')."</i> [emphasis added]<br /><br />This is nothing short of <i>institutionalized newspeak</i> and woe betides the tenure of any academic at the University of Delaware if they act in a contrary manner.<br /><br />Given the nature of these instances, I think it is quite safe to say that the current administration and its MSM cheerleaders are pointing America in the exact same direction as Europe.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-9661093896505328832011-11-13T10:00:45.274-08:002011-11-13T10:00:45.274-08:00mpresley: I do not believe that I've contradic...<b>mpresley</b>: <i>I do not believe that I've contradicted myself. The difference between "PC" in the US and what happened during Soviet Communism is marked. In the Soviet Union, one could very well lose life, and often wound up in prison for incorrect speech.</i><br /><br />Believe as you wish but Political Correctness has one goal and one goal only; the enforcement of a totalitarian system. Please consider reading up on <a href="http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-prin.html" rel="nofollow">newspeak</a>: <i>(strongly suggested for all at SBPDL)</i><br /><br /><i>To give a single example - The word free still existed in Newspeak, but could only be used in such statements as "The dog is free from lice" or "This field is free from weeds." It could not be used in its old sense of "politically free" or "intellectually free," since political and intellectual freedom no longer existed even as concepts, and were therefore of necessity nameless. Quite apart from the suppression of definitely heretical words, reduction of vocabulary was regarded as an end in itself, and no word that could be dispensed with was allowed to survive. <b>Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought</b>, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.</i> [emphasis added]<br /><br />Politically Correct speech and newspeak are essentially identical. They both seek to constrain thought and have the explicit intention of combating thoughtcrime. SBPDL addresses this issue directly and on a daily basis.<br /><br />No better example of this exists than the way that racism has become such a hot button issue. Look at how Muslims constantly, and quite successfully, play the race card <i>when Islam is not even a race</i>.<br /><br />It is not just in the Soviet Union of old where a person could lose their life for politically incorrect speech and thought. There are emerging cases of this in the European Union.<br /><br />Consider the case of Dutch cartoonist <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/05/sacrificing-free-speech-at-altar-of.html" rel="nofollow">Gregorius Nekschot</a>:<br /><br /><i>Gregorius Nekschot was arrested last week [May 2008] and kept in custody for 30 hours for cartoons that are “discriminatory against Muslims and people of darker skin”, as the Public Prosecutor’s Office (OM) in Amsterdam put it. <b>Nekschot (‘Neck Shot’) has confirmed reports that around 10 police dragged him out of his home in Amsterdam, seized his computer and telephone and told him his real name would be revealed.<br /><br />The arrest was particularly remarkable because it followed a complaint dating from 2005. The complaint was made at the time by Abdul Jabbar van de Ven, a Dutch convert to radical Islam. After the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, he said on TV he would thank Allah if he could arrange for MP Geert Wilders to die, “for example of cancer”.</b></i> [emphasis is original]<br /><br />Got that? The police “told him his real name would be revealed”, which could easily result in the cartoonist’s death at the hands of a Muslim terrorist, just like what happened to Theo van Gogh.<br /><br />[to be continued]Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-51104517470185973342011-11-12T17:34:07.562-08:002011-11-12T17:34:07.562-08:00Zenster: "To assert that it originated in Ame...Zenster: "To assert that it originated in America suggests that it is some sort of predictable outgrowth of a Capitalistic free market economy when nothing could be farther from the truth."<br /><br />"Communism is alive and well today, even to the point of residing in America's Oval Office."<br /><br />You keep attacking strawmen. Oh well, I'm with Robert Marchenoir. No more attempts for me as well. Back to Joe Paterno.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-43306061389594968642011-11-12T13:32:20.209-08:002011-11-12T13:32:20.209-08:00Congratulations upon managing to contradict yourse...<i>Congratulations upon managing to contradict yourself in just one (albeit run-on), sentence.</i><br /><br />My sentence was grammatically correct. A run on sentence conjoins two or more distinct independent clauses that are not fixed properly, either with a comma or semicolon. <br /><br />In any case, when writing within the context of a combo box on a blog, no one should be too concerned over grammar or spelling since people often type quickly, and editing is not often convenient.<br /><br />I do not believe that I've contradicted myself. The difference between "PC" in the US and what happened during Soviet Communism is marked. In the Soviet Union, one could very well lose life, and often wound up in prison for incorrect speech.<br /><br />Here in the US, PC is mostly a social convention. One will not go to jail for criticizing Negroes, or any other group, although one may lose a job. As I mentioned, this is likely changing, and in another generation it would not surprise me to find that wrong speech is deemed criminal.<br /><br />I am posting under a screen name since you may have confused me with another anonymous poster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-5548835677391618752011-11-12T09:42:21.773-08:002011-11-12T09:42:21.773-08:00Anonymous: Political correctness is a misnomer in ...<b>Anonymous</b>: <i>Political correctness is a misnomer in a way, since it mostly subsumes social correctness, and is not an outright political manifestation, but this may be changing. In any case, it is certainly different from what happened in the Soviet Union, where the regime was offended if one thought differently than what one was told.</i><br /><br />Congratulations upon managing to contradict yourself in just one (albeit run-on), sentence.<br /><br />You first assert that Political Correctness "is not an outright political manifestation" and then, just as quickly note how "the [Soviet] regime was offended if one thought differently than what one was told."<br /><br />How is the Soviet version any different than America's legally enforced "hate speech" laws? Both target thoughtcrime and seek to impose a conformity of opinion in total opposition to the rights granted by America's Constitution.<br /><br /><i>Here, in the US, the regime is rather removed from it all, and the social repercussions from "PC" thought are the main enforcement to correctness.</i><br /><br />Again, nothing could be farther from the truth. You are totally mistaken in asserting that, "the [Obama] regime is rather removed from it all". Obama is actively pushing for implementation of shari'a compliant anti-blasphemy laws that would prohibit criticism of Islam. If that isn't having a direct hand in steering Political Correctness, I don't know what is.<br /><br />Yes, American Liberals are such marionettes of Communist doctrine that they actively participate in socially enforcing Politically Correct doctrine. Look no further than Yale University's publication of a book about the <i>Jyllands-Posten</i> Mohammad cartoons <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/12/disgrace-yale-removes-mohammed-cartoons-from-book-about-mohammed-cartoons/" rel="nofollow">that does not contain images of the actual cartoons themselves</a>.<br /><br />However, both Republicans, such as Lindsey "<a href="http://vimeo.com/22053514" rel="nofollow">Jackass</a>" Graham and countless Democratic Party members actively support completely unlawful restrictions upon our Constitutional right to Free Speech. <br /><br /><i>However this is changing, and in another generation it may be quite political.</i><br /><br />It already has changed and it already is thoroughly political. You are well behind the times.<br /><br /><i>We find both social and political manifestations of PC in the UK, and also to a lesser degree in Germany, the latter where if one speaks of certain minority members and their recent history in a questionable or revisionist manner one may wind up in jail.</i><br /><br />Europe is much farther down the rabbit hole than America. Doesn't that seem to contradict the supposed American origins of Political Correctness? Europe's proximity to Soviet Russia and general subscription to Socialism made it far more fertile ground for Communists to till. After all, the Frankfurt School <i>was</i> founded in Germany.<br /><br />On a final and cheerfully ironic note, the famous bust of <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/38/Chemnitz_Karl-Marx-Monument_2010_2.jpg" rel="nofollow">Karl Marx</a> in Chemnitz (near Dresden, Germany), now has McDonald's for a neighbor.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-15376924972518698022011-11-12T08:54:59.663-08:002011-11-12T08:54:59.663-08:00Anonymous (November 11, 2011 7:58 PM):A lot of lib...<b>Anonymous</b> (November 11, 2011 7:58 PM):<i>A lot of liberal agitprop is actually imported from the US. The most favored kind of anti-Americanism is what is exported from the US media and academia.</i><br /><br />None of which changes the critical aspect of identifying the true fountainhead of Political Correctness. To assert that it originated in America suggests that it is some sort of predictable outgrowth of a Capitalistic free market economy when nothing could be farther from the truth.<br /><br /><i>The origins of the tactics may lie in antiquity, but the talking points are made in the USA.</i><br /><br />They do not "lie in antiquity", in fact, far from it. Communism is alive and well today, even to the point of residing in America's Oval Office. Our world has yet to remotely comprehend the incalculable amount of death and destruction that Communism brought about and continues to cause.<br /><br />The reality of Soviet Communism is that it was a Totalitarian kleptocracy. Many people in this world remain deluded that Communism is a viable alternative form of government. Again, nothing could be farther from the truth. <br /><br />It is much the same with Islam and shari'a law. Like Communism it is highly dysfunctional and between the two of them they have caused <i>hundreds of millions of deaths</i>, with Islam leading in the count.<br /><br />People have yet to realize just how evil Communism really is, or else Obama would not be able to talk about any redistribution of wealth without being treated to the public scorn and disdain he so obviously deserves.<br /><br /><i>It's unfair to level a charge of anti-Americanism against Robert, because I can tell you that when we expats have to defend our country in spirited debate overseas, we find that our rear flank is where we are attacked most frequently.</i><br /><br />So long as he voluntarily spreads such disinformation, that tag will stick. I have invited him to ackknowledge the erroneous nature of his statement. He has yet to act upon that invitation, let alone admit that his only resort was to stoop to <i>ad hominem</i> attacks instead of structured, fact-based rebuttal.<br /><br />Again, it is vital to ensure that people everywhere make an immediate connection between Political Correctness and Totalitarianism. Yes, America's MSM is a lapdog of this world's Communist apparatus and for that they deserve nothing but the back of every freedom loving patriot's hand.<br /><br />Obscuring the true wellspring of Political Correctness is to imbue it with some sort of free-floating pedigree that wrongfully conceals its deep seated roots in one of the world's most disgraceful political abattoirs.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-81484808907385633632011-11-12T04:54:30.180-08:002011-11-12T04:54:30.180-08:00Political correctness is a misnomer in a way, sinc...Political correctness is a misnomer in a way, since it mostly subsumes social correctness, and is not an outright political manifestation, but this may be changing. In any case, it is certainly different from what happened in the Soviet Union, where the regime was offended if one thought differently than what one was told.<br /><br />Here, in the US, the regime is rather removed from it all, and the social repercussions from "PC" thought are the main enforcement to correctness. However this is changing, and in another generation it may be quite political.<br /><br />We find both social <b>and</b> political manifestations of PC in the UK, and also to a lesser degree in Germany, the latter where if one speaks of certain minority members and their recent history in a questionable or revisionist manner one may wind up in jail.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-75957373943609554102011-11-11T19:58:29.947-08:002011-11-11T19:58:29.947-08:00"I think research would show that Political C..."I think research would show that Political Correctness originated in the United States, then spread pretty much all over the Western world."<br /><br />Zenster, I live outside the US, and many conservative Americans I've encountered overseas feel the same way as Robert Marchenoir. A lot of liberal agitprop is actually imported from the US. The most favored kind of anti-Americanism is what is exported from the US media and academia. The origins of the tactics may lie in antiquity, but the talking points are made in the USA.<br /><br />It's unfair to level a charge of anti-Americanism against Robert, because I can tell you that when we expats have to defend our country in spirited debate overseas, we find that our rear flank is where we are attacked most frequently.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-35034693291385019992011-11-11T15:27:49.383-08:002011-11-11T15:27:49.383-08:00Robert Marchenoir: ...what you are showing is your...<b>Robert Marchenoir</b>: <i>...what you are showing is your utterly paranoid, self-centered, pedantic, arrogant and chauvinistic turn of mind, which leads you to huge errors of judgement.</i><br /><br />Which you just as casually neglect to itemize. We are all supposed to take such an unsubstantiated assertion at face value despite a total lack of supporting evidence.<br /><br /><i>If anything, I have a strong pro-American bias.</i><br /><br />Then please demonstrate it by acknowledging your erroneous statement that:<br /><br /><i>I think research would show that Political Correctness originated in the United States, then spread pretty much all over the Western world.</i><br /><br />I have provided extensive fact-based evidence for my conclusions. You have not. Instead, you respond with an <i>ad hominem</i> attack upon me that is bereft of any links, cites or references.<br /><br />So be it.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-37874176786415802762011-11-11T13:54:01.864-08:002011-11-11T13:54:01.864-08:00Hmmm... That's what I thought, Zenster. There&...Hmmm... That's what I thought, Zenster. There's no use trying to have an honest, straightforward and relaxed discussion with you. Tried it elsewhere, tried it once more, does not work. Lesson learned. There will be no more attempts.<br /><br />Just for your information, though. By saying : <br /><br /><i>"Your anti-Americanism is showing",</i><br /><br />...what <i>you</i> are showing is your utterly paranoid, self-centered, pedantic, arrogant and chauvinistic turn of mind, which leads you to <i>huge</i> errors of judgement.<br /><br />If anything, I have a strong pro-American bias. I get spat on daily all over the non-American blogosphere on such an indictment. <br /><br />Not that this leaning of mine has been fed in the least by obnoxious and infatuated individuals such as yourself, mind you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-11518870396049027832011-11-11T12:26:07.393-08:002011-11-11T12:26:07.393-08:00Of additional interest and highly germane to SBPDL...Of additional interest and highly germane to SBPDL are these passages from "<a href="http://torontonews.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/roots-of-political-correctness/" rel="nofollow">The Historical Roots of 'Political Correctness'</a>":<br /><br /><i><b>As a grand scheme intended to deny the intrinsic worth of white, heterosexual males</b>, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. </i>Leon Trotsky<i> <b>believed that oppressed blacks could be the vanguard of a communist revolution in North America. He denounced white workers who were prejudiced against blacks and instructed them to unite with the blacks in revolution</b>. Trotsky’s ideas were adopted by many of the student leaders of the 1960s counterculture movement, who attempted to elevate the black revolutionaries to positions of leadership in their movement.<br /><br />The student revolutionaries were also strongly influenced by the ideas of </i>Herbert Marcuse<i>, another member of the Frankfurt School. </i>Marcuse<i> preached the “Great Refusal,” a rejection of all basic Western concepts, sexual liberation and the merits of feminist and black revolutions. <b>His primary thesis was that university students, ghetto blacks, the alienated, the asocial, and the Third World could take the place of the proletariat in the Communist revolution.</b> In his book, An Essay on Liberation, Marcuse proclaimed his goals of a radical transvaluation of values; the relaxation of taboos, cultural subversion; Critical Theory; and a linguistic rebellion that would amount to a methodical reversal of meaning. <b>As for racial conflict, Marcuse wrote that white men are guilty and that <a href="http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2007/03/28/the-harold-rosenthal-interview-part-4/" rel="nofollow">blacks are the most natural force of rebellion</a></b>.</i> [all emphasis from original article]Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-22365996504748302812011-11-11T12:08:24.953-08:002011-11-11T12:08:24.953-08:00Robert Marchenoir: Are you really making a differe...<b>Robert Marchenoir</b>: <i>Are you really making a difference between two ideologies [Liberals and Marxists] there, Zenster?</i><br /><br />Yes, and for very valid reasons. Marxists seek a total dissolution of Capitalist free market economies along with the Democratic institutions that often bracket them.<br /><br />There are many Liberals who’re nowhere near as rabid in their dislike for these same institutions. In fact, true Classical Liberals ― the original source of modern Liberalism ― were often in major agreement with these Western traditions.<br /><br /><i>I'm highly doubtful of this [that Political Correctness originated in the Soviet Union]. I don't think the Soviets made a huge fuss over such things as anti-racism, "fighting prejudices and stereotypes", "inclusiveness", gay "marriage", "gender studies", "not offending other people's sensitivities" or caring about the environment.</i><br /><br />You clearly don’t understand the obscene versatility of Political Correctness.<br /><br />It both enabled the Soviet regime to disenfranchise individuals who refused to toe the line of Communist conformity, and proved a highly useful tactic for instituting self-imposed and self-enforced limits upon Free Speech among Communist Russia's most powerful enemies. <br /><br />Talk about a win-win solution!<br /><br />While, technically, the roots of Political Correctness can be traced to the Frankfurt School, its practical birth and full implementation happened in the Soviet Union. <i>In fact the Frankfurt School was modeled on Moscow’s Marx Engles Institute.</i><br /><br />It’s also quite revealing that the Frankfurt School’s original name was, "The Institute for Marxism". In reality, its true name was "The Institute for Social Research", as deft a bit of Politically Correct obfuscation as one might ever hope to see from Germany's budding Communists. <br /><br /><i><b>To this day, Russia is one of the less politically-correct nations in the world</b>, and it has not been a complete reversal from Communist times. Russians are ethnically proud, they don't mind being overtly racist towards their small black minority, they endorse manly values, etc.</i> [emphasis added]<br /><br />I suggest you read "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" and "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn before continuing to spout such nonsense. As I’ve already noted, Political Correctness is the Swiss Army Knife of <i>apparatchiki</i> and subversives alike.<br /><br /><i>I think research would show that Political Correctness originated in the United States, then spread pretty much all over the Western world.</i><br /><br />Your anti-Americanism is showing. Please view "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaBpVzOohs" rel="nofollow">The History of Political Correctness</a> (22:27), before continuing to delude yourself.<br /><br /><i>But did the Soviets practice Political Correctness at home? I really don't think so.</i><br /><br />Then you think wrong. From "<a href="http://torontonews.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/roots-of-political-correctness/" rel="nofollow">The Historical Roots of “Political Correctness”</a>" by author Raymond V. Raehn:<br /><br /><i>When addressing the general public, advocates of Political Correctness – or cultural Marxism, to give it its true name – present their beliefs attractively. It’s all just a matter of being “sensitive” to other people, they say. They use words such as “tolerance” and “diversity,” asking, “Why can’t we all just get along?” <b>The reality is different. Political Correctness is Not at all about ”being nice,” unless one thinks gulags are nice places. Political Correctness is Marxism, with all that implies: loss of freedom of expression, thought control, inversion of the traditional social order and, ultimately, a totalitarian state.</b> If anything, the cultural Marxism created by the Frankfurt School is more horrifying than the old, economic Marxism that ruined Russia.</i><br /><br />If that isn’t a concise description of the old Soviet regime, I don't know what is.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-14850819788516057282011-11-11T05:13:03.526-08:002011-11-11T05:13:03.526-08:00Yes, Anonymous, probably. When I'm not knowled...Yes, Anonymous, probably. When I'm not knowledgeable enough about a subject, I usually take precautions before stating something point blank.<br /><br />However, if anyone, even yourself, know of some facts supporting or unsupporting my hypothesis, he is more than welcome to share them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-13940815626272614542011-11-10T22:32:47.573-08:002011-11-10T22:32:47.573-08:00'KGB probably encouraged Leftist movements in ...'KGB probably encouraged Leftist movements in America, whose heritage morphed into Political Correctness.'<br />probably!!!!<br /><br />read "DUPES" and "Useful Idiots"<br />probably!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-6671680059855710902011-11-10T20:41:25.119-08:002011-11-10T20:41:25.119-08:00Left coast white guy.....
I would like to post a ...Left coast white guy.....<br /><br />I would like to post a correction for cap'n crunch for our European brothers and sisters reading..... The first 48 isn't a show that has the intention of showcasing black/brown crime. It is about homicide investigators attempts to get their first major clue in a homicide case within the first 48 hours. It just so happens that nearly all the homicides are commited by black/brown people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-87511116780137445172011-11-10T18:53:05.824-08:002011-11-10T18:53:05.824-08:00Anonymous (November 9, 2011 2:23 PM): Next are the...<b>Anonymous</b> (November 9, 2011 2:23 PM): <i>Next are the mainstream business Republicans. They are often rightly considered a further subset of the neoconservatives.</i><br /><br />As I noted in the "<a href="http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2011/11/black-people-southern-poverty-violence.html" rel="nofollow">Black People + Southern Poverty = Violence in Montgomery?</a>" thread:<br /><br /><i>"… this most recent generation and the past few presidential administrations represent a new breed of globalist transnational Politically Correct multiculturalists that are ― through a deliberate process of looting, malfeasance and pure greed ― quite literally, bringing America to its knees.<br /><br />This new breed knows no loyalty save to the almighty dollar and, in reality doesn't even care what shape the dollar is in. It is a profit-above-all-else mentality that disregards fair play, strangles honest competition and has no regard for the working man's quality of life.<br /><br />Nothing better exemplifies this than the obscene <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/18951094/The-Staggering-Social-Cost-of-US-Business-Leadership-August-2007" rel="nofollow">executive overcompensation</a> that is wreaking such economic havoc upon America's manufacturing base. Some examples from the linked article:</i><br />_________________________________<br /><br />• CEOs of large U.S. companies last year made as much money from just one day on the job as aver- age workers made over the entire year. These top executives averaged $10.8 million in total compensation, over 364 times the pay of the average American worker, a calculation based on data from an Associated Press survey of 386 Fortune 500 companies.<br /><br />• The private equity boom has pushed the pay ceiling for American business leaders considerably further into the economic stratosphere. The top 20 private equity and hedge fund managers,Forbes magazine estimates, pocketed an average $657.5 million, or 22,255 times the pay of an average U.S.<br />worker.<br /><br />• Workers at the bottom rung of the U.S. economy have just received the first federal minimum wage increase in a decade. But the new minimum wage of $5.85 still stands 7 percent below where the<br />minimum wage stood a decade ago in real terms. CEO pay, over that same decade, has increased by<br />roughly 45 percent.<br />________________________________<br /><br /><i>Moreover, unlike the robber barons of old, this new breed of financial wizards rarely create jobs and, instead, obtain their wealth by acting as gatekeepers in the dealmaking process. Few innnovative technologies or manufacturing processes that actually create wealth are being birthed. All of this is pure poison and daily promotes conversion of America into one giant service economy. As a wag economist put it:<br /><br />You cannot base a healthy nation's economy upon giving each other haircuts.<br /><br />There is a fraternity of well-connected good old boys whose crony Capitalism is bleeding America white and spiraling us down towards the status of a Third World nation. A goal which coincides perfectly with those of Liberals and Marxists alike.</i><br /><br />That should suffice with respect to "mainstream business Republicans". Eh?Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-46170128857376462402011-11-10T18:52:21.423-08:002011-11-10T18:52:21.423-08:00Anonymous (November 9, 2011 2:23 PM): If we are t...<b>Anonymous</b> (November 9, 2011 2:23 PM): <i>If we are to "name names," then we can start with those whose immediate plan is to encourage Majority dispossession. Here we find a large strain of Christians, especially the Catholic Church, and many Protestant denominations, too. They have embraced what they consider a Christian universalism to the exclusion of white interests.</i><br /><br />I am obliged to agree. Due to the enormous persuasive power enjoyed by established Christian churches in America, they have been able to exert a disproportionate amount of influence on what had once been a bastion of conservative values.<br /><br />This "universalism" nonsense is not just suicidal but flies in the face of Jesus' own teachings.<br /><br />In my own personal view, it is a fool's errand to extend human rights to those parties who most aggressively seek to violate them. Islam being a prime example of this.<br /><br />Likewise, showing mercy to the merciless or respect for the disrespectful amounts to nothing more or less than <i>tolerating the intolerable</i>.<br /><br />As Barry Goldwater once said:<br /><br /><i>"Extremism in the defense of normalcy is no vice, and moderation in the pursuit of <b>tolerating the intolerable is no virtue</b>."</i> [emphasis added]<br /><br /><b>Anonymous</b> (November 9, 2011 2:23 PM): <i>Next we may include most liberal Jewish elites, who fear white nationalism, and perpetuate their secular mythologies to the distress of Nordic and Anglo whites.</i><br /><br />My agreement with this has forced me to being a careful recalibration of my support for Israel and Jewish causes. <br /><br />It's safe to say that a vast majority of American Jews are pro-Israel. That being the case, they should then display a modicum of gratitude and loyalty for America's, until recently, unwavering support for the Israeli state.<br /><br />The advocay of Liberal Jews for unlimited immigration and other measures that are deconstructing traditional American culture represents a deep and abiding hypocrisy. It can be summed up thusly:<br /><br />"<i><b>Ethno-state for me but not for thee.</b></i>"<br /><br />American Jews had best start paying close attention to how Liberal causes are eroding White America and, therefore, the massive base of support which that represents with respect to Israel.<br /><br />I, for one, will not tolerate such continued subversion of White American culture by a group whose very existence was bought with hundreds of thousands of World War II casualties.<br /><br /><i>Whatever their stripe, neoconservatives believe Israel is the undeclared 51st state, and believe that foreign policy should promote the expansion of the American empire.</i><br /><br />If neoconservatives wish to be taken seriously, they had best abandon their role a cheerleaders for the Republican Party and demonstrate genuine support for real Conservative values regardless of partisanship.<br /><br />There is so little difference between the Republican and Democratic parties that America is now a one party system of the almighty dollar.<br /><br /><i>Another group are the educational elite. Typically atheists, in spite of their sometimes religious-ethnic background, they hold sway over confused youth, and preach white hatred. They are steeped in neo-Marxist materialist thinking, and politically usually vote Democrat.</i><br /><br />These academic elite, along with the MSM, represent one of the most dire long term threats to America's overall health. I still maintain that Islam is the larger short term threat.<br /><br />However, as many have noted, if anything, Liberal Cultural Marxists are the HIV/AIDS auto-immune system dysfunction that is allowing America's body politic to be attacked by the opportunistic virus of Islam.<br /><br />[to be continued]Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-55180283382381371762011-11-10T17:02:11.317-08:002011-11-10T17:02:11.317-08:00For all of you speculating on the origins of polit...For all of you speculating on the origins of political correctness, watch this video made in the 1990s by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaBpVzOohs" rel="nofollow">William Lind.</a> It is 20 minutes long and worth your time. It is an excellent documentary tracing the origins of what we call PC to the time of World War 1.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-55327565495617350512011-11-10T16:27:59.038-08:002011-11-10T16:27:59.038-08:00"A goal which coincides perfectly with those ...<i>"A goal which coincides perfectly with those of Liberals and Marxists alike."</i><br /><br />Are you really making a difference between two ideologies there, Zenster ? And if so, what is it ?<br /><br /><i>"Political Correctness originated in the Soviet Union."</i><br /><br />I'm highly doubtful of this. I don't think the Soviets made a huge fuss over such things as anti-racism, "fighting prejudices and stereotypes", "inclusiveness", gay "marriage", "gender studies", "not offending other people's sensitivities" or caring about the environment. <br /><br />They did not promote mass immigration of Africans into the USSR, even if they entertained a body of foreign students, mainly for diplomatic reasons.<br /><br />They ruthlessly fought Muslims in Afghanistan.<br /><br />To this day, Russia is one of the less politically-correct nations in the world, and it has not been a complete reversal from Communist times. Russians are ethnically proud, they don't mind being overtly racist towards their small black minority, they endorse manly values, etc.<br /><br />I think research would show that Political Correctness originated in the United States, then spread pretty much all over the Western world.<br /><br />It certainly has links to Marxism, but it's a different beast, further down the line of ideological evolution.<br /><br />The KGB probably encouraged Leftist movements in America, whose heritage morphed into Political Correctness.<br /><br />But did the Soviets practice Political Correctness at home ? I really don't think so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-70847952157506098032011-11-10T06:36:24.123-08:002011-11-10T06:36:24.123-08:00For our readers outside the USA, "the first 4...For our readers outside the USA, "the first 48" is a television show on "A&E" channel here in the states. It is a no-nonsense documentary about black crime and criminals.It is a REALITY show. All of the crimes are REAL, as are the detectives and police that try to solve them. I highly suggest watching this program, as it showcases the reality of black/brown criminality.Cap'n Crunchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-36718334576387199502011-11-09T14:23:32.653-08:002011-11-09T14:23:32.653-08:00If we are to "name names," then we can s...If we are to "name names," then we can start with those whose immediate plan is to encourage Majority dispossession. Here we find a large strain of Christians, especially the Catholic Church, and many Protestant denominations, too. They have embraced what they consider a Christian universalism to the exclusion of white interests.<br /><br />Next we may include most liberal Jewish elites, who fear white nationalism, and perpetuate their secular mythologies to the distress of Nordic and Anglo whites. They are active in the media by pushing miscegenation, and consider Israel first, even as they are American citizens. They usually consider any criticism as anti-semitism. The most prominant example are the ADL, but that is because they are just the most obnoxious. In America, these folks are mostly liberal Democrat voters.<br /><br />We must also mention the neoconservatives. This group is often considered a subset of the former, but it cannot be taken too literally because many are not Jewish at all. Some are passionate Christians, such as Ann Coulter or Sean Hannity, while others are Mormons, like Glenn Beck and Mitt Romney. Whatever their stripe, neoconservatives believe Israel is the undeclared 51st state, and believe that foreign policy should promote the expansion of the American empire. They are usually not thought of in terms of domestic policy, but if you scratch the surface, they are all mostly Lincolnian Republicans.<br /><br />Another group are the educational elite. Typically atheists, in spite of their sometimes religious-ethnic background, they hold sway over confused youth, and preach white hatred. They are steeped in neo-Marxist materialist thinking, and politically usually vote Democrat.<br /><br />Next are the mainstream business Republicans. They are often rightly considered a further subset of the neoconservatives. In their business interests they are not always pro-Negro, but certainly pro-brown, especially if they are associated with agri-business.<br /><br />Also we may identify the libertarians, whose nominalistic, individualized and personal-atomic philosophy runs counter to anything traditional, such as the legitimate group interest of whites. These folks are usually youngsters taken with the pseudo-Nietzscheian writings of Ayn Rand, and are both idealistically and naively anti-racial in their general outlook.<br /><br />This is just a beginning overview, but it is a start.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-78500279204004712622011-11-09T13:36:30.498-08:002011-11-09T13:36:30.498-08:00"FBI claims that white percentage of serial k..."FBI claims that white percentage of serial killers isn't likely to be any greater than white percentage of society, serial murder has a reputation of being a white male thing."<br /><br />Serial killing involves forethought, passion and attention to detail. "Normal" killing involves impulses, rage and access to weapons. That's why its a white male "thing". The blacks are too stupid to get away with it.<br /><br />Serial killer is just a term used by detectives to cover that police are useless for preventing determined criminals. They're only good at catching negros that shoot someone for stepping on their Nikes in front of 10 witnesses, a security camera and drop their own wallet when running away.YTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-59940138008620919462011-11-09T13:25:40.794-08:002011-11-09T13:25:40.794-08:00"To Zenster and the others of like mind: to a..."To Zenster and the others of like mind: to argue that "Cultural Marxism" is the problem conflates cause with effect. It is as if some believe that there is a disembodied idea floating around that somehow infects and influences others.<br /><br />It is better, instead, to criticize those who are responsible for the idea."<br /><br />Agreed but when you name them some people on the fence tune out. Like when Neo took the red-pill and realized the truth all at once, his body rejected it and he barfed. One step at a time. First you realize there is a matrix...most of us here probably have. The sinister plot and individuals behind it falls out of the scope of things black people do or do not like.YTnoreply@blogger.com