tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post1653122411263103333..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: Take a Picture: The Real Alinsky and the Fall of RochesterStuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger87125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-19199442383631547102015-10-12T22:53:41.813-07:002015-10-12T22:53:41.813-07:00You are so awesome! I do not suppose I've read...You are so awesome! I do not suppose I've read through a <br />single thing like that before. So wonderful to discover someone with some unique <br />thoughts on this subject matter. Really.. many thanks for starting this <br />up. This web site is one thing that is required on the internet,<br />someone with a bit of originality!<br /><br />Look into my blog post - <a href="http://Arwahseo.Blogspot.com/2015/09/niagapoker-agen-judi-poker-online-dan-bandar-domino-terpercaya.html" rel="nofollow">NIAGAPOKER.COM AGEN JUDI POKER ONLINE DAN BANDAR DOMINO TERPERCAYA</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41034176068601943652012-11-12T22:07:07.119-08:002012-11-12T22:07:07.119-08:00Zenster: Ten to a hundred trillion dollars in loss...Zenster: Ten to a hundred trillion dollars in losses due to 9-11? Uh-uh. If the stock market is a ponzi scheme, as I believe, then there are no real losses in stock values due to the attack on the Trade Towers. And the losses and money spent in Afghanistan and Iraq are due to the choices made by President Bush and his advisors, not Al Queda. <br /> Today, I tried to buy a new electric drill, one made in America. I couldn't find one, so I found an old guy who fixes them, if he can get parts. The export of American manufacturing has been far more costly than a few ragheads knocking down a couple buildings full of world trading cubicle rats. Not until I heard of all the cops and firemen who died did I give a shit about it. Discardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-61253247949872835292012-11-10T20:56:17.374-08:002012-11-10T20:56:17.374-08:00" crusada infinita said...
Portugal and spain..." crusada infinita said...<br />Portugal and spain were fully under muslimn control in the 1490, and the illiterate portuguese and spanish managed to chase the muslim plague out.<br /><br /><br />It was legal to KILL THEM then, it isn't now and even in combat with them over here in afghanistan we put our freedom in jeopardy if we kill one of them. Keep in mind too that even being legal to kill them it took years to get rid of the bastards. Imagine the liklihood of EVER getting rid of them in Americistan since they are a protected species, DOUBLY so being mostly black too.SKIPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-12213235362658598152012-11-10T20:04:12.061-08:002012-11-10T20:04:12.061-08:00Bogolyubski: You appear to be taking this bizarre ...<b>Bogolyubski</b>: <i>You appear to be taking this bizarre position that we should support the objectives of a treasonous and genocidal oligarchy because they are themselves afraid of their Musloid friends (who they never stop importing, by the way) because just this once they're not being lying, treasonous genocidal enemies (despite the century-long record to the contrary). At the end of the day, Musloids aren't that bright. We won't even be able to think about dealing with them until the monster which has us in its claws is defeated.</i><br /><br />Ummm … no.<br /><br />What I advocate is delivering unto Islam the Total War it so dearly loves to brag about. Leaving the entire MME (Muslim Middle East) in smoking ruins would be a good starting point.<br /><br />Sadly, nowhere does anything close to this sort of political will exist in the West. For that reason, I'm obliged to hope for some strong neutralization of the current most-active terrorist elements.<br /><br />Allowing them to fabricate or purchase nuclear weapons is in NO ONE'S interest save that of Islam. Just the loss of a few American or Western cities could bring about the sort of catastrophic economic collapse that you read about in Stephen King novels. We DO NOT need that sort of total catastrophe. Try hard to remember that radioactive soil grows food for NOBODY.<br /><br />What we NEED is to visit that sort of destruction upon our enemies. Yes, including some very harsh measures against the internal ones as well.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-72125803379657696512012-11-10T19:37:54.566-08:002012-11-10T19:37:54.566-08:00Anon (11/10, 2012 10:55 AM): Absolutely, 9-11 was ...<b>Anon</b> (11/10, 2012 10:55 AM): <i>Absolutely, 9-11 was no where close to costing us $1 trillion.</i><br /><br /><a href="http://www.iags.org/costof911.html" rel="nofollow">Counting the value of lives lost as well as property damage and lost production of goods and services, losses already exceed $100 billion. Including the loss in stock market wealth -- the market's own estimate arising from expectations of lower corporate profits and higher discount rates for economic volatility -- the price tag approaches $2 trillion. </a><br /><br />And…<br /><br /><a href="http://money.msn.com/investing/latest.aspx?post=d332081f-f177-4710-a3be-acd0d7ab9787" rel="nofollow">The U.S. launched a global war on terror after the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the most deadly strikes against domestic targets by foreigners in U.S. history. Beyond the incalculable human cost of nearly 3,000 civilian lives and the subsequent deaths of more than 6,000 soldiers, 2,300 contractors and hundreds of thousands of Afghan and Iraqi soldiers, policemen and civilians, the fateful choices made after the attacks had profound ramifications for the U.S. government and continue to be a major contributor to its fiscal woes.<br /><br />If you include both the next decade's interest payments on the debt-financed wars and future veterans' benefits, the total cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is now estimated to reach more than $5 trillion.</a><br /><br />And…<br /><br /><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/09/putting-price-tags-911-attacks/42240/" rel="nofollow">The agency by agency cost In Today's New York Times, Shan Carter and Amanda Cox gather estimates from a range of experts and breaks down the attack's fees agency by agency with a grand total of $3.3 trillion, including costs for war funding, homeland security, economic impact, veteran's care and physical damage.</a><br /><br />You know it's got to be bad when even Wikipedia agrees with you:<br /><br /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_effects_arising_from_the_September_11_attacks" rel="nofollow">The September 11 attacks also led indirectly to the U.S. war in Afghanistan, as well as additional homeland security spending. The attacks were also cited as a rationale for the Iraq war, although this rationale was discredited by intelligence organisations globally. The cost of the two wars so far has surpassed $5 trillion.</a><br /><br />Thank you for playing, please try again.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-31619787259104201892012-11-10T16:53:41.829-08:002012-11-10T16:53:41.829-08:00The only possible valid reasons for people in our ...The only possible valid reasons for people in our position to support the "Free World" (bad choice of term, Zenster, as the so-called "Free World" are totalitarian satraps of a genocidal oligarchy) is to bring about a faster collapse of the rotten totalitarian banana republic situated on the Potomac River. Remember? It's not reformable. After all, if Benny and the Feds can push the buttons to create a few trillion, why not a few hundred quintillion? Worse is better.<br /><br />If a nuke-armed Iran brings about the collapse of the treasonous and genocidal regimes and oligarchy in control of the "Free World", then we should not seriously oppose Iranian nukes. The House of Saud aren't our friends, and the Israelis have more than enough nukes to deal with the entire Ummah just by themselves. If mullahs with nukes are a real existential threat to Israel, we can be assured that Netanyahu will deal with them far more effectively than the BRA-regime of Magic Negro., as would China or even Putin - neither of whom is bound by the laws of PCMC. <br /><br />You're failing to grasp the concept of greater enemy and lesser enemy. The Muslims are fully aware of the <i>jihad of the womb</i> and are waging it quite effectively in the EUSSR's prison of nations, with the full assistance of the treasonous and genocidal elites there. The oligarchy and all of their numerous indoctrinated servants in the west work to facilitate the simultaneous destruction of whites with feminism, sports, BRA, open-borders, "free trade" and "free market" banksterism while carrying out bogus PCMC military actions to make the Ummah safe for feminism, sodomy and the Amurikan way. Quite a scam - which has roped in whites from both the "liberal" and "conservative" camps in support. The Evangelical Christians want to go bomb the hadjis while the Leftist "Social Justice" types resettle Somalian Muslims in the heartland. Both policies are utterly disastrous for us. <br /><br />You appear to be taking this bizarre position that we should support the objectives of a treasonous and genocidal oligarchy because they are themselves afraid of their Musloid friends (who they never stop importing, by the way) because just this once they're not being lying, treasonous genocidal enemies (despite the century-long record to the contrary). At the end of the day, Musloids aren't that bright. We won't even be able to think about dealing with them until the monster which has us in its claws is defeated.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-16321827240098060342012-11-10T10:55:48.835-08:002012-11-10T10:55:48.835-08:00Are you saying that the 9-11 atrocity was not a tr...<i>Are you saying that the 9-11 atrocity was not a trillion dollar "threat" to America? </i><br /><br />Absolutely, 9-11 was no where close to costing us $1 trillion. And the one solution that would have prevented 9-11 is the one thing we did not enact, namely, putting an end to muslim immigration. In fact the number of muslims in the US has doubled since 9-11. Instead we attacked Iraq. Way to go Bush and the neocons. <br /><br />As Steve Sailer has so aptly stated, conservatives under Bush and the necons enacted the policy of "invade-the-world, invite-the-world, in-hock-to-the-world". <br /><br />Not only are you guys bankrupting us with your worthless military campaigns, you are replacing the historic American population at the same time. <br /><br /><i>Yes, the demographic threat is of genuine concern. Properly enforcing our immigration laws could change much of that in a heartbeat. What our legal system cannot change is this simple fact:</i><br /><br />Demographic threat is the ONLY threat of genuine concern. How can one not see this. If we are talking about Israel, people will say "Israel must remain a Jewish state. If it loses its Jewish majority, it will cease to be a Jewish state." There is truth in that sentiment.<br /><br />If you replace the historic people of the United States with people from diverse alien cultures then you do not have the United States. You might call it the United States, and it might occupy the present territory of the United States, but it is no more the United States than Detroit of today is the city that put the world on wheels.<br /><br />Given all the discussion we have here on Detroit, I am surprised people don't understand that demographics are not just the main issue, they really are the only issue.<br /><br />And we are past the point of return when it comes to enforcing immigration law. It is over. Already there are more minorities under age two than whites. Even if immigration stopped cold turkey, which it won't, the white share of the population is now on the downward slide. More minority kids are born each year than whites, and that number is growing. So even if immigration stopped tomorrow, our future is baked in the cake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-49812225456075693962012-11-09T23:33:27.556-08:002012-11-09T23:33:27.556-08:00Portugal and spain were fully under muslimn contro...Portugal and spain were fully under muslimn control in the 1490, and the illiterate portuguese and spanish managed to chase the muslim plague out.<br /><br />Maybe islam during the iberian peninsula's occupation was more benign that the feral islam of today, but if illiterate ppl could make them shove off, then literate ppl of today can accomplish the samecrusada infinitanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-71013863213454302832012-11-09T22:02:00.844-08:002012-11-09T22:02:00.844-08:00"To paraphrase Pat Buchanan, while Bush was w..."To paraphrase Pat Buchanan, while Bush was worried about saving Anbar province, he was losing Arizona."<br /><br />And we STILL LOST Al Anbar province to Al Qaeda, in fact, all of Iraq is lost to Al Qaeda as is Dearbornistan, Michiganistan. Dearborne is a beach head of islam as was the allied invasion of Normandy in WWII and we know where that ended for Germany. The more I think about it, the wrong side won WWII and I'm sure a lot of British vets think the same every time they see Burqa clad muslim women all over Londonistan.<br /><br />SKIPnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63726214370631066442012-11-09T20:31:55.439-08:002012-11-09T20:31:55.439-08:00Zenster: Our policy should have been and needs to ...<b>Zenster</b>: <i>Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out.</i><br /><br /><b>Mr. Rational</b>: <i>That's not sufficient; they'll just get new toys.</i><br /><br />Then break them again.<br /><br /><i>You need to break their will as well, and the only thing proven to do that is to kill, maim, and destroy the homes and livelihoods of enough of them that they lose the will to fight and the cultural memory remains for generations.</i><br /><br />What part of: <i>leveling a major Islamic city after every jihadist atrocity</i> was unclear? Unfortunately, America and Europe lack the political spine to do anything of the sort. Ergo, my Smash and Grab Method™. Baby steps. Baby steps.<br /><br />I don't expect that you've read my body of work at <a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Gates of Vienna</a>. Feel free to peruse my three-part summation of dealing with Islam and then get back to me:<br /><br /><a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/09/when-will-it-end.html" rel="nofollow">When Will it End?</a><br /><br /><a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/09/why-will-it-end.html" rel="nofollow">Why Will it End?</a><br /><br /><a href="http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-will-it-end.html" rel="nofollow">How Will it End?</a><br /><br />As you might have noticed, I recommend all of what you mention and more.<br /><br /><i>Anyone canvassing for Al Qaeda should have been killed on the spot by the locals, for fear they'd bring hell down on their heads again.</i><br /><br />The only alternative to the Smash and Grab Method™, would have been to set up ruthless military dictatorships amidst the smoking ruins that shot-on-sight after curfew, summarily executed anyone out of uniform who carried arms, bulldozed all mosques and viciously suppressed the practice of Islam for at least three generations.<br /><br />Otherwise, the end point is what we are headed straight towards, a Muslim holocaust courtesy of cost-efficient Western nuclear weapons. <br /><br /><i>A starting point would have been to chase the Taliban to Kandahar and then flatten the city with MOABs and incendiaries, no survivors. We never even started.</i><br /><br />Which is what should have been done within days of the 9-11 atrocity and something I advocated just hours after the WTC attack. Mullah Omar's hometown should have been a "teachable moment" for every last Muslim on earth.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-47353963151650394022012-11-09T19:07:21.304-08:002012-11-09T19:07:21.304-08:00Islam's biggest weapon is demographics. In mos...Islam's biggest weapon is demographics. In most of Europe they are the only people having kids. I suspect it has always been this way.SwampThizzlehttp://www.youtube.com/user/SwampThizzlenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-39060399719018345792012-11-09T18:37:36.109-08:002012-11-09T18:37:36.109-08:00Our policy should have been and needs to be one of...<i>Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; <b>Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out.</b></i><br /><br />That's not sufficient; they'll just get new toys. You need to break their will as well, and the only thing proven to do that is to kill, maim, and destroy the homes and livelihoods of enough of them that they lose the will to fight and the cultural memory remains for generations. Anyone canvassing for Al Qaeda should have been killed on the spot by the locals, for fear they'd bring hell down on their heads again.<br /><br />A starting point would have been to chase the Taliban to Kandahar and then flatten the city with MOABs and incendiaries, no survivors. We never even started.Mr. Rationalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-42038818619149391002012-11-09T14:42:19.622-08:002012-11-09T14:42:19.622-08:00Everyone always asks what about 9-11? 9-11 happene...<i>Everyone always asks what about 9-11? 9-11 happened because foreign muslims were allowed into our country on visas and not deported once they overstayed. We could have made ourselves safer over the past decade by concentrating on repatriating people who don't belong here and turning off the spigot on new arrivals.</i><br /><br />Absolutely. Doing that in combination with leveling a major Islamic city after every jihadist atrocity (i.e., 9-11, Bali, London, Beslan, Madrid, Bali II, Mumbai) would see us much farther ahead in fighting jihad. The only other thing that would help is a "wetworks" campaign against the upper echelons of Islam's political, clerical, financial and scholastic aristocracy. A billion dollars spent on neutralizing just one thousand of these terrorist elite would have made more progress <i>in just one year</i> than the last <i>decade</i> that we've wasted in Afghanistan and Iraq.<br /><br />Finally, the grim reality. There are another 48 Muslim majority countries that must be pacified. At the current rate of spending, that effort represents some 24 TRILLION DOLLARS. The entire Free World <i>combined</i> doesn't possess that much available cash. There is only one way to effectively reach out and touch 1.5 BILLION people. After Islam has forced our hand enough we will reach the tipping point. That being: When living <i>with</i> Islam is more trouble than living <i>without</i> Islam. <br /><br />As seen above, the only economic way of pacifying 1.5 billion people is with nuclear weapons. This is what Islamic jihad is driving us towards. If anything, after Afghanistan and Iraq, at the very least we will be able to tell future generations "we tried". Islam has always demanded to be paid in its own bloody coin. At whatever cost, the West will eventually learn this dreadful lesson. Then will come the Muslim holocaust.<br /><br />Islam has "unhappy ending" written all over it. Richard Fernandez, the owner of <a href="belmontclub.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Belmont Club</a>, summed it up most concisely in his magnum opus "<a href="http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2003/09/three-conjectures-pew-poll-finds-40-of.html" rel="nofollow">The Three Conjectures</a>":<br /><br /><i>The most startling result of this analysis is that <b>a catastrophic outcome for Islam is guaranteed whether America retaliates or not</b>. Even if the President decided to let all Americans die to expiate their historical guilt, why would Islamic terrorists stop after that? They would move on to Europe and Asia until finally China, Russia, Japan, India or Israel, none of them squeamish, wrote -1 x 10^9 in the final right hand column. They too would be prisoners of the same dynamic, and they too have weapons of mass destruction.<br /><br />Even if Islam killed every non-Muslim on earth they would almost certainly continue to kill each other with their new-found weaponry. Revenge bombings between rival groups and wars between different Islamic factions are the recurring theme of history. Long before 3,000 New Yorkers died on September 11, Iraq and Iran killed 500,000 Muslims between them. The greatest threat to Muslims is radical Islam; and the greatest threat of all is a radical Islam armed with weapons of mass destruction.</i><br /><br />Remember just this one thing, <i><b>Islam wouldn't have it any other way.</b></i>Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-83491757960046501262012-11-09T14:42:10.170-08:002012-11-09T14:42:10.170-08:00Anon (11/9 9:59 AM): Zenster, I will have to disag...<b>Anon</b> (11/9 9:59 AM): <i>Zenster, I will have to disagree with you about Iran. Iran getting a nuke is no threat to the the US. Just like North Korea, Pakistan and India, it is no threat to us. The main threat those countries pose to us is not sending nuclear weapons our way, but sending their people as immigrants. The demographic threat trumps any military threat from these nations.</i><br /><br />Apparently, you have forgotten the old addage about how:<br /><br />"One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day."<br /><br />Yes, the demographic threat is of genuine concern. Properly enforcing our immigration laws could change much of that in a heartbeat. What our legal system cannot change is this simple fact:<br /><br />Beyond a certain unspecified number of nuclear weapons held by Muslims there emerges a <i><b>non-zero</b></i> probability that one or more of them will fall into terrorist hands.<br /><br />Nor does this begin to encompass the issue of how Iran's accession to nuclear weaponry would drive an immediate atomic arms race in the increasingly unstable MME (Muslim Middle East). Iran's Shiites are regarded by the Sunnis as heretics who might just as, if not more, readily nuke Mecca than Islam's infidel foes. Plus, rogue nations like North Korea and Pakistan have <i>already</i> participated in proliferating nuclear weapons technology. The last thing this Free World needs is for there to be an avalanche of Islamic nations sharing out amongst each other the tedious details of unconventional arms technology.<br /><br /><i>This fixation by conservatives on foreign policy is killing us. We have wasted a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan when they were never a threat to us.</i><br /><br />Are you saying that the 9-11 atrocity was not a trillion dollar "threat" to America? The global cost of that one single terrorist attack—based in and executed out of Afghanistan—was more on the order of ten to one hundred trillion dollars, after factoring lost tourist revenues, economic upheaval, extra operational airline overhead, increased security measures and military retaliation. There is also proof that Saddam was an active conduit for movement of al Qaeda operatives. Not a "threat" you say?<br /><br />That said, should we have bothered to engage with nation building in Afghanistan and Iraq? Horse snot! I mean, <i>of course not!</i> The "hearts and minds" nonsense that is preached by Liberals and Conservatives alike is pure tommyrot. Nothing could be more foolish than attempting to uplift Muslims who adore wallowing in the filth of their their Islamic quicksand. One may as well seek to uplift Blacks and we all know how that little adventure turned out.<br /><br /><i>And what did it get us? We have spent trillions, lost some of our best young men and replaced them with an uninterrupted stream of immigrants, LEGAL ones at that, year after year.</i><br /><br />Agreed, but this has little to do with the fact that it is still important to prevent any nuclear escalation in the MME. Our policy should have been and needs to be one of; <i><b>Break the bad boys' toys and get the hell out.</b></i> We should have done that in Afghanistan and Iraq—whilst backbilling the Iraqis for our expenses in oil—and it is what we need to do in Iran. The Smash and Grab Method™. Fly in, bomb the crap out of their enrichment facilities plus any supporting infrastructure, trash their last few remaining gasoline refineries and then wave good-f&%king-bye. Lobbing a few dozen cruise missiles into a full session of the Iranian <i>majlis</i> (parliament), wouldn't hurt either.<br /><br />[to be continued]Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-84682200295326883342012-11-09T09:59:03.428-08:002012-11-09T09:59:03.428-08:00If you are incapable of absorbing the importance o...<i>If you are incapable of absorbing the importance of America having at least one ostensible ally which possesses the necessary scrotal endowment to neutralize Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, then you're just plain brain dead or obsessively Antisemitic.</i><br /><br />Zenster, I will have to disagree with you about Iran. Iran getting a nuke is no threat to the the US. Just like North Korea, Pakistan and India, it is no threat to us. The main threat those countries pose to us is not sending nuclear weapons our way, but sending their people as immigrants. The demographic threat trumps any military threat from these nations. <br /><br />What good is it to be s superpower, when you are peopled by third worlders? In fact if the USA is going to become a multiculti empire, I just assume it DIDN'T HAVE military power. Does anyone here really want a multiculti USA making the world into its image?<br /><br />This fixation by conservatives on foreign policy is killing us. We have wasted a decade in Iraq and Afghanistan when they were never a threat to us. And what did it get us? We have spent trillions, lost some of our best young men and replaced them with an uninterrupted stream of immigrants, LEGAL ones at that, year after year.<br /><br />Everyone always asks what about 9-11? 9-11 happened because foreign muslims were allowed into our country on visas and not deported once they overstayed. We could have made ourselves safer over the past decade by concentrating on repatriating people who don't belong here and turning off the spigot on new arrivals.<br /><br />To paraphrase Pat Buchanan, while Bush was worried about saving Anbar province, he was losing Arizona.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-82532331480866587532012-11-09T07:47:40.099-08:002012-11-09T07:47:40.099-08:00California will be the place because it may very w...<i>California will be the place because it may very well become the first entire state to go the way of Detroit or Gary. </i><br /><br />I live in Arizona and I've been seeing tons of cars on the road with California plates. There are also many blacks moving here from California. Unfortunately, these retards all support the same failed policies that fucked up California to the point where no one wants to live there anymore. My new state senator is, in fact, a liberal Californian. I think it may be the beginning of the end for this once-fair state.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-70609723742111048732012-11-09T03:20:15.564-08:002012-11-09T03:20:15.564-08:00So CAL Snowman: New Zealand has a huge advantage ...So CAL Snowman: New Zealand has a huge advantage in having few Africans, but it's very liberal (in spite of a large South African expatriate population). <br /><br />Self-defence is illegal. Cost of living is high (especially <a href="http://www.trademe.co.nz/property/residential-property-for-sale" rel="nofollow">property</a>), consumer choice is limited, salaries are low. Crime is low.<br /><br />New Zealand is about as far as it's possible to get from world markets. It has no industry. Its main export is dairy products. In short, it's like living in the sticks, without the space.AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85972546409040088972012-11-08T20:54:08.659-08:002012-11-08T20:54:08.659-08:00Anon (11/8, 2012 5:29 PM): You mean when they'...<b>Anon</b> (11/8, 2012 5:29 PM): <i>You mean when they're</i> [the Israelis]<i> not busy spying on us and stealing our technology to sell to the Russians or the Chinese?</i><br /><br />In a last effort to wise you up, I must guess that either you're new here or purposefully opaque.<br /><br />I have already mentioned every last one of your objections in prior comments <i>which is why I feel no need to enumerate them now.</i><br /><br />If you are incapable of absorbing the importance of America having at least one ostensible ally which possesses the necessary scrotal endowment to neutralize Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, then you're just plain brain dead or obsessively Antisemitic.<br /><br />Pay close attention to what <b>Bogolyubski</b> noted in his comment here at November 8 10:23 AM. If you are unable to digest the central message being made, then I politely suggest that you take your insincere protestations over to Stormfront.Zensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12004871212603603831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-16849157692268844512012-11-08T17:29:25.739-08:002012-11-08T17:29:25.739-08:00"...there is no possible way for you to know ..."...there is no possible way for you to know the amount of valuable intelligence that Mossad is passing to the USA regarding Islamic terrorism."<br /><br />You mean when they're not busy spying on us and stealing our technology to sell to the Russians or the Chinese?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-66050010444649794932012-11-08T17:07:07.448-08:002012-11-08T17:07:07.448-08:00Sounds like we need some similarly talented "...Sounds like we need some similarly talented "community organizers" like Alinsky to move the blacks back to a certain confined area of the country. And then induce them to riot in favor of declaring their independence as a separate nation.<br /><br />(Although I'd prefer that said future nation be sprinkled with DWL's who'll then be forced to live with the consequences of their mindless crusades for black power.)TFDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-76001525700712831722012-11-08T15:58:40.868-08:002012-11-08T15:58:40.868-08:00Anonymous said "Maybe I really will move to M...Anonymous said "Maybe I really will move to Montana. Watch the fires from a distance. Learn to hunt, fish, skin and trap - all that Davy Crockett shit. Who needs Obamacare? "<br /><br />I tweeted a comment similar to this to PK on election night and he quickly upbraided me "No you stand and fight". Fight? Somebody tell me how. I've watched city after city fall to the black cancer for all of my 63 years. It never stops. How do we stop this black undertow that destroys everything it touches?Tomnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-327414056049507482012-11-08T15:54:20.776-08:002012-11-08T15:54:20.776-08:00California will be the place because it may very w...California will be the place because it may very well become the first entire state to go the way of Detroit or Gary.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-78531372812101362642012-11-08T14:56:12.301-08:002012-11-08T14:56:12.301-08:00I apologize for the spelling errors. I am writing ...I apologize for the spelling errors. I am writing this on my smarty phone and it substitutes the words it guesses that I am writing at will.<br /><br />More thoughts on democracy...<br /><br />Alexander Tyler...<br /><br />This one I gave yesterday...<br />"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of document. It can only exist until a majority of voters discover that they can vote themselves larges out of the public treasury." <br /><br />Charles T Sprading...<br />"We no longer believe that it is just for one man to govern two, but we have yet to outgrow the absurd belief that it is just for two men to govern one man."<br /><br />H. L. Mencken...<br />"Government is a broker pillage, and every election is sort of an advance auction of the sale of stolen goods."<br /><br />George Bernard Shaw...<br />"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul."<br /> Update 2012 ...<br />"A government that robs Robert to pay Juan and deshawn can always depend on the support of Juan and deshawn"<br /><br />Harold E. Stassen....<br />"Let us always have in mind that every attempt to establish a loafers paradice had wound up a dictators hell hole."<br /><br />Lord Action...<br />"It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is worse to be oppressed by a majority."<br /><br />Jim Davidson...<br />"In a democracy the people get what the majority deserve."<br /><br />(This it's my personal favorite)<br />Richard J. Maybury...<br />"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for lunch."<br /> <br />Also, <br />"in the hands of a lazy, envious self righteous majority, democracy is under most vicious tyranny of them all.<br /><br />I do not believe in the collective wisdom of average ignorance.<br /><br />Do you remember the ten planks of the communist manifesto? Did you ever learn it in school? <br />1. Abolition of private property<br />2. Heavy progressive income tax<br />3. Abolition of rights if inheritance tax<br />4. Confiscation of all property of rebels<br />5. Control money supply through central bank<br />6. Govt control of transportation and communication<br />7. Govt control if factories and agriculture<br />8. Govt control of labor<br />9. Corporate farms/regional planning<br />10. Govt control of education<br /><br />Compare to God's ten commandments<br />1. You shall have no other gods before me.<br />2. You shall not make for yourselves any graven images.<br />3. You shall not taker three name if YHWY your God in vain.<br />4. Remember the sabbath to keep it holy.<br />5. Honor your mother and father<br />6. You shall not murder.<br />7. You shall not commit adultery.<br />8. You shall not steal. <br />9. You shall not best false witness.<br />20. You shall not covet.<br /><br />Government to think about...<br />Left Coast White GuyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-2643976983729546182012-11-08T14:55:53.176-08:002012-11-08T14:55:53.176-08:00Anonymous said...
It seems as though one could tra...Anonymous said...<br /><i>It seems as though one could trash the church, but not defend it.</i><br /><br />Care to explain? As I stated above, the church as it presently stands is essentially aiding and abetting the genocide of whites. It is therefore an enemy and should be destroyed completely at the earliest opportunity. And please refrain from any 'no true Scotsman' excuses. I'm not referring to the church of 1000 years ago, or those of even 200 years ago. The church as it exists right now in the USSA and elsewhere in the western world is controlled by genocidal Marxists. Burn it. Hopefully the survivors will emerge from ashes to return to the real thing.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-22884772893642799422012-11-08T14:29:19.506-08:002012-11-08T14:29:19.506-08:00So, why were we all taught in high school that we ...<i>So, why were we all taught in high school that we live in a democracy?<br /></i><br /><br />The US was established as a republic, not a democracy. This was the reason behind the checks and balances as well as the electoral college and limiting the franchise. The idea was to prevent democracy from turning into demagoguery and then dictatorship. As Heinlein points out, once the plebs figure out they can vote themselves bread & circuses, they will do so until there are no more bread & no more circuses--at which point they rally behind that man on a white horse. <br /><br />As to why we are told the US is a democracy? Mainly because for the last century the franchise has been expanded to all warm bodies 18 and over (and some cold ones, too!). This has been especially so since the civil rights revolution. <br /><br />Of course, democracy is a joke, anyway. When voters support measures which the establishment does not like, they use the courts to toss them out. Meantime, blatantly abusive policies, such as the TSA police state at the airports, are allowed to stand. <br /><br />Anyway, looks like what the Founding Fathers feared is coming to pass in front of our eyes and on 500 channels.Californiannoreply@blogger.com