tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post2521082621988306826..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: "It was not preached to the crowd, It was not taught by the State. No man spoke it aloud..."Stuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger99125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-2494464127386580522015-11-30T10:29:16.362-08:002015-11-30T10:29:16.362-08:00Anon
Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jes...Anon<br /><i>Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jesus won't do a f shit to the murderers but he has to say something so the media vultures will get what they want and go away.</i><br /><br />I'm sorry, you're writing complete nonsense. He <b>had</b> to say something to the Ministry of Truth?? Was there a pohleece-goonda holding a loaded machine-gun to his head forcing him to say something? No. He <b>wanted</b> to say something (get his own face before the idiots who watch the lying jujubox). If he really felt an irresistible urge to say something, there are two simple words to say, which are of zero use to the negro killers' dream-team of ACLU, $PLC, ADL, and NAACP Legal Defense Fund shysters: <b>No comment.</b>Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-41255204947347251352015-11-29T21:04:34.209-08:002015-11-29T21:04:34.209-08:00Anon @ 4:30 PM said i.a.
Whether or not there is ...Anon @ 4:30 PM said i.a.<br /><br /><i>Whether or not there is such a thing as working objectively is a matter of opinion.</i><br /><br />Nice! ... I think?AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-5205574817799042432015-11-29T17:11:12.451-08:002015-11-29T17:11:12.451-08:00Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jesus wo...Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jesus won't do a f shit to the murderers but he has to say something so the media vultures will get what they want and go away.<br /><br />Inside him, I am sure he wants these thugs punished properly.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-4278435436765150642015-11-29T16:30:59.674-08:002015-11-29T16:30:59.674-08:00God doesn't consider the Jews to be equal to e...<i>God doesn't consider the Jews to be equal to everyone else. </i><br /><br />Christians do; see Galatians 3:28.<br /><br /><i> I have never known any of them [i.e., Christians] to be particularly eager to die or in a hurry to reach the afterlife. In fact, most of them put that off as long as possible.</i><br /><br />Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die? That's not news. But back in the old days, when they had the pure faith, they were eager. Jesus himself was eager. He could have prevented his own death, but didn't.<br /><br /><i>... this idea that Christianity is the core problem doesn't make logical or historical sense.</i><br /><br />It doesn't make sense to you because you refuse to accept that Christianity has profoundly influenced the way Western man thinks about the world, man, and man's place in the world; that Christianity has, over the centuries, been secularized to the point that even atheists accept its basic assumptions. But the flawed Christian religious conceptions of man, upon which things like Affirmative Action are premised, are incompatible with science.<br /><br /><i> This argument of "science vs Christianity" is fraudulent as it implies the left side of the equation is working objectively.</i><br /><br />Whether or not there is such a thing as working objectively is a matter of opinion. But, as I've said, it's Christians themselves who claim Darwin as an opponent. They know very well that his scientific claims are deeply at odds with Christian beliefs. They know it much better than most of you, apparently.<br /><br /><i>... nor is there any statement of equality apart from the assertion these nations are all descended from Adam and Eve. </i><br /><br />If Adam and Eve were of the same race, then so are all of their descendants (i.e., everybody), and nations (or separate races) are without biological reality. That's all political correctness needs to prove that all significant differences in behavior are only environmental in origin.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-66809367909564138382015-11-29T14:40:07.422-08:002015-11-29T14:40:07.422-08:00Anonymous said ”. . . No, it was a suicide cult ev...Anonymous said <i>”. . . No, it was a suicide cult even in the beginning; today it's just returning to its roots. . . ”</i><br /><br />I dunno about this. I've been a Christian all of my life and have listened to many Sunday school teachers and Preachers, and have associated with countless other Christians. I have never known any of them to be particularly eager to die or in a hurry to reach the afterlife. In fact, most of them put that off as long as possible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-28248620671002706742015-11-29T13:37:49.875-08:002015-11-29T13:37:49.875-08:00For the Christian, humanity is one, created by God...<b>For the Christian, humanity is one, created by God and subject to God, who remains intensely interested in man's behavior and has set the same rules for all. Moreover, all must be considered equally able to obey, for would a just and rational God have the same expectations of everyone unless it were equally possible for them to comply?</b><br /><br />Not sure why I should read the rest of your rant when this clearly wrong. <br /><br />God doesn't consider the Jews to be equal to everyone else. The Bible is very clear on them being a "chosen people" and in fact holds them to a higher standard:<br /><br />“You only have I chosen of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your sins” (Amos 3:2).<br /><br />I think you have been too influenced by mushy SJW style Christianity that selects a few versus about love and then pretends the old testament doesn't exist. <br /><br />I don't mind criticisms of modern Christianity but this idea that Christianity is the core problem doesn't make logical or historical sense. Eastern Germany is heavily agnostic/atheist and they have the same exact problems with egalitarian idiocy. As pointed out before California is one of the least Christian states and it is filled to the brim with loony White guilt liberals. SF and Berkeley are liberal capitals. Maybe you believe that Christianity influenced Marxism. So what? How does that solve our problem? We could also point our fingers at the Greeks for a lot of democratic egalitarian influence but what does that do for us? <br /><br />Reducing Christianity in society obviously doesn't solve the problem as seen California and many other European countries like Germany. So what the hell is the point of going after Christianity? Maybe we should go to Greece and piss on their ruins? Take issue with France and the revolution? Where does it end? Let's focus on productive solutions. Going after Christianity is pointless, especially when all evidence suggests that Whites will adopt liberalism in the absence of Christianity. <br /><br />If you could wave a magic wand and get rid of Christianity you could make our problems worse. You could end up turning the entire country into California. We need address the core of the problem and not simply encourage Whites to just switch from one religion to another.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-76082333224831732712015-11-29T13:17:54.315-08:002015-11-29T13:17:54.315-08:00No cop should have to go into these areas without ...<b>No cop should have to go into these areas without a rifle and gear normally worn in any other combat environment, but as soon as they do the cry babies start wailing about the militarized police. It sends the wrong message to those sensitive little turds.</b><br /><br />I'm so glad libertarians are working hard to make sure cops can't have military weapons while at the same time trying to legalize crack and pcp. I'm sure a libertarian Afro-utopia is right around the corner!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-91116369870348274582015-11-29T13:13:59.420-08:002015-11-29T13:13:59.420-08:00A scientific view considers man only one of many a...<b>A scientific view considers man only one of many animals on planet earth and can take into consideration genetics and race when accounting for the causes of behavior, but a Christian view cannot, and in point of fact never has.</b><br /><br />You speak of a scientific view as if it is universal constant or untainted by modern politics. <br /><br />Are the social sciences based on the scientific view? <br /><br />What would happen in the typical University if you proposed a scientific study that compares the brain sizes of Black and White students? <br /><br />The social sciences have gone beyond egalitarian bias and have actually rejected objectivity as a false concept created by Western (read White) thinkers. This is part of "critical theory" where they openly oppose everything associated with traditional Western society. <br /><br />So we have professors on the dole in Western countries that have the word "science" in their career description and yet they openly deride Western objectivity. Feel free to study "Critical theory" on your own to learn about this madness. <br /><br />Only the sciences that are completely unrelated to biology allow objectivity. You can't raise your hand in a class on evolution and ask about evolutionary differences between Africans and Europeans. That's a massive breach of PC politics. On today's campuses you could have your name ruined or be the target of false allegations once you are labeled a "hater" which really means does not follow the ruling order on race. <br /><br />This science vs Christianity debate is a joke because it assumes that today's science is the same science from 100 year ago. In today's college you will be demeaned and ostracized by SCIENTISTS for questioning the status quo. I know because I have sat in those classrooms and quickly learned to keep my mouth shut less I be targeted as a "hater" for thinking critically about race and evolution. <br /><br />Science in the West today is a fraud. Our country is dominated by two religions. This argument of "science vs Christianity" is fraudulent as it implies the left side of the equation is working objectively. Liberals have shut down objectivity in our Universities and media. That's the real problem. Christianity is still voluntary and depends on donations. Liberalism and "science" are funded with my tax dollars. I was never given a choice on whether or not I want to support Professor Jane Leftberg's class on how White males are destroying society.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-28595079129002156502015-11-29T10:23:17.962-08:002015-11-29T10:23:17.962-08:00Race said ”Bogolyupski,
I've never heard you...Race said <i>”Bogolyupski, <br /><br />I've never heard you say to take back churches, but I have heard you blame alk social ills on Christianity itself, rather than draw a distinction between modern false . . . “</i><br /><br />My general understanding of bogo's theory is that nothing can be taken back or repaired. The consistent theme of bogo's comments that I have read is that everything and everyone is beyond repair, and that everything must be destroyed. The sooner this happens the better, and that we should start this process by turning off our TVs. There are others who agree with this theory.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-31473566125374086252015-11-29T09:59:35.938-08:002015-11-29T09:59:35.938-08:00@Race,
There's been no turn-around. The posit...@Race,<br /><br />There's been no turn-around. The position stated above is completely consistent with all the previous ones. Christianity is just dry bones in Europe now. The whole institution as it exists there is completely controlled by genocidal SJWs. If not just a twitching corpse in the USSA, Christianity is on its deathbed, with remnants of the 'old believers' scattered here and there. To give a single example, I've yet to see a single condemnation of the ongoing genocide of whites in South Africa coming from any Christian source - not even from the Calvinist churches of the victims. Most whites slaughtered in SA have been done in by negro "Christians" who are working for the openly Marxist ANC. Never a peep from the Moral Majority crowd, but lots of tears over negro babies being processed in Abortion mills largely owned by unmentionables.<br /><br />Nor has there ever been any excommunication of - let's take another example - the United Church of Christ in Chicago where Jeremiah Wright preached re-cycled Nation of Islam propaganda for two decades while D'Won Mocha Messiah and Michelle (who are also officially "Christians") apparently took lengthy naps. Any Christian denomination worth the name would excommunicate the following churches and all who attend and give to them: Episcopalians, United Church of Christ, ELCA, Presbyterian USA, Negro "churches", Catholics who haven't rejected Vactican II completely. That's just a short list of the worst offenders, by no means inclusive.<br /><br />If you want to read a pretty forceful anti-Christian argument, take a look at Anon of 626-P above. He's taking a single line of scripture out of its context just as Christians like to. Here's Acts 17:26 (KJV): <br /><br /><i>And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;</i> <br /><br />This was Paul preaching to the philosophers in Athens as I recall. If anything, it argues against the Protestant notion that any halfwitted fool can begin to comprehend scripture (not referring to Anon, who as I said makes fair arguments). Nowhere is there a denial of the existence of nations, nor is there any statement of equality apart from the assertion these nations are all descended from Adam and Eve. The verse is naturally used by Marxoid SJWs to buttress their Gospel of Galatians 3:28 <i>equality über alles</i>, which really comes from the openly atheist French Revolution. <br /><br />Anon nevertheless makes a halfway decent argument that the roots of the disease were at least potentially there from the very beginning. I still think the historical record disproves his position but this isn't hugely relevant to the present day, is it? I do note that he failed to address my point that the percentile of self-described atheists who hold to the gospel of equality is even greater than that of self-described Christians. Even so, Anon probably knows the scripture better than Pastor Blackburn does by a long shot. That in itself should tell you something about the nature of the problem. As Centurion noted: <i>Any god that won't let you fight back is no god at all.</i>Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-15559321879627504552015-11-29T09:36:53.091-08:002015-11-29T09:36:53.091-08:00AnalogMan regarding Bogoluybski said ”. . . Never ...AnalogMan regarding Bogoluybski said <i>”. . . Never dogmatically pro- or anti-religion. . . “</i><br /><br />This might be true. However, of the few bogo comments that I have taken the time to read I've never noticed any of them being pro-anything. There isn't really anything remarkable about him not being pro-religion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-7755538410683370352015-11-28T20:58:14.015-08:002015-11-28T20:58:14.015-08:00Bogolyupski,
I've never heard you say to tak...Bogolyupski, <br /><br />I've never heard you say to take back churches, but I have heard you blame alk social ills on Christianity itself, rather than draw a distinction between modern false interpretations and teachings versus actual writing and traditional understanding. The bible itself teachers separation over and over and over and yet that is ignored both by modern JUDEO preachers and a attackers like yourself. The bible also doesn't teach the abolition of old testament law only certain ceremonial laws. That is again ignored and taught and conversely condemn otherwise. So why the turn around?Racehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09810047744616701191noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-57873502729703050072015-11-28T19:44:15.410-08:002015-11-28T19:44:15.410-08:00Anonymous said ”. . . Ideally they wouldn't ha...Anonymous said <i>”. . . Ideally they wouldn't have handguns in what are really warzones. Handguns just aren't well suited for combat. As the saying goes a pistol is for defending yourself until you get to your rifle. . . “</i><br /><br />No cop should have to go into these areas without a rifle and gear normally worn in any other combat environment, but as soon as they do the cry babies start wailing about the militarized police. It sends the wrong message to those sensitive little turds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-8369124839454705042015-11-28T19:20:05.164-08:002015-11-28T19:20:05.164-08:00NY Girl said ”What happened? How did the guy find ...NY Girl said <i>”What happened? How did the guy find himself bleeding to death? Who called the ambulance?”</i><br /><br />I wish that I could relate the entire story, but I've given about all of the details that I can without jeopardizing my anonymity. His injury was inflicted by a weapon, not a wreck or some other accident. There were onlookers behind windows and doors not wanting to get involved or place themselves in harms way, but one of them must have called 911. The part of the story that I shared is the least disturbing part, and I can say that while I watched him bleed I felt nothing for him but a white hot hatred. A lesson in the story is that a Christian is capable of hating as much as anyone else. I honestly don't see why more of these criminals aren't killed by cops who momentarily lose control.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-59665378232867716562015-11-28T18:26:10.276-08:002015-11-28T18:26:10.276-08:00But I don't think Christianity is the core pro...<i>But I don't think Christianity is the core problem ...</i><br /><br />Then it seems you have missed my point, which is that there is a fundamental, irreconcilable difference between a scientific view of man and a religious one, based in Christian theology. A scientific view considers man only one of many animals on planet earth and can take into consideration genetics and race when accounting for the causes of behavior, but a Christian view cannot, and in point of fact never has. For the Christian, humanity is one, created by God and subject to God, who remains intensely interested in man's behavior and has set the same rules for all. Moreover, all must be considered equally able to obey, for would a just and rational God have the same expectations of everyone unless it were equally possible for them to comply? At no time has Christianity denied the equal humanity of the negro; not even those Christians who held them as slaves were so bold. This idea of universal brotherhood and there being "no race but the human race" is not a corruption of Christianity, it's quite canonical, based as it is on Christian creation myths and expressed openly in Acts 17:26. If there's a way to fix this without discarding the heart and soul of Christianity as it has been practiced from its earliest years, I've never seen it.<br /><br /><i>Christianity didn't become a suicide cult until the 1800s, with the advent of the abolitionists, followed up by the Darbyite-Scofield heresies.</i><br /><br />No, it was a suicide cult even in the beginning; today it's just returning to its roots. As someone else already pointed out, the early Church had to make suicide a sin (there's not a word against suicide, per se, in the Bible) in order to keep the early Christians from slaying themselves en masse. They wanted above all to go to heaven. They worshiped death and saw in Jesus' death and transfiguration the ultimate triumph. Take that out of Christianity and what's left? Not much. (Marxism, perhaps.) Likewise with all the Christian martyrs, who saw their own deaths as desirable and an emulation of Christ. They were, and still are, held up as examples to the rest of the Christians. <br /><br />Abolitionism, too, isn't something that suddenly and inexplicably arose from within Christianity in the 1800s; nor did it come from outside. It was present in Christianity from the beginning, and eventually became the standard. The pre-Christian Romans and Greeks cheerfully had been enslaving their fellow whites for centuries, but after the Christian takeover of Europe, slavery was gradually abolished everywhere under Christian control, largely because of Church doctrine. It persisted longest among the pagan Vikings, who themselves renounced its practice once they became Christian. It only stood to reason then that for Christians, who saw humanity as one and racial differences as morally irrelevant, this abolition should be extended to the negro. The development of abolitionism in the America of the 1800s was only an expression of Christian faith, not its abnegation. This is shown particularly in the fact that Christian fanatics figured very prominently among abolitionists. They were its driving force.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-12688968576308644642015-11-28T18:21:14.926-08:002015-11-28T18:21:14.926-08:00Bogolyubski, good to see you defending your positi...Bogolyubski, good to see you defending your position, with which I broadly agree, and without the usual picturesque language which apparently confuses many.<br /><br />Bogo has never been anti-Christian, though not professing to be Christian. He has several times linked to Cambria Will Not Yield, Vox Day and, if I'm not mistaken, Ann Barnhardt. He's always scrupulously fair in his commentary. Never dogmatically pro- or anti-religion.<br /><br />Lots of good commentary on the subject today, and agreeably civil. Ultimately, though, as CENTURION says, to no conclusion. The evolutionary team, what Richard Dawkins (I believe) called the "magic of big numbers", really is no more satisfactory than the scriptural side. The numbers just aren't big enough.<br /><br />If anybody is interested, Fred Reed, usually an amusing read, has a long article <a href="http://www.unz.com/freed/fredwin-on-evolution-267/" rel="nofollow">Fredwin on Evolution.</a> Several others on the same subject - just search his site. Of course, he has no new answers, just some good questions. That's the nature of this debate.AnalogMannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-22266234535105133442015-11-28T17:57:53.211-08:002015-11-28T17:57:53.211-08:00@1202 pm
Respectfully sir you need to read up on w...@1202 pm<br />Respectfully sir you need to read up on what a scientific theory actually means. Evolution is "proven law" as far as what you're trying to say goes. Nobody is going to take us seriously if we still run around saying that the earth is flat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-80975528255255602962015-11-28T14:00:48.679-08:002015-11-28T14:00:48.679-08:00amen to CENTURION.
any god that won't let you...amen to CENTURION.<br /><br />any god that won't let you fight back is no god at all.<br /><br />noomdorAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-40643970351352144742015-11-28T13:13:57.339-08:002015-11-28T13:13:57.339-08:00Well said. Eye for an eye is what I say. They shou...Well said. Eye for an eye is what I say. They should be given the same amount of mercy they gave to their victims. Just be thankful this didn't happen in Canada. They'd be chalked up as having a poor upbringing and released after 10 years of good behaviour. We had a nutjob released after 3 years in the psyche ward after decapitating a random stranger on a bus. Just imagine what the poor chaps family feel?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-34693648870344711312015-11-28T13:11:48.833-08:002015-11-28T13:11:48.833-08:00If Dirty Harry had been on duty a single .44 magnu...<b>If Dirty Harry had been on duty a single .44 magnum round would have finished the engagement. Is returning to revolvers the answer? There is no complete solution to this problem. There are only compromises. The 9mm it seems is too weak for the larger bad guys.</b><br /><br />Revolvers take too long to reload and those big 44 rounds over-penetrate. They are also very loud and will blast the ear drums of you and the cop next to you. But I would want more than a 9mm if I worked an area like Chicago. <br /><br />Many agencies switched to 40 with the FBI but now the FBI is switching back. It takes practice to hit a balloon 20 yards away with a 40 caliber glock and that is standing still with both hands. In the heat of battle a cop might have to shoot one handed while running or if wounded. The 9mm is easier in these situations. And yes it is easier for smaller framed men and women. <br /><br /><b>Yet we continue to equip our street cops with light weight pistols to take on Trayvon Brown (6'3") or Michael Brown (6'4"). It seems to me that we need cops big enough to handle a .10mm automatic or a .357 magnum. If not, give them a desk job.</b><br /><br />Yea well there's the rub. I agree that in an area like Chicago the cops should be big and well armed. I would want something like a UMP-45 if I was a cop there. But in our PC society we have both liberals and libertarians complaining about the police becoming "militarized" even though the gangs of Chicago have AK-47s. So yes were are sending in 5'9 women with 9mms against 6'3 linebackers. <br /><br />Ideally they wouldn't have handguns in what are really warzones. Handguns just aren't well suited for combat. As the saying goes a pistol is for defending yourself until you get to your rifle. <br /><br />But if it makes you feel better the 9mm ammo is a lot more advanced than it used to be. I suspect the gang bangers buy cheap ball ammo at Wal-mart which is partly why they normally wound each other. <br /><br />Overall I think you make a valid point. Blacks can be huge and we are sending in cops that are armed for a White suburb.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-24299888813891202942015-11-28T13:06:58.223-08:002015-11-28T13:06:58.223-08:00Another report from the Wild West. It looks like t...Another report from the Wild West. It looks like the PC crap is now sweeping through the Northern Mid-West. The cowboys are getting radical. It first started in Wyoming and has now invaded my area. The first thing was the cowboys boycotted two cowboy bars. Then they started burning down buildings in town which included a church and a western wear and boot store. Now the town is full of cops from the State Patrol. <br /><br />It seems the cowboys do not like the word COWBOY. It is very "sexist." From now on they want to be called "cow-persons." EX NEW YORKERnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-8953174290719722132015-11-28T12:55:57.654-08:002015-11-28T12:55:57.654-08:00"Justice" is the LAST thing blacks are c..."Justice" is the LAST thing blacks are concerned with. Groids will twist any situation to justify their "victimhood" with the sole intent of rioting, looting, burning, destroying and murder of YT's. We race realists know this.<br /><br />The problem is the DWL's who've created and perpetuated this disaster ever since LBJ opened the welfare floodgates to blacks in 1964 with his "Great Society" crap. Blacks have been schooled for decades by DWL's about their "victimhood" and taught to be "professionally offended" by everything.<br /><br />What we're burdened with now is the logical endgame of LBJ's and the DWL's wet dreams. <br /><br />Blacks create mayhem because it works for them. They riot, the DWL's feel guilty for their whiteness and cough up more gibsmedats, and the cycle repeats. In the words of Frank Zappa, "It's a way of life."Thought-Criminalnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-24462980956831493072015-11-28T12:55:33.697-08:002015-11-28T12:55:33.697-08:00One more thing...The negro cannot even organize a ...One more thing...<i>The negro cannot even organize a block party without it spiraling out of control.<br /></i><br /><br />Yep.<br /><br />If YT ever wakes up and regains control of his/her own countries, defeating blacks would be child's play. Look at how easily white Europeans conquered just about all of Africa in the 19th century. And how small numbers of whites maintained control of millions of Africans in the colonial era. A few thousand whites were always able to militarily defeat any number of blacks, whether Boers against Zulus or the Rhodesian army against ZANU/ZAPU. <br /><br />Black Africans were only able to gain tactical ascendancy when they had outside support. Cuban intervention saved a black Marxist regime in Angola during the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Blacks gained victories in anti-colonial struggles only because they had the full support of not only the communist superpowers, but also of too many treasonable white politicos, media fronts, financiers and even churchmen in Europe and North America. <br /><br />Here in the Homeland, blacks (as D-FENS notes) can not organize even an anti-violence march without "shots ringing out." Cities which had been fully functional when blacks took them over are soon reduced to wastelands of "streets gone wrong." Imagine if they tried to fight a race war on their own? Without access to the mainstream media, corporate grants and DWL "organizers," blacks would end up disintegrating into a mutual bloodbath of tribal warfare. YT could then move in and pick up the pieces.<br /><br />The struggle for white activists is on two fronts. One is against the tactical enemy--the violence from black gangbangers, BLM pilagers, African "immigrants" and such, the proverbial barbarians within the gates. The other struggle is against the strategic enemy--the hostile elites who pull the strings on those barbarians. <br /><br />Something to think about in the ongoing chaos...Californiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-18027110208625234532015-11-28T12:43:36.651-08:002015-11-28T12:43:36.651-08:00What happened? How did the guy find himself bleed...What happened? How did the guy find himself bleeding to death? Who called the ambulance?NY Girlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-73484313512808652992015-11-28T12:41:38.026-08:002015-11-28T12:41:38.026-08:00The negro in incapable of taking control of himsel...<i>The negro in incapable of taking control of himself, let alone society. ...<br />The negro is simply a weapon. A proxy. </i><br /><br />You might look at the current BLM movement as an attempt to create a sort of "Arab Spring" or "Color Revolution" (the latter, both figuratively and literally) in the USA. Soros and company have had a hand in both the Ukrainian and Ferguson risings. Also consider the blatant Beltway level intervention on the side of Trayvon Martin (sending White House reps to the funeral). All this was backed up by the mainstream media and the usual useful idiots among DWLs.<br /><br />So yes, there is a strong Establishment footprint on all this.<br /><br />This goes back to at least the Civil Rights Revolution (CRM). The CRM had the backing of several White House administrations (among other things, Ike sent the troops to de-segregate the South literally at bayonet point). Mainstream media supported the CRM with non-stop agitprop, and continues to glorify it today. Quite a few major corporations turned up the economic pressure for CRM, notably ("I'd Like to buy the world a...") Coke(tm). And you had the usual useful idiots among DWLs.<br /><br />Imagine, if you would, that race realists/Southern nationalists had but a fraction of this support. Say, one major television network giving the white side of things, or producing pro-white programming. Of it a major corporation or financier would drops a couple million dollar$ to support white activists.<br /><br />So yes, it's been an Establishment operation since day one. The goal? Probably to destroy the white middle class in the old game of divide and conquer. Break down resistance to globalized economics. Reduce resistance to international political control ala New World Order, UN, EU-supranational bureaucracies, whatever. <br /><br />Meantime, your average John/Jane Q. YT continues to watch that 500 channels of telescreen and swallow their Blue Pills, one per day.<br /><br />All the more reason for those who have awakened to continue the Internet Insurgency.Californiannoreply@blogger.com