tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post2969821151167054038..comments2024-01-26T00:52:04.340-08:00Comments on SBPDL: Pinch-hitting for mighty Casey, the Republican PartyStuff Black People Don't Likehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07923871032509110194noreply@blogger.comBlogger60125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85534629260491519702014-11-09T10:38:36.261-08:002014-11-09T10:38:36.261-08:00"I've said it before: Civilization is a r..."I've said it before: Civilization is a revolt against Nature."<br /><br />Interesting. I'm not sure what your point is about "progress" and so forth. It's a shame we didn't have a better organized forum for deeper and divergent discussions about these sorts of matters. <br /><br />A question for PK, would you consider creating a discussion board for this site? Would you consider linking to an "official" discussion board if some regular reader who has knowledge of how to create one were to do so?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-85497874485097722362014-11-08T16:01:13.855-08:002014-11-08T16:01:13.855-08:00"In short, societies that don't share a c..."In short, societies that don't share a common race, language, religion are the antithesis of "natural" evolution. History shows this from the story of the tower of Babel to the present day."<br /><br />We don't seem to be in disagreement about the process. The disagreement is that you appear to think the process can arbitrarily be stopped at some particular stage, and I don't. There's nothing about the nation state that guarantees it won't be superseded, any more than previous stages have already been superseded. Another name for this is progress. It's the march forward (?) of civilization, the same civilization that many here seem to want to defend at any cost. That this sets races against one another, and makes cultures and traditions obsolete, and that it's all very bloody and painful, is certainly true. "Progress" discomforts many people; it has caused many a genocide. But it will go on until the totalitarian civilization it is bringing about collapses or is intentionally brought down.<br /><br />I've said it before: Civilization is a revolt against Nature.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-56780683622883276992014-11-08T11:49:04.677-08:002014-11-08T11:49:04.677-08:00BTW, the writer who popularized the term "vam...BTW, the writer who popularized the term "vampire squid" (It's really the invention of the writer H.P. Lovecraft) is out again with <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-9-billion-witness-20141106" rel="nofollow">a story about the antics of the Obama regime and how they "police" the oligrachy.</a> There's no doubt more than enough evidence to impeach, convict and remove the entire administration. That would require an actual opposition party instead of the pretend opposition party who is still celebrating their great leap forward, so we already know what the chances of seeing someone like Diamond, Holder and the rest go to club fed are (less than a snowball's in hell on a hot day). When you make money by adding zeros to accounts, 9 million is the same as 9 cents, or 999 trillion. From Ted Cruz to Weepin' Johnny and his brokeback boys, they all serve the same masters.Bogolyusbkinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-38150134029911477532014-11-07T20:06:55.558-08:002014-11-07T20:06:55.558-08:00On November 6, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Anonymous wrote&qu...On November 6, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Anonymous wrote"For the record. SBPDL is the ONLY race realist site that will post comments that even hint at YKW and secret societies."<br /><br />Very, very true.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-693132911725641002014-11-07T19:38:46.940-08:002014-11-07T19:38:46.940-08:00Platinum EBT Cardholder:
I don't believe in c...Platinum EBT Cardholder:<br /><br />I don't believe in conspiracies. Not to begin with anyway. I believe an event occurs, whether natural or man made, and different interests converge to take advantage of the situation. The conspiracies begin once the players are identified. They then begin to feel one another out to determine the extent their interests coalesce. This is the point I believe where things begin to go wrong for the players, or things begin to get too complicated and the final resource grab is enacted to get out and cover tracks. <br /><br />Ultimately I am a capitalist at heart because I believe the only thing in this world that is constant is greed. You can always bank on it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-28078899079956759902014-11-07T08:45:35.836-08:002014-11-07T08:45:35.836-08:00"When we look at the arc of history we can ge..."When we look at the arc of history we can generally discern a transition from lower states of organizational complexity to higher."<br /><br />Yes, but the most successful and cohesive have had homogeneous populations. The nuclear family is the basic unit of society and societies that really work are just an extension.<br /><br />You will have a difficult time finding any society that is not bound by common race, language, and/or religion that isn't in constant turmoil or eventually fractures along those lines.<br /><br />Also consider that bureaucracy becomes an unstoppable juggernaut and a millstone around the neck of everyone, the larger the scale, the worse it becomes of necessity. Look at even the largest corporations. They almost invariably grow to a size where they're simply no longer profitable and need to streamline, divest some pieces, or collapse under their own weight.<br /><br />Lastly, I believe that the greatest society ever developed by man is that of the United States. Simply looking at the unprecedented freedoms, prosperity, and accomplishments can prove my case there. Now did this work because we had a King, Oligarchy, or all-powerful Federal overlords? Hardly, it worked best (when it worked) with the INDIVIDUAL as sovereign and the level of government strongest at local levels with only a minimal federal government to facilitate trade and common defense.<br /><br />I'm an American, I believe in God given rights, and I believe in the Constitution for the United states of America. If you wish to sell my birthright down the river to some global utopia you are my enemy and an enemy of the United States.<br /><br />Lastly I'd like to point out that if this world government is going to be so great, how come every step towards it always happens behind closed doors or by deception? If it's so great why not trot it out into the front stage, let us all see it, and discuss it?<br /><br />In short, societies that don't share a common race, language, religion are the antithesis of "natural" evolution. History shows this from the story of the tower of Babel to the present day.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-63639528359601985172014-11-06T23:09:15.305-08:002014-11-06T23:09:15.305-08:00"Abolition of all nation states. And shacklin..."Abolition of all nation states. And shackling "the mob" in a totalitarian socialist "benevolent dictatorship". "<br /><br />When we look at the arc of history we can generally discern a transition from lower states of organizational complexity to higher. Because agriculture was more efficient, wandering tribes of hunter-gatherers settled down in agricultural communities; these villages becames cities, then city-states. The city-state ultimately gave way to the nation state, and in its turn we start to see signs that the nation state is beginning to disappear in favor of a global governance. If any part of it is a conspiracy, then why not all of it? There's nothing about the nation state that is necessarily more permanent than any of its antecedents. Nation states can be expected to last only as long as they fulfill perceived needs better than alternatives. Global problems requuire global solutions.<br /><br />The increase in complexity is due to the requirements of technological advances. The more highly advanced a technology, the more it involves the close cooperation of large groups of people. Thus, freedom necessarily diminishes with each advance, and where this will end is in plain view. The "benevolent dictatorship" that is being brought about is what one would expect. The perfect society will require no police, because man will be re-engineered so that no one will ever want to break the law. Or as Aldous Huxley put it so well:<br /><br />"In an age of advanced technology, inefficiency is the sin against the Holy Ghost. A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude. To make them love it is the task assigned, in present-day totalitarian states, to ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers. But their methods are still crude and unscientific."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-59999599115260322482014-11-06T20:11:05.436-08:002014-11-06T20:11:05.436-08:00Actually all the original AA law required was the ...Actually all the original AA law required was the posting of federal government jobs in newspapers (media outlets) serving the black community in and around DC. That activity was the 'action' in Affirmative Action. <br /><br />I would gleefully support returning it to that purpose. <br /><br />It was chasing the fallacy of 'equal opportunity' that resulted in the mess we have today. Because of course you can't measure opportunity. You can only measure outcome which is what today's AA is really ask about. <br /><br />We're seeing the same thing played out today only this time it's much more direct: income rather than opportunity inequality. Putting unqualified people into jobs doesn't guarantee that they'll be successful. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-26915634172222030342014-11-06T19:29:39.658-08:002014-11-06T19:29:39.658-08:00How many of you still pay for you extermination vi...How many of you still pay for you extermination via Cable/Satellite?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-28845233801070838842014-11-06T19:05:34.571-08:002014-11-06T19:05:34.571-08:00In the time it has taken PK to write ten topics &a...In the time it has taken PK to write ten topics & post them on his outstanding blog I have acquired no fewer than three firearms and 1500rds of ammunition.<br /><br />I'm hoping I will be the one to water the tree of Liberty, but if not, my sons are being prepared.<br /><br />Quite simply, we are not getting out of this mess without an enormous bloody fight to the death. Race realists who have any sense know this and are preparing accordingly. <br /><br />It may not happen tomorrow, next week, next year or next decade, but rest assured, it WILL happen. Blacks aim to be in control & to rule whites with an iron fist.<br /><br />Don't go softly into that good night.<br />Truth Corpsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-66003414134964844662014-11-06T18:57:33.670-08:002014-11-06T18:57:33.670-08:00Anon:
The Bible is a pre-scientific document that ...Anon:<br /><i>The Bible is a pre-scientific document that takes no notice of race in the scientific sense. Therefore, for the Christian, anything it calls a man is the spiritual equal of any other man. This is the basis of the Christian concept of "equality", and it was around right from the start, and long before the Reformation. Plenty of non-whites are mentioned in the Bible. Early Christians tried to convert anyone who would listen, including negroes. That this spiritual equality would ultimately be translated into a legal equality in Christendom isn't very surprising.</i><br /><br />While it might not mention "race" in the sense that most use the term today, the Bible makes considerable mention of all kinds of different nations, tribes, or ethnic groups - the Old Testament especially. There's also the whole Tower of Babel story, which is not well-loved by globalists. There is really only the one rhetorical flourish in Paul's latter to the Galatians (3:28), which makes a kind of appeal to equality. The church never really applied this as the SJW's today do, however. The same writer stated women had no business speaking in church, for example. But yes it was an easy jump from a religion which was universalist in nature to be hijacked by the egalitarian utopians. Funny thing about such folks is that like Napoleon the Pig in Orwell's <i>Animal Farm</i>, they certainly view <b>themselves</b> as being "more equal than others."Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-57228933312022826912014-11-06T17:25:11.015-08:002014-11-06T17:25:11.015-08:00"The ruling elite of the western world have e..."The ruling elite of the western world have embraced a religion or an ideology which basically calls for the extermination of whites and the abolition of all white nations, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government. This utopian ideology has been around for at least 300 years, perhaps longer - but not before the Protestant reformation. The extermination aspect has only become obvious in the last century, but the lie of "equality" is the thing which drives it. "<br /><br />The Bible is a pre-scientific document that takes no notice of race in the scientific sense. Therefore, for the Christian, anything it calls a man is the spiritual equal of any other man. This is the basis of the Christian concept of "equality", and it was around right from the start, and long before the Reformation. Plenty of non-whites are mentioned in the Bible. Early Christians tried to convert anyone who would listen, including negroes. That this spiritual equality would ultimately be translated into a legal equality in Christendom isn't very surprising. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-42070559567923420102014-11-06T17:14:44.712-08:002014-11-06T17:14:44.712-08:00"The statement about the Catholic church is c...<b>"The statement about the Catholic church is closer to the mark. The ruling elite of the western world have embraced a religion or an ideology which basically calls for the extermination of whites and the abolition of all white nations, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government. This utopian ideology has been around for at least 300 years, perhaps longer - but not before the Protestant reformation."</b><br /><br />Indeed it MUST be religious in nature. If it were only about "money" one could simply offer a conspirator enough money and they would spill the beans on the whole thing! Also, money and power alone are not sufficient to explain the extremely long time frame in which this "great work" is being advanced.. It is 100% a religion.<br /><br />I will say that the extermination of the white race is unlikely. If nothing else they will make up the inner-party and of course the ruling class. Clear evidence is that the world's real power brokers have always been white (or Saturday people). By my estimation the Saturdays are a big piece of the puzzle but not the entire picture.<br /><br />Their goals are abolition of all the "old" monotheistic religions (specifically Islam, Judaism, and Christianity). Abolition of all nation states. And shackling "the mob" in a totalitarian socialist "benevolent dictatorship". <br /><br />They believe the ends justify the means, and they believe in "Order ab chao" (Chaos which they created).<br /><br />Bear those three goals in mind when you view national and world events and you will see just about everything happening futhers one of more of those goals.<br /><br />Oh, and look up the seal of Martin Luther. It's a rose and cross. This shouts that he is very likely an adept in that branch of the mysterys. Certainly the "reformation" and fracturing of the Catholic church was a huge blow to the political clout of the Vatican. I'd be shocked if that wasn't carefully orchestrated. <br /><br />For the record. SBPDL is the ONLY race realist site that will post comments that even hint at YKW and secret societies.<br /><br />Thanks ever so much, PK. I feel this is vitally important. Then again, if I'm totally wrong, it shows you have faith in the discernment of your readership to research and think for themselves and make up their own minds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-71152570227730162802014-11-06T17:14:31.177-08:002014-11-06T17:14:31.177-08:00The problem with conspiracy theories is that they ...<b><br />The problem with conspiracy theories is that they rely too heavily on the rule of "Cui bono?" Broad social movements may benefit some and disadvantage others, but this doesn't prove that they are the results of a preconceived design executed by a conspiracy. </b><br />You are correct, cui bono does not explain the nature of the conspiracy at work, nor will a short sighted view of some immediate visible win reveal the larger picture.<br /><br />Cui bono and "follow the money" are often really good places to start looking when attempting to explain thinghs which otherwise make no sense.<br /><br />"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." - Franklin D. Roosevelt <br /><br />Listen to JFK's "secret society" speech. <br /><br /><b><br />After a while, you get the feeling talking to some of these people that virtually everything that happens is according to some plot.</b> <br /><br />Once you understand the nature of the conspiracy, their symbols, and their motives you can indeed make a lot of connections.<br /><br /><b><br />One question I've always wanted to ask conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, whose bogeyman is "globalists", is how far back in history the conspiracy goes. Did "globalists" cause the fall of the Roman Empire? </b><br /><br />Alex Jones is a sensationalist and proven long-time bullshit artist. The fact that he has become the "mainstream" conspiracy advocate, and syndicated on satellite radio is enough to convice me he's either controlled or simply a useful idiot. On an interesting side note his wife is a pork dodger (funny how such a small percentage of the population always seem to pop up in the damndest places). The way I read him, he is combination of honeypot and poison pill. There are certain things he will NEVER touch. <br /><br />Anyway, the religion to which the conspirators subscribe is ancient. They trace their own roots to the Old Testament story of the tower of Babel, and the building of Solomon's Temple. These are all largely symbolic, but the order is very old.<br /><br />As far as what we can really trace of their influence in world politics, start with the order of the Assassins who were among the first sect who adopted many of the control, initiation, and infiltration methods we see today. Much of their "secrets" along with Talmudic occultism was brought back west with the crusaders (Knights Templar to be specific). <br /><br />The Order of the Rosicrucians (Merovingian bloodline cult) is a similar branch that took the mystery religion west that undoubtedly influenced much of the national and international politics of the last millennia in Europe. <br /><br />You can do some digging, there's plenty of great books that tie together this ancient religion/secret society with many world events. It's quite easy to follow their "genealogy" if you will, right up to the modern day.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-54461122380401504022014-11-06T14:11:02.082-08:002014-11-06T14:11:02.082-08:00Bogo, you are correct. There are real tax benefits...Bogo, you are correct. There are real tax benefits in "providing" affordable housing. There is actually an industry that puts deals together for such rewards.<br /><br />Not only do we peasants pay the taxes for this, we also pay the taxes for the rich who gain from Section Ape.<br /><br />Pure, fascinating evil.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-65842274638883128902014-11-06T13:16:02.201-08:002014-11-06T13:16:02.201-08:00BTW, we started to have a little "cui bono&qu...BTW, we started to have a little "cui bono" reporting by PK a couple of threads back on the topic of Section 8. It was quite interesting to see the principal beneficiaries of the Ferguson thug-rookery where the sprog Michael Brown grew to be St. Swisher the Sweet, Ferguson's Gentle Giant. It was an LLC in South Portland, Maine whose management was very YT indeed. There might have been a TWMNBN among them but not obviously so. Obviously these nice well-off white-folks who run that slumlord racket receive considerable "bono" from the taxes extorted by the Banana Empire and seem appear confident in their moral superiority over other whites they regard as less human than negroes (who are divine beings they serve, and do very well in serving). <i>Cui bono</i> is always an important question, and the answers sometimes lead to unexpected results.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-44939818423157047722014-11-06T12:43:45.117-08:002014-11-06T12:43:45.117-08:00Ideologies and religions (which are very similar i...Ideologies and religions (which are very similar in many respects) are all too often referred to as "conspiracy theories". There was a <b>conspiracy</b> to assassinate Abraham Lincoln in 1865 involving 3 people besides John Wilkes Booth. The officially-approved purpose of this conspiracy (to revive the Confederacy) was completely insane by any rational measure. Lee's surrender was a done deal. The Confederacy was finished. It's possible that Booth and his 3 associates were really so deranged that they actually believed killing Lincoln, Johnson and Seward would revive the Confederacy. Such an action <i>could</i> have changed things if carried out in April of 1863, but not by 1865. <br /><br />The statement about the Catholic church is closer to the mark. The ruling elite of the western world have embraced a religion or an ideology which basically calls for the extermination of whites and the abolition of all white nations, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government. This utopian ideology has been around for at least 300 years, perhaps longer - but not before the Protestant reformation. The extermination aspect has only become obvious in the last century, but the lie of "equality" is the thing which drives it. Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-82777000319827169972014-11-06T12:20:12.020-08:002014-11-06T12:20:12.020-08:00Democrats win? Buy more guns, ammo, food and have ...Democrats win? Buy more guns, ammo, food and have a good water supply.<br /><br />Republicans win? Buy more guns, ammo, food and have a good water supply.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-32689445801857796882014-11-06T11:49:47.931-08:002014-11-06T11:49:47.931-08:00"There is a conspiracy at work ... Even among..."There is a conspiracy at work ... Even amongst those who can see, many see the symptoms, but who really understands the cause?"<br /><br />The problem with conspiracy theories is that they rely too heavily on the rule of "Cui bono?" Broad social movements may benefit some and disadvantage others, but this doesn't prove that they are the results of a preconceived design executed by a conspiracy. After a while, you get the feeling talking to some of these people that virtually everything that happens is according to some plot.<br /><br />One question I've always wanted to ask conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, whose bogeyman is "globalists", is how far back in history the conspiracy goes. Did "globalists" cause the fall of the Roman Empire? How about the agricultural revolution of circa 10,000 BC?<br /><br />Sometimes things just happen. Hard to believe, I know.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-43067107882114382032014-11-06T11:45:47.979-08:002014-11-06T11:45:47.979-08:00@Ex NY:
That was one classic masterpiece of a ran...@Ex NY:<br /><br />That was one classic masterpiece of a rant! You're quite right, there's really nothing which ails the place that couldn't be remedied by a 50-megaton fireball. Same is naturally true for Shitcongo, Atlanta, LA, Detroilet (redevelopment!) and a few others. <br /><br />Might be more amusing to watch it all descend into full Afro-retard mode: Congo-style 'bushmeat' sales, witch-burnings (a truly fitting end for a feminist), with a Gentle Giant Big-Man in Gracie Mansion - punctuated by periodic visits from the Ebola-chan, the Diva of the Copybook Headings.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-60041981369380002152014-11-06T11:23:38.571-08:002014-11-06T11:23:38.571-08:00Anonymous "moderate"
We should focus on...Anonymous "moderate"<br /><br /><b>We should focus on goals that are not too extreme, and demand that our Congressmen make it happen. It will be a waste of time to demand that Congress enact new laws to create a white homeland or to ship all negroes to Liberia. An achievable goal would be to pass laws to clearly limit AA to to its original stated purpose of not discriminating against minorities rather than its current function of the promotion of incompetence. Another achievable goal would be to cease subsidizing and encouraging the continuing failure and irresponsibility of the undertow and utilize EBT and other gibmedats as tools to encourage responsibility and productivity with the amount of money dedicated to these programs to be reduced significantly each year.</b><br /><br />Note how anon has already conceded the legitimacy of the racial preferences which go by the Orwellian term "Affirmative Action"? His proposal boils down to that of Bill Clinton the last time anyone dared to bring up the subject: "Mend it, don't end it." This is a perfect example of Repuke surrender in action. How about termination of all racial preferences, as even the honest negro Ward Connerly (remember him?) worked to do? You know, strictly color-blind, as used to be advocated? <br /><br />Before the 1990 amendments to the civil rights act, passed with Repuke votes and signed by "Poppy" Bush, those claiming "discrimination" needed to prove they were <i>actually discriminated against</i> on the basis of race. After the amendments, no such proof required. All they have to do now is convince the always-sympathetic blackrobe that the amorphous, shifting standard referred to as "disparate impact" (which never applies to whites) has been met. Basically, it turned the standard of proof on its head: any company sued by a negro has to prove that there is no "disparate impact" with respect to negroes being in all positions equal (or greater) to their percentile of the population. Strict quotas would actually be better for whites than this.<br /><br />This is all much too radical and KKK for our anonymous 'concerned friend'. Instead a shit-sandwich is offered of a meaningless compromise - to "return AA to its original purpose". Affirmative Action's original <i>actual purpose</i> was to remove whites and replace them with negroes and other preferred groups, nothing less. The goal-posts of what "qualified" means were continually shifted so that now even convicted felons can get the fat AA jobs. Like everything from the left, <b>AA was a lie from the very outset.</b> Boehner and McConnell have already given their surrender speech. <br /><br />The one good thing about the Repuke 'victory' is that they'll now be able to get us into several additional wars, which will bring about the Banana Empire's demise that much faster. Burn baby burn.Bogolyubskinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-19355348034794379632014-11-06T10:45:07.963-08:002014-11-06T10:45:07.963-08:00"Also, your view seems to imply that the $10,..."Also, your view seems to imply that the $10,000 donor always offsets your vote. I'm only guessing, but it doesn't seem likely to me that many $10,000 donors to a Republican candidate will be demanding that AA be strengthened to promote more incompetence and that we increase the amount of gibmedats to the undertow."<br /><br /><br />Well, riddle me this, if the people who own the politicians didn't want AA, gibs, etc. why is NOBODY in Washington aggressively opposing it? <br /><br />Frankly I'm not even suggesting that people with 10K$ even actually have a say in what happens, just that they can actually get one of these traitors to listen to them, smile, and nod for half an hour.<br /><br />My conclusion from logic and some deep historical research, is that the people who actually set policy want things to happen precisely the way they are. <br /><br />There is a conspiracy at work and virtually nobody can put their finger on who the enemy really is. We have had a few election cycles with a great anti-incumbent backlash, but what has changed? The continuity of agenda goes on. You could take the Pope and all the Cardinals and shoot them off into space on a rocket and in 1 year the Catholic church would have changed little. <br /><br />I firmly believe that a peaceful solution to the subversion of our government is completely beyond reach. The masses will always be easily manipulated and overwhelm the minority of people who can see. Even amongst those who can see, many see the symptoms, but who really understands the cause? I'd like to think I've got a good idea but I'm open minded enough to know that I could be off the mark as well.<br /><br />So, go on and write your congressman and let us know what his reply is, and come back in 2 years and let us know what he has and hasn't actually done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-54240411499986544702014-11-06T10:39:46.516-08:002014-11-06T10:39:46.516-08:00It is not as bad, and not as good, as all that. No...It is not as bad, and not as good, as all that. Not many Blacks, Latinos, etc. voted. Same for Single White women, who are now, most White women. Married women being a distinct minority among all racial groups.<br /><br />So, absent a Big Man Non White Leader on the ballot, to turn out for, the "diverse" coalition does not turn out.<br /><br />HOWEVER, Weeping Johnny and Mitch have a big problem. While they make their donors happy with going along with Obama, particularly in Wall Street and Hollywood, Academia, and the Media (as Steve Sailer's blog points out -- that's all HARD LEFT) their base detests them.<br /><br />The Base Wants: higher wages by less labor competition, a labor shortage; no Ebola-versity; a country for the Historic White Majority; key players reflecting the Historic White Majority; not paying for gibs for Vibrants.<br /><br />That's basically it and they expect the leaders to deliver. <br /><br />Look at Eric Cantor. He made his donors happy and screwed his base. Now Dave Brat WON his seat; Brat who ran on illegal immigration and stopping it, won. And Cantor is a small time lobbyist with a fraction of his earnings, wealth, and power.<br /><br />Bureaucracies die all the time. Human affairs are a discontinuous function. Just like metal or a building can be stressed, right up until the part where it breaks, bureaucracies can simply shatter under too much stress.<br /><br />The game of playing the Donor's tune while promising the base "real soon now" to do something for them has passed I think.<br /><br />Because Donor panderers like Weeping Johnny (and Mitch McConnell who barely survived his own challenge) fear being primaried. Hugging Obama and his policies allows young, hungry, ambitions guys like Dave Brat to unseat old, tired, corrupt hacks like Weeping Johnny. Who lost his best buddy ever Eric Cantor. <br /><br />My guess is that McConnell (fearing a recall election and with allies up for their own re-election) will go along with various investigations into Obama's illegal activities: Fast and Furious, gunrunning to ISIS in Benghazi, Solyndra, etc. while Obama simply "grants" Citizenship to illegals and declares Open Borders in a power grab. Which will force even Weeping Johnny to allow impeachment proceedings and the Senate to convict.<br /><br />Manchin in West Virginia, Landrieu in Louisiana, other Dems who need White support in run-offs and relections, think they'll tie themselves to Obama?<br /><br />Most Dems got around 20% of the White vote. And clearly, the trend for Dems is non-White political leaders at every level -- from staffer to President. Sure, money counts from large donors. As do mass illegal voting (illegals and Blacks voting five times). But for White politicians wanting to avoid a huge reduction in status, power, and wealth they either go along with the base or get scraps from the Donors; while political civil war rages into a hot one.<br /><br />Republican Party members could easily stage a primary-movement, or simply found their own party and watch the Reps collapse into Whigdom. <br /><br />Bottom line most Whites expect the Republicans to close the borders, stop pandering to Vibrancy, and boost wages by deporting illegals and stopping H1--Bs. And there will be hell to pay if they don't get it.Whiskeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01854764809682029464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-925974060638208772014-11-06T10:15:18.112-08:002014-11-06T10:15:18.112-08:00Anonymous said ”LOL. I assure you, when he weighs ...Anonymous said <i>”LOL. I assure you, when he weighs your opinion against the opinion of the folks who pay 10,000$ a plate to have dinner with him your words will be weighed accordingly.”</i><br /><br />Few people would dispute your assertion that a $10,000 donor will probably get more attention than the letter from a single voter, but the strength of demands from many voters will have far more impact on a Congressman's action than can be achieved by enlightening everyone that voting is ineffective and we can only wait and prepare for the sky to fall.<br /><br />Also, your view seems to imply that the $10,000 donor always offsets your vote. I'm only guessing, but it doesn't seem likely to me that many $10,000 donors to a Republican candidate will be demanding that AA be strengthened to promote more incompetence and that we increase the amount of gibmedats to the undertow. Perhaps the $10,000 donors want the same thing that you want, but the Congressman just needs to know that he has enough voter support to take positions as controversial as reforming AA and EBT.<br /><br />I haven't followed this blog for an extended period of time, but I have been surprised how many commenters seem eager to just give up and wait for the end. I agree that it is prudent to be prepared for a crash, but I cannot understand the thinking of those who appear so willing to let the crash happen without attempting every alternative. Many times during my life I have encountered challenges that seemed hopeless and I wondered if it was time to just give up, but more often than not if I continued working the problem, I found a solution. I don't give up until there is no alternative, and in my opinion we're not there yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3890530692790573387.post-51326132150448153772014-11-06T09:47:19.671-08:002014-11-06T09:47:19.671-08:00Roughly 20 million people in New York State and no...Roughly 20 million people in New York State and not even 4 million of them voted. King Cuomo won by about half a million votes. You look at a map of where he won, it's all major cities except for the northeast corner of the state, and he somehow lost Rochester. I'd sure like to know where all the gun owners were. <br /><br />It's no wonder the elected people don't take the voters seriously; not enough of them vote to matter. <br /><br /><br />I have to say, though, were I the Republicans I'd rub my newly elected black pets in the face of the Democrats, too, just for the simple reason that the Dems will show off their racism in spades over it. Which gives you one more place to point out their hypocrisy. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com