Wednesday, December 15, 2010

For all those who Referee/ Umpire sporting events...

Stop. Stop now. Don't umpire or referee anymore:

Above, you can view the most shocking video we’ve seen thus far today. It depicts a sequence from a recent high school basketball game in Florida between DeSoto County and Port Charlotte. For the first 1:20 of the video, absolutely nothing out of the ordinary happens. Then, things get nutty.

A DeSoto player and Port Charlotte player got into a minor scuffle after an inbound pass, which appeared to get the involved DeSoto player ejected from the game. He was, um, not happy about this. First, he pleaded with the official. Then, that didn’t work, so he shoved the official (very bad decision #1). Then, he felt his work wasn’t done, so he actually wrestled the official (and himself) to the ground (very bad decision #2).

Fort Myers News-Press sportswriter Carl Bleich (Mad Magazine parody name: Carl BLECCH) alerted The Big Lead to the video; they then posted it and unsuccessfully tried to learn the player’s name (he might still be a minor, so DeSoto wasn’t at liberty to divulge his identity, and the school’s MaxPreps page doesn’t list a roster, so that method won’t work, either).

SWFL Hoops, who uploaded the video to Youtube, had this to say about the incident on the video’s page:
The game ended in forfeit after the player from Desoto High School in Arcadia, FL attacked the referee. The player has been removed from the team and may be facing expulsion as well as legal ramifications.
We’d say that sounds about right. We also have to wonder if anything else happened early in the game that might have made tempers flare, just because of how insanely fast things spiral out of control in the video. Either way, the player has to be wishing he’d handled this whole situation a tad differently.




49 comments:

Don said...

The player has been removed from the team and may be facing expulsion as well as legal ramifications...................................................................................................................................



May be facing expulsion!. MAY BE!!!???....How could there possibly be ANY doubt?!. He launched an un-provoked attack on a school official in front of two hundred students, for all to see!..May be!?. Immediate expulsion THEN assault charges are in order here...Yeah, just keep telling yourselves people "they are just like us"!...Awaiting "black guy & "Desiree" to find some sort of excuse for this behaivior!.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

We are all alike!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSd8DAEHkLk

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGX_EvmOJos

Don said...

@ SBPDL... Lol!, good ones!.

Anonymous said...

Absolute, f*cking, savages. And it's only getting worse...

JS

Desiree said...

@ Don:

I love B-ball and many times refs make stupid calls. The player 'in the wrong' clearly made contact with the other player and it was a good call, in terms of it being by the books.

Was it a big deal that they made contact? Well, as a basketball fan, I'd always say no, regardless if the team receiving the foul is a team I want to lose. Such calls fuck up the rotation of the game.

Players know this, too. He got heated--maybe he was in foul trouble?--and perhaps it was the wrong thing to do, to push/shove the ref. But, in reality, we all know this is not a big deal because getting overly emotional as a player is common. Adrenaline is going and people get excited. Who cares?

I don't know how many times I've wanted to clobber a ref during Playoff season.

But assault charges? Don, untwist your panties. That is a little excessive and you know it.



@ SBPDL:

We are all alike.

In your megalomaniacal quest to be the Glenn Beck of your field--whatever THAT may be--and that quest entails hiding information to suit your needs, you failed to highlight European soccer matches and white brawls during football games, all available for viewing any Wednesday or Thursday night on TruTV.

Yes, regardless of the race, sports fans really do behave the same way. Especially when given liquor.

I've seen a few girl videos but this is a male/Neanderthal behavior. Women really are the ones who are more highly evolved and civilized. Our civility dips when we associate with men. And when women get in trouble, do men come to visit us in jail? No! But the vice versa occurs because women are not assholes.

By the way, the white boy in the second video you linked was truly a mark and if he could actually swing to defend himself, there would have been a real fight. Too bad he couldn't; he was dissed for no reason.

Anonymous said...

LOL @ Desiree. First you INSIST that "We are all alike" and then you go into how women aren't assholes and are more evolved and civilized. Way to contradict yourself.

Anonymous said...

Deziarrhea, in case you've ever wondered why no one reads your blog...

You're boring. You're predictable. You're unoriginal.

And your obvious and desperate need for attention from white males is pathetic.

Anonymous said...

Women really are the ones who are more highly evolved and civilized. Our civility dips when we associate with men.

Spoken like a true black lesbian

Don said...

From Desiree:Players know this, too. He got heated--maybe he was in foul trouble?--and perhaps it was the wrong thing to do, to push/shove the ref. But, in reality, we all know this is not a big deal because getting overly emotional as a player is common. Adrenaline is going and people get excited. Who cares?..........................................................................................


I knew it!, I just knew it!. And you didn't take long. I knew you would make excuses for this type of behaivior & you did not disapoint!...The REASON that assault charges need to be put on this thug is because this was an attack on a SCHOOL OFFICIAL, not random fisticuffs between two peeved players!. I should not have to go into the vastly greater importance of the maintenance of order & decorum in the school enviornment & that attacks on teachers, officials, et.al can NEVER be tolerated.....I played baseball in Jr. high & high school & the refs irked me on numerous bad calls but I would have NEVER in a million years thought of attacking him, there in lies the difference!!.

Black guy, Desiree is full of excuses! (as WE ALL KNEW she would!). Your turn!.

Fayette White Guy said...

LOL @ Desiree. She's gotta be taking the piss. Not a big deal huh?

I don't know what the savage's problem was in the second video. But Hoover is a bunch of thugs, that's for sure.

Anonymous said...

Pardon my French:
This is just a fucking nigger acting like a fucking nigger. It really doesn't get anymore complicated than that.

Desiree said...

I should add, no one wants to ever take an ass-beating like a man. I'm not talking about an assault or a group beating, but a little schoolyard-style ass-beating, you know?

If you have the stomach to watch UFC or boxing, you should be able to take a one-on-one ass-beating like a man (or, alternately, beat someone's ass one-on-one). If you watch boxing or UFC and you can't take an ass-beating, then you are a hypocrite.

Before anyone gets confused or wants to say I'm 'ghetto', I am a pacifist. I wish everyone could turn the other cheek and just not fight. I don't do it! But I also am a realist. I know that sometimes you just want to kick someone's ass and sometimes you know some people deserve it. Might not be the smart thing to do, the levelheaded thing to do, but it's a human response.

And it's an ass-beating. Not someone being assaulted. I'm trying to make this as clear as possible so (white) people don't get confused.

If your pride is a little scuffed, remember: do you really want your tax dollars feeding the dude who beat your ass while he sits in jail? Don't say you want him to get an ass-beating in jail that would 'serve him right'.

If that's the case, I think you should learn to fight better so you won't catch an ass-beating but be the one delivering the ass-beating.

That's the problem with this country. Girlie men. Like the ones in this thread calling for arrests and legal action....

Anonymous said...

Says Desiree: "But assault charges? Don, untwist your panties. That is a little excessive and you know it."

A generic definition: "Assault is often defined to include not only violence, but any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent."

Please tell me, then, how what this player did was not violent, was not intentional, was not physical, and how you figure the referee consented to being thrown to the floor. Then I'll believe you know what you're talking about in saying that to call this assault is "a little excessive."

--Mencken--

Anonymous said...

"...and perhaps it was the wrong thing to do, to push/shove the ref. But, in reality, we all know this is not a big deal..."

Really, does anyone need another example of black "thinking"?

Violence, and utter disregard for civilized behavior, is their default mode. For blacks, this type of savage behavior really ISN'T a big deal.

JS

Anonymous said...

The video has been pulled/made private, but here's another youtube link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrXOhbypuVg

Notice how happy the groid in the stands is at the very end of the video. They all thrive on lawlessness, violence and mayhem.

Anonymous said...

I think this is part of that new Fox reality show, "When Blacks Attack"

Desiree said...

"First you INSIST that "We are all alike" and then you go into how women aren't assholes and are more evolved and civilized. Way to contradict yourself."

No, sports fans are all alike, it's true. People are all alike, regardless of race. That's true; cultural differences make us different but that's malleable and our human responses are all the same.

Which is why brawls break out at American basketball and football games AND at European soccer matches. Remember, check out TruTV on the alloted days of the week.

BUT men and women are biologically different; you can put it under a microscope or scan it with an X-ray. You cannot tell me WOMEN are less civilized than men; I won't have the conversation because it isn't true. I never said eliminate men, no, but you just aren't as highly evolved.

This is not contradictory, either. Nor is it sexist or any indication of lesbianism.


@ Deziarrhea Anonymous:

"Deziarrhea, in case you've ever wondered why no one reads your blog...
You're boring. You're predictable. You're unoriginal.
And your obvious and desperate need for attention from white males is pathetic."

LMAO. Sorry that was just too funny. Actually many people read my blog. You can look at my site if you'd like to see the number of comments I get (I just put up a new post so the comments will come soon). And that's not even reflective of the number of people who read it.

Naturally, I don't expect you to click over to my blog from here because if you hate black people, I doubt you'd want to read analysis of a deceased, rich and famous, gay black pedophile who wanted to be white. That doesn't interest you but it interests a lot of people so I write about it for these people.

This post was about a black basketball player pushing a referee and you are talking about how I have a desperate need to get attention from white men? Where did THAT come up?

You should know that this is not the only blog I frequent. But this is the only blog I frequent with such a readership that is almost entirely 'white male', which does tickle me, I have to admit. But I am not at all interested in racist white men. I enjoy sparing with you guys but it really isn't deep-rooted.

You really shouldn't think about me in such ways. Does Black guy have a desperate need to get attention from white men? Why am I any different? Because I'm a 'girl'?

Again, such baseless accusations should be kept to yourself.


@ Don:

Yes, I gave you what you wanted to hear. I agree with you; I wouldn't shove a school official either. But, again, no deal. No one was hurt. Assault charges is excessive for a high school player, or any player if someone wasn't seriously injured. Sorry, that's the way it is, regardless if it was a school ref or not. Just suspend his ass and bar him from playing B-ball.


@ Mencken:

Untwist your silken pink panties, too. The shove just wasn't a big deal. If a white player had done that to a black ref, would you really want him behind bars with a record that would follow him for the rest of his life?

I wouldn't. Assault is a felony where I live and I don't think it would be right for someone to have to pay for too much testosterone and adrenaline during a HS B-ball game for the rest of their life.

If you could live with someone doing that to a young person, I'm glad you aren't a judge or in the legislature. Let me guess: you think it was 'levelheaded' how they dealt with Emmitt Till?

Anonymous said...

Lol, Arcadia is my home town and i can say its a pity what its degenerated to. We always kept the blacks in line there historically, but since around the mid 90s theyve really gotten out of control. But the state of Florida has really orchestrated this and destroyed all small towns in Florida. By insisting that lowincome housing be built in all areas of the citys, all that was accomplished was to cause all whites who could afford to leave to do so, and move into the county outside of the city. This caused the blacks to develop an even worse attitude than they had before and turned the city into a big slum with less property value than in the 80s, and it was that way before the housing bubble burst. Sad fate for a town that was rated in the top 10 small towns in the nation in the early 80s.

Artur said...

It's like a monkey, it can't control itself.

Anonymous said...

Desiree, like someone said before, you and black guy might be blacks who are more white-like, and maybe I could tolerable living in the same neighborhood with you....maybe.

However, whites do not live like blacks, we don't talk like blacks, we do not have the same interests or the same priorities. Black culture is foreign to us. Blacks are coarse, rude, loud, self-indulgent, hateful, criminal. Sure there are a few good ones, but those folks have already blended in with us and you don't see them. We don't want to blend, or mix, or multicult, or just "get along". We want to separate physically from you. This is the problem and you do not get it.

You may think that most people want to whip someone's ass, maybe blacks do, but most white people actually want to get the hell away from blacks. Look how much time and money we spend trying.

Blacks handle things with violence and black mobs can grow out of control very quickly. Ever heard of the Boondocks' "Nigga Moment"? It can happen in a snap. Black low IQ brings down the white averages and lowers the quality and standards of everything. You don't recognize the problem because you are black and have always been exposed to black culture. You can't help this, but whites are mostly repulsed by black behavior and lack of high standards.

Add to this the fact that whites pay for blacks to eat and exist in large numbers, and this makes us very, very angry. Blacks victimize whites and each other at higher rates. The stats don't lie.

We want for things to change, and for blacks to start funding their own project. Is this too much for your to understand, or too much for us to ask? Why do you keep arguing with us, we don't like black culture, it is foreign to us.

None of us really care about your opinions. You are young and liberal. You are unrealistic. You cannot change our minds with your long rants. Why not get back to the business of teaching people about Michael Jackson and spend your spare time on more important projects, like helping to educate your people? Just a suggestion.

Anonymous said...

"Actually many people read my blog."

LMAO. Sorry that was just too funny.

Artur said...

Please put a muzzle on Desiree. Like most niggers, it uses WAY too many words.

crimesofthetimes.blogspot.com

Please blogroll us !

joe said...

"
If you have the stomach to watch UFC or boxing, you should be able to take a one-on-one ass-beating like a man (or, alternately, beat someone's ass one-on-one). If you watch boxing or UFC and you can't take an ass-beating, then you are a hypocrite."

If you can't differentiate between to people agreeing to scrap and somebody getting suckered, you are a bigger dope than i thought. I guess 'surprise sex' wit de wimminz is just like getting laid, too....

Desiree said...

@ Anonymous 1:38:

"Ever heard of the Boondocks' "Nigga Moment"? It can happen in a snap."

The Boondocks is one of my favorite shows ever and I am deeply saddened you could watch a show as brilliant as that one and use it to further your hateful racism.

Let me guess: your favorite character--now, go on and admit it--is Uncle Ruckus, isn't it?

Aaron McGruder is a very intelligent black radical thinker but, as usual, makes the mistake of putting money in front of the message. I am sure he has to grapple with ignorant redneck thinking. Sometimes I sit and think the show helps and hurts.

The 'nigga moment' is a reality but only for 'niggas'. That you have failed to figure that one out shows the Boondocks is out of your league intellectually.

I will go back and educate the world on Michael Jackson but I believe I have the right, as long as SBPDL allows, to comment on his articles. Yes, they will be differing opinions. Why you feel the need to advocate silencing me is a reflection of the strength of your own arguments.

Yes, they are really weak and sort of indefensible when shown reality, aren't they?

By the way, if black culture is foreign to you, you won't grow any more well-versed in it by reading this site. You will, however, become more ignorant.



""Actually many people read my blog."

LMAO. Sorry that was just too funny."

Laugh if you'd like but it is true. Granted I don't get as many visitors as this site but I do have readers who read my blog everyday, even if I don't post for weeks and there are just discussions in my comment threads.

Have you been to my blog? Really, you are quite the simpleton.



@ artur:

On the blogging tip, have you seen your site? I happened to look since you are attempting to whore it to everyone here.

I may use too many words--an odd statement from a blogger, don't you think?--but you'd do well to get your writing together. It is called using more than one sentence to express more than one idea. Thank God you aren't reading it aloud; your face would turn blue with those run-ons!

SBPDL, don't blogroll him. His use of 'nigger' shows his intellectual capacity, which seems dubious at best.

Anonymous said...

Desiree says: "Untwist your silken pink panties, too. The shove just wasn't a big deal. If a white player had done that to a black ref, would you really want him behind bars with a record that would follow him for the rest of his life?

"I wouldn't. Assault is a felony where I live and I don't think it would be right for someone to have to pay for too much testosterone and adrenaline during a HS B-ball game for the rest of their life.

"If you could live with someone doing that to a young person, I'm glad you aren't a judge or in the legislature. Let me guess: you think it was 'levelheaded' how they dealt with Emmitt Till?"

I ask you to answer just four simple things for me, and you won't do it. You shuck and do some steppin', jive and do a little fetchin'. I guess it's what passes for intellectual discourse in your neck of the 'hood.

As to what I would want had the assaulter been white, as to whether I think a record of an assault such as this should "follow" someone forever, as to what I think of Emmett Till, you still have four pending questions on the table. I'll answer yours just as soon as you answer mine first. That's the way debate between intelligent people works. You know that, don't you?

So I'll ask again: Was it violent? Was it intentional? Was it physical? Did the ref consent?

Give me a simple yes or no, and you can certainly justify your answers all you need to after that. But do stop with all the shuckin' and jivin'. If you can't give a straight answer, I can only surmise that you know that it was, in fact, a criminal assault and you just can't bring yourself to say so.

Or perhaps you just don't have the capacity to articulate yourself.

--Mencken--

Blue Eyed Devil said...

This is a pretty simple concept when you get right down to it. The ref made a call. The shine went all Emo and had to be all about keeping it real and laid hands on the ref. Once again we see a stereotype or example (whichever you prefer) where a black person did something idiotic. Our highly educated female negro chronic commenter, who no one really gives two shits and fuck about, makes sure to chime in that the action of the negro thuglete isn't that big a deal. If it had been a white guy that snatched up the ref, he would have been considered a fucking douchebag and I seriously doubt anyone would have come to there defense. Notice how each perspective take on the given situation varies? LOL too funny.

Anonymous said...

"The shove just wasn't a big deal."

Partial list of things that are not "a big deal" to negroes...
1. Committing acts of violence.
2. Being arrested, going to jail.
3. Having out-of-wedlock children.
4. Hating whitey.

Anonymous said...

Desiree,

So it's an innocent "ass-beating" if a nigger assaults an authority figure, but it's assault if police have to use force to subdue a pcp-crazed nigger felon?

Or, more simply, if a nigger assaults YT you endorse it, but if a caucasian protects him (or her) self from violent TNB, it's time for the ghetto lottery?

I read your blog. Your still devastated that Michael Jackson preferred white boys to molest, and wouldn't satisfy your masturbatory fantasies by molesting you.

You sicken me, because you have the opportunities to become civilized, but you choose to maintain the savagery embraced by the majority of your people.

While I am on this rant, I must say: I once was horrified by the racial stereotyping and the things my friends and extended family would say about niggers. They would tell me..."You don't hate niggers because you have never been around them." (This is true--for the first 25 years of my life, I was in a 99.5% white rural area and my university was also 98% white). I made the mistake of moving into a nigger neighborhood in a major southern city (Charlotte, if you must know). Actually, I made the mistake of buying a home in a nigger neighborhood. My horror grew as the displays of TNB became greater and greater. Niggers took the furniture from my porch and carried it to the bus stop near my house. A nigger was actually f*cking a sheboon as they leaned against the tree at the corner of my lot. (I had pictures which I turned over to the police). I was gardening on a Saturday morning, went inside for a drink, and while I was gone, a nigger loaded up my gardening tools, plants and bags of topsoil into my roll-out trash can, and took off down the street. After calling police, I followed the nigger in my car. He was arrested. Of course he "di'n do nuffins"--he "found" all my stuff (but he was stupid enough to load it all into the trash can which had my address on it. When I went to court to testify against this worthless animal, it turned out that he had already been convicted 57 times for property crimes, assault, etc. OMFG. I could go on and on. Not all black folks are niggers (and you wouldn't believe the black folks that are my very dear friends)...but as Chris Rock said...black folks hate niggers too.

Desiree, you are a nigger.

Anonymous said...

It took me years to realize that it wasn't just random TNB in the vicinity of my home. The niggers didn't want whitey moving in and fixing up a house in the niggerhood. The aggressive nigger behavior was directed to intimidate me. Nigger terrorism. An expanded version of the bizarre nigger habit of skulking around near entrances and making sudden lunges toward white people, for the sheer nigger amusement of watching them flinch. Nigger terrorism. Of course to Desiree, this is perfectly acceptable, funny, whatever. But the truth is, civilized people do not behave in this manner. Niggers behave in this manner. That is why they are niggers.

Anonymous said...

Ultimately it is *behavior* which defines the nigger, and the *behavior* (Desiree, I am looking at you) of defending inexcusable TNB in niggers, well, that behavior is as bad as any other typical nigger behaviors.

I don't hate niggers for their skin color, or the other physical traits that usually accompany the darker skin (enormous lips, noses, asses, etc). However, the skin color and the other characteristics signal me that a person is likely predisposed to uncivilized behavior. It really is rational to respond this way. Other deadly animals (Coral snakes, Black Widows, etc) LOOK DANGEROUS so that those around them are made aware of the danger.

Thug culture, including thug attire, with its distinctive oversized pants, jerseys, T-shirts, stupidly worn hats, untied shoes, trashy bling, etc...those are further warnings to alert civilized people that a dangerous animal is approaching.

Desiree said...

@ Anonymous racist:

"So it's an innocent "ass-beating" if a nigger assaults an authority figure, but it's assault if police have to use force to subdue a pcp-crazed nigger felon?"

I never said that. I clearly differentiated between assault and an ass-beating, which is a simple one-on-one, schoolyard style fight. Please don't confuse the two. Also, it IS excessive force if police officers beat unarmed individuals, regardless of race. An officer trying to subdue a 'PCP-crazed nigger felon' with force is not an assault.

"I read your blog. Your still devastated that Michael Jackson preferred white boys to molest, and wouldn't satisfy your masturbatory fantasies by molesting you."

That is one of the funniest things I've ever read! No, no, silly, Michael Jackson molesting white boys has nothing to do with my 'masturbatory fantasies'; I would never want to be molested by anyone. But, perhaps you can explain something to me.

Why is it that little black Emmanuel Lewis' mother learned Mike had checked in to a hotel with Manny as 'father and son' (God knows what he was going to do to that boy!) and immediately ended the relationship? Yet, the parents of these little white boys he molested took million dollar payoffs, sometimes pimping the boys out to Mike for cars, vacations, etc.?

I am very close to a source in the music biz and word gets around fast in the industry. As a result, I know a lot of shit about Michael Jackson's little white boyfriends. A Norwegian couple pimped their son out to Mike and he became a live in lovetoy. A German woman let her six y.o. son be alone with Mike and he French kissed and fondled the boy!

Now, is it just that, when facing celebrity, white people are more stupid than black people, or is it that they are just totally amoral?

"You sicken me, because you have the opportunities to become civilized, but you choose to maintain the savagery embraced by the majority of your people."

Really? I didn't know I was uncivilized. That is a complete surprise. I was raised by a Stanford-educated mother and have always been upper-middle class. I am currently attending university in my city. I had no idea I was feral.

"Desiree, you are a nigger."

Do you really think that hurts me over the Internet? Come on, now. The pervasive use pejoratives tends to kill credibility and makes the user look uneducated.

Everything else you said is absolutely ridiculous and will get no response. I'd like you to answer that Michael Jackson question, though.

Desiree said...

@ Mencken:

"So I'll ask again: Was it violent? Was it intentional? Was it physical? Did the ref consent?"

a. Not really; aggressive, yes.
b. I would say it was intentional--he was upset.
c. Physical, yes; the essence of contact is physical.
d. The ref did not consent to the contact.

All in all, I don't believe the incident is worthy of a felony charge of assault, regardless if YOU, Mencken, feel is fits your criteria. Felonies stay on records and follow a person for the rest of their lives.

You know as well as I do that a moment of poor judgment--which is what that was--should not be enough to ruin a teen's life.

That you cannot be honest enough to admit that is a negative reflection on you. I never said the teen should go unpunished but giving him a criminal record is excessive.

Anyone with two brain cells to rub together and a heart that beats would agree. It is EXCESSIVE.

Now answer my questions: if it were a white teen player and a black ref, would you want him to be charged with assault and have a criminal record hanging over his head for the rest of his life (I wouldn't)? And, do you think what happened to Emmitt Till was excessive?

Honesty, Mencken, honesty...

Anonymous said...

"Desiree, you are a nigger."

I agree. She qualifies.

Anonymous said...

Desiree said:

"I never said that. I clearly differentiated between assault and an ass-beating,"

The differentiation exists only in the twisted malfunction of your brain, and is at odds with civilized humanity and the law. "ass-beating" is, obviously, assault. With your very flawed reasoning applied to a different situation, date rape is not rape because "a nigger beez hawny an' sheeit, gnomesain?" Being "upset" justifies assault, being horny justifies rape. Only in your mind, Desiree. I feel sorry for you.

Anonymous said...

"...You know as well as I do that a moment of poor judgment--which is what that was--should not be enough to ruin a teen's life..."

Target rich. Where to start?

This "teen" has already ruined his life. He - unless he is lucky enough to win the sports lottery - will do nothing the rest of his, hopefully short, life, but commit mayhem...

Again, assault to blacks is "poor judgement" And she is technically correct; regardless of the reason he had (right out in the open where you could get caught IS poor judgement. I'm sure the savage regrets getting caught...), they have no problem with the actual act, but with the moment. But assault is right in their wheelhouse. Thangs don't go a brotha's way? F*ck that mutha up! Woot!!

Not sure why we continue with this - blacks are garbage - they and we know it.

Cut the cord already...

Desiree said...

@ Anonymous 5:31:

Strawman after strawman after strawman...

You know, I tried to make myself perfectly clear so simpletons would 'get it'. Perhaps you are one of the ones that just don't.

I never said or implied horniness is a justification of date rape/rape, nor did I ever say being 'upset' is a justification for an actual assault. Most people know this. If that were a legitimate justification, I'd have been beaten up by many people, probably outright murdered if everyone from this site, for example, met in one room.

I simply stated that a schoolyard-style one-on-one fight, called an 'ass-beating' in my mental glossary--not an ambush or group-on-one beating or bullying--should not be considered an assault just because you happened to lose.

This used to be common knowledge until recently...

No, I feel sorry for you that you have to resort to using fallacies to defend your backward racism. Please, don't write a comment towards me if you are going to be dishonest, especially when what I'd actually said is written on the same page.

By the way, you ought to know that your ear for dialect is terrible. You should work on that.

Anonymous said...

"I clearly differentiated between assault and an ass-beating,"

How can you beat someone's ass without assaulting them, you dumb fucking whore?

Desiree said...

@ Anonymous 6:14:

Would you feel the same way if a white teen basketball player 'assaulted' a black referee? Would you seriously advocate giving him a criminal record that will follow him for the rest of his days?

Please, answer the question. Because I would say the same exact thing I've been saying about the black player: no big fucking deal!

This really is not a difficult issue. Maybe for you guys because, well, you're racists...

"Not sure why we continue with this - blacks are garbage - they and we know it.
Cut the cord already..."

Totally didn't get the memo on that one!

But let's be real: if black people suddenly ceased to exist, whites like you would suddenly have to face the reality of your pathetic status. No longer will there be someone to arbitrarily 'beat-up' and demean.

You would be the loser. Oh yes, the loser at the very, very bottom. You will deny that, of course, and say something else about blacks but that is just the predictable response!

By all means, PROVE MY POINT! Say something, anything!

But the reality is you are the no-hoper, the also-ran, the nonstarter and without someone to there to be the de-facto punching bag to assuage your true feelings of utter worthlessness, you would probably go insane, regardless if you have a seemingly 'nice life' in a 'comfortable neighborhood'.

Nope! You are the jackass. The court jester. The clown.

I know it and you know it.

Anonymous said...

"Would you feel the same way if a white teen basketball player 'assaulted' a black referee? Would you seriously advocate giving him a criminal record that will follow him for the rest of his days?"

Yes. I'd feel the same way.

And if he had a history of violence or other crimes (as this negro almost certainly does), then the punishment should be even harsher.

Any other questions, you dumb fucking whore?

Desiree said...

"How can you beat someone's ass without assaulting them, you dumb fucking whore?"

You people really are congenitally idiotic girlie men. This is seriously like teaching foreign language to rocks.

An ass-beating is what results when you lose a one-on-one schoolyard-style fight. Many people cannot take 'losing' so they want to report their lost fight to the police as an assault when that's not what it was. Had they won, they wouldn't be upset.

Assault is a legal distinction and does not always occur when a fight happens, a 'fight' being the aggressive consensual contact between two individuals.

I believe fights, and ass-beatings, should always be broken up. But they are not illegal.

When Brock Lesnar lost a few months ago, that was an ass-beating. The video in one of SBPDL's newest posts represented an assault. White teens beating up defenseless black homeless men is assault.

The video in this post? Not assault, certainly not in need of legal charges.

Please... totally simple concept. I doubt you'd care if the player was white and the ref was black (or white).

Anonymous said...

"You people really are congenitally idiotic girlie men."

And you're a dumb fucking negro whore, who doesn't have a fucking clue about the definition of "assault".

as·sault noun \ə-ˈsȯlt\
1
a : a violent physical or verbal attack
b : a military attack usually involving direct combat with enemy forces
c : a concerted effort (as to reach a goal or defeat an adversary)
2
a : a threat or attempt to inflict offensive physical contact or bodily harm on a person (as by lifting a fist in a threatening manner) that puts the person in immediate danger of or in apprehension of such harm or contact — compare battery 1b

Now, if you possess the ability to read, you can see that an assault can be a physical OR verbal attack, or even JUST A THREAT.

THAT is the definition. Whether you like it or not is not relevant, you dumb fucking whore.

Anonymous said...

I'd feel worse if a White player assaulted a black referee. Because I HATE when Whites commit senseless acts of violence, because I don't want Whites behaving like blacks.

It is that simple.

You will always find a reason, any reason, to justify and trivialize your race's violent ways. This includes changing the definition of "assault" if need be. Acts of violence are NOT a big deal to you savages. A brutha's gotta do wut a brutha's gotta do...

JS

Desiree said...

"Yes. I'd feel the same way.
And if he had a history of violence or other crimes (as this negro almost certainly does), then the punishment should be even harsher."

Sure you'd feel the same way. I know you are not telling the truth for the simple fact it took you very long to answer. Not to mention you had to include conditions not assumed in the original question.

This is a typical tactic of deceptive people.

"And you're a dumb fucking negro whore, who doesn't have a fucking clue about the definition of "assault"."

Why we are on the definition tip, do you know what 'whore' means?

a. A woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money
b. (informal) a promiscuous woman

You do realize what you are calling me, right? And that that is totally incorrect?

I was just saying that if you are going to wield a dictionary around, you might as well re-evaluate some of the words you're using as well.

"Now, if you possess the ability to read, you can see that an assault can be a physical OR verbal attack, or even JUST A THREAT."

I can't agree with some of those definitions because physical violence and words are two different animals. If I say, 'You fucking bitch, I'm going to kill you,' that should not in any capacity be put in the same category as me actually going out and attempting, through a violent physical attack, to kill said fucking bitch.

Do you get that? Regardless of the definition, words and physical violence are not the same which leads me to believe that dictionary, and some ridiculous laws in general, were written by yellow-belied girlie men afflicted with congenital idiocy. To charge someone with 'assault' for saying what I wrote above and put them in a prison cell with someone who did the attack I previously mentioned is nothing short of ludicrous.

An intelligent person would agree.

If we were in real life and you said what you say, 'You're a dumb fucking negro whore who doesn't have a fucking clue' in an 'aggressive' manner, and I felt 'threatened', do you think you should be put in jail for assault?

I doubt it.



@ JS:

"I'd feel worse if a White player assaulted a black referee. Because I HATE when Whites commit senseless acts of violence, because I don't want Whites behaving like blacks."

Yes, more conditions because you know you wouldn't feel the same way.

And when Neo-nazi skinheads beat up homeless black men, or homeless white men, are they acting black, especially when they are upholding 'race'? Really? LOL.

Anonymous said...

"I know you are not telling the truth"

And I know you are a dumb fucking whore.

Anonymous said...

"...Yes, more conditions because you know you wouldn't feel the same way..."

I have no idea what she means by this.

Conditions? What "conditions"? I stated that senseless acts of violence are not my thing, and that I despise Whites who act in that manner. I expect Whites to behave, just as I expect that blacks will not.

Apparently, in addition to dismissing black violence as perfectly understandable (because us Whites are a bunch of pussy's, I guess, who can't take a little shoving around?), she is also a mind reader, who knows how I really feel.

Look, the simple fact is that blacks are a disaster - especially in places (cities, countries, continents) that they "run" They poison everything they touch, although we are supposed to embrace their special cultural wonder.

No amount of attempted brain-washing from Hollywood and the TV, etc, can change this fact...

Desiree said...

"And I know you are a dumb fucking whore."

How so? If I said you are a racist fucktard, I can point to your comments as proof. But what evidence exists to tell you that I am a 'dumb fucking whore'? Whore especially. Have you talked to someone who's told you they paid me for sex?

You do know the meaning of the word 'whore', right? I'm assuming since you attempted to enlighten me on the definition of assault you do have access to a dictionary.

If you are going to used a phrase, by all means defend it!

By the way, I'm not surprised you did not address the other points in my comment. I'll take it a concession because we both know I'm right on this one. (And don't even bullshit anyone by saying you didn't read it. That is untrue and laughable.)


"she is also a mind reader, who knows how I really feel."

Actually, I'm not. It is just that I am well-versed in a technique called statement analysis. It's not foolproof but 9 out of 10 times, through peoples words and written statements, they give away their deception. Most people, even when writing, cannot lie well because lying is physically uncomfortable.

"the simple fact is that blacks are a disaster"

You're making the mistake of being extremist. Do you know just one exception to that ridiculous blanket statement would make it untrue? How about: Rice, Powell, Thomas, Carver, DuBois, King, X, etc., etc.

Me.

"I expect Whites to behave, just as I expect that blacks will not."

You expect whites to behave. How sweet. But, as with anyone of any race, bad people misbehave and good people follow the rules. I am a good person, as is my mother, my late grandmother, my aunts, my father, my black friends, etc.

This is not exactly 'acting black' for whites, is it?:

whitewatch.info

I will teach you the proper way to use a qualifier: after looking at White Watch, SOME whites are total disgusting filthy perverted savages with a lust (no, a real lust, not a figurative lust) for children and animals.

(that's the new site, SBPDL; update your blogroll)

Anonymous said...

"How so?"

Using the same logic you use when you say stupid shit like "I know you are not telling the truth"...
Ok, well "I know you're a dumb fucking whore".

Anonymous said...

There is nothing you could ever teach me.

You accept, on a number of levels, black violence. That is why I would never have anything to do with you, and why I have nothing to do with any black, unless I "have to" I avoid, as much as possible, black people. I rarely even watch football anymore. I simply do not care for you savages. Nothing you could ever do could change that.

So you go ahead and teach away - there are way too many White idiots who wholeheartedly agree with you. I am not one of them. You go ahead and declare that you have "won"; that you have rendered my opinions pointless, and that you have proven you and yours to be whatever you want to be.

I don't care. I don't waste one second of my time on earth in the company of blacks. I know who and what you people are. And so do you. You are used to having Whites grovel. I will never do that.

And never forget: at the end of the day, you are still black.

Anonymous said...

Desiree said: "Now answer my questions: if it were a white teen player and a black ref, would you want him to be charged with assault and have a criminal record hanging over his head for the rest of his life (I wouldn't)?

I don't make judgments based on the color of person's skin. So to answer your question, no, a hypothetical white teen should be charged with assault under the same circumstances. Actions have consequences, or should have, and sometimes they do follow us the rest of our lives.

Desiree further said: "And, do you think what happened to Emmitt Till was excessive?"

Well, you already guessed, didn't you, (December 16, 2010 11:04 AM) that I think it was "level-headed." Another example of your making your judgments based on the color of someone's skin, that.

But I think it was horrible what happened to little Emmett Till. Not being Solomon, I don't know what the correct disciplinary response would be in the instance where a 14-year-old boy propositions another man's wife, grabs her hand and grabs her around the waist (which, by the way, is an assault). But hitting him with a hammer and shooting him was excessive.

And, finally, Desiree, you said that the player picking up the ref and throwing him to the hardwood floor was being aggressive but not violent. You said, in essence, that the player only met three of the four conditions for assault, the one failing in this instance being it was an aggressive action but not a violent one.

Okay. Would you, then, please, for the benefit of all here reading this enlighten us upon the difference as you see it between "violent" and "aggressive"?

--Mencken--