 |
The 2008 US Presidential Election Results: a Visual Representation of the power of Black-Run America* |
This shows you the power of Black-Run America (BRA); the Disingenuous White Liberal (DWL) policies that work in lily-white Portland and Seattle are the same that work in monochromatic New England. They have failed in areas like Chicago, Detroit, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Kansas City, St. Louis and other cities in the mid-west where the 20th century “Great Migration” of Blacks from the south inadvertently brought economic ruin to most of those cities.
Though the Republican Party is embarrassed by the fact it is the de-facto political organization for white Americans, you can see for yourself that much of the country is united in their opposition to BRA. Funny that most of the Republican Party leaders - especially those entrenched in odious non-profits purporting to defend "the Real America" - are actively on the side of BRA. Only those white areas of the nation where the Black population is limited (and progressive liberal policies strangely work, though in Detroit they fail...) did they cast their vote for Mein Obama.
Peter Bradley recently wrote the most powerful column detailing who really are the Welfare queens (and just whom is represented on her entitlement court) at Vdare. He writes:
In 1990, the black-white breakdown for Aid to Families and Dependent Children (AFDC) was 41 percent black to 38 percent white. In 1999, the gap widened to 38 percent black to 31 percent white (with Hispanics constituting 25 percent). Blacks were only 12 percent of the population over this time period—so the image of the black welfare queen used by Ronald Reagan was rooted in reality.
he most recent racial breakdown of welfare recipients is from 2009. Officially, welfare is now called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). The racial makeup of Americans on the dole is as follows: blacks 33.3 percent, whites 31.2 percent, Hispanics 28.8 percent, Asians 2.1 percent and American Indians 1.3 percent.As John Derbyshire wrote this summer in TakiMag, food stamp use is going up and blacks are again leading the pack. Food stamps are now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Derbyshire quotes from a New York Times article:
“Nearly 12 percent of Americans receive aid—28 percent of blacks, 15 percent of Latinos and 8 percent of whites….Half of Americans receive food stamps, at least briefly, by the time they turn 20. Among black children, the figure was 90 percent.”[Food Stamp Use Soars, and Stigma Fades, By Jason DeParle and Robert Gebeloff, November 28, 2009 ]
We could have gone to Mars, but instead white state citizens are taxed so that we can pay to support the feeding, clothing, housing, “educating” (which means Waiting for Superman), and eventual incarceration of the children of the Black Undertow. Like 38-year-old Angel Yulee Adams and her brood of 12 (actually 15, but three children don’t live with her).
The citizens of those white counties all across the country have no desire to pay to support people like Adams; that’s why they’ve abandoned major metropolitan areas for nice Whitopias where they can still raise their children in a Norman Rockwell setting, devoid of the Black Undertow (or five or six illegal alien families living in one home).
The government of BRA (it didn’t start with Obama) has no desire to support the sons and daughters of the white working class and actively promotes policies that undermine the ability of hard-working Americans to make an honest living by engaging in free trade deals, moving manufacturing abroad, and importing millions of millions of people for their cheaper labor.
Inevitably, these policies will begin to impact even DWL (Stuff White People Like) whites. Obama’s War on White America has only intensified the attack on the Real America (remember his DoJ is suing states like Arizona, Utah, South Carolina and eventually Georgia and Alabama that dare pass laws to stop the illegal immigration invasion; didn’t California try and save itself in the 1990s when citizens voted for a bill that the courts eventually overturned?) that has been ongoing for decades.
This map of Red States vs. Blue States is wrong; it’s really a visual representation of white people’s rejection of BRA (and conversely, those predominately white areas where the full power of BRA don’t yet affect, like Maine, Minnesota, Iowa, Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Wisconsin, etc.).
James Carville famously told Bill Clinton back in 1992 that it was “the economy, stupid,” which the voters cared about. The America of 1992 is not the America of 2011. As a column on Vdare will soon state regarding the collapse of Detroit, it’s imperative that those who can see understand unequivocally that it’s “the race, stupid.”
It is these areas of the former Rust-Belt states that the white working class is being abandoned by the Democrats.
*White – denotes counties that voted for McCain
Black – denotes counties that voted for Obama
What to take away:
The Black areas in the south (primarily in Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Louisiana) are primarily Black counties. In Georgia, this is also the case (notice Atlanta).
The coastal areas of Oregon and Washington (Portland and Seattle); portions of Colorado (Denver and other where Disingenuous White Liberals escaping California have fled), the entire Northeast (the whitest portion of the country); and the predominately white counties of Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois (those surrounding Chicago) are completely transfixed with the concept of the Black Fictional Image.
It is these areas of the former Rust-Belt states that the white working class is being abandoned by the Democrats.
California, Arizona, New Mexico, and the Mexico – US border counties in Texas offer the greatest visual representation of why a strategy of Hispanic outreach is doomed.
58 comments:
"Inevitably, these policies will begin to impact even DWL (Stuff White People Like) whites."
Hence the 99%ers protest, for all their rhetoric they are largely protesting against immigration. And that is why the diversity industrial complex came out attacking, rather than supporting, them.
I read an article at American Renaissance last year that was also inspired by the map the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2010/07/an_expanded_pro.php
The author of that article seems to agree that those election results are a fairly accurate indicator of where WE are and where THEY are.
I know this might be a bit off topic, but is anyone else turning into a psycho from thinking about cannibals too much?
Lately, whenever I see a Negro in person or on TV or online, I superimpose an image over them that depicts them scrunching all up and making that famous Lee Harvey Oswald face.
Is that an indication of a diseased and disordered mind or is it perfectly normal?
Most of us in flyover country know that it is a problem. But politicians do not dare touch it with a 100-foot pole.
The place where I see the race thing come up most is in the South. 95% of Black voters vote Democrat, even the upper class residents. Nearly 50% of Whites vote Republican. However, look where the Black/White voter disparity exists the most: The Deep South. 6 out of every 10 African-Americans live in the Deep South. The South has the highest percentage of Blacks. By this assessment, the South should be a haven for Democrats. However, even since the administration of former President Lyndon Johnson, the South has been voting Republican alot, except when former President Bill Clinton was running. The South has been a Republican stronghold. It was a Democrat stronghold, until the 1960's. Many northern states, however, don't have large Black populations. Look at Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont. Small Black populations, but these states tend to vote Democrat alot. Georgia, Mississippi, and South Carolina have very high Black populations, but Democrats always lose here, even with Blacks voting heavily Democrat in the South. The question is: What is with the South?
People of Color have kids.
Whites do not.
Game over.
Public transportation in Seattle would be great, if it wasn't for all the niggers and their Disingenuous White Liberal defenders...
http://spdblotter.seattle.gov/2011/11/29/strong-arm-robbery-aboard-bus/
Strong Arm Robbery aboard bus
Posted by Detective Jeff Kappel
November 29th, 2011
On November 29th at approximately 3:45 p.m. officers responded to the report of a strong arm robbery on board a Metro bus near 23rd Avenue South and South Jackson Street. Preliminary investigation indicates that the victim was riding on the bus when an unknown suspect grabbed the i-phone from the victim’s hands. The suspect exited the bus and fled the scene on foot heading southbound. Responding officers conducted an area search but were unable to locate the suspect.
The suspect is described as a black male in his late 20’s, approximately 5’11”, 270 pounds with short curly hair and wearing a black jacket and blue jeans.
Anyone with information about this incident or who may know the identity or whereabouts of the suspect is asked to call 911 or Seattle Police and refer to this incident. Anonymous tips are welcome.
=================
http://spdblotter.seattle.gov/2011/11/29/detectives-make-arrest-in-south-seattle-robbery/
Detectives make arrest in South Seattle robbery
Posted by Detective Mark Jamieson
November 29th, 2011
On November 17th, at approximately 4:20 pm, a female was waiting in the bus stop at Rainier Avenue South and South Brandon Street, when she was confronted by two unknown black females. They attempted to take the purse she was carrying. A struggle ensued and the victim was knocked down to the ground and struck in the face. The victim let go of her purse and the both suspects fled, running eastbound on South Brandon. A witness observed the suspects get into a light colored sedan and provided the license plate number to police. The victim sustained a gash to her face. The Seattle Fire Department responded and treated her at the scene. Several patrol officers responded and attempted to locate the suspect vehicle, but it could not be located.
On November 27th, a 19 year old female, who matched the description of the suspect, was issued a citation while driving the suspect vehicle. The vehicle was impounded with a hold for the Robbery Unit. The next day, detectives followed up and contacted the suspect at 12th and East Yesler, where she was taken into custody. She was transported to the Robbery Unit office where she was interviewed by detectives. The suspect was then booked into the King County Jail for Investigation of Robbery. Robbery detectives are still investigating this incident as there is still an outstanding suspect
Hence the 99%ers protest, for all their rhetoric they are largely protesting against immigration. And that is why the diversity industrial complex came out attacking, rather than supporting, them.
Interesting points. As has been noted, the Occupy movement seems to be made up of primarily white people. And many of the things that they are (or were) protesting were related to the end of the American dream: home foreclosures, the rising cost of university education, etc. And there is the slogan about the 99% versus "Wall Street," the same economic elites who are frequently lambasted on race realist websites.
So the Occupy movement may represent some elements of populism, and dare I say, a white populism.
Of course, the whole thing had a definite left-of-center aspect. And many of their solutions, such as open borders, would only hammer more nails into their own collective coffins.
But I wonder. How much of the leftist aspect to the Occupy movement was because the left has been agitating among the people, while the right has failed on this front?
For example, many of the arguments which I have heard from the Occupy people seem to come from the Radio Pacifica party line. Is there a corresponding agitprop effort from the right to win over these people?
Anyway, there is a lot more that can be said on this topic...
Evergreen, if you want to know about the South, please go here, and read the comments too:
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2011/11/30/hillary-country/
In 2011, 54 percent of blacks live in the South. In 1911, 90 percent of blacks lived in the South. In 1911, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana were majority blacks. In 2011, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana have fewer blacks than almost ever before.
What is with the South?
Three words. Black voter fraud.
SNICKER....on Drudge
A Black whoring clown...
The Angel Adams video is simply dumbfounding.
(Video time point ― 02:19) "Somebody needs to pay for allll my children and my takin’ care (of them) and allll my suffering! Somebody needs to be held accountable. And they need to pay!”
Talk about surreal. Here’s a suggestion, Ms. Adams, how about you pay for the feeding and upkeep of all those children that you chose to have?
How about you “take responsibility” for the circumstances that you currently find yourself in?
How about you hold yourself "accountable" for bringing so many children into this world when you have no apparent means of support much less the individual skills to generate anything remotely approaching the adequate level of income to house, clothe and feed all of them?
This baby volcano shows not one whit of embarrassment or contrition that she, as a parent, is one gargantuan FAIL. Instead, we are treated to the outrageous spectacle of her towering sense of entitlement. She makes her ridiculous demands without even a trace of shame or mortification.
If this is characteristic of the typical Black urban mentality ― and, given the huge number of cases similar to this, it certainly seems to be ― then there needs to be new laws passed that can jail such individuals for voluntary child endangerment. This woman’s feckless disregard for the well-being of her children is nothing short of criminal. She is nothing less than a spectacularly unsuccessful welfare queen.
From all appearances, this individual is no more than early thirties in age. Given that, she has literally been spawning her sprogs since shortly after reaching puberty. It is equally apparent that she has never been able to provide for even the first few in an adequate manner, much less the subsequent dozen.
At some point, CPS (Child Protection Services), had an obligation to society and the already existing children of this woman to intervene and lock her up without conjugal visits, so that she could no longer continue to place even more children in danger of starvation and exposure.
None of this even addresses the uselessness of her sperm donor baby daddies, especially the one who is responsible for a dozen of these hapless drags on society.
Any bets that even a small fraction of these offspring will manage to avoid entering the legal system in the next few years?
[crickets]
Zenster....
Now...once the welfare system crumbles away...and IT WILL...
Imagine the hordes of these BREEDERS and their spawn...are going to get really bitter and dangerous....
Let's face it, she at least could put on a good front...and act "right" temporarily while talking to the white reporters...etc...
NOW...imagine all the "out of control and violent behaving sheboons"...and we all have seen them...once THEY get their attitude all jacked up...
It is going to get really ugly.
ALL in all...
I love it that Drudge is keeping all of this OUT IN FRONT of the white tax payer!
Turning blue counties to black and red counties to white doesn't accurately portray race.
COUNTY BLACK PERCENTAGE:
http://tommcmahon.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834515db069e20120a6cf1bac970b-800wi
2008 ELECTION:
http://geochristian.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/counties-2004.gif
As you see there is no straight correlation. Yes, most blacks are democratic, but so are most of the liberal cities in America. I agree with this website, but I just want to make sure you don't get ahead of yourself and make errors. If that is not what you intended to show (and you instead meant to show who was on the "white" side and the "black" side, then my bad.
What needs to be done - and I'll do it - is show those majority counties that voted for Obama with a different color other than Black.
Black Undertow counties - think Fulton, Jefferson, Prince George's County, and many others - would stay Black.
I'd even try and label a color that shows majority Hispanic.
But you are right, there does need to be a DWL color (which would cover the New England area, coastal Pacific counties, Denver, and Wisconsin).
Evergreen:
"The question is: What is with the South?"
The answer to your question lies in your post:
"The South has been a Republican stronghold... Many northern states, however, don't have large Black populations... these states tend to vote Democrat alot."
Whites with little actual experience with blacks think that they're oppressed rather than irrevocably dysfunctional, so they vote for socialist programs to "help" blacks - not realizing its a fruitless endeavor that only harms whites.
Whites who have the most experience with blacks - both daily interaction and long term; i.e. frequency and duration - see the problem. They don't see the logic in willing taxing themselves to pay for programs for people who are unable to take care of themselves; thereby perpetuating the problem.
I know, I know. Your family isn't on welfare, and you know some people... blah, blah... pointless anecdote that does nothing to contradict the general tendencies... blah, blah...
Qualifying additions to Anon 11:42:
People of Color have kids (that they can't support without financial assistance from whites).
Whites do not (need financial assistance, and will eventually tire of being taxed to support others).
Game over.
@SBPDL
DWL color (which would cover the New England area, coastal Pacific counties, Denver, and Wisconsin).
Try PINK for the damn pinkos....
Just a side note:
4 percent of blacks voted for McCain.
4 percent of blacks voted for David Duke when he ran for governor.
4 percent of blacks don't seem to know which button to push.
"4 percent of blacks don't seem to know which button to push."
So you are in favor of a dictatorship, telling people who they have to vote for?
And by the way, it isn't that Black
don't know what button to push, but rather, people look out for themselves. It is a matter of "I vote based on what's best for ME personaly, what I get out of it". We all do it. Blacks do it. Whites do it. Everyone does it.
"I know, I know. Your family isn't on welfare, and you know some people... blah, blah... pointless anecdote that does nothing to contradict the general tendencies... blah, blah..."
Actually, it is not pointless to ME. The "tendencies" do not reflect me and my family. It doesn't take into account the individual. Me and my family are making good choices because of personal responsibility and family responsibility. The question I have to ask is "What helps me as an individual"?
"Lately, whenever I see a Negro in person or on TV or online, I superimpose an image over them that depicts them scrunching all up and making that famous Lee Harvey Oswald face.
Is that an indication of a diseased and disordered mind or is it perfectly normal?"
That kind of thinking is sick-minded.
"The question is: What is with the South?"
The whites who vote Democrat are whites who DO NOT live around blacks.
Whites in the south interact with negroes, and observe negro behavior on a daily basis, and therefore vote Republican.
"Whites in the south interact with negroes, and observe negro behavior on a daily basis, and therefore vote Republican."
Then explain why Whites who live in the the Dakotas, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and Nebraska vote heavily Republican?
@ Everspleen
" The question I have to ask is "What helps me as an individual"? "
Nobody here gives a goddamn shit about YOUR LITTLE PERSON, got that?
Go to some Negro blog and leave us alone you whining moron!!!!
Evergreen: It is a matter of "I vote based on what's best for ME personaly, what I get out of it". We all do it. Blacks do it. Whites do it. Everyone does it.
If Whites looked out for themselves, there would be no blacks in the USA.
Evergreen: So you are in favor of a dictatorship, telling people who they have to vote for?
Are you incoherent?
That remark is wholly irrelevant to the point I made. Your reply is nonsensical.
What does a dictatorship have to do with noting that 4 percent of blacks voted for McCain and David Duke?
Minnesota and the black and white counties:
Having lived here for oh so long I can explain some of it---maybe a lot. In the Metro area to the south east, there are the mostly white counties that are black, surrounded by white counties that are mostly white as well. The difference is, is that the urban black areas are no longer inhabited by majority white Minnesotans, but by small town and east coast whites. Most of the natives moved to the suburbs following integration in the late 70's. Though a small black population by east coast standards, it was enough for us to know better. So, you either put your kids in private schools (49% of all children that live in Minneapolis or St. Paul) or you move to the burbs. The large black counties in the north of the state are the Iron Range areas--they have always had a socialist bent. That's where the Swedes and Fins settled. It was originally lumber country. However, they voted in a Republican in 2010 for the first time ever. They have had a taste of black importation in Duluth as well as environmentalism killing their jobs.
"Then explain why Whites who live in the the Dakotas, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and Nebraska vote heavily Republican?"
Because they're pro-life, pro-gun, pro-christian conservatives, who believe in small government, you clueless dipshit.
"It is a matter of "I vote based on what's best for ME personaly, what I get out of it"."
Evergreen, for the past 50 years, as the city of Detroit has gone from shining metropolis to urban shit-hole, the negroes of Detroit have elected nothing but Democrats, mostly black Democrats.
That's right...they keep electing the same people who gutted and destroyed the city...over and over and over.
So stop making excuses for black stupidity, it's pathetic, and it makes you look like a fucking jackass.
Are you incoherent?
That remark is wholly irrelevant to the point I made. Your reply is nonsensical.
What does a dictatorship have to do with noting that 4 percent of blacks voted for McCain and David Duke?
No I'm not incoherent. The "dictator" comment was in response to: "4 percent of blacks don't seem to know which button to push." The not knowing which button to push suggested to me that you felt that people needed to be told who to vote for.
"but Democrats always lose here, even with Blacks voting heavily Democrat in the South. The question is: What is with the South?"
Whites in those areas tend to vote 90% republican. It is just straight up demographics, and as noted, whites that tend to vote democrat are also the first out of a diversifying area.
"Then explain why Whites who live in the the Dakotas, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and Nebraska vote heavily Republican?"
There is also the rural vs city issues, but I don't think the republicans carried those areas by 90%
Evergreen: 'The question I have to ask is "What helps me as an individual"?'
mr_evergreen,
it is clear to me that despite all your protestations that you are not like the stereotypical black, you are all alike in that you keep demanding solutions from whites that do not require you to lift a finger or make any sacrifice.
Obama supporters supported Mccain's policies when portrayed as those of Obama
Democrats are so stupid as Whoopi Goldberg said.
@ AV
Someone needs to tell that gal in the video, "Ma'am, it's a vagina, not a clown car."
"...there does need to be a DWL color..."
Yellow, c'est la plus exacte.
Or perhaps lavender?
Crickets........... no ones
gonna git her sterilized
we live in a free society
[read... we pay]
ed show................ed is a creep
yes..USA is in a depression
Evergreen: "Then explain why Whites who live in the the Dakotas, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and Nebraska vote heavily Republican?"
These places vote heavily Republican because most of the states are purely rural with an agricultural back ground. Family farms are passed on from generation to generation and so are the values that go along with with it. If you notice the map provided, the bigger population centers vote liberal more often than not. Fortunately for those of us that tend to lean to the right, the rural population out numbers the population centers in these states, for now. This is coming from someone who lives in South Dakota.
Not having had much interaction with minorities throughout my life, I have just recently started frequenting sites like this one after researching the race riot at the Wisconsin state fair this summer. Needless to say, that incident helped me decide to stick it out here in the sticks instead of moving to Wisconsin, and this web site has opened my eyes to the unchangeably destructive nature of black society as we know it.
Evergreen:
Would you support or oppose the following legislation:
Elimination of AA, minority set-asides, and other laws that require preferential treatment of blacks in school admissions, hiring, and government contracts.
Elimination of federal welfare programs. Strict limits on use of state and local welfare programs so that they are truly emergency safety nets, and cannot be used as long term sources of income.
Elimination of Section-8.
Return to respect of property rights and free association, so that a business owner's choices in hiring and customers are not subject to government interference.
In all of the above, under current law, the rights of individuals ARE violated. Enacting said legislation and eliminating said laws would NOT violate anyone's rights. Where do you stand?
A coherent explanation would be nice. One that doesn't dance around the issue in a failed attempt to sound intellectual.
Ben in Indiana -
"If Whites looked out for themselves, there would be no blacks in the USA."
Wow, you have nailed it.
I live in Indianapolis. The troublesome blacks are all concentrated in the inner-city and a few of the college towns. I know many, many whites who wish that the blacks would just go somewhere else. If they did, also leaving would be the excessive trash and litter, the crime, rape and robbery, the hip-hop culture, the shitty neighborhoods, the rude government employees, the sirens and gunfire, the transfer of our wealth, and the fear.
These whites I know are good Christians, and being so are compelled, mistakenly, to help blacks whom they believe to be "oppressed". This is, after all, what God wants us to do. The blacks are laughing at us, trust me.
These whites are starting to realize that blacks are beyond help and hate whites. Blacks are not like us. There is zero return on our investment. I don't even think you can get into heaven for helping them. It only causes more destruction of our morals, culture, and property.
Evergreen will never understand that he is nothing special to us. Just as every criminal believes that he is innocent, most blacks believe that they are "good people". But compared to whites, they are not.
Evergreen is full of black pride and no shame. You will never get through to him and his false pride.
I, like most whites, wish no harm to decent blacks, but do wish they would all just go somewhere else.
"But you are right, there does need to be a DWL color "
Purple. Here is an example map of indiana that would be a good template http://images.encyclopediadramatica.ch/1/18/Revisedmapofindiana.jpg
"Talk about surreal. Here’s a suggestion, Ms. Adams, how about you pay for the feeding and upkeep of all those children that you chose to have?
How about you “take responsibility” for the circumstances that you currently find yourself in?"
Zenster, while I agree with the intent of your statement, it is not an option as its assigning undue empathy.
Its like me asking my dog why he choose to eat from the trash or lick his nuts if he didn't want bad breath. Or asking a chicken what they think of lips. That level of brain functioning isn't there. Chances are it that part of the brain (neocortex? Biology isn't my thing) isn't actually there.
Asked to mr. ebergreen
"Are you incoherent? "
Is this national ask a question with an obvious answer day?
"Would you support or oppose the following legislation:
Elimination of AA, minority set-asides, and other laws that require preferential treatment of blacks in school admissions, hiring, and government contracts.
Elimination of federal welfare programs. Strict limits on use of state and local welfare programs so that they are truly emergency safety nets, and cannot be used as long term sources of income.
Elimination of Section-8.
Return to respect of property rights and free association, so that a business owner's choices in hiring and customers are not subject to government interference.
In all of the above, under current law, the rights of individuals ARE violated. Enacting said legislation and eliminating said laws would NOT violate anyone's rights. Where do you stand?"
I would support getting rid of all preferential treatment provided NO ONE gets it. At the University of Michigan, there are special preferences set aside for applicants from the rural Upper Peninsula counties. Everyone made a big deal about affirmative action, but not about the Upper Peninsula deal. The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is mostly White people up there, very few, if any, Blacks live up there. One thing to note is that White females benefit alot from affirmative action. If affirmative action was even working, Black unemployment wouldn't be nearly has high as it is now.
The other things like welfare, I am not in favor of eliminating them as someone will need them at some time. Look at the welfare rolls. Yes, there are a higher percentage of Blacks on welfare, but there are more Whites on welfare than anyone else.
How I feel about section 8 and welfare, well, I look at it this way. What if you CAN'T afford a home? What if you really are trying and can't make it. I would say regulate the system to keep cheaters out and career welfare persons out.
The last one, well, I have a feeling of what that will lead to. If someone comes on your property to harm you, then by all means defend yourself. However, from what I'm gathering, it seems like you might be in favor of people being able to discriminate against Blacks. I do not want that coming back, not that it doesn't happen now. I do not believe the "free market" would solve that problem.
When Blacks were denied the right to vote, were told what schools they could go to, subjected to Jim Crow, individual rights were violated too. Here is a an idea. Do you think there is a solution where no one's individual rights get taken away and everyone enjoys the same rights as everyone else? In the USA, that hasn't happened by a mixture of your assessment and the stuff I know that happened to Black people pre-1964.
"Evergreen will never understand that he is nothing special to us. Just as every criminal believes that he is innocent, most blacks believe that they are "good people". But compared to whites, they are not.
Evergreen is full of black pride and no shame. You will never get through to him and his false pride.
I, like most whites, wish no harm to decent blacks, but do wish they would all just go somewhere else."
In short, you make no differentiation between a Black person who is NOT a criminal and Black person who is? For one, you were in the inner city. Of course you are going to be exposed to the worst that Black people can offer. I lived in a rural, predominantly White area in the South and I got exposed to some of the worst from Whites. I routinely got bullied by White kids in middle school and high school, some of them threatening to "lynch" me.
By the way, I don't think you know anything about me at all. I have no shame? What do I have to be ashamed of? I haven't hurt you, I don't commit crime, I work, I go to school, I treat people with respect. What do I, as a person, have to be ashamed of?
"mr_evergreen,
it is clear to me that despite all your protestations that you are not like the stereotypical black, you are all alike in that you keep demanding solutions from whites that do not require you to lift a finger or make any sacrifice."
What sacrifice am I expected to make?
"Not having had much interaction with minorities throughout my life, I have just recently started frequenting sites like this one after researching the race riot at the Wisconsin state fair this summer. Needless to say, that incident helped me decide to stick it out here in the sticks instead of moving to Wisconsin, and this web site has opened my eyes to the unchangeably destructive nature of black society as we know it."
In that case, how would you react if I, an African-American, moved to South Dakota? I'm graduating from college soon and I will need a job. I would gladly take a job in South Dakota and live there if it means I can work and make some money. Like my father says to me "you go where you can work and make money".
And something else. My father is from Wisconsin, born, raised and educated. He got both of his college degrees there. He held work there for a few years, then got let go. After being told the "overqualified" excuse over and over, he left the state to find work elsewhere, and found it. Here is a question. Why is it that educated African-Americans are leaving Wisconsin?
Mr. evergreen is just another finger wagging black man. He is an expert based on his victimology. He knows things are bad for his people. But he must keep hope alive for the ultimate payout of reparations to blacks, and sweet revenge against whitey for slavery. They must keep whitey on the hook, because without whitey, his schools, his businesses and technology, and his money, they have nothing. Blacks hate freedom. They hate American ideals like personal responsibility, rugged individualism, limited government, freedom to associate. Notice how all of these blacks have told us the color of their skin. That makes them experts on racism.
Blacks need whites, but whites do not need blacks.
Like Barack Obama, Herman Cain, Honest Crusader, Desiree, Black Guy, and all of the other Noble Negroes who post here, he uses a false black victim morality to put us all in our places. He is good just by being black. We are all racist bigots just for being white. If we dig deeper, we will find many problems. But it would be racist to do so.
Remember all of the insurance commercials where the all-knowing black puts the white man in his place? evergreen has been taught that he can do this too. He is emboldened.
We know what is best for this country. We built it. We run it. We fund it. We don't care what your opinions are. Create something of VALUE and we can talk. We are entitled to serve whomever we wish, in private, without your input. We are free to discriminate against whom we choose in our private lives.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqod16fhMPE
Blacks just don't have a product that we want to buy. There is nothing in your culture to emulate. However, blacks like evergreen have learned how to mimic white culture, and can find some success by denouncing their authentic blackness. But they are hypocrites, stepping and fetching for the white man by day, but going back home and living as an authentic black again. That must be exhausting.
Blacks are discriminated against because of their foul behaviors. I can remember my Grandpa teaching me to avoid blacks. This is nothing new. All of us have hundreds of stories of trash-mouthed black women cursing someone on their cell phone, creating a spectacle. ALL of us have stories about black ghettos, black thugs, lazy black workers, blacks "gettin' over", black crime, welfare queens, and the list goes on. And on. And on.
Give us a break. The Root or NewsOne would be better places. At least you will find like minded blacks to support your ideas. You will change no minds here. Freedom to associate = discrimination.
"And something else. My father is from Wisconsin, born, raised and educated....yada yada yada."
Are you trying to convince us, or convince yourself?
We don't care evergreen. Please go somewhere else with your sob stories.
YT: Zenster, while I agree with the intent of your statement, it is not an option as its assigning undue empathy.
Its like me asking my dog why he choose to eat from the trash or lick his nuts if he didn't want bad breath. Or asking a chicken what they think of lips. That level of brain functioning isn't there.
Your comparisons are as apt as they are amusing.
Yes, my questions were largely rhetorical and mostly there to serve any newcomers who might not have caught the incredible irony of this walking train wreck trying to blame others for her insanely poor life choices.
Lily White: Someone needs to tell that gal in the video, "Ma'am, it's a vagina, not a clown car."
Now, that's a keeper. Effing priceless!
http://nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2011/12/chip-off-old-block.html
Jesse Jackson Jr. on how blacks use the black church for illegal electioneering because "the rules do not apply to us."
Will someone please prosecute this clown and throw his black ass in jail once and for all?
Voter fraud, absentee ballot fraud, pulpit electioneering, threats of black rioting, looting and burning. Can't wait for 2012.
"In that case, how would you react if I, an African-American, moved to South Dakota? I'm graduating from college soon and I will need a job. I would gladly take a job in South Dakota and live there if it means I can work and make some money. Like my father says to me "you go where you can work and make money".
Come on down....apparently affirmative action works everywhere. Just remember this, when the shit hits the fan, we have a lot more bullets than we do minorities in this section of the country.
Oh...and you would fit rite in on the reservations. So come get it.
Thanks, Zenster. Ordinarily, I try to be civil on the boards, but when faced with such colossal stupidity as that woman in the video, the Snark Monster tends to rear its ugly head.
Said mr evergreen at December 1, 2011 5:57 PM:
"The question I have to ask is "What helps me as an individual"?"
Tell me about it. I ask the same question to myself all the time.
And the answer keeps coming back over and over: Stay the hell away from black folk.
--Mencken--
Lily White: Thanks, Zenster. Ordinarily, I try to be civil on the boards, but when faced with such colossal stupidity as that woman in the video, the Snark Monster tends to rear its ugly head.
Your response was eminently civil and, perhaps, if Ms. (not-much-of-an) Angel Adams had been told your exact words a few times during her self-inflicted train wreck of a life, maybe there would have been a different outcome.
Regardless of such wishful thinking, in future situations of such an inviting nature, please do not resist the least provocation if it would deprive us of such well-honed and brilliant witticisms. Truly a keeper, indeed!
Man and Woman arrested after one month old baby raped
A man and a woman have been arrested after one-month-old baby was allegedly raped and battered.
The tiny child had a heart attack brought on by his injuries and is fighting for his life.
He was rushed to Darent Valley Hospital in Dartford, Kent, on Thursday at 7am, but was transferred to London's King's College Hospital after having a cardiac arrest there.
Whites with little actual experience with blacks think that they're oppressed rather than irrevocably dysfunctional, so they vote for socialist programs to "help" blacks - not realizing its a fruitless endeavor that only harms whites.
Whites who have the most experience with blacks - both daily interaction and long term; i.e. frequency and duration - see the problem. They don't see the logic in willing taxing themselves to pay for programs for people who are unable to take care of themselves; thereby perpetuating the problem.
True. In addition to which, black birth rates in Blue states like Wisconsin are higher than in Red states like Alabama. Ain't much welfare available to welfare mommas in 'Bama, so blacks actually control their spawning there.
I'm quite late replying to this, as I'm new to the blog and have only recently gained the ability to See.
@Playing Roots Backwards
I know this might be a bit off topic, but is anyone else turning into a psycho from thinking about cannibals too much?
Yes. I'm about to lose my mind.
Post a Comment