The country of Panem has risen out of the ruins of our American civilization. The decadent and hated city of Capitol—whose residents have all the luxuries of advanced science, medicine and technology, coupled with the stylings of Queer Eye for the Straight Guy on steroids—is situated in what was the Rocky Mountain region of the American West. In thrall to Capitol are twelve Districts, each tasked with supplying the Capitol with one peculiar resource.
Seventy-four years before The Hunger Games begins, a rebellion against the Capitol by the subjugated Districts broke out. Twelve of the Districts were eventually subdued by the Capitol’s superior military technology. (Nuclear weapons are hinted at). The thirteenth District was completely destroyed.
After the defeat of the Districts, the Treaty of Treason was imposed by the victorious Capitol. This results in the eponymous Hunger Games. As punishment for the insurrection, one male and one female child is picked from each District to compete in this yearly event. These 24 individuals—Collins dubs them “tributes”—fight to the death, all broadcast on television for the enjoyment of the Capitol’s citizens.
Hunger Games’ heroine is Katniss Everdeen, played by Jennifer Lawrence, one of the 8,000 residents of District 12. At the tender age of 16, she volunteers to take her beloved younger sister’s place as one of the two children selected to compete in the 74th Hunger Games.
Ah, obviously another in a long-line of “butt-kicking” girl-power movies! A Sandra Fluke on the big screen! Katniss is just a younger version of Quentin Tarantino’s “The Bride” from the Kill Bill films!Read the rest there, comment on it here.
Another Paul Kersey article is up at Alternative Right. The topic is of high importance:
That Democrat hegemony bemoaned for ruining the city has been overwhelmingly Black for 40 years, starting with the election of Coleman Young, the first Black mayor in the history of Detroit. The mass exodus of people from the city was primarily White back in the 1960s and '70s (which turned a majority White city into the majority Black mess you have now), but is currently a torrent of Black people fleeing in hopes of finding a place to live with a national grocery chain.
White people fled Black crime then; Black people flee Black crime now.
Mike Brownfield of The Heritage Foundation has said Detroit is “a liberal’s worst nightmare,” but fails to point out that it is Black people fleeing a liberal Black city to the tune of a 25 percent population decline in 10 years.
What are you afraid of saying Mr. Brownfield? Why can’t you just say Detroit is in trouble because of its majority population (why doesn’t the Detroit Free Press ever run an article that asks, In changing world, Detroit remains overwhelming black?)? Why can’t Dr. Sowell? Why can’t The American Thinker? Why can’t National Review?Read the rest there.
Big article coming tomorrow. Perhaps two.We might even go old school with a numbered post.
52 comments:
If whites had been given the benefit of the doubt in Dixie much of the fate of America could have been avoided.
Europe's problem is Arabic. But at least Arabs can maintain a city and a business.
Why isn't Atlanta struggling if 54% of its population is black, and its mayors have been 100% black since 1973?
Stone Glasgow, Atlanta isn't where Detroit is but soon enough it will happen. The proof is in the suburbs. Atlanta is sure to be one of the next major cities to fall to Black Run America. Have you walked downtown Atlanta after midnight? If you did you might speak a different tune.
The blacks in Atlanta are still able to leach off just enough whites in neighborhoods areas that are trying to re form their own counties that were amalgamated in the 1930s.
Also Atlanta gentrified from the mid 90s onward. Whites moved back into certain enclaves and cleaned up the place in patches.
The blacks areas are still the crime infested areas.
Stone Glasgow said...
Why isn't Atlanta struggling if 54% of its population is black, and its mayors have been 100% black since 1973?
March 24, 2012 7:38 PM
Atlanta suburbs move to secede
When Fulton County whites can extricate themselves from financing the local area blacks, Atlanta will fall flat on its face faster than you can say 'Detroit-ed'.
Black alone - 274,322 (50.7%)
White alone - 211,168 (39.0%)
Hispanic - 29,186 (5.4%)
Asian alone - 16,783 (3.1%)
Atlanta city data
City-data.com crime index (higher means more crime, U.S. average = 319.1)
2010 Atlanta crime index: 583.5
Indeed the drop in crime coincided perfectly with the re entry of hipsters and white professionals into the city. If anything it reinforces the thesis. If for the sake of example a section of Detroit was exclusively given to whites and strictly segregated keeping blacks out, except for menial work--The area would have no crime.
If a Microsoft campus were built and fenced off guarded with towers, to keep the ferals out there would be fewer problems there.
Simples.
"Why isn't Atlanta struggling...?" You're kidding, Stone, right?
Furthermore if the counties surrounding Deroit that are white were amalgamated into the
City the immediate fiscal issue would be fixed. However it would require that the blacks bleed white tax layers dry to pay for patronage jobs.
It's so simple every polite commentator misses it. Racism is so déclassé you see, even if it is spot on.
I don't live in Atlanta,but if the population is 50% shaded,the tipping point has been reached,and there's probably no going back.
What I think is probably happening is that-unlike Detroit-the white residents of Atlanta didn't pull up stakes and leave overnight,all at once.
The process is there,of course,since no sane individual will live willingly in close proximity to blacks,but I bet it's been slow enough,and gradual enough that the net results can be spun in a positive manner by the local and national media.
Those neighborhoods aren't losing productive,stable,tax paying citizens: they're gaining vibrancy,rents have gotten affordable,businesses ( wing stops and barbershops ) have opened to serve the new clientele,yadda yadda yadda.
White Atlantans maintained very rich enclaves. These enclaves were separate counties 70 years ago. There's a move to go back to that. Administrative boundaries around Detroit were a bit different. The blacks have tried to dissolve white suburbs and communities in order to raid their property taxes.
Giuliani had to kick out the blacks in NYC and set stage for gentrifying. It's amazing he got away with it. I'm surprised he was not assassinated. His theatrics after 9/11 are no where near as impressive as his hardass climate change.
Congrats Paul, Great Article. I am pleased to see your writing penetrating the mainstream Conservative and Independent blogs. Your tactic of calling them out with facts and figures is undeniably effective.
To Stone Glascow: 100% of murders in Atlanta last year were by blacks. They are only 50% of the population, do you think it is going to get better? You don't call that struggling?
"“Plantation” is the wrong word. On actual plantations, people worked. In the case of Detroit, the White Republican “owners” will labor away on behalf of their "slaves.""
Q: What do you call a living area maintained by someone else, paid for by someone else, built by some one else and has to be overseen by some one else.
A: Zoo
"Why can't Mr. Sowell"
Thomas Sowell, as conservative as he is, also knows that he too is Black, and will be viewed as a Black man first. And does he know for a fact that any of it is true?
@Dan
"But at least Arabs can maintain a city and a business."
I think you were being slightly optimistic on that one. maybe because you were comparing two kinds of mass destruction weapons, so one has to be better than the other at some point :DD
OT
Calling Obama:
Cash stolen from handicapped Cary boy collecting funds for wheelchair basketball
Police are still searching for the man who took the money. He is described as black male...
Mr President, what's your opinion on this?
I mean, how low do you have to be to steal money from a kid in a wheelchair?
@ Anonymous March 24, 2012 7:54 PM
Thanks for the Fulton County secession link. It's interesting, and contains this text:
The demographic make-up of Fulton County has changed considerably in recent decades. The northern portion of the county, a suburban area that is mostly Republican, is among the most affluent areas in the nation. The central and southern portion of the county, which includes the city of Atlanta and its core satellite cities to the south on the other hand, is overwhelmingly Democratic, and contains some of the poorest sections in the metropolitan area.
For the benefit of Stone Glasgow, the following word substitutions are essential: "Republican" = white, "Democratic" = non-white, and in the case of Atlanta this means overwhelmingly black.
A classic case of White Flight (in Wikipedia-speak, the demographic makeup has changed). But the better off Whites who fled to the north are unluckily still in the same county, and I guess are fed up with subsidizing the underclass Blacks who inhabit most of the rest of the county.
Hey Stone, are you a DWL?
That's a Disingenuous White Liberal.
Because honestly, only blacks and DWL's could ask such a question as that.
Like the others have said; if not for the overburdened tax payers, then Atlanta would fall faster than Grant taking Richmond.
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/03/24/search-continues-for-suspect-in-computer-store-killing/
EXECUTION OF WHITES HAS STARTED
Question for PK:
You explicitly invite us to comment here, but increasingly those comments (however well-written) wind up in the bit-bucket without feedback.
Why should we bother?
I live outside of Atlanta near Johns Creek where they are working to establish a new county, Milton County, where the taxes will go to services for the local residents instead of going into the southern parts of Fulton county and the city to subsidize blacks. The blacks are fighting this tooth and nail because they need that white tax money to keep the lights on.
The reason Atlanta is still standing is because whites were not driven out by riots. There are still largely white neighborhoods scattered throughout Atlanta with very expensive homes and very active homeowners associations (and police presence). In addition there has been a huge effort by younger whites to gentrify sections of the city. These are young professionals who are willing to take the risk of black crime to have an urban hipster lifestyle. There has been a boom in certain areas of Atlanta in just the last few years of restaurants, bars, clothing stores, and coffee shops in small white enclave neighborhoods.
I work in the city with white intown residents and I can assure you they are concerned with the increase in violent crime by blacks in the city. Muggings, break-ins, and murders of store clerks have been on the rise just recently. The gentrification effort is running smack into serious violent black crime and with the continued deterioration of race relations its only going to get worse. Those persons who bought homes or rent in areas right next to the ghetto are taking the brunt of the black undertow.
The recent mayoral elections pitted a white candidate against a black and the vote was pretty much right down racial lines with the black candidate winning. The whites living in Atlanta have not yet given up on the place, but those with families in particular are uneasy about their situations and often tell me they wished they lived 20 miles outside the city like I do.
The future of Atlanta will mirror the state of race relations in the US. Its going to get ugly as these two forces continue to battle for the soul of Atlanta. If anything Atlanta is a city that is probably generating more white race realists than any other city in the US. Its an expensive lesson to learn for some.
More on how Atlanta has been Detroited: http://abcnews.go.com/US/atlanta-cheating-178-teachers-administrators-changed-answers-increase/story?id=14013113
So, how long till the riots start? Glad I live in a non-black area.
This is a very interesting website with unfiltered observations, common sense conclusions and engaging readers’ comments. There aren’t many sites like this and I think you should enjoy it while you can. My guess is the thought police will place it on their list soon.
Anyway, I have two observations about the subject. First it seems like a third of people commenting on each essay focus on ‘what is to come’ and the mechanics of getting there. Most predict some form of violent revolution. Our natural instinct is to use the past as a roadmap to the future, but I think this is a totally incorrect and imprudent strategy. There has never been the sophistication of intrusion, surveillance, infiltration and money available for government control and suppression of thought in the history of the world. You really can’t compare the challenges of the founding fathers to today. The current American public is simply out-gunned, out -witted, out-spyed, and out-spent (ironically using their own money), by an out of control, evil, globalist, UN-loving, climate-changing, eco-terrorist- supporting elitist government formally known as the USA. The solution is not to turn to violence; you for sure will lose (unless the US military declines to be involved- as was the case in the dissolution of the USSR- when you will only likely lose). The solution is to simply stop paying taxes or stop working. Be legally uncooperative. Instead of Occupy Wall Street…become occupy the United States… Of course there will be government threats, arrests and even work drafts. Just don’t go…
My second observation is that backs ARE genetically different and not just in their physical superiority and sickle cell hemoglobin. The way they evolved favored a herd survival benefit. They were prey, not unlike antelopes. They had to look over their shoulder and never had to develop any higher cognitive skills so they didn’t. …economy of nature. No seasons meant they didn’t have to plan, so they didn’t. Now they are being asked to adapt to a technological world but can only use and not invent that very technology. Look at Africa or any black attempt at coordinated infrastructure. It speaks for itself. Why are they ‘brother’ and ‘sister’ to complete strangers? Herd evolution. Why are they incapable of forward thought and anticipation of consequences? Herd evolution. Why is there no self-discipline? Epidemic drop-out? Constant complaints and whining? Nauseating victimization? All because they evolved in an environment that did not reward higher cognitive skills (skills that we call basic); just escape skills. The herd must ‘stick together’ to survive, that is why they are a monolithic voting block and brainlessly support any cause defined by their current ‘leader’…Jesse, Al, B, Farak, Lebron, etc. Just as the first antelope turns suddenly the herd instantly ans without question follows…herd survival..It’s all in the genes.
Stone, others have pointed out problems with Atlanta. Did you assume Atlanta was still a thriving city without problems?
Detroit is just the most obvious example of when whites flee an area. When whites abandoned Detroit to the blacks it became clear blacks could not maintain a modern city on their own. They lacked the will and brain power to create businessed that provide jobs or taxes, and instead sucked from the government teat while occasionally setting buildings on fire at Halloween.
Liberals and politicans started to demonize whites fleeing black crimes, so 'white flight' became a slur. "How dare you want to prevent your daughters from being raped, or children have horrible educations in public schools, or not want your property stolen! FOr shame!"
So The Myth was invented. There are two sides to The Myth, and whites generally do not question it even when it's no longer feasible to support The Myth. The first is that given the chance blacks would be the equal with whites in business and education. That failed, and blacks still need affirmative action to keep lazy blacks employed, and the government has to hire any stray negro for any position because few businesses that need profit to survive can hire to many blacks.
The second lie of The Myth is that blacks do no committ crimes in numbers dispropotionate to whites. Liberals and blacks love to crow about serial killers and school shooters.
This ignores two things. First the number of serial killers is very small, and there are alot of black seriel killers. Plus there are many more black street gangs who kill, rapes, and steal, and cover each other. A seriel killer is a lone psycho, street gangs are like mini armies. As for school shooters, again, that doesn't happen that often. What happens far more frequently are blacks shooting at other blacks, missing and hitting some kid. But that doesn't get the same air play as white school shooters because it's a 'negative stereotype'.
Basically, most cities are have troubles, Detroit is just the worst. Any city with a high percentage of blacks is a hell hole, you just can't call it a hellhole because it's racist to point out blacks can not mainstain civilization without masssive aid from whites.
Stone, others have pointed out problems with Atlanta. Did you assume Atlanta was still a thriving city without problems?
Detroit is just the most obvious example of when whites flee an area. When whites abandoned Detroit to the blacks it became clear blacks could not maintain a modern city on their own. They lacked the will and brain power to create businessed that provide jobs or taxes, and instead sucked from the government teat while occasionally setting buildings on fire at Halloween.
Liberals and politicans started to demonize whites fleeing black crimes, so 'white flight' became a slur. "How dare you want to prevent your daughters from being raped, or children have horrible educations in public schools, or not want your property stolen! FOr shame!"
So The Myth was invented. There are two sides to The Myth, and whites generally do not question it even when it's no longer feasible to support The Myth. The first is that given the chance blacks would be the equal with whites in business and education. That failed, and blacks still need affirmative action to keep lazy blacks employed, and the government has to hire any stray negro for any position because few businesses that need profit to survive can hire to many blacks.
The second lie of The Myth is that blacks do no committ crimes in numbers dispropotionate to whites. Liberals and blacks love to crow about serial killers and school shooters.
This ignores two things. First the number of serial killers is very small, and there are alot of black seriel killers. Plus there are many more black street gangs who kill, rapes, and steal, and cover each other. A seriel killer is a lone psycho, street gangs are like mini armies. As for school shooters, again, that doesn't happen that often. What happens far more frequently are blacks shooting at other blacks, missing and hitting some kid. But that doesn't get the same air play as white school shooters because it's a 'negative stereotype'.
Basically, most cities are have troubles, Detroit is just the worst. Any city with a high percentage of blacks is a hell hole, you just can't call it a hellhole because it's racist to point out blacks can not mainstain civilization without masssive aid from whites.
Stone,
I'm writing a book on Atlanta right now. You're joking right? The city is fu%ked.
http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2012/02/white-people-are-real-walking-dead-in.html
White people have fled the city and built thriving suburbs that - inevitably - Black people move to quickly.
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/marta-bill-blasted-as-1378055.html
The city is ready to come part at the racial seams with white tax-payers paying for a continuous Black party in city hall.
While it took place more than 15 years ago now, it should also be mentioned that at the time it was said by more than a few that the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta were the worst of modern times:
As for the worst Olympics, Vancouver has a long way to go before it comes close to deserving that honour, he said.
That, he said, belongs to the Atlanta games.
Along with the bombing that killed two people and the transportation problems, the Games were marred by ill-trained volunteers, computer system problems and failing equipment.
(Of course the bombings were not the fault of the organizers -- the rest of the complaints were.) How many of the incompetent organizers, and useless volunteers, were black? Inquiring minds etc...
Anonymous at 10:17 AM,
The solution is not to turn to violence; you for sure will lose (unless the US military declines to be involved- as was the case in the dissolution of the USSR- when you will only likely lose). The solution is to simply stop paying taxes or stop working. Be legally uncooperative. Instead of Occupy Wall Street…become occupy the United States… Of course there will be government threats, arrests and even work drafts. Just don’t go…
I have been preaching this for at least 3 years. There is absolutely no way we can win if we are up against the US military. And make no mistake about it, they would show absolutely NO mercy to taxpaying white people. The only answer is to starve the beast.
This used to be by far the greatest country in the world, but it has devolved into a third worlde shithole in many respects. The whole thing will collapse, and we may yet again build an even greater country. This time, we won't tolerate liberals.
Stone really ought to respond. I welcome an argument about this topic.
It keeps the ammo fresh. It's funny to see Glaswegians argue about this.
Ralph and Anon at 10:17: Why do you assume that the U.S. military will attack Whites? Any major violence in this country will be a matter of looting, killing, and raping by darks, and most White violence will be in direct response to Dark rioters. Are the 85% White infantrymen of the 101st Airborne going to shoot down Whites who are protecting their lives and property from Dark arsonists? Are the officers, who know exactly who mans their nuclear submarines and jet aircraft, and who designs and builds them, going to send their White elite troops to war against Whites? They may just as well bomb the aircraft plants and torpedo their own Navy. OTOH, in the aftermath of any great uprising that swept away BRA and the DWLs, the military would rise greatly in prestige. Leftists despise the military, and the generals know it. Why back your enemies?
Slightly off topic but interesting. Here are some funny little statistics:
Box office receipts for George Lucas' "Red Tails":
Opening Weekend: $18,782,154
Total Domestic Gross: $49,526,450
Total Budget: $92 million
Opening weekend estimates for "The Hunger Games":
Domestic: $155,000,000
Foreign: $59,250,000
= Worldwide: $214,250,000
Opening Weekend: $155,000,000
Total Budget: $78 million
A rousing chorus of "I told you so!" from Paul and SBPDL readers everywhere is in order.
flo: @Dan
"But at least Arabs can maintain a city and a business."
I think you were being slightly optimistic on that one. maybe because you were comparing two kinds of mass destruction weapons, so one has to be better than the other at some point
Thank you, flo, for catching that wee bit of wishful thinking.
2 year old child recoverig after being shot in detroit
President Obama shocked by senselessness and says and I quote " "
Zenster [or zen star]
what is HG about?
Is it worth seeing?
The second lie of The Myth is that blacks do no committ crimes in numbers dispropotionate to whites. Liberals and blacks love to crow about serial killers and school shooters. This ignores two things. First the number of serial killers is very small, and there are alot of black seriel killers...
----
The idea that serial killers are almost universally white is a trope in popular culture that deserves to be discredited.
Relative to the African American proportion of the population across that time period, blacks were overrepresented in the ranks of serial killers by a factor of about 2.
New Book on Black Serial Killers. Justin Cottrell expels the myth that serial killers in America are predominately white.
(posted by anon 7:54 + 8:01)
You asked for comments on Hunger Games. I have not seen it yet, but I am given to understand that it is on one level a satire on the grotesque nature of today's mass media, especially reality TV, and how that media is used to maintain the power structure. Of course, as was once observed in an episode of "The Simpsons," the power of the media is there because audiences give it that power. Turn off the tube, tune in to your life, drop into reality.
Anyway, I think television is hopeless. But Hollywood still produces movies which have a pro-white point of view. Look at the recent "John Carter." The hero is a white guy (and a former Confederate officer at that!). The movie carries over Burroughs' Mars with its warring races; this was a common enough theme of a century ago when races were seen as distinct entities. A key scene is in the opening when Carter rescues the Army Colonel from Indians, even though the Colonel was his nemesis. Blood is thicker than water and all that sort of thing. Whites have to stick together. And the movie carries through with concepts such as honor.
(OK, "John Carter" is expected to lose money, but what did Disney expect when they spent a third of a billion dollars on a flik?)
Granted, you might look at how Hollywood frequently makes movies with a liberal point of view on race, as SBPDL has rightly pointed out. But there are enough movies showing a distinctly illiberal picture. Why? Ultimately, Hollywood is about the money, and there still is a majority audience out there which wants to see white people as heroes.
Look a the original "Star Wars" (later retitled "Episode IV: A New Hope")--one of the most influential and successful movies of the last half century. White farm boy as hero. White warrior as mentor. White warlord as supreme-technocrat. Aliens are confined to a city deemed a "wretched hive of scum and villainy." Even the fighter pilots making the assault on the Death Star are entirely right out of Texas and Iowa.
I could go on about the "Indiana Jones" series, "Lord of the Rings," and so forth. White heroes abound. One thing these movies indicate is that the vast majority of people are behind race realism, even if only at a basic level. After all, they pay to see these movies, buy the DVDs, purchase the toys.
It's the elites that are selling everyone out.
Anonymous (3/24, 2012 8:19 PM): Those neighborhoods aren't losing productive, stable, tax paying citizens: they're gaining vibrancy, rents have gotten affordable, businesses (wing stops and barbershops) have opened to serve the new clientele, yadda yadda yadda.
How do you fit that much tongue into your cheek? Do you have hamster pouches or something?
My second observation is that backs ARE genetically different and not just in their physical superiority and sickle cell hemoglobin. The way they evolved favored a herd survival benefit.
Something I have been told by blacks from Africa is that individualism is an alien concept to them. They see the collective as being all important: the village, the clan, the ethnic grouping. This is one reason that libertarianism, small government conservatism, and anarchism (as a political ideology) fail to make headway among blacks. It's group survival which counts in Africa, not individual rights.
This is also why independent African countries turn into one party dictatorships, or disintegrate into warlord fiefdoms. The chief is the warrior who can bring the most benefits to his followers, and just as critically, terrorize foes into submission: hence, a Mobutu, a Mugabe, a Kony. It's not about guaranteeing individual rights, but about raking in collective benefits.
There has always been optimism in some quarters that black Africans could be brought over to Western standards with sufficient education, or missionary work, or foreign aid, or market economics, or NGO telethons, or whatever. But these experiments keep failing. Is this genetics raising its inevitable head? And DWL ideology refusing to recognize the reality?
... street gangs are like mini armies
Too true. Gangs are not unlike degenerate warrior bands. They form around a warlord type leader, they control territory, they shoot up the competitors, they form an alternative state within the state. Again, reminiscent of the warlord situation you see in parts of Africa (and for that matter, among many if not most peoples historically).
Every manner of social program has been employed by liberals to change the "conditions" which create gangs. But these programs fail. Why? Probably because it is not social conditions which create gangs, but the genetic predispositions which result in gang formation. And the gangs, in turn, trash the areas which they dominate. Right now in the USA, draconian police measures have kept the gang situation under control. But it's an endless battle and nobody sees a victory in sight.
This brings up another point: if collectivism and warlordism are inherent to black Africans, and it is genetic, then what will be the long term impact of importing increasing numbers of sub-Saharan Africans into the first world? Can they be educated and assimilated? Or will genetic patterns reemerge? Look at last year's rioting in Britain. Was this a warlord style uprising?
Something to think about in the decadent days ahead...
From the Vdare article.
Per Gregory Hood: Rather than Nazis or even old school Communists, the oppressive Capitol society seems composed of liberal arts graduate students, part time workers at feminist bookstores in Portland, and a sprinkling of the wealthier members of Occupy Wall Street. Panem has somehow reversed Hegel’s master-slave relationship — the one who is unwilling to risk his life for honor has become the master. [emphasis added]
Which has everything in common with America's political and financial elite.
Instead of spending a trillion dollars squelching just two of some fifty Islamic countries and sacrificing thousands of our brave warriors in the process, jihad could be stopped in its tracks and only a few hundred Muslims would die in the process.
Way less than one billion dollars would adequately fund a "wet works" campaign involving targeted assassinations of Islam's clerical, financial, scholastic and political elite. The information hoarding nature of Islamic terrorists means that killing just a few hundred of the very most powerful Muslims will make a tremendous rent in the fabric of jihad.
Just the power vacuum left behind by such a campaign would consume additional thousands of young Muslim bucks vying for those newly vacated top positions. More importantly, many now-functional financial channels, weapons sources, indoctrination sites and propaganda outlets would be stripped of their key players and almost permanently disrupted.
Why do Western politicians refuse to target terrorism's upper echelons? Might it have something to do with how the jihadists would then begin targeting them in return?
Our politicians are perfectly content with sending the flower of Western youth die for their respective countries. However, they abhor the notion that they themselves might ever make the ultimate sacrifice for this nation's safety and security.
Knowingly or not, this is what's meant by Hood's mention of "the one who is unwilling to risk his life for honor has become the master".
The same applies to America's financial elite. They are perfectly content in using every tax loophole imaginaable to reduce their own contribution to the economy. At the same time, they are equally happy to benefit from the Constitutional rights conferred by a nation largely supported by the working White middle class. Yet, for the sake of a few extra percentage points in profit, these corporate parasites cheerfully export American jobs to China, a place they themselves would never in a million years consider living.
Again, there is no sense of honor among those whose fortunes were originally made in America. There is no loyalty to their country shown by these globalists and transnationalists. They could care less that America is sliding perilously close to the brink of economic disaster just so long as they are able to keep on farting through silk.
A pox upon both their houses.
Here's another cinema statistic I meant to include in my original comment:
"Red Tails"
Opening Weekend: $18,782,154
Total Domestic Gross: $49,526,450
Total Budget: $92 million
'The Hunger Games' Made $70 Million in One Day
Nice work, Californian!
As far as the gubament and civil unrest of some type, trust, they will NOT HESITATE to disarm, arrest, or worse, white middle class.
They don't give a crap about the blacks. *WE'RE* the ones that must be subjugated.
Don't expect anything positive from the police or military.
Mr. Rational: You explicitly invite us to comment here, but increasingly those comments (however well-written) wind up in the bit-bucket without feedback.
You explicitly invite us to comment here, but increasingly my comments (however well-written) wind up in the bit-bucket without feedback.
There, fixed that.
I'm certainly not having any big problem with my comments getting through. As in one or two over the past month.
Thank you for some solid "boots-on-the-ground" reporting about Atlanta, Milton Man.
@ Caiden
African-Americans Also “Shoot Up Schools”
'most school shooters (55 percent) are African Americans.'
http://backintyme.com/essays/item/52
Anonymous (3/25, 2012 10:17 AM): The solution is to simply stop paying taxes or stop working. Be legally uncooperative. Instead of Occupy Wall Street…become occupy the United States… Of course there will be government threats, arrests and even work drafts. Just don’t go…
Wow! WOW! WOW!
A most excellent comment. Speaking for myself, please do not hesitate to make more comments of a similar caliber. Again, just wow!
Zenster: I'm certainly not having any big problem with my comments getting through.
If you haven't been paying attention, I am not the first to raise a complaint either.
I post the question because there may be a technical problem (comments going to spam, comments not approved within X hours automatically being deleted), or even some kind of tampering. If nobody talks about it, it's never going to be fixed.
Dan et al have made some reasonable points; I haven't spent any time in Atlanta and I am relatively ignorant of its status, but my opinion of the city previous to this post was that it was a good place to live. I know several people who moved there as young adults and they seem relatively happy with the place.
That said, the crime rate in Atlanta doesn't seem as bad as Chicago or Detroit. Am I mistaken about that?
Another commenter suggested that NYC booted black people at some point. Do you have a reference for that statement?
One of the few things that will certainly land you in jail is not paying taxes.
They will seize your bank account and anything they can get their hands on.
That's what a cashless society is all about. It's not about convenience. It's not about ending bank robberies(nice one!).
It's about controlling you. You can't buy a glass of lemonade from a kid with a credit card. No exchange can avoid taxation. No getting paid off the books, and if the gubmint doesn't like you, they turn off your card. Now what are you going to do.
These are fucked up times.
I saw the hunger games, total eugenics wank film. Lotsa magical negroes.
Hey Glasgow. Atlanta's crime rate dipped when whites started to recolonize metro Atlanta.
Mr. Rational: If you haven't been paying attention, I am not the first to raise a complaint either.
I pay attention just fine. How about you? You commented openly about Paul's typographic and grammatical errors. Did you bother to send him a private email first? As in, you know, the polite thing to do.
Finally, this is a private blog and Paul has ZERO obligation to publish comments by readers. Free Speech does not apply and reader contributions appear solely due to the gracious assent of this site's host.
While Paul does not have any official guidelines for commenting, neither does he seem to be very restrictive, given the often salty and relatively free-flowing repartee that happens here. More power to him, I say.
Clueless DWL mom writes an open letter to Trayvon's mom.
http://jenhatmaker.com/blog/2012/03/26/dear-trayvons-mom
"While Paul does not have any official guidelines for commenting, neither does he seem to be very restrictive, given the often salty and relatively free-flowing repartee that happens here. More power to him, I say."
Zenster: Well said.
Mr.Rational: You aren't being very rational. Go have a beer.
Post a Comment