Live. Die. Repeat.

There is no reformation. 

There is no renaissance. 

There is no turning of the tide. 

There is only survival. 

We all live on the Edge of Tomorrow, where Malthus and Darwin stand waiting. 

Watching. 

All we can do is live. die. repeat. (lame reference to Edge of Tomorrow, but it makes sense), until this age finally ends, when the warnings of Malthus finally manifest. 

Live. Die. Repeat. 

It's the cycle all American cities - built by whites and ultimately undone by blacks - must go through, regardless of the size or economic vitality of the city. 

Detroit. Chicago. Camden. Birmingham. Memphis. 

Indianapolis. 

With this in mind, allow me to reproduce the brilliant analysis of commenter "Rebel" and his "Rebel's Guide to the Collapse of an American City":

Here is my "Rebel's Guide to the Collapse of an American City". This applies to every city everywhere in the U.S.:

1. Court orders schools desegregated;

2. Crime and violence increase in schools;

3. First wave of white flight takes place;

4. White flight results in increased percentage of africans in the schools;

5. Africans gain confidence as numbers increase and begin agitating for special black treatment in schools. Black dances, black student government, black counselors, liaisons, ombudsmen, etc. to deal with "black concerns";

6. Second wave of white flight takes place;

7. Sell-off from white property owners to africans takes place as property values start to plunge;

8. Violence increases in the schools and neighborhoods as africans become the majority;

9. As the violence escalates, africans blame white racism among police and local government and demand black officers and a black Police Chief who "understands" the black community.

10. The city appoints an african Police Chief in hopes that the violence will begin to subside as a result.*

11. Violence explodes under the incompetence of the black Police Chief who invariably looks the other way and dabbles in trendy, expensive programs that avoid dealing with the actual black violence problem;

12. The final wave of white flight takes place. After this, the only whites who remain are the Grand Torino-like, stubborn old people;

13. African political control is cemented and an african mayor is elected;

14. The city descends into chaos under a majority black city government and spirals into filth, poverty, disease, crime and bankruptcy.

15. Whites without children gentrify 5% of the city, normally a historic district that attracts artists, gays and grads. NY Times writes an article about how the city is experiencing a comeback without stating the obvious which is that it is only in the white-invested area.

Indy is near the end. A white democrat mayor is only a temporary condition until a black mayor takes power.

*It's worth noting that the black police chief that Indianapolis hired is from the Baltimore P.D. BALTIMORE. One of the biggest crap holes in America. And, on top of that, his job there was to be the african police agitator. Representing the gripes and complaints of black officers. There were over 1,000 police in Indianapolis they could have chosen to lead the department. Why did they choose a racial instigator from a violent cesspool as Chief? And his 1st job when he came to Indy? Visit with the 10 Point Coalition of angry black pastors. His 2nd job? To testify in court for sentence reduction of a black convicted sex offender. These were his 1ST two actions. And it's been straight down hill from there. Anyone NOT see this coming??

Live. Die. Repeat.

More importantly, survive. 

The History of NASA the History Channel Leaves Out... (NASA was established on July 29, 1958)

History.com alerted me today (via email: This Day in History...) that NASA was founded on July 29, 1958:

 On this day in 1958, the U.S. Congress passes legislation establishing the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), a civilian agency responsible for coordinating America's activities in space. NASA has since sponsored space expeditions, both human and mechanical, that have yielded vital information about the solar system and universe. It has also launched numerous earth-orbiting satellites that have been instrumental in everything from weather forecasting to navigation to global communications.

What History.com doesn't provide is why NASA's unprecedented success between 1958 and 1972 came to a crashing halt. Luckily, 'Whitey on the Moon' by Paul Kersey provides the explanation, but in honor of NASA's establishment on July 29, 1958, why not a refresher course? 

In 1972, Rep. Charles Rangel (yeah, he's still around) charged NASA with bias and demanded a  civil rights probe against all-white astronaut corps

Only four years into NASA's establishment, racial politics were inserted into astronaut selection by an overzealous Kennedy Administration seeking to find a black astronaut avatar to parade around the nation as "the hope for black people everywhere."

Enter Air Force Capt. Edward Dwight. Colin Burgess' Moon Bound: Choosing and Preparing NASA's Lunar Astronauts offers up an incredible frank summation of what was expected out of the pursuit of a black astronaut candidate:  

Even as NASA began the process that would choose the third group of astronauts, political pressure was being exerted at the highest levels for the space agency to select an African-American pilot. For some time, President John F. Kennedy had wanted the minority electorate to regard him as doing something positive on the issue of equality in the military. 

On 24 June 1962 he appointed an advisory committee to study equal opportunity policies in the military, charging its members with ensuring that “any remaining vestiges of discrimination in the armed forces on the basis of race, creed or nation origin” were removed.  

One of the initiatives he pressed for was for a black serviceman to be inducted into the high-profile astronaut corps. At the specific behest of the president, the Department of Defense was contacted to determine whether the Air Force had any suitable candidates, but even though records were thoroughly scoured the response coming back to the White House was apologetic. 

No black Air Force officers had the required amount of flying time or the requisite academic background, let alone meeting other stringent requirements for consideration. President Kennedy did not like being denied his initiative. In response the Air Force was essentially instructed to locate a suitable black candidate and have him enrolled in the next Aerospace Research Pilot School course at Edwards AFB. Once the airman had passed the course, and even without the necessary flight hours, background, experience and academic qualifications, pressure would then be exerted on NASA to include the officer in its next astronaut group. 

Once again the Air Force searched through its records and, to the relief of the researchers, finally came across something that might fit the bill – a hope-filled application from a serving Air Force officer requesting test pilot and astronaut training. The name on the application was 28-year-old Capt. Edward Joseph Dwight, Jr., USAF. (p. 201)

1962. 

Four years into NASA's existence, the Kennedy Administration was trying to force a black astronaut onto the space administration, a clear example of social engineering for the benefit of electoral success if there ever was one...

Capt. Dwight ended up not being made of the right stuff, as you can learn about here (thanks Chuck Yeager). 

10 years later, an almost completely white NASA came under the scrutiny of professional black agitator Rep. Charles Rangel (D., New York). 

Yes, that Charles Rangel. 

Here's what Jet magazine published on August 10, 1972 regarding a the black congressman's crusade to erase the whiteness at NASA [ Rangel Charges NASA Bias; Wants Civil Rights Probe]:

Rep. Charles Rangel (D., New York) recently called upon the U. S. Civil Rights Commission to conduct an investigation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to discover why the agency has no Black, Spanish or women astronauts.  

In an interview with JET, Rangel said, "I am not concerned with reviewing  the program as it exists today. It is obvious that it is not representative of the people of these United States. I would have NASA review its personnel policy. Something is seriously wrong when not a single member of the 42-man astronaut corps is female, Black or Hispanic. NASA is one of the few federal agencies which manages to get more money from Congress than the Administration often requests." 

During its 14-year history, NASA has had only one Black nominee to be an astronaut. He was Maj. Robert Lawrence, a native of Chicago, Ill. However, his career as an astronaut ended tragically when he was killed making a landing of his F-104 jet.  

John Buggs, newly appointed staff director of the U. S. Civil Rights Commission, said that an investigation of NASA would fall in line with the responsibility of the commission. 

Prior to 1972, NASA had standards. 

It based pilot selection (outside of the Kennedy Administration forcing Capt. Dwight on NASA for his advantageous blackness) on merit. 

After 1972, those standards - once general operating procedure - were replaced with a mandate from the U. S. Civil Rights Commission to... scrub away the vestiges of whiteness and replace it with minorities. 

You can only have one mandate: prior to 1972, NASA's mandate was space exploration; post-1972, NASA's mandate was pleasing the U. S. Civil Rights Commission.

Joseph Shafritz and Jay Atkinson's 1985 book The Real Stuff: A History of NASA's Astronaut Recruitment Program fills us in one what happened next once NASA mandate for the exploration was grounded in favor of minority uplifting:

"We are working on plans to get members of minority groups into space. The Space Shuttle, which is the keystone to all our future space programs, will be an important factor in accomplishing this goal," NASA Administrator James Fletcher told an audience of 200 during a luncheon address on March 2, 1972, at the Equal Employment Opportunity Conference at Kennedy Space Center.  

Fletcher turned to the television and news reporters, emphasizing, "These are only plans. We don't know they'll work out," adding that he would personally aid in "attempting to cut out the red tape and removing the stumbling blocks to real progress in EEO." 

Sending black and women into space had become one of the major issues of the space program.  

During a personal interview Ruth Bates Harris, Director of NASA Equal Employment Opportunity [1972], said, "We [NASA] were concerned that we had no minority or women astronauts and that was something that came up constantly in my discussions with managers, including the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator."  

NASA was vitally in a goldfish bowl. The emphasis on equal opportunity had increased significantly after passage of the 1972 amendment to the 1964 Civil Rights Act subjected the federal government to equal opportunity legislation.  

On July 19, 1972, in a memorandum to Todd Groo, Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, Harris state:   

You perhaps will recall our earlier conversation in which I strongly underscored the urgency of moving ahead in this regard as (1) a way to improve our image and hence win some support from minorities and (2) a way to improve our EEO in a very vital area. I have taken this same concern to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator as well. It is important that we take steps now to implement Dr. Fletcher's publicized remarks at NASA's EEO conference that "we are working on plans to get minority groups into space."  

It would not be considered preferential treatment nor reverse discrimination for NASA to integrate its Astronaut Corps. In fact to the contrary, it is discriminatory to allow our Corps to remain as pasteurized and insulated from the real world. Not only do we contribute to their mis-education by allowing a segregated group to exist, but also we acquiesce to a false sense of security and superiority... Equally as poignant is the fact that in spite of many space missions, minorities and women have gone through almost a half generation without being able to identify a single space hero in NASA. This looms as extremely significant when one realizes how our history books already have distorted versions about the contribution (or lack of them) by person from minority groups. A similar situation exists for women and other traditionally excluded group. (p. 134-135)

Considering minorities have made virtually no positive contributions to America (sports, music, and entertainment don't count), it's puzzling to try and ascertain what Ruth Bates Harris was talking about back in 1972.

In closing, it's important to note the response Charles Rangel's charge of bias at NASA received.  The Real Stuff: A History of NASA's Astronaut Recruitment Program tells us: 

As a result, Jeffry M. Miller, Director, Office of Federal Civil Rights Evaluation, told NASA in a letter written August 12, 1972: 

The Commission recently received a letter from Congressman Rangel which asserted that all of the astronauts in NASA's space program are white males. In view of the important part that this programs plays in our lives and the great psychological impact that media coverage of our manned space efforts has on millions of people around the world, this figure if true is most distressing. (p. 136)

America, in 2014, no longer has a manned space program.

We no longer have the ability to send men of any color into space, unless they hitch a ride with the Russians.

But, remember, the "most distressing" (words of the Director, Office of Federal Civil Rights Evaluation in 1972) news of an all-white male astronaut program was greeted with the full force of the Federal Government; NASA's mission for the stars ended, with the advancement of colored people via the white man's technology the new priority. 

So we no longer have a manned space program, but at least we have a multicolored mixture of humans pretending to be astronauts!

So, there's your history of NASA the History Channel (History.com) won't share with you. 

From 1958 to 1972, NASA embarked a mission to explore the heavens; post-1972 NASA was nothing more than the United States Postal Service, dedicated to the same goals as the NAACP -- the advancement of colored people at the expense of white people. 

An Open Letter to Indianapolis Recorder's Amos (the white police force is an "occupying army") Brown: Do you Expect a Majority Non-White Indianapolis Fate to be any different than Detroit's?

“Indianapolis is being hit with a dry hurricane of violence... We need a disaster response.”

So published the Indianapolis Star. 

Without telling us 'who' is behind the "hurricane of violence," the article lets slip the culprit. [Indy needs disaster response to ‘hurricane of violence', Indy Star, 7-18-14]:

[Reverend Charles Harrison of the Ten Point Coalition] offered three other potential solutions: increased mandatory sentences for gun crimes; more community policing; and increased efforts among black leaders to build stronger ties between the community and police. That last step is an attempt to establish some level of respect for law enforcement. 

“This generation of young people does not have any respect for authority in general, and are much more willing to be confrontational with the police,” Harrison said.

"Increased efforts among black leaders to build stronger ties between the community and police."

Hmm... black leaders in Indianapolis like the vile Amos Brown, longtime agitator for black pride/power who called the Indianapolis Police an "occupying army"? [Indianapolis violence deja vu, Indianapolis Recorder, 4-17-14]

Amos Brown, who has described the white police force in Indianapolis as an "occupying army." He's celebrated Indianapolis going from nearly 80 percent white in 1990 to the threshold of being a racial plurality by 2020

Remember, Indianapolis was nearly 80 percent white in 1990; today, Amos Brown brags about how whites are soon to be a plurality in the city, where a coalition of blacks and browns will rule the city. [Census to Indy's leaders: minorities; not whites, power city's growth, Indianapolis Recorder, 7-3-14]:

The Census says that as of mid-2013, 42.6 percent of Indianapolis’ population is minority; a percentage that’ll continue to increase. 

If the Chamber of Commerce and the Ballard administration were serious about improving the tax base, they’d develop meaningful strategies to improve employment opportunities and living wages for Indianapolis’ Black and brown communities – the population with the lowest median household incomes and highest rates of child poverty. 

The business community, mayor’s minions and educational reformers always rail about African-American school dropouts; especially in IPS. But they ignore Indy’s white dropout crisis. Another reality that’s holding Indy back economically.

Remember,  Indianapolis was nearly 80 percent white in 1990; crime and homicide in the city has always been powered by its black population. As the city becomes less white, crime will increase as the cries of Indianapolis Police become less an "occupying army" (trying to protect what's left of the white tax-base) and more a public relations organization trying to make the black population feel better about its superfluous nature.

Back in 2010, a career black criminal - 15-year-old Brandon Johnson - alleged police abuse when he was arrested (the city was forced to pay $150,000 to Johnson in 2013 over the "abuse").

It's important to remember that individual acts of black crime collectively represent a sustained war on the civilization whites created in Indianapolis: eventually, the crimes become so great it's vital white families move (white flight) to protect their families; businesses follow suit as the purchasing power of blacks is no where near that of the whites who have fled; the tax-base erodes to a point where basic city services are no longer a need, but increasing a luxury item the remaining black population can't afford.

In the early stages of the blowup of the black community around the alleged abuse of Brandon Johnson, black leaders in Indianapolis put out this press release making their intentions known of using the incident as a means to "gel" blacks together against their perceived enemy (Amos Brown's "occupying army" of white police) [Black Leaders’ Response To IMPD Beating Investigation, Indianapolis Record, 6-11-10]:

A wide coalition of Indianapolis African-American leaders and institutions has issued a strong response to IMPD’s investigation into the beating of 15-year-old Brandon Johnson. Spearheaded by the Baptist Ministers Alliance, community leaders called for the firing of all officers involved in the beating incident, a civilian oversight of Internal Affairs, Federal Monitoring of the IMPD and that IMPD’s training be “reevaluated, revised and replaced”.  The full text of the response is below. 

STATEMENT FROM INDIANAPOLISBAPTIST MINISTERS ALLIANCEDr. Stephen J. Clay, President, June 11, 2010 

Today I’m joined by Pastors, Lawyers, Funeral Directors, Business Owners and other Community Leaders to express our outrage at the determination reached by the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department (IMPD) Internal Affairs Unit. 

For the sake of extreme clarity, I want to say that crime in Indianapolis is not a Black issue. It’s an issue in every community. You don’t have a zip code that exempts you from the potentiality of crime. I also want to make clear that my comments today are not directed at all the fine men and women who serve on the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, both black and white. My observations are directed solely at those officers who tarnish the labor of those who place their lives on the line for this community every day. 

Several days ago, the Marion County Prosecutor determined that Brandon Johnson committed no actionable crime. Specifically, the Marion County Prosecutor stated that Brandon’s conduct on May 16, did not meet the burden for criminal charges. 

Indeed, Brandon is not a criminal, Brandon is the victim. 

Regrettably, the Chief of Police reported yesterday that only one officer would be terminated. It is clear to us, based off the narrative shared, that these officers acted as a team and as a result they are all culpable. It is unequivocal that all police officers involved in this case should be terminated immediately and a criminal investigation should be launched immediately into the conduct of these officers. 

Moreover, it is clear that the police department lacks the internal capacity to “police” its own, especially in matters where the general public is involved. The internal affairs process has no credibility in this community. As a result we call for the complete dismantling of the IMPD internal affairs unit and demand that it be replaced with a transparent citizens’ review process to specially address those cases where members of the civilian community are the center of an investigation. 

We will also request that the Federal Government monitor this process. It is clear to most in the African-American community that some officers on IMPD think that it is open season on African-Americans, Latinos and other people of color and the poor in Indianapolis. As leaders in this community, we will not tolerate abusive force by the police upon our children in particular, or anyone for that mater. 

We will not standby and have the youth of our community beaten by drug dealers, gang bangers or the police. It is obvious that the training of IMPD officers is so profoundly inadequate that the entire process needs to be reevaluated, revised and replaced. It’s apparent that some officers lack the judgment to apply the appropriate response in many circumstances. 

The action taken yesterday by the Internal Affairs Unit makes these officers think they can act with impunity. It sends the signal that you can beat a Black, a Latino and anyone of color or a poor citizen nearly beyond recognition and get away with it. 

Well, this community will not stand by and watch while our kids become victimized by the criminal conduct of a few rogue officers. We will bring the bright light of justice to these deeds. We will use our collective resources economically and politically, we will dismantle our historic differences to address this issue. 

In conclusion, we take note of the Mayor’s silence during this ordeal. His silence speaks volumes. History has proven that in times of crises leaders speak out as well as delegate duties. The Mayor’s brief press release yesterday suggests that he may be more interested in capital improvements than he is about public safety. This fact will be as much a part of his political resume as his surprising mayoral victory was in 2007. 

No Justice No Peace!! 

Dr. Stephen J. Clay, President

Crime is pretty much a black issue in Indianapolis (sorry Mr. Brown, "military weapons" aren't the scourge of the hood... it's the black people who call the hood home that represent both the source of the sorrowful conditions in the hood and the true scourge of civilization).

And it's pretty much the issue of the unelected black leadership to continually demand we not acknowledge this fact...

The victim is the civilization whites created in Indianapolis, regressing to the black mean in the increasing absence of whites and growth of the black population.

Indianapolis' black population, with leaders like Amos (the white police force is an "occupying army") Brown, have been chipping away at the civilization whites created in the city, whose standard of living erodes with each white person who flees to the suburbs; yes, some individual black people can assimilate to the civilization whites created, but they cannot sustain the civilization in their absence when the black population has become the majority.

Detroit taught us this.

Gary, Indiana taught us this.

Newark and Camden, New Jersey taught us this.

Memphis taught us this.

Indianapolis is teaching this to us in realtime.

The police must have the monopoly on violence, or else the "state" (in this case, the civilization in Indianapolis the elected officials are purportedly tasked with protecting) will ultimately fail; in Indianapolis, the monopoly on violence is held by the black community, with so-called leaders like Amos Brown using frightening language -- an "occupying army" -- to describe the police actions against "his community."

After all, "his community" is the only one that matters...

It won't be 20 years until Indianapolis is less than 30 percent (perhaps 20 percent) white, with the majority non-white population whining about paying their water bills... just like in less than 8 percent white (and 83 percent black) Detroit today.

Black leaders, be they elected officials, members of the cloth ("reverends"), radio hosts, or community organizers, work overtime to make law enforcement impossible and create a climate where black criminality is protected by the regression of law: meaning, any act of perceived brutality by police against a black individual is an attack on the black community; thus, police are forced into a continuous procession of tolerance, diversity, and sensitivity seminars/classes, and are psychologically castrated by the knowledge one aggressive arrest could result in their suspension, a black riot, or a massive lawsuit.

We call this enabling a climate of freedom from responsibility (what the civil rights movement was all about).

No matter how heinous individual black criminality gets (think home invasions or executions of whites for $5), the black community that harbors such an army against civilization will never allow real reform.

Such reform would translate to allowing the fangs of the state monopoly on violence to be unleashed; when the threat of black protests/riots/lawsuits keeps these fangs at bay, like garlic, a cross, or daylight to a vampire.

So civilization (and law) will recede, assimilate to the type of conditions/climate the black majority is able to maintain.

We call this Detroit.

Available Now! 'Whitey on the Moon' :Race, Politics, and the death of the U.S. Space Program, 1958 - 1972

If you have a Kindle, head over to Amazon.com and pick up the latest Paul Kersey book, 'Whitey on the Moon': Race, Politics, and the death of the U.S. Space Program, 1958 - 1972.

It's the definitive book on NASA and how one of the great achievements in America's history was grounded because of the lack of diversity and blacks involved in the Apollo Program. 

Available now for Kindle at Amazon.com!

If interested, the paperback version of the book will be published in mid-August. For a $25 donation (right-side of the scroll down via PayPal), you can secure a signed copy of this one-of-a-kind look at the history of NASA's fall, all because the government of the United States of America deemed it "embarrassingly white."

What's exciting is this means we are close both the sequel to Escape from Detroit and the billboard campaign accompanying it...


We went to the moon.

This is a fact.

Indisputable, except to those conspiracy theorists clinging to their belief some sinister plot was hatched by the US Government to conceal our inability to navigate to earth's natural satellite.

On July 20, 1969, man first stood on the moon; on December 18, 1972, man stood on the moon for the last time. What happened to end the dream of space exploration, left instead to the colorful imagination of Trekkies and science fiction fans believing some diverse band of humans could navigate the heavens in a utopian future?

The US Government neutered NASA by forcing a much different mission upon the space agency: diversity and the promotion of blacks. We went to the moon.

On multiple occasions. When NASA was nearly all-white, with an all-white astronaut team. But in 1972, the Apollo program was grounded, with the Space Shuttle program becoming a glorified experiment in social engineering and special interest group cheerleading. Each successive launch included women, blacks, and other racial minorities, not for the sake of exploration, but for the sake of gender and racial cheerleading.

The glory of NASA and mankind's great moments in space exploration were all milestones performed under the watchful of an almost completely white NASA, devoid of the hindrance of affirmative action programs and the shackles of Equal Employment Opportunity mandates.

The mandate then was to get the moon; the mandate soon after was the promotion of blackness and diversity, at the expense of the initial dream of exploring the stars.

'Whitey on the Moon': Race, Politics, and the death of the U.S. Space Program, 1958 - 1972 tells the shocking story of NASA's demise from an angle never-before told: the racial angle.

Learn the story of Captain Ed Dwight, the black Air Force pilot the Kennedy Administration tried to force on NASA; learn about how General Curtis LeMay and Lt. Colonel Chuck Yeager demanded accountability and stood against what the latter deemed "reverse racism" in how the Kennedy Administration forced a black astronaut candidate on NASA just for the sake of having a black astronaut candidate.

Learn about the "Poor People's Campaign" (led by Rev. Ralph Abernathy), which protested the launch of Apollo 11 on July 16th, 1969, by showing up with a horse and buggy.

Rev. Abernathy demanded the money going to Apollo and space exploration be redistributed to fight poverty and starvation in America's inner cities...

And his vision won out.

The final chapters of the book deal not with the exploration and colonization of new worlds, but the redistributing of wealth to pay for EBT/SNAP Food Stamps cards and other welfare payouts... a testament to Rev. Abernathy's dream.
 
We could have been on Mars, but we had to fund Black-Run American instead...

And the people bowed and prayed, To the neon God they made.

There is no educating liberals. 

For the most part, there is no educating conservatives. 

The former will go to their grave cursing their whiteness (blaming it for all the world's ills); the latter will go their grave wishing they could have found a 'Michael Oher' to adopt and rehabilitate (praising their altruism for all the world's hope). 

Reading about Indianapolis and it's horrific decline under almost a century of continuous Republican leadership is enough to forever make the flaccid the hard-on any young white conservative had for Ronald Reagan and the GOP. 

Back in 2010, one of the resident white liberal columnists for the Indianapolis Star, Matthew Tully, expressed frustration with the mass shooting at the Indiana Black Expo (subsequently, each successive Black Expo has required near a martial law atmosphere to keep attendees safe from the privations of blackness). 

More so, he was upset anonymous white people took to the Internet to vent against the near all-black violence in the city of Indianapolis (remember: Mayor Greg Ballard launched an campaign exclusively against black-in-origin violence in the early part of 2014 [Black on black crime on Mayor Ballard’s agenda, WISHTV, 3-8-14]), which he compared to a "KKK" rally.

What's so funny is this: a black person would probably be safer at a Klan rally than in some parts of Indianapolis,where fellow black people would have no problem firing at them (since, black-on-black violence is so frequent in Indianapolis).

Here's what the Captain Tully, the avenger against noticing, wrote [Tully: Time to talk about problems linked to Expo, Indy Star, 7-21-10]:

Let's be honest.

If the shootings that occurred Downtown last weekend had been tied to the Indiana Plumbers Expo, or one of a thousand other conventions, the follow-up discussion wouldn't be so difficult.

We all respect plumbers, of course. But if their annual convention required hundreds of city cops patrolling our compact Downtown on a Saturday evening, and if shootings and fights and other incidents outside the convention had become all too common, we would question whether the plumbers expo was worth the trouble.

But we're talking instead about Indiana Black Expo and its annual Summer Celebration. So any discussion about the monumental problems tied to it gets bogged down in the treacherous issue of race.

It's a hard issue to discuss. I've ticked off an endless stream of readers during five years of writing columns about all sorts of issues, but even I got queasy at the idea of diving into this one.

It doesn't help that moronic and simplistic racists thrive on this kind of thing. They turn anonymous online forums into a 21st century version of KKK meetings and make it even harder to have an adult conversation.

That said, we can't let the delicate nature of this subject, or the words of a few racists, prevent us from finally having an honest, and perhaps painful, discussion about the ongoing problems related to Black Expo. Fear of having a blunt conversation, and fear of being labeled a racist, likely has prevented the city from adequately addressing this ongoing problem before now. And so we are subjected to national headlines about the 10 young people shot in the very Downtown that Indy's leaders so often point to as the thing that makes this city special.

Well, it would be nice to have a blunt, adult conversation about crime in Indianapolis (and, for that matter, all of America), but when race is involved honesty is always the first casualty. 

Better to be on the side of the anointed angels (blacks) than those evil white demons who earn their honorary Klan robes just by mentioning "race" in the same sentence as "crime."

Or, in the case of the Indianapolis Star, something that is covered-up as editorial policy. Only three years earlier, the paper basically bragged about its social justice platform of covering up the injustices against civilization committed by almost exclusively black people. [A caution on suspect descriptions, Indy Star, 3-24-2007]:

Last week we faced one of the more challenging decisions editors ever face, and we didn't handle it well.

It involved the carjacking/robbery/rape of a young woman after she entered her car in a Downtown parking ramp. Police said the assailant was a black male in his late teens, small thin build, approximately 5 foot 8 with medium complexion and short hair. He was wearing a blue polo shirt with thin yellow and white stripes, and blue pants.
We didn't publish that description.

Why?

Lacking, to my surprise, a written approach for dealing with such matters we operated under the common newspaper standard to be wary of all such descriptions because they most often are so vague as to be meaningless.

Does it really help to know that an assailant was, say, a 6-foot-2 blond, upper middle-age white male? Not really. Those guys are everywhere. I'm one of them. But at least when somebody of that description is mentioned, every one of the huge selection of men in my universe isn't thought of as a potential criminal.

Now substitute a black male with black hair. All of a sudden all black men of that description are considered suspect.

That's an injustice from my perspective and from the perspective of most other editors. Most Americans, when they think of crime, fall victim to a racial stereotype.

Let's be honest. When black men commit crimes there is an unfair tendency to blame all black men. Not so with whites.

Here's another truth: When The Star doesn't print a description of a black suspect alleged to have been involved in a crime, my phone will ring and my e-mails will pile up with messages that angrily accuse us of bowing to the evil forces of political correctness.

When the authorities seek a white suspect and we don't print the description, I don't hear a peep. That speaks volumes, don't you think?

That doesn't mean we should have a blanket prohibition against using suspect descriptions. After reviewing policies of several newspapers and discussing the matter with colleagues, including our public safety team, we decided on this policy:

"We will publish descriptions of suspects from public officials or eyewitnesses only when the descriptions are distinct enough to differentiate the person from all but a narrow group of people. The description would likely include a combination of physical characteristics and other identifiers such as age, race, height, weight, hair color, haircut, tattoos, scars, clothing, jewelry, glasses, getaway cars, etc. The use of such descriptions is likely to be rare and must be approved by a senior editor."

Every situation is different, which is why the above statement is inadequate without some discussion points, which we are providing in question form:

Is racial identification relevant to the story and if so can we explain why? Remember that ethnicity isn't necessarily an indication of skin color and that race often is not easily definable. There are black Latinos, and white Latinos, for example.

What is the potential of our decision adding to unfair stereotypes?

Most important, is a description of a suspect so sketchy that a suspect could not be identified in a crowd of people, or is it specific enough to be useful? A 5-foot-10 white male wearing glasses and a knit golf shirt doesn't offer much. A 5-foot-10 white male with a blond crew cut, a tattoo on his left arm, a diamond earring in his left ear, and wearing glasses and a green knit golf shirt provides much more to go on.

My gut tells me that we should have provided the police description of the suspect last week. Bystanders who may have seen the suspect and, learning of that description, may have been able to provide helpful information to the police. (And we should have given the story stronger play in the paper.)

We also shouldn't have confused the situation by printing, later in the week, a police sketch of what appeared to be a black suspect, without mentioning in the adjoining story the suspect's race.

Using the guidelines and questions above, we want to have a more thorough discussion of these kinds of things in the future so we don't repeat the inconsistency we showed last week.

Thanks for reading The Star.

So, Mr. Matthew Tully, the policy of the Indianapolis Star (your employer) is to hide from race, just as name-calling is your policy when it comes to "adult" conversations about race.

This entire scheme (Black-Run America) is nothing more than the foundation of religion, from which we are heretics if we dare question the authenticity of the myth.

Better to practice heresy than find common cause with a theology peddled by the likes of Tully, the Indy Star, and those believing every neglected black male is a budding Michael Oher (with only the right, white... prodding and upbringing).

There is no educating liberals. 

For the most part, there is no educating conservatives.

There is only surviving.

The Talented Tenth as the Great Enduring Myth... Major Davis, Jr. and his Family as the 'Real' 99 Percent (The Face of black America)

The Talented Tenth.

One of the great myths in American history.

If you want to understand the power which generates the black undertow, look no farther than Major Davis, Jr. and his family.

"Talented Tenth"... one of the great enduring myths in America. The real 99 percent is represented by Major Davis, Jr. and his family...

The Occupy Wall Street crowd got it wrong: the real "one percent" is the percentage of the black population capable of assimilating to and maintaining the civilization ("Aping," in the literal sense) white people, of even the lowest social class, are the progenitors of...

For the real 99 percent has a name and a face... Major Davis and his family.[HE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN HIS SQUAD CAR: Cop-Killer’s Family Blames The Police For Officer’s Death, Bearing Arms, 7-7-14]:

Major Davis, Jr was brandishing a semi-automatic rifle Saturday night in Indianapolis, which led to a 911 call that dispatched police. When IMPD Officer Perry Renn found Davis at 34th Street and Forest Manor Avenue, Davis opened fire on Officer Renn. Davis was critically wounded in the gunfight, but survived. Officer Renn died of wounds sustained in the firefight. Davis now faces a charge of murder.
It’s probably a shock to no one that Davis’s family is blaming the police for his actions:

He wasn’t a bad person. His father was killed by IMPD. That is enough to hurt a person and scar him for life,” said Moornan.

One of the officers listed in that 2003 police report is Officer Perry Renn.
“I imagine he figured they were going to try and kill him. I mean cause look what they did to his father,” said Moornan.

On Saturday night, the family says they were having a cookout.

“Next thing, I just heard shots and everybody running in the house and everybody hit the floor,” said Yvonne Moornan, Davis Jr.’s aunt.

By the time they got outside, they realized those shots were Davis Jr. and Officer Renn shooting at each other. Davis had an assault rifle.

“Major is not a bad person in spite of what happened. Things happen,” said Pam Moornan.

Now, the Davis family is worried about their son’s reputation and again, questioning police tactics.

“It’s horrible about what took place, but, I mean, I don’t think it’s fair though for them to keep dragging him through the mud,” said Moornan.

And again, questioning police tactics.

“I don’t know how the police was shooting. I don’t know if they took concern of any kids running around,” said Yvonne Moornan.

The family did say it is sorry for Officer Renn’s family, but they said the tragedy may have been avoided if Officer Renn would’ve stayed at his car since he could see Davis had a gun.

The alleged cop-killer’s father, Major Davis, Sr. had been arrested 15 times and did three years in prison on a drug charge. He died of a heart attack in 2003 while in handcuffs after fighting with police as he attempted to avoid a public intoxication charge. The family (of course) blamed the police for his death.

Here is the family’s reasoning/justification for Davis’s murder of Officer Renn:

• Davis, Jr’s convicted felon father had a heart attack and died in police custody while attempting to avoid his 15th arrest… which is enough to “scar him for life.”
• Davis, Jr. must have thought the cops were trying to kill him, again blaming the father’s heart attack on police.
• “Things happen.”
• Officer Renn shouldn’t have shot back at Davis, Jr. because there were kids in the area.
• Officer Renn should have just stayed in his car, since he could see criminal Davis, Jr. brandishing a weapon.

It probably won’t surprise anyone that Davis, Jr. had multiple arrests on drug charges dating back to 2006.

I’m at a loss to explain a mindset that seems to have an unswerving ability to justify any and all criminal activity from their family members, while finding a way to blame authorities who are simply attempting to keep the peace.

 I'm not a loss to explain the mindset... it's a uniquely black phenomenon (the real 99 percent).  

Things don't just happen...

But was Major once an honor student?

Was he turning his life around?

Did he pay his water bill?

Talented Tenth?

Please.

A myth.

Major Davis and his family?

That's the reality of black America.

Rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic: Indianapolis is Headed Straight for a Black Iceberg

It's perhaps America's largest city with a "Republican" mayor. 

Only 20 years ago, the city was nearly 80 percent white. 

Only 10 years ago, the city was 67.5 percent white.

Today, it's roughly 56 percent white. 

The reason is simple: the quality of life in Indianapolis regresses to the mean of the majority racial group living in neighborhood, community, zip code... and Indianapolis is quickly regressing to the black mean, with whites fleeing the crime, depreciating property values, failing schools, and higher taxes (because blacks = poverty, someone has to pay for all the entitlement programs) that the black community contributes to the city. 

Gun violence in the city is monopolized by the black community, roughly 28 percent of the city's population. Violence over the July 4th holiday was all courtesy of black assailants, a fact only a few dare publicly admit. 

For noticing the correlation to crime, home invasions, fatal and nonfatal shootings in the city of Indianapolis with race (black people) will bring the wrath of Amos Brown down on you. Long the agitator for all things black in the city, he didn't take too kindly to a Fox59 report on how ads for night clubs where consciously trying to attract black people; those same clubs are the site of intense violence. [Broad Ripple: Concerns over business ads turn into conversation about race relations, Fox 59, 7-23-14]:

 FOX59 followed up on a story we ran Monday on NewsPoint at Eleven about obscene advertisements promoting clubs in Broad Ripple.

The story spurred a big reaction on social media, showing there is much more to this conversation than just advertisements. 

“I thought I was going to have a nice quiet day, but all kind of stuff is going on,” said Amos Brown.

The talks show host led his show Tuesday on AM 1310 with a story from NewsPoint Monday about public safety leaders not happy about “racy” advertisements in Broad Ripple. 

“Over the years there has been this perception, this reality, that the African American community doesn’t feel welcome in Broad Ripple. And the people who run Broad Ripple have not seen fit to come to our community and say ‘welcome!’ It kinda hit a nerve last night on a brand-new newscast,” said Brown on his radio show.  

FOX59′s story about lewd advertising turned in to a discussion about race relations. Below are some of the comments from callers on Brown’s talk show Tuesday.

“Broad Ripple itself. They don`t want black people up there really, man. I used to go there a lot,” said an anonymous caller. 

“We’ve been doing stop the violence charity events for the last two weeks,” said G. Spears.

“No disrespect to you (Nicole Pence), the video, editor and photographer, but it did strike a nerve. There is a problem with race relations in our city and county on a number of levels. It’s not just a Broad Ripple issue,” Brown told FOX59.

Much disrespect to you, Mr. Brown, but sit down and shut the hell up (white people have never come together to implore their community to stop the violence, or has a explicit or implicit white event needed police state measures as the Indiana Black Expo does every year...).

The problem with race relations in not just Indianapolis but every city in America is that some self-appointed black leader/member of clergy feels compelled to speak on behalf of their community and demand white people assimilate to the lowering of standards that always accompanies demographic change: in essence, Amos Brown has long been a champion of white flight, knowing it breds black political control of the city. 

Black criminals, regardless of what percent of the overall black population they represent, are the foot soldiers behind both white flight and coming of black political control in Indianapolis. 

Though city officials say "only one percent" of city's population is responsible for more than half of the crime in Indianapolis, this percentage enjoys the protection the black community (including the vociferous black agitator Amos Brown), though they were breed and raised in the black community: 

 Last year, Indianapolis had slightly more than one shooting a day that was not fatal. In those cases, 46 percent of victims, mostly black males, refused to cooperate with police. 

Most of the victims of nonfatal shootings were between the ages of 15 and 34.

 Almost all homicides in Indianapolis in 2014 include some combination of black male involved (be it aggressor or victim), a fact the local media doesn't try to hide. [Current trial sheds light on increasing violence, The Indy Channel, 7-8-14]

But it's the story Trayvon Martin Ja'Vonne Ellis, recently gunned down in Indianapolis, that serves as a microcosm of why Amos Brown and his ilk are hypocrites for daring to claim there's a race relations problem in the city without understanding it's entirely because the black community lacks any impulse control; and with this lack of impulse control they help devolve the civilization whites built in Indianapolis to the level of blacks. [Family suspects friends as streets claim another teen life, Fo59, 7-22-14]:

Ja’Vonne Ellis did a lot of living in 15 years. 

He gave up football after being mysteriously shot in the foot. He was bounced from middle school for punching a teacher. He was caught with marijuana and a friend with a gun in the spring, right about the same time another friend was shot to death at the Village at Mill Crossing and he discovered welding at Arsenal Technical High School and his sister thinks he could have made a career of it. 

“Whoever it was, they had to call him to meet him on that street. He don’t just leave the house. He can’t just leave the house,” said Jayln Ellis, Ja’Vonne’s sister. “So it had to have been a close friend. He don’t talk to too many people.” 

Ellis said one of his brother’s best friends has made himself scarce ever since the killing. 

He’s the same teenager Ellis was busted with in May on the marijuana charge.“I don’t know,” said Ellis’ big sister. “It’s jobs. It’s just kids. They don’t have nothing productive to do. So I feel like they get bored and they want to get into the street life.” 

That sentiment was echoed by Ellis’ friend Danta Hannon at the murder scene.
Hannon feels the city’s emphasis on tracking recent prison parolees is misguided. 

“Everybody focused on prison. We oughta be worried about these kids, man.” 

“I don’t see why everybody worried about Broad Ripple and north side,” said Hannon, reflecting on the recent 4th of July weekend shootings that left 7 people injured, “when clearly its the east side and these east side black kids the kids in IPS that clearly got all the problems, man.” 

Ellis was one of those kids, passing through John Marshall Community School and the Coleman Alternative Academy on his way to Tech where he sat out most of his freshman year with a bullet wound to the foot. 

“All those people up north. All those people out west. That …. is irrelevant, bro. It’s all about these kids out east, bro. Its real tough man. All poverty, death, dying, robbery. That’s what these kids is all growing up in.”

 People like Ja’Vonne Ellis, Jayln Ellis, and Danta Hannon are giving birth the new Indianapolis, the one Amos Brown has worked so hard - his entire adult life - to ensure comes to fruition, one in which blacks have forced out enough whites to assume political control of city hall. 

The executive, legislative, and judicial branch... all will one day be in the hands of black people because foot soldiers like Ja'Vonne Ellis went to their grave and convinced law-abiding white people the best days of the city were behind them.

But just for Amos Brown's benefit, let's publish the findings of the 2012 and 2013 Indianapolis Non-Fatal Shooting Review Board Report to help illustrate the violence in Indianapolis is truly a reflection of the type of community the city can hope to enjoy when whites are - thankfully - a minority. 

Remember, whites are 56 percent of the population, with blacks roughly 28 percent.

In 2012, there were 472 nonfatal shootings in the city
Whites were 16.84 percent of the suspects (33) and 18.64 percent of the victims (88). 
Non-whites were 80.10 percent of the suspects (157) and 80.72 percent of the victims (381). 

Interestingly, only 196 of the 472 suspects in nonfatal shootings race was known. Didn't we learn above most black people found with nonfatal shooting wounds were uncooperative with the police? Hmmm.

In 2013, there were 397 nonfatal shootings in the city
Whites were 12.12percent of the suspects (12) and 20.30 percent of the victims (80). 
Non-whites were 80.81 percent of the suspects (80) and 78.17 percent of the victims (308). 

Interestingly, only 99 of the 397 suspects in nonfatal shootings race was known. Didn't we learn above most black people found with nonfatal shooting wounds were uncooperative with the police? Hmmm.

More to the point, the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYINDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT Criminal Homicide Analysis for January 1 – December 31, 2013 shows something... incredible. 

There were 125 murder victims in Indianapolis in 2013, of which 95 of the cases had suspects. 

Here's a racial breakdown of those murders:

The racial relationship between victims and their suspects was:

• Black victim – Black assailant = 71

• White victim – Black assailant = 11

• Black victim – White assailant = 3

• White victim – White assailant = 11 

 You do the math, Amos Brown. 

You want a real conversation about race, Amos Brown, or - like Eric "My People" Holder - are you just 'color brave'?

Indianapolis is drowning: not in water, but in the misery created by the individual life choices (compelled by a lack of impulse control) of black people like Ja’Vonne Ellis, Jayln Ellis, and Danta Hannon.

Members of the white community (remember: only 20 years ago, the city was nearly 80 percent white; only 10 years ago, the city was 67.5 percent white; and today, it's roughly 56 percent white) are fleeing the city, deciding they don't want to send their kids to public schools when Ja'Vonne and Jayln Ellis, along with Danta Hannon are running the show. 

We already know how this ends: black political control of the city, with black people complaining about paying water bills in Detroit...

Water ("Is a Human Right that White People Must Pay for") World: The NAACP Gets Involved on Behalf of 83% Black Detroit Citizen's Refusal to Pay Their Water Bills

The collapse of Detroit was racial, with high rates of black crime motivating white flight. 

The city is now less than eight percent white and nearly 85 percent black. 

Darwin's Shadow: There's not much else to say about an 83 percent city black city descending into third world levels of civilization

It's a metropolis whose public offices (judicial, executive, and legislative) are completely dominated by black employees and black department heads.

Detroit is not union run. 

Detroit is not Democrat run. 

Detroit is black-run, for the expressed benefit of blacks, and only blacks. 

The following story needed this introduction, for clarity and transparency. [NAACP: Detroit water shutoffs are racially motivated, Washington Times, 7-22-14]:

A class-action suit has been filed against the city of Detroit for water shutoffs that the NAACP Legal Defense Fund says are racially motivated. 

The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department stopped service to about 7,200 buildings with overdue bills in June, compared to 1,570 in the same month last year. The issue gained national attention last month after activists appealed to the United Nations for help. 

There are concerns the shutoffs are “being done in a discriminatory fashion,” the Defense Fund’s Veronica Joice told a local CBS affiliate. “They should at least take a look at whether there’s a better way to do this that doesn’t affect the most vulnerable citizens — the majority of whom are African-American here in Detroit.”Attorney Alice Jennings, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Detroit residents, agreed the shutoffs were a racial issue. 

“These companies are basically Caucasian companies,” she told the station. “The folks who are being cut off are almost one hundred percent African-American.” 

Detroitannounced Monday that it would suspend its aggressive policy of cutting off water for the next 15 days, but the NAACP said in a press release Monday that it’s not enough. They also want the financial aid program for Detroit’s neediest people to be reformed. 

Disclosure of the 15-day moratorium was made in bankruptcy court — three days after an estimated 2,000 people took to downtown streets to protest the shutoffs. “Avengers” actor Mark Ruffalo made a surprise appearance at the rally, hoping to “shed a little light on what’s happening” in Detroit.

Pay for individual black people's water bills or else collectively make demands:

Reform or we march. 

March, and if our demands aren't met we riot. 

America is held hostage. 

The "folks who are being cut off are almost one hundred percent African-America," Alice Jennings, because almost one hundred percent of those with balances due on their unpaid water bills in 83 percent black Detroit are black...

Our future is held hostage, with the handcuffs of blackness ensuring our civilization is shackled to the  level of "civilization" blacks can attain. 

For years, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department has allowed unpaid water bills to pile up and free water to flow to primarily black people, but the city's bankruptcy in 2013 forced a cessation of this odd accounting oversight. 

Probably because someone knew black people, long accustomed to getting free water (and their way) wouldn't take too kindly to being told "no." [NAACP Legal Defense Fund: Detroit Water Service Shutoffs Are Discriminatory, CBS Detroit, 7-21-14]:

Talking to WWJ’s Sandra McNeil shortly after the announcement, [Detroit Water and Sewerage Department] spokesman Greg Eno admitted there’s no doubt that the department has been lax over the years, letting the bills pile up. 

He said people who now owe more than they can afford are being asked to come in and apply for assistance through the Water Affordability Program. 

Eno said, through, it’s not just free money. 

“It also teaches them, or works into their budget, monies that would be dedicated to their water bill, because they have to make a contribution every month,” he explained. “This is not a program where you get everything given to you and you contribute nothing.” 

Eno stressed, however, that not everyone in need will be able to get help. 

“We don’t have, you know, a bottomless cup of funds,” he said, adding that’s why it’s important that affected customers come in as soon as possible.

The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department aided the bankruptcy of Detroit by being lenient, admittedly for years, to primarily black customers who didn't pay their water bills.

The water kept flowing, as the bills piled up...

The Day the EBT Cards Runs Out is the moment nature reminds us all the fury of living continuously on the Malthusian Edge.

For years, large segments of the black population of Detroit has enjoyed virtually free water, with the cost of water redistributed to those stupid enough to paying for the service; now, because this service has been disconnected to those unwilling to pay their bill (an unfortunate side effect of the audit into why Detroit went bankrupt), the NAACP has declared enforcing the concept of payment for a service/good to be "discriminatory"...

Darwin's Shadow is falling across not just Detroit, but all of America.