 |
| If nothing changes, all of Indianapolis will resemble the six "killing zones" soon |
Oh, and the city is Indianapolis, where Amos Brown III - writing for the black newspaper, the Indianapolis Recorder - confirms on a yearly basis that without a black population there wouldn't be much need for a huge police force.
The above scenario did happen to Indianapolis Star writer John Tuohy, whose stunning exposé on the type of environment black people create in formerly white built/occupied parts of the city should be required reading for anyone under the impression the city of Indianapolis is destined to prosper once the white population is supplanted as the majority demographic group.
Easily, the most poignant portion of Tuohy's article is when he mentions that homes (designed in a late-Victorian, Romanesque-style tastefully imported from Europa) built by European immigrants in the mid-1880s are today listed on the National Registry of Historic Places.
Unfortunately, they were long abandoned by white people and are now occupied almost exclusively by blacks, who have made the Haughville neighborhood of Indianapolis one of its most deadly. [The killing zones: In 6 small spots in Indianapolis,sudden, violent death is part of everyday life, Indy Star, August 12, 2013]:
The Irish, Germans and Slavs settled Haughville in the mid-1880s, building small homes on narrow streets. Today a portion of the neighborhood is listed on the National Registry of Historic Places, its 329 buildings — including some churches — built in the late-Victorian, Romanesque style imported by the European immigrants.
The neighborhood is a favorite target of urban renewal efforts. Earlier this year, plans to build a 100,000-square-foot greenhouse were announced, and it is sharing in a $10 million grant to improve parks.
Yet, Haughville has had one of the highest crime rates in the city for decades and is one of the places police constantly send saturation patrols to curb sporadic violence.It would be a general disservice to the public to leave the contents of this article forever banished behind a pay-wall no one will ever try and scale, so luckily we at SBPDL were able to track down a cached version of the article, which is reproduced below in its entirety.
One simple question remains, which you should ask yourself upon finishing: why in the world would we subsidize the continued reproduction of this population, transferring the wealth created by the white community to ensure that in 20 years, all of Indianapolis looks like the Haughville community white immigrants built so long ago, only to abandon to the black undertow?
It's a long article, but worth reading every sentence [The killing zones: In 6 small spots in Indianapolis,sudden, violent death is part of everyday life, Indy Star, August 12, 2013]:
There is a reason residents call the four-square block area near 42nd Street and Post Road “Sudden Death.”
Murder happens here fast — and often.
Twenty people have been slain in six years in this tattered tract of land on the Northeastside, the deadliest in Indianapolis.
“My uncle was standing in this exact spot just the other day, asking someone for a cigarette and someone drove by and shot him in broad daylight,” said Donnell Armstrong, 25, as he stood in front of the former Hearts Landing apartment complex. now known as Meadowlark. “There is nowhere safe.”
His uncle lived — but Armstrong’s friend, Robert Shorter, 24, did not. Nicknamed “Bullethead,” Shorter was found shot to death on a sidewalk behind a creek in the 4200 block of Essex Avenue on July 11. A bag of suspected marijuana was next to him.
“They left his body in the street for four hours before anyone called police,” Armstrong said. “This is what the kids get to see here.”
Indianapolis Metropolitan police crime analysts, using mapping technology, have sliced and diced the city into 1,500 half-mile grids to measure violent crime over the past six years.
And they’ve found that it is remarkably concentrated, with a disproportionate percentage of violence and killings occurring repeatedly in the same neighborhood blocks.
“Sudden Death” and five other grids are especially dangerous; 65 homicides have been committed there since 2007.
Just as white people are responsible for producing the tax-revenue to pay for keeping the city afloat (and extra police), the black community has the responsibility of producing the homicide hotspots
The pockets are like violence bull’s-eyes that seem to radiate danger, police say. This year, 48 percent of all homicides have been committed within a two mile range of each of them.
“Every year, the homicides are where they’ve happened before,” said Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Maj. Thomas Kern. “These are historic trends with very little change. Now we need to know why this is.”
That will include examining social and economic factors, and health, environmental, infrastructure, housing and economic shortcomings, city officials said. They will seek the community’s help in curbing what many experts fear is a culture in which violence is too casually accepted.
“Look at any of these these high-crime grids and you will see a number of systemic, quality of life issues that need to be addressed,” Public Safety Director Troy Riggs said. “We’ve identified ‘Where?’ Now we can move on to the ‘What?’ and ‘How?’ ”
In addition to 42nd and Post, the deadliest pockets are all north of Washington Street and south of 43rd Street. They are centered near Martin Luther King Jr.
Drive and 29th Street; Haughville; Michigan and Rural streets; Illinois and 37th streets; and Keystone Avenue and 33rd Street.
A common thread through them all is poverty.
Vacant or abandoned buildings checker each block. Overgrown weeds and chopped-up streets seem to be permanent landscaping features. Idle teens and unemployed adults wander their poorly lit sidewalks.
These areas also share another quality; the weary tolerance with which residents deal with the constant gunfire, fights, drug dealing, police and death.
This resignation, they say, is rooted in low expectations that conditions will ever improve.
'Just a few homicides'
Sharon Griffie, 56, has lived near Martin Luther King Drive, south of 30th Street, her entire life. Police said the four-square block area is one of the most violent in the city: 10 people have been slain there in the past six years.
Griffie says she knows 15 to 20 mothers in the broader neighborhood whose children were victims of homicide. She is among them. Her son, Brian Griffie, 20, was fatally shot in 2000 in a neighborhood just northwest of hers.
“I try not to get too emotional about it,” she said. “I pray for the families of the victims and I pray for the families of the perpetrators, including the one who killed my son.”
The neighborhood is quiet, shady and sparsely populated. A post office anchors the commerce on MLK Drive.
Griffie said the neighborhood has changed. Many longtime homeowners have died off or moved out. Now, it is mostly the very old and very young who share the space. The old mostly stay in. The young, she said, roam the streets.
“They’re running from police all the time,” she said. “There’s overgrown bushes and trees and empty houses and broken streets lights here. There’s all sorts of places they ditch guns, dump trash and do whatever else kind of activity they do.”
Griffie says she seldom strays far at night from her one-story home and thriving garden because the streets are so dark.
The police, she said, respond promptly to 911 calls and do a good job sweeping in for serious crimes. But the city could do a better job making it less inviting for criminals, she said.
“There’s a lot of good people here but it looks like we don’t care and that sets it up for high crime,” Griffie said.
A few miles to the southwest, in Haughville, Israel Douglas, 73, insisted his street was safe, even though eight people have been slain in six years in the four-square-block area.
One of those victims was Jimmidell Golden, 31, on July 15, 2012.
Douglas, who lives in a one-story home at the corner of Medford Avenue and 12th Street, had noticed a maroon SUV in front of his house where cars weren’t usually parked.
It was 9:55 p.m. on a day that had reached 95 degrees. Douglas already had eaten dinner and was settled in for the evening when he heard several popping sounds in rapid succession.
“There were three shots, four shots, maybe five and I flinched,” said Douglas. “I come and look out the front door and I saw a guy sitting in his SUV, shot. I called 911.”
But Douglas says the block is mostly peaceful, even if every time he leaves his home there’s a grim reminder of the killing. In his yard stands a memorial to Golden; stuffed, animals, baseball caps, beads and other trinkets crawling 10 feet high are attached to a wooden utility pole.
“It’s real quiet here,” he said. “There’s no drug dealing on my block. I’d be the first to call 911 if there was.
No matter where you go there’s going to be violence.”\
The Irish, Germans and Slavs settled Haughville in the mid-1880s, building small homes on narrow streets. Today a portion of the neighborhood is listed on the National Registry of Historic Places, its 329 buildings — including some churches — built in the late-Victorian, Romanesque style imported by the European immigrants.
The neighborhood is a favorite target of urban renewal efforts. Earlier this year, plans to build a 100,000-square-foot greenhouse were announced, and it is sharing in a $10 million grant to improve parks.
Yet, Haughville has had one of the highest crime rates in the city for decades and is one of the places police constantly send saturation patrols to curb sporadic violence
.
However, police say Douglas might not be too far off the mark in assessing his own block. The violence in the micro-hotspots is even more isolated than their maps show. A couple of troublesome houses on a well-kept, working-class block can account for a large amount of violence. As can a busy drug corner.
Some streets seem impervious through time to repeated police crackdowns or flashes of gentrification.
“Crime can become institutionalized,” IMPD’s Kern said.
Fishing for souls
Four years ago, Anthony Jordan, 52, got a taste of the violence near 34th Street and Keystone Avenue the first day he moved there. It is an area that has had 10 homicides in six years.
Jordan, a mechanic, was working on his car in his driveway in the 2100 block of East 32nd Street when a young man approached him with a gun.
But instead of handing over his wallet, Jordan pulled out his own gun.
“That changed his mind and he ran away,” Jordan said.
Jordan watched his would-be robber scuttle into the Blackburn Terrace apartments, a block away.
A few minutes later, Jordan said he heard three gunshots.
“Then I see him all shot up. He comes crawling back here and he falls down right on my lawn,” Jordan said. “I didn’t hold it against him. Crazy kid. I called 911.”
The neighborhood is just as deadly this year as it has been in the past.
• On May 6 at 9:30 p.m., Jerryn Greene, 19, was gunned down in a drug dispute at 34th Street and Brouse Avenue. No arrests have been made.
• To the north, in a crime pocket that has had five homicides in six years, Carl Gildersleeve, 29, was fatally shot on June 1.
Gildersleeve was filling up his car with gas at a station at 24th Street and Keystone Avenue at 3:30 a.m. when he got into a quarrel with Phillip Garrett, 24. The scuffle and shooting were caught on the gas station’s security camera. Garrett was charged with murder.
Jordan said gunfire regularly punctures the night quiet until about 4 a.m. He pointed to a bullet hole in the hood of his light blue mid-sized sedan. Someone had fired a gun in the air, he said, and that’s where the
bullet came down.
Pastor Kim Graves, at New Vision Ministries, 2056 E. 32nd St., said many of the younger people in the neighborhood see little hope for improvement and have “lost any reverence for the church.”
“Therefore, our approach to them has to be different than it used to be,” she said. “We have to got to where they are because they won’t be walking through that door. We have to be talking their language, reaching out. Fishing for souls.”
Graves said few jobs in the neighborhood and young people with idle time create a volatile mix. Many lack the resources and background to get jobs.
“There are obstacles that have to do with money,” she said. “Transportation is a big one. People don’t have the means to go to the library to get on a computer and apply for jobs. Many of them have criminal backgrounds, so they can’t get a lot of jobs.”
For the past six years, black men age 18 to 24 years old have been slain in larger numbers than any other age group — about one in four homicides. This year in Indianapolis, the number is running about twice that rate.
The onslaught has helped drive down the average age of victims this year to 28 —significantly below age 32, where it has stood for several years.
“You can’t have fun anymore,” said Christopher Brown, a 17-year-old who attended a Young Men, Inc., summer camp which provides black male youth positive interactions and role models. “You can’t go to a party anymore without a fight or a shooting.”
Brown said bad behavior among young men his age is driven by peer pressure. The actions of a few, he said, pervade the entire neighborhood.
“It’s all about fitting in,” he said. “Everyone is trying to be ‘hard.’ They are influenced by rappers they see on TV, talking tough. They learn that it is cool to carry a gun and shoot people.”
"Sudden Death"
No patch of the city has been bloodier this year than the areaeast and south of Post Road and 43rd Street.
Within the half-mile area are several housing complexes with rows of small apartments and one-story homes spread across a series of short, dead-end courts, drives and lanes.
“The bullets fly night and day,” said Shamonte Love, 30, who has lived there all her life. “This is not a desirable place to live. It is a destination of last resort.”
In addition to “Bullethead”Shorter,
• Dominique Jenkins, 21;
• Charles Nelson, 25;
• Christina Elridge, 36;
• Osiel Rangel, 27;
• Bryan Scott, 37, all have been slain there this year — within a couple of hundreds yards each other.
And despite its location in one of the more congested parts of the city, many residents in “Sudden Death” said they live in isolation.
Families with young children are apt to spend almost all their time indoors, especially in the summer, because of the danger in the streets. There are few recreational activities for children and the nearest grocery store is a mile away.
“We don’t go outside much, or really at all” said Sh’may Posey, 37, as she waited for her 9-year-old son to get off a school bus last week.
Posey, who also has a 4-year-old son and a 2-year-old daughter, let the children run around in front of the apartment for a few minutes after the bus arrived. She sat by the front door, never letting them get more than a few feet away.
“I think everyone should be able to go outside and play whenever they want to, but that’s not the reality here,” Posey said before shuttling the children inside and locking the door. “I know it’s not good for the kids and they know it, too. It’s not living, just existing.”
Donnell Armstrong, a self-employed mechanic, likes to fix up bicycles for young children and sell them for $20. He said sometimes he doesn’t know why he bothers.
“It’s nice to bring a smile to a little one’s face when they set their eyes on a new bike,” he said. “But then you realize that there’s nowhere safe for them to ride them, so what’s the point?”
Most residents don’t expect the area to ever receive much attention from any city agency — besides police.
“If you don’t live here you don’t care about it,” Love said. “And most people don’t have the resources to go anywhere else. When you don’t have anything, this is what you have left.”
Which makes her relish tranquility.
“If there is a day without gunfire around here that is considered a real good day,” Love said. “But I don’t remember very many of those.”Nothing in this article is the fault of either white people or white racism; it's entirely the fault of individual black people, who collectively participate in negatively impacting their communities in every possible way sociologists/economist/realtors/investors can devise measures for accessing a communities viability
Poverty? It's the result of individual actions/decisions, or, properly named, black dysfunction.
Violence? It's the result of individual actions/decision, or, properly named, poor future time-orientation, low impulse control, and lower IQ.
You see, Disingenuous White Liberals believe if black people weren't living in segregated communities, they'd magically abide by the law and produce the type of community good, upstanding white people create.
But even when dwelling in homes/communities built by white people in the 1880s, the only type of community black people can collectively create is exactly the same as found in the ghettos of Newark, Chicago, Milwaukee, and New Orleans.
Worse, it's the same found in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
There are plenty of safe areas in Indianapolis, it's just they happen to be completely devoid of black people; in these residential areas, white children are free to roam without any fear of being the victim of a random bullet, fired with malicious intent by a black trigger-man.
These areas also happen to be free of 'Martin Luther King Dr. or Martin Luther King Boulevards'.
In the story, "Public Safety Director Troy Riggs is quoted as saying, “We’ve identified ‘Where?’ Now we can move on to the ‘What?’ and ‘How?'"
'What' is simply black people; how, is because the white community continues to subsidize the poor life-choices of black individuals, which collectively add up to turning even the most productive city in the world (Detroit: "The Paris of the West") into... 2013 Detroit.
America's future, as is currently projected, is simply Port-au-Prince, Haiti, only without foreign aid and white do-gooders to keep the island nation artificially propped-up.
46 comments:
Ashes to ashes
Dust to dust
If there were no negroes
It'd be heaven, I trust
America's future, as is currently projected, is simply Port-au-Prince, Haiti, only without foreign aid and white do-gooders to keep the island nation artificially propped-up.
You don't need to be an advocate, for anything, to have a clear picture of America's future, or Europe's for that matter. The term carrying capacity means how many people can live in the borders of such-and-such land under certain conditions. Thanks to global warming the planet up and fossil fuel running out, the carrying capacity of this country in the near future, about twenty years or so, may be reduced by as much as 50%. So what happens to the 175 million who have to go?
Anonymous said...
America's future, as is currently projected, is simply Port-au-Prince...
Thanks to global warming the planet up and fossil fuel running out, the carrying capacity of this country in the near future, about twenty years or so, may be reduced by as much as 50%
Right on. Global warming is going to kill us. But there's a simple solution to that frightening scourge. All you have to do is send lots of money to the state. We'll call it a carbon tax. Then the state will take care of us and protect us from the heat.
America is so Walking Dead.
"Examining health shortcomings"
I love that. Do DWLs honestly believe that feral, hair-trigger, homicidal degeneracy is caused by, say, higher levels of osteo-arthitis in one particular communidee? I mean, really, can these people honestly look at themselves in the mirror at night?
90210
I see the lutherans are importing
'refuse or refugees' from CONGO.
I get a newsfeed via 'white history month' at Facebook.
and just when ya think ya read it all..now a baby is a 'fetus'?
wtf?
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/10/17/nypd-possible-fetus-found-in-teens-bag-inside-nyc-victorias-secret/ [via drudge]
Why do people in this country carp and moan about global warming? Worried about the power plants spewing carbon into the air? Lessen the demand by going off grid. Walk everywhere or ride a bike. Eat nuts, berries and fruits found in nearby forests. That will help curb the demand for raised animal products. The third world folks burn whatever they can find to cook whatever they can manage to get each day. If all the Al Gore types would simply step back into the lifestyle of 1800, the world would be a better place immediately. But they want to push their problems off onto others to bear the burden to "protect the planet". When this president is done transforming the USA into a modern day Argentina, with lots more crime, fewer jobs and massive inflation, the worries about the earth warming will fade back into obscurity.
We already have a carbon tax. It called EBT.
"Brown said bad behavior among young men his age is driven by peer pressure. The actions of a few, he said, pervade the entire neighborhood.
“It’s all about fitting in,” he said. “Everyone is trying to be ‘hard.’ They are influenced by rappers they see on TV, talking tough. They learn that it is cool to carry a gun and shoot people."
White kids listen to the exact same gangster rap and watch the exact same shit on the TV that the black kids are watching. So why don't the White kids think it's cool to carry a gun and shoot people? Why do the White kids refrain from the violence preached by their black rapper heroes? The funny thing is that the vast majority of these rappers are big time poseurs; they pretend to be big time street thugs when in real life they would cry like the little bitches they are if they ever had a gun pulled on them in the hood. So here you have low IQ black kids with no impulse control and no future time orientation listening to the exploits of fake wannabe gangsters, and these black kids are motivated to kill and rob by these frauds!
What does that say about black people when they are motivated to commit violence by the music they listen to? How completely disconnected from reality do you have to be to look up to fake gangbangers preaching violence and death? It's no wonder that blacks in America were used as the jackhammer to destroy Western Civilization. These creatures are so mentally weak that they can be programmed to return to their jungle mentality by a bunch of bleating, stuttering, Auto tuning morons. The current nightmare facing Western Civilization would not have been possible without a substantial number of blacks in America. They really are the key to our current predicament. It's interesting to note that the Shelly v. Kraemer decision was handed down in 1948, a scant three years after the end of World War 2. We allegedly saved the United States from the evil Nazis, only to give away the United States and OUR FREEDOM to the evil blacks via the end of restrictive covenants. Remind me again what we were fighting for?
Speaking of Indiana:
http://countenance.wordpress.com/2013/10/17/read-their-lips-no-new-whites/
You see, Disingenuous White Liberals believe if black people weren't living in segregated communities, they'd magically abide by the law and produce the type of community good, upstanding white people create.
Good point.
What happened when segregation ended, and blacks started first moving into white neighborhoods and attending white schools? There was a brief period when the numbers reflected the populace: a neighborhood was (say) 10% black homeowners, schools were 10% black students. What then happened? How long did that balance hold out before crime, etc., kicked in?
One of the "etc." is the fact that when blacks move in, they (or their DWL shills) also start the race hustling: AA, black studies programs, hoax crime lawsuits and demands for everything. This makes life untenable for whites, who have to fall back.
The community then becomes "segregated" again, and the process starts all over.
But even when dwelling in homes/communities built by white people in the 1880s, the only type of community black people can collectively create is exactly the same as found in the ghettos of Newark, Chicago, Milwaukee, and New Orleans.
Which ought to give the lie to the DWL assertion that "conditions" create crime. Even when handed a fully functioning neighborhood, town, city or country, the same pathologies reassert themselves.
Look at the rainbow nation of South Africa where the end of white rule and the opening of the "better" neighborhoods and schools to blacks has not led to any improvement in behavior. Rather, the country has seen an explosion in crime and the usual black collective dysfunctions once kept in check by apartheid.
Similarly, we can see the same situation in Europa, where there was no long-history-of-segregation(tm) of blacks, and where the social systems have bent over backwards to give everything to black immigrants. What has been the result: crime, poor educational achievement, rioting, and ethnically cleansing of whites from their ancient cities.
Here's a question for anyone: can you show us some black majority communities which do not show these same pathologies of high crime, high illegitimacy, high welfare dependency, and high numbers of attacks on whites?
You don't need to be an advocate, for anything, to have a clear picture of America's future, or Europe's for that matter. The term carrying capacity means how many people can live in the borders of such-and-such land under certain conditions. Thanks to global warming the planet up and fossil fuel running out, the carrying capacity of this country in the near future, about twenty years or so, may be reduced by as much as 50%. So what happens to the 175 million who have to go?
Hilarious. Total fail train.
There is no (human-caused) global warming. Carbon dioxide is not a greenhouse gas. The government is as untrustworthy on this issue as it is on every other issue.
Amazing that anyone still believes this crap.
There is no (human-caused) global warming. Carbon dioxide is not a greenhouse gas.
It's amazing how many very wealthy people want you to believe this, so they can continue collecting a nickel for each kWh you buy from selling natural gas instead of a fraction of a cent per kWh from enriching uranium.
The government is as untrustworthy on this issue as it is on every other issue.
"The government" isn't at work here. It's the climate science departments of every research university on the globe, save Russia (which makes piles of money from... selling oil and natural gas and doesn't want its customers to switch to the very uranium Russia is moving into in an even bigger way).
Oh, let's not forget the big nuclear builds in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. They wouldn't have any interest in keeping you as a customer for oil and gas instead of you using uranium yourself, would they? They wouldn't be denying the effects of their only salable commodity while promoting the Religion of Peace™? Nah... preposterous!
some day on a planet in a faraway galaxy someone will ask "was there ever intelligent life on that smoldering planet?"
Mr. Rational
It's the climate science departments of every research university on the globe....
Climate science is an oxymoron. There is no science in climate science, just a bunch of leftie ideologues "adjusting" historical temperature data, playing with their computer models and doing their mendacious best to hide the decline.
And their latest trick, tweaking the ARGO data to show all that missing global warming went for a deep ocean swim. By mechanisms unexplained and basically unexplainable.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Cooling is warming. Ignorance is strength.
"The government" isn't at work here. It's the climate science departments of every research university
Those climate "research" programs are funded by the government -- and those same researchers have been shown to falsify their data.
Oh, let's not forget the big nuclear builds in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. They wouldn't have any interest in keeping you as a customer for oil and gas instead of you using uranium yourself, would they?
Use uranium ourselves, for what?? Is there a new Plutonium-powerd Prius on the market now? Do you honestly believe the Saudis are going nuclear just to have cleaner electricity? Are you completely oblivious to their enemies in Iran and their ambition to build nuclear weapons?
Yes, let's all save Mother Gaia by unplugging our microwaves, ride a camel to work, and eat free-range dung beetles. That would be really Rational, right Mister? And if any company is selling uranium-sourced electricity for "a fraction of a cent per kWH", please name them. All utilities are regulated, protected monopolies who charge as much as they possibly can, regardless of fuel costs.
@Mr. Rational
Thank you. At least someone understands that global warming isn't some "Marxist global conspiracy" or whatever the deniers are claiming nowadays. If there is evidence against global warming - and in particular anthropogenic climate change - then the scientists would be all over it collecting their prizes for new discoveries.
I think the only real debate on the matter is as to how much humans effect climate and at what rate. It is unfortunate to have the science politicized by both parties here in the States.
You will also see a huge overlap in climate change deniers and those who still think the science of evolution is "just a theory" and drivel that pops up in the creationist movements.
Anonymous
You will also see a huge overlap in climate change deniers and those who still think the science of evolution is "just a theory" and drivel that pops up in the creationist movements.
You people are so intellectually dishonest.
I know I won't get through to a true believer like you. I could show you the data and you'd refuse to look at it.
What I want to know is how you reconcile your revulsion for the Federal Government imposing BRA on you with your wide-eyed trust in that same Federal Government's so-called environmental agenda?
I guess like many people you have no problem with taking the things you want from the Fedrah Gubmint while petitioning same to deny the other guy what he wants.
I agree that black criminality is partially the problem of low education and high unemployment.
That's why they should be schooled in the ways of their African fore fathers and given jobs building a new society....BACK IN AFRICA.
Anonymous
I think the only real debate on the matter is as to how much humans effect climate and at what rate.
The answers to your question. A negligible amount. At a rate that's lost in the noise of natural climate variation.
At least Mr. Rational - aka James Hansen - understands the science. You are obviously scientifically illiterate.
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing = Fedrah Gubmint BAD.
Demolish the coal industry = Fedrah Gubmint GOOD.
Section Ape = Fedrah Gubmint BAD.
EPA regulates carbon dioxide = Fedrah Gubmint GOOD.
etc.
So explain to me please how you live with this kind of hypocrisy.
@ Chuck
Just show me the data. And since I struck a nerve I have to ask, are we still on climate science or have we moved onto evolution?
Just show me I am wrong. I honestly have no problem with being corrected. In fact, quite the opposite.
And saying there is an overlap in creationism, climate change denial and far right politics is not dishonest. It is demonstrably true.
And as I mentioned, I find it a sad state of affairs that the science has become politicized by both parties. I nor more like some ass hat like Gore wanting to tax me for carbon emissions while he runs around in private jets any more than I like big oil following in the footsteps on big tobacco by rigging their own "studies".
Climate does change, its a fact, Chuck. And I have said, the degree to which humans affect it is what is in question as are the steps we should take to insure that we are not ruined by it. The over hyped sky-is-falling far left assholes who want to use the science to promote their agenda are just as bad as the far right that wants to ignore the fucking elephant in the room.
I'm really surprised to see all the 'hate' towards Christianity from fellow whites who have very similar views of race as I do, as well as the belief in man made global warming (or is it cooling ? I forget, it changes every couple of decades or so).
I as a White man have no trouble in reconciling my Faith in Jesus Christ with a wish to live separately from blacks, Hispanics, etc... As far as 'humans evolved from lower apes' goes, its a science shot so full of holes it's virtually transparent. The reading I've done on human hemoglobin, etc... things we know now, as opposed to a Victorian age myth based on a repudiated book.
Global warming is nothing short of a cult like religion, one requiring more faith than almost any religion you could think of. When I think global warming immediately Scientology leaps to mind. I quite literally got tired of reading the materials from both sides of that issue, especially knowing that in a few months or a year, some 'warming' scientist would reveal how they how diddled the numbers a bit to fit the collective agenda. Really tiresome stuff.
"A few miles to the southwest, in Haughville, Israel Douglas, 73, insisted his street was safe, even though eight people have been slain in six years in the four-square-block area."
Well, the TWMNBN says that his street is safe, no matter what anyone says. And blacks are just like us, and Whites need to mate and marry with blacks and please give to the Israel Defense fund you stupid Goy.
This is the journalism the MSM should be doing, but falls to Paul and other bloggers who I hope makes a fortune on book sales. Every subject of our culture is ignored exactly as this is due to Political Correctness, whether it is the Mocha Messiah or Racial preferences in Contracting. Without accurate information, people are adrift and helpless, as Orwell repeatedly commented.
It has gone too far. No one tomorrow is going to come out with a TV show "No PC" that says that blacks are a dangerous child race that cannot live with Whites and need to be benevolently returned to their homeland. Far less a point (Taxes and Slavery) were fought over in this Country. I would not be surprised (in fact pleased) if such were the cause of the FUSA breakup leading to a White Homeland.
As to Carbon Dioxide and GW see: http://youtu.be/S-nsU_DaIZE
For those who believe in the GW thing, assuming Whites are a minority in both Europe and FUSA, the decision will not be "ours" to make. Our Negro and Shitspanic masters will make that call and they will like the planet warmer, along with as much free stuff as they can grab.
White Homeland.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/gym-teachers-fired-calling-students-negroes-article-1.1489152
“Every year, the homicides are where they’ve happened before,” said Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Maj. Thomas Kern. “These are historic trends with very little change. Now we need to know why this is.”
This is what they were saying back in the 1950s, and the solution was: end segregation!
This is what they were saying back in the 1960s, and the solution was: war on poverty!
This is what they were saying back in the 1970s, and the solution was: affirmative action!
This is what they were saying back in the 1980s, and the solution was: enterprise zones!
This is what they were saying back in the 1990s, and the solution was: compassionate conservatism!
This is what they were saying back in the 2000s, and the solution was: hope and change!
See that black cat sauntering by? A sign that they are reloading The Matrix.
This new appointee to DHS, the organization designed to rule the streets, the national security force, name of Jeh Johnson, he's black.
I find this beyond disturbing.
Gosh I've got the fatigue, how many different ways can MSM spin this in an over-explaining way. To a normal, world citizen this is making excuses through therapy of explaining away the elephant in the room. I'm tired. Just as well keep pushing on.
Kind of like the "research" done at East Anglia university in England. Where they hacked in to the data and found damaging emails between the various researchers admitting to falsifying the data.
Conspiracy theoretics shades imperceptibly into paranoia. I think Chuck Hammer is there. Anonymous isn't far behind:
Use uranium ourselves, for what?? Is there a new Plutonium-powerd Prius on the market now?
In a manner of speaking. The Prius now has a plug-in model, and everyone who gets part of their power from nuclear plants is getting some of that from fission of plutonium.
Of course, every watt of electricity we make with uranium is a watt that's not made by burning something. France has more or less eliminated the issue of carbon emissions from their electricity supply. They did it back in the 1980's, not because of climate concerns but to eliminate their grid's previous dependence on oil which had suddenly become OPEC's political weapon. The USA did the same; look at the historical data at the Energy Information Administration's site, and watch oil nearly disappear from the grid.
Do you honestly believe the Saudis are going nuclear just to have cleaner electricity? Are you completely oblivious to their enemies in Iran and their ambition to build nuclear weapons?
No, Saudi Arabia is running out of natural gas and has to burn crude oil to generate electricity and desalinate water. Building nuclear plants lets them sell that crude instead, which is worth a lot more than the uranium that's needed to displace it. It's a very simple business decision. Of course, using cheap uranium (and some batteries) to replace expensive oil is a good idea for us even if carbon isn't an issue. So is using natural gas, which the trucking industry is moving to.
It's impossible to use pressurized-water reactors to make nuclear bombs. The fresh fuel is light-years away from bomb grade, and so's the plutonium in the spent fuel (loaded with Pu-240). Saudi Arabia farms out its nuclear deterrent to the USA, along with much of the rest of its defenses; it doesn't have to build its own program, nor pay for it.
And speaking of paranoia, being told that I'm James Hansen looks like a pretty good indication for it. Those interested in the actual context (and thus meaning) of "hide the decline" can look here.
SoCAL Snowman:
Remind me again what we were fighting for?
The only winners of wars fought by whites for at least the last 100 years have been the squids. Look at the official "winners" of WW I and II today. Are the USA, Britain and France better off now than they were in 1914? Only in the view of those whose desire is our extermination.
Hmmmm, lotsa juice team here crying over yet another of their scams. Tell me, how is it record lows consitently beat out record highs in the northern hemisphere 2:1 over the last few years? Same in the South too. We as Albertosaurus noted, are in the end stage of an interglacial, we will return to a glacial very soon.
Anonymous
Climate does change, its a fact, Chuck. And I have said, the degree to which humans affect it is what is in question as are the steps we should take to insure that we are not ruined by it. The over hyped sky-is-falling far left assholes who want to use the science to promote their agenda are just as bad as the far right that wants to ignore the fucking elephant in the room.
OK, I'll take that at face value.
The case for anthropogenic global warming is deceptively simple. Rising atmospheric CO2 and apparently rising global temperature. Obvious, right? That in a nutshell is why this hoax has been so successful. Lay people see two rising curves (thanks, Al) and assume they are linked. i.e. one causes the other. In reality, the AGW argument is complex and contains several important assumptions that are 100% not proven by so-called climate "science."
Let's start with one fact that is, at a minimum, food for thought. What percentage of global carbon dioxide emissions are anthropogenic - i.e. from human sources? A small piece of trivia is that the early IPCC assessments had a table showing this data but the IPCC long ago decided that this fact did not support their agenda.
What percentage of global carbon dioxide emissions are anthropogenic - i.e. from human sources?
Essentially all of the newly-added carbon is from stocks that were fixed biologically (not captured as carbonates by weathering of rocks). We know this because biological fixation of carbon favors carbon-12 over carbon-13, and formation of carbonate stones doesn't; fossil fuels show the C-12/C-13 ratios of plants, not rocks. The atmospheric ratio of C-13 to C-12 has been going down, showing that the added carbon isn't coming from volcanoes. Human activity is the only source for C-13-depleted carbon big enough to explain the measurements, and reported consumption of coal, oil and gas fits pretty neatly (with allowances for e.g. draining and burning of tropical peat-bog forests).
A small piece of trivia is that the early IPCC assessments had a table showing this data but the IPCC long ago decided that this fact did not support their agenda.
Documentation? I could find you references on carbon-isotope ratios but you'd probably be more convinced if you dug them up yourself.
New point in next comment, since it's distinct and very, very important.
The over hyped sky-is-falling far left assholes who want to use the science to promote their agenda
Pay close attention to this: "want to use the science to promote their agenda". The science says that carbon emissions threaten to change Earth's climate in dangerous ways (for many things, including humans).
What is the obvious thing to do, given this? Anything to reduce GHG emissions, including:
(a) an immediate cessation of immigration to high-emitting western countries, and a return of immigrants who can be made to leave. Shipping out illegal immigrants would be a top priority.
(b) preservation and scale-up of nuclear power to replace coal.
The Left's policy prescriptions on these two points are the exact opposite, a complete non-sequitur. From this come two conclusions:
(1) The Left truly believes the science. They believe it will persuade people to act.
(2) They believe that having the only policy response on the table means it will be adopted even if it is largely counterproductive.
A serious response to the climate issue would demand the re-direction of resources from BRA to the construction of nuclear power plants, assembly lines for traction batteries, and the electrification of rail lines. Above all, it demands competent management—IMPOSSIBLE with BRA in force. A serious conservative policy for climate change means the end of BRA. But Conservatism Inc. is fully on-board with BRA, so they deny instead.
I was one of the last white people to move out of the 42nd and Post area mentioned in the Star article. I left in 1995 after my apartment was burglarized, probably by someone looking to pawn the items stolen so they could get money to buy drugs with. In the seventies and early eighties that was a nice neighborhood. The blacks in the area seemed like they behaved themselves as long as they were a minority but once they became a majority they became insufferable to be around. Right before I left, I had neighbors playing their stereos at two in the morning, neighbors letting their pit bulls roam the neighborhood, neighbors knocking down elderly women and stealing their purses, neighbors shooting off guns, neighbors throwing trash on the sidewalk, neighbors selling drugs or sex on the street corner etc. People who live out in the suburbs and are never exposed to the black underclass have no idea what they are really like.
“My uncle was standing in this exact spot just the other day, asking someone for a cigarette ....
And that is why I cross the street when I see a black.
Reading the comments here I can't understand how someone can be smart enough to see through the race hustle but not smart enough to see through the exact same hustle applied to climate change.
Because it is the same thing, we're expected to believe that all these things besides blacks being black are the problem causing all the issues blacks have, and we're expected to believe all this nonsense about carbon - outside of the fact that plants thrive on taking it out of the air - is causing global warming. This outside of the fact that the planet has warmed, and cooled, many times through it's history without so much as a single man driving a single SUV to put carbon into the air. Nobody yet can explain how that happened without man.
I can't understand how someone can be smart enough to see through the race hustle but not smart enough to see through the exact same hustle applied to climate change.
Oh for Pete's sake... use empericism for just one lousy minute, will you?
Venus has an albedo of 0.75. The radiation at the top of the atmosphere is about 2700 W/m^2, so the absorbed power is about 675 W/m^2 of disc or roughly 170 W/m^2 of planetary surface. Working the Boltzman blackbody radiation equation P = 5.67*10^-8 W/m^2/K^4 backwards, the temperature of a blackbody radiating 190 W/m^2 would be 240 Kelvin, cold enough to freeze water. Instead, it's hot enough to melt lead. Without a greenhouse effect, Earth would average about 250 Kelvin; it actually averages something over 280 K.
Now, empiricism also shows that Blacks given the same and even better educational and employment opportunities than Whites still perform worse on average. Just be consistently empirical and ask questions and you will eventually get the right answer.
Yes, this means BOTH the left AND the right are wrong about major issues; the left rejects anything which questions the Blank Slate theory, and the right rejects radiation physics (admittedly, physics is hard). That's part of how the elites have stalemated us. Breaking free requires ditching the dogmas and changing the rules of the game.
Still no explanation how those ice ages ended and the planet warmed up without man there to cause warming.
I mean, man's known history of the weather and temperature measurement is such a tiny blip in the history of the planet it's statistically irrelevant; you want me to be concerned with perhaps a single degree rise in temperature over 100 years? What do you propose I do about it, find some way to dial back the thermostat on the sun?
One volcano erpution can put more carbon and pollution in the air than 200 years of industrial development, has done so, yet the planet has healed itself. To me it's the height of arrogance to presume that man has so much control over the planet, that he can destroy it, short of a world-wide nuclear war taking place.
And the kicker for me is the weatherman usually is lucky if he can get the next 24 hours right, let alone the rest of the week or the month. I'm supposed to worry about what may happen in 50 or 100 years based on an accuracy rate that's no more than 50% at best? Yeah, I'll take my chances.
I'm pretty damned certain that everyone who comes to this site is fully aware that the presence of feral Negroes isn't good. We all go to the same sites and we all read the same articles. Has any one of you ever come across an actual workable solution to the Negro problem? I haven't, and I've been attuned to this issue since the newsletter days.
Yeah, we've all read the KILL 'EM ALL suggestions. Sounds great, and it would solve the problem, but it's not going to happen.
Then there is the END WELFARE AND LET 'EM ALL STARVE method of Negro control. That one sounds good, too, but it won't happen either. They are the descendants of cannibals, so do you really believe they won't be able to find something to eat in a country with a population of 330 million.
Those useless suggestions have been tossed around ever since LBJ started giving financial incentive to the stupidest, laziest members of our society to breed unchecked.
What IS the solution?
First you end the government programs that keep a constant supply Black Trash flowing from stupid women's wombs to the tattered streets where the sprog will raise one another.
Next you quit giving tax breaks to corporations for off-shoring the menial labor jobs that Negroes can perform. We all know that a huge percentage of the bruthas don't get much out of school. We've had the discussion about WHY too many times. Nature, nurture, or a combination of the two, it doesn't make a bit of difference. What does make a difference is that working-class Blacks are rapidly degenerating into welfare class and thug class Blacks. If you don't recognize the difference between those groups, then your knowledge of the N'ers is so minuscule that you really shouldn't try to speak authoritatively about them.
Cut down the Black Trash population through attrition and create dummy jobs for the Black proles and we will be back where we were before the politicians tried to legislate equality. That was far from perfect, but it was a hell of a lot better than where we are now.
The dark ones are here and they will continue to be here. It's time to stop the bullshit day-dreaming about an all White country and start working toward a society with far less "true niggas".
Well, and let's see if we can't encourage them to up that 70% abortion rate closer to 100%.
James, you think we're idiots for saying "END WELFARE AND LET 'EM ALL STARVE", but then your solution is to:
*"First you end the government programs that..." creates useless welfare niggers
*"Next you quit giving tax breaks to corporations for..." giving nigger work to foreigners, and give the nigger jobs back to the niggers.
Sounds like you just said "LET EM STARVE" in 800 extra words. The problem with the "jobs" portion of your plan is that the exported jobs were white jobs: manufacturing, and low-level IT. The nigger jobs were always domestic, shit labor jobs, and have been given to the mexicans. So, let's get rid of the mexicans & give the niggers their jobs back, right? Good luck. The same DWL-Coexist-DontExist mentality that made blacks "equal" to you and me, also invited all those mexicans into our homeland to be co-equal with whites and blacks. The mexicans aren't leaving, and the niggers don't want those "slave" jobs anymore.
Anyways, we're all on the same chapter, if not always the same page.
I haven't the knowledge to judge the truth about global warming and all that, but it's still unquestionably a good idea to use less resources, spend less money, watch less TV, eat less junk food, ship less food to Africa, and so forth. However much or little of anything there is on this planet, it is limited. I suspect that, even if many knowledgeable Greens are overstating their case about global warming, they have the long term interests of humanity at heart. (No, not the Al Gores) We don't have to buy their story to recognize that environmental destruction is not good for Whites. Sustain our race with sustainable policies. When oil runs out, as it will, let our people be prepared to continue.
Very well said! I agree wholeheartedly.
I am a black person from the east coast who just moved to Indiana. I chose Carmel not for the whites but they seem to treat me better than the blacks here. I never seen so many lost black people in my life. I can see why whites here feel this way. It's disgusting. My children perfer Carmel over Indianapolis in a heartbeat. I don't want to be around them either. The WALKING DEAD....
Very true info on the black community here. Why is it however that one retard mentions global warming, and all of us "smarter than them all's" follow suit and comment on global warming? Did they miss the article headline?
Post a Comment