Friday, July 25, 2014

And the people bowed and prayed, To the neon God they made.

There is no educating liberals. 

For the most part, there is no educating conservatives. 

The former will go to their grave cursing their whiteness (blaming it for all the world's ills); the latter will go their grave wishing they could have found a 'Michael Oher' to adopt and rehabilitate (praising their altruism for all the world's hope). 

Reading about Indianapolis and it's horrific decline under almost a century of continuous Republican leadership is enough to forever make the flaccid the hard-on any young white conservative had for Ronald Reagan and the GOP. 

Back in 2010, one of the resident white liberal columnists for the Indianapolis Star, Matthew Tully, expressed frustration with the mass shooting at the Indiana Black Expo (subsequently, each successive Black Expo has required near a martial law atmosphere to keep attendees safe from the privations of blackness). 

More so, he was upset anonymous white people took to the Internet to vent against the near all-black violence in the city of Indianapolis (remember: Mayor Greg Ballard launched an campaign exclusively against black-in-origin violence in the early part of 2014 [Black on black crime on Mayor Ballard’s agenda, WISHTV, 3-8-14]), which he compared to a "KKK" rally.

What's so funny is this: a black person would probably be safer at a Klan rally than in some parts of Indianapolis,where fellow black people would have no problem firing at them (since, black-on-black violence is so frequent in Indianapolis).

Here's what the Captain Tully, the avenger against noticing, wrote [Tully: Time to talk about problems linked to Expo, Indy Star, 7-21-10]:
Let's be honest.
If the shootings that occurred Downtown last weekend had been tied to the Indiana Plumbers Expo, or one of a thousand other conventions, the follow-up discussion wouldn't be so difficult.
We all respect plumbers, of course. But if their annual convention required hundreds of city cops patrolling our compact Downtown on a Saturday evening, and if shootings and fights and other incidents outside the convention had become all too common, we would question whether the plumbers expo was worth the trouble.
But we're talking instead about Indiana Black Expo and its annual Summer Celebration. So any discussion about the monumental problems tied to it gets bogged down in the treacherous issue of race.
It's a hard issue to discuss. I've ticked off an endless stream of readers during five years of writing columns about all sorts of issues, but even I got queasy at the idea of diving into this one.
It doesn't help that moronic and simplistic racists thrive on this kind of thing. They turn anonymous online forums into a 21st century version of KKK meetings and make it even harder to have an adult conversation.
That said, we can't let the delicate nature of this subject, or the words of a few racists, prevent us from finally having an honest, and perhaps painful, discussion about the ongoing problems related to Black Expo. Fear of having a blunt conversation, and fear of being labeled a racist, likely has prevented the city from adequately addressing this ongoing problem before now. And so we are subjected to national headlines about the 10 young people shot in the very Downtown that Indy's leaders so often point to as the thing that makes this city special.
Well, it would be nice to have a blunt, adult conversation about crime in Indianapolis (and, for that matter, all of America), but when race is involved honesty is always the first casualty. 

Better to be on the side of the anointed angels (blacks) than those evil white demons who earn their honorary Klan robes just by mentioning "race" in the same sentence as "crime."

Or, in the case of the Indianapolis Star, something that is covered-up as editorial policy. Only three years earlier, the paper basically bragged about its social justice platform of covering up the injustices against civilization committed by almost exclusively black people. [A caution on suspect descriptions, Indy Star, 3-24-2007]:
Last week we faced one of the more challenging decisions editors ever face, and we didn't handle it well.
It involved the carjacking/robbery/rape of a young woman after she entered her car in a Downtown parking ramp. Police said the assailant was a black male in his late teens, small thin build, approximately 5 foot 8 with medium complexion and short hair. He was wearing a blue polo shirt with thin yellow and white stripes, and blue pants.
We didn't publish that description.
Why?
Lacking, to my surprise, a written approach for dealing with such matters we operated under the common newspaper standard to be wary of all such descriptions because they most often are so vague as to be meaningless.
Does it really help to know that an assailant was, say, a 6-foot-2 blond, upper middle-age white male? Not really. Those guys are everywhere. I'm one of them. But at least when somebody of that description is mentioned, every one of the huge selection of men in my universe isn't thought of as a potential criminal.
Now substitute a black male with black hair. All of a sudden all black men of that description are considered suspect.
That's an injustice from my perspective and from the perspective of most other editors. Most Americans, when they think of crime, fall victim to a racial stereotype.
Let's be honest. When black men commit crimes there is an unfair tendency to blame all black men. Not so with whites.
Here's another truth: When The Star doesn't print a description of a black suspect alleged to have been involved in a crime, my phone will ring and my e-mails will pile up with messages that angrily accuse us of bowing to the evil forces of political correctness.
When the authorities seek a white suspect and we don't print the description, I don't hear a peep. That speaks volumes, don't you think?
That doesn't mean we should have a blanket prohibition against using suspect descriptions. After reviewing policies of several newspapers and discussing the matter with colleagues, including our public safety team, we decided on this policy:
"We will publish descriptions of suspects from public officials or eyewitnesses only when the descriptions are distinct enough to differentiate the person from all but a narrow group of people. The description would likely include a combination of physical characteristics and other identifiers such as age, race, height, weight, hair color, haircut, tattoos, scars, clothing, jewelry, glasses, getaway cars, etc. The use of such descriptions is likely to be rare and must be approved by a senior editor."
Every situation is different, which is why the above statement is inadequate without some discussion points, which we are providing in question form:
Is racial identification relevant to the story and if so can we explain why? Remember that ethnicity isn't necessarily an indication of skin color and that race often is not easily definable. There are black Latinos, and white Latinos, for example.
What is the potential of our decision adding to unfair stereotypes?
Most important, is a description of a suspect so sketchy that a suspect could not be identified in a crowd of people, or is it specific enough to be useful? A 5-foot-10 white male wearing glasses and a knit golf shirt doesn't offer much. A 5-foot-10 white male with a blond crew cut, a tattoo on his left arm, a diamond earring in his left ear, and wearing glasses and a green knit golf shirt provides much more to go on.
My gut tells me that we should have provided the police description of the suspect last week. Bystanders who may have seen the suspect and, learning of that description, may have been able to provide helpful information to the police. (And we should have given the story stronger play in the paper.)
We also shouldn't have confused the situation by printing, later in the week, a police sketch of what appeared to be a black suspect, without mentioning in the adjoining story the suspect's race.
Using the guidelines and questions above, we want to have a more thorough discussion of these kinds of things in the future so we don't repeat the inconsistency we showed last week.
Thanks for reading The Star.
So, Mr. Matthew Tully, the policy of the Indianapolis Star (your employer) is to hide from race, just as name-calling is your policy when it comes to "adult" conversations about race.

This entire scheme (Black-Run America) is nothing more than the foundation of religion, from which we are heretics if we dare question the authenticity of the myth.

Better to practice heresy than find common cause with a theology peddled by the likes of Tully, the Indy Star, and those believing every neglected black male is a budding Michael Oher (with only the right, white... prodding and upbringing).

There is no educating liberals. 

For the most part, there is no educating conservatives.

There is only surviving.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

The Talented Tenth as the Great Enduring Myth... Major Davis, Jr. and his Family as the 'Real' 99 Percent (The Face of black America)

The Talented Tenth.

One of the great myths in American history.

If you want to understand the power which generates the black undertow, look no farther than Major Davis, Jr. and his family.
"Talented Tenth"... one of the great enduring myths in America. The real 99 percent is represented by Major Davis, Jr. and his family...

The Occupy Wall Street crowd got it wrong: the real "one percent" is the percentage of the black population capable of assimilating to and maintaining the civilization ("Aping," in the literal sense) white people, of even the lowest social class, are the progenitors of...

For the real 99 percent has a name and a face... Major Davis and his family.[HE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN HIS SQUAD CAR: Cop-Killer’s Family Blames The Police For Officer’s Death, Bearing Arms, 7-7-14]:
Major Davis, Jr was brandishing a semi-automatic rifle Saturday night in Indianapolis, which led to a 911 call that dispatched police. When IMPD Officer Perry Renn found Davis at 34th Street and Forest Manor Avenue, Davis opened fire on Officer Renn. Davis was critically wounded in the gunfight, but survived. Officer Renn died of wounds sustained in the firefight. Davis now faces a charge of murder.
It’s probably a shock to no one that Davis’s family is blaming the police for his actions:

He wasn’t a bad person. His father was killed by IMPD. That is enough to hurt a person and scar him for life,” said Moornan.
One of the officers listed in that 2003 police report is Officer Perry Renn.
“I imagine he figured they were going to try and kill him. I mean cause look what they did to his father,” said Moornan.
On Saturday night, the family says they were having a cookout.
“Next thing, I just heard shots and everybody running in the house and everybody hit the floor,” said Yvonne Moornan, Davis Jr.’s aunt.
By the time they got outside, they realized those shots were Davis Jr. and Officer Renn shooting at each other. Davis had an assault rifle.
“Major is not a bad person in spite of what happened. Things happen,” said Pam Moornan.
Now, the Davis family is worried about their son’s reputation and again, questioning police tactics.
“It’s horrible about what took place, but, I mean, I don’t think it’s fair though for them to keep dragging him through the mud,” said Moornan.
And again, questioning police tactics.
“I don’t know how the police was shooting. I don’t know if they took concern of any kids running around,” said Yvonne Moornan.
The family did say it is sorry for Officer Renn’s family, but they said the tragedy may have been avoided if Officer Renn would’ve stayed at his car since he could see Davis had a gun.
The alleged cop-killer’s father, Major Davis, Sr. had been arrested 15 times and did three years in prison on a drug charge. He died of a heart attack in 2003 while in handcuffs after fighting with police as he attempted to avoid a public intoxication charge. The family (of course) blamed the police for his death.

Here is the family’s reasoning/justification for Davis’s murder of Officer Renn:

  • Davis, Jr’s convicted felon father had a heart attack and died in police custody while attempting to avoid his 15th arrest… which is enough to “scar him for life.”
  • Davis, Jr. must have thought the cops were trying to kill him, again blaming the father’s heart attack on police.
  • “Things happen.”
  • Officer Renn shouldn’t have shot back at Davis, Jr. because there were kids in the area.
  • Officer Renn should have just stayed in his car, since he could see criminal Davis, Jr. brandishing a weapon.
It probably won’t surprise anyone that Davis, Jr. had multiple arrests on drug charges dating back to 2006.
I’m at a loss to explain a mindset that seems to have an unswerving ability to justify any and all criminal activity from their family members, while finding a way to blame authorities who are simply attempting to keep the peace.
 I'm not a loss to explain the mindset... it's a uniquely black phenomenon (the real 99 percent).  

Things don't just happen...

But was Major once an honor student?

Was he turning his life around?

Did he pay his water bill?

Talented Tenth?

Please.

A myth.

Major Davis and his family?

That's the reality of black America.

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic: Indianapolis is Headed Straight for a Black Iceberg

It's perhaps America's largest city with a "Republican" mayor. 

Only 20 years ago, the city was nearly 80 percent white. 

Only 10 years ago, the city was 67.5 percent white.

Today, it's roughly 56 percent white. 

The reason is simple: the quality of life in Indianapolis regresses to the mean of the majority racial group living in neighborhood, community, zip code... and Indianapolis is quickly regressing to the black mean, with whites fleeing the crime, depreciating property values, failing schools, and higher taxes (because blacks = poverty, someone has to pay for all the entitlement programs) that the black community contributes to the city. 


Gun violence in the city is monopolized by the black community, roughly 28 percent of the city's population. Violence over the July 4th holiday was all courtesy of black assailants, a fact only a few dare publicly admit. 

For noticing the correlation to crime, home invasions, fatal and nonfatal shootings in the city of Indianapolis with race (black people) will bring the wrath of Amos Brown down on you. Long the agitator for all things black in the city, he didn't take too kindly to a Fox59 report on how ads for night clubs where consciously trying to attract black people; those same clubs are the site of intense violence. [Broad Ripple: Concerns over business ads turn into conversation about race relations, Fox 59, 7-23-14]:
 FOX59 followed up on a story we ran Monday on NewsPoint at Eleven about obscene advertisements promoting clubs in Broad Ripple.
The story spurred a big reaction on social media, showing there is much more to this conversation than just advertisements. 
“I thought I was going to have a nice quiet day, but all kind of stuff is going on,” said Amos Brown.
The talks show host led his show Tuesday on AM 1310 with a story from NewsPoint Monday about public safety leaders not happy about “racy” advertisements in Broad Ripple. 
“Over the years there has been this perception, this reality, that the African American community doesn’t feel welcome in Broad Ripple. And the people who run Broad Ripple have not seen fit to come to our community and say ‘welcome!’ It kinda hit a nerve last night on a brand-new newscast,” said Brown on his radio show.  
FOX59′s story about lewd advertising turned in to a discussion about race relations. Below are some of the comments from callers on Brown’s talk show Tuesday.
“Broad Ripple itself. They don`t want black people up there really, man. I used to go there a lot,” said an anonymous caller. 
“We’ve been doing stop the violence charity events for the last two weeks,” said G. Spears.
“No disrespect to you (Nicole Pence), the video, editor and photographer, but it did strike a nerve. There is a problem with race relations in our city and county on a number of levels. It’s not just a Broad Ripple issue,” Brown told FOX59.

Much disrespect to you, Mr. Brown, but sit down and shut the hell up (white people have never come together to implore their community to stop the violence, or has a explicit or implicit white event needed police state measures as the Indiana Black Expo does every year...).


The problem with race relations in not just Indianapolis but every city in America is that some self-appointed black leader/member of clergy feels compelled to speak on behalf of their community and demand white people assimilate to the lowering of standards that always accompanies demographic change: in essence, Amos Brown has long been a champion of white flight, knowing it breds black political control of the city. 

Black criminals, regardless of what percent of the overall black population they represent, are the foot soldiers behind both white flight and coming of black political control in Indianapolis. 

Though city officials say "only one percent" of city's population is responsible for more than half of the crime in Indianapolis, this percentage enjoys the protection the black community (including the vociferous black agitator Amos Brown), though they were breed and raised in the black community
 Last year, Indianapolis had slightly more than one shooting a day that was not fatal. In those cases, 46 percent of victims, mostly black males, refused to cooperate with police. 
Most of the victims of nonfatal shootings were between the ages of 15 and 34.
 Almost all homicides in Indianapolis in 2014 include some combination of black male involved (be it aggressor or victim), a fact the local media doesn't try to hide. [Current trial sheds light on increasing violence, The Indy Channel, 7-8-14]



But it's the story Trayvon Martin Ja'Vonne Ellis, recently gunned down in Indianapolis, that serves as a microcosm of why Amos Brown and his ilk are hypocrites for daring to claim there's a race relations problem in the city without understanding it's entirely because the black community lacks any impulse control; and with this lack of impulse control they help devolve the civilization whites built in Indianapolis to the level of blacks. [Family suspects friends as streets claim another teen life, Fo59, 7-22-14]:
Ja’Vonne Ellis did a lot of living in 15 years. 
He gave up football after being mysteriously shot in the foot. He was bounced from middle school for punching a teacher. He was caught with marijuana and a friend with a gun in the spring, right about the same time another friend was shot to death at the Village at Mill Crossing and he discovered welding at Arsenal Technical High School and his sister thinks he could have made a career of it. 
“Whoever it was, they had to call him to meet him on that street. He don’t just leave the house. He can’t just leave the house,” said Jayln Ellis, Ja’Vonne’s sister. “So it had to have been a close friend. He don’t talk to too many people.” 
Ellis said one of his brother’s best friends has made himself scarce ever since the killing. 
He’s the same teenager Ellis was busted with in May on the marijuana charge.“I don’t know,” said Ellis’ big sister. “It’s jobs. It’s just kids. They don’t have nothing productive to do. So I feel like they get bored and they want to get into the street life.” 
That sentiment was echoed by Ellis’ friend Danta Hannon at the murder scene.
Hannon feels the city’s emphasis on tracking recent prison parolees is misguided. 
“Everybody focused on prison. We oughta be worried about these kids, man.” 
“I don’t see why everybody worried about Broad Ripple and north side,” said Hannon, reflecting on the recent 4th of July weekend shootings that left 7 people injured, “when clearly its the east side and these east side black kids the kids in IPS that clearly got all the problems, man.” 
Ellis was one of those kids, passing through John Marshall Community School and the Coleman Alternative Academy on his way to Tech where he sat out most of his freshman year with a bullet wound to the foot. 
“All those people up north. All those people out west. That …. is irrelevant, bro. It’s all about these kids out east, bro. Its real tough man. All poverty, death, dying, robbery. That’s what these kids is all growing up in.”
 People like Ja’Vonne Ellis, Jayln Ellis, and Danta Hannon are giving birth the new Indianapolis, the one Amos Brown has worked so hard - his entire adult life - to ensure comes to fruition, one in which blacks have forced out enough whites to assume political control of city hall. 

The executive, legislative, and judicial branch... all will one day be in the hands of black people because foot soldiers like Ja'Vonne Ellis went to their grave and convinced law-abiding white people the best days of the city were behind them.

But just for Amos Brown's benefit, let's publish the findings of the 2012 and 2013 Indianapolis Non-Fatal Shooting Review Board Report to help illustrate the violence in Indianapolis is truly a reflection of the type of community the city can hope to enjoy when whites are - thankfully - a minority. 

Remember, whites are 56 percent of the population, with blacks roughly 28 percent.

In 2012, there were 472 nonfatal shootings in the city
Whites were 16.84 percent of the suspects (33) and 18.64 percent of the victims (88). 
Non-whites were 80.10 percent of the suspects (157) and 80.72 percent of the victims (381). 

Interestingly, only 196 of the 472 suspects in nonfatal shootings race was known. Didn't we learn above most black people found with nonfatal shooting wounds were uncooperative with the police? Hmmm.

In 2013, there were 397 nonfatal shootings in the city
Whites were 12.12percent of the suspects (12) and 20.30 percent of the victims (80). 
Non-whites were 80.81 percent of the suspects (80) and 78.17 percent of the victims (308). 
Interestingly, only 99 of the 397 suspects in nonfatal shootings race was known. Didn't we learn above most black people found with nonfatal shooting wounds were uncooperative with the police? Hmmm.

More to the point, the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETYINDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT Criminal Homicide Analysis for January 1 – December 31, 2013 shows something... incredible. 

There were 125 murder victims in Indianapolis in 2013, of which 95 of the cases had suspects. 

Here's a racial breakdown of those murders:

The racial relationship between victims and their suspects was:
  • Black victim – Black assailant = 71


  • White victim – Black assailant = 11


  • Black victim – White assailant = 3


  • White victim – White assailant = 11 
 You do the math, Amos Brown. 

You want a real conversation about race, Amos Brown, or - like Eric "My People" Holder - are you just 'color brave'?

Indianapolis is drowning: not in water, but in the misery created by the individual life choices (compelled by a lack of impulse control) of black people like Ja’Vonne Ellis, Jayln Ellis, and Danta Hannon.

Members of the white community (remember: only 20 years ago, the city was nearly 80 percent white; only 10 years ago, the city was 67.5 percent white; and today, it's roughly 56 percent white) are fleeing the city, deciding they don't want to send their kids to public schools when Ja'Vonne and Jayln Ellis, along with Danta Hannon are running the show. 

We already know how this ends: black political control of the city, with black people complaining about paying water bills in Detroit...

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Water ("Is a Human Right that White People Must Pay for") World: The NAACP Gets Involved on Behalf of 83% Black Detroit Citizen's Refusal to Pay Their Water Bills

The collapse of Detroit was racial, with high rates of black crime motivating white flight. 

The city is now less than eight percent white and nearly 85 percent black. 
Darwin's Shadow: There's not much else to say about an 83 percent city black city descending into third world levels of civilization

It's a metropolis whose public offices (judicial, executive, and legislative) are completely dominated by black employees and black department heads.

Detroit is not union run. 

Detroit is not Democrat run. 

Detroit is black-run, for the expressed benefit of blacks, and only blacks. 

The following story needed this introduction, for clarity and transparency. [NAACP: Detroit water shutoffs are racially motivated, Washington Times, 7-22-14]:
A class-action suit has been filed against the city of Detroit for water shutoffs that the NAACP Legal Defense Fund says are racially motivated. 
The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department stopped service to about 7,200 buildings with overdue bills in June, compared to 1,570 in the same month last year. The issue gained national attention last month after activists appealed to the United Nations for help. 
There are concerns the shutoffs are “being done in a discriminatory fashion,” the Defense Fund’s Veronica Joice told a local CBS affiliate. “They should at least take a look at whether there’s a better way to do this that doesn’t affect the most vulnerable citizens — the majority of whom are African-American here in Detroit.”Attorney Alice Jennings, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of Detroit residents, agreed the shutoffs were a racial issue. 
“These companies are basically Caucasian companies,” she told the station. “The folks who are being cut off are almost one hundred percent African-American.” 
Detroitannounced Monday that it would suspend its aggressive policy of cutting off water for the next 15 days, but the NAACP said in a press release Monday that it’s not enough. They also want the financial aid program for Detroit’s neediest people to be reformed. 
Disclosure of the 15-day moratorium was made in bankruptcy court — three days after an estimated 2,000 people took to downtown streets to protest the shutoffs. “Avengers” actor Mark Ruffalo made a surprise appearance at the rally, hoping to “shed a little light on what’s happening” in Detroit.
Pay for individual black people's water bills or else collectively make demands:

Reform or we march. 

March, and if our demands aren't met we riot. 

America is held hostage. 

The "folks who are being cut off are almost one hundred percent African-America," Alice Jennings, because almost one hundred percent of those with balances due on their unpaid water bills in 83 percent black Detroit are black...

Our future is held hostage, with the handcuffs of blackness ensuring our civilization is shackled to the  level of "civilization" blacks can attain. 

For years, the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department has allowed unpaid water bills to pile up and free water to flow to primarily black people, but the city's bankruptcy in 2013 forced a cessation of this odd accounting oversight. 

Probably because someone knew black people, long accustomed to getting free water (and their way) wouldn't take too kindly to being told "no." [NAACP Legal Defense Fund: Detroit Water Service Shutoffs Are Discriminatory, CBS Detroit, 7-21-14]:
Talking to WWJ’s Sandra McNeil shortly after the announcement, [Detroit Water and Sewerage Department] spokesman Greg Eno admitted there’s no doubt that the department has been lax over the years, letting the bills pile up. 
He said people who now owe more than they can afford are being asked to come in and apply for assistance through the Water Affordability Program. 
Eno said, through, it’s not just free money. 
“It also teaches them, or works into their budget, monies that would be dedicated to their water bill, because they have to make a contribution every month,” he explained. “This is not a program where you get everything given to you and you contribute nothing.” 
Eno stressed, however, that not everyone in need will be able to get help. 
“We don’t have, you know, a bottomless cup of funds,” he said, adding that’s why it’s important that affected customers come in as soon as possible.
The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department aided the bankruptcy of Detroit by being lenient, admittedly for years, to primarily black customers who didn't pay their water bills.

The water kept flowing, as the bills piled up...

The Day the EBT Cards Runs Out is the moment nature reminds us all the fury of living continuously on the Malthusian Edge.

For years, large segments of the black population of Detroit has enjoyed virtually free water, with the cost of water redistributed to those stupid enough to paying for the service; now, because this service has been disconnected to those unwilling to pay their bill (an unfortunate side effect of the audit into why Detroit went bankrupt), the NAACP has declared enforcing the concept of payment for a service/good to be "discriminatory"...

Darwin's Shadow is falling across not just Detroit, but all of America.