To the last syllable of recorded time... Gov. Nixon Admits the National Guard Stood Down because 'Black Terrorists Lives > Private Property'

Ferguson War Journal: Day 194

Throughout the insanity of the situation in Ferguson, one frighteningly obvious fact has become crystal clear: there is no real opposition to those pushing for the canonization of Michael Brown and for castigating all white people of metropolitan St. Louis for bearing some responsibility for the inexcusable actions of Officer Darren Wilson. 

Governor Nixon on why the National Guard stood down: The lives of black rioters/looters/arsonists matter more than private property or whatever equity is left in the homes people in Ferguson own... 

Why no business owner of a looted or burned store has yet to sue the Obama Administration, George Soros, the editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, or any of the out-of-town agitators who created and promulgated (or, in the case of Soros, funded) the narrative of white supremacy/racism being responsible for the death of Brown is beyond me. 

Why no home owner in Ferguson has yet to take the Department of Justice, the Obama Administration, Soros, or the St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial board to court is also beyond me, considering whatever equity they had in their home is virtually worthless. [Ferguson home sales fell as uncertainty gripped real estate market, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 2-8-15]

The goal all along by the Obama Administration and Department of Justice Attorney General has been to slander the remaining white people in Ferguson (never forget: Ferguson was virtually 100 percent white in 1970 and nearly 80 percent white in 1990) for tolerating a racist police force obviously out for black blood. 

And yet not one voice has dared stand, save for the heroic Jeff Roorda - The St. Louis Police Officers Association’s business manager - who dared defend the St. Louis Police Department in the face of a rabid black crowd prepared to satiate itself on the knowledge a review board will end the threat of actual police force once and for all.

But now Roorda, who proudly wore an "I am Darren Wilson" bracelet to hearing, has been neutered. 

And now comes the news the National Guard called up to protect businesses from the black insurrection the Obama Administration and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial board agitated (with George Soros helping fund the riots to the tune of $33 million) wasn't even there to stop the riots. 

The city and region had been turned over to the black insurrectionaries. [National Guard would have had to use 'deadly force' to stop riots in Ferguson, official says, St. Louis-Post Dispatch, 2-18-15]:

 For months, critics have questioned why the Missouri National Guard did not respond more quickly as buildings burned along Ferguson’s main business corridors. 

But even had guardsmen arrived sooner that night in November, interviews and newly released documents show they would not have had the authority to stop the violence. 

The Guard was never meant to engage with protesters, Adjutant Gen. Stephen Danner said on Tuesday. Troops were to stand guard over sites critical to the region, sometimes as invisibly as possible, documents show. 

Guardsmen were not authorized to shoot to protect property in Ferguson, make arrests, or even stop people from committing most crimes. 

“That was never the plan, to have the Guard in Ferguson,” Danner said. “When you’re dealing with a civil disturbance and a tightknit group of folks coming at you, you cannot string your soldiers down the street like so many parking meters. That is a danger to them.”

That was never the plan...

Private property, businesses, and potentially residential homes were to be sacrificed to the black mob, so that no black lives would be lost in the process. 

What's the point of even having a National Guard if they are told to stand down to domestic terrorism? Then again, what's the point of having a nation if domestic terrorists get $33 million to fund their efforts and a sympathetic President and Attorney General of said nation to offer support?

But it gets better. [Nixon: Decision to use restraint in Ferguson avoided 'a gun fight on the street', St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 2-18-15]:

In the wake of new revelations about the restrictions placed on Missouri National Guard troops deployed in the Ferguson area during last fall's rioting, Gov. Jay Nixon forcefully defended on Wednesday the choice to protect life rather than property. 

“It was clearly not the best path forward to get into a gun fight on the street,” said Nixon, responding to a report that guard troops had been ordered not to protect private property or intervene in most crimes during the late-November rioting. 

“Those buildings and businesses will be rebuilt . . . but to say that that night we should have had a larger and broader gun fight? That would not have solved any problems,” Nixon told reporters after an event at Roosevelt High School in St. Louis. 

But officials and businesses in and around Ferguson say they were told explicitly by local and St. Louis County Police that the guard troops would protect property. Some reacted furiously Wednesday to Nixon's comments. 

“It's disgusting. I'm beside myself,” said Kurt Barks, owner of Complete Auto Body & Repair on West Florissant Avenue in Dellwood. 

“I sat in a meeting the Thursday before this happened and was promised there would be National Guard on my property," said Barks. "I was even told, `Don't board it up.' ” His business later sustained about $40,000 worth of damage to an automobile show room, including a vehicle that was flipped over. 

The housing market in Ferguson was already tanking long before August 9, 2014, with Section 8 vouchers depopulating lower class blacks from St. Louis and settling them in the formerly bucolic suburb where Wilson had his fateful encounter with Brown.  

Almost entirely black North St. Louis is a region known for being a food desert, renowned for brick thievery turning what once was an all-white (thriving) area into nothing more than "doll houses."

Blight, with no hope of an economic recovery. 

Ferguson, already 70 percent black, is headed to this same fate. 

What incentive for a business owner to rebuild is there when the future legal tender in an all-black Ferguson will be a food stamp/EBT card?

A war has been waged in Ferguson, though there truly was never even an opposition. 

The state of Missouri (white tax-payers) has spent $11.2 million on the response to the situation in Ferguson, but none of this was actually allocated to stop the madness Soros was funding and Obama, Holder, CNN, MSNBC, black academicians, Al Sharpton, the NY Times, and the editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch encouraged. 

Watching all of this from afar, documenting the insanity of the #BlackLivesMatter movement and the Detroit-ization of St. Louis has left one thing abundantly clear: most white people have no problem being Macbeth's "walking shadow"... a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more.

Ta-Nehisi Coates -- Have You Looked at 4300 West Belle Place in St. Louis Today?

"We all have our time machines, don't we. Those that take us back are memories... And those that carry us forward, are dreams." The Time Machine, 2002

Reading an article by Atlantic's go-to black authority figure Ta-Nehisi Coates brought a smile to my face that will be hard to wipe away. 

It's from this story. [The Racist Housing Policies That Built Ferguson: The geography of America would be unrecognizable today without the race-based social engineering of the mid-20th century., 10-17-14]

An image from Ta-Nehisi Coates article in Atlantic attacking the past housing ordinances in St. Louis as the reason for the situation in Ferguson (be quiet: you can't mention Section 8 Vouchers in polite company!)

No, nothing he wrote is particularly interesting (or even remotely based on anything outside of your typical black grievances). 

It's an image used to highlight the evils of white people - past, present, and future white people - strategically placed at the start of the story. The image shows gorgeous houses on 4300 West Belle Place and reads: 

Look! Look at these homes now! An entire block ruined by negro invasion. Every house marked "X" now occupied by negroes. ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPH OF 4300 WEST BELLE PLACE. Save you home! Vote for segregation! -- A 1916 leaflet proposes to segregate St. Louis. The measure passed. (Missouri History Museum Library and Research Center)

Isn't there just one question needing to be asked today? 

Thanks to Google Earth: 4300 West Belle Place 100 years later...

Of course there is: what happened to 4300 West Belle Place in St. Louis? 

Located in the Vandeventer neighborhood of St. Louis (a community that is 95.7 percent black and 1.2 percent white), 4300 West Belle Place is nestled in a community where the average list price for a home is $17,499 [source: Trulia.com]

Courtesy of the magic of Google Maps, you can virtually walk down West Belle Place in St. Louis and see the homes that were pictures in the 1916 leaflet proposing to segregate St. Louis. 

It's a haunting trip, seeing for yourself the bulk of those houses in the 1916 leaflet - strategically used by Ta-Nehisi Coates to conjure antipathy by Atlantic readers against white people of the past, present and especially the future - are now gone, the entire area surrounding West Belle Place looking more like Dresden after the Allies bombed the city than before. 

An image of West Belle Place (looking the other way from the photo in the 1916  leaflet... abandoned homes where nature is now the only inhabitant...

But there's an interesting post-script to the story, highlighting the type of individual who calls 4300 West Belle Place home nearly 100 years after the ad Ta-Nehisi Coates used in his story on Ferguson to connect present-day whites in St. Louis to their past racism (castigating all future white people in the process). [St. Louis police commander survives ambush while on special patrol, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 6-12-13]:

Police Major Joseph Spiess was among department brass who hit the streets after a particularly violent night this week, to help look for trouble. 

He found some, and it almost killed him. 

Spiess was among about a dozen top commanders helping supplement patrols Tuesday night after 19 people were wounded in eight incidents the night before. 

By the time the shift ended, there would be two close calls for officers and one embarrassing mistake. 

Spiess, 52, was alone, in uniform, driving an unmarked Chevrolet Impala about 9:22 p.m. when he spotted a suspicious-looking black Pontiac Bonneville with temporary license tags on Evans Avenue, heading west near Vandeventer Avenue. 

He said he made a U-turn to follow, and the Pontiac’s driver would not stop for his lights and siren. The circumstances did not qualify under rules limiting pursuits, so he gave up at Evans and Sarah Street. 

As Spiess continued along Evans, a man jogged slowly toward him and stopped between parked cars about 12 feet away. 

“He looks me dead in the eye, lifts his pistol and starts shooting at me,” Spiess said Wednesday. “The first round sounded like a shotgun went off in my car. Then I heard a high-pitched whine go through the (open) driver’s side window and out the passenger window. 

“He looked at me square in the face, I’m in an Impala, wearing a police shirt, and he was looking me right in the eye. He knew who he was shooting at. He absolutely knew I was a policeman.” 

Spiess said that as he sped off, he watched in the mirror as the gunman stepped to the middle of the street and continued firing. 

About a block away, Spiess pulled over to check himself for wounds. “I remember thinking, ‘I have to be hit,’ ” he said. “I could not believe I wasn’t hit.” 

Meanwhile, police arrested three people found hiding in a home near the ambush on Spiess, and seized handguns. They were believed to have been in the Pontiac, which was found abandoned in the area. 

Two of them were later charged. Robert O. Simmons, 19, of the 4500 block of St. Ferdinand Avenue in St. Louis, was charged with first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer and armed criminal action. Demetrius J. Vanarsdale, 24, of the 4300 block of West Belle Place in St. Louis, was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm and resisting arrest. 

Spiess said investigation showed that 16 shots had been fired at him from a 9-millimeter weapon with a 30-round extended magazine. He said he found two bullet holes in the driver’s side door of his car. The windows were down, so he’s not sure how many other rounds might have passed through.

Did you catch it? Demetrius J. Vanarsdale represents why the 1916 leaflet was put out by white homeowners in St. Louis, worried about the long-term damage to the equity in their homes black people would bring...

We can't change the past, nor can we have much influence on the present... but events in both the past and present represent our only guide to crafting policies for a stable, prosperous future.

The 1,000+ Black "Teens" Riot in Ocoee, Florida: Do White People Understand What 'Zombie Apocalypse' Represents Yet?

Thirty-six miles. 

That's the mileage from Sanford, Florida to Ocoee, Florida. 

You remember Sanford, right? George Zimmerman surely does. 

An image from 2004's Dawn of the Dead remake 

Anyways, last month, 10,000 Orlando-area students had the chance to see Selma for free. 

Perhaps those kids who didn't get to see the movie for free took out their frustrations on a theater in Ocoee. 

Black kids, that is. [Deputies: Hundreds of teens storm Ocoee theater: Middle, high school students try to get into theater free, ClickOrlando.com, 2-15-15]:

There was a chaotic scene at an Ocoee movie theater when hundreds of teens stormed the building, trying to get in for free, according to deputies. 

The incident happened Saturday night at the AMC Theater at the West Oaks Mall.Orange County sheriff's investigators said up to 900 middle and high school students tried storming the theater.  Deputies said about 200 students were able to get inside the building before the security gates were closed. 

"(It's) a big concern to us that are juveniles are doing this at such an early age," said Orange County Sheriff's Office Lt. Paul Hopkins. 

Investigators said as the crowd was being taken from the area, several fights broke out in the parking lot. 

Ocoee police on Monday said officers discovered about 300 teens causing a disturbance.  Officers dispersed the crowd after many of them stormed the theater.  

One person was arrested at the theater on charges of battery and resisting arrest. 

Gunfire was also reported and someone was robbed at gunpoint, but Ocoee police said on Monday that the shots turned out to be firecrackers.  Police also said it wasn't believed that the robbery was connected to the theater incident.  Three teens were arrested on allegations of stealing cellphones from two other teens at a nearby location, police said. 

"Everybody just started scattering, ducking underneath the seats," said moviegoer Kenny Johnson. "It was a scary moment." 

"These are middle to high school kids who have guns, who are shooting guns, are robbing people, driving stolen cars and they have drugs in their cars," Hopkins said. 

Detectives told Local 6 on Monday that they're still trying to figure out who planned the storming of the theater. Police said they're looking into whether it was planned via social media, but they would not discuss any specifics. 

The theater announced Monday that anyone under the age of 17 must now be accompanied by an adult after 9 p.m. 

Police said it's doubtful any arrests would be made in the incident because they wouldn't be able to prove who had purchased a movie ticket.

There's a reason George Romero made his Night of the Living Dead at the tail-end of the black-riot heavy 1960s, just as there is a reason The Walking Dead is finding a massively receptive audience during the era of Obama.

And it has everything to do with black people, lawlessness, and riots.

Lynchings in USA over an 86-year time-span vs. Homicides in St. Louis over a Decade: Retiring the Idea #BlackLivesMatter

The truth of lynching. 

You've seen a comparison of black homicides in Detroit over a ten-year span to lynching in America; you've seen a comparison of black homicides in Baltimore over a seven-year span to lynching in America. 

It's only natural we'd turn our eyes to St. Louis. 

An image of two black males in St. Louis... far, far more of threat to the stability of city than lynchings have ever been (with this fact dating back to the 1910s, when St. Louis was 93 percent white)

But first, a quick refresher. 

Though Oprah Winfrey, who donated $13 million to the building of National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC), claimed “millions of black people were lynched,” it turns out only 3,446 blacks were lynched between 1882-1968:

From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States.  Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black.  The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched.  

  Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched.  That is only 27.3%.  Many of the whites lynched were lynched for helping the black or being anti lynching and even for domestic crimes.

So, over a span 86 years, 3,446 black people were lynched (many were lynched for actual crimes, mind you); that’s roughly 40/lynchings per year.

The city of St. Louis has been in the news for the better part of sixth months, primarily because an 18-year-old black male refused to cooperate with a police officers request to walk on the sidewalk (instead of in the middle of the road). 

But before we explode the hilarious myth of #BlackLivesMatter, let's look at the historical record of homicide in St. Louis just to better understand the rationale of those white people who hoped to protect the integrity of their communities and neighborhoods with restrictive covenants (in the mid 1910s - when the city was 93 percent white - two-thirds of white St. Louis residents voted in favor of passing the nation's first referendum imposing racial segregation on housing). 

Why were white St. Louis residents so fearful of blacks then? Why does residential segregation still persist in St. Louis, much to the chagrin of white liberals nationwide (who still practice such activities in their private lives, while demanding quite vocally other whites practice only integration)? 

The book St. Louis Metromorphosis: Past Trends and Future Directions (edited by Brady Baybeck and F. Terrence Jones), published in 2004 by the Missouri Historical Society Press, provides a historical reference to not only why residential segregation was necessary in 1916 St. Louis - when the city was only six percent black - but also why it is still necessary today... when the city is 49 percent black. 

They write: 

Examining overall homicide trends ignores the substantial role that race plays in levels and trends in city crime rates. Are the patterns shown for St. Louis similar for blacks and whites? To begin to address this question, in Figure 4 [below] we present homicide arrest rates for 1930-2000 disaggregated by race. Three trend lines are show, which represent total homicide arrest rates and black and white homicide arrest rates, respectively.  

St. Louis Homicide Arrest Rates by race from 1930 - 2000. Source: St. Louis Metromorphosis: Past Trends and Future Directions 

Three important observations emerge from inspection of Figure 4. First, the trend in homicde arrest rates for whites is relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating no more than 10 per 100,000 over the last seventy years of the twentieth century. Second, consistent with findings reported in previous historical studies of homicide in the United States and New York, homicide arrest rates for blacks are generally much higher than the rates observed for white, and they remain higher though out the period. Indeed, black arrests account for over half of all arrests from 1950 on, a period of time when blacks accounted for less than one-third of the city's population. And since 1970, blacks have accounted for 80 percent of homicide arrests except for a single year.  

Although the full meaning of the race-specific trends shown in Figure 4 would move us well beyond the scope of this chapter, it is noteworthy that the year in which black and white homicide arrest rates begin to diverge considerably - 1963 - is a unique year in the demographic history of St. Louis. As shown in Figure 5, 1963 is the first year in which the City's black population approaches about one-third of the total population, a proportion that has been identified as an important "tipping point" in social science research on racial segregation, and whites' expressed neighborhood residential preferences, perceived threat from blacks, and fear of crime. (p. 268-270)

Why does the past matter? Because the trends of the past are the ghost from the future was born. [Study: More Blacks in St. Louis Killed by Other Blacks Compared to White Officers, KMOX.com,10-15-14]:

...a University of Missouri – St. Louis researcher says emotions aside, the number of black youth who have been fatally shot by white police officers has been fairly low in recent years.

Criminology professor David Klinger told KMOX’s Charlie Brennan that he conducted a thorough, decade-long study that showed there were 1,265 murders over that time, with 90 percent of the victims being black. And 90 percent of those black victims were killed by other blacks.

“While I understand the people are concerned about the use of deadly force by the police, by far – about 50 to 1 – more blacks in St. Louis are killed by other blacks as compared to white police officers,” Klinger says.

Over that same period, Klinger says 31 blacks were killed by police officers – 21 by white police officers.

“The sad fact is, we had well over a thousand black-on-black homicides in the city of St. Louis during that same decade,” he says.

The article should have read: 90 percent of known victims were killed by other blacks... (no snitch!)

So 90 percent of 1265 is 1138... 1138 black people murdered, with 90 percent of them killed by other black people. Or 1024 black on black homicides in St. Louis in the decade Klinger studied. 

We can get a better number though: 

Of the 567 homicides from 2008 to 2011, for which the race of the victim is available in the SLMPD annual reports, 502 are listed as black, while 64 were white. Over that period, 89% of those killed in the city were black. In a city that's very nearly 50/50 black/white, those 64 homicides would give an annual murder rate of ~10/100,000 for white residents and ~78/100,000 black residents.

In the entire United States of America, from 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States.  Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black.  The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched.  

In just one decade in St. Louis, there were 1024 black on black homicides...

Each year, the City of St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, releases an Annual Report to the Community. This report breaks down violent crime and the overall percentage of the racial group arrested for each offense (note because of lack of trust with police, many homicides lack suspects).

This information should further illustrate the lie of #BlackLivesMatter.  Remember, out of 318,000 people, St. Louis is 49.2 percent black 43.9 percent white (as of 2010 US Census). 

Here's the breakdown 1999:

• 90.2% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 1999 were black.  

Here's the breakdown for 2000:

• 91.67% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2000 were black.  

Here's the breakdown for 2002:

• 94.78% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2002 were black.  

Here's the breakdown for 2003:

• 96.77% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2003 were black.

Here's the breakdown for 2004:

• 94.78% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2004 were black.  

 Heres' the breakdown for 2005:

• 91.55% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2005were black.  

 Here's the breakdown for 2006:

• 91.8% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2006 were black.  

Here's the breakdown for 2007:

• 92% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2007 were black.  

Anything different in 2008? No:

• 97.7% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2008 were black.  

2009? Is it still almost all-black? Yes:

• 97.1% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2009 were black.  

Please, tell me 2010 is different...:

• 92.4% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2010 were black.  

 2011? Same old song:

• 92% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2011 were black.  

According to 2012 Metropolitan Police Department, City of St. Louis: Annual Report to the Community:

• 97.6% of those arrested for murder in St. Louis in 2012 were black.  

No, Black Lives truly Don't Matter.

What does matter, is that in the 1910s, the white people of St. Louis (representing 93 percent of the population of the city) decided to pass laws to protect their property and communities.

In so doing, they declared #WhiteLivesMatter.

In only one decade, black people in St. Louis killed other black people to the tune of 30 percent of the number of blacks lynched in all of the United States in a span of 86 years!

St. Louis has a homicide problem and is only dangerous today because of black people, just as it only had a homicide problem and was only dangerous because of blacks in the decades of 1910, 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010...