Monday, March 17, 2014

Lynchings in USA over an 86-year time-span vs. Homicides in Baltimore over a 7-year time-span (91.5 percent Black-on-Black)

Two lynchings.                                    

Matthew Williams and George Armwood.

United an entire community to wage war against what they perceived (white supremacy) was holding them down.

In 2014, the 63 percent black city of Baltimore needs police line surrounding the entire city. Decent people don't live there for a reason...
Today, this liberated community runs the show, powered by black pride and bolstered by black political power.

Yet the conditions of this city are a stark reminder of the great fear whites once had if they were to see their power supplanted, usurped by something else.

Something that continually brings up the names of Williams and Armwood as justification for the continued guilt trip (a 21st Century Bataan Death March for whites) they force the grandchildren – and great-grandchildren - of whites from that area to endure. [Breaking The Silence: A University of Maryland law professor writes a book on the last two recorded lynchings in the state - and the culture that let the crimes go unpunished, Baltimore Sun, 2-25-2007]:
I originally thought I was going to write this encyclopedic book of lynching," says Sherrilyn Ifill, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law in Baltimore. 
Instead, her research took a narrative turn as she focused on the tragic deaths of Matthew Williams and George Armwood, two black men murdered by white mobs on the Eastern Shore in the 1930s - the last two recorded lynchings in Maryland. Ifill wound up devoting five years to writing On the Courthouse Lawn ($25.95, Beacon Press). 
Some 5,000 lynchings have been documented in the United States. Yet no one has ever been convicted of a lynching crime. Reverberations from that era of violence are still being felt in American society, Ifill contends. For that reason she is a proponent of racial-healing efforts modeled after the South African government's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 
"There is unfinished business in communities throughout this country," she notes in the introduction to her book, "where the reality of lynching and racial pogroms has never been fully confronted." Is there a definition per se of lynching?
“Unfinished business?”

A South African-style “Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” run by blacks, to make whites pay for their past (actions that dared stop the conditions of Baltimore 2014 from coming to nightmarish fruition…) is ‘unfinished business.’

Whites must always pay.

Always.

Never mind what’s happening now, we must always look to the past for justification as to the continued oppression of whites today.

The truth of lynching.

Though Oprah Winfrey, who donated $13 million to the building of National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC, set to open in 2015 on the National Mall in Washington D.C. and costing a cool $500 million), claimed “millions of black people were lynched,” it turns out only 3,446 blacks were lynched between 1882 and 1968:
From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States.  Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black.  The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched.   
  Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched.  That is only 27.3%.  Many of the whites lynched were lynched for helping the black or being anti lynching and even for domestic crimes.
So, over a span 86 years, 3,446 black people were lynched (many were lynched for actual crimes, mind you); that’s roughly 40/lynchings per year.

But here’s the real fact you won’t find at the NMAAHC, or will Sherrilyn Ifill even consider:

From 2007 through 2013 in Baltimore, 1,629 lives were lost to homicides in Baltimore. Over a seven-year time period, 1492 of these homicides were black people, meaning 91.5 percent of the homicide victims in this 63.5 percent black city were black. [Patterns persist in city killings: Victims, suspects usually black men with long criminal histories
rate is among highest in U.S., Baltimore Sun, 1-1-2007]:
Despite a seeming revitalization of several city neighborhoods, Baltimore's homicide rate remains among the highest in the country. A driving force behind this dubious distinction is that people such as Whitfield - young black men with lengthy criminal histories - continue to be killed in large numbers by others with similar backgrounds, according to police homicide figures reviewed by The Sun. 
Whitfield was gunned down on Hanover Street in South Baltimore about 1 a.m. Dec. 15. As of last night, 274 people had died by homicide in Baltimore - five more than the 269 victims in 2005. 
In 2005, 236 of the 269 homicide victims were black. Through mid-December of 2006, 236 of 256 victims were black. 
In 2005, 243 victims were men and 26 were women. In 2006, through mid-December, 231 men and 25 women were killed.
But let’s keep talking about two black males lynched in the 1930s. White people may have lynched Williams and Armwood (they were criminals), but these actions were done to protect the integrity of the city and ensure Baltimore was a safe place live for the law-abiding. Today, Baltimore is the poster child for civic dysfunction and lawlessness.

Almost all of the violence in Baltimore is black-on-black, prompting former black drug dealers to find a cottage industry as “reformers” hoping to better the black community through stories of their emancipation from crime. [On a mission to halt epidemic of killings: A graveyard visit helps a crusader drive home his point: Young men can change their lives and reduce homicides, Baltimore Sun, 12-12-2005]

The perception of Baltimore as an unsafe city isn’t because the ghosts of a white lynch mob haunt this city; it’s because of the great fear of young black males turning large parts of the city into an uninhabitable, never-ending, warzone. [Two men convicted in murder of 12-year-old Baltimore boyGang members fired randomly into group of teens to send a message, prosecutors say, Baltimore Sun, 3-17-14]:
Two men were convicted Friday of randomly firing into a group of young people, killing a 12-year-old boy and wounding three others in an attempt to "send a message" to their East Baltimore neighbors. 
In May 2011, prosecutors said, Danyae Robinson, 31, and Derrick Brown, 20, fired at least 15 shots, seeking to avenge the shooting earlier that night of a fellow gang member — even though their victims had nothing to do with their gang's rivals or the earlier shooting. 
"This was a deplorable, unconscionable act of violence that hurt many and took the life of one of our young people," State's Attorney Gregg Bernstein said in a statement. "I thank the police and prosecutors for their unrelenting commitment and tireless work to bring this case to justice." 
The victims were "boys who had done nothing wrong," Assistant State's Attorney Thiru Vignarajah said during opening arguments. "They were young boys who paid in blood in a war among men." 
Sean Johnson, a standout student with a promising future, was killed after being shot twice in the head, once in the neck and once in the leg. Another teen in the group was shot nine times, but survived. 
None of them had ever been arrested; one of the surviving victims now works as an usher at the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra; another is attending college, and the other is about to graduate from high school. 
Sean's mother, Shawnta Little, sat in on the trial and said she was pleased the case was concluded "so I can start the process of healing, all over." The neighborhood has been quiet since the shootings, she said, though it is less common to see children outside playing anymore.
But it’s white people today who must continually pay for the actions of their ancestors in the past, despite the present being nothing more than an endless rundown of black-on-black misery, crime and murder.

Even celebrations of murder rates dropping hide the ugly truth of life in a majority black city, where black leaders constantly harp of the past evils of white supremacy and lynchings while remaining willfully ignorant to the destruction of civilization by blacks in the present. [Fewer than 300 homicides at last: Crime: For the first time in more than a decade, Baltimore's toll for a year breaks a barrier that it had seemed impossible to breach only months ago., Baltimore Sun, 1-1-2001]:
But statistics hardly matter to the families left to grieve. Rosalind L. Knott, 45, has lost two sons to shootings - and a third wounded by eight bullets - since April 1998. 
"Every time I turn on the TV, they are telling me that crime is down," Knott said. Her son Ernest L. Knott III, who was shot and killed Dec. 6, would have turned 23 the next week. 
"It's all lies," she said, crying as she sat among family members in her Northeast Baltimore home recently. "No mother should have to mourn like this. You tell me why I have two sons taken by gunfire, lying side by side in a grave." 
Baltimore has experienced more than 300 murders each year since 1990. Most are blamed on the city's volatile cocaine and heroin trade fueled by an estimated 60,000 addicts who stumble around desolate neighborhoods pockmarked by boarded-up rowhouses, vacant lots and trash-filled alleys. 
Police officers had T-shirts emblazoned with "The city that bleeds," mocking the city's old slogan, "The city that reads." 
With each violent death, a family mourned, most having gained little public attention. Rosalind Knott said she doesn't like the preoccupation with the numbers that shroud the names. 
Her sons Daniel P. Smith, 22, and David Smith, 16, were shot April 2, 1998, as they stood on their porch in the 1100 block of W. Saratoga St. The elder brother died; the younger was hit eight times. He survived, but has three bullets lodged in his chest. 
Police said four assailants rode down the street shooting from bicycles. No motive has been discerned, nor has any arrest been made.
A lynching by another name.

But by blacks on other blacks. 

No outrage, because it's such a common occurrence. 

So to recap:

Between 1882 and 1968, there were 4,743 lynchings in America; of those, 3,466 were black and 1,297 were white.

Between 2007 and 2013 in Baltimore, there were 1,629 murders in the city, of which 1,492 (or 91.5 percent) were black – almost all murdered by other blacks.

No need to mention the rate of black-on-white homicides in the city, but we all remember what Zach Sowers widow endured.

Baltimore is a majority black city because white people no longer feel safe to raise families there (white flight wasn't because of racial hatred, it was because of legitimate racial fear of blacks), with the remaining whites scared to even mention the racial elephant in the room when discussing crime, homicide and just why property values are so low and so much real estate is unsafe for gentrification.

The black community has collectively lynched the civilization whites created in Baltimore (turning once thriving public housing buildings into “concentration camps”), remaking the city in their image. Every week, another horrific crime occurs – such as the execution killing of five black women, three generations of a family, in 1999 – by black male, that does far more to threaten the stability of Baltimore than two lynchings did back in the 1930s. [A race against time, revenge: Police scour city for two suspects in rowhouse slayings, U.S. marshals join hunt, Baltimore Sun, 12-9-1999]

The names Matthew Williams and George Armwood have far more political capital behind them, than Mary McNeil Matthews, Levanna Spearman, Mary Helen Collien, Makisha Jenkins and Trennell Alston do (whose executions were labeled a “local brush of evil”) precisely because black life only has value when it’s taken by a non-black.

Black-on-black crime?

How boring.

It has no value to those blacks in power now, for it reinforces all those fears white people had for their civilization long ago.

Blacks may collectively lynch civilization in Baltimore, but the only story we can learn about is individual lynchings of two blacks back in the 1930s.

65 comments:

HaroldC said...

It is commonly believed that the lynching of blacks was the result of no more than white supremacy and for nothing but mere insults or even capriciousness on the part of whites. But that is absurd. If an insult to a white person could result in a lynching how much more likely would it be that a serious crime against a white person or even another black person would result in a lynching.

http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lynching_table_causes.html

Anonymous said...

There is no money in black on black crime.

Only white on black crime pays.

Why did whites let this happen??

Blacks have no honor, they only want money. Whites sit by and take the blame and turn the other cheek like good Christian folk. More is coming unless you turn it around.

Here is a story of black corruption in Philadelphia. But remember, dey dint do nuffins/disparate impact:

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/03/17/pennsylvania-corruption-sting-shut-down-because-only-black-democrats-were-accepting-bribes-the-democrats-suffered-disparate-impact-ergo-the-sting-operation-had-to-be-stopped/#more-78689

Anonymous said...

Hey Paul, I dare you to be a boss and say all of this directly to a black person's face. On film.

Wouldn't that be a more effective way to prove your point?

You could just go around asking random blacks what they think about white people, white supremacy, the Constitution, or ask them to imagine a world with no whites, and film them as their faces light up.

Unlike whites, blacks have no problem expressing racial hatred. It would be great to hear it directly from them.

Bob Smith said...

I have no doubt the "Reconciliation Commission" will work Islam-style. In Muslim countries, Muslims murder or rape Christians, and when the Christians react the Muslims demand "reconciliation" to "heal community grievances". "Reconciliation" is basically a demand to "shut up or we'll do it again". It's a sick and twisted dynamic.

Anonymous said...

Why did Whites let this happen?

Us older folks saw it happening slowly. There was some pointless racial hatred in the 1960s and earlier, so most TV and media messages simply assumed all White people were racist against Blacks.

Our elite decided all people were exactly alike and differences would disappear with Affirmative Action and Civil Rights guarantees.

In the 1970s, Black crime increased. It was blamed on racism and "barriers" Black people had to face.

In the 1980s, Black crime soared. Again, White racism was blamed along with White Republicans dumping cocaine in Black neighborhoods.

Every decade since, Black crime is up and more extreme. Now, everybody knows it's the fault of Black people. They are simply living how they live, nothing more. Now the crime isn't White racism, but historic racism; something long forgotten but always used as a club against Whites. Now it's "noticing" the race of the perpetrator.

To be anti-racist, you have to accept Black crime, pretend Whites are worse and ultimately the cause of all structures that create crime.

We can continue to play this suicidal game....Or we could ship them to Africa in one great national experiment. Overnight, our crime rates would drop to those of Luxembourg.

Sam said...

Paul,
Here is an article you may find interesting, and other readers of SBPDL may also find interesting:

Former elementary school lunch lady taken to jail for paying kids $1 to beat up classmate

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2014/03/former_elementary_school_lunch.ht ml

Anonymous said...

Anonymous here:

It is not permissible to compare black on white crime to lynchings.

It is permissible to deplore "all the killings" of both whites and blacks, and to blame the availability of weapons.

It is permissible to deplore the white on black crime of lynching.

But it is not permissible to compare the rate of lynchings to the rate of black on white homicide.

In related news,

It is permissible to glorify black athletic prowess, such as the ability to jump and put a ball through a hoop.

It is not permissible to question the value to society of the ability to jump and put a ball through a hoop.

It is permissible to point out that white men can't jump.

It is not permissible to point out that white men know how to use a ladder, therefore do not need to jump, and thus have created something we call "civilization."

Jeff said...

I wonder how many people notice scores of Black-on-Black killings compared to a handful of White-on-Black killings many decades ago.

Will the "Legacy of Slavery" be an excuse five hundred years from now when the USA is just another African pit?

Will Jim Crow explain why young Black males shoot each other daily?

Is segregation the reason why Whites sell homes for a loss, quit jobs and escape schools simply to be free of Black violence?

If White liberals are sincere in their unlimited defense of Blacks, then why did they give up on defending OJ Simpson so quickly? I mean come on! They want all the Black Panthers released, and they always want to "free Mumia"... why won't they fight for the freedom of all Black killers?

Seems like moral exhibitionism to me, and nothing realistic about race.

Kathy Bratsch said...

Why don't more people know about this? Racial discrimination is discrimination -- Black to White or White to Black. It does not help to continuously bring up the past... my family was massacred most all by the Native Americans. Am I supposed to hate the Native Americans?
Grow Up America!

Anonymous said...

I grew up during the first "civil-rights" era and have a decidedly different "take" on this whole "civil-rights movement" era. In fact, I saw for myself, what went on during those turbulent times.
Despite the lies and fabrications by the so-called "mainstream media" the Selma and Montgomery "civil-rights marches" were not peaceful "gatherings" that were met with dogs and fire hoses, but were violent black confrontations that actually set back the "cause" of "civil-rights". .
The so-called "civil-rights" demonstrations were waves of lawlessness that disrupted the lives of peaceful citizens. There were many black citizens in these areas that were against these "outsiders" coming there to cause trouble. These "civil-rights" marchers committed crimes, rapes, robberies and other crimes, and trashed the areas they were protesting in. I WAS THERE . . . Of course, the cameras were turned off during the episodes of violence. . .then just as now, the news media could not "let a crisis go to waste" . . .
It was mostly ACLU and ADL types that riled things up. . .and then later on "melted into the woodwork" only to become "civil-rights" attorneys, race hustlers and poverty pimps.
One incident comes to mind--the tragic death of Mrs. Viola Liuzzo--Mrs. Liuzzo was a Detroit housewife who traveled to the "deep south" (without her husband) to run around with "freedom riders" at night--this was a recipe that was asking for trouble. What business did she have running around with blacks at night in the South while she had a family in Detroit?? Why did she put herself "in harms way"??
I WAS THERE during the "civil-rights" disturbances and witnessed the misbehavior of these "civil-rights" groups (that never got reported). . .
Of course, the "victors" write the history. To the victors--how does it feel now that those you pushed and supported are now turning on you??

The so-called "news media" had an agenda then as it does now. White-on black crime (although relatively rare) is ALWAYS described as a "hate crime" where as black-on-white crime is NEVER described as a "hate crime". . .Actually, ALL crimes are "hate crimes" . . .

DailyKenn.com said...

Apologists for black crime will never be convinced by data. Their minds are attuned to emotional appeals that fit the cultural Marxist narrative.

Trying to reason with such people is akin to tuning in an FM station on an AM radio. They just don't get it.

james m said...

So I'm driving thru Plainfield NJ last week population 50,244
Plainfield races chart
Black alone - 23,146 (46.9%)
Hispanic - 18,308 (37.1%)
White alone - 4,368 (8.8%)
Other race alone - 2,167 (4.4%)
Asian alone - 871 (1.8%)
Two or more races - 439 (0.9%)
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone - 55 (0.1%)
American Indian alone - 11 (0.02%)
And I drive past a bronze Ford Taurus with tinted windows and I saw something so stunning I had to go back and take a pic of it.
Now mind you I drive around 6 days a week(72 hrs!) and see a lot of bumper stickers and assorted other stickers on peoples cars.
I've seen : My son is an Honor student at..
I've seen :Who rescued who? with paw-prints
I've seen: Ballerina stickers, Karate, Baseball, football, Politics left and right.
USMC -My son is a Marine Army- My Dad is in the Army,
Stick figure families, Star Wars figure families you get the idea.
In my opinion these stickers represent what you want the world to know about you. What you think is important to know about you. Why else would you spend money and time on such things if communicating something meaningful to total strangers was not the goal?
So what I saw last week floored me I dropped my fare then headed back to the corner of Richmond ave and Preston ave and got out of my cab and took this pic: https://plus.google.com/u/0/108361472155539396773/posts
I was caught in the act by the cars owner? I guess.. this was at 11:30 am on a Thursday, apparently he was NOT at work.
Tall slim medium complexion black male with dreads down to his shoulders. Saw me taking the pic and shouts "Yo!" I look left look right don't see anyone and consider another pic (just in case the one I took sucked) I hear "YO MAN !!" and lok up to the 3rd floor entrance of a rooming house and see the black male, he gestures towards the car and says "Whuts UP!"
"Im taking a picture of the sticker" I say, he looks peeved "I've never seen anything like it before" he shakes his head as if to say YT sure is a crazy mutherfucka, and I walk to my car and drive away.
Now you tell me what does this guy want the world to know about him?

Anonymous said...

Blacks are a "protected class" So any crime that involves White on black, no matter even if the White is the initial victim, is so doggedly prosecuted as a hate crime. That's why they get away with hate crimes against whites on a Federal level. Whites of European extraction, are not protected unless Gay or LGBT. We need to END this protected status and affirmative action. It will take a Patriot President,this Country hasn't seen in 200 years to do it though. Think of all the "reverends" that'll be outta work!

Ex-Brooklynite

Anonymous said...

90210\
OFF TOPIC
This is a continuation of discussion from other thread on
WHY ARE THERE SO MANY ANGRY WHITE MEN
artcle from Milwaukee paper..

led to websearch

I found:


White people are afraid of black people, in this country, because we know what WE would do in revenge for what has been done to blacks, Native Americans and basically everybody. Whites are scared to death of what will happen when the tables do get turned. BTW, I am white.

http://www.jsonline.com/news/opinion/why-are-white-men-so-angry-b99223290z1-250400781.html

Californian said...

Lynchings? Will this include such events as "Beat YT Night" at the state fair?

Anonymous said...

Wisconsin is quickly becoming a hot bed of racial tension. The unimaginably brutal rape of the pregnant Madison woman, the recent beating of the janitor, now this opinion article printed by the state's largest newspaper.

The shear nerve of a 'news' source printing garbage like that amazes me. Every white subscriber (aka all of their subscribers) should instantly cancel and send that paper into ruin.

Mr.Ken said...

"They were young boys who paid in blood in a war among men." No. no way. Men do not fire into crowds of civilians on a city street, like some stupid video game. Men identify the target and use the appropriate force to stop the aggressor, keeping in mind what is beyond the target.
"young boys"...or "teens" as we have heard so many times (even if they are 35 year old boys), shoot into crowds.

Philadelphia Mike said...

Beginning in the 1880's, the 1st and 2nd generations of Italian Americans had encountered many obstacles and difficulties into being welcomed into the White American mainstream. This lasted for decades...up until the early 1960's.

Thanks to the violence, laziness, irrationality, and dangerous unpredictability of multitudes of blacks...worsening with each generation...the Italians were finally recognized as being not so different from other European Whites after all.

Yes, we had our bad apples, but the majority of us were not involved in crime. And we were recognized for what we are... industrious, productive, peaceful, and hard working people. We were given the White badge of Honor...of acceptance.

And as man who is genetically Italian/Sicilian/Swiss/French, I proudly wear my White badge of honor. And I work hard, sacrifice, and act with forward thinking to maintain this badge of honor.

The Italians did not bemoan the legacy of discrimination. They did not expect government hand outs. They bore no animosity towards anyone but their own bad apples for smearing their group image.

Every other White European immigrant group basically went through dilemmas of their own. And each one overcame the obstacles through the content of their characters.

Even many of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation Mestizos have proven their badge of integrity.

So, to the black community I say this: "Thank you for your complete and total failure in achieving civility as a group. You have shirked the collective responsibility of monitoring your bad apples and instead have adopted their behavior, glorified them, idolized them, and made them the talisman of your black culture. You have made the rest of us look like shining stars."

And that is the sum total of what I am willing to thank you for.

And from vile and evil actions, did arise this unforeseen outcome.

And this, black America, so far, is your legacy.

Silence = Death

Break the White Silence

Still fairly young, Still hopeful, and contrary to what some troll readers think about us proud White men...I'm still fit, still built, and still good looking.

Philadelphia Mike, proof that the Caveman lives among us.

Philadelphia Mike said...

Nothing...nothing collectively...at all...has been done to the majority of black people who are alive in America today.

Whatever happened generations ago has NOTHING to do with us Whites today.

It's just an excuse for laziness...for low ambition...for the libido over cerebrum genetics.

Their absurd cries of unfairness are falling upon more and more deaf ears.

My heart is hardened. And once your heart is hardened, nothing...nothing at all...will ever soften it again.

I am so ready for a new beginning. And if it's not here on US soil, then it will have to be elsewhere. White flight might take on a whole new meaning.

Philadelphia Mike

Anonymous said...

Melina Abdullah, Pan-African studies chair at CSULA, agrees the change is significant as it is a more realistic representation of global demographics.

...

The diversity in the student profile has not gone unnoticed. California Assemblymember Luis Alejo recently introduced legislation AB 1750 to investigate incorporating ethnic studies in public high schools, an idea Abdullah feels is critical to student success.

“Every study has signaled the importance of ethnic studies,” Abdullah said. “The idea that we should have an ethnic studies requirement becomes even more urgent as we have an increasing number of people of color in the state.”


http://sundial.csun.edu/2014/03/latinos-will-surpass-whites-as-majority-ethnicity-in-march/

Liberal academics in California jumping for joy at the fact that Whites are now a minority in California, as of this month.

Also, we're moving beyond taxpayer-funded "ethnic studies" programs in state colleges and now the Democrats are pushing hard for "ethnic studies" programs in K-12 public schools.

Those of you with kids still "in the system" will get a taste of all that vibrant diversity (our greatest strength!, after all).

Democrats are wrecking the US educational system as much as possible. First we have Common Core starting a race to the bottom, in order to cater to ignoramus Black kids. Now we'll have White Guilt 101 become a class. Sickening.

Anonymous said...

It's approaching a flashpoint in Wisconsin. You have a traditional, rural/farming based white populace with a nasty bunch of DWL cancer in the Madison and Milwaukee suburbs.

This is one of the fascist DWL groups in the Milwaukee burbs -- Shorewood (the whitest and most liberal part of Wisconsin). Note in the cover picture how white the group is, but don't dare accuse them of being racist.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Grassroots-Northshore/128562791528

One of their PR people is a loud mouth scumbag (who stole money from the village) who declared today in the Journal Sentinel comments that he'd welcome a mass influx of minorities into the suburbs. Of course, he was wanting to punish the white, conservative suburbs of Waukesha, and not his lily white suburb of Shorewood.

Anonymous said...

Well, then the lesson to be learned regarding Baltimore's demise:

If blacks don't seem to care what happens to their future, why should we care what happens to them?

E. Newton said...

Off and on topic. This situation with V. Putin and Ukraine is a case of international racism against our President. I will not stand for foreign countries treating our President in a racist manner. I am ready to put on the uniform again and fight against international racism. What about you?

10mm AUTO said...


"White people are afraid of black people, in this country, because we know what WE would do in revenge for what has been done to blacks, Native Americans and basically everybody. Whites are scared to death of what will happen when the tables do get turned. BTW, I am white."

March 17, 2014 at 5:46 PM"

You may be White and if so God Help you; but Whites are NOT afraid of negros. Whites are afraid of incarceration, losing their jobs, families, licenses and businesses to negros and their behavior so they smile and pretend. In a way, I guess that makes us all a little ingeniousness in public. If Whites were afraid of negros they would be cleansed from this land in a weekend, all their crap piled in pyres and burned. What we fear is the shunning and losses if we do what we and Lincoln and Jefferson and all those others in our history knew what one day would have to be done. Like William Wallace, there will be a White who is a good man and a negro will take from him everything. In that moment a leader will come forth. Perhaps a commoner, perhaps a educated man, but he will come.

White Homeland!

Anonymous said...

White activists are driving around a truck that reads "Diversity = White Genocide". They've gotten a positive reaction across much of our country.

I've always said, tens of millions across the US are race realists but afraid to say so publicly. The more risk-takers we have who boldly go public, the closer we get to the dam's collapse and an overflow of support for the fall of Black Run America.

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/help-the-white-man-march-keep-trucking

Californian said...

White people are afraid of black people, in this country, because we know what WE would do in revenge for what has been done to blacks, Native Americans and basically everybody. Whites are scared to death of what will happen when the tables do get turned. BTW, I am white.


i.e., the article admits the real motivation behind minority violence against whites is to fight a racial war. But if this is the case, then it makes sense for white people to:

* Arm themselves
* Shut down third world immigration
* Amp up the war on crime and put as many black men in jail as possible
* Dump the liberal optimism and realize that civil rights programs are a mistake as they will never satisfy black rage
* Start implementing racially realistic policies
* Ally themselves with white nationalist movements globally

Californian said...

As for PK's article: once again, there is little to add. PK again hits it out of the park.

One thing to add in here are black-on-white farmer murders in majority rule South Africa. These total at least 3000, and often involve some really horrendous tortures. In a mere 20 years, SA blacks have racked up a number of farm murders on the same order of magnitude of the total number of lynchings in the USA over some eight decades.

Let's also note that that unlike most of the lynchings in the USA, black murders of white farmers in SA have not been attempts to bring malefactors to extrajudicial punishment for a crime. Black people murder white people for trivial reasons, though there is a political element with the ANC minions chanting, "Kill the farmer, kill the Boer."

Another point about farm murders: the victims had generally known the perpetrators...something to consider for those who boast IKAGO.

Anonymous said...

Urban dictionary definition of lynching:

"An impromptu jury hearing gone wrong."

Anonymous said...

My department is sponsoring an initiative to outlaw ropes. Every time that a black person in America sees a rope, whether on a flagpole, or holding him/her back from entering a "guests only" line at a club, or even worse, at a rodeo, he/she is reminded of the terrible legacy of lynching.

Is it any wonder that blacks can not perform at school or in the workplace when they are surrounded by ropes? And when you consider the last thing that thousands of beautiful black persons saw before being thrown over the side of slave ships to the sharks was rope hanging from the big poles which held up the sails.

Rope is a form of micro-aggression against blacks.

I.M. Klewless, MFA
Cultural Relativism and Peace Studies

Anonymous said...

Sam--think of how big a story the "pay to get a kid beat up" would've been if the lunch lady would've been white!
Here's another from the Furniture City:
http://woodtv.com/2014/02/10/gun-fired-at-mcdonalds-after-wrong-orders/

GR Public Schools have gone downhill to the point of being SIMBA training grounds.

Well-meaning organizations provide "sack suppers" for many children so they don't go hungry--a noble concept. So doing some quick maff tells you simblets are getting 3 squares a day, Monday through Friday. But SURPRISE-WIC/EBT/breedge cards ain't enuf--gibs us some more!

Muskegon Avenger said...

Meanwhile, in Grand Rapids, MI:

A (black) lunch lady pays three 9 year old children to beat up another nine year old. Why did she do this? Because the offending 9 year old called her a "pregnant bitch".

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2014/03/former_elementary_school_lunch.html

Sheila said...

I realize the point you are trying to make, Paul, but to point out that blacks and libs are hypocrites is a bit . . . obvious, shall we say?

My only concern is blacks breed faster than they kill one another.

Anonymous said...

Meet Archie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-KmR7dilKk#t=186

Demographic replacement at your expense.

Anonymous said...

Blacks are killings blacks. Blacks also kill whites, latinos, asians, whatever is available to kill. Blacks are also supported and protected by our various governments, city, county, state and federal. All of these governments are supported by our tax dollars. When do we stop committing suicide?

Anonymous said...

So you don't think Slavery and Jim Crow from 1600-1965 have anything to do with the economic inequality gap between blacks and whites?
You sit, suffer from white denial

Anonymous said...

I don't believe that whites or any other race are afraid of blacks. They simply recognize a propensity on the part of blacks to react suddenly and with extreme and irrational violence over simple issues.
Case in point is the previous article where someone is evicted from an apartment and instead of accepting their own responsibility for their behavior that resulted in the eviction, they freak out and launch a full scale attack with a deadly weapon with no thought of the consequences. The attack would not prevent the eviction nor would it change anyone's mind so that they allowed the evictee to remain in the apartment. Instead, it could only lead to (in the best of circumstances) an arrest and charges for assault with a deadly weapon and, at worst, charges for murder. That is, if the attack had been "successful" instead of two perps getting blown away. It reminds me of a local incident where a black went to a department store and tried to return an item even though it was clearly known that the return was against store policy. The negro solution? Pull out a gun and kill the clerk.
If this kind of behavior on the part of blacks was infrequent, unusual and a matter of isolated incidents, one could perhaps view them differently. However, there are thousands of videos showing exactly the same kind of behavior in restaurants and other businesses as well as on the street~ a simple issue results in a psychotic freak out by an individual black or group of blacks and a physical attack. Rather than being isolated incidents, such behavior is common and "ordinary"-at least, for blacks. In another local incident a black is stopped for a moving violation. His solution? Pull out a shotgun and try to kill the cop and then try to claim he was only trying to scare the cop away. Sure.
No, it's not fear. It's a recognition that one is dealing with a low IQ group of people with no impulse control, a propensity for violent attacks and the lack of any consideration for the consequences of their own behavior. Stupidity on a scale so vast it defies description.
It's so common that it's only natural as well as sensible for other races to react with extreme wariness around blacks as you never know when a freak out will erupt or for what simple minded reason. Even worse, this is but one of their dysfunctional behaviors among many. It doesn't get better- only worse- the more you observe them and their behaviors.
This is why no one wants blacks around~ not racism. It's because this is their culture and they view it as ordinary and their simple minds cannot comprehend why other races find it unacceptable and don't want to live in a negro hell hole of dysfunction, violence and mayhem.

Anonymous said...

Californian said…
...the article admits the real motivation behind minority violence against whites is to fight a racial war. But if this is the case, then it makes sense for white people to:

* Arm themselves
* Shut down third world immigration
* Amp up the war on crime and put as many black men in jail as possible
* Dump the liberal optimism and realize that civil rights programs are a mistake as they will never satisfy black rage
* Start implementing racially realistic policies
* Ally themselves with white nationalist movements globally


But none of your bullet points are actions of war. War being death and destruction brought to the enemy, who is bringing you death and destruction. Arming oneself is not counter-attack.

Jeff said...

No, it's not fear.

A few Black columnists are now pushing a "crisis of White masculinity" as the real problem.

Is that it? If you are White, is your masculinity threatened when a Negro rapes your pregnant wife?

Are you a complete wuss when you get knocked out cold by some random Black guy and they laugh at you while you are bleeding out your ears?

If a Black man shoots me, does that mean White women prefer his genitals over mine?

Wow, great liberal logic there. Either Whites are racist losers for defending themselves, or dickless wimps for getting robbed or killed. Either way, the holy negro wins.

Anonymous said...

Whenever blacks are accused of anything, they sometimes reply "white people do it too". I often watch television shows about crime, specifically murder. If the show starts out "On June 17th, 1987 blah blah blah" you can just about bet the suspect / killer is going to be white. If it's one of those rare occasions with a fairly recent date, the suspect / killer may be black. Ever wonder why the program has to go back in time so far to find a white heinous crime? Yeah whites may do it too, every few years! Not on a daily basis.

Another topic, has anyone had any trouble loading a wedsite which may contain information which doesn't look good for blacks? I went to philly.com for the sting information mentioned above. Just as it starts to load up, it's gone! Is our BRA trying to keep information away from the citizens they represent? (Gasp! )
Just wondering.

Anonymous said...

Anon 3/18/2014 @ 9:32 A.M.
Please explain how a black child born in (let's say 1970) suffers from da legacy of da slabery and Jim Crow? It certainly couldn't be Post Traumatic Stress Disorder as to have that you have to actually experience something first hand. So, that's out as an excuse right from the starting gate.
How does that black child born in 1970 differ from the white, asian, hispanic or indian child born the same year and all attending the same schools, getting the same education and having the same chance to do something with their lives? Let's further assume that all the children mentioned were born in poverty. Why are all the others statistically likely to exceed the black child in terms of accomplishment in every way given the exact same conditions and resources? Could it be that they don't have a victim mentality instilled in them by parents and don't view getting an education as "acting white?"
Many different races come to America from terrible backgrounds and conditions and yet they succeed starting from nothing. They have far more horrible experiences in their lives than the black child who NEVER experienced slavery or Jim Crow. There's a huge "income inequality" between them and blacks as well.
Please tell me how they succeed and blacks don't. Is there some hispanic, asian and indian privilege that we are unaware of? What kind of denial are they engaging in to explain their successes verses black failure?
I eagerly await your response as I need a good laugh.


Anonymous said...

"So you don't think Slavery and Jim Crow from 1600-1965 have anything to do with the economic inequality gap between blacks and whites?"

My reply, who gives a flying f*ck about the black income inequality gap?? Turns out the black welfare queens are bringing in about $60K in benefits per year, that is more than I make. Add on the money from the criminal activity and drugs and they make well over $80K tax-free.

IQ gap, income gap, technology gap, learning gap, earning gap, transportation gap, marriage gap, homeownership gap.

For Christ's sake.

Did I miss any? Blacks are losers and become parasitical and violent when put in open competition with whites. We need segregation now. Blacks' #1 problem is their intense hatred and jealousy for whites.

I simply don't care about the plight of blacks anymore. I have paid enough of my children's inheritance money to equalize humanity and the experiment has been a complete and utter failure. If black had any honor or integrity, they would have a bit of shame and call the whole redistribution hustle thing off. But they don't, they march and scream for more and vote Democrat 99% of the time. Fuck them.

Black and white are not equal, never have been, never will be. Shit or get off the pot I say. Truth is, blacks can't cut it in Western world. So what if whites "brought" them here for slavery? They can easily pack up and take their asses back home, no one is stopping them.

They should do the RIGHT THING and move back to the motherland instead of insisting that whites pay to make them equals in the Western world.

I have had it, can you tell?

Anonymous said...

If black had any honor or integrity, they would have a bit of shame and call the whole redistribution hustle thing off.

Amen.

Anonymous said...

Blacks born now wouldn't have that mindset except for how they are raised.

Black parents, if they bother to raise their kids w/o the help of the State every step of the way, indoctrinate their kids to "protect" them from YT.

They teach them:

"Whites will do anything they can to hold you back."

"Never trust a White person. They always try to find some way to harm you or humiliate you."

"You are their enemy. They see your skin and hate you instantly. If they give you shit, give it back immediately. Don't let them win."

This is what 90% of Black parents program their kids with; raw racial hatred and animosity. You wonder why they look at you with hatred and dull, soulless eyes? You've been their devil since birth. They want revenge and don't even know why they do.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
"So you don't think Slavery and Jim Crow from 1600-1965 have anything to do with the economic inequality gap between blacks and whites?"

My reply, who gives a flying f*ck about the black income inequality gap?? Turns out the black welfare queens are bringing in about $60K in benefits per year, that is more than I make. Add on the money from the criminal activity and drugs and they make well over $80K tax-free.

IQ gap, income gap, technology gap, learning gap, earning gap, transportation gap, marriage gap, homeownership gap.

For Christ's sake.

Did I miss any? Blacks are losers and become parasitical and violent when put in open competition with whites. We need segregation now. Blacks' #1 problem is their intense hatred and jealousy for whites.

I simply don't care about the plight of blacks anymore. I have paid enough of my children's inheritance money to equalize humanity and the experiment has been a complete and utter failure. If black had any honor or integrity, they would have a bit of shame and call the whole redistribution hustle thing off. But they don't, they march and scream for more and vote Democrat 99% of the time. Fuck them.

Black and white are not equal, never have been, never will be. Shit or get off the pot I say. Truth is, blacks can't cut it in Western world. So what if whites "brought" them here for slavery? They can easily pack up and take their asses back home, no one is stopping them.

They should do the RIGHT THING and move back to the motherland instead of insisting that whites pay to make them equals in the Western world.

I have had it, can you tell?


Your remarks show a disturbing lack of empathy for our African-american brothers and sisters. These people have been horribly treated by our majority white culture now for 400 years. You are certainly a rich white man. You can afford to sacrifice 20 or 30% of your wealth if it lifts the life of a young African-american. What will you be sacrificing, a fancy vacation or your daily grande latte?

Once you make an effort to befriend an African-american, you will find they make the most loyal friend you will ever have. Why not make a donation to the President's Brother's Keeper program or volunteer at an inner-city lunch program? I volunteer for Cooking for African-americans or CAA. We have chapters across the U.S. and we volunteer a few nights each week to make nutritious home-made meals for the community at their homes. We also do light house-keeping and generally help the family through tutoring and conflict resolution.

Whether you choose to donate your time or money, you will find that the African-americans that you show such disdain for, are really wonderful and gentle people. They do not want charity. They just want to be treated fairly. I have found that they have an intense desire to work and contribute to our country. We need to appreciate all that they add to the fabric of our nation.

Bogolyubski said...

Californian:
One thing to add in here are black-on-white farmer murders in majority rule South Africa. These total at least 3000....

Over 4000 actually. Over 80,000 whites in Mandelaland killed since their leaders sold them out a the behest of the usual cephalopod suspects. As AnalogMan (from SA) remarked about his farewell dinner, most whites remaining there continue to deny that they're being exterminated and continue to support the regime carrying out the deed by paying taxes, serving in police, judicial systems, etc.

A massive number of whites, perhaps a majority (especially females and the young) are under the sway of Crystal Methodism, whose salient feature is negro-worship. The negro has become their god. For the believers, they get a religious high without any of the sacrifice, toil, challenge or struggle found in their old religion of Christianity - now dead for all intents and purposes. Like Crystal Meth, it's an instant high with zero effort on their part - and wildly addictive. They will sacrifice themselves and their own families to this god of theirs (see the female in Seattle in the thread below whose husband of two decades was slaughtered for a cell phone), and they will cheerfully slaughter or hand over any whites who refuse to bow the the knee before their new black gods.

As Gwinnett Gladiator mentioned, I do not say this to state "we are defeated - give up" but to point out that we are going to need to seriously think outside all of the usual boxes (traps, really - set by those who intend our extermination) in order to a) survive; and b) fight. I also mention this to point out the true nature of our enemy - which many still deny even here. Like 10MM, I much adore the ideal of a white homeland. The closest thing to such a place on earth right now is Russia, who you will note is being targeted by the combined forces of the Squid World Empire. While on the mend, Russia is still cleaning up from decades of Marxist destruction and TWMNBN looting. They are in no position to save a small remnant of whites in the west (many of whom don't much care for them anyway).

Realistically, the only way such a homeland will take place on this continent would be the total collapse of the rotten, stinking genocidal regime known as the United States. Absent direct divine intervention is a very obvious way, it is not reformable or salvageable. In light of the fact that the majority (at least 80%) of those who call themselves "Christians" are actually Crystal Methodists - some even assisting (and profiting from) the Musloid and Negroid colonization of places like Minnesota and (soon) Wyoming, why would there be any intervention? They obviously worship a new, improved god who demands nothing from them (except their very existence). This is a very difficult and bitter pill to swallow (it certainly as been for me).

Many even here continue to cling to the false notion that there is some 'great awakening' just around the corner, that if the Republican party can be changed, or even if (laughably) only enough whites had voted for Mittens the Underwear Bankster - the present road to disaster could be averted. The present course is no longer reversible. A faster collapse - with an implosion of the regime - is more survivable than an even more powerful totalitarian regime in the hands of those who intend to exterminate us. We have only one flag for now - the black flag.

Bob Smith said...

The real reason Abdullah wants "ethnic studies" is to push Islam. Getting mandatory Islamic study into the public schools has been a goal of Muslim supremacist groups like CAIR for decades.

Anonymous said...

"Blacks born now wouldn't have that mindset except for how they are raised"

100% garbage.

They hate each other too. Who kills more blacks? They hate Mexicans, Joos, light skinned, Asians, dogs, cats, and everyone else.

The creatures have black Satan souls and hatred for everything right, Godly and beautiful. They are malcontent, jealous, hateful by nature.

Anonymous said...

If I hear one more RINO Conservatard or LIberaltarian say that blacks are violent, poor and evil because the Democrats keep them on some plantation, or that Planned Parenthood's presence in the ghetto is responsible for black women killing their babies, or that unemployment and desperation makes black kill black, or that welfare has "broken up" marriage and the "black family", or that predatory lenders prey on noble blacks, or that fatherlessness is the cause of their degeneracy and deviance, or that blacks would excel at school if only the books were newer and the paint was not peeling, I think I might just freakin' PUKE.

Give. Me. A. Break.

Anonymous said...

"you will find that the African-americans that you show such disdain for, are really wonderful and gentle people. They do not want charity. They just want to be treated fairly. I have found that they have an intense desire to work and contribute to our country. We need to appreciate all that they add to the fabric of our nation."

You mean urinate, defficate, and rip the fabric of our nation?

Anonymous said...

Speaking of lynching, check out this crap.

http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/

I reject the premise that the Civil Right era was our greatest achievement as a nation. I reject the notion that Jim Crow was bad for America. I reject the notion that blacks are better off with 100% freedom. Here we have a list of ammunition to use against the GOP.

The GOP is the anti-white, Civil Rights, Affirmative Action, negro power party, the Democrats in the South were pro-white and worked to protect white posterity, freedom of association, and private property rights.

RINO GOP is saying to blacks, "We're not racist! We're not racist!, vote for us!"

Apparently the Democrats are the KKK party and the GOP is the anti-racist, Civil Rights party. So if we simply show this list to the blacks, then *poof*" they will vote Republican, get straight As, form married families, AND reject welfare, abortion, and free shit?

Here is an historical account of the evil racist Southern "Dixicrats":

This is magical thinking, and white people are doomed.

Anonymous said...

90210

'This is what 90% of Black parents'

You are so 50 years behind the times...

Black parents, no. mamas yes.

Anonymous said...

Your remarks show a disturbing lack of empathy for our African-american brothers and sisters. These people have been horribly treated by our majority white culture now for 400 years. You are certainly a rich white man. You can afford to sacrifice 20 or 30% of your wealth if it lifts the life of a young African-american. What will you be sacrificing, a fancy vacation or your daily grande latte?

Once you make an effort to befriend an African-american, you will find they make the most loyal friend you will ever have. Why not make a donation to the President's Brother's Keeper program or volunteer at an inner-city lunch program? I volunteer for Cooking for African-americans or CAA. We have chapters across the U.S. and we volunteer a few nights each week to make nutritious home-made meals for the community at their homes. We also do light house-keeping and generally help the family through tutoring and conflict resolution.

Whether you choose to donate your time or money, you will find that the African-americans that you show such disdain for, are really wonderful and gentle people. They do not want charity. They just want to be treated fairly. I have found that they have an intense desire to work and contribute to our country. We need to appreciate all that they add to the fabric of our nation.


This had better be a parody...

Maybe that white woman in Madison should have offered to cook a meal for those urban terrorists as they raped her? Maybe the dumb lib in Seattle should have offered some free house cleaning to the yoof that shot him for his sail foam?

Even if your post was a parody, GTFO.

Jay Santos said...

Here is a terrifying video of a white man attacking an "unarmed", defenseless and well behaved negro. /sarcasm/

Two white men attack a black teen

You will notice something very odd here. While there are two white "men" and one black "teen", something seems to stop the second white man from joining the other in the attack. As you have seen countless times, this is not the practice of negro attackers, where many blacks will swarm and beat the victim. Also, once the victim is down and beaten, they will continue to deliver punishing kicks to the victims head and body. It's an interesting comparison of the cultures here.

R.E. Prindle said...

Anon: 'we volunteer...to make nutritious home made meals for the community at their homes. We also do light housekeeping...'

Am I reading you right? Are you insane?

Do you not realize that you consider these people to be your equals hence fully capable of feeding themselves and picking up their own dirty underwear? You're not altruistic, you're a slave picking up after your massas and feeding them?

Piss on you, Jack, I think you're a fool and so do your masters. I don't know what to say. You're not really insane you're completely our of your gourd.

Gnome Sane said...

Anon: 'we volunteer...to make nutritious home made meals for the community at their homes. We also do light housekeeping...'

Yeah, and these bottom-feeders wouldn't piss up your ass if your guts were on fire. You're being played.....grow up.

Anonymous said...

R.E. Prindle said...
Anon: 'we volunteer...to make nutritious home made meals for the community at their homes. We also do light housekeeping...'

Am I reading you right? Are you insane?

Do you not realize that you consider these people to be your equals hence fully capable of feeding themselves and picking up their own dirty underwear? You're not altruistic, you're a slave picking up after your massas and feeding them?

Piss on you, Jack, I think you're a fool and so do your masters. I don't know what to say. You're not really insane you're completely our of your gourd.


You sound as if you are interested in joining us in helping at the CAA. We are always excited to bring in new volunteers. Are you near Atlanta by any chance? We are in need of a qualified cook and cleaner with our Atlanta branch. We lost one of our best volunteers recently. Mrs. Hasgrowe, a lovely 86-year-old volunteer got in an unfortunate scuffle with some teens at one of the homes. There was a disagreement about her meat loaf seasoning and she apparently was slow to address the problem. She has been in ICU for a few weeks, but she's expected to recover for the most part. But we do have an urgent need for someone in that area. Based on your picture, you seem to be the kind of lady we are looking for. Please contact us at the CAA website and use the metro Atlanta chapter. We are looking forward to hearing from you.

Clara Besonhurst
Chairwoman of CAA

Hannibal Smith said...

The parodies and satire postings were funny 300 posts ago. Now they're just annoying and take away from the general discussion

R.E. Prindle said...

OK, Cowboy. I guess you got me. Next time don't try to be so sincere or I will take you seriously.

Anonymous said...

On a side note, my elderly neighbors (both White women in their 70s) used to do Meals-On-Wheels to older Black folks.

The young thugs wouldn't even wait for the old ladies to leave, just barge in and take the prepared meals. After one White lady got slapped for protesting, the meal delivery stopped for good.

Blacks even s*** on their own grandparents if they can get away with it.

Chuck Hammer said...

Jay Santos
Two white men attack a black teen


Here it is on WorldStar, no sign in necessary.

Your description is tongue in cheek, obviously, as the video clearly shows a black assaulting a white man and then getting his ass handed to him on a plate.

Interesting to contrast this with how this incident would have unfolded if the races were reversed. The white man stops the beating when his friends call him off. If this had been a black beating a white the watching blacks would have been hooting and howling with glee and delivering kicks to the helpless (white) victim's head.

It's unfortunate that this incident's on video, nevertheless, as a politically-motivated prosecutor may turn this into an aggravated battery charge against the white victim of the initial assault.

Anonymous said...

R.E. Prindle said...
OK, Cowboy. I guess you got me. Next time don't try to be so sincere or I will take you seriously.


You are a good sport. Admirable.

Anonymous said...

I volunteer for Cooking for African-americans or CAA.

Perhaps this enlightened person would care to volunteer to be chief cook for Liberia's Joshua Milton Blahyi, aka General Butt Naked? CAA there stands for "Cannibals Ate Africans."

Ahem.

Californian said...

If I hear one more RINO Conservatard or LIberaltarian say that blacks are violent, poor and evil because the Democrats keep them on some plantation...


RINO GOP is saying to blacks, "We're not racist! We're not racist!, vote for us!"


Here's a question for any conservative or Republican reading this who is trying to do outreach to the black voting demographic: "Have any of your efforts ever succeeded?"

Seriously.

Can you tell us when your talking points are going to win over 51% of the black vote? Heck, if you could win over 15% it'd be a sign of higher order intervention.

Now for the next question: "What do you plan to do when your outreach fails to bring home the bacon (i.e., the black vote)?"

Every election you waste time with outreach to blacks is another 2 to 4 years that the position of white people in the USA is going to be worse. There will be more blacks (thanks to their reproductive habits which you may be accelerating via opposing family planning/abortion), as well as even more blacks due to third world immigration.

Here's a better idea: Why not go after the white vote? You can start by opposing affirmative action, then restricting third world migrations and perhaps even opening up the USA to white South Africans?

Do that and you just might win an election.

Anonymous said...

Hannibal Smith said...

The parodies and satire postings were funny 300 posts ago. Now they're just annoying and take away from the general discussion

March 18, 2014 at 3:44 PM



Amen!All the would be comedians are cluttering up a good site with nonsense.Since PK is censoring the board now,why not cut out the unfunny schtick.

Anonymous said...

What is more revealing are the comments on the worldstar video. Such as the one upstanding american citizen boasting that his town had the first homicide of 2014 ......

It's worse than we think. Truly.