Thursday, November 26, 2015

"It was not preached to the crowd, It was not taught by the State. No man spoke it aloud..."

In a more civil world, Phil Byars would be sitting down with his family today for Thanksgiving dinner. 

He'd say grace, giving thanks to a God he has dedicated his life to worship and bring people to give their life to and open their hearts to accept. 

Then, he'd peak a quick glance and smile at his daughter - as she was deep in prayer - knowing that in another year, she'd bless him with another grandchild. 

Amen. 

But we must not wish to live a world that does not exist. 

We live in this world, and Phil Byars is a father to a murdered daughter. 

Amanda Blackburn. [Amanda Blackburn's father: "I want to be more like Amanda", WTHR.com, 11-24-15]:

Amanda Blackburn's father acknowledges he's been feeling a wide range of emotions since getting the terrible news of his daughter's death. 
Amanda Blackburn was found shot in the head during a burglary inside her home on Nov. 10th. On Monday, Indianapolis Metro Police arrested two men in connection with the murder and burglary. 
Phil Byars says he's praying that God will soften his heart. Speaking to WTHR at his home in South Carolina, Byars told us, "I know that God brings justice through government. God brings justice. He will bring upon these men what He wills. That's not for us to worry about and to think about and to fixate on. We just need to turn it over to him and we'll take care of it." 
"I have seen the men and I do know their names," Byars said of the two suspects accused in his daughter's brutal murder. He says he's not really sure how he feels about them. 
Suspects Larry Taylor and Jalen Watson pleaded not guilty in court Tuesday morning. 
"I'm sure any dad would understand that when your daughter's a little girl...there's nothing gonna stand between you and your little girl. You're gonna do everything in your power to protect her from any kind of wickedness, any kind of evil. Never gonna let it happen, right? I have those same feelings today with my adult children, especially my daughters. So what rises up in me is hard to deal with, because I want to be angry. It would be really easy to become bitter and hateful in the midst of all this. But there's nothing good down that road. There's nothing happy down that road. There's nothing righteous down that road. I'm trusting that the Lord is gonna strengthen us and take that away, those feelings. Byars quoted scripture, saying, "'Vengeance is mine, I will repay,' says the Lord. It's not ours to take into our hands vengeance upon anyone who does evil to us or our children. But it hurts and it's painful. So we're asking God to help us with those feelings. 
We asked Mr. Byars about Amanda's legacy. He replied with a smile. 
"She's the love of my life. Here's what I know about Amanda. Unapologetically, she gave her whole self to God. So her legacy is that she gave her whole self to God in His service to serve people. 'Cause that's how we serve God, by serving others. I want to be like that. I want to be more like Amanda. I hope that everyone who looks at this and looks into this would say, 'Wow, I want to be like Amanda Blackburn.'"
An 18-year-old black gang member murdered Amanda Blackburn.

He had two black accomplices, one of whom should have still been in jail, but had his sentence commuted.

Because of these three black males, Phil Byars no longer has a daughter.

On this Thanksgiving in 2015 America, Rudyard Kipling's poem stirred deep within Byars as he finished saying grace, only to look upon an empty seat where his daughter should have been sitting.

99 comments:

Anonymous said...

Phil Byars didn't make a fool of himself as his son in law continues to do. He didn't forgive the turds, he isn't worried about a conviction tarnishing their lives, and he isn't worried about the effects of their murderous actions on their families. It isn't difficult to see that he wishes they were dead and hopes they burn in hell, but he is pragmatic enough not to say it out loud. His attitude partly explains Amanda's final decision to charge the killer gang rather than attempt to run away and leave her child behind. It is very important for us to raise our children by example. As they say, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

Anonymous said...

Texas here:

The Beginnings

by Rudyard Kipliing

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late
With long arrears to make good,
When the English began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy-willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the English began to hate.

Their voices were even and low,
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show,
When the English began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd,
It was not taught by the State.
No man spoke it aloud,
When the English began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred,
It will not swiftly abate,
Through the chill years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the English began to hate.

Damn straight.

Solid post.

Anonymous said...

I want to be more like Amanda. I hope that everyone who looks at this and looks into this would say, 'Wow, I want to be like Amanda Blackburn.'

"She's in a better place." Isn't that they always say at Christian funerals? She's with Jesus in heaven now, for all eternity.

This is what comes of Christianity's life-hating focus on an imaginary afterlife. The Christian looks forward to death, sees it as an improvement in his condition. Is there a greater insanity in all the world?

I want to be more like Amanda. I hope that everyone who looks at this and looks into this would say, 'Wow, I want to be like Amanda Blackburn.'

In other words, you want to be raped and shot dead, and hope everyone else will too?

Don't worry, if you're white, your government is working tirelessly, night and day, to make your dream into a reality!

Anonymous said...

While staring out the window today, thankful for all that I have, I actually thought about Amanda Blackburn and her family and friends. Such a tragic loss and truly heartbreaking. Savagely murdered for no reason.
May she rest in peace and may the ferel beasts who took her life be sent away forever.
The sad thing is, she won't be the last to die this way. It's happening all too frequently, but the media doesn't bother with it. But some dangerous vibrant runs from the police and justly gets killed and the world stops and the chimpouts begin. I'm tired of it.

Anonymous said...

I sure as hell hope that I never have to react to such a situation, but I'm pretty sure that forgiveness would be off the table and vengeance would not be God's", but mine.

IZZY WHITE said...

Diversity always destroys what feeds it.......Whites.

Californian said...

Powerful stuff, PK, powerful stuff.

If we lived in a just society, you would be on nationwide media.

Meantime, let's all keep up the struggle via the Internet Insurgency.

Anonymous said...

So, now these pos thugs are pleading not guilty. Surprised? Of course not, when have you ever seen a black man step up and take responsibility for his actions? They were swaggering. dangerous killers before they were caught, right? They were the "Kill Gang". Anyone want to guess why this idiotic name appealed to them? One of them talks about shooting Amanda, then watching her bleed, how freaking inhuman can you be. No mention is made of when he raped her, maybe even after she was dead, as horrible as that image is.

And now this piece of filth is pleading not guilty, forcing the family to go through the pain of the mockery of a trial, all at taxpayers expense.You know damn well he'll be all contrite, and do all the " sorry" to the family bullshit. No way will he do the smirk, or the cold blooded glare when his life is on the line. This is the reason the death penalty was invented, for rejects like this. Should round up every one of these kill gangsters, and have a public hanging. Then send the guard after all the blm and sjws who will be there protesting, charge them with the riot act, and prosecute them to the full extent of the law.

Previous poster said it "People are not the product of their communities, communities are a product of the people". That is such a simple, self evident truth, it should be the foundation of every civics class. That in a nutshell is the problem with every major city in the U. S. today, everybody who wants to live in a safe, clean, well governed society has moved away from black dysfunction. In my town this week a somoli community leader was saying a successful community is a multicultural, multi income level blah blah blah. You know the reason why, all the blacks from southern ghettos, primarily Chicago, and somoli refugees have taken over the south side, and anybody able to has moved out. He even said people have to be told not to litter. Seriously? How many of us have to be told not to litter? Isn't that just basic good sense, and civic responsibility? I guess the community just went bad after the whites moved out, and forced the blacks to go out and rob students, break into cars and houses, and throw their trash out on the streets and yards. Good thing the whites moved out, before the community made them violently dysfunctional as well.

Anonymous said...

Her father should be very quiet, and then come out swinging. Be a Man for Christ's sake.

If that were my daughter...


OT: amazing interview at link below. DWL is crucified by straight logic. Hysterical and raunchy too. This guy is my new hero. And watch him take the convo into negro territory! This is how you do it folks!

ps. his comment about a male model on Fox is a joke about himself; he was on the show he's discussing.

Really worth your time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFFJWzgUmTE

NC Realist said...

On a side note...I could really care less about what this man thinks..or anyone like him. I don't want him on my side. However.......I did give Thanks for all the dead common low life diseased black plague negroes yesterday. That includes you tim swarens.

Anonymous said...

C-span's Washington journal has a three hour call in show on free speech and tolerance today and the longer the black callers talk the more their racism shows.

Anonymous said...

Black Friday is open season, no license needed for the day,for sub-saharans to murder whites in USA as long as they keep it under the guise of Black Friday "enthusiasm" & stomp whites to death all over Wal-Marts & other black shopping magnets...Stay safe, stay the hell away from Wal-Mart....stay the hell away from sub-saharan African's (the not quite human primate)

/H hypie out H\

Anonymous said...

Like any father would, he misses his daughter, and when "interviewed" about her death, he can't say what he really wants to say. Not in BRA! If he says what he thinks, how long before the the rest of the family and himself, start getting death threats?
He wants revenge! I would want revenge! To hell with justice, that will never happen in BRA against black defendants.
The lawyers will twist things around so much, Amanda's father wouldn't even recognize her. Our government is incapable of administering justice, but they're very good at stopping "the people" from administering justice. Especially white people. F you Obama and all your sons too!

J.J.

Anonymous said...

@409
Fantastic find. Reposting your video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFFJWzgUmTE

Fromnabout 10:00 till around 17:00 is where she gets devastated by the race question. She literally just sits there and mumbles "I don't know" softly into the mic.
Everyone should watch at least that part of this video.

Anonymous said...

More accurately from 15:00 till about 18:30. Thats the heart of it. But yeah the entire thing is amazing. Shows just how paper thin and utterly unfounded the entire sjw position is.

Anonymous said...

Yes. The video being discussed is an amazing glimpse into the minds of thenieve deluded brainwashed twentysomethings in our world today making all the noise. This shows their line of "thought", and utterly destroys it in a hysterically funny way. As the kids say, That girl got served!

Anonymous said...

Too bad comedian in the video didn't get into the genetic explanation for all the black dysfunction we're surrounded by. That should be the bedrock of his argument, both on race and sex.

Mutant Swarm said...

I read the entire quote from Mr. Byars' interview twice. "...Phil Byars says he's praying that God will soften his heart. Speaking to WTHR at his home in South Carolina, Byars told us, "I know that God brings justice through government. God brings justice. He will bring upon these men what He wills. That's not for us to worry about and to think about and to fixate on. We just need to turn it over to him and we'll take care of it..." And I reached one conclusion.

You, sir, are not a man.

A man would never take the death of one of his children in such a blase', neutered fashion. "God brings justice through government?" Really? I believe Randy Weaver and the Branch Davidians would beg to differ. "God brings justice," but not through government. Have you ever considered acting as the instrument of his justice, or are you just stoned on Jesus? "He doesn't know how to feel about this?" Did he keep his testicles after they were removed?

Ein Weißer Engel, sieben schwarze scheisse should be the order of the day. Kipling's poem has been bookmarked for a long time, but I also found this while looking for a different quote. From Mark Twain:

"O Lord our God, help us tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it..."
- Mark Twain / 1835-1910 / The War Prayer

(Way different than Tom Sawyer, isn't it?)

______________________________________________

You know, it occurred to me while writing this that a lot of blacks profess to be Christians, too. But they go out and behave in the most un-Christian ways possible, then beg for forgiveness. In essence, a lot of them are trying to "get over" on God.

But God will not be mocked.

Anonymous said...

To the EBT Americans .......... Happy Thanksgetting ....... And your f@&$ing welcome.

tradcon said...

Two afro-monsters in South Carolina draw guns on couple responding to Craiglist ad; one afro-monster shot dead by female member of couple and second afro-monster flees; no race given for couple, including female shooter, but presumably Euro-Americans, because they call police and wait at shooting scene; media violates cardinal rule of BRA and report description of fleeing perp as "black man wearing grey hoodie." http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/crime-courts/2015-11-25/aiken-deputies-report-fatal-shooting#comment-1482115

10mm AUTO said...

"This is what comes of Christianity's life-hating focus on an imaginary afterlife. The Christian looks forward to death, sees it as an improvement in his condition. Is there a greater insanity in all the world?"

Not to jump on Christians, as I have always counted myself as one, but this was an issue in the early church. Church leaders had to make suicide a moral sin because early Christians were killing themselves to hurry themselves to the afterlife. The expression: "the meek shall inherit the earth" has NEVER been true. The meek are pushed around and abused by those with more power till they inherit the earth in 3 x 6 plots. Instinctively we know that earthly life ends. Interaction with those we love ends. Those lives we nurture will have to go on without us and our protection.

Fighting for ones life, scratching, clawing, killing for life seem outside the christian doctrine, even to the point of Quakers or the Amish who will not kill.

Each man must decide; what will they fight for and for whom?


Fatigued in Minneapolis said...

re: "..looks forward to death, sees it as an improvement in his condition. Is there a greater insanity in all the world?" - Damn straight. Amen. These nutty Muslim guys too. And even (if I may interject) the whole hunting-as-*sport* thing ("Look! A living thing! KILL it!"); Unless there's suffering involved, or self-defense or hunger/survival etc.,.. most any time that death trumps life, there's sick twisted fucked-up Homo sapien thinking going on.. "In a better place..?".. Non-existence?.. is a "better place"!?.. What the fuck is wrong with you! Planet Earth, if you haven't noticed.. is a pretty nice place. Ever seen Grand Canyon? The Himalya? Antarctica? The Indian Ocean? I'm happy right here friends. There is no better place. And I'll defend my right to be here.. count on it..

CENTURION said...

Sorry, but I am not "Thank Full" for all I have.

I've worked my entire life for it. I worked for it. I made it. I own it. It's mine.

Anonymous said...

TPTB have conditioned many that hate is bad. meanwhile its just a threat to them in any form. nothing to do w the greater good. embrace and refine your hate. to action. not violence , per se, but in a way that nature intended for you to react

Anonymous said...

Lets not be too quick to place the father in the same category as Davey. Emotions can be a mysterious thing. I know this from personal experience. I have never lost a child, but I can say that if Amanda was my daughter, I would be unable to conduct an interview or discuss the tragedy. I would literally be unable to speak about it. However, my hate would be without bounds. It is likely that if the opportunity arose to exact vengeance without creating a disaster for my family that I would seize that opportunity. I once watched a POS bleed without lifting a finger to help. I didn't cause his injuries, but I watched him slip out of this world before paramedics arrived to render assistance. Until assistance arrived it was just the two of us where he fell. He was beyond help, and I remember wondering why anyone even bothered to try. I remain surprised by my lack of sympathy as I watched him go, and it is probably one of a number of things that will have to be explained if I get as far as the pearly gates. Silence or standard words calling for justice and peace don't always mean much.

We can't expect a man being interviewed shortly after the horrific death of his daughter to present us with a wonderful motivational speech. It appears to me that he is expressing admiration for his daughter while merely going through the motions of asking for lawful justice, appropriate punishment for the turds in the afterlife, and hoping for peace within.

Bogolyubski said...

Bryers isn't as bad as his son-in-law but he still falls for the lie that the Ministry of Truth is something other than his mortal enemy. What was the previous thread about? There are no people who have Ministry of Truth jobs who aren't the same as Swarens. We don't even really know of Bryers is being quoted accuratelyhere, or how much his actual statement has been edited by the SJW to fit their narrative more. Apparently Ministry of Truth in Incitatus Lindsay Graham's "conservative" state (SC) sought Bryers for a comment. YT should only comment to Ministry of Truth if full tape of unedited interview is provided in order to counter "editing" - and this only of YT is fully aware of who these people are and what their agenda is.

Anonymous said...

Sorry folks it is going to get far far worse. Bitching and complaining only make you feel helpless. Here are some things you can do. Learn to have a combat mindset. Read Jeff Cooper's book "Principles of Personal Defense".Learn real serious combatives not MMA, not classical styles but real SHTF combatives (www.attackproof.com , Americancombato.com ) only two I would recommend without reservation. If you live in a concealed carry state train and carry. ( Read "Shoot to Live" by white hard ass W.E. Fairbairn) Teach your wife and children that it is a cruel Darwinian world and we are in a struggle with others for resources. Read all of Paul's books and give them away in a paper form if possible. Good fate favors the brave and the prepared. Good luck best wishes. Never defeated.

Anonymous said...

Evolutionary theory is of course the great rejoinder to Salvationist dogma of all kinds. Darwin. Himself was a deeply distressed man who lost a daughter to disease.
The lesson I draw from this murder is not complex but the situation is. Forcing people with a history of chronic under-achievement and alienation from standards not theirs is to force a latent violence into the open. The frustration and rage of the underclass is avoidable by the simplest of solutions: geographical separation. However the complexities of modern American politics has ruled this out. The psychological strangeness of Africans also mitigates against this solution; unlike the Jews whose word for apart-living they use ( ghetto ) their dysfunction condemns them to requiring intervention from outside authority. On this point the Nation of Islam and I agree: apart-living is something black people must ( underlined ) have. They are headed to physical and modal extinction unless they get it. The sheer perversity of the modern American political system's requirement that these people live cheek-by-jowl with white or Asians is going to pay out negative consequences for decades to come. It is really odd to have to admit but I don't see a solution to America's racial problems. They appear to be forever.

Anonymous said...

Killing someone in cold blood should automatically carry a death sentence. I really don't get where all the concern for the murderer comes from- outside of the murderers family, of course.

I've had two cousins murdered (both female)- one by an illegal alien and the other by a drug addict who strangled her to death. Even though both murderers were sentenced to prison, I don't see that as true justice. Their continued existence serves no purpose and just requires the taxpayer to support them. Even though they're in prison, they still continue to have that negative impact. It's not like they're going to turn their lives around, become outstanding citizens and do something so spectacular that it makes up for all the damage and pain and suffering they caused. They can't. So what's the use in their continued existence? Is it justice that they "serve their time" and get out and get to go on with their lives enjoying everything they can while their victims simply rot in the ground? I really don't think so.

If the system was set up so that these murderers knew that once they were captured and convicted that they would be summarily executed, it might make many of them think long and hard before they decided to murder someone. As is, they currently know that they most likely won't face the same kind of fate (death) that their victims did. There will be plea bargains, people advocating for reduced sentences, and so on. Not to mention the murderer's family wanting everyone to be concerned for the murderer and concerned with how the murderer's fate affects them!

No, I'd prefer it to be like one SE Asian country I lived in. Once convicted of murder beyond any shadow of doubt that they were guilty, the murderers would be marched out by the King's Palace, lined up against a wall and then the soldiers would come out with their machine guns and simply shoot them. No more costs to society, no more issues, no more problems. Over and done with.

That is true justice. However, in America, we all know that such a system would have a "disparate impact" on blacks and their "community" and result in howls of unfairness, discrimination and so on because more blacks would be getting executed for the crime of murder than any other race. Even if the murderer to be executed was guilty of a black on black murder, the howls from "da community" would still erupt. The "fambly" would claim that their Orc didn't murder no one- Daquan just tried to shoots him in da shoulder and missed and that man done got kilt by accident! It ain't murder! It wuz a accident!"

Additionally, there'd be the usual protests by the religious claiming that the executions weren't justice but rather vengeance, that killing is wrong and that killing someone because they killed is equivalent to being just like the murderer. For Christians, this position comes from not understanding that the religious law is (in the original text) "Thou shalt not commit murder" not "thou shalt not kill." If a religious person for whatever reason wants to see a murderer not be executed, then I say fine. At that point, they can be responsible for his continued existence and support the murderer in prison by paying all associated costs. They can put their money where their mouths are- which, of course, they won't do. They'll "forgive" as long as it doesn't cost them anything and then claim it's all about the kind of person they want to be.

Excuse me for going on about it at such length. Having been personally affected twice by the actions of murderers, I grow weary of how murderers are coddled in this country and weary of all those who engage in "moral preening" over the murderers.

Anonymous said...

Religion and saviors are for people who have no faith in God. You either believe in God or the church. You can't serve two masters.

Anonymous said...

Just read a USA Today article on BLM protesters in Chicago attempting to disrupt and shut down one of the biggest holiday shopping days of the year. The video included was short and uneventful (just chanting, calling to bring down the system because it is guilty as "Heel"). Without all the DWLs they would only have a fraction of the protest. Sure is great that there are always whites that they can call upon free of charge who are willing to help in the bashing and demise of their own race for a reward that will never materialize or be realized. You'll notice nearly all of them are college age diversity utopians. Black agitators never have a shortage of young wet behind the ears whites to use and shakedown to pay for all of their 'causes', which are always centered around black people and nothing else. Some people are finally realizing that blacks will protest and attempt to become front and center of all affairs no matter if you give in to their demands or not. If a black thug gets what's coming to him from a white cop, even if the cop is arrested for murder and thrown in a cell they will STILL protest after getting "justice". They rallied and protested in STL a year after St. Swisher received what was coming to him just because "they could". The reason that I mention USA Today is because they primarily use Facebook for commenting. The purpose of this is, of course, to make people stand behind their words by not remaining anonymous. People are getting so fed up and tired of blacks and their constant 'looks at me, I uh victim' b.s. that they are bashing blacks and their constant antics while using their real names. Another attempt to shut of whitey fails.

And as for black people, they want to be loud, agitate/protest, complain and blame others- that is their default setting. All these campus protests didn't start to happen until the Mizzou extortion was pulled off with the help of the school's sorry football team. Now all of these other entitled blacks on campuses that most whites couldn't get into are following suit because, well, because they can and are strangely enough, getting away with it.

They want attention and respect and to be liked/loved without having to offer ANYTHING in return. What a fking moronic approach, but with the media's constant help and reframing of events some of what they are claiming is actually being taken seriously. Crybullies is an apt term, but I would prefer a more harsh word myself.

Anonymous said...

The expression: "the meek shall inherit the earth" has NEVER been true

I understand your point but I do think there is wisdom to that statement.

I've lived around wealthy liberals and they were miserable compared to poor rural Whites I have met.

There seems to be a psychological price to building your life around materialism and cosmopolitan ideals. Some of the most miserable people I have met were wealthy liberals.

But if you are poor and White in a city like L.A. then you are definitely screwed. You need to get out because there is nothing for you to inherit. Being poor and White in a liberal city is the absolute worst combination. I'm amazed at how many young Whites stick with their barista or restaurant jobs in cities like L.A. They have to live near ghettos and spend their income making a landlord wealthy. Of course half of them have some fantasy about being a rock star, actress or famous writer. Sad.

Anonymous said...

This is what comes of Christianity's life-hating focus on an imaginary afterlife. The Christian looks forward to death, sees it as an improvement in his condition. Is there a greater insanity in all the world?

Christianity can focus on the afterlife or the present. It really depends on who is giving the sermon.

The Bible actually says very little about the afterlife. It's not like the Koran where they spell out everything that you get.

But I do find the evangelical belief in the rapture to be disconcerting. Many of them believe that Jesus is going to return and reset everything. That to me sounds like a cause of nihilism if you think that nothing really matters.

However our secular culture encourages nihilism as well. It depicts Whites as evil and destructive which leads Whites to believe that it doesn't matter if Blacks destroy our cities. Secular culture depicts White people as deserving of any destructive fate.

Both Christian and secular culture have been corrupted by Marxism and egalitarian fantasy. Only the internet has survived the corruption but it only reaches people that seek truth on their own. I don't know what the answer is but I am optimistic. Both the left and rapture right want to indoctrinate the youth and that is getting harder with the internet. I suspect the leaders of the left are well aware of this which is why they want to flood White nations with immigrants while they can.

Anonymous said...

Evolutionary theory is of course the great rejoinder to Salvationist dogma of all kinds. Darwin. Himself was a deeply distressed man who lost a daughter to disease.

He was also religious and wrote extensively about race.

The left has used Darwinism against Christianity while suppressing his racial work.

If you want to mess with a liberal's head ask if Darwin should be censored. The liberal will say OF COURSE NOT with the assumption that you are talking about conservative censorship. Then ask the liberal if the book's full title should be used and not the censored liberal one. You can even earn a free beer on a friendly bet. Watch their jaw drop when they learn the truth on this one.

The full title is:
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life


Dawkins types (secular egalitarians) will try to downplay by what he meant by "races" in the hope that you haven't read any of it. They are hoping you don't know about quotes like this one:
At some future period not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes...will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest Allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as the baboon, instead of as now between the Negro or Australian and the gorilla


Secular egalitarian indoctrination was a lot easier before the internet. Now we can see how the left has been lying about everything including its own heroes.

EX NEW YORKER said...

Just looked at some video clips of the Black Friday maniacs. Like a herd of stampeding cattle. Yelling, screaming and beating the shit out of each other for an electric toaster of a pack of matching pillow cases. Rolling around on the floor for a Goddamn television set. Fat slobs pounding on each other for some cheap shit made in China. Who are these stupid fucks. The freak show gets worst by the day. A nation of morons. I no longer care about what happens to these brain dead dullards. Let the Africans burn down their cities. Who gives a shit.

What will these people do when the lights go out. I know very well what they will do. They will kill you and your family for a can of Spaghetti-O's or a can of Beanie Weenies.

Back in the late 50's I saw a Twilight Zone show where the lights went out in a suburb neighborhood and all the people started fighting each other. At the end of the show the camera panned back to some space aliens in a flying saucer. One alien said "See...we don't have to invade. All we have to do is turn off the lights."

Anonymous said...

Lots of good comments today.

Evolutionary theory is of course the great rejoinder to Salvationist dogma of all kinds. Darwin. Himself was a deeply distressed man who lost a daughter to disease.

The choice is between a Darwinian view of man based in science and materialism, or the utopian, other-worldly vision of man provided by Christianity. It's Jesus or Darwin, and America has collectively placed its bets on Jesus so far, just what you'd expect of a country founded by Christian religious fanatics. So long as that's the case, its culture of lies and its worship of ugliness and death will continue.

re: "..looks forward to death, sees it as an improvement in his condition. Is there a greater insanity in all the world?" - Damn straight. Amen. These nutty Muslim guys too.

But Christianity was the original death cult, almost six centuries before Mohammed was born. Even Rome, famous for its decadence, lacked a death cult before the arrival of Christianity. Whether this was something that Islam borrowed from Christianity would be an interesting topic for somebody's doctoral thesis.

Both Christian and secular culture have been corrupted by Marxism and egalitarian fantasy.

Nobody is corrupted against their will, and there is a reason these things arose in the Christian West. Marxism and "secular culture" are only secularized Christianity. Egalitarianism is built into Christianity on many levels. The Bible makes a big point of telling us that God regards all souls equally, and the souls of the raping, murdering negroes who terminated the life of Amanda Blake are just as valuable to him as yours. If you don't understand this, you don't understand Christianity.

He [i.e., Darwin] was also religious and wrote extensively about race.

Darwin was an atheist and his most powerful and vocal opponents were Christians, something that is still true to this day. If Darwin's theory had been adopted by white "conservatives" instead of being denounced as immoral, atheistic, and sacrilegious, the racial situation in the West would be very different now.

chattanooga gal said...

you know, I think I like Darwin even better now.

Anonymous said...

Hey Phil, got an idea. Teach your daughter to:

AVOID THE GROID!

I know, it's rocket science. Very complicated. Hard to understand. Hard to teach. Hard to implement. Guess what? It's a #@*&&*( lot harder to have your daughter get raped and killed.

If you had taught your daughter some basic facts on race, you would spend Christmas thinking about how the next one would have at least one more grandkid instead of missing your daughter. All the result of not teaching your kids basic (if politically incorrect) truths about race.

Bill in St Louis said...

He is asking God to help him deal with those feelings.

Good luck.

I am asking God to help him realize that those feelings are natural and should be allowed to grow.

I will probably have the same results.

Bill in St Louis said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFFJWzgUmTE
At 11:40 where she can't answer a simple question regarding the woman who sent her alleged rapist many texts regarding how she wanted him to "fuck her in the ass" had undermined her story tells me all I need to know about her. Anything to avoid answering the question, when the answer will make you look stupid.

Anonymous said...

"anthropomorphous apes"...you GO Darwin!!

Anonymous said...

More info on blacks disrupting peaceful shoppers in Chicago. There is also another story about how blacks vandalized the city's Christmas Tree in Millennial Park while doing another one of their "peaceful" protests:

Haha the media is full of #$%$, always trying to spin the story however they want us to see it. I was just there and it was NOT peaceful or civilized in the slightest. They were yelling obscenities at poor grandmas, tourist and kids walking on Michigan ave trying to storm into the apple store and others. The group keep harassing people trying to leave and enter the stores in a very violent manner. They ran into the continental hotel Michael Jordan restaurant and began harassing the poor guest. By the 4 o clock you see a ton of police wagons heading in that direction. Over the police radar app you hear non-stop assaults and battery in progress. This was just an excise to act like animals. None of the passerby's in millennium park were talking positive over this protest's message. Kudos to the cpd working this event, they're doing a great job of keeping it from getting worse. This is a display of ignorance and hate at its best.

Anonymous said...

310

I found a copy of TIME ragazine [who would buy it?].

Cover is bernie sanders and inside [surprise] TIME praises the [marxist] Pope.
The Pope must be doing their work.

PB said...

"God will bring justice through government".

Wait...what?

Annie Oakley said...

Happy Thanksgiving y'all!

Yesterday afternoon my two neighbor's had their cousins over for dinner. My neighbors are whiggers. It's amazing that their kids they have now are still fairly good kids and unaffected by their loser parents.

The two young ladies were 11 and 13. Cute as a button redheads. They moved from an area of Florida I thought was still fairly white. Nothing could be further from the truth I found out. They moved about a mile from me.

I asked the oldest how she liked our town. She said I love it. I said why is that? She said now I'm not the only white kid in class. I said was your prior school in FL all non-white? She said yep and not only that, my sister and I was always picked on and nearly beaten. Mom and Dad sold their home at a loss and moved out. Kids are in school and in a safe place. That's what real white women and men do when their kids are bullied by nogs. They leave and find a safe space for their babies.

I'm in the grocery store today and a young white lady (about 14) asked her Mom for milk. Momma really looked like some kind of freak. She just had this odd look about her. Momma said no, you have pepsi, be glad you have that. I thought are you kidding me? I turned around to the young lady (Momma was right there glaring at me) and I said here is $2, buy yourself some milk. She grinned from ear to ear and said thank you Ma'am and bought herself some milk.

Ex-New Yorker is so right on. White folks are our worst enemies. They must be dealt with. Many of these white parents do not appreciate their good white kids. Like the one above in the grocery store. Would she rather have some feral nog full of tats or dreads?

There are a few cashiers at the local grocery store I buy food at that are really poor. They have old beater cars and you can tell they're just beaten down whites. I'm making a trip to a larger town this month for a little bit of Christmas shopping. They're going to be on my list. I'm not sure what I will buy them, but something pretty to lift their spirits.

Fellow whites on SBPDL....take the time these holidays (if you can) and give that white cashier, your white postal lady, or someone white who works in retail, a restaurant or even a co-worker something nice for Christmas. It doesn't have to be something hugely expensive as I can't afford anything crazy myself, but something to remind them that WHITE LIVES MATTER and that you appreciate them.

CENTURION said...

The one thing I enjoy most about being I, I don't have to be concerned with most of the nonsense many of you discuss here.

Is there a God? NOBODY knows, thus I don't have to worry about some "God's" will or forgiveness. I am free to make the correct decision.

Being that I am totally ir-religious, I don't have to be the least bit concerned over some bizarre commandment from an unknown past.

People. FREE YOURSELF. Drop the ancient BS. THINK. It is really an awesome sense of self-worth, freedom, power and control.

Anonymous said...

"I have seen the men and I do know their names," Byars said of the two suspects accused in his daughter's brutal murder. He says he's not really sure how he feels about them. 

This is the correct way to publicly say “I know who they are, and I don't know what I might do.” Byars isn't forgiving them and probably never will.

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 4:45, Amanda didn't invite her killers in, so give Mr Byars a break. He lost his daughter to these beasts. Pray that you're not attack by these savages.

Anonymous said...

I don't think we're meant to live as cannon fodder for whoever wants to harm us. We're put on this earth to do good things, go forth and multiply, etc.

I prefer the way Skidmore, Mo. handled their out-of-control town bully back in 1981. Google Ken McElroy if you don't know the story. Long story short, after years of escalating trouble, some people shot Ken dead on the town square in broad daylight and nobody saw anything. And nothing any law enforcement said or did ever got anybody to say anything.

They got rid of the town bully finally because he was threatening to kill a fellow townsman and had already shot him once. If you read all the crimes the guy got away with for years, you'd only conclude someone should have taken him out years earlier. Why would religion prefer he be allowed to harm people rather than a few strong people stopping him?

Why does law enforcement work so hard to prevent people from taking care of the problems in their neighborhoods? Why are we being made sitting ducks for thieves, rapists and murderers? It's time for good people to start wearing No Snitching t-shirts.

And on a happier note, I heard BLM grabbed Jesse Jackson's mic and shooed him away. Ha ha!

Mr. Rational said...

Ein Weißer Engel, sieben schwarze scheisse

You couldn't issue statements taking credit without being tracked down instantly, and they wouldn't notice seven given the normal background of TNB.  They'd notice a hundred if you could manage it in a week, though.

They'd especially notice if you could pick off some in a really unusual way.  For instance, sniper fire suddenly clearing a gang's favorite corner (or several), taking out the loudest loudmouth at a BLM rally, or nailing a group of "teens" prowling an alley in the commercial district.

Who's ready to take a page from the Islamist playbook and create a fake "KKK" front that takes credit for Black-on-Black gang killings?  With a little bit of work listening to police monitors you could have the tweets or whatever out before the cops got back to the station.  You'd need to hide yourself via TOR at the very least, but you could drive them crazy.  Probably best to operate out of Russia or China, though.

Anonymous said...

You are witnessing the negro revolution, the negro's attempt to take full control of this society through violence and intimidation. Given that the culture is largely controlled by women, the negroes will be successful.

Anonymous said...

"God" ... Who is this guy, "God"? And who introduced him to us? And why does he not want us to fight back?

Anonymous said...

Governments bring justice? That's what they are teaching in church now? Perhaps some specific government brings justice sometimes or in specific circumstances but ours no longer does. What is that, the poor man's interpretation of Romans 13? I feel for him but he is wrong.

Anonymous said...

The community didn't go bad, it was the streets that actually "went wrong".

Brian in Ohio said...

EX NEW YORKER, I remember that episode. I believe it had a young Claude Akins in it, and they killed one of their neighbors by mistake in the end. There`s another great episode from that era called "The Shelter" that's eerily relevant.

Being the 1950`s, one of the neighbors has built a bomb shelter in his basement and stocked it with provisions in case the bomb drops. He is mocked by his neighbors, who look at him as one of Bloombergs "right wing crazies". Until the think WWIII has started... They then turn on him, threaten him and his family, try to break into his shelter and are about to murder him when they realize it was just a Civil Defense drill.

Of course, this isn't the 50`s, and this is NOT a drill.

Stay alert, stay alive

Anonymous said...

I remember the incident, I just couldn't remember where in Missouri it happened. Those people had balls and knew what to do, even though it took a while. But everyone in town knew what the problem was.
Is that when white America takes care of the black problem? When everyone knows what the problem is?
If we all wait until the MSM reports what the problem is, it's going to be a long, long wait.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

Our government denies justice to white people and rewards black families of criminals millions of dollars.
That's our new justice system.

J.J.

FD80215 said...

Obama is denouncing Planned Parent Shooter this morning I see. "Gun Violence" In other news. A "vibrant teen" who I'm sure has been turning his life around was caught up in a sticky situation. http://6abc.com/news/pa-state-trooper-shot-on-i-676-in-center-city/1097486/

Michael Isbell said...

I think it is fair to say when a black thug (or thugette) dies in police custody or is killed by officers, it should be termed as, "an arrest gone wrong" or "police work gone wrong" or "premature justice sentencing" or the dindu in question could be referred to as having "been at the wrong place at the wrong time"

Also, all of these sorts of "deaths" of "youth" should be reported as side notes or lighter side stories or editorials, not taken seriously as the scum of the earth doesn't deserve front page, top story recognition.

Anonymous said...

I'm so sorry you and your family have had to endure these deaths. I'm also sorry there's nothing I can say or do to ease any of the pain.
There are many, many people that feel the same way about the brutal killers that roam free amongst us courtesy of our government.
All I can offer is my condolences.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

Nobody is corrupted against their will, and there is a reason these things arose in the Christian West. Marxism and "secular culture" are only secularized Christianity.

Marxism is not secular Christianity. There is nothing in the Bible about using the government to redistribute property nor does it claim there is biological equality.

The Bible makes a big point of telling us that God regards all souls equally

No it doesn't and there are actually few versus about the afterlife. There are far more versus on husbandry. It's the modern churches that emphasize soul saving.

and the souls of the raping, murdering negroes who terminated the life of Amanda Blake are just as valuable to him as yours. If you don't understand this, you don't understand Christianity.

This lack of judgement for the worst elements of society is a relatively new addition.

Darwin was an atheist

He was most likely a deist.

Look I understand your criticisms of Christianity as I share many of them. But I don't think Christianity is the core problem nor do I think it is fair nor productive to blame it for the mess we are in. 100 years ago these murderers would have been lynched by Christians without second thought. They would have been lynched the night they were caught and those same Christians would have gone to Church the next day and had pie. It was far more common in those days to not only read the entire Bible but also classic Western works by the Greeks. Put simply those Christians knew far more about the Bible than the current churchian. The Bible hasn't changed so obviously something else has.

To me the situation is similar to the corruption of the education system. It doesn't make sense to tell Whites to avoid it entirely. We need to focus on the source of the corruption which is paint theory. Once a White person learns that there are undisputed brain differences then both liberal and churchian ideals lose their authority. These "modern" preachers look like snake oil salesmen to the educated White. Secular culture loses its appeal once it is learned that Africans bring poverty wherever they go and Whites are not actually responsible for all of their problems. The entire house of cards falls apart when Whites learn the truth of racial realism. Both liberalism and "modern" churches lose when the curtain is pulled on the great lie of paint theory.

Don M said...

Anon inquired:

"Why does law enforcement work so hard to prevent people from taking care of the problems in their neighborhoods? Why are we being made sitting ducks for thieves, rapists and murderers? It's time for good people to start wearing No Snitching t-shirts."

I do not know if this question was asked in earnest or not. I have to assume that it was, and that makes it doubly depressing to have to answer.

Quite simply it is this way precisely because the people whom the police serve, a collection of genocidal leftists and effeminate cuckservatives want it this way.

A population of completely helpless, demoralized, white sheep who can be shorn at will (via taxation and fines for the breaking of multitudinous petty ordinances) is what they want. Black and brown criminality is the hammer and "Law" Enforcement is the anvil against which you are to be crushed financially and spiritually. This shouldn't be hard to figure out.

Most LEOs, particularly in the most Sovietized of American locales (e.g. NY, NJ, MD, MA) are all too happy with this arrangement. Their perks include generous pensions (for now LOL, but the squids will get around to these), being armed while the proles are not, and being able to imbibe and drive with impunity.

They aren't your friends. They are modern day Chekists and NKVD men.

Anonymous said...

Great debate. Thnx for the link. I'm going to look more into Gavin.

Anonymous said...

Ex-New Yorker is so right on. White folks are our worst enemies. They must be dealt with

Well at the end of the day I think we all know that. I could write a book on problems with Africans in modern society but not a single African has tried to indoctrinate me with egalitarian fantasies. It's Whites that have lied to me about race ever since I was a child. It was White professors that tried to shut me down for questioning egalitarian orthodoxy. White people are good at maintaining a society but God knows they have their own set of flaws. Moral arrogance would be one that comes to mind where Whites adopt THE TRUE WAY TOWARDS UTOPIA and then proceed to shut down the opposition instead of maybe, just maybe accepting that they don't actually have all the answers.

Whites are also too easily drawn into petty power struggles. I've seen White people tear each other apart over the most mundane tasks. White people will create a board of directors for a hot dog stand and then fight over who gets to be president.

I reached the conclusion long ago that most Whites actually do poorly with too much independence. They get too complacent during peace time and are too prone to false idealism. I don't think most of them can even handle wealth. Too much materialism and comfort leads them down unhealthy paths. This is also why I don't identify as a conservative. I don't share their enthusiasm for material inequality or inherited wealth. It creates too many White guilt millionaires that end up funding anti-White causes and raising anti-White children. If you pulled the White kids out of the BLM protests I would bet that at least half are from upper income homes. If that makes me "un-American" then I don't care. The current system is not working and headed for collapse.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon 433P
The choice is between a Darwinian view of man based in science and materialism, or the utopian, other-worldly vision of man provided by Christianity. It's Jesus or Darwin, and America has collectively placed its bets on Jesus so far, just what you'd expect of a country founded by Christian religious fanatics. So long as that's the case, its culture of lies and its worship of ugliness and death will continue.

Why is it then, Anon, that the overwhelming majority (95% or more) of atheists like Dawkins and Sam Harris are fervent advocates of "social justice" and "equality" (who at the same time refer to themselves as "brights" - which is particularly hilarious in the case of Harris, who is about as bright as a negro). I've had Christians here advocating my banning because I'm basically telling them to take back their churches from the Marxoid SJW Cuckstains who presently control all organized denominations of any size and influence. You seem to think that a century or more of sustained brainwashing has zero effect, but major corporations paying billions of dollars per annum to the owners of what is broadcast over the brainwashing boxes argues otherwise. There are very few atheists among the WNs, plus a fair smattering of agnostics, some Neo-Pagans (especially in Europe), and even some Christians. Atheists are the smallest group from what I can tell.

Christianity didn't become a suicide cult until the 1800s, with the advent of the abolitionists, followed up by the Darbyite-Scofield heresies. The Christianity of Charles Martel or even the settlers of the Plymouth colony in 1620 were something altogether different from far too many of those who identify as "Christian" nowadays. The type of "Christian" who appears to have taken over the reigns of the majority of the organized church, from the obscenity sitting in the Vatican to the con-man prancing across the jujubox screen fleecing the flock, have been nicely summarized by Vox Day (himself a Christian) just a couple of days ago. Bad off as they are - and Vox is correct that such Cuckstains will be first ones to go up against the wall (deservedly) when the squid oligarchs finally depart for better looting elsewhere and leave the place in chaos - the percentage of SJWs in the rank and file of self-identified white Christians is nevertheless lower even now than it is among hard-core atheists, nearly all of whom are SJWs, and many of whom are non-white (though white-looking).

Your argument that Christianity per se is the root of the problem simply does not stand up to the historical record. The problem is that whites, for reasons which remain somewhat obscure, have (for the most part) voluntarily (it's true that nobody forces Yt to watch niggaball this weekend) adopted a Marxoid morality fable that they must sacrifice their own race and culture upon the altar of equality. This is actually something pretty fairly close to what is described in traditionalist Christian theology as the 'sin for which there can be no forgiveness'. They once believed and tasted of grace but turned from salvation, effectively stating that Christ's sacrifice was insufficient. If they've replaced the older God (Christ) as God and put in a new one (the Negro, or the Jew - as with the Darbyites - as a stand-in for the elusive unicorn equality), it stands to reason that their new god demands total sacrifice. So why do the vast majority of so-called atheists (who claim there is no god) practice this strange new religion??

Pat Boyle said...

Maybe I'm just slow but I'm having difficulty understanding today's negro.

Last year there were negro demonstrations because prosecutors refused to indict some white cops who had shot black people who had been apprehended for committing a crime. At the time I thought I understood it. They had hoped to pressure the public officials to punish the policeman involved. But now there are negroes in the streets again on this case where a cop shot a negro 16 times. Presumably had his pistol held more rounds he would have shot him even more times. The authorities saw his actions as inappropriate and he is being charged with murder.

So why are the black people marching? They march when they think justice hasn't been done and they march when they think justice has been done. It seems that the justice element is irrelevant. Blacks just seem to like to march. Or maybe I'm missing something.

The officer's pistol seems to have been a 9mm, The news reports didn't say but I believe a full size Glock holds 16 rounds of 9mm but only 14 of .40 S&W. It holds even fewer in .45 ACP. A great advantage of the 9mm is that in a full sized pistol it has almost no felt recoil. It is like shooting a .22. A few years ago there was a famous FBI shootout where bad guys failed to promptly expire from the rounds shot by the local police and the FBI. This led to the search for a more effective round culminating in the 10mm. But it had too great of a recoil for 'smaller framed' officers (especially women). So they cut it down to a short or Kurz round and distributed it as the .40 caliber Smith & Wesson.

If Dirty Harry had been on duty a single .44 magnum round would have finished the engagement. Is returning to revolvers the answer? There is no complete solution to this problem. There are only compromises. The 9mm it seems is too weak for the larger bad guys.

You are not allowed to hunt deer in many states with a rifle smaller that .30 caliber. That means you are legal with an AK-47 but not an AK-74 or an AR-15. You would be very foolish to hunt a Kodiak bear with anything much smaller than a .300 Magnum. Yet we continue to equip our street cops with light weight pistols to take on Trayvon Brown (6'3") or Michael Brown (6'4"). It seems to me that we need cops big enough to handle a .10mm automatic or a .357 magnum. If not, give them a desk job.

Pat

Thought-Criminal said...

Mr. Kersey, I just read your powerful letter to Mr. Trump on VDARE and only hope he continues with his courageous call-out of immigration and race problems by incorporating the info you furnished into his campaign speeches.

I guess we'll now see how courageous The Donald really is.

Thanks for your efforts to save America.

Anonymous said...

Talk about a dream headline......

"Jury fails to convict greiving father who took justice into his own hands!

D-FENS said...

"You are witnessing the negro revolution, the negro's attempt to take full control of this society through violence and intimidation. Given that the culture is largely controlled by women, the negroes will be successful."

The negro in incapable of taking control of himself, let alone society. The negro cannot even organize a block party without it spiraling out of control.

The negro is simply a weapon. A proxy. As is the mestizo, the muslim, the fag and the other assorted creatures we are forced to live with.

Ask yourself who would wield these weapons and why. Are the womyn really in charge of the culture or are they too a proxy. Who really does control the media, entertainment etc.?

Gwoobus Harmon said...



Anonymous said:

The left has used Darwinism against Christianity while suppressing his racial work.

If you want to mess with a liberal's head ask if Darwin should be censored. The liberal will say OF COURSE NOT with the assumption that you are talking about conservative censorship. Then ask the liberal if the book's full title should be used and not the censored liberal one. You can even earn a free beer on a friendly bet. Watch their jaw drop when they learn the truth on this one.

The full title is:
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life



That is also one of my favorite debate tactics when discussing race with vacuous millenials who spout crap like "race does not exist" or "people are all the same."

I ask them which fundamentalist church they attend, because those are some really strong CREATIONIST sentiments regarding the origins of man. From that point on in the conversation, I refer to and address them directly as creationists and constantly refer to their views as creationism.

There is nothing they hate worse than to be called that, because in their mind the caricature of a young earth creationist is the lowest form of intellectual life on the planet. They also have never had their dogma displayed in front of themselves and to themselves in that way either.

It doesn't really matter if you are regurgitating what your preacher said or your marxist professor said ---- if you are declaring this kind of universalist, no human biodiversity, no evolution ---- you are a creationist. Deal with it!

Anonymous said...

It is interesting how Laquan McDonald was "getting his life back together" by taking PCP and walking down the middle of a busy street openly holding a knife. It did however turn his life around so to speak.

Anonymous said...

Evolution is a theory, not a proven law. Anybody ever hear of Michael Behe and the concept of irreducible complexity? (Idea center.org) Even Darwin admitted the human eye 's complexity was a real problem for his "theory". To believe that this incredibly complicated universe just "happened" or that the exquisitely complex human body just "evolved" takes a lot more faith than believing in a Creator. Check out www.Reasons.org. The survival of our people is supremely important. But if there is a God, and I am firmly convinced there is and that Christ is His Son, then as Pascal said, one is taking a tragic risk by dismissing Him. "What is a man profited if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul...?" I have no problem with the label Christian and Creationist. Creationism is NOT automatically synonymous with a young earth belief. I am much concerned for the survival of my people and completely opposed to white genocide. I do not hate others, but simply love my own family and people more. This is completely consistent with Scripture. By turning away from the God of our fathers many of us whites are rejecting the cure for our problems. When our people were faithful, our race was the "head" and not the "tail". We did remarkable exploits. We all, each and everyone, will die, no matter how this struggle for our people's future comes out. Everyone should consider that soberly.

Anonymous said...

You are witnessing the negro revolution, the negro's attempt to take full control of this society through violence and intimidation. Given that the culture is largely controlled by women, the negroes will be successful.

Right, if only culture was ran by a man like Amanda's deluded husband.

It is true that women are more likely to support egalitarian policies and environmental explanations. They do after all have a more nurturing nature.

But you can't pin this mess on women. Women are more likely to be egalitarian but they are less likely to be moral crusaders. It's White liberal and cuckservative men that see themselves as gladiatorial saviors of the darkies.

The dummy that sued for the Chicago video tape was a liberal White male journalist. The BLACK family that settled actually didn't want it to be released. We have too many White males that want to use Blacks for their own social advancement. These Whites want to become Captain America and fight the evil RAYSISS Whites that are supposedly holding down the darkies. It's a source of self-esteem for them. In their minds they are not only morally superior to most Whites but also more intelligent and educated. There are both liberal and cuckservative versions of this position.

D-FENS said...

Seems that the Constitution (and the bible) are being misinterpreted. And it seems that our government (and the churches) are also being infiltrated.

Now, I don't doubt the latter. But how can the former be so, particularly if, as many argue, they both came from divine inspiration?

It's not surprising that many of those that argue against religion are also SJWs. The SJW creed is itself a religion ( a philosophy based on nebulous concepts defended by faith rather than logic the purpose of which is to control people and enhance the power of the rulers). The SJWs have what they believe is a better way to control people.

Besides, if they weren't SJWs, the media would not pay any attention to them other than to criticize them.

Glad to see Don M. Commenting again.

Californian said...

The negro in incapable of taking control of himself, let alone society. ...
The negro is simply a weapon. A proxy.


You might look at the current BLM movement as an attempt to create a sort of "Arab Spring" or "Color Revolution" (the latter, both figuratively and literally) in the USA. Soros and company have had a hand in both the Ukrainian and Ferguson risings. Also consider the blatant Beltway level intervention on the side of Trayvon Martin (sending White House reps to the funeral). All this was backed up by the mainstream media and the usual useful idiots among DWLs.

So yes, there is a strong Establishment footprint on all this.

This goes back to at least the Civil Rights Revolution (CRM). The CRM had the backing of several White House administrations (among other things, Ike sent the troops to de-segregate the South literally at bayonet point). Mainstream media supported the CRM with non-stop agitprop, and continues to glorify it today. Quite a few major corporations turned up the economic pressure for CRM, notably ("I'd Like to buy the world a...") Coke(tm). And you had the usual useful idiots among DWLs.

Imagine, if you would, that race realists/Southern nationalists had but a fraction of this support. Say, one major television network giving the white side of things, or producing pro-white programming. Of it a major corporation or financier would drops a couple million dollar$ to support white activists.

So yes, it's been an Establishment operation since day one. The goal? Probably to destroy the white middle class in the old game of divide and conquer. Break down resistance to globalized economics. Reduce resistance to international political control ala New World Order, UN, EU-supranational bureaucracies, whatever.

Meantime, your average John/Jane Q. YT continues to watch that 500 channels of telescreen and swallow their Blue Pills, one per day.

All the more reason for those who have awakened to continue the Internet Insurgency.

NY Girl said...

What happened? How did the guy find himself bleeding to death? Who called the ambulance?

Californian said...

One more thing...The negro cannot even organize a block party without it spiraling out of control.


Yep.

If YT ever wakes up and regains control of his/her own countries, defeating blacks would be child's play. Look at how easily white Europeans conquered just about all of Africa in the 19th century. And how small numbers of whites maintained control of millions of Africans in the colonial era. A few thousand whites were always able to militarily defeat any number of blacks, whether Boers against Zulus or the Rhodesian army against ZANU/ZAPU.

Black Africans were only able to gain tactical ascendancy when they had outside support. Cuban intervention saved a black Marxist regime in Angola during the late 1970s and into the 1980s. Blacks gained victories in anti-colonial struggles only because they had the full support of not only the communist superpowers, but also of too many treasonable white politicos, media fronts, financiers and even churchmen in Europe and North America.

Here in the Homeland, blacks (as D-FENS notes) can not organize even an anti-violence march without "shots ringing out." Cities which had been fully functional when blacks took them over are soon reduced to wastelands of "streets gone wrong." Imagine if they tried to fight a race war on their own? Without access to the mainstream media, corporate grants and DWL "organizers," blacks would end up disintegrating into a mutual bloodbath of tribal warfare. YT could then move in and pick up the pieces.

The struggle for white activists is on two fronts. One is against the tactical enemy--the violence from black gangbangers, BLM pilagers, African "immigrants" and such, the proverbial barbarians within the gates. The other struggle is against the strategic enemy--the hostile elites who pull the strings on those barbarians.

Something to think about in the ongoing chaos...

Thought-Criminal said...

"Justice" is the LAST thing blacks are concerned with. Groids will twist any situation to justify their "victimhood" with the sole intent of rioting, looting, burning, destroying and murder of YT's. We race realists know this.

The problem is the DWL's who've created and perpetuated this disaster ever since LBJ opened the welfare floodgates to blacks in 1964 with his "Great Society" crap. Blacks have been schooled for decades by DWL's about their "victimhood" and taught to be "professionally offended" by everything.

What we're burdened with now is the logical endgame of LBJ's and the DWL's wet dreams.

Blacks create mayhem because it works for them. They riot, the DWL's feel guilty for their whiteness and cough up more gibsmedats, and the cycle repeats. In the words of Frank Zappa, "It's a way of life."

EX NEW YORKER said...

Another report from the Wild West. It looks like the PC crap is now sweeping through the Northern Mid-West. The cowboys are getting radical. It first started in Wyoming and has now invaded my area. The first thing was the cowboys boycotted two cowboy bars. Then they started burning down buildings in town which included a church and a western wear and boot store. Now the town is full of cops from the State Patrol.

It seems the cowboys do not like the word COWBOY. It is very "sexist." From now on they want to be called "cow-persons."

Anonymous said...

If Dirty Harry had been on duty a single .44 magnum round would have finished the engagement. Is returning to revolvers the answer? There is no complete solution to this problem. There are only compromises. The 9mm it seems is too weak for the larger bad guys.

Revolvers take too long to reload and those big 44 rounds over-penetrate. They are also very loud and will blast the ear drums of you and the cop next to you. But I would want more than a 9mm if I worked an area like Chicago.

Many agencies switched to 40 with the FBI but now the FBI is switching back. It takes practice to hit a balloon 20 yards away with a 40 caliber glock and that is standing still with both hands. In the heat of battle a cop might have to shoot one handed while running or if wounded. The 9mm is easier in these situations. And yes it is easier for smaller framed men and women.

Yet we continue to equip our street cops with light weight pistols to take on Trayvon Brown (6'3") or Michael Brown (6'4"). It seems to me that we need cops big enough to handle a .10mm automatic or a .357 magnum. If not, give them a desk job.

Yea well there's the rub. I agree that in an area like Chicago the cops should be big and well armed. I would want something like a UMP-45 if I was a cop there. But in our PC society we have both liberals and libertarians complaining about the police becoming "militarized" even though the gangs of Chicago have AK-47s. So yes were are sending in 5'9 women with 9mms against 6'3 linebackers.

Ideally they wouldn't have handguns in what are really warzones. Handguns just aren't well suited for combat. As the saying goes a pistol is for defending yourself until you get to your rifle.

But if it makes you feel better the 9mm ammo is a lot more advanced than it used to be. I suspect the gang bangers buy cheap ball ammo at Wal-mart which is partly why they normally wound each other.

Overall I think you make a valid point. Blacks can be huge and we are sending in cops that are armed for a White suburb.

Anonymous said...

Well said. Eye for an eye is what I say. They should be given the same amount of mercy they gave to their victims. Just be thankful this didn't happen in Canada. They'd be chalked up as having a poor upbringing and released after 10 years of good behaviour. We had a nutjob released after 3 years in the psyche ward after decapitating a random stranger on a bus. Just imagine what the poor chaps family feel?

Anonymous said...

amen to CENTURION.

any god that won't let you fight back is no god at all.

noomdor

Anonymous said...

@1202 pm
Respectfully sir you need to read up on what a scientific theory actually means. Evolution is "proven law" as far as what you're trying to say goes. Nobody is going to take us seriously if we still run around saying that the earth is flat.

AnalogMan said...

Bogolyubski, good to see you defending your position, with which I broadly agree, and without the usual picturesque language which apparently confuses many.

Bogo has never been anti-Christian, though not professing to be Christian. He has several times linked to Cambria Will Not Yield, Vox Day and, if I'm not mistaken, Ann Barnhardt. He's always scrupulously fair in his commentary. Never dogmatically pro- or anti-religion.

Lots of good commentary on the subject today, and agreeably civil. Ultimately, though, as CENTURION says, to no conclusion. The evolutionary team, what Richard Dawkins (I believe) called the "magic of big numbers", really is no more satisfactory than the scriptural side. The numbers just aren't big enough.

If anybody is interested, Fred Reed, usually an amusing read, has a long article Fredwin on Evolution. Several others on the same subject - just search his site. Of course, he has no new answers, just some good questions. That's the nature of this debate.

Anonymous said...

But I don't think Christianity is the core problem ...

Then it seems you have missed my point, which is that there is a fundamental, irreconcilable difference between a scientific view of man and a religious one, based in Christian theology. A scientific view considers man only one of many animals on planet earth and can take into consideration genetics and race when accounting for the causes of behavior, but a Christian view cannot, and in point of fact never has. For the Christian, humanity is one, created by God and subject to God, who remains intensely interested in man's behavior and has set the same rules for all. Moreover, all must be considered equally able to obey, for would a just and rational God have the same expectations of everyone unless it were equally possible for them to comply? At no time has Christianity denied the equal humanity of the negro; not even those Christians who held them as slaves were so bold. This idea of universal brotherhood and there being "no race but the human race" is not a corruption of Christianity, it's quite canonical, based as it is on Christian creation myths and expressed openly in Acts 17:26. If there's a way to fix this without discarding the heart and soul of Christianity as it has been practiced from its earliest years, I've never seen it.

Christianity didn't become a suicide cult until the 1800s, with the advent of the abolitionists, followed up by the Darbyite-Scofield heresies.

No, it was a suicide cult even in the beginning; today it's just returning to its roots. As someone else already pointed out, the early Church had to make suicide a sin (there's not a word against suicide, per se, in the Bible) in order to keep the early Christians from slaying themselves en masse. They wanted above all to go to heaven. They worshiped death and saw in Jesus' death and transfiguration the ultimate triumph. Take that out of Christianity and what's left? Not much. (Marxism, perhaps.) Likewise with all the Christian martyrs, who saw their own deaths as desirable and an emulation of Christ. They were, and still are, held up as examples to the rest of the Christians.

Abolitionism, too, isn't something that suddenly and inexplicably arose from within Christianity in the 1800s; nor did it come from outside. It was present in Christianity from the beginning, and eventually became the standard. The pre-Christian Romans and Greeks cheerfully had been enslaving their fellow whites for centuries, but after the Christian takeover of Europe, slavery was gradually abolished everywhere under Christian control, largely because of Church doctrine. It persisted longest among the pagan Vikings, who themselves renounced its practice once they became Christian. It only stood to reason then that for Christians, who saw humanity as one and racial differences as morally irrelevant, this abolition should be extended to the negro. The development of abolitionism in the America of the 1800s was only an expression of Christian faith, not its abnegation. This is shown particularly in the fact that Christian fanatics figured very prominently among abolitionists. They were its driving force.

Anonymous said...

NY Girl said ”What happened? How did the guy find himself bleeding to death? Who called the ambulance?”

I wish that I could relate the entire story, but I've given about all of the details that I can without jeopardizing my anonymity. His injury was inflicted by a weapon, not a wreck or some other accident. There were onlookers behind windows and doors not wanting to get involved or place themselves in harms way, but one of them must have called 911. The part of the story that I shared is the least disturbing part, and I can say that while I watched him bleed I felt nothing for him but a white hot hatred. A lesson in the story is that a Christian is capable of hating as much as anyone else. I honestly don't see why more of these criminals aren't killed by cops who momentarily lose control.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”. . . Ideally they wouldn't have handguns in what are really warzones. Handguns just aren't well suited for combat. As the saying goes a pistol is for defending yourself until you get to your rifle. . . “

No cop should have to go into these areas without a rifle and gear normally worn in any other combat environment, but as soon as they do the cry babies start wailing about the militarized police. It sends the wrong message to those sensitive little turds.

Race said...

Bogolyupski,

I've never heard you say to take back churches, but I have heard you blame alk social ills on Christianity itself, rather than draw a distinction between modern false interpretations and teachings versus actual writing and traditional understanding. The bible itself teachers separation over and over and over and yet that is ignored both by modern JUDEO preachers and a attackers like yourself. The bible also doesn't teach the abolition of old testament law only certain ceremonial laws. That is again ignored and taught and conversely condemn otherwise. So why the turn around?

Anonymous said...

AnalogMan regarding Bogoluybski said ”. . . Never dogmatically pro- or anti-religion. . . “

This might be true. However, of the few bogo comments that I have taken the time to read I've never noticed any of them being pro-anything. There isn't really anything remarkable about him not being pro-religion.

Bogolyubski said...

@Race,

There's been no turn-around. The position stated above is completely consistent with all the previous ones. Christianity is just dry bones in Europe now. The whole institution as it exists there is completely controlled by genocidal SJWs. If not just a twitching corpse in the USSA, Christianity is on its deathbed, with remnants of the 'old believers' scattered here and there. To give a single example, I've yet to see a single condemnation of the ongoing genocide of whites in South Africa coming from any Christian source - not even from the Calvinist churches of the victims. Most whites slaughtered in SA have been done in by negro "Christians" who are working for the openly Marxist ANC. Never a peep from the Moral Majority crowd, but lots of tears over negro babies being processed in Abortion mills largely owned by unmentionables.

Nor has there ever been any excommunication of - let's take another example - the United Church of Christ in Chicago where Jeremiah Wright preached re-cycled Nation of Islam propaganda for two decades while D'Won Mocha Messiah and Michelle (who are also officially "Christians") apparently took lengthy naps. Any Christian denomination worth the name would excommunicate the following churches and all who attend and give to them: Episcopalians, United Church of Christ, ELCA, Presbyterian USA, Negro "churches", Catholics who haven't rejected Vactican II completely. That's just a short list of the worst offenders, by no means inclusive.

If you want to read a pretty forceful anti-Christian argument, take a look at Anon of 626-P above. He's taking a single line of scripture out of its context just as Christians like to. Here's Acts 17:26 (KJV):

And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

This was Paul preaching to the philosophers in Athens as I recall. If anything, it argues against the Protestant notion that any halfwitted fool can begin to comprehend scripture (not referring to Anon, who as I said makes fair arguments). Nowhere is there a denial of the existence of nations, nor is there any statement of equality apart from the assertion these nations are all descended from Adam and Eve. The verse is naturally used by Marxoid SJWs to buttress their Gospel of Galatians 3:28 equality über alles, which really comes from the openly atheist French Revolution.

Anon nevertheless makes a halfway decent argument that the roots of the disease were at least potentially there from the very beginning. I still think the historical record disproves his position but this isn't hugely relevant to the present day, is it? I do note that he failed to address my point that the percentile of self-described atheists who hold to the gospel of equality is even greater than that of self-described Christians. Even so, Anon probably knows the scripture better than Pastor Blackburn does by a long shot. That in itself should tell you something about the nature of the problem. As Centurion noted: Any god that won't let you fight back is no god at all.

Anonymous said...

Race said ”Bogolyupski,

I've never heard you say to take back churches, but I have heard you blame alk social ills on Christianity itself, rather than draw a distinction between modern false . . . “


My general understanding of bogo's theory is that nothing can be taken back or repaired. The consistent theme of bogo's comments that I have read is that everything and everyone is beyond repair, and that everything must be destroyed. The sooner this happens the better, and that we should start this process by turning off our TVs. There are others who agree with this theory.

Anonymous said...

A scientific view considers man only one of many animals on planet earth and can take into consideration genetics and race when accounting for the causes of behavior, but a Christian view cannot, and in point of fact never has.

You speak of a scientific view as if it is universal constant or untainted by modern politics.

Are the social sciences based on the scientific view?

What would happen in the typical University if you proposed a scientific study that compares the brain sizes of Black and White students?

The social sciences have gone beyond egalitarian bias and have actually rejected objectivity as a false concept created by Western (read White) thinkers. This is part of "critical theory" where they openly oppose everything associated with traditional Western society.

So we have professors on the dole in Western countries that have the word "science" in their career description and yet they openly deride Western objectivity. Feel free to study "Critical theory" on your own to learn about this madness.

Only the sciences that are completely unrelated to biology allow objectivity. You can't raise your hand in a class on evolution and ask about evolutionary differences between Africans and Europeans. That's a massive breach of PC politics. On today's campuses you could have your name ruined or be the target of false allegations once you are labeled a "hater" which really means does not follow the ruling order on race.

This science vs Christianity debate is a joke because it assumes that today's science is the same science from 100 year ago. In today's college you will be demeaned and ostracized by SCIENTISTS for questioning the status quo. I know because I have sat in those classrooms and quickly learned to keep my mouth shut less I be targeted as a "hater" for thinking critically about race and evolution.

Science in the West today is a fraud. Our country is dominated by two religions. This argument of "science vs Christianity" is fraudulent as it implies the left side of the equation is working objectively. Liberals have shut down objectivity in our Universities and media. That's the real problem. Christianity is still voluntary and depends on donations. Liberalism and "science" are funded with my tax dollars. I was never given a choice on whether or not I want to support Professor Jane Leftberg's class on how White males are destroying society.

Anonymous said...

No cop should have to go into these areas without a rifle and gear normally worn in any other combat environment, but as soon as they do the cry babies start wailing about the militarized police. It sends the wrong message to those sensitive little turds.

I'm so glad libertarians are working hard to make sure cops can't have military weapons while at the same time trying to legalize crack and pcp. I'm sure a libertarian Afro-utopia is right around the corner!

Anonymous said...

For the Christian, humanity is one, created by God and subject to God, who remains intensely interested in man's behavior and has set the same rules for all. Moreover, all must be considered equally able to obey, for would a just and rational God have the same expectations of everyone unless it were equally possible for them to comply?

Not sure why I should read the rest of your rant when this clearly wrong.

God doesn't consider the Jews to be equal to everyone else. The Bible is very clear on them being a "chosen people" and in fact holds them to a higher standard:

“You only have I chosen of all the families of the earth; therefore I will punish you for all your sins” (Amos 3:2).

I think you have been too influenced by mushy SJW style Christianity that selects a few versus about love and then pretends the old testament doesn't exist.

I don't mind criticisms of modern Christianity but this idea that Christianity is the core problem doesn't make logical or historical sense. Eastern Germany is heavily agnostic/atheist and they have the same exact problems with egalitarian idiocy. As pointed out before California is one of the least Christian states and it is filled to the brim with loony White guilt liberals. SF and Berkeley are liberal capitals. Maybe you believe that Christianity influenced Marxism. So what? How does that solve our problem? We could also point our fingers at the Greeks for a lot of democratic egalitarian influence but what does that do for us?

Reducing Christianity in society obviously doesn't solve the problem as seen California and many other European countries like Germany. So what the hell is the point of going after Christianity? Maybe we should go to Greece and piss on their ruins? Take issue with France and the revolution? Where does it end? Let's focus on productive solutions. Going after Christianity is pointless, especially when all evidence suggests that Whites will adopt liberalism in the absence of Christianity.

If you could wave a magic wand and get rid of Christianity you could make our problems worse. You could end up turning the entire country into California. We need address the core of the problem and not simply encourage Whites to just switch from one religion to another.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said ”. . . No, it was a suicide cult even in the beginning; today it's just returning to its roots. . . ”

I dunno about this. I've been a Christian all of my life and have listened to many Sunday school teachers and Preachers, and have associated with countless other Christians. I have never known any of them to be particularly eager to die or in a hurry to reach the afterlife. In fact, most of them put that off as long as possible.

Anonymous said...

God doesn't consider the Jews to be equal to everyone else.

Christians do; see Galatians 3:28.

I have never known any of them [i.e., Christians] to be particularly eager to die or in a hurry to reach the afterlife. In fact, most of them put that off as long as possible.

Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die? That's not news. But back in the old days, when they had the pure faith, they were eager. Jesus himself was eager. He could have prevented his own death, but didn't.

... this idea that Christianity is the core problem doesn't make logical or historical sense.

It doesn't make sense to you because you refuse to accept that Christianity has profoundly influenced the way Western man thinks about the world, man, and man's place in the world; that Christianity has, over the centuries, been secularized to the point that even atheists accept its basic assumptions. But the flawed Christian religious conceptions of man, upon which things like Affirmative Action are premised, are incompatible with science.

This argument of "science vs Christianity" is fraudulent as it implies the left side of the equation is working objectively.

Whether or not there is such a thing as working objectively is a matter of opinion. But, as I've said, it's Christians themselves who claim Darwin as an opponent. They know very well that his scientific claims are deeply at odds with Christian beliefs. They know it much better than most of you, apparently.

... nor is there any statement of equality apart from the assertion these nations are all descended from Adam and Eve.

If Adam and Eve were of the same race, then so are all of their descendants (i.e., everybody), and nations (or separate races) are without biological reality. That's all political correctness needs to prove that all significant differences in behavior are only environmental in origin.

Anonymous said...

Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jesus won't do a f shit to the murderers but he has to say something so the media vultures will get what they want and go away.

Inside him, I am sure he wants these thugs punished properly.

AnalogMan said...

Anon @ 4:30 PM said i.a.

Whether or not there is such a thing as working objectively is a matter of opinion.

Nice! ... I think?

Bogolyubski said...

Anon
Don't be hard on the father. He knows Jesus won't do a f shit to the murderers but he has to say something so the media vultures will get what they want and go away.

I'm sorry, you're writing complete nonsense. He had to say something to the Ministry of Truth?? Was there a pohleece-goonda holding a loaded machine-gun to his head forcing him to say something? No. He wanted to say something (get his own face before the idiots who watch the lying jujubox). If he really felt an irresistible urge to say something, there are two simple words to say, which are of zero use to the negro killers' dream-team of ACLU, $PLC, ADL, and NAACP Legal Defense Fund shysters: No comment.