Land reform is a key issue in South Africa, due to the long history of dispossession of indigenous populations by white settlers. Progress has been painfully slow over the past 24 years, but the question of land is now suddenly at the top of the political agenda.
A glimpse of things to come in the USA...
A major controversy erupted at the end of February following a motion adopted in parliament, tabled by the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and modified by the ANC, which started the process of potentially amending the constitution to allow for the expropriation of (white-owned) land without compensation, and its subsequent redistribution (to black people.)
In March, the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, sent out phone messages stating: "ANC & EFF working together to take all private land and homes. You can only stop this if you're registered correctly to vote! Check now."
As a result, white South Africans are panicking that they will lose their land and their homes, and some white commercial farmers believe this is the beginning of Zimbabwe-style ‘land grabs.’ Australia’s minister of home affairs even offered to fast-track visas for white farmers.
In contrast, the motion was supported by many other political parties and has been greeted with approval by large numbers of black people. Given the bitter history of large-scale land dispossession, refusing to pay for stolen land is seen by many black South Africans as essential to restoring their dignity.
Parliament recently resolved to investigate whether or not the country’s constitution should be amended in order to allow for expropriation without compensation. A constitutional review committee is organising public hearings countrywide, and will report in August.
The ANC is clearly attempting to regain political ground lost to the small but vocal opposition party, the EFF. The unresolved land question, and in particular the issue of compensation, has been a key rallying cry for the EFF since it first emerged in 2013. It is sure to make land a central issue in national elections due to take place on 2019.
Anthony Spearmen…You know its delicate you have White people who were born in Africa, who believe they are native, and of course you have native born Black Africans who dispute this claim. The right to redistribute the land is an argument that is going to be decided by the people and as it looks they are up in arms about reclaiming it. Violence in my opinion is never the answer, but it was taken through violence and most likely it will have to be reclaimed by violence. Those White folk are not going to give up easily.
Charles Townsend…From my personal opinion anyone is justified in reclaiming property that has been stolen. I know if I had something of value stolen from me I am going to all that is in my power to retrieve it. I think South Africa has every right. Apartheid has been a stain in that country for a long time and it’s time to remedy that.
Shirley Johnson…As far as I am concerned it was never the Europeans’ land in the first place. I think it is a difficult task — the redistribution of land. But from a justification point of view, yes the native born Africans do have a right to reclaim what was naturally theirs. What they will have to be prepared for is the blowback both politically and socially.
Mike Pierce…I don’t think the violence is necessary, but I think from a theoretical perspective the people of South Africa are justified and have the right to redistribute the land stolen. White colonization has run it’s course as consciousness is rising and awareness is growing in terms of the wrongs of the past. Society is becoming more compassionate towards the victims of those wrongs and the victims are beginning to fight back.
Monique…South Africa has every right to claim what is theirs. White people have been robbing the resources of that continent for centuries and the chickens are coming home to roost. Karma is what it is. It looks like to me that the African has had enough and are fighting back, fighting for what’s theirs. I hope they succeed.Peace? No peace.
Today, white-owned land in South Africa will be confiscated by the black-controlled government to rectify historical inequities; tomorrow, white-owned land in the United States will be confiscated by the multicultural government to forever end white privilege, deliver a fatal blow to implicit bias, and squelch once and for all systemic inequalities.
You didn't think teaching an entire generation of non-whites to resent white people in the USA for their unearned privilege wasn't going to have consequences?
Did you?
70 comments:
"Anthony Spearmen"
Bit of nominative determinism, non?
Everyday we inch closer to civil war part 2
All this is robbery on a grand scale. Torch what you can and leave, it is not worth your life. Let them starve and beg you to come back. Because if they thing the Chinese will rescue them, they are in for a rude wakeup call. The Chinese do not have guilt to manipulate and they will run over the blacks. Watch and see.
Blacks have been seizing white property in neighborhoods across America for decades. Blockbusting has been going on since the 1040’s. Ruining one city after another taking property for cents on the dollar. They aren’t done yet. Reparations my butt. Between houses, welfare, food stamps, utilities, grants, etc., reparations have been made ten fold. Africa will starve when these idiots are in charge of the farming. They haven’t been able to feed themselves here or there.
Blockbusting since the 1940’s not 1040’s
White settlers carved a successful country out of a wilderness in South Africa. The blacks in South Africa migrated from the north. It was another case of "let's go sponge off of the whites."
Those ignorant statements are infuriating but I wouldn't expect much of a different tone even if they knew better.
The real irony is that the entire Bantu narrative is a lie. There was no force involved. When the Boers arrived in South Africa, the land was empty with only a few Khoi-san (Bushman) hunter-gatherers running across it.
The Bantu think they are going to enjoy the White man's bounty without the White man. They are ignoring the examples of Zimbabwe (from breadbasket to basket case in a generation) and the failed Black-expropriated farms in S. Africa itself. No rational person can think this is going to work.
This leads to the question: are the kaffirs so stupid as to believe this, or are they just making noise and the true goal of the exercise is to get rid of the White man no matter the cost? Or should we embrace the power of "and"?
Blacks and whites see almost everything -- including history, fairness and justice -- 180 degrees apart.
That part of southern Africa was a depopulated but resource-rich area that white Europeans developed. Then neighbor tribes came in and put bogus claims on it. Of course do American blacks have the slightest notion of this history? / rhetorical
It’s already happened, my former town looks like a shithole.
If it's ok for blacks in africa to take back their land, then it's ok for white in the US and Europe to do the same to them.
'Anthony *Spearman*'.
This should be amusing to watch - if only to be able to say "I told you so"; just like after Haiti, Liberia, Rhodesia, bussing, Section Ape, AA, CRA ...
[to be cont´d]
But the comfort is getting cold - (((they))) are not fazed by ANY amount of contrarian outcomes. Not-in-the-slightest.
[throwing up arms in disgust]
One thing we need to make clear to the Africans in America before they get any ideas about doing this here: nobody took your land from you in North America, you were taken from your land in Africa. If anyone has a claim on this land before the white people it’s the native tribes, and the best thing the Africans can do is go reclaim their motherland and let the whites and the native Americans sort it out here.
When Oxfam or whatever (((charity))) starts harping on about needing sponsors to help feed the poor, starving picaninnies of South Africa because they now have a food desert (because Blackie counldn't farm a sandbox without raping someone), then I will take enormous pleasure in laughing in the face of the SJW asking for the money.
Whites did not steal the land from blacks. Blacks evolved - or were created by God - to live in the Tropics, north of the Tropic of Capricorn and south of the Tropic of Cancer.
This is exactly where the US will head once the demographics have shifted. Heck, it's happening now in most major cities ! Colin Flaherty has said that Crime is "The New Black Entitlement" and he's definitely on too something there. Black judges, Bronx juries, witness intimidation, combined with the normalization of the anti white agenda will naturally seek the next level in the black mind. It will never be enough for them until we are gone and dead. Believe that.
refusing to pay for stolen land is seen by many black South Africans as essential to restoring their dignity.
Restoring their dignity? LOL. Dignity is something you have, or you don't. Magic dirt will not give it to you. Hey moon cricket! the shanty towns and rampant crime is of your own doing, in South Africa or the U.S.A.
I've changed my mind. South Africans should stick it out and obliterate any black that tries to steal their land.
I don't know how the USA can say "ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE" when one half of the nation hates the other half. If it wasn't for the Boars, the blacks in SA wouldn't even know what a farm was!
If you ask blacks, you'll discover they're convinced "we built this country," making them entitled to take it, and they will do so through the Black Plague overrunning cities, using the government to enrich themselves through legal actions, or "by any means available."
Of course, even if it's obvious to them that they're taking something that doesn't belong to them, they won't have a problem with it because theft comes naturally, and if YT is too much of a "punk bitch" to defend himself and his belongings, then YT shouldn't have it.
As for South Africa, those in favor of ripping off the Afrikaaners prefer to ignore the fact that, if YT hadn't arrived, the place would still be in a completely undeveloped state of barbarism -- TNB in its purest form.
I've visited Paris numerous times in the 1970's.
It must be an horrific hell today, but, the Parisians ASKED for this since they didn't believe the "Ugly American" and would not comprehend that our racism, segregation, and water cannons were NECESSARY !!
So, for you French, let me re-introduce you to a phrase that your Grand Parents heard, and perhaps YOU can use to save your wimpy country:
"Valise ou Cercueil", which in English means: "Suitcase or Coffin".
This was the chant the Algerians used against the French occupying their country (Which the French had NO right to do). It is time for the French to say this back to them.
Oh, the French would not have this problem today had they not lost World War 2.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/04/06/2000-asylum-seekers-apply-asylum-living-streets-paris/
It comes down to one thing: blacks think racially while Whites do not.
The critical thing, then, is to re-awaken White racial consciousness.
We should do an exchange, bring all whites from S. Africa here, and send all our black down there, win-win.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/224/098/1f3.jpg
Coming soon to a formerly first world country near you.
The one saving grace of our multicult dystopia is that black Africans will NEVER pull this off in the USA because beaners and other muds out-breed them and are marginally better at organizing and cooperation. So yes, a non-white majority would very well attempt to confiscate everything from whites but none of them would bend an inch in sharing the spoils with other perpetual victim groups. Infighting between 26% Aztec and 26% African population debating who will get the wealth created and saved by 48% whites and Asians.
And of course this is all dependent on white man being disarmed which won't happen in my lifetime.
That all said, the situation in South Africa seems like blockbusting on a national scale. YKW already looted the store as it was burning.... they agitated for equality and GTFO while the getting was good. Now who benefits in a 5-10 year timeline? Who is doing colonialism in Africa these days? Not the usual suspects for once, but China. 2 years after land confiscation there will be mass starvation. Likely there will be a civil war within 5, perhaps sooner. The masses go along with this because each one individually believes he will be enjoying the plundered riches, once they figure out the spoils of conquest only went to a few well connected kin of the ruling party and now they are starving and the lights don't work at all there will be a lot of Bantu wondering why it isn't them who got all the gibs.
In comes China to save the day and offer them their managerial services. I'd wager somebody in China is funding pro-Bantu propaganda now, YKW will be shilling for starving black "refugees" to be let into the west in a couple years, and they likely have already figured out a way to make some shekels on this in the meantime.
Sad for the remaining whites there, but their extinction may serve as a good modern example of why black Africans cannot be allowed political power. My only hope is that they arm up and fight to the last man killing as many savages as they can before they go.
As for South Africa, those in favor of ripping off the Afrikaaners prefer to ignore the fact that, if YT hadn't arrived, the place would still be in a completely undeveloped state of barbarism ....
And that, perhaps, is the biggest "crime" of Europeans. They brought modern civilization to Africa, and Africans just can not handle civilized life. So they must tear down that which they do not understand.
It's the same pattern you see in the Caribbean, and America, and now Europe: blacks simply can not function in a society which expects impulse control, future time orientation and a certain degree of intelligence. If you look at the incidents which triggered the BLM movement, they mainly involved black thugs not cooperating with law enforcement. And whether we are talking about a thug sauntering down main street and then assaulting a cop, or trashing a once great city like Detroit, Africans-in-America demonstrate their true "color." i.e., they reject the basic principles of White civilization, whether civil behavior or maintaining basic infrastructure.
Blacks have had every opportunity in the last half century to demonstrate what they can build. And all that they can achieve is destruction. Something to think about in the continuing chaos.
Stay armed, YT, stay alert, and most critically, stay mentally armed and mentally alert.
I agree. The whites created the farms from nothing. No one was there now all the migrants from the north want to seize the land of the local whites.
OFF topic but people deserve a laugh.
http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/37892195/teen-laughs-before-judge-hands-down-65-year-prison-sentence
Just a thought about this "Ghost DNA" and the Jeffersonian concept of the negro being 3/5 Human........HOW THE HELL DID THEY KNOW THAT BACK THEN? WOW
Blacks are the same no matter where they are. As I've related before, even back in the late 60's in the US, I remember blacks carrying on about seizing several Southern states and taking over. The idea excited and delighted them and they were all getting in our faces and carrying on about how they were going to take all our stuff and it would be theirs. Just the thought of engaging in such massive theft thrilled them to death. I can still recall the frenzied expressions on their hysterically delighted faces and how they were gloating over the idea. At the time, they stupidly believed that such a takeover was imminent and it was just a matter of weeks if not days.
Many years later and 2200 miles or so away on the west coast in the early 80's, some blacks were openly talking about the same thing in front of me at a place I worked and how wonderful it would be and how they (black people) would eventually do it. They spoke as if it were an absolute certainty, seemed quite smug at the prospect and kept giving me looks as if to say, "See, white man! Dis is what you gonna get! It comin'!" Being the sarcastic type, I immediately burst into song with an island flavor and began singing as I walked away, "Kill de white mon so de black mon can be free, den de black mon kill each udder fightin' ova cadillacs and TV's." There was several more lines but I can't remember them these many years later. As is, when I looked back at them, if looks could have killed, I'd have been dead many times over. The whole point for me was to rub their faces in the fact that they'd destroy themselves because of their natural inclinations and/or be existing in 3rd world conditions or worse if they ever achieved their "dream." Plus, I was letting them know I knew exactly what they were. It begins with the letter N and ends in an R.
Never forget. The greedy, avaricious and envious eye of the negro is always focused on what you have, what you've built, what you've created and they all want it all for themselves by whatever means necessary. It's what they are. True in America, true in South Africa, true anywhere they exist.
Mr. Rational earlier in the comment thread stated the history of Africa according to our best understanding of Africa and its racial history. The Bantu were not the original occupants of South Africa. They were an expansionist group that colonized and conquered the area.
When you speak of race most people mean just five major groups: The Caucasoids, the Mongoloids, the Africans, The Amerindians and the Australoids. What about the other little groups? Well what about them?
For most normal political discussion the smaller groups like the Andaman Negritoes are just ignored. Most of them will soon be gone like the Tasmanians - absorbed or eliminated. That's probably why almost everyone makes the mistake of thinking that all the peoples of Africa are the kind of black East Africans that we brought over to the New World starting in the 15th century.
DNA is being scrutinized for all groups and it will soon be recognized that there are several distinct races in Africa. I guessing of course, but I expect an article in the scientific literature soon that will announce that the Bantu are more distant genetically from the San (or the Ituri Pygmies or even the East Africans) than they are from Europeans. The San (the native inhabitants of South Africa) live in the desert because they were driven into it by the invading blacks from West and Central Africa.
The San don't really look very much like the blacks. Many anthropologists have commented that they look vaguely Oriental with their yellowish skin and flat faces. They have spiral hair whereas the blacks who came down from the Congo have helical hair. The true blacks are rather stupid (IQ about 70) but the San are even mentally slower (IQs maybe 55).
The Ituri Pygmies are also not closely related to the Bantu. They too appear to be very primitive ( they were once classified as a variety of Chimpanzee). Finally while the East Africans dominate all sprint races and have for the last fifty years, the East Africans dominate the distance races just as completely. It is possible that as we delve deeper into the mysteries of African genomes we will split the two groups into two races.
When that day comes (if it comes) expect headlines that declare - "Science says Obama was not a negro".
Pat
D is for Depressing wrote:
"I've changed my mind. South Africans should stick it out and obliterate any black that tries to steal their land."
I wish I could agree but unfortunately that is another huge part of the problem. The country is run by blacks; black police, black judges, and black jurors. They actually PENALIZE the whites for trying to protect themselves against the horrific savagery of the blacks. The ONLY way for them to be saved is to either be granted refugee status immediately, or be given enough money for a one way ticket to a better country and live there illegally. Those are their only options. It is a heartbreaking situation but certainly one that could be used to "red pill" some other whites. South Africa is a perfect example of what blacks do to whites when they are put in charge.
They should have kicked them out while they had the chance. But I guess they wanted cheap labor, just like Europe and the US...
What's kind of cool when you actually think about it (in a very sick way) is that Negroes in America are a type of biological weapon used to undermine and destroy our people and civilization. They have been handled by (((them))) in such a way that they were let loose like a virus from a Bioweapons lab. They are now latched onto us and so many of us are too brainwashed to see the actual suicidal parasitic dynamic. They are destroying us from within. It's remarkable....
Try and speak out against the attack and you're shamed and silenced. Point at the HBD science and you're laughed at and dismissed. It's like being in an insane asylum and realizing you're the only sane person inside.
Christ! When will this end!!??
"yes the native born Africans do have a right to reclaim what was naturally theirs"
Never mind that the land the white settlers took wasn't settled by blacks, and thus the term "reclaim" is a lie.
Hopefully someone's security team will swoop in and secure all their nukes. Otherwise these new Kangs will be bombing their soccer opponents.
ERATTA
I wrote East Africans. I meant West Africans.
Pat
CENTURION on April 6, 2018 at 10:43 AM said:
Just a thought about this "Ghost DNA" and the Jeffersonian concept of the negro being 3/5 Human........HOW THE HELL DID THEY KNOW THAT BACK THEN? WOW
Centurion:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was proposed by delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The result of the compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, which reads:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
Basically it was a means for the slave states to have legislative representation based on a partial population count instead of a full count. The northern states didn't want to include any of the slave population, while the southern states wanted to count everybody, regardless of whether or not they had property or voting rights. It effectively increased reprensentation and apportionment of taxation for the southern states by about 1/3 in actual practice.
The interesting thing is the concept of a non tax-paying person being ineligible to vote for representation. A legal challenge could perhaps be attempted to restrict voting rights based on tax-paying status, but this could open a whole new can of worms. What about people under the age of 18 being granted the right to vote? If they are working and their wages are subject to witholding for income tax, Social Security and FICA, then as taxpayers should they be allowed to vote? This would likely be a case of the cure being worse than the disease.
Is it just me or is the whole reasoning of taking a plea deal to keep from getting hammered when they hammer you for being so stupid as to think you’ll get off for actual things you were proven to have actually done. Amazingly predictable!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/teen-turns-down-plea-deal-for-25-years-in-prison-gets-65-years-instead/ar-AAvx1hZ?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout
Teen turns down plea deal for 25 years in prison, gets 65 years instead
WETUMPKA, Ala. — A teenager tried as an adult under Alabama's accomplice liability law was sentenced to 65 years in prison Thursday after rejecting an earlier plea deal that recommended 25 years.
In a two-day trial in March, Lakeith Smith, now 18, of Montgomery was convicted of felony murder, burglary and theft for helping in the 2015 break-ins of two homes in Millbrook, about 10 miles north of Montgomery. He did not kill A'Donte Washington, 16, of Montgomery, who was part of a group of five accused in the thefts.
But several in the group, including Washington, fired shots at Millbrook police officers who responded Feb. 23, 2015, to a call of a burglary in progress, according to officer body-camera footage. The officer that Washington ran toward pointing a .38 caliber revolver fired his police-issued sidearm four times, killing Washington.
Smith was accused of being criminally responsible for the acts that led to Washington's death, the gist of Alabama's accomplice law. An Elmore County grand jury cleared the officer who fired the fatal shots; the officer's name was not released.
On Thursday, Judge Sibley Reynolds of Alabama's 19th Judicial Circuit Court handed down three sentences that Smith will serve back to back: 30 years for murder, 15 years for burglary and 10 years each for two theft convictions.
Smith smiled and laughed through the sentencing, said C.J. Robinson, chief assistant district attorney. Smith flashed a broad smile March 14 as he was led out of the courtroom shortly after the verdicts were announced.
“I don’t think Mr. Smith will be smiling long when he gets to prison,” Robinson said. “We are very pleased with this sentence. Because the sentences are consecutive, it will be a long time before he comes up for even the possibility for parole, at least 20 to 25 years.”
Alabama's accomplice law states that a person is legally liable for the behavior of another who commits a criminal offense if that person aids or abets the first person in committing the offense. It wasn't immediately known how many states have similar statutes.
"The officer shot A'donte, not Lakeith Smith," Smith's lawyer, Jennifer Holton, said during the trial. "Lakeith was a 15-year-old child, scared to death. He did not participate in the act that caused the death of A'donte. He never shot anybody."
Other surviving defendants charged in the case — Montgomery residents Jadarien Hardy, 22; Jhavarske Jackson, 23; and La’Anthony Washington, 22 — entered guilty pleas to charges of felony murder, burglary and theft, court records show. They are awaiting sentencing.
You can go through every (and I mean every) neighborhood in Detroit and see what these fools do to property that was once white owned and nice. They are a plague among themselves. A stranger bunch of idiots has never roamed the earth. I actually think they should have the whole continent of Africa. All the resources and land. The only stipulation is that they all occupy that continent.
It’s a roach motel, not a bat cave!
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gang-members-admit-to-firebombing-black-families-in-la-housing-development/ar-AAvwRw3?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout
Gang members admit to firebombing black families in LA housing development
LOS ANGELES - Members of a Latino street gang have admitted to carrying out a racially motivated firebombing attack on black families in a Los Angeles housing project, prosecutors announced Thursday.
Three men belonging to the Big Hazard gang will plead guilty to federal hate crimes stemming from the 2014 attack, according to written plea agreements. In exchange for the confessions, prosecutors for U.S. Attorney Nicola T. Hanna agreed to seek some leniency for the men when they are sentenced. Each faces more than 30 years in federal prison.
The nighttime attack on Mother's Day four years ago laid bare long-standing racial animosity Latino gangs have stoked in the Ramona Gardens Housing Development and elsewhere. The Big Hazard gang claimed the housing project in the Boyle Heights neighborhood as its territory and the men set out to terrorize black families into fleeing their apartments, according to a statement released by Hanna.
Jose Saucedo, 24; Edwin Felix, 26; and Jonathan Portillo, 23, were part of a group of eight gang members who carried out the well-planned attack.
Three other members of the gang previously pleaded guilty to participating in the bombing. As part of the plea deals announced this week, prosecutors will not require the three men to testify against the alleged ringleader of the group and an eighth man, who have maintained their innocence and face a trial this summer. Details of the earlier guilty pleas have been kept under seal.
The attack was discussed at a gang meeting in early May 2014, prosecutors alleged, where the purported ringleader, Carlos Hernandez, 31, told gang members that they would use Molotov cocktails to firebomb apartments of some of the 23 black families living in Ramona Gardens at the time.
Hernandez said the order for the attack had come from figures in the Mexican Mafia, a prison gang that controls many Hispanic gangs in Southern California, according to court filings.
On May 11 - Mother's Day - the group met again to prepare for the attack, the indictment said.
At that second meeting, Hernandez assigned each gang member a specific job: breaking apartment windows, lighting the devices, throwing them inside. He also handed out disguises and gloves, according to the indictment.
Prosecutors allege the men didn't carry cellphones to prevent police from tracking their movements and purposefully avoided security cameras as they sneaked up on their targets.
After midnight, the men smashed windows of four apartments they had scouted out and threw in the lit explosives, according to the plea agreements. Black families, including women and children who were sleeping during the attack, lived in three of the apartments, prosecutors said.
A mother who was asleep on a couch with her infant in her arms narrowly missed being struck by one of the firebombs, the statement said.
"It was a miracle that no one was injured in these racially motivated attacks," Hanna said. "These defendants have admitted their goal was to drive African-Americans out of this housing facility. This simply will not be tolerated, and we will take any and all steps necessary to protect the civil rights of every person who lives in the United States."
The racial friction persisted after the attack, according to the indictment. Months later, prosecutors allege, a gang member confronted a black family and "warned that they should leave Ramona Gardens or that they too would get firebombed."
The case is the latest of several over the last two decades against Latino street gangs accused of using violence to push rival black gangs out of certain neighborhoods.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gang-members-admit-to-firebombing-black-families-in-la-housing-development/ar-AAvwRw3?li=BBnbfcL&ocid=mailsignout
Part 2
A few years
ago, federal prosecutors charged members of a Latino gang with a campaign to push blacks out of the unincorporated Florence-Firestone neighborhood that allegedly resulted in 20 homicides over three years.
In the Harbor Gateway district of L.A., a Latino gang was accused of targeting African-Americans, including 14-year-old Cheryl Green, whose 2006 death became a rallying point against such attacks.
And members of a Latino gang in the Highland Park section of Los Angeles were convicted of a series of assaults and killings in the early 1990s.
In Ramona Gardens, the Big Hazard gang tried to keep blacks out for more than a generation.
On Aug. 30, 1992, an explosion ripped through the pantry of a Ramona Gardens apartment where a black couple and their seven children lived. Another black family across the street had been attacked minutes earlier.
At the time, seven black families lived in the project. After the attack, they left. For the next two decades virtually no blacks lived at Ramona Gardens. Big Hazard had deep connections to the Mexican Mafia, which directed attacks on blacks, authorities allege.
Eventually, black families started moving back to Ramona Gardens, a sign of progress in a community and a city that was working hard to put the violence of the 1990s behind it. Then came the 2014 attack. At least one resident said at the time that she would ask for an emergency transfer out of the complex. Others insisted they would stay.
In late 2016, about 4 percent of the nearly 1,800 people living at Ramona Gardens were black, according to most recent figures available.
" Monique…South Africa has every right to claim what is theirs. White people have been robbing the resources of that continent for centuries and the chickens are coming home to roost. Karma is what it is. It looks like to me that the African has had enough and are fighting back, fighting for what’s theirs. I hope they succeed."
I too, hope the African succeeds. I hope every white person in Africa burns down wherever they are living, gets on a boat and leaves. When this happens, i am in favor of a multi-national, Black/Liberal American Celebrity led movement for all of them to return "home". In fact, all White Americans should support this effort. There is plentry of room for all to return home, along with thier pet SJWs, and with every wealthy BLACK celebrity/sportsball felon, etc financing the effort, Wakanda could become a reality.
Or, in 3 years they could all starve to death, die of the plauge or dysentery or whatever. Either way, a win-win for YT.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrity/20-celebrities-who-shunned-hollywood-for-small-town-life/ss-BBKah2r?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=mailsignout#image=3
Article on “small towns” where celebrities live. I’ll shorten your reading time. The people that are in (((Hollyood))) movies aren’t being diverse to a large extent. SWell, so much for die-versity. Hell, I know I don't like it, but I don't go around recommending it.
1. Salisbury, Connecticut, home of Meryl Streep is 95% white.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salisbury,_Connecticut
2. Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively; Bedford, New York, 87% white.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_(town),_New_York
3. Julia Roberts; Taos, New Mexico, 40% White, 52% Hispanic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taos,_New_Mexico#Demographics
4. Bill Murray; Charleston, South Carolina, 70% White, 25% AA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston,_South_Carolina#Demographics
5. David Letterman; North Salem, New York, 95% White
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Salem,_New_York#Demographics
6. Dave Chapelle; Yellow Springs, Ohio, 78% White, 12% AA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Springs,_Ohio#Demographics
7. Bruce Willis; Bedford, New York, 87% White 7% AA
8. Brendan Fraser; Bedford, New York
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedford_(town),_New_York#Notable_people
9. Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban; Leipers Fork, Tennessee
10. Ashley Judd; Leipers Fork, Tennessee
(Town unincorporated, county demographics: Williamson, TN 91% White, 5% Black)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williamson_County,_Tennessee#Demographics
11. Jeff Daniels; Chelsea, Michigan, 96% White, less than 1% Black!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea,_Michigan#2010_census
12. Harrison Ford and Calista Flockhart; Jackson Hole, Wyoming
(Teton Co. Demographics) 88% White, 15% Hispanic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teton_County,_Wyoming#2010_census
13. Debra Winger; Westchester County, New York, 57% White, 15% Black
14. Stanley Tucci; South Salem, New York
No data given, located in Westchester Co.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westchester_County,_New_York#Demographics
15. Jon Bon Jovi; Middletown, New Jersey, 93% White, 1% Black
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middletown_Township,_New_Jersey#2010_Census
16. Ted Danson & Mary Steenburgen; Little Rock, Arkansas, 52% White, 45% Black.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Rock,_Arkansas#Demographics
It was also Roger Sherman’s doing.
They decided on three-fifths because they were feeling generous that day.
I console myself with the fact that I will live long enough to see the blacks in S. Africa starving to death after all the whites are gone.
And yes, the Africans in America would do this to us if they had the numbers. In a heartbeat.
Stay alert, stay alive.
At the end of the article PK mentions teaching a whole generation of non whites to resent/hate whites (Referring to White Privilege classes/courses.
1. Germany/Hitler used the term Jewish Privilege in the 1930's with the DESIGNED GOAL to create resentment of Jewish People, (Also there was a MAJOR Book Burning of books by Jewish Authors in 1933 to erase their works, anyone see that as similar to the taking down of Statues of White people AND ONLY White people)
Questions,
1.How do Public Colleges justify the teaching of White Privilege using taxpayer money?
2. Is there any other goal than to create resentment/hate of whites, I can't think of any, and when I look at the Social Media of Professors teaching Critical Race Theory/CRT which ALWAYS includes teaching White Privilege, none of these professors EVER say anything positive of whites.
Just a thought with whites in a captive environment (School) being told they are crap EVERY DAY, no wonder the Suicide rates and Addiction rates have skyrocketed and this likely has something to do with the shootings as well, is it that surprising a person who is constantly put down explodes?
Also a Sidenote Many of these Professors are White themselves, Tim Wise who is well known, and Noel Ignatiev who told Students on his last day of teaching (He was retiring, not fired) White people are responsible for all the World's problems and if any White people want to make the World better, they should just kill themselves (UNFORTUNATELY he did not lead by example) I mentioned 2 but there are many, probably thousands.
Well it’s an official ebonics phrase now... Blue bloods tonight.. black “actor” uses term “Dindu Nuffins” while being detained as a suspect in a murder. Too funny !!!
Non PC Infidel harkens to a theme just posted over at Field Negro. PissantX just got a schooling he won't be able to understand. There's more, but here's the meat of it:
"for the record it was specific individuals who created powered flight ect not an entire nation of people of a certain color."
So why didn't the airplane emerge from spectacular African individuals like Chaka Zulu? Why couldn't he make Wakanda, and was stuck being a mere warlord?
If you could actually think instead of following rote directions, you'd realize that even building something as simple as a Mongolfier hot-air balloon requires an entire culture behind it. You need an economy which isn't limited to truck farms growing food, you need one which grows fibers for trade. Cottage industry won't do; you need spinning and weaving on an industrial scale, which means at least water power. You need enough of a market for cloth that it gets cheap enough for inventors to buy it for experiments. Finally you need people in either the merchant or noble class who have the money and time to spend on testing new concepts.
NONE of those things existed in Africa when white people first came to see it. No airplane was ever coming out of there.
Culture matters. If your people degenerate to gangs doing drive-by shootings in cars and with guns they could never make themselves when you aren't firmly under the thumb of the people who created it all, you will never be a part of it. You've had 400 years to prove you're human, and always fallen into savagery. That's enough.
Wow, it's almost like they are never satisfied, have no empathy, and will terrorize whites and hold them hostage once they're in the minority.
Gee, is that the writing on the wall that I'm seeing?
Blacks (Aboriginals) in Australia are the same. The Aboriginal Industry/Land Rights Industry officials are mostly keeping their traps shut on the subject - or at least so it seems if you rely on MSM for all your information - but word is getting around that most Aboriginal Australians and their Elders or Cultural/Community Leaders are cheering on the ANC. Whether or not it works in South Africa, they intend to do the same in Australia.
Like a lot of negative incidents that originate from Aboriginal Australia, the MSM refuses to report it because the truth WILL stir up White Australia ... and a stirred up White Australia may just wake up and put a stop to what amounts to their own genocide.
Mr. Rational said...
The Bantu think they are going to enjoy the White man's bounty without the White man. They are ignoring the examples of Zimbabwe (from breadbasket to basket case in a generation) and the failed Black-expropriated farms in S. Africa itself. No rational person can think this is going to work.
Not even with extra funding for Midnight Basketball programs?
One of the other stories from that site, a night club stops playing rap music because of black on black crime.
http://m.wmcactionnews5.com/story/37899095/purple-haze-blames-black-on-black-crime-decides-to-stop-playing-hard-rap-music#_ga=2.148833975.1428522295.1523060170-1039471422.1523060170
Paintjob Theory said...
Sad for the remaining whites there, but their extinction may serve as a good modern example of why black Africans cannot be allowed political power. My only hope is that they arm up and fight to the last man killing as many savages as they can before they go.
Well, now, that's mighty White of you, Mr Theory.
You need another example? Didn't we warn you about this before you held all those anti-apartheid rallies, and destroyed our economy with sanctions? Before you wore all those cool "Free Mandela" T-shirts? The examples of Ghana, Congo, Sudan, Ivory Coast, Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda, Zambia, Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and a dozen other disasters were not enough? We need one more lesson, then surely we'll learn?
This is nothing new. We've been doing this since the 1950s. The results have been uniform. And each time, this time will be different, and each time it's the same.
How many of you have read this Warning to America from South Africa? Yes, you were warned.
Land redistribution is nothing new. South Africa has been redistributing land since the fall of civilization. Some of the early results are reported in the book The Great South African Land Scandal. It's an easy read, each chapter is a separate case study. Read it online at the link, or download it here (PDF).
No government in the world will do anything for White South Africans. If it comes to a shooting war, they're the ones America will be bombing. I'm afraid that is what will happen; I'm more afraid they will just roll over and die. Most Whites seem to be thoroughly cowed. The kaffirs have been emboldened to the point of delusions of competence.
Damn, I wish we had just nuked Soweto.
Californian said...
And that, perhaps, is the biggest "crime" of Europeans. They brought modern civilization to Africa
Noo fooling. I read an article by one of those black "intellectuals", full of black triumphalism, where he concluded by saying
Your biggest mistake was when you "taught" us to read.
Yeah, complete with the scare quotes. So-called "taught". Not really, of course.
Damned missionaries. Invent a written language for them, invent words for that language for concepts that they never dreamed of, including a number system (previously their number system consisted of "one, two, many"), and this is the thanks you get. Think you will get your reward in heaven? All those black souls you think you're saving will never get to heaven, simply because if there are blacks there, by definition, it's hell.
If the blacks do indeed "take over"...should be "take under" because that is where this country will go... the inevitable result would have been "Communists" moving in; but since that movement is dead we can count on Chinese capitalism. Chinese engineers and scientists will be only too happy to take control. And the Chinese know it'll be a cakewalk. The Africans will be begging to be taken over. The specter of starvation will be only too real a decade into their "independence".
Anonymous said
Many of these Professors are White themselves, Tim Wise who is well known, and Noel Ignatiev
Both (((white-looking))). Open your eyes.
Dindu Nuffinz: "Well it's an official ebonics phrase now... Blue bloods tonight.. black "actor" uses term "Dindu Nuffins" while being detained as a suspect in a murder."
Negro Detainee: "I dindu nuffins!!"
Negro Bystander: [Steps forward] "No, sir. I Dindu Nuffins."
Negro Bystander #2: "No!! [Everyone looks] I... Dindu Nuffins!!"
District Attorney Moe Latto: [to Police Chief] "Better kick him loose, Cracker. It'll never stand up in court."
Police Chief Cracker: "Dammit!!"
District Attorney: "What did you say?"
Police Chief: "Yes, sir."
I remember reading about the Mau Mau uprising in Kenya and what the negroes believed would happen after the white man was removed from power. The kaffirs thought they'd all be living in big fancy houses, driving huge expensive cars, wearing the latest fashions and living the high life with servants waiting on them hand and foot. That's essentially what every negro seems to think will happen when they talk about taking over from the white man.
Of course, the reality is a third world existence, shanty towns and decrepit conditions. However, despite all the numerous real world examples of what really happens, they still persist in believing in some pie in the sky grandiose delusion. It must be the low IQ "magic dirt" theory of existence- they think all they have to do is plop their black butts down on what whites have worked for, strived for and created and that they'll be infused with the magic juju that will deliver them all the same results sans any effort on their part.
If you've never read about the initiation rituals of the Mau Mau, do so and be prepared to be utterly disgusted. The initiation ritual partly consisted of drinking a foul mixture of urine, menstrual blood and other substances. There were also cases of young white children who'd been kidnapped after their parents were murdered being used as human sacrifices.
Remember though- we're all the same and they're just like us. Sure.
Fortunately, handling nukes takes a level of sophistication they don't have. So if they try playing with them, they will just blow themselves up.
"and a stirred up White Australia may just wake up and put a stop to what amounts to their own genocide."
No we won't. The Africans here give them a harder time than we do.
The zombie apocalypse is the black apocalypse!
The same thing blacks have done to whites for decades!
Yeah, no. Not gonna happen. I like your analysis on these issues but rest assured, blacks will never take over our government. Ever. We have the power here, we just don't exercise it often.
“Blacks will never take over our government “
There’s a reason some commentators use the phrase “black run America.” It doesn’t matter whether or not blacks formally hold power. What matters is whether government is run for their benefit, and I would argue it very much is. The same analysis applies to women.
It doesn’t matter whether or not blacks formally hold power.
Actually, it does.
When power is exercised on their behalf, there's a modicum of competence involved.
In ABRA (Actual Black-Run America), there is zero competence and you get illiterate school-board presidents and mayors so bad the Black populace turns to White saviors (see Detoilet).
Anonymous said...
Fortunately, handling nukes takes a level of sophistication they don't have. So if they try playing with them, they will just blow themselves up.
Oh, they don't actually have nukes. Nobody would be daft enough to give them nukes. All the bombs were dismantled before handing the country over to the kaffirs.
South Africa's nuclear autopsy.
How did South Africa acquire the technology to build weapons of mass destruction? And how did Pretoria react to international export controls?
Hands down, Israel was South Africa’s most important missile supplier. Pretoria got most of what it needed from Tel Aviv. But the secrecy surrounding its A-bomb efforts often forced Pretoria to make do with low-tech equipment. “These guys were immensely proud of what they achieved under sanctions,” says a U.S. State Department official, “they came up with their own home-spun technology.” But for some tasks more sophisticated equipment was needed, so South Africa resorted to smuggling.
You think the kaffirs will be able to figure out how to put them together again?
what do you get when you feed 1 million starving africans?
10 million starving africans
Not so much sponge ..reallly ...thefe was a lot of work in the development of the region and the low hanging fruit of the local tribes went to the south for the employment and chance at having a wife and family outside of the tyrannical rule of the tribes leader .
I live in an area with Native Americans (I use that term as I grew up around actual people from India) and have gotten some appreciative remarks when I tell them that blacks were imported because Natives love friends, family and freedom so much that they just don't have the ability to be enslaved like blacks. "Indians" can be poor, but as long as they aren't drunks they are usually pretty decent folks.
From the Newsweek article: "Whereas attempts to defend their privilege could well lead to the loss of everything they own—an important lesson from Zimbabwe in the early 2000s."
No. The important lesson is that when white people are driven out your country turns into a steaming pile of feces. They take all those jobs they used to provide. They also take all that medical, financial and technical expertise with them.
All they have left are the Chinese who will happily rape their land to take their natural resources and aren't the least bit worried about being called "racist".
Hilarious first names on these idiots also.
Post a Comment