 |
| 21st Century England: No crime here when it's a white person be attacked. |
Meanwhile, a gang of Black girls (Muslims from Somalia for those counting at home) will be free to roam England like Morgan Freeman's character Azeem in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves after participating in a racial beat down of a white girl (while her boyfriend watched):
A gang of Muslim girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were 'not used to being drunk' because of their religion.
The group screamed 'kill the white slag' while kicks raining in on 22-year-old Rhea Page as she lay motionless on the ground, the court heard.
The attackers - three sisters and their cousin - were told by a judge that normally they would have been sent to jail.
However, he handed the girls - all Somalian Muslims - suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.
Their victim was left with a bald patch after they pulled a chunk out of her hair during the attack on the High Street, Leicester.
Ambaro and Hibo Maxamed, both 24, their sister Ayan, 28, and cousin Ifrah Nur, 28, attacked Rhea, a care worker, as she walked to a taxi rank with her boyfriend after a night out.
The victim, a support worker, was left so traumatised that she lost her job following repeated absences with stress and flashbacks, Leciester Crown Court was told.
The charge - assault occasioning actual bodily harm - carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison.
James Bide-Thomas, prosecuting, said Ambaro Maxamed, who started the violence, had called Miss Page a 'white bitch' during the incident.
'White bitch' and "kill the white slag" are no longer considered evidence of racial hate in England, because the government of that nation is actively trying to import a new people (if you recall the admission that the Labor Party was actively promoting mass immigration there).
The women, who are all Somalian Muslims, were not charged with racial aggravation.
Much as the Democratic Party is abandoning the white working class vote in America, every party in England has abandoned any hope of defending the English people. Emma West is in prison for words; a gang of Black Muslims from Somalia are free to roam England after beating a native Englishwoman.
 |
| Words can hurt in an age of tyranny; they have the power to motivate |
In America, Black people participated in violent Mahogany Mobs all across the nation (the most frightening occurring at the Wisconsin State Fair in Milwaukee where hundreds of Black people attacked whites, even pulling many scared pale-faces from their cars).
Parts of Paris are no longer safe for native Frenchmen to walk, or police to dare tread.
If 2011 has taught you anything, it must be that the concept of freedom is dead. Mark Steyn - who basically admits a race war is coming in his new book After America that National Review sends to all new subscribers - tells us the only way to save the country is to embrace "liberty" and "freedom."
What does that even mean anymore, when the Federal Government actively works to resettle refugees from places likes Somalia - the same country where those charming girls in England threatened to kill a white girl and went unpunished - to homogeneous states like Maine or a city like Minneapolis that had virtually no crime prior to their arrival?
Any Whitopia erected outside of a crime infested Black Undertow major city will inevitably be circled for destruction by the Department of (In) Justice and HUD with Section 8 communities placed squarely in the middle of Main Street. Just ask New Berlin.
Just remember we live in Black-Run America (BRA) and the threat by the Black Caucus in Atlanta to sue cities for white flight must be taken seriously (Atlanta would die without its white tax-base to lean upon and practice an extreme form of racial monetary redistribution).
England no longer prevails. Not for the left-wing wing notions endemic in Alan Moore's V for Vendetta (or the movie of the same title), but for the reasons outlined in this article:
V for Vendetta is almost a perfect reversal of the actual situation in England today. In the film, an ultra nationalistic and Christian theocratic government uses state terrorism to coerce the masses behind a repressive right wing agenda. The Church of England rules the moral landscape. Muslims, homosexuals, and immigrants are all imprisoned or deported. Guy Fawkes is a long forgotten hero who struck a blow against tyranny.
In the actually existing England of today, the English flag is considered a racist symbol. The officials of the state are told the Red Cross is offensive because it reminds those oppressed Muslims about the Crusades. Six year olds are investigated for racism. The leader of the Church of England is busy advocating for Muslim Sharia law. The state maintains that Islamic terrorism must be labeled “anti-Islam activity” so Muslims do not have their feelings hurt. It is not criminal to be a homosexual – , even in the mildest of terms. Perhaps most revealing, political leaders have actually admitted that mass immigration offered no benefits for England but was a tactic to make electing conservatives and libertarians impossible in the future by flooding the country with Third Worlders dependent on the welfare state. In essence, by their own words, the English government is a conspiracy against their own people.
In a movie that I immediately understood when I saw it back in 1998, these immortals lines are heard:
Figuring things out for yourself is practically the only freedom anyone really has nowadays. Use that freedom.If you are new to SBPDL, spend some time exploring the archives (or pick up a copy of one of the three books over Amazon) and use the only true freedom we have left. Black-Run America (BRA) exists and the logical outcome is on display in England.
Emma West sits in jail; a gang of Black Muslim's from Somalia have been set free after beating a white girl and yelling "Kill the white slag."
That's your freedom. That's your liberty. One man's freedom and one man's liberty is another man's tyranny. Now you understand where BRA is heading in America.
Free Emma West. For the West.
Update:
Hunter Wallace points out a 96-year-old British war veteran was assaulted by members of the Black Undertow on the same tram that Emma West was cited for "racial hatred." Liberty failed. Freedom failed. Public transportation could work in America (and does work in a majority white - though shamed by this fact - like Portland), but it can't work when you cede control to the Black Undertow. Just look at MARTA. Look at Cleveland's problems. Look at Detroit, where Black bus drivers sit idle at the Rosa Parks Bus Terminal, fearful of going into certain areas of that dying city because of the behavior of Black riders.
240 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 240 of 240"That's an example of a White writer. Most educated blacks use the misnomer, "African American.""
.....and avoid punctuation.
Its sad to think the boyfriend couldnt protect her against feral Somalis. But any white man in the west has hal an idea of how any action would be perceived and twisted.
Lets see: women and black and muslim. If a white man dared lay a finger on them or accidently let the wrong word slip out *bang*! youre looking at jail time Mr White Racist Oppressor.
It could hardly be worse unless they also turned out be lesbians and disabled, in which case he might as well have shot himself rather than intervene.
Talking of wrong words - if you watch the Emma West video you will note that, in fact, she doesnt say anything racist. Its all in the ears of the beholder.
Ive frequently asked DWLs and others to explain whats racist about what she said.
Not had one clear answer yet.
"One man's freedom is another man's tyranny"
That is what has happened to Black people in American from any time period before 1964. When Whites were "free" in the sense that many people here are talking about, Blacks lived under tyranny. In fact, Blacks have lived under some form of tyranny while in the USA before the 1960s.
"When Whites were "free" in the sense that many people here are talking about, Blacks lived under tyranny."
Evergreen, you are truly the King Of Negro Fairy-Tales, stuck on repeat (or stuck on stupid).
I'm going to repeat myself, even though I realize you are probably TOO FUCKING IGNORANT to listen...
YOU HAVE BEEN FED A MONSTROUS LIE, AND YOU HAVE UNCRITICALLY ACCEPTED IT HOOK, LINE AND SINKER.
This blog is for Those Who Can See. If you are not interested in taking off your blinders and embracing the truth, then please leave, you do not belong here.
"Funny thing is, I'm about half German, half Irish. And it has never EVER occurred to me to identify myself as German/Irish - American. I'm just an 'American' "
Because people can look at you as a White person and consider you as American first. You look like most other White people in the USA. When people see me, I am going to be seen as Black first. If I say American, which I am an American, I could be anyone. I could be of Japanese descent. I am American. I say Black American because I do look Black. However, I am still American.
"YOU HAVE BEEN FED A MONSTROUS LIE, AND YOU HAVE UNCRITICALLY ACCEPTED IT HOOK, LINE AND SINKER"
Okay then. Do you have any proof that Blacks did not live under tyrannical conditions for a long time?
Do you call slavery democratic?
Do you call not being able to vote democratic?
Do you call being told "You can't live here because of your skin color democratic?
Do you call Jim Crow democratic?
If you do, that is a warped view of democracy. Sounds more like a tyrannical rule to me. You might say it represented the will of the people. It didn't represent the will of Black American people. We didn't have a say in any of that. Black Americans began to have their say when they went out to the streets and protested the Jim Crow Laws. Personally, I'd rather be dead than live under Jim Crow laws.
"Africa was repeatedly rapped"
Well it sure as hell was never technoed!
"Okay then. Do you have any proof that Blacks did not live under tyrannical conditions for a long time?"
Evergreen, get this through your thick fucking skull...
I'm not interested in proving ANYTHING to you, I really don't give a fuck what you believe. If you prefer to believe in Santa Claus, then please continue to believe, I don't care.
I'm not going to do your research for you, you lazy piece of shit.
But PLEASE keep your fairy tales OFF OF THIS BLOG, this blog is for Those Who Can See. You have been fed a MONSTROUS LIE, if you are not interested in the truth, then please leave, you do not belong here.
"Do you call slavery democratic?"
It doesn't matter. Blacks were better off as slaves, black families stayed intact, blacks all had jobs, black crime was low, and blacks did not cost the taxpayers a dime.
Negroes are not capable of democracy.
"Do you call not being able to vote democratic?"
Giving blacks the right to vote has been a disaster, as they continue to elect the same corrupt black leadership, just because they're black. Take a look at how they've destroyed Birmingham, Detroit, Baltimore, etc...
Blacks also voted 99% for our current black president, who is destroying this country.
"Do you call being told "You can't live here because of your skin color democratic?"
Evergreen, NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE AROUND BLACKS, BECAUSE BLACKS DESTROY EVERYTHING. It makes perfect sense to keep blacks away from non-blacks.
"Do you call Jim Crow democratic?"
Jim Crow protected whites from rampant negro violence, you fucking idiot. How many times do I have to explain this to you??
"Personally, I'd rather be dead than live under Jim Crow laws."
Jim Crow laws kept blacks away from whites.
So you'd rather be dead than kept away from white people???
LOLOLOLOL Typical negro.
"But PLEASE keep your fairy tales OFF OF THIS BLOG, this blog is for Those Who Can See. You have been fed a MONSTROUS LIE, if you are not interested in the truth, then please leave, you do not belong here"
So when I present facts to you, the response is to call it fairy tales?
"Evergreen, NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE AROUND BLACKS, BECAUSE BLACKS DESTROY EVERYTHING. It makes perfect sense to keep blacks away from non-blacks"
You don't speak for everyone. And secondly, the reason Blacks are here is because Blacks were forced to be here. Don't like the fact that Blacks are here, then the USA shouldn't have had slavery.
"
Jim Crow laws kept blacks away from whites.
So you'd rather be dead than kept away from white people???"
Jim Crow limited the freedom of Black people. And yes, I would rather be dead than to be singled out because of my skin color. I would rather be dead than to be told that I can't vote.
"Jim Crow protected whites from rampant negro violence, you fucking idiot. How many times do I have to explain this to you??"
How were Black people rampaging back in those days?
"Giving blacks the right to vote has been a disaster, as they continue to elect the same corrupt black leadership, just because they're black. Take a look at how they've destroyed Birmingham, Detroit, Baltimore, etc...
Blacks also voted 99% for our current black president, who is destroying this country."
Black people voting for President Obama is no different from voting for Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. All are Democrats. Blacks vote Democrat alot because that is the legacy of the Voting Rights Act.
It is a hypocrisy to espouse freedom and then deny other people their freedom.
"It doesn't matter. Blacks were better off as slaves, black families stayed intact, blacks all had jobs, black crime was low, and blacks did not cost the taxpayers a dime.
Negroes are not capable of democracy."
Black people also wanted to escape from slavery. Black people were forbidden from reading and writing. You say Black people are not capable of democracy. Well, the last time I checked, Black people in the USA weren't getting the benefits of democracy or being taught democracy, but rather dictatorship.
The community of Lawnside,NJ was founded for escaped Black slaves. In 1926, Lawnside was incorporated as a borough and became the first independent, self-governing black municipality north of the Mason-Dixon Line. Blacks are capable of Democracy.
"the reason Blacks are here is because Blacks were forced to be here."
Blacks are here because they were sold for chump change by their own people.
"Don't like the fact that Blacks are here, then the USA shouldn't have had slavery."
Every living non-black person wishes that blacks were never brought here.
"Jim Crow limited the freedom of Black people."
It limited the freedom of negroes to force their presence where they were unwanted.
Personally, I'd love to be able to shop in stores, or eat in restaurants where blacks are not allowed.
"How were Black people rampaging back in those days?"
Black people have been violent since the beginning of time, it's in their nature. There has never been a time when blacks were not violent.
"Black people voting for President Obama is no different from voting for Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter."
Blacks did not vote 99% for Clinton or Carter, you fucking nitwit.
"You say Black people are not capable of democracy. Well, the last time I checked"
Evergreen, every time you use the phrase "last time I checked", it translates to "I don't have a fucking clue what I'm talking about".
Well, the last time I checked, Black people in the USA weren't getting the benefits of democracy or being taught democracy, but rather dictatorship.
So is $32 000 average income in dictatorship dollars worth more than 200 freedom under Mugabe dollars?
For those wondering, the Black crime rate in America was just as bad in 1921 as it is now.
The Lie of Lynching
From that article:
Robert L. Zangrando cites figures for the much longer period of 1882-1968 in his book The NAACP Crusade Against Lynching, 1909-1950. Again, his statistics, which he reports were given to him by the Tuskegee Institute, differ somewhat from the other two lists where they overlap. His total figure for 1890, say, is 96, with 11 being white and 85 black. The NAACP's report of 91 was based on 3 whites and 88 blacks. So we again have reason to take the specifics with caution. Just the same, the order of magnitude is indicated by his 87-year total of 4,742, of which 1,297 were white and 3,445 black. Of equal significance is the declining numbers shown over the years: prior to 1902, there was only one year (1890) with less than 100; prior to 1923, only one year ((1917) with less than 50; prior to 1932, no years with less than 10.
Californian: Question: what can be done to support Emma West and millions of others like her who speak the truth?
I'm not sure why my original submission was not posted but I'll try it again.
The best way of showing your support for Emma West, and having it noticed, is by doing what politicians CANNOT ignore:
HIT THEM IN THE POCKETBOOK
Any Americans who like to attend the Olympics should send letters to the British embassy with photocopies of their previous Olympic event tickets and an explanation that they will not attend the 2012 games in Britain due to their anti-Free Speech policies.
Just a few thousand Americans doing this would see a loss of MILLIONS of dollars for these raving multiculturalist British wankers.
mr_evergreen: It is a hypocrisy to espouse freedom and then deny other people their freedom.
Not if those "other people" don't show a shred of respect for individual freedom and rule of law.
The merciless should be denied all mercy. The intolerant should not be tolerated. The willfully criminal should enjoy no freedom. No parasite "deserves" a single drop of anyone's blood.
Anonymous (December 8, 2011 10:59 PM): Talking of wrong words - if you watch the Emma West video you will note that, in fact, she doesnt say anything racist. Its all in the ears of the beholder.
I'm really glad to see that someone else picked up on this fact. Emma West is just one of many political or Christian martyrs that Politically Correct Multiculturalism is about to litter the landscape with.
mr_evergreen: In fact, Blacks have lived under some form of tyranny while in the USA before the 1960s.
Boo fricking hoo!
I'd wager my last dime that from the time of slavery up and until this very last minute, in a matching time frame, American Blacks have, on average, enjoyed a better standard of living than other Black people anywhere else in the world.
There must be some way of establishing this so that the notion of "suffering" slaves can be strangled to a very unquiet death.
You want some real "tyranny" why don't you try Idi Amin or any of a host of other African monsters.
Jim Crow limited the freedom of Black people.
And you prefer the present situation, where the laws limit everyone's freedom, Whites and Blacks included.
And yes, I would rather be dead than to be singled out because of my skin color.
Forgive us for assuming you're lying; we're being generous, in assuming you aren't really a moron.
I would rather be dead than to be told that I can't vote.
Would you rather be dead than be told you can't vote in Mexico, even though you don't live there and aren't a citizen?
This is where the conversation ends with Blacks: they're such liars, and so dependent on Whites, they can't admit that acknowledging the human right to self-determination (irrespective of race) is clearly far more just than the current status quo.
It's a pretty clear situation: on one side you have Black economic self-interest, and on the other you have freedom and justice. And blacks leave freedom and justice on the table every time.
"One man's freedom is another man's tyranny"
That is what has happened to Black people in American from any time period before 1964. When Whites were "free" in the sense that many people here are talking about, Blacks lived under tyranny. In fact, Blacks have lived under some form of tyranny while in the USA before the 1960s.
Translation: Evergreen hates freedom and justice, and loves authoritarianism and oppression.
I want Whites' (and everyone elses') right to decide the composition of their own neighborhoods, communities, businesses, and institutions, acknowledged, protected, and enforced.
Let me spell this out so Evergreen is highlighted even more starkly as an enemy of freedom and justice, and a friend of authoritarianism and oppression:
I'm fine with a community of Whites, Blacks, Yellows, and whatever, that decides it wants to be "racially diverse" and "multicultural." I'm fine with a community deciding to be a Black community. I'm fine with a community deciding it wants to be a White community. I'm fine with a community deciding it wants to be Yellow.
You can substitute any groups you want (religious, ethnic, political, cultural...whatever) for White, Black, or Yellow here, and not only am I fine with it, I advocate for their right to choose their own destiny.
Evergreen is only okay with the status quo, where everyone is forced to live the way the NYC-Washington clique decide. He's not even willing to address this issue, preferring to talk about the past, rather than the present and the future.
You tell me who's the better man? Who's the misanthrope? Who's the authoritarian? Who's the bad guy, and who's the good guy?
Evergreen hates freedom and justice. He loves authoritarianism and oppression. His whine about "one man's freedom is another man's tyranny" is a transparent fig leaf, which will be reinforced when he again fails to address this issue forthrightly.
You don't speak for everyone. And secondly, the reason Blacks are here is because Blacks were forced to be here. Don't like the fact that Blacks are here, then the USA shouldn't have had slavery.
This isn't exactly logical, now is it?
It's a lot like a doctor telling someone who smoked he won't operate on his lung cancer.
You seem to be supporting the idea of collective and inherited guilt: white children born yesterday are already guilty of and responsible for the deeds of their ancestors.
But collective and inherited guilt means Whites get to punish Blacks for the crimes their ancestors committed, no?
It's almost like me blaming the presence of Blacks in America on the descendants of the African Blacks who sold my ancestors the slaves in the first place. Of course, this is precisely your logic, so we should be able to punish Black Africans, and extract restitution from them, on that basis.
But, I've already responded to you with exactly these same points, and you ignored them before, so I suppose you'll ignore them now. No reason for you to man up and grow a pair today, when you steadfastly refused to yesterday and the day before, I guess.
Ultimately, there's no point to arguing with Blacks beyond exposing their utter lack of honesty and intellectual courage.
This is what I mean about Blacks' inability (or unwillingness) to distinguish what they want from what is right. If they want it, it's automatically right. In a word, argumentativism.
Actually, it's obviously unwillingness, because otherwise they'd be unable to employ deception as effectively as they do. A race of liars, then.
Thus we get fellows like Evergreen telling us that ideas like freedom, property rights, and the right to enter contracts are "undemocratic" and "tyranny." That's what he really means when he says "one man's tyranny is another man's freedom"; he's saying that he doesn't like what someone else might do with their freedom, so he's going to call it "tyranny" instead.
Not even a shred of honesty in this fellow. I find him perfectly representative of his race as a whole.
A Muslim man seen on youtube attacking someone on the London Underground could not be charged as it is not allowed under the Police reform Act of 2002.
When will the authorities realize that this Act also applies to Emma West?
Anonymous (December 8, 2011 9:19 AM): Wow! This one hit a chord- I love that there are this many comments, people are starting to wake the fuck up.
Agreed. I believe this thread has set a record, Paul. Would you please confirm that?
Courtesy of Obama ― especially if this incompetent swine is reelected ― look for this British madness to be coming to America sometime soon.
Milquetoast Guy here. Down on the FAMU thread below, I tried posting a rather long and thoughtful answer to your questions, but it appears so far that Kersey is choosing not to approve publishing it.
Milquetoast,
I was away for a couple of days and just checked out the FAMU thread again. Much to my delight, there were more chuckles to be had there. Here's some friendly advice: if you repeat over and over that you've "struck a blow" or "scored points" against someone, you're trying to convince yourself. Now get lost.
And yes, I would rather be dead than to be singled out because of my skin color.
Strange that you should mention this, because I am singled out because of my skin color. I'm placed at a legal and social disadvantage for education, for jobs, for subsidized housing, for the right to choose my neighbors, even for free speech... because I am White.
Let's see you deal with just the legal presumption of racist intent in everything you do, and after a few decades maybe you will have the depth of experience and informed moral character to give you the legitimacy to speak on the subject.
Maybe. Inexperience is a factor in your favor, but I still think your odds are poor.
Every living non-black person wishes that blacks were never brought here.
People like Tim Wise and Nancy Pelosi like Blacks. They make it much easier to make money and get elected.
B. Herder, in English, the adjective comes before the noun. Calling oneself a "Black American" IS placing the emphasis on being American. And Mr Evergreen was calling himself that because some other commenter said that he was White. I'm not a fan of his, but he's on solid ground this time.
"B. Herder, in English, the adjective comes before the noun. Calling oneself a "Black American" IS placing the emphasis on being American. And Mr Evergreen was calling himself that because some other commenter said that he was White. I'm not a fan of his, but he's on solid ground this time."
Agreed!
Post a Comment