Friday, April 20, 2012

Ann Coulter's Idea for an American Renaissance: Arm Negroes. But What About Gun Buyback Programs Aimed at Curbing Black Crime?

Ann Coulter has never heard of Gun Buyback Programs that target minority gun owners
We already know that guns don't kill people in either Detroit or Chicago, dangerous Black people do. Considering that the only people using guns to kill fellow citizens in New York City or Washington D.C. are Black people (well, throw in a few Hispanics), you quickly understand that gun violence in America is largely a Black phenomenon and that private citizens who are buying guns at record numbers do so to protect their persons, family, and property primarily from Black people.

Now, I Have a Dream (IHAD) Conservatives favorite femme fatale, Ann Coulter, has published a column calling for Black people to be armed nationwide (Negroes with Guns, April 19, 2012). She  was even given a national platform on The O'Reilly Factor on April 19 to state why Black people should be armed:


O'REILLY: "Personal Story" segment tonight, Ann Coulter causing trouble again. In her latest column on AnnCoulter.com she says "Every black person in America should get a gun and join the NRA."
Ms. Coulter joins us from Los Angeles. So why are you saying that? 
ANN COULTER, CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST: Well, I think that generally But this was specifically in reaction to the Trayvon Martin case. And I won't be like some other in the media and claim to -- and jump to conclusions on it. We are going to have a trial but I was just making the point that if what a certain network I could name not Fox is claiming happen that George Zimmerman stalked this young black child just because he was black shot him dead in cold blood.
If that's the case well, the reaction isn't the conclusion they're coming to on the left which is oh, we need more gun control. Gun control laws have been used historically, they were -- they were to keep guns out of the hands of blacks and it was the Republican Party and the NRA that has always supported arming blacks in order to protect themselves from the democratic Ku Klux Klan. 
O'REILLY: All right so what you're saying is if MSNBC and NBC News's hypothesis is true that this was a racially-biased driven murder -- 
COULTER: Right. 
O'REILLY: -- that all African-Americans should take that as a warning sign and arm themselves against that happening to them therefore, they should support the NRA. They should support the law that gives, allows you to fight back if threatened and they should arm themselves. That's what you're saying? 
COULTER: Yes. And I mean the reason I thought of it is because liberals are leaping to exactly the opposite conclusion that oh, we have to get rid of these Stand Your Ground laws. They are against the easy issuing of concealed carry permits. Well as I point out in my column Martin Luther King Jr., a Christian minister under constant death threats applied for gun permit after his house was fire bombed. 
And the Alabama authorities under the discretionary gun permit law said no, no this Christian minister is not suitable for a gun permit. That's how discretionary permits were. People who are for gun control are trying to keep guns out of the hands of the powerless. 
O'REILLY: You know that's an interesting -- what you did was you turned the tables on the left and their agenda, there's no doubt about it. It's interesting that you cite Martin Luther King Jr. because the reason he was denied a gun permit is because he was black. That was the only reason. 
COULTER: Yes. 
O'REILLY: If he had a been a white preacher and his house if fire bombed they would have had the National Guard with bazookas protecting him. But because he was down in the south where there was racial discrimination in every area he was denied the gun permit. And you say that now African- Americans should now understand that if what Al Sharpton and the other guys are saying is true that they are targets of racists, white racists and those people are coming to get them.
The only protection they have is to arm themselves. 
COULTER: Yes and -- and gun control laws have always been used this way. I mean, this is the history of gun control on these shores. The very first gun control law ever enacted on these shores in 1660 all it did will say that blacks both slaves and free men were not allowed to be armed. That was the battle that Republicans were fighting against Democrats well first through the Civil War but then in the wake of the Civil War you had free black American citizens and they had a right to be armed and among the rights they were being denied by Democrats. Not Republicans in the south.
I mean, the -- the history books will often try and twist the history by referring to the KKK and the racists as southerners. Oh no, no the Republicans in the south weren't discriminatory and by the way some of the Democrats up north were -- were voting against the Civil Rights Act. 
The one thing all of the discriminators and the KKK sympathizers or the KKK themselves have in common was they were all Democrats and they would use things like gun registration to find out which blacks had guns so that the KKK could go in and take them away or sometimes just informers who would be given those guns or the May issue which we still have on some books today where the authority is determine whether you're suitable to have a gun. And they've look at you and if you're black you're not suitable. If you're white you're suitable. 
O'REILLY: Well it's interesting that you raised this because we did this story a few months ago about an elderly man on the South Side of Chicago. And we just referred to that with Dr. Hill who was actually arrested in his home for having a gun because the drug addicts are breaking into his home every hour on the hour taking his stuff. And he said I have had enough of this. I'm going to get a gun. And the cops they got him. 
Now those charges were dropped but he went national with the media. What do you want me to do? So I think you've got --
COULTER: Right. 
O'REILLY: I think you've got a very good point here that, you know are -- is the left really that concerned about Trayvon Martin or are they concern to get once again ramming their agenda no matter what it is down the throats of the American people under the guise of being sympathetic toward this poor teenager and his family. I'll give you the last word. 
COULTER: Yes and -- and I think it's important for people to know that the NRA was issuing charters to black men like Robert Williams in my site -- it was his book, "Negroes with Guns" to fight off the Klan. He started a gun club called "Armed Black Guards". And that was the end of the clan in Monroe, North Carolina. 
O'REILLY: All right, Ann Coulter, everybody. Thank you.



Sorry to burst Ann Coulter's IHAD bubble, but police aren't doing gun buyback programs in the America Heartland or the suburbs surrounding major cities controlled by and populated by union members, Democrats, Black people.

Seems like Black people like to target whites... when they aren't targeting  Blacks
Gun violence perpetrated by Black people in Newark, Tampa, Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, Washington D.C. Memphis, Charleston, Birmingham, Kansas City, St. Louis, Milwaukee, Miami, New Orleans, Detroit, and - well - virtually any city with a noticeable Black population necessitates the police initiating a "gun buyback" program in a last-ditch effort to curb high rates of crime (and stave off property value drops, white flight, and the erosion of the business community).

Yes, Virginia: Gun Buyback programs are targeted at the Black community. In November 2011, the US Department of Justice released the Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008; Annual Rates for 2009 and 2010 report. In it, we learn:
Blacks were disproportionately represented among homicide victims and offenders
In 2008, the homicide victimization rate for blacks (19.6 homicides per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (3.3 homicides per 100,000).The victimization rate for blacks peaked in the early 1990s, reaching a high of 39.4 homicides per 100,000 in 1991 (figure 17).

After 1991, the victimization rate for blacks fell until 1999, when it stabilized near 20 homicides per 100,000.In 2008, the offending rate for blacks (24.7 offenders per 100,000) was 7 times higher than the rate for whites (3.4 offenders per 100,000) (figure 18). 
The offending rate for blacks showed a similar pattern to the victimization rate, peaking in the early 1990s at a high of 51.1 offenders per 100,000 in 1991.

The race distribution of homicide victims and offenders differed by type of homicideFrom 1980 to 2008— 
Black victims were over-represented in homicides involving drugs, with 62.1% of all drug-related homicides involving black victims. By comparison, 36.9% of drug-related homicide victims were white and 1% were victims of other races. 
Compared with the overall percentage of murder victims who were black (47.4%), blacks were less likely to be victims of sex-related homicides (30.4%), workplace killings (12.5%), or homicides of elders age 65 or older (28.6%) (table 7). 
While two-thirds of drug-related homicides were committed by black offenders (65.6%), black offenders were less likely to be involved in sex-related killings (43.4%), workplace homicides, (25.8%) or homicides of elders age 65 or older (41.9%) compared to their overall involvement as homicide offenders (52.5%).
Ann Coulter seems to believe the only way to enact an American Renaissance is via arming Black people. We at SBPDL believe the only way to enact a true American Renaissance is through similar actions taken by police in heavily Black cities and counties: offer great buy back programs for their guns.

It is Black violence - and the fear of Black violence, which is statistically, warranted - that threatens the stability of major American cities and drives law-abiding citizens to seek shelter and refuge in areas uninhabited by Black people.

Ms. Coulter--- arming Black people wouldn't bring about an American Renaissance. Disarming Black people, an act that police in heavily Black areas try and do in a yearly basis through gun buyback programs, is the first step to a true American Renaissance.

Ann --- you need help. Gun Buyback Programs are held in almost exclusively Black-controlled cities (or cities with a population that is more than 10 percent Black). Don't arm Black people; emulate the police in Birmingham, New York City, Chicago, Charlotte, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Indianapolis, Shreveport, Jackson (MS), Houston, Dallas, and Nashville... buy back all of Black people's firearms.

Remember: guns don't kill people, dangerous minorities do. This is why police have gun buyback programs.







131 comments:

Puggg said...

Gun buyback programs don't work, either. Even though they're advertised towards black people, they almost always end up in white people trading in inoperable junk for the reward du jour.

Ann Coulter's idea is also idiotic. Other than getting the few decent black people CCW permits, which they can do now where CCW exists, there's a reason why both white people and black people who have political or police power over black citizens want heavy gun control laws.

xthred said...

Ann is a traitorous fraud. A DWL posing as a conservative.

countenance said...

I don't know what Miss Priss is trying to accomplish here. If I didn't already know better, and I read her latest column from start to finish, I would come away from it wanting to send all my money to Sarah Brady.

Paul: You are absolutely correct that gun buyback programs are targeted at blacks. Every time they have one in St. Louis, it's pushed heavily in the local black media, and a bit in the mainstream media, but none others. Not on the soft rock office music station, not on the rock stations, and certainly not on the country stations. Though I would rather be a whore sitting in the pews of a church and let out a big ole fart than advertise a gun buyback program on a country music radio station. It would go over better.

Bogolyubski said...

Coulter's an idiot. She jumped the shark some time ago. Just another DWL with a Reagan mask. Even so, gun buyback programs are laughable. They're a great scam too. I even know some folks who've make tidy sums selling 50-dollar junk guns to big-city pohleece for a triple mark-up.

Blacks have a near-unlimited supply of guns as it stands thanks to burglary, under-the-table networks, etc.. Once D'Won gets his national civilian homeland security army (with plenty of Republican votes), the NBPP and its associates, plus innumerable groid gangbangers, will be equipped with high-end HK MP5's and the like (not available to any civilian except Class 3 dealers who sell to law enforcement - thanks to a law signed by the great Republican conservative icon Ronald Reagan in 1986.)

FYT said...

Honestly, I think Coulter is trying to subvert the liberal argument for gun control by using their favorite demographic against them.

She knows negroes are not going to be joining the NRA or start buying lots of expensive guns.

The net effect of someone like Coulter (who blacks and liberals despise) calling for blacks to arm themselves willl be less blacks arming themselves.

Anonymous said...

I like Ann, but she's an N-person lover. She is either totally ignorant about the truth of black criminality or willfully blind to it in the manner of so many DWLs and DWCs.

Whiskey said...

For the record, gun control was done most in the Northeast, and aimed (by Teddy Roosevelt no less) at the Irish and Italians in places like NYC and Boston. Or more specifically the mobsters among them.

FrenchKiss said...

Gun buy back programs solve nothing. See those people turning in guns? They are not criminals, they are legal owners giving away their right to self-defense for peanuts. $50 or $100, that's nothing. Some of those guns were more valuable than the money offered. Futhermore, thugs are not gonna turn in their guns. Just stupid sheeple do that.

Anonymous said...

Respectfully, I'm a little confused at Paul's take on Coulter's argument, as well as the first few posters agreement with said disagreement with Coulter.

Your stats are all true Paul, but here's the thing:

What do you have when you disarm a problematic populace that is prone to all kinds of criminality, including murder, at many times the rate of other racial populaces, as well as widespread dysfunction in other spheres?

Answer:

You have that same populace, with the same innate impulse control issues, but with less practical ability to carry out their most criminal of impulses. So, the populace with an innate murderous impulse stays under the radar, but their other problems still plague us, and we are only left with less to point to to argue for their separation from us, if not completely, at least in the spheres which are most impacted by their dysfunction (work, education, civic health, military, etc.) Um..okay, complete separation.

Their innate problematic impulses and dysfunctions don't go away, but the murder impulse is just a little more neutered from being carried out. Furthermore, the only reasonable way to truly disarm them is to ban all guns. As long as we share a society with them, banning guns is not an option. Not being able to buy a gun is not an issue for the criminals, and getting a hold of guns, despite buyback programs, won't be an issue for them at any time, either.

The truth is that the only way for the truth to be amplified into the deep reaches of public consciousness, is through the amplification of their chaos.

I believe Coulter was trying to spin the anti-gun momentum into pro-gun momentum, and I can;t fault her for the strategy if she really believes that the anti-gun momentum poses a threat. If the gun laws are changed, the criminals won;t be affected, only people looking to defend themselves will. Therefore, her address of this issue in a politically savvy way (pro-black self-defense) deserves closer inspection.

If blacks were to take her advice, and buy guns en masse, we do know what the result would be. Vastly increased criminality and ilelgal guns on the street, facilitated through increased legal/illegal gun ownership by blacks.

The victims would be martyrs, but the black problem would be amplified in the minds of the people, and further presented to the front of the national conversation. The racial divide would increase in the political mainstream, which is what we want. Under no circumstance do we want the racial divide to decrease in the political mainstream, as that allows them to continue with their dysfunctional behavior ignored and unpunished at the level that it should be, and it forces us to continue to lower our civil standards to accommodate them.

Not to be overly dramatic, but the following maxim applies to this situation, as it applies to any war:

Order through Chaos.

YIH said...

Gotta agree with ''Puggg'':
An Orlando radio station has been doing ''kicks for guns'' (originally Air Jordans for guns, now gift cards) for many years.
And that's what happens, junk/unwanted guns by Whites or stolen ones by blacks, they are 'fenced' no questions asked.
Even the hosts of the radio show that began it eventually admitted it makes no difference in crime.
It is nothing more than a PR event for the station and the Orange County Sheriff's Office.
To me it's like the D.A.R.E. program, while it does no harm, it does no good either.
BTW, if you've read Auster on Coulter his opinon of her is little different than mine, way more wrong than right and sleazy.

Survivor said...

Paul, if the purpose of this column were to show that Republicans and conservatives can be as blind on race realism and what is happening in this country as Democrats and liberals, I'd say you have succeeded quite well.

Zenster said...

Ann Coulter seems to believe the only way to enact an American Renaissance is via arming Black people. We at SBPDL believe the only way to enact a true American Renaissance is through similar actions taken by police in heavily Black cities and counties: offer great buy back programs for their guns.

It's springtime and the Kool-Aid™ is flowing freely. Let's examine the ramifications of Coulter's suggestion that American Blacks arm themselves in large numbers.

Within the first week:

A.) Lots of dead sprogs from when baby daddy visits and leaves his piece within easy reach but passes out after too much Olde English 800. Sprog starts nursing on the gun muzzle, next thing you know, sprog brains get splattered all over.

B.) Lots of schoolyard and playground shootings as Deshawn Jr. sneaks off with the household firearm and pops a cap or three into some disagreeable playmates.

C.) More than a few dead spouses as an entire generation of Black adults discover a new method of marital conflict resolution.

Within the first month:

A.) A sharp uptick in self-inflicted or unintentional injuries and deaths as people with little inclination to heed, much less attend, gun safety instruction drop weapons with their safeties off and assorted other violations of common sense gun ettiquete.

B.) Towards month-end, a surge in armed robbery statistics as Blacks engage in a quest to overcome the nettlesome habit that EBT cards have of running out way too soon.

C.) A definite upward trend of police officers being shot or killed when stopping suspects for even the most innocuous sorts of offenses.

Within the first year:

A.) A massive increase in illegal gun transactions as legitimately purchased weapons are traded for drugs, sex or hair weaves.

B.) An escalation in homicides of Black women by Black women as they learn to join in with what was once a relatively exclusive domain of male festivities.

C.) Lots and lots and lots of dead Black people at a price of even more robbed, raped and murdered Whites. A price that even Ann Coulter might find herself questioning, especially if her smarmy White ass coincidentally ended up being the victim of some good old fashioned vibrant and diverse Black crime.

IT'S TIME said...

Gun bybacks are stupid...mmmmkay

Annie has an agenda....mmmmkay

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....If the race batters can some how provoke the Mau Mau to go on the warpath here are a few tips to secure the home.

Nail a 3 or 4 foot long two by four on the floor next to any doors to the house. They can't kick in the door unless they take off the hinges.

A refrigerator or large freezer shoved next to the back or front door will also slow someone from getting inside.

A board or plywood about a foot wide with sharp nails hammered into it and placed by a window. The board must be the length of the window. The nails should be about 1 1/2 to 2 inches long. The weight of a grown man wearing tennis shoes will easily injure the foot. Have the nails close enough so you get at least two nails into the shoe.

If you have to shoot from a window, never get close to the window sill. ALWAYS shoot from as far away as possible so the only guy that can see you is the guy you are shooting at. Never stay in one spot to long. The closer you are to the window the more people will see you.

Use a mattress to shield your children. Bonnie and Clyde at the famous shoot out in a motel used a mattress. John Dillinger and his gang used mattresses at the "hunting lodge" shoot out. It worked. They were up against Thompson Sub Machine guns.

Have motion detector lights for the outside and if you are in a shoot out at night turn off all lights inside the house.

Many things can be used for a weapon. A can of bug spray. Flip your bik and then press the spray nozzle. A flame of fire will shoot out about 2 or 3 feet long. I used this in New York on a Mau Mau that was trying to kick in my door. I kid you not.

If you are buying guns for protection you should also get a flak vest or some kind of body armor. Remember those two bank robbers in L. A. The cops hit them with a shit load of rounds and they just kept shooting.

If you are getting jumped by more than one person and somebody is holding you from the back with their hands. Never try to pull their hands off you. What you do is you GRAD THEIR FINGER AND BEND IT BACK AS FAR AS YOU CAN. You will feel the finger pop about 3 times as you break it. Do this to only one finger on each hand holding you. They will let go real quick. This saved my ass in Frisco back in 1963.

Some of this might sound a little grim, but anything you can do to stay alive is okay. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND YOURSELF

Anonymous said...

She's the same bozo that claimed that Civil Rights was a conservative movement. She may well know the score in private, but she's on a leash. As such, she is useless to any movement wishing to restore this once great nation.

Anonymous said...

Every time I see something on TV about a gun buyback program being held in some 'brown town' locale, I can't help but wonder how many of those guns have already been used in crimes. These gun buybacks are supposedly done with no questions asked, so my guess would be that these programs may have been used by criminals as a means to dispose of evidence that could have otherwise been used against them in court.

Anna Liffey Monocacy said...

FYT,
I believe your take on Coulter's column is correct. It's just too convoluted to be useful when a gloss is needed out of the starting gate.

So CAL Snowman said...

WOW! That has to be one of the most insipid pieces of SPIN and DOUBLESPEAK that I have ever read. I HOPE (but seriously doubt) that you guys understand that the "Trayvon Affair" is just another form of CONTROL. The media is setting us up for a race war, I think we can all agree on that. YET I still see posts that feel THIS will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. THAT FINALLY White America is waking up do to Negro Fatigue and we will finally rid ourselves of this parasitic race. Well IF "THEY" have US fighting EACH OTHER who is FIGHTING THEM?? See my point? The True Controllers KNOW multiculturalism/Diversity is SUICIDE but their minions (DWLs/Talking Media Heads) are just brainwashed sheep without a clue.

Now look at what Coulter is selling: Blacks must find Peace/Safety through Arming Themselves! WAR IS PEACE. The most violent, psychotic race on the planet and SHE WANTS TO ARM THEM?? Can you see through the BULLSHIT YET?? DO you understand how controlled this all is??

One of the worst parts is that O'Reilly actually interjects a pretty monumental TRUTH in the middle of all this diabolical rambling when he says :

"is the left really that concerned about Trayvon Martin or are they concern to get once again ramming their agenda no matter what it is down the throats of the American people under the guise of being sympathetic toward this poor teenager and his family."

Pretty solid work here PK - I just wanted to say that I do not see this site as a "race realist" site. IMHO SBPDL.COM has become a "news-culture-information-networking" platform of the highest order. Clicking on the comments section of any post reveals a wealth of information covering all social, economic and religious concerns. Oh yeah and to the anonymous poster that suggested giving So CAL to the blacks, I know you were kidding, but to quote Eric Cartman,"I'm Seriously" So CAL is the White Man's Manifest Destiny. It's sunny and 65 degrees here every day, I surfed in the morning and snowboarded in the afternoon twice this past winter......Las Vegas, New York, San Fran, Philly, D.C are all just cities, SO CAL is a state of mind.

Anonymous said...

Coulter has fallen off the radar in these last couple years.

Making what can be construed as an, "inflammatory statement", only leads me to believe she is desperately trying to get back in the punditry limelight.

So CAL Snowman said...

OT - Damn.

White Teacher in an LA School

JP said...

The gangbangers are gonna get guns no matter what. Its obvious who/why the buybacks are targeted to and they're usually a waste of gov cash given the scams there.

They have a gun buyback deal about once a year in Portland OR. It doesnt get too much news though. Lately it probably would. Last year they had several folks holding up signs or just hanging out nearby offering cash to some folks looking to trade in guns. Apparently you can find the occasional deal/collectors item.

As for Coulter... meh all law abiding citizens should arm for self defense.

Anonymous said...

So the 'Democrats are the real racist' crowd thinks expanding gun ownership to people that hate you is a good idea?

Anonymous said...

It's just Coulter with another lame attempt at seriousness by way of irony. But she comes across as merely shrill, undisciplined and absurd. What a shrew.

Witness a cutting-edge Romney supporting Republican. Coulter underscores the proposition that the sooner the empire breaks apart, the better.

Anonymous said...

I like Coulter, she's right about 90% of the time.

Sometimes she's a fucking idiot.

Like most whites, she shies away from honest discussions about race.

Jay Santos said...

Zenster says:

A.) A massive increase in illegal gun transactions as legitimately purchased weapons are traded for ... hair weaves


That's funny. Paul, or Zenster, ought to do a piece on the whole hair weave thing. These hair weaves seem to be gigantically important to the negroes and most of us YT's don't have a clue about it.

Anonymous said...

White law-abiding Americans have to get background checks before buying a gun,at least here in California.Yet,felons with long criminal records have guns galore.
There's obviously a giant underground black market for weapons all over the country.
Maybe "The Great White Hope" Romney will address the issue (when my dog gets his pilot license -lol). As far as I know, not one politician has ever addressed this issue in any way.Not once in my 55 years have I ever heard the topic of a black market in weapons addressed-let alone any actual attempt to put an end to the black market weapon trade.
This is just f*ckin unbelievable to me.
White Americans: protect your children and elderly. The blacks will attack them first,then they will go for the women. White men will be attacked also, but the blacks rather attack people who are less able to fight back. They want the most destruction with least amount of resistance.
I hope that race riots don't break out this summer,but looks like there's a good chance there's going to be some serious violence.Be alert and streetwise. Joe

Anonymous said...

There was a pro-gun organization here in Illinois whose name I think was "Conceal Carry." The guy running it got an FFL (Federal Firearms License) so that he could sell guns. He too was sick of Black Gun Controllers like Jesse Jackson and the NAACP.

So this is what he did. He said that his organization would REFUSE to sell guns to Blacks. Period. Unless either Jesse Jackson, NAACP or some recognized Black leader requested that he sell guns to Blacks.

No Black "leaders" stepped forward to request that he sell guns to Blacks.

He eventually gave up trying to get Illinois to change it's anti-gun ways, what with all the low-IQ gun controllers in Crook County running the State and Chicago, and left to a more pro-gun
area.

Anonymous said...

Ummm, Ann, Blacks have already discovered firearms and have been using them rather proactively in anticipation to a white uprising!
Perhaps the media purposely blocking the cowardly acts of savagery, violent rape & robbery.

…But thank you for trying to incite even more deaths of innocent white people, you stupid cunt.

Good lord, I thought only niggers got affirmative action marks in school, how on earth did this stupid cunt get a law degree?

I'm going to enroll in law school too, it must be easy as getting a black person to have unprotected sex.

FYT said...

DC Metro strikes again:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/transportation/2012/04/metro-defibrillator-failed-during-riders-fatal-heart-attack/510226

Bogolyubski said...

Speaking of Coulter's dumbass notion of "expanding gun ownership", I have to wonder if the 'nurse' who murdered the young white mother and kidnapped her child the other day legally owned the firearm from which she emptied seven shots into the hapless unarmed 24-year old woman, who was in "the wrong place at the wrong time" (taking her child to a doctor appointment).

Blacks have plenty of access to guns, often with the advantages of not having to go through NICS checks, waiting periods, etc. - so the notion is laughable in several respects.

Hirschibold said...

I see tranny neck/witch hair is back up to her usual bag of tricks.

rjp said...

Ann Coulter is a fucking idiot.

The only place I would advocate every negro having a gun is Africa. I am sorry for the White people in South Africa trying to protect what they have, but they have to realize it has already been done and it is only a matter of time. Get out, give the African negroes guns, let them kill each other.

rjp said...

Oh ..... and I forgot to add the most important thing I have always thought.

Ann Coulter looks like a woman that beds negroes. First time I heard her name and saw a picture, I thought "n!88erfvcker".

Anonymous said...

I can't believe the number of people here who actually think Coulter was serious on this subject. Hello! Definitely a blunt attempt at sarcasm by Annie.

SKIP said...

I wonder if the police would buy back my M4A3 for $1400 or my AK47 for $600 and multiple hand guns for fair value! Cheap to buy back guns from blacks because for the blacks it would usually be 100% profit for a stolen gun with which they had previously committed a crime and are now disposing of the evidence.

Paul Rian said...

Um.. pretty much everyone here, bar FrenchKiss, is missing the point. Gun buybacks never ever get guns off the street that will/have genuinely be/been used in crimes. If they did, would you not have heard heard of it from the media? Probably about once every oh, hour or so?

No, at best all they do is let thugs or their enablers hand in rubbish guns in exchange for something that can be converted into cash and used to buy a more effective weapon. Not that most thugs need guns when they know their unsuspecting victims will be unarmed.

More usually, some teenage scumbag gets to hand in the weapon his mother, grandmother, whatever, depends on to have a little security against other blacks. If the weapon has been used in a crime, oh well, he picked it up out of the gutter and just thought it should be returned safely to the authorities. Want to bet there has been one single prosecution of a thug handing in his weapon?

Ms. Coulter's argument ridicules black 'leaders' who claim that a world where noone but thugs is armed would be better. It doesn't say anything about gun buybacks, which are utterly without value.

Anonymous said...

Umm, guys you know that coulter is a humorist mostly, right? Very funny girl. Read her books. This stuff she does is mostly just tongue in cheek to point out the hypocrisy of the left. This arming blacks is just a joke she knows it will never happen and she is just pointing out their brainwashing.
Her Romney support is getting old though.

Anonymous said...

Great article PK, glad you wrote about Coulter on O'Reilly. I commented about it on your NJ post yesterday and borrowed your wonderful term IHAD. Which she is. Besides worshipping Martin King and Lincoln, she says last year's London riots had NOTHING to do with race. It was about the economy!

Anonymous said...

I haven't seen much TV since the 90s, but I am familiar with Ann Coulter. I suspect she is attempting to use some reductio ad absurdum in some way to play gotcha with those who are pushing "The Narrative". Given how much SWPL-types love ironic stuff, I suspect that, that is really the only way to make them stop and think that their position is crazy.

Anonymous said...

Coulter is just a goof. This is what's being sold as "conservative" these days. No wonder the mainstream media gives her a platform.

R Neville said...

SoCal---I believe you are right. Whites are beginning to wake up. Why? Well, if it is any indication it would be from the blacks living in predominately white suburbs. I work by three of these guys, and they have been going to the range, and arming up. I think they are scared. These bozos used to talk it up about Ashtrayvon, but have been oddly silent the last week or so.
Ex New Yorker--thanks for the advice. I think you could write a really good book about urban survival and combat. The ones on the market don't seem to have the personal experiences like you have written about.
I liked the matress and nail boards especially. I also have been told that having a horizontal "kick" board (attached to a perpendicular 2x4 that is afixed to a ceiling beam) on your basement windows will break a leg if they try to kick it in.

Anonymous said...

So the 'Democrats are the real racist' crowd thinks expanding gun ownership to people that hate you is a good idea?

Is that a question or a statement? Obviously, rhetoric isn't your strong point. That's okay, and I'll indulge you nevertheless:

Its a good idea similar to the way giving them crack is a good idea. It causes their innate propensity toward dysfunction to fully manifest, and therefore the race divide is furthered.

That is good for whites.

Blacks and whites (as individual groups) have the same access to both crack/coke and guns. It's only the blacks that go off the rails with either, as a group.

So, let them go off the rails as much as possible. It causes more people to awaken, and hopefully will keep us from having to accommodate their never-ending dysfunction forever.

If it takes increased black violence to eventually free our education system from having to lower its standards,a cross the board, because both English and math are rayciss, then so be it. If it takes temporarily increased black violence to eventually free my city of black gang-banging, rape, robbery, and murder, then so be it.

You are under the impression that we are intimidated by those that 'hate us', especially when they are armed. You have never been more wrong.

Lord Drek said...

My wife bought a copy of the Blues Brothers (1980), so I watched it.

Black culture is depicted as glorious and cool. Whites (the Blues brothers and others) are hopelessly incapable of emulating Blacks' sense of style and soul. Blacks are a source of inspiration for the clueless white people.

We have been under assault for a long time, haven't we?

YIH said...

@Zenster:
It's springtime and the Kool-Aid™ is flowing freely. Let's examine the ramifications of Coulter's suggestion that American Blacks arm themselves in large numbers.
No [golf clap] here; [loud applause and whistles]!
As you pointed out, mAnn Coulter 'just doesn't get it' s(h)e is the stereotypical neocon who thinks ''we can 'fix them' with our 'conservative' family values''.
We've been trying to bring our 'conservative' 'family values' to those who don't understand them and in fact OPENLY REJECT THEM no matter where they are.
If we can't 'fix them' here how can we 'fix them' over there?

MB said...

Women in politics. Sigh. They think they're being clever. It's the MSM version of Connie Chastain syndrome.

Zenster said...

FYT: DC Metro strikes again:

http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/transportation/2012/04/metro-defibrillator-failed-during-riders-fatal-heart-attack/510226


On my honor, I promise that I haven't opened the link:

Let me guess; the de-fib unit's battery pack was stolen by scrappers?

Tell me I'm wrong. I dare you.

YIH said...

@Lord Drek:
"The Blues Brothers'' is my favorite movie, and I disagree with your opinion of it.
Did you think ''the mall scene'' was not funny?
How 'bout the bar they played in where ''we like both kinds of music, country and western!'' the music IS good and the scene is funny! (chicken wire).
Back then blacks at least provided us entertainment to earn money.
Now they don't give a damn, they are simply parasites.
We need a ''flea collar'' for black ''fleas'' now.
If actual fleas can do a ''flea circus'' why can't blacks?
Just like other wild animals, they can be entertaining if humanely controlled.

Anonymous said...

Ten years ago I knew a former heroin addict that collected guns. He'd buy them from the 18th street gangmembers(latinos) that sold him drugs.

He'd get in the car, his dealer would tell him 'it's under the seat'(in a paper sack) and $150 later he had a nice weapon that would cost $600+ legally.

He sobered up and disposed of them in pieces in trashcans all over LA.

No black is going to buy guns legally.

Shooting ranges are for whites and asians, and the ocassional mexi.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker again.....More on body armor....The last few years in New York I live in the Soho. Near where I lived there was a store that sold BULLET PROOF SHIRTS. As I recall the shirts sold for something like $1,800.00. Now you can buy them really cheap. I just got through trolling some web sights and I was surprised how cheap they sell for now. Do your own search. Type in BULLET PROOF SHIRTS....KEVLAR SHIRTS...BODY ARMOR...etc. If not for you, for your family. Armed and ARMORED is best. I know a lot of you out there are in black-zones and for some reason can't head for the hills.
I was on the ground and getting shit kicked by three Mau Maus one night on Second Avenue. What saved me was a garbage can lid. I used it as a shield. Not only did I do street time I also did a lot of hitchhiking in the early 1960's. I would wrap my bed roll (blanket) around a sledge hammer handle and a rope to sling it over my shoulder. With a sledge hammer handle I would aim for the knee cap. It is hard for a guy to fight standing on one leg.
I used every trick in the book to be safe. A sharpened beer can opener (they kept cutting a whole in my back pocket). Car antenna comes in handy. And for awhile I carried sand in my back pocket to throw into a persons face. In NYC knives and guns were against the law. There was no law against crescent wrenches.

Anonymous said...

I can see us heading for a future in which guns are illegal for personal ownership and only the government police and military will have them. This is the only way to prevent the populace from exercising its right to eliminate a government that no longer functions as intended by the will of its majority people.

Blacks will be used, and given much power, to enforce the will of the elite and to attempt to break the will of any resistance.

There is a book, from the late 70's, whose name can, apparently, (I've tried twice) not be mentioned on this site, which predicts these events. Although I've not heard of any recent book burnings, surely, denying their memory, and relevence, will serve the same purpose.

Do people not deserve the information to draw their own conclusions?

Anonymous said...

HERE'S WHO HAS THIS RIGHT, AND ANYBODY ELSE IS NOT PAYING ATTENTION:

"FYT said...

" Honestly, I think Coulter is trying to subvert the liberal argument for gun control by using their favorite demographic against them.

" She knows negroes are not going to be joining the NRA or start buying lots of expensive guns.

" The net effect of someone like Coulter (who blacks and liberals despise) calling for blacks to arm themselves willl be less blacks arming themselves."

:P

Anonymous said...

If the plan is to first segregate them so that once armed they can "party like is dey birfday" and kill themselves off like lemmings with sneakers, count me in. Otherwise, the proper solution is to stop. Stop paying. Stop supporting. Stop recognizing any authority that their "leaders" might think they have. Stop listening to them. Stop participating in your own genocide. It's obvious that the removal of white assistance will spell the end of their very existence. What are we waiting for?

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter looks like a woman that beds negroes. First time I heard her name and saw a picture, I thought "n!88erfvcker".

Common knowledge

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter is rayciss'n'sheeit

Anonymous said...

Fortunately, black people don't listen to Ann Coulter.

Anonymous said...

It is utterly inappropriate for someone to use the Zimmerman case in this convoluted way.

Furthermore, to state that, "I won't be like some other in the media and claim to -- and jump to conclusions on it. We are going to have a trial", is inconsistent. The fact that there is going to be a trial is because some people jumped to the conclusion that the police were not justified in determining that no crime had been committed.

Anonymous said...

This woman seems quite dangerous if you read her ramblings or watch the TV talk. Nothing wrong with women having a healthy educated mind, but Ann is a bloody nutcase in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

To those who opine that Coulter is a humorist. I agree, she is a joke. Her "attempts" at humor are pathetic. If you're going to use irony, you should be subtle, have wry wit, and temper it with intelligence. Coulter is simply an opportunistic Republican hack; and a boor. Go Mitt!

What makes her stand out is simply that Obama supporters are completely humorless. I also suggest that she start hanging and McN. A few double cheeseburgers and a sack of extra large frys couldn't hurt her physiognomy.

white is right said...

i usually go with what dear ann say's! but definitely not this time little annie. what are you out of your f-ing mind girl? to me this is like saying you should gulp down more sugar if you are a diabetic. sometimes i wish people would just keep these crazy thoughts to themselves. what's next little annie give these black bastards a check for those old slaving days? which brings me to this never mentioned fact. shouldn't whites also be compensated for the civil war. blacks talk about reparations for slavery. right? well what about the whites that lost kin fighting to free them slaves in the civil war? i think those who lost white kin should be compensated then! people will say those solders were compensated with their monthy pay! well then i will say those blacks(slaves) were compensated with their freedom! as they say you can't put a price on freedom people. annie don't ever say give blacks more guns you idiot.ever!!!

Anonymous said...

"My wife bought a copy of the Blues Brothers (1980), so I watched it.

Black culture is depicted as glorious and cool."

This has been going on for decades.

However, as black culture has become increasingly openly vile (rap music), it is becoming difficult to depict it as "cool".

Several years ago Pepsi was forced to drop Ludacris as their pitchman (WTF were they thinking??) when O'Reilly publicized his lyrics.

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter's position to arm black people is actually a good idea.

Since black people commit most violent crime against other blacks, they should be armed to defend against their own …. and be encouraged to shoot first and ask questions later.

At the end of the day, there will be a lot less black thugs around.

Dissident said...

Off topic, but:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/TV-reporter-assaulted-live-691235

This Negro exhibiting TNB, grabs the mic from a TV reporter and yells, "I'm a NIGGER", into the mic.

Yep....I'd have to agree.

YIH said...

@Zenster:
I opened the link. Those batteries were physically there, but they'd already gone to battery heaven.
Just plain bad luck. $#!+ happens, sometimes it's simply not the niggers fault.
I still believe in lex parsimoniae AKA Occam's razor.

Zenster said...

YIH: If we can't 'fix them' here how can we 'fix them' over there?

We can, but only in the veterinary sense.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/21, 2012 6:33 AM): Since black people commit most violent crime against other blacks, they should be armed to defend against their own …. and be encouraged to shoot first and ask questions later.

At the end of the day, there will be a lot less black thugs around.


Not to mention lots of dead Whites at the hands of wannabe thugs who were encouraged to become armed by abject idiots like Coulter.

In the absence of all Whites exercising their concealed carry rights, increased arming of Blacks is an idea that ranks right up there with New Coke™.

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter is a brain dead moron who toes the line of acceptability by saying outrageous things that wannabe conservatives parrot because they know it gets under liberal skin and she does it because it makes her money. In reality, she is no more conservative or genuine than Stephen Colbert. In the event that you agree with her on some topic, just remember that your point of view is done a disservice by being spouted from her lips (and their close proximity to that pronounced Adam's apple in the middle of her freakishly long neck).

10mm AUTO said...

Whoa Guys! (And Ladies!) Ann was simply trying to illustrate the Hypocrisy and Political agenda behind DWL "concern" for Trayvon as a way to attack self defense laws.

The Liberal agenda is to remove Whites force so that the government has a monopoly on the gun. If DWL really believed that Whites were hunting negroids for sport, then their advice should be to "Arm the blacks" as she said in her statement. But DWL are only interested in power (by any means necessary) so they are using this event to attack "Stand your ground" laws which encourage gun ownership, most especially handgun ownership.

As Ann Says: If the negroid argument is that Trayvon really had the "right" to be where he was and he was innocent, then Liberals should be saying that negroids should be able to defend themselves from the evil White (or Latino) man. She is illustrating that this is another DWL attempt of trying to implement Gun Control.

Negroids are as armed up as they every are going to be, a 9mm Glock or a "for-tay" and a box of cheap hardball. At home, they have an AK-47 semi that they have never sighted in and some cheap Chinese ammo. The words of Ann are not going to make negroids purchase a 10mm carbine with a ACOG and a nightvision attachment or a bolt 308 with a scope. Most of the male negroids can't even own a weapon legally "cuz de gots a record and sheet".

Don't let the idea of an Armed black population paralyze you. They have what they have and will attack with what they have, you just have to be better.

Also, good point about Jorge not drawing on Treyvon the moment of the confrontation. To Jorge, he had done nothing to be attacked for, but in the negroids eyes he was "disrespecting". I am seeing this more and more as a justification for attacks. (PK recently had a post about three White women shot in Atlanta by a "Security Guard who was "disrespected". Also, there was the massacre at the plant where the negroid was stealing beer and was fired so he killed 9 people, he was "disrespected". Paul could do an entire series on the danger of "disrespecting" the Dusky Plague".

Unless you show fear to the negro, you are challenging him and it will not back down. A whole book can be written on the negro psychology of fear and tribal relations, but suffice to say they are much like dogs without the pleasant personality. Social relations revolve around figuratively "respecting" a person either by speech or by physically showing fear (hence the famous dagger stare) or this clip from rap:

“Dropping verses, casting curses, throwing these hexes on the devils … respect to Farrakhan, but I’m the jungle-don, the new guerrilla, top-ranked honky killer … what do blacks do; they just keep on blowing devils away … evil fucking cracker … I’m tightening up the laces to my steel-toed boots, so I can walk, stomp; we stomp this devil down in the park”
“Planet of da Apes”; Da Lench Mob, Planet of da Apes, 1994, Priority Records, Thorn EMI; now called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.


Note the figuratively "dog rolling on its back" comment to Farrakhan. Rap, Hip-hop and black commentary in general) is filled with this type in-tribal messaging, essentially saying "Look you are black and I am black and we are brothers and you have high rank, but I disagree on this subject, I think "X"." A Philologist would have a great time unwinding negroid language locutions. Please note I have never heard a black "respecting" a White in language or in manner except in old movies (Casablanca comes to mind).

Ivan Shatov said...

Going to the range today in about 2 hours. I will keep you posted.

@ Zenster:

Were it not for Martel, Sobieski, El Cid, Isabella, Janos Hunyadi, Don John of Austria, Charlemagne and a host of others we would not know the light European civilization. (And, as you know, Europe is Christianity and Christianity is Europe).

These brave Christian warriors exemplified the muscular masculine Christianity of old Europe. They did not indulge in the moral exhibitionism of self abnegation. They made no apologies for themselves or their ancestors. They understood and unequivocally declared their rectitude.

The Christian phoenix of old Europe shall rise again or we die and civilization with us.

Ivan Shatov said...

What's the name of the book from the late '70's mentioned by Anonymous on April 20, 2012 10:18 PM? Please email me at ivandshatov@gmail.com You've piqued my curiosity.

Tyrone shoelaces said...

That guy in the video needs to get himself a big black dog!

How do you go on tv in Cleveland and tell all the n-words that are watching that now your home is gun-free? Every n-word watching that will see if they recognize him so that they can rob that n-word !

As far as laws to disarm n-words, I am against them. They serve just like the drug laws do. The n-words still get their drugs or their guns, but the government that enables all of this crap gets more authority and control of our lives so they can pass more libtard laws so we can all pay for more niglet education(sports and daycare)

Let them have their guns. They mostly use them on n-words.

Get that black dog yet?

Anonymous said...

This is simply standard useless Conservative drivel, you can't separate it from the firing of John Derbyshire. These establishment Conservatives are completely subservient to the left (particularly on race), look to them for respectability, and can only argue social issues from a leftist perspective, e.g. - Liberal policies and beliefs that destroyed Detroit are bad because they are bad for the blacks left there, not because they are destroying Western Civilization. Basically it comes down to Conservative women like Ann Coulter and Rich Lowery shrieking "ple-e-e-e-ase don't call me a racist, master!"

Diamond Mair said...

Might want to check out Fred Reed: http://www.fredoneverything.net/Zimmerman.shtml

Semper Fi'
DM

Bogolyubski said...

FYT's points (raised by others):
" Honestly, I think Coulter is trying to subvert the liberal argument for gun control by using their favorite demographic against them.

" She knows negroes are not going to be joining the NRA or start buying lots of expensive guns.

" The net effect of someone like Coulter (who blacks and liberals despise) calling for blacks to arm themselves willl be less blacks arming themselves."


The first one could be true, but do keep in mind that AC is a mudskank who worships at the altar of St. Martin the Adulterer, thinks the civil rights act (which abolished freedom of association for whites) was "conservative", etc. AC's record is clearly indicative of a DWL who wears a Reagan mask. The fact that she's shilling for the DWL elitist Mittens Underoos, Capt. of the Big-Gov Luvboat, speaks volumes about her supposed "conservatism."

She might not know this at all, and in fact hopes that more groids join the NRA in order to diversify it.

Coulter's advocacy remark will have zero effect on the black rate of arms possession. If anything, more black females will arm out of sheer hatred for a white blonde (the favorite sex-object of black males worldwide) - resulting in more murderous attacks like the one in Houston the other day.

Anonymous said...

Uncle Sam should mail every negro in America a Harvard diploma then they all be edjumacated and sh*t and then they will all be respectable and sh*t like that and then they all will be lovin whitey and there be no reason for the brothers to carry and then we be havin alot of engineers and architects and sh*t like that ... and America be number #1 again you be hearin me crackers../ lol / Joe from the Bronx (now in California)

Anonymous said...

I like 1 of Coulters books BUT she said NUTSO things about Amanda Knox, that Amanda was guilty.
Check the facts Ann!!!!

Anonymous said...

Paul..pls put a like button here so we can 'like' a comment.
also if you put a respond button youll get more readers, i think

Anonymous said...

I did not read all of Anns stuff, but she is A POLEMICIST.

IT'S TIME said...

off topic:

CNN is continue to stoke the race war fire--what does Rodney King have to do with this?

http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#/video/us/2012/04/21/piers-bts-rodney-king-trayvon-martin.cnn

Bogolyubski said...

Diamond Mair: Might want to check out Fred Reed: http://www.fredoneverything.net/Zimmerman.shtml

Semper Fi'
DM


Seconded. This is one of Reed's most effective articles. In a rational country with genuine free discourse and political discussion as opposed to a managed 'debate' between nominal factions of the single ruling party, the article would be reprinted in every single local newspaper, every mainstream website. It would be widely available everywhere to anyone.

All Reed did here was to state the essential truth of the current affairs - in a very calm and matter-of-fact way. To those who control the flow of information, Reed is a "dangerous extremist" and this site is a hotbed of hate. (BTW, while the internet is relatively free at the moment, the "conservatives" such as Lamar Smith are busy at work on reviving the SOPA and PIPA laws to take over the internet - allowing sites to be shut down by DHS on mere accusations).

Ivan Shatov said...

Yep, Ann lost much of her credibility with her Knox tomfoolery. Additionally, she spent much of her conservative capital when she endorsed Christy and then Romney.

Knox was railroaded pure and simple and Ann, whose iconoclastic views are frequently spot on, more than missed the boat, she did Knox an egregious injustice. Nary a word from her since.

I've read every one of her books but am unlikely to read another.

W74 said...

Blacks might trade in their guns for $100 but they'll buy another one later on for more than that.

Blacks will go to a pawn shop and pawn their Xboxes for $50 and then buy one next month for $300.

Blacks will rent rims for their vehicle to go along with their monthly payments. They never plan on actually owning anything. Everything is transient.

Blacks will buy bling and watches for hundreds, even thousands of dollars and then pawn them or trade them at a "cash for gold" shop for a tenth of twentieth of what they bought it for. Later they'll just get more at full price.

They'll do the same with their guns. It's obvious from the video that there's more in their hands than we think.

Is there anything new under the sun?

Anonymous said...

@IT'STIME
The black panthers spokesman in Sanford threatened rodney king type riots across the country if the trial doesn't turn out they way they want. That's why "rodney king" is now being mentioned. It's disgusting-- but that's the reason.Joe

Kylie said...

"In the absence of all Whites exercising their concealed carry rights, increased arming of Blacks is an idea that ranks right up there with New Coke™."

Shouldn't that be "In the absence of all conservative Whites..."?

While I don't ever advocate violence or illegal activity, I can't say I'd be sorry to learn a few (as in "a few million") white leftists were picked off by the blacks they champion.

Blacks are not our enemies, they are the weapons our enemies use against us, with increasing effectiveness.

Zenster said...

YIH: Just plain bad luck. $#!+ happens, sometimes it's simply not the niggers fault.

As someone who assiduously subscribes to William of Ockham's (borrowed) maxim, please note that I mentioned "scrappers" and not niggers.

That said, whomever was responsible for the periodic maintenance and upkeep of those portable de-fib units should be out of a job right about now.

Zenster said...

Ivan Shatov: They did not indulge in the moral exhibitionism of self abnegation.

[golf clap]

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: Unless you show fear to the negro, you are challenging him and it will not back down.

This is about the best explanation anyone is ever going to get regarding the near-automatic violence of Blacks.

Even the, for us, civilized effort to treat Blacks as equals is an affront to their delusions of adequacy (much less their fantasies of superiority). Anything other than abject tail-between-the-legs submission "disrespects" their fragile, eggshell thin sense of what passes among them for "dignity".

Small wonder that they are continually chimping out as just about every last damn thing they see, hear and touch in White America reminds them of what total f&%king failures they are. They take such immense pride in their skin color even though it may as well be a glowing neon sign flashing "EPIC FAIL", "EPIC FAIL", "EPIC FAIL", "EPIC FAIL" for all to see.

Please note I have never heard a black "respecting" a White in language or in manner except in old movies (Casablanca comes to mind).

Maybe it's just me but I have noticed how often Black men automatically address me as "chief" or "boss" in casual conversation. Maybe it's just to put me off my guard … or the fact that they understand how I will just as soon bust their chops as give them the time of day.

Bogolyubski said...

Kylie: Blacks are not our enemies, they are the weapons our enemies use against us, with increasing effectiveness.

That's not the case, Kylie. They are very much our enemies and have been more than willing to carry out the dirty war against whites for at least five decades now. That said, their hateful desires would have been quite ineffective were it not for the white and semi-white elite under whose direction and protection the onging war has been waged.

There is a vast infrastructure in place - entrenched in every single western institution from government, academia, law, military and police, media and entertainment, and even churches - whose 'prime directive' is to destroy whites and the society which sprang from their civilization. The overwhelming majority of the support for the dirty war comes from whites themselves - DWLs.

Take for example the murderous attack in Tulsa upon the elderly white couple Bob and Nancy Strait. Mrs. Strait was raped before being murdered. The yoots and honah stoodintz responsible will be exempt from the death penality because our "conservative" supreme court has decreed that executing a savage teenager violates the UN-notion of morality (which is really humorous in light of the types of regimes whose minions sit on UN human rights councils). Nobody is looking to seek justice for the elderly couple - not even the local Tulsa prosecutors, who are much more interested in going after the "white" Cherokee guy who killed some blacks in response to the failure of the "justice" system to put away his dad's killers.

Not only will the thugs be exempt from death penalty, they will have an entire legal team with endless funds and lawyer-hours devoted to fighting even a life-sentence (also now under attack from the usual suspects as being 'cruel and unusual' and 'racist') all the way through the myriad levels of courts. Who is funding all this? Black hip-hop artistes? Athleeetz? Not at all. That which is not being funded by armed extortion of taxpayers is being paid for by the very same folks who own both nominal political parties, all major corporations and foundations. Thanks to a certain little law passed nearly a century ago, the overlords can create money at the touch of a button - literally. Those who have the power to legally counterfeit (their bogus money having been decreed to be 'legal tender') have unlimited funds to buy whatever or whomever they want. There is a reason I refer to this country as the Banksta Banana Republic.

Midwestern said...

Isn't Ann Coulter dating "JJ" Jimmy Walker "Dynomite" the Good Times TV show? Might explain a lot of her statements.

blanc de seine saint denis said...

Hi Zenster and those who are not anti french:) Tomorrow is the day of Marine Le Pen I hope..if she's not elected so there will still be more muslims and white still commit suicid..they will see it in 30 years...but who is the Lepe, geert wilders of the USA?Have US People forgotten their pride?? Are they only concerned by NBA superstars??

Discard said...

Ann Coulter: N-word F-word. Not on our side.

Anonymous said...

Racial diversity comes to Boston Hempfest

http://cofcc.org/2012/04/boston-hempfest-ends-with-black-mob-attacking-white-man/#respond

Anonymous said...

You missed her point, and the delivery of it, completely. She's a lot more subtle than she's given credit for. Too many people in this movement think that if you don't come on like a sledgehammer that you don't get the message.

W74 said...

"Pepsi was forced to drop Ludacris as their pitchman (WTF were they thinking??) when O'Reilly publicized his lyrics."

Keep posting the lyrics to rap songs on the web. There's far too many White kids from my generation and subsequent ones who were brainwashed into thinking their jungle beats were "cool."

All too often I hear the music groids play on their iPods while walking around campus, loud enough to hear the lyrics sometimes (though not clearly) and it's disgusting. Sometimes they'll come from outside into the library while I'm trying to work with the music still playing. It's no different than when the come from outside into the library while YELLING on their cell-phones. Of course if you were to point out what they were doing, it would be a hate crime.

Anyway, all I'm saying (and I know I rant) is to post (true and verifiable) rap lyrics elsewhere. If that doesn't wake up a few more here and there then at that point they're lost.

Kylie said...

"'Kylie: Blacks are not our enemies, they are the weapons our enemies use against us, with increasing effectiveness.'

That's not the case, Kylie. They are very much our enemies and have been more than willing to carry out the dirty war against whites for at least five decades now."


You are right. I should have said that blacks are not the enemies we need to fear most.

"That said, their hateful desires would have been quite ineffective were it not for the white and semi-white elite under whose direction and protection the onging war has been waged."

Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for clarifying my point. White elites encourage and direct black rage against non-leftist whites. White elites also have control of the justice system, the educational system, the armed forces, the MSM, etc. Without blacks, they could still wage war on us. Without white leftist support, black "rage" would collapse, though some criminality would remain.

Zenster said...

blanc de seine saint denis … but who is the Lepe, geert wilders of the USA?

Sadly, there is none. Race Realism, Islam and immigration are all political third rails. To mention them is the kiss of death for any aspiring or incumbent candidate.

Have US People forgotten their pride??

Yes. Over 50 years of demoralization by Cultural Marxism has taken its toll.

Are they only concerned by NBA superstars??

Far too often, they are. The sacralizing of organized sports in America is one of the most emasculating forces currently in play. The idolization and hero worship devoted to professional athletes is an obscenity, the depths of which defy description.

People have almost entirely forgotten that you must be your own hero. That each of us must strive for the epic and noble in our lives. This vital task is now left to others and they are not even our astronauts or scientists. One need only survey the plethora of Magic Negroes in modern cinema to comprehend this.

To say that our modern idols have feet of clay would be a kindness. More often they are narcissistic megalomaniacs with completely demagnetized moral compasses. The process of demagnetization has almost become a rite of passage into adulthood. What began with Kitty Genovese has morphed into a society of discourteous, solopsistic hedonists who, nonetheless, wax hysterical over snail darters and nonexistent anthropogenic global warmening.

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2132933/Gunman-stalked-couples-motels-forced-sex-caught--shows-court-traffic-summons.html

IT'S TIME said...

blanc de seine saint denis:

I hope Le Pen wins by a landslide!

I wish we had more women in US politics like Arizona's Janice Brewer.

Have you noticed its the conservative women in politics that don't take shit from the mostly male government who support outsiders--in our case border illegals--in your case--muslims? They are the only ones who have the true guts to speak it and stand by it--and not back track from what they believe.

I am sure Le Pen will end your mangey muslim problem and possibly make your country a place I would like to visit one day. For now, not.

No offense guys:}

Mutant Swarm said...

@ Zenster:

"Maybe it's just me but I have noticed how often Black men automatically address me as "chief" or "boss" in casual conversation. Maybe it's just to put me off my guard … or the fact that they understand how I will just as soon bust their chops as give them the time of day."

The black guy I used to work with, who used to be a guard at San Quentin, told me that if a black addresses you as "chief," or especially, "boss," he has been in prison. Of course, by now there could be bleed over into the black culture, in the same way "saggin'" started out in prison.

Anonymous said...

@IT'STIME
You Go Girl! lol
I have alot of respect for women who stand up for their white race.Especially these days when some very intense forces are working against the whites.
I thought you gave some good solid advice yesterday: Use Your Brains
Alot of whites have been so brainwashed from 24/7 "tolerance" and "diversity" propaganda that they have blinders on and are very naive-- tons of whites here in California are like "hey dude,it's all good". lol
Well,it's not all good and my fellow white Americans need to be more alert and streetwise, especially if race riots break out.Joe

Full Auto said...

Another masterful comment Zenster. Excellent.

Eustace Mullins said...

w74-great observation about blacks pawning crap. no wonder they can't afford child support. I worked with a guy that owed support, yet bought a $300 shirt to wear to a party and probably smoked that much worth of dope a week. I couldn't stand him after that. The password is Mexico, like in the movie.

zen-i was afraid you wouldn't be able to bring up islam for a change, but you found a way. congrats! you're officially a bore.

Anonymous said...

Gunj buyback proigrams are nothing but a nio questions way for darkies to dispose of weapons used to commit murders. As it is, they are seven or eight times more likely to kill whites than the reverse in unprovked attacks. Gun buyback programs willl ensure the mruders of a growing number of whites is never solved. Worse they turn in old weapons that do not work, or are otherwise junk, not their Ak-47's altred to fire fully automaticaly, not their stolen U.S. miltiary weapons, not their UZI's, MAC-10's, grenades, .50 caliber sniper rifles, RPG's and other military firepower gangs are known to have. The way to curb black crime is confiscate their weapons whenever possible. Kill blacks when they committ robberies, either by civilian or police gun shots. Jail them when they commit gun crimes for long terms, or execure them. The same should be also done with Hispanics. Illegals who come here and committ any crime of violence or trafficking should be executed immediately as enemy insurgents.

Zenster said...

Full Auto: Another masterful comment Zenster. Excellent.

Thank you so much, Full Auto. From your own comments it is clear that you fully comprehend what I mean about how "you must be your own hero".

The tragedy of this is truly incomprehensible. A generation or more of Americans have lost all sight of the ultimate sacrifice made by our WWII veterans (not to dismiss any Korean or Vietnam partichants). The notion of civic duty, public service and actual patriotism has been lost in a wash of consumerist driven mindlessness the likes of which were totally alien just a few short decades ago.

Again, thank you for taking to heart this agonizing lamentation of mine. America's legacy pivots upon an decreasingly small number of dedicated and combat-ready individuals who have yet to be dissuaded of this nation's greatness when it comes to our sole and undeniably successful role as lab-rat in the great experiment of Democracy.

Once more, thank you.

Anonymous said...

White elites also have control of the justice system, the educational system, the armed forces, the MSM, etc.

The actual soldiers and enforcers of the laws, however, are overwhelmingly white and conservative.

This is a large problem for them, as they essentially request that their soldiers enforce their laws against their own self-interest. No matter how they spin their politics, the military in this country will always be inherently conservative and nationalist.

All it takes is for soldiers to realize that the black man to their left, or in command, is more their enemy than is the white man in front of them, and it won't matter to what far end the elites aim to take their communist politics.

Anonymous said...

Blacks are not our enemies, they are the weapons our enemies use against us, with increasing effectiveness.

...Says the person who doesn't live around a significant number of blacks, and doesn't understand the nature of politics and political power. Sincerely, no offense. Please keep coming back and posting, it's just that this perspective, in-particular, is incorrect.

Zenster said...

Eustace Mullins: zen-i was afraid you wouldn't be able to bring up islam for a change, but you found a way. congrats! you're officially a bore.

Oh, joy. Yet another indispensable validation from Saint Eustace the Entertaining (not!). My life is, once again, complete.

PS: When you get the chance, turn around and look behind you for all the positive and supportive comments that, somehow, just aren't there. Surprise!

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous: The actual soldiers and enforcers of the laws, however, are overwhelmingly white and conservative.

1. Not so much as in the past. Most true patriots are now weeded out of military and law enforcement. The rulers want those who will obey orders - any orders - without question. Note also the large infusion of both black and Mexican gangs into the active-duty military, along with women.

2. The active-duty military and police had no problem with slaughtering unarmed women and children, nearly all white, in Waco, TX in 1993. Likewise, the mostly white Oklahoma National Guard - fresh back from serving in Curious Jorge's Misunderestimated Mesopotamian Misadventures - had no problems obeying a blatantly unconstitutional order to disarm middle-class homeowners from the Ebonics-spluttering moron 'Pohleece Cheeph' of New Orleans in the wake of Katrina.

This notion partially stems from Hollywood-generated mythology about WW II, which held that the Waffen-SS and other Nazi units were somehow different than most soldiers in armies worldwide - whose primary training is to obey the orders issued by their superiors without question. Note also how the Marines, who publicly were against the repeal of DADT, are now vigorously implementing the Sodomite agenda with no resistance.

Hopefully there will be some defectors from the ranks, but it's folly to think that most will hesitate to deploy their weapons against any whites who contemplate armed resistance against BRA. They will obey orders - even orders issued by a person who has multiple SS numbers and a very dubious (at best) nativity story who is clearly the dancing-monkey of a treasonous and genocidal elite. Of course, any who do obey such orders are themselves actual traitors and are fully deserving of the ultimate penalty for their treachery. Forget not that Benedict Arnold himself, whose name is a byword for treason, wore the Army blue.

Silent Running said...

There is a book, from the late 70's, whose name can, apparently, (I've tried twice) not be mentioned on this site, which predicts these events.

I know this book. Sorry, but when every other villain is a Mossad agent or an Israeli colonel, the work quickly loses credibility. Besides, the author is openly fascist and his solution to our problem is the fascist solution: authoritarianism, vast government, and life ruled by a handful of unaccountables (who are themselves members a homoerotic secret society).

If survival is on your radar, you can do much, much better than the work in question.

but who is the Lepe, geert wilders of the USA?

We'll get them when we've sunk as far as you have.

The actual soldiers and enforcers of the laws, however, are overwhelmingly white and conservative.

The world has passed you by. The actual soldiers and enforcers of the law disarmed whites after Katrina.

Oop, there I go again, being a completely unprincipled cop-hater. I guess I should just tell myself that the cops who just shot my wife and took my guns were among the "few bad apples" I keep hearing about.

Bogolyubski said...

Thanks for the link to the video, Silent Running. For those who still insist on believing in mythology they were taught in public edumacation and TV, take a look at the video and note the race of the fully armed military who were lawlessly breaking/entering private homes and seizing weapons and arresting homeowners for arming themselves. Also note the race of the 'pohleece cheeph' giving the orders. The soldiers alleged loyalty to the constitution is meaningless - the were in open violation of the fourth and second amendments right there on camera for all to see. If they had actually been loyal to the constitution, they would have turned their weapons upon those who issued lawless unconstitutional orders. In a nutshell, they are traitors who will obey any order without question, and should be regarded as such. In a sane society, every one who obey the lawless orders would face immediate dishonorable discharge.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous 7:46 PM

You said "All it takes is for soldiers to realize that the black man to their left, or in command, is more their enemy than is the white man in front of them, and it won't matter to what far end the elites aim to take their communist politics."

--> Keep dreaming. As I said in another post. There are thousands of foreign troops training across our borders and that are already on our soil in anticipation of civil unrest and Marshall Law.

Not only that, white soldiers are perishing on the battlefield at a phenomenal rate. Most black service-members enter support MOSs. Many learn combat & other survival skills, but they are not perishing on the battlefield at nearly the extraordinary rate that white service-members are. Also, the numbers of minority servicemembers have increased exponentially.

Additonally, white militarymen, both foreign & domestic- will blow the heads off of white civilians, given the command. Keep being delusional that they won't. I've talked to many of them down at the UN in NYC. They say they would have no problem, esp. the foreign soldiers, as many of them hate Americans. Trying to find a solution for "BRA" as you term it, will never happen. Why? Because it's not written in this govt's agenda. There's so much I want to say re: the audacity of the term "BRA" as a black person, but I'll stop here. Maybe in a future post.

The govt is coming for YOU-white ppl- since most gun owners in this nation are white. Trust me, all this military training is not for black America. The black community doesn't even make a blip on the radar until it's time to use us in some way, to further their agenda. Believe it when I say, they're coming for the guns...they're coming for YOU.

Anonymous said...

But, anon blackie@12:48 pm,.. when/IF whites are attacked/corraled, or forced to give up those guns, there will be real resistance for the first time in many decades.

When people are subjugated or attacked, a lot of them will have the tendency to fight back in simple self-defense. Seeing loved ones roughed up, or carried off, would incite plenty of violence

But, one of the few things that will make white Americans angry enough to take up armed resistance is taking their guns. That's a fighting offense in America more than anywhere else.

Also,blacks think that whites can be the only possible target of all others; but, black people haven't made any allies of other races: Hispanics consider you undesirables to live among; you've deliberately alienated Koreans, Orthodox Jews, and plenty of 'Redneck' whites and cops. You are much smaller in numbers than whites and will take almost as much hostility...IF such an event occurs.

Any goon military told to round up white 'subversives' will have to deal with a pretty large group of people who finally feel justified to take up armed rebellion... guerrilla style, in the long run.

Even these days, in the right circumstances, with little other choice, there are whites who will fight back. I'm sick of hearing that ALL whites will give up in that hypothetical scenario. Black men think they're invincible and can roll over whites no matter what.

Anonymous said...

Silent Running:

I stand by my statement that I can see the book being prophetic in the ways I mentioned in my
4/20 @ 10:18 post in regards to our eventual situation due to the actions of our 'controllers,' whoever they may be.

Of course, this literature written so long ago is not totally accurate, nor is it a manual for survival. I merely think its author had a substantial measure of insight. If you will just re-read my previous post and take it as I intended, I think you will appreciate my point of view. Anyway, thanks for your feedback.

ration said...

The gun buyback programs are being implemented in several cities, but do they actually work? It seems to me that the only people participating in the programs are law-abiding citizens (the people the guns are around to protect). It just doesn't make sense to me. If someone was using guns for criminal purposes, they would be making way more by committing crime then they would through one lump-sum gun buyback. Real g's won't turn they're guns in and believing they will for a few hundred bucks is really fucking stupid.

Discard said...

ABC News is not where I go to find out how the world is turning. That Katrina video showed some cops playing at infantry. Would they really let news cameramen dogs their heels if they thought there was going to be any shooting? Stagecraft.
Would anyone expect the real soldiers the video showed to say to the camera, "Fuck no, I'm all for these Whites who are ready to shoot Blacks!"? More stagecraft
While living in L.A., I once was ordered out of my house as a fire approached, and I have friends and relatives who have also been ordered out. Evacuations during disasters are routine in some parts of the country, and just as routinely, many people ignore them. Ignore, don't refuse. They'll go away if they can pretend they've done their duty. All they really want is to not have to come back and save your dumb ass. But if you display a weapon, they will, I promise you, get hinky. It's not that they want to leave you helpless. Again, they just don't want to come back later and have to sort out a mess, like a shooting. If you act like an intemperate fool, flashing a weapon or blabbing about Niggers, they will shut you down. Use your head, it's just like being pulled over. If your ducks are lined up, they'll let you be. Of course, if you are unfortunate enough to live in a jurisdiction with excessively dirty cops, like one New Jersey commenter wrote about, you might prefer to have rioters at your door.

Discard said...

Anon at 12:48 PM, Apr 22: You've talked to many military men, both foreign and domestic, down at the United Nations building in New York City, and they say that they'd have no problem blowing our heads off.
Bull Shit. There are are "many" soldiers walking around the UN HQ in NYC (No there aren't), and they will just open their mouths and tell a stranger that they would like to kill White Americans? You need to work on your storytelling.

Anonymous said...

Besides, the author is openly fascist and his solution to our problem is the fascist solution: authoritarianism, vast government, and life ruled by a handful of unaccountables (who are themselves members a homoerotic secret society).

I have some unfortunate news for you. You have two choices: communism or fascism. Your choice. There is no third choice. I recommend you take a long, hard look into both before you speak about either. FYI: libertarianism, and liberal democracy, will both 100% lead to communism. This is obvious to anyone with an understanding of the origin of political power (which is the family, and by extension, the ethnically homogenous community). You will undoubtedly live under one, and so it's important that you make that choice soon. Democracy is merely a placeholder while the social values conversion to communism takes place over many generations. Democracy facilitates the coming of communism of in every way, by allowing foreign groups to compete within the same nation under the disingenuous propaganda of equality and equal opportunity. Democracy is the very reason why foreign political groups can be continuously introduced in this nation to the detriment of the European majority, as any protest leads to accusations of being anti-equality, anti-democratic and fascist. Note that fascism has been demonized in your mind, and the minds of most others who refuse to analyze the politics without prejudice. Look to everything that is demonized in this society for answers to your oppressed political state.

The actual soldiers and enforcers of the laws, however, are overwhelmingly white and conservative.

The world has passed you by

Your assumption that I'm not aware of this is uninformed, and your response borders on being impolite.

You said "All it takes is for soldiers to realize that the black man to their left, or in command, is more their enemy than is the white man in front of them, and it won't matter to what far end the elites aim to take their communist politics."

--> Keep dreaming. As I said in another post. There are thousands of foreign troops training across our borders and that are already on our soil in anticipation of civil unrest and Marshall Law.

"Thousands" of foreign troops, huh? Let's see your credible evidence that isn't from Alex Jones. Furthermore, it will take a lot more than "thousands" of foreign troops to disarm this country.

You've missed the point of my post, and I originally wrote a response to clear up your confusion, but then I realized that you're black and it doesn't matter that you don't understand the implications of my suggestion. It was a post that was intentionally indirect and subtle in it's suggestion. That you didn't grasp that isn't surprising.

Not only that, white soldiers are perishing on the battlefield at a phenomenal rate. Most black service-members enter support MOSs. Many learn combat & other survival skills, but they are not perishing on the battlefield at nearly the extraordinary rate that white service-members are. Also, the numbers of minority service members have increased exponentially.

Again, you don't even understand my metaphor in saying the "black man to the left". You should try to be less of a stereotype. Also, what I got from your post is that combat is not the black man's specialty. Check. We all assume that. Trust us, we are aware of the unjustly disproportionate sacrifice that white soldiers make to keep all of the black soldiers safe behind their desks. That's okay, because we have large numbers of white men, who are natural warriors, to both replace those fallen soldiers as well as combat your desk jockeys if necessary.

Anonymous said...

There's so much I want to say re: the audacity of the term "BRA" as a black person, but I'll stop here. Maybe in a future post.

Well, you're trained from birth to think of yourself as a victim, and so it's not a surprise that all of the extra codified privilege that your race enjoys, even in the face of a savage rates of murder and crime committed by your people, doesn't register. Nor does the utter destruction of any neighborhood that your race touches in any significant way. You just assume that its our burden to accept this state of our cities. Keep living in your bubble.

The black community doesn't even make a blip on the radar until it's time to use us in some way, to further their agenda.

haha...like I said, in a bubble.

Anonymous said...

I don't care what Coulters agenda is, but most of you are missing the point on what she is doing.

Getting black people to join the NRA, which only take respectable citizens can only improve their behaviour.

Secondly, the liberals are using Trayvon to attack stand your ground and the right to bear arms - which if implemented, means only the criminals have and use guns. She is spinning it to our benefit.

Plus, an armed society is a polite society.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous 11:07 PM
“Well, you're trained from birth to think of yourself as a victim,....Keep living in your bubble. “

---> LOL. Living in a bubble eh? Oh, the hilarity of it all. The “audacity” to which I speak has to do with this lying govt. Pres. Obama has no real power. He’s just a figurehead, much like the Queen of England. Both answer to those who run the show from behind the scenes.

Having said that, the black populace is not one- big- monolithic group.Just as the entire white race doesn’t like to be blamed for the negative actions of a few of its members, the entire black race cannot speak on the behalf of those black ppl who’ve assaulted whites.

As an aside, I live in the most linguistically diverse city in America. Multiculturalism is strong in my town. My community is also multi-racial. We all get along and many black ppl have a plethora of friends from diverse cultural backgrounds. I don’t know what is going on in other parts of the U.S., as I have not visited every state in the union, but here, my community is just fine.

I’ve never been raped, robbed or mugged. By the grace of God, not one assault. But as a woman, I certainly can sympathize w/other females regardless of race and on a human level, any victim really. I can only imagine the horror. All criminals should be brought to justice. End of story.

Zenster said...

Anonymous: (4/23, 2012 12:10 PM): Just as the entire white race doesn’t like to be blamed for the negative actions of a few of its members, the entire black race cannot speak on the behalf of those black ppl who’ve assaulted whites.

Oh, yes they can. They can speak to the police and turn in these thugs, rapists and murderers. Do they? It happens so rarely as to be statistically insignificant.

The Black "no snitch" policy is the root and branch of Black crime. Blacks know who the criminals are and, by staying mum, they unleash those malefactors upon Whites and others while, themselves, idiotically suffering under the same lash.

It is stupidity and mulishness on an unforgivable scale and Blacks must take collective responsibility for law enforcement, or the lack of it, in their communities.

Remember, Whites actively track down and prosecute the criminals in their midst. Blacks do nothing of the sort, nor do they feel anything remotely approaching the shame and humiliation at having a criminal record or serving hard time in prison.

All of this is a direct reflection of "no snitch" and the tacit acceptance of criminality within the Black community. So, please, don't try to act surprised or offended when you encounter Whites who are totally f&%king fed up with Black criminality. Little Ashtrayvon found out the hard way just how pissed off people (not just Whites), have gotten about having their belongings stolen, homes broken into, daughters, nieces, wives, aunts, grandmothers and granddaughters raped and abused, not to mentioned murdered, at the hands of Black men.

Purchase a clue and start reporting crime at every opportunity or sit back and honestly admit to yourself and everyone else that you are part of the problem. As you may have noticed by now, Whites have some of the most well-developed problem solving abilities of any race on earth.

When those abilities are, in full measure, turned to solving the issue of Black criminality, woe to anyone who gets in the way.

Silent Running said...

Would they really let news cameramen dogs their heels if they thought there was going to be any shooting? Stagecraft.

The confiscating of weapons, however, was not stagecraft.

They'll go away if they can pretend they've done their duty.

Everything in your comment (and other comments besides) implies that the cops are justified in doing whatever they please to whomever they like, regardless of law. The flagrant violation of the 2nd and 4th Amendments and Posse Comitatus in this case doesn't seem to bother you.

It seems you've accepted your role: cops are the natural order-givers, and "civilians" are the order-followers.

When and if they come for your guns, will you meekly hand them over, Discard? Will you crawl up into the Paddy Wagon to be taken to a FEMA reeducation camp? My suspicion is that your conditioning is deep enough that you will follow the orders that lead to your enslavement. I hope not, but that's the impression I get.

Discard said...

Silent Running: Cops will act as cops generally do, whether I feel they are justified or not. They have certain powers, they carry guns, and expect certain responses from normal White people, because they usually get those responses from normal White people. They get directions from elected officials and carry them out. Evacuation orders during fires and floods are normal government business. Recall how the mayor and government of New Orleans were criticized for bungling the evacuation before Katrina hit? Protecting the citizens by moving them out of harm's way is their job.
Unless you want to get into a shootout with the police who are warning people to leave, understand their position, and adapt to it. As I pointed out, when people don't want to obey an evacuation order from the mayor or governor, they don't defy it, they ignore it, and they don't draw attention to themselves. People do that all the time in SoCal. But letting the cops see guns is definitely drawing attention to yourself. Defiant and armed will make them antsy every time. Cops don't care about the 2nd Amendment when your gun makes them nervous. Understand that and act accordingly.

Anonymous said...

@Zenster

Black people don’t call the police? All anyone has to do is go down to the courthouse and see who is taking whom to court. The generalizations are just ludicrous. There are over 40million of us and every last one supposedly adheres to the “no snitch” policy? Unbelievable. Stop believing everything this lying media feeds you. I thought you were of the few who could “SEE?” You say you want intellectual discourse, and yet it seems, the moment a black person with sense decides to post on this blog, all kinds of accusations and assumptions run wild. My original post was about govt and what they have planned for this nation. A few stayed on topic, but the others? They decided to take the opportunity to link media about white genocide, post books re: who said this and who did that- as if I raped, robbed and killed all those ppl. Then they engage in all this name calling.

If you sincerely want honest dialogue, there needs to be a redress of this issue. Is this how guests are treated? The owner of this blog has not said that he doesn’t want black ppl posting. Therefore, whoever doesn’t like the presence of black ppl here, need to keep it moving. Simply don’t respond to any commentary we give. What prompted my appearance is the folly re: the term “BRA.” I find it a most inaccurate descriptor. Also, I think if anyone makes commentary concerning the black community, it’s only fair that our input is acknowledged. This country has long been on the decline, way before anyone knew that Pres. Obama even existed. But now that a black man is in office, a certain segment of white America, wants to start acting “brand new.” Zenster please.

Your white leaders have been deceiving you since day one. Yet, they went undetected, because they were perceived as one of the ”good old boys,” to the detriment of the ignorant. Where is white America when most of their sons and daughters are being killed in these bogus wars- chasing pseudo terrorists? The current fiasco has them in Afghanistan guarding “poppy fields,” which is used to make heroin and other drugs. Where are the marches when their family members are assaulted? I don’t want to hear any nonsense about “we’re afraid of being labeled racist. That’s why we don’t march.”

But whites will march and stand online for hours to acquire a seasonal ticket to your favorite hockey, football, or baseball game. Don’t even get me started on the World Series and Superbowl. You place the blame everywhere except where it belongs? As I said, I’ve never been assaulted and I thank God for that. I pray so that my family and I won’t become a “prey.” As I’m looking at this world I really do count my blessings. If I am living in a bubble, I deem it as the protecting hand of God.

Btw, I answered Discard re: his U.N. cavil. No post?

Silent Running said...

Discard,

When the cops in NO got the illegal order to disarm the citizenry, they weren't taking "ignore" for an answer. They were forcing their way into houses and taking firearms.

But I won't press the issue; your dancing around the question has provided the answer. Cops will always be your Boys in Blue, and you won't be lifting a finger to defend yourself so long as the thugs arrive in the proper uniform. Happy trails.

D J said...

"Getting black people to join the NRA, which only take respectable citizens can only improve their behaviour."

Where in their charter does it say that? They take those who pay the membership dues.

Anonymous said...

"Getting black people to join the NRA, which only take respectable citizens can only improve their behaviour."

"Where in their charter does it say that? They take those who pay the membership dues.

It USED to be that in order to become an NRA member you had to get another member to vouch for you. That changed somewhere in the early 1970s (I think) when NRA needed to start building political muscle from their nominal membership of about a million. Remember, this is when the gun controllers, who were in 100% control of the MSM, were beginning to assert themselves.

Believe it not, Americans were once FREE to buy AR-15s and semi-auto G-3s through the US Mail. You were able to purchase Colt .45 M1911s handguns through common carriers. The Gun Control Act of 1968, whom the organization Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership claims is based on pre-World War 2 Third Reich gun control laws, changed all that.

Now we have communists telling us we must eliminate the so-called "gun show loophole" and evil, unregistered PRIVATE "gun transactions" so that the GOVERNMENT will know who has guns.

In order that they may be confiscated by the Police, the folks that tell us we shouldn't patrol a neighborhood armed nor carry in restaurants or government buildings. So that we can be killed at will by thugs but, they, the cops, can feel safer because only they will have guns in the streets.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/24, 2012 7:09 PM): Black people don’t call the police?

Not when it comes to turning in other Black criminals. Making trouble for Whites might see them dial the police, but otherwise the statistics are negligible. Why do you think the term "no snitch" even exists? If Black people had a solid reputation for reporting criminal activity at all times, "no snitch" would not be part of the modern vernacular.

Discard said...

Silent Running: Would I, if the cops showed up on my porch demanding my .22, let them take it? Yes. Intelligent men avoid confronting superior force whenever possible. If need be, another gun can always be had. Are you claiming that you'd slap leather and take one with you before they cut you down?
How many cops are there in this country, half a million? How many can be on duty at one time, even in an emergency? Half that? And how many of them would be lackadaisical about seizing guns from their fellow citizens, either on principle or from fear? Simply put, there are not enough lawmen in this country to confiscate the guns, even if all of them were willing to. It's not going to happen. Did the cops in New Orleans have lists of weapons and their owners, or did they simply take what was in sight? People who flash guns make cops very nervous, so keep your guns out of sight. Don't provoke men who are already agitated by the emergency situation.
Why do some commenters here think that the people who have the most reason to understand Black disfunction, the cops, are against us? They know that it's Darks who commit the great bulk of violent crime here, they see it daily, in person. They don't need to read the paper or go online. Many cops are perfectly happy for honest citizens to shoot ghouls. Didn't the cops return Zimmerman's gun, once they had decided that he acted in self defense? In Los Angeles, a man shot a robber with an unlawfully carried pistol, and the cops wrote a report that finessed the issue and let him keep the gun. I only know of it because the man was a customer and told us about it the day it happened. The next day the story was in the paper, suitably sanitized, thanks to the LAPD.
And why do people think that the military is not full of People Who Can See? Generals are literally scholars of conflict. They have what amounts to post-graduate degrees in 4th and 5th generation warfare, from the Army War College and the Command and General Staff School, or from other schools, military and civilian. They know more about whatever may come this summer than anyone here does. They are keenly aware of what happens on The Day The EBT Card Stops Working. They know all about the Mexican invasion, and what it means. And they know just how dumb Blacks are, since they have to use them as soldiers. They may have to spout diversity bullshit, but who do they put in jet cockpits and in submarines? Why are the SEALS and Green Berets White, if not because the military Powers That Be know the score? Are they so stupid that they cannot draw any conclusions from the Moslem psychologist who murdered a dozen unarmed men? Are they oblivious to the infiltration by Dark gangs? And would they rather command Blacks and Browns than Whites? Anybody with half a brain want to crew a nuclear sub with lesbians and Mexicans? No, the military is not going to war against the very people who make it work.
Lastly, learn to disagree without insulting people. It's the adult thing to do.

Anonymous said...

Regarding black responsibility on the problem:

It is undeniable why inner cities are the worst place in America to live. That is where the majority of blacks in America live. There is no coincidence and poverty is not the cause.

Now with the hard truth stated lets get to the root.

The black population overwhelmingly has been fooled by the democratic machine to think that the nanny state is the end all and be all, cradle to grave caretaker.

This was accomplished through several means but notably through the Civil Rights era, the HUD development projects, the No Child Left Behind Act and many other tools of appeasers in Washington to make you happy in spite of yourself.

This toolkit gave the black American community legs to live an otherwise unsustainable existence. Prior to the movements of the 60s, blacks were still a problem but a much smaller problem as those with the foresight to see error in their ways were already changing and already moving up the social ladder the CORRECT way.

The democratic machine took note of this and sabotaged republican efforts to give the negro autonomy in America. It also doesn't help that the vast majority of blacks do not meet the intellectual requirements of an advancing society. I mean in terms of jobs here.

The end result we have today is that most black Americans find fault with community watch, find fault with the 2nd amendment and find fault with Capitalism in general. Why? Because the narrative doesn't fit what they were programmed to believe.

Little do these enabled fools know that the very laws they aim to abolish are the very laws that would set them free in their own nightmarish realities.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/27, 10:18 PM): The end result we have today is that most black Americans find fault with community watch, find fault with the 2nd amendment and find fault with Capitalism in general. Why? Because the narrative doesn't fit what they were programmed to believe.

As a result of participating at this web site, it seems very likely that there is a genetic Root Cause that underlies, if anything, a susceptibility to being "programmed" in such a manner.

Whether it is the smaller average brain case or a concomitant lower IQ, lack of forward planning or future time orientation still seems to play a major role and at a more primal level.

Things like "community watch", the "2nd amendment" and "Capitalism" are all high order concepts that require a much larger degree of social cohesion and deferred gratification, both of which are conspicuously absent in most Blacks.

For community watches to operate they need a population that can set aside individual short term interests (i.e., ripping off neighbors), for the objective of preserving the larger body's private property (i.e., accumulated wealth). Theft convictions alone indicate that Blacks are justifiably notorious for their inability to comprehend the notion of private property. All of which underscores how any idea about "community watch" was stillborn in favor of "no snitch".

Little do these enabled fools know that the very laws they aim to abolish are the very laws that would set them free in their own nightmarish realities.

As Oscar Wilde was wont to observe:

When the gods wish to punish us, they answer our prayers.

Blacks have yet to learn, in even the smallest measure, to be very careful about what they wish for…

Silent Running said...

The relatively homogeneous Japanese and Chinese must look on our gov't sponsored insanity in jaw dropping awe and say to themselves: 'who in their right mind would do such a thing to themselves?

Who in their right mind would worship the Head of State as a living god? The Japanese only stopped that in 1945. Because we forced them to.

Modern Japan is evidence of a potential that was there all along, and it's the reason the Japanese should fall to their knees every day and thank whomever they pray to (still the Emperor in some cases) that they were conquered by us rather than the Soviets. Kooky beliefs can have very deep roots and be suprisingly resistant to change. Would the Japanese we know be as they are if their grandfathers hadn't decided to bomb Pearl Harbor?

While White Guilt and all of modern liberalism are mostly unprecedented in human history, belief systems that actively degrade civilizations or keep them locked in stasis for centuries are not.

I suspect this may be due to a belief, by Rand, that her philosophy was only meant to apply within the context of White Western civilization. It certainly isn't any gigantic presumption to think so.

Or she didn't personally know any blacks and just assumed them to be like "everyone else." Have a look at this article from last year. The commenter madmax was "outed" at VFR as Doug Bandler, a staunch Objectivist.