Sunday, November 30, 2014

Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.

Remember, Al Sharpton was noted as a "key advisor" to President Barack Obama on all things Ferguson by the New York Post
An Oath Keeper in Ferguson: a city still under siege by a people motivated for racial revenge/racial justice courtesy of Obama's "key advisor" Al Sharpton

This makes his declaration, from Ferguson on Sunday November 30th, that, " “Justice will come to Ferguson," and, “We’re not gonna stop marching and protesting until we do," all the more interesting. 

But not as interesting as the other "advisors" who arrived in Ferguson recently. [Police shut down mysterious 'Oath Keepers' guarding rooftops in downtown Ferguson, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 11-30-14]: 

Following a night of arson fires and bashed storefronts that hit close to home, Greg Hildebrand stood naked Tuesday, drying off from a needed shower, when he noticed somebody on the rooftop. 
“I opened the window and said, ‘Hey, can I help you?’” said Hildebrand, 35, a website developer. 
The man said he was security and would be up there at night with others to protect the pocket of second-story apartments and lower-level storefronts near the Ferguson Police Department. A day earlier, rioters had broken out windows below Hildebrand’s apartment in the 100 block of South Florissant Road and torched a nearby beauty supply store. 
“I am in the middle of a difficult spot,” Hildebrand said. “I feel a lot better having those guys up on the roof.” 
But he wasn’t clear exactly who “those guys” were or where they came from. 
Puzzled and alarmed protesters have wondered, too — some accusing the mysterious guards in military fatigues of being in the Ku Klux Klan. 
In fact, they are volunteers affiliated with a 35,000-member national organization called Oath Keepers. Yale Law School graduate and libertarian Stewart Rhodes said by telephone from Montana that he founded the group in 2009 to protect constitutional rights, including those of protesters confronted by what he described as overly militarized police. 
Police questioned group members early in the week and allowed them to stay. But Saturday, after media inquiries, St. Louis County police officers ordered the Oath Keepers to leave the rooftops. 
Threatened with arrest for operating without a license, the volunteers argued but eventually left their positions early Saturday, Rhodes said. 
“We are going to go back as protesters,” Rhodes said Saturday afternoon. 
Rhodes, who said he is Mexican-American, stressed that Oath Keepers is not anti-government. He said the volunteers handling rooftop security in Ferguson were current or former government employees and first responders, many who have intense military, police and EMS training. 
“We thought they were going to do it right this time,” Rhodes said of government response to the grand jury decision released Monday in the Michael Brown case. 
“But when Monday rolled around and they didn’t park the National Guard at these businesses, that’s when we said we have got to do something. 
“Historically, the government almost always fails to protect people,” he added. 
“We were sick in our gut we couldn’t be here sooner,” said John Karriman of Joplin, Mo., a state leader of Oath Keepers who teaches police tactics. “We are here to volunteer our time and make sure everybody stays safe.” 
Another leader, who would give only his first name, Sam, described himself as a weapons engineer from the St. Louis area who has done security contracting for the U.S. government. He said he was motivated to help after seeing a CNN story featuring extensive damage to Natalie’s Cake’s & More,which also helped generate thousands of dollars in donations for the small business. 
Sam said he contacted owner Natalie Dubose and told her he was going to secure her store and others. 
“She started crying,” Sam said.
The alternative Hill Valley in 1985 (From Back to the Future 2): the high school was burned down after Biff Tannen took control of the city.
Oath Keepers boarded up a bunch of the storefronts and started night rotations on several rooftops. Sam said he vetted volunteers to ensure there weren’t any “racists” or “people with an ax to grind.” He said he picked volunteers who “have seen the elephant and are calm under fire.” 
Fearing more arsonists, Oath Keeper volunteers kept buckets of water, fire extinguishers and other nonlethal weapons on the rooftops. Some are also armed with rifles that aren’t available at Walmart and Cabela’s. 
The volunteers said they were well aware of the risk to life that arson can play and the legal right to stop it from happening. 
Group volunteers say they are confident they have helped protect property and lives since they arrived. 
Victor Clark, a dentist at Ferguson Dental on South Florissant Road, said he was happy to have the Oath Keepers’ free assistance. He wants to reopen his business soon. On Monday, rioters shattered the front door and window, and stole dental needles and anesthetic. 
Then Oath Keepers showed up out of the blue. “We gave them our keys,” he said. 
“We didn’t know that much about them, but we got a feeling of trust. You have to do something to protect our building.”
 Are you beginning to realize where all this "Ferguson" nonsense is heading?

In Back to the Future 2, we got a glimpse of a future American city, Hill Valley (set in 2015), where flying cars and hover boards were the norm; in our world, the city of 67 percent black Ferguson looks like the dystopian world of 1985 Hill Valley created by the movies antagonist, Biff Tannen.

It was a copy of Grays Sports Almanac: Complete Sports Statistics 1950-2000 that was the catalyst for the collapse of Hill Valley into the chaos, violence, and vice Marty McFly encountered in an alternate 1985; it's the absence of white people and the growing black population (whose crime and social capital disabling culture only they can create being the catalyst for white flight) there responsible for the crumbling community of Ferguson.

Back in 1985, the city of Ferguson was around 85 percent white; if you were to go back in time and show citizens of the city then images and video of the city now, would they believe you?


83 comments:

Ex-Brooklynite said...

Amazing to me is how the black leaders are fixated on this guy, Brown, as a cause to rally around. He was a thief, and he attacked a cop. He got shot. Argue if you want about whether lethal force was needed, but they were a LOT smarter back In 1955 to find Rosa Paris, who was much more respectable than the single mother who was originally supposed to stand up to the segregated buses.

Meanwhile there is this 12yo black kid in Cleveland who really DOES look like an innocent victim of overly jumpy police. I would bet most SBPDLers do not support the cop in that case, who I believe was white. No threat, dead kid, yet they still want to focus on Brownie. I don't get it.

Anonymous said...

Notice the people trying to protect citizens and civilizations are being labeled as "anti government". So trying to maintain the rule of law and protect lives and property is anti government? Very telling.

I also saw reports about how police were very fast to respond putting a stop to these terrible "anti-government" terrorists that would dare to get in the way of our favorite pets.

You people still cheering for the police? What will it actually take for you all to admit they are serving our enemy?

Anonymous said...

Platinum EBT Cardholder:

"Vetted to make sure there were no racists volunteering." Absolutely wonderful. Thank the gods.

"The vision of homeland security is to ensure a homeland that is safe, secure, and resilient against terrorism and other hazards."

"Protecting the American people from terrorist threats is our founding principle and our highest priority."

These statements are right out of the DHS webpage. When your insurance company denies your claim because riots are acts of domestic terrorism and thus, not covered in your policy, sue fed.gov.

Believe me, the incompetence that is rampant throughout the bureaucracy will guarantee a long wait as well as multiple erroneous responses to said suit, a sleazy lawyer could eventually milk a powerful payday when the suit is settled.

They say we still live in a nation under the rule of law. Make them prove it. I've stated this before in earlier rants, but it still rings true. When an AA incompetent is wrong hold them to the fire under the guise of training. It will not "train" them but will force our "betters" to spend their time doing something other than sitting on their fat asses. It takes practice, but wearing a look of genuine concern for the idiot sells it. Following up, again with the concerned look, finally forces them to at least make a superficial effort. This is often enough to make Shitavious or Shitqueefa "chimp out". Totally worth it.

Anonymous said...

I believe the Obama DHS has identified violence inciting persons like these as "terrorists." To criticize and denounce Islamic hatred and promotion of violence is called being "Islamophobic." Isn't that comparable to being Kneegroidophobic, and justly so?
So where are the FBI infiltrators to get these people arrested on terrorism charges? I mean, just as they should, but don't do to Black inciters of anarchy.

Farrakhan: Violence is Needed, Racial Holy War is Necessary
Kyle Rogers
CofCC
December 1, 2014
"On November 22nd, 2014, the Nation of Islam [NOI] turned Morgan State University [MSU] into a rally for racial holy war."

"Farrakhan said young blacks are ready for war and don’t want “compromising talk.” He praised the violence in Ferguson saying the rioters have put white people “on edge” for the first time."

"Just 15 years ago, Farrakhan was giving speeches saying violence was not practical because “the enemy has tanks.” At Morgan State University he declared that young black people today are “not afraid of tanks.”
At the end of the speech Farrakhan screams “we’ll tear this god damn country up.” At that point, the crowd leaps to their feet and cheers. When Farrakhan was done speaking, the crowd chanted “Allahu Akbar.”"

http://www.dailystormer.com/farrakhan-violence-is-needed-racial-holy-war-is-necessary/

Anonymous said...

The OathKeeper spokesman in Ferguson reported that the NG and the ST.Loo police put snipers on the roofs of neighboring buildings with their guns pointing at them. They had no intention of protecting buildings, but were ready to shoot the armed Oathkeepers if they did. The OK's were threatened into standing down from the roof tops. So much for law enforcement protection --None!!

10mm AUTO said...

"Fearing more arsonists, Oath Keeper volunteers kept buckets of water, fire extinguishers and other nonlethal weapons on the rooftops. Some are also armed with rifles that aren’t available at Walmart and Cabela’s. "

Too much chance of reporter misreporting and ignorance, but I would guess he means HK's, Ar-15's in full auto, M14's, etc. all equipped with night vision and suppressors.

Just wait till they shoot one of these gentle negros with a Molotov cocktail in his hands.

Ladies and Gents, this is full on Militia. Whites are rising but who knows what rabbit hole this takes us down.

poetcomic1 said...

Just for those who don't know. I live in St. Louis and remember when Ferguson was first created as a white flight working class suburb for those fleeing the crime, drugs, gangs in North St. Louis.

Anonymous said...

PK----you are getting close to the whole truth...be careful...you are seeing the real reason the FBI, Homeland Thugs and National Guard just outside the ring of violence being allowed to happen.

see the following....

https://henrydampier.wordpress.com/2014/11/26/state-sanctioned-riots/

State-Sanctioned Riots

The state’s opinion-making organs are sanctioning riots.

The police and the national guard aren’t there to protect the townspeople. They’re there to protect the rioters from people who would defend their property with lethal force.

America has ceded what used to be the prerogative of militia to professional standing armies and police forces. The result is that public defense gets left to parties who have a limited direct stake in the town itself. The soldiers don’t care because they are not from the town, are not culturally linked to the town, and could arguably care less about whether everyone there lived or died. This is the same for the democratically elected civilian governors who are in and out of office in a matter of years rather than lifetimes.

Out of the many businesses burned to the ground in Ferguson, MO over the last two days, it seems that the official military organizations have been both unwilling and unable to retaliate or act pre-emptively in such a way as to discourage future destruction.

Republican government is a joke-concept if there is no militia made up of citizens, if the rights of citizenry aren’t directly connected with the people who actually need to enforce the law directly. To the extent that citizens cede law enforcement to standing armies, they cede their governing ability. To say that citizens ‘govern’ and are ‘sovereign’ when outside parties actually implement governance without any authority higher than they are is to say something false, or at the very least to water down the word ‘citizen’ to the point to which it is meaningless.

It’s certain that, given that the most influential national press organs are supporting riots, excusing the destruction of property, that those riots will continue to spread until they are met with real physical resistance. Given that the law is an insufficient tool for progressives to achieve their goals, they are using their influence to suppress the state’s own fighting-forces, and instead relying on mobs of thugs to intimidate what remains of their scattered opposition into submission.

It’s a demonstration of power, to be able to destroy a town with impunity, at any time, using nothing but incitement to the mob, and entangling competing security forces with absurd rules of engagement which prevent them from providing an effective defense.

This is likely to continue and become worse, because to the extent that looting goes unpunished with the appropriately lethal severity, it begins a positive feedback loop. Even an auto parts shop like the one in your home town might be holding hundreds of thousands of dollars in inventory that can be easily re-sold on the internet to buyers indifferent to where they came from. There’s real plunder to be had from the American middle class, and not all of it can be seized directly from a 401(k) account at the press of a button.

Much of it has to be stolen or destroyed directly, especially when it’s real estate.

This is always the course of the left in power, and none of it should be terribly shocking. The ‘nice’ nebbish reporter provides the moral suasion for the looter coming for your property and your life tomorrow. The looter has no capacity to survive in a civilized society without the intellectuals providing verbal cover for their actions, hampering the organization of armed defense.

Anonymous said...

Buckets of water? That's going too far.

Anonymous said...

If blacks think they've had a hard time finding jobs till now, wait until they see they have an additional 5 million competitors in the job market...

Anonymous said...

Oath Keepers is "mysterious"? Good lord, they've been out about what they do for as long as they've existed. What's the mystery? That the MSM is too stupid to do a little online research? They didn't have any problems doing that in finding out that St. Skittles drew a fluffy bunny in first grade or St. Swisher Sweets had dreams of being an "air conditioning engineer."

The MSM spin on this is sickening. "Some protestors say they're Ku Klux Klan," "They have guns you can't buy at WalMart." Insinuations and gossip, and

ABSOLUTELY NO DISCUSSION OF WHETHER THEY WERE EFFECTIVE IN STOPPING VIOLENCE.


Anonymous said...

Another young white man - a Bosnian this time - was brutally murdered by "teens" in St. Louis. Don't get me wrong, I'm very sorry this guy died, but if this is the only way to spur honest discussion about blacks, then this has to happen more often. Whites simply refuse to wake up, or at least speak up.

You can bet this story is HUGE in Eastern Europe right now.

Anonymous said...

"Sam said he vetted volunteers to ensure there weren’t any “racists” ..."

Yep, gotta weed out those r-r-ray-cists, by which is meant, of course, white supremacists. If we measure just by the amount of societal resources dedicated to their eradication, they are the deadliest enemies of civilization, of Progress, and the brotherhood of "man".

Californian said...

In Back to the Future 2, we got a glimpse of a future American city, Hill Valley (set in 2015), where flying cars and hover boards were the norm; in our world, the city of 67 percent black Ferguson looks like the dystopian world of 1985 Hill Valley created by the movie's antagonist, Biff Tannen.

I happened to see In Back to the Future 2 not too long ago. The alternative Biff Tannen dystopian Hill Valley was evocative of BRA with its corrupt leaders, it's corrupt cops, and it's corrupt thugs in the streets. Note that the high school in that world burned down, not unlike many Ferguson buildings today.

In Back to the Future 2 nailed another thing: that the promise of science to make for a utopian world can be demolished. We have seen the US manned space program sacrificed to pay for BRA. Bear in mind the Back to the Future movies were made in the 1980s, when there was still optimism for the future. We can see how it has turned out. They were ahead of the power curve with these films.

Here's hoping that in 2015 they finally get those hoverboards working.

As for America in 2014, all one can say is, "Great Scott!"

Anonymous said...

Take the concept even further- if you could go back in time to 1700 and show all the people what the negro would do to this country in the future, what do you think would happen?
I'm pretty sure we'd now be living in a 100% negro free nation since no one would import negroes for any reason and negroes certainly wouldn't be capable of getting here on their own. In fact, importing a feral negro would probably be a crime worthy of the death penalty~ or expulsion of the importee along with his idiotic importer back to sub-Saharan Africa.
Hmmm. That's what should happen to all the Africans being imported now and the libtards who are behind it.
Works for me!

Anonymous said...

Breaking news: St Louis negroes murdered a white man yesterday with hammers. He was a member of the Bosnian community there. It will be ironic if it takes foreigners here to stand up and fight back against the murdering racist blacks who kill us with impunity. Maybe they will remind us what being a Man is all about. Keep an eye on this...

dondiego said...

Your A.N.Z.U.S Ally has heard of the Oath Keepers, through my VRWC meanderings.
What I'm wondering is:All that firepower the Fed rocked up with but didn't use- when will they get to turn it on whites?

When Vet's and bikies show up, a la Bundy Ranch style before they have enough targets for all that ammo? [Extrapolating- couple of thousand coons isn't worth them getting out of bed]

Now, if I may P.K, an essay on Christians NOT being required to 'love thine invasive dark hoards'
http://www.amren.com/ar/2001/07/#cover

Anonymous said...

These Black savages on the field have the same potential to exert their savage nature in assaulting White victims. I doubt that White fans in the stands even know how much these Black players hate them.

[WATCH] RACIST THUGS IN HELMETS – ST. LOUIS RAMS ARE LOSERS, NO MATTER THE POINTS ON THE BOARD
30 NOV 2014
Rick Wells

Racism is never tolerated when it is displayed by white people, as was demonstrated by the NBA with the LA Clippers in the Donald Sterling incident. Black racism has for some reason been seen by these organizations as being different, justified and less offensive or damaging. It’s time for that perception to change.

This display of racism by the Rams players was ugly and unacceptable. Tolerance of their racism by the Rams organization and the league is equally racist and unacceptable.

Had these been white players who had donned Klan hoods during the introductions, they would never have been allowed onto the field and rightly so. These players should be dealt with in a similar manner. Their actions are equally offensive. In today’s society it has become acceptable to make one-sided racial attacks against white people. That needs to change. Now is a good time to start.

http://gopthedailydose.com/racist-thugs-in-helmets-st-louis-rams-are-losers-no-matter-the-points-on-the-board/

Anonymous said...

Excellent piece. It just goes to show the potential ruin of current 85% white cities nationwide. The citizens there might have an easier time understanding that savages in the future may destroy their communities as well.

Anonymous said...

Let's change the current black mike brown meme. Take all those photos of angry blacks with their "hands up" and add the line...

"We're Comin' To Getcha'!"

Anonymous said...

There is no "militia rising". Once these guys are noticed, they will be infiltrated by deep cover FBI or ATF. They'll find anything that could be turned into a federal indictment and the whole group will face charges.

It's unbelievably simple to shut down any pro-freedom, pro-right wing group.

This is why WFB and Reagan warned against the Left. Once they are in power, they never go away. When you vote for Happy Bill Clinton or Cool Barack, you are electing legions of hardcore leftist government agency staffers who are desperate to control you and take your money. Now they are all armed to the teeth and only Black criminals operate freely while they shout praises to Allah.

America is dead. A big part of the blame lies on those morons who spit venom at "Repukes" and hate everything traditional. You want hope and change? It comes with warrantless searches, Section Ape and a completely unrestrained undertow.

D-FENS said...

If I recall correctly, by 1985 Hill Valley elected negro Gordy Wilson as Mayor. So was Hill Valley's black future due to Biff Tannen or Gordy Wilson?

Dan said...

St Louis is a dead city. blacks are the hand of death.

Anonymous said...

Dear American Negro,

http://therightstuff.biz/2014/11/26/a-thanksgiving-day-letter-to-the-american-negro/#disqus_thread

Anonymous said...

Somebody mentioned it earlier about the Bosnian that was attacked and brutally murdered by the "teens" in ferguson.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/11/30/Teens-Jump-Beat-St-Louis-Man-To-Death-With-Hammers

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

"Sam said he vetted volunteers to ensure there weren’t any “racists” ..."

Yep, gotta weed out those r-r-ray-cists, by which is meant, of course, white supremacists. If we measure just by the amount of societal resources dedicated to their eradication, they are the deadliest enemies of civilization, of Progress, and the brotherhood of "man".

November 30, 2014 at 11:49 PM
__________________________

Then I guess there weren't any blacks in his group...right? /sarcasm

Can you imagine the storm that will ensue when one of these "mysterious" Oathkeepers actually shoots somebody? It's going to happen sooner or later. Perhaps a "real" patriot will find himself confronted by a mob while turning a corner. Perhaps a government patsy will do it, then be taken out by our heroic "anti-racist" police force. There are probably more scenarios that may play out, but I'd bet the title to my house that none of them involve the Oathkeeper's shooter living through it. The Oathkeepers threaten the government's credible monopoly of armed force just by existing. That can't be allowed.

Anonymous said...



"Threatened with arrest for operating without a license, the volunteers [Oath Keepers] argued but eventually left their positions early Saturday,"

A "license" grants the "privilege" to do something that is otherwise forbidden. For example, it is not legal to use the public highways for commercial purposes unless permission has paid for and obtained (a driver license).

Apparently the rioters and looters had the good sense to apply for a Rioting License.
Maybe Michael Brown had a Strong-Arm Robbery License on his 'person' too.
Other licenses that are obviously in force:

The Impeding Traffic License (probably a city license)
The Domestic Terrorism Permit (issued by DHS)
The Inciting a Riot License (Sharpton, Obama, CNN etc.)
The Arson License (city issue)
The Looting License
The Deceptive Trade Practice License (for the universities, the media, etc.)
The Misrepresentation Permit (same)
The Treason Permit

And of course the Master Permit-
The White Genocide License

-Beyond Hatred

Anonymous said...

"When your insurance company denies your claim because riots are acts of domestic terrorism and thus, not covered in your policy, sue fed.gov."

There's plenty of precedent on the matter of government's duty to protect us. Even if we give them the benefit of the doubt that it's just incompetence, NOBODY will lose their job or even be reprimanded.

They had no intention of protecting buildings, but were ready to shoot the armed Oathkeepers if they did.

Let this one really sink in. Still think the police are the thin blue line protecting us from the dark hoards? Clearly they're the line between the black hoards and white civilization, but I think many folks haven't noticed at whom their guns are pointing from that line.

Can we be done showing sympathy for people in uniforms who are taking their pay/orders from BRA? The lines have been drawn and the sides are abundantly clear.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

"Threatened with arrest for operating without a license, the volunteers [Oath Keepers] argued but eventually left their positions early Saturday..."
________________________________

Were those blacks that guarded the gas station for its White owner also operating without a license? (Presumably, they're talking about operating a private security company w/o permission.) They were allowed to stay on the premises.

So Whites were put out of "business," yet blacks were allowed to remain? Sounds like unequal protection under the law to me. But that won't even make it onto page 17, it's been going on so long.

Please permit me my delusion that the courts would remedy this situation (or even give a damn).

Anonymous said...

Unlike the citizens of Ferguson, I suspect most readers here are waiting to hear all the facts before deciding on the guilt or innocence of those involved.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

Most of the time I would say be careful of what you wish for, you might get it. But this time I'd say go for it, dumbasses!

J.J

Anonymous said...

Innocent victims don't go around threatening people at the park with a replica hand gun.

Anonymous said...

It's disgusting to see this bunch of Africans marching, rioting, looting, etc. Africans running to St.Louis so they can raise hell. Death and destruction all committed by a worthless bunch of assholes that don't worry about getting up early to go to WORK! Have everything handed to them & they're still not happy.
When they get what they want, and don't have to obey any law, and any standard of behavior is okay, white people will not have to obey laws either.

J.J.

Anonymous said...

OathKeepers is a honeypot. Think about it, they represent ACTIVE DUTY police and military. They have vested interest in BRA and expect it to pay their fat pensions.

Of course there are tons of honest men in OK, but the leadership is run by the CIA.

Not to be trusted

Californian said...

RE:

Feral "teens" armed with hammers attack and kill a Bosnian man in St. Louis.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/bosnian-community-in-st-louis-outraged-over-fatal-hammer-attack/article_9f15bf49-c8b7-5bc3-8671-ac291f666084.html



The article contains the following statement:

"This senseless beating death—which came on the heels of the November 24 Ferguson looting and the August riots—demands a clear response from Republicans who aspire to run for president in 2016. Those would-be candidates need to study the 1968 GOP campaign and revive calls for "law and order.""

First, this was not a "senseless" killing. It was part of the ongoing war on YT. The "teens" could have been acting out what they have been told in the school, by the government, in the movies, and on the telescreen: that they must rebel against white "oppression." Otherwise, they will become 12 years a slave, or something.

Did the victim decide to step out of his car because had he stayed inside and locked the doors, he would be committing the thoughtcrime of "micro-agression?" Heaven help the victim had he pulled out a gun and shot the "teens." He would be Zimmermanned quicker than the next CNN newsticker!

As for "law and order"...until the GOP brings the racial component out into the open, "law and order" will not work as a public policy. The moment someone shoots a "teen" they will be duly vilified by BRA. A major difference between today and 1968 was that back then, white people still had leaders who would state the obvious.

Anonymous said...


WILSON
zimmerman
2016

I. Dindu Nuffins said...

A little off topic but a good one.

There's been tons of justified commentary regarding how even if and when blacks "take over" or annex a once civilized area,it goes to crap. Basically even if it were to even be handed over--they would not even be able to maintain it. That's why ghettos look the way they do.

So, reminded me of a good joke I heard a long time ago...

Question: How do you set a black guy up with a small business?

Answer: Give him a big business and wait a few months.

Anonymous said...

"NFL Will Not Discipline St. Louis Rams For Hands Up Don't Shoot Display"

MUST. KEEP. NIGGERS. PLACATED. AT. ALL. COSTS.

Anonymous said...

That he had deliberately cut the orange safety tip off of.

Anonymous said...

25 million. Just because they weren't covered by the "amnesty" doesn't mean they're not out in the job market.

MMP said...

Joe Scarborough goes off about the lies of the HANDS UP bullshit on his MSNBC show.....You gotta watch it.....While his co-hosts are dumbfounded by his rant.

I can picture libtard fans of his heads melting this morning :)

Wonder how long before he's fired or has some kind of retraction?

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe

St. Louis Asian said...

RIP- Zemir Begic.RIP Kaylah Peterson. RIP Hoang Nguyen. You will be missed.

Just amazing. Someone finally shows up to protect us and the mainstream media attacks them, trying to portray them as crazies.

The real crazies are the ones howling "Burn this Bitch Down." The ones sympathizing and identifying with a criminal who brought it on himself?


Mr. Rational said...

The OathKeeper spokesman in Ferguson reported that the NG and the ST.Loo police put snipers on the roofs of neighboring buildings with their guns pointing at them.

That's felonious assault.  Is there any video of this?

If the cops have been ordered to be the enemies of people trying to protect their homes and themselves, evidence of that needs to get out.  At the very least, we need the cops to call in with "blue flu" when such orders come down.  If the tyrants lose their enforcers, it's over for them.

Anonymous said...

"At the end of the speech Farrakhan screams “we’ll tear this god damn country up.” At that point, the crowd leaps to their feet and cheers. When Farrakhan was done speaking, the crowd chanted “Allahu Akbar.”"

Damn, that pisses me off!

The militant groid undertow has learned from their spiritual brethren (Islamist ragheads) that the more you threaten and commit murder and violence, the more you will be left alone.

to wit: Our government dares call neither Islamist murderers nor rioting Ferguson neeeggers "terrorists".

Playing Roots Backwards said...

Ex-Brooklynite: Don't be amazed by anything that Black leaders do. They seldom get very much to work with. Hell, when they needed a combination martyr/saint, the best they could come up with was MLK.

Being a negro rabble-rouser is a rough job. To get paid you have to have a victims that folks will feel sorry for. Angels seldom do shit that will get them shot, so the Good Reverends and their ilk and the media assholes who need to sell a story have to work hard to polish turds like Trayvon and Mikey.

Sometimes they even have to change their sizes. They had to turn Trayvon into a twelve year old again and Mikey had to be portrayed as a little kid in a great big fat-assed thug body.

If cops would be a bit more helpful by blazing away at Negro pre-schoolers, Al and Jesse and their clones would all make sticky messes in their expensive suits.

Anonymous said...

"To the extent that citizens cede law enforcement to standing armies, they cede their governing ability. "

Advanced technological societies are inherently anti-democratic, since they breed a government comprised of experts, not ordinary citizens. They are also anti-freedom, since in most cases their expertise will sanction one, and only one, "best" course of action -- usually the one that is the most efficient means to an end, heedless of concerns for culture, tradition, or race. "Progress" always necessitates increasing demands that these changes be imposed by force if they aren't adopted voluntarily. In the ideal technological society of the future, every facet of life will be regulated for society's maximum benefit, and no freedom will be allowed at all.

Soldiers in technological society's mercenary army -- the hundreds of state and federal police agencies and the military -- need years of training in order to mesh smoothly with each other and operate as reliable parts of its mechanism. This wasn't the case in technologically simpler times, when they could be drawn locally and operate more or less autonomously.

Anonymous said...

"No threat, dead kid, yet they still want to focus on Brownie. I don't get it."
12-yr old Black kid waving a real-looking gun around IS a threat if there is a Black hood. Kids that age have already become criminals--rape, theft, murder--and cannot be trusted. Cops profile Blacks, because they are the majority of the criminals they have to deal with daily. That kid KNEW what he was doing and was likely trying to imitate gangbanger idols. Well, he succeeded to the ultimate goal-- to be St. Kid in Groidhell.

Anonymous said...

The only "justice" these urban terrorists deserve is a tactical nuclear device. Delivered hot and steaming. You know, just like their rhetoric.

Anonymous said...

"Feral "teens" armed with hammers attack and kill a Bosnian man in St. Louis."

This is another set-up being done by DOJ/Obama--another front of getting more violence into action. The Bosnian community is probably as close-knit as the Black ghetto one, but more war experienced. They won't just sit around and wait for "no justice"and passively take attacks like these hammer killings. Very likely to be open retaliatory warfare in St Louis, which must have Obama/Holder drooling in anticipation.

Anonymous said...

The negroes beat a man to death with hammers.

They are incomprehensibly violent and savage. Their brains are like those of a reptile.

When you see them out in public, look closely. They know that they are not human.

Anonymous said...

Police questioned group members early in the week and allowed them to stay. But Saturday, after media inquiries, St. Louis County police officers ordered the Oath Keepers to leave the rooftops.

The Oathkeepers had the right idea but they need to refine and adapt their approach to better fit the legal and political realities involving use of force or threat of force. If there was any doubt before Ferguson, there should be no doubt now that the government will not shoot blacks or allow someone else to shoot a black for rioting, looting, or the destruction of property unless it places someone in obvious danger of imminent serious harm. In other words law enforcement and the National Guard will not fire on blacks for burning or looting unoccupied buildings. The strongest resistance blacks can expect for these activities is the application of non-lethal deterrents such as tear gas or rubber bullets. As long as they don't actually attack law enforcement or kill bystanders in the presence of law enforcement they can do anything they wish without fear of serious injury.

I don't claim to be a lawyer, but I thought that in most states people can use lethal force in their homes to protect themselves, family members, or guests from harm, and that there is generally a presumption that if intruders break into an occupied dwelling, the occupants are in danger of harm. I was under the impression that outside of the home the defense of self-defense generally applies only to one's self or certain family members, and that one cannot generally use the justification of self-defense to protect others in public areas.

A problem that the Oathkeepers have in situations such as Ferguson is that they are traveling to the event to defend the lives and property of others. It is possible that the only legal right they have is to defend themselves so long as they have a legal right to be where ever they happen to be. With a membership of 35,000 the Oathkeepers should have enough lawyers among their members to review the laws in the areas they wish to assist. Perhaps they they need to receive an invitation from individuals in the targeted area so they can clearly occupy those buildings and/or homes as guests during the turmoil. Then when the cops ask them what they are doing on the roof, the Oathkeepers can say that they are just guests of the owner and thought it was a good idea to stand on the roof to watch things.

Or perhaps they should travel to troubled areas upon request to provide education to the locals on how to protect their property and lives for the duration of the event. Much like some special forces in the military the Oathkeepers would be teaching the locals how to survive the difficult times without any intent of actually engaging any rioters. Any shooting by the Oathkeepers would be strictly to defend themselves. Perhaps their services need to be free or delivered in a certain manner to avoid the need of licensing or permits that a commercial business might need.

I'm pretty sure that an Oathkeeper shooting from a rooftop into a mob on the ground will end badly for both the Oathkeeper and the target unless the person in the mob who was shot was recorded throwing a Molotov cocktail or pipe bomb at a non-threatening Oathkeeper. If the Oathkeeper was on the roof with a sniper rifle, the mob will just claim that they threw the cocktail in self defense.

I'm very happy that the Oathkeepers attempted to do something, but I think that they need to fine tune their approach.

Awakened White said...

Louis Freakakhan. If you tear the whole GD country where are you going to receive your gibsmedat from?

spot on people on the cops, bunch of wimps at best, and the govbermints friends at worst.

Anonymous said...

One of the most simply brilliant points that have been made to date regarding the Furguson fiasco. YT will always be held to a higher standard......but then only YT can achieve that standard anyway. Nicely done here sir.
Spencer Finn

Anonymous said...

And when and if they retaliate, Obama can once again jump on to his gun control bandwagon. He is just waiting for a group of yt's to do something.

J.J.

Mr. Rational said...

Louis Freakakhan. If you tear the whole GD country where are you going to receive your gibsmedat from?

He'd rather be king of a dungheap than a well-kept hanger-on.  Think Zimbabwe.

Anonymous said...

"Now, if I may P.K, an essay on Christians NOT being required to 'love thine invasive dark hoards'
http://www.amren.com/ar/2001/07/#cover"

This is by far the most literate defense of Christian doctrine I've come across. It's also very entertaining and spirited. Nevertheless, I think it's incorrect, hypocritical, evasive, and even duplicitous in parts. For example:

When Christ commands Christians to “love their enemies” (Matthew 5:44; Luke 6:27,35), he uses the word for one’s private enemy, that is to say someone with whom a Christian has quarreled. Never is this injunction applied to foreign enemies, the enemies of one’s people.

This is just a lexical quibble, attempting to conceal the fact it's very clear that the Christian's obligation is to extend love (agape) to everyone. After all, Christ's supposed love was for all mankind (John 2:2), and according to Paul (Galations 3:28), his message was for everyone, regardless of race or gender. Nothing could be more clear than that Christians should do likewise, since they are supposed to imitate Christ (1 Peter 2:21-24).

Unlike Hebrew, the Greek in which the New Testament was written does have a word for mankind, anthropon; however, it is used infrequently and never suggests the elimination of the national or racial divisions of mankind. Luke wrote that God “made from one [Adam] every nation [ethnos] of mankind [anthropon] to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation” (Acts 17:26).

This is just wrong, completely deceptive. The Greek of Acts 17:26 is:

26 εποιησεν τε εξ ενος αιματος παν εθνος ανθρωπων κατοικειν επι παν το προσωπον της γης ορισας προτεταγμενους καιρους και τας οροθεσιας της κατοικιας αυτων

Without any explanation he translates the Greek word for blood kin or race (aima) as "Adam". However, the boldened part, "ex enos aimatos pan ethnos anthropon", means exactly the opposite of what he gets from the passage, and says literally that all men are of one blood, i.e., the same race. This does nothing less than proclaim an underlying universal brotherhood of man that transcends racial boundaries.

There are lots of other problems with this essay, but that's enough for now.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite said."Meanwhile there is this 12yo black kid in Cleveland who really DOES look like an innocent victim of overly jumpy police. I would bet most SBPDLers do not support the cop in that case, who I believe was white. No threat, dead kid, yet they still want to focus on Brownie. I don't get it."

November 30, 2014 at 7:22 PM






Sorry pal,some dumb ass kid points a pistol at me,I'm drawing and shooting.The officer did what any one with sense would do.Gun turns out to be a replica?I guess momma shoulda smartened that boy up some.

Anonymous said...

It is logical to assume that the "Hands Up" position being done by protesters in deference to Michael Brown's alleged action means that they too see themselves as potential criminals deserving to be shot. The Rams Black players make public confessions that they too would attack investigating cops after having committed aggressive crimes.

Anonymous said...

The incident in St.Louis was a classic example of a vehicle defense scenario. You don't abandon a weapon of several thousand pounds to confront a group of teens armed with hammers without being armed yourself. If you exit the vehicle you do so at a safe distance and you do not allow them to close. Stupid stupid stupid. The goal is to get out of the situation. It's a lose lose situation. Unless "they" are armed if you hit one, you can rest assured the so called authorities will come after you. Shoot one and you can expect worse. Cameras do work both ways. You can only shoot if you life is in danger and you way is blocked. The goal is to survive. Have any of you ever thought about this? If your weapon is not secured you might lose it. You also might be like Wilson, trying to secure your weapon while trying to fight off what are essentially car jackers. Get out quickly and immediately report the incident to the PD.

QLB

Long Island Guido said...

LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

L here-
So the National Guard was not sent in, the police hands were tied, and when the Oath Keepers showed up with WATER to put out FIRES, and other NON LETHAL defense items, they were told to stand down?? WTH??
And the last sentence- Back in 1985, the city of Ferguson was around 85 percent white; if you were to go back in time and show citizens of the city then images and video of the city now, would they believe you?
I guarantee that the white people that had to forfeit or lose money on their homes that lived in the area in 1985, and suck up the expense of moving, they believe you 100%. But then again, another saying I have heard a lot from blacks is that "white folks are born into money". So I guess they just reached into the never ending money all YTs have in their pocket- no problem. Damn.

Anonymous said...

Throughout the years of the war on terror, I have noticed one consistent event: the enablement of further terror, and the disablement of self-defense measures. In the case of the airplane bomber, we now have the ludicrous situation at our nation's airports: exploding government intrusion and security theater, and gross loss of privacy. The terrorists are emboldened, not intimidated, by the groveling to their omnipotence we all are required to do as a result of some idiot trying on a belt bomb. I predict as a result of the Ferguson mess we will see Federal intrusion in daily life multiply, especially in matters related to local control of police forces.

Anonymous said...

Video shot in the immediate aftermath of the murder of Bosnian immigrant Zemir Begic in St. Louis features a local resident revealing how blacks had chanted “fuck the white people, kill the white people” before the brutal hammer attack which took Begic’s life.


http://www.infowars.com/blacks-screamed-kill-the-white-people-before-brutal-murder-of-zemir-begic/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/01/protests-sparse-after-pack-hammer-wielding-teens-beats-man-to-death-in-shadow/

Anonymous said...

some dude said: "If I recall correctly, by 1985 Hill Valley elected negro Gordy Wilson as Mayor. So was Hill Valley's black future due to Biff Tannen or Gordy Wilson?"

In BTTF 1 gordy wilson was up for reelection and hill valley was a fine clean town. in BTTF 2 gordy wilsons grandson was up for election and hill valley was still a fine town.

its not until biff tannen steals the delorean and gives himself the sports almanac, thereby altering the future, that hill valley turns into a mess.

also biff should not have been able to return to the future he left. he should have returned to an alternate 2015 and left doc and marty stuck in 2015. biff's action created an alternate universe. this is a major flaw in the BTTF series. this is also a major problem with time travel which makes it impossible.

Don M said...

"Anonymous said...

Notice the people trying to protect citizens and civilizations are being labeled as "anti government". So trying to maintain the rule of law and protect lives and property is anti government? Very telling."

Of course! What we are witnessing is squabbling between the BRAmerican Empire's two most privileged groups of subjects: LEOs and negroes. Interlopers like the Oathkeepers will be tremendously resented by both sides.

LEOs and negroes have a symbiotic relationship. Constant negro criminality terrifies the sheeple into demanding more police. Conversely, increased policing in negro areas fuels the social justice machine. Both serve the purpose of fleecing the sheeple.

Its kind of a shame these groups, united in purpose but differing in method cannot agree to a detente:

"You keep your 'Goot Boyz'(c) from attacking us, we'll turn a blind eye to TNB and we can both get back to robbing (and in the case o negroes, raping and butchering) the sheeple."

It would be so much more efficient than all of this ritualistic posturing in riot gear and bandanas...

Anonymous said...

"They" have achieved sufficient momentum to make the "thin blue line" much less effective.

Anonymous said...

The reporting on the murder of the Bosnian immigrant was of course disinformation, in the extreme. The media reported it to be not a racially motivated crime, but rather one of those "random" acts we are so accustomed to seeing. And the reason it was not racially motivated was that the murderers didn't KNOW the victim!
So conceivably if they did know the victim it would not be racial either...it would be personal!
So, logically, there is no way it could be a racially motivated murder.

Note how the PC forces within the police itself try to overpower our sense of the danger lurking in society by "ruling out" racial reasons for the attack. Those forces are creating cognitive dissonance by denying the obvious truth that blacks indeed do harbor murderous rage. Why, you ask.
My conjecture is that this disinformation purposefully denies obvious truths in order to make the inquiring public ( i.e., intelligent people) doubt their own judgment. This self-doubt is putty in the hands of the propagandists. This is an open invitation to intellectual masochism, of the kind seen amongst the "willing led" in totalitarian societies. In our society, the willing led are the DWL's.
Notice, though, that the putty has to be really worked over and over again before it is malleable enough to be useful. Thus, the constant refrain the killings are all "random". Never will you hear they are directed against you, even though you know for sure they are.

Anonymous said...

Letter from Lisa Lyle from MICDS in St. Louis Missouri (an extremely expensive private school in the most exclusive part of the city). What a load of shit.


Dear Parents and Guardians of Upper School Students,

As a follow up to Scott Small’s earlier email today, I write to share that just after noon approximately 160 students, one quarter of our Upper School, gathered in Brauer Auditorium to participate in the peaceful action as planned.

Heaven Guerin gave brief opening remarks, stressing that she wasn’t trying to convince anyone of who was right and that just being there together was an important demonstration of respect for the loss of Michael Brown’s life.

Everyone sat quietly for four and a half minutes; it was a still and peaceful moment of silence. Within five or so minutes everyone quietly exited and returned to lunch or to class.

While some may worry that our students chose to come together in this way, I think it is important to remember that we as educators, in keeping with our mission, actively encourage students to stand for what they believe is good and right. What each believes is good and right will vary, of course, based on personal experience.

Our Upper School is a microcosm of the larger St. Louis community. Ours is a large tent. What happens outside of school is discussed at school, and it impacts our community, just as what happens on campus influences what goes on beyond our 100 acres. During this brief time, our students practiced respectful political engagement, and they demonstrated we can coexist peacefully in a divided larger community, a great lesson for us all.

To be an inclusive community, we have to be willing to allow a range of opinions to be expressed. I am proud of our Upper School students today. As far as I can tell, not a single person was disrespectful to another about participating or not in today’s demonstration, and we came through it as one community despite our many differences -- e pluribus unum.

It was a good day in Upper School.

Warmly,
Lisa

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....Wait until the Mexicans start getting all their freebies. Now that they are members of the welfare state things could really get wild. Kind of a FREEBIE WAR could start with all the bottom feeders fighting each other over the GIBS.

We will become a nation of protestors roaming through the streets FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE as they beat and kill each other over who HAS THE MOST RIGHTS. Mobs of psychopaths tearing out each others throats for bigger and better welfare checks. Upper middle class white Frankfurt Marxist stirring the pot with their bitching and moaning about racism and all the other "feeding the poor and taxing the rich" bullshit. Gays protesting at Toys R Us because they don't sell Trans-Gender or Transvestite Barbie Dolls. A whole country filled with mobs of crazy people. Stupid fools who get dumber by the day. A nation of victims who love wallowing like pigs in their own self made suffering and misery. I have spent fifty years watching America die. It is not a pretty sight.

Playing Roots Backwards said...

Damn! I wish Darren Wilson had been there to help run off those troublesome Oath Keepers.

Anonymous said...

Having met a few Bosnians here in Chicago I can honestly say you'd be hard pressed to find a more primitive group of Europeans.Mean, violent throwbacks to another age, always up to fight. And Muslim. Maybe the Negroes in St Louis will finally learn that not all Whites are sissyfied victims in waiting.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Ex New Yorker here.....Wait until the Mexicans start getting all their freebies. Now that they are members of the welfare state things could really get wild. Kind of a FREEBIE WAR could start with all the bottom feeders fighting each other over the GIBS.

We will become a nation of protestors roaming through the streets FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE as they beat and kill each other over who HAS THE MOST RIGHTS. Mobs of psychopaths tearing out each others throats for bigger and better welfare checks. Upper middle class white Frankfurt Marxist stirring the pot with their bitching and moaning about racism and all the other "feeding the poor and taxing the rich" bullshit. Gays protesting at Toys R Us because they don't sell Trans-Gender or Transvestite Barbie Dolls. A whole country filled with mobs of crazy people. Stupid fools who get dumber by the day. A nation of victims who love wallowing like pigs in their own self made suffering and misery. I have spent fifty years watching America die. It is not a pretty sight.


Well done. It is beginning, the collapse is starting, just starting. Once the finances start failing then the real fun begins. it has got to get pretty uncomfortable before the sedated white people begin to wake up. But I believe Obama, Holder, Sharpton and Farrakahn can make it happen.

Anonymous said...

"So the National Guard was not sent in, the police hands were tied, and when the Oath Keepers showed up with WATER to put out FIRES, and other NON LETHAL defense items, they were told to stand down?? WTH??"
The official word from the White House (Valeri Jarrett) was "make sure the anarchists are not stopped" by anyone. Because the ultimate goal is Black power, they are using their YT-hating numbers to aggressively demand and get all-encompassing entitlement to rule and reign, especially over YTs. Marxist YTs want low IQs, not intelligent thinkers, to take over, which is what has been happening locally in Missouri. What make YTs in leadership bow down to be walked on rugs? Threats or bribery?

As to CIA/FBI infiltration of Oath Keepers. The intel government spooks infiltrate everywhere, probably even here at SBPDL in order to influence discourse. We are never private and alone, so it is necessary to continue on doing the best we can, because even if we do no wrong, the criminal government can still accuse and convict at will.

A thought about the decision to go with the Grand Jury, which has been so criticized. Witnesses were able to give their information secretly, which was very important because they had been threatened and were fearful of their lives. However, with all the evidence now made public, those witnesses who testified on behalf of Officer Wilson could possibly be identified because they all live in such close quarters. No witness protection for them. Some have risked their lives to try to do what was right.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....Saturday I drove into the big city East of me to re-supply with cat food and eggnog. The first 15 to 20 miles were kind of a traffic jam. I had a car traveling about half a mile or so behind me and I was starting to feel crowded out with somebody that close on my bumper. Finally he pulled off onto a dirt road and I had the road all to myself.

On the way home a cattle truck pulled in front of me coming down from South Dakota. He was in front of me for a mile or two until he got up speed and soon was out of sight. Whew. Driving in heavy traffic like that sometimes gets to me. The sun was in my eyes the last twenty miles and I don't drive faster than I can see. I saw a pickup truck was coming up on my rear but he soon zipped past me.

When I got home I flipped on the computer and saw all these guilty white privilege commie liberals laying on the floors of shopping malls and city streets. They were harassing shoppers and blocking traffic and a lot were walking around with their hands up. The media was filming them and some got to be interviewed and they talked about FREEDOM and JUSTICE and SLAVERY and PRIVILEGE and POLICE BRUTALITY and SUFFERING and CAPITALISM and POVERTY and EQUALITY and SOCIALISM and PAIN and EDUCATION and RACISM and all kinds of horrible shit.

Then it dawned on me. THESE PEOPLE ARE THE ONES WHO ARE SLAVES. They have never lived free. Believers in the lie. They talk the talk but it is just empty babble. Living and repeating the leftist propaganda shoved down their throats by the universities and media. Gathering in MOBS to tell others how to live. Never in their lives have they ever had an original or rational thought. Living under a perpetual state of mind control. Mindless zombies living in a world of politically correct Marxist bullshit. Always searching for the next great cause so they don't have to look into their own lonely and useless lives. What a sad way to live. Pawns of the politburo. The proles. The sheep. The cattle. The goyim.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous said...As to CIA/FBI infiltration of Oath Keepers. The intel government spooks infiltrate everywhere, probably even here at SBPDL in order to influence discourse.

Infiltration is a two-way street.

Leaving aside "infiltration".... I would be surprised if there aren't a number of "rayciss" people within federal law enforcement.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon 4:52
Sorry pal,some dumb ass kid points a pistol at me,I'm drawing and shooting.The officer did what any one with sense would do.Gun turns out to be a replica?I guess momma shoulda smartened that boy up some.

Brownie (heckuva job!) attacked a cop. Wilson didn't throw the first punch, and Wilson didn't draw on him until he was attacked. The situation there means no threat to me, other European Americans, or even most black people, who know HITTING COPS IS NOT ALLOWED AND BRINGS BAD CONSEQUENCES.

Your approach, however, IS a threat to me. "I felt threatened" so I fired first could happen to a 12yo black kid at the hands of a white cop, or a white guy at the hands of a rogue black cop who has been steeped in anti-white hatred. Really, if blacks want to kill whites, in some horrible inversion of the old Alabama trooper's song, all they need to do in your book is become cops, and then fire away because they "thought" they saw a gun.

Perhaps the police, who are paid WELL above what the people earn, should not be prosecuted for firing. But any first use of lethal violence by police ought to come with immediate dismissal from the force. It would slow some of the jumpy ones down, since we seem unwilling otherwise to stop militarized police.

One thing I am certain about the police officer in Cleveland: he is suffering mentally for his quick action. The cops who shot Amadou Diallo were sickened afterward. I don't know how you can bring peace to those men. I hope no more get created.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Playing Roots Backwards,

Yeah, look at the black victim scams over the years, like Tawana Brawley, Crystal magnum, and others. As you say, not a lot to work with.

But the Cleveland kid is a CLEAR step up over Brown. Clear. If you want to make a winning argument.

It becomes clear that they DON'T want to make a winning argument. Makes me wonder, in agreement with Don M., if the whole thing isn't staged to make charges of police brutality look ridiculous. Also, as Don Points out, cops 'n' negroes have a symbiotic relationship, with negroes justifying ever more money spent on cops.

Check out the real story of the guy who started the Arab Spring in Tunisia some time. There they never fully debunked the myth of the "gentle giant" who also assaulted a cop. Fortunately, we did.

10mm AUTO said...

""Your approach, however, IS a threat to me. "I felt threatened" so I fired first could happen to a 12yo black kid at the hands of a white cop, or a white guy at the hands of a rogue black cop who has been steeped in anti-white hatred. Really, if blacks want to kill whites, in some horrible inversion of the old Alabama trooper's song, all they need to do in your book is become cops, and then fire away because they "thought" they saw a gun."

I respectfully disagree. He didn't "think" he saw a gun, he did see a gun, a replica that even an expert could not distinguish from 10 feet away in good lighting.

What you are saying is that Police must "always absorb the first shot" no matter what, because it might be a replica (toy) gun. You understand that the first to fire has a huge advantage on the other side, usually a fatal advantage. You understand that 12 year old negros have been murdering people for the fun of it?

No Army, Militia or Police force has ever been under the "he must fire first" restriction.

Tell me, what are you going to do about toy knifes? They are often used in training and are rubber painted blue, but can be spray painted black or silver to look real. Does the negro get the "first stab in"? Kind of throws the 21 foot rule right out then, eh?

You are asking officers to deny reality of every object that comes at them, to assume that every weapon is a toy till examination can prove otherwise. That is an unreasonable standard.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite said...
"One thing I am certain about the police officer in Cleveland: he is suffering mentally for his quick action. The cops who shot Amadou Diallo were sickened afterward. I don't know how you can bring peace to those men. I hope no more get created."



They are alive.You don't seem to have any survival instinct.You are never under any obligation to take the time to make sure the replica gun is not an actual working model.Nor should you take the time to check the age of someone waving a gun at you.

Anonymous said...

"If the cops have been ordered to be the enemies of people trying to protect their homes and themselves, evidence of that needs to get out. At the very least, we need the cops to call in with "blue flu" when such orders come down. If the tyrants lose their enforcers, it's over for them."

Couldn't do that.... they wouldn't want to risk having to go out and work for a living. Not to mention that great pension they'll be getting (after Ferguson is 99% black I'm sure that won't be looted along with everything else).

Cowards and traitors to the last.

Anonymous said...

If these youts were NOT beating this guy to death because he was White, then what were they doing?

Anonymous said...

"Take the concept even further- if you could go back in time to 1700 and show all the people what the negro would do to this country in the future, what do you think would happen?"

You mean after they stopped laughing at the spectacle of white men being ruled by a negro President? Probably they'd first wonder what happened to make white people of the future so stupid and docile. Either that, or good Christians that they were in those days, they'd either start praising Jesus if they believed the vision of racial equality they saw was true, or cursing Satan for deceiving them if they believed the vision to be false. In any event, I doubt it would change anything about how they conducted themselves. The future of society is an abstract concern. Most don't, even can't, look past their own private troubles. There's a even a phrase for this private disregard of a collective future: the tragedy of the commons.

A visionary like Thomas Jefferson speculated about it in his writings. He had the example of Haiti before him -- the Haitian revolt in which all the white men were killed and their women raped -- "an army of cannibals" he called them -- and yet he still continued screwing his teenage octaroon and being a slave master. It's not like he thought it couldn't happen here either. He even saw it coming. He has this to say about it in his autobiography:

It was thought better that this should be kept back, and attempted only by way of amendment whenever the bill should be brought on. The principles of the amendment however were agreed on, that is to say, the freedom of all born after a certain day, and deportation at a proper age. But it was found that the public mind would not yet bear the proposition, nor will it bear it even at this day. Yet the day is not distant when it must bear and adopt it, or worse will follow. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers. If on the contrary it is left to force itself on, human nature must shudder at the prospect held up. We should in vain look for an example in the Spanish deportation or deletion of the Moors. This precedent would fall far short of our case.

In fact, the Founding Fathers could easily have "deleted" all the negroes once they were done with them, of course, but that would have been quite unChristian and barbaric. So they did nothing. Even when he became President, Jefferson was unable to make any headway in getting rid of the negroes.

Anonymous said...

Thats why Obama is bringing in all the Mexicans. So the blacks can all be big time sports stars and famous rappers. All Latinos will take care of the labor required