This website will serve to educate the general public on Black people and the Stuff That Black People Don't Like. Black people have many interesting eccentricities, which include disliking a litany of everyday events, places, household objects and other aspects of their everyday life.
Black people are an interesting subject matter and this website will chronicle the many problems in life that agitate this group of people.
To suggest material, please contact sbpdl1@gmail.com
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
A Tale of Two Park Beatings: One is a Hate Crime, the other a Random Crime
Recall that the Baltimore McDonald's beat down of Chrissy Lee Polis by a Black girl wasn't considered news until it turned out that the former was a transsexual.
Had Carter Strange been a homosexual, his attack would have been a hate crime
The initial video of the beating went viral and - courtesy of Matt Drudge - people thought a white girl was the victim of a vicious assault. It was until it was revealed that Polis was a transsexual that the story gained Mainstream Media Attention from Perfidious White Journalists (PWJs): white girl being beaten by Black = non story; white guy dressed as a girl being beaten by Black = hate crime.
We don't like terms like 'reverse racism' or 'double standards' and never use them; because Black people being racist doesn't fit the carefully constructed narrative of eternal Black oppression in Black-Run America (BRA), some people throw these terms around to discuss anti-white policies.
It isn't a 'double standard', it's The Standard in America for Black people to be treated as extra-equal and white people as non-entities.
Take a look at how the story of Carter Strange is being treated - Columbia has passed an emergency curfew in the wake of the 8 Black people nearly killing him for no apparent reason - by local police, with people quick to state it wasn't a hate crime:
[5th Judicial Circuit Solicitor Dan] Johnson said he knows some in the Columbia area are questioning why “hate crime” charges haven’t been brought in connection with the bearing. A hate crime is a term that connotes violence committed against a person or property because of the victim’s race, religion, ethnic background or sexual orientation.
But Johnson said South Carolina has no “hate crime” law. Also, police thus far have uncovered no evidence suggesting that race played a part in the attack on Strange. “This was a robbery,” said Johnson. “People have made an assumption of hate crime because the victim is white and the suspects are African-American. But there is no evidence we have seen that race played a part in this.
Eight Black people savagely beating a white guy has no racial connection in the eyes of the police. It's a non-story because Carter Strange is a non-entity. Had he been a homosexual, like the 30-year-old who was recently beat in Springfield, Massachusetts (Mass. most gay-friendly city), it would have automatically been declared a hate crime:
Nine teens and preteens were arrested for allegedly beating and robbing an openly gay man at a Springfield park Tuesday morning. The 30 year-old victim was badly hurt in the attack, which police are labeling a hate crime.
According to Springfield Police Sergeant John Delaney, Shay Andre Edwards, 19, of Springfield was arrested on charges of unarmed robbery and violation of civil rights with injury. Four other teen boys and four teen girls are also facing the same charges in connection with the attack. Their identities are not being released because they are underage. Delaney says the attackers ranged in age from 12 to 19 years old.
According to Delaney, before 3:00 Tuesday morning, the group saw the 30 year-old man walking by Barrows Park. They called out to the man, telling him to enter the park, but he kept walking. That was when they allegedly knocked him to the ground. The male teens punched him in the face and kicked him in the head and stomach, while the females of the group cheered them on. All the while, the group members allegedly yelled out anti-gay slurs. The group allegedly took his MP3 player before running off.
Shay Andre Edwards is pictured here, undoubtedly a valued member of the Springfield community.
There is no 'double standard' in the reporting of these crimes; just the standard. White people have no Civil Rights in America, no laws to protect them. That is the standard.
Carter Strange was just the victim of an isolated incident where 8 Black people (including teens) attacked him in Columbia. Even though Black violence in Milwaukee, Cleveland, Chicago, Philadelphia, Newark, Baltimore, Atlanta and other cities throughout the land are forcing those cities into lock-down mode this summer, Strange's beaten is an isolated incident.
There is no epidemic of homosexuals being attacked in America; there is an epidemic of white people being attacked in America.
That a 30-year-old was mugged and beaten in Springfield by a group of 9 Black people (apparently some girls joined in the fun) wouldn't be news either, but because the person assaulted was a homosexual, the world will hear of the hate crime and insidious deed that transpired there.
Shay Edwards attacked a homosexual in Massachusetts; automatic hate crime
Knowing that Disingenuous White Liberals and PWJ’s are in charge of the editorial policy at The Washington Post,The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, and Gannett assets, and openly admit to censoring stories of Black criminality, it’s easy to understand why many newspapers are losing subscribers and the ability to charge huge rates for national ad campaigns.
That homosexuals get upset when a member of their community is attacked and assaulted by nine Black people is not cause to get mad that this group of people dares to confront The Standard. They are an organized community, they have goals and they are determined to live peacefully in their own enclaves and when that lifestyle is threatened they organize as one.
This is nothing to get upset about; it's something to emulate.
The day is coming when white people - the dwindling majority population that must continue paying for educating, incarcerating and moving away from an urban Black (and Brown) population that preys upon them without cops or elected officials caring - begin to mobilize on their behalf.
It is stories like the one of Carter Strange and the unnamed homosexual in Springfield, both attacked by Black people in parks, that illustrate why this day is coming.
Remember: Chrissy Polis' story was a non-story only disseminated on evil blogs until it turned out that the dude who looked like a lady was really a dude dressed as a lady.
The summer of 2011 will be one to remember forever.
I'm here is Columbia, SC, we're so progressive we just elected our first black mayor, and the chief of police is black too, and the majority of the members on the council,,, you get the picture. This is the new 'merica, and obamanation of the original.
This area in Columbia where he was beaten has been having problems for years with gangs doing beat up whitey iniations, in the last year and a half it has escalated to this point.
"Columbia City Council decided to hold off on a curfew for teens 17-years old and younger.
City Attorney Ken Gaines and Police Chief Randy Scott say there isn't enough data to prove that juveniles are committing a significant amount of crime in the Capital City.
Councilwoman Tameika Isaac Devine says the city could face a lawsuit if it passes this ordinance in a hurry."
It took the savage beaten of Carter Strange to get this passed; someone should arrest every council member who didn't want this bill passed because it would disproportionately affect Black people.
The blood of Carter Strange is on Tameika Isaac Devine hands.
So what is it that you want, expect, encourage white people to do??? At some point, white "race realists" (or whatever you want to call yourself) have to stop whining and start advocating. This is the achilles heel of conservatives in this country. They never actually do anything. They bitch and moan, but at the end of the day they go along willingly with Black Run America or whatever it is you want to call the dominant liberal establishment. Talking will accomplish nothing.
Another flash mob in Philadelphia: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/06/flashmobbery-in-philly-100-youths-storm-through-city-center-on-robbery-assault-rampage/
Ret'd LAPD here. I would like to assure everyone that the cops are not blind to the racial nature of beatdowns (among other violent acts) committed by blacks on whites and everyone else. I can't recall how many times I and other cops wanted to pursue hate crime charges against blacks and Hispanics but were dissuaded from doing so by Sergeants (who have to approve reports prior to being submitted to the DA's office) and Lieutenants.
We would charge these assailants with as much as we could to attest to the racial aspect of the beatdown, but the department and DA would always remove the obvious racial aspect to prevent a black/Hispanic backlash from their communities. If they let us pursue hate crime charges the result would be mass rioting by those who say they're not violent.
Even though the department (many departments across the US actually) sometimes liberals do admit the truth. The LA Times has a blog called The Homicide Report which dares to mention the race of an attacker, something I never thought this "Pravda" would do.
Anon 8:13 am Here's what I want, though I can't speak for everyone.
1. Take the blindfolds off of mainstream America by thoroughly discrediting DWL, BRA, and exposing MSM censorship regarding black criminality, welfare, affirmative action.
2. Take the handcuffs off of law enforcement. Enable them to do their job to the best of their ability without fear of reprisal from black shakedown groups like the ACLU and Al Sharpton.
3. Re establish a culture of meritocracy. Eliminate all policies and programs aimed at "advancing underrepresented" or "culturally disadvantaged" groups.
4. Establish time and budget limits on welfare.
5. Modify Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Person's born in the US should require at least 1 parent who is a citizen.
"1. Take the blindfolds off of mainstream America by thoroughly discrediting DWL, BRA, and exposing MSM censorship regarding black criminality, welfare, affirmative action."
Of course, the MSM is owned and run by "Those we can't talk about". And can't talk about even on this website I might add.
If I ever get attacked by a pack of "teenage honor students", the first words out of my mouth when the cops come and do a report will be "I'm a proud gay male and these hateful teens attacked me for being who I am!" I'll go all out and fly around like a flaming fruit cake until the court case is over to get a hate crime charge to stick one.
Of related interest, from today's Irish Savant blog:
"The mayor of Darby Borough (an exurb of Philadelphia) is pleased. Calm has descended on the town. Calm has descended because she's imposed a curfew – you know the kind of thing we read about in Baghdad, Syria, Gaza and such places. For those of you still surprised to see the sun rise in the east every day I’ll add that Darby is overwhelmingly black.
And why the curfew? Guns are causing a problem, according to the authorities. Not, mind you, the people who discharge said guns. Rather the guns themselves. Strange, no? Maybe they should give out different guns, then everything would be ok.
So the US has reached a stage where curfews are added to the list of rights violations. We can add violation of:
() the 1st Amendment by placing protesters in cages, banning books like “America Deceived II” and censoring the internet.
() the 4th and 5th Amendment by molesting airline passengers
() the entire Constitution by starting undeclared foreign, wars
And, as uniformed thugs like the TSA and black mobs run riot, the ‘authorities’, embodied in AG Eric ‘my people’ Holder, have made it a priority to confiscate legally-held guns – violating the 2nd Amendment
Am I paranoid, or are certain people preparing for certain events for which a disarmed white citizenry is a requirement?"
You all already know this, but it needs to be said.
White men are still seen by liberals, gays, and minorities as the oppressor, the "Man". White men are smarter, richer, more successful, more easily educated, more civil, and more law abiding that non-Asian minorities. Because of this natural ability, whites are seen as "privileged" in America, because we are the majority AND because we are part of Western Civilization with European roots, AND because we have shown that we can stomp one big giant foot down on a group when we want to.
This waking of the sleeping giant scares some people to death.
If you think that law enforcement or government will change this view any time soon, you are crazy. This is why there is no such thing as "reverse racism" in their eyes. Blacks and other minorities can do no wrong because they can't compete with whites and they are protected by law by our own government. The government does not represent the people. We must change this. Whites have the advantage in EVERY situation if they are allowed to act (except for nine-to-one beatings, apparently).
Whites can easily be accused of the oppression of any minority or homosexual because they are the majority and not a protected victim group, and because whites are considered a threat to diversity and multiculturalism. Until whites become a statistical minority and by law considered a protected class, unfortunately, this probably will not change.
Unemployment In The Black Community - Black unemployment has hit Depression-era levels. We’ll look at the causes and possible solutions.
The jobless rate in America is more than nine percent, but in African-American communities it’s back at Great Depression levels: Sixteen percent, and even worse for black males.
If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night.
I agree with Ret. I was a Deputy Sheriff for a couple of years and DA's make the charges in doing so they think of every possible outcome associated with said charges.
In essence they know any Hate Crime charges against blacks will instantly be met with opposition by black politicians and the NAACP, ACLU, SPLC, etc.
I like the suggestions displayed here read any of the comments sections online was these attacks have taken place. Those Who Can See are increasing in number now we just need to mobilize.
I have already noticed a back lash by MSM when opening my Yahoo mail I met by the News of the day and recently have seen more articles discussing Survivalist Groups, Skinhead/White Nationalist groups. The MSM is trying to stop us before we start by comparing HBD believers with Skinheads. They are fearful more will join our ranks because when we have enough to reach a tipping point BRA is doomed.
"Gays aren't in the streets beating and looting, now are they?"
Is "gay" a race now? White-Amer., Black-Amer.,... gay-American? It's ironic that homosexuals can even discriminate against any minority when they are the first to bring up the fact their brushes with "discrimination" are tangential to the racial/ethnic Civil Rights movements in this country. I disagree with the comparison; although, you can "tell" if you have really good gaydar, most gays can hide it fairly well. You can't hide your racial/ethnic features and, thus, the discrimination would be unavoidable.
Stereotype or not, "gays"--for a lack of a more scientific descriptor--are more likely than heterosexual men to affect a feminized behavior pattern. While I don't believe homosexuals are "born that way," effeminate gays, like women, compared to heterosexual men, are less likely to break the law.
Therefore, you'd have no problem.
Gays, white gays specifically, are also more likely to be richer and more educated. As we all know, poverty and crime are linked.
Whenever homosexuality is mentioned on this website, many gays or gay-sympathizers emerge into the comments. This is actually unremarkable: there is a thriving male homosexual artery within the white nationalist movement, although your "quasi-nationalists" tend to be more conservative and disagree with homosexuality.
Anyway...
Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate; it looked as though it was a gang initiation attack. It's just reactive for anyone to assume race difference between criminal and victim means hate crime. America is diverse. However, gays make up about 1-2% of the US population and only 5-6 states have legal gay marriage, my own state having a constitutional amendment banning gays from wedding.
Given this, the likelihood of a beating being a "hate crime" when the victim is a homosexual--most likely an effeminate and/or flamboyant gay--and a straight perp is much higher than the incidence of a white beaten by a black or vice versa.
Thirty years ago, the late Joe Sobran said that there are no double standards, just a single standard that you're not aware of. Reds might change their appearance, but they're always the same inside.
I should add, I don't think this was a hate crime. It sounds like a robbery and this gay man happened to be an easy victim. Because someone uses a slur during the commission of an assault does not necessarily mean they were attacked because of their group status.
(White) gays, while only 1-2% of the population, are sacred cows.
@ Anon 2:40
"If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night."
"Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate"
Diarrhea, you don't have a fucking clue about the motivation of those 8 black thugs. I can't imagine why'd you'd say something so foolish, but it seems to be your habit.
If you can produce an assault history of them attacking non-whites, then your argument would be more convincing.
I've said it before and had it deleted so I will try again as this issue is of great concern to me.
One thing you cannot count on is other whites, not anytime soon anyway. With that in mind you had better get smart and aware. For starters think of the commonalities among these victims. The feral groups that commit these crimes pick easy targets...they are not looking for a test. There are ways to mitigate your probability of being selected as a victim; 1) understand how victims are selected 2) learn how to appear as sh*t on a shingle vs. prime rib to those looking for an easy meal.
The book "Violence, Blunders and Fractured Jaws" is an excellent treatment of the subject.
Likewise, "The Gift of Fear" by Gavin DeBecker is highly recommended.
I'll stop at that but there is so much more to say on the subject of "what to do?"
Preparedness and superior mentality is everything.
As a teacher of Self Defense, I must slightly disagree with both your premise and your advice. Though there are very effective ways to avoid being picked as an individual target by the negroid, this applies a great deal less when speaking about a mob. A group of fifty or more negroids will take on anyone, be he a weightlifter looking confident in the daytime or a weak person radiating fear at night. Normal rules of contact avoidance are far less effective when the mob controls the entire area.
Further, it is obvious that this kind of behavior, (avoiding the negro, staying inside during the times it is active, selling property and going to a White-Utopia when violence was increasing is WHAT GOT US HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. We can't run any more. We are at the point where normal people must fight back because they are the next target. You are not rich if you own a cell phone. You are not rich if you own an iPad, yet to carry such down the street invites attack. Again, to carry ordinary tools of modern day life down the street invites attack from negroids.
The police owe no duty to protect you, which makes the plaintive calls to 911 in the face of hundreds of rioting negroids all the more tragic. You are responsible for you. Your Second Amendment rights are more expansive than at any time in our Nations History. What is missing is will.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, it seemed that the people newly freed were gutted Spiritually, that to make the jump to Freedom had been beaten out of them. What was missing was individual responsibility and the ability to act. We in this country have also lost that Spirit, by a process that we are only now acknowledging to ourselves. We know that to fully take back our streets and our cities would take confrontation, shooting and killing and perhaps the removal of the negroid from our land. Most will take the path of least responsibility, to do violence only when the negroid comes to YOUR door, takes YOUR iPad, rapes YOUR wife or daughter, tries to crush YOUR eye socket. I hope that at that time, you will fight like a Tiger. But that moment is upon you because you did not fight when things were better. If every porch in Petoria had dropped one negroid with a rifle shot the Summer would be totally quiet. Instead, we are like the mice in Esops fables, voting to bell the cat.
I will read your book, but may I recommend "In the Gravest Extreme" by my teacher, Massad Ayoob.
Maybe this one will go through (stupid Firefox 3.6!)
One should look at Gays as an example. Gays are only 2-3% of the population, but hit far above their demographic weight? Why? Because White women love them, that's why! Gays really only became an electoral and social force when Women became dominant in voting and consumer patterns (thus advertising and advertising supported media). Watch any showing of the Today Show. It is totally oriented towards White women, and is completely Gay-celebratory. And just as significant, anti-White guy.
White Identity never developed, unlike Gay, Lesbian, Disabled, Deaf, and a zillion other identities that describe only tiny fractions (below 5%) of the population. Certainly White GAYS have an identity, as do White Lesbians. But not White GUYS. Why?
IMHO, because women punish White Identity in many ways. Denial of access to the sexual marketplace is the most important (and enforced rigorously against those in that market). Social ostracism and so on in other ways for older guys not looking to score. White women generally figure, if a White guy got a beat down, he deserved it. Because he was not Alpha enough. That's pretty much how the non-stop sorting out of Alphas from Betas happens. White women alone spend a LOT of time disparaging White guys (commercials make White guys into doofuses because that's how their target market, White women, view them). Commercials feature Middle Class blacks a lot, because White women prefer that "pretty lie" as Roissy puts it. ONLY White guys have no developed Identity and pressure group, and the reaction of White women in preventing it is I think the explanation. [White women LOVE LOVE LOVE their gays, any female oriented entertainment will have tons of gays in it, because most White women prefer their men Alpha A-hole or gay, gay GAY! dang it! The ickiest thing is a non-dominant White guy expressing interest in them.]
The key is to turn around White women's views of White guys. Only then will an acceptable White identity be OK, the way Gay or Deaf or so on White subcultures (Goth, for example) are now to the gatekeepers -- White women.
"Your Second Amendment rights are more expansive than at any time in our Nations History."
Hogwash. Pre 1968 or 1934 you had far more 2nd ammendment "rights" than now. In 1933 you could order a fully automatic tommy gun, shipped to your door.
Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate; it looked as though it was a gang initiation attack.
Precisely. And Chrissy Lee Polis was not a victim of a hate crime because it was only a gang initiation. (Which Teonna Monae Brown had to take twice as she was too stupid to pass it the first time owing to the man not educating her correctly as not enough money was spent on her school. And slavery. And the failure to convict the policemen who saved Rodney King's life.)
"If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night."
Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity." Blacks and crime are linked, rich or poor, doesn't matter.
As for Mr. Strange's run in with "basically good kids" (that's defense lawyer speak for black kids that haven't been arrested for several violent felonies yet) just know that this wouldn't have happened 50 years ago. No way. Thanks to black worshiping leftists the South in particular is enduring a second reconstruction. Gerrymandered districts put hostile black representatives in your face. Black mayors dominate every major city. Feral black youths run amok with no fear or understanding of consequence.
People used to laugh and say "come on" when I used to tell them that I would rather deal with the Taliban than live amongst ghetto blacks. They don't say that any more.
"Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity.""
I think urban areas, in general, will have more crime than rural areas simply because of the associated claustrophobia with the former. If stuck in a more confined space, people tend to get more stressed and become more reactive than if they weren't in that condition. Wouldn't you be more volatile if you were stranded with other people on an elevator instead of in a banquet hall?
Nice middle class ladies of the white race used to go into early 20th century East Coast tenements and "advise" impoverished white ethnics on how to raise their children and how to "behave". Remember nativism: white Americans blamed social ills on largely poor, urban white ethnics. There's great cartoons of the time showing violent, ape-like Irish women contrasted with these middle class American ladies.
A crime rate disparity between rural and urban areas is a given. Add class and it's a given. When you put together the fact blacks are more likely to be poor and live in urban areas, it's not all that surprising...
I don't think anyone denies that blacks commit crime at higher rates than others but I find it strange that you'd be so simplistic and say being black makes someone more likely to break the law. You could try to be predictive and apply a statistical probability based upon current rates but it still is not complete enough to say being black is a significant predisposition to breaking the law. You'd have to prove it genetically.
I don't believe blacks are inferior, for the record.
Ghetto-behaving blacks are the problem, not blacks as a whole. I can be honest enough to admit that, everyone should. If every black was like Sowell or Williams or Oprah or yes, even the Obamas, anyone who demonized blacks for being black would rightly get a kick in the pants. I think that's the problem with sites like this because there is no grey. I can see how people can be turned off by a site like this one. Maybe they've had it with ghetto blacks but adore their black colleagues?
Until whites become a statistical minority and by law considered a protected class, unfortunately, this probably will not change.
My friend, when whites become a minority this country will have sunk into full-on tinpot dictatorship. Dictators generally don't let something as weak and feckless as the law dictate whether or not to crush their longstanding enemies.
There will be no seamless transition from oppressor to oppressed w/extra rights when we are a minority. Rather, the enemy will take that opportunity to finish us off, Zimbabwe-style.
haha! yeah, i know springfield, ma. it is a hellhole of a city. it recently got hit by, of all things, a tornado. the looting began literally a few minutes after it passed.
"Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity." Blacks and crime are linked, rich or poor, doesn't matter. "
I can attest to the validity of this statement, as I live there. Violence is virtually unheard of here, except the occasional domestic dispute, etc.
The correlations between poverty and violence don't hold water. We're poor but we're civilized poor crackers.
AND WE ALL OWN WEAPONS! So gang bangers and thugs, it's best to keep your violent @$$e$ out of Appalachia: 10-4?
I read with interest what one of Diarrhea's numerous alter-egos recently posted.
Here she states :
'I think urban areas, in general, will have more crime than rural areas simply because of the associated claustrophobia with the former. If stuck in a more confined space, people tend to get more stressed and become more reactive than if they weren't in that condition...'
Thank you Diarrhea ! Finally someone has solved the mystery of Tokyo's crime-ridden subway system. ;-D
Bubo: The Black/White gap is not limited to crime. It applies across all behaviors, and the differences are extreme. Blacks who make $75K have worse credit than Whites who make $35K, on average. Rich Black's kids do worse on the SAT than poor White's kids. The patterns are consistent. On and on, whatever the attribute being measured, there is no equality between the races. The politically orthodox explanation is White racism. The logical and scientific explanation is Nature's racism. Try reading Nicholas Wade, the NY Times science writer, for an absolutely mainstream explanation of the matter.
54 comments:
I'm here is Columbia, SC, we're so progressive we just elected our first black mayor, and the chief of police is black too, and the majority of the members on the council,,, you get the picture. This is the new 'merica, and obamanation of the original.
This area in Columbia where he was beaten has been having problems for years with gangs doing beat up whitey iniations, in the last year and a half it has escalated to this point.
Columbia's elected officials debated putting a curfew into effect back in March of 2011, but Black members balked at the idea:
http://www.midlandsconnect.com/news/story.aspx?id=590447
"Columbia City Council decided to hold off on a curfew for teens 17-years old and younger.
City Attorney Ken Gaines and Police Chief Randy Scott say there isn't enough data to prove that juveniles are committing a significant amount of crime in the Capital City.
Councilwoman Tameika Isaac Devine says the city could face a lawsuit if it passes this ordinance in a hurry."
They passed an emergency curfew yesterday:
http://www.thestate.com/2011/06/28/1877405/council-passes-emergency-curfew.html
It took the savage beaten of Carter Strange to get this passed; someone should arrest every council member who didn't want this bill passed because it would disproportionately affect Black people.
The blood of Carter Strange is on Tameika Isaac Devine hands.
Here's another ape assault by a gang in Philly:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20110629_Teens_in_a_mob_assault_and_rob_Center_City_patrons.html
When are you people going to arm up and fight back?!?!?!
So what is it that you want, expect, encourage white people to do??? At some point, white "race realists" (or whatever you want to call yourself) have to stop whining and start advocating. This is the achilles heel of conservatives in this country. They never actually do anything. They bitch and moan, but at the end of the day they go along willingly with Black Run America or whatever it is you want to call the dominant liberal establishment. Talking will accomplish nothing.
"So what is it that you want, expect, encourage white people to do???"
Step One: Confront the reality that you have been force-fed a gigantic lie, un-indoctrinate yourself, and join the ranks of THOSE WHO CAN SEE.
In order to have sociopolitical clout, you must first have numbers.
Spread the word.
Another flash mob in Philadelphia: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/06/flashmobbery-in-philly-100-youths-storm-through-city-center-on-robbery-assault-rampage/
Ret'd LAPD here. I would like to assure everyone that the cops are not blind to the racial nature of beatdowns (among other violent acts) committed by blacks on whites and everyone else. I can't recall how many times I and other cops wanted to pursue hate crime charges against blacks and Hispanics but were dissuaded from doing so by Sergeants (who have to approve reports prior to being submitted to the DA's office) and Lieutenants.
We would charge these assailants with as much as we could to attest to the racial aspect of the beatdown, but the department and DA would always remove the obvious racial aspect to prevent a black/Hispanic backlash from their communities. If they let us pursue hate crime charges the result would be mass rioting by those who say they're not violent.
Even though the department (many departments across the US actually) sometimes liberals do admit the truth. The LA Times has a blog called The Homicide Report which dares to mention the race of an attacker, something I never thought this "Pravda" would do.
Anon 8:13 am
Here's what I want, though I can't speak for everyone.
1. Take the blindfolds off of mainstream America by thoroughly discrediting DWL, BRA, and exposing MSM censorship regarding black criminality, welfare, affirmative action.
2. Take the handcuffs off of law enforcement. Enable them to do their job to the best of their ability without fear of reprisal from black shakedown groups like the ACLU and Al Sharpton.
3. Re establish a culture of meritocracy. Eliminate all policies and programs aimed at "advancing underrepresented" or "culturally disadvantaged" groups.
4. Establish time and budget limits on welfare.
5. Modify Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Person's born in the US should require at least 1 parent who is a citizen.
@Sheila
Ahhh the City of the Brother's Niggerly Love...o
"1. Take the blindfolds off of mainstream America by thoroughly discrediting DWL, BRA, and exposing MSM censorship regarding black criminality, welfare, affirmative action."
Of course, the MSM is owned and run by "Those we can't talk about". And can't talk about even on this website I might add.
SG
Looks like the double standard to investigate crimes against others bullying a black student in Santa Monica still exists.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/29/2290818/black-student-in-ca-says-he-was.html
Correct. It's not a "double standard," but a Single Standard.
If I ever get attacked by a pack of "teenage honor students", the first words out of my mouth when the cops come and do a report will be "I'm a proud gay male and these hateful teens attacked me for being who I am!" I'll go all out and fly around like a flaming fruit cake until the court case is over to get a hate crime charge to stick one.
It cannot be a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate-hate.
Yours sincerely,
Caryn Jackson (America's idiot)
Of related interest, from today's Irish Savant blog:
"The mayor of Darby Borough (an exurb of Philadelphia) is pleased. Calm has descended on the town. Calm has descended because she's imposed a curfew – you know the kind of thing we read about in Baghdad, Syria, Gaza and such places. For those of you still surprised to see the sun rise in the east every day I’ll add that Darby is overwhelmingly black.
And why the curfew? Guns are causing a problem, according to the authorities. Not, mind you, the people who discharge said guns. Rather the guns themselves. Strange, no? Maybe they should give out different guns, then everything would be ok.
So the US has reached a stage where curfews are added to the list of rights violations. We can add violation of:
() the 1st Amendment by placing protesters in cages, banning books like “America Deceived II” and censoring the internet.
() the 4th and 5th Amendment by molesting airline passengers
() the entire Constitution by starting undeclared foreign, wars
And, as uniformed thugs like the TSA and black mobs run riot, the ‘authorities’, embodied in AG Eric ‘my people’ Holder, have made it a priority to confiscate legally-held guns – violating the 2nd Amendment
Am I paranoid, or are certain people preparing for certain events for which a disarmed white citizenry is a requirement?"
You all already know this, but it needs to be said.
White men are still seen by liberals, gays, and minorities as the oppressor, the "Man". White men are smarter, richer, more successful, more easily educated, more civil, and more law abiding that non-Asian minorities. Because of this natural ability, whites are seen as "privileged" in America, because we are the majority AND because we are part of Western Civilization with European roots, AND because we have shown that we can stomp one big giant foot down on a group when we want to.
This waking of the sleeping giant scares some people to death.
If you think that law enforcement or government will change this view any time soon, you are crazy. This is why there is no such thing as "reverse racism" in their eyes. Blacks and other minorities can do no wrong because they can't compete with whites and they are protected by law by our own government. The government does not represent the people. We must change this. Whites have the advantage in EVERY situation if they are allowed to act (except for nine-to-one beatings, apparently).
Whites can easily be accused of the oppression of any minority or homosexual because they are the majority and not a protected victim group, and because whites are considered a threat to diversity and multiculturalism. Until whites become a statistical minority and by law considered a protected class, unfortunately, this probably will not change.
Unemployment In The Black Community - Black unemployment has hit Depression-era levels. We’ll look at the causes and possible solutions.
The jobless rate in America is more than nine percent, but in African-American communities it’s back at Great Depression levels: Sixteen percent, and even worse for black males.
- http://onpoint.wbur.org/2011/06/29/black-unemployment
I thought this was Stuff Black People Don't Like, not Stuff Gay People Don't Like. Gays aren't in the streets beating and looting, now are they?
I didn't see where I attacked homosexuals in this piece. Find where I did and point it out.
I think this Orwell quote is SBPDL's de facto motto: "Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act."
If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night.
I agree with Ret. I was a Deputy Sheriff for a couple of years and DA's make the charges in doing so they think of every possible outcome associated with said charges.
In essence they know any Hate Crime charges against blacks will instantly be met with opposition by black politicians and the NAACP, ACLU, SPLC, etc.
I like the suggestions displayed here read any of the comments sections online was these attacks have taken place. Those Who Can See are increasing in number now we just need to mobilize.
I have already noticed a back lash by MSM when opening my Yahoo mail I met by the News of the day and recently have seen more articles discussing Survivalist Groups, Skinhead/White Nationalist groups. The MSM is trying to stop us before we start by comparing HBD believers with Skinheads. They are fearful more will join our ranks because when we have enough to reach a tipping point BRA is doomed.
MuayTyson
@ Anon 1:42
"Gays aren't in the streets beating and looting, now are they?"
Is "gay" a race now? White-Amer., Black-Amer.,... gay-American? It's ironic that homosexuals can even discriminate against any minority when they are the first to bring up the fact their brushes with "discrimination" are tangential to the racial/ethnic Civil Rights movements in this country. I disagree with the comparison; although, you can "tell" if you have really good gaydar, most gays can hide it fairly well. You can't hide your racial/ethnic features and, thus, the discrimination would be unavoidable.
Stereotype or not, "gays"--for a lack of a more scientific descriptor--are more likely than heterosexual men to affect a feminized behavior pattern. While I don't believe homosexuals are "born that way," effeminate gays, like women, compared to heterosexual men, are less likely to break the law.
Therefore, you'd have no problem.
Gays, white gays specifically, are also more likely to be richer and more educated. As we all know, poverty and crime are linked.
Whenever homosexuality is mentioned on this website, many gays or gay-sympathizers emerge into the comments. This is actually unremarkable: there is a thriving male homosexual artery within the white nationalist movement, although your "quasi-nationalists" tend to be more conservative and disagree with homosexuality.
Anyway...
Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate; it looked as though it was a gang initiation attack. It's just reactive for anyone to assume race difference between criminal and victim means hate crime. America is diverse. However, gays make up about 1-2% of the US population and only 5-6 states have legal gay marriage, my own state having a constitutional amendment banning gays from wedding.
Given this, the likelihood of a beating being a "hate crime" when the victim is a homosexual--most likely an effeminate and/or flamboyant gay--and a straight perp is much higher than the incidence of a white beaten by a black or vice versa.
"Looks like the double standard to investigate crimes against others bullying a black student in Santa Monica still exists."
Bet heavily that the entire noose story is a fabrication.
Thirty years ago, the late Joe Sobran said that there are no double standards, just a single standard that you're not aware of. Reds might change their appearance, but they're always the same inside.
I should add, I don't think this was a hate crime. It sounds like a robbery and this gay man happened to be an easy victim. Because someone uses a slur during the commission of an assault does not necessarily mean they were attacked because of their group status.
(White) gays, while only 1-2% of the population, are sacred cows.
@ Anon 2:40
"If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night."
No, they wouldn't. Come on now.
"Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate"
Diarrhea, you don't have a fucking clue about the motivation of those 8 black thugs. I can't imagine why'd you'd say something so foolish, but it seems to be your habit.
If you can produce an assault history of them attacking non-whites, then your argument would be more convincing.
But of course, you can't.
"I should add, I don't think this was a hate crime."
You are consistent in your belief that black-on-white violence is never motivated by hate, you don't need to keep repeating yourself.
We get it.
Not surprised to find Desiree, aka anon @ 2:55, preaching homophobic hate.
I've said it before and had it deleted so I will try again as this issue is of great concern to me.
One thing you cannot count on is other whites, not anytime soon anyway. With that in mind you had better get smart and aware. For starters think of the commonalities among these victims. The feral groups that commit these crimes pick easy targets...they are not looking for a test. There are ways to mitigate your probability of being selected as a victim; 1) understand how victims are selected 2) learn how to appear as sh*t on a shingle vs. prime rib to those looking for an easy meal.
The book "Violence, Blunders and Fractured Jaws" is an excellent treatment of the subject.
Likewise, "The Gift of Fear" by Gavin DeBecker is highly recommended.
I'll stop at that but there is so much more to say on the subject of "what to do?"
Preparedness and superior mentality is everything.
Newsflash! Desiree says the Carter Strange beating was not a hate crime!
"Bet heavily that the entire noose story is a fabrication."
That appears to be correct.
When I read the article, I thought it had to be a prank by student athletes.
The local news reports that the coach said this reported incident was really two separate things.
The rope or knot and dummy were part of a practice set up and had nothing to do a hanging noose.
The incident of tying up the boy was a practical joke by teammates... something the coach said goes on all the time.
There were never any racial remarks made at any time.
Of course, this is still being investigated by the PC authorities.
Anon @ 3:37
As a teacher of Self Defense, I must slightly disagree with both your premise and your advice. Though there are very effective ways to avoid being picked as an individual target by the negroid, this applies a great deal less when speaking about a mob. A group of fifty or more negroids will take on anyone, be he a weightlifter looking confident in the daytime or a weak person radiating fear at night. Normal rules of contact avoidance are far less effective when the mob controls the entire area.
Further, it is obvious that this kind of behavior, (avoiding the negro, staying inside during the times it is active, selling property and going to a White-Utopia when violence was increasing is WHAT GOT US HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. We can't run any more. We are at the point where normal people must fight back because they are the next target. You are not rich if you own a cell phone. You are not rich if you own an iPad, yet to carry such down the street invites attack. Again, to carry ordinary tools of modern day life down the street invites attack from negroids.
The police owe no duty to protect you, which makes the plaintive calls to 911 in the face of hundreds of rioting negroids all the more tragic. You are responsible for you. Your Second Amendment rights are more expansive than at any time in our Nations History. What is missing is will.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, it seemed that the people newly freed were gutted Spiritually, that to make the jump to Freedom had been beaten out of them. What was missing was individual responsibility and the ability to act. We in this country have also lost that Spirit, by a process that we are only now acknowledging to ourselves. We know that to fully take back our streets and our cities would take confrontation, shooting and killing and perhaps the removal of the negroid from our land. Most will take the path of least responsibility, to do violence only when the negroid comes to YOUR door, takes YOUR iPad, rapes YOUR wife or daughter, tries to crush YOUR eye socket. I hope that at that time, you will fight like a Tiger. But that moment is upon you because you did not fight when things were better. If every porch in Petoria had dropped one negroid with a rifle shot the Summer would be totally quiet. Instead, we are like the mice in Esops fables, voting to bell the cat.
I will read your book, but may I recommend "In the Gravest Extreme" by my teacher, Massad Ayoob.
Maybe this one will go through (stupid Firefox 3.6!)
One should look at Gays as an example. Gays are only 2-3% of the population, but hit far above their demographic weight? Why? Because White women love them, that's why! Gays really only became an electoral and social force when Women became dominant in voting and consumer patterns (thus advertising and advertising supported media). Watch any showing of the Today Show. It is totally oriented towards White women, and is completely Gay-celebratory. And just as significant, anti-White guy.
White Identity never developed, unlike Gay, Lesbian, Disabled, Deaf, and a zillion other identities that describe only tiny fractions (below 5%) of the population. Certainly White GAYS have an identity, as do White Lesbians. But not White GUYS. Why?
IMHO, because women punish White Identity in many ways. Denial of access to the sexual marketplace is the most important (and enforced rigorously against those in that market). Social ostracism and so on in other ways for older guys not looking to score. White women generally figure, if a White guy got a beat down, he deserved it. Because he was not Alpha enough. That's pretty much how the non-stop sorting out of Alphas from Betas happens. White women alone spend a LOT of time disparaging White guys (commercials make White guys into doofuses because that's how their target market, White women, view them). Commercials feature Middle Class blacks a lot, because White women prefer that "pretty lie" as Roissy puts it. ONLY White guys have no developed Identity and pressure group, and the reaction of White women in preventing it is I think the explanation. [White women LOVE LOVE LOVE their gays, any female oriented entertainment will have tons of gays in it, because most White women prefer their men Alpha A-hole or gay, gay GAY! dang it! The ickiest thing is a non-dominant White guy expressing interest in them.]
The key is to turn around White women's views of White guys. Only then will an acceptable White identity be OK, the way Gay or Deaf or so on White subcultures (Goth, for example) are now to the gatekeepers -- White women.
"Your Second Amendment rights are more expansive than at any time in our Nations History."
Hogwash. Pre 1968 or 1934 you had far more 2nd ammendment "rights" than now. In 1933 you could order a fully automatic tommy gun, shipped to your door.
Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate; it looked as though it was a gang initiation attack.
Precisely. And Chrissy Lee Polis was not a victim of a hate crime because it was only a gang initiation.
(Which Teonna Monae Brown had to take twice as she was too stupid to pass it the first time owing to the man not educating her correctly as not enough money was spent on her school. And slavery. And the failure to convict the policemen who saved Rodney King's life.)
"If Carter Strange was carrying a gun and retaliated against the thugs attacking him, you can bet your ass that the NAACP and the lefties would be screaming about a hate crime if there were a few dead Blacks laid out in the street that night."
No, they wouldn't. Come on now. "
Ever heard of Bernard Goetz? Look him up.
"Carter Strange's beating was not a hate crime because it was not motivated by hate; it looked as though it was a gang initiation attack."
Then Medgar Evers and Emmett Till were not hate crimes. It was just whites sick of black crime - not a hatred of black skin.
"As we all know, poverty and crime are linked."
Not true. Rich and middle class blacks cause more crime than poor whites and Asians.
Race and crime are linked.
"As we all know, poverty and crime are linked."
Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity." Blacks and crime are linked, rich or poor, doesn't matter.
As for Mr. Strange's run in with "basically good kids" (that's defense lawyer speak for black kids that haven't been arrested for several violent felonies yet) just know that this wouldn't have happened 50 years ago. No way. Thanks to black worshiping leftists the South in particular is enduring a second reconstruction. Gerrymandered districts put hostile black representatives in your face. Black mayors dominate every major city. Feral black youths run amok with no fear or understanding of consequence.
People used to laugh and say "come on" when I used to tell them that I would rather deal with the Taliban than live amongst ghetto blacks. They don't say that any more.
Not surprised to find Desiree, aka anon @ 2:55, preaching homophobic hate.
He ain't Desiree. What a typical knee-jerk liberal comment. Are you going to call me a homophobe because I don't believe homosexuality is moral?
i like when i read obituaries of
some young black male and they describe him as an "aspiring rapper"
always makes me laugh
Ret'd LAPD here. I saw many a tribute to these "aspiring rapper" obits; I just started calling them "expiring rappers" afterwards
Can we drop the whole gay discussion please? All of that belongs on a different web site, one that I won't visit because the topic bores me to tears.
Let's focus on our obsession with our dusky brothers & sisters & their continued delightful behavior. Please, Thanks.
bubo said...
"Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity.""
I think urban areas, in general, will have more crime than rural areas simply because of the associated claustrophobia with the former. If stuck in a more confined space, people tend to get more stressed and become more reactive than if they weren't in that condition. Wouldn't you be more volatile if you were stranded with other people on an elevator instead of in a banquet hall?
Nice middle class ladies of the white race used to go into early 20th century East Coast tenements and "advise" impoverished white ethnics on how to raise their children and how to "behave". Remember nativism: white Americans blamed social ills on largely poor, urban white ethnics. There's great cartoons of the time showing violent, ape-like Irish women contrasted with these middle class American ladies.
A crime rate disparity between rural and urban areas is a given. Add class and it's a given. When you put together the fact blacks are more likely to be poor and live in urban areas, it's not all that surprising...
I don't think anyone denies that blacks commit crime at higher rates than others but I find it strange that you'd be so simplistic and say being black makes someone more likely to break the law. You could try to be predictive and apply a statistical probability based upon current rates but it still is not complete enough to say being black is a significant predisposition to breaking the law. You'd have to prove it genetically.
I don't believe blacks are inferior, for the record.
Ghetto-behaving blacks are the problem, not blacks as a whole. I can be honest enough to admit that, everyone should. If every black was like Sowell or Williams or Oprah or yes, even the Obamas, anyone who demonized blacks for being black would rightly get a kick in the pants. I think that's the problem with sites like this because there is no grey. I can see how people can be turned off by a site like this one. Maybe they've had it with ghetto blacks but adore their black colleagues?
Until whites become a statistical minority and by law considered a protected class, unfortunately, this probably will not change.
My friend, when whites become a minority this country will have sunk into full-on tinpot dictatorship. Dictators generally don't let something as weak and feckless as the law dictate whether or not to crush their longstanding enemies.
There will be no seamless transition from oppressor to oppressed w/extra rights when we are a minority. Rather, the enemy will take that opportunity to finish us off, Zimbabwe-style.
This isn't a game. It's a war.
haha! yeah, i know springfield, ma. it is a hellhole of a city. it recently got hit by, of all things, a tornado. the looting began literally a few minutes after it passed.
"Lie. The most impoverished sections of the country, deep Appalachia, have much lower violent crime rates than LA or Chicago or Atlanta or any city rich in "diversity." Blacks and crime are linked, rich or poor, doesn't matter. "
I can attest to the validity of this statement, as I live there. Violence is virtually unheard of here, except the occasional domestic dispute, etc.
The correlations between poverty and violence don't hold water. We're poor but we're civilized poor crackers.
AND WE ALL OWN WEAPONS! So gang bangers and thugs, it's best to keep your violent @$$e$ out of Appalachia: 10-4?
At Anon. July 1, 2011 1:58 AM
I read with interest what one of Diarrhea's numerous alter-egos recently posted.
Here she states :
'I think urban areas, in general, will have more crime than rural areas simply because of the associated claustrophobia with the former. If stuck in a more confined space, people tend to get more stressed and become more reactive than if they weren't in that condition...'
Thank you Diarrhea ! Finally someone has solved the mystery of Tokyo's crime-ridden subway system. ;-D
Bubo: The Black/White gap is not limited to crime. It applies across all behaviors, and the differences are extreme. Blacks who make $75K have worse credit than Whites who make $35K, on average. Rich Black's kids do worse on the SAT than poor White's kids. The patterns are consistent. On and on, whatever the attribute being measured, there is no equality between the races. The politically orthodox explanation is White racism. The logical and scientific explanation is Nature's racism. Try reading Nicholas Wade, the NY Times science writer, for an absolutely mainstream explanation of the matter.
Anybody compare the photos of Carter Strange and Shay Edwards? Both have short hair, so the craniums are easily seen. The inequality is obvious.
Diarrhea also explains why the Trailer parks of Salt Lake City, Utah are also havens of crime.
The only problem with Diarrhea's 9:29 post is, blacks are also over-represented in white collar(or is it called black collar?) crime.
Funny that.
Post a Comment