Tuesday, February 7, 2012

It's Time to Play the Game: All-In on a STRESS-free Detroit vs. Rudy's Post-Dinkins NYC

PK Note: Sunday, the long-awaited article on Atlanta and The Walking Dead will be released on Sunday, in honor of the return to AMC of the hit zombie apocalypse show. Many of those who reside in the seemingly never-ending suburbs of the greater metro Atlanta-area exist in a momentary state of peace, though this safety is fleeting.


Since it's Black History Month, a return of Black Fictional Heroes will commence on Thursday.

Your average cop in Detroit, post-STRESS
You may have noticed a trend growing here at Stuff Black People Don't Like: an all-out assault on Detroit, the greatest representation of Actual Black Run America (ABRA) available for study.

No, not the Detroit that has come to symbolize the Big Three Automakers, entering our lexicon as some synonym for the combined fortunes of Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. We aren't talking about the Detroit that has been rebuilt in the Whitopia's surrounding the city, a place where commerce lives on, school systems produce college-ready graduates, and innovation is a daily reminder of what was lost to The Motor City once the Black Riots of 1967 turned a majority white city, majority Black in less than five years.

Any discussion about the decline of Detroit - not the fortune of the Big Three motor companies, but of the 82 percent Black city - must have race at the center of the discussion.

Consider that 20 years, New York City under its first Black Mayor David Dinkins appeared headed to a similar fate as Detroit. It took the election of a proto- fascist Rudy Giuliani, who basically worked to resurrect the policing methods once implemented in cities with horrible rates of Black crime (hmm, think Detroit, where Black people in 1960, though only 26 percent of the overall population, were responsible for 65 percent of serious crime) to once again ensure that the City that Never Sleeps could rest peacefully when its citizens dared shut their eyes:

The book Violence in the Model City: The Cavanagh Administration, Race Relations, and the Detroit Riot of 1967 by Sidney Fine reports this on page 15:

It was crime and its association with blacks that triggered a major crisis in race relations in Detroit in 1960. Four days after the Civil Rights Commission concluded its hearings in the city, the Detroit News noted in an editorial that although blacks constituted 26 percent of the city's population, they were responsible for almost 65 percent of its serious crimes. Asserting that the black community bore "a share of responsibility" for this fact, the News complained that the black leadership had "not pressed as hard" on this issues as it should have. "A wave of murders, rapes and purse snatching," with blacks identified as the perpetrators, culminated that same month in the murder of a white nurse's aide, a twenty-eight-year-old mother of three.

The policing methods implemented as a last ditch effort to maintain law and order in Detroit - where Black crime was tearing apart the social fabric of the city - were epitomized in a unit called STRESS: Stop the Robberies, Enjoy Safe Stress:
In the 1960s and 1970s the Detroit Police Department was notorious for its violence, particularly against minority youth. One police unit, dubbed STRESS—Stop the Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets—carried out the execution-style killings of a more than a dozen black men in the space of a few years.
Coleman Young, the city's first black mayor, was elected in 1973 by pledging to disband STRESS and integrate the police force. Young and other Democratic officials oversaw the appointment of black police chiefs and the hiring of thousands of minority officers. But as social inequality grew in the 1970s and 1980s—particularly as the mass layoffs and plant shutdowns in the auto industry turned Detroit into the poorest big city in America—Young strengthened the powers of the police and embraced the politics of law and order.

The Black Police Chiefs in Detroit, after the Black Riot of 1967 ended with the white abandonment of the city
Nothing like a little affirmative action to shake-things up, and make Detroit a STRESS-free city. Of course, Detroit became one of the world's infamous cities for murder, crime, and other mayhem - courtesy of Black elements within the majority Black population - but had the fictional Black Detroit Detective Axel Foley of Beverly Hills Cop, Beverly Hills Cop II, and Beverly Hills Cop III (portrayed by Eddie Murphy) helping out the PR effort for the city.

As Detroit quickly became a majority Black city, a study was commissioned in 1973 by New Detroit, an organization founded in the ashes of the 1967 Black Riot, that showed 78 percent of white Detroit citizens approving of STRESS; 65 percent of Detroit's Black citizens disapproved of STRESS.

Knowing that the dwindling Black population is resorting to vigilante justice or the hiring of private security firms - mercenaries - to stop criminality from being the No. 1 vocation and avocation in Detroit (with the embarrassingly inept affirmative-actioned majority Black Detroit police force incapable of providing even the basic fundamentals of protection), you have to wonder how many Black citizens would favor a return of STRESS.

How bad was affirmation action in Detroit, and what role did it play in dismantling the police department's overall effectiveness? Well, the answer shouldn't surprise you:  
Many police department entrance exams, especially in the prelitigation years, were aptitude tests akin to the verbal SAT. Detroit administered
a three-hour I.Q. test (the “Otis”) to applicants in the 1960s and into the 1970s.4 Over the same period, the District of Columbia used a civil service examination designed for positions in the federal bureaucracy. This test comprised 80 questions on vocabulary, reading comprehension, and analogies. These questions clearly measure aptitude, but are not related in any obvious way to police work.



African American applicants, historically as well as today, do not perform as well as white applicants on police department entrance examinations.  For example, in the Detroit, Michigan,exams of 1967 to 1971, the African American pass rate was 44.3 percent, and the white pass rate was 80.7 percent. The Memphis, Tennessee, tests administered from 1981 to 1989 had a similar impact on black applicants. The pass rate for whites was a high 96.7 percent, but that for African Americans was 69.2 percent.
So these tests might not have been related to police work, but judging by the inability of the majority Black police force in place in Detroit now (all of whom were afforded the right to their position based on their race, and not their sterling academic credentials) you can see they were important.

But what was most important for Mayor Coleman Young was the removal (in his quest to remake the Detroit police in his own corrupt image) of the nefarious applicant tests that potential Black police officers - all across the nation - had trouble passing:
In New York City, Chicago, Minneapolis, New Orleans, San Francisco, and other cities, theyfiled lawsuits on size and height requirements for new recruits, on the content of entrance and promotion examinations, and on patrol assignments. They demanded to be hired in greater numbers. Their gains were impressive: in 1972 there were only 7 women in the United States assigned to patrol work; by 1974 there were 900, and women made up 4 percent of police forces in cities and towns throughout the
country. Advocates of affirmative action on the basis of race claimed even more success. In Chicago, for example, the percentage of blacks on the force climbed from 13 percent in 1962 to over 20 percent by the late 1970s. In Washington, D.C., it went from 13 to 42 percent, and in San Francisco, from 2 to 20 percent in the same period. In the 1970–1990 period blacks accounted for 41 percent of all new police hires nationwide. By the end of the 1980s, 130 cities in the United States had black police chiefs, including New York City, Chicago, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Houston.
Now you can begin to understand why crime is so bad in all of these cities. But in Detroit, it all goes back to STRESS and what Mayor Coleman Young - that fighting Tuskegee Airmen - did to the city's police force. In Bridging the River of Hatred:The Pioneering Efforts of Detroit Police Commissioner George Edwards, author Mary Stolberg practically orgasms in writing about the removal of embedded white racism in the Detroit police force, and its replacement of an affirmative-actioned, Disingenuous White Liberal (DWL) approved Black force:
Wayne County Sheriff Roman Gribbs replaced Cavanagh in the mayor's seat. After tow years in office, Gribbs instituted a controversial undercover, anticrime campaign called Stope the Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets (STRESS). Critics complained that the STRESS program's unorthodox tactics, including the use of decoys, unfairly targeted African-Americans. Other problems exacerbated objections to STRESS. As author William Rich wrote, "During a thirty-month period in the early 1970s, there were an estimated four hundred warrantless police raids and twenty-two related deaths (mostly of blacks). Detroit had the highest number of civilian killings per capita of any American police force." Just as they had in 1961, police excesses galvanized the city's African-American voters behind Coleman Young, who won the 1973 mayoral race. 



Significant change in the department also came with passage of the City Charter of 1973, which gave more impetus to Edward's belief in civilian control of the police department. Under the new system, the commissioner was replaced by a board of five commissioners appointed by the mayor and approved by city council. A chief replaced the superintendent. To appease worried white Detroiters, Young appointed Douglas Fraser of the UAW to chair the police board. He also retained FBI Agent Phillip Tannian as police chief. To meet supporters demands, Young appointed Frank Blount, an African American, as deputy chief. Three months into office he disbanded the STRESS program. 



Like Edwards, Young recognized the importance of recruiting and promoting more black officers. In September 1975, he appointed Detroit's first African-American police chief, William Hart. In 1991, when Hart was convicted for embezzlement and sentenced to prison, Young replaced him with another African American, Stanley Knox. 



Young also moved quickly to hire black officers. The department opened recruitment offices in inner-city neighborhoods and scrapped test that smacked of racial bias. (PK NOTE: one that Black people disproportionately failed, like in Dayton, Ohio now)


Young also called for enforcement of the city's residency requirement and instated an affirmative action program that required promotion of one black officer for every white officer promoted. His efforts eventually bore fruit. By 1990, Detroit was far ahead of of the nation's other large cities; its force was 58.7 percent African American. The next closet was Philadelphia, where 25.7 percent of police were black.
Wait a second: doesn't Detroit's proud majority Black police force still lead the nation in both rates of police brutality and police killings? The only variable that changed was Black police officers shooting Black criminals, instead of white cops shooting the Black criminals that made so many DWLs and representatives of Organized Blackness irate.


So STRESS wasn't that bad after all. It was just a last ditch effort to save the city from the Black criminality that now occupies all seats of government power, frightens away investors, and, more importantly, keep Black criminals on the streets in check.

NYC faced a similar crisis back in the earlier 1990s.

Isn't the application of STRESS in New York City basically what saved the city?:
New York's Republican Mayor Rudolph Giuliani waged his successful campaign in 1993 on an aggressive law and order platform. A former federal prosecutor, he denounced the Democratic incumbent, David Dinkins, as soft on crime. In office, Giuliani's proudest boast has been the declining crime rate, which he attributed to his "get tough" policy.

By the way, getting tough on crime means getting tough on racial minorities, because they represent the groups most likely to be criminals:
The color of murder and gun violence in New York
Lo and behold, Capehart learned something he apparently hadn't known before: Blacks and Hispanics commit essentially all the violent crime in New York. They are also the most likely crime victims.
Capehart quoted the report for 2010 directly:
"Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter victims are most frequently Black (67.0%) or Hispanic (28.1%). White victims account for (3.2%) of all Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter victims while Asian /Pacific Islanders account for (1.8%) of all Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter victims. The race/ethnicity of known Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter suspects mirrors the victim population with Black (65.3%) and Hispanic (30.6%) suspects accounting for the majority of suspects. White suspects account for (1.8%) of all Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter suspects while Asian/Pacific Islanders accounted for (2.4%) of the known Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter suspects.
"The Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrest population is similarly distributed. Black arrestees (53.8%) and Hispanic arrestees (36.4%) account for the majority of Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrestees while White arrestees (7.1%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (2.2%) arrestees account for the remaining portions of the Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrest population."[PDF]
Seeing the news so starkly distressed Capehart. He writes:
"In short, 95.1 percent of all murder victims and 95.9 percent of all shooting victims in New York City are black or Hispanic. And 90.2 percent of those arrested for murder and 96.7 percent of those arrested for shooting someone are black and Hispanic. I don't even know where to begin to describe the horror I still feel looking at those numbers. But the word 'hunted' comes to mind."
Detroit's police force is the Blackest in the nation (thanks to affirmative action): Police usage of lethal force didn't change
New York City could have ended up like Detroit (though the only criminals left in NYC - it seems - share a common bond with Detroit's majority population), but instead of capitulating to ABRA, the citizens of The Big Apple rejected it.

For those failing cities where Black crime is driving away white residents, businesses, and investors - think Philadelphia, New Orleans, Baltimore, Atlanta, Milwaukee, Cleveland, St. Louis, Birmingham, Richmond, etc. - understand that being STRESS-free is only a precursor to becoming another full-fledged Detroit.

It's that simple.


64 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yes, you have a good point here. I live in NYC and your data is on point. Mr. R.G. was a great mayor of nyc , he cleaned up a lot of scum. Our city owes Mr. R.G. a lot of thanks.

Anonymous said...

"We aren't talking about the Detroit that has been rebuilt in the Whitopia's surrounding the city, a place where commerce lives on, school systems produce college-ready graduates, and innovation..."

Thank you for acknowledging this.

There are really two Detroits. There is the 90% black burnt out shell of 'Detroit City', but there is also 'Metro Detroit'; the combined white-flight suburbs where most of the modern economic and cultural activity takes place. Metro Detroit is where the real Detroiters live, and by that I mean the people who actually built Detroit and were responsible for its prosperity.

Winston Smith said...

I was reading this shtfplan blog and an author was relating lessons learned surviving the Egyptian riots.

one I thought relevant was that when trouble arrives, move. all he had needed tp do to protect his family was check in to a hotel in a different part of town for a couple weeks.

if I only had a vacuum cleaner to defend my home(like I saw on tv) from armed attackers, that hotel sounds like a plan.

anyway it made me think of the drifter colonies analogy. maybe I don't need to change cities, I just need to change neighborhoods.

food for thought.

Anonymous said...

Capehart: "I don't even know where to begin to describe the horror I still feel looking at those numbers. But the word 'hunted' comes to mind."

So as a black man, Capehart thinks of himself as "hunted", forever playing the victim, and apparently ignoring the fact that black men are the HUNTERS.

Pathetic.

Anonymous said...

The tragedy of the commons wherein the commons is the great legal heritage of personal freedom and politic behavior. This is the cultural legacy of BRA. What frightens me most is the willing embrace of para-military rule of law by the white dwindlers, for the purchase of elemental safety.
Not too surprised though given the absolute mind-control exerted by the media in the matter of the color of the perpetrators.

W74 said...

From the Giuliani article:
“I never thought Rudy Giuliani was a racist,” said Fran Reiter, one of Mr. Giuliani’s deputy mayors. “But he was obsessed with the notion there were certain groups he couldn’t win over. And he wasn’t even going to try.”

Good, they can shove it! I don't know why GOP politicians cater to the ruckus for a couple thousand black votes every two years. Is it out of hopes of not alienating Whites who've not yet woken up to the lie? I like to think that that's the case.

The parasites do not care even though a free market would be in their long-term best interests. They don't care because they know they can not compete.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 4:46 PM, I live in NYC also. Remember when Dinkins allowed the anti-jewish riots to continue, the harassment of Korean shopkeepers, Freddy's Fashion Mart? The list goes on and on. Crime was out of control. Remember the Utah tourist visiting for the U.S. Open, murdered by hispanics? It was a terrible time. I don't feel safe now either, though.

YIH said...

Just another day in Mogahdisu, err, I mean Detroilet.

Anonymous said...

Here in Chicago(Cabrini Green) they moved the diversity/vibrancy(you know who) into the surrounding suburbs. Where did they move the New York diversity/vibrancy?

Magnifico said...

I lived in the Bronx during that time and Giuliani did a great job locking up the scum. I asked my cousin who is a cop how they did it. Very simple. Plain clothes cop were stationed by the train turnstiles. They waited for some thug to jump the turnstiles and arrested them. Almost all the time these thugs had a warrant out for their arrest. I had noticed that riding the trains was once again safe. And less graffiti on the trains.

And he also instituted workfare. In about 3 months 250,000 welfare parasites dropped out of the welfare program. We found out that they were gaming the system. They already had full time jobs and collected welfare.

Also the proto-fascist really does not sit well with those of us with vowels at the end of our names. Just nit picking on my part. Our loyality has always been with the stars and bars.

Winston Smith said...

I witnessed cabrini greens vibrancy. whoa.

Can anybody think of a white neighborhood that would ensure attack on a black person entering like almost amy black area would attack a white?

The roughest one I've witnessed was in an irish section of Boston (saw a knife fight among 3 whites). I also saw a black dude eating with whites there in a place I was scared to enter fwiw.

just guessing, a black may have gotten shit but not attacked for no reason.

we all know what entering a diverse and vibrant neighborhood will get you.

Agnes Day said...

"Remember when Dinkins allowed the anti-jewish riots to continue, the harassment of Korean shopkeepers, Freddy's Fashion Mart?"

Ah, Freddy's Fashion Mart. If there was any justice in this country - and it is now abundantly clear that there is not - Al Sharpton would be in prison for manslaughter, and Jessie Jackson would be serving a life sentence on racketeering charges in the next cell. They are free for one reason: They are black, and the blacks would riot. That reality has ruled and ruined our land over the last 50+ years.

Nolan said...

Paul, my apologies in advance if this isn't the correct place to post this, but I wanted to share about an event that happened earlier this evening.
I am currently in the back third of a Masters program and was in one of the "touchy-feely" classes that I'm required to take this evening. The instructor is a fairly pleasant older black woman from Chicago. Unfortunately, she has been very forthcoming about the fact that she has spent her entire adult working life in the employment of some kind of government agency for the "benefits", and tries to justify that by saying that she is being "patriotic".
During the discussion this evening one of the women in my class started reading an interesting passage from the text that talked about cultural stereotypes of workers that were actually pretty accurate. I don't remember it word for word but it basically said Asians tend to be more team oriented and are less invidualistic, Germans are very rules oriented and analytical, Hispanics tend towards more one on one relationships, Western Culture as a whole is more indiviualistic than Eastern, Anglo's tend towards innovation and outside of the box thinking etc, etc.
So, my female classmate (who is very much a DWL) finishes up the passage and our instructor says "What does it say about blacks?" and the classmate, with this horrible pained expression on her face replies "It doesn't say anything about them".
You could've heard a pin drop in that classroom... right until I laughed.

Anonymous said...

This is a current events issue here in NYC. The program is called "Stop and Frisk" and is primarily aimed at low income minority (e.g. black and hispanic neighborhoods). While violent crime has fallen dramatically, so has the rise of complaints by black and only black political leaders complaining about stereotyping. The NYPD (NY Police Dept) will also stop Whites on the basis that b/c they are out of place in the neighborhood they must be drug/prostitution customers. Asians are rarely stopped b/c despite comprising about 20% of the city's population they make up less than 2-3% of national crime perpetrator statistics.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/opinion/the-truth-behind-stop-and-frisk.html

map said...

"Here in Chicago(Cabrini Green) they moved the diversity/vibrancy(you know who) into the surrounding suburbs. Where did they move the New York diversity/vibrancy?"

Camden, NJ and Baltimore.

Whiskey said...

There is a long history ala "Albion's Seed" of the Backwoods, Jacksonians, Scots-Irish, "Borderer" types settling things via clan networks. The downside is constant feuding, illuminated by Mark Twain in Huck Finn and also Life on the Mississippi.

But around the border region of Scotland/England, for almost three thousand years, continuous fighting was the norm. No governmental authority existed save for distant landlords collecting taxes but never providing security or justice. Hence the desire to "settle things yourself" not because that was an especially nice way of doing it but because there was effectively no other way.

Point being there is a long, nearly unbroken, cultural history in this country of settling things without any government, said government being distant, corrupt, ineffective, and foreign for most of three thousand years: Picts vs. Celts vs. Romans vs. Saxons vs. Vikings vs. Normans vs. English vs. Scots. This group of people has an ample cultural memory of knowing how to fight, dumping low-investment residences for new ones at the drop of a hat, relying on clan / extended family networks, and putting a lot of men in the field. Even after Culloden, it was not uncommon for Border clans to muster out 8,000 or more men.

Anonymous said...

'And he also instituted workfare'
1 in 2 Black males is unemployed.

MuayTyson said...

Another good article P.K.. Liberals may not believe in reality yet there it is. Can numbers lie sure, we have seen a lot of number manipulation in the Global warming scam science.

Funny people woke up real fast to the reality Al Gore was/is full of shit. I can only hope more people wake up to the racial reality.

make it rain TRUTH said...

W74 said...

From the Giuliani article:
“I never thought Rudy Giuliani was a racist,” said Fran Reiter, one of Mr. Giuliani’s deputy mayors. “But he was obsessed with the notion there were certain groups he couldn’t win over. And he wasn’t even going to try.”


I am not a total Giuliani fan, since I disagree with him on plenty.

But this one point was an area where I absolutely adored the man.

What is most important is that he took the side of LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS.

This is a concept that is lost on the black communities rife with people who do not know right from wrong.

You want to clean up a city? You take out the trash. The trash being criminal thugs. Period.

Anonymous asks where did they go?

The criminals end up either in jail, curbing their criminal tendencies, or simply dissipating into other areas where they are less concentrated and therefore easily picked off by similar law enforcement policies.

Once you start making a life of crime actually dangerous? You get lots less of it, and that means you get lots less of it's INFLUENCE on the communities in which it resides (mostly blacks). That means that the majority of the community ends up being able to live a law-abiding typical life, without the poisonous influence of criminals.

Now, in the black community they don't know these things. They don't understand the cause-and-effect that rampant criminality causes in a community. But even if they are ignorant of the WHY, they are not immune to the results (of getting rid of the criminals via law enforcement being tough).

Anonymous said...

It is almost like a town goes majority black and ABRA cadaver, the town turns into a third world cess pit.

Lame, I know...

R Neville said...

As to where did the criminal negroes go under the fist of RG,well from my experience here in Saint Louis, they get flushed out and migrate somewhere else.
I have observed police making major busts a couple of blocks from our home, only to find strange hoodrats on my block.
I assume they merely moved to one of the boroughs surrounding NYC and continued their modus operandi.

Paleface 6 said...

"Of course, Detroit became one of the world's infamous cities for murder, crime, and other mayhem - courtesy of Black elements within the majority Black population - but had the fictional Black Detroit Detective Axel Foley of Beverly Hills Cop, Beverly Hills Cop II, and Beverly Hills Cop III (portrayed by Eddie Murphy) helping out the PR effort for the city."

Yeah...by teaching the Beverly Hills cops how to get drunk on duty, hang out with criminals, circumvent search warrants, and lie on police reports.

Good job, Axel.

W74 said...

Two videos from Mogadishu, err, Detroilet:
From WSHH and YouTube.


Alright, who let the chimps out?

I had trouble telling the difference, but it seemed like one video occurred in the daytime in a more natural environment and the other occurred at night in a place they could break stuff.

But in all seriousness, holy smokes, black people are dangerous. I'm a resaonably brave man and can hold my own, but blacks are so unpredictable and prone to stupidity that those things don't matter.

Their propensity to attack in groups the way the chimps in the zoo doesn't make for fair odds either. I'll stand up for myself, but damn if I don't know when to fold 'em and just RUN.

Am I in the same boat as every other man on here where I worry about my family more than myself?

Safer to put yourself (and definitely your family) in a position where you don't have to see, hear, or smell these savages.

W74 said...

R Neville,
As to where did the criminal negroes go under the fist of RG,well from my experience here in Saint Louis, they get flushed out and migrate somewhere else...

You're quite correct Sir. Blacks never actually LIVE anywhere.

They just STAY with someone else, whether it be a mother, grandmother or drug-dealer homeboy.

W74 said...

http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/02/06/maryland-mall-evacuated-locked-down-after-sneaker-fight/

Nearly 400 comments on the fight over shoes at a Maryland mall. This is about an hour from where I live and quite disturbing.

I like the comments from "MsMoore". Her "feewingz" got hurt, and I encourage you guys to keep finding naysayers (I see some of you have commented frequently already) and type them some more truth.

There's a few N(naive)WLs on there who need to learn to stop apologizing for them. This is a prime opportunity to reach out to them.

Many thanks to whoever originally posted this yesterday.

Anonymous said...

There is no more important and accurate account of the destruction of life in scores of US cities than the one posted here.
Statistical realities don't need to be 'debated'. Almost nothing has changed with these crime numbers in ~ 50 yrs. Philadelphia provides the clearest example of this destruction. 20 years ago, under Mayor Rendell, the city was booming, with businesses and new construction everywhere. Then the era of the thug mayor John Street began. He once stated to a mob of screaming voters: 'we own this city again', and everyone knew what that meant. It meant the election of Police Commisioners who refused to adopt advanced policing techniques (like CompStat), and 'zero tolerance' policies on 'quality of life' crimes. When the Phil PD Comm was asked why he was refusing to enact methods that had been proven successful in dramatically reducing crime in cities across the US, his response was: 'we want to respect the sensibilities of our community', which everyone also understood. The result today is that violent mobs can walk ~ 20 blocks down Broad St, in the middle of the day, and assault shoppers, restaurant patrons, rob clothing stores, and nothing is done. The Phila DA comes out the next day with a plan to 'perhaps prosecute parents'.
This is called the 'Zimbabwe' model: it doesn't matter if your economy collapses and 'your people' end up eating dirt. The most important thing is that 'we are in charge', even while their cities burn and their own people are killed daily.
This is what the former genuis Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans calls: our 'chocolate city'.
As long as these criminals can continue to draw a paycheck, and sit on top of the smoldering ruins, they don't give a damn about anything else.

DW said...

one I thought relevant was that when trouble arrives, move. all he had needed tp do to protect his family was check in to a hotel in a different part of town for a couple weeks.

Thank you for bringing this up.

Everyone should have a plan. Don't wait 'till TSHTF to pull it all together.

General suggestions:

1. Have a place to go. This can be a list of hotels and/or a friend or family member who'll let you stay with them. Make sure every adult in your household knows what to do. For example, if there's trouble while the kids are at school and both spouses are at work--who gets the kids? Who picks up the supplies? Where do you meet?

Familiarize yourself with local crime maps. Knowing where NOT to go is important, too. Better to take the long way around to safety than drive straight through trouble.

2. Supplies. A suitcase or two filled with clothes, blankets, hygiene supplies, first aid kits, food, can openers, water (or filtration system), weapons, and a week (at least) supply of everyone's prescription meds. Pretend you're going camping for a week or two. Keep these suitcases either in your car, or someplace where you can grab them and run.

This is just the basics. You should do this even if you're in a relatively safe location. At least you'll be prepared to evacuate if there's a disaster.

Speaking of which--I suggest that everyone gets their plan together by election time.

I'm posting this for the benefit of anyone who's been reading the articles here at SBPDL and going, "Oh $#!&!, I'm not as safe as I thought!".

Caiden said...

I remember when Rudy took over NYC there were complaints that NYC would lose 'charms' such as open prostitution, and the streets would be cleaned up and Disneyified. So for limo liberals driving around safely and seeing hookers and dying neighborhoods gives them a thrill.


There is a book called What Cops Know. It interviews with various Chicago cops who anonymously give insights and short stories about their time as cops. Some are a few paragrpaphs, some just a sentence or two.

Anyway, one of the stories was a white woman who was grabbed and dragged in Cabrini Green and raped by various men. Guys were coming in from all over, even kids. Afterwards she said she could see those guys everywhere, she believed every black was one of the rapists keeping an eye on her, and she started to wear wigs when she went out to disguise herself. The cop said that case kept him up at nights.


I think about i t alot lately because, really, it's the truth. Even the blacks who aren't actively raping or robbing are defending the blacks who do. THey give excuses, or the old 'yeah but whites do so and so' crap. It was one of the earliest moments of understanding on race relations, that blacks are basically primitive. Basically evil would be a good word, but more like they literally don't understand why doing something wrong is wrong. It's like they're a race of angry children, incapable of adult thoughts, incapable of or morales or standards. So every black will get angry over the shot drug dealer.

If anyway read up on the black gang rapists who attacked the hispanic girl in TX some months ago, there was a quote from someone saying she felt bad for the rapist because the 'tag' of being a rapist would follow them their whole lives. It didn't seem she thought they were innocent, at least she didn't say they were innocent or we should wait for a trail, just that the rapists would be known as rapists, and that was somehow wrong.

Blacks do not think like any other race, they are not able to function as humans.

Anonymous said...

one of the reason many whites, myself included are uttterly disgusted with blacks is their behaviour-meaning a ridicolously high crime rate. Add to that their utter lack of respect, common decency and civility towards others. Of course the NAACP and other of their groups refuse to acknowledge behavioual issues at all....Instead they keep adding fuel to the situation-so that many of us whites are just utterly fed up with blacks, and want nothing to do with them PERIOD.Lets just see how long they can exist without us. I doubt it could be long...

Caiden said...

W74 I had not seen that link before today. I posted some stuff there. While trying to keep my language clean I still pointed out what's wrong with society protecting black failures.

Anonymous said...

"Here in Chicago(Cabrini Green) they moved the diversity/vibrancy(you know who) into the surrounding suburbs. Where did they move the New York diversity/vibrancy?"

In DC they are being pushed into Maryland and in particular Prince George's County which has a skyrocketing crime rate and is rapidly. DC's gain is Maryland's loss.

Discard said...

Nolan at 8:56 PM: You just might have blown your Master's degree when you laughed about Blacks' unimportance in class. I was invited to quit three different teaching credential programs, without ever even mentioning my real views. As a White working class man, I was automatically suspect, and my failure to show sufficient enthusiasm for White dispossession was enough to convict me.

DW said...

Blacks do not think like any other race, they are not able to function as humans.

More Stuff Black People Don't Like:

Emergency Preparedness.

Didn't we learn this after Katrina? Did any of those people have some extra food or anything?

Basically, this requires the ability to think long-term and the ability to exercise self-control (as in, I can't afford to buy both liquor and emergency supplies, so I'll hold off buying the liquor until we get a stash of canned goods).

Seriously, Whites have a HUGE survival advantage, if we can just get more of us to wake up.

Safer to put yourself (and definitely your family) in a position where you don't have to see, hear, or smell these savages.

After 9/11, one of my co-workers bought some undeveloped land about an hour away and put a used trailer on it. Not luxurious accommodations, but it was a place to go far from the city in case of trouble. It was their bug-out place and vacation spot. Heard they built a small house there and moved in permanently.

I also knew a lot of people who had hour or more commutes, just to keep the kids in a nice (and affordable) neighborhood.

Winston Smith said...

Thanks DW

I try to shoehorn in some preparedness where I can do it staying OT.

I keep the emergency bags packed and in the trunk of my car. Be it earthquake or unrest I'm at least a bit ready. I also hikewith all my gear to get it dialed in, which has been huge. A pile of stuff is better than nothing, but actually using it gets the bugs out and familiarizes, not to mention gives me some much needed conditioning!

I talk to friends about it however they'll be most receptive. its a bugoutbag, emergency bag, earthquake bag, whatever they can wrap their head around. I'm a pacifist, but I wont be reginald denny. I keep misting pepper spray and several other stronger defense options in a gun purse I mean maxpedition fat boy shoulder bag as part of my system.

I live in Los Angeles and know based on bitter experience what rioting looks like, who it involves, and where to avoid.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist, just eyes that can see to anticipate what's going to happen.

sadly, I've had discussion with a friend that thinks whites will riot like 'groids in certain situations. he doesn't believe in protection, rather brotherhood and evading trouble. well, 'trouble' by way of maurading zulus will find him and be wise to avoid me.

I love what I read here. woe to anyone that sees a group of blacks as friends I haven't met yet!

I'm no expert, but I can't think of a single white riot in the last 100 years that was anything like the chimpout of '92 or many, many others. maybe Argentina but the little I know of those they didn't appear to be mindless looting and burning and attacking.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Warlord1958 said...

As a life long metro Detroit-er,I can say that the STRESS program was a beautiful thing. It was the perfect cure for outbreaks of TNB. "Executions"? That's a laugh. Only a 'groid or some ACLU tribe shyster would say that.

So CAL Snowman said...

@Californian - I agree with Zenster about That comment you made on the "Life After White People" thread regarding the Warrior Mentality Vs. The Soldier Mentality. That was one of the best comments I have ever read on the internet. I was thinking the exact same thing as Zenster after reading it, namely that it would make a GREAT COLUMN!

Comments like that and many others are why this site desperately NEEDS A FORUM. There is far too much intellectual commentary to respond to on a single comment section.

AquaSparky - Thanks for the love man!

So CAL Snowman said...

CHARLES MARTEL made a very interesting comment in the last thread regarding "white flight" and the automobile. He said:

"The real problem with the urban centers started back in Eisenhowers day when the push for an American Autobahn like Highway system was coordinated with the practice of "blockbusting" to drive white people out of all the major city centers and into the newly created Suburbs."

This is a revelatory comment because in essence what he is saying is that White Flight from Major Urban areas to escape Black criminality and general uncivilized behavior was responsible for the post WW2 Automobile boom and by extension the rise of the multinational Oil oligarchs. Indulge me if you will:

Had White Americans been able to live in peace and prosperity in the cities they built, the need for the automobile would be almost nil as would the need for vast amounts of IMPORTED oil. The automobile would be seen as more of a luxury item than a necessity. Only by forcing the White community out into the suburbs and away from the Urban Centers and jobs would an automobile become a NECESSITY. This NECESSITY would have incredible ripple effects on the global oil market. Americans bought nearly 60 MILLION CARS during the 1950's!

From: OPEC and Crude Oil Chapter 13

"More sales mean more profits, as long as selling prices are kept high and stable, and production costs are kept low. The facts are that world consumption of crude oil rose at a clockwork 9.55% a year from 1950 to 1972,"

Today in the United States, oil is primarily consumed as fuel for cars, buses, trucks and airplanes (in the form of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel). Two-thirds of U.S. oil consumption is in the transportation sector that can trace its' roots to the automobile boom of the 1950s.

So basically what we see here is that Blacks were WEAPONIZED by the Cultural Marxist Elite against the peaceful Whites in order to drive the Whites out into the suburbs where they could be exploited in many different way. One way of exploitation came in the form of making the Automobile a NECESSARY part of everyday life because the suburbs lacked the Public Transportation of the cities (which would in time be ruined by the same Blacks that drove the Whites to the Suburbs in the first place!) As we all know, Automobiles are USELESS WITHOUT GAS and as I said above, Americans bought nearly 60 Million Autos alone in the 1950s'. And wouldnt you know Oil Companies began to make a killing. From the same article linked above:

"In fact, profit margins increased enormously in the 1950s and 1960s while production costs decreased. The volume of oil shipped increased, and the advent of supertankers decreased shipping costs while selling prices were increased. In the late 1960s, Middle East oil that was delivered to Europe and the United States at $2 and more a barrel had cost less than 40¢ to produce and ship."
(to be continued)

So CAL Snowman said...

(continued)
In an "incredible" way, the Marxist Elite used Black Pathological Behavior as the catalyst for the emergence of the automobile and oil market via the transference of Whites from the City to the Suburb.

The above dovetails incredibly well with "The Great Migration" out of the South by the black population starting in 1910 and really gaining steam in the 1940's. As much of the White working age men were off fighting WW2, the Black working age population began to migrate north and into the cities. Just another ASTOUNDING effect of WW2 on the USA! The Great Migration was the primary reason that many of the Northern Cities began to experience an uncomfortable demographic change which led to the subsequent "White Flight" to the suburbs. Man it's AMAZING to watch the sweater unfold as you start to tug on the loose threads....

Anonymous said...

Where did they move the New York diversity/vibrancy? It seems like most of them are still here, with more coming all the time! But many did move upstate to once lovely towns along the Hudson...like Newburgh and Poughkeepsie. Trouble with Bloods and Latin Kings up there. Trouble with MS-13 on Long Island. One of the consequences of Reagan's amnesty...MS-13. Some conservative.

Anonymous said...

Affirmative action success is Oxxymoronic.

'Many police department entrance exams, especially in the prelitigation years, were aptitude tests akin to the verbal SAT. Detroit administered
a three-hour I.Q. test (the “Otis”) to applicants in the 1960s and into the 1970s.4 Over the same period, the District of Columbia used a civil service examination designed for positions in the federal bureaucracy. This test comprised 80 questions on vocabulary, reading comprehension, and analogies. These questions clearly measure aptitude, but are not related in any obvious way to police work'

In 'Bell Curve' I read much of DC police are illiterate.

Anonymous said...

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART):

Black causes problem on bus, black shoots at black transit cop, black shoots & kills white bystander, black transit cop shoots at shoots at black gunman and instead hits white bystander:

http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2012/02/wouned-bystander-sheds-light-o.html

----

http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2012/02/wfaa-bystander-who-survived-sh.html

---

http://www.myfoxdfw.com/dpp/news/passenger-shot-by-dart-officer%2C-he-says-020812

Anonymous said...

"Here in Chicago(Cabrini Green) they moved the diversity/vibrancy(you know who) into the surrounding suburbs. Where did they move the New York diversity/vibrancy?"

"Camden, NJ and Baltimore."

ditto, although i'd say it's less about removing than replacing i.e. swapping black for hispanic.

The whole zero tolerance thing was really a cover for harassing black people into moving out. The same thing is happening in LA and more recently DC.

Zenster said...

A very interesting comment, So CAL Snowman. One other factor worthy of mention was the General Motors streetcar conspiracy. Most tram lines were electrically powered whereas the Diesel buses that replaced them only increased our consumption of oil.

There may even be a factor that, due to lower infrastructure cost (i.e., no rails), bus lines were more distributed. This may have augmented the ability for petty criminals to access wealthier neighborhoods that were previously out of reach.

You make an interesting point about how Black Undertow and concomitant White Flight caused a massive increase in oil consumption. It also served the ends of Marxism by creating a gigantic influx of wealth into the Islamic Middle East which then used those funds to begin its jihad against the West, further draining our economic coffers.

DWLs like Ted Kennedy sponsoring the 1965 immigration act that brought Muslims and other throwbacks into America were a final nail in the coffin of White culture. It is going to take some serious medicine to reverse the damage that has been done.

DW said...

Comments like that and many others are why this site desperately NEEDS A FORUM. There is far too much intellectual commentary to respond to on a single comment section.

Agreed. SBPDL makes an excellent case against the idea that "racists are stupid".

This site's about to get a lot more attention, so how about adding a Race Realism 101 page? This could be a list of crime stats, IQ scores, SAT scores, a link to a national crime map, a glossary of terms (DWL), etc. Something to get new people up to speed.

DW said...

Man it's AMAZING to watch the sweater unfold as you start to tug on the loose threads....

Yeah!

I used to think the rising crime rates around Black neighborhoods were merely a symptom of cultural disease. Lately, I'm thinking of this as more of a strategic move in a big game of chess. Blacks are being used. But who are the players? (Tinfoil hat time) Am I nuts? Or did I just leave the Matrix?

Anonymous said...

I live and work in NYC . Manhattan to be.exact. I don't care what the crime reported statistics say. NYC is a very dangerous place. In NYC there are small pockets of pseudo safe.neighborhoods surrounded by govt subsidized housing hell holes. The latter mentioned areas are breeding grounds for the animals that I absolutely loathe. They are black and hispanic gangbangers . Decent civilians fall victim so often, because of these animals , that they don't always report the incident so the total number of true crime taking places is not reflected in NYC crime stats. In one of the prior posts someone brought up the topic.of the Asian Disease that is infecting our society. It is so very true. The asians are a truly serious threat. The are very cautious and they keep their dealings quiet and to themselves. Not too long ago an entire cargo tanker ship was discovered in NY city's main harbor to be filled with illegal Chinese sneaking into our country. In my hospital, 98% of the Chinese patients are on welfare. The Chinese women claim they don't have a baby's father(which is bs) and have all hospital services they (mom and baby) receive billed to to US Govt. Meanwhile her husband either here or in China earning an income. Some even own profitable businesses yet still have their wife.and child collect public assistance. So as you can see I am surrounded by evil black gang members and slick, scamming , milking the system Asians........I see all the taxes I pay in my check going to this nonsense...I will move out of NYC soon. Thank you for letting me rant

Anonymous said...

Los Angeles has moved them out of south central (plenty left though) and from what I understand out to palmdale/Lancaster

Anonymous said...

blog owner:
what about some 'immigrant stories'?

I have read this is going on for a long time...
shipoloads of illegals jumping ship...living 20 to a room..selling things on the street:

' Not too long ago an entire cargo tanker ship was discovered in NY city's main harbor to be filled with illegal Chinese sneaking into our country. In my hospital, 98% of the Chinese patients are on welfare. '

Mr. Rational said...

Basically evil would be a good word, but more like they literally don't understand why doing something wrong is wrong. It's like they're a race of angry children, incapable of adult thoughts, incapable of or morales or standards. So every black will get angry over the shot drug dealer.

This is a good time to point out a pertinent piece on IQ versus criminality.  Criminology: Intelligence and crime.  A selection:

Kohlberg (1976), Candee (1984) Smetana (1990)

- Suggest low IQ is linked to failure to develop beyond first stage of moral development (effectively have learning difficulties)

- First stage = preconventional, people put own desires first, only obey law out of fear of punishment, one-dimensional thinking.

- Second stage = conventional, people learn law and accept it because should be followed.

- Third stage = postconventional, fully developed moral character. Person capable of testing law against abstract concepts of justice, fairness and respect for human beings and their rights.


Eerily familiar.  I would have bolded the first stage, but I'm sure everyone here gets the point without typographical emphasis.

So CAL Snowman said...

@ Zenster- HA! You beat me to the punch regarding the GM Streetcar Conspiracy. I was going to post about that, but I thought it might be considered superfluous.

Anonymous said...

Discard, you have mentioned this 2 or more times...

What school?
when?
where?
name teachers names!
what degree were you wanting to get.

Discard said...

The GM streetcar conspiracy is a myth. GM finished off the already dying urban rail lines by designing and building a superior bus in the late 1930s.

Ivan .M said...

I'm a lifelong New Yorker, and while I'd love to be able to flee upstate, it's safer here than in many other major cities.

We have no-go zones, but overall, the heavy police presence and massive East Asian immigration make the city fairly livable for civilized humans. I reside on the edge of a growing Chinatown; there's relatively little violent crime here.

Recently, the first few SWPLs have begun trickling into my majority-Hispanic apartment building. I suppose it is now imperative that I secure a well-paying job before the rent shoots up and I'm priced out.

Anonymous said...

To Anon Feb 8 6:24 AM, I'm in NYC too. You're right about the Asian immigrants. Model minority my a*s.

Discard said...

Anon at 7:50 PM, Feb 9: I assume that this and similar sites are monitored by both public and private agencies. I further assume that the individual identities of we commenters are known to those agencies that have the resources and sophistication to find out. But why would I be so foolish as to make it easy for amateur anti-Whites to harrass me by giving out names and dates?
If you doubt my story, you should start openly discussing racial reality in class.

Anonymous said...

Wow. It's great to see fellow New Yorkers joining in on this topic. I too think this city is dangerous. It is not safe to walk down the streets of this city. The black and hispanic thugs, drug dealers, and rapists are everywhere. A new yorker must stay alert and have a good sense of spatial orientation. I too agree with the fact that the asians in our city are a nasty deadly virus. The blacks and latinos are very simple minded and incredibly vicious. The asians are the biggest threat because of their unprecedented breeding and their attitude towards White people. The asians will try to overtake the White race. They will not succeed.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/23/nyregion/23kid.html


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/04/white-population-rises-in-manhattan/

Anonymous said...

When did this site go from SBPDL to a white supremacist site?

Anonymous said...

To anon at 07:09pm. Listen up. The statistical tally inregards to the population demography of nyc is flawed. The report does not reflect the true numbers. The only New Yorkers counted are the few that adhere to the rules and of the nyc census guidelines. Whites follow the rules and an accurate total is noted. Black criminals, hispanic rapists and asian illegals dodge the census programs causing false results on report taking. The amount of illegal asians in nyc is unfathomable.

Anonymous said...

This blog should be renamed Stuff White People Don't Like - Anyone Not White

Alexandra said...

Back in the late 60s my dad wanted to be a Detroit cop. He passed all their tests. Only one thing kept him out: lack of a high school diploma.

Today his being a blue-eyed blond would have kept him out, I'm willing to bet!

Anonymous said...

YIH said...

Two videos from Mogadishu, err, Detroilet:
From WSHH and YouTube.


Heh, started both links in the background. Clicked to watch the Youtube video first. The chimps seemed okay compared to the inane spectator voiceover. THEN I realized upon clicking to the WorldStarHipHop tab that there was no voiceover, just genetically-psychopathic blacks being worthless dangerous violent morons. The actual chimps seemed much more humane and rational than the genelines of the black Misery Beings.

Detroit Youngins Going Wild In A Corned Beef & Ham Sandich Place!
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshh1sk9POHqMh0eWF6R

Detroit Zoo Chimp Fight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7MdxQc3B0c

Anonymous said...

"Even after Culloden, it was not uncommon for Border clans to muster out 8,000 or more men."

Culloden was the last stand of the Highland clans, who were not Borderers, Whiskey! You really are a clueless blowhard. You spend a couple of paragraphs talking about English/Scottish Borderers (ie the people we call Scots-Irish here in the USA) and then you f_ck up your entire point by confusing them with Scots Highlander Jacobites, ie Gaelic speakers!

I'll bet you think Braveheart is a historically accurate film and that William Wallace wore kilts, too. Idiot.

This is why people think you are a YKW and not "Scots-Irish".