But the head of the executive branch of the United States government did just this when he said those angry over Darren Wilson escaping indictment (performing some legal Houdini act, aided by white supremacy in the eyes of those still clinging irrationally to the false Ferguson narrative of a cop executing the black equivalent of Andre the Giant's character in The Princess Bride) were merely engaging in, “an understandable reaction.”
 |
| Who ordered the National Guard to stand down in Ferguson? The man who pointed out those upset and angry with the grand jury decision were engaging in "an understandable reaction..." |
"An understandable reaction..."
Perhaps President Obama found inspiration in the command of Michael Brown's stepfather encouraging the black mob in Ferguson to, "burn this bitch down!"
Telling some white Quisling (the Quisling as mentioned in Max Brooks novel World War Z, who pretends to be a zombie and ultimately gets eating alive by the horde they march with...) on MSNBC that, "This is St. Louis's race war," Missouri State Sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadali warned those whites still believing character judgements are the best course of action in pursuing interracial relations.
When, in fact, Chappelle Nadali and her army have already judged you by the color of your skin: if it resembles Darren Wilson, then you are their enemy:
"We didn't have a race war like other cities throughout the U.S. This is our race war."Those other cities as to having a race war transpire go unmentioned, but judging by the condition of Newark, Baltimore, Detroit, and Birmingham (those locations where a one-sided war was waged on the whites who built the very civilization blacks could only envy and watch crumble away once they became in demographic control), St. Louis and Ferguson are headed to a similar in the hands of black political control.
Which brings up the primary question going unanswered as of yet: why was Ferguson allowed to burn last night?
We know firefighters were being shot at by those race warring blacks, in a hilarious reminder the events of American History X have a real-world basis for fact; thus the conflagration of black racial hate toward symbols of white capitalism (structural racism to the enlightened masses at MSNBC and CNN) in Ferguson went up in flames after being thoroughly looted.
But why-oh-why did the National Guard not intervene to provide much needed support to those outgunned police in Ferguson? The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports:
As ruins of about a dozen businesses here smoldered today, an "extremely frustrated" Mayor James Knowles III was asking what happened to onetime plans to shield vulnerable businesses with a protective line of Missouri National Guard members.
"The National Guard was not deployed in enough time to save all our businesses," he said in a press conference just after 2 p.m., calling the delay "deeply disturbing."
Earlier, in an interview, the mayor said: “What should have happened last night? They should have had National Guard troops protecting the hard targets in Ferguson and allowed law enforcement to pursue a very mobile crowd of looters and arsonists. That’s the problem. They (the police) could not secure the commercial districts.”
Knowles added, “I don’t believe we’ve seen the commitment from the state we hoped to get. And knowing that there’s so many people out there who committed a crime, who committed destruction, who aren’t going to be held accountable, because law enforcement was overwhelmed — it makes me concerned for the nights to come.”
St. Louis city officials said they requested 400 Guard troops, which were deployed by Police Chief Sam Dotson to protect government buildings and businesses. They delivered what a mayor's aide said was a good result.
Nixon's office has not responded to requests for comment today, but announced that he will hold a press conference with Guard leaders at 3 p.m. at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, a Republican, said the governor, a Democrat, owes an explanation for an "inexplicable" decision to hold back on Guard help.
He said Knowles called him after being unable to reach Nixon. "How does the governor of Missouri not answer the calls, the pleas, of the mayor on the ground?" Kinder asked.
Earlier today, Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson raised the question of whether the Guard plan was changed to add to outside political pressure for him to resign.
"I can't say that for sure; there was a period of time that passed (between the formation of the original plan and pressure for his resignation)," Jackson said. "I can't speak to other people's motives."
He said he was assured weeks ago that Ferguson would get as many Guard soldiers as needed to secure the businesses, so officers could concentrate on police duties, like answering calls for service.
Then, he said, the plan was changed without explanation.
"I thought, 'Holy crap, are we going to have enough people to protect the businesses in our major corridors?' I was assured we'd have plenty of law enforcement to handle those tasks. And we got overwhelmed and overrun."Do we need to even venture a guess as to where the order for the National Guard to stand down came from, ensuring the black insurrectionists in Ferguson had an opportunity to light the flames of race war so many blacks in Missouri seem excited to see ignited?
Any guesses?
How about a three word hint...
"An understandable reaction..."
And now those white people remaining in Ferguson and metropolitan St. Louis know how Charlton Heston's character felt in The Omega Man: "Oh my God! It's almost dark. They'll be waking up soon."
And those waking up will be the army Chappelle Nadali hopes to usher in a race war to take not only Ferguson, but all of St. Louis in a similar manner to how Detroit and Birmingham fell.
223 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 223 of 223"We need a map of small towns and their White population %"
City-data.com has a really handy interactive map that is based on US census data. It breaks down race, pop. density, income, etc. to neighborhood or even city block level.
You can't debate the behaviour of negro's when it is caused by their genetics. It would be like asking a scorpion why it stung you, it's simple reply would be (if it could speak):
"It's in my nature, don't question it".
File this one under: A Kindred Spirit -
Anonymous sez;=)
Blacks will at least defend each other which can't be said for Whites. We have Whites bending over backwards to deny reality and sell out their neighbors. Whites come with their own problems and one of which is the deluded and destructive egalitarian. And in all honesty the more I read about history the more I understand how that element needs to be kept in check through force. I honestly never thought I would reach that conclusion but Whites seem to have these crazed egalitarians that can't be dealt with rationally. I truly wish I didn't believe that was the case.
*****
From your mouth to God's ears, babe!
bernicegreenbaum said ”The only other thing I can think that might work, hopefully, is voluntary segregation in all establishments. It's only a dream, but that's how Brother Martin's got started. :)”
bernicegreenbaum is probably correct that blacks will never be removed from our country. Unfortunately, there will not be a bi-lateral voluntary segregation until the black communities provide a nicer environment to live in than the white communities. This could only be accomplished with white labor, white control of the local infrastructure, and an incredible perpetual infusion of re-distributed white wealth. This also will never happen.
It seems to me that a reasonable, although not ideal, solution is to first hold blacks to the same standards as whites regarding social responsibility. Abolish AA and all forms of special treatment to any race, and require all able bodied persons to be employed as a condition of receiving any welfare assistance. All of the gibmedat programs must be modified to encourage responsibility rather than encourage irresponsibility. For example, once a welfare recipient qualifies for benefits, those benefits should not be increased merely because the recipient creates new dependents. We should encourage employment and two parent households by not automatically cutting off welfare for two parent households or situations where one or both of the parents are employed. The amount of welfare could be gradually decreased as family income rises.
Blacks are by far the most obnoxious, ungrateful, and destructive of any class of welfare recipients. However, I suspect that in absolute numbers there could be more white welfare recipients than black. A sensible reform of the welfare system would improve the situation with respect to all races. Holding blacks to the same social standards as everyone else would make them more tolerable. Welfare and blacks are actually two separate although related problems.
It is my opinion that any non-governmental entity should be free to discriminate as they wish. If blacks want black only restaurants, I'll be very happy to stay away from them, but white owners of restaurants should be able to do the same. Owners of property should be able to sell or not sell to anyone for any reason whatsoever. If a group of people want to form a white or a black homeland within the US, let them do it so long as it doesn't burden taxpayers or harm other persons.
The simple truth is that if the only difference between whites and blacks was the color of their skin, there would be very little discrimination. If truly qualified (not AA qualified) blacks were available without all of the negative overhead associated with blacks, corporations would gladly hire them over less qualified whites. If blacks actually made good neighbors there wouldn't be as much resistance to them moving into a neighborhood as there is today.
Serious welfare reform will be hated by the welfare class of all races which will make this a politically difficult effort by politicians of any party, and a crackdown on AA and the black privilege to create mayhem with impunity will upset the blacks which will worry politicians depending on black votes. It is possible that Republicans are in a slightly better position to cause change, but we need to let them know what we expect and that we are ready to give someone else a opportunity to make changes if they won't.
And it goes without saying that it would be prudent to continue preparing for the alternatives in the event that we can't cause change and we just ride this train until it crashes.
I'm thinking Vermont (aka White Homeland)
Please don't start on me about libs! I'll take just about anything but negroes. I used to be a lib but can keep my mouth shut if it means no bantus! I'm sorry but it's every man for hizz elf! I need to leave the freakin' South!
I really like Pincus and especially like Travis Haley, personally. 9mm is not a terrible choice when you use it in a quality weapon and use good ammo for it. The +p+ ammo from Buffalo Bore is extremely fast and has 500ft lbs of muzzle energy. That rivals some of the good 45 acp stuff as well as 40 caliber. What good is 1000 magnum ..pun intended... If you cannot hit shit with it?
I know the drill you speak of as the failure drill. Agencies are starting to use it more during qualifying and I have seen it since 1997. Excellent drill too by the way. I worked for a fairly squared away dept in 97. We use it with where I am now too.
CENTURION said...
BerniceGreenbaum:
Don't feel bad about "censored" posts. You have NO idea...
Thanks, Centurion. I think you gave us all a pretty good idea!
I'm really growing tired of Yahoo, CNN and MSNBC (usual suspects) providing a platform for the Brown family! I wished they would go away.
They would go away if you got rid of your television set. They would go away if YT would stop paying -- paying -- to have the enemy's agitprop system pumped into their living rooms.
Liberate yourself.
Kill
your
television!
Holding blacks to the same social standards as everyone else would make them more tolerable.
I would agree in theory. But realistically speaking, how do you plan to hold accountable a demographic which has low IQ, lack of impulse control, no future time orientation, and a tendency to explode into mindless violence?
Once upon a time, segregation could contain black pathologies. But segregation is not going to work in a modern society. You can't have an efficient society with two sets of infrastructure for everything from schooling to water fountains. You have to live in a permanent state of siege -- I saw enough of that in South Africa. Simply walking down the street becomes an exercise in maintaining your dominance over blacks, because any weakness might be pounced upon.
Probably the only realistic solution is physical separation of the races into different countries. We've seen multi-ethnic states broken up into smaller ethno-states: Yugoslavia, India-Pakistan, the USSR. Blacks are 13% of the US population? Give them 7 of the 50 states. Heck, give them 13 states as long as they take all the DWL with them. Real white people get the rest of the country.
There were those in South Africa who proposed just such a partition. This would preserve a white homeland and rid white civilization of the black undertow. But too many whites believed they could hold on to it all: that farm out on the veldt, that nanny and gardener they simply could not live without. They ended up with -- nothing. YT loses the farm anyway when nanny and gardener lead an ANC gang intent on torture-murder kicking in their door.
Yeah, I know, white Americans do not want to give up on the idea of the USA. But that country has self-destructed. From on high, globalization dissolves its borders. From on low, the undertow destroys entire cities.
A partition can lead to white peoples gaining more territory--supposing all whites form one super-union in which they act together? A federation of post-partition white states, each maintaining its particular historic culture. White Americans, white Canadians, white Europeans, white ANZACs, white South Africans. Work together and take on all comers.
White people once conquered the world.
We can reconquer our own territories.
Seen this yet? Seems fairly accurate, although I don't think I'd limit it to just liberals who don't get it.
"10 Black Things Liberals Just Don't Understand"
http://takimag.com/article/10_black_things_liberals_just_dont_understand_gavin_mcinnes/print
And today I give thanks again that I am not black -
"YT needs an organized, professional movement to VOICE OUR FURY and ADVOCATE for OUR OWN INTERESTS (like the reinstatement of Freedom of Association) or we will continue losing this "coontry" like a prisoner losing his mind by Chinese water torture..."
Remember the Bundy ranch. Whatever you think of the underlying facts, it's undeniable and awesome that a couple hundred armed white patriots made Uncle Samantha turn tail and run. It demonstrated something that at least I didn't expect: just a few thousand armed patriots could expel Bathhouse Barry and return America to constitutional non-BRA rule. Barry's praetorian guard isn't loyal to him, QED.
Here's one Californian who won't give an inch.
"Probably the only realistic solution is physical separation of the races into different countries."
This was the case at one time. White people had a homeland. Why did it break down? Were the races lonely, and so eager for one anothers' company that they felt they just had to mix? Or were there deeper reasons that made the mixing unavoidable?
Another question is, what could possibly make any sane man think it will be different next time, even assuming it's possible to make time flow backwards and return everyone to a racial homeland? Unless steps are taken to avert it (and this is not easy, if it's possible at all), it's pretty obvious there will always be the same incentives for invasion and mixing that led to the current situation.
Thank you for pointing out this fact. Many elderly are low income and don't have family there to help them relocate. They're vulnerable and stuck in that hell hole. The negros in fergusson beat an elderly white man with his own oxygen tank and then ran him over with his own car in front of a news crew! This story was on the wnd site today. Sickening! Where's the damned msm report on this? The liberal pigs!
once a welfare recipient qualifies for benefits, those benefits should not be increased merely because the recipient creates new dependents.
When this was proposed in Michigan, the "pro-life" lobby deemed it an abortion bill and fought it successfully. Had it passed and been upheld, Detroit would probably be habitable by humans.
BTW, I have never seen comments going to 2 pages like this before. Fergadishu has been a huge wake-up call. I hope PK can keep up, but if he can't, lost comments are just part of the price we pay for having one un-paid moderator.
Bernice and others who say a white homeland is impossible:
A white homeland is not impossible at all. It would be very easy to round up all illegals on a C130 and send them home. I’m sure there are plenty of ex Vietnam vets and current vets who would gladly volunteer their time and some pilot skills to ship them home. Permanently. Any military official who acted in this capacity would be presidential material and would earn great respect from not only us but whites worldwide. Would it be difficult? Yes. Impossible? No.
I’m sure there would be much crying and gnashing of the teeth, but who cares? You couldn’t have women on this mission, they’re too soft hearted. You’d need men with balls to the wall steel resolve to do the job. Maybe after this white men would get their balls back and start taking their country seriously again instead of asshole smelling (football).
Whites can be assholes, but you know what? I’ll take a white asshole over any non-white any day of the week. All resident aliens would go home as well. We don’t need any more Indian IT workers. We have enough white men out of work.
All dual citizens would either rescind their country of origin and pledge allegiance to America ONLY or go home. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
We should model our immigration policy from Israel. They’re kicking out Sudanese refugees from their country left and right. I don’t blame them. Africans don’t belong in Israel.
Oh and Bernice there are lots of white enclaves in the south. I’m in one. It’s wonderful. If you don’t like the South, there are plenty of people like me who’ll buy your place so you can leave. We like people in the South who love living here. Whites here work in retail, fast food and hotels. Yes we have white hotel maids, isn’t that something?
There was peace in the South before the Saturday folks stirred up trouble. This was told to me by my grandma.
Repeal all Civil Rights Law. I want to be able to hire whites only or have white only in my place of business without being fire bombed or sued.
So yes it is possible. Do any of our politicians or leaders have the balls to do it?
RexHymens here:
"Am I the only one who is wondering precisely why the clown Dorian Johnson has not been arrested for (1) Perjury under oath (2) Assault on a police officer (3) Strong arm theft (3) Some fucking sort of aiding and/or abetting the FALLEN saint and lastly, the coupe de grace (4) Manslaughter and/or second degree murder or some other in the commission of a fucking crime? Why not?"
I am certainly not wondering why he will not be arrested. He hasn't and won't be arrested because he's BLACK, and arresting black people for crimes they commit is RAYSISS!
And because the government is afraid of making the blacks angry. It's like refusing to spank a spoiled retarded child because you don't want to upset him and have to deal with the giant tantrum it will cause. So the child just grows worse and worse and soon all hope is lost that the child can ever be tamed.
If it were up to me rioters amd looters would all be dealt with, using the swiftest and heaviest hand possible. And the rioters that reacted to that, would recieve the exact same treatment, without apology.
The Threat is Real UK/26Nov14@7:25 AM,
Re: Scenario #2
There's a dog that isn't barking aspect about Scenario #2 that so far as I know hasn't been noticed,: The first time Ferguson blacks went on a looting spree there were multiple examples of armed storeowners guarding their businesses & the reverse being glaringly obvious during the second instance w/ LE absence both times being the only unifier. Makes one wonder if somebody knew what the verdict was going to be & put the word out that those who attempted to protect their property w/ armed force from the 'justifiably aggrieved' mobs would most assuredly be arrested/charged with & then convicted for at minimum aggravated assault, at maximum w/ murder 1 if they killed anyone even in self-defense, & just might be 'accidently/mistakenly/justifiably' shot/killed by LE.
It's encouraging to see two pages of comments. It's the most I've seen since I started reading SBPDL regularly.
It seems the chimpout in Ferguson has been good for business...huh Paul.
As I say "Never let a chimpout go to waste."
Rebel here.
The testimony from the Emmitt Till trial is publicly available. The main witnesses were Carolyn Bryant and Till's cousin (or maybe friend. I can't recall).
Till had bragged to the other black boys that he had a white girlfriend back in Chicago and showed them a picture of a girl that he claimed was his white girlfriend. His cousin testified that all the other boys were laughing at him and mocking him. So he went into the Bryants' store to prove to the other boys that he could pick up a white woman. His cousin testified that they all went to the window to watch what happened inside the store and he saw Till putting his hands on Mrs. Bryant and rushed in to the store to get him out of there because he thought Till didn't understand the trouble he was getting into. He dragged Till out of there and into their car to get out of there because Mrs. Bryant was upset and was going for her gun. Till was all aped up and was still talking at Bryant as the other boys dragged him away. As they drove off, Till whistled at Bryant as she was getting her gun.
Bryant testified that Till came into her store and when he went to pay or somehow had his hand near hers, he grabbed her hand and wouldn't let it go. She tried to get her hand away from him and he told her about how he had "f***ed white women before". She got her hand away and went around the counter, I think to go get her gun out of her car, and he grabbed her by the waist or the hips and wouldn't let go. That's when she testified that another black boy ran in the store and dragged Till out.
If you read the actual testimony from the trial, you don't get anything close to the simple "whistled at a white woman" scenario. It's a sexual assault of a married woman in her own place of business.
I went to Wikipedia and checked ther to see what it said. Basically, it reports the wolf whistling story, but also goes on to quote his mother as explaining that Till was a stutterer and had trouble with the letter "B". So he would whistle to cover up his stuttering. So when he was trying to ask for bubble gum, Mrs. Bryant just mistook his special needs helplessness as an attack, because she was a racist. Or some such.
Very much like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, there's this angelic portrait of Emmitt Till painted by blacks and liberals to sanctify him as a martyr in the cause of black oppression by racist whites. Till was not a "victim" any more than Martin or Brown was a victim. They all got themselves killed.
The actual sworn trial testimony of what happened in that grocery store bears no resemblance whatsoever to the popular negro yarn about poor Emmitt Till, the innocent black angel. Just like skittles and a hoodie and hands-up-don't-shoot, the popular story of innocence is just that. A story. But not the least bit true. Three dead thugs magically transformed intointo three victims of racism.
-Rebel
Pull your head out of your ass and don't content on stuff you know nothing about. And, if you're going to say stuff that is inflammatory and causes division amongst us, then have the balls to post your name or handle. Otherwise we are all going to assume you're a troll just doing that.... Causing division. You're taking scripture and twisting it out of context. Doubt me? Stand in front of me with that mealy mouth crap and I'll teach a lesson on some other verses that will surprise you.
If you read the actual testimony from the trial....
Rebel, don't just refer to it. Post the link, if you have it. That is a rock-hard stone of truth that can be thrown into the teeth of DWLs and their dark pets.
PK: if you can fix the template so that the "newer" link on each page goes to the top of the comments (#comments) instead of the top of the page, Things Would Be Much Improved.
(wow, 3rd Captcha attempt.)
Post a Comment