Tuesday, December 5, 2017

The Murder by Blacks of Jamie Urton in Cincinnati was 100% Racially Motivated: Were the Races Reversed, Cincinnati Would Be Ashes Now

Previously on SBPDL: His Name is Jamie Urton: White Man Dragged from Car, Shot to Death by Blacks in Cincinnati "begged for mercy" before he was executed

White privilege is a concept Jamie Urton didn't comprehend, for in the final moments of his life - and the subsequent media blackout/coverup of his murder - he and his family experienced the true depth of how black privilege dictates life in Black-Run America (BRA). 
Jamie Urton's killing in Cincinnati: It was entirely a racial murder


In all seriousness, were the races reversed (Urton been a black male and his murderers been white), the city of Cincinnati would have burned to the ground.

This is a part of the story I wasn't aware of, until a quick follow-up was made to ascertain whether or not his killers had been brought to trial yet. 

Brace yourselves and remember: were the racial roles reversed, Cincinnati would have burnt to the ground. [Deters: Video of Jamie Urton killing reveals racial element, Cincinnati.com, April 13, 2017]:



There was a racial element to the Walnut Hills street slaying of Jamie Urton on March 24, Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said.
In a news conference Thursday, Deters said the killing of the 44-year-old Cincinnati Association for the Blind employee was caught on video. However, that video was not shown to the press.
The incident began when Urton struck a 4-year-old child with his vehicle on Kenton Street. Deters said Urton was going to lunch with his passenger.
"The kid ran between cars and got hit," Deters said. "[Urton's] view was totally blocked."
Deters said the video shows that instead of checking on his son's well-being, Jamall Killings went to car, opened Urton's door and began beating him.
"You'd think his first instinct would be to run to see the 4-year-old," Deters said. "No, his first instinct was to run to the car and start beating the driver."
Then Deters said Deonte Baber, 25, approached Urton's African-American passenger and told him, "get out of here, you're black." Baber then began shooting, firing five rounds, according to Deters. The Hamilton County Coroner said Urton was struck in the left thigh and bled out.
Both Baber and Killings have been charged with murder. Killings turned himself in and after some resistance is cooperating with police, Deters said. Baber is still at-large. The reward for information leading to Baber's capture totals $7,500.
"It is disgusting to see something like this happen. It is, for somebody to be targeted – and I’ve had it the other way, where I’ve had black people targeted because of their race, and I don’t care which way it goes... it's disgusting," Deters said.
Deters said the reason that ethnic intimidation has not been added as a charge against Baber and Killings is that it's only a misdemeanor.
"If there was any way I could have sought the death penalty in this case, I would have," Deters said.
On New Year's Day, a prominent attorney was also shot while driving on Kenton Street during what police called a gun battle. Deters said Urton, unfortunately, stopped in a bad neighborhood.
"In that neighborhood, I wouldn't have stopped," Deters said. "I would have driven to the police department."
Deters said that the surveillance video showing the incident would not be released to the media.
"This is on video, which we will not be releasing. Back in the old day, before you guys all sued me, I probably would have played it," Deters said. "But now that you've set the table, we're not playing it."

This video will one day be required viewing by schoolchildren across the Occident, to understand why state-enforced integration was a failure. Currently, a video of a white man being brutally murdered by blacks - with race being a prominent, if not primary justification for his murder - is being kept sealed by the state.

Were the roles reversed, the mainstream media and black elected officials (not to mention anti-white non-profits, agitating clearly for a diminishing of rights in America to protect white Americans) would be camping out in Cincinnati until the video was released.

Jamie Urton was riding with a black friend in his car, and this didn't protect him from being a deliberate - if not carefully selected - victim of black crime in Cincinnati.

They protected him - his black friend - and murdered Urton on film.

A racial snuff film, the state conceals.

White lives don't matter in 2017 America.


43 comments:

D-FENS said...

Is the negro actually being charged with a hate crime? Has any negro EVER been charged with a hate crime?

Non PC Infidel said...

This is simply African behavior by Africans in America. Even in Africa, if someone hits a pedestrian and is foolish enough to stop, they will be dragged from their car and killed by a mob of self-righteous, incensed negroes. It doesn't matter that the pedestrian is entirely at fault. The tiny mind of the negro can't process the sequence of events in a logical, rational fashion and determine who's responsible- all they "know" is that "you done hit somebody wid your car!" and they flip out, become hyper emotional and instantly launch an attack to get "revenge" as if the person intentionally hit someone with their car. Even in this story, the Africans in America display a total lack of responsibility or comprehension- the "baby daddy" wasn't taking care of his kid and allowed the kid to run into the street and get hit but it's automatically somebody else's fault he got hit by a car. To the low IQ negro, this lack of rational thought and their idiotic assessment of the situation makes perfect sense.

Even in the video with the negroes affirmative action lawyer, stupidity is on full display. He knows there's video of the incident and that his client did in fact savagely attack the victim but says his client denies it. Neither have the intelligence to realize what they're trying to claim is that this was an act of cold blooded murder. Nah, dawg! He wasn't mad- he coldly, calmly and with malice and forethought walked up to de car and decided to murder da man! He weren't mad, see, so dat make it all better!

I can guarantee you that there's a prosecuting attorney in Cincinnati who's shaking his head in absolute disbelief and saying, "Omg! This case is just too good to pass up!"

Negro Antidote said...

Nothing demanded,nothing changes. It will be far too easy for some to say that the victim should have known better on many angles...Driving in the wrong area, stupid to stop, no CCW,etc.etc. These are perspectives to be filed under White Bullshit. Cincy is not an ash heap because whites give less of a damn about white lives than all of the BLM SJW groups who wail and destroy and demand 24/7 about the dead(beat) thug of the day. White inaction to the ever growing black murder plague dishonors the victims,their families and friends, and our proud history. ...If not me,Who? If not now? When? May God grant us our lost courage.

Anonymous said...

Deters said Urton, unfortunately, stopped in a bad neighborhood.

"Bad" neighborhood?

Like a "bad" school.

BAD = Black African Dominated.

As the saying goes:

Stay alert, stay alive. And stay armed!

Boy the way Glenn Miller played said...

"It is disgusting to see something like this happen. It is, for somebody to be targeted – and I’ve had it the other way, where I’ve had black people targeted because of their race, and I don’t care which way it goes... it's disgusting," Deters said.

Really? In Cincinnati? Would you mind naming a couple of those instances?

thereIsaidit said...

A nearly identical event happened in Cleveland many years ago - you probably reported on it already.

Nomad said...

Deters said Urton, unfortunately, stopped in a bad neighborhood.
"In that neighborhood, I wouldn't have stopped," Deters said


If only Deter could provide the public with maps that identify all these "bad neighborhoods". It would make it much easier to know where a family can safely stop by food or gas during a road trip, or where one can safely pull over to change a flat tire without fear of the "bad neighborhood" ending his life.

chattanooga gal said...

"In all seriousness, were the races reversed (Urton been a black male and his murderers been white), the city of Cincinnati would have burned to the ground"
hate to say it, but maybe this is what is going to have to happen. obviously the blacks can get whatever they want with such tactics.

Kram said...

Killings - the shooters name says it all

Gwoobus Harmon said...

Two Quick Takeaways:

1. There is no similar advocacy/grievance network for Whites. We are a voiceless people. This is something to keep in mind as the demographics shift and there are more jurisdictions with White minorities. We need only look to South Africa as an example. This is something that we must begin forming in the interim.

Long term, we must have our own ethnostate. History is rife with examples of stateless peoples being subjected to slaughter when they are incapable of self-rule.



2. With the Kate Steinle verdict of last week, there is now legal precedent of juries forgiving non-whites for the killing of Whites. The concept of justice by peer formed juries of free men is a distinctly Anglo tradition, beginning first with Dane law and then further reformed later under Norman rule. This tradition eventually followed itself to the United States which codified it and guaranteed it with the ratification of the Bill of Rights, amendment VI.

The entire concept is that an accused, a plaintiff, and the jurors all share COMMON bonds and are each other's peers. There are no common bonds now --- We live in a multicultural hell. As we saw in San Francisco, the population really does not have much in common at all and the juror pool may or may not be composed of ACTUAL PEERS.

It is not inconceivable that a jury will be formed which is only peer to the accused, meaning all black, who will be particularly sensitive to the "dindu nuffin" line of defense and be a priori unwilling to convict THEIR peer.

There cannot be justice with non-assimilated groups. Common law cannot work with populations sharing nothing in common. Again, ETHNOSTATE NOW!!!

Anonymous said...

If you are aware of your surroundings the moment you realize that you are in a no go zone of negro crime, get out asap. If involved in a traffic accident immediately leave. Go to a safe location, all white, a police station, firehouse, federal building, and then call the popo. You were in fear for your life is the reason you left. Be safe and you have a valid excuse for any "leaving the scene" bullcrap.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't be surprised if it was all setup "gon' wrong". What's to stop a low empathy negro from sending his sprog to run onto oncoming traffic in an effort to extort money from vulnerable whites.

Sunscreen

chattanooga gal said...

"If only Deter could provide the public with maps that identify all these "bad neighborhoods". It would make it much easier to know where a family can safely stop by food or gas during a road trip, or where one can safely pull over to change a flat tire without fear of the "bad neighborhood" ending his life."
they used to have one called sketch factor but the blacks all screamed racist and they shut it down.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure when viewed through the lens of a lawyer on the public payroll, I'm sure he can find examples such as ex-slaves being repatriated to satisfy our curiosity if pressed on the issue.

Californian said...

The normal rules for a civilized society is that a driver stops and renders assistance upon an injury accident. But we are talking here Black Run America, and BRA is not a civilized society. You have to consider the same rules (or lack thereof) that one would follow in Liberia or Congo. It's law of the jungle, baby. Act accordingly.

Anonymous said...

And if you look it up, it is NOT a "slave name", it was a direct translation to English from his proud, strong, noble African name!

Iron Sharpens Iron said...

Racial Demographics Map of the USA:
https://demographics.virginia.edu/DotMap/index.html

Find the Section 8 zones too and stay clear!

Stay alert, stay alive.

Bud said...

"In that neighborhood, I wouldn't have stopped," Deters said. "I would have driven to the police department."

Think about this. A district attorney telling an innocent person to commit a crime.

Do you know where the nearest police department is? I don't. What happens if you are arrested on the way home to reporting this as a hit and run?

A rhetorical question. Are you charged where the crime is committed or where they arrest you?

Keep this story in your back pocket.

Nomad said...

Mr. Urton's fate was sealed the moment that unsupervised turdlet sprinted into the street and was struck by the car. There were only two possible paths forward:

a) Keep his IKAGO-glasses on and try to reason with the hellscreaming hordes of Orcs, and be sacrificed to the gods of political correctness right then-and-there.

or

B) Throw off his IKAGO-glasses and flee to the nearest safe-haven, claiming he was in fear of his life.

This, of course, would be perceived as an even GREATER offense in the land of BRA. Sure, Mr. Urton dun keeled one of Shaniqua's 7 chillen', but she can (and will) make more. That isn't the REAL travesty.

What's REALLY offensive is that Mr. Urton assumed that he was in any danger at all when surrounded by people that have been irrefutably proven by (((Hollywood))) to be peaceful and caring citizens. This would be a clear indication of his Racism(R), White Privelege (R), and possible connections to the KKK and Trump himself.

His remaining time on Earth would be spent awaiting a trial of his genetic enenmies before an Obama-appointed leftwing judge, before being sentenced to 10,000 years inside some third-world prison. He would be raped by orcs daily until being shanked and bleeding out in a cold, dark prison shower room.


Anonymous said...

Nothing demanded,nothing changes. It will be far too easy for some to say that the victim should have known better on many angles...Driving in the wrong area, stupid to stop, no CCW,etc.etc. These are perspectives to be filed under White Bullshit.

It isn't bullshit at all. He broke too many rules.

The rules need to exist to protect Whites.

It doesn't mean he is at fault. The negro that killed him is at fault.

But he broke too many rules and put himself at risk.

The government isn't going to help us so we need to protect ourselves. That means setting safety rules to follow.

Rule #1 is to avoid them when possible.

Brian in Ohio said...

Anonymous Boy the way Glenn Miller played said...

Really? In Cincinnati? Would you mind naming a couple of those instances?


Here`s one for ya. lol

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/courts/2015/01/23/man-pleads-guilty-to-assault-of-deters-son/22225997/

Joe Deters son and his girlfriend got enriched by diversity at Taste of Cincinnati (food festival) down on Fountain Square by 5 dindus. They even yelled "get the white guy!"

Hate crime charges? Perish the thought.

Joe Deters is a cuck. This was on full display during the Sam "99 arrests" Dubose shooting when he practically fellated the black community to keep them from setting the city ablaze. Rolled the white cop under the bus so fast, it was unbelievable.

Stay alert, stay alive.


Anonymous said...

If only Deter could provide the public with maps that identify all these "bad neighborhoods". It would make it much easier to know where a family can safely stop by food or gas during a road trip, or where one can safely pull over to change a flat tire without fear of the "bad neighborhood" ending his life

It won't help if an area is 30-40% Black. There is no such thing as a safe area at night if it is that Black.

Stick to main roads and always gas up in the morning. Carry fix a flat and a gun in case you have to wait for AAA. Always have AAA, don't ever go into these areas without it.

More Whites need to carry truck guns. Basically a beat up rifle or shotgun.

Pat Boyle said...

One of the heroes of the left is the geographer and pop anthropologist Jared Diamond. Diamond teaches geography and he is a bird watcher so he has become a frequent visitor to Papuan New Guinea. (There are lots of birds there).

His familiarity with the natives of New Guinea led him to write his best seller "Guns, Germs and Steel" which presents the notion that the stone age tribesmen are intellectually superior to Westerners. He tries to answer "Yali's Question" to whit - "Why do Westerners Have so much more Cargo than we have? (Yali - a native 'Big Man' believes in the Cargo Cult).

American liberals were giddy with delight to read that the darkies from the jungle were not just the mindless savages that they appeared to be, but were actually sages and philosophers.

Diamond has continued to write books like this. The most recent was "The World Until Yesterday". Diamond claims that we have a lot to learn fro the primitives. To illustrate that point the tells a long story about how a Highland native ran down the child of a Lowland native. The kid wasn't being watched and ran out into traffic. The totally innocent driver immediately drove off to a police station because he knew he would be pulled from his truck and beaten to death. As it happened the wise natives - missing the opportunity to immediately kill the innocent driver had to extort blood money from the drivers boss. Jungle justice.

Diamond tells this story that so closely mirrors the events of today's incident as a lesson as how we white people can learn from black men. Yes. He derives a preposterous lesson from the bestial rampages of savages. So we should realize that many liberals will see the murder of this white guy as a lesson in the superiority of blacks.

You probably think I'm just making all this up. Read the book. The twisted minds of liberals surpasses all understanding.

Pat

Nomad said...

Who are "they", and why do we allow them to control our lives to such a degree that they dictate what maps we may and may not use?

This, of course, is a rhetorical question, with the moral being that BRA possesses no more authority than we cede to them.

As soon as "The Happening" finally occurs, and enough of us grow brave enough to defiantly turn to BRAand say "No.", it all comes crashing down.

Non PC Infidel said...

"They used to have one called sketch factor but the blacks all screamed racist and they shut it down."

Of course. Because it exposed the black community for what they are and "made them look bad" and put a spotlight on their dysfunction and criminality. I don't know if that's the same app I read about years ago but the hilarious excuse blacks used back then was that the app would have a negative economic effect/impact upon their areas. I immediately thought, yeah, right! All the fancy stores, restaurants and other businesses in black areas are sure to suffer a loss of income! lol. Not even a drug addled black crackhead on the street would've fallen for that excuse but apparently "progressives" and cucks swallowed it hook, line and sinker. Others no doubt simply caved to negro demands just to shut them up and stop all their screeching and whining about it.

So much for public safety! That pales into insignificance compared to negro "feelings."

Anonymous said...

I don't think there's any way that Urton could have survived this situation once he struck the kid with his car.

Even if he wasn't a GoodWhite and did what many of you are advocating and drove to a police station to report the collision, what then? You don't think the "community" outrage from a white hit-and-run driver who killed a child wouldn't lead to a trial for manslaughter (or worse)? You don't think his black traveling companion wouldn't testify against him and confirm his "racist beliefs"? And after he gets sentenced to jail, how long would he survive inside as a murderer of a black child?

Getting out of the car surely ended Urton's life, but it was ending pretty soon no matter what he did.

Anonymous said...

Same thing happened in Chicago. Late at night a fool let his toddler Jay walk across the stream ahead of him and the kid was clipped by a motorcycle.

The biker went down trying to avoid the kid and Baby Daddy ran over and starting stomping biker's head.

Turned out the biker was a cop who just got off work and he put a bullet in poppa.

Reverend Bacon said...

PK- Thanks for keeping this "hush crime" in the forefront, at least to some of us.

To all: It's interesting to note that this crime, like so many other black-on-white violence, will NOT be scored as a "hate crime." They should drop that designation altogether, and just report the races (etc.) of those involved, and let the data speak for itself. Instead, we hear that blacks are disproportionate victims of "hate" crimes, despite whites being disproportionate victims of interracial crime.

PB said...

"Rule #1 is to avoid them when possible."
By having one in the car with him he put himself in an untenable situation.

D-FENS said...

Pat, one of the characteristics of people of a particular tribe such as (((Jared Diamond))) is to keep the host society constantly off balance. They have done this with Marxism, feminism, porn, terrorism, LTGB, immigration, psychology, protest movements, culture, etc. Occasionally, it backfires against the tribe in a kind of auto-immune syndrome such as marrying out of the tribe.

PB said...

"The tiny mind of the negro can't process the sequence of events in a logical, rational fashion and determine who's responsible- all they "know" is that "you done hit somebody wid your car!"

An important marker of a civilized society and its people is the ability to process and understand complex issues objectively, even when confronted with extremes of grief. Example: I once looked after a White child in ICU who had been hit by a car and had a closed head injury which was extending and bringing her to "brain-death". The Mother, who I hadn't spoken with much, simply because we both knew that there was little to say, after some time, asked me whether this was the kind of situation that led up to organ donation. I told her she was right, without adding more than I needed to at the time, and she then proceeded to ask more questions and offer up a number of ideas, scenarios etc and generally (as I said) processed a complex issue unselfishly even in the midst of extreme grief. Were this woman and Aboriginal or Islander, this discussion would not have occurred, but one about "payback" may have (which the dumb f***ers are obsessed with).

David In TN said...

A murder case like this might get some attention at the time, maybe even national, but after the initial story, a news blackout falls over it.

Years later, after numerous continuances, the trial starts with no warning or news ahead of time.

Brian in Ohio said...

Anonymous said...
I don't think there's any way that Urton could have survived this situation once he struck the kid with his car.

Even if he wasn't a GoodWhite and did what many of you are advocating and drove to a police station to report the collision, what then? You don't think the "community" outrage from a white hit-and-run driver who killed a child wouldn't lead to a trial for manslaughter (or worse)?


The child wasn't seriously injured, just a few bruises and scrapes. Either Urton wasn't going that fast, or the kid ran into the side of the car as Urton passed, and his injuries were from falling to the ground.

Stopping to see if the child was alright was what any decent white person would do...in 1950`s America. Unfortunately those days are looong gone. Had he continued to police station, or stopped a few blocks away and called them, he would likely still be cited for leaving the scene. But he`d still be alive to have his day in court.

Keep driving. Let the courts deal with it. Tell the judge you didn't want to be the next Jamie Urton. It`s probable that any witnesses in this case wouldn't have come forward against Mr. Urton for fear of the likely numerous warrants for their arrest.

Stay alert, stay alive.

Anonymous said...

One of the heroes of the left is the geographer and pop anthropologist Jared Diamond.

He is the high priest of People's Equality Fantasy History, taking the spot of Gould.

As with many leftist professors they claim to have all the answers but won't debate their positions.

Diamond claimed that Africans were simply unlucky in that none of their animals could domesticated. This is ridiculous as it implies you need to start with perfectly tame animals. It's not as if Europeans and Asians started with milk cows from the woods or that Arab horses were from human friendly stock.

The other major problem with his theory is that Africans have had domesticated animals for over 1000 years. The Masai were tending cow before America existed. So why isn't Africa more advanced than America?

His entire book falls apart to critical thinking and yet it is basically a Holy book to liberals. He explains all the inequality away through mere chance but leaves some blame for White people (germs).

It's a childrens book for liberals. The fact that it has sold millions of copies tells us what we are up against. Most college students are required to read it at some point.

Anonymous said...

I don't think there's any way that Urton could have survived this situation once he struck the kid with his car.

Even if he wasn't a GoodWhite and did what many of you are advocating and drove to a police station to report the collision, what then? You don't think the "community" outrage from a white hit-and-run driver who killed a child wouldn't lead to a trial for manslaughter (or worse)?


If that was the worst case scenario he would still be alive. Yes the worst he would get is manslaughter and he would probably get probation. The justice systems in BRA are overloaded with criminals. They can't afford to lock up first time offenders for vehicular homicide. You have to be drunk or driving recklessly to get serious time for that anywhere.

You are thinking too much like a White person in a White area. These are American Congo reservations. You don't stop and if that means taking a chance with the law then so be it. A criminal charge is far better than being beaten by a mob.

The prosecutors in these areas are normally White and if they are Black they will be sick of Dindu behavior. Meaning they probably won't even care unless it makes CNN.

Anonymous said...

The little bugger graduated college, found out he was actually smart enough to be an apprentice fry cook and started killing.

If he was white, they would scoff at any hint of mental illness. No insanity defense, he is a strong, proud black kang! His life wasn't fit for this white country, will anyone help with a Go Fund Me page to have this black body repatriated to his spiritual home of Wakanda?


http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/06/us/tampa-seminole-heights-killer-parents/index.html

The parents of the man accused of killing four people in a Tampa, Florida, neighborhood could face contempt charges after they appear before a judge Thursday to explain why they're not cooperating with investigators, according to their attorney.

"I cannot fathom a worse scenario than a parent having to testify against their child in such a serious matter," attorney Ralph Fernandez told CNN on Wednesday.

"It goes against everything we stand for as a people in this country -- dividing the home."

Warren told CNN that the parents were served with subpoenas and granted immunity from anything they say being used against them. But they stopped answering questions during a meeting with investigators. The judge will decide if there are grounds for a hearing to show cause -- which will likely take place next week, according to the prosecutor.
Fernandez told CNN affiliate WFLA that when prosecutors asked about Donaldson's life on Tuesday, one parent responded: "Testify against our son? You mean to testify against our baby?"

The attorney told the station the parents, who he described as the "perfect family," were interviewed separately and declined to answer questions about their son's mental health, his state of mind before the killings and whether he was under psychiatric care.

Californian said...

This is something which needs to be considered by those Whites whose mantras include IKAGO and NAXALT.

...Deters said Deonte Baber, 25, approached Urton's African-American passenger and told him, "get out of here, you're black." Baber then began shooting, firing five rounds, according to Deters. The Hamilton County Coroner said Urton was struck in the left thigh and bled out.

Having a black man in the car did not save Urton. The shooter was not impressed with Urton's embracement of diversity, nor did Urton's black friend take a bullet for him (though we do not know all the details on the latter). The shooter did judge the passengers of the vehicle according to the color-of-their-skin (tm) and chose to attack the White while giving the black a chance to escape.

The point is, no matter how "anti-racist" you see yourself, no matter how much you sing the egalitarian party line, no matter how much "privilege" you renounce: in a crisis blacks will still see you as White. And they will act accordingly.

To sum up: You may not be interested in race, but race is very much interested in you.

IKAGO: I Know A Good One
NAXALT: Not All "X" Are Like That

Left Coast White Guy said...

Your skin is your flag whether you like it or not.

Anonymous said...

"Rule #1 is to avoid them when possible."
By having one in the car with him he put himself in an untenable situation.


Having a Black friend let other Blacks know he was trying to befriend them which means non-threatening. They can assume that White with Black means not a crazy cracker ready to shoot.

Hanging out with them is definitely breaking the rule. Not just because of the message it sends but because of the cousins.

Blacks stick to what they know. You can see this by watching First 48. They don't like random targets. They will rob the petty drug dealer their cousin knows even if they know he probably won't have more than a few hundred dollars. So while your IKAGO friend may seem ok the problem is that his cousin knows who you are. You are "the White dude" that has been vetted.

AnalogMan said...

Wouldn't be surprised if it was all setup "gon' wrong". What's to stop a low empathy negro from sending his sprog to run onto oncoming traffic in an effort to extort money from vulnerable whites.

Sunscreen


From my recollection of the news reports, that's exactly what it was, and it didn't go wrong. The brat didn't run in front of the car, it ran into the side of the car as it passed. Not much danger of getting hurt. Makes a big noise and scares the hell out of the driver, who never even saw the brat lurking between the parked cars. The killer knew damned well it wasn't hurt, they've done this before, which is why he didn't bother to check.

Bastion Harm said...

"I can guarantee you that there's a prosecuting attorney in Cincinnati who's shaking his head in absolute disbelief and saying, "Omg! This case is just too good to pass up!"

No, not really. I know two of Deter's prosecutors and they are currently suffering from "negro fatigue" as they've watched criminal case after criminal case get sabotaged by black jurors due to their combination of having an 80 IQ (and hence being completely incapable of understanding things like "reasonable doubt") and hating white people.

Nowadays, if you've got even a couple of blacks on a jury in Hamilton County, and the case has any racial element, expect it to be sabotaged by your black jurors. End of story.

...and to think that only 3% of their cases go before a jury. Imagine if that number were much larger and you had even so much as 30 or 40% of your trials going to a jury instead of a bench trial.

You think our "justice system" is screwed now....

Anonymous said...

To be fair, whites tried, and still do albeit unsuccessfully, to tame African animals (the human variety too). It's true that Africans have possessed the intelligence to domesticated animals for millenia, but considering the nature of the swarth, to become like America is at best Sci fi.

Nnn PC Infidel said...

Bastion Harm: I've only had one experience in being called for jury duty where I was part of the selection process. In that case, a negro was on trial for being an accomplice in a robbery/shooting. During jury selection, the negro sat with his attorney and had the right to have any potential juror dismissed for whatever reason. That being said, if I was on trial, I certainly wouldn't want any low IQ negroes on the jury as I don't consider them to be my "peers" or to have the necessary intelligence to render any kind of sensible decision. I know how they are and their "get whitey" mentality so I'd do everything I could to get them thrown off. Nor would I want an affirmative action judge. In a place like Cincinnati with such a high groid population I suppose that would be hard to do.

In any case, I've known several lawyers in my 90% white town and they've all essentially told me that a jury is one of the stupidest creatures on Earth and that they've won cases they never should have won and lost cases they never should have lost. I can only imagine how much worse that is with negroes on the jury. Their advice was that if I ever got into trouble that I should go for a bench trial. Not that this would ever happen (hopefully!) but their advice was well received.