Showing posts with label hate facts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hate facts. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

More Than a Feeling: Black on (Gay) Black Attack in Atlanta = Hate Crime; Black on White Attack in Philly = Nothing

God Bless WSHH... but why no "Hate Crime" in Black-on-white attack in Philly?
World Star Hip Hop (worldstarhiphop.com) is the most important Web site on the Internet, for it shows Black America in all its glory. Black people willingly upload videos of themselves engaging in behaviors that Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) dismiss as "stereotypical" and Organized Blackness claims are only isolated incidents of neglected youth lashing out against a society dominated by white privilege.

No. World Star Hip Hop (WSHH) is just Black people 'keepin it real'. It's undiluted, uncensored, uncouth, unapologetically untrammeled Black behavior. That's why the recent video upload of Black people in Atlanta assaulting a quote "faggot" (No Homo, right?) instantly became a WSHH sensation:
Members of an Atlanta street gang were filmed beating a man who was brutally assaulted because “faggots” were not allowed in their neighborhood, according to a videotape of the apparent hate crime.
The 30-second clip, posted today to the Worldstar Hip Hop web site, was shot outside a grocery store in Atlanta’s Pittsburgh neighborhood. The business, located at 1029 McDaniel Street SW, is a popular congregating spot for members of the Pittsburgh Jack City Gang (or “PBJC”). The group has also used the name “Jack City 1029.”
After being provided a link to the video, an Atlanta police spokesperson told TSG that the clip had been forwarded to the department’s gang division as well as the unit that investigates bias crimes against the LGBT community. Officer Kim Jones added that she was researching whether a police report was generated at the time of the attack (which investigators believe took place over the weekend).
As seen above, the video opens with an unseen cameraman and a second man outside the grocery store. The second man announces, “Round one. Jack City. No faggots.” Then, after a diminutive man exits the grocery, an assailant approaches him from behind and delivers a brutal punch to the side of the victim’s head. The man’s cell phone flies from his hand and he crumples to the ground.

Black people have gleefully uploaded their crimes for the world to see on WSHH (nor bragging about them on Facebook), but this time, the usage of the word "faggot" has stripped the usual Black-on-Black crime we have come to expect to dominate the news in a big-city like Atlanta, to a level of naked bigotry that can not be tolerated:
Federal authorities joined Atlanta police Monday in investigating video footage posted online of an apparent gang-related beating in southwest Atlanta.

The video, posted on YouTube and the website for WorldHipHop.com and reported by online news site The Smoking Gun, shows three men attacking a man they claim to be gay coming from a grocery store on McDaniel Street.
One of the alleged assailants shouts a derogatory term for gays as he attacks the victim.
In a prepared statement emailed to the media Monday night, U.S. Attorney Sally Quillian Yates said, "Along with the Atlanta Police Department, we are working to determine if the actions portrayed in the video violate federal law, including the hate crime statute.
"The actions depicted in the video are appalling and unacceptable in our community, and we encourage anyone with information about this video to contact the FBI or Atlanta Police," Yates said.
YouTube removed the video on Monday, citing it violates the website's policy against violence.
In the video, the victim appears to be talking on his cell phone as he emerges from the store, and rounds a corner into an apparent ambush.
Three assailants  swarm the man, punching and kicking him repeatedly. When the man falls to the ground, someone grabs a car tire and strikes him with it.
Atlanta police say they were made aware of the video by the media, but weren't able to determine Monday when the footage was shot and whether anyone had filed a report.
"We encourage the victim to come forward to discuss the incident with investigators," police spokesman Carlos Campos said in a statement. "The Atlanta Police Department is working to determine more about the attack depicted on this video, including attempting to identify the victim and the perpetrators."
 Just like the predominately white student body of Georgia Tech (located in downtown Atlanta) - targeted on a daily basis for robbery, random assaults, rape, and murder by Black people - it now seems gay bashing is a enjoyable game in the Black community of Atlanta. Considering that the gay community is the last chance for ensuring that property values remaining high in Fulton County (via the first wave of gentrification), this incident might spook one or two members of that community from settling down in The City too Busy to Hate.

But this incident, when compared to a recent ruling in Philadelphia shows us one simple fact: white people have no real legal protections anymore when they are assaulted by Black people, especially when said Black people are using racial epithets during the barrage. Remember the Urban Terrorists who targeted whitey in Philadelphia recently? As they beat two white guys, they yelled racially charged slurs and pejoratives toward them. Federal authorities aren't launching an investigation however:

THREE JUVENILES accused of assaulting a cabdriver and his passenger in Center City Saturday night while shouting racial slurs will not be charged with a hate crime, the District Attorney's Office said yesterday.
The teens, who are black, were not charged with hate crimes because there was no evidence that the assault had been motivated by the race of the victims, who are white, said Tasha Jamerson, D.A. spokeswoman. Just shouting racial epithets during the commission of a crime doesn't rise to the level of ethnic intimidation, she said.
"They just didn't have that in this case," she said. "If they had somebody who, two blocks before, heard them say, 'We're going to beat somebody up because they're white, brown or purple,' it might be different."
Such is life in Black-Run America (BRA), where Obama's War on white America gets more obvious on a daily basis. Lawrence Auster at VFR recently opined on the meaning of "hate crimes" and it's vital for you to read what he stated:

The creation of the legal category of “hate-crime” illustrates how liberalism is the dominant force of our society, progressively taking over and displacing normal and traditional concepts. Traditionally, a crime consists of two elements: the intention to commit the criminal act, and the criminal act. Those are the two things that must be found in order for a jury to find a person guilty of a crime. The only required psychological component is that the defendant had mens rea—the guilty thought, the guilty intent to commit the crime. The precise nature and quality of this intention does not matter, insofar as the establishment of his guilt is concerned, only that he had the intention to commit the crime.


The establishment of “hate-crime” as a category in criminal law adds on to the normal idea of criminal intent the idea of “hate.” If you “hate” the ethnic, religious, or sexual group to which your victim belongs, and if such hate was part of your motivation, your crime is much worse, and is punished more severely, and society condemns you more harshly. Determining whether such “hate” obtained in a given crime involves looking into the thoughts of the defendant in a manner that does not happen in normal criminal law. It defines as criminal certain kinds of thoughts, which has never been the case in the Anglo-American legal tradition. It makes certain kinds of intentions more criminal, and more punishable, than other kinds of intentions. So, even as society keeps letting off with light punishments people who have committed terrible murders, it makes a huge deal of, and punishes more severely, people who have committed crimes who also had “hate” in their mind when they committed them. In 1989 an acquaintance said that racism is now worse than murder. With the establishment of the category of hate-crimes, that statement has become literally true. 

As I’ve always said, the ruling principle of modern liberal society is non-discrimination. Therefore under liberalism discrimination is the worst thing there is, the thing that must be rooted out and eliminated, as liberals are always saying it must be. The introduction of hate-crimes statutes shows how this liberal ideology has taken over our society. It shows how, to a very significant degree, America is no longer a free country, but an ideological state, ruling society according the ideology of non-discrimination. But of course this ideology is not imposed equally on everyone, but principally on white Christian heterosexual men, who according to the liberal ideology are the main or only source of hate and discrimination in our society. Thus when, as in Philadelphia this week, blacks commit what appears from the news reports to be a grossly obvious hate-crime against whites, physically assaulting a white cab driver and the white cabbie while yelling racial epithets, the hate-crime charge was instantly dismissed by Philadelphia’s district attorney.
The economy of Philadelphia will continue to falter with white flight from a city under-siege by Black people engaging in Flash Mobs Mahogany Mob attacks on white people and then uploading their buffoonery for all to observe on WSHH.  Atlanta's property values will continue to plummet, and commercial real estate prices will bottom out (as companies seek to open headquarters in the lily-white suburbs up 400 north in Alpharetta) because Black crime makes living in the city an intolerable act of cruelty; commuting two hours every day to work in the city and live away from that same Black crime is an even greater act of cruelty (and one of the sparsely researched areas of why marriages are failing: having to spend so much time commuting to and from your Whitopia in a bid to escape Black Undertow cities).


None of this warrants national discussion; none of this warrants national dialogue. We would rather see every major city in America turned into another version of Detroit, then confront the reality of race.

One day, to even acknowledge that Black people commit a disproportionate amount of crime in America will automatically be deemed a "hate crime" in BRA. To even point out twisted application of the law (when comparing the attacks in Atlanta and Philly) is probably grounds for some sort of punishment in our brave new world.

SBPDL has more than a feeling that a few people around the nation saw these two stories and made the same connection we did. In the end, the Black attack in Atlanta (is there any other kind?) only brought more attention to WSHH, that wonderful Web site that confirms every anecdote you've ever heard or read about Black people.

And that's a good thing.

The bad thing? The quick decision to go after Hate Crime charges in the Atlanta story, but to deny that there was a Hate Crime in the Philadelphia situation (when racial slurs against whites were used by Blacks in the latter) shows that the legal war against white people continues unabated.

More than a feeling that a lot of people wish someone would confront that "bad thing" - they'd have a huge portion of the nation behind them. 





Sunday, September 19, 2010

Truth, Justice and the American Way are Incompatible in BRA: 700 Black people Demand News Editor Practice Censorship

Remember that incident in Buffalo, when the joyous wedding party was interrupted with a hail of gunshots? Largely unreported nationwide, the local news covered the story with a passion that once motivated all reporters who were tasked with garnering the truth and enlightening the citizenry.

The idea of truth, justice and the America way is no longer relevant in Black Run America (BRA), as the myth of the pioneering reporter searching for the truth amidst an endless sea of lies is actually the reverse description of journalists now - they swim in a sea of truth yet report only what their lying eyes tell them is good for career advancement.

The Buffalo News decided to investigate the lives and backgrounds of those who died in the horrific shooting, actually working to locate a motivation to the killings and reported this:
Eight young people who grew up on Buffalo's streets were gunned down in a hail of bullets last weekend outside City Grill downtown, four of them fatally.


They left grieving families. Mournful friends.
And arrest and conviction records.


Their records indicating past or present associations with crime begets a certain lifestyle risk, law enforcement and criminology experts say.

"A felony prosecution or conviction increases your statistical likelihood of becoming a victim of a crime, and it's particularly true for men and particularly true for African-Americans," said Yvonne Downes, a criminal justice professor at Hilbert College. "It doesn't mean that the people deserved it or in any way had it coming."
Added a local law enforcement official who asked not to be named: "There were some very dangerous people there. There were numerous gang bangers and other unscrupulous people. But there were a lot of good people."

Family members, friends and community leaders say the victims were working to be better people and certainly didn't deserve the fate that befell them Aug. 14.
For reporting the facts, the editor of the paper was forced to meet with 700 to 800 Black people that the story worked into a frenzy and inflamed with a righteous indignation that can only be satiated with a self-imposed censorship by the soon to be neutered press:
About 700 members of Buffalo's African-American community tonight shared their grievances with Buffalo News Editor Margaret Sullivan over an Aug. 22 article on the criminal backgrounds of victims of the shooting at the City Grill three weeks ago.
The forum, held in True Bethel Baptist Church, 907 E. Ferry St., was one that Sullivan had requested following negative reaction to the report.
Many in the crowd expressed outrage that the police records of the shooting victims were reported at all. They called the report a gross departure from how The News traditionally treats crime victims and that it was disrespectful to the victims, their families and the African-American community.
"I feel that we were victimized twice," said Cheryl Stevens, mother-in-law of Danyelle Mackin, one four victims who was killed in the shooting.
She was one of four family members of the victims invited to address Sullivan during the forum.
"What you did to us was you poured salt on the wounds that had not even healed. So, I'm asking -- and this is for all the families -- we want an apology," added Stevens.
Others who were specifically invited to speak included former Buffalo Common Council President George K. Arthur, who offered a historical perspective on the African-American community's grievances with The News' coverage of its community.
The Rev. Matthew Brown and Murray Holman of STOP the Violence Coalition also offered their perspectives, charging the newspaper did not often respect black people's feelings and that it showed a historic pattern of insensitivity in its coverage of the community.
Sullivan said she was pleased she was able able to listen to the views and explain the editorial decision behind the publication of the Aug. 22 story.

"I really am not here to try to do a point-counterpoint to everything that I've heard because I don't think that would be possible and my main purpose in being here is to listen," she said.
"I do want to say that the way The Buffalo News is being portrayed, at least, in terms of our intention and what we try to do every day is, essentially, unrecognizable to me. I know that the people I work with feel very deeply, that they care about this community. They care about you," Sullivan said.
Among the several-hundred people present at the forum, grumblings greeted Sullivan's opening remarks. And when members of the public got an opportunity to address her, they didn't mince words.
"It was an article concerning four victims that has brought us together," said the Rev. Darius G. Pridgen. "However, it is the decades-old perception of many in the community that must be addressed tonight.
 It was only a few weeks that gang members in the war zone known as Chicago held a press conference to lambaste the police for, well, doing their job:
At a news conference organized by self-identified gang members Thursday morning, several speakers complained that police and city officials do not respect them, and that the only way to curb violence is to provide jobs and improve their community.

The men who spoke out Thursday morning blamed poverty, drugs and a lack of jobs for the problems in the streets. They also said that Chicago Police Supt. Jody Weis' meeting with so-called gang leaders was a waste of time.


But when asked what could be done right now to stop the daily barrage of bullets on Chicago streets, they didn't have an answer.


Akeem Berry Sr., an admitted former gang member, said.
Reporting the race of the accused is a no-no in the current epoch we'll all endure together (Thugreport.com will one day be banned for being a modern-day Samizdat) and the editor from the Buffalo News dared flaunt this rule that governs journalism.


The Washington Post is afraid to talk about race when it might paint Black people in a negative light. The Los Angeles Times as well. Even police sketches are now reduced to a non-racial hue to comply with the rules that govern journalism and ensure that the Black community remains calm.

One book accurately nailed the rules that govern the world of modern journalism:

In his impressive new book, "Coloring the News," William McGowan has an unusual take on the continuing battle over bias in the news media: He think liberals are as damaged by it as everyone else. Bill Clinton, he thinks, was victimized in a sense by the early non-reporting of the gays-in-the-military issue. Because the newsroom strongly supports gay causes, journalists didn't bother to do much reporting on the depth of the opposition building against Clinton's pledge to allow openly gay members of the armed forces. The debate was skewed, and Clinton paid a high political price, because reporters thought the open inclusion of gays was too obvious a cause to cover in any detail.


The same yawn of obviousness surrounds newsroom treatment of affirmative action. One New York Times reporter told McGowan, "Nobody wants to do a story on affirmative action because they just don't see anything wrong with it." In the papers I read, coverage is slack, and articles favorable to race and gender preferences are much more common than not-so-favorable ones. The newsroom air is so thick with orthodoxy that it is very hard for readers and viewers to figure out what is really going on.

McGowan argues, in case-by-case detail, that diversity ideology has corrupted the newsroom. Hiring more women, gays and minorities was fair, but it pushed the newsroom further to the left, since those groups are more liberal than white males. These groups acquired the ability to monitor coverage of their own activities, often with the clear ability to airbrush out anything they considered negative or hurtful to the cause. Militant gays took over AIDS beats, often with little or no protest about a conflict of interest. Office commissars began to appear -- "senior vice president, diversity" or "diversity director" -- who sometimes sat in on daily news meetings and contributed to coverage decisions. (Just like a teacher or someone from the principal's office used to sit in and contribute to coverage of your high school paper.)
Those who dare point out the relationship of crime to Black people are denounced in the harshest of terms, branded  below even the Untouchables in the Indian caste system. News editors that dare break the taboo of reporting race will be axed or worse, grilled by 700-800 Black people in the saintly confines of a Church.

Journalists should report that the one-armed man was behind the crime henceforth and let the police discover the truth while the general public frets about a handicapped miscreant on the loose.No race; no description; just report that the one-armed man did it.

Because "truth, justice and the American way" is but a misappropriation of words in BRA. The inverse is reality, because "truth" is incompatible with modern America; "justice" but a word for profiling and police racism.

 Truth has been on vacation for far too long; we are past due for justice. After all, it once was the American way.











Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Black History Month Heroes: Tattooed Prisoner from "The Dark Knight"





If you were to consider the most profitable genre of film in the past 15 years, what would your answer be? Chances are, you wouldn’t consider the answer a genre at all, but comic book fans everywhere would beg to differ.

Superhero films would be the correct answer as the exploits of DC, Marvel and Image comic characters on the big screen have enraptured audiences across the world with their tales of heroes clad in tights, titanium armor and capes.

The amount of money brought in from comic book movies is absolutely staggering, and hardly a summer goes by when two super hero films aren’t causing long lines at the local cinema.

However, curiously absent throughout all of the casting choices for superheroes have been Black people. The paucity of Black faces is so notably that some films have had to turn traditional white characters into Black people, in vain attempts to placate groups advocating on Black actors and actresses behalf.

Therein lays the problem, as the majority of popular comic book characters are the uniform color of white and casting a Black actor in any particular superhero role is bound to cause some uproar:

“That's the problem, said Russell Robinson, a professor of law at the University of California - Los Angeles, who wrote a 2006 report about unfair race-based casting in Hollywood.

"It's an industry norm that the assumption is that roles go to white actors," Robinson said. "They use people of color to flesh out the film and exemplify racial stereotypes."

Robinson's report, "Hollywood's Race/Ethnicity And Gender-Based Casting: Prospects For A Title VII Lawsuit," found that the majority of roles that do not specify a race or ethnicity are played by white actors, which tends to limit black actors to stereotypical roles.

"I think what bothers a lot of African-Americans is that we see the same images time and time again. ... We'd like to see the full range of complexities that we see in our communities," Robinson said.”

Thankfully, last summer’s epic blockbuster “The Dark Knight” offered us a reprieve from the monochromatic white world of superhero movies by granting us the rare view into a world populated by Black superheroes.

Wait, which character are you referencing? Batman, Two-Face and the Joker were all played by run-of-the-mill white guys, you say.

Correct, but this is the fictional look at Black History Month and we are doing are best to locate Black people worthy of praise and acclaim, so in “The Dark Knight” we have found such a Black person.

In that film, one scene stands out from the others as potentially being implausible and garnered laughs and stares when first viewed by audiences everywhere. We are not talking about initial robbery of the bank, but the boat scene at the end of film.

Wikipedia describes it this way:

“With the bridges and tunnels out of the city closed due to a warning by the Joker, authorities begin evacuating people by ferry. The Joker has explosives placed on two of the ferries—one ferry with convicts, who were evacuated in an effort to keep the Joker from freeing them, and the other with civilians—telling the passengers the only way to save themselves is to trigger the explosives on the other ferry; otherwise, he will destroy both at midnight

… The Joker's plan to destroy the ferries fails after the passengers on both decide not to destroy each other.”

Left out is the heroic individual – morally superior to all individuals riding on those two ferries and perhaps, even to the films protagonist, Batman – who also happens to double as a prisoner. Credited as “Tattooed Prisoner”, this menacing Black individual is on the prisoners ferry for reasons that can’t be properly deduced nor explained, for his pious nature is worthy of inclusion in the Justice League of America.

The situation – a prisoner’s dilemma – is a boon for game theorists:

“The Joker, doing so without prior knowledge of the passengers and city officials, wired the ships with powerful explosives such that their explosion would destroy the entire ship and everyone aboard. No single individual is allowed to escape. Each ship is given a detonator for the other ferry. The use of the detonator saves the ship while killing everyone aboard the opposing ship. Thus, if any member of Ship A pushes the detonator, then Ship B is destroyed and all of Ship A is saved. Additionally, if either ship fails to use the detonator to destroy its opponent, then both ships will be destroyed by the Joker.”

The ferry of civilians has voted democratically to blow up the other ship, thus proving the Joker’s philosophy of absolute anarchy reigning in Gotham City. With precious few minutes remaining until the time the Joker has stated both ships will be destroyed if one group – either the prisoners or civilians – is incapable of killing off the other, a lone Black prisoner stands to showcase morality to civilians (and to the scores of millions who saw the film):

The Joker has rigged two ferries to explode, one filled with prison inmates, one with ordinary people, giving each ferry one detonator and telling them they have to blow up the other, or he'll blow up both. A prisoner approaches the warden, who's holding the detonator]

Tattooed Prisoner: You don't want to die, but you don't know how to take a life. Give it to me; these men would kill you, and take it anyway. Give it to me. You can tell 'em I took it by force. Give it to me, and I'll do what you shoulda did ten minutes ago.
[...]

Yes, the Tattooed Prisoner (played by the criminally underutilized Tom “Tiny” Lister) is the moral compass of the film, spoiling the Joker’s plans of anarchy and chaos.

The actor who played Tattooed Prisoner is a hulking mass of humanity, weighing in at 300 and towering over most mere mortals at 6’5. And, he is a Black man. Thus, the Tattooed Prisoner is a Black superhero, even if he is in shackles from crimes committed prior to his heroic act on the boat.

Some wish to debate the merits of good and evil in the film, yet we here at SBPDL just want to point out the true superhero of the film, Tattooed Prisoner, who was brilliantly portrayed by a man who once played a Black president in the film The Fifth Element.

Why is Tattooed Prisoner, from The Dark Knight, a character of such epic proportions? Consider that more Black males are in jail than are in college. Consider that crime in this country has a distinct Black face, and this time, there isn’t an Al Jolson behind it.

Thus, Tattooed Prisoner – nobly, he is given no name in the film, like the unnamed hero who rides a white horse and vanquishes evil – is initially installed in the movie to play on our misguided-by- hate-facts stereotypes.

However, all Black criminals are as morally righteous as Tattooed Prisoner and the fine film “The Dark Knight” shows us that reality.

Tattooed Prisoner is a shining example of why Stuff Black People Don’t Like found it crucial to honor those theatrical performances by Black thespians whom can be honored in our fictional Black History Month.

He is a titan of virtue, who casually grabbed the detonation device from a white warden and nonchalantly dispelled it to the bottom of Gotham Bay. Tattooed Prisoner saved hundreds of lives and thwarted the Joker’s villainous plot.

All Black criminals would do the same, right?

The Ferry Scene from The Dark Knight can be viewed here.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

#716. The Ghost Costume for Halloween


Already, we have discussed that Black people don’t particularly enjoy Ghosts (registered mail and dogs are also on that list). Halloween is closely linked with reverence for the dead and an understanding that on Halloween, the thin line that separates the land of the living from the realm of the deceased is blurred:

“On the night of October 31, they celebrated Samhain, when it was believed that the ghosts of the dead returned to earth. In addition to causing trouble and damaging crops, Celts thought that the presence of the otherworldly spirits made it easier for the Druids, or Celtic priests, to make predictions about the future.”

Black people find ghosts abominable, for these other worldly specters have the ability to bestow sudden frights upon them that leave Black people petrified (after the initial striking back, as SPBDL: Sudden Frights, teaches us).

Scary movies that are shown at theaters are a wonderful place to see Black people being frightened by make-believe ghosts, which send Black people into a permanent frenzy of non-stop chatter, as they deliver play-by-play during the movie to avoid being scared.

However, apparitions in movies and the thought of a real-life floating ghoul hardly create the fear and dread in Black people, that a person donning white sheets and impersonating a ghost does.

The decision by an individual to mimic the appearance of a ghost sends shivers of paranoia and fear down a Black persons spine, for the potential of multiple people adorned in ghost paraphernalia is a thought to dreadful to contemplate.

The inscrutable and inveterate fear that Black people have of ghosts and of those who dress like ghosts on Halloween is one that SBPDL hopes they are soon manumit from, for the seemingly scurrilous nature Black people view this Halloween costume is reaching truly frightening dimensions:

"The Halloween garb worn by a Westview student last week was a ghost costume, not a Klan outfit, the boy's father said yesterday. “My son is not racist. He was more naive than malicious,” said the father, whose name is not being used because he said he feared his son could be subject to harassment.

The father called The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday after print and broadcast media publicized reports of the incident, one of two that has prompted a parents group to call for diversity and tolerance training in the Poway Unified School District.

The group, Concerned Parents Alliance, said the Westview High student wore a costume resembling a Ku Klux Klan outfit on Halloween. The group also was concerned about an incident last month in which a noose was found hanging in a boys bathroom at Poway High School in Poway….

“It was a ghost costume made by his aunt 10 years ago,” he said. “He and his brother had worn it on and off for years.”

Superintendent Don Phillips said he's been told that the boy has friends who are black, and they have said the teen is not racist.

“Sometimes kids don't understand that some symbolism can be really, really powerful and hurtful,” Phillips said.

“Whether it was meant to be a ghost costume or not, it was not interpreted that way,” Phillips said. He said the district recognizes the need to create greater sensitivity among students.”



Black people have a distinct fear of ghosts that has a correlation to their great dislike of Halloween, and for their continued fear that a resurrection of a largely irrelevant organization (whose membership consists of people living with their parents and FBI agents) is just around the corner.

There can be no denying the similarity between the robes of those who are members of a long immaterial organization and those of children or adults enjoying Halloween wearing the sheets with cut-out eye holes in a moving deference to the traditional image of the ghost.

Think back to the classic film, ET: The Extra Terrestrial, and the importance of the traditional ghost costume in helping our beleaguered illegal alien attempt to contact his friends in space to pick him up:

“On Halloween, Michael and Elliott dress E.T. as a ghost so they can sneak it out of the house. Elliott and E.T. ride a bicycle to the forest, where E.T. makes a successful call home. The next morning, Elliott wakes up to find E.T. gone, and returns home to his distressed family. Michael finds E.T. dying in the forest, and takes the alien to Elliott, who is also dying.”

The ghost costume is much maligned, for you have to remember that any attempt to defame Black people in America is grounds for social and immediate expulsion, as Black people are a protected class from any criticism or from seeing people dressed as ghosts.

One of the easiest ways to end a debate with someone who is using Hate Facts is to say they must be a member of an organization that finds great delight in dressing up in ghost costumes on days that aren’t Halloween, for the KKK inference is one any person will immediately back off from. Even Hate Facts have a kryptonite:

Two students in Leesburg were suspended for wearing Ku Klux Klansman-like costumes to class amid apparent rising racial tensions at a high school, according to a Local 6 News report.

Local 6 News has learned that besides the costumes, there has been at least one other incident reported during the week of homecoming festivities at Leesburg High School.

Two black students were arrested and charged with felonies after allegedly getting into fights with white students.

"There is a problem," student Gilliam Kamken said. "If there wasn't a problem, all of this would not be going on. Nobody would be fighting. Nobody would be in the hospital, and nobody would be in jail."

"It is not just white people against black people and black people against white people," student Elese Stein said. "I think it is more of an attention thing."

No one ever bothered to ask these students (this happened during the month of October) if they were just massive fans of Halloween and were eager to engage in trick or treating. You see, Halloween is 365white, not 365Black.

This incident has been repeated numerous times over and the confusion of the similarity between the ghost costume and the KKK accoutrements is eerie, but has had harsh ramifications for those who dare to blur the line between phantom and hate:
"A dozen Tri-state high school students made quite a scene at the school halloween dance when they put on Ku Klux Klan outfits.

Students and administrators in Rising Sun, Indiana, say they're upset it happened and shocked the students would do it.

The principal made the students take off the outfits right away, but the damage was done.

9News learned the students were told they have to go through sensitivity training or risk suspension.

People in the community are also being asked to reach out to each other.

"I think you're surprised if one person shows up [in KKK garb], but sometimes good people, whether they're adults or kids, do things that aren't the best and make bad decisions and that's what we had. We had about 12 individuals make a very bad decision," said Superintendent Steve Patz.

The students, all boys, came to the dance wearing sheets, dressed as ghosts and pulled out hoods a little later.

There was one African-American girl at the dance, 9News learned.

Although the superintendent says he's under the impression the act wasn't done maliciously, it doesn't matter.

He says this kind of action regarding race, religion, cultures -- just can't happen.”
Halloween brings out the ghoul in everyone who participates in the revelry of the day, and some parties (Fraternity parties) have been mistaken for hate filled congregations of bigots. The ghost costume was a major hit in Pre-Obama America, but still was viewed as a risqué costume for the odious connotations it inspired.

So, be careful when wearing a ghost costume to your Halloween party, for Stuff Black People Don’t Like includes the ghost costume for Halloween, as this ensemble combines a number of variables that elicit fear in Black people.

For in reality, Black people believe all white people have a ghost costume in their house ready to don at any moment, and that upside down T's will appear everywhere.





Friday, October 9, 2009

#84. Only Winning Nobel Prizes for Peace


SBPDL has tried to make it clear to everyone that We Live in a Black World now, regardless of the demographic figures. All that matters anymore is the United States number one and two exports – sports and Mein Obama – and the citizens of not only our country but the entire world consume both in vast quantities.

From the National Basketball Association (NBA) to the National Football League (NFL), the citizens of our country will follow their professional team to the gates of Hell if they had too, and with sports being one of our top forms of economic production in the nation, we might as well admit the US is not even a service economy anymore, but a hybrid sports-consumption economic society.

Sports project a positive image of Black people – if you don’t read Jeff Benedict’s work - since Black people are capable of performing the extraordinary feat of running with a football and putting a ball into basket. However, one skill that eludes Black people is flying planes, a task no amount of government intervention can rightfully alter.

Our second most valuable export is Barack Obama, a real-life General Zod. Black people know this, which is why they support him with nearly unanimous numbers and why the look to him as being the man who drove the stake deep into the heart of Pre-Obama America.

His approval rating in America might be slipping – among everyone but Black people - and social unrest might be just around the corner as the economy slides into disaster mode – just ask the good citizens of Detroit – but Zod/Obama has finally been given the honor that he rightfully deserves; a Nobel Prize for Peace:

"A beaming President Barack Obama said Friday he was both honored and humbled to win the Nobel Peace Prize and would accept it as a "call to action" to work with other nations to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Obama told reporters in the White House Rose Garden that he wasn't sure he had done enough to earn the award, or deserved to be in the company of the "transformative figures" who had won it before him.

But, he said, "I will accept this award as a call to action, a call for all nations to confront the challenges of the 21st century."

Barack Obama is seen as the 21st version of Ozymandias, and in this Black man rests the ability for the world to be unified (which the Nobel committee took into consideration for his prize):

Ozymandias was another name for Ramesses the Great, Pharaoh of the nineteenth dynasty of ancient Egypt. Ozymandias represents a transliteration into Greek of a part of Ramesses' throne name, User-maat-re Setep-en-re. The sonnet paraphrases the inscription on the base of the statue, given by Diodorus Siculus as "King of Kings am I, Osymandias. If anyone would know how great I am and where I lie, let him surpass one of my works.”

The Nobel Prize is correct to award Obama with this honor, for his election has lead to peace in the United States. Were it not for his election, the chaotic scene in Detroit, where upwards to 50,000 Black people thought they would be getting a stimulus check, would be repeated in every major city. Black people have the highest unemployment of any racial group in America and yet, having a fellow Black occupy 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue keeps alive the prospect of hope and change.

A white person in office would be cause for riots, as no positive net growth in jobs is beyond the horizon, and the rate of unemployment will only aggregate in the coming months. Yet, Obama is seen as the figure who can eradicate this imbalance, merely by maintaining his current melanin level.

Sadly, the Nobel Prize for Peace that Obama was bestowed is but another honor given to a Black person for Peace:

The first Nobel Prizes were awarded in 1901, it was not until 1950 that a Black person was a recipient. An African American from Detroit, Dr. Ralph J. Bunche was the first black man to receive the distinguished prize for his work as a United Nations mediator; his efforts led to the 1949 Arab-Israeli armistice agreement.

Ten other remarkable Blacks have received a Nobel: Albert John Luthuli, 1960 Peace Prize; Martin Luther King Jr., 1964 Peace Prize; Sir William Arthur Lewis, 1979 Economics Prize; Bishop Desmond Tutu, 1984 Peace Prize; Wole Soyinka, 1986 Literature Prize; Derek Walcott, 1992 Literature Prize; Toni Morrison, 1993 Literature Prize; Nelson Mandela, 1993 Peace Prize, Kofi Annan 2001 Peace Prize and Wangari Maathai, 2004.”

How peaceful is the world currently? Let’s just say the United Nations is considering calling rape a tool of war, which doesn’t bode to well for those who are committing it in open warfare in America.

No, Black people have been honored primarily for bringing a faux-peace to the world, where it has quickly devolved into an even more bellicose state than it was before – a precursor of things to come in the United States with Obama’s latest gift from Nobel.

Take for instance Dr. Bunche. He sure did a good job ending that Arab-Israel conflict, didn’t he? Or Desmond Tutu of South Africa, as his nation is a beacon of peace and prosperity.

What other honors does the Nobel Committee give? Alfred Nobel stated this, in his will:

“The capital shall be invested by my executors in safe securities and shall constitute a fund, the interest on which shall be annually distributed in the form of prizes to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind.

The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the person who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work of an idealistic tendency; and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity among nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

Black people have won 11 Nobel Prizes, with most coming in the peace category and others in the literature and economics category, or 1.4 percent of all Nobel’s given out.

Never has a Black person won a Nobel Prize for work in the field of chemistry, physics or medicine and sadly, no award is handed out for best overall athlete.

William Shockley and James Watson, however, both won Nobel Prizes for their work in ENSURING humanity survived.

Obama is seen as the man who has brought peace to the world, as he has skillfully kept the United States from entering economically-fueled riots, but the scene in Detroit earlier this week showed what is coming. The Nobel Prize he won is a great honor, but it may turn out to be short lived. Stuff Black People Don’t like includes only winning Nobel Prizes for Peace, because more than 70 percent of their awards have come in this category.

The Nobel Prize is thus inherently racist for only awarding prizes in the fields of chemistry, physics and medicine to white people or Asians. Black people have made contributions in these fields… haven’t they?



Thursday, October 8, 2009

#214. Top Gun


We at SBPDL broke the magnificent news to the world on July 4th, 2009 that Pre-Obama America was officially dead. With the election of Mein Obama, a nation that Michelle Obama stated “she would be proud of for the first time in her life,” was forged, largely out of the blood, sweat and tears of Civil Rights activists who toiled with disingenuous white liberals to eradicate the evil that was Pre-Obama America.

Yet, something interesting is transpiring in regards to who suits up to defend the United States (previously discussed in Real American Heroes), as Black people are finding enlistment in the military an option they no longer deem suitable for a vocation. They can salute General Zod in or out of the military, as defending Omerica is a vocation for white people:

“African-Americans don't like war, and we especially don't like the wars we've been fighting for the last eight years. According to the Department of Defense, the number of African-American volunteers for the military dropped by 58 percent between 2000 and 2007. The current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were cited as the key reasons for the decline. We've now hit exactly eight years since the start of the war in Afghanistan, and troops are still being killed…

The truth is that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are primarily white, liberal issues; African-Americans tend to be worried about problems in our own communities, such as violence, unemployment and education. In fact, even when it comes to matters that affect us most, it would take a long list of incredibly irresponsible decisions before the black community is to ever turn on their political superman.

African-Americans will stick with Obama through the war. They will stick with him through health care. They will stick with him through hell, high water or the return of bell-bottom pants. They love Barack Obama - and no war, economic downturn, educational crisis, or health care quagmire is going to change that. He might as well name himself the King of Black America.”

And yet, The New Black World we live in where Mein Obama lords over all would be defenseless were it not for all those palefaces. You see, the United States derives the bulk of its might from the vast military superiority it enjoys in aviation, and as we learned Black people find themselves lacking in a field where affirmative action policies are a death sentence for everyone involved:

“Only 1.9 percent of Air Force pilots are black, according to AFPC. Of 14,130 Air Force pilots, 270 identified themselves as black; another 620 declined to report their race.

“We’ve been trying for 20 years to get more black pilots, but it’s a little lower than it was 20 years ago,” said Stewart, who is a pilot.”

Black people in the Navy don’t fare much better (nor do Naval Academy Standards), for Navy Aviators that happen to be Black people are but 2.5 percent of the flyers.

Statistics can be Hate Facts though, so these numbers must be due to the inherent racism of the sky.

The military isn’t the only place where Black aviators are a quizzical sight to behold, as commuter airlines find it just as difficult to find Black people capable of logging the strenuous hours necessary to gain qualification to fly:

“In 1976, approximately 80 black pilots were employed by the nation's major and commuter passenger airlines and freight carriers. By 1986 that number had risen to nearly 400, and today the total is estimated to be 674, including at least 14 black female pilots (thanks to Bessie Coleman). While the total increase is impressive on the surface, one must realize that there is a total of over 71,000 pilots working for these airlines.”

Oddly, a move is underway to find more Black pilots to command the cockpit of some of the nation’s top airlines, where affirmative action policies of undoing “discrimination” could result in loss of life for not only the pilots, but the 150 + people aboard the plane:

“….chart of the number and percent of black pilots at Delta and Northwest. Both airlines ranked at the bottom (Northwest had 58 black pilots or 1.12 percent; and Delta had 92 or 1.22 percent) of that list. By comparison all the other airlines in the chart had higher percentages: American (1.63 percent), Federal Express (2.68 percent), United Parcel Service Inc. (3.88 percent), Continental (3.48 percent), Southwest Airlines (2.18 percent) and United Airlines (3.42 percent).

Delta said in an e-mail that 4.65 percent of its pilots were minorities and women, but it did not break down those numbers.

Beasley said Delta can do better.

“I’m retired from the Air Force,” he said. “There were almost no black pilots when I joined, and the Air Force made an effort for inclusion. If Delta wanted to, it could hire more black pilots.”

Interestingly, the number of Black pilots for Delta mirrors the Air Force’s number, which disqualifies the statement that inclusion necessarily brings equality.

Remember the film Top Gun? Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer portrayed every white boy’s fantasy as cocky, arrogant, skirt-chasing, top-notch pilots. Made in the 1980s, this movie has become a classic for many, due to its high-octane soundtrack, classic one-liners and accurate portrayal of the racial elements of pilots (a re-make today would require the absurd sight – when looking at the reality of pilots – of numerous Black people as pilots):

“The setting of Miramar itself is in prosperous California, where the sun always shines. It is a typical White Anglo Saxon Protestant society with little evidence of ethnic groups. There is one negro pilot who becomes Maverick's new partner after the death of Goose, but he is represented in a rather unsympathetic way. Maverick has forced himself into the skies, but has lost his nerve. The negro pilot seemingly unable to comprehend Maverick's "block", berates him for not firing on the "enemy" . This pilot in addition is the only black man seen at the graduation ceremony.

The lone Black pilot in the movie has the call sign of “Sundown”, which is fitting considering that the sun is setting on Black people in aviation.

Sadly, The New Black World we all live in can’t be defended by the Tuskegee Airmen anymore, for this group of aviators is leaving earth for greener pastures. One of the foundational myths of The Black World we all live in now, the evil that is Pre-Obama America must constantly be reminded that without the heroic deeds of these brave Nubian airmen, the evil of Nazism would still be around. In fact, it is this all-Black unit that never lost a pilot in World War II. But wait…:

“It has been part of the lore of America's first black fighter pilots since the end of World War IIhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif: The Tuskegee Airmen never lost a bomber to enemy fire.

But now, more than 60 years later, a leader of the group says he has uncovered records proving the claim is not accurate.

Former Tuskegee Airman Carrol Woods of Montgomery called their claims "outrageous."

"I think they are trying to destroy our record. What's the point now?" Woods, 87, told the Advertiser.

Holton said his sole interest is in making sure the group's history is as accurate as possible.

With nearly 1,000 pilots and as many as 19,000 support personnel ranging from mechanics to nurses, the group was credited with shooting down more than 100 enemy aircraft and — for years — with never losing an American bomber under escort.

Holton, who has been historian of the association for about a decade, said he began leafing through mission reports after hearing a veteran complain that the Tuskegee Airmen really did lose some bombers.”

You see, these heroic Black pilots “escorted” bombers and engaged Nazi pilots sparingly, resulting in a minute ratio of shoot downs for their squadron.

It is interesting to think that flying has long been a fantasy of mankind and was achieved by palefaces only 106 years ago in North Carolina. A people who built the Pyramids should have conquered gravity eons ago, right?

Black people look at pilots with envy, for policies that would promote Black people ahead of other pilots could jeopardize the lives of countless people and is a misguided policy. But, many would see this done in the name “diversity”.

Black people find aviation to be the domain of white people and men like Charles Lindbergh who once wrote an article in Readers Digest declaring the skies to be the territory of the white man.

Statistics don’t lie. Facts can be hate though, and Stuff Black People Don’t Like will include Top Gun, for the movie accurately showcases who rules the air and who flies the planes we see above us at any given time. Let it be clear: this entry is not solely about the movie, but uses the film to symbolize flying into the wild blue yonder and who is left behind on the ground.

No amount of “happy thoughts” could ever lift Black people into the skies and this is why SBPDL welcomes another entry into our airspace.

(Hint: While you read this entry, have the video that is below playing)