Monday, October 3, 2011

Heart of Darkness: The (real) Soul of Black Folks Available at WorldStarHipHop.com

Knowing that white people flee the Black Undertow (and the discernible Climate Change that comes with it), the lack of propinquity to real-life Black people allows Hollywood and television to fill that costly void with Black Fictional Images.

All non-Black people know perfectly well what they are avoiding when they choose to live in Whitopias or in homogeneous neighborhoods, but movies and entertainment (primarily through sitcoms) refuse to showcase stereotypical Black behavior and social customs for the masses to see. Instead, sitcoms like The Cosby Show and Family Matters present a Black middle-class, nuclear family, though real-life provides roughly 25 - 28 percent married Black couples raising children.

A scripted sitcom with only Black leads is no longer a viable commercial property for NBC, CBS, ABC, or Fox. Sure, Black Entertainment Television (BET) can target its built-in audience with Black sitcoms, but most of these shows are outcasts properties that failed on other networks.

Because audiences have rejected Black people in popular culture (save a few actors in movies, like Will Smith and Morgan Freeman), producers of television shows have resorted to turning networks into all-white channels - like F/X with Wilfred, The League, Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Justified, and Rescue Me - or Stuff White People Like (SWLP) sitcoms like The Office, Parks and Recreation and 30Rock on NBC, and Two and a Half Men and Mike and Molly on CBS (the latter are more Untouchable White shows).

Period pieces are becoming popular, like ABC's Pan Am. Set in the 1960s, a virtually all-white cast is being watched by a virtually all-white audience.

The rest of television consists of largely niche networks like History, AMC, Discovery, Bravo, etc., that have few - if any - shows that have prominent roles for Black actors or reality shows based around a Black person.

About the only time you'll see authentic Black people on television is when you watch your local nightly news broadcast (a endless display of wanton Black criminality, fires at predominately Black apartments, or Black people being hilariously interviewed in a real-life Black environment). Or when you watch sports and see Black people celebrating after every play - regardless of its importance - and, generally, acting stereotypically Black.

There does exist a portal into the true soul of Black folks, a trip into the heart of darkness that showcases everyday hi-jinks and behavior of Black people that every white family instinctively moves away from in a maddening quest for "good schools" (all-white school districts with minor Asian influence) and a low crime county.

Not even Rod Serling himself could offer the correct amount of foreboding commentary on what comical depravity awaits the eyes (and senses) at WorldStarHipHop.com, where the reader can take a hard shot of authentic Blackness that instantly washes away the residue left from watching Cliff Huxtable or Carl Winslow on scripted television shows.

WorldStarHipHop.com is a video aggregate, much as Drudgereport.com is a news aggregate. The videos collected at WorldStar show a different face of Blackness then what is commonly seen on television or from Hollywood, with the Black Fictional Image replaced with Authentic Blackness.

Here is Wikipedia on the site:
WorldStarHipHop is an American hip-hop and content aggregating blog. Created in 2005, the site averages 1.1 million unique visitors a day. Alexa ranks the site 225th in site traffic in the United States. The site was founded by Lee 'Q' O'Denat, a Hollis, Queens-based hip-hop fan. Described by VIBE as a "remnant of the Geocities generation", the site regularly features public fighting caught on tape, music videos and other content targeted to young Black-American audiences. In response to complaints that World Star gives a negative portrayal of the African American community, O'Denat calls the site the “CNN of the ghetto.” “We’re just the messenger,” O'Denat says. “Maybe that will help Blacks or minorities say, ‘Wow, I don’t want to be on World Star, I don’t want to be on blast.’
From an article exposing WorldStar creator at TheVibe.com, we learn about he supernatural forces that prompted Q to start a Web site showcasing Authentic Blackness for the world to see, how Black people film Blacks Behaving Badly and proudly state - while filming - that they hope to see it on WorldStar (thus reveling in the behavior since it affords them some celebrity), and are granted another shining example that Black people love being Black:
According to Q, his strategy pays off with “roughly” 2 million unique visitors a day. Alexa, a Web analytics company, ranks the site 225th in site traffic in the United States and the 900th in the world. By comparison, MTV.com notches 222nd and Travelocity.com at 232nd. Alexa says World Star’s visitors tend to be Black males under the age of 35 who are “moderately educated.” As a result of all this activity, Q says the site is valued “in the millions.”

The clips of public fighting have become so popular on World Star that “documentarians” with cell phone cameras sometimes name-drop the site while recording brawls. The site has popularized online personalities such as Kat Stacks, a notorious kiss-and-telling groupie; 50 Tyson, an autistic emcee who resembles the rapper and the boxer; and Cubana Lust, an adult model with an extra large booty. One recent video shows a homeless woman attacking a shrieking man in a New York City subway train. “9-to-5 people love to see misery,” Q says. “People want to say, ‘I thought I had it bad, but look at these people.’ That’s what sells.”
While offering a glimpse at the stretch-marked underbelly of hip-hop, World Star hasn’t only generated torrents of traffic, but also spurred accusations of cultural bottom-feeding and back dealing, which has landed Q in the crosshairs online and off. The incident involving 50 Cent and World Star dovetailed with Q’s emergence as a public figure. He has always been relatively easy to contact through his site, but he had nevertheless been a faceless dictator of a roiling empire.

WorldStarHipHop.com is one of the most popular sites on the Internet. Nixing the popular methodology (in Hollywood and network studio casting offices) and trend of creating Black Fictional Images for mass-entertainment consumption, WorldStar has amassed one of the biggest audiences on the World Wide Web by showcasing Authentic Blackness.

A winning formula for success that will eventually trickle-down into the pens of script writers and executives hoping to create the next big hit comedy. Oh wait: Daniel Tosh of Tosh.0 is already doing it.

To understand the behavior of Authentic Black people, refrain from watching scripted television shows and Hollywood feature films crafted by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) whose only interaction with Black people came from second-hand stories of college roommates who tried to unsuccessfully educate inner-city youth with Teach For America.

Type 'WorldStarHipHop.com' into your browser and venture into the world that suburbia shields one from; that gentrification displaces; and that living in a Whitopia watching Denzel Washington or Morgan Freeman movies makes incredulous.

And never forget that Black people willingly upload videos to this site and film authentic Black moments with glee knowing that the WorldStar logo will soon appear on the bottom right-hand corner making them instantly into a star.

Well, until the next video showcasing authentic Blackness is uploaded that is.

The (real) soul of Black folks is available at WorldStar, a Web site that Black people find no shame in, because Black people find nothing objectionable about typical Black behavior. Judging by the character on display at WorldStar (WSHH), it's not too hard to judge why cities like Birmingham, Atlanta, Newark, Baltimore, Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, etc., where abandoned to the Black Undertow.

WorldStarHipHop.com isn't racist; how could something that Black people willingly upload videos to that showcase the lifestyles of the welfare-aided and EBT/SNAP card fueled Black Undertow be called racist?

Visit WSHH and see for yourself why everyone avoids Black Undertow cities, counties, and neighborhoods. Visit WSHH and see for yourself that Black people find nothing objectionable about Black Undertow behavior; in fact, they celebrate it.


69 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. An overlooked gem that truly captured black people, albeit in a funny way, was The PJ's. It was a claymation show that had a lot of wonderfully ghetto characters. The situations and story lines were so hilarious, it made the show a target of Jesse Jackson for its embarrassing honesty. If you can catch reruns, by all means do.

Baldowl said...

I visited that site once and thought it was a white racist site like ChimpOut. The absence of irony is absolutely shocking. It's appalling what those Black people are proud of. Ignorance and savagery glorified--disgusting.

10mm AUTO said...

Wow...I mean Wow. I knew that negroids were evil, pernicious, violent, smelly, criminal, stupid, disease carrying, raping and dangerous, but I never thought they would brag about it Publicly! I have seen security camera videos of shootings, but this is a whole new level. This is an entire generation of negroids showing their Soul. While Whites win Science Fairs and ballet competitions, Chess clubs and History debates, Physics and Astronomy projects, negroids show just what a world run by their young would be like. Absolute Hell.

Great Entry Paul. This should be a numbered Post.

The videos range from downright Evil (Can you believe cheering a Music video featuring a Graphic Home Invasion and Slaughter of Whites? OMG!) to merely petty, childish thuggery between females. The obsession negroids have with trying to get people to fight is sick. The evil petty ones are just sad, like this one:

http://youtu.be/xfqXz6pMSCI


You wonder what this man felt when he closed the restaurant for the evening after working a full day. He went home to his kids or his wife and said, What?

Baldowl said...

In case you haven't seen this yet

Whiskey said...

I'd disagree on Black people on TV, they are about 85% of all commercial actors, after a big stink made by the NAACP and others over lack of representation. Black and Middle Class represents of course ... 5% of the population or less. But there you go.

Also, shows like Pan Am, Charlies Angels, and Playboy Club have token Black actors, the NBC experiment of all Black (Undercovers), mostly Black (The Event), and all Indian (Outsourced) failed, but the desire to have lots of Black actors employed to keep the NAACP off their back is still strong. Hence the woefully miscast Black actress (complaining of "racism" that she's not in the publicity shoots) as the Black NYPD detective in "Person of Interest."

Otherwise though yes, in the main TV is whiter than White. Because its audience is entirely White. What is interesting is watching WB ("Want Blacks") with Moesha and Homeboys in Outer Space, and UPN (Secret Diary of Desmond Pffeifer) morph into CW, with abortive attempts to keep their Black Audience (Kevin Hill, Girlfriends) then dump it for all White teen female all the time. Even Gossip Girl with often less than a million viewers (nearly all of them teen females or White gays) is worth more than the old Black-coms they used to run as WB/UPN.

Zenster said...

In response to complaints that World Star gives a negative portrayal of the African American community, O'Denat calls the site the “CNN of the ghetto.” “We’re just the messenger,” O'Denat says. “Maybe that will help Blacks or minorities say, ‘Wow, I don’t want to be on World Star, I don’t want to be on blast.’

All the while raking it in as he glorifies stereotypical Black behavior. He probably doesn't even realize that reverse psychology doesn't work on people whose basic form of behavior is acting out with negative attention-getting.

From an article exposing WorldStar creator at TheVibe.com, we learn about the supernatural forces that prompted Q to start a Web site showcasing Authentic Blackness for the world to see, how Black people film Blacks Behaving Badly and proudly state - while filming - that they hope to see it on WorldStar (thus reveling in the behavior since it affords them some celebrity), and are granted another shining example that Black people love being Black

I rest my case.

According to Q, his strategy pays off with “roughly” 2 million unique visitors a day. Alexa, a Web analytics company, ranks the site 225th in site traffic in the United States and the 900th in the world. By comparison, MTV.com notches 222nd and Travelocity.com at 232nd.

Which just goes to show how pervasive and insidious (c)rap "culture" is.

While offering a glimpse at the stretch-marked underbelly of hip-hop, World Star hasn’t only generated torrents of traffic, but also spurred accusations of cultural bottom-feeding and back dealing, which has landed Q in the crosshairs online and off.

Does anybody want to bet even a plugged nickel that Lee 'Q' O'Denat doesn't end up on the wrong end of some outraged thug's 9mm whose name was spelled wrong or had his momma get dissed online?

To understand the behavior of Authentic Black people, refrain from watching scripted television shows and Hollywood feature films crafted by Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) whose only interaction with Black people came from second-hand stories of college roommates who tried to unsuccessfully educate inner-city youth with Teach For America.

I stopped watching network television back in 2001. I've never even had cable as actually paying for television would just be adding insult to injury.

The (real) soul of Black folks is available at WorldStar, a Web site that Black people find no shame in, because Black people find nothing objectionable about typical Black behavior.

As a matter of fact, where is all of the outcry by Black America's moral community about this "cultural bottom feeder"? How is it that I had to hear about WSHH here and not in the news? Could it be that the MSM backs away from anything that denigrates (c)rap "culture"?

WorldStarHipHop.com isn't racist; how could something that Black people willingly upload videos to that showcase the lifestyles of the welfare-aided and EBT/SNAP card fueled Black Undertow be called racist?

Le bingo!

From the WSHH site (Oct. 1):

Yelawolf Says He Would Slap V-Nasty If She Uses The N Word Around Him! "No White Rapper Should Use The N Word"

Yelawolf, being a whigger (White nigger) rapper, must bow and scrape to Black Political Correctness that prohibits any White from using the word "nigger" within the hearing of Blacks. Even as the word "nigger" remains a favorite expression among Blacks. Either Black America drops its use of the word "nigger" or it accepts that anyone has the right to use it.

Zenster said...

I'll go you one better, 10mm AUTO:

Very scary 15 year old

Here is a Black voice in the wilderness:

Dedicated to all the stupid black people

Baldowl said...

Zenster, your very scary fifteen-year-old reminds me of the queen bug in "Aliens."

Anonymous said...

Your cultural reference is better than I think you know, although the Congo has come to us:

"We penetrated deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness. It was very quiet there. At night sometimes the roll of drums behind the curtain of trees would run up the river and remain sustained faintly, as if hovering in the air high over our heads, till the first break of day. Whether it meant war, peace, or prayer we could not tell. The dawns were heralded by the descent of a chill stillness; the woodcutters slept, their fires burned low; the snapping of a twig would make you start. We were wanderers on a prehistoric earth, on an earth that wore the aspect of an unknown planet. We could have fancied ourselves the first of men taking possession of an accursed inheritance, to be subdued at the cost of profound anguish and of excessive toil. But suddenly, as we struggled round a bend, there would be a glimpse of rush walls, of peaked grass-roofs, a burst of yells, a whirl of black limbs, a mass of hands clapping, of feet stamping, of bodies swaying, of eyes rolling, under the droop of heavy and motionless foliage. The steamer toiled along slowly on the edge of a black and incomprehensible frenzy. The prehistoric man was cursing us, praying to us, welcoming us--who could tell? We were cut off from the comprehension of our surroundings; we glided past like phantoms, wondering and secretly appalled, as sane men would be before an enthusiastic outbreak in a madhouse. We could not understand, because we were too far and could not remember, because we were traveling in the night of first ages, of those ages that are gone, leaving hardly a sign-- and no memories."

"Kurtz is dead."

Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad (Basis of Apocalypse Now - well worth reading.

http://www.pagebypagebooks.com/Joseph_Conrad/Heart_of_Darkness/

Anonymous said...

"Either Black America drops its use of the word "nigger" or it accepts that anyone has the right to use it."

Zenster, you can't apply white logic to negroes, they have clung to this absurd policy for decades.

Of course, it raises lots of fun questions, such as:
1. If you hear the word "nigger" in the dark, but you don't know the race of the user...do you get offended?
2. If a half-black or quarter-black uses the word "nigger", is it only partially offensive?
3. If a white is singing along with the lyrics of some shitty rap song, should he skip over the word "nigger/nigga/niggaz"? Or is it okay because it's part of a rap song?

Anonymous said...

Zenster, you can't apply white logic to negroes, they have clung to this absurd policy for decades.

"View" Co-Host Approves Of Whoopi Using The N-Word, Not Walters

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu6VgOC-BuA&feature=player_embedded

Anonymous said...

Will Smith and Morgan Freeman.....

Those two are idiots and I avoid their movies. Denzel Washington is the only credible black actor. Denzel in "Man on Fire", being his best. What a trip through the dark underbelly of Mexico.

capn crunch said...

The truth hurts,and they know it. I invite our readers from UK and AUS to watch A&E channel,gangland vicelords.

10mm AUTO said...

Ya got me Zenster! That is exactly the type of breeding sow that will end up with Whites supporting her.

"It's Free! Swipe your EBT".

Zero education in a rich technological society that has free education for any who ask and who favor female negroid breeding sows for special treatment when it comes to grants and access for education.

"It Free! Swipe your "GED" (General Education Degree)

Zero ambition in a society that rewards the smallest efforts by negroid females with AA positions with high salary's and benefits

"It's Free! Swipe your AAB" (Affirmative Action Blackness)

Risking and spreading a hundred STD's by trading sex for money, some of which cause death to the infant or yourself simply to buy the next thing. Literally trading a blow for a stranger to cover the cell phone bill.

"It's Free, Swipe your HIV" (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)

This is the kind of female that breeds killers. She has no interest beyond the moment and neither will the offspring. If it is female, it will be a little "Hoe" by 6 years old, making you tube videos about how she hates Whites in her class and how she want to get pregnant and if it is a buck, he will be blowing away frightened Christians as they plead for their lives on their knees and then going back so he can get on TV.

The mother will telling her:

http://youtu.be/XqB2fKbflWw

It would be far better for us to deal with them in a gentle way than allow them to feel totally lost in an advanced culture while their spawn makes games out of killing us, beating and robbing our Elderly and raping our women.

Baldowl said...

Denzel Washington plays one hell of a white guy. He plays an awesome white dude in "Book of Eli."

Zimri said...

2. If a half-black or quarter-black uses the word "nigger", is it only partially offensive?

I can answer this one! It is very offensive - and physically dangerous. There's a whole history here of mixed-race blacks looking down on purebloods. The latter, of course, resent the former much.

See, if affirmative action just goes to "blacks": then some octoroon poser who looks about as black as I do - and has my level of education - will get the perks not only over me, but also over the real blacks. . .

Anonymous said...

Parks and Recreation isn't really a SWPL show. It sincerely portrays white wholesomeness and optimism. The one black character, Donna, is a self-absorbed idiot, and the two insecure guys who try to "act black," Jean-Ralphio and Tom, pretty much become clowns for it.

Anonymous said...

"Denzel Washington is the only credible black actor."

Guys, I hate to burst your balloon, but Denzel Washington is a typical, crybaby, race-baiting negro.

"I know I'm swimming upstream ... A whole lot of people in the country won't go to a movie I'm in because I'm black. Period"...
Denzel Washington

Anonymous said...

"I can answer this one! It is very offensive"

Mulatto rapper Ice-T uses it frequently in his songs, I've never heard any negro complaints. In fact, blacks adore him.

map said...

10 mm Auto -

What do you recommend for small auto/revolvers for CCW purposes? What's thin and small enough to carry inside a pocket that still has some firepower?

Anonymous said...

Pit Bulls are very like Negroes. By themselves, in a controlled environment, they are probably manageable. Especially if the owner is willing to use great discipline. But you never know when one might "snap" into a killing rage-always a possibility. Roaming in a pack all bets are off.

Anonymous said...


Those two are idiots and I avoid their movies. Denzel Washington is the only credible black actor. Denzel in "Man on Fire", being his best. What a trip through the dark underbelly of Mexico.


Unless my memory is way,way off,"Man on Fire" is a remake-the Denzel Washington version,that is.

I wandered into the office of a fishing camp once,about 6 or 7 years ago,and there were some DVD's and VCR tapes (like I said,this was a few years back) available for overnight rental. One of the VCR's was-you guessed it-"Man on Fire". Definitely B-movie stuff,and if I remember the blurb on the back correctly,it was set in Italy-I guess during the Red Brigades unpleasantness. The plot seemed to involve an annoyingly pale former CIA agent performing bodyguard functions for a wealthy family of Europeans,although I never rented or watched that version,so I can't swear to any of this.

I didn't recognize any names on the wrapper,so I'm guessing it was a modestly budgeted flick that went straight to rental,but it might be worth a quick google to see if my assumptions are correct. Seems like the copyright was in the early 80's.

mr_evergreen said...

"movies and entertainment (primarily through sitcoms) refuse to showcase stereotypical Black behavior and social customs for the masses to see"

A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images, such as that of Sambo, Alfalfa from Little Rascals(the old one, not the movie), and other demoralizing things. It is demoralizing for the Black people who don't fit any of those stereotypes to see nothing but those images of Black people. Personally, if I had not seen those shows such as the Cosby Show and Family Matters, I might have grown up differently. In a way, those shows represented my family. It showed an example of what a Black family could and should be. It gave me a few decent role models to look to. So showing ONLY the negative stereotypes of Black people is going to give ONLY negative ideas.

Anonymous said...

mr_evergreen: "Personally, if I had not seen those shows such as the Cosby Show and Family Matters, I might have grown up differently."

I am Asian American, and more than half of my friends are non-caucasian. All of us seemed to do okay without television sitcoms which portrayed us as hyper-cool and uber-positive role models. Are you implying that you might have ended up robbing and killing, if white society did not give you those programs? If not, what exactly do you mean "I might have grown up differently"? Look, you're the one who dangled that bait, so you should explain yourself.

Anonymous said...

"Look, you're the one who dangled that bait, so you should explain yourself."


(crickets chirping)

LBD said...

Alfalfa was white. Buckwheat was black. And "Little Rascals" portrayed a neighborhood where both the white and black kids played with each other peacefully. Why was that a degrading image? Amos and Andy was ten times more wholesome than the way blacks portray themselves on BET on any given weekday today. It portrayed working class black people in a comedy which was no more pejorative than "The Honeymooners" was to white people.

mr_evergreen said...

"Are you implying that you might have ended up robbing and killing, if white society did not give you those programs?"

What I was implying is that I would have had a bad self-image of myself. I never said I was going to go out and kill and rob. What I meant was that I would have had a demoralized self-image of myself.

Anonymous said...

Mr_evergreen,
You are neither making a case from logic nor experience. "little black Sambo" was not black, but rather east Indian. Ir was also not a negative depiction. This was another famous case of black hyper-sensitivity to "perceived" racism when in fact it was nothing of the sort. Also, Alfalfa? Alfalfa would derisively referred to by blacks and dwls today a "whiter than white". All this just goes to show that you come here and make a case out of complete ignorance. This is another one of an endless chain of examples why w cannot co exist in the same place. We cannot make endless efforts to make blacks feel better when they childishly take constant offense when there is none. Listen to what everyone is telling you and go address your own peoples problems before we have to. ...Of coarse that wil require you to be more honesty with yourself about your people than you have displayed here.

Left coast white guy

Anonymous said...

"A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images"

Mr Evergreen, you are like a broken record, all you do is continually repeat tiresome negro grievances from "a long time ago".

Are you so fucking weak and pathetic that you need media images to define yourself?

Television has been around for less than 100 years. How the fuck do you think people managed to survive for thousands of years without "positive media images"?

Your constant whining and excuse-making is nauseating. You have been fed a monstrous lie, and you continue to buy into it. This blog exposes that lie. If you are not interested in being enlightened, then please leave, this blog is not for you.

Anonymous said...

"What do you recommend for small auto/revolvers for CCW purposes? What's thin and small enough to carry inside a pocket that still has some firepower?"

One must be realistic. You want a gun with the power of a 12 gauge that can fit in your pocket. But we all want a pony, too.

There are small CC pistols available in 9mm and even 40 SW. But remember, the frame absorbs the initial blast, and recoil. A small frame coupled to a more powerful bullet may make for an uncomfortable experience, and a weapon that is difficult to shoot accurately. And small pistols are never very accurate all things being equal--they are for up close work.

If you can hide and shoot a 9 or 40 that would be the way to go. If not, look for the 380 or 32. A .380 may have enough power for reliable hollow point expansion, but I've seen many times where this doesn't happen. A .32 almost never has good reliable expansion. Therefore, in 32 Auto it is best to use 70-73 grain FMJ. These bullets will give you good penetration, but the hole will be small. Shoot until you can't shoot anymore.

.25 and .22 offer good concealability, with typically less penetration along with a smaller hole. The .22 is rim fire and the cartridge may not ignite as reliably as a center fire design. Also, feeding may be an issue. That being said, many people have been taken down by these calibers. Shot placement is the key to any firearm. Practice practice and then more practice.

Midwestern said...

Just like the other blacks who post here, you should listen to them. They will tell you how very different they are from us.

I believe that Mr. Evergreen is telling the truth about blacks. In order for blacks to effectively mimic white behavior, they must constantly view images and examples of appropriate behavior. When blacks speak of "degrading images of blacks", they are talking about realistic portrayals of blacks, which of course are very negative. Black behavior does not fit in with Western society, and so we should encourage blacks to learn how to behave like whites.

Traits such as cleanliness, politeness, gentleness, talking instead of hitting, education, delayed gratification, positive parenting, articulation, smiling and friendliness, suppressing rage and anger, chastity, spirituality, and personal accountability are all parts of white culture that blacks should strive to emulate.

Without these positive images and reinforcement, blacks like Mr. Evergreen will always revert back to third-world, savage/criminal mode and live in squalor. He is telling the truth. Blacks who watch WB and BET and listen to gangsta rap are the types of blacks who are out of control and destroying our cities.

I applaud blacks who know this truth and learn how to mimic whites. It makes life better for whites when we have white-acting blacks around instead of anti-white, thuggish, ghetto blacks, who create mayhem for our society. If you look at any black hole ghetto, you will see the blacks exhibiting their natural low-IQ behaviors. Like small children, blacks need constant positive modeling, redirection, and quick correction when they forget their manners.

Midwestern said...

"A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images..."

Mr. Evergreen, these images were real images of authentic blacks. Blacks had not been influenced by white behaviors yet. Blacks are more like Africans than anything else. There was no PC or BRA back then, and just like Paul says, the only reason we have positive images of blacks now is because of the promotion of blacks in sports and entertainment.

I watched a football game the other day with my husband and we counted the number of commercials that contained at least one token black. It was almost 100%. One commercial even had a nice white family of 4 on a road trip, singing with the windows down with one little dark negro boy in the back seat singing right along. Where did he come from??

Anyway, thanks to BRA and white guilt, American citizens get to endure the constant brainwashing attempts of the liberal media. The black we see in public behave nothing like the blacks we see on TV, and so whites are waking up to this. I am not sure that blacks are absorbing these positive black images anymore, as they become more militant, Africanized, and hateful towards the society which rejects them.

Anonymous said...

"In order for blacks to effectively mimic white behavior, they must constantly view images and examples of appropriate behavior."

I disagree, and the reason I disagree is because blacks absolutely love "being black". They are not interested in "acting white", and they will always reject any sort of behavior that they consider "white".

They see appropriate behavior every day, and they deliberately choose NOT to mimic it.

Anonymous said...

"we counted the number of commercials that contained at least one token black. It was almost 100%."

Here's a typical tv commercial, where all the whites are moronic buffoons, and the black is normal (and of course, thankful not to be white).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe-Y-zSd5gs

Anonymous said...

What's thin and small enough to carry inside a pocket that still has some firepower?

@ map: I would go with the Springfield Armory XD Sub-Compact 3" in .40 S&W if I were in the market for a quality-made pocket pistol with some serious firepower.

Joel said...

anon 9:19,

Here's another example that immediately springs to mind: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd8ppk0UCx8

Of course, it's (once again) the white guy making a complete fool of himself while the "minority" characters (a black guy and a woman) look on with condescension.

Anonymous said...

Oh, God. "Everspleen" is back.

Well, the comments section on THIS post is now closed... intellectually speaking.

- Fr. John+

~AV~ said...

Midwestern said...

I applaud blacks who know this truth and learn how to mimic whites. It makes life better for whites when we have white-acting blacks around instead of anti-white, thuggish, ghetto blacks, who create mayhem for our society. If you look at any black hole ghetto, you will see the blacks exhibiting their natural low-IQ behaviors. Like small children, blacks need constant positive modeling, redirection, and quick correction when they forget their manners.



which rings back to my constant drum beat...

I love me some Uncle Tom...

these are the people who subsribe to "Traditional American values that involve abiding by the law and fearing the wrath of God"...these traditional institutions were developed by CIVIL societies and PUT INTO PLACE by whites...


Thanks to the View...

I now know that the word NIGGER really pisses off NIGGAS!

and I hate NIGGAS and NIGGERS...

all you caught in the middle blacks out there...

Barbara Waters...ain't gonna take too kindly to the double standard...

and she is liberal enough to open the DWLs eyes....

to your bullshitting ways...

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, what the vast majority of whites do not understand is that whites are in fact a decreasing minority in a world composed of people with various shades of melanin in their skin, that ranges from dark black, almost blue black, to high yellow, and a very light beige almost. Whites are less than 10 percent of the world's population and ever decreasing. The experts say there will be no whites on the face of the earth in about 700 years, if that long.
In this country infants of color being born outnumber white babies being born. Guess who pays for most of those colored babies being born?
So this is our white future as we pay home and homage to those that will erase whites from the face of the earth. Tim Wise and Tom Hayden and others that hate whites must be chuckling and rubbing their hands with delight.

10mm AUTO said...

Inside a pocket but with stopping power?

If you mean a mans coat pocket, then a .357 j frame S&W loaded with 357's is the top answer. Reliable, Accurate and with stopping power. I would still consider carrying this with leather (Strong Side carry) as it is discreet and extremely fast. Once you make the decision to carry, you tailor your wardrobe around the weapon, rather than vica-versa. Pocket carry tends to be slow to grab and more difficult to deploy and things can snag, plus it is useless in a carjacking situation. Due to jamming, I generally do not recommend micro Autos for pocket carry. I also do not recommend those buttpacks (as they advertise to the enemy) or a purse (as a purse snatcher will merely be armed by sucker punching you and running with purse).

To answer the inevitable question, I carry a "Daisho", a matched pair of 10mm Autos, rather than the usual single gun with extra magazines beneath a sport coat. The weight is nearly the same but in perfect balance, so I don't "walk heavy", but an extra weapon can be drawn if the first is disabled or runs dry, is snatched away in a disarm, your strong arm is wounded, or the Primary jams or you need to arm a loved one you are with and so on.

Everyone solves the defense situation differently.

Rule #1 Have a Gun

Californian said...

Unfortunately, what the vast majority of whites do not understand is that whites are in fact a decreasing minority...

I have raised this point on occasion but the usual response from whites, at least those of the liberal persuasion, is to declare that they are "not afraid" to live in a non-white majority country. DWL macho, no doubt.

Liberals seem to conceive of such a society as one in which racism will be purged from the land and we will have the jubilee. Remember, according to DWL ideology, white people invented racism. Most people are not aware of, or will rationalize away, the high rates of criminality, illegitimacy, etc., among "people of color" as carry overs from the bad old days of slavery-segregation.

When one points out the fate of whites as a minority in places like Zimbabwe or South Africa, they will dismiss black-perpetuated outrages by claiming those societies are now more equitable than they were in the bad old days of colonialism, apartheid, etc.

Mainstream conservatives are not much better. They claim that they too believe in judging people by the content of their character and not by the color of their etc. This is so even when one points out that blacks, et alia, do in fact demand preferential treatment based on the color of their skin. You can on occasion rouse a conservative over issues such as affirmative action or illegal immigration. But there is little long term traction.

I have observed that many Americans (and is this true of Europeans, also?) conceive of third worlders as having essentially the same values and outlooks of themselves. Liberals see illegal immigrants as joining in the struggle against racism; conservatives see them as bringing in family values. This is so even when the aliens behave in ways diametrically opposed to those values: e.g., Hispanic gangbangers who terrorize blacks out of their neighborhoods, or the high rates of illegitimacy among third world immigrants.

It is quite clear that many white people are living in some kind of ideological fantasy land.

The question is: how to break this ideological stranglehold.

map said...

"It is quite clear that many white people are living in some kind of ideological fantasy land.

The question is: how to break this ideological stranglehold."

You either break it by exposing them to the harsh reality of experience or you shame the personal decisions they make in their own lives: "Owe...you are a liberal? Tell me...how white is your zip code? How white is your kid's school?"

map said...

10 mm Auto -

Thanks for the reply. What do you think of those new Ruger LCR's? They have a 357 magnum version of those. Also, I take it that you are a fan of Glock 10mm pistols, the compact versions?

Check out this product for concealed carry: http://www.ccwbreakaways.com/

Anonymous said...

MAP: Before you go out and buy something, much less a .357 J-frame (a remarkably difficult revolver for many people to shoot well), do yourself a favor. Go to a gun range that allows you to try out some pistols/revolvers. Then shoot a box load for each gun. Then ask the dealer if you can wear it around the store for a half an hour. I know that sounds strange, but if you've never done it, wearing a gun is a lot different than you might think--especially concealed.

Comments on the Net are one thing. Knowing how to shoot and buying something you can carry all the time is another. There are many factors that come in to play. I've known a lot of people that go for the biggest and baddest they can afford, and then the weapon sits at home because it is too much for them to lug around. That is not a weapon. Just do your homework and use your head. You'll do OK.

Discard said...

Map: I suggest that you look into the .327 Magnum. Note, that is .3 Twenty 7, not .357. Ruger makes a revolver in this caliber.

Van said...

Map:

I'm somewhat new to shooting, but I'm fond of the .40 and .45 myself. Compacts are concealable, but really aren't that small - the frame still absorbs a good amount of the recoil.

Anon 3:12 is right - try out different guns to see what you like. Many indoor ranges will have a good assortment that you can shoot. In my experience, gun lovers are rarely judgmental to newbies (as long as you are courteous and follow every safety rule they give you), and won't mind giving you advice.

Also, take a basic pistol course to learn safety and proper technique. The one I took was well worth the cost.

And get your carry permit.

Discard: I'll have to try the .327

Indianapolis said...

I finally got it:

Television is all White.

Black actors are paid apes doing exactly what their White script writers and directors demand. Television is not intended for black audiences (though blacks watch more frequently). It targets white people with the express purpose of scrubbing their minds clean of any thought of rationality, reason or reality and refilling their empty hulls with with the nonsense of White guilt and all the tenets of multiculturalism.

And it's working.

Dissident said...

And thus: that is exactly why I don't watch television!

Haven't had cable since 1994. I'd suggest everyone reading this do the same.

I refuse to finance my own indoctrination.

Screw Hollywood and their liberal, multicult, PC, agenda.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images, such as that of Sambo, Alfalfa from Little Rascals(the old one, not the movie), and other demoralizing things.

Rule Number One for Blacks: If you're going to piss and moan about the past, always, Always, ALWAYS START WITH SLAVERY!

Not doing so will confuse honorable and rational people such they may not immediately identify you as a whinging crybaby and thereby know well enough to not waste either of yours time.

Notice the complete lack of sympathy, mr_evergreen? You really should lay off of the Liberal talking points if you want to have any hope of getting some traction around here.

Anonymous (October 4, 2011 7:39 AM): Television has been around for less than 100 years. How the fuck do you think people managed to survive for thousands of years without "positive media images"?

Face the question squarely, mr_evergreen.

Anonymous (October 4, 2011 9:09 AM): They [Blacks] see appropriate behavior every day, and they deliberately choose NOT to mimic it.

It is increasingly difficult to argue otherwise. When many Blacks see someone who is successful and influential, instead of earnestly inquiring as to how they, too, can achieve such status, the typical response is either instinctive hatred or to mount a physical attack and robbery of such a person.

Californian said...

Ever see the movie "Groundhog Day?" Bill Murray is a reporter who wakes up and finds himself reliving the day past. He stays on this hamster wheel until he enlightens himself. The theme's been redone in various movies and an episode of "Star Trek the Next Generation." It's what I am seeing happening in the USA with racial politics. To wit:

A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images...

Why this obsession with the past? No black American today has ever been a slave, and we have had a couple of generations of minorities who have been brought up in the era of civil rights-affirmative action-positive black media images-etc. And let us note we have had large numbers of black immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean who were never enslaved, at least not by Americans, nor under American segregation.

Is the reason for the obsession with the past a recognition that the present favors minorities, especially blacks? What SBPDL terms "BRA?" And if this were to be recognized, then the race hustlers would have no reason to be making demands on whites?

Look at how blacks are portrayed positively in the media in any number of ways. If the media is so powerful, then why do we not see blacks forming families, graduating with degrees in high-tech and medicine, and leading America into a new era of prosperity? Instead we have the dreary stats on rising black illegitimacy, school drop outs, crime, ad nauseam.

Again, it gets back to this pathology of living in the past. It's as if the last half century of liberal-civil rights-welfare state-media social engineering never occurred.

Every day that race hustlers wake up, it still seems to be Groundhog Day 1953.

Zenster said...

Californian: It's as if the last half century of liberal-civil rights-welfare state-media social engineering never occurred.

In our effing dreams.

Anonymous said...

Anecdotal evidence and I haven't done the necessary research, but while browsing movies in netflix I notice that predominately black movies are often rated one star. I noticed it because I often rate movies I never want to see with one star so they don't show anymore. I think others are doing the same and I imagine many of them are what we would consider SWPL.

Silent Running said...

@ map: I would go with the Springfield Armory XD Sub-Compact 3" in .40 S&W if I were in the market for a quality-made pocket pistol with some serious firepower.

I've carried a XD9 Sub-Compact in the small of my back for many years and have never had a problem with it. I'll leave the more serious handgun advice to the experienced pistol-shooters here, but I will say this: I've long held to the philosophy that the handgun is a secondary weapon. Your primary weapon should never be so far away that you must rely on your handgun for survival. Wherever you are over the course of the day, memorize the quickest way back to your arsenal.

The experts say there will be no whites on the face of the earth in about 700 years, if that long.

Anything purporting to tell the future seven centuries hence is worthless and certainly dishonest. Would anyone in 700BC have predicted that a tiny hamlet on the Tiber would in 700 years dominate much of the world? Would a Byzantine general holding the line against the Turks in 1050AD have foreseen the 18th century gunpowder wars of Europe?

Predictions made 50 years ago have a very hard time coming to fruition; trying to get a sense of the world in 2711 is simply masturbation. I've said it many times, and I'll say it again: extrapolating the future from present trends is fantastically wrongheaded. Human history involves humans, and humans are chaotic. Trends falter, are reversed, and slam into the brick wall of Reality with suddenness, very often thanks to War.

Silent Running said...

Why this obsession with the past? No black American today has ever been a slave, and we have had a couple of generations of minorities who have been brought up in the era of civil rights-affirmative action-positive black media images-etc.

The problem with the slavery argument is that its designated starting point is sometime in the 17th century, which just so happens to coincide with Negros being shipped in earnest across the Atlantic. The slavery argument, like all liberal arguments, is rigged, but it is less subtle than most others.

If we decided to go back further than the 17th century we'd find that the Danes enslaved the English, Irish, and Scots, the Romans enslaved the Gauls, and the Greeks enslaved each other. Slavery has existed since the neolithic among all the races of the world. Most of the Caucasians reading this probably have a slave ancestor. With this in mind, singling out Whitey as somehow uniquely guilty and evil for the sin of slavery reveals the nature of the hustle, and a hustle it certainly is.

Svigor said...

Otherwise though yes, in the main TV is whiter than White. Because its audience is entirely White. What is interesting is watching WB ("Want Blacks") with Moesha and Homeboys in Outer Space, and UPN (Secret Diary of Desmond Pffeifer) morph into CW, with abortive attempts to keep their Black Audience (Kevin Hill, Girlfriends) then dump it for all White teen female all the time. Even Gossip Girl with often less than a million viewers (nearly all of them teen females or White gays) is worth more than the old Black-coms they used to run as WB/UPN.

And there he goes, contradicting himself again. Or waking TF up, maybe?

Svigor said...

Human history involves humans, and humans are chaotic. Trends falter, are reversed, and slam into the brick wall of Reality with suddenness, very often thanks to War.

Actually, humans are orderly and progressive, the opposite of chaotic. All that we know of history shows humans steadily progressing toward increasing order and complexity. Reversals tend to be short and highly mitigated, and themselves complex and organized (war, for example; I'm sure what a wrecking ball does strikes some people as "chaotic").

Not to say you aren't right about the difficulty of predicting the future, mind.

Svigor said...

A long time ago the only images ever portrayed of Black people were degrading and demoralizing images, such as that of Sambo, Alfalfa from Little Rascals(the old one, not the movie), and other demoralizing things.

Alfalfa was not degrading and demoralizing. Alfalfa normalized Blacks as acceptable company for millions of White kids. Yours is a common angle of attack, but it depends on an ignorant, Black Supremacist (AKA BRA) revisionist version of history. The media's been boiling the White frog since day one. Looking backwards with hindsight, Black Supremacist revisionists use their contemporary standard for judging "racism." And since that standard is always moving in a more Black Supremacist direction, the past is always becoming more and more "racist." So today's perfectly-PC anti-White social engineering from the media masters is tomorrow's "racism."

The media figured out long ago that it had to boil the frog; move its audience by inches, not feet or miles. You can only move your audience slowly. Otherwise they notice. You go too far, and they rebel. But do so consistently, and you can move miles over a long enough timeline. And we can all see how many miles they've moved over the years, and in which direction they're going.

This is why Whiskey is so WRONG WRONG WRONG with the whole thrust of his "the audience dictates" schtick. But he knows perfectly well he's full of it. Like I'm in the driver's seat when I sit down to watch a movie, lol. If any producers read his pablum they've got to be howling with laughter at the absurdity.

It is demoralizing for the Black people who don't fit any of those stereotypes to see nothing but those images of Black people.

Oh, please. The media's been puffing blacks up from day one. When has the media ever done to Blacks what it did to Whites in Machete? Deliverance? When has the media ever been comfortable with Black villains? The ranks of Hollywood villainy are stuffed with Nordic Whites, and practically devoid of blacks. The reverse has never been true. When they were just starting out back in the earlier days, they still presented Blacks as harmless aw-shucks innocents. Show me a couple of movies with menacing black villains, prominently portrayed, from the 30s. 40s? 50s? 60s? 70s? It wasn't until the trend became REALLY FRIGGIN OBVIOUS, and overwhelmingly positive, shined-up portrayals of Blacks (out of all proportions to their share of the population) became the norm, that we started to see a few menacing Blacks, once in a blue moon (that Law and Order prosecutor guy with the gumby haircut as the assassin in an episode of Firefly, for example, or the Kingpin in Daredevil). And we still never see the Black drunk, the Black child molester, God forbid, the Black rapist, or the shitbag Black junkie (we sometimes see Black junkies, but if they're not harmless victims, they're usually Magic Negros, like Bubbles from The Wire).

Rednecks are fair game, of course. But not Blacks. Despite their far exceeding the pathology of rednecks (much less Whites in general), Blacks get a pass.

To be continued.

Svigor said...

Personally, if I had not seen those shows such as the Cosby Show and Family Matters, I might have grown up differently. In a way, those shows represented my family. It showed an example of what a Black family could and should be. It gave me a few decent role models to look to. So showing ONLY the negative stereotypes of Black people is going to give ONLY negative ideas.

I have no problem with a media that wants to boost the self esteem of its audience. The idea that this is what we have is laughable. I do have a problem with a media that puts a shine on Blacks, and at the same time dips Whites in shit. If they're going to candy-coat reality, they should do it across the board. If they're going to whine about how Blacks should be represented fairly, then they should pursue real fairness: TV demographics that represent reality (not a doubling or tripling or quadrupling of the Black population), which should apply equally to positive and negative portrayals - no more of this zero Black villains/negative portrayals, lots of Nordic villains/negative portrayals shit, while at the same time puffing up Blacks. No more of this "all shitbirds are White, and disproportionately Nordic" stuff. They should be as sensitive to Whites as they are to Jews and Blacks. Same goes for women. How about some dog-stupid wives once in a while? They ALL gotta be smarter and more mature than their husbands?

"Minorities" (women included) should find this shit insulting, really. What? They aren't real people? Fully rounded? 3D? They have to have their fragile egos massaged constantly? They can't take the heat?

I guess I've answered my own question here. That "minorities" (women included) don't generally find this shit insulting and don't complain about the situation pretty much confirms that they're mental children.

Svigor said...

In order for blacks to effectively mimic white behavior, they must constantly view images and examples of appropriate behavior.

This certainly cannot be the media's purpose. All the negative portrayals are of White folks. Blacks get the polish. So how can what the media's serving up have as its purpose providing a model of Whiteness for Blacks to mimic? No, the purpose is to mold White minds - to elevate Blacks and suppress Whites.

Black behavior does not fit in with Western society, and so we should encourage blacks to learn how to behave like whites.

Again, this makes no sense. To improve Black behavior, they'd have to act like the Blacks on television, not the Whites. All pathology on television is White. So TV Whites are an inferior role model for Black audiences.

You seem to be confusing reality with television.

I have raised this point on occasion but the usual response from whites, at least those of the liberal persuasion, is to declare that they are "not afraid" to live in a non-white majority country. DWL macho, no doubt.

You should instantly respond that they should stop being so White, and start thinking like a Japanese, a Chinese, a Zimbabwean, a South African black, a Saudi Arabian, an Israeli, a Mexican, etc. None of these people want their territories or resources taken over by aliens, none of them are allowing such things, none of them would, and none of them reciprocate his stupid WhiteKopf thinking. If he disagrees, tell him to look into it. Tell him to look into the policies these people have for immigration, foreign investment, etc. Tell them to check out every policy you suggest that he disagrees with, and see how many "people of color" are reciprocating in their homelands. Really drive home how "white bread suburbia" his thinking is.

When one points out the fate of whites as a minority in places like Zimbabwe or South Africa, they will dismiss black-perpetuated outrages by claiming those societies are now more equitable than they were in the bad old days of colonialism, apartheid, etc.

Point out the fate of Whites in Japan; they get the door slammed in their faces, just like all non-Japanese. And South Africa is not more "equitable" than the old SA, the shoe's just on the other foot now (how is it more equitable for the productive to be under the thumb of the parasites, btw?); crime is rampant, rape is epidemic, the economy is going down the tubes, and for what? Some suburban White American's soi distant notions of "equality"? Whites are fleeing from the new regime; Blacks were jumping the fences to get into SA under Apartheid. That should tell you everything you need to know.

Tell him if he loves South Africa and Zimbabwe so much, why doesn't he advocate to bring their policies here? SA demands the majority hold certain percentage of power. Let's try that here. Zimbabwe kicks its minorities around; let's try that here?

If non-Whites are so great, why does he insist on being so White?

Zenster said...

Really thought-provoking comments there, Svigor.

Svigor: "Minorities" (women included) should find this shit insulting, really. What? They aren't real people? Fully rounded? 3D? They have to have their fragile egos massaged constantly? They can't take the heat?

This is what I find so astonishing about Liberalism's "soft racism" of lowered expectations that infantilize Blacks, Muslims and, to a lesser degree, women as well. Minorities thirstily suck up this dis-empowering pap like it's ambrosia of the gods. Even as they are reduced to childish imbeciles incapable of uplifting themselves even if they all wore personal jet-packs.

The more complex issue of how women are actually disempowered by the MSM needs to be approached from a different angle.

Zenster said...

Svigor: I guess I've answered my own question here. That "minorities" (women included) don't generally find this shit insulting and don't complain about the situation pretty much confirms that they're mental children.

With respect to how women have been stripped of their most crucial and worthy role in society, few better summations exist than that provided by by Stefan Molyneux, host of Freedomain Radio, in his, " The Handbook of Human Ownership - A Manual for New Tax Farmers": (Time point ― 56:40)

In our constant quest to perfect human ownership we have found a far better way to break these family bonds and substitute allegiance to ourselves in the form of patriotism and or religiosity. (Ahhh … ) It’s one of these beautiful win-win situations that come along so rarely. Listen, first we raised taxes to the point where it became very difficult to maintain a reasonable lifestyle if one parent stayed home with the children. We also funded feminist groups to the tune of billions of dollars, one of the greatest investments we ever made, to encourage women to abandon their children and enter the workforce.

Not only did this help break the parent-child bond but it also moved women’s labor from non-taxable to taxable, a delightful coincidence of self-interest and practicality for us. With both parents working all we had to do was create a few scares about the quality of childcare allowing us to move in to control can regulate that industry and remaking it to serve us best.

In some countries like the United States, children are effectively removed from parental care by the state within a few weeks or months after birth. In other countries parents receive direct subsidies to stay at home which is quite funny when you think about it and there is precious little room for humor in much of this.

We take money by force from the parents, keep a large portion for ourselves, use another portion to run up debts that their children will somehow have to pay off and then dribble a few pennies down to the mother who then feels that we are somehow doing her a great favor by allowing her to stay at home. (Giggle) Ah, it’s a delicious irony that everyone remains so totally blind to reality that they run to us to protect their children from all kinds of harm while we are the one selling off their children’s future through national debts. It really is like hiring a thief to guard your property.

The amazing thing is this is all so completely obvious and never ever, ever, ever spoken about.

Zenster said...

Svigor: This certainly cannot be the media's purpose.

It's pretty apparent that Midwestern (@ October 4, 2011 8:46 AM) makes no pretense of the MSM providing such positive reinforcement of White values or portraying them as being worthy of emulation.

It also appears as though Midwestern's sole point in this respect is that Blacks need constant guidance because of their socio-cultural immaturity.

All the negative portrayals are of White folks. Blacks get the polish. So how can what the media's serving up have as its purpose providing a model of Whiteness for Blacks to mimic? No, the purpose is to mold White minds - to elevate Blacks and suppress Whites.

You are absolutely correct. The MSM has absolutely no love for Whites.

Again, this makes no sense. To improve Black behavior, they'd have to act like the Blacks on television, not the Whites. All pathology on television is White. So TV Whites are an inferior role model for Black audiences.

You seem to be confusing reality with television.


Damn good point, even if you are preaching to the choir.

Tell them [DWL's] to check out every policy you suggest that he disagrees with, and see how many "people of color" are reciprocating in their homelands. Really drive home how "white bread suburbia" his thinking is.

Great riposte!

Some suburban White American's soi distant notions of "equality"?

Actually, it's soi disant, but you don't deserve this sort of nitpicking in the midst of such a fine rant.

Tell him if he loves South Africa and Zimbabwe so much, why doesn't he advocate to bring their policies here? SA demands the majority hold certain percentage of power. Let's try that here. Zimbabwe kicks its minorities around; let's try that here?

You can almost hear Liberal skulls splitting open like overripe melons from the level of cognitive dissonance that this line of questioning would inspire.

If non-Whites are so great, why does he insist on being so White?

Or sending his kids to White schools? Or living in white neighborhoods?

From the linked article, "White Identity: What it is and Why it is Necessary" by Jared Taylor of American Renaissance:

“White people say they’re all in favor of integration and yet there is a profoundly important act of integration that they could undertake but they almost never do. A White person could buy a house in a Black neighborhood. Nowadays there are plenty of middle class Black neighborhoods where a White person would be perfectly safe. But not even the most Liberal Whites will take that basic integrationist step. Despite what they say they, too, prefer the company of Whites. Just as I do.

Were you aware that the statistics for residential segregation in the United States are almost identical to what they were fifty or sixty years ago? Despite all of the encouragement and propaganda in favor of mixing of the races, Whites prefer to live with Whites and Blacks prefer to live with Blacks, Asians… Hispanics … there is self-segregation virtually across the board.”

Zenster said...

Hat Tip to Unamusement Park for the Jared Taylor video.

Svigor said...

Zenster, you might not feel as sanguine about me if Paul hadn't spiked the comments I made kicking you in the teeth. :) But thanks for the kind word anyway.

And thanks for making me look up soi disant, I thought it meant something totally different.

Zenster said...

Svigor: Zenster, you might not feel as sanguine about me if Paul hadn't spiked the comments I made kicking you in the teeth. :) But thanks for the kind word anyway.

We'll never know unless you figure out a way to tone it down so that some real exchange can take place. That's entirely up to you.

I'm always willing to consider well-stated opposing viewpoints. Eff knows how little in life I would have learned otherwise. So, bring it on and let's see what happens.

Svigor said...

We'll never know unless you figure out a way to tone it down so that some real exchange can take place. That's entirely up to you.

Content, not tone. Well, mostly. And it's entirely up to Paul, not me. I have a blog too if you're curious. Not that I'm spoiling for a fight or anything. I just call 'em like I see 'em. How people run their blogs is their business.

Zenster said...

Svigor: Content, not tone.

Stop quibbling! I left you some juicy comments over at your own blog and have yet to receive any replies after several hours (not accounting for time zones). Now man up!

For the comments that Paul Kersey lets slip into this blog, your "content" must have been rather incendiary or flat-out hogwash.
Just sayin'.

kenza said...

hahah... a white man talking about black, really how pathetic

Anonymous said...

ahaha... a black man commenting about white, really how pathetic