Kill Whitey? Is this what Disingenuous White Liberals want?

We know - thanks to the coverage of the Omar Thornton story - that there can be no peace. Those who perished weren't even buried before Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) in the media castigated them for alleged - by the mass murderer himself - racism.

Now comes word of an intriguing survey dubbed the "Kill Whitey" study that postulated an intriguing scenario and produced interesting results that corroborate our findings that there can be no peace:

Perhaps most revealing is what Pizarro calls the “Kill Whitey” study. This was a footbridge problem — two variations on a footbridge problem in one, actually — that the team presented to 238 California undergrads. The undergrads were of mixed race, ethnicity and political leanings. Before they faced the problem, 87 percent of them said they did not consider race or nationality a relevant factor in moral decisions. Here the paper’s (.pdf) description of the problem they faced:

Participants received one of two scenarios involving an individual who has to decide whether or not to throw a large man in the path of a trolley (described as large enough that he would stop the progress of the trolley) in order to prevent the trolley from killing 100 innocent individual strapped in a bus.

Half of the participants received a version of the scenario where the agent could choose to sacrifice an individual named “Tyrone Payton” to save 100 members of the New York Philharmonic, and the other half received a version where the agent could choose to sacrifice “Chip Ellsworth III” to save 100 members of the Harlem Jazz Orchestra. In both scenarios the individual decides to throw the person onto the trolley tracks.

Tyrone and Chip. Just in case you’re missing what Pizarro is up to:

While we did not provide specific information about the race of the individuals in the scenario, we reasoned that Chip and Tyrone were stereotypically associated with White American and Black American individuals respectively, and that the New York Philharmonic would be assumed to be majority White, and the Harlem Jazz Orchestra would be assumed to be majority Black.

So the guy on the bridge kills either Tyrone to save the New York Philharmonic or Chip to save the Harlem Jazz Orchestra. How, Pizarro asked the students, did they feel about that? Was sacrificing Chip/Tyrone to save the Jazz Orchestra/Philharmonic justified? Was it moral? Was it sometimes necessary to allow the death of one innocent to save others? Should we ever violate core principles, regardless of outcome? Is it sometimes “necessary” to allow the death of a few to promote a greater good?

Turned out the racial identities did indeed, ah, color peoples’ judgments, but it colored them differently depending on their political bent. Pizarro, who describes himself as a person who “would probably be graded a liberal on tests,” roughly expected that liberals would be more consistent. Yet liberals proved just as prejudiced here as conservatives were, but in reverse: While self-described conservatives more readily accepted the sacrifice of Tyrone than they did killing Chip, the liberals were easier about seeing Chip sacrificed than Tyrone.

But this was just college students. Perhaps they were morally mushier than most people. So the team went further afield. As Pizarro describes in the talk:

We wanted to find a sample of more sort of, you know, real people. So we went in Orange County out to a mall and we got people who are actually Republicans and actually Democrats, not wishy-washy college students. The effect just got stronger. (This time it was using a “lifeboat” dilemma where one person has to be thrown off the edge of a lifeboat in order to save everybody, again using the names “Tyrone Payton” or “Chip Ellsworth III”.) We replicated the finding, but this time it was even stronger.

If you’re wondering whether this is just because conservatives are racist—well, it may well be that conservatives are more racist. But it appears in these studies that the effect is driven [primarily] by liberals saying that they’re more likely to agree with pushing the white man and [more likely to] disagree with pushing the black man.
So we used to refer to this as the “kill whitey” study.

They offered some other scenarios too, about collateral damage in military situations, for instance, and found similar differences: Conservatives accepted collateral damage more easily if the dead were Iraqis than if they were Americans, while liberals accepted civilian deaths more readily if the dead were Americans rather than Iraqis.

Kill Whitey. There is nothing more perverse, profane and disgusting to the white liberal mind then a white conservative, the embodiment of all that is evil and unholy in their secular worldview. 

The white liberal finds the Red State dwelling, white Republican a most despicable, degenerate form of life and looks upon their existence with a combination of both pity and fear. That they lack the intellect to understand progressive politics and erudition to pursue fine arts is a cause for pity, but that these Red State inhabitants still cling ferociously to proletarian  and archaic ideas of God, Country and guns they fear what that might lead too.

DWLs cheer on the demise of whitey nationwide, as long as the variety of whitey is conservative and preferably a George W. Bush supporter.

You see, DWLs are firmly ensconced in liberal Whitopia's of their own and this geographic segregation from a people whose votes they use with increasing regularity to win at the polls, is just the way they see fit to live.

Take a look at the top places in the United States for liberals to live and you will see towns, cities and municipalities listed that lack the diversity all DWLs preach is paramount for a strong, unified America.

Diversity is our greatest strength, but it is what DWL bastions lack in spades.

Boulder, Portland and Seattle have fewer Black people than Tea Party rallies, yet these same DWLs attack the Tea Party for a lack of inclusion (here is a list of the 40 largest US Metro cities based on white population).

One town dubbed a "city of the future" even advertised paying Black people to move there because the DWLs were immersed in whiteness.

Kill Whitey? It only depends on what type of white person when that question is directed to the DWL. They live in liberal enclaves that feature surprising little diversity, less even than appear at Tea Party rallies bemoaning the increasing size of the Federal government.

Freedom of Association is one of the last true freedoms we Americans have left and, based upon patterns of residence, DWLs think like the Red State white people they loathe:

America is known as the Great Melting Pot.

But a closer look at census data shows we're a lot closer to a dinner plate with the peas here, carrots here, potatoes here, and steak over there. In other words, a very high level of racial segregation.

This cool series of maps was produced by Eric Fischer, based on a map of Chicago from Bill Rankin'sRadical Cartography.

Red represents white people, blue is black, green is Asian, and orange is Hispanic, and each dot is 25 people.

Click here to see the maps

One thing that DWLs and those cretinous white Republicans have in common, though, is a steadfast desire to live as far removed from Black people as is humanly possible. Both groups practice a form of white flight and both practice a form of pioneering known as gentrification.The end of white flight is here, as the once Whitopia suburbs become brown.

More importantly, both groups pander and grovel to the principles of Black Run America (BRA) with equally emasculating efficacy. The point is that one group is disingenuous, while the other group desires a continued supply of Black athletes to cheer for in collegiate and professional sports.

We have already stated that the South must be abandoned. DWLs have no problem - according to one psychological test - offing conservative whites to save a Black person. But DWLs do have a problem living around Black people, as one can discern from residential patterns.

Where do people move too in an effort to be free from both "Kill Whitey" DWLs and those that Thug Report profile with such harsh honesty?