Friday, July 8, 2011

Brewing up Big Trouble in Milwaukee: Newark, Cleveland, Mobile, Indianapolis also on lock down Mode

Editor's note: Due to events outside of my hands, SBPDL must undergo an emergency fundraiser. You can make a donation through the PayPal link in the upper left-hand corner or contact us and we'll you send PO Box information. Or purchase Hollywood in Blackface or SBPDL Year One from Amazon.com in either book or Kindle form. 

Every city is seeing this more and more
How many major American cities have police forces and city council members that have passed emergency curfews, normally reserved for wartime or for natural disasters,  all because of the lawlessness of a certain segment of society that we'll just call youths, gangs of teens, Black people?

Indianapolis is about to kickoff its Black Expo, an event that was incredibly violent last year and that requires a massive police and volunteer presence to go on this year. On the first day of the expo, two Black people have already been shot.

Newark (Baltimore and Atlanta too) has already become a police state because of youths, gangs of teens, Black people, but now armed guards will patrol fast food joints at night because Black people can't abide by the law when they go for their fourth - or fifth - meal of the day.

Though the ACLU protested, Columbia (South Carolina) passed an emergency curfew after the brutal beating of white Carter Strange by eight very Black men.  Cleveland, a city where Black people fail to pay bus tickets, is a city where an emergency curfew is needed because of - surprise - Black people:
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, Ohio -- This city, known for its liberalism, tolerance and racial diversity, finds itself in the thick of a social dilemma: How do you crack down on trouble-making groups of teenagers -- mostly black -- without violating civil rights or appearing to be racist? 

In the wake of disruptions at the Coventry Street Fair on Sunday by hundreds of the teens, the city kicked into emergency mode, adopting a draconian curfew Wednesday. The new law, which took effect Thursday, prohibits anyone under 18 to be in the Coventry Village or Cedar-Lee commercial areas after 6 p.m. unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. 

Law professor Lewis Katz, from Case Western Reserve University, said that the curfew will likely face a constitutional challenge. 

"I think it's too broad," he said. "I think it's just too restrictive on teenage kids." 

Mike Brickner, spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union, characterized the new law as "a classic example of smashing a fly with a sledgehammer."

Philadelphia is a city on the brink after three consecutive weeks of massive violence. Mobile, Alabama, famous for Black people trying to find the leprechaun, is another town where youth, gangs of teens, Black people will make a curfew mandatory to keep the peace:
Had a teen curfew been in place, a 17-year-old injured in an early morning shooting may have been at home, Mobile Police Chief Micheal T. Williams said Tuesday. 

The shooting occurred about 1 a.m. Tuesday at St. Francis and Claiborne streets in downtown, according to authorities and news reports. 

Williams said that the teen who was injured had been attending a function at The Temple Downtown.
"There had been a fight in the parking lot, (behind) Club Insanity, and while he was standing near the temple he felt something," Williams said of the injured teen. "I don’t know if he was involved in the fight or if it was a stray bullet. The investigators are still looking at it. I do know from the reports that I got that he went to the hospital and that he didn’t require any stitches or any type of surgery."


Milwaukee is a town where Black people are actively targeting white people, knowing that the current police chief is too much a wimp to dare be like Police Chief Harold A. Breier. No, you know have a police chief who calls crime 'color blind':
Shaina Perry remembers the punch to her face, blood streaming from a cut over her eye, her backpack with her asthma inhaler, debit card and cellphone stolen, and then the laughter.

"They just said 'Oh, white girl bleeds a lot,'" said Perry, 22, who was attacked at Kilbourn Reservoir Park over the Fourth of July weekend.

Though Milwaukee Police Chief Edward Flynn noted Tuesday that crime is colorblind, he called the Sunday night looting of a convenience store near the park and beatings of a group of people who had gone to the park disturbing, outrageous and barbaric.
As Lawrence Auster has long said, "the more racially violent the behavior of blacks becomes, the more racist whites are for noticing it and being concerned about it." Police Chief Flynn had this to say:
Flynn has called a community meeting to talk to residents in the Riverwest neighborhood at 5:30 p.m. Wednesday about the events of July 3. He said it was important to challenge commentary in some blogs and reader comments on news stories that emphasize the race of the victims and suspects.

“We can’t allow this activity to divide this community because ultimately it’s this community standing together that will identify these individuals and ultimately bring them to justice.”

Police have still not said the looting and the beatings are connected, although they might involve some of the same people. Several of those injured described being attacked by a mob that subjected them to racial taunts. The injured were white; the attackers were African-American, witnesses said.

Mayor Tom Barrett, who also was at the Gordon Park meeting, said the parents who turned in their children saw video of the incident at the gas station and called police.
 Noticing that Black people are attacking is not to be tolerated in Black-Run America, even if it is happening in cities across the nation (and has cool names like Knockout King or Polar Bear Hunting).

Though crime in New Orleans is primarily courtesy of Black people, saying this as a police commander is grounds for reassignment (even if the event in question - The Essence Festival - is a largely Black event) :
As one of the nation's premier festivals celebrating African-American culture got under way Friday, the commander of an elite New Orleans police unit instructed his officers to target young black men for questioning, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter.


Police Commander Eddie Selby, the head of the NOPD's Special Operations Division, was reassigned and placed under internal investigation Monday for allegedly giving his officers "inappropriate instructions" before they embarked on downtown patrols.

Selby made the comments to a diverse group of more than 30 people, including patrol officers and ranking supervisors, at a roll call meeting before sending them off to their assignments, the sources said. He told his officers to look for young black males sitting on stoops because they are responsible for recent armed robberies and are likely carrying guns, the sources said.
 Braden on Sunday said the officers who heard the comments were deployed "in the most popular tourist spots -- the French Quarter, hotel areas like the Central Business District and Downtown Development District." Those areas were packed with Essence Festival attendees all weekend. 

The NOPD has been accused of racial profiling before. In March, a scathing U.S. Department of Justice report questioned whether the NOPD's arrest practices were discriminatory. The federal probe, part of a civil litigation review that will lead to an eventual consent decree, found that African-American residents are arrested in disproportionate numbers and that the disparity occurs with serious crimes -- ranging from homicide to larceny -- as well as less-serious offenses.
Chicago? Don't even get us started on the windy city, where Black crime is being covered up by those in the highest echelons of power. Same in Washington D.C., same in New York, where no paper will dare report the truth that every one knows, but no one dares admit:

Knowing that Disingenuous White Liberals and PWJ’s are in charge of the editorial policy at The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, and Gannett assets, and openly admit to censoring stories of Black criminality, it’s easy to understand why many newspapers are losing subscribers and the ability to charge huge rates for national ad campaigns.

In Nashville, police just started dropping thousands of domestic violence cases all because Black people don't snitch:
Nashville police dropped their investigations into domestic violence complaints at an increasingly high rate during the past four years, possible fallout from the department's focus on improving crime-fighting statistics.

That's the conclusion of a statistical analysis of domestic violence complaints conducted by The Tennessean, a spot check of cases by the newspaper and a retired detective, and interviews with former members of the police department.

In 2005, police cleared 211 cases without making an arrest. One year later, the number jumped to 3,866, and by 2009, it was 5,600.

 Police cited the victims' lack of cooperation for not pursuing those arrests, but state law says that cannot be an excuse if there is other evidence or probable cause.
Charlotte, Birmingham, and St. Petersburg are cities where curfews - normally reserved for martial law, war or natural disasters - are needed to keep the peace. Don't get us started on Grand Rapids.

Black Memorial Day 2011 showed us a taste of things to come. Cities can enact curfews, post armed guards in front of fast food joints, and bring in Blackwater (XE) to patrol the streets - those in power can even say crime is 'colorblind' - but the truth is being broadcast from sea to sea shining sea, with Black criminality being shown for all to see.

No one can predict what is coming or what city could possibly have the first incident of police brutality that sparks the wrong kind of fire; but based on trends that city leaders and police are taking across the nation, it appears that many municipalities are preparing for 'it'.






View more videos at: http://nbcnewyork.com.

69 comments:

Anonymous said...

"As one of the nation's premier festivals celebrating African-American culture got under way Friday, the commander of an elite New Orleans police unit instructed his officers to target young black men for questioning, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter."

Bold. Stupid, but bold.

In this particular situation, why not just question young men? It's the Essence Festival, so all the young men will be black anyway.

FoxSnooze.com said...

Curfews target black areas.

They are defacto Jim Crow laws.

• Jim Crow laws protected White people (and others) from black violence and crime.

Curfews do the same.

• Jim Crow laws unfairly included well-behaved blacks. But that was the price to pay for law and order.

Curfews do the same. They also include well-behave White teens. But that is the price we are paying for law and order.

Anonymous said...

Before you cast me off, I am Caucasian, which means no below-the-belt attacks on my I.Q. or my skin color. It won't work here, buddy, so you and your deranged readers can save it!

Man, you should do a lot MORE reading and a lot LESS writing. You obviously lack a good handle on what you are even blogging about. I know I don't have to post here because we differ politically but your site represents the intellectual tight-roping between trying to be a measured political commentator-albeit with "controversial" angles-claiming to report just the "facts" and appealing to the race-reactionary segment of the Caucasian populace. As such, it's pretty amusing AND unintentionally informative with regards to racism's pathology. Just look at some of the followers you have, white pride this and that. No wonder you want to hide your identity! you're running a good con. Such a Janus-faced conundrum you are in; why not be as openly honest as you are here:

"all because of the lawlessness of a certain segment of society that we'll just call (youths, gangs of teens) Black people?"

Well, you've just implicated the entire black populace living in the United States.

That's the problem with you Nationalists, which is why your movement is unpopular with intelligent Caucasians. It's almost a standard trope in popular movies and literature that the bad guy either hurts animals or is a flaming racist Shithead. You people don't know how to separate good and bad. And, obviously, you are implicating all blacks=bad, so why not say it? Why not write on your blog banner that you believe blacks are inferior? Furthermore, and this has always bugged me about your types, if you have such a problem with blacks, why don't you stop writing a blog about them? Most of the whites who hate blacks are probably either
(a) living in bad neighborhoods and, as such, blame all blacks for whatever junk they see lower class blacks do because they HAVE to blame someone for their misery,
or
(b) talking out of their asses and not basing their bigotries on any kind of substantive contact with blacks.

It's insane.

The vast majority of blacks are good people. Law-abiding people. If you don't think so, you'd be dead wrong, buddy, you'd bet your ass. I thought we lived in a nation upholding individuality, yet, you lump all blacks together?

How stupid is that? it's the same thing I tell blacks or Hispanics who want to call whites "devils." But it's bad for them to Blame Whitey yet you can be so sweeping? How are you grappling with your dissonance?

So, take my suggestion and read read read to get a full understanding of black people and then see how you feel when you know why some blacks may do the things they do. That's all we can ever do outside of transforming ourselves into them, and that won't happen. You talk a big talk but you know very little. You are NOT as smart and as informed as you believe yourself to be.

Signing off,
Proud Liberal.

FoxSnooze.com said...

My crystal ball has about a 93 percent accuracy. So if I'm off on one or two items, please forgive me.

I consulted my cb regarding "Proud Liberal" above and it delivered the following profile.

Proud Liberal is . . .

• White.

No self-respecting black would ever refer to anyone as "buddy."

• Under 30

While many young people are attuned to reality, it seems the majority of those still in the fog of multicultural mind manipulation are under 30.

• Lives in White area

Folks who live in White areas believe in the media myth regarding multiculturalism because they have never experienced it. Proud Liberal has encountered a few black folk in his life time and that, he thinks, qualifies him as a expert on race relations.

• Has High School education

My crystal ball is astounded at Proud Liberal's lack of writing skills. It estimates an average IQ; maybe a bit under 100.

• Hates NASCAR

Anonymous said...

@ Anon. Proud Liberal


"Before you cast me off, I am Caucasian, which means no below-the-belt attacks on my I.Q. or my skin color".

Being Caucasian and smart are not mutually exclusive! Could it be that you're informing us that since you're a Caucasoid white we should not address you with below-the-belt attacks on your I.Q.? Isn't it in itself a RACIST ASSUMPTION on your part?

and
" It won't work here, buddy, so you and your deranged readers can save it! "

DERANGED??? Are you an authority on normalcy? Who says we're deranged because we choose to express a VERY UNPOPULAR view on a phenomenon that is quite controversial ? And on what affirmation do you choose to call us DERANGED; are you an authority on the matter?

Most of us are in agreement that the society we live in is irremediably sick. Are we more sick than our leaders, the people that govern us? Ask yourself some fundamental questions Mr. Proud Liberal?

And Please, please keep your sanctimonious rants to yourself; we do not care to become indoctrinated with your specious discourse.

Signée,
Proud Iconoclast and Childless Middle-Aged Female

That White Girl said...

"Just look at some of the followers you have, white pride this and that."

Do you have an issue with those espousing "Black Pride," "Hispanic Pride," "Brown Pride," etc... this and that?

"Well, you've just implicated the entire black populace living in the United States."

Blacks account for 53% of the murderers in the US, but 12% of the population. You can further break that down to the fact that the majority of these violent crime perpetrators are males, and in between the ages of 14 - 35. So roughly 2 or 3% of the US population perpetrates around half of its murders. As a matter of fact, blacks are severely over represented in just about every facet of violent crime, including interracial violent crime, according to FBI statistics. Yet calling attention to this very black problem is strictly forbidden because Disingenuous White Liberals such as yourself will kick and scream to high heaven because it's "racist" to criticize blacks.

Of course not all black people are bad! Of course not of all them are criminals. If you think the purpose of this blog is to paint every last black person in this country with a negative brush, might I suggest taking your fingers out of your ear while singing "la la la you guys are racists."

"That's the problem with you Nationalists, which is why your movement is unpopular with intelligent Caucasians."

Yet most "Caucasians" live in segregated, mostly White communities, and flee like bats out of hell when the neighborhood starts growing dark. "Live right, speak left."

"It's almost a standard trope in popular movies and literature that the bad guy either hurts animals or is a flaming racist Shithead"

Maybe YOU need to read more and brush up on your films if you think this is the case. But even if that were true, do you really believe Hollywood does NOT have an agenda to push? Come on, they're pretty open about their extreme leftist viewpoints.

"Why not write on your blog banner that you believe blacks are inferior?"

You would enjoy that, wouldn't you?

"The vast majority of blacks are good people. Law-abiding people."

That may be the case, but doesn't change the fact that there are severe problems with the black community in this country, and that the majority of good, law abiding blacks are unwilling to speak up and do something about it.

You really don't have anything of substance to write, do you? I at least hope you feel better now that you have asserted your moral and intellectual superiority over us "Shithead racists." I would love to have a debate with you regarding the content of this blog, but I highly doubt we'll get beyond the "you're a racist, and racism is bad and dumb, so you're bad and dumb,. Educate yourself." tripe.

Anonymous said...

@ FoxSnooze.com

I would also assume our Proud Liberal writer is dating a young African-American woman with a college education, and most certainly with an I.Q. that surpasses his. She's a Black Huxtable, and those are the coloured people he's mingled with for most of his life. Please, do not shatter his romanticized concept of L-O-V-E transcending colour barriers!

Wish you well Proud Liberal!

Anonymous said...

"No self-respecting black would ever refer to anyone as "buddy.""

Maybe. This strikes me as an exaggerated attempt to "sound white" by someone who is not white.

Also, consider the following sentences:

"Well, you've just implicated the entire black populace living in the United States."

"The vast majority of blacks are good people. Law-abiding people."

"No wonder you want to hide your identity!"

These themes are perpetually repeated by our resident psycho-chubby-mulatto, over and over and over. How odd that a new white visitor posts the exact same thoughts as our negress.

Plus, the posting style is identical to hers.

So I won't mention any names, but if I was a gambler, I'd bet heavily this is not a white liberal.

Anonymous said...

@ Proud Liberal 6:45: Two questions:
1) Would you prefer living in a majority black area or a majority white area?

2) Given the choice, would you send your own children to a "black" school or a "white" school?

Please be truthful. I'm quite curious about how you'll respond. (Incidentally, I am a biology professor with an IQ of 110)

Lord Bangarang said...

"Before you cast me off, I am Caucasian, which means no below-the-belt attacks on my I.Q. or my skin color. It won't work here, buddy, so you and your deranged readers can save it!"

No one here ever said that all Whites have a high IQ. Thank-you for reminding us that there are low IQ, self-hating Whites out there.

"That's the problem with you Nationalists, which is why your movement is unpopular with intelligent Caucasians. It's almost a standard trope in popular movies and literature that the bad guy either hurts animals or is a flaming racist Shithead. You people don't know how to separate good and bad. And, obviously, you are implicating all blacks=bad, so why not say it?"

*Gasp* Are you trying to paint us with broad strokes by calling us White Nationalists and unintelligent? You're not running your playbook correctly! It is also "standard trope(seriously, don't try and use obscure words if you're not going to use them correctly)" in modern America for the perpetrator of a violent crime to be a black male! Don't believe me? Do a Google search for "The Color of Crime" by NCF. No one here has ever said that all blacks were bad. On an individual basis, there are many well-mannered, kind, and law-abiding black people as well as many slovenly, crime prone, unintelligent white people. Unfortunately, we speak in terms of groups here and whether you like it or not, black people have chosen to be seen as a group. When >95% of them vote for the same man and after said man has proven to be nothing more than an empty suit, >88% still approve of his handling of the country then it is very safe to say that blacks think and act as a group. When people like Bill Cosby tell black people to get their act together, they are berated and called Uncle Toms for their trouble.

"Furthermore, and this has always bugged me about your types, if you have such a problem with blacks, why don't you stop writing a blog about them?"

Ummmmmmmmmm, so he can illustrate what a drain on society blacks as a group are. Unlike you, not all people have made up their minds to be a guilty White person forever and when they see how liberal policies have failed both blacks and Whites, they may change their minds!

"Most of the whites who hate blacks are probably either
(a) living in bad neighborhoods and, as such, blame all blacks for whatever junk they see lower class blacks do because they HAVE to blame someone for their misery,
or
(b) talking out of their asses and not basing their bigotries on any kind of substantive contact with blacks."

Probably my favorite little snippet right here! I love your use of 'probably.' Typical liberal rubbish, just basing all of your arguments on feelings and emotions rather than facts. You know, it couldn't possibly be due to their neighborhoods being ruined by Section 8 housing recipients. It couldn't possibly be the fact they have been robbed and assaulted by blacks. It couldn't possibly be the fact that complete areas of cities have been cordoned off to average people due to extreme racism and violence. It couldn't possibly be that Whites are sick of trying to close the achievement gap by wasting more and more money on a problem that is genetic and cannot ever be fixed. No, it's really only because we're just racists, no other reason.

Lord Bangarang said...

"The vast majority of blacks are good people. Law-abiding people. If you don't think so, you'd be dead wrong, buddy, you'd bet your ass. I thought we lived in a nation upholding individuality, yet, you lump all blacks together?"

Just an opinion, not a fact. Once again, you fail to realize that blacks lump themselves together. Even upper and middle class blacks fail to see that blacks are responsible for their own problems and refuse to condemn the behavior of their own people. Blacks cheer when O.J. and other violent criminals are released for the sole reason that they are black. I didn't see any Whites cheering when Casey Anthony got off.

"So, take my suggestion and read read read to get a full understanding of black people and then see how you feel when you know why some blacks may do the things they do."

Here is the excuse portion of the liberals' playbook. Let me guess... black people do the things they do because of poverty and the "legacy of racism." You are correct, poverty can cause an increase in crimes, mostly property crimes. I live in Vietnam and I see crushing poverty that American blacks have never tasted, yet I have never seen a fight, never seen a flash mob of violence, never seen a shooting or stabbing, etc. I have heard of burglaries, robberies, and petty theft on the beach, but the perpetrators didn't senselessly beat anyone or murder anyone for "jockin' my steez." Face it, blacks are innately prone to violence. Look at any country or city that is majority black and you will see the same thing, violence. The top 10 most violent cities in the U.S. have something in common, I'll let you guess. The top 10 safest cities in the country have something in common, I'll let you guess.

"That's all we can ever do outside of transforming ourselves into them, and that won't happen."

Because of genetics.

"You talk a big talk but you know very little. You are NOT as smart and as informed as you believe yourself to be."

The same can be said for you.

Anonymous said...

Ret'd LAPD here. The above poster, who writes just like a certain banned member with a perpetual chip on her shoulder, clearly has her head placed firmly in her sphincter.

"So, take my suggestion and read read read to get a full understanding of black people and then see how you feel when you know why some blacks may do the things they do. That's all we can ever do outside of transforming ourselves into them, and that won't happen. You talk a big talk but you know very little. You are NOT as smart and as informed as you believe yourself to be."

What garbage. Sites like this exist because people from all over the US have come to their own conclusions about blacks through firsthand experience. Lo and behold, we all post our experiences here and find, unsurprisingly, that we all pretty much have seen the same things.

Blacks and guns are a truly lethal combination.

I pushed a radio car in Los Angeles for over 20 years and saw firsthand what blacks consider normal life. Nothing about their way of life made any sense. Violent, stupid, give up easily, zero concern for people, demanding, parasitic. From generation to generation it never changed and they were content with this failed way of life because their free money and criminal lifestyles paid for whatever they wanted.

I am now in a nearly black-free locale where I may run in to one a day, which is plenty. I wish it was less than that but the law of averages is working against me. No rampaging blacks, no piece of shit cars with insane rims and bone rattling bass, no ebonics, no public housing, nothing. Pure heaven.

Anonymous said...

@Ret'd LAPD 8:18: In what state does such a place exist? ("am now in a nearly black-free locale.... No rampaging blacks, no piece of shit cars with insane rims and bone rattling bass, no ebonics, no public housing, nothing. Pure heaven.") I am sincerely happy for you, albeit with a touch of envy. Best of luck to you, sir!

Ivan Urkinoff said...

"I am Caucasian"

"segment of the Caucasian populace"

"unpopular with intelligent Caucasians"

Dear Proud "white" Liberal...

Whites refer to themselves as "white".

Agitated negroes often use "Caucasian", apparently because they believe it sounds intelligent.

You're not a good actor.

Anonymous said...

It is really a sad state of affairs when police departments CANNOT ENFORCE the law w/o worrying about being politically correct.

The gloves need to come off and there needs to be a concentrated effort to stop this stuff from happening, I don't care whose feelings get hurt! If this continues, I fear it is going to lead to a sense that the cops won't really do anything and it will escalate and then who knows what. It's past the point of being ridiculous anymore.

Anonymous said...

"The vast majority of blacks are good people.

Dayton Daily News had a relative of the woman who microwaved her baby say that she was a good mother.

Chris Anderson said...

Regarding curfews:

I lived under a full martial-law style curfew during the 2001 Cincinnati riots. It was declared for the entire city even though it could have, and should have been for a few neighborhoods, but to do that would have been racist.

On one of the first nights of the curfew, a bar in Mt. Adams (gentrified, overwhelmingly white neighborhood, hard to get into and out of because of its location on a hill) stayed open and had a few locals show up to drink. Word got out, and it suddenly became a huge priority to encode the curfew in Mt. Adams. Again, so as not to be racist, even though everyone right down to the rioters themselves knew that the residents of Mt. Adams were no threat.

Point being, I'm disturbed by this move toward increasing curfews, because they will not distinguish between marauding black "honor students" and regular teens who just want to be out for a good time, harming no one. It seems the more diverse we are, the less free. Sad.

Anonymous said...

Retd LAPD

Gun Control and Blacks are an even worse combination

Left Coast Dude

bubo said...

Ivan has the same thoughts as me. Nobody I've ever known refers to themselves or other whites as "Caucasian." This is a ruse.

As for the article, I've stopped listening to police talking heads, mayors, newspapers, news reporters or anybody else that is deeply involved in covering up daily black atrocity. I know what's going on. I don't need their lies.

Cities that are above say 20% black are doomed to ruin. That's it. After the Obama riots, they'll all look like Detroit.

Jonah said...

Signing off,
Proud Liberal.


So long White Liberal the world will be better without you.

Before you cast me off, I am Caucasian, which means no below-the-belt attacks on my I.Q. or my skin color. It won't work here, buddy, so you and your deranged readers can save it!

No you fool you're a pathetic white liberal. Just die at the hands of your pet minorities please.

Man, you should do a lot MORE reading and a lot LESS writing.

We READ and WRITE at the same time. Got a problem?

No wonder you want to hide your identity!

We're hiding from creatures such as yourself with your lawsuits.

Well, you've just implicated the entire black populace living in the United States.

That's because it IS the entire population of the USA. Do you really believe in freedom, equality and individualism as the biggest goals in existence? You do know that a group or a society is the bigger picture and an individual is part of the bigger picture? The exception to the rule does not negate the rule.

I thought we lived in a nation upholding individuality, yet, you lump all blacks together?

Libertarianism is as delusional as liberalism.

That's the problem with you Nationalists, which is why your movement is unpopular with intelligent Caucasians.

It's unpopular because liberalism has gripped the hearts of the elite and is controlling the culture idiot. You think being a liberal makes one intelligent? Oh please.

David Glenn said...

@ 'Proud White Liberal'

- What's your Zip Code? Any chance it begins with 89?

Discard said...

Speaking for myself, Proud Liberal, I do think Blacks are inferior. I am a racist. I am not unintelligent, and I have read, read, read. Soul On Ice, by Eldridge Cleaver. The Autobiography of Malcolm X. Black Boy, by Richard Wright. Manchild in the Promised Land, by Claude Brown. It is decades of personal observation that informs my views, not ignorance. Trust me, there are a whole lot of adult liberals who have figured out that Darks are a problem that won't go away, but they are afraid to say so aloud. But your taboos are coming apart, no matter how hard you try to enforce them.

Anonymous said...

Update! Proud Liberal was walking home after this courageous rant standing up to Evil White Bigotry and was attacked by a flash mob who demanded his money. PL said "But I understand you and I don't think this has anything to do with race! I have read sooo many book about understanding your kind, your struggle and how bad whites have been to you. Aren't we cool, bro? Aren't we cool?" The Urban Youth before cold cocking PL with a pistol butt simply said "Watdafukyoutalkinabout, nigga?"

Warrior said...

Blacks have "diplomatic immunity" to commit any crime no matter how vile. If you send law enforcement to clamp down on black crime then it is "raciss 'n sheet". We will be paying the price for black crime for years to come. Families destroyed by those killed by black criminals, businesses looted and robbed by black mobs. An entire class of underachieving blacks unable to compete with "whitey" on an even playing field as they are an intellectually inferior race, genetically predisposed to stupidity. The facts speak for themselves yet we are told to live in a dreamland where blacks are our equals. If so equal why do they need special laws to be admitted to college, or get preference in hiring when they are unable to score competitively with other applicants. Unable to function in the confines and constraints of "whitey's world" they lash out at whitey and "the man" for oppressing them and keeping them down. It's all whitey's fault. Goddamn right!

Anonymous said...

I read this site everyday religiously - a huge fan, & just for the record one of the very reasons I DO is because I don't get along with any of the white 'Nationalists' - I've been banned and or completely ignored on all their sites for a variety of reasons including the fact that yes, you do have one point correct- they usually DO tend to be dumbass rednecks which is what you are saying in so many words Mr.'Caucasian' (snicker).

I guess you could say I'm a well educated person who for some inexplicable reason I don't like the idea of the possibility of being murdered or beaten or both because I'm white just going about my everyday business in public.

Would YOU like to live like that, Mr. Caucasian? Because if you really are white then you're in the same boat unless you're living on some other planet.

Btw, here's something everyone can do if you're ever called a 'racist.' Don't miss a beat and ask this person, "What is the difference between a 'bigot' and a 'racist'?" And watch their reaction - it's especially hysterical if there's other people listening. (this won't work on line obviously - only face to face) Chances are this person is a liberal fuck and as liberals go, they truly ARE 'ignorant' - stupid as I've found. There's nothing they can say that I haven't heard one BILLION times since the 70's.

Liberalism, multiculturalism, Feminism, the race card- all of it is OLD antique shit with nothing new to say- no new ideologies- just new ways to fuck white men over.

Dissident said...

Proud Liberal (Lord Bangarang) is none other than that insane black woman Desiree. The writing style is verbatim.

She is truly obsessed with this blog, she fantasizes about it hourly and stays in a perpetual huff, because THIS SITE tells the truth about she and her people.

So, in essence, she feels that she must defend herself and her people from what she terms as Racist (TM), Nationalist rhetoric, ie. classic, traditional American viewpoints.

I'd be willing to bet a thousand dollars to anyone, that "Proud Liberal" would shut this site down in a New York minute if she could? Any takers?

She's just another dumb-@$$ hypocrite that can't stand the reality of truth. She froths off at the mouth constantly and never says anything that could be construed as truthful.

Go pollute some other blog with your nonsense silly woman.

Storm said...

Anon 8:18-- Anywhere is western Wisconsin!

Anonymous said...

Face it, blacks are innately prone to violence. Look at any country or city that is majority black and you will see the same thing, violence.

I believe the reason for this is purely physiological. Negroids, particularly the males, and particularly the males aged from adolescence to mid-life, tend to have high testosterone levels and low serotonin levels in the composition of their biochemistry. Such a combination often results in violent tendencies and over forms of anti-social behavior. Many researchers and scientists are quite aware of this, and they have been so for many years too, but few of them are willing to risk their careers and reputations by the politically incorrect act of connecting the dots between these physiological traits, and the members of the Negroid racial sub-group.

Anonymous said...

Where are the web pages dedicated to outing the criminals, as with the Vancouver riots?

Anonymous said...

Here's a lovely story about how a star high school athlete lost his life over a senseless brawl...started by his own father. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/grid_dad_st_shot_6RFEc0oYn7whgkG1Jpxx4O

Anonymous said...

About curfews-it seems to me that we are in a sorry state when local governments have to set curfews for teenagers because their parents obviously haven’t. Putting the Black mob violence aside for just a moment, aren’t we as parents, responsible to set curfews, rules and enforce them for our underage children? Where are these kids getting all of this time to run around and cause mayhem? Between homework, their chores, dinner time, getting ready for the next day, and what time they have to be in bed to get enough sleep to be ready for school the next day my kids simply don’t have time to run the streets. I have two teenagers at home who are not allowed to run around willy-nilly on their own. They are not allowed to “hang out” in the streets with their friends. If there is no destination and purpose to their outing then there isn’t going to be one. My teenagers are under 18 years of age. I am responsible for their safety and their actions. Do these parents get that???

What the hell is going on with parents? My parents kept us close. Yeah, it was a pain in the ass (boy, was I was bitter at the time) when I was a teenager but when I saw the difference in how my life turned out and what the kids (many of them nice people who got caught up) that didn’t have parents like mine had to go through…my kids are being brought up the same way. I understand that “life is short” is a lie. Life is LONG. There is plenty of time for my kids to do anything they end up thinking they want to do. I did . By keeping my kids close until they’re older and better able to make good choices their priorities will have time to settle. The teenage years are hard. Poor impulse control, raging hormones, peer pressure, and an overwhelming sense that they are right and the parent is wrong without the benefit of experience to make a good judgment calls…it’s tough for them. It is my responsibility as a parent to set boundaries for them for their sake, the sake of my family, society and country. I am not my children’s “friend”. I don’t need teenage friends and they don’t me to masquerade as their friend. My children need a PARENT.

Anonymous said...

Bull Connor of Birmingham had the right idea in the early '60s, turn the police dogs and firehoses loose on them. Time to do that again!

Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy said...

Hello there That White Girl,

"I would love to have a debate with you regarding the content of this blog, but I highly doubt we'll get beyond the "you're a racist, and racism is bad and dumb, so you're bad and dumb,. Educate yourself." tripe."

Maybe you are alone in wanting to debate the merits of this website with someone with whom you disagree, but it won't happen as long as SBPDL is the moderator. If that was even allowed, he wouldn't go deleting people left and right when they make a good point off of him. Instead, he allows inanities filled with nigger this and that.

No, he's not interested in debate or discussion. He is merely a lecturer who wants validation and complete obedience. A toe out of line and he gets his flunkies to pounce upon this renegade interlocutor and silence him with abuses.

Just look at the way "Proud Liberal" was treated. Just look at the way any black person is treated on this website. He writes about liberals and blacks (mainly) and when they even muster up enough courage to "disagree," off with their heads. Remember "Wondering" a few posts back? All he said was he didn't agree that blacks were inferior and he was shouted down.

To me, people are entitled to think the way they'd like. However, you better have the stuff to defend it, especially on a easily findable blog. Plato called it "dialectics," and it's the highest exercise of human intelligence, finding a truth through the exchange of reasonable yet opposing arguments. Sure, calling people "racists" is not going to get anyone anywhere but neither is calling someone a "nigger." If he or the other readers think they should not have to defend their views, why not say, "No differing opinions allowed"? It may kill some of the traffic but at least people will know that it's pointless to post if they disagree.

I think it's fairly expected for liberals and blacks to come on and say, "This is how you are wrong."

Personally, I am curious in this innate violence to which these people speak. It doesn't make rational sense to me, seeing that all of these places have people at death's grip and in various stages of privation or using drugs. There were mainly places that turned into war zones because of the 80s crack epidemic; before, it was much more peaceful. Sure, that sounds like leftist talking points but, scientifically speaking, you can't say something's innate when it's time and time again proven to be only a symptom.

If you are honest in your wanting to debate, I'm letting you know now: it won't happen here. If you haven't done so, look through his past pieces, when he still did #-posts. Free and open debates everywhere one looked.

I can guarantee many liberals and blacks read his site but they may not post. I think they should. Excitement is what makes life fun and worth-living.

To note, many HBD bloggers do fierce comment moderation and I think there is a reason for it. If a commenter with an opposing view gets going building their case, it can cause shame to the blogger if he's handily refuted. To me, if you are okay with nigger this and that, you should be okay with a liberal or black, or whoever catches the ire of the blogger, going against you. That's the point of debate. But most people are either too stupid or too cowardly or too egotistical to allow that type of honesty.

Oh, and by all means, go ahead and call me a stupid negro or Desiree or whatever. I'm sure it's coming and, let me tell you, I've already anticipated it in lieu of anyone supplying actual discourse!

Anonymous said...

"...Personally, I am curious in this innate violence to which these people speak. It doesn't make rational sense to me..."

Sentence structure notwithstanding...

It would make sense to you, Desiree, if you simply looked at all/mostly black areas anywhere on the planet, at any time in history. They are violent, corrupt, filthy hell holes. From Detroit, to the "new and improved!" South Africa. Blacks simply are not capable of civilized behavior.

Look at that poor, poor, young negro footballer who tragically died in a fight caused by it's father, in which said footballer PARTICIPATED. Baby daddy was in no way threatened, or in the right. His sense of victimhood was all that was needed to set off his innate violence. The teenaged subhuman jumped right in, instead of, oh I don't know, calling the popo, pulling "dad" out of there, etc...

Dispute it all you want. Blacks are a failed race, due to their own genetics...

Anonymous said...

Mr. Not so nice,

I can't find the part in your meandering diatribe where you dispute any of the black criminality presented on this website or the commentators. All you did was take 8 paragraphs to whine about this website being unfair.

Here's my argument, and please respond to it. As a whole, blacks are very dangerous people. They are 12% of the population but responsible for 40% of violent crime. The incidents of black mob violence is trending upwards as evidenced by the quantity of weekly media reports on the subject.

I want to hear your argument on why I am wrong and I want to see your facts and figure. I will pull the FBI crime stats if you need to see mine.

Theoderic

Anonymous said...

"Oh, and by all means, go ahead and call me a stupid negro or Desiree"

That would be redundant.

Please go now. Like most blacks, it is in your nature to want to ruin anything that whites enjoy. Apparently, like your anti-social brethren, you just can't help yourself.

In spite of your never-ending efforts, you have not changed a single mind on this blog. Your inability to conclude that you are wasting your time (in addition to being a colossal nuisance) suggests that your IQ is below the norm.

If it makes you feel better to believe that Santa Claus is real, along with his friends the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny, then I encourage you to keep believing. After all, you are entitled to your opinions.

However, to those of us who stopped believing in Santa Claus decades ago, you are only making a fool of yourself. Seriously. You are a fucking fool.

If you are uncomfortable with the notion of negro intellectual/moral inferiority, then this is not the blog for you. As I've told you many times, I have no interest in changing your mind, because you are irrelevant. If it is your opinion that blacks are not inferior, then I encourage you to keep believing that.

Now, if you'd just have the common fucking courtesy to reciprocate...

But that would require you being white.

Anonymous said...

"Remember "Wondering" a few posts back?"

Thank you Desiree, although several here suspected it was you, I was not convinced. You have now confirmed that "Wondering" was another of your many fake user names.

One way or the other, you always give yourself away.

MrGJG said...

The problem with, "not all blacks are violent criminals", is the one's that aren't, rationalize or minimize the actions of their brethren.

Right here on this site we have one of those "high class" sistah's, who refers to these garden variety psychopaths as, "actin the fool", as if they're stealing hubcaps.

Until the law abiding among them allow the po po to do their jobs without fear of lawsuits and character assassin, fair minded people will continue to be suspicious of all blacks and sites like this will become more mainstream as white guild abates.

When that happens, which I now believe to be a virtual certainty, we'll be living in a society we never thought possible.

Anonymous said...

At Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy:

Still not satisfied Desi? You come back as “ Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy”now because we all knew you were the “ Wondering “ character just as you're “ Proud Liberal”. You've been posting on this blog for a little over a year now; many faithful readers & commentators eventually got a hold of your thought processes. You immerse yourself into this new persona, and then come back with a strong
rebuttal post in which you berate us for seeing through your shenanigans.
Your discourse is redundant even if you phrase it in different grammatical styles while apposing it with your latest fictitious character. You do have a vivid imagination; you're a self-avowed creative writer, aren't you?

Please, girl, I exhort you to seek help for your personality disorder: obsessing about the blog and it's followers is eating at you day & night! Take a much needed break from this blog. We're not mandated to appease your growing insecurities.

Discard said...

Mr No-More-Mr-Nice-Guy: I am always open to debate. I have had a couple go-rounds on this site over whether to argue with Desiree or one of her aliases, rather than dismissing her. I opt for discourse with you or anyone else, as long as they're plausibly honest and rational. Even when somebody comes along saying that affirmative action has never involved discrimination against Whites, and that AA is just an excuse for whiners and losers, I try to keep my temper and explain things to them, by the Socratic method of asking question. (No adult fails to recognize AA for what it is. Only young liberals and old liars defend it.)

Now, I am older and have learned patience. I try not to fault others for being as short tempered as I once was. If you think this site to be intolerant of dissent, ask yourself why our views are NEVER allowed to be explained or defended on mainstream media outlets? Having views that even approach ours will get you fired from a lot of places. Do you really think that a place where people come to discuss forbidden views will be a temple of calm? Do you get a sense of how blind you appear, criticizing us for not being open to the views of liberals, when liberals use all their considerable power to silence us completely? What's the worst that can happen to you if you post here using your real name? Why, nothing at all. Yours is the voice of power, you have the backing of every major institution in the country. Come and discuss things here if you wish, but don't get on a high horse about being shouted down. Your kind has controlled the debate for decades.

Brother Anonymous said...

@No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy

"Oh, and by all means, go ahead and call me a stupid negro or Desiree or whatever. I'm sure it's coming and, let me tell you, I've already anticipated it in lieu of anyone supplying actual discourse!"

Said the negress wearing an outrageous pair of Groucho Marx glasses.

Indeed, she's also Proud Liberal, another fictitious poster with the identical problem as the fictitious Professor Snape: all attitude, absolutely zero intellectual content.

I know we should be getting beyond this, but it's just too damn weird. The spectacle of it is sort of curiously fascinating.

Sheila said...

The black female troll's writing style is pretty easy to identify. She continually uses words she doesn't correctly understand in order to sound intelligent, and this usage (combined with various memes, trite phrases, written expostulations, and incorrect grammar) give her away every time. I have no time to waste on rebutting her boilerplate, and no desire to fulfill her voracious appetite for White attention. Please people, ignore her. She's poisoned enough comment threads here.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

I don't think Mr. I'm not going to take it is Desiree. Based on IP Address, that person is not from Las Vegas.

I'm all for debate: I just believe the debate is already won. All the arguments have been one.

My real views will be published in the book "Captain American and Whiteness".. check VDARE in the next few days to see a story of what happened to me as well.

I think it's time to tell the story of what happened to require a quick, emergency fundraiser.

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

All the arguments have been won*. Jeez, too much sun today.

Anonymous said...

I'm not black nor white. I have lived in a ghetto full of blacks are they're worse than this site makes them out to be. My family came here as refugees from a war. Five children and a single mother who spoke no English. All five of us graduated from college and I have two graduate degrees. We lived in the same slums as the blacks, yet we were able to succeed without raping, stealing and murdering.

Anonymous said...

@ Sheila

You're right Sheila, we should discourage Desiree from posting here by not giving any credence to her manifold attention seeking rants.
She obviously covets the title of “ Queen Bee of the Blog “.

She was supposed to be BANNED, obviously it hasn't worked. But I wonder if igoring her wholly will finally deter her from posting?

@ Stuff Black People Don't Like

“I don't think Mr. I'm not going to take it is Desiree. Based on IP Address, that person is not from Las Vegas. “

Getting a different IP address can be done easily, you should know that.

Maple syrup said...

@ Stuff Black People Don't Like, July 9, 2011 4:02 PM.
Looking forward to read this new development, it certainly will help shed some light to your misadventures.

Awaiting anxiously,

Maple

Anonymous said...

Here's a lovely story about how a star high school athlete lost his life over a senseless brawl...started by his own father. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/grid_dad_st_shot_6RFEc0oYn7whgkG1Jpxx4O

Holy crap! That is a classic tale from the depths of Black Run America. The maniac attacks two guys for a totally stupid reason, he escalates things and tries to kill people with a shovel, his retard son joins in and is killed, and the family says..."It's the attendants' fault!" LOL. Insanity.

It's a great example of how black people always expect non-blacks to suffer and die to satisfy their lust for blood, chaos and moronic ideas of status and territoriality. NO ONE of any other race wants to live near black people and this is why.

Discard said...

SBPDL: The winning arguments have been made, but until they're heard, we haven't won. We're still living in BRA. It's just like teaching math. Geometry is a fact, but not every child knows it, yet. So we keep on teaching.

Anonymous said...

"The vast majority of blacks are good people. Law-abiding people."

I might have believed that before the election. Since most if not all blacks voted for Obama, I am no longer inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. That door has slammed shut, for me at least. They are what they are, & they need to be somewhere else so that the rest of us can live decent lives.

Anonymous said...

Paul, are you being sued?

sick & tired

Anonymous said...

The problem with, "not all blacks are violent criminals", is the one's that aren't, rationalize or minimize the actions of their brethren.

For example I give you the statement that the woman who put her child in the microwave was a good mother. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows that you do not put children in microwaves.

Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy said...

Discard,

Thank you for being civil. No, I don't intend to get on a high horse like "Proud Liberal"! I debate the two "no-nos" often -- religion and politics -- and the only thing I can't stand is the unwillingness to allow free discourse. You won't get snootiness from me... mostly.

"Do you get a sense of how blind you appear, criticizing us for not being open to the views of liberals, when liberals use all their considerable power to silence us completely?"

I'm of the opinion that people can have their own views on anything as long as it does not represent a "clear and present danger" to someone or something else and even that is pretty hard. It's incredibly grey and the problem is that even when you put proscriptions on certain things -- "It's OK as long as you don't say or do or broach XYZ" -- new conflicts arise and fine print comes up, et cetera.

To your question, I think the reason it's silenced is because your worldview can hurt people. Let's not try to bring up "you-know-who" but we all know what a belief in superiority/inferiority can lead to. Also, I think it has been refuted over and over again. I don't mean to be trite but how many blacks and Africans have to do well before you take note that they aren't inferior? Do you not see the relation between deprivation and crime? South Africans were not living in the violent shanties before they were pushed into them by this tiny minority of white settlers. You can't at all think that was right, can you?

People who try to justify Apartheid look at the crime now as if it was the same when these laws were initiated. It was not; that is not true. I just believe if you are going to hold a view, please know its ends and outs and be able to be rational about its flaws.

As a liberal myself, I can tell you that it is "silenced" because, frankly, it's dangerous. Now, if you wanted to simply start up a village with whites-only and be separatist, I think no one should cry foul. But when you have folks saying that they are glad Hispanics are killing blacks but bemoan blacks killing whites, I think you have a problem. When you have folks saying they want sterilizations of blacks and advocate abortions of black children as if they all are going to be little demons and all of that nonsense, that's way worse than simply being a separatist.

But the problem is that it is never just separatism; the justification for it always involves saying someone is inferior. Look at this blog. SBPDL talks about whiteness, being good, yes, but he can only give it a value by devaluing another group. Why make a site about blacks? Aren't white liberals the problem, since they run "BRA"? Someone mentioned, "Well, he's highlighting stuff the media doesn't want to highlight, black crime." So? But if you just want to be separatist and be with whites, why does that even bother you?

Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy said...

Is it because the only way you can justify separatism in a multicultural, blended society is to say that a group is not-as-good?

I think that is when people don't want to advocate your views and don't want them to spread. Black people also don't highlight the views of black separatists (though they exist less) who want Whitey dead. That viewpoint is actually not popular with blacks, contrary to what you people think. I'm sure there are those blacks who're "sympathetic," just like I believe -- fervently -- that their are whites sympathetic to you but that will not lead to advocation of the views, though.

I'm not minimizing you in saying this but it's kind of like that old crazy Aunt who everyone just lets talk but they don't listen to her because she's, well, crazy.

It's just dangerous now, the thinking.

You mentioned in another post, Discard, your reading of Cleaver, Wright, Brown, Malcolm X. Well, you are aware that Cleaver is not the militant he used to be, but a conservative politically and has disavowed his actions and views. You can't read the protest novel and say that's how blacks think now. Sure, blacks are sympathetic, of course, but racism is a lot different and a lot less. Baldwin would never deflect to France today!

"What's the worst that can happen to you if you post here using your real name? Why, nothing at all."

True, but it's because of what I described. I think people just want to get along and don't like anyone -- black or white -- who destroys that goal. If you don't want to get along and make nice, I guess you can create a village in Montana but why do you have to go about saying someone's not-as-good?

"Your kind has controlled the debate for decades."

But what are we debating, exactly? If it's "blacks are inferior," well, you had controlled that debate for centuries before. Revolutionaries don't emerge from quiet, do they? No, they emerge from struggle. I think, as a group, people know slavery, they know Jim Crow abuses, they now this and that and are sympathetic. It shouldn't be a trump card but it is understandable. But if you're wanting to discuss why you believe blacks are inferior when the consensus is (and there is a consensus, not a "coverup") they are not, I think you have to be both frank and honest and supply the goods.

That's my opinion anyway but since there is a dearth of liberals here, I will speak for them on this forum.

Anonymous said...

"I'm of the opinion that people can have their own views on anything as long as it does not represent a "clear and present danger" to someone"

The "opinion" that we are all alike and can all live together represents a clear and present danger to all non-blacks, and especially to whites.

Anonymous said...

Mr. No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy said...

You are entitled to your opinions, and in fact, encouraged to continue in your beliefs. No one here is trying to change your mind about anything.

Please show us all the same courtesy. Thank you.

Brother Anonymous said...

Jesus. Ok, No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy's not Desiree. He's even more incoherent than she is.

Anonymous said...

"That viewpoint is actually not popular with blacks, contrary to what you people think."

Oh look, Mr "White Liberal" is suddenly an expert on what is "popular with blacks".

I'm not fooled, she always gives herself away.

Robot Sam said...

I shit you not; my ultra liberal pro negro friends (yes there was the token negro male/white girl couple) moved out of their neighborhood when they could no longer stand the gunfire and assaults in their neighborhood. They said.. ha ha ha.. that the neighborhood didn't gentrify fast enough and they had to get out. Liberal whites are the biggest hypocrites ever. They do anything to be liked by the 'in' crowd, the cool kids. We need to start treating liberals like what the really are spoiled, self righteous, sheltered, disingenuous (liars) little children who just want a lifelong party and be snuggly wuggly wuved by everyone.

Liberals and sheltered suburban kids don't need a vote, they just need to complain through to the next joint or between visits to the apple store. They don't like reality and can't handle it.

Robot Sam said...

Don't mean to post again so quickly, but this had to be added.

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2011/07/09/mother-teenage-girl-mob-attacked-my-family/

Another gang attack on a family. This time it was on a mother and her two daughters. It's over. This country is done.

Anonymous said...

Jim Crow is gone. The doors of academia were opened and what do black people do? Close down Funtown due to obnoxious behavior and engage in chimpouts at Maccy Ds, Burger King, Wendys etc.

Analytical said...

If you don't want to get along and make nice, I guess you can create a village in Montana but why do you have to go about saying someone's not-as-good?

We did that.  We had Levittown and lots of other places with housing covenants which did not allow people to sell or rent to blacks.

Today, blacks from Chicago go to Iowa on Section 8 vouchers and invade the formerly all-white cities and towns.  Ex-Chicago ghetto bangers living in Des Moines borrow a van and drive to Cedar Rapids to kidnap and rob people.  They were arrested quickly because they were stupid enough to think they'd be anonymous while driving a van painted with advertising for an adult club.

If you were remotely as good, this sort of crap wouldn't start appearing in places where it was unknown just as soon as blacks (and Mexicans, see "speed kidnapping") do.

YT said...

I'm of the opinion that people can have their own views on anything as long as it does not represent a "clear and present danger" to someone or something else and even that is pretty hard.

Leaving aside the incoherence of that last clause, yeah, because teaching blacks that their ubiquitous failures are caused by evil whites, and assiduously fomenting resentment against the same has never presented any danger, whether clear or present, to the thousands of humans that are attacked by feral blacks every year. Nope, no sirree! And what an arrogant bastard you are to appoint yourself the arbiter of what views humans may be allowed to hold.

The victims of blacks, who number annually in their many thousands just in the US, are real people whose names can be listed. Many are real people with real blood that has really been spilled, and real bones that have really been broken, and real brains that have really been damaged by the ever present phenomenon of black gang stompings. Tens of thousands annually are real people with real vaginas that have really been brutalized. Your hypothetical victims of race realists in the US, on the other hand, are nothing more than a figment of your fevered imaginings. And you can fuck off with any horseshit about lynching, because for one thing, more whites are lynched every year by blacks in the US than the number of blacks lynched by whites in any entire century in history; and for another thing, the victims of lynching by whites were mostly guilty of serious crimes, whereas the victims of lynching by blacks are almost one hundred percent innocent.

And since you also slyly invoked Godwin’s law by a periphrasis, you can fuck off with that too. It is well known that about a third of black men have been convicted of a crime, which certainly means that a much larger fraction of that population has perpetrated crimes. So, though you say that all blacks cannot be condemned for what a huge proportion of them are doing this very day, you appear to be very comfortable doing a similar thing in regard to whites with what a tiny proportion of “nationalists” did generations ago on another continent. Hypocrisy much?

But if you're wanting to discuss why you believe blacks are inferior when the consensus is (and there is a consensus, not a "coverup") they are not, I think you have to be both frank and honest and supply the goods.

What the hell are you babbling about? A consensus among whom? Among the people of the world or among the Masters of Discourse? Notwithstanding the fact that an appeal to authority or popularity is a logical fallacy, do you honestly contend that if the world’s population were polled, that an overwhelming majority would refuse to acknowledge the obvious inferiority of congoids to humans in regard to intelligence, planning, initiative, and civility? Get your head out of your ass. “Supply the goods”? Intelligence testing has been going on for over a century, and one hundred percent of the time it has shown that whites in the aggregate are more intelligent than blacks in the aggregate. You are the one who has failed to "supply the goods" in supporting your assertions with evidence. It is easily PROVABLE that whites have invented almost all of the technology of modern civilization, and that blacks have invented virtually none of it.

And while we’re at it I would like to point out another faulty debating tactic that is extremely common among the illiberal leftists who like to refer to themselves as ‘liberals’. You do not REFUTE (your word) things simply by refusing to concede that they are true. You might want to have a little consultation with Mr. Dictionary about that matter.

Anonymous said...

Excellent piece YT!

Discard said...

Mr No More Mr Nice Guy: Excuse my delay in responding, busy weekend.
I can see three issues in your post: Freedom of speech, racial in/equality, and proposed solutions to perceived inequality.
First, you are not a liberal if you oppose the free exchange of ideas. That is simply the core value of liberalism. There's a reason freedom of speech is guaranteed by the First Amendment, not the 3rd or 7th. If you endorse the silencing of racists, you can no more accurately call yourself a liberal than you can call yourself an elephant. Look up "free speech" in a book of quotations, and read the words of the great liberals of history. "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." "Freedom of thought is freedom for the thought we hate".
The classic example of speech presenting a "clear and present danger" is "shouting fire in a crowded theater". Both quotes are from the same Supreme Court opinion, by Oliver Wendel Holmes. "Clear and present danger" does not mean "When I am elected" or "When the Revolution comes". No political idea, not even racism, meets that standard. If anything, Marxist ideas would be outlawed, given their demonstrated appeal to the bloodthirsty.
Even before the founding of this country, racial equality has been argued unceasingly. The debate has not been controlled by "my kind". And even if it were, how would the opinions of John C. Calhoun or Chief Justice Roger Taney justify the silencing of people living today?
The taboo on racism is rooted not in any liberal principle, but in fear, the fear of the current elites that their influence and power with be greatly diminished if their hypocrisy is exposed and the narrative that justifies their position revealed to be false. That's the real clear and present danger, IMO.
Continued in a couple hours.

Discard said...

Mr No More Mr Nice Guy: The second issue is racial equality. I will be frank and honest. I think that Blacks are inferior to Whites. You are wrong to think that there is a consensus among scientists that Blacks are our equals. I first learned about the IQ gap while reading a professional journal in a doctor's office, ten years ago. I asked the doctor about it, and he confirmed that it was common knowledge in the profession. I have since then done some investigating, reading up on IQ and surrogate measures and whatnot. Black wretchedness is obvious, the only question is whether it's genetic or due to racism. The geneticists are winning, though they are generally careful to limit their statements. What they are doing is marshaling their facts, letting certain ideas become accepted before pressing forward with the implications. Nobody wants to be exiled like Nobel Laureate James Watson was, for speaking too plainly about racial differences.
The Watson incident, to me, confirms my racism. If Watson were wrong, why was his error not exposed, held up for examination and it's flaws demonstrated? If there were a consensus of racial equality, there ought have been plenty of people who could have done the job. A perfect opportunity to discredit racism, and nobody of scientific stature stepped up? Maybe nobody wants to end up like Professor Stephen J. Gould, racial egalitarian and author of "The Mismeasure of Man". Last month, an article in the New York Times described him as a "charletan".
You can look up the link to the article at Occidental Dissent, posted on June 14.

Discard said...

Mr No More Mr Nice Guy: Your third issue with SBPDL is with some of the solutions suggested here. As an avowed liberal, I assume you can see the virtue in seeing things from another's point of view. Consider the racially aware perspective, then.
You are not wrong to think that the matter is more complex than some people would allow. For example, while there are not enough Blacks and African doing well to convince me that they are not, on average, inferior, there are some perfectly intelligent, capable, and decent Blacks around. That is exactly what would be expected in a population with an average IQ of 85. Assuming a standard deviation of 15, five percent of that population would have IQs of 115 or better. I have read that some researchers think that average Black IQ is 83, and that others believe that the standard deviation is less than 15, but still, there are bound to be a few worthy fellows among them. But ought we assume the burden of caring for the great mass of Black dullards and bastards for the sake of a few good Blacks? Particularly when we know that those few able and self-disciplined Blacks have been and will be held up as typical rather than as the outliers they are? Able Blacks are just a opening wedge for their dumb cousins. The smart Black kids who integrated Central High in Little Rock were followed by hordes of their kin, who destroyed the school. Shall we continue to sacrifice White resources, White civilization, and White lives to sustain an illusion of equality?
In other times and places, inequality has been managed without resort to mass slaughter. Inequality is in fact the norm throughout history. Most familiar to us might be Jim Crow or Apartheid, but it's something than many peoples have dealt with over the centuries. In our lifetimes, racial reality has been denied, and racial fantasy forced on us, but the cost is becoming clear. Call some of us extremists, but how ought a population of lifelong adolescents be dealt with?

Anonymous said...

@No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy

Wow, an aware liberal. as a former liberal myself, I know that this is rare. Trust me. I've been deep into the philosophy of both sides at various points in my life. Also trust me that when all of the noise and idiots are filtered out on both sides, the racially aware conservatives are correct. At least as far as the future existence of the white race and culture is concerned. Over the next few generations, they will be wiped out if nothing is changed. You can't mix people of different races together and expect genetic homogenization (intermixing) not to occur. Once the white race is genetically eliminated, there is no getting it back. Ask yourself, what are the political reasons for this? I would venture, at my current point of trying to figure this all out, that its much nicer to be a racial aristocracy in a third world country then it is to be an elected or purely familial aristocracy in a first world country. This is the systematic downgrading of the intellectual genetics of the middle and underclasses, toward the end of realizing a more unmovable and dominant aristocratic class. At the world current level of technology, there is no need for more then a small class of intellectuals. What they need are vast populations of a slave labor class. A large somewhat intelligent white population, outside of a small racially oriented aristocracy, isn't conducive to this goal. Therefore, the middle and lower white population is being replaced and bred out of existence. This is all hypothesis.

You show some balanced awareness when you state that both white people should be allowed to be separate from other races, and that the "inferiority" schtick is a problem.

I disagree when you state that it being "dangerous" as being the reason that it is silenced. Dangerous to what end? That blacks will be slaves again in this country? That isn't going to happen. The "danger" is used as excuse to completely eliminate free speech and white rights. We have roughly thirty years to get those rights back. If it doesn't happen within that time, then we are finished.

The "inferior" schtick is an over-emotional and self defeating meme that needs to be stomped out in pro-white groups. Why? Because, as your logic proves, it is what is holding the white rights movement back. Opposing groups hold those attitudes out as the prime anchor-point to limit free speech. Nationalism would be a politically effective movement if the "inferiority" opinions were dropped. They are unnecessary, and are more consistent with "internationalist" philosophies. That is, consistent with a political movement that wishes to dominate other nationalists (blacks, Hispanics, etc). "Internationalism" is the prime foe of nationalism, both as a separate movement and as a philosophical pollutant in nationalist circles. The public "inferiority" opinions are used to silence the group. What happens is that these opinions, or facts that certain over-emotional whites use to draw these politically ineffective and incorrect opinions, are used to wake white people up - especially white people that live insulated from large ethnic groups and whose political opinions are largely formed by the media and diversity education. Its like shock therapy for indoctrinated whites, but the "inferiority opinions are hugely counterproductive, politically. All nationalists, as a matter of philosophical consistency, need to respect other groups, unless they insist on continuing to oppress us. However, correctly executed black nationalism is philosophically one of white nationalism's best assets. They both want separation. The reasons for this separation are irrelevant outside the groups themselves, and should not be discussed outside of the group...

Anonymous said...

@No-More-Mister-Nice-Guy

cont'd...

In reality, domination is not what white people want. They just want separation. The CORRECT nationalist political opinion is that every other nationalist group is equal, but needs to be separate. If blacks want to kill each other, or practice their particular brand of culture and government, no matter what it is or how repulsive whites find it, for political purposes they need to reiterate "separate but equal".
Only then will the white rights movement gain any momentum.

Now, it is fine to show blacks misbehaving to convince deluded or sheltered whites. If others form the opinion that whites are claiming "supremacy" based on this, and accuse whites of supremacism, then those people are being politically manipulative and deserve to be shouted down and politically silenced. They are then being "anti-white" in that they are not allowing whites to remove themselves from a group that, as a group, behaves differently and demonstrably more violently then they do. Additionally, they are not allowing whites to preserve their genetic existence as a group, which is also racist and anti-white.

So, you are right in a lot of what you say (at least what I read - I didn't get to all of your posts) but, at the same time, white rights cannot be stymied because a few less informed whites don't realize that the pubic "blacks are inferior" schtick is going to only reinforce the oppression of their group. The greater good and the result is much more important then individual misconception about the politically philosophy used to attain that goal.