Saturday, April 14, 2012

Freedom Failed: World Star Hip Hop (WSHH) Edition

From a sit-in to a World Star Hip Hop approved Black Brawl: Freedom Failed
Were one of the 48 contiguous states in the Union to decide to go all anti-Federalist and declare that they will honor "Restrictive Covenants," tomorrow, I would move there.

This is the first step toward restoring a sane policy of home ownership and establishing the ability to build long-term capital that can be passed down from generation to generation, allowing REAL WEALTH to be built and accumulated. Only people - family's - who want to establish roots in a community and understand that they (and their posterity) will directly effect the quality of neighborhood and have the ability to sustain an economy for the long-term can understand what it means to build a nation.

As part of the Second Battle of Atlanta - which starts tonight (finally) - I started reading Sprawl City: Race, Politics, and Planning in Atlanta. It's a left-of-center read which only needs one simple rebuttal: the Atlanta metropolitan area and surrounding suburbs growth are directly correlated with an innate desire by white people to live as far away from Black people as possible.

When whites abandon one suburb for another, the character of that suburb falls upon the new majority population. The same truth is for a county as well. 

But because "Restrictive Covenants" are unconstitutional (Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948) (LandMark Publication), Clayton County can go from 90 percent white in 1980 to almost 90 percent Black in 2012. Where a thriving community with top schools once existed, you now have the lowest property values in all of Georgia and the worst school system.

The Black Undertow folks. It's real. Damn real.

Also, I'm of the opinion that a business owner should be able to discriminate when it comes to who they will serve. Were this idea to be seriously debated, I'm of the opinion that most white business owners would run for the hills instead of getting behind what is arguably the most pro-business concept (ultimately it would a referendum for freedom) imaginable.

However, I believe that immigrant business owners would nod their heads in approval and get behind this concept, for they largely own the small shops that cater to the Black population of America (taking their lives into their own hands by opening up shop in primarily Black areas).

It is with this in mind that we bring to you latest video of Blacks Behaving Badly (a wonderful term coined by a writer who now pens columns for The Daily Caller). I don't like these types of videos unless they prove a point.

This one does. It directly relates to why Restrictive Covenants must make a comeback (real estate agents would see huge dividends to a restoration of this legal concept on property and who it can be sold to) and why business owners must immediately start demanding that their right to discriminate be restored.

After all, looking at the residential patterns of metro Atlanta citizens, your average white person would rather commute an hour each way to work (10 hours a week; 40 hours a month; 480 hours a year of wasted productivity or time spent with the family) then live next to a Black person or send their kids to a school filled with Black kids who will inevitably bring down the quality of education.

Declaring Restrictive Covenants unconstitutional was a move in the direction of "freedom"; so was the passing of Civil Rights laws that made it impossible for a business owner to discriminate against certain types of customers frequenting their establishment.

Guess what?

Freedom Failed.

Enjoy.

251 comments:

1 – 200 of 251   Newer›   Newest»
Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Please don't write anything about "chimpouts" or "TNB"... it won't get posted and you're wasting your time.

It's just Black people acting Black.

Anonymous said...

I just watched the video and all I could think was ANIMALS!!! I have lived 44 years and have NEVER seen White people act in such a manner. Yet, I have seen blacks do this exact thing a number of times, and not on video, but live!! Anyone who thinks we are all the same, please view this video and then give an honest opinion.

Rocky said...

This belongs in the Congo, not in civilization.

Anonymous said...

Freedom of association is the frequently unspoken basis to a free society. Without it even the right to own property is subtly threatened. In all truly totalitarian societies - that is, the nightmare variety such as North Korea or Stalinist Russia - the allowed group gathering was limited to two or three. They knew what they were doing. Dissent by oneself is not possible. Even though the "Occupy" types seem pathetic they are preserving something however unconsciously...

Anonymous said...

If you were to do a careful statistical analysis of fatal robberies (clerk or storeowner shot dead) in West and North Philadelphia, for example, over the last 5 years, the numbers would be staggering. Employees/owners murdered even after giving the thugs all they had.
The reward that these hardworking immigrants get for persuing their American Dream is too often an early grave.
This has given rise to the 'cage' type of commercial establishment seen in this vid, where in order to protect themselves, all monetary transactions must take place behind a steel or plexiglass barricade. Undertow Commerce.

AM said...

I was laughing and crying at the same time watching that.

Dan said...

OT but at some point the Magical Negro in the press is going to look more and more unreal. The dark anchors, fantasy black cops, absurd erkels, baritone VoiceOver salesmen, Will Smith USMC pilots, Morgan Freeman Presidents are simply evidence that a poisonous official fantasy has taken over from empirical reality. It has reached a fever pitch in adverts. OTOH, BBB on YouTube is the best thing since the invention of the printing press. Who you gonna believe will beat up your kid: Harvey Weinstein's Bully or your own lying eyes?

.45Jack said...

How can any sane, rational person watch this video - and the many, many other such videos - and not conclude that these creatures are more beast than human? How can anyone make the argument that they are equal to Whites?

Or is there a World Star Redneck website showing Whites behaving in the same way that I am not aware of?

Anonymous White Male said...

You say tomato....

Baldowl said...

I can honestly say it has never--not once in my life--occurred to me to behave that way.

Anonymous said...

Dear New Black Panther Party:

Please continue to ramp up your amusing antics. It's priceless. What are you guys actually gonna do, anyway... invent an atomic basketball?

You didn't even invent a _regular_ basketball.

You don't even know where the rubber to make rubber balls actually comes from, do you. Admit it. Be honest.

I can't wait for you chuckleheads to start your race war. My forefathers stormed Normandy in an industrialized amphibious assault. Your forefathers think Normandy is a street in Los Angeles that they didn't build... if they can even remember that far back.

Bring it. Pleeeease.

This is going to be really f#cking funny.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if President Obama would comment on this incident as he did the shooting in Florida. "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." I wouldn't be surprised if some of these individuals are in His extended family.

Anonymous said...

I agree 100%. Freedom of association.

And black people LOVE acting black. Notice the smiles, the laughing, the celebration as cheesy ass cheeks and plastic hair flies around in the video. They love wrestling on that greasy, sticky fast food floor. I couldn't tell who "won" the fight, I think it was all in good fun.

They don't want to "act white". That is why we need to be able to legally separate from them. Our only convenants now are high prices, limit son percentage of rentals in a neighborhood, high admission fees, high property taxes, private school fees, and dress codes.

Avoid these corner chicken and shrimp shacks like the plague.

Anonymous said...

Good perspective, by black columnist...

http://www.suntimes.com/news/fountain/11715200-452/black-on-black-victims-could-fill-our-stadiums.html

10mm AUTO said...

Paul, I am no expert on Restrictive Covenants and I agree that having a business decide whom to serve is a basic right, the sea change of attitude that would have to take place to bring those about (say to be able to post a sign that says "No Blacks Served Here") I believe a Bridge Too Far.

If I may suggest that the simple step of requiring implant Birth Control for anyone on Welfare would solve the negroid problem within 2 generations. Assisting this would be private programs (such as Planned Parenthood) to offer financial rewards (say $2000 to $5000) to sterilize negroid females.

I agree that restrictive Covenants have all the benefits you delineate and of even greater consequence would be the elimination of Property Taxes forever in exchange for a large lump sum payment, thus allowing land to be passed from father to son forever and preventing land from being controlled or seized by the State but again I think this is overreach.

The negroid population is reducing itself through abortion, murder and (in the higher I.Q. populations) non-reproduction; as well as devolving based on the findings of the NYLS and the Census bureau, even with the influx of Somali and other African and Caribbean negroids as fast as the Lutheran church can sponsor them. They simply need assistance to accomplish this by Whites. I find it far more likely that Whites will seal the border of the USA and greatly reduce immigration and demand that those who derive their sustenance from the State not squeeze out thug reinforcements at taxpayer cost than the bringing back of Restrictive Covenants and "No Blacks" signs in White Drifter Colonies.
In fact, the "Welfare Reform Act" of the mid 1990's nearly did just that by not paying negroids more money per child "birfed" while on Welfare (this clause was opposed by the Congressional BC and has been eroded over time).

In Judo, sometimes you win by Relaxing.

Anonymous said...

Businesses can easily discriminate. Places like Sam's Club and Costco already do this. The Civil Rights Act only applies to businesses open to the public. With modern technology, it wouldn't be too difficult to make most businesses for members only. Given that, it's still doubtful that any business would decide to discriminate on the basis of race. The backlash would be so great as to not be worth it.

Tyrone Shoelaces said...

I don't see the video. Is this a flash thing? (iPad)
Any links to it on YouTube?

Get that dog yet?

Anonymous said...

It will only get worse as Atlanta's housing market collapse

Italian guy said...

In that site you will see alot of videos of white women, getting harassed and/or attacked by one or more of those sheboons, but it's the same for white men... How could this happen? Why? it's disgusting and sad at the same time, you rally need to separate from blacks asap.

Dan said...

Bull Connor must be laughing his ass off at us.

"Told you so."

Anonymous said...

Host a movie night with THE HELP being the feature film.

Every five minutes, stop the movie and show a starship brawl video.

Point being . . .

These videos make excellent tools for deprogramming the nonsense instilled in our thinking by Hollywood.

Kylie said...

"Businesses can easily discriminate. Places like Sam's Club and Costco already do this."

Really? I saw some blacks at the Sam's Club I frequent just two weeks ago. And the one near a major metropolitan area that I visited a couple of years ago was so full of non-whites that it looked like a Third World bazaar.

The Sam's Club website says "Sam's Club reserves the right to accept, refuse or revoke Membership without cause" but we all know if any blacks were subject to this and decided to kick up a fuss, Eric "My People" Holder would be all over it like stink on s***.

Artur said...

(reposted from Unamused Kitteh):

How is the whole race and IQ thing even a debate any more?

FFS, Samuel Morton in the 1830s poured powdered mustard seed into the skulls of thousands of specimens. He concluded that the negro skull is smaller on average by about 20% than the white skull, and that this smaller voluminousness translates – quite naturally – into a smaller and lighter brain, id est some 120 grams lighter.

Blacks have different cognitive ability compared to other races because their brains are different because they are a different species, sort of, because they evolved in a different climate over tens of thousands of years. Possibly as much as 200 hundred thousand years. Negroes are more higher primate than lower human. How is this even a question? Just look at a darker-skinned black in profile next time you’re at WalMart, the slope of the head (70 degrees, compared to an orangutan’s 60 and a white euro’s 80 degrees) indicates that something major different is going on inside that thick skull.

This crap was common knowledge in the 19th century and early 20th, the heyday of so-called “scientific racism,” which was nothing more than a bunch of (typically) curious white dudes trying to figure out why our african ex-freedmen presented such a curious display of at once animal and human characteristics. (See: greatmindsonrace.com also: thosewhocansee.com).

Seriously, since last summer when some brave academic types totally shot apart the enduring slander of Morton’s work by Stephen Jay Gould and his lying “Mismeasure of Man” (required reading for two generations of brainwashed white college kids), the whole race and IQ debate should not even have “lieu d’être”, as gratuitous French girl might say.

The whole race and IQ debate can be summed up with one word:

“One Banana”

Okay two words.

*sigh*

Sincerely,

- Arturo One Banana de Gheaube

crimesofthetimes.com

Artur said...

(reposted from Unamused Kitteh):

How is the whole race and IQ thing even a debate any more?

FFS, Samuel Morton in the 1830s poured powdered mustard seed into the skulls of thousands of specimens. He concluded that the negro skull is smaller on average by about 20% than the white skull, and that this smaller voluminousness translates – quite naturally – into a smaller and lighter brain, id est some 120 grams lighter.

Blacks have different cognitive ability compared to other races because their brains are different because they are a different species, sort of, because they evolved in a different climate over tens of thousands of years. Possibly as much as 200 hundred thousand years. Negroes are more higher primate than lower human. How is this even a question? Just look at a darker-skinned black in profile next time you’re at WalMart, the slope of the head (70 degrees, compared to an orangutan’s 60 and a white euro’s 80 degrees) indicates that something major different is going on inside that thick skull.

This crap was common knowledge in the 19th century and early 20th, the heyday of so-called “scientific racism,” which was nothing more than a bunch of (typically) curious white dudes trying to figure out why our african ex-freedmen presented such a curious display of at once animal and human characteristics. (See: greatmindsonrace.com also: thosewhocansee.com).

Seriously, since last summer when some brave academic types totally shot apart the enduring slander of Morton’s work by Stephen Jay Gould and his lying “Mismeasure of Man” (required reading for two generations of brainwashed white college kids), the whole race and IQ debate should not even have “lieu d’être”, as gratuitous French girl might say.

The whole race and IQ debate can be summed up with one word:

“One Banana”

Okay two words.

*sigh*

Sincerely,

- Arturo One Banana de Gheaube

crimesofthetimes.com

Anonymous said...

I have seen these "outbreaks" many times in life over the years but almost no one believed me when I tried to tell people how blacks really behave, everyone said I was exaggerating. I am glad almost everyone has a camera now and these clips make it onto the internet for all to see.

What struck me about the clip was that I thought they were in some sort of check cashing place judging by the security screening but I stopped it to look at what kind of place it actually was.

Were my eyes deceiving me or is this really a typical set-up for a fast food joint in the ghetto and not a check cashing or payday loan outlet?

Kylie said...

I couldn't finish watching that video. I can't say the creatures in it reminded me of animals because in all the National Geographic specials I've ever watched, no species behaved in such a mindlessly destructive fashion. Animals in the wild fight to establish dominance in their group or to protect their territory or young, they hunt and kill so they can eat. They don't waste their time hurting each other and destroying the environment around them.

My dogs, both dominant females from breeds that can be dog-aggressive, only fight when they fight over food or toys. They spend their leisure time napping side by side--which they are doing as I type this--or grooming each other. They don't brawl to amuse themselves. So wild animals and domestic pets behave in less destructive and more understandable ways than these creature do.

But these creatures hardly seem human, either. When white trash gets into a brawl, they look stupid, violent and uncouth--but they are still recognizably human, even if I'm not anxious to claim them as fellow members of my species.

But these people act in a way that's alien in a way to other life forms. Such chaos and nihilism, in the absence of some terrible societal calamity like war, is uncivilized and even evil.

I've given up trying to understand them. I just want a life totally separate from them.

IT'S TIME said...

I could not ignore the obvious safety bars around the whole counter--top to bottom. Smart business owner. As for EVERYONE that stood around and watched and urged it on--INCOMPREHENSIBLE.

But, that's because I am white.

For the record, I grew up in Clayton County when it was 90% white. Wonderful place. I never knew what the future held for my hometown. My husband travels at least an hour each way (no traffic) to the airport for his employment. How nice would it be to be able to live there, save gas and have wonderful convienence again. After all, my parents and everyone I grew up with are the once who were taxed to build it up to what it is. Sadly, only to be taken over.

IT'S TIME said...

Anonymous @8:43 am:

We could always require a reading, spelling or math test upon admission--on the spot. No time to study. No dictionary. If you don't pass--you do not become a member.

Anonymous said...

We could always require a reading, spelling or math test upon admission--on the spot. No time to study. No dictionary. If you don't pass--you do not become a member.

Of possible interest: this came up in lunch table conversation at work a week ago,and I'd never heard of this alleged practice,but it makes sense to me:

One of the workmen mentioned that he only kept a landline phone because-according to him-it was something that banks wanted to see when applying for a loan.

As in,"I plan on being here long enough to make it worth the effort to have a phone in the house,to go along with the one in my pocket.",and yeah,looking at it from that point of view,I could see where it would be an indicator for a bank loan officer.

So if some of these members-only business establishments could come up with a simple watermark like that-not necessarily a landline phone,but something that almost every stable,decent,U.S. citizen has,but is almost never had by our genetically shady members of society,that's something to think about.

Anyone have any ideas????

Anonymous said...

If you want a mostly Negro-free shopping experience, I recommend Costco. I love Costco. When I go there it's mostly all white, with a few Asians, white Hispanics (LOL), and a smattering of the better sort of Muslim. Middle-class shopkeeper types, in other words. The few blacks you will see there are either working there (and believe me, Costco filters out the riff-raff; the Negroes that work there are like TV black people!) or are profesionals (MDs, lawyers, etc.). Doo-rag-wearers, baggy pants morons, fat, nappy-headed bitches in PJs, and sideways hat thugs don't get through the door.

Note: I am not an employee of Costco, nor am I affiliated with it in any way other than by ordinary membership.

Anonymous said...

I have several thoughts:
1. We need English subtitles. Was this a foreign kung fu film?
2. The black boy who waited to 'engage' looked like Obama AFTER he got his ass kicked
3.I could only understand several words and phrases...'fuck'...'sheeeeit'...'fat girl down'...and 'beat dat nigger'...I kind of feel cheated since it's not every day we get a chance to hear zoo animals try to talk
4. This is 'normal' and, for the older spectators, humorous conflict resolution.
5. Mediation clearly isn't an option
6. Blows to the head don't hurt them
7. I am actually surprised by the length of their primitive 'dispute dance'. Also, that there were only two obese women involved and that no hair extenders were forcefully removed. That can mean only one thing: these ovulating animals were 12 to 15 years old. By the time they reach 18 they will have been pregnant 3 times, have been treated for Gc and Chlamydia monthly and have biscuit poisoning.
This is the human equivalent of the 2nd law of thermodynamics...everything goes to its lowest energy state.
ate.

Anonymous said...

another one:

"woman" starts attacking another "woman" holding a baby...

http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/video.php?v=wshhL5tG4nSPX7y0Cx75

Anonymous said...

Anyone have any ideas????

heh-replying to myself,but this just popped into my head. Would anyone here object to showing proof of vehicle liability insurance as a condition of membership in one of these places?

Since it just occurred to me,I haven't thought out the goods and bads of the issue. Speaking only for me,I wouldn't,but as I said,I haven't thought it out completely,and I'm sure there are valid objections.

But the way I see it,you pretty much need a vehicle to get to one of those places,and if you're bolted down tight enough to have a vehicle and insurance for it,the business has one less reason to not want you in the parking lot-which could be a reasonably plausible excuse for asking to see it as a membership condition.

Back to yardwork,will wait till later to see all the reasons not to use insurance,and look at any alternative ideas. Please keep the flames to a low simmer level-like I said,this isn't something I've thought about very hard.

Anonymous said...

Paul, can we write BBB or Blacks Behaving Badly?

Anonymous said...

Must-See!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LONUecnsMb8

Anonymous said...

As MetroAtlanta becomes more non white it's economy will go downhill.

YIH said...

SBPDL:Please don't write anything about "chimpouts" or "TNB"... it won't get posted and you're wasting your time.

It's just Black people acting Black.
Your blog, you get to make the rules.
But I wanted to tell you something about myself, I'm a smoker. Yep, those evil ciggies. When it comes to ''segregation'' I deal with it all the time.
No ''White privilege'' there, according to my lease, I can't even smoke in my house! I have to go outside. Remember the movie ''Airplane!''? Back then you could smoke on a passenger jet (and they even had built-in ashtrays!). Not anymore. I've seen cartoons on 'Cartoon Network' depicting a nervous father in the waiting room smoking like crazy! Not anymore, most Hospitals won't allow you to smoke ANYWHERE ''on the campus'' (the property lines).
If we can do that with smokers why can't we do that with blacks?
Hmm, How 'bout a ''no black people'' symbol?
Zenster already claimed the ''no white flag'' symbol :)

Anonymous said...

Journalism today demands a willful descent into total delusion, and a request to ignore all personal intelligence, knowledge and instinct, ie, it demands you cease functioning as a thinking human being. It is a request for self-immolation.
In this case, the apologist DWL line concerning the stone-silence, nationwide, re: the horrific Knoxville murders.
Read this utter insanity. This idiot knows full well what civilized, objective people are upset by, just as he knows full well what the mindset and motive of these criminals were/are.

"How about the Chipman Street horrors? Were they triggered by race?
No evidence ever has been presented to support that. To my mind, the dimensions of evil in that case were much broader and ultimately incomprehensible."

Did you get that? The 'dimensions of evil' are an 'incomprehensible' mystery, beyond the understanding of mortals (assholes like you)'.

We understand the message here very well.

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/apr/01/knoxville-stands-together-for-justice/

Anonymous said...

In principle there would be ways to establish an ethnically homogeneous community. The primary issue would be would it would make the home difficult to finance through a bank. First thing is that the Declarations or Restrictive Covenants would absolutely have to have a right of first refusal built into them so that anyone who wanted to sell their property would have to basically end up selling it to the Association. The Association would have to be willing to either finance potential buyers into the Association or be willing to come in and buy homes out of foreclosure. Secondly the Declarations would have to be pretty stringent so that only very neat, orderly and basically anal retentive people would want to live there. Accompanying these rules would have to be a determination on the part of the Association to stringently enforce them so that violators would be pressured to sell in order to escape the fines. Lastly the Board would have to be selected on the basis of maintaining it as an ethnic enclave. This would be difficult to maintain over time. I would have to give it some thought as to how an association could prevent a minority family member from inheriting property in the Association from a white owner. Discrimination against women is prohibited but Augusta has no women members. It isn't impossible to have a discriminatory policy against otherwise privileged groups but it is difficult.

W74 said...

OT but at some point the Magical Negro in the press is going to look more and more unreal. The dark anchors, fantasy black cops, absurd erkels, baritone VoiceOver salesmen, Will Smith USMC pilots, Morgan Freeman Presidents are simply evidence that a poisonous official fantasy has taken over from empirical reality.

Dan,
Right before my wife and I cancelled cable (I'd decided years ago but finally got her on board after convincing her to pick up the tab for it...which she did for all of 6 months before realizing what I realized that it wasn't worth it) I noticed how many TV shows featured White chicks dating black guys.

Of course the didn't portray them as the thug type, but the clean shaven, suit-wearing, professional types which probably constitute less than 0.05% of black males. It was everywhere from chick-flick movies to cop shows to sitcoms. I stopped watching TV long before my wife did, but if the half hour a week I caught was enough to disgust me, imagine what it's doing to the unthinking sheeple who're getting the drug injected into their eyeballs half their waking lives.

If they had simply portrayed thug types and the abusive relationships, injuries or deaths White women are almost sure to experience in real life, the jig would be up. If that were to happen H✡llyw✡✡d would lose it's stranglehold on the Western mind and wouldn't be able to push it's agenda upon the sheeple masses.

Anonymous said...

they have a totally different concept of public space and ameneties.

they have absolutley no respect for private property, either.

this is why they honestly think they're entitled to behave this way in public -- a store, restaurant, mall, school, subway, etc.

and homeowners with blacks in the neighborhood will tell you that blacks are oblivious to the concept of private property.

that's why they will walk thru someones's front yard, or throw their garbage in front of someone's home.

if you live in a black area, you'll certainly see a black striding thru your yard at night, or black kids playing in your driveway while you're at work.

and as for public spaces, they have no understanding of shared responsibility and upkeep.

it's why they scratch their graffiti into elevators and urinate in the hallways of their own building.

it's one of the reasons why they are outraged over george zimmerman.

(he'd be a free man today if his named was spelled jorge instead of george).

the concept of zimmerman caring about his neighborhood is completely foreign to them, and they are genuinely outraged by the thought of someone trying to impose any standard of civilization into a community.

personal anecdote -- i have noticed that blacks will always attempt to insert themselves into whatever white gathering they come across.

perhaps it's out of sheer spite, and the bitter, trollish joy of ruining things for people.

personal advice -- when i am scheduling a furniture delivery, or a cable TV installation, i always ask for a spanish-speaking worker.

i don't speak spanish, but it means the company will not be sending me a lazy black.

HaroldC said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lisa B said...

I am beginning to get the strange idea that the Jim Crow laws were actually meant to protect white people. Imagine that. I was always told it was RACIST! WHITE RACISM!

Any chance we can get Jim Crow reactivated? White flight can be very expensive.

muttullu said...

How do we get restrictive covenants back?

W74 said...

Negroes are more higher primate than lower human. How is this even a question? Just look at a darker-skinned black in profile next time you’re at WalMart, the slope of the head (70 degrees, compared to an orangutan’s 60 and a white euro’s 80 degrees) indicates that something major different is going on inside that thick skull.

HEY! My forehead doesn't have any slope to it between my nose and hairline. Above my hairline it takes a rounded corner and continues relatively flat (sloping on the sides like a VERY obtuse gable roof that would barely drain water were it actually a roof) going back until it reaches the area just north of the back of my ears.

80°s is just insulting. Most of us probably have something like 85°-88°. Funny, I do remember a (horribly ugly) girl from middle school and how I found myself wondering why her head was shaped more like a monkey's. Early insight into race differences? Probably one of several.

I too wonder why some of these things are even questions. The liberals at my University do everything in their power to try to convince students that "races don't exist" or that "race is a social construct". It's sad really.

Liberals want to believe (and have us accept) that everyone's the same. Can't we just accept that we're all different?

IT'S TIME said...

Anonymous @10:45 a.m.:

BRAVO!!!!

Don't you wish WE could all be neighbors? I know I would be a happier person:}

Anonymous said...

Notice the high overhand right...

Hunter Morrow said...

But doesn't it sound like a pack of chimps having a fight? Be realistic and listen to the audio to a black fight without watching.

OOOK OOOK EEKEEKEEKSCREACH

You have expect a narrator from something like Wild Kingdom to talk about it in hushed tones, a zombie Steve Irwin to show up and start going "Crikey mate, lookat dah weave on dat one. She's a beaut!"

Anonymous said...

What was that place they were in? Is that how stores are run in those neighborhoods? The clerk sits safely behind glass and they have to line up and ask for what they want? I have always thought that is the safest arrangement for running a business in that kind of environment.

W74 said...

In principle there would be ways to establish an ethnically homogeneous community. The primary issue would be would it would make the home difficult to finance through a bank. First thing is that the Declarations or Restrictive Covenants would absolutely have to have a right of first refusal built into them so that anyone who wanted to sell their property would have to basically end up selling it to the Association....

Last summer I spent time with a very close friend out on the Left Coast. His family owns a little Cabana shack by a beach...a very nice section of beach. The setup is this: it's 75 some shacks just barely big enough for some cots and the storage of some beach gear. Pack a lunch or bring something to grill. To get to the beach there is a sandy trail and a couple of stairs, lots of palm trees and plants that were foreign to me.

Here's how the property works: If you want to sell it the association will hold the title for you until it finds a buyer. There are no agents, it doesn't go on the regular market. Also, no one person can own more than one shack. The property is surrounded by hotels who'd pay tens of millions for EACH shack (they're worth a million probably), but if it's either all or none. If 74 people (or however many) vote to sell and one person refuses, it doesn't get sold to developers.

What a setup. Perhaps we'd need set up an institution like that, a holding company, an "association" among homeowners. You know what else? All transactions are to be conducted in real money....gold and are to be all or none.

There should be no financing Whitopia. You either save for what you want or you don't deserve it, whether you think you "deserve" something or not.

YIH said...

Paul: ''Also, I'm of the opinion that a business owner should be able to discriminate when it comes to who they will serve. Were this idea to be seriously debated, I'm of the opinion that most white business owners would run for the hills instead of getting behind what is arguably the most pro-business concept (ultimately it would a referendum for freedom) imaginable.''
I hope you never make this a ''no smokers allowed to comment'' blog.
But you still have the freedom to do so.
When it comes to smokers, you don't have that freedom. Now even in bars in England, no smoking, NOPE, can't enjoy a pint at the bar while smoking that evil ciggie.
In FL if 75% of what that business sells is beverages (alcoholic or not) they can allow their patrons to smoke in the establishment.
If they do more than 25% of sales in food, they gotta ban it. As in total ban. A ''no smoking'' zone.
Yet we can't do that with black ''people''.
Personally I think black ''people'' are more hazardous to health than those evil ciggies.

Anonymous said...

@Artur

greatmindsonrace.com = anti-black, anti-semitic, anti-christian, all in an atheist-driven theme. Sorry, you lost me on that one.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here...My wife graduated from High School in the early 1960's. She went to school in Miami Beach and during her last year in school was when the first couple blacks were brought in. She would go back to Florida each Winter and a few years ago drove over to her old school. She parked near the school to see how things had changed. She was in shock. All she could do was cry.
Remember folks, what you are seeing is the first and second generation of CRACK BABIES. When I left NYC in 1984 the first few HEROIN and COCAINE BABIES were being born. They were born addicted and needed blood transfusions. I am not bullshitting you. Do a web search on it. The CRACK BABIES are of age and coming to a school near you.
I would like to introduce a new word here on this sight. The word is NEGROPOLITAN. There is no mystery as to what it means.

Zenster said...

AM: I was laughing and crying at the same time watching that.

I was laughing so hard that I was crying.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/14, 2012 8:08 AM): Notice the smiles, the laughing, the celebration as cheesy ass cheeks and plastic hair flies around in the video.

That was the only thing which caught my attention. You'd think there would be expressions of embarrassment or apprehension. Instead, it is some perverted form of entertainment for the lot of them.

D J said...

Dan mentioned "The dark anchors, fantasy black cops, absurd erkels..."

An interesting take about "dark anchors". Back in the mid-1970s I lived in the San Francisco Bay area. One of the TV stations had an evening news anchor called Dennis Richmond. I recall his having wonderful camera presence, an amazing speaking voice, and not a trace of black cadence in his speech patterns. He was a joy to listen to, and most assuredly had a face for television. I did not know the man personally, but he struck me as the sort who could no more say the m-f compound word than fly to the moon.

Quite the opposite was one Isabel Duran. Except she waaay over-enunciated her name when speaking in in a voice otherwise devoid of any accent of any kind. We were discussing this at work one day and one of the Mexicans spoke up. "Why does she do that? I don't hear Mr [man with Scandinavian surname) saying his name like he just flew in from Oslo. What is she trying to prove?"

Another difference between Richmond and Duran. From what I could tell, Richmond was FAR from a "down with the stuggle" type, while Duran probably stuffed envelopes for MALDEF or LULAC in her spare time.

YIH said...

@W74:''Right before my wife and I cancelled cable (I'd decided years ago but finally got her on board after convincing her to pick up the tab for it...which she did for all of 6 months before realizing what I realized that it wasn't worth it)''.
I recently got cable, for internet and phone. I no longer even own a TV. My roomates have them, not me. Hell, the last two Super Bowls I watched by streaming video.
To me a TV is about as useful as a rotary dial phone. Or an 8-track tape player.

Baldowl said...

I like when you impose rules in the comments, Paul. It's hilarious how deftly many of your readers can dance right around them.

Hunter Morrow, I am literally in tears at your Steve Irwin comment. Well done!

D J said...

"Your forefathers think Normandy is a street in Los Angeles that they didn't build... if they can even remember that far back."

Normandy is still there. How many of those living there realize, if they have a phone number starting 66, that they are tied to the old NOrmandy exchange? How many know that Florence (which crosses Normandy) is a city in Italy.

I'm a native Angelino. Florence and Normandy was a place we stayed away from.

An interesting thing about Inglewood and that area: what killed it was not blacks, at least not directly. That was done by the dawn of the jet age. Early jets made more noise on approach than today's make taking off. Apartment buildings started to empty out, and the landlords had to reduce rents drasically. Guess who they all but had no choice about renting to.

Eustace Mullins said...

I'm alays amazed by the head stomping and kicking.

You can kill somebody doing that, or do some serious, permanent damage.

I thought queensberry rules said no kicking or punching when somebody is down, or , you know, 'thats enough' or something like that.

No? Maybe the black community hasn't embraced that.

They *LOVE* being black. That's a great message to communicate to whites.

They have no desire to behave differently.

Eustace Mullins said...

It just occurred to me. They surely were behaving like this back during segregation.

There's a good reason why in that classic photo of a black and white water fountain, the black one was all raggedy.

They'd just break a nice one, and probably had.

Anyway, has anybody heard stories about what life was like under segregation? what it was like to sit at a segregated lunch counter or ride a bus.

whites riding the bus-can you imagine! did that really happen?!?

Bogolyubski said...

muttullu asks: How do we get restrictive covenants back?

Absent the overthrow or collapse of the present regime which rules over the Banksta Banana Republick of North America, this will simply not happen. Anyone who thinks Mittens Underoos of Massachusetts is going to undo or even slow down the establishment of BRA needs to have their head examined. BRA could not have been imposed upon this land by blacks. Keep in mind that blacks could not impose the equivalent even in South Africa (where they are a huge majority).

The deadliest enemies we face - the ones who are truly dedicated to our erasure as a people - are DWLs and EMACs (who are really just DWLs wearing masks). Obama, Holder, Sharpton, Jackson and all the rest would be a laughable minstrel show of dancing monkeys were they not empowered by the likes of Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, George Soros, Lloyd Blankfein, Michael Bloomberg and Ben Bernake. The entire ruling elite and the vast infrastructure of their considerable power is dedicated to our extermination.

The term DWL doesn't really fit the treasonous and genocidal ruling elite. DWL is too mild. It fails the capture the salivating blood-lust of Bill Clinton when he was gloating about whites being a minority by 2050. One never reads about the offspring or family members of the ruling elite getting to experience murder or rape at the hands of the mahagony mobs. We never will, either. The Bloombergs of this world are surrounded by machine-gun toting security. If by chance a mahagony mob popped up, they'd be mowed down in the street - you'd never see a word about it from the "profesional journalists" who've been masturbating over the Great White Defendant for the past few weeks.

IT'S TIME said...

Just as a "thank you" to SBPDL:

I appreciate having a place to sound off and share thoughts in an environment not associated with KKK and other not so smart organizations. What we talk about here are real concerns that need to be and should be addressed without being associated with hate. Because if hate is ever assoicated--getting any changes made will never happen and we will all continue to be pulled under. I hope this forum will begin to make positive changes in our country.

The other day while at the park with another family I brought it up to my friend. Two years ago I would have never done it for fear of being labeled a racist and believing all things racist are bad. But I did it. I started a dialogue and told her that dialogues need to be started everywhere about the obvious problem that good people just want to ignore and wish and hope would go away. I told her about the site. I hope she visits.

My twelve year old visits here to. I appreciate the educational tool and I'm thankful that he sees that "hey--mom and dad aren't alone--and this makes more sense than what society seems to accept as okay and normal."

Again, I really appreciate it and I hope this turns into a movement that will not be stopped.

Hereward said...

I'm rereading Lovecraft's Call of Cthulhu. In this sequence, the authorities are approaching a gruesome Voodoo ritual held in the depths of the Louisiana bayou:
Only poetry or madness could do justice to the noises heard by Legrasse's men as they ploughed on through the black morass toward the red glare and the muffled tom-toms. There are vocal qualities peculiar to men, and vocal qualities peculiar to beasts; and it is terrible to hear the one when the source should yield the other. Animal fury and orgiastic licence here whipped themselves to daemoniac heights by howls and squawking ecstasies that tore and reverberated through those nighted woods like pestilential tempests from the gulfs of hell. Now and then the less organised ululation would cease, and from what seemed a well-drilled chorus of hoarse voices would rise in sing-song chant that hideous phrase or ritual:
"World Star Hip-Hop! World Star Hip-Hop!

OK, that's not really the "hideous phrase" from the book, but it might as well be.

Anonymous said...

The final solution to the black problem- free abortions for anyone who wants one. Guaranteed to annihilate the black population in a short span of time.

HaroldC said...

I wouldn't say freedom has failed since freedom was diminished by the 'civil rights' revolution. It is Equality that has failed. It has been conclusively demonstrated that the great majority of blacks are not equal to whites. Though it pains me to say that since I know several very fine black people. The very vital freedom of association was stripped away by the 'civil rights' revolution or at least it was for the business owner. That freedom still remains for the customer. No one forces blacks to eat at Maurice Bessinger BBQ or homosexuals to eat at Chic-Fil-A after all. As for me I've always considered the asymmetrical application of a moral or ethical principle (non-discrimination in this case) to be immoral or unethical without some very extraordinary justification.

Bogolyubski said...

W74: You're point about the media and Hollywood and the agenda they push is of course true. It's not even debatable in the slightest.

There's a thing to keep in mind, however (one which you have apparently discovered). Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you (or your family) to watch this crap! In fact, most white folks are actually paying for the poison to be broadcast into their homes. Here's one very simple thing anyone can do: STOP BUYING THEIR CRAP!!!! It's nothing but poison. The same goes for "professional journalism", "sports", and every other form of entertainment. It's all owned by the same folks - and they intended nothing less than your erasure. It seems the very least we could do is to make those who are wanting our elimination to pay for it themselves.

Kylie said...

"my wife and I cancelled cable (I'd decided years ago but finally got her on board after convincing her to pick up the tab for it...which she did for all of 6 months before realizing what I realized that it wasn't worth it) I noticed how many TV shows featured White chicks dating black guys."

White women dating black men is just part of the larger aim of all the media to portray blacks as not merely equal to but superior to whites. As soon as I started noticing this odious trend, I asked my husband to cancel our cable subscription. He got cable so we could watching HBO boxing (I gave that up years ago b/c there were so few white boxers) and classic movies on TCM (where Robert Osbourne quickly alienated me with his left-wing POV). Mu husband was sure I'd regret not being able to watch old movies on cable but I really couldn't stand cable any more. Finally we got Netflix (where you can limit your exposure to blacks and see lots of great stuff cable doesn't have) and dropped the cable. I am so much happier. I now watch tons of good movies from all over the world (except from a certain continent, which, weirdly, is the only place in the world that's never developed a decent film industry) and don't feel sullied or exploited by having cable. Plus, it's cheaper.

Anonymous said...

Notice the shop owners are behind concrete and barred windows. They know the public to which they are catering. This tells you all you need to know , if you are white.

I think John Derbyshire's version of the talk rings more truer with videos like these. Thank WSHH for existing. The veil is truly lifted and finally civilized society can see these creatures as they really are, not some media-sanitized version.

Anonymous said...

You should note that the corporation that used to be known as Woolworth's, where one of the infamous "sit ins" took place, is now known as Foot Locker. The target clientale has obviously changed over the years. As has the behaviour of the clientale.

HandoStomper said...

Having lived in Atlanta 35 years, I don't even chuckle at the irony anymore.

The last community article; it struck me odd that some people hadn't seen that before. Not only have I seen such behavior by black mothers (Marta once, Piedmont Park second time) firsthand but also experienced it.

Yes, at Music Midtown, a black father with a 2-3 year old daughter on his shoulders wanted to fight me... over a complete misunderstanding.

Why bother explaining; it was a black girl acting out of control publicly which attracted the attention of a "act first, ask questions later" black man.

So every time I read something on Atlanta, it's not shocking. It is, however, enjoyable watching enlightened reactions by readers.

I've witnessed this enlightenment by countless people that have moved here.

The 'city too busy to hate' isn't a shield for racism, it's a beacon for blacks. It's the mural you see coming into Hartsfield (not adding on black-forced surname of our airport) from the terminal.

It's a resort filled with happy, fun-loving people; about 20 of them.

And they're all black.

As for the burbs, white flight never stops here. People living in Flowery Branch tell locals they live in Atlanta Metro.

Bogolyubski said...

BTW, if you want to see how the utter thoroughness of the BRA propaganda campaign, take a look at this video. Gates of Hell, produced by the "conservative" Molotov Mitchell (who never mentions the racial issue and seems blissfully unaware the 97% of blacks voted for a Marxist/Black supremacist in 2008, who is the most rabidly pro-abortion candidate to ever run for major office in the nation's history) is based on a completely absurd scenario where by a group of black ex-military decides they've had enough with Planned Parenthood's making lots of money off of aborting blacks and launches a terror-style campaign against the abortion machine. The premise of Mitchell's story is laughable many levels.

Mitchell regularly features little quasi-religious peans to St. Martin the Adulterer as some sort of 'groid Chistian Martyr for his weekly videos at WND - which is quite absurd on its own in light of the fact that St. Martin was a plagiarist, an adulterer whose antics would embarrass Bill Clinton, a Marxist who embraced both Liberal theology (which boils down to denial of all traditional doctrines of Chistianity) and Liberation Theology (Marxism in a bishop's mitre) and - best of all - the proud recipient of PP's "Maggie" award. (Clue for nitwits: Planned Parenthood doesn't award these to pro-lifers).

Mitchell is a perfect example of just how profound the level of indoctrination is - even in circles where one would think it would be absent. Somehow, I just can't picture all the sherillas, yoots and honah stoodintz breaking down the doors of the nearst Best Buy to snap up copies of Mitchell's dumbass video. But hey, this is BRA - maybe they watch and use it as an excuse to go shoot up some white Catholics.

Anonymous said...

They must have been hitting the pretty one ,ha ha ha

Anonymous said...

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/detroit-sees-whole-foods-proof-071304467.html

Wholefoods opening in Metro Detroit! This should be good! Over/Under is about 5.5 months.

blograju.com said...

Why was one girl wearing only a pink blouse and pink panties? Did she lose a piece of clothing in the fight?

They need to wear belts so that the pants rest properly on the waist.

I would not be able to stand after being hit in the head so many times. These women actually stood up immediately even after been ferociously stomped.

The business still had customers! I would have gone somewhere else.

Anonymous said...

come on just post it for what it really is CHIIIIIIIMMP-OOOOUUUUT! LOL!

Ni123 said...

"Good perspective, by black columnist...

http://www.suntimes.com/news/fountain/11715200-452/black-on-black-victims-could-fill-our-stadiums.html"

Good, but only one way perspective. I understand him grieving about sons and daughters of his people, but it would be more honest for him to add to those figures numbers of white bodies too.

Ni123 said...

Sorry, forgot to introduce myself.

Hi. I am one of those who woke up over night. I started following Martin/Zimmerman story and it opened my eyes. Then I came across this blog, and Whitelocust, and Unamusement Park, and here I am.

Zenster said...

Bogolyubski: BRA could not have been imposed upon this land by blacks.

A superb point which only serves to indicate how deeply self-hatred and self-loathing runs amongst Whites.

Zenster said...

A particularly appropriate Lovecraft quote, Hereward. If you like HP, try Clark Ashton Smith. Especially his early work, "The City of the Singing Flame". Lovecraft so admired Smith's work that a high priest in one of his stories is named Klar-Kash-Ton.

Mutant Swarm said...

@ Anonymous @9:44 am:

Intelius dot com lets you do background checks, reverse phone number look-ups, etc. The reverse phone number check provides the name of the service provider. Takes about 5 minutes, most of the time.

I used them to do background checks on prospective buyers of German Shepherd puppies that I bred. I had one guy call up (who was obviously Black, by the sound of his voice), I said, "My name's (blank). And you are?"

(Half second pause) "Uh...Donald. Right. Do you spell "Uh" with one "H" or two? Strike one.

Talk to the guy some, he tells me that he has been training personal protection dogs and guard dogs for ten years, then asks me where he can get a bite suit (a thickly padded, puffy suit that the dogs can bite from any angle, not just a "feed 'em the arm" arm bite).

If you've been training protection dogs for ten years, you should already HAVE one, or know where to get one. You haven't been taking bare arm and bare leg bites from Rottweilers and German Shepherds for ten years, have you? Strike two.

BS the guy a little more, multiply my asking price of $1500 times three (because I KNOW where this prospect is going...straight into the trash can), thank you, talk to you later. Run the reverse phone number check. It comes back to a MetroPCS account, the only name listed on the account is "Mike" (no last name given), with four of the worst Oakland, California addresses it is possible to have without the words "State Prison" after them.

Swing and a miss! STRIKE THREE! You're outta there! Get somebody else's dog to guard your dope.

Percy Kittens Reloaded said...

SBPDL wrote: "I'm of the opinion that most white business owners would run for the hills instead of getting behind what is arguably the most pro-business concept (ultimately it would a referendum for freedom) imaginable."

I had to laugh a bit when I saw and heard black activists threaten to boycott all non-black-owned businesses in Sanford, Florida, if George Zimmerman wasn't arrested. I'm sure that would actually have been a very welcome development for many of the companies in the area who are tired of the aberrant, anti-social behavior, the theft, and the violence associated with the black community. Just imagine going to your local shopping mall or Best Buy or grocery store armed with the foreknowledge that not a single black person would be there. Sales might actually increase at those stores. Getting blacks to not visit your store would probably be a dream come true for 90% of business owners, and they wouldn't have to worry about civil rights investigations because it wasn't the owners denying service to the blacks, it was the blacks doing it to themselves. But we all knew that idea was too good to be true; black Americans can't support themselves, have no discernible infrastructure, and depend upon non-black-owned business, companies, services and ideas in order to get by.

Survivor said...

WSHH amazes me. It's not the presence of Blacks Behaving Badly; that's something I've come to take for granted.

The site is filled with examples such as this, and I'd wager that most of the people filming it all are black. Can you imagine why a white person would be around? Would it be safe for a white person to film these antics in these surroundings?

No, it's clear that many black people see this as natural and normal. Nobody makes the slightest move to get off camera or prevent the filming. This is why there's no World Star Red Neck.

If it weren't for the presence of so many females, I'd say throw in a basketball and get them to stop.

Anonymous said...

Lovecraft is one of my favorites. If you like his work, please read "color out of space" which is his best work in my view.

Also, he was a race realist:

“Race prejudice is a gift of nature, intended to preserve in purity the various divisions of mankind which the ages have evolved.”
- H. P. Lovecraft, Letters

“Now the trickiest catch in the Negro problem is the fact that it is really twofold. The Black is vastly inferior. There can be no question of this among contemporary and unsentimental biologists… But, it is also a fact that there would be a very grave and very legitimate problem even if the Negro were the White man’s equal.”
- H. P. Lovecraft, Letters

“Of course they can’t let Niggers use the beach at a Southern resort – can you imagine sensitive persons bathing near a pack of greasy chimpanzees? The only thing that makes life endurable where Blacks abound is the Jim Crow principle, and I wish they’d apply it in New York both to Niggers and to the more Asiatic types of puffy, rat-faced Jews!”
- H. P. Lovecraft, Letters

Anonymous said...

whites riding the bus-can you imagine! did that really happen?!?

It certainly did. Back in what would have been the very early 1960's,I used to go spend a week or two at a time with my cousins in the Big City in South Texas.

Back then,most families were single car families-at least most of the families that I knew were single car families,unless Dad had a company car,and if he didn't,the way it worked was that Dad drove off to work and Mom stayed at the house and took care of the kids.

And in the case of my city cousins,my aunt thought nothing of herding the lot of us down the block to the bus stop and taking us all downtown with her while she ran errands and did some shopping,and the like.

For a kid like me who lived in what passed for the sticks,it was an adventure,and I loved every minute of it. And it was the first time in my life I got to experience AIR CONDITIONING! ( the municipal buses were air conditioned,already )

Just another thing we've lost in the age of looming race replacement-the ability and opportunity to take a batch of kids downtown on a public transportation system.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the other posters on here-Get rid of your television, at least your cable. I haven't had cable since I got back from Iraq in 2005 (around the same time I became One Who Can See) and I don't miss it one bit. I get all my news from sites like SBPDL and CofCC, I watch DVD and I love Netflix. I do get some over-the-air channels out of Chicago and watch PBS style shows like Rick Steves Europe (including the episode where he declared third-world immigration into Norway a good thing because it brought different foods into Norway, which suffered from bland food. Of course, once upon a time Norway suffered from super-low crime rates, but...)

Anyway, ditch your cable and never look back. You don't need it.

W74 said...

Swing and a miss! STRIKE THREE! You're outta there! Get somebody else's dog to guard your dope.

MutantSwarm,
Thank you for doing you due diligence. Here in the Baltimore area we had 2 of Obama's sons get aquitted for setting a pit bull on fire. No one noticed because it happened on the same day Zimmerman got charged.

The incident happened 2½ years ago in the summer. There was VIDEO TAPE EVIDENCE and they were still found not-guilty. Keep in mind this is the re-trial.

Watch the video! You have the black woman who was the odd vote in the 11-1 decision that would've put those bastards away a year ago. Do you know what she says? "Praise Allah! Praise Allah!"

Blacks are not fit to serve on juries. That woman just wanted to protect one of her own, guilty or not. A travesty of justice. If those two thugs are able to get away with animal cruelty (and you should've seen the smug look on their faces leaving the courthouse) what will they get away with next?

W74 said...

^^Also, the were found with lighter fluid on their pants.

Nope, not guilty in BRA. All I know is that an honest man cannot get a fair trial in Baltimore City or in the state of Maryland.

Whiskey said...

Somewhat OT, for those looking to pick up something to replace say, the NFL/NBA/MLB, try Grand Prix/Indy Car/Formula 1/NASCAR/Moto GP. USA Today has in its excellent sports section Friday the Weekend racing schedule, lots of fun. Long Beach Grand Prix is on as I watch now and type this. ESPN, NBC Sports, and Speed feature this stuff regularly.

Exciting, fun, dangerous, filled with skill, with guys you can admire, not feel awful watching.

This sort of stuff is what happens when you have differential of average IQ. A lower average IQ has profound implications for populations. Yes individuals from a lower average IQ can still be brilliant. Example: Scott Joplin. Also Duke Ellington. BUT the implication is that there will be a LOT more folks around 70 IQ than a population of around 100 IQ. That second population with higher average IQ will still have 70 IQ people, there will just be a lot less of them.

Low IQ means high impulsiveness, low future time orientation, higher frustration levels, higher physicality. That is VERY BAD for an economy that depends critically on high-IQ things and HAS TO LOWER ITS COSTS for crime, security, education, and so on.

America's "free ride" is over because China is a massive competitor. One with its own problems, to be sure, but its massive amount of high IQ people makes China a big commercial competitor. This means over and above the problems of Black Undertow and massive and constantly churning investments in infrastructure to enable continuous White Flight, America HAS to get costs down to compete with China.

THAT can only be done by not Klan-style Hate, but honest discussion of Black dysfunction, and a refusal to tolerate it. Those people brawling belong in jail, period. That sort of thing cannot be tolerated. It is not up to White people to give Black people a moral lecture, or run their lives (I only want to run my own, no one else's) but Whites cannot from a cost perspective alone tolerate open criminality.

The brawlers belong in jail.

Joel said...

"I can't even smoke in my house! I have to go outside."

And why is that?

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/14, 2012 4:12 PM): Lovecraft is one of my favorites. If you like his work, please read "color out of space" which is his best work in my view.

A personal favorite of mine is "The Shadow Out of Time". The compendium containing "The Color Out of Space", and bearing that title, was one of the very first sci/fi - fantasy books I ever purchased. It was the British Panther edition due to how no American publishers were printing Lovecraft's works back then, when dinosaurs roamed the earth.

Also not to be missed is William Hope Hodgson, author of "The House On The Borderland" and "The Nightland". Here is a link to an online sample of his work, The Voice in the Night. I first enountered this tale in a collection by Alfred Hitchcock titled, "Stories They Wouldn't Let Me Do on Television".

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Paul speaks truth: "Please don't write anything about "chimpouts" or "TNB"... it won't get posted and you're wasting your time."

I come here to get further educated...and numb to the actions. I frankly don't care about what people do to their own. Leave me and mine alone, I'll do the same for you.

I'll be moving in a few years. Don't follow me. I won't pursue you.

Zenster said...

Whiskey: America's "free ride" is over because China is a massive competitor. One with its own problems, to be sure, but its massive amount of high IQ people makes China a big commercial competitor.

Without manipulating its currency like a marionette, routinely defrauding foreign investment and regularly committing institutionalized intellectual property theft plus the incessant violation of patents and copyrights, China would not pose any serious competition. Moreover, China attains its economic goals at an unsustainable cost to the environment. Both its own and that of other countries.

It is not up to White people to give Black people a moral lecture, or run their lives (I only want to run my own, no one else's) but Whites cannot from a cost perspective alone tolerate open criminality.

We do so only to our own very serious detriment.

The brawlers belong in jail.

Or a zoo. It's hard to tell sometimes.

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

People are looking for "solutions" to solve the problem. The only legal one I can think of is the purchase and development of a large tract (like Disney's Reedy Creek with Disney World) and the inclusion of a covenant that initial purchasers of the tract (again, see how Disney did it - hint, no one knew the purpose).

You run the collective as a private membership, with the granting of a home as part of the membership benefits. Somebody moves because they don't want to be in the collective. The collective, a private membership with its own rules, reapportions the home to another member that fits membership regulations.

No real estate is sold, so no FHEO laws prevail; no loans are made, so no ECOA laws are enforceable. You don't own the land, so there's no mortgage. You don't worry about housing bubbles. You don't worry about the neighbors or the crime - you're all in the collective in common cause. It's a voluntary membership - it ain't communism. Your neighbor might own a Benz, you might own a Ford. Everybody gets along peachy keen.

Needs:

1) capital
2) members
3) the will to accept the public clamor and the media scrutiny

We win.

Anonymous said...

"This one does. It directly relates to why Restrictive Covenants must make a comeback (real estate agents would see huge dividends to a restoration of this legal concept on property and who it can be sold to) and why business owners must immediately start demanding that their right to discriminate be restored."

Not necessarily, especially given the fact that vast amounts of property have been built up specifically to price discriminate blacks out of neighborhoods. House sizes, property values, et al would collapse, and would HAVE to to foster what Sailer calls affordable family formation. Going back to pre-1960s America would uproot a lot of parasites who have latched onto the current state of things.

Tracy said...

Could this behavior be partly attributed to the higher levels of testosterone, not only in black men, but also in black women?

Combine that with the lack of civil behavior encouraged by the black culture, and I think we could explain the lack of impulse control in the black American community.

This IS clearly behavior modeled closely after a lower animal species.

Anonymous said...

I think that the following is more apropo to the thesis of this post, namely the right of businesses to serve civil people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfqXz6pMSCI&feature=related

I have a feeling though, consistant with the realization expressed in some of the comments above, that as things get tighter economically all over the world, as things get more competitive, that the free ride that this kind of behavior has been given will, bit by bit, come to a violent end.
The contempt shown here, to the people trying to earn a living and maintain a business, will sooner rather than later, be met with an equivalent response.
The idiots who gleefully asked over and over: 'didja get dat?', will have a lot more to worry about than producing more 'funny videos'.

winston smith said...

Has anybody seen this? Crisis in Levittown, Pennsylvania.

1957 docu about a black family moving into an all white suburb that had a restriction against selling to blacks.

A family arranged to privately sell a home to the black family, bypassing the no blacks allowed restriction the homebuilders had set.

Seems they had concerns property values would decline, crime would increase, and there'd be intermarriage! as if they marry! hah!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x37QKvuYpGk&feature=relmfu

Don't Blink said...

10mm AUTO said...

"If I may suggest that the simple step of requiring implant Birth Control for anyone on Welfare would solve the negroid problem within 2 generations. Assisting this would be private programs (such as Planned Parenthood) to offer financial rewards (say $2000 to $5000) to sterilize negroid females."

A great idea for curing the current problem and "thinning the heard"... all I could think of when I read this was Bob Barker at the end of the Price is Right for so many years - "And remember folks to get your pets spayed or neutered" - f-in priceless.

nameispointless said...

A typical night in the E.R. waiting room when blacks have to wait too long.
Hence, security guards posted in every corner.

Anonymous said...

Yes,you are correct . I grew up there too and the change is noticeable. But I must say you don't sound like the women I grew up with from the county. I believe you are an undercover homosexual and left our great town inorder to pursue your true sexual desires. But I would rather have you reside next to me more than the current new comers. I still reside in Clayton and I am raising a real true American family. Stand your ground and stop giving in. We rule!

nameispointless said...

PK, would you clarify the blog posting policy?
Is there to be no personal anecdotal reportage allowed? No emotional reactivity to the content of of your posts?
I confess, I am moved to apoplexy when viewing some of the video taped youtube material.
Is the alternative to my reactive post a valium? Sometimes, a woman needs to let it out....and I don't want to go to a Redneck Asshole forum to do it.

Anonymous said...

Free abortions only if you agree to be irreversibly sterilized and banned from receiving any assistance for adopted children ever in the future.

Also, no voting rights while on welfare or other non-UC assistance.

Anonymous said...

You know, I probably wouldn't mind at all living next to the young man who tried to break up the fight and got pounded for his trouble. For all the bad behavior of those women, if he was my son, I'd actually be proud of how he behaved. But I'd be disgusted if my son was the one with the phone. If more black people acted like the brave young man and not those skanks or the ass with the phone, I think the world would be a much better place.

Hereward said...

Zenster,
Thanks for the tip about Smith - I'll look him up.
Anonymous 4:12 - "The Colour Out of Space" is great - I read it years ago, and is in the same anthology I just acquired, which has "Call of Cthulhu." I knew something about Lovecraft's racial attitudes, but hadn't seen the quotes you supplied. Thanks.

YT said...

And black people LOVE acting black. Notice the smiles, the laughing, the celebration as cheesy ass cheeks and plastic hair flies around in the video. They love wrestling on that greasy, sticky fast food floor. I couldn't tell who "won" the fight, I think it was all in good fun

I think they all "won" by default since anyone here viewing that lost.

p.s. can you imagine what it smells like in there?

Zenster said...

Tracy: This IS clearly behavior modeled closely after a lower animal species.

I can only hope that you are aiming lower than the "great apes". One glance at the peaceful and rarely aggressive demeanor (video time point ― 00:01:58) of these remarkable animals is so unlike most Blacks that any comparison is totally unwarranted and insulting, at best.

That said, and with all due respect to our primate antecedants, "sherilla" and "sheboon" are permanent, unapologetic additions to my Race Realism vocabulary.

My own "lower animal species" nominations tend more towards hissing cockroaches, blood ticks and (cannibalistic) rattlesnakes. Other suggestions are freely welcomed.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous April 14, 2012 10:38 AM: Condo Associations already have the right of first refusal. (I used to manage high rise Condo Associations and Co-ops in Chicago.) They have restrictive rules and punitive fines. The reason it doesn't work as a way to create an ethnic enclave is because as soon as anyone suspects that the "rules" have a disproportionate effect on minority's your Association will get sued and the "rules" will be reviewed by a judge (the process varies by state). Even right of first refusal is rarely used because as soon as the Board exercises that right, any half intelligent person would immediately call a lawyer (and they always win in my state).

Federal law even prohibits discrimination based on "disability". I managed a building that had a "no pets" rule. It was built as a no pet building in 1955 and in 2009 after the Association spent over one hundred thousand dollars (over several years) they were forced to settle with a woman who kept birds in her unit to allow her to have pet birds (and allow them to fly around her unit crapping on everything - they couldn't even get the city to force her to get rid of them due to sanitation issues). Why? Because she had a battle with cancer and cancer made her depressed. A mental health professional recommended that she be allowed to have pets in order to relieve her suffering from depression. Therefore it was a violation of her civil rights for the Association to force her to remove the pets or fine her. Even though she voluntarily moved into the Association that didn't allow pets. There are thousands of examples of similar issues in IL alone. (Alcoholism and drug addictions are also "disabilities" FYI.)

Now, that was the bad news. The good news is that cooperatives (co-ops) are LEGALLY allowed to discriminate and choose who can move into their buildings. Since co-ops are corporations that issue stock to members - they are legally not bound by fair housing laws. Your ownership of stock in the corporation entitles you to a proprietary lease for the term of your life. The Board has the right of first refusal and can exercise it without fear of endless lawsuits. The Board (with majority shareholder support and/or original covenants in the declaration) can simply prohibit rental for any reason (condos are forced by law to allow "hardship exemptions" which is apparently anything an individual owner says it is). The key to reclaiming your neighborhoods and ensuring property values lies in refusing to purchase Association planned communities. The trick is finding a developer who has the clout (or slick skills and political connections) to be able to build a cooperative community.

There will be issues with inheritance of stock and such but the declaration can be crafted in a way to deal with those contingencies (mostly through right of first refusal).

I have always wondered why there are not more co-ops being built. I think it because most people don't know much about them. You could completely side step the race issue and stay under the radar if the cooperative limited membership to certain religions (Christian) and lawfully married couples if they have children (this eliminates almost all black people as they almost never lawfully marry). You could require that the men provide character references and limit stock sales to persons without certain criminal backgrounds. For example you could prohibit anyone convicted of a drug offense (again you are tackling the race issue without upsetting the ACLU who will publicize your co-op and even if it is legal get your property destroyed or stigmatize everyone who want to live there.)

Anyone know any housing developers? Buy up land and incorporate as a co-op. Done and done you have your ethnic enclave.

Agnes Day said...

Whiskey and Zenster:

I wonder about the IQ of the Chinese. Who has really been tested? Were the tests only on city dwellers, or were the poor peasants in the countryside tested as well? We could be seeing a selection effect if only one group has been tested.

Also, you may have read this article: http://lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft2.htm

His revision of his "smart fraction" theory was sparked by an email I wrote him suggesting a bifurcation in the Northeast Asian IQs. Subtracting 4-6 points from their IQs puts them equal to or slightly below whites.

Of course our own national IQ will only go down if the brown flood from Mexico is not stopped and reversed.

Maidmarian said...

Yeah, my professor went into a rant the other day about how race doesnt exist. He said the differences stop at skin color, and any anthropologist will tell you that. I was thinking, then how do they figure out the race of a murder victim who has rotted away to just a pile of bones? I couldnt say anything, lest I fail.

Jay in DC said...

My hero for tonight- Bogolyubski
And anyone else that realized the brilliance of Lovecraft. "On Niggers", is poetry. Only Cthulhu could spawn entities so primal and destrcutive.

Again, and some here will hate me for this. Westerners, you are chained to this. It is your inescapable fate. Take the three sub-human wildebeasts featured primarily in this video to a few places, let us posit for fun; Ukraine, Belarus, Russia. They would be taken into an alley. Shanked in the neck, and bled out like chickens. No one would care. Such is the fate of the 'groid in these places. You Westerners brought this on yourself. Learn Russian, Learn Chinese, or disintegrate in the horde. Those are your options.

90404 said...

'Yes, at Music Midtown, a black father with a 2-3 year old daughter on his shoulders wanted to fight me... over a complete misunderstanding'
so what else is new???

Folks, those gals JUST AINT COLLEGE MATERIAL!

Maidmarian said...

Years ago, and friend and I were walking home from school when a car sped by and almost hit us. My friend yelled 'slow down'. The car stopped. The driver was white, but there was a black female passenger. The black got out, walked up to my friend and slapped her across the face. She then pointed her finger right up to her nose and cursed her. This was in broad daylight on a busy street. nobody came to our rescue. thank goodness we weren't killed.

Anonymous said...

Tribal warfare!!

Anonymous said...

They really don't know how to throw a punch, do they? We should probably be grateful they don't study martial arts. They also Can't Speak English at all. Can anyone make out what this dust-up is all about? - not that we care, but just out of curiosity.

General impression: Different species. Avoid at all cost.

Anonymous said...

You have hit on THE central legal change that will have to occur. But it should not be framed in racial terms, whatsoever-- it should be part of a broader, libertarian, property rights push.

For a philosophical foundation, I recommend reading and considering Hans-Hermann Hoppe, particularly his "Democracy: The God that Failed."

Anonymous said...

Being black is sort of like playing "The Game" (sorry to all those who just lost) - in The Game, thinking about The Game makes you lose The Game, while Being Black make you lose the game of life, just by virtue of Being Black.

Jay Santos said...

Ni123 said...
Sorry, forgot to introduce myself.
Hi. I am one of those who woke up over night.


At least your eyes are now open. Welcome! Now, get busy tearing BRA down, every last evil part of it.

Anonymous said...

"Please don't write anything about "chimpouts" or "TNB"... it won't get posted and you're wasting your time".

Why not? You are making one of the biggest, if not the biggest, mistakes made by our race, namely, being polite to one's enemy.

Make no mistake, blacks are our enemy.

We need strong emotional phrases such as "chimpout" and "TNB" state in the strongest terms possible our distaste for their improper behavior.

As one poster said, you blog, your rules. Perhaps you are of the opinion that using such terms brings us down to their level. Well, sometimes you have to fight your enemy on their turf.

Semantically, as well as physically, one should never bring a knife to a gun fight.

To the Devil with these savages, and to the Devil with being polite to them or when talking about them.

blanc de seine saint denis said...

hello, i'm french and i read these articles since 2 months. Il discover this blog by reading "the white flight on google". In fact in france, the white flight is now a reality since 15 years. White people like me go to 40 kls to paris because the suburbs (5 to 20Kms) are full of arabican and africans. So i discover that in US you live this since the 70's and detroit 's riots. In france we get the 2005 en 2007 riots and it was like a civil wars. So i would be happy to discuss with US people to tell you that i think the situation is worse in france (especially in paris and marseille) than in the US for these reasons :
- france is 60 M people with at less 10M of arabs and africans (so15% of the opultaion)
- france is less larger country than US so its more easy to contaminate
- french white who are victims of racism can't tell anything otherwise they look like hitler. In fact white people in suburbs are attacked but cant say anythings because journalists, justice and politicians are "bobos" (=liberals for yours...). They think african and arabs have the right to set their culture and way of life and attack people because one part "we" colonize them and second part we bring them to france for working bad jobs. So africans and arabs impose islam way of life (hallal, polygamy with rap...)In US you dont have islamization...in france we have racism and islamization on a smaller country and liberals defend them. So dont be surprised if Marine LE PEN (the ron paul french) has 25% on the next election.

bubo said...

People should familiarize themselves with the unimaginable savagery committed by blacks during the Miami riots of 1980. They were pulling white people, kids out of cars and bashing their heads in with concrete blocks. Google has some cached newspapers from that event.

That was before the media decided it's sole mission is to keep blacks in a state of homicidal rage. It will be even worse this time around.

This is a good write-up taken from Lawrence Auster's blog.

“The negroes in Miami were outraged because four hardworking policemen were found innocent by a jury. At 9:30 p.m. on the first night of the riot, three whites, Charles Barreca, 15, Robert Owens, 15, and Benny Higdon, 21, were dragged from their car and beaten to death by a mob of negroes (New York Times). “Nearly three hours later, a body believed to be a Hispanic man was found on a street in the riot area, mutilated beyond identification.” (New York Times) “Around 3 o’clock yesterday morning, Emilio Munoz, a 66-year-old butcher returning home from his nighttime job, was burned to death by blacks who stopped his car and set it ablaze.” (New York Times) “The violence in Miami has its special horrors. The race riots of a decade ago familiarized us with the basics—arson, looting, sniping and killing. But Miami had atrocities, the kind of savagery that occurred in the Congo when the blacks fell on their colonial oppressors. The body of a white man, one of two who had been beaten unconscious, was run over by a car, three times, while onlookers cheered”

Mr. Rational said...

Anonymous @ 10:24 AM: http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/apr/01/knoxville-stands-together-for-justice/

That comment thread is begging for the race-realists to post evidence to refute the "incomprehensible" claim.  I was able to get my 2¢ in using BugMeNot for an account.

Midwestern said...

I wonder if there has been any attention paid to the ways in which whites can suffer from a form of PTSD after having to live around blacks for a period of time. Since learning to "see" over a period of about ten years, I have experienced the following symptoms:

Dread, panic, watching out my windows as I enter a room, scanning my property before turning off my car in the driveway, very violent dreams, not staying out late, hopelessness, a feeling that things are out of control, fear, a reduced desire to have nice things, emotional exhaustion, distrust, hate, self-doubt, depression, preoccupation, bouts of weeping, and a great sense of loss of nothing in particular.

Also, I have noticed that while living in a large urban city with about a 35% black population, I have changed many of my behaviors. I now bank online, drive my car less, watch more online movies and DVDs in order to avoid movie theaters, make friends and find support online instead of through personal interactions, feel less inclined to help blacks through charities like hunger programs and tutoring and United Way, smile less to strangers, shop less, or drive out of my way to shop with more expensive boutique style restaurants and shops in order to avoid blacks. If I walk in and see more than 5 blacks in a place, I leave immediately.

I wonder if these feelings and behaviors can be tracked and measured scientifically. This may explain why whites are not standing their ground with blacks. The energy of blacks is like kryptonite to whites. We suffer greatly in their presence...anyone else experiencing this?

Anonymous said...

I see blacks have got those hair extensions glued on pretty well now. In the earlier videos of black pack attacks the hair extensions were all over the floor but now the hair extensions hold on pretty well. Probably hair extension fight proof.

Everyone is afraid of a race war that the blacks are calling for. There's more of us than there are of them. As Phil Sheridan said, "They want war. We'll give'em war." There is absolutely no reason why Whites should stand by idly while blacks are killing Whites. Obama wants a race war so he can declare martial law and cancel the election, but we'll burn that bridge after we cross it.

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Anon at 4/14 6:48pm said, "that the free ride that this kind of behavior has been given will, bit by bit, come to a violent end."

The free ride was offered as a carrot by the government to end the violence of the 60s. Free school lunches, for example, started with the Black Panther party. By creating the nanny state, you create dependency on the government and, in the minds of the geniuses of the day, reduce violence against it. Well...that didn't work.

My point is that there may be a disinclination by the government to alter the plan, as they may fear it being a catalyst for more violence. I don't know if we can stop it either way.

Edwood said...


I wonder if these feelings and behaviors can be tracked and measured scientifically. This may explain why whites are not standing their ground with blacks. The energy of blacks is like kryptonite to whites. We suffer greatly in their presence...anyone else experiencing this?


I experienced the same thing. I lived in Dallas in a nice neighborhood, surrounded by section 8 apartments. More than once I was awakened by police helicopters shining search lights down into my neighborhood. My kids experienced "diversity" in their school.

Midwestern, I know you want to stand your ground in your neighborhood, but what will be the personal cost to you? For us it was too high. The solution was for us to move. We moved to a far away suburb (we don't commute because my DH got a job in said suburb). This suburb is 40 miles from Dallas and unlikely to ever attach to the DART system. It isn't completely diversity free, but it mostly is. The cashiers at Walmart are friendly and people wave and smile here. It took a while for me to thaw out and smile back. Diversity makes people antisocial--there was a Time magazine article about it a while back, I can't remember when. I think you will be happier if you move.

You asked if the feelings and behaviors could be measured scientifically, and I would say that chronic stress (which is the worst kind because of the constantly elevated cortisol)can definitely be measured and will show itself on lab tests as elevated cholesterol (as a sign of inflammation), less clear-thinking, weight loss or gain, trouble sleeping or wanting to sleep all the time, and in general all other kinds of health problems. Go to your doctor and they will prescribe an SSRI for you since you are "depressed" or beta-blockers for your "anxiety".

My prescription for you would be to move to a suburb or rural town far from diversity (just look at the local school ethnic makeup, which you can almost always find on the school district website), spend lots of time in the sunshine looking at the green hills and trees around you, make new friends, shop in the friendly diversity-free shops, and feel yourself come back to life.

Midwestern said...

"I see blacks have got those hair extensions glued on pretty well now."

They glue it on, or sew it on with thread now. I saw a video at OD where a black girl first glued a dew cap to her head, then glued the hair extensions to the dew cap. It has to get pretty balmy under there, and I know they don't wash it often or at all.

Black women go through a lot to get white girl hair, paying thousands of dollars for products. Just go to YouTube and type in "invisible part". You will be amazed.

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA_8PvmhbS8

You will need a translator. Notice all the lip smacking and useless dialogue. Still entertaining.

The True Truth said...

************************
TO ZENSTER

Bogolyubski: BRA could not have been imposed upon this land by blacks.

Zenster response: A superb point which only serves to indicate how deeply self-hatred and self-loathing runs amongst Whites.

Your comment shows how deep YOUR hatred and loathing of White people runs, Zenster.

You speak of those White people who live in a Liberal bubble as if they are contemptible types to be treated with disdain and ridicule.

You speak of self-hate and self-loathing by White people as if acting so is a crime they have committed.

You conveniently leave out the fact that the only reason White people in America are Liberal, vote for Obama, support ever-increasing welfare handouts, etc., is because their emotions can so easily be manipulated. Empathetic feelings in White people are used to create guilt - a guilt that blinds them to the quasi-logical nature of the socio-political standpoints they are brain-washed into accepting as their own.

Do we deride a person who is so empathetic that evildoers who want nothing more than the downfall of American society as we know it are able to emotionally manipulate him/her into doing their bidding?? Absolutely not!

How can we condemn a person for being soft and empathetic!? These are superb, essential qualities for a human to possess. Thing that are evolutionarily frivolous, like 'empathy', are what separate us from animals. (Of course, there has been an evolutionary advantage to empathy and community-mindedness at various stages of the speciation of humans - but let's leave that aside for now.)

What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING. To be Liberal in America is to be a feeling, caring human, manipulated by outside forces.

So: not the horrible pariah-twit, rather the innocent bystander who deserves our sympathy and skillful de-brainwashing attentions.

The way you refer to White people, Zenster, brings me to wonder at the peculiar way in which you seem to subtly hint at their "otherness", as if you aren't one yourself. It being extremely unlikely, based on your cogency (which is hard to fake) that you are any race other than Asian and White, and finding your rash, reactionary, ruthless streak rather un-Asian-American, (not un-Asian, however - but that is a different discussion) I find myself in a quandary.

Not non-white.
Not Asian.
Not White in the strictest, European DNA way (seemingly).

What is left? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

A type of person with high intelligence, quasi-White identity in the USA but not ethno-religious White identity, affected by anti-White bias and pro-Black socio-political movements due to that aforementioned quasi-White identity......

Again: anyone got any suggestions?

I am, of course, being facetious, but then acting as such always seems to go down better than forthright truth. Spoonful of sugar and all that.

April 14, 2012 2:45 PM

Midwestern said...

Before a fight, the black girls at my urban high school (1985) would remove all wigs and earrings and take their shoes off. They respectfully took time to do this before they got busy. There was always an effort to do facial damage.

The clothing all fell off eventually, exposing body parts and butt cracks. There were no weaves back then, sometimes clip on wigs, but the ones with pressed out hair would look like chickens at the end. Their hair was always standing straight up on their heads as they sat in the Dean's office after the fight.

The black girls carried box cutters in their pockets and always threatened to "cut you". I remember one girl had her cheek sliced open and had to have it closed with a track of stitches.

Anonymous said...

TO: "Midwestern", on April 15, 2012 6:36 AM...


YES.
We have all experienced that same set of feelings as you. You have pinpointed and encapsulated so perfectly in your comment, the extreme mental pressure of living around genetically (and thus culturally) foreign humans. It happens all over the world, except between South-East Asians and Europeans.

Your comment is superb.
Copy and paste it to Word and save it for the future, when spot-on factoids, questions, ponderings and reflections on various experiences will come in handy for you or for our movement.

Anonymous said...

I saw this comment somewhere and thought I'd pass it along:

"If blacks are eventually accomodated and get the race war that they want, it will be lights out for [BRA].

At 12% of a population of 330,000,000 that means there are about 40,000,000 blacks. Now suppose that they are incredibly gifted war machines and are able to eliminate their enemy (us) at a rate five times greater than whites can eliminate them. That would mean when the dust settles there would be 200,000,000 whites dead, 40,000,000 blacks dead and 90,000,000 whites remaining to inherit a black-free United States. Of course, I hope that they will find a way to pick their own damn cotton."

D J said...

MaidMarian said: "Years ago, and friend and I were walking home from school when a car sped by and almost hit us. My friend yelled 'slow down'. The car stopped. The driver was white, but there was a black female passenger. The black got out, walked up to my friend and slapped her across the face. She then pointed her finger right up to her nose and cursed her. This was in broad daylight on a busy street. nobody came to our rescue. thank goodness we weren't killed."

I was discussing such incidents on line with a good friend. He asked me if perhaps the time has arrived to smack back, HARD, and enough to get them down and curled up. Then say "You DARE do this to ME? You need to remember your place, girl!"

Is that time coming? I believe it might be.

Ni123 said...

Jay Santos said...

"At least your eyes are now open. Welcome! Now, get busy tearing BRA down, every last evil part of it."

Thanks for welcome. My husband learned about TNB the hard way - he is originally from Philly. When I was thinking about getting a job in our local black university he was saying that I was crazy. Funny but I did not believe him :) I know better now.

Anonymous said...

I think liberal whites hate the "wrong kind of whites." Or the rednecks, crackers, honkeys. Most white elites are only a single generation from the rednecks.

My mother, for example is liberal, and has always hated the "fat white good old boys club." She hates NASCAR and anything associated with southern white culture. She sees herself as one of the "good ones". She is the first of her blue-collar family to be college educated and feels that she has gotten the hell out. Her parents all smoked cigarettes, drank, listened to Johnny Cash and played poker. They came from farmers. My grandfather owned a string of Texaco service stations in the Midwest. They were from Alabama. My father was from the same type of white family, but he was a backwards redneck and she divorced him and despises him to this day.

I believe that she is suffering from white self-hatred. She is not even very sympathetic to blacks or other minorities, just hates toothless white people and works very hard to avoid being one. I have a first cousin who was educated at Brown. He is late 30s, an elitist snob, lives in a safe Whitopia, and avoids minorities like the plague. He would not tolerate a negro joke, but is the first to tell a redneck or a blonde joke, poking fun at poor trash whites, and feels very good about himself compared to those dirty white slack jaws. He is ashamed of his heritage.

Check out Cambria Will Not Yield.

I think that many whites would love to see great harm come to the "other white people" once the unleash the angry black troops on us. That is why I loathe DWLs. They have evil intent, and it is nothing close to "a feeling, caring human, manipulated by outside forces." He even cackles and licks his chops when he talks about white trash.

Midwestern said...

Passover Syndrome

http://takimag.com/article/diagnosing_passover_syndrome_among_white_liberals#axzz1s7hBm5h3

D J said...

Midwestern said...
"I wonder if there has been any attention paid to the ways in which whites can suffer from a form of PTSD..."

Midwestern, you are not alone. I do not feel all of the things you list, but I certainly feel most of them. And though I live in Birmingham AL, I am fortunate enough to reside in a mostly non-black area. As luck would have it, I have a baggy-shorts-and-tank-top living upstairs now. Noisy, crude language, and The Stare.

I recently became, at my advanced age, a first-time firearms owner. For reasons not to be discussed here, I have avoided it, but now realize that I must be armed. That as the summer approaches, I will need to travel with a firearm in my vehicle at all times.

In short, we are living in South Africa now.

R Neville said...

You have described the symptoms I suffer from as well. I have told friends I suffer from PTSD from living in the city. I would also add having arguments with loved ones more regularily--aka--- increased domestic dysfunction.
I believe Paul covered something similiar to this as "Negro fatigue syndrome". For those of us constantly exposed to urban blacks, I too susribe to the PTSD aspect.

Ivan Shatov said...

"Obama wants a race war so he can declare martial law and cancel the election, but we'll burn that bridge after we cross it."

Bingo. NOW, you can see. The groids are being whipped into a frenzy for precisely this purpose. The groids are the stormtroopers of the radicalized left, the lords of international usury.

This blog and its participants are gradually beginning to apprehend the malevolent design behind that creature known as Obama.

Anonymous said...

What do these two videos have in common?

Old Spice commercial where a muscled black guy denuded and humiliates a white boy:

http://youtu.be/IUlCYWINAwQ

Baltimore Incident where black thugs knock out a white boy and stripped him, leaving him naked:

http://youtu.be/LIsPBqAQ2qk

------------

Liberals decry how Nazis presented the 'Aryans' as muscled, noble, and manly while presenting Jews as subhuman, wimpy, and sickly. But now, the advertising industry--run by liberal elites--show the Negro as the Neo-Aryan ubermensch while the white boy is presented as the faggoty, dorky, and contemptible subhuman who's only purpose in life is to be humiliated by the racially/sexually superior Negro.

Liberals want all white boys to be castrated and all white women to surrender to the racial superman Negroes. THAT was the main reason for the liberal support of Obama. Funny how history repeats itself with Liberals as the New Goebbels. Though liberals officially say there are no racial differences, the message of commercials, sports, porn, and etc are that black males are the racial-sexual superior of wimpy white males. It is to emasculate whites males and to turn white women into Negro-worshiping sex slaves.

Anonymous said...

This is going to discriminate against older white folks who rely on family, public transportation, retirement home vans, etc to get there.

A checking account. There's a reason that the usurious check cashing places thrive in the ghetto. People are either too dumb to get a checking account or are wanted for child support, warrants or whatever and can't make a paper trail.

Anonymous said...

Lefties like me always take note of that. A simple duck and step to the left and a solid left hook, right uppercut would send most of these morons to the canvas (or greasy, filthy fast food joint floor). The average black male or female are nothing to fear on their own. That's why they hunt in packs.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/14, 2012 6:48 PM): I have a feeling though, consistent with the realization expressed in some of the comments above, that as things get tighter economically all over the world, as things get more competitive, that the free ride that this kind of behavior has been given will, bit by bit, come to a violent end.

Welcome to the world of "unhappy ending" that both Blacks and Muslims have tattooed upon their respective foreheads. Neither of them is dedicating anywhere near the necessary resources towards getting the f%&k along with other groups so that those other cultures don't join ranks and exterminate the both and be done with it.

The contempt shown here, to the people trying to earn a living and maintain a business, will sooner rather than later, be met with an equivalent response.

I believe some Korean Los Angelenos already proved that point.

The idiots who gleefully asked over and over: 'didja get dat?', will have a lot more to worry about than producing more 'funny videos'.

They do already, in that their miserable existence holds so little promise. They're just to damn dumb to understand it.

Anonymous said...

Reading the comments on WSHH, it's pretty clear that at least the majority of black folks intelligent enough to use a computer are as tired of this shit as we are. That made me feel a little better, but the complete lack of anyone else stepping in to break up the fight confirms that they're just as cowardly dealing with the issue as most white folks are. Did you see how big some of those dudes were? They just let that little dude get beat on while 6 of their women humiliated themselves. Disgusting.

Anonymous said...

In my own humble experience, large angry black women are scarier and more quick to attack than black men. I'm not sure why. I think they wish to "out-boy" the boys, so to speak. Because they are weaker than black males, they adopt a more aggressive stance. They also have more of a tendancy to be "crazy violent" and lash out wildly. Has anyone else noticed this, or perhaps I'm mistaken?

I've often wondered why white people put up with the more absurd of black peoples' complaints. An entire boardroom of fairly well educated white people said nary a word when a black politician (I think) complained about the use of the term "black hole" to describe government programs. My uncle set me right: It's the implicit, yet palpable threat of violence first and immediately, that most intelligent white people sense. Then, with future oriented cognition, the possbility of economic sanctions, job loss, career destruction for not bowing to the "wisdom" of diversity.

In my personal experience, it's also the sheer pointlessness of arguing with a stupid person. I once had a discussion with a black woman in her mid 30's about inflation. We were receiving Bush's ill-advised stimulus checks. She hadn't received hers yet and stated, with complete conviction, that we got ours before she got hers because she's black. How to argue with such stupidity? Well, to continue. She said she intended to keep her money in her dresser drawer. I, stupidly, decided to explain to her the benefit of putting it into a bank account where her money would not lose its value as quickly, due to interest making up in some small way for inflation. I gave up explaining to this woman, who was a nurse, what inflation was. She was starting to feel stupid. She said to me "I understand, taxes." I tried to explain how taxes aren't inflation. I gave up. She was becoming angry.

It's easier just to ignore what they say, if you can. It's pearls before swine otherwise, if you're lucky. If you're unlucky, it could be a right to the jaw or unemployment, or both. Remember a racist is worse than a murderer in topsy-turvy America.

Thank you for reading this admittedly long post.

To French guy or girl. Please continue contributing. I found your on-the-ground report very illuminating. I would love to live in France. I wish you the best of luck.

Anonymous said...

Rats with weaves.

Anonymous said...

"What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING. To be Liberal in America is to be a feeling, caring human, manipulated by outside forces."
The inherent moral wrong is that if they do not protect their conscientiousness it will be selected out, and not just by black violence. Conscientiousness doesn't just exist, or else everyone would have it. It had to be carefully cultivated, and it will disappear in the environment it has been thrust into left to itself.

"Why not? You are making one of the biggest, if not the biggest, mistakes made by our race, namely, being polite to one's enemy."
You have no idea how easy it is to roll ones eyes at such language alone, and in doing so utterly discount the message one is trying to convey.

Anonymous said...

@ D.J.

I am in the same process as you. I've never owned a firearm and am about to get the training.

Big difference between here and South Afica: a law-abiding citizen must jump through multiple hoops to get a gun and to keep it. I'm glad I live here.

Zenster said...

Survivor: No, it's clear that many black people see this as natural and normal. Nobody makes the slightest move to get off camera or prevent the filming.

What's really missing, save (perhaps) for the efforts of that one young buck, is intervention. No one else is making any attempt to stop some serious violence in the form of head kicks and stomping.

There is also a distinct sense that most everyone involved, including the brawlers, regards this as some sort of entertainment. Imagine what their version of American Idol would look like.

Kylie said...

Eustace Mullins: "It just occurred to me. They surely were behaving like this back during segregation."

No, they didn't. They were afraid to. Did you watch that video Paul posted of the black females fighting at the St. Louis Community College at Meramec? In the late 50's and early 60's, I grew up just over a mile from there, mear Meacham Park, a poor black neighborhood. True, the cops got called to Meacham Park fairly often (as opposed to our quiet white neighborhood where the cops were seldom if ever called). But when blacks were off their own turf, that is, out of strictly black neighborhoods, they were mostly very polite. Our proximity to them did not mean we were not safe. I remember as a kid hearing about the cops having to be called to Meacham Park for various disturbances. (Once my parents called because we heard gunshots late at night.) But not one of these altercations ever involved a white person. Meacham Park was run-down and shabby but living near it was not risky for whites.

Those whites my age and younger mostly grew up thinking Jim Crow was a needless and cruel way for bigoted whites to keep blacks down. Now those of us who can see know better. Back during segregation, blacks were well-behaved in public not because they tend to be polite and respectful of public spaces but because they were afraid not to be. Of course, since they were mostly well-behaved, liberals called for an end to Jim Crow. It's similar to when some lib says a convict should be released from prison early becaues he's a "model prisoner". Few stop to think that if a convict is a model prisoner, then prison is exactly where he should be.

SwampThizzle said...

Paul posts a video of extreme black misbehavior but we're aren't allowed to call it what it is... because that would be raysizzum?! Sometimes you need to call a spade a spade.

Anonymous said...

Zimerman lives!!!

Eustace Mullins said...

The True Truth:

You nailed it, sir, while coloring inside the lines and not getting censored! Nice work!

I'd given Zen the benefit of the doubt he wasn't a neocon when someone called him out.

I enjoy some of his contributions. It's hard not to notice his attempts to steer the conversation to eeeeeevil muslim terrorists that are responsible for 9/11 and all these peace wars.

That, coupled with the frequency he posts(almost like it's a job), his disdain for whites(our 'lesser bretheren'), gives me pause.

Agnes Day said...

Midwestern said:

"I wonder if there has been any attention paid to the ways in which whites can suffer from a form of PTSD after having to live around blacks for a period of time. Since learning to "see" over a period of about ten years, I have experienced the following symptoms:

Dread, panic, watching out my windows as I enter a room, scanning my property before turning off my car in the driveway, very violent dreams, not staying out late, hopelessness, a feeling that things are out of control, fear, a reduced desire to have nice things, emotional exhaustion, distrust, hate, self-doubt, depression, preoccupation, bouts of weeping, and a great sense of loss of nothing in particular."

There's nothing wrong with you. Your feelings are appropriate to the situation we are in.

Many of us are hoping the election will enable us to turn things around. But we recently passed the 100th year since the Titanic went down. James Cameron has great new CGI of the event. The scene of the bow beginning to sink into the water was particularly striking to me, because that ship could represent the US, or even the Western world. We're going down. Our ship of state was built with substandard materials and driven recklessly. The hubris that said the Titanic was unsinkable and that the US can spend and grow without limit and take in an infinite number of non-European aliens and remain the same, is the same. Replacing the Captain and crew with more conservative ones, now that we've struck the ice berg, won't do any good. The damage is irreversible. There is no way to save it. A cataclysm is inevitable. Our only hope, as individuals, is to get to a life boat as fast as possible.

Zenster said...

The True Truth: Your comment shows how deep YOUR hatred and loathing of White people runs, Zenster.

Aw jeez, not this sh!t, again.

You speak of those White people who live in a Liberal bubble as if they are contemptible types to be treated with disdain and ridicule.

Few things are more ridiculous than being willfully blind with regard to exactly which race built Western civilization. No amount of media lies should be able to fog that mirror. Liberals who buy into how minorities helped build America are voluntarily participating in their own eRace and it is a contemptible act.

You speak of self-hate and self-loathing by White people as if acting so is a crime they have committed.

The inability to sense or detect cognitive dissonance at the high levels required to enact self-hate and self-loathing essentially is a crime against one's own humanity.

You conveniently leave out the fact that the only reason White people in America are Liberal, vote for Obama, support ever-increasing welfare handouts, etc., is because their emotions can so easily be manipulated.

So, it's all right to bash Blacks about their refusal to take personal responsibility but just fine to let Whites off the hook for being bleeding heart morons over BRA (Black-Run America)?

Empathetic feelings in White people are used to create guilt - a guilt that blinds them to the quasi-logical nature of the socio-political standpoints they are brain-washed into accepting as their own.

Tolerating the intolerable is not a desirable quality. I never thought that, in my lifetime, I would be quoting Barry Goldwater, but stranger things have happened.

"I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."

The moderation that has happened in our society's pursuit of justice has, with special thanks to Eric "my people" Holder, become an obscenity. Those who are unable or unwilling to perceive this are rapidly becoming complicit in this abortion of justice. Thank goodness for the Zimmerman incident and how it ripped the mask off of White-hating American media.

Do we deride a person who is so empathetic that evildoers who want nothing more than the downfall of American society as we know it are able to emotionally manipulate him/her into doing their bidding??

No, we wake them up. Just as so many here at SBPDL are seeking to do. If they abjectly refuse to snap out of their slumber, then we deride.

Absolutely not!

Feel free to abstain from any derision of those who richly deserve it. I, for one, shall not deny myself that soupçon of consoling entertainment.

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

How can we condemn a person for being soft and empathetic!?

Please explain how "being soft and empathetic" won two World Wars. If you need a more explicit example of "being soft and empathetic" taken to extremes, please try this on for size:

From an article by Fjordman at Gates of Vienna

In the book Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn’t , Robert Spencer quotes “Rachel,” a white American student, who spoke these words to American Indian professor Dr. David Yeagley in 2001: “Look, Dr. Yeagley, I don’t see anything about my culture to be proud of. It’s all nothing. My race is just nothing.... Look at your culture. Look at American Indian tradition. Now I think that’s really great. You have something to be proud of. My culture is nothing.”

As Yeagley observed, “The Cheyenne people have a saying: A nation is never conquered until the hearts of its women are on the ground… When Rachel denounced her people, she did it with the serene self-confidence of a High Priestess reciting a liturgy. She said it without fear of criticism or censure. And she received none. The other students listened in silence, their eyes moving timidly back and forth between me and Rachel, as if unsure which of us constituted a higher authority… Who had conquered Rachel’s people? What had led her to disrespect them? Why did she behave like a woman of a defeated tribe?”
[emphasis added]

That is not just "being soft and empathetic", it is being suicidal and this is what must be challenged at every turn. If no shame is felt by those who profess such idiocy, then ridicule is the mildest of treatments they deserve to experience.

These are superb, essential qualities for a human to possess.

Not in that measure they aren't and, yet, this is the hemlock being sloshed out and unhesitatingly chugged down at many institutions of higher learning.

Thing that are evolutionarily frivolous, like 'empathy', are what separate us from animals. (Of course, there has been an evolutionary advantage to empathy and community-mindedness at various stages of the speciation of humans - but let's leave that aside for now.)

No, let's not "leave that aside for now". Evolution demands survival of the fittest and an inability to override empathy in the face of a basic threat to survival gets you tossed out of the gene pool.

What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING.

At the end of your comment, you mention "being facetious", yet not all of your statements fall in line with such a claim.

To be Liberal in America is to be a feeling, caring human, manipulated by outside forces.

Again, where does personal responsibility enter into this. Or shall we, as with Blacks and Muslims, subject Liberals as well to the soft bigotry of lowered expectations?

[to be continued]

Zenster said...

So: not the horrible pariah-twit, rather the innocent bystander who deserves our sympathy and skillful de-brainwashing attentions.

Which is why, with Paul's gracious assent, I publish full length articles here at SBPDL. What are you doing about it?

The way you refer to White people, Zenster, brings me to wonder at the peculiar way in which you seem to subtly hint at their "otherness", as if you aren't one yourself.

Now do you see why I get the feeling that your claim of "being facetious" rings hollow? You are posing this as a serious speculation. That does not remotely qualify as "being facetious".

It being extremely unlikely, based on your cogency (which is hard to fake) that you are any race other than Asian and White, and finding your rash, reactionary, ruthless streak rather un-Asian-American, (not un-Asian, however - but that is a different discussion) I find myself in a quandary.

Again, that sure as hell doesn't sound like you're "being facetious".

Not non-white.
Not Asian.
Not White in the strictest, European DNA way (seemingly).

What is left? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?


Piss off.

A type of person with high intelligence, quasi-White identity in the USA but not ethno-religious White identity, affected by anti-White bias and pro-Black socio-political movements due to that aforementioned quasi-White identity......

[points towards "Rachel" in Dr. Yeagley's class]

Again: anyone got any suggestions?

I provide them on a regular basis. Do you?

I am, of course, being facetious, but then acting as such always seems to go down better than forthright truth. Spoonful of sugar and all that.

Nice attempt to suddenly duck under the radar after crapping on the carpet. However, it doesn't cut any ice with me.

Zenster said...

Midwestern: I wonder if there has been any attention paid to the ways in which whites can suffer from a form of PTSD after having to live around blacks for a period of time.

If there is, it certainly isn't enough. My heart goes out to you, Midwestern. On the past I, too, once had to live around Blacks and witness, first hand, the trail of destruction and wreckage they leave nearly everywhere they go.

It is a (not-so) "hidden cost" that Blacks exact upon all around them by reducing the overall quality of life for everyone, including themselves. I certainly hope that participating here at SBPDL is able to give you a modicum of surcease.

Zenster said...

Ivan Shatov: This blog and its participants are gradually beginning to apprehend the malevolent design behind that creature known as Obama.

It's been more than apparent to many of us for some time now. However, the Zimmerman case really ripped the mask from White-hating American media. Whether you sympathize with Zimmerman or not, he is being martyred by BRA and Whites would do well to pay very close attention.

blanc de seine saint denis said...

In US you have black people who are in US since 1650 and have white blood. IN france, we have pure african islamized and who do 8 children (senegal, mali, ivory coast...) who are in france since 30 years...imagine the differences between your blacks and ours...our football team was black ->fiasco in south africa. Our schools are blacks and arabis->france is nos 29th on 45 in OCDE...and the worst is that the next generation they will be more than white...i give celtic surnames to my children to go to australia, irland, scotland, pittsburgh, portland, new zealand...but dont go in france, especially in paris...the airport is full black, the principal station too...

blanc de seine saint denis said...

To anonymous..i'm french guy, so you want to live in france. So if you want to live in paris you must earn 5000 euros (7000 dolars) to live in centre of paris where there is no blacks ni arabs (only qataris who are very rich). If you dont earn this, go to live in bordeaux or strasboug but all the other big cities are contamined, the worst ara paris and marseille. The best is to go in cdentre of france in towns of 15000 people max...

Anonymous said...

Sadly, the same people who are trying to convince us that black people are just like us also have an irrational fear of legal gun ownership. It's always the gun's fault because otherwise it would mean that the negro or illegal alien wielding it would be at fault in 90% of gun-related incidents. The only way you can explain away the violence without being raycisss is to blame an inanimate object. I wonder sometimes how these people dress themselves, let alone get elected to office.

Anonymous said...

"Why not? You are making one of the biggest, if not the biggest, mistakes made by our race, namely, being polite to one's enemy."

You have no idea how easy it is to roll ones eyes at such language alone, and in doing so utterly discount the message one is trying to convey.

Yeah, and Liberal idiots like you are an example of what I was saying.

Do you get a nosebleed every 28 days?

Anonymous said...

MY GOD

LOOK AT THIS GUY'S HEAD (in the link below, which is for a specific time in the video)

LOOKS LIKE HE HAS BEEN LOBOTOMISED!!!????

How can a human FUNCTION with a skull (and brain) shaped like that???

The distance from the back of his eye sockets to the back of his head IS LESS than the distance from the tip of his nose to the lobe of his ear! There isn't room for all the essential parts of the brain, surely!????

YouTube video

Zenster said...

blanc de seine saint denis: In fact white people in suburbs are attacked but cant say anythings because journalists, justice and politicians are "bobos" (=liberals for yours...).

For those who not acquainted with the situation in France, "bobo" refers to "bourgeois bohemian" and they are the Frankish equivalent of our politically correct multiculturalist Liberals.

Thank you, blanc de seine saint denis, for some international flavor. What you have described conforms exactly with everything my own reading and research has turned up about the situation in France. Even worse for you is that you end up with tons of Black Muslims. A combination that only takes on meaning when compared to, say, a rabid skunk.

I was in Lyon two years ago and enjoyed myself immensely. The supposed legendary French hostility to Yankees was no where in sight and everyone I encountered was very congenial.

Please continue to contribute updates on the situation over there.

Anonymous said...

"What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING."

LOL This is easily one of the most idiotic comments I've ever read in my life.

winston smith said...

The True Truth:

you nailed it sir!

W74 said...

You have described the symptoms I suffer from as well. I have told friends I suffer from PTSD from living in the city. I would also add having arguments with loved ones more regularily--aka--- increased domestic dysfunction.
I believe Paul covered something similiar to this as "Negro fatigue syndrome". For those of us constantly exposed to urban blacks, I too susribe to the PTSD aspect.


And here I thought my insanity came about due to Iraq, the utter absurdity of it, and the silliness of the people there (Man on a cell phone taking a shit in the middle of an intersection; Dirt floor houses, but with flat screen TVs in them, etc, etc. ABSURD! They aren't called "sand-ni66ers" without reason!).

No, moving back home to MD, and getting an apartment here has really woken me up to the BS. Blacks here are the same way, you'll have sheeboons jump out of an Escalade at a gas station and ask you for money. I get 36mpg and it's not my fault they bought an SUV for the price of 3 houses in the city. I just tell them I don't carry cash on me. I imagine their living situations are not too different, they probably have houses that are torn apart and strewn about with garbage, but flat screens and Xboxes in them too. Blacks are just as silly.

Growing up my town didn't have too many blacks (of course I grew up a liberal falsely believing that if you just gave people a chance....) and I attributed black problems to being individual faults. Oh how wrong I was.

Four years in the South was silly too. I swear I once had a bullet buzz by my car while driving down the road past a black trailer park. And this in the middle of a built up area by the base.

"1951" said...

@ blanc de seine saint denis:

Bienvenue à SBPDL! Ces paroles sont si bon entendre venant d'une personne Français. Bien que, je ne accepte pas certains les positions de Mme. le Pen, j'admire vraiment sa opposition contre le communisme, le socialisme et l'islamizacion de France. Mon cher epouse et moi aimons la France, et nous avons le intention d'acheter là une petite propriété dans la prouche avenir. J'espère que la France de l'avenir, il sera vraiment Française, pas l'avenir de «la Republique Islamique du Ferengistan».

S'il vous plaît pardonnez mon français mauvais. Merci.

"1951"

Anonymous said...

So I did a little research and apparently this is essentially a bratwurst vendor... but my question is this - the window appears to be covered in expanded-metal-mesh as a security grate and the proprietor appears to be talking into a microphone at the people fighting (some type of speaker system for taking orders?) I'm not trying to be facetious but is it normal for fast-food stores in America to be outfitted like a prison?

Anonymous said...

How can we condemn a person for being soft and empathetic!? These are superb, essential qualities for a human to possess. Thing that are evolutionarily frivolous, like 'empathy', are what separate us from animals.

You are half right, and half wrong.

What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING. To be Liberal in America is to be a feeling, caring human, manipulated by outside forces.

It is the empathetic impulse, arguably more widely developed in emotionally stable humans of higher intelligence (deeper emotional insight and development), that both creates stronger and more functional communities but also leaves a population vulnerable should they be persuaded into channeling the developed empathy away from their ethnic political group (family and extended community) and toward differing political-ethnic groups that are politically hostile to their groups survival and progress; groups who never reciprocate with the same brand of inter-group liberal 'empathy', only communist entitlement to usurp the other groups resources, culture, and institutions.

Your statement has us assume that liberals have the market cornered on human empathy, and that somehow they have more developed emotional cognition that allows them to 'love' and 'care' for other people in contrast to the lack of equivalent feelings and empathetic impulse in conservatives.

This assumption outs most liberals as both intellectual and political morons.

In fact, it is the liberal who ignorantly misuses his or her empathy, to the detriment of him/her and his/her family. It is a lack of understanding of the social morals that are the only method by which to produce true political power, a lack of understanding of the tribal political behavior that is antithetical to his/her interests and the survival of the west, a lack of understanding of community economics, and, in fact, a lack of understanding of liberalism itself that allows the average DWL to foolishly misappropriate his or her empathy toward his/her political enemy and against the survival interests of his or her ethnic group and their culture, values, heritage, institutions, and resources.

The average high school educated conservative (I'm not saying that conservatives are uneducated, but am just trying to illustrate a point) is a political genius compared to the average brain-washed college educated liberal, as they understand, at least on an instinctual level, the true nature of politics and why this isn't a game of equality, but a zero sum game of cultural and economic power. They understand that helping their group's political enemy hurts their family, and the heritage that their fathers worked so hard to build and preserve. They understand that ethnic groups act differently in terms of emotional impulse, group values, family values, community values, educational values. They understand that their heritage and group values are at least as valuable as that of other groups, if not more so due to their proven success in building this country as well as Europe, and are worth fighting for and preserving. They understand that what they give to other groups, especially in terms of non-meritocratic favoritism, takes something from the mouths of their children that don't get such favored non-meritocratic treatment in the education or employment spheres. They understand that their empathy is best spent on the interests of their children, their extended family, and their extended ethnic community. This is a deep empathy and love for those that mean the most to them (immediate family), for those that care the most for them and their survival, and for those that best represent the core values and who best execute the community behaviors that they hold dear.

...(cont'd)

Anonymous said...

(cont'd)...

So, you see, stating that 'empathy' is the mark of the liberal a simply stating that you, and the liberals that believe such tripe, are ignorant, myopic, brainwashed fools. Conservatives are plenty empathetic, but do not spend such empathy on the interests of alien groups that are antithetical to their group's, and by extension their family's, interests.

This politically traitorous behavior is what marks white liberals in this country, this misappropriation of empathy is the definition of a liberal in this country, and this is why liberals are to be loathed and their political influence avoided and suppressed whenever possible. It is their misuse of empathy, as a weapon against the interests, communities, and values of their political ethnic group that is the issue.

White liberals fail to see how their agenda is used as a weapon against their people; however, as they most often are under the false assumption that liberalism is about equality for all, rather than their recognizing its true nature as a winner-take-all war against the ethnic majority's interests and values.

EVERYTHING is inherently, morally wrong with being liberal in this country.

If you are a white liberal, your political influence is used as a weapon against the group that is comprised of your specific extended family, and the people that maintain and perpetrate your culture and heritage. Liberalism makes a value judgment, whether or not DWL's realize it, that the culture and interests of the racial minority are superior to and should be advanced against those of the racial majority.

If you are a minority liberal, your agenda and political influence is different than from a DWL. You are likely nationalist (conservative) as far as your inner group politics are concerned (in other words, your groups survival and progress is paramount to the survival of other groups, and the culture should thrive exclusive of outside influence), but extremely liberal in the politics external to your group. Your agenda would be to crate a culture of inter-group entitlement: to usurp the culture, institutions, and resources of the majority (the definition of liberalism), rather than to build such institutions and create such resources of your own merit.

So, you see, liberalism is war in which a value judgment is placed that marks the majority's interests as inferior to the minority's interests, it is not about empathy or co-existence. DWL's are agents against their own interests and the interests of their children, not empathetic good guys. Minority liberals are agents of cultural conquest and economic favoritism, whose end-goal is to supplant the majority, not to co-exist with it.

Survivor said...

No, it is not normal for fast food places to be outfitted like prisons. However, if you are in World Star Hip Hop parts of town, it is not at all unheard of for any business to be outfitted that way.

After all, you are in a prison of sorts.

Svigor said...

Restrictive Covenants must make a comeback (real estate agents would see huge dividends to a restoration of this legal concept on property and who it can be sold to)

I don't know about that. Real Estate agents make money from sales.

Under the social chaos of anarcho-tyranny, they can continually profit from "churn." One sale when Whites buy expensive homes, and anoter when Whites sell at a loss to escape the undertow, and another when White homosexuals move in to gentrify the area, and another when Whites buy it at a high price (now that gentrification is complete), rinse and repeat.

Same goes for construction. Builders make money once when YT buys an expensive home in a nice neighborhood, and again when he has to move and buy a new one in the 'burbs, then the sticks, etc.

"Churn" helps these people. They love the social chaos of anarcho-tyranny. And this is to say nothing of the "insider trading" they can get into, what with being hip to the scam.

As opposed to just once.

Svigor said...

The brawlers belong in jail.

Whiskey hates Freedom of Association, because it gores his ox.

He loves the idea of Police State big-government authoritarianism, because it gores our ox, not his.

Zenster said...

Kylie: Back during segregation, blacks were well-behaved in public not because they tend to be polite and respectful of public spaces but because they were afraid not to be.

Blacks are living confirmation of Caligula's favorite maxim:

Oderint dum metuant

"Let them hate so long as they fear."

It's similar to when some lib says a convict should be released from prison early becaues he's a "model prisoner". Few stop to think that if a convict is a model prisoner, then prison is exactly where he should be.

You're being waaaaay too logical!

Whiskey said...

I am cautiously optimistic that something can be done. If a population has a lot of low IQ people (and therefore impulsive, low inner restraints) the best thing is ...

A good deal of social repression. Not Jim Crow Segregation, but Victorian-style social repression:

*Don't get DRUNK. Ever.
*Don't brawl in the street. Ever.
*Don't steal, and don't tolerate those who do.
*Don't do drugs. Ever.
*Don't tolerate those who get drunk or high.
*Go to Church REGULARLY.
*Be scrupulously honest, every second of the day.
*Be polite to everyone.

These are things good for everyone, including elites. Add to them work hard ethic, get married and STAY MARRIED, etc. and you have the social elixir for reform.

Bonus points: SWPL love social reform, see Waiting for Superman, Bully, etc. A good dose of Victorianism for EVERYONE is just what the Body Politic Doctor ordered.

Zenster: yes, correct, China manipulates its currency, has many flaws, not the least of which is Red Princes and Aristocracy, no rule of law, and lots of dirt poor people. But it does at current pose a competitive threat and that threat is useful for getting people to do things they would otherwise fight over.

Zenster said...

blanc de seine saint: In US you have black people who are in US since 1650 and have white blood. IN france, we have pure african islamized and who do 8 children (senegal, mali, ivory coast...) who are in france since 30 years...imagine the differences between your blacks and ours

While I might argue that over 250 years of residence has not seen much in the way of successful domestication with respect to America's Black population, yours is the far greater madness. Not that America couldn't have landed on Mars by now, mind you, were it not for our own idiotic attempts at uplift. However, France's immigration policy has ZERO to do with minority uplift and everything to do with the most cynical political maneuvering imaginable.

European PCMC (Politically Correct Multi-Culturalism), in combination with much stricter gun control laws, has left most of its citizens stripped of all right to self-protection or even any realistic protest against the rising tide (i.e., tsunami) of Third World immigration. That those immigrants are just as often illiterate, barbaric, genital mutilating, jihadist savages is a plight I could not wish upon any European country.

I hope you understand how there is some lingering hostility in America towards France regarding your nation's opposition to our misguided invasion of Iraq (as with Afghanistan, an intensive drone and bombing campaign would have done quite fine, thank-you-very-much).

That said, it can only be a lead pipe cinch that your Muslim Black population is the most hellish invasion since the Nazis.

If you're unfamiliar with the "Eurabia Pact" by Bat Ye'or, I strongly suggest you investigate it. Her work will explain much of what you are witnessing today in la belle France.

Jack from OKC said...

I remember reading - unfortunately I don't remember where - that when the Europeans made first contact with sub-Saharan Africans they seriously debated whether the indigenous people were very low grade humans or very high grade animals. I opt for the first choice, bearing such members of W.E.B. Dubois' 'Talented Tenth' as Thomas Sowell and Larry Elder.

nameispointless said...

Paul, I have turned several family members onto this very fine forum; they are all defeated refugees from ever repressive, liberal HuffPo.
They are lurkers here, not posting yet, but it's a start. They are overjoyed, feeling at last, intelligent like-minded voices cry out in the b/s media wilderness.

Zenster said...

blanc de seine saint denis: If you dont earn this, go to live in Bordeaux or Strasboug but all the other big cities are contaminated, the worst are Paris and Marseille.

Again, this is entirely consistent with what I have read or researched about the Black Muslim infestation of modern France.

Please continue to contribute your comments. They present a altogether rare opportunity for Americans to realize how so many other Whites in this world have it far worse off. And not just those in the sub-Saharan African cess pits.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/15, 2012 1:49 PM): The only way you can explain away the violence without being raycisss is to blame an inanimate object. I wonder sometimes how these people dress themselves, let alone get elected to office.

[golf clap]

D J said...

Agnes Day: with due respect, what you wrote above is defeatest clap-trap and nothing more.

Period.
paragraph.
-30-
...- .-
finis

You are welcome to do nothing but despair. But, please, step to one side. Or, climb into that lifeboat; you are only in the way.

Some of us want to at least try to save this ship of state.

To continue with the ocean liner metaphor:

It may be a Christian helping the Jew hold the patch that the Indian will weld into place.

The American indian may be shoring up bulkheads with scrap timbers.

It may be the Chinese math major computing which bilges to pump to arrest the listing, the good ol' boy who knows engines keeping the generators going, while the Greek keeps the crew fed.

Yes, there was a hell of a lot of hubris with the Titanic. Lots of folks lost their lives. But if they had never tried what they did with the Titanic, we'd still be sailing walking-beam steamers with even less safety.

The Comet 1 (tinyurl.com/6qgjytp) blew up in mid-air at least twice. They found out why. They corrected it, and today, you virtually never hear of an airliner going down due to mechanical fault. (I believe the 777 has been in service since 1995, and over 1,000 have been built. NO lives have been lost in them, and the hull writeoffs have been due to pilot error or bad conditions).

Vlademir Zworykin and Francis Jenkins had the hubris to think he could send pictures through the air.

In short, the above-cited is because people TRIED.

Again: live with the despair. But the rest of us will at least give of our best. I truly believe we can get this turned around.

nameispointless said...

@Zenster & Blanc de Seine:
If you're unfamiliar with the "Eurabia Pact" by Bat Ye'or, I strongly suggest you investigate it.

Thanks, Zenster for the link.
Blanc, I double down on that suggestion. Check out the above.
I also wish to thank you for visiting this site, and encourage you to stay with us with your input from abroad. It is most welcome.
It is my fervent wish that Western Europe [and the USA] wake up to the disaster that awaits them if Islamic [and Third World] immigration continues at its present pace.
My x-husband's family all live in a white suburb of Hamburg, Germany. They have witnessed, since WW2, the gradual decimation of what was once a beautiful city, Hamburg, into neighborhood after neighborhood of crime infested high density projects housing Africans and Muslim wannabe terrorists on the dole. These are termed dangerous 'no-go' areas for whites.
As Germany's Chancellor said, "multiculturalism has not worked in Germany."

Californian said...

My uncle set me right: It's the implicit, yet palpable threat of violence first and immediately, that most intelligent white people sense.

Liberals are, generally, "foxes," people who are by nature manipulators, as opposed to the "lions," who live by force. When confronted with violence, liberals tend to equivocate and grant concessions, though dressing it up in ideological language about "justice" and "equality."

It can be argued that the DWL social programs of the 1960s and later were attempts to either divert the threat of violent uprisings from blacks, or craven capitulations. Think of these programs as a form of tribute, much as a civilized nation might give cartloads of silver to a barbarian tribe to keep them from invading (while rationalizing away the treasure lost as building a subsidized alliance).

This may be one reason that DWLs and the multicult in general does not criticize Islam. You would think that Islam, with its policies towards women and homosexuals, not to mention its combination of religion and state, as well as ongoing policies such as slavery and torture, might be the target of some DWL ire. But DWLs seem to be doing PR flak work for Muslims: consider how "Islamophobia" has become a new taboo in the Western world.

Muslims have proven willing to use a combination of terrorism, military posturing and urban rioting if they do not get their way. Are the high rates of sexual assault by Muslims against European women also involved here? Remember when that video clip of the Oslo police woman was bouncing about the internet, in which she claimed that since the perpetrators were coming from "traumatized" countries, they needed to be understood. Spoken as a true Eloi!

I also wonder if one reason that DWLs piled on against South Africa and Rhodesia is because those countries were no threat to the West. In fact, they were actually fighting for the West. So DWLs could push them around with sanctions and support for terroristic insurgents, letting others do the dirty work for them. It was the war of the foxes against the lions.

Anonymous said...

Tonight I turned on the T.V. and flipped through the channels. I came across a Toyota commercial where a White woman is talking about the safety features of the vehicles then she asks something like: "Are these really that important?" She answers in the affirmatie as a mulatto child appears in the scene and the woman kneels down and engages the child while some narrator takes over.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (4/15, 2012 3:02 PM):
"What is inherently, morally, wrong with being Liberal in America? NOTHING."

LOL This is easily one of the most idiotic comments I've ever read in my life.


I'm glad somebody else noticed that turd in the punchbowl.

Kylie said...

Midwestern: "I wonder if there has been any attention paid to the ways in which whites can suffer from a form of PTSD after having to live around blacks for a period of time. Since learning to "see" over a period of about ten years, I have experienced the following symptoms..."

I experienced many of the symptoms you list when I lived in a lower-income neighborhood that was probably 1/3 black. Sure, there were some trashy and even dangerous whites. But it was the blacks that made the area a hellhole. The needless squalor they caused and the constant stream of petty crimes they committed horrified me, even after I'd got used to it.

When I finally managed to get away to a 90% white, conservative area, I noticed the peace and quiet instantly. Also, the few blacks around were way more polite than what I was used to. But it wasn't till a couple of years later than I realized something: not only was my environment more peaceful--but so was I. I wasn't constantly on edge, constantly worried that some black would go off for a trivial reason or no reason at all, constantly irritated by having my stuff stolen by blacks (yes, I knew who stole it; no, there was no point in reporting it to the police), etc., etc., etc. I felt free as a bird and lighter than air. It was only then that I began to feel resentful that I, a law-abiding citizen and good neighbor, should have had to live among them. The longer I live in a white area with genuine civility and neighbhorliness, the more I resent the way the presence of most blacks degrades our country.

I do know how you, R Neville and others feel and I'm so sorry you have to go through this. It's hell on earth, isn't it?

Concerned Citizen said...

I disagree that attacking restrictive covenants and the right to refuse service was in support of freedom. It actually was an assault on freedom of association.

Under the current sociopolitical climate there is no way to bring back restrictive covenants and the right to refuse service. And if they do make a comeback then businesses will be smeared and boycotted.

However there's one powerful tool to keep blacks out of your neighborhood and that's gentrification. It's what's turning Harlem white.

An idea of making sterilization a requirement for welfare was thrown out there which is another good one. While it wouldn't keep blacks out of your neighborhoods it would thin their number. However making sterilization a requirement to receive welfare would create backlash. Therefore I think it would be better to pay them a certain sum of money to be sterilized.

In this day and age if you want to get rid of blacks you need to use stealth tactics. For now discretion is the better part of valor.

YIH said...

In a recent blog post Vox Day mentioned he had interviewed Derb: ''Now, I know Derb, I've read his articles, I've read his books, I've interviewed him, and I've exchanged email with him. He is a good, decent, and intelligent man.''
I didn't remember seeing it because it turns out that was because it hadn't been posted yet.
Now it has been.
Example; The thing that appears to have bothered your critics the most was the idea that one should not stop and offer assistance to a black individual in apparent distress. Obviously, you’re not a Christian, so barring any sort of Good Samaritan Christian duty, why do you think there’s been such a negative response to that particular piece of advice?
Read that answer and more there, but I'll simply repeat what I did yesterday: I see that point, but 'helping' doesn't have to mean face-to-face, who doesn't have a cell phone these days? If nothing else, pull over, keep the windows up, the doors locked and as Shatner said for years: ''Call rescue!...9!...1-1!''
If it's the real deal the cops are likely more capable of handling the situation anyway, and if it's not they are better suited for handling that situation as well.

R Neville said...

Funny you should mention politeness when blacks are out of their element Kylie. I was at a deli on the "Hill" for lunch a couple weeks ago. Three black males came in from the street department, adorned in the latest ghetto fashions. I have not witnessed such polite behavior from 3 young black males in many years. One guy accidently bumped into me a couple of times and I got "I'm sorry sir." each time!
Maybe it had something to do with all of large Italian men in the deli.
I beleive that the Ashtravon incident has begun to have an effect on interacial relations here in the Lou. At a grocery store this weekend, I noticed that no white people were checking out in ques attended by black female clerks. I do my best to avoid them, but it was obvious that others were doing the same thing.
Maybe it just me with my negro fatigue syndrome, but there seemed like there was more tension in the aisles when a couple of welfare mommas were getting their sugary drinks and little debbies. I saw most of the people try to avoid them; taking another aisle and doubling back.

Anonymous said...

If you were to do a careful statistical analysis of fatal robberies (clerk or storeowner shot dead) in West and North Philadelphia, for example, over the last 5 years, the numbers would be staggering. Employees/owners murdered even after giving the thugs all they had.
The reward that these hardworking immigrants get for persuing their American Dream is too often an early grave.
This has given rise to the 'cage' type of commercial establishment seen in this vid, where in order to protect themselves, all monetary transactions must take place behind a steel or plexiglass barricade. Undertow Commerce.


Whites in Philly, and Whites in other large mixed cites, have a private front row seat to the black on white (and black on Asian/Latino) violence that occurs so disproportionally, and with such regularity, that it should be demonized on the world stage as both a constant war of hate against other races and an intolerable burden to western society.

I say that it's a private seat because these crimes are very rarely publicized outside of the local news, and therefore we are almost completely unaware of these murders and rapes (the robberies are too numerous and common to even mention) outside of our individual local areas. However, if you live in a large city, just multiply what you see on the news by the number of similarly mixed areas throughout the country, and you can only guess what the number of interracial crimes is per year, in the USA. Seriously, someone should start a website for which central reporting of the known details of such crimes is its only function. We can then compare the crime between races, in detail and in accurate proportion. This way, whenever there is a Trayvon like incident that stirs the Africans, we can point to the detailed track record of consistently lopsided inter-racial murder in this country, and make everyone aware of who should truly be up in arms.

It makes me sick to think of the details of all of the black on white murders and rapes that have occurred in my city already this year, and how little attention they have gotten (none) outside of my local news that always attempted to occlude the race of the perpetrators (almost always unsuccessfully) whenever possible. It makes me sick when I compare these crimes to the national coverage of a single incident of a man, both accused of murder and falsely accused of being White, murdering a black boy - and possibly in self-defense.

Interracial crimes have to be made public, in detail, via a central database if people are going to wake up.

I'm bad at all things web-tech, but someone else more competent could make quick work of such a project.

YIH said...

@Zenster: ''There is also a distinct sense that most everyone involved, including the brawlers, regards this as some sort of entertainment. Imagine what their version of American Idol would look like.''
Who needs imagination? Just do a YouTube search :)

Anonymous said...

Could someone please explain to me the logic of calling an illegal from Haiti, for example, an African-American... Or African... Or American, when they are, IMO, none of the above. Aren't all people with melanin content above some level, in other countries, called just what they are....black?

Anonymous said...

If only enough OB/GYNs would perform tubal ligations and vasectomies on blacks @ birth, if this is even possible, we would have a start. To get consent from the parents, just explain that the procedure is for safety purposes. Most won't know what the terms mean and will think it's for the child's safety, not ours.

Anonymous said...

@ nameispointless

And it has happened in Rotterdam, Marseilles and Molenbeek in Bruxelles.

Anonymous said...

I had to laugh a bit when I saw and heard black activists threaten to boycott all non-black-owned businesses in Sanford, Florida, if George Zimmerman wasn't arrested.

What? They would refuse to shoplift in support of Ashtrayvon?

Anonymous said...

Here's one:

http://newnation.org/index.html

Anonymous said...

Wow...this thread has me remembering a couple incidents from my own school days, involving some Black girls at the Jr. High I attended in southeast Wisconsin, & the year was 1970. I was in 7th grade; bussing to achieve racial balance was the order of the day. Our school had what was known as the "Modular System". I went to school from about 12:00 noon until almost 5:00. 8th & 9th graders went to school in the morning.

It was time for gym class, but we (I & some of my fellow classmates) culdn't get through to the gym because a line of Black 8th & 9th grade girls, who had stayed beyond their dismissal time, had decided to create some mischief, & had formed a thick line & wouldn't allow anyone to pass.

Some of us went around & about, through the cafeteria (which was never used for meals because of this ridiculous Mod set-up), hoping to find a way to get to gym class. More of the same. I don't remember anything violent, that is, nobody was hitting or anything, but there was a lot of shouting, mocking of the "little 7th graders", & just general intimidation by numbers.

Well....I don't know what came over me (perhaps a greater fear of being marked tardy for class?), but I pushed ahead between two of these Black girls, & I remember feeling very angry, & though they tried to stop me I managed to complete my mission. After that, I think the fun went out of things for these gals....I sensed other kids behind me, & the crowd of Blacks dissipated.

It amazes me, now, that I would have fought back like that...I was such a skinny little thing, & most definitely not the confrontational type...but I do know that I never had any more trouble.

I guess if I had to analyze things I'd say my success, however meager it may seem to some, rested on getting angry at the right time. Perhaps, on a national level, Whites will react similarly. May the "pushback" to get through the "thick line" of BRA be an achievement we can be proud of.

p.s. I've noticed that one way to guess at the racial makeup of a school district is to look online at their homepages. If they show photos of little White children jumping off a bus, I'd say that's a pretty fair bet it's a largely Black district. White districts, however, in their effort to show how diverse they are, will locate the one or two Black students in the school choir & photograph them.

Zenster said...

Eustace Mullins: I'd given Zen the benefit of the doubt he wasn't a neocon when someone called him out.

Oh f&%king joy, absolution from Saint Eustace! My life is complete.

I enjoy some of his contributions. It's hard not to notice his attempts to steer the conversation to eeeeeevil muslim terrorists that are responsible for 9/11 and all these peace wars.

Who else is responsible for "9/11"? I'd truly love to know. Come on, spit it out.

Not coincidentally, my list of similarities between Blacks and Muslims has passed the 100 mark and I am now preparing an essay based on that for submission at SBPDL.

That, coupled with the frequency he posts…

Far be it from you to possibly realize that maybe, just maybe, I genuinely enjoy participating at this web site? To quote John Belushi:

"But noooooooooooooooooooo!"

… his disdain for whites(our 'lesser bretheren'), gives me pause.

You have my freely given permission to politely get stuffed. Right along with with your moron snuggle buddy, The True Truth. I will not even stoop to defend myself against such slanderous rubbish.

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 251   Newer› Newest»