Thursday, October 17, 2013

Ohio: Pre-1965 Immigration Act Population, With Cities Engulfed in Black-on-Black (And Random White) Mayhem

The state of Ohio has the demographics in 2013, of what the entire country would look like in a hypothetical alternate-universe where mass immigration/illegal immigration/resettlement of refugees never occurred.
Cincinnati: All but one of the homicide suspect (69) in 2011 were black; the city is 48 percent white

Of 11.5 million people, 80 percent are white and 12.5 percent are black.

It should be noted, that because of the monolithic black vote in 2012 (96 percent of the black vote went to Obama in Ohio, which ensured the state went Democrat; 41 percent of whites voted Democrat, probably because they didn't want Republican free-traders to ship their jobs out of the country), we were guaranteed another four years of Barack Obama in the White House.

But what's so interesting about Ohio is the incredibly violent black population being bred there, which helps ensure cities like Cincinnati, Toledo, Columbus, Cleveland, Youngstown, and Dayton all continue to lose tax-bases with white people fleeing the madness.

A simple review of the violence in these cities will show that without black people in Ohio, you'd have a state with a homicide rate like that of Wyoming.

Let's review the evidence.

Youngstown [In-Depth: Kids killing kids and black on black crime, WFMJ.com]:
It could be considered a cultural epidemic and it's plaguing Youngstown, kids killing kids and black on black crime.
Ashley Chatman, whose two cousins Jaron Roland and Dary Woods were brutally murdered and their bodies found in a burning car says, "They're all killing each other for senseless things."

The heart of America's homicide/gun problem that is, and it's black!
Poverty, gangs and drugs often play a major role in the violent crimes.  Glen "Big Poppa" Williams of Youngstown says, "It's not just the respect issue, it's the money issue, it's about what they don't have at home.  Children going to school with no food, or not even having water at home or having Kool-Aid with no water or having sugar with no Kool-Aid."
Of 19 murders in the city of Youngstown so far this year, 21% of the victims were teenagers and Prosecutor Jay Macejko says, "The victims and the offenders are getting younger."
Fourteen of the 19 murder victims were black males, nearly 100% of the suspects were also black males, and their weapon of choice, guns.
 Columbus [Murder rate drops in Columbus, Cleveland.com, 12-31-2009]:
If you’re a Black man in Columbus, you are at risk of being murdered.
But you were a lot safer in 2009 than you were in 2008.
As revelers prepared for New Year’s Eve – and a possible shooting or two – only 83 residents of Columbus were murder victims in 2009. That was down 24 percent from 2008, when the city posted 109 homicides.
Cmdr. Mary Mathias, head of the Crimes Against Persons Bureau, noted that the more than half of those individuals murdered in 2009 – 46 – were Black.
“Overwhelmingly that’s the highest risk race and gender group (of murder victims) in Columbus,” Mathias said.
Last year, 67 of the 109 Columbus murder victims were African American.
At the same time, Mathias noted that the homicide rate was slightly up from 2007, when the city posted 79 homicides.
 Black men, who represent only about 12 percent of the population of Columbus, were about 55 percent of those who were murdered in 2009. By contrast, only 16 white men were murder victims in 2009. But even that terrible number held a silver lining. In 2008, 67 of the 109 murder victims were African Americans, slightly more than 60 percent. Only 16 of the 109 murder victims in 2008 were white men.
 Cleveland [Homicides up in Cleveland in 2009; three multiple-victim killings partly to blame, Cleveland.com, 1-2-2010] doesn't have journalists interested in publishing on the racial data of homicides, but a graph created by the Plain-Dealer show that 94 of 120 homicides in 2009 were black people.
Remember, almost all black homicide victims have a black suspect


Cincinnati [ENQUIRER IN-DEPTH: Black-on-black crime gets new focus from city leaders, Cincinnati Inquirer, 4-22-12] is headed the way of Detroit, with the black population's violence acting as the catalyst for white flight. [Report: black on black crime rising in Cincinnati, News Herald, 8-9-13]
Homicides in Cincinnati increasingly involve a black victim and a black assailant, a trend that has risen through the decade, a newspaper analysis has found.

The figures have become so troublesome that city council plans a special session Monday night to discuss the topic, which previously has been limited to conversations about economic development or downtown safety.
The Cincinnati Enquirer reports Sunday (http://cin.ci/JjHLjz ) that since 2005, 86 percent of homicides in which an arrest was made involved black-on-black violence, up from about 75 percent of homicide arrests from 2000 through 2004.
The analysis found eight of 10 homicide victims since 2000 have been black, and finds that all but one of the 66 homicide victims in 2011 was black.
An increasing proportion of homicide victims were black in recent years as well, with the paper's analysis showing they made up 78 percent of homicide victims from 2000 to 2004, with that proportion rising to 84 percent between 2005 and the present.
"The criminals are getting bolder," said Christopher Smitherman, the council member who called for the special session and is also president of the Cincinnati branch of the NAACP. "They are shooting at people, not caring who else they might hit, in the middle of the day on residential streets."
Smitherman is one of five black members of the nine-person council, the first in Cincinnati history to have a majority of African-Americans.
Cincinnati also has its first black chief, James Craig, and a black mayor and city manager. The 2010 Census shows that Cincinnati had become a predominantly minority city, with the white population dropping to 48.1 percent, from 53 percent in 2000.
Craig met Thursday with three dozen people, 20 of them black church pastors, who pledged to use their influence to help police and increase their own efforts to reduce violence.
Only one suspect in Cincinnati homicides in 2011 was non-black (all but two of the victims were black); half of these murders go unsolved:
There were 69 homicides reported in Cincinnati in 2011, down from 73 a year prior.
Of the 69 homicides, arrests had been made in only 31 of the cases. In three cases, the victim died from police gunfire.
Avondale and Over-the-Rhine were the areas with the most homicides, 11 each.
In what continues to be a disturbing trend in Cincinnati, the vast majority of homicides are cases of black-on-black crime. All but two homicide victims and one suspect were black.
Dayton [Nearly 90 percent of city’s homicide victims black:Local figure is twice the U.S. rate, analysis finds, Dayton Daily News, 1-9-2012]:
Almost 90 percent of the city’s homicide victims in 2011 were black, nearly twice the national average, according to a Dayton Daily News analysis.
At the same time the city’s homicide numbers are remaining stable, the percent of homicide victims who are black has increased dramatically from 65 percent in 2003 to 86 percent last year.
“So many (people) don’t know how to handle their anger in a situation, except to pick up a gun,” said Darren Byrd, a street advocate for the Community Initiative to Reduce Gun Violence. The group, which mentors 141 ex-felons, has been credited by its law enforcement partners with a reduction in gang-related homicides by two-thirds.
“If we didn’t do anything for these guys, things would be worse,” Marlon Shackelford, another street advocate, has said. “Because these guys are in gangs and most of them are the shooters.”
Blacks make up 42.9 percent of the city’s population, according to the U.S. Census.

“Black-on-black crime is a problem,” said Sgt. Dan Mauch, head of the homicide unit. “The figures don’t lie.”
Mauch said programs such as CIRV and law enforcement task forces have made a difference in keeping the homicide numbers stable. “If it weren’t for the cooperation between agencies and the advancements in medical care, the 38 homicides we had last year would have been in the 50s or 60s,” he said.
The newspaper reviewed 346 incident reports classified as homicides by police for the gender, age and race of the victim.
From 2002 through 2007, the number of homicide victims fluctuated between 29 in 2007 to 41 in 2006. Mauch attributed 2006’s numbers to a spike in drug killings. 
But since 2008, the number of homicide victims remained in the mid-30s with the exception of 40 in 2009. That year, the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, Dayton Police Department and several federal agencies began a cooperative effort to control gang violence, the reason behind the sudden increase, Mauch said.
In some alternate universe, America closed her borders and remained a nation of roughly 85 - 90 percent white people and 10-15 percent black people. In our reality, the state of Ohio has roughly maintained that population dynamic.

But as you can see, the black population is almost exclusively responsible for homicides in the state, which act as form of warfare in seizing political control of the major cities (through attrition - white flight - they assume a voting bloc capable of... helping elect a President of the United States).



79 comments:

Jay Santos said...

Just realized I posted to the older thread. This new DHS appointee, the national security force, Jeh Johnson, he's black.

I find this beyond disturbing. Well beyond.

countenance said...

Missouri is another similar example, largely untouched by post-'65 immigration.

The difference in Missouri being red such that it was never considered a swing state in 2012 and Ohio being blue is that Missouri whites were 66% Romney, 31% Obama, 3% others.

Anonymous said...

OT:--And the nigra intifada against ebil Whitey continues in Philly. White girl attacked by "gang of teens" is lucky to be unraped and still alive. Traitorous media continues to cover up the obvious by excluding race of perps, yet again...

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/10/16/exclusive-15-year-old-girl-attacked-by-group-of-teens-in-delaware-county/

Anonymous said...

Blacks have been voting 90+% Democrat since the 1930s. The big difference in the 2008 and 2012 elections is that most of them voted in those elections, whilst many whites did not.

Also, there was considerable voter fraud on the part of blacks in 2008 and 2012, such as this black poll worker in Cincinnati who voted six time for Obama:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/11/cincinnati-poll-worker-charged-with-voting-half-dozen-times-in-november/

Anonymous said...

Blacks killing blacks is part of their culture and an obviously enjoyable past time for their community. I have nothing to say about what blacks do to each other or how they conduct themselves in their own neighborhoods.

What I object to is when blacks take out their "cultural values" on white people in the form of white genocide, which is happening every day in all white countries. That's the only issue concerning blacks that I care about.

I care that they not be forced in to my neighborhood, place of work, schools, church and other aspects of my culture, and that they stop being allowed to murder, rape and rob my people with impunity. White genocide must be acknowledged and addressed and then we can work on how to stop it.

Anonymous said...

nigs got galvanized by obongo-- that will fade (no mo magic negroes).

still-- democracy is a failure. it is antithetical to liberty. Give me liberty over a "vote" any day

americans have to drop this democracy cant before they can ever truly be free... otherwise you'll always have a majority of mediocrities voting to eat the natural aristocracy of producers

nigs are a tool being used to do this, nothing more-- when the elites have no further use for them (or any other grouping), they'll be ignored

Anonymous said...

It should be noted, that because of the monolithic black vote in 2012 (96 percent of the black vote went to Obama in Ohio, which ensured the state went Democrat; 41 percent of whites voted Democrat, probably because they didn't want Republican free-traders to ship their jobs out of the country), we were guaranteed another four years of Barack Obama in the White House.

That is a great statement Paul. The GOP could clean up with white votes if they dropped this incessant support for free trade and other policies that are a detriment to the white working class. I am not saying whites would ever vote in black-like bloc fashion, but the GOP could probably put together a platform to attract 65% of whites if they'd cater more to the white middle and working classes.

AnalogMan said...

Anon 8:37 -

White girl attacked by "gang of teens" is lucky to be unraped and still alive.

While her father appears to be white, the girl clearly is not. I can sympathise with the girl, and I certainly condemn the "teens", but this is not a White survival issue.

What irritates me is the numerous "activists" and officials who suddenly start getting concerned whe the proportion of black homicide victims rises. Not the number of people killed, but the disproportionate impact on the black coonmunity. Das rayciss.

I'm with anon 8:55; what these animals do to each other in their own areas is no skin off my nose. Segregation forever.

Cole Bernher said...

6 times seems right, may in fact be low for Cincy blacks in '08 and '12. I witnessed voter fraud being committed in '08-UC had tables set up on campus where you could sign up to be bused to a voting precinct. Only trouble was, they didn't care if you were registered in a different state or city, nor did they care if you had already voted. They asked me every day that I walked past their table to get on their bus and go vote "for Obama," without ever once asking me for identification or proof of voter registration.

Cole Bernher said...

Cincy is a BRA rat-hole. Roving gangs of youthful vibrant diversities run around UC's main campus to perform strong-arm robberies of ignorant co-eds who have never before encountered vibrant diversities. UC students get emails weekly that mention the latest home invasion or campus robbery committed by black teens.
Seriously, the blacks are awful in Cincy.
They take buses to Northern KY to shoplift, taking less than $500 because $500 is a felony in OH, not realizing that $300 is felony theft in KY.
My friends in retail hated black thieves because they would come in mixed-gender groups complete with lookouts and getaway drivers and they would also use babies to stuff stolen clothing into infant strollers. When they were confronted, the blacks would get violent and scream racism. The stores wouldn't prosecute. And what wasn't recovered on scene ended up being sold on Clifton street corners (nice D&B purses, for instance)

Don M said...

This isn't such a tough nut to crack! "Big Poppa" lays out the solution right here:

"It's not just the respect issue, it's the money issue, it's about what they don't have at home. Children going to school with no food, or not even having water at home or having Kool-Aid with no water or having sugar with no Kool-Aid."

Sugar with no Kool-Aid? Egads! The horror. No wonder the little dears are murdering each other. All we have to do is set up distribution stations in the city to hand out bottled water and individual packets of Kool-Aid (grape, I presume) and problem solved!

This shouldn't cost the taxpayer too much and after all, "aybah poda hep."

Negroes. They really have no idea how stupid they sound to us, do they?

Anonymous said...

Ethnoautism is the only black mental attribute that benefits the rest of society.
The average black is so mentally weak compared to a typical White that they can't relate. They're like children interacting with adults. Blacks are on Planet Negro with almost all the stupid melodramatic soap opera directed inwards.

Wiggerization is a White mental disease that's weakening White culture and politics.
A significant minority of Whites in Ohio voted for a hard core Racial Socialist who will bleed White people to provide more goodies for lazy, stupid, violent, irresponsible blacks. They voted to increase anti-White racial discrimination against themselves, their children, and grandchildren.
They foolishly did this because they wanted nanny-state welfare for themselves and industry and weren't made aware of the Racial Socialist agenda.

Bleeding Heart Liberalism's approach of creating greater racial equality by uplifting blacks to White standards has died.
Racial Socialism's approach of creating racial equality by downgrading Whites to black standards is as alive as the AIDS virus in a crack whore.













Anonymous said...

" Anonymous said...

OT:--And the nigra intifada against ebil Whitey continues in Philly. White girl attacked by "gang of teens" is lucky to be unraped and still alive. Traitorous media continues to cover up the obvious by excluding race of perps, yet again..."

This site is much appreciated because Paul and those who post comments fill in the blanks that are intentionally left by the MSM. Here's another color-blind crime:

http://kstp.com/article/stories/s3187208.shtml

No mention of hate crime charges. Probably just forgot to check that box on the paperwork. I'm sure the cops will correct that later today.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous October 17, 2013 at 10:47 PM said : The GOP could clean up with white votes if they dropped this incessant support for free trade and other policies that are a detriment to the white working class.

Cuts both ways. Because of that cheap overseas labor, many items that those working class people buy are substantially cheaper than if made here. More precious after-tax dollars in their pockets.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

Paul notes that Ohio is largely the America of before the 1965 immigration act. Run the numbers, and you'll see one reason WHY that act was passed.

According to the 2010 Census, African-Americans comprise 12.6% of the population, and "white" Americans comprise 72.4%. However, consider only the population inthe country as of 1960: Europeans, blacks, and a few others. According to the 2010 census, that's 197MM for whites, 38MM for blacks, and I'll guess 2MM for Asians, Indians and others here in 1960. That would mean that blacks were 38/237 or 16% of the population; they were 11% in 1960 (Hispanics 3.5% in 1960). Without the immigration flood, the USA would be nearing 20% black soon.

Say what you will about Asians, but their crime rates (and birth rates) are far below blacks and even whites.

Anonymous said...

LOL, black-on-black, blak-on-blak, blaque-on-blaque violence sounds like the racial pundits, press & po-po alike are sad that it's not black-on-white killing. Like dem NAPAs don't unnerstan theys be killing wrong peeplz. Dang, come to think on it, they probably are sad, very sad that YT is not one the dead end of the trade

eah said...

OT (but related)

I am reminded of this old story in the NYT:

More Africans Enter U.S. Than in Days of Slavery

No doubt it's true today as well.

A survey would probably show that Blacks from Africa behave better than American Blacks, at least for the first couple of generations. But you have to wonder how long that will last...

Also, according to the great blog Refugee Resettlement Watch, the US plans to admit tens of thousands of "refugees" from the Democratic Republic of Congo over the next few years.

Anonymous said...

Don't forget the "vibrant divershitty" that randomly fired "culture" towards the main entrance to uc hospital, hitting a bystander, last summer and it didn't even warrant a 30 second blurb on the evening news. I love OTR!!!

Anonymous said...

Jay Santos said...

Just realized I posted to the older thread. This new DHS appointee, the national security force, Jeh Johnson, he's black.

I find this beyond disturbing. Well beyond.


It is beyond deeply disturbing, and for a reason. Blacks have control of the agency that will personally manage our homeland security.

From the previous thread, my post that several respondents "failed" to understand. Try to connect the dots, folks, and no, I don't care about a carbon tax.

PK wrote
America's future, as is currently projected, is simply Port-au-Prince, Haiti, only without foreign aid and white do-gooders to keep the island nation artificially propped-up.

My response:

You don't need to be an advocate, for anything, to have a clear picture of America's future, or Europe's for that matter. The term carrying capacity means how many people can live in the borders of such-and-such land under certain conditions. Thanks to global warming the planet up and fossil fuel running out, the carrying capacity of this country in the near future, about twenty years or so, may be reduced by as much as 50%. So what happens to the 175 million who have to go?

Will DHS decide?

Robert Fitzpatrick said...

"While her father appears to be white, the girl clearly is not." sorry, I watched the video disagree, she looked YT 2ME

Bogolyubski said...

Anon notes:
Also, there was considerable voter fraud on the part of blacks in 2008 and 2012, such as this black poll worker in Cincinnati who voted six times for Obama.

There's been massive, systemic vote fraud in groid-majority precincts for decades. There's nothing new there, though (as you mention) they were pumped up for the turnout with D'Won. The thing that few are aware of is the Repukes' refusal to challenge the practice. They have operated under a consent decree since 1983 which basically prohibits them from challenging the massive fraud in groid-precincts. They made a (deliberately) half-assed appeal of the decree when the info first surfaced during the teleprompter-readership of the shrubbery (also known as the great Moose-limb theologian Imam al-Duhbya, the Mahdi from West Texas).

Yet more proof (as if any were actually needed) that the Repukes are a completely bogus "opposition" party whose sole purpose is to suck up money, time, and energy from those who might form a real opposition to the squids.

Robert Fitzpatrick said...

Analog Man wrote "While her father appears to be white, the girl clearly is not", I watched the video and I'm curious how you reckon the girl is "clearly" not white?

Anonymous said...

I do not want to hijack the conversation about BRA and divert it to global warming. My point is that GW reduces carrying capacity, and in the future the population of the US will be only half what it is now.

The president is black, the attorney general is black, and as Jay Santos pointed out, the newly appointed head of DHS is black.

Connect the dots, folks. What does the administration want to do to all of us when food becomes scarce? Why did DHS purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammo, along with armored personael carriers? What are they preparing for? What are they planning?

Jay in DC said...

Connect the dots, folks. What does the administration want to do to all of us when food becomes scarce? Why did DHS purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammo, along with armored personael carriers? What are they preparing for? What are they planning?

And don't forget the sacking of two generals recently as well. The military is being cleansed of people who won't chant the party line too.

All the arrows are starting line up and once they do it will be time for the final big gun grab and then after that It's Go Time.

Anonymous said...

Black men complaining about hunger in the black community!

Has it occurred to these numbnuts that the solution is to shake down the hippos that pass for women among their subspecies?
KHow many millions of tons of fried chicken, twinkies, cheetos, etc. have been greedily stashed under seat cushions, underwear, and old socks by the TV addicted blubberbutts?

eah said...

According to the 2010 Census, African-Americans comprise 12.6% of the population,...

Thanks for the link.

Everyone should note the number. Now consider this: black women outlive black men. So let's say approx 6% of the population is male and black. Let's divide that into three balanced groups by age: 0-17, 18-40, and above 40. Last I looked, you could still find on the internet official USDOJ statistics on murder broken down by race, and as I recall those showed Blacks committing approx 55% of all murders, the vast majority of those by younger black males of course. To make the point, assume that the 18-40 group commits all the murders. This means that approx 2% of the population commits more than half of all murders. Contemplate that.

And that's just murder, and does not consider other violent crime (or felonies).

Also think about the cost to society to process black criminals: police, courts, prison, probation. It is entirely reasonable to ask if Blacks make a net positive economic contribution to America.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
It is beyond deeply disturbing, and for a reason. Blacks have control of the agency that will personally manage our homeland security.

From the previous thread, my post that several respondents "failed" to understand. Try to connect the dots, folks, and no, I don't care about a carbon tax.


PK wrote
America's future, as is currently projected, is simply Port-au-Prince, Haiti, only without foreign aid and white do-gooders to keep the island nation artificially propped-up.

My response:

You don't need to be an advocate, for anything, to have a clear picture of America's future, or Europe's for that matter. The term carrying capacity means how many people can live in the borders of such-and-such land under certain conditions. Thanks to global warming the planet up and fossil fuel running out, the carrying capacity of this country in the near future, about twenty years or so, may be reduced by as much as 50%. So what happens to the 175 million who have to go?

Will DHS decide?


And who was it that created a new, massive federal agency in the wake of the 9/11 attack - itself the direct result of government failure to enforce its own immigration laws on the books at the time?

The DHS is basically the equivalent of what existed in the old USSR, where the military was divided in two halves: one half responsible for fighting overseas (exporting the revolution) and the other half responsible for destroying all internal counter-revoolutionary activity. The basic infrastructure of the DHS was enacted by the Repuke congress during the Clinton era in the wake of the OKC bombing.

The Repukes in the Senate will no doubt rubber-stamp this latest outrage as they do everything else. However, Johnson will take his orders from the same folks who issue his putative boss' orders, the same folks who issue the orders for the allegedly "independent" legislative and judicial branches. Things are uni-directional and have been so for decades now, despite all shit-sandwiches hawked to the contrary by the Ministry of Truth and public edumacation.

What the DHS will do to whites when the order comes from squid-central will be similar to what the minions of the South African ANC are doing to whites there now, except on a more massive scale. I note with interest that even now in South Africa most whites there continue to support the regime, pay their taxes and (at best) keep their heads in the sand. Even the Afrikaner farmers continue to hire groids instead of going to the white shantytowns to find workers because they're cheaper - not because they're forced to by laws (yet).

South African whites would have full moral justification for any action - no matter how bloody and deadly, including deployment of WMDs - to resist the genocide they're being subjected to but there appears to be no actual resistance there. The best they can manage is to make pathetic appeals to squid-controlled human rights organizations who will never listen to anything they say. I don't see American whites as being substantively different in any way. While one cannot ignore the role played by the oligarchs who control everything, their level of control is dependent upon the cooperation and both active and passive endorsement of a large segment - perhaps even a majority - of those being targeted. The spiritual malaise is more grave than the evil of the oligarchs.

Anonymous said...

I have many friends who used to live in the former USSR, Poland and Czechoslovakia. When I asked them about the police state, they all said the same thing. It is important to preserve the appearance of the rule of law.

For our future, this means it is important to keep two things in mind.

(1) Do not allow yourselves to be provoked into illegal activities. These could be used to cause your arrest, and eventual confinement in a DHS camp.

(2) Does anyone think the blacks will be able to preserve the appearance of the rule of law? I don't. Be patient. When their excesses reveal them to be incapable of governing, then they will lose the mandate of the people and it will be easy, and quite legal, at that time to restore the proper order of things.

Remember the end game. Keep the end game in mind. The carrying capacity of this country will diminish over time. If a dollar crisis causes an oil shock ($500 per bbl anyone) or worse, the country that shall not be named attacks Iran, then food production will decline precipitously, the ability to continue commerce will decline precipitously, food will become very scarce (as it did in the Walmart when the EBT cards had no limit), and someone will have to make the decision as to who gets fed and who goes to the DHS confinement camps.

Keep the end game in mind. Obey the law, become resilient (meaning stockpile lentils, beans, water) and stay under radar until those who cannot govern themselves clearly demonstrate that they have no business governing us.

Anonymous said...

Bogy said
South African whites would have full moral justification for any action - no matter how bloody and deadly, including deployment of WMDs - to resist the genocide they're being subjected to but there appears to be no actual resistance there. The best they can manage is to make pathetic appeals to squid-controlled human rights organizations who will never listen to anything they say. I don't see American whites as being substantively different in any way. While one cannot ignore the role played by the oligarchs who control everything, their level of control is dependent upon the cooperation and both active and passive endorsement of a large segment - perhaps even a majority - of those being targeted. The spiritual malaise is more grave than the evil of the oligarchs.

I think there are differences.

(1) We are the true natives of this country. (No offense to feather people, but hunter-gatherers do not form countries, even though the Iroquois were on the way to doing so.)

(2) There are many of us in comparison to the non-whites. Recall the movie Zulu where the (white) British garrison was overrun by a few thousand Zulus, and you would think whites would not survive an onslaught, but read into the conflict, understand the failure of the British commanders to defend themselves properly, and then the subsequent conflict where a vastly outnumbered British force defeated the Zulus. Draw the conclusion that only when blacks greatly outnumber whites, and whites are stupid, do blacks win. The and whites are stupid part is key.

(3) World opinion is turning against the idea of total equality. A Norwegian of Somali descent was involved in the mall massacre. The French are ready to evict all non-French, whatever that means, and much of Europe never has had any use for non-Europeans.

(4) There won't be a US leading the charge to sanction and isolate ourselves as we did to SA.

Keep the end game in mind. Those who cannot govern themselves have no business governing us.

Anonymous said...

"the U.S. plans to admit tens of thousands of refugees from the Democratic Republic of the Congo over the nest few years."
What a lovely idea! Import a population with some of the lowest IQ's in the world who will quickly become just more worthless niggers sucking the taxpayer dry so they can have their ebt cards, welfare, and section 8 while destroying the communities they infest! Not to mention breeding like flies!
I've had the misfortune of having to work with Afriniggers in the past and let me tell you, they quickly adopt all the worst characteristics of the foulest of North American Pavement Apes and are worse than home grown hood niggers due to their greater levels of stupidity, lack of impulse control and propensity to chimp out in a heartbeat.
No doubt this is part of the squids plan of Accelerated Destruction as the home grown niggers just aren't getting the job done fast enough.

Jay Santos said...

Bogolyubski said...
Anon:
It is beyond deeply disturbing, and for a reason. Blacks have control of the agency that will personally manage our homeland security.

Bogolyubski said…
….And who was it that created a new, massive federal agency in the wake of the 9/11 attack…


Yes, the Republicans. Bush. But that's not the relevant point. The agency is bigger and badder than ever. They're on the highways, in the train stations. They've procured more ammunition than is imaginable. Now we're about to get an Eric Holder clone running the agency. The agency head actually does have power over the organism's behavior, as seen with Holder. Whether the horrid Republicans established the agency is just not the point and I believe you actually know that.

CENTURION said...

I'm in the Optical business and have an interesting report for you all, which if you have children, is important.

I spoke with a Blue Cross Blue Shield rep for 2 hours on Wednesday attempting the figure out the Obama Reparations Black Free Health Care act, where Whites are taxed to death to provide FREE health care for blacks. And that is exactly what it does.

(I don't have time to get into the subsidies for poor people, but basically your health care is free).

Here is the relevant part. For "children" under 19, ALL PLANS provide for an eye exam and pair of glasses. All. You can't get out of it. Now, I have 2 children and guess what? I have to pay for the very thing I do all day. BUT, if you have children, you will find every eye doc saying they need glasses. Why? If they don't push glasses on every kid they won't make any money.

You are going to see every kid with glasses. So, not only is this "health care" act revolting, but it will damage the eyes of millions of kids.

Just warning you.

Anonymous said...

Paul, just remember, #heisnotasuspect...

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20131018/PC16/131019452/1177/a-complicated-issue-behind-a-simple-inflammatory-statement

Californian said...

South African whites would have full moral justification for any action - no matter how bloody and deadly, including deployment of WMDs - to resist the genocide they're being subjected to but there appears to be no actual resistance there.

Way back when whites still ran South Africa, a friend made the following observation (I'll sum it up): "Since whites in South Africa have just about everyone in the world against them, they actually have a free hand. They ought to take the 'steps necessary' to deal with the blacks and be done with it -- after all, how could they be any more hated by the rest of the world? This way, they would save themselves from the black tide and in another generation, who would even remember?"

At the time, his advice sounded a bit harsh, but it actually spoke to the matter. It really comes down to a struggle of "us" against "them." If white South Africans had been anywhere near as ruthless as their critics claimed, they would have mass deported blacks, closed down all the schools and hospitals they had built for them, and conducted some outright massacres. i.e., the whites would have treated the blacks the way blacks routinely treat each other, as well as the way that blacks treat white minorities (or majorities, if American cities are any example). But of course, whites in SA were too civilized to take the steps necessary. The result was that they lost their country.

Now I know this all sounds harsh, but what is the alternative? One-man-one-vote has proven a miserable failure in Africa. The history of the world shows nothing that would lead us to believe that we are progressing towards a utopia of democracy, equality and freedom. The reality is that entire peoples are routinely subjugated and wiped out. Look at the Fall of Rome, or the medieval Islamic jihads, or the American Indian, or what is going on from Johannesburg to Detroit.

History gives you no second chance.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous October 18, 2013 at 8:09 AM said:
The president is black, the attorney general is black, and as Jay Santos pointed out, the newly appointed head of DHS is black.

Connect the dots, folks. What does the administration want to do to all of us when food becomes scarce? Why did DHS purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammo, along with armored personael carriers? What are they preparing for? What are they planning?


Yawn. I'll say it again, do the math. You have a (relatively well-armed) nation of 330 million. If everything went to hell, figure how many "real" personnel (exclude support people, etc.) you would need to "clamp down" (military, national guard, LEO). How many are available? And how many of those "real" personnel are going to do anything nasty for the sake of the negros in DC?

If I was near a negro-infested area I would be far more focused on the chimping negros than anything the government is going to do. And if I am not near a negro-infested area, life will go on... the whites will do what they need to do, peaceably, and the government will be nowhere around as they would be busy (and overwhelmed) in the infested areas.

Don't believe me? Just look to the LA riots, Katrina, etc.

rjp said...

Compare Cincinnati, OH to Covington, KY.

Ohio pays better welfare.

This same fact reveals itself with Ohio towns vs. West Virginia towns.

AnalogMan said...

Robert Fitzpatrick @ 8:08 said:
I watched the video and I'm curious how you reckon the girl is "clearly" not white?

Her hands are brown. Not dirty brown, not tanned brown, but brown that comes only from a touch of the tarbrush. Note the darker brown on the backs of her hands, and especially around the fingernails.

Anonymous @ 8:09 said...

I do not want to hijack the conversation about BRA and divert it to global warming. My point is that GW reduces carrying capacity,

This assumption seems to be taken for granted by the warmists, but I don't buy it. The earth has been warmer in the past, with the result that grapes, for example, were cultivated in Britain. When Leif Eriksen discovered America, he named it Vinland, because there were grapes growing in what I believe is presently New England. I think you can set your mind at rest on the AGW score.

Jay Santos said...

Mr. Clean said...
Anonymous October 18, 2013 at 8:09 AM said:
The president is black, the attorney general is black, and as Jay Santos pointed out, the newly appointed head of DHS is black.

Connect the dots, folks. What does the administration want to do to all of us when food becomes scarce? Why did DHS purchase 1.6 billion rounds of ammo, along with armored personael carriers? What are they preparing for? What are they planning?

Yawn. I'll say it again, do the math. You have a (relatively well-armed) nation of 330 million. If everything went to hell, figure how many "real" personnel (exclude support people, etc.) you would need to "clamp down" (military, national guard, LEO). How many are available? And how many of those "real" personnel are going to do anything nasty for the sake of the negros in DC?


You have lots more faith in those 330 million than I. They re-elected Obama and most will sit pasively slack jawed, provided the tele screen works and Taco Bell remains open. Those who do participate in the "clamp down" will do so for that pay check, their uniform and their pension, not for negroes in DC.

Anonymous said...

@Centurion, re: eyeglasses
I've heard from guys in a union healthplan that covers optics, that they go in every year for a pair of "prescription sunglasses" worth $150 (whatever the limit is). Because if they don't, they get nothing out of it, and the system just pockets that $150. In a way, the niggery of it offends me, but OTOH those guys contribute up to $20,000 of invisible (not on the paystub) contributions to their health plan, with no possible way to use the benefits, short of having a kid with cancer. I suspect many kids, in the scenario you outline, will adopt zero-refraction glasses for fashion purposes, like the supposed trend of blacksketball players dressing up as Urkel for interviews.
Overall, you're right about the general waste of the system that's going to add a new "Shit Sammich" category to the food pyramid. I hope everyone remembers this next November when the cowardly Repubes are up for re-election, that they had a chance to kill this abomination, but bent over to Osama instead.

Anonymous said...

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous @ 8:09 said...

I do not want to hijack the conversation about BRA and divert it to global warming. My point is that GW reduces carrying capacity.

This assumption seems to be taken for granted by the warmists, but I don't buy it.


99% of climate scientists are in agreement. If you don't want to believe, then go sail off the end of the earth.

Better yet, read Animal Farm and try to figure out who the pigs and dogs are.

There is a reason why this formerly (somewhat) free nation is turning into a paranoid police state, and it has nothing to do with a love for diversity. In the USSR, real criminals, the kind who murder and steal, had the upper hand in the gulags. They were used to control political dissidents.

So go ahead, refuse to believe science, but believe that all this BRA has no purpose than a fuzzy social agenda, while those of us in the reality-based sphere brace for an onslaught of BRA abuses, all to keep us separated from the refined upper class.

Anonymous said...

There is no "science" in studying the climate, or evolution. The scientific method (hypothesis, experiment, observation, analysis, conclusion) simply cannot be applied worldwide, over hundreds or thousands of years. Building computer models is no substitute, either, because the models are programmed by people with limited knowledge, and at best, will simply spit out results that the programmer expected to achieve.
Anyone worried about SUVs melting glaciers should be doing everything in their power to keep the developing nations from industrializing, rather than wagging their finger at Sally Soccermom. Also, I don't see anyone posting here that thinks BRA is just a "fuzzy social agenda", especially not AnalogMan.

Mr. Clean said...

Jay Santos said: You have lots more faith in those 330 million than I. They re-elected Obama and most will sit pasively slack jawed, provided the tele screen works and Taco Bell remains open.

Obama got 66 million votes.... 20% of the 330 million. The bottom 20%. That is with a heavy negro turnout (and the usual Democratic voter fraud).

Mittens still got 61 million votes, and there were God only knows how many whites who don't like the Negro in the formerly White House, but decided to protest the Republicans by staying home.

The 330 million was just a reference to the country's size. The actual number of people who matter and can make a difference is much smaller than that.

Jay Santos said: Those who do .... will do so for that pay check, their uniform and their pension...

Not much of which will matter if everything goes to hell.

Pro-Civ said...

Ey did fo all mah REALL NUCCAS! Keep shootin! Natural selection at work.

Woo Da Kid - "Body Bag"

"[Hook]
Homicide in the air, put on a red flag
Shoot him in the head, put him in a bodybag
One shot kill, put him in a body bag
Zip! Lift 'em, now he in a bodybag
Put him in a bodybag, he in a bodybag
Zip! Lift 'em, now he in a bodybag

[Verse 1: Wooh Da Kid]
Homicide in the air smell like a graveyard
Six niggas extinct for tryna play hard

Red pitbull tough with the lockjaw
Bullets maneater so we call him Carnivore
You know it's rude love to the OG's shoffy (Sooo Wooo!)
Blood love to my Brem niggas like Jaffy
I be like piano keys
They be like, "what's that?"
First the white Sheet
Then come the Bodybag
Coroners ride next, it's a long ride
He died real quick, and he died with his pride
No pain
No itch
Put him in a black bag
ZIP!

[Hook]

[Verse 2: Waka Flocka Flame]
Oh shit, what the fuck?!
This nigga wanna buck?
Pistol-whip this fuck nigga till his eye bust

Make the paramedics rush
Matter-fact DOA
I'm that guy, I'm that man
I'm the crazy nigga with the Kay
It's goin down
Shoot his ass up - ZIP!
Now he in a bodybag, police hit the scene, zip em - don't say shit!
They gone ask you
What happened? Who got shot? Who done fired shots?

Reply back:
I ain't see jack shit! I ain't sayin' shit! I ain't no snitch, matter-fact it was Waka Flocka, ZIP!
Dumb nigga (stupid)
I told you
Don't snitch on Waka Flocka
Soo Woo"


Keep it up Black men! Black men are the #1 enemy of Black men.

Anonymous said...

90210 of topic
Remember Obama and his die versity visas?
The World Health Organization estimates that 1 in 3 Somalis are mentally ill due to their country’s constant violence and abuse of the Khat narcotic. Somali science however came up with a surefire cure for the crazies. Lock the patient up in a room with a hyena and wait for the ugly beast to see the demons causing the madness and drive them out.

Somali medicine, like American medicine, however suffers from rising health care costs. A session with a trained psychiatric hyena costs 560 dollars in a country where the average national salary is 190 bucks putting a Mogadishu trained hyena on par with a Harvard trained psychiatrist.

Somalis who can’t afford to blow a three month salary to spend time on the couch with a hyena have a more practical solution. They tie the affected person to a tree and leave. The hyenas usually find the patient sooner or later and snack on him pro bono, while his kin head off to the welfare office in Lewiston, Maine.

Like the joke about the mental patient and the driver with the broken wheel, the Somalis may be nuts, but they aren’t stupid.

Somalia only has half the Somali population. Kenya has almost a million. The United Kingdom has over 100,000 and Canada may have as many as 150,000. The United States has quite a few and Minnesota alone has may have 80,000 to 125,000 of them.

American politicians, who can give any Khat-chewing Somali pirate a run for his money in the insanity department, dumped thousands of Somalis into Lewiston, Maine where they now make up a seventh of the population.

The average low in Lewiston in January is near zero. Meanwhile January in Mogadishu is a balmy 86 degrees with occasional flurries of machine gun fire.

Despite its chilly weather, Lewiston did have some warm welfare and the Somalis ignored the cold and flocked to the cold cash. The WHO may consider them crazy, but unlike the politicians who welcomed them in, they aren’t stupid.

The Somali gangs that tore apart their homeland have been reborn in the frigid Midwest. Ten percent of the gang members in the Minneapolis Police Department’s system are Somalis. The Somali Outlaws, the Somali Hot Boyz and the Somali Assault Unit go from welfare to crime. Like the gangs at home, Somali migrant gangs scale up from street crime, drug trafficking, robberies, sex trafficking and protection rackets to international terrorism.

Lewiston, Maine, a place as traditionally synonymous with gangs as Mogadishu is with snow, now has concerns about gang violence.


Maine has gone from having no gang members a few years ago to having 4,000 of them. Mainahs have gone from thinking of gang members as something they saw on COPS to something they see when they look out the window.

Vacationland now hosts the True Somali Bloods and the True Sudanese Bloods who spill each other’s blood to find out who has the truest blood of them all. In Lewiston, Somali flash mobs attack natives. In Bangor, a Somali gang is at the heart of local crime.

Gangs are still the closest thing to a rule of law in Somalia. There was every reason to expect the Somali migrants in the United States to fall back into that pattern, clusters of young men building families around gangs and making their own law the way they did back home. Nietzsche said that when you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes into you. When you stare at a hyena, the hyena stares back at you. When you stare into Somalia, Somalia stares back at you.

The Somali migrants are not becoming Americanized. Maine and Minneapolis are becoming Somalized.

The American hyena became extinct as the march of civilization drove it back. Where there is civilization, carrion eaters no longer eat well unless they learn to be small and quiet. In Somalia, hyenas thrive because there isn’t civilization and so there is good eating for their kind.

Anonymous said...

continued


Hyenas don’t destroy civilization. They are a symptom of its collapse. They are a sign that the city is giving way to the desert, the town to the village and the village to a handful of burnt out shacks. Carrion eaters go where civilization falls, where men no longer work shoulder to shoulder and where nothing bigger than a gang can endure. They go where there are bodies and no one to bury them.

In Somalia, the hyenas that aren’t in private practice carry on a battle of wits with the Islamic terrorists of Al-Shabaab responsible for the Westgate Massacre in Kenya.

The hyenas have been known to taste the occasional Al-Shabaab fighter who falls asleep in a Khat induced trance in the sun. And Al-Shabaab hunts and kills hyenas and sells their meat to finance terrorism. Hyenas, like most dog-like animals, are considered unclean in Islam, but Al-Shabaab overcame its Islamic scruples to sell hyena flesh and even market its consumption as effective at fighting off evil spells.

Al-Shabaab, which keeps killing people in order to impose Islamic law on a country that already runs on Islamic law, has to use black magic to convince people to buy the meat of an animal that eats corpses.

Including human corpses.

The Islamic terrorist group is coming rather close to cannibalism in the name of imposing Islamic law. But American liberals are coming even closer to cannibalism in the name of imposing tolerance.

Somalia is what happens when a country goes mad. And it would be foolish to believe that the same thing couldn’t happen here.

If we could lock up the advocates of open borders in a room with a hyena for three days and hope the scavenger eats the evil spirits in their minds, it would be worth the 560 dollars.

Anonymous said...

90210
Common Core has anti White 4th grade book.
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/fourth-graders-learn-to-own-their-white-privilege-thanks-to-common-core-aligned-lesson/61821?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+fromthetrenchesworldreport%2FWQjf+%28_From+the+Trenches+World+Report%29

Pro-Civ said...

Jay Santos, you are right. Jeh Johnson is the new Homeland Security administrator to succeed Janet Napolitano. That is beyond disturbing.

The Daily Beast: Jeh Johnson Tapped to Lead Department of Homeland Security: Jeh Johnson, the top Pentagon lawyer during Obama’s first term, will be nominated to succeed Janet Napolitano at the Department of Homeland Security. Daniel Klaidman reports.

Bogolyubski said...

Jay Santos on the DHS:
Yes, the Republicans. Bush. But that's not the relevant point. The agency is bigger and badder than ever. They're on the highways, in the train stations. They've procured more ammunition than is imaginable. Now we're about to get an Eric Holder clone running the agency. The agency head actually does have power over the organism's behavior, as seen with Holder. Whether the horrid Republicans established the agency is just not the point and I believe you actually know that.

Of course but you're sort of missing my larger point. As with Eric Holder (an actual outright criminal who belongs in prison) - there is no opposition to this. This worthless asshat will be rubber-stamped without a peep. The Repukes in the Ho-House just put on a Kabuki performance about defunding the totalitarian fill-in-the-blank law they were elected by tea-party patriotards to oppose, knowing full well that they'd end up assuming their customary position fellating Housenigga Huseein, who is now basking in the adoration of the Ministry of Truth. I've yet to see even the wildest Tea-Party Repuke propose that the DHS be defunded and dismantled - have you? Note also that despite all the Repuking, huffing and puffing over the whole 'Fast and Furious' racket, Eric "My People" Holder still has his job, completely untouched and untouchable.

This is why some of us maintain that the political system in the Banksta Banana Republick is merely a sham (as are the financial and legal systems). No real opposition is permitted. If we play by squid rules, we are guaranteed to lose every single time. It's no different in the EUSSR, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, etc. It's the squid way or the highway (or, ultimately, the FEMA camp). Obviously, what has been attempted for the last 50-60-70-80 years has utterly failed. Trying one more time is not going to effect the outcome.

panjoomby said...

@ anonymous: your quote -
"the niggery of it offends me"
is beautiful!

Mr. Rational said...

Which is the same as saying there's no "science" in studying astrophysics because you can't experiment on stars, or epidemiology because you can't go back and tweak the transmission of the bubonic plague or smallpox or influenza.  If you believe this, you've crippled your own mind.  Of COURSE these fields are sciences.

Anyone worried about SUVs melting glaciers should be doing everything in their power to keep the developing nations from industrializing

They're not smart enough.  Just stop sending them money, food and technological stuff.  Stop sending them medicine and they'll begin dying off almost immediately.  The problem isn't Gabon, it's China, India, and us.  We're also smart enough to fix it.

We can also get rid of our domestic NAPA problem by refusing to feed the breeders any longer.  Ghettoes and babies should be mutually exclusive.

So CAL Snowman said...

Dammit, not this anthropogenic global warming bullshit again.

National Snow and Ice Data Center - A Better Year For the Cryosphere

"This summer, Arctic sea ice loss was held in check by relatively cool and stormy conditions. As a result, 2013 saw substantially more ice at summer’s end, compared to last year’s record low extent. The Greenland Ice Sheet also showed less extensive surface melt than in 2012. Meanwhile, in the Antarctic, sea ice reached the highest extent recorded in the satellite record."

Antarctic Sea Ice Hits 35 Year Record High

"On Saturday, the ice extent reached 19.51 million square kilometers, according to data posted on the National Snow and Ice Data Center Web site. That number bested record high levels set earlier this month and in 2012 (of 19.48 million square kilometers). Records date back to October 1978."

"Ultimately, it’s apparent the relationship between ozone depletion, climate warming from greenhouse gases, natural variability, and how Antarctic ice responds is all very complicated. In sharp contrast, in the Arctic, there seems to be a relatively straight forward relationship between temperature and ice extent."

Ultimately they are just full of shit. As Don M said, why the hell would you trust the Fed Gov to tell the truth about anything? You really think that the Fed Gov is on OUR side regarding this whole global warming nonsense? Does anyone else smell that? It smells like a foot long submarine shit sandwich.

Anonymous said...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/florida-orphans-appeal-prompts-10000-inquiries/story?id=20610902
Of the 10,000 families who want to adopt this 15yr old future-SBPDL-story, I'd be shocked if less than 9,500 of them were white.
"If you can, reach out and get me and love me until I die," Davion told ABC News.
Good God, he really has perfected the huckster routine. Sounds like a prison penpal. "Love me til the day I die"???? That's not asking for love, that's asking for a Sucker.

Anonymous said...

Which is the same as saying there's no "science" in studying astrophysics because you can't experiment on stars
Yep, just worship everyone with a post-B.S. education as a "scientist", and they all start circle-jerking each other with nonsense theories about "dark matter" and "dark energy", "unified string theory" -- which, conveniently, they also cannot experiment on. These guys apparently make a good living, through govt grants and the lecture circuit and appearances on The Sy-ence Channel, to pontificate and fantasize and try to become the Next Albert Einstein to give us all a 5-syllable equation to make us think we now know everything.
The problem isn't Gabon, it's China, India, and us. We're also smart enough to fix it.
Agreed, but since we were also "smart enough" to allow the free flow of money and industry into those nations (whose people actually have a few brain cells to rub together) to the point they are a military threat to our power projection and even our existence, I'd say we're not really smart enough to stop them. That same Triumph of the Lack of Will that elevated China's economy at our expense, gives us the unending flood of tird-world squatters in our own homeland.

Chuck Hammer said...

Mr. Rational
Which is the same as saying there's no "science" in studying astrophysics because you can't experiment on stars, or epidemiology because you can't go back and tweak the transmission of the bubonic plague or smallpox or influenza.


False analogies. Global climate is vastly more complex than any of your examples. The only truly honest approach to climate science is to say it's too complicated to be able to know "the answer." Instead of which what we get from the high priests of warming is "consensus," a concept that has no place in science and "99% of scientists agree..." as if they think they can sell us warming bullshit the same way Procter & Gamble sells us soap powder.

In any case, the onus is on you to make your case as 99% of the climate models are now outside of their 99% confidence intervals for global average temperature. (I get to throw 99% around too). Even the IPCC admits no warming for 18 years now and honest climate scientists see global cooling ahead thanks to the PDO, AMO and declining solar insolation.

Ten more years and even you will have to throw in the towel.

Jay Santos said...

Mr. Clean said...
Jay Santos said: You have lots more faith in those 330 million than I. They re-elected Obama and most will sit pasively slack jawed, provided the tele screen works and Taco Bell remains open.


Here's nearly10,000 of those Americans you can count on to save the Republic:

Anonymous said...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/florida-orphans-appeal-prompts-10000-inquiries/story?id=20610902
Of the 10,000 families who want to adopt this 15yr old future-SBPDL-story, I'd be shocked if less than 9,500 of them were white.
"If you can, reach out and get me and love me until I die," Davion told ABC News.
Good God, he really has perfected the huckster routine. Sounds like a prison penpal. "Love me til the day I die"???? That's not asking for love, that's asking for a Sucker.


My point is that something, at some time, destroyed a large swath of the American of European extraction. TV, squids, feminization, pot, fluoride, cheeseburgers, I don't pretend to know. But all the evidence indicates they will lay down for the slaughter, figuratively or literally.

Robert B said...

Well, the real lesson here is whites need to mentor blacks--especially those in the inner city ghetto areas, but all of them really.

You see, the real problem here, when one analyzes the stats in the article, is that the blacks just can't aim a gun worth a shit. They are not getting kill shots and the silly doctors are able to save too many of them. If they had better control and better aim, more of them would succumb to the first shot. That's where white mentoring comes in. Whites can teach them better control and they will thus get better kill rates.

Now, all you red blooded white males who are into the shooting sports, get those street creds (and bonus points at work) by getting out there and getting into the "hood" and make a positive difference where these stats are concerned. You never know, the life you don't save may have been the one who might have raped your mother.

Pro-Civ said...

"American politicians, who can give any Khat-chewing Somali pirate a run for his money in the insanity department, dumped thousands of Somalis into Lewiston, Maine "

-Anon 2:12

Perfect statement. I sometimes wonder - who is more insane: the liberals, or the ones taking advantage of the liberals?

Anonymous said...

Possibly there might be some food in the house if stupid shit like Michael Jordan sneakers and 30" rims for the $200.00 hooptie were not purchased.

Robert B said...

Okay you people, repeat after me, "there is no global warming". Jeezus, they got 5 feet of snow in the Black Hills last week and it's going to snow this weekend in Minneapolis. The Japs and the Russians never signed on to it and now thousands are speaking out against it--thousands of scientists.

Have you all no clue as to what it was about? Did none of you ever even look at the Kyoto Protocol? It was and remains all about taxing white people in the West (Russia would never sign onto it) in order to pay non-whites in the third world to NOT POLLUTE. Any body with a brain knows the third world are the filthiest places on the planet. It was all about GLOBAL WELFARE for non-whites. Damn, get a clue. The only thing more carbon dioxide does is make plants grow faster and greener. It isn't warming (it was far warmer in early Roman times than now and it was cooling that caused the crop failures that sent the "barbarians" on the move)you have to worry about, it's cooling. Cooling causes massive crop failures. How the hell do you think a blond King Tut ended up in Egypt? It's called an ice age.

Anonymous said...

HEY, Robert B that was great. Plus we have to teach the thugs to stop turning there hand side ways.
Remember the only real answer to all this shit, cause it will not get better. Is a WHITE ONLY HOMELAND.
Just had to say that.....johnny j.

Robert B said...

Remember, Mr. Rational also believes in giant Chinese Junks circumnavigating the globe several hundred years before Magellan. The fact that every single historian of repute laughs at the notion, does not stop him from believing it. Mr. Rational? Hardly. Even wikipedia devotes massive space to debunking the idea of the Chinese--a people who still have to pay someone like the Russians to build ships for them, could circumnavigate the globe 700 years ago in their Junks.

Robert B said...

Thanks Johnny.

I have always seen the black on black violence problem as a white problem. We need to help them out. Going to the sporting goods warehouse? Buy a box or two extra of ammo and "drop" it off in the ghetto--literally, just drop it on any street corner and it will find its way to a needy hoodie. Got an old .22 or .32 laying around from grandpa's day? It's most likely unregistered so, why not donate it to a thuggie in the hood? Just drop it on any street corner with a spare box of shells and there ya go--you've done your part to help end black on black crime. After all, if they just had enough guns and ammo, there wouldn't be any left to breed, now would there?

Bogolyubski said...

Robert B.
Have you all no clue as to what it was about? Did none of you ever even look at the Kyoto Protocol? It was and remains all about taxing white people in the West (Russia would never sign onto it) in order to pay non-whites in the third world to NOT POLLUTE. Any body with a brain knows the third world are the filthiest places on the planet. It was all about GLOBAL WELFARE for non-whites.

Indeed. BRA on a global scale. That plus all the cow-fart derivatives which can be marketed by the usual suspects (while they buy up CDS's and bet against them).

SoCAL Snowman:
It smells like a foot long submarine shit sandwich.

...good-n-fresh, with crunchy kosher maggots on top. Yummy! Yummy, we be hohngry in our tummy! Just say the gubmint scientists' shahadah three times and you're ready to go:

There is no truth but warming, and AlGore is its profit!

Anonymous said...

We are the race of people that built this great country.
Most of this great land has been built in the last 100 years.
Irish, Italians, Polls, English, Germans, etc.
If we can do this beautiful work, why is it we have to see it all go to waste.
If we were able to succeed once, we will be able tosucceed again.
WHITE ONLY HOMELAND

Robert B said...

To Anon @ 2:12,

Great post. About 6 years ago the Minneapolis Star Tribune (affectionately known here as the "Star and Sickle"), Published a story on the Somalis here where they admitted that half of them are here illegally and entered via Canada. They also put the blame on them for more than 2,800 mugging per year. I actually had hope for the paper for a bit after that, but no, the article made waves, CAIR got excited and that was the last they did on the Somali problem. They are hated by everyone--especially American blacks. But that's okay with Somalis as they hate everyone else.

Robert B said...

@ Anon @ 6:44PM--

As a an 8th generation American (I'm only guessing at the Generations, but since 1634) I beg to disagree with you. My ancestors were the ones who conquered this continent and made it safe for all those who came much, much later. We built this country. Everyone else is merely a guest.

Anonymous said...

I haven't read all 88 comments, but obviously, the takeaway from the article is that whites will have to secede into some sort of homeland away from the black/brown menace... and THEN
defend it.

AnalogMan said...

Damn, you guys are on fire today. Some great comments - too many of which are anonymous. Get a handle, guys, so we can tell who's who.

@ Anon 1:09 -

99% of climate scientists are in agreement. If you don't want to believe, then go sail off the end of the earth.

Actually, I have considered that very seriously, but life got in the way.

Oh, my. 99%. We have a consensus. The science is settled. You must Believe to be Saved. And if you do not Believe, you will be banished to Outer Darkness. Can you see how your behaviour resembles nothing more than a cult? It cries out for refutation, and Chuck Hammer, Robert B et al have ably done so. Also...

Anon 1:54 (thanks for the support) makes the excellent point that

Building computer models is no substitute, either,

Models serve the purpose of testing hypotheses by making predictions which can be confirmed. Unfortunately for the "climate scientists" (the ninety and nine percent) their predictions have failed spectacularly. But wait, there's more!

Some have mentioned the so-called "Climategate" scandal, where emails and other records of the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit were hacked and published, displaying those "climate scientists'" bad faith and dirty tricks. I found the records from their computer department more interesting.

You may have read how the CRU refused to release its data for others to check their results (an absolutely anti-scientific attitude). Why should we give you our hard-won data, they said, when your intention is purely to prove our conclusions wrong? Well, because that's how science is done! Repeatability. Falsification.

Climategate revealed a more prosaic reason. The CRU can't repeat its own results. They have no idea how they arrived at their published results. There are maintenance notes from an analyst who spent three years trying to figure out what the relevant program looked like at the time they ran it. Unsuccessfully.

There are program listings that show an interesting detail. After all the number crunching, the program adds a "fudge factor" to each year's temperature. No explanation of the source of these factors. Possibly something calculated off-line from other source data, possibly a thumb-suck. The point is, these hardcoded fudge factors are an increasing series - each is larger than its predecessor. In other words, you could feed this model a series of identical temperatures, and it would spit out a hockey stick.

Now, true believers like Mr Rational will point out that, just because the people hawking this sandwich are proven liars with ulterior motives and sloppy procedures, who don't consume their own product, that doesn't prove they're wrong. True enough; logic is a harsh master. But I know which way I'm betting.

Anonymous said...

Thwy speak standard english too. Amazing than imigrant africans speak better english than AA's taught in American schools!

Ex-Brooklynite said...

99% of climate scientists are in agreement. If you don't want to believe, then go sail off the end of the earth. ...

So go ahead, refuse to believe science...


"Science" needs to follow disinterested inquiry, based on the data, wherever it leads. It is formally interested in truth, and a scientist who falsifies data is no longer a scientist. I think we can all agree on that.

Politicians start with a theory and look to find support for it, or at least destroy the opposition to it. This mentality is a different syndrome (not all bad, btw) from science. The problem is, most of "science" has been funded by politicians, with decisions by funders made on a political basis. This corrupts the disinterested search for data, wherever it may lie, and forces the investigators to look in the fields where the government lighting is, not where they lost their metaphorical keys.

So, you wind up using "voting" mechanisms like "99% of X say something" instead of weighing mechanisms.

The irony is, I do not believe in anthropogenic global warming (which is now called "climate change," since there is no warming for years), but I also think that spewing excess carbon into the atmosphere is an uncontrolled scientific experiment, and thus the epitome of bad science.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Robert B
You never know, the life you don't save may have been the one who might have raped your mother.

The un-PC humor on this website is superb.

You see, the real problem here, when one analyzes the stats in the article, is that the blacks just can't aim a gun worth a shit. They are not getting kill shots and the silly doctors are able to save too many of them. If they had better control and better aim, more of them would succumb to the first shot. That's where white mentoring comes in. Whites can teach them better control and they will thus get better kill rates.

Here's the problem with this. When there are more men than women, men have to compete to attract women. When there are more women than men, women have to compete to attract men. This logic is unassailable; ask any poor Chinese man in the one-child PRC how his marriage prospects are going.

Because of the murder and incarceration rate among AA men, basically 1/3rd are unavailable to AA women, either b/c they are in prison, jail, or dead/crippled. This means basically 100 women for 60 men, which means that the women have to offer sex (what else do they have?) to attract men, and the men can secure sex easily.

If you want to control the breeding of another generation of poor impulse control AAs, you need to find a way to reduce the female population below the male one, so men have to compete for women. The system at present makes the problem worse: one man can fertilize 100 women, but 100 men are limited to the reproduction of the one woman in their midst.

I don't have a solution, but I think it's important to point out that increasing the kill ratio will make the problem WORSE.

Mr. Rational said...

Analog Man repeats a canard:

You may have read how the CRU refused to release its data for others to check their results

The CRU at East Anglia didn't own a lot of the data they used, so they couldn't give it out.  It was the proprietary property of the countries which captured it (yes, some countries consider weather records to be national property or even secrets).  The skeptics could either purchase the data or try to get it free under NDA.  Have you noticed them doing this?  No, they're all screaming "CRU WON'T SHARE (what isn't) THEIR DATA!"  (The Koch-financed Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project had no difficulties there.  It also came up with the "hockey stick" just like Mann.)  There is no science on the side of the "skeptics".  None whatsoever.

Mr. Rational said...

And Robert B chimed in:

Okay you people, repeat after me, "there is no global warming". Jeezus, they got 5 feet of snow in the Black Hills last week and it's going to snow this weekend in Minneapolis.

How do you think 5 feet of snow got there?  The air was full of water!  How did it carry all of that water?  It was WARM (relatively speaking).  Why is the center of Antarctica a desert, with less than 1 inch of precipitation per year?  Because it's COLD and COLD air doesn't carry water worth a fig.

Have you all no clue as to what it was about? Did none of you ever even look at the Kyoto Protocol?

Have you no clue about READING ENGLISH?  The left believes the science, but the policy prescriptions are non-sequiturs.

Mr. Rational also believes in giant Chinese Junks circumnavigating the globe

Hah!  Hardly, not without magnetic compasses!  They were technically capable of reaching the east coast of Africa, and the claims that they did so had some credibility with me.  I'm not a historian so I can't judge the counter-claim that this is modern pro-Chinese propaganda.  Not a big deal either way.

Mr. Rational said...

And back to Chuck Hammer again:

False analogies. Global climate is vastly more complex than any of your examples.

More complex than entire stars?  How would you know?  Does the word "helioseismology" even mean anything to you?

The only truly honest approach to climate science is to say it's too complicated to be able to know "the answer."

The IPCC reports don't even try to state "the answer", but probability projections.  You know, like the probablistic projections of likelihood of damaging weather events which let your insurance company quote a premium for coverage against wind, hail and tornadoes?

Instead of which what we get from the high priests of warming is "consensus,"

About the confidence limits, yes.  I've tried to read some of these reports (they're very heavy going).

Unlike you, I would start taking action when the probability of serious adverse climate change hit 5%, or even 1% if I could do it on the cheap.  We passed 5% a long, long time ago; we're up somewhere around the 95% confidence level.

It's actually pretty easy to test the greenhouse model.  Just measure the thermal infrared radiation coming down from the atmosphere.  Measure it at sea level, on mountains, when the air is dry, when it's humid, day and night.  Measure radiation coming up at ground level, and over the same terrain from high altitude.  Do you think this hasn't been done?  If you do, you're wrong.  AND crazy.

Now, if you could just get your head around these concepts you might (might) be able to use them against the blank-slatists.  As a for-instance:
1.  What's the likelihood that behavioral differences between dog breeds, chimpanzees vs. bonobos, etc. are innate rather than environmental?
2.  What's the likelihood that differences in behavior between human races are also innate?
3.  How much of a chance of this should there be before we take it seriously in criminal justice?  In educational policy?  In welfare policy?  In immigration policy?

You really need to read this, where the author says "Career number two was coming unglued under the weight of cognitive dissonance."  Who knows, you might be able to recruit some new racists!

Anonymous said...

**sigh**
To get back to the actual post has anyone seen the movie "Flag wars"? It is about how a bunch of gays wanted to come into a Columbus neighborhood and rehab/clean up the area. This 'hood was already populated with "low income" (read: blacks) people and it showed the war that played out between the two groups. You have to see this movie. Being from Columbus I can tell you that the blacks eventually won, as most of this area is still ghetto. The gays moved on to other areas. But this movie shows an important truth...blacks HATE gays. If you want to isolate your neighborhood from a black invasion, get and sustain a sizable gay population. It has worked out GREAT for certain parts of Columbus, which is now actually experiencing a white INflux from the outer suburbs.

Chuck Hammer said...

Mr. Rational
Unlike you, I would start taking action when the probability of serious adverse climate change hit 5%, or even 1% if I could do it on the cheap. We passed 5% a long, long time ago; we're up somewhere around the 95% confidence level.


Ah yes, the Chicken Little argument. Let's trash the global economy just in case.

Among the many glaring flaws in the entire ridiculous edifice is that even if AGW were a real phenomenon, which it's not, there's nothing meaningful we can do about it.

How's that? Well, anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions are less than 5% of the total sources of carbon dioxide entering the atmosphere. So to have any meaningful effect on the CO2 flux we would have to take absolutely Draconian measures. Not just to curtail hydrocarbon fuel use but to micromanage agriculture and land use across the entire globe. Hey, nothing you couldn't get done with a totalitarian New World Order and global government, right?

So it's just as well AGW is fiction.

I remember when I used to wonder how medieval clergy could be so stupid as to debate the number of angels that could fit on the head of a pin.

I also remember when I used to wonder how Rome could have fallen.

It's all so clear now.

AnalogMan said...

Mr. Rational said...

Analog Man repeats a canard:

You may have read how the CRU refused to release its data for others to check their results


How is that a canard? Did Dr Phil Jones, or did he not, say

"Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it"?

Is that science?

Did he not also refuse to release his methodology? Understandable, since he apparently doesn't have a record of the methodology used. Or, does that also belong to someone else?

Mr. Rational said...

Ah yes, the Chicken Little argument. Let's trash the global economy just in case.

That is not a counter-argument, it's name-calling.  And speaking of trashing the economy, do you recall what the Dust Bowl drought did to the economy of the lower Midwest?  Texas and Oklahoma had mass exodi.

even if AGW were a real phenomenon, which it's not

You, who I would wager a 3-figure sum have never calculated an adiabatic temperature lapse rate, assert on the basis of nothing that AGW is not a real phenomenon?

there's nothing meaningful we can do about it.

And then you assert a contradiction!  If it's anthropogenic, it's caused by something humans are doing.  OF COURSE we can do something about it, just by doing something different.  It is literally that simple.

anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions are less than 5% of the total sources of carbon dioxide entering the atmosphere.

No, they're not.  Net additions to atmospheric carbon are almost entirely from fossil fuels; one look at the Keeling curve is enough to prove that the annual CO2 rise is closer to a fifth of the seasonal cycle than a twentieth.  And as I said before, we KNOW that this is from human activity, because the ratio of carbon-13 in the new CO2 is too low for volcanoes.

All of this can be verified with a few searches, but you won't do it.  The spirit of open and honest inquiry has fled you, if you ever had it in the first place.

So to have any meaningful effect on the CO2 flux we would have to take absolutely Draconian measures. Not just to curtail hydrocarbon fuel use but to micromanage agriculture and land use across the entire globe.

Nonsense.  In the 1970's the USA was on course to eliminate coal-burning electric plants, which (spread to Europe as well) would have done half the job right there.  The process was derailed by government under the guise of "safety".  Refusing to admit China to the WTO would have kept its economy small, and coal consumption with it.  Last, just refusing to buy timber or products from countries which clear rainforest or drain peat bogs would halt most of the ag-related emissions.  We don't get anything from SE Asia that can't be obtained elsewhere, it's no hardship at all.

nothing you couldn't get done with a totalitarian New World Order and global government, right?

Nothing you couldn't get done with cost-benefit analysis forced on the NRC and modest oil import and coal severance taxes.

Mr. Rational said...

"Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it"?

Is that science?


No, it's the same game being played by those allegedly interested in the data:  politics.  Why shouldn't Jones play politics, when the other side isn't practicing science?

Did he not also refuse to release his methodology?

Methodology is published in the papers.  What the "skeptics" were demanding wasn't methodology, but working computer code.  My understanding is that code is written as needed and generally discarded; it is not published with the results, and confirming the work would use original code in any case.  That's just how they do things.

That is light-years away from my world, where every line of code is vetted for conformance to a requirements document.  But academia does things its own way.  NASA actually did things both ways with the Space Shuttle flight computers; the Shuttle carried two independently-written and verified programs to avoid common logic bugs.