Monday, October 7, 2013

Where Segregation Saves the Day (For Whites): Newark

'No snitching.' It means violence will supplant the rule of law. [Newark Battles Murder and Its Accomplice, Silence, New York Times, 5-27-2007]:
“I don’t know what frustrates me more,” Captain Coley sighed the next afternoon, an aromatherapy candle burning in her precinct office. “These knuckleheads killing each other, or the residents who won’t cooperate with my officers.” 
One graph, that catalogues homicides and nonfatal shootings in Newark, by breaking down the predominant racial group of who calls where they occurred 'home'-- Q: What do you immediately see? A: Jim Crow's Shadow
That lack of cooperation — steeped in public mistrust that has been simmering at a low boil since the 1967 riots and fueled by hip-hop culture’s “stop snitching” mantra — is among the major roadblocks Mayor Cory A. Booker faces in his struggle to curb the lawlessness here in New Jersey’s largest city... 
...while violent crime has dropped since January — armed robberies are down 42 percent and auto theft 28 percent compared with the first five months of last year — the pace of homicides has not let up since 2006, when 105 people, most of them young black men, were killed.

If most of the homicides in Newark involve black men (and the suspect/individual arrested is almost always a black male), it shouldn't be hard to deduce that the overwhelmingly majority of nonfatal shootings involve a black suspect. [Nonfatal shootings continue to plague N.J. cities, thousands of cases unsolved since 2008, NJ.com, 9-10-13]: 
The statistics from New Jersey’s most violent cities paint a grim, but simple, picture.Gun violence is increasing statewide, and resource-strapped police departments are failing to solve hundreds of nonfatal shootings each year in nine of the state’s largest cities: Newark, Camden, Atlantic City, Paterson, Jersey City, Elizabeth, Plainfield, Irvington and Orange.
Last year, police failed to solve more than 80 percent of nonfatal shootings in those cities, continuing a trend that has left thousands of potential killers on New Jersey’s streets. From 2008 to last year, roughly 2,600 out of 3,400 nonfatal shootings went unsolved in those cities.
Since 2008, Newark has been home to 1,240 nonfatal shootings; there have been only 237 arrests (19 percent). 

The New York Times created a map of all homicides and nonfatal shootings in the city, plotting where each crime occurred on an overlay of the city of Newark. More to the point, the dots were plotted on this map of the city, with the racial groups percentage of the population shaded in to denote where the violence was situated. 

Notice the high percentage of dots in areas that are 80 percent or greater black; notice the almost absence of dots for areas that are populated by a majority of whites. 

That map is reproduced above. James Crow Shadow still covers the white population of Newark, whether they know it or not. 

Were the races not segregated, who knows how many whites would fall victim to gunfire, fired (with extreme malice) by a gun operated by a black male; worse, the culture of 'no snitching' would ensure this black individual protection for his crime. 

The latter is already the name of game in Newark, where the rule of law has long been a casualty of the absence of Mr. Crow. 

For those wondering what the end-result of the American Experiment is (where open borders and black empowerment combine to produce a most unsightly off-spring), look no farther than 2013 Newark. It's coming to a neighborhood, a community, a city, and a state near you. 


24 comments:

Anonymous said...

I want to live in a place where I don't have to worry about Negro violence. Where in this country is such a place?

Rocky said...

Really reminds you of that most disgusting of words to call a black man. The "N" word one never wants to use when referring to a black, Neighbor!

james m said...

This is a good example of wht Blacks should not be allowed firearms.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2444741/Detroit-driver-shoots-man-dead-telling-slow-down.html
And here is a preview of whats coming to NYC once Di Blasio is elected, meet Reggie Chance (see photo on lower left of article)
http://nypost.com/2013/10/07/cops-haul-in-biker-beating-suspect/
I'll be able to see the flames rising over Manhattan from the burbs...

countenance said...

Only 19% of non-fatal shootings in New-Ook result in arrests.

Meanwhile, the real threats to New Jersey? Darren Walp and Brian Aitken.

R.E. Prindle said...

Here's a historical quote from Perrett's America In The Twenties of a Chicago incident. In reading this I'm guessing that the protagonist, Grover Cleveland Redding was not reacting to current events.

The vast majority of Negroes were brought over to the US after 1800 and the invention of the cotton gin. That means that the majority of the Negro population was hauled out of the jungles shortly before the Civil War so that there was a single generation between arrival, 1860 and emancipation. The freed slaves were still African savages.
Thus the second and third generations were born after say, 1840-1860 and the third perhaps 1880-1900.

The first generation must have retained nearly full African mores and identity passing them on to current Negroes. Thus current Negroes are African in America. Thus Redding's action in the quote I believe harks back to the Negro reaction to the US of the first generation. Perrett p. 239

Quote:

(Marcus Garvey) was not without competition. On one side were the integrationists, such as the NAACP, and on the other revolutionaries such as the "Abyssinians" led by Grover Cleveland Redding. For a time Redding seemed likely to outshine Garvey.

Redding's Ethiopian Mission to Abyssinia began to attract large numbers of blacks whom Garvey was trying to recruit. Then, in the summer of 1920, Redding rode a white stallion through the South Side of Chicago. He was dressed in a toga of brilliant colors so that the horse did not capture all the attention. He ended his ride by setting fire to an American flag, and before it vanished completely in smoke, he emptied a pistol into it. Redding prepared to do the same to another flag, but this time a white sailor and a black policeman attempted to stop him. Redding instantly shot them down.

The Apyssinians raced down the streets to attack policemen, killing two of them, wounding a half dozen more...Redding was seized, tried for murder, convicted and hanged, his great dream of leading an "armed force" into the South unrealized.

Unquote.

I think it probable that this whole San Domingo Moment was 'planned' that is discussed around the fires by the recently introduced savages prior to the Civil War. It is being worked out now. It would seem that the only solution to this racial problem is genocide, one of us or the other. Take your choice.

10mm AUTO said...

People wonder where the breakdown of civility will start, well here it is. A police department that has an 80% homicide/violent crimes clearance rate is not a Police Dept., its a statistical agency that gathers money through road tickets and taxes. It used to be that a clearance rate of 90% was common and the "cold case files" barely were mentioned.

But put a negro in the "Top Cop" position and all of sudden, 60% clearance is the new "normal", then less. "Youth Gang" units are deployed, that do nothing. "Community Policing" tactics are tried, that do nothing and the number of gang members swells. Da Chief goes to seminars and the department gets new equipment but the tide never turns.

There will come a time where you only go to the police with ready cash, because that is the only you will get any effort.

Just like any third world country.

The expectation of a first world, high tech police force that actually catches criminals exists only on TV (to quiet the proles) and in the minds of those who remember when it was true.

Anonymous said...

I want to live in a place where I don't have to worry about Negro violence. Where in this country is such a place?

Try North Dakota, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, or Idaho.

E. Newton said...

Anonymous said...
I want to live in a place where I don't have to worry about Negro violence. Where in this country is such a place?


In the mid-90's I lived in Washington DC. Of course negroes were everywhere, but I had a job to do and made the best of it. I remember during that time taking a month long trip through Indonesia. This was the first time I really had left the US and the longest trip I had ever been on. It was a very enjoyable time, I saw great sights and experienced a different culture. My return trip left me overnight in LA, where I stayed at an upscale airport hotel.

I remember walking into that hotel and for the first time in 30 days, I saw them. They were not so much sitting on the lobby couches as laying across all of them. All had the thug clothes of the day, the baseball hats on sideways, the baggy pants. They were loud. Louder than anything I remembered in Indonesia, louder than the streets of Jakarta. Loud and dumb, and generally threatening with the hard stares. I just felt sick seeing them again. Almost 20 years ago and I can remember it like it was yesterday. Now they are in every corner of the nation. This country has surrendered to this garbage?

Anonymous said...

For those wondering what the end-result of the American Experiment is (where open borders and black empowerment combine to produce a most unsightly off-spring), look no farther than 2013 Newark. It's coming to a neighborhood, a community, a city, and a state near you.

Thank you Emanuel Celler, Jacob Javits, and Chuck Schumer.

Discard said...

Question: I understand that Blacks commit 53% of the murders in this country. Now, if only 20% of the killings are solved does that mean that Black commit 53% of solved murders, with the other 80% apportioned somehow? Do the authorities simply assume that Black victims most likely were killed by Blacks? Or are the unsolved murders just left out of the equation?
Anybody know?

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous bleats:
I want to live in a place where I don't have to worry about Negro violence. Where in this country is such a place?

There are few such places left even now. There will be zero once the Repukes are finished with their dog-and-pony show for the Tea-Party patriotards and roll over to allow both the full-speed implementation of Obamacare, amnesty, and the funding of HUD's expansion of Section 8 to destroy what few enclaves remain. Gated communities for squids and upper-level nomenklatura will be exempt of course, just as Congress exempted itself from Obamacare.

The thing that is so frustrating is how they keep on pulling the same cheap tricks over and over to sell used shit-sandwiches - and how a large segment of the white population falls for it yet again! It's like watching the movie Ground Hog Day in a 10-hour marathon 5 times in a row.

R.E. Prindle:
The vast majority of Negroes were brought over to the US after 1800 and the invention of the cotton gin. That means that the majority of the Negro population was hauled out of the jungles shortly before the Civil War so that there was a single generation between arrival, 1860 and emancipation. The freed slaves were still African savages.
Thus the second and third generations were born after say, 1840-1860 and the third perhaps 1880-1900.


This is simply inaccurate. The importation of slaves was outlawed in 1808. The law was actively enforced, too - by the US Navy. The vast majority of freed slaves were born here and were descended from parents and grandparents born here. The only place where slave importation continued well into the 19th century was Brazil.

This actually makes any argument justifying TNB on the basis of insufficient assimilation even weaker. The population in America was (and is) thoroughly detached (physically) from its African roots - yet the same epic stupidity, violence and depravity remains despite the generations of countering influence from an advanced white culture. In the past century since the squids took over the country and its culture, groids have actually actually devolved - a reversion to the African cultural mean.

Bogolyubski said...

10 MM Auto:
Da Chief goes to seminars and the department gets new equipment but the tide never turns.

Not only does Da Cheeph go to fancy seminars with the department getting shiny new toys, Da Cheeph invariably gets shiny new thread with lots of gold trim, gold badges, etc. Ever notice how they all start looking like African dictators in uniform after a while?

Anonymous said...

"But put a negro in the "Top Cop" position and all of sudden, 60% clearance is the new "normal..."

That's because once a negro is hired, it can never be "unhired" without incurring huge legal costs to the employer. Negroes lower the bar in everything they do, except destroying civilizations, for which they are rather handy tools of destruction.

"Try North Dakota, Montana, Utah, Wyoming, or Idaho."

If you do decide to try North Dakota, just make sure you don't tell anyone there that you want to live around whites. The brainwashed folks of ND seem to have embraced the negro from afar, thanks to constant commercials and movie propaganda showing that negroes are just like us and they are our friends.

drew458 said...

the map shows crimes from 2006. Population demographics have probably shifted quite a bit since then, although one interesting part shown is that in 2006 several black areas were NOT really poor, yet still full of violence.

AS a NJ resident, let me tell you, of the 9 cities listed, at least 7 are wall to wall homies.

The linked article isn't that truthful. Shootings are up a few in some cities, down a few in others, for about the same number this year as last. And arrests made are not as high as some of us would like, but considering how cash strapped - bankrupt! - some of these cities are, it's impressive that the rates are as high as they are.

Is the non-fatal shootings arrest rate higher in white communities in NJ? Maybe, maybe not. Not all shootings are crimes after all, regardless of skin color. But are there far fewer shootings in white communities? Most likely. Problem is, we don't have any cities that are mostly white. Trenton may be closest? 75%+ NJ blacks live in urban areas. Good thing the rest of the state is white suburbia and farms.

Anonymous said...

I want to live in a place where I don't have to worry about Negro violence. Where in this country is such a place?

There are plenty of areas still left to choose from. Check out this online and interactive map:

AFRICAN-AMERICAN POPULATION

D said...

Newton - this country was surrenderd long ago. The active genocide already crossed the event horizon. It's pretty much over for whiteness as we know it.

Anonymous said...

Is there a site that breaks down the FBI and DOJ data into easily understood racial data? A site that follows and posts this critical information so that we can clearly see what the various rates of crime are? For example, I have heard that over 30,000 white females a year are sexually assaulted by black males. I don't doubt this but is this a fairly accurate trend, year after year?

Anonymous said...

Plenty of small towns with a limited black presence but there are also limited employment opportunities.

Mich Mike

Anonymous said...

NYC will be interesting to watch. Will the elites allow De Blasio to ruin their own property values and allow ferals to run riot in their working neighborhoods?

I lived in Chelsea during the Dinkins area. It was BAD until the elites chucked him out. Why are they allowing this to happen? An experiment? Failed memory? What will the outcome be?

R.E. Prindle said...

Bogolyubski: There were relatively few Negroes in 1798 and a few million in 1860. Where did they come from? It is true that the British outlawed slavery and patrolled the coasts of Africa after 1808, both East and West by the way, but Americans are resourceful and Negroes continued to be imported.

Anonymous said...

Ooooh, dat Reggie Chance beez a REBEL an' sheet!

Flipping the bird! How bold! How original!

Californian said...

Is there a site that breaks down the FBI and DOJ data into easily understood racial data? A site that follows and posts this critical information so that we can clearly see what the various rates of crime are?

There are some studies at:

http://www.colorofcrime.com/

http://thosewhocansee.blogspot.fr/2013/08/whence-afro-criminality.html

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...
The thing that is so frustrating is how they keep on pulling the same cheap tricks over and over to sell used shit-sandwiches - and how a large segment of the white population falls for it yet again! It's like watching the movie Ground Hog Day in a 10-hour marathon 5 times in a row.


Republicans whom I know keep asking me this question: "What do you think of [X,Y,Z] candidate?" They are really hoping this time 'round, they will elect a Real Republican(tm) who will cut taxes, raise defense spending and balance the budget. They completely ignore the racial end of elections.

Thing is, the Democrats have been pushing a race-based socialism since the 1960s. The GOP is still mired in some mid-20th century idea that by pushing economics it can turn things around. But this only works in a relatively homogenous society, like the America of the 1950s which was 90% white. It will not work when every other racial group has the votes to loot the country. So the GOP has to either go racial or render itself irrelevant.

And yes, the Ground Hog Day analogy is right on the money. To use another movie analogy: How do you get Americans to take that Red Pill?

Dave said...

Buffalo NY is a diverse city, but highly segregated. If a black family moves into a white neighborhood, the house immediately catches fire, and nobody saw anything. If anyone snitched, their house would probably catch fire too. Poor whites can't afford to move away, so they defend their turf.