Sunday, November 10, 2013

Karate Classes, Gun Lessons, and a New Security System Won't Save the White Suburbs of Indianapolis from the Black Undertow; A Return of Racial Reality Will

Imagine you run a small business.

Be it a gun shop, an owner of a self-defense/karate studio located in some strip mall, or a locksmith.

Maybe you own a security company not affiliated with one of the national conglomerates, competing for market-share against the likes of ADT.
This will not save you or your family (most importantly, your small business or your property value) from the depravity of the black undertow terrorizing 'lily-white' areas of Indianapolis

There exists no greater boon to your business than the emptying of the black ghettos of an abandoned major city and their migration to the safe, bountiful suburbs from which white Americans attempted to prolong some semblance of America.

The coming of the Black Undertow is one of the - sadly - great creators of economic growth in areas that would otherwise see stagnant or normal growth in a 'lily-white' environment, one where neighbors leave their garages opened and doors unlocked without fear of crime.

Those days are in the past in Indianapolis, where the black community white suburbanites tried to flee (setting up what we once dubbed 'drifter colonies') is now following and exporting with them crime, rape, and murder in the process.

But economic activity is being stimulated in the process, with startled white citizens of Indianapolis clamoring for peace and security that has been disturbed by those 'Sons of Obama' scarcely found at those "good schools" your white neighbors once claimed was the primary reason they moved to the 'burbs. [Gun sales surge after recent home break-ins: Gun safety classes also filling up, RTV 6 ABC Indianapolis, 11-10-13]:
The recent increase in home break-ins and robberies has led to a surge in gun sales. The owner of Indy Trading Post said more people are buying guns, applying for carry permits and signing up for gun safety courses.
"We've seen a large increase in people coming in that have been in those areas where the home invasions have taken place," owner Brian Ludlow said.
Ludlow stressed the importance of firearms education and safety, but he believes having a gun could prevent somebody from becoming a victim.
"These guys aren't coming in being nice about it. Most of these criminals are armed when they come in. So by arming yourself you are evening out the playing field," Ludlow said.
Annette Pierson said she was concerned about making sure her family was protected.
"I've been a gun owner, but I'm exercising it more with the training, the education and becoming skilled with it," Pierson said. "I will be taking their class. Their last class was full. So I'm definitely going to be taking their class, my daughter-in-law, my children, my family, we all believe in our right to bear arms and protect our families."
Classes are already full for November and are filling up quickly for December, but private lessons are still available. A two-hour lesson will cost about $80.
State police records showed a steady increase in gun permit requests over the last year.
In the third quarter of the year alone, more than 60,000 people in Marion County have applied for a gun permit.
In Indiana, a person needs a permit to carry, but anyone can have a gun at home for personal protection, no permit required.
 The police are ineffective, becoming nothing more than an affirmative action hiring board for otherwise unemployable black people that are believed to have some magic cure-all for establishing trust with the black community (you know, that community responsible for breeding the people who commit almost all the homicides in Indianapolis). [IMPD's push for diversity promotes good policing, Indy Star, 11-9-13]

Luckily, a black writer at the Indy Star, Abdul -Hakim Shabazz, is willing to highlight the type of culture presently sending middle-aged white people to gun stores in Indianapolis and seeking some form of security to guard against. [Abdul-Hakim Shabazz: Black community needs to stand up against crime, Indy Star, June 20, 2013]:
At the risk of being the bad guy, I want to say that it is time for the black community in Indianapolis to have a serious discussion about the city’s rising murder rate. There has been a lot of talk about the need for more police officers and whether the city is directing its priorities in the right places, but I have seen the data, and while more cops may help in ­addressing some crime, I doubt if adding more officers will lead to a decrease in Indianapolis’ murder rate.
Allow me to share some statistics. Between Jan. 1 and June 3, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department cataloged 50 murders. Of the 50 murder victims, 41 (82 percent) had criminal records. And according to IMPD, 30 of the victims accounted for 119 adult felony arrests. Now let’s look at the suspects. Of the 29 suspects that local law enforcement was able to identify, 75 percent of them, or 22, had criminal records accounting for a combined 61 adult felony arrests.

Safety. Security. Peace. Stability.

All things possible in that most denigrated of environment, the 'lily-white' one.

But with the advent of the Black Undertow, things we once took for granted in a 'lily-white' community - think safety, security, peace, and stability - vanish before our eyes. In a frightened dash to re-capture the beauty of a freshly fallen snow, citizens of Indianapolis are turning to karate, guns, and extra locks for the door. [Indy residents search for safety after home invasions, Indy Star, 11-10-13]:
A recent spate of home invasions has residents of some Indianapolis neighborhoods on edge, but law enforcement and security experts say preparation — not panic — is the best defense.
Many local residents already have taken steps to protect themselves and their families, from installing security systems to enrolling in self-defense training courses to buying guns.
“I just got a call this week from a group of women from the Meridian Hills areas who want personal protection instruction,” said Guy A. Relford, a Carmel attorney who specializes in Second Amendment law and operates Indianapolis-based Tactical Firearms Training LLC.
The request was “specifically due to some of the recent incidents,” said Relford, who also teaches a gun-law class on what Hoosiers can legally do to protect their homes and themselves.
Relford was referring to two separate and harrowing incidents recently in northern Marion County.
The first occurred on Oct. 24, when two homeowners were assaulted, their home ransacked and their vehicle stolen in a home invasion in the 7000 block of North Spring Mill Road.
Five days later, a home invasion in the 800 block of East 79th Street was carried out by as many as four men, who shot a woman, sexually assaulted her and her adult daughter and stole three vehicles.
Those cases were among at least eight home invasions in the Indianapolis area since mid-September in which residents were terrorized, shot or stabbed.
“Based on what’s being reported,” he said, “there is no question there has been a rash in areas where people are not used to seeing these types of crimes. They also have been very violent. Things like that are going to get people’s attention.”
That was evident Tuesday, when more than 150 people showed up at Second Presbyterian Church, 7700 N. Meridian St., for a community forum on home safety.
“When something of this magnitude occurs, it grabs everyone’s attention,” said Jon Pactor, 64, a Northside resident who was at the meeting.
“I think people are scared. I also think people are mystified. People want to know who are these villains? Where do they come from? Why are they here?”
 The villains are black, with Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) and opportunistic white Republicans unleashing this population upon white America in one of the truest forms of bipartisanship; the white working-class and white middle-class must be destroyed, their wealth eliminated via a property-value demoralizing racial infusion of vibrant diversity directly from the black ghettos of Indianapolis (rinse and repeat this process in every major American city with a thriving ring of suburbs). 

Never realizing the implicit whiteness of their suburban paradise before it's too late, these atomized white suburbanites inability to protect their small slice of the American Dream all stems from their failure to understand that there's nothing wrong with thinking explicitly white. 

That's the kind of mindset that built America; since the battle of Newark in 1968, the reverse is the kind of mindset that ensures the Detroiting of all of America will never be stopped. 

The Indy Star article continues:
Alan Stockman, owner and instructor at Carlson Gracie Indianapolis Jiu Jitsu in Greenwood, said he has seen an increase in interest in self-defense training in the past two weeks. More people, particularly women, have been coming in every day, he said, either signing up for classes or inquiring about them.
“A lot of them come and they said they wanted to make sure they know how to take care of themselves and take care of their family,” Stockman said.
Clint Cloys, owner and instructor of Circle City Safety in Fishers, also has seen increased interest in self-defense classes.

“In the past seven days,” he said, “I have had nine requests for when my next self-defense class is, and I usually only get six to eight requests a month.”
His business runs workshops that teach women the “nuts and bolts of self-defense, just basic techniques and concepts that are highly effective in a situation where adrenalin is going to take over,” Cloys said.
At Broad Ripple Lock Service, office manager Liz Smith said the business experienced a surge right after the home invasion incident on Spring Mill Road near the Meridian Hills neighborhood. She said the business received about 15 calls — about double the amount of calls they normally get in that time frame.
“A lot more from that area are calling, wanting to know what they can do to make their houses a little bit more secure and to make it harder for people to kick in their doors,” Smith said.
Bill Nelson of Nelson Alarm Co. said the recent incidents have prompted “an extreme uptick in the number of calls for new systems and additions to existing service.”
One of the most popular requests, Nelson said, has been for “panic buttons” that can be worn or carried and, with a touch, alert the center that monitors alarms to a home invasion.
“With all the recent commotion,” he said, “I took another one home and hung it by the garage door. I told my wife to grab it every time she goes out to get the paper.”
Fear also appears to be driving an increase in the number of residents who are buying guns for personal protection, said Don Davis, who owns Don’s Guns and Galleries at 3807 Lafayette Road.
“We are getting an awful lot of people, particularly women, buying guns for the first time,” he said. “It’s all for personal protection. These things are starting to really weigh on people’s minds.”
 Karate won't save you; a gun might save you, but you'll enjoy the George Zimmerman-treatment if used to disturb a black home invaders mission; a security systems and new, enhanced locks are by definition a defensive measure, an admission that peace, stability, and the safe community you moved your family to is now irrevocably lost.

The best defense is a good offense, and there is only one offense in America capable of returning safety, security, peace, and stability to not only Indianapolis, but every zip code in the USA.

Racial reality.

It's the greatest offense against not just crime, but against the bipartisan agreement of both Democrats and Republicans to destroying the wealth of the white middle-class.

That's how we wake up from the nightmare that is 2013 America.


98 comments:

countenance said...

The Breitbart article didn't mention anything about race.

But I fixed that in a comment section.

Jay Santos said...

...a gun might save you, but you'll enjoy the George Zimmerman-treatment…

This is such an important point. There were two reasons for the State's, the media's and the negro agitators' efforts on behalf of Trayvon Martin. First, they wanted a "fresh" Emmitt Till fantasy story, something to juice up both white guilt and black solidarity.

But they also knew that they had to put a chill on defensive measures against negroes. Negro violence is spiking and they needed to send a message to any non-negro, that you better think long and hard before you touch that firearm. In fact, they would prefer you think just long enough to have your head smashed in.

It really is beginning to resemble South Africa. The difference being that it's not white farmers that are being slaughtered in America. Not yet.

Anonymous said...

It should be clear that BRA wants to precipitate another "Trayvon moment" that will generate the desired result, which is civil unrest. Florida was just too heavily armed and they knew it.

james m said...

This: The police are ineffective, becoming nothing more than an affirmative action hiring board for otherwise unemployable black people that are believed to have some magic cure-all for establishing trust with the black community (you know, that community responsible for breeding the people who commit almost all the homicides in Indianapolis).

And This: The villains are black, with Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) and opportunistic white Republicans unleashing this population upon white America in one of the truest forms of bipartisanship; the white working-class and white middle-class must be destroyed, their wealth eliminated via a property-value demoralizing racial infusion of vibrant diversity directly from the black ghettos of Indianapolis (rinse and repeat this process in every major American city with a thriving ring of suburbs)
Show you are firing on all eight cylinders PK !
Outstanding truly outstanding.

panjoomby said...

DWL's want us to think these are just "growing pains" & after some initial difficulties adjusting to integration (over the last 50+ years) we'll all get along like puppies & rainbows.

police = "affirmative action hiring board for otherwise unemployable blacks... believed to have some magic cure-all for establishing trust with the black community" - superbly said!

i was impressed breitbart allows honest factual comments!

breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/11/10/Indy-Gun-Sales-Surge-After-Home-Invasions-Rise

Ricky Tucker said...

Breitbart,O'Reilly,Limbaugh...blame big city crime on Democrats and their liberal policies. They rarely lay the blame on blacks.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

Atomization is the source of the problem. Deracinated people, unable to come together like the fingers of a hand into a fist. The home invaders are not united; the black community has never been able to act cohesively, except at the ballot box.

At present, the First Amendment protects religious organizations from government interference. This is probably the last Amendment to go down. The white religious leader who figures out how to use the shield of religion to protect the community and social capital of his flock will be as venerated in 100 years as Moses.

Anonymous said...

Breitbart & Limbaugh are monitored daily by liberal media watchers for the slightest hints of BRA violations. They can't be explicit but often times especially with Limbaugh, he'll lead the savvy listener to the real truth. Look what he did with the Detroit book.

Anonymous said...

Gun Lessons...Won't Save the White Suburbs of Indianapolis from the Black Undertow
Amen. What good is owning a gun, if you lack the will to use it? Or if your daughter's Fight-or-Flight instinct is "Walk Into Room and Offer Purse"??
a gun might save you, but you'll enjoy the George Zimmerman-treatment if used to disturb a black home invader
This is true in many parts of the country, but should not deter or derail anyone's will to defend themselves at all costs. If you live in a Zimmerman-Hostile zone, then take any possible measures to avoid that outcome (e.g. don't call the cops and tell them you're about to confront a hoodlum). Stay anonymous and off the record if possible; but most importantly, never, ever, let the enemy prevail. Put some forethought into what situations could arise (at home, and on the street), and how you might evade and counter them; and put your family into the same mindset.

Anonymous said...

90210 off top

In santa monica [lib ville] they named the [almost new, 20? million dollar] Libraries main auditorium..
yup...you guessed it...not Hamilton or Taft but....
drum roll...MLK auditorium [fold hands in prayer]

Anonymous said...

The white religious leader who figures out how to use the shield of religion to protect the community and social capital of his flock will be as venerated in 100 years as Moses
...Or be demonized as the next David Koresh or Jim Jones. Some religions have stayed out of the Social Security scam, and others have claimed free exercise of medical choice -- which may very well be attacked and usurped down the road under Osamacare. You may have also noticed a general rise in hostility toward religious 503-C tax exemptions; but as many have pointed out, the government/squid uses laws against the people, not for them. Don't expect to bring down the system with some legal technicality, when they already ignore the laws that would deny them from totalitarian control.

Anonymous said...

90210: In santa monica they named the Libraries main auditorium ...drum roll...MLK auditorium [fold hands in prayer]
I'm doing something different with my hands right now.
Stuff like this makes me disbelieve every sci-fi time-travel movie, with Super Agents waging unseen battles to protect the continuity of the cosmic timeline, preventing the uncontrolled creation of splintered-off parallel universes. It seems much more likely that any time machine would be commandeered and used by DWL Time Vacationers to go back to 1960 so they can worship The Reverent Doctor Marvelous Lufis King (PBUH) in person, and lick his balls if he'd be so kind.

Anonymous said...

Black male viciously beats to death his White girlfriend's young White daughter.

http://www.10tvtogo.com/wap/news/text.jsp?sid=40&nid=1578003353&cid=21017&scid=-1&ith=1&title=Local+News&headtitle=Local+News

"They could not differentiate the different lobes of her brain, it was just basically mush. He beat her so bad," added Miller.

Anonymous said...

Black man killed a 10-year old White child, the son of his White girlfriend. Why do White women keep leaving their kids with sub-80 IQ filth like this? Do they want to see their kids beaten to death? Are they that mentally f*cked up?

http://www.wbtv.com/story/23907032/man-accused-in-murder-of-10-year-old-back-in-court

Anonymous said...

In santa monica [lib ville] they named the [almost new, 20? million dollar] Libraries main auditorium..
yup...you guessed it...not Hamilton or Taft but....
drum roll...MLK auditorium [fold hands in prayer]
---------------------
Stupid name, yes, but then again, it isn't like blacks go to libraries.

Anonymous said...

90210

I do listen to Rusn Limbooo..
He has the left figured out. BUT
he is for:
Wars
Military
Immigration
And will not admit that the Biosphere is being destroyed.

re....Look what he did with the Detroit book.

WHAT DID HE DO? PRO? CON?

Anonymous said...

Breitbart,O'Reilly,Limbaugh...blame big city crime on Democrats and their liberal policies. They rarely lay the blame on blacks.

You mean Breitbart's successors. O'Reilly and Limbaugh in particular are so isolated from reality and life's hard problems. Don't put those sell outs on any pedestals.

What the fuck does Limbaugh know about middle class concerns with crime? With his private jet, 20mil mansion, exclusive lilly white country club membership, hob nobbing with NFL owners, body guards, what the fuck does he know about real life anymore? Answer: Nothing.

Think he lives near any blacks? Not on your life. He's not that crazy. But you know, at his time of life, life is good, dont need to rock the boat.

"It's good to be the king"

Now, for the rest of the peasants....well that's a different story.

blancdeseinesaintdenis said...

@jay santos, I read a post of you 3 days ago in which you said that wichi other country is being as worst as USA except South Africa?

I re^peat but I think Frnace is maybe as worst than USA. In fact when i watch on google street streets like campton or camden, I fell more afraid when I watch guettos of France like this :


https://www.google.fr/search?q=sarcelles+ghetto&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=A3GAUu6mIs3M0AWOrYC4Ag&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=647&bih=795#es_sm=122&espv=210&q=sarcelles+cite&tbm=isch

https://www.google.fr/search?q=sarcelles+ghetto&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=A3GAUu6mIs3M0AWOrYC4Ag&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=647&bih=795#es_sm=122&espv=210&q=aulnay+sous+bois+cite&tbm=isch
https://www.google.fr/search?q=sarcelles+ghetto&espv=210&es_sm=122&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=A3GAUu6mIs3M0AWOrYC4Ag&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=647&bih=795#es_sm=122&espv=210&q=la+courneuve+cite&tbm=isch

In france guettos are constitued of big buildings where police dont go anymore because it's difficult to enter. And thse guettos in suburb of Paris become more and more only full blacks and these blacks are not since 400 years living with Whites, they directly come from Africa, they are muslims, the father has 20 children and 3 wifes...they name mamadou sissoko by exemple.

North Paris is already lost, Marseille too, East of Lyon too, South of Toulouse too,...Racist anti White is very strong in France with murders avery week for a watch, a cigarett,...Tokyo has classified PAris as dangeroos as Johanessburg and Rio for their tourists! I dont read it about New York or Los ANgeles. So you see what I say? USA has no big buildinds guettos, no Islams, no Africans direct from Africa, no Arabs...


Bogolyubski said...

PK's insight and talent for cutting right to the heart of the issue just keeps on getting better.

Bogolyubski said...

Now don't get me wrong - this is NOT a statement to say we should disarm, roll over and die (and to be fair to Whiskey, not even he has not advocated this cyanide cocktail to my knowledge). The lesson to be drawn from the following linked story is that we must stop deluding ourselves about the nature of DWLs and their cult-religion. If you actually end up doing what needs to be done in a bad situation, they are going after you (the Zimmermann treatment). That's the reality we live in. Stop believing the myth that police, prosecutors, lawyers, etc. are anything other than enemy soldiers. Most have already either drunk the Kool-Aid and/or sold their souls for a pension (which will be looted before they ever get to collect it). This is how it is in SA, even today in the face of overt genocide.

Anonymous said...

Let's hope those guns don't just sit around gathering dust ...

Anonymous said...

In case you didn't know, but the US Supreme Court has ruled in the case of Castle Rock v. Gonzales that the policy have no responsibility to protect you. Even if they fail to enforce a restraining order. It is solely up to you to arm yourself and provide for your own defense.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Rock_v._Gonzales

And in case you ever do have to defend yourself, be sure to keep your mouth shut until you can speak with an attorney. The US Supreme Court has ruled that the cops can lie and say anything they want to trick you in to confessing to a crime regardless of whether or not you actually committed one. See the case of Fraizer v. Cupp.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp


It is better to spend one or two nights in jail until your attorney can get you released on bond, than it is to spend 10+ years in jail for a crime you never commited.

Anonymous said...

Indianapolis has a big & problematic brown-Hispanic population too. Let's not forget about them.

Dissident said...

" Why do White women keep leaving their kids with sub-80 IQ filth like this? Do they want to see their kids beaten to death? Are they that mentally f*cked up?"

That's an easy answer: Y-E-S!


Next question.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon
...Or be demonized as the next David Koresh or Jim Jones. Some religions have stayed out of the Social Security scam, and others have claimed free exercise of medical choice -- which may very well be attacked and usurped down the road under Osamacare. You may have also noticed a general rise in hostility toward religious 503-C tax exemptions; but as many have pointed out, the government/squid uses laws against the people, not for them. Don't expect to bring down the system with some legal technicality, when they already ignore the laws that would deny them from totalitarian control.

There's no doubt that they COULD persecute. I point out that community-focused neighborhood reclamation projects have worked for Jews, who through demographic increase and high social capital have reclaimed several areas from blacks in Brooklyn.

Ideally, a weaponized Christianity would encourage believers to buy up enough of, say, Highland Park, MI (cheap and destroyed now...) so that they could get effective control at the ballot box. Turn the town into a mini-theocracy if all the land was owned by the Church. You thus control who lives there: only Church members get subsidized housing, and you can only join the church if related to a Church member (Jews do this with defining who is a Jew), and if you violate community norms, you are expelled from the Church and lose all access to its resources.

Got a better idea?

make it rain TRUTH said...

Ex-Brooklynite, that plan would be stopped by the federal government. There is no freedom of association any longer, thanks to the dismissal of the U.S. Constitution.

Since your state is no longer willing to stand up to the feds, as they certainly were able to under the original U.S. Constitution, you have nobody to stop the tyrants from trampling on your rights.

As to the people that think whites ought to think in lockstep groupthink? It's never going to happen. It hasn't ever happened anywhere in the world.

The first steps to any solution honestly lay in the settling of the relationship between tyrannical federal government and state sovereignty. But there is no will to fight that battle in most areas. Perhaps a Texas or one of the odd NW states. Even those states still have a large share of peoples that see nothing wrong with federal tyranny, and their states unwillingness to stand against it via nullification and/or secession.

Jay in DC said...

I need to play the Devil's advocate a bit here...

A gun, in and of itself, may not help you. These Sally Soccer Moms, in fact, are likely to potentially do more damage to their household if they simply run out and arm themselves.

Why? Improper planning and equipment.

Scenario: You are home in the Whitopia Gardens Subdivision watching Dancing with the Stars or whatever inane shit you watch at night with little Bobby and Becky. Daddy isn't home from work yet.

You feel pretty safe from those bad ol' darkies. Because you recently bought a shiny new Ruger Redhawk handcannon that weighs as much as you do.

Suddenly, you hear a loud crash. Oh no! That ole blackie! Let me go upstairs and get my... "GET ON THE FLOOR WHITE BITCH, GET THE FUCK DOWN NOW!" Oh, wait... it only took him 3 seconds from door kick to my couch. You mean I have to have the thing NEXT to me?!

Scenario 2-- Same as above, but Sally Soccermom thinks she probably should have that pocket bazooka handy so she conveniently, as a clueless dippy broad, leaves it in the end table drawer near the couch. Chance of firearm tragedy in home w/o need for a 'groid---> 90%

It is really part of the reason that women are not, were not, and never will be warriors. It ain't in the genes.

The -only- scenario which works is one where you have played all the angles. Men excel at this.

Scenario 3- I have a biometric (finger scan) quick release box on TOP of end table with same said hand cannon in it. I'm watching the Military Channel. BOOM! Oh shiznit, kneegrow just kicked down my door. Thumb slide on safe .5 seconds. Weapon is locked, loaded, and hot, in hand .5 seconds. 2 seconds to spare. One second to aim 'cuz I heard him kick in the back door.

Annnndddd. Target. BLAM BLAM, oh a friend too? BLAM BLAM. Damn another one? BLAM BLAM.

Fuck! That is a lot of blood on my goddamn linoleum tile. No idea how my wife is gonna clean all that gore up...

Anonymous said...

And in case you ever do have to defend yourself, be sure to keep your mouth shut until you can speak with an attorney. The US Supreme Court has ruled that the cops can lie and say anything they want to trick you in to confessing to a crime regardless of whether or not you actually committed one. See the case of Fraizer v. Cupp.


HOLD IT, HOLD IT.

That would be a direct violation of the Miranda Act (ruled by The Supreme Court in 66)
"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you."

So if the Miranda rights weren't read, you'd have a big time lawsuit on your hands.

The Supreme Court has also ruled vs allowing citizens to sit in jail without a crime brought vs him within a 24hr time frame.

US Supreme Court has also ruled vs unreasonable police tactics during questioning.

Besides, the ACLU would jump at the chance to take that kind of cases and they usually do pro bono.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous
Besides, the ACLU would jump at the chance to take that kind of cases and they usually do pro bono.

Stop believing the myth that the ACLU gives a damn about the constitutional rights of anyone except TWMNBN communists, negroes and whatever other deviants can be used to destroy what few shreds remain. They never did and they never will. Appeals to a dead, meaningless document are pointless anyway. There is no rule of law, only the law of rule. Did the ACLU defend everyone's favorite white hispanic octaroon? How about even Bernard Goetz (a rare working-class TWMNBN who was tossed under the bus by the squids)? Yes we need to by all means use every available tool at hand, just stop reciting fairy tales.

Anonymous said...

couple hours of Kwon Do

that oughta do the trick

Baron Munchausen said...

O/T - Slightly

This blog catalogs the pathological behavior of the black people in this nation. This behavior I believe to be the direct result of the evolutionary process i.e. genetics. A few posts ago genetics was touched upon. (GACT) Genetics to me explains everything; why we look the way we do, our actions, desires, etc. etc.

Sitting in my ethics class we are talking about capital punishment, I came across this piece. A few months old (May) but it is hilarious to see how the author dances around the issue and ONLY uses Caucasians as an example. Never once does the author address Black people and their propensity to collectively commit crimes as a group. Of course, it ends with a feel good liberal explanation that flies in the face of the cold hard facts presented in the article itself.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/neurophilosophy/201305/criminal-genes-and-criminal-brains

Beam me up
The Baron
-ATX

Anonymous said...

All the karate & gun lessons in the world won't help most of these YTs because they lack survival instincts (as shown by that teen girl offering her purse to the home invaders).

You need to be right in your head before a gun or physical training does you any good. And now you need to have researched lawyers and have a name in mind if the time ever comes that you've defended yourself against someone darker than yourself.

pat said...

I immediately this morning saw as I opened up the Drudge Report a picture of a black guy who had shot up an ice rink while trying to steal a coat. So I came here.

But you haven't gotten to it yet.

Looks like you need another site just to keep up with the volume.

Albertosaurus

Robert B said...

Emm, Limbaugh got a dose of reality when he wanted to buy an NFL team--they denied him due to his alleged racism.

Limbaugh also was the lead attacker of the most recent "Immigration Reform Act"--pointing out that it would forever destroy the make up of America and doom Republicans to the ash heap of history. He stayed on it relentlessly and did force the shutdown of it in the House.

I admit that I waited many years for that, but he did do it. And no one on "the Right" has the clout he does--no one. So, I will give him credit for it. He made it very clear that if these people were legalized and if the other 20-30 millions were allowed in, America would cease to exist. That took guts--publicly stating the browns are now whites. It was after he did that, that Coulter and others began to pile on.

Now that he was successful with that, give him time to do more.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite: "Ideally, a weaponized Christianity would encourage believers to buy up enough of, say, Highland Park, MI so that they could get effective control at the ballot box. Turn the town into a mini-theocracy if all the land was owned by the Church. You thus control who lives there: only Church members get subsidized housing, and you can only join the church if related to a Church member"
It sounds nice, on paper; but look at what has become of "Christianity" in just 20 years. It would be too easy for squishy-minded progs to infiltrate an exclusive religion -- by devious outsiders (an atheist was just elected student body president at Northwest Christian Univ.) or from within (family members). Women will demand power, like their sisters have in other churches; dissatisfied defectors will leave and tell the world about this weird racist nazi cult their husband/father dragged them into; etc. And just wait til the bishops/deacons/whatever start believing they have priestlike moral authority over "their flock". (I'm also reminded of the comical "Brigadier Generals" in every militia ever formed.)
The Baptist church I grew up in used to own prime real estate, that today would be worth 8 figures. When I left for college, it had a big scary scandal that divided the congregation -- over the fucking piano player. The woman had been married, gotten divorced (ok, it happens), but when she decided to marry another man, the pastor wanted to kick her off the piano, over Biblical divorce/reconciliation guidelines. The pastor ended up getting bounced, half the members got pissed off and also left, and now it is no longer a Baptist church, but sports some fruity name like "The Rainbow Fellowship of the Sonshine" or whatthefuck.
I just don't see how you can form a wink-wink religion -- where secretly it's not about religion but race -- and everyone will stick to the story. The bigger it got, the more scrutiny it would have (see: Mormons). You'd have smartass jews and blacks and atheist communists constantly trying to break ranks. It would be simpler to just go for a WN. In either case, the govt will use all its power to block it. Maybe a Celtic/Druidic thing could fake some legitimacy, but people would have to b.s. their way through rituals and crap, but then you'd have black Irish like Shaquille O'Neal claiming heritage.

pat said...

Forgive me if I wax a bit academic for a moment - it might help.

It is true that Limbaugh and O'Reilly tend to focus of liberal policies rather than on racial matters when they discuss social violence. The reason is simple - almost all complex phenomena have multiple causes which gives the commenter a variety of causes to rant about. Some of the rant choices get you acclaim. Some get you fired.

Multiple causality has been understood for a long time. Aristotle you will remember enunciated four causes in ascending levels of importance. More recently we have developed various statistical measures to tease out the relationships among multiple causes. Among those tools are partial correlations, and multiple regression.

Let me explain again how step-wide multiple regression works. You may never have heard of the mathematical technique but, trust me, every product at the super market that catches your eye has been market tested with it. It is universal and ubiquitous.

You take all your candidate independent variables (possible causal factors) and you put them in the hopper to be judged against your one dependent variable (the thing you are trying to explain). So if you are trying to understand urban violence your dependent variable might be homicide rate. The independent variables that you want to test might include: family income, age, church attendance, grade point average, political affiliation, sex, and race.

As it happens every single one of those independent variables affects crime rate. The step-wise multiple regression algorithm churns through them and spits out a list in rank order by their explanatory power. Or as it's called in statistics - explained variance (R2).

As it happens I've done this calculation for educational performance. I had to teach myself how to program and how to use a computer at the time. I was the only person anyone knew who had a personal computer (early seventies). I had had an Altair before then but this was with a Commodore PET.

It was all very experimental, but the answer popped out just like it said it would in the stat text book that showed me the algorithm (not the code).

Race was the most important factor. Indeed it was the only statistically significant factor. The answer was race, race and only race.

Anyone today can verify my results from forty years ago. It took me nearly a week just to punch in all the numbers back then. It had taken me months to learn Microsoft BASIC (there were no books then). I had had to learn a mini computer BASIC first.

I was being paid for my time, so I didn't complain. But I didn't report my results either. Telling the agency that the only thing that mattered was race was not going to be an acceptable result.

I had justified buying that computer just to be able to do that calculation. When it yielded a politically unacceptable result I had to look for other uses for it.

O'Reilly could do the same analysis today. He has an army of analytic minions and access to much better hardware. He doesn't do it for the same reason I didn't report it. He wants to keep his job.

I'm sure that there are many stories like mine. I needed a word processor back then so I wrote a word processor for myself in BASIC. Later I learned that there were dozens of guys who had done the same. Before WordStar writing your own word processor in whatever language was available was almost mainstream. I'm sure there were others who used the tremendous analytical power of the personal computer that suddenly became available in the early seventies to study social issues. And I'm sure many of them discovered just what I had discovered - race matters a lot. But if you are smart enough to figure out all this you are probably smart enough to keep your head down.

Albertosaurus

FSR said...

I haven't seen it mentioned here on SBPDL, so here it is: There was a groid riot in Portlandia the other day, it's getting to be less and less of a whitopia every day.

http://www.kval.com/news/local/Large-police-response-in-NE-Portland-witnesses-say-fatal-shooting-231276061.html

Police: 1 dead, 2 injured in shooting during fight, riot in NE Portland

PORTLAND, Ore. – One man was killed and two other people were injured early Saturday morning after gunfire erupted outside a nightclub in Northeast Portland, according to the Portland Police Bureau.

Sgt. Pete Simpson, a bureau spokesman, said there was a large fight and riot involving 75 to 100 people outside Fontaine Bleau nightclub at 237 Northeast Broadway at about 12:45 a.m.

A 30-year-old man was shot and died at the scene, Simpson said. Two others who were also shot, a 50-year-old woman and a 44-year-old man, were taken to the hospital. They are expected to be OK.

The owner of Fontaine Bleau told KATU two men were arguing about money before the fight started.

The Oregon State Medical Examiner will perform an autopsy on the man who died. Police say the names of the three victims will be released after the autopsy.

The police response was huge. Dozens of police cars converged on the area and police blocked off a number of streets. Simpson said police called all available officers to the scene because they were met by a "large, hostile crowd."

The group scattered on foot and in cars when police arrived, said Simpson.

A KATU News reporter on the scene saw a body bag at Northeast Third and Weidler.

Tim Knight, an employee at a nearby 7-Eleven told KATU that he heard four or five gunshots.

"I was dealing with customers at the time and a bunch of people came running into the store, frazzled," he said. "There was one girl crying, a couple people screaming ... within moments, there was police everywhere."

He said he'd just move to Portland from Chicago to "get away from stuff like this."

Simpson said homicide detectives and the Gang Enforcement Team are investigating.

Police want witnesses who fled the scene without talking to them to call (503) 823-3333.

Police closed Northeast Broadway from Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to 2nd Avenue during the shooting investigation.

Andrea Ostrov Letania said...

Generally speaking, blacks are more muscular and stronger than whites. Sure, there are strong man competitions where a bunch of huge Nordics win, but when we are dealing with most Americans, blacks have an advantage in fighting ability, and this is why blacks dominate in so many power/fighting sports and it's why so much of the violence is black-on-white. Blacks are also, by nature, more aggressive. Evolution made them this way, and there's a new book by David Epstein that details why blacks are physically different from other races.

Unless this fact is discussed, nothing much can be done to save the white race. This fact is the best argument and rationale for white separation from blacks. If blacks were only different in skin color, I would have no problem with them... just like whites pretty much get along with dark-skinned Asian-Indians. But blacks are different in facial features, vocality, aggression, temperament, muscularity, bone structure, personality, and psychology. Blacks, for example, tend to be more psychpathic: narcissistic, self-centered, self-righteous, indifferent to others, self-aggrandizing, demanding, lacking in empathy, uninhibited, etc.

If we carry on with the fiction that the races are different only in skin color, people will look to culture, economics, and history to explain or excuse black pathology and violence against whites. But if we focus on the fact of black superiority when it comes to aggression and muscle power, the white race will be seen as the biological/racial victims of the stronger, tougher, angrier, and more pathological black race.

And then, based on the notion of RACIAL RIGHTS--all races have a right to live in safety and peace--, we can make a strong argument for racial separation.

Truth may lead to white males having to swallow their pride--they don't wanna admit they are athletically inferior to blacks--, but only truth shall set you free.

10mm AUTO said...

Right On.

Judo is a good way to stay fit and a way to make friends but useless against a 300 lbs greasy groid. A weapon is the only way, extending your range and power but only effective if it is on you at that terrible moment.

The aftermath is :http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2496113/Gonzaga-University-students-face-expulsion-school-pulling-gun-home-intruder.html

He is a level headed young man who saved both his roommate and himself, yet his academic career will always have a cloud over it. Expulsion from a good University means his odds of a Professorship is gone, so the private sphere is his only hope. Oh, and no Law school fr you, you racist White hatemonger. Pulling a Paula Deen might have saved him, but this defiant tirade has sunk his chances.

It's that White http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2496113/Gonzaga-University-students-face-expulsion-school-pulling-gun-home-intruder.html

Andrea Ostrov Letania said...

Lots of women have taken karate classes, but the violence is still male on female.

I've seen lots of geeks and dorks in school who took karate classes. They still got beat up by stronger kids.

Only in movies does some little karate guy whup everyone's ass.
But in a movie, even a kung fu baby can kick ass. Movies don't amount to a plate of beans.

Bogolyubski said...

Robert B:
Limbaugh also was the lead attacker of the most recent "Immigration Reform Act"--pointing out that it would forever destroy the make up of America and doom Republicans to the ash heap of history. He stayed on it relentlessly and did force the shutdown of it in the House.

I admit that I waited many years for that, but he did do it. And no one on "the Right" has the clout he does--no one. So, I will give him credit for it. He made it very clear that if these people were legalized and if the other 20-30 millions were allowed in, America would cease to exist. That took guts--publicly stating the browns are now whites. It was after he did that, that Coulter and others began to pile on.

Now that he was successful with that, give him time to do more.


Agreed. He's a clown and the late Larry Auster's name for him - El Slowbo - is spot on. He's only begun to stick his tip-toe into the cold water of reality in the past five years or so. Nevertheless, we must give credit where it's due - regardless of how much it makes me bite my lip. Limbaugh is still a Repuke, and we all know how much I like Repukes (almost as much as Musloids like TWMNBN).

FSR said...

More Portlandia groid mayhem

http://www.katu.com/news/local/Shooting-victim-previous-gang-violence-1992-231353601.html

Man killed in nightclub shooting was shot, wounded in 1992.

PORTLAND, Ore. – The man killed in a shooting at a Portland nightclub early Saturday morning was also a victim of gang violence 21 years ago.

Police said the man killed in the shooting was 30-year-old Durieul Harris. The State Medical Examiner determined Harris died from multiple gunshot wounds.

In 1992, Harris was shot and wounded while he was sitting on his couch. He was nine years old at the time.

KATU’s Steve Dunn spoke with Harris 21 years ago while he was recovering in the hospital. Harris said he wanted to get out of his neighborhood so he could live a full life, and he said people should get out of gangs.

“I think they shouldn’t be in (gangs) unless you wanna die faster than you really live,” Harris said in the interview. “I don’t wanna go through this again.”

Police found 30 shell casings in the street outside Harris’ house after that shooting. His family said they were looking to move him to a safer neighborhood.

Nightclub shooting investigation

Police said Harris was shot and killed when a fight and riot involving 75 to 100 people spilled outside the Fontaine Bleau nightclub just before 1 a.m. Saturday.

Two other people were shot: 44-year-old Fredrick Glenn Conner and 50-year-old Shelia Renee Shelby.

Sgt. Pete Simpson with the Portland Police Bureau said both victims are recovering in a Portland hospital.

No arrests have been made in the shooting.

The owner of Fontaine Bleau told KATU two men were arguing about money before the fight started.

Dozens of police cars converged on the area and police blocked off a number of streets. Simpson said police called all available officers to the scene.

"There were very hostile people in the crowd," Simpson said. "People were chanting to shoot the officers who were trying to calm the situation down. Ultimately they got it calm enough for medical to come in."

Simpson said homicide detectives and the Gang Enforcement Team are investigating.

Police want witnesses who fled the scene without talking to them to call (503) 823-3333.

The Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) served an indefinite emergency liquor license suspension on the Fontaine Bleau nightclub Saturday night.

Read the OLCC suspension order
The suspension was based on a serious danger to the public health and safety and a history of problems at the nightclub, including two recent incidents with guns.

Jassi said...

I miss Albertosaurus' posts. Always truth gleaned from black and white and applied to a grey world.

Wouldn't everything be so much easier if all the platitudes and absolutes were true and applicable? Political and social problem solving require far more creative thinking than "team a vs team b" even if the thrust of the problem is conflict between two teams.

There are a good many interests seeking fulfillment. Many compromises and alliances must be made if success is to be had.


Hitting oneself with a great hammer hurts all the same. Whites have only a short time left to assert themselves politically.Today we're pretty much hitting ourselves in the face with a political hammer, though it seems like the big brother is holding our arm and saying "stop hitting yourself!" If he really is that powerful then it's best we use his strength in our favor.


ACLU practices also occasionally exist in grey areas.

http://rt.com/usa/american-court-kkk-missouri-830/

Bogolyubski said...

Pat
I immediately this morning saw as I opened up the Drudge Report a picture of a black guy who had shot up an ice rink while trying to steal a coat. So I came here.

But you haven't gotten to it yet.

Looks like you need another site just to keep up with the volume.


I think we really need a wiki-cyclopedia of all the black-on-white atrocities (a closed wiki only editable by a trusted few, given the havoc created by leftists over at Wikipedia). This way a huge database could be assembled which not only spelled out the details, but tracked the ultimate disposition of the perps. How many of the Zebra killers are out of jail now - 35-40 years after the fact? Such information is not always easy to track down, and having all the particulars at your fingertips would be a help.

Anonymous said...

90210

found this online....sad

NO MENTION OF AGE, RACE, HAIR COLOR ETC

http://nypost.com/2013/11/11/woman-raped-at-home-while-daughter-slept-next-to-her/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow

Anonymous said...

90210

RE.
Sitting in my ethics class we are talking about capital punishment, I came across this piece. A few months old (May) but it is hilarious to see how the author dances around the issue and ONLY uses Caucasians as an example. Never once does the author address Black people and their propensity to collectively commit crimes as a group. Of course, it ends with a feel good liberal explanation that flies in the face of the cold hard facts presented in the article itself.

USA GOV CRIME STATS PUT NON WHITES IN W WHITES TO 'EVEN THINGS OUT'
doubt me? go to ThugReport
and various places to see pix of what gov calls 'whites'.

Also on my facebook news feed theres a report on a LEO killed in SD by black thug...THE F--KING TV NEWS NOTES HOW HE BOUGHT A BALCK KID FOOD AT MCD MINUTES BEFORE NIG KILLED HIM.

gees...why not focus on the nig and his anti White killing...
TV NEWS TURNED INTO A HUMAN INTEREST STORY...IT IS NOT.

on Racist Black Cop-Killer Dejon White - Nicholas Stix, Uncensored
nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/.../more-on-racist-black-cop-killer-...‎
Jun 18, 2012 - San Diego Police Officer Jeremy Henwood survived combat in ... White police officer killed in unprovoked racially motivated double shooting ... [N.S.: Make that: Black racism has forever changed Martin Hanna's life.] “And still ... "[Hana] is a good kid and has a long way to recover," his sister told Fox 5 News.

E. Newton said...

You can always count on the media to inform you.

NY Post reports that a woman in NYC's Chinatown (aka former Little Italy) was raped at knife point in the presence of her 7-year-old.

The NY Post helpfully provides you a full description of the perp "Police are looking for the suspect, who was wearing a black leather jacket, a white t-shirt, a knit cap and black pants. He is about 5-foot-9". Now, can you add anything that that description?

Anonymous said...

@10mm: FWIW, Gonzaga is a Catholic/Jesuit school. The evangelical school I attended also had a no-firearms policy on-campus (don't know/care about off-campus), but my dormmate (a former cop) had one. Gonzaga looks like an easy target for lawsuit, given the recent USSC rulings against local bans against firearms. Especially the Off-Campus part. GTFO.
When did Spokane become a nigger magnet? First Shorty, now these guys. Instead of flouride, do they add grape koolaid to the water supply?

Anonymous said...

Why do White women keep leaving their kids with sub-80 IQ filth like this? Do they want to see their kids beaten to death? Are they that mentally f*cked up?

Why yes, yes they are.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Brooklynite said:
"Ideally, a weaponized Christianity would encourage believers to buy up enough of, say, Highland Park, MI (cheap and destroyed now...) so that they could get effective control at the ballot box. Turn the town into a mini-theocracy if all the land was owned by the Church. You thus control who lives there: only Church members get subsidized housing, and you can only join the church if related to a Church member (Jews do this with defining who is a Jew), and if you violate community norms, you are expelled from the Church and lose all access to its resources."

I have a feeling the muslims (no upper case for them) will be in control of Detroit within 20 years. The groids will fall in line because they are easily manipulated. That's why the communists and democrats have sought to get them on their bandwagon(s).

I think the closest thing to a Christian land grab is via the Mormons. I don't believe as they do, but that may be the closest thing to what you're suggesting. I don't believe any other white religious groups have the juice or the will. The Catholics are heading for history's dustbin, I'm afraid. I think groid islam will be what saves the ghettos. Of course, to the middle east muslims the noi and their ilk are considered infidels. Useful idiots are useful idiots.

As far as the groid murders of white children, these tragedies should be a warning to any white women who think groid men are choice mates. Protecting their children should be the first goal. I'm puzzled by the segment of the white populace that is choosing the classless and violent groid lifestyle. Evidently the multi-generational shaming of us for being white has become part of the social fabric.

OT (kinda): I'd like to see suggestions of places east of the Mississippi that likely won't soon see da undertow. Your suggestions are appreciated. BTW, northeast Wisconsin is slipping, so that's out.

--NB

Jay Santos said...

Bogolyubski said...
Pat
I immediately this morning saw as I opened up the Drudge Report a picture of a black guy who had shot up an ice rink while trying to steal a coat. So I came here.

But you haven't gotten to it yet.

Looks like you need another site just to keep up with the volume.

I think we really need a wiki-cyclopedia of all the black-on-white atrocities (a closed wiki only editable by a trusted few, given the havoc created by leftists over at Wikipedia). This way a huge database could be assembled which not only spelled out the details, but tracked the ultimate disposition of the perps. How many of the Zebra killers are out of jail now - 35-40 years after the fact? Such information is not always easy to track down, and having all the particulars at your fingertips would be a help.


Such a resource, a database, a wiki, would be gigantically valuable. It's doable and it's more than important, it's critical.

I very much like newnation.org. Someone or some people over there are working real hard and diligently to compile those stories. Blackracismandracehatred is also excellent in terms of its scope. But neither is so well organized that you can both get details and trends easily. For example, say I want to know how many negro assaults, rapes or killings involved setting the victim on fire. Or I wanted to know only the negro rape of elderly females. There is so much that can be done here. Both sites I mentioned do a fine job already and I wish they got monetary rewards and credit for what is being done there. But there's another dimension to this that's not being presented in a way that would be the most useful to the task of ending the relentless cover up of this savagery. Anyway, I'm in any way I can help.

Anonymous said...

Hey Paul and fellow SBPDLer's, hope all is well. Havent been commenting in a while, but still read everyday if possible.

Anyways, saw this story and was wondering how much of this has to do with race. I am not very familiar with this every changing metro area. The Atlanta Braves are moving to Cobb County, new stadium. Saw that MARTA does NOT go there as of now... Keep strong everyone!

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/atl/atlanta-braves-leaving-turner-field-for-new-ballpark-in-nearby-cobb-county?ymd=20131111&content_id=63830416&vkey=news_atl

Proud in NC

So CAL Snowman said...

Oh Andrea Letania, how I've missed your whole "White men are candy ass pansies and black men are macho tough guys" spiel.

Tell me Ms. Letania, if White guys are so weak and frail WHY are the military special forces DOMINATED by White males? Why are the Navy Seals (possibly the toughest men in the world) almost exclusively White men? You keep chirping about black athletic superiority, when the truth is that they only excel only in a FEW rigidly structured events and games. Ice Hockey is THE premier power/fighting sport and there are but a handful of blacks in the league. If it's anything other than running fast in a straight line or jumping high, the blacks fail compared to Whites. Both boxing and mixed martial arts are dominated by Whites in the heavy weight divisions. The toughest position in professional sports (Quarterback) is almost exclusively dominated by White players. Hell blacks don't even feature at the Winter Olympics! As far as blacks having an advantage in "fighting ability" I would say that is pure supposition seeing as how you are a FEMALE and fighting is the domain of the MALE. I wonder how many fist fights you have been in Ms. Letania? Ex-New Yorker can tell you all about "black fighting ability" as can many of the posters on this site. Blacks rarely engage in one on one "fair fights" so I guess you could call sucker punching, gang beat downs, and attacking the elderly and women "superior black fighting ability."

You want us White males to swallow our pride and admit that blacks are physically superior to us in the hopes that it causes the scales to fall from the eyes of the liberals regarding racial differences? That is pure bullshit and your attempts to emasculate White males are on the level of the liberal main stream media. Perhaps we should just start sitting down when we pee and take fashion clues from Hilary Clinton right? Pantsuits, glorious pantsuits for everyone!

Back on topic - Oh yes karate is going to save your ass against 4 feral groids with guns! One part of me is laughing (because it's kind of funny) and the other part is silently weeping (because it's sad that they don't understand what they are fighting and they think that karate will help). It reminds me of watching my father "vote" for Mitt Romney, hoping that Mitt would somehow make it better. it just made me really sad knowing that my extremely hard working father would put his faith in a system like ours. It's becoming more and more like South Africa every day. People say oh we have more guns, we have more White people, what happened in South Africa could never happen here. Well it's happening and all the guns in the world are doing NOTHING to prevent it. At this point nothing will stop the black and brown hordes, no amount of guns or police. In theory the White race could put a stop to non White violence, but that would be racist. And NOTHING is worse than racism.

Anonymous said...

Andrea Ostrov Letania said...
"Generally speaking, blacks are more muscular and stronger than whites. Sure, there are strong man competitions where a bunch of huge Nordics win, but when we are dealing with most Americans, blacks have an advantage in fighting ability, and this is why blacks dominate in so many power/fighting sports and it's why so much of the violence is black-on-white. Blacks are also, by nature, more aggressive. Evolution made them this way, and there's a new book by David Epstein that details why blacks are physically different from other races.

Unless this fact is discussed, nothing much can be done to save the white race. This fact is the best argument and rationale for white separation from blacks. If blacks were only different in skin color, I would have no problem with them... just like whites pretty much get along with dark-skinned Asian-Indians. But blacks are different in facial features, vocality, aggression, temperament, muscularity, bone structure, personality, and psychology. Blacks, for example, tend to be more psychpathic: narcissistic, self-centered, self-righteous, indifferent to others, self-aggrandizing, demanding, lacking in empathy, uninhibited, etc.

If we carry on with the fiction that the races are different only in skin color, people will look to culture, economics, and history to explain or excuse black pathology and violence against whites. But if we focus on the fact of black superiority when it comes to aggression and muscle power, the white race will be seen as the biological/racial victims of the stronger, tougher, angrier, and more pathological black race.

And then, based on the notion of RACIAL RIGHTS--all races have a right to live in safety and peace--, we can make a strong argument for racial separation.

Truth may lead to white males having to swallow their pride--they don't wanna admit they are athletically inferior to blacks--, but only truth shall set you free."

Carelton Putnam did this very thing...

In the early 1960's. "Race & Reason"
Google it.
Outcome? Ignored & mocked. Now we have BRA & Carelton is spinning in his grave, shouting, "I told you so!"

Anonymous said...

O/T http://www.vice.com/read/soul-on-fire-0000148-v20n11?utm_source=vicefbus

CA is hiring ex-cons as firefighters. These are good jobs being given to the un-hireable.

Gubbler of the Society of Reformed Chechenistics said...

"In the early 1960's. "Race & Reason"
Google it.
Outcome? Ignored & mocked."

That's the problem. It was ignored and mocked. And not only by Liberals but by Conservatives, as well as by the masses.

So, this time, we must not ignore it. We must say it over and over and spread it over the internet and friends and etc.
Just because something fails first time around doesn't mean it will fail forever. After all, many attempts by blacks to get their movement started failed over and over before it finally caught fire in the 1950s. Finally, their voices were not ignored.

So, even if the guy in the 1960s was ignored, we can start the debate all over again, and those on the 'alternative right' must not reject or mock it but follow through on it and spread the message.

Everything begins small. Forest fires begin with flicker. The thing is to provide fuel to the fire.

So, wherever there's a spark of truth, don't ignore it. Spread it and give it fuel.

Anonymous said...

So CAL Snowman, you are my hero. I was just going to respond to the long-winded idiocy of supposed negro male superiority, but you got there before me.

Negroes have a few special attributes given them, say, to escape lions. All hominids have body odor, largely thanks to apocrine glands, but the negroid species has approximately 20% more apocrine glands than Whites and these glands are larger and more active (lion repellant).

Negroid males and females both have substantially larger quantities of testosterone in them, and we all know what (g)roid rage can do. Too much testosterone is likely a high reason for negroid violence and lack of impulse control, among other things.

Negroids also have developed tendons that are quicker to "startle" and get them moving quickly, but they cannot sustain this speed, as Whites can.

These evolutionary and, thus, species-related differences help negroes survive in a temperate climate with very large predators.

I really don't see how those three examples, and they are only a few of the differences (see gestation period of negroid females, and inability of mulatto offspring to receive bone marrow from either "parent") can lead anyone with a developed frontal lobe to suppose the negroid species are superior in any way to Whites.

Jassi said...

This site has been mentioned a number of times but I'll post it again in response to the mention of a sort of black on white wiki.


http://blackracismandracehatred.blogspot.com/


I wish it were organized in a more linear fashion but it does the job well enough. There are well over 1000 entries of different murders and other attacks yet it is by no means an exhausted list.

Anonymous said...

"That would be a direct violation of the Miranda Act (ruled by The Supreme Court in 66)
"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you."

So if the Miranda rights weren't read, you'd have a big time lawsuit on your hands."


You have to explicitly invoke this right, it isnt granted automatically. And you wouldnt have a lawsuit on your hands, the most you could do is attempt to make a motion to suppress evidence. See Berghuis v. Thompkins

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berghuis_v._Thompkins


"The Supreme Court has also ruled vs allowing citizens to sit in jail without a crime brought vs him within a 24hr time frame."

Cite a case.


"US Supreme Court has also ruled vs unreasonable police tactics during questioning."

Which would be torture, not lieing to you. Stop making unsubstantiated claims without citing a case.

james m said...

The only way I see of avoiding the Zimmerman treatment is to have CCTV cameras set up around your house.
A little Googling and you'll find these systems are pretty cheap these days.
Honestly if there had been some kind of video in the Travon/Zimmerman incident then there would not have been any national attention and damn little local attention because the phrase " I have it all on video" ends the argument quickly.
Without control(Lies) of the narrative BRA cannot maintain power. And The images from CCTV can be uploaded to a dozen sites web-wide and seen unfiltered by the masses. And in fact many of the derisive,sarcastic statements I see in the comments section frequently start with "If Obama had a Son..." or "This could have been Obama 20 yrs ago" ect.
Race realists are using the white House's own rhetoric against the MSM/DWL narrative , and its working.
Heaven forbid anyone on this board be a victim of Home Invasion ,but if you have cameras set up (backed up off site/online)
and use force/firearms to defend yourself/family/property it wont matter what you say to the cops or how they try to twist it because the video will show the truth. Any statements you make incriminating or not will be dismissed as mistaken perceptions due to stress.
Remeber how many people started thier Trayvon Lies with "We don't know for sure EXACTLY what happened but"... and then proceeded to fill the public head with whatever narrative they chose and then the host/moderator would try to put a stop to it but alas too late.
"Speculation" became fact in the mind of the viewer.

"I have it on video" ends all that shit, before it even gets started.

I'll join the bandwagon in laughing at the effectiveness of Karate, it wont work in a one-on-one situation much less six-on -one.
As far as who will pull the trigger or not under stress? I wont make any predictions because its impossible to know. ( and you do yourself no favors pretending that you DO know)
As for Blacks being better fighters than whites? Please! try not to post about what you know nothing about.
All things being equal
Younger/stronger/more athletic is always an advantage in any contest but not a guarantee.
Multiple Attackers vs solo Defender is almost a certainty.
And nobody here no matter how "Prepped" they think they are are running realistic Home Invasion Scenarios...imagining shit in your head ain't practicing.
And everyone in the house would have to practice multiple times.

Anonymous said...

Robert B said...
Emm, Limbaugh got a dose of reality when he wanted to buy an NFL team--they denied him due to his alleged racism.


STOP. HOLD IT. Limbaugh is not God. Reality? What the fuck is that to him? He's NOT a victim. He was NOT lynched. He tried to buy a FUCKING NFL Team, he's gotten mega rich off the backs of true believers thinking he was more conservative than he really ever was.

Keep it in perspective. "Waa waa waa! Those mean rascally liberals are all against me! I'm the victim, waa waa!" No, he's a fucking sell out to middle america. He's an elitist snob and never did identify with heartland, hard working white america. The only color he worships is GREEN, lots of it.


FACT: Rush supported big time NAFTA (a great illegal alien percentage booster. Tons of manufacturing jobs were lost as well as other jobs)

FACT: For near 20 yrs Rush was AWOL on illegal immigration. Seldom ever mentioned it and when he did it was like "but's no big deal, we're a melting pot, now lets get back to bashing Clinton".





Limbaugh also was the lead attacker of the most recent "Immigration Reform Act"--pointing out that it would forever destroy the make up of America and doom Republicans to the ash heap of history. He stayed on it relentlessly and did force the shutdown of it in the House.


NO, not initially. Vdare and other populist conservatives particularly online did that.

FACT: Rush was strongly for the Dubai ports, which is a national security issue. He was wrong then and now on that one.

FACT: ASK YOURSELF: If Obama was a Republican, do you REALLY think that Rush would be vs immigration? Answer: NO.

FACT: Rush was AWOL on the 2007 illegal alien immigration act.

FACT: He aint no genuine conservative, he's a mainstream Republican. There not always synonymous.

Yeah, he's "on the right side" THIS time, because a Democrat's in office. What happens next time when a GOP is in the White House? Answer: Crickets will chirp and he'll be AWOL again on illegal immigration. He wont publicly criticize GOP presidents, he has a proven track record of not criticizing GOP Presidents.





I admit that I waited many years for that, but he did do it.

I stopped waiting and woke up to the truth. The only reason he's doing it now is because Obama is a Democrat. The SAME POLICY could be promoted by a GOP President and you wont hear a word from him. He didnt speak up at all in 06-07 when this shit was going on, Obama's immigration policy is basically the same as Bush's was. It's the same policy.

He buttkissed up to GOP leadership. He likes being invited to the White house and all the perks. He wont rock the boat. Only reason it seems like he is now is cause a Democrat's in the white house. Again, once GOP takes the white house back, he'll be nowhere to be found on this issue (or many others)

Anonymous said...

And no one on "the Right" has the clout he does--no one.

I'd have readily agreed about 10yrs ago. I'd say there are MORE alternative right voices and more populist right (of which Rush never was a populist voice) that have collectively made a difference. Rush for instance, is NOT RELEVANT AT ALL on Social Media.

YTF did he get sandbagged last yr on what he said? Cause of Twitter. He has no influence with it, nor with facebook. He's still living in the past where radio was king and the internet didnt exist.

If anything, the alternative right, and populist websites like this one have led the charge and taken the fight to the liberals in more ways than Rush ever has before or will in a consistent manner.

Rush is basically living off of yesterday's news. Clinton is no longer in office though he still thinks and acts like he is. He never fully grasped the power of either TV or the Internet.

There are collectively more challenges to his influence now than ever before.

Just ask yourself: When was the last time that Rush reported in any depth the reporting that PK does on this site? Answer: NEVER.

But get him started on talking about nixing the minimum wage, and he'll go on and on for days. He knows thats a bullshit topic cause it wont ever be nixed.




So, I will give him credit for it.


Go ahead. Not me. He hasn't for 20 yrs and now it looks like: 1. He wants to get in on the action and then take credit retroactively for leading the charge. 2. Obama is a Democrat. 3. As soon as GOP takes back the white house, he wont be anywhere to be found on the issue. He wasn't all the other times.



He made it very clear that if these people were legalized and if the other 20-30 millions were allowed in, America would cease to exist. That took guts--publicly stating the browns are now whites.


OK. YOU WANT TO GIVE CREDIT? MICHAEL SAVAGE. HE has been on the illegal immigration issue since day one, HE was talking about it for over TEN YRS when Rush was still blabbing on about the minimum wage
If anything, Rush is stealing Savage's talking points.

Give the right credit to the right person. Savage was on this issue before anyone on the right would talk about it.





It was after he did that, that Coulter and others began to pile on.

NO, it was AFTER Michael Savage, Vdare, and other populist alternative right sites were in depth on it that Rush piled on to get some credit. AGAIN, as soon as a GOP takes the white house, you wont hear him talk about it.

FACT: What we've discovered is that: If a GOP is in the white house, a liberal can pass their legislation, even persuade the GOP Pres to sign off on it fully and Rush isn't anywhere to be found.




Now that he was successful with that, give him time to do more.

AGAIN, MICHAEL SAVAGE was the first and consistent voice for the last 10-12YEARS while Rush was out playing Golf, popping viagra and oxycontin, getting divorced for third time and hob nobbing with elitist while Michael Savage was on the front lines about illegal immigration and crime and the urban makeup of crime.


ONCE MORE TO THE HILLS: If a GOP gets in the white house next time, Rush will be AWOL once again on this issue and all other issues that might make the GOP look bad in public.

Don't make the GOP out to be anything more than what they are Democrats lite. They don't care about the crime issue anymore than the dems do. Just look at how they vote. They're part of the system and thus part of the problem. They're not always as bad as the dems, that's true, but they are still part of the problem.

Anonymous said...

Honestly if there had been some kind of video in the Travon/Zimmerman incident then there would not have been any national attention and damn little local attention because the phrase " I have it all on video" ends the argument quickly.
Without control(Lies) of the narrative BRA cannot maintain power. And The images from CCTV can be uploaded to a dozen sites web-wide and seen unfiltered by the masses. And in fact many of the derisive,sarcastic statements I see in the comments section frequently start with "If Obama had a Son..." or "This could have been Obama 20 yrs ago" ect.
Race realists are using the white House's own rhetoric against the MSM/DWL narrative , and its working.
Heaven forbid anyone on this board be a victim of Home Invasion ,but if you have cameras set up (backed up off site/online)
and use force/firearms to defend yourself/family/property it wont matter what you say to the cops or how they try to twist it because the video will show the truth. Any statements you make incriminating or not will be dismissed as mistaken perceptions due to stress.
Remeber how many people started thier Trayvon Lies with "We don't know for sure EXACTLY what happened but"... and then proceeded to fill the public head with whatever narrative they chose and then the host/moderator would try to put a stop to it but alas too late.
"Speculation" became fact in the mind of the viewer.

"I have it on video" ends all that shit, before it even gets started.




AMEN! That's the truth. How in the hell did Rodney King win in court of public opinion? Cause it was "on video'! It was recorded at the time and the MSM played it ad nauseum to manipulate public opinion.

ONE THING: Be careful when you say "I have it all on video" because the standard reply will be "Yeah, and you EDITED it selectively!" Videos can be edited in such a way to make anyone believe anything you want them to. Just like the Rodney King episode. That video wasnt played in its entirety, only the last minute of it was and that was enough to fit the agenda of the MSM.

Aside from that, excellent point. If it's on video, you win the argument, eventually anyway cause the proof is with you.

Anonymous said...

As far as who will pull the trigger or not under stress? I wont make any predictions because its impossible to know. ( and you do yourself no favors pretending that you DO know)


But, it's better to take your chances IF you have the chance to pull the trigger than if you DONT. IF you HAVE the gun at your ready disposal, at least there's the option of survival. If youre unarmed in situations like these, forget about any chance of survival.

Anonymous said...

7:07pm "I really don't see how those three examples... can lead anyone with a developed frontal lobe to suppose the negroid species are superior in any way to Whites."
Those conclusions are reached when the cerebral cortex is switched off, beer is drunk, and streaming videos of bakskitball and footsball flow into the eyeballs. WHOOP WHOOP!!

Anonymous said...

james m: "The only way I see of avoiding the Zimmerman treatment is to have CCTV cameras set up around your house."
I don't know about that. The evidence very clearly showed that Zimmerman shot in self-defense after being attacked by Skittles, yet they still prosecuted him under the theory that he provoked the attack by asking "What are you doing here?" The full facts were made public within 2-3 months of the shooting, were further made public by a few blogs, yet the MSM continued to run with the "choirboy vs vigilante" lie, up to and even after the trial.
Reference also the white USAF Sgt now charged with murder, for shooting a black home invader at 2am. Why? Because "he should have called 911 first, before grabbing his gun and repelling the guy kicking in his door."
Point being, on their whim, they will fucking prosecute you and persecute you No. Matter. What. Evidence is not guaranteed to save you; but if it shows any sliver of a possibility that you misjudged the situation, your own video will be used against you -- in court and leaked to the media. Also keep in mind, if one of the negroes survives, they may very well swear a blood libel against you that your wife or daughter invited him, because as Whiskey can't stop preaching to the world, white wimmen love love love the black alpha nigger dick. Only a racist would deny that. Are you testifying under oath, sir, that your wife is the one woman alive who doesn't love love love it?

Anonymous said...

"Just like the Rodney King episode. That video wasnt played in its entirety, only the last minute of it was and that was enough to fit the agenda of the MSM."
This was part of my "video won't save you" argument. The MSM liars get the snowball rolling by releasing their edit of the tape -- they get millions more eyeballs than our sphere gets -- and instantly the savages are agitated and no amount of logic or reason will stop that snowball. The race pimps organize street rallies, filmmakers like Spook Lee twitter the addresses of your grandmother's home, your wife's job and your kids' elementary school. They don't want to hear the truth; they just want the next excuse to burn it down.

Mr. Rational said...

No kidding.  When I investigate noises I don't recognize, I usually do it with a rifle in my hands.

Anyone who tries invading this house while I'm awake is likely to have a very bad day.

Anonymous said...

James M said: "I'll join the band wagon in laughing at the effectiveness of Karate, it won't work in a one on one situation much less six-on-one."
Who knew that for the past several hundred years and more, Asians have simply been wasting all their time practicing a skill that is unworkable and never realized it? You'd imagine a race with the highest average IQ's in the world would have figured it out by now. ~sarcasm definitely intended~
No, Karate won't work against multiple attackers armed with guns but then neither will boxing even if you're the world heavyweight champion.
Nor will it work for Sally SoccerMom (or her male equivalent) who has practiced twice a week for 3 months and has no courage or fighting spirit which is absolutely essential. Outside the dojo (in a real world situation) they'll most likely be scared, panic, go to pieces and be utterly ineffective.
Yes, I studied various forms of martial arts in Asia and yes, I've been involved in two situations where it came in very useful. In the most dangerous, I was attacked by five people- one armed with a knife, one armed with a hammer. As we were trained to deal with exactly that type of scenario, I had no fear and was simply calm, cold and calculating. I took a few blows from the hammer (to my back) but still defeated the attackers. The hilarious thing was after the police became involved, the idiots were screaming they wanted to sue me because two had broken noses, one a sprained hand/arm.
Martial arts are quite effective or they would have long ago been consigned to the dustbin of history.
All that being said, Karate or any other martial art will NOT turn a pussy into a tiger. Ditto for owning a gun.
As for martial arts movies, even we laughed at them and called them "flower movies." Very flowery, showy and entertaining but mostly over wrought and ridiculous.
One on one? I've seen 15 year old kids with years of experience in Martial Arts take on GI's in their twenties and absolutely mop the floor with their butts. I still laugh at how shocked they were whenever I think back on it.

Anonymous said...

Stop with this nonsense. The police in Sanford did it right. Most police I know are painfully aware of which group causes the vast majority of violent crime and subsequently, whose deaths equal a net benefit to society. Four were murdered in Jacksonville this week and look at the public rejoice in the comments section here: http://www.news4jax.com/news/police-investigating-quadruple-shooting-in-murray-hill/-/475880/22866362/-/88ht1s/-/index.html#comment-1114551078

Robert B said...

Anon @ November 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Little over wrought, aren't you? Limbaugh has more day to day listeners than all of those others you sight --including their readers, put together. Or did you think he rose to such wealth by taking money under the table? Savage can scream and yell (why I dislike him, though agree with much of what he says) all he wants to and not a single newspaper or MSM outlet will ever notice--nor will politicians. But I assure you, that if Limbaugh spends an entire month arguing against something, they will listen because of the depth and breadth of audience.

I am not justifying who he is, but as others have pointed out, some of you people are not realistic in your expectations. Limbaugh is also watched by liberal groups more than the rest of those you sight because of his prominence. He is fully aware of his existence.

You are wrong about his stance on GW's push for amnesty. I was heavily involved in the counter push and, while Limbaugh did not drag GW's name on the floor, he repeatedly pointed out the failure of Reagan's amnesty as well as making it clear that Reagan later regretted it.

Okay, go ahead and bark at me.

Robert B said...

I disagree with those putting martial arts down. From the age of 11 to 14 I had personal training by Jiu jitsu black belt--my older brother. He was into what would become known as "Gracie" or Brazilian Jiu Jitsu.

I was small for my age and he worried about what would happen to me when I started middle school. My regimen was 2 hours per day, five days per week. Four hours on Saturday. I was not taught the pretty, flowing stuff, only what mattered. There wasn't anyone who could touch me. Because he was my only free fighting partner, I was very good at fighting those much larger than me.

In more than a hundred fights, I lost two--both involved multiple (black) assailants. In the first such loss (8th grade), I was defending a fellow white. Two of them jumped in from behind. In the first incident, I went down, bounced my head off a concrete curb, was knocked out, but still jumped up and kept defending myself--it was broken up shortly after that. I have no memory of what happened as no one one who has been knocked out does. The point is, is that I did not lie there like 99% of other people would have and get stomped. All that training made me machine like and completely without the need to think anything through--purely automatic. In the second such case, I was able to back myself into a corner and hold them off until help arrived--a broken nose was all that I suffered. I have been mugged twice since then and, while being unharmed, sent both opponents to the hospital.

That automatic response only comes from resolute training and it is that auto response which will save your life. In the cases of my muggings, I would have spent the night in jail had it not been for witnesses at the scene. The reason being is that cops will almost always arrest the last man standing since he is usually the one who started it. 95% of the people out there will simply freeze when confronted with violence.

Anonymous said...

All that being said, Karate or any other martial art will NOT turn a pussy into a tiger. Ditto for owning a gun.

Not an accurate statement in and of itself. Attackers vs a gun, the gun wins.

Even if a person is terrified and doesnt know what to do, if that person is armed to defend themselves the genuine possibility exists that the gun will be fired.

Now, whether or not the person will actually hit the target, thats an entirely different discussion since it could be a willy nilly shot and best will serve to merely scare off the would be attacker (attacker runs away never to return)

But that's the best case scenario of a terrified person who is too scared to think calmly rationally while armed.

Anonymous said...

Robert B said...
Anon @ November 11, 2013 at 7:20 PM

Little over wrought, aren't you?

Now that's funny. And ironic. Specially since you later state that you've been in over a hundred fights. Bit of anger issues there, heh?

Those that come looking for something will oftentimes find it.

Now to your Limbaugh stuff.


Limbaugh has more day to day listeners than all of those others you sight --including their readers, put together.


Again, 10yrs ago I'd have signed on completely with that propagand---I mean, statement.
We actually DONT know the actual SIZE of his audience. Much as been made over the years without rebuttal. He simply asserts it as if true.
Young Turks, for example took issue and did an analysis of it...more or less it states that Rush's total audience at any given hour is roughly 3-4mil. A little less than David Lettermans or the Tonight Show. The often repeated canard that he has 20 million listeners per day, is in fact, very misleading and fairly demonstrable. If he indeed had that large an audience we would expect to see it directly effect GOP politics come election time since that amount is significant size of the total voting of America (it would be nearly 20% of the electorate).





Or did you think he rose to such wealth by taking money under the table?


Absolutely not. But come on. He rose to prominence in the late 80s chiefly due to the fairness doctrine having been eliminated around '86. Prior to that he was a local talker in Sacramento area. Nothing less and nothing more.
He was the first to really capitalize on the effects of the total elimination of the fairness doctrine.





Savage can scream and yell (why I dislike him, though agree with much of what he says)

Why do you disagree? That's his schtick, just his persona. Once you get past that, you see that he's a much more substantive person than ever Rush was (who isnt an original thinking about...anything cept more $ for himself) Savage's books, for example, have been bestlsellers and all contain substantive in depth analysis of his policy proposals, including of course, the immigration issue. Borders, language, culture.






not a single newspaper or MSM outlet will ever notice--nor will politicians.


I'd take issue somewhat with that last part, since Savage has had GOP politicians on his show as interviews, something Rush seldom ever will do and when he does he stubbornly refuses to concede that he has ever interviewed a single person ever on his show.






But I assure you, that if Limbaugh spends an entire month arguing against something, they will listen because of the depth and breadth of audience.


Again, this is a myth, a canard. The DEPTH of the audience isn't as large as we think it is. Only his assertion. In the internet age as opposed to when he started on the national scene we now have more than just his word to go by since he refuses to release the Arbitron ratings (wonder why? Whats he have to hide?) If he were on TV which HE WAS and we know that his TV show was a total ratings failure his ratings have to be publicly made known.

Interesting irony: For someone who allegedly has such a high ratings radio show, when he has been on a different medium, the one that basically counts the most (television) he has failed abysmally from a ratings perspective. One would think that with his alleged 20 million radio audience he would be cleaning the clocks of most TV politicos. Even if 10% of his radio audience followed him to watch him on TV he'd have a sizable ratings bonanza in the Nielsen ratings.

It never happened. Each time Rush has appeared on TV he's been a total failure. He doesnt understand that medium which is why he largely has avoided it.

Anonymous said...

I am not justifying who he is,

Yes you are, but that's ok, it's US, you want to be a fan boy of oxycontin, go ahead.



but as others have pointed out, some of you people are not realistic in your expectations.


Hyperbolic bullshit. Realistically, he got into trouble due to the new media (twitter). The new media is now a major player in public policy. Notice how the last pres. election during the debates that TWITTER was used? They were taking questions from TWITTER followers? This is a major thing. One could say that by the end of this decade that Social media will have far more power and influence than radio ever has, if it doesnt have that influence already.




Limbaugh is also watched by liberal groups more than the rest of those you sight because of his prominence. He is fully aware of his existence.



Oh, I have no doubt that he is fully aware of his own existence. There's no one else in his world for anyone or thing else. All about himself, not about America.

Liberal groups, like conservative groups, are still stuck somewhat in the time warp. As social media and blogs become the dominant newsmaker, they will overtake his influence if that has not already occurred. One can strongly make the case that in terms of totality, his show is dead last in shaping public opinion as vs to the internet.

EXAMPLE: In 1994 the historic GOP takeover of Congress, at the January inaugural, the GOP freshman PUBLICLY thanked Rush for his work on their behalf in informing voters to pay attention to issues, etc. In other words they believed that his influence helped them retake congress. Contrast that to 2010, no such thing was mentioned. He wasn't much to be found on the radar screen as vs to the Tea Party. His influence has waned over the years for various reasons not least of all is that he is an out of touch elitist whose interests lie with self preservation and maintaining the status quo within the GOP. He is not a real conservative, he is a real established corporate GOP and they are not usually synonymous.





You are wrong about his stance on GW's push for amnesty.

No, actually I'm correct. Michael Savage who has been on this issue for the last 10yrs was very vocal as was Vdare and conservative grass roots advocates who deal with voters on a daily basis as well as bloggers and social media. Social media was really starting to take hold and root in 06/07.

Anonymous said...


I was heavily involved in the counter push and, while Limbaugh did not drag GW's name on the floor, he repeatedly pointed out the failure of Reagan's amnesty as well as making it clear that Reagan later regretted it.


Yeah, basically that was his one note statement. AGAIN, Savage and other grass roots conservatives as well as internet minded.


Okay, go ahead and bark at me.


So, anyone with a different viewpoint = barker?

All I've been saying is that Rush has been AWOL on various conservative issues for the last decade, perhaps longer than that.

He was one of the loudest voices for supporting NAFTA. Even Al Gore, in his debate w/Perot called him a distinguished citizen who supported Clinton and his position.

Actually, I may have to reconsider what I just wrote. During the debate, toward the end of it, Perot made a not so subtle warning that if NAFTA passed this would have strong repercussions at the mid terms (which is exactly what happened).

I know that Rush has usually encouraged (which he definitely encourages as much as possible) the myth that he was the main thrust of why the GOP won Congress in 94 but perhaps a more telling policy issue was the immigration AND NAFTA. Many many Americans were NOT in total support of that horrendous policy issue, precisely because of the immigration issue as well because they saw that the two were intermittently linked.

All that is basically to say: There are OTHER OPTIONS NOW to get the vital information for conservative policies, issues, etc. (Fox news, anyone?)

Dont just look to Rush and hold him up as the major mover and shaker within GOP conservative policy issues. The landscape now has changed from 20yrs ago. You can't live in the past, have to live in right now.

With Breitbart.com's big sights, social media, bloggers at the grass roots level, etc. we now have more options than ever before to affect change. His audience is much smaller than you think and we also know that its a fairly old/elderly audience.Very few folks under 40-45, for instance listen to him. Why would they? They've grown up getting their news online and also have real concerns about their future (whether from crime infested areas that they live near or from genuine concerns about finding full time employment) these issues Rush couldnt care two shits about since he is an elitist and is woefully out of touch with successive generations. Nor does he particularly care about the real concerns of future generations, as attested to in his biography by Zev Chafets, he is not the real conservative that some would believe he is on several issues. But hey,


"it's good to be the king"

You have a nice day.

pat said...

I see that there are several comments on Oriental martial arts. Robert B tells us that he is small and jui jitsu helped him. I'm glad. Personally I was not small (6'4" and 250lbs) when I took judo in college. But it helped me. My judo medal got me my first job after graduation.

Otherwise it did little for me. Maybe if I frequented bars I might have gotten into more fights and could have employed my wicked osotogari move. But I've never seen a bar with tatami on the floor. Maybe it wouldn't have worked?

The idea that knowing karate can allow you to overcome multiple opponents has an interesting history. It descends, I believe, from the Shinsemgumi in the Meijii Restoration. After Perry brought the Black Ships into Tokyo Harbor Japan began to modernize. The Emperor and the Shogun each had factions which fought in the streets rather like the Clodius and Milo factions in the late Roman Republic.

The Shinsemgumi were political terrorists. They murdered their opponents. They encircled a victim and cut him down by attacking from all sides at once.

There have been many depictions of Kondo and the Shinsemgumi in Japanese cinema. But a funny thing happened. Those movies engendered other movies in which the victim, through his fighting prowess, killed all the attackers - something that probably never happened in real life. Soon it became an action movie cliché. Soon it included unarmed combat as well. Bruce Lee was the first one I remember who was surrounded by a dozen opponents and who beat the snot out of all of them.

Oriental action movies have two distinct differences from ours. First of all they have a strong fantasy element. Samurai in the movies can jump ten feet in the air - backwards. The Chinese warriors in 'Crouching Tiger - Hidden Dragon' can fly over roof tops and fight in the tops of bamboo. John Wayne never did anything like that.

Secondly Oriental movie fighters are always scholars. They can beat everybody else because they have studied. In Westerns the hero might practice with his gun but he doesn't read a book on fast draw. Real cowboys were illiterate.

The reality of course is that the Samurai were not good warriors. They were not good with their swords. And their swords were not good swords.

The good Oriental warriors were of course the Mongols who beat everyone. Whereas the Samurai never beat anyone other than other Samurai. When the Mongols invaded Japan they decimated the Samurai and the Samurai's swords often broke or delaminated.

There were three phases of Samurai. The first were mounted and armed with bows. Those Samurai were not however good archers. The second phase were mounted lancers. Only the final phase in the Tokogawa Shogunate were the Samurai on foot and armed with swords. But the Samurai hardly ever used their swords. Read the autobiography of Musashi Miyamoto. He advised the swordsman to move slowly so as to look good. He actually fought some duels, but in general the Samurai did not resolve disputes with swordplay. The daimyo would resolve disputes by ordering seppuku by one party or the other. Nero ordered Seneca to commit suicide but generally Westerners fought it out amongst themselves. That's why Westerners were always better swordsmen - they kept in practice.

So it's ironic that all Western movies nowadays show Oriental martial arts as being more effective than our home grown fighting varieties.

Albertosaurus

Robert B said...

Anon--

you are a zealot and like all rue zealots, there is only your way. How's it working out for you?

You may have discovered "social media" on 2007, but some of us have been using it since the mid 90's.

Believe what you want to believe. I stand by my statement. All of those you site, have a paltry following. There is no debating that. As far as websites go, 500,000 hits daily means nothing--its the number of unique IPs that matter.

How's that twitter feed working out for ya? Didn't think so.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@make it rain TRUTH

Ex-Brooklynite, that plan would be stopped by the federal government. There is no freedom of association any longer, thanks to the dismissal of the U.S. Constitution.
Well, yes and no. The Orthodox and the Hasidim get special treatment because of their group solidarity. It's not illegal to discriminate in who you sell your house to, but it is illegal to ADVERTISE that fact in a public channel. NSA Spying makes non-public channels and informal conversation and in-synagogue meeting that much more powerful a method of exclusion. They do not, at present, force people to sell or rent their houses to others, and the Supreme Court has explicitly said that Catholics CAN discriminate in favor of hiring Catholics and enforcing Catholic rules on employees. It has to be done carefully, but it can be done.

Since your state is no longer willing to stand up to the feds, as they certainly were able to under the original U.S. Constitution, you have nobody to stop the tyrants from trampling on your rights.
NY State was one of three states that signed the Constitution with the proviso that it could secede at any time. Be nice to see that spirit renewed, but I won't count on it.

As to the people that think whites ought to think in lockstep groupthink? It's never going to happen. It hasn't ever happened anywhere in the world.
Correct. There will be no top-down revolution. We'll win this the way whites have when most effective: bottom-up, with high trust and social capital. Frankly given the depradations of DWLs, I trust the honesty of the negro more: they're reliably untrustworthy.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Jay in DC,

Fuck! That is a lot of blood on my goddamn linoleum tile. No idea how my wife is gonna clean all that gore up...
Something the DWLs will never have is the freedom to laugh the deep laughs that bring health. You helped cure some people with this, literally.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon,

It sounds nice, on paper; but look at what has become of "Christianity" in just 20 years.
Please. The change from Benedict to Francis is even worse than from Bloomberg to that Sandinista.

It would be too easy for squishy-minded progs to infiltrate an exclusive religion
What about Hasidic Judaism? They're horrified by it, just as they're horrified by Christian Fundamentalism. The latter is controlled, however, as it cannot escape Christian egalitarianism. Interestingly, the Catholic church in America was open, but separate: each neighborhood parish was Irish-Catholic, Italian, etc. For a while, they proposed opening a black-Catholic parish on the south side of Chicago. But that idea has vanished, and it's just generic Catholic. Except for odd sects like Melkites and other Eastern churches that obey Rome. One of those would work...

Women will demand power, like their sisters have in other churches; dissatisfied defectors will leave and tell the world about this weird racist nazi cult their husband/father dragged them into; etc.
Women abhor a leadership vacuum; good for them. Masculine Christian leadership was fine, but men have been abandoning that role. By having the Church own everything, per my above mention, there is NO way to steal a man's house by divorcing him. Divorce him and you're out of the community; if the community provides most support, there ought to be no child support capability. Again, look at the ultra-Orthodox Jews: their men basically study Torah all day, they're much poorer, and yet their divorce rate is lower than Reform and they're going to outbreed and replace the liberal Jews, and soon (over 3 children per woman versus about 1 for the Reform crowd.)

I just don't see how you can form a wink-wink religion -- where secretly it's not about religion but race -- and everyone will stick to the story.
You're arguing that Jews don't exist, then? That's exactly what Judaism is, and it's not only not persecuted, it's supported. I think some of the Eastern Orthodox churches might have the same basic DNA and possibilities. Catholicism had it, as I wrote above, but cannot have it any longer.

Maybe a Celtic/Druidic thing could fake some legitimacy, but people would have to b.s. their way through rituals and crap, but then you'd have black Irish like Shaquille O'Neal claiming heritage.
I do have great hope for the Irish. They helped restore the faith once, and they have a group solidarity that was driven out of other groups long ago. To quote Brendan Gleeson from The Guard: "I'm Irish. Racism's part of me culture."

In that regard, having a language other than English can also serve to insulate the group. Assimilation of Italians and Poles and Germans helped to destroy their faith here.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon,

I have a feeling the muslims (no upper case for them) will be in control of Detroit within 20 years. The groids will fall in line because they are easily manipulated. That's why the communists and democrats have sought to get them on their bandwagon(s).
There are a lot of Iraqi Christians near Detroit, too. They have no love for the Groid or the Muslim. It will make for an interesting few years. Detroit is too valuable a geographic location to lie fallow for too long. That's why I proposed Highland Park as the place to start: self-contained city surrounded by Detroit, cheap, and a place where poor but organized, disenfranchised working class whites COULD reclaim, with good leadership.

As to places east of the Mississippi, I'd go to West Virginia. There's no wealth to plunder there, so it won't attract flies to its honey. Central and Western PA are like that too, and the white working class forced out of NY has largely moved to the Poconos if they've stayed nearby.

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon
"Just like the Rodney King episode. That video wasnt played in its entirety, only the last minute of it was and that was enough to fit the agenda of the MSM."
This was part of my "video won't save you" argument. The MSM liars get the snowball rolling by releasing their edit of the tape -- they get millions more eyeballs than our sphere gets -- and instantly the savages are agitated and no amount of logic or reason will stop that snowball. The race pimps organize street rallies, filmmakers like Spook Lee twitter the addresses of your grandmother's home, your wife's job and your kids' elementary school. They don't want to hear the truth; they just want the next excuse to burn it down.


Now, what's changed since Rodney King in 1991? First of all, EVERYONE now has a video camera on their phone. Secondly, EVERYONE can upload video to any number of sites. The MSM have lost control of whites, and they will soon lose control of blacks, too. On the Internet, we can fact-check their ass, and post full-length video. How would you have posted the full-length Rodney King video in 1991? What conservative media organization would have opposed the narrative?

Face it, the MSM and the Left are flying high, but running on fumes. They are liars, and you can lie and deny reality for a long time, but you need a lot of outside support to do so (as in housing: you can build your house to avoid summer heat, or you can build A/C systems to remove the heat that your poor design let in.) The outside support is not there as we become poorer, and the cost of maintaining the lies is increasing. They're fucked.

Mr. Rational said...

All you Anonymouses having the back-and-forth:

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, DO SOMETHING TO DISTINGUISH QUOTED MATERIAL FROM YOUR NEW ADDITIONS!

Like bold itItalicize it.  "Put it in quotes."

>> Indent it with a lead-in.

But don't just cut-and-paste.

Robert B said...

Actually, he has a fairly even spread in his viewership when it comes to age:

http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/

Not so much when it comes to education.

His website generates a hell a lot of traffic--note the vast number of unique addresses. I doubt all of your "alt-right" sites combined even come close to that;

https://www.quantcast.com/rushlimbaugh.com?country=US

More importantly, the Left considers him dangerous. They also claim he rules the Repub party. And there is no getting away from the fact that the house shut up about "immigration reform" the louder his opposition got. Even that puke Rubio backed away from it.

You also seem to have missed all of his (I think) very funny Obama skits--that the Left was livid over for it's out right racist (think Rastass) intonations. Just today, he pointed out that care under Obamacare is not for whites--not for white doctors and not for the white middle class.

As I have said before, you are not going to change a DWL's mind anymore than I am going to change yours. This belief that you can evangelize the vast majority of true believers is simply a pipe dream. My God, some of the sites that claim to "see" are clearly running with nuts off the bolts. Others are well done and well thought out--but the traffic they generate is small and insignificant. Again, you are far and away better off creating networks in the world and creating support groups within them.

Robert B said...

Pat--

I am not small, I was small in 6th grade. All people grow at different rates. Comparing an eleven year old to someone in college is a bit, well, silly, and speaks a lot to your reasoning. I guarantee you that age 15, and at 5'9" , I could whip your butt when you were done with your college "judo" sport training. I routinely thumped 5'10" 9th graders as a 5'2" 7th grader. Three weeks after my daughter's death 15years ago, at 5'10" I thumped a 6'2" intruder in back yard during a black out when he was messing with my generator. I gave him 17 stitches and 13 staples in his head. I later had to prove I had not used excessive force in subduing him. Piece of cake. I only weighed 155lbs. at the time due to depression, he weighed 245 lb.s

Not all martial arts are created equal. Judo is a pale comparison to Jiu jitsu. Gracie Style rules the MMA fighting circuit for a reason--it is extremely viscous. When I competed as a kick boxer in the 70's, most matches either ended with a knockout, a stranglehold pass out or tap out to avoid getting an arm or leg broken. Likewise, pure karate or kwon do is not as effective--there is not much going for it in terms of tight space or ground fighting. Southern Praying Mantis Kung-Fu, if you can get someone to teach it to you, is perhaps the best. But they don't teach that to the masses--there are no open store fronts for it, that I know of.

I can fight better on the ground, on my back, then most people can on their feet. In fact, that is how I avoided serious injury the second time I fought three negroes.

Anonymous said...

Further to this, just to hammer it home:

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

Anonymous said...

Don't waste your time on Karate or any other martial arts. There isn't enought time left anyways to get good enough and you're more than likely just making the car payment for some Dojo owner. Keep yourself fit and strong and master a few basic fighting moves. And always carry an improvised weapon such as a flashlight to use as a Yawara stick, which can be used to disable an opponent. Carry a gun if you can and must but be well aware of the consequences as mentioned above. I'd much rather dish out a pepper spray shower followed up by a few basic blows then run off to fight another day.

Old Sarge

Anonymous said...

Robert B said...
Actually, he has a fairly even spread in his viewership when it comes to age:

http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/

Nice and very tactful of you to OMIT the number of advertisers he has lost and have not returned (over 100) due to the unpleasant bruhaha.

Well, considering based on the Pew survey of voting patterns of those by decade (ages 20s 30s 40s) the young and under 40 are not well represented in conservative and or GOP circles. So, while Rush's audience may have some young members it is clearly not the majority of his audience and he has severe trouble reaching younger members per se since most are inclined to vote for Democrats. Also, his audience is roughly 70% men, so it would seem that he also has difficulty reaching out to women. Wonder why? Can't imagine why?



Not so much when it comes to education.

Agreed, most of his audience is very dumb or it skewers toward high school graduate.

If we want to contrast this with NPR's audience which is much higher educated in regards to schooling (PHD, MA, etc)



His website generates a hell a lot of traffic--note the vast number of unique addresses.


So does porn. That's a non-sequitor. Somethings popular so OBVIOUSLY it is the most accurate and truth telling. Obviously, according to this line of thinking.



I doubt all of your "alt-right" sites combined even come close to that;


Not so fast. Breitbart's big sites, and several sites are doing quite well. Also, they haven't been around as long as Rush, that is readily conceded. So he's got a major head start. But his presence on social media is very limited and in 2013 onward, that's where a large chunk of the political action is generated, not via radio.




More importantly, the Left considers him dangerous.


Oh, so we're back to that canard again are we? Those big mean rascally wibwuls are the problem. Ok, back at you--Rush has just celebrated his 25th anniversary as host of a national audience, what DIRECT POLICY ADVANCEMENTS can he PERSONALLY CLAIM to have DIRECTLY INFLUENCED IN THE CAUSE OF CONSERVATISM?

ANSWER: Crickets chirping. I mean for alllll his supposed influence, what particular legislation that he has gone on and on full throttle to support has he directly influenced and caused the Congress to pass? What issues has he taken the lead on and convinced his audience to support?

Answer: Nothing.

Anonymous said...

And there is no getting away from the fact that the house shut up about "immigration reform" the louder his opposition got. Even that puke Rubio backed away from it.


Again, this in 2013 has nothing whatsoever to do to Rush directly. There are NOW more and more options of which to get the news. I fully grant that IF, IF this debate were happening 20yrs ago, theoretically then yes, Rush would be definitely big influence. But now, with more and more people getting their news online from multiples sources readily available that as recently as 10yrs ago were not, no one can conclusively say that it this is directly due to Rush as the major primary influence of informing people not to pass illegal immigration.




You also seem to have missed all of his (I think) very funny Obama skits--that the Left was livid over for it's out right racist (think Rastass) intonations.

I humor this, because you are obviously a supporter and would much like to turn this into an informercial propaganda piece extolling the thrice divorced, viagra poppin', oxycontin (hillbilly heroin) junkie/druggie. Yes, his humor is ho ho ho ho hee hee hee bust a gut laugh aloud funnnnyy! This is actually a one trick pony of his, he did this similar thing 20yrs ago. It's old hat and not very creative anymore.

AND, this helps make and strengthen my point: HOW MANY TIMES did Rush parody W in the same line or venom? Answer: none.

Again, IF Obama were a Republican, you wouldn't be hearing a chirp out of him. Once a GOP wins back the White House, you wont hear anything remotely critical of the Pres. He's a GOP water carrier, he'll do it again.
Liberals = Bad Conservatives (Republicans) = Good. Its a simple schtick for his audience of dumbed down but as for passing for legitimate thoughtful opinion on public policy, I'll take this website, Breitbart's big sites and other places including social media.



Just today, he pointed out that care under Obamacare is not for whites--not for white doctors and not for the white middle class.



Enough with homoerotic fan boyism and please desist with all the verbal fellatio. This isn't a bath house, save it for your special friend(s).








As I have said before, you are not going to change a DWL's mind anymore than I am going to change yours.


I am not trying to change a DWLs mind or anyone else's period. I strive for accuracy. That's one of the reasons I enjoy this blog, namely, for the information that isn't readily found.....just about anywhere. Do you really think that Rush is going to talk about crime rate and the origins of the high numbers etc in any great detail on his show for an extended amount of time? He'd lose those few remaining sponsors that he has left.

Anonymous said...

This belief that you can evangelize the vast majority of true believers is simply a pipe dream.


And observing your fanboyism w/Rush, clearly you speak from verbal fellatio experience. Rush! (orgasm from you) "Oh Rush, Rush! You're so great great great!"
Ok, bend the ankles now the way you've been doing.




Again, you are far and away better off creating networks in the world and creating support groups within them.



Uh....I thought we were already doing that, yes no? Isnt that what Rush himself has always admonished his blind followers to do?


No, what I've been saying is that he's no longer as relevant as before. Contrary to your early point about social media, Facebook wasnt fully available before 06-07 and Twitter really took off after 08, certainly by 09. He is holding on to a largely defunct obsolete style of engaging in public policy. Yes, radio will always have a place for discussion of issues, but in 2013 he's not relevant any longer the way he once was.

Just remember: Why did he lose over 100 advertisers most of whom have and will not return? That was due primarily to social media Twitter specifically. That's how conservatives have to be, ready to take the fight to the liberals via social media.

Conservatives today, right now, have to be new media savvy and ever ready to take the argument to online airwaves themselves. He is irrelevant it's time to let go of a person who never really was all that conservative to begin with.

Anonymous said...


"Now, what's changed since Rodney King in 1991? First of all, EVERYONE now has a video camera on their phone. Secondly, EVERYONE can upload video to any number of sites. The MSM have lost control of whites, and they will soon lose control of blacks, too. On the Internet, we can fact-check their ass, and post full-length video. How would you have posted the full-length Rodney King video in 1991? What conservative media organization would have opposed the narrative?"


Exactly. EVERYONE now has a cell phone w/video. THAT is how the alternative right can gain control of the narrative at least in part.

What the fuck did Rush Limbaugh have to do with Acorn's scandal? NOTHING. That was all Mr O'Keefe and his brave stand, virtually alone with a video camera. THAT is how you do it. Then upload it and boom! You have a news story.

Making news, recording it, and putting it out in the public realm instantaneously and quicker than ever radio can do. Boom! There's the story.

If 1,000 conservatives armed with only a cell phone and or a small videocamera did what Project Veritas did to liberals, we would start to see more and more news changing the overall narrative. That's the way to change lives and change minds and hearts.

For one lesser example: How did the occupy movement originate? Online, via social media. Then it just spread.

What conservatives need to do is something organized by via social media and in a focused direction (e.g. Lets inform people about the dangers of violent crime....post online various videos of crimes happening and let the viewer draw their own conclusions....as one example would be)

Now, maybe a few videos online won't change things very much but one thousand? That's a start, and if only ten percent of those stories are accurately portrayed, then you've got yourself some legitimate news and can control the narrative.

james m said...

Sorry to bust the theoretical bubble of the MA crowd but a brief perusal of Japanese history reveals that Ieyasu Tokugowa defeated the other Daymiao using western GUNS and CANNONS. He blasted his rivals to smithereens and then he outlawed guns!! Result? 300 years of uninterrupted rule.
You would know this if you approached history as the cold hard realist you imagine yourself to be, not the 14 yr girl meeting Justin Beiber that you sound like.
and here's a nod to all those who claim Asian intellectual superiority...the Japs know gun beats sword every time, and cannon beats bow and arrow....every time.

Bullshit yourself all you want but if you want to dominate for 3 centuries guns are what get you there. Just ask Tokugawa.

To those who cant see that video records remove the possibility of BRA turning things inside out please take a moment to ask yourself what TWMNBM lawyer is gonna take a case he cant win big $$ on? gain political office on?
In all those gas station hold-ups/shoot outs no owner has been sued because no lawyer will take the case! Because the video SHOWS what really happened. Sheesh!

Mr. Rational said...

Anony-nitwit did another 3 "talking to himself" posts, or it was impossible to tell what was said by whom because the bozo can't be bothered to use the <b> tag to bold, nor the <i> tag to italicize, and can't even be bothered to hit the "quote" key a couple of times.

Whenever I see that, I just page down to the next comment.

AnalogMan said...

I have to support Mr Rational on this. All that you-say/I-say argument over Rush and Weiner is confusing and boring. In addition to identifying quotes, please (both of you) spend five minutes with a dictionary and learn the difference between sight, site and cite. Your comments are incomprehensible.

Anonymous said...

I really must contact all the branches of the US Military and tell them that since they have guns, they no longer need to teach any form of hand to hand combat to anyone.
Who knew?
On second thought, I probably don't need to as I'm sure all those who've dismissed any form of martial arts as next to worthless and have stuck their noses up in the air over it have already done so.

Anonymous said...

"To those who cant see that video records remove the possibility of BRA turning things inside out please take a moment to ask yourself what TWMNBM lawyer is gonna take a case he cant win big $$ on? gain political office on?
In all those gas station hold-ups/shoot outs no owner has been sued because no lawyer will take the case! Because the video SHOWS what really happened. "


Amen to the truth. And usually the surveillance is DATED along with the time it occurred on the video as well. Those that rob convenience stores just don't care. If they're caught, hey, they get to go to where all their brothas are holed up. So they get to socialize some and make some connections.

Only thing is, outside of hard facts like surveillance video if it's not necessarily dated then it could theoretically be "debated" in court of law. Lawyers do however, like to take on cases that they believe will be a big payout. Playing the race card in court can sometimes lead to big payoffs and that risk they will run provided the video does not have a date. 'Well, your honor, how do we know that this video wasn't made a few wks ago? etc etc'. That kind of thing could definitely happen.

Sometimes the ACLU will get involved and then look out.

Brobee said...

You've obviously never been to America.