Sunday, August 17, 2014

The Ultimate Ferguson Question: Pentagon 1033 Program vs. HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (Weaponizing Equality)

In all of talking, editorializing, and tweeting about the black insurrection in Ferguson, Missouri, one politician’s Drudge-linked piece stands out as the silliest and most juvenile.

Then again, this same elected official did consider Republican outreach to the 83 percent black city of Detroit a winning strategy

Sen. Rand Paul, beloved leader of the nebulous liberty movement (meaning: liberty means whatever the current zeitgeist demands it conform to mean), took to Time.com to write an article denouncing the police state measures enacted by the besieged white police force trying to maintain order after multiple days of black rioting in the 67 percent black city of Ferguson.
An attempt to restore order in 67% black Ferguson, where black rioters/looters/arsonists were put down by force

After denouncing the militarization of our police departments (courtesy of the Pentagon’s 1033 program, which distributed military surplus equipment), Sen. Paul writes a paragraph seemingly plagiarized from the speeches of Attorney General Eric “My People” Holder when he addresses he an adorning black crowd. [Rand Paul: We Must Demilitarize the Police, Time. 8-14-14]:

When you couple this militarization of law enforcement with an erosion of civil liberties and due process that allows the police to become judge and jury—national security letters, no-knock searches, broad general warrants, pre-conviction forfeiture—we begin to have a very serious problem on our hands. 
Given these developments, it is almost impossible for many Americans not to feel like their government is targeting them. Given the racial disparities in our criminal justice system, it is impossible for African-Americans not to feel like their government is particularly targeting them.
With all due respect to Sen. Paul, but couldn’t those racial disparities exist in our criminal justice system because individual black people break the law at an extraordinary rate when compared to other racial groups?

The obvious answer to this question is “yes,” but it’s one Sen. Paul and every card-carrying member of Conservative Inc. knows (or never considers) is completely off-limits if they desire maintaining solid standing in the Beltway and with the gatekeepers at Fox News.

And why is Sen. Paul thinking “collectively” when aggregating black individuals in a manner Ayn Rand would declare the worst form of racism? Isn’t this a repudiation of his “libertarian” cred?
So here are the main points to make about Ferguson, Missouri and the black riots that broke out after a police officer shot 18-year-old “aspiring rapper” Michael Brown. [Who was Mike Brown? Profile of black teenager shot in Missouri, Christian Science Monitor, 8-13-14]:


·       The city of Ferguson was 73 percent white in 1990 and is now 28 percent white
·       St. Louis, of which Ferguson is a suburb of, is 49 percent black and 43 percent. Violent crime in the city is almost exclusively caused by individual black males, the same racial group Sen. Paul believes is the victim of racial profiling and correctly has grievances with the judicial system

Why are these the main points, you’re probably asking yourself?

Because Ferguson has seen its black population from 25 percent of the overall population in 1990 to 67 percent black today; the distrust between the police department in Ferguson (50 of the 53 are white, precisely because the dramatic shifts in the racial demographics didn’t allow the relocation of public employees as easily as private sector employees) and the increasingly black community exists because the former group are arresting suspected members of the latter group frequently.

The racial changes have happened so quickly in Ferguson that the nearly 3/4ths black city still has a white mayor, and five of the six city council members are white.

Thus, why the riots/looting/pillaging/burning of buildings and private property is correctly labeled a black insurrection. The anger at the shooting death of Michael Brown was the catalyst for finally demanding real change in a city where the now-white minority must placate the black majority before surrendering actual power.

Thus, one of the primary reasons the Ferguson Police Department reacted with such a dramatic – and, sadly, maligned by both conservatives and liberals – use of force on Wednesday to subdue the black rioters (enabled by a sympathetic mainstream media looking for another Trayvon Martin-figure to canonize).

The actions of the almost entirely white Ferguson Police Department conjured up images of Bull Conner and his attempts to maintain order in 1963 Birmingham, providing ample fodder for a media to paint sympathetic images of black protestors in the face of a violent reaction by the state.

How did Birmingham turn out again... oh, that's right.

Replaced where images of black looters and burnt-out buildings; in their place, where blacks running from armored-clad white officers brandishing AR-15 and black agitators scampering through clouds of tear gas.
From August 14th, the night the police stood down in Ferguson, and blacks celebrated the victory. Courtesy of HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, this form of weaponized equality is coming to majority white city near you


The monopoly on violence by the police in Ferguson was supplanted by an outpouring of vitriol against their actions, which handed over power to the black mob in the city.

The monopoly of violence is the black mob, with the fear of looting, rioting, arson and even shootings by this rebel force keeping the police from action (of course, any action will be seen as casus belli for black people nationwide to riot as well).

This fact was crystallized by the governor of the state of Missouri putting Captain Ron Johnson, a black police officer, in charge of the police in Ferguson. He became a man of the people, as he grew up in Ferguson. [Missouri Highway Patrol Will Take Command in Ferguson Operations, Riverfront Times, 8-14-14]:
Captain Ronald Johnson will lead police response for the highway patrol. 
"I grew up here," Johnson told reporters. "This is currently my community and my home...I understand the anger and fear of the citizens of Ferguson, and our officers will respect both of those."
Images of Captain Johnson leading the black protestors around Ferguson on August 15th, marching around with them and even “fist bumping” them, represented the surrender of the city to anarchy and inevitable black political rule.

This changed, of course, when blacks to rioting again on Friday and Saturday nights (even after a curfew was imposed by the feckless governor of the state of Missouri). 

But there’s a silver-lining lost in the story of the fall of Ferguson, Missouri: the political architects of a new, post-white America fail to realize what the Pentagon 1033 program means, especially when viewing what the Ferguson Police Department did on Wednesday night when trying to reclaim the city from black rioters.

White Americans, courtesy of HUD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program, increasingly have nowhere to run; they have nowhere to hide. [Obama administration using housing department in effort to diversify neighborhoods, Fox News, 8-8-13]:
In a move some claim is tantamount to social engineering, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is imposing a new rule that would allow the feds to track diversity in America’s neighborhoods and then push policies to change those it deems discriminatory.  
The policy is called, "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing." It will require HUD to gather data on segregation and discrimination in every single neighborhood and try to remedy it. 
HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan unveiled the federal rule at the NAACP convention in July. 
"Unfortunately, in too many of our hardest hit communities, no matter how hard a child or her parents work, the life chances of that child, even her lifespan, is determined by the zip code she grows up in. This is simply wrong,” he said.
The sinister sounding Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program means the federal government is dedicated to eradicating social capital around America, replaced with the promotion of social justice.

And they did just that with Ferguson. [Why did the Michael Brown shooting happen here?, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 8-16-14]:
Long before the nation rested its collective conscience on the protests along West Florissant Avenue, there was a different mobilization going on. 
Hundreds of people were moving out of their urban neighborhoods to this north St. Louis County suburb seeking a safe and affordable place to live. 
They found it in an isolated corner of Ferguson that was flush with sprawling apartment complexes. Far from Ferguson’s leafy residential streets and quaint downtown, many people didn’t even know the apartments were part of the city until young Michael Brown was shot and killed there Aug. 9. 
But not the police. They knew. 
After decades of relative calm and stability, the apartments have become a tinderbox for crime. Canfield Green Apartments and the nearby Oakmont and Northwinds complexes are a study of the slow encroachment of poverty and social distress into what had been suburban escapes. 
Angela Shaver has witnessed that sea change since she moved into Canfield Green Apartments 20 years ago. The state employee said she raised a prom queen there and sent her off to college. 
There used to be a swimming pool. Now, there’s a bullet hole in the door below her.That shooting, and many others, happened long before all the vigil candles melted in the middle of the street for Brown. 
Even as Shaver explained the frequency of gunfire, she was cut off by a sudden blast coming from Northwinds Apartments, a hulking spread with more than 400 low-income units. 
Boom! 
Shaver paused to listen. No screams. No more shots. She picked up the interview where she’d left off. 
“I hate to say I got used to them,” she said of the gunshots. 
Ferguson’s crime and poverty rate is lower than some of the other North County municipalities. But the small southeast corner of the city where the apartments are glows bright red on crime maps. 
That area along West Florissant Avenue and just east of it accounted for 18 percent of all serious crimes reported between 2010 and August 2012, according to a Post-Dispatch analysis of crime data provided by St. Louis County. 
The area accounted for 28 percent of all burglaries, 28 percent of all aggravated assaults, 30 percent of all motor vehicle thefts and 40 percent of all robberies reported in the city of 21,000 people. 
It’s a cluster of densely populated complexes that stand apart from the predominantly single-family streets of Ferguson.
The personification of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program...
On a map, the area sticks out like an appendage, one that was added to Ferguson by annexation. Many of the children who live there aren’t even part of the Ferguson-Florissant school system. 
Adding to that isolation, police have blocked off nearly all access roads to the apartments with concrete barriers, fences and gates. 
A Post-Dispatch request for more recent data from the Ferguson Police Department is pending. 
The nearly all-white police force has struggled to maintain control and respect from many African-Americans who live there as officers try to clamp down on crime. 
There is a common perception that police stop people without reason. 
“If you stay here, they basically think you are a thug,” said Gerard Fuller, 19, who is headed to Arkansas Baptist College in a few days on a basketball scholarship. 
The Brown shooting dug into that nerve. The response seems to have as much to do with socioeconomic factors as it does opinions about race relations and police brutality in communities across the country that have struggled to integrate. 
In St. Louis County alone, African-American poor are six times as likely as white poor to live in areas of concentrated poverty. 
The apartment complexes located on the fringe of Ferguson — the self-proclaimed “Community of Choice” — give a glimpse of what that looks like. 
The eruption of looting and violent protests and the national attention it drew give a glimpse of the implications.
You have no where to run, white people. The black undertow will follow, and with HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program, the federal government has found a way to weaponize equality...

But the Pentagon’s 1033 program means more small towns across America are being armed with military-grade weapons straight from warzones around the world… and as crime rates rise in city across city (thanks to the mandated dispersing of blacks via HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program), a similar situation to the one the St. Louis Post-Dispatch described above will occur: an almost entirely white police force will encounter a growing black community hostile with the police for daring to arrest perennially "good boys"...

Strange that, like Ferguson, America’s future seems to be a warzone, courtesy of a federal government mandating the legislation of equality and arming local municipalities with military-grade weapons.

As we see in Ferguson, this is all going to end in tears…

Police State America or Detroit 2014: this is what those in charge of Black-Run America (BRA) have in mind for your future.

66 comments:

Mr. Rational said...

I'm waiting for a nice, big, "affordable housing" complex to go into the community of Torch Lake, MI, where Michael Moore has his waterfront mansion.

This "equality" is to be imposed on the little people, not the elites.

Anonymous said...

Go outside the Kwanstain for journalism:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2727321/Conversation-recorded-bystander-just-moments-Michael-Brown-shooting-casts-doubt-claims-teen-surrendered-Officer-Darren-Wilson.html

Anonymous said...

There is no doubt that we are hearing so much about Ferguson is because it relates to blacks. But frankly I feel that this is a good thing.

If what it takes to wake people up about the militarization of the police is these riots, then so be it.

It's a shame that so many other instances of police overreaction have been ignored, but if this gets the word out, so be it.

Anonymous said...

A soft weak feminized nation of cupid stunt nagra lovers gets everything it deserves and it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.

Mr. Clean said...

SBPDL said...You have no where to run, white people.

Not true... yet. We might be experiencing something along the lines of a political "worst case scenario" with the current administration and the past 5.5 years, There might be some chance of turning this circus around a bit in the 2014 and 2016 elections. But I am not holding my breath.

And again we have the defeatism here, and it's offensive. Whites don't "run", they simply move on to avoid the hassle. There is a difference. Large bears will often move off when they hear humans approaching. They aren't afraid or fleeing, they are simply moving on because they don't want to be bothered and there isn't enough of anything keeping them where they are.

Perhaps if there does come a time when whites have nowhere left to go, then things might get interesting. It might be like cornering a large bear.

Anonymous said...

It's funny to watch all the politicians, newscasters, TV personalities and PC scared white rabbits running around looking for a black ass to kiss, and the blacker, the better!

No more telling a nigger "no", no more pulling a gun on a nigger, no more slapping a nigger's paw. Time to kiss that black ass, and YOU will kiss it too (in time).

Niggers have arrived, they have woken up.

Anonymous said...

Captain Ron Johnson flashing a gang sign in solidarity with the mob:

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/ron-johnson.jpg

When this debacle is over, the residents will elect a black mayor who will in turn hire a black police chief. This will likely be Ron Johnson and you can bet the media will praise this transition ad nauseum while venerating "Big Mike" as a legacy of police brutality.

ATL Born said...

This is the first time I have made a comment on the SBPDL site, which, I only found a month or so ago. I feel like I have escaped the Matrix! I am born and raised in the metro Atlanta area and am shocked at the truths that PK and the rest of you expose us Whites too. It is eye opening and very insiteful! I had spent the last 13 years living in All White Cumming,GA. That's where they threw rocks at Oprah and her crew when they tried to March there. Due to financial issues, I work for Dot Indians and the office is overrun by nogs, byt now I moved back to Conyers,Ga. OMG!! has it changed since I grew up here. Its a scumbag ghetto with trashed parks and nogs niggin around everywhere. I mean, where are they all walking around too? It is rough! Then I found out the same Oprah they hurled rocks at in Cumming,Ga. actually told all the darkies to move to Conyers!! I pine away for the day my own plight turns around and I can head back to YT town or once my daughters are grown head to the NW. Bless you guys for all the info on this site and down with the BRA!

Anonymous said...

the military response was totally necessary because eventually the out of control looters would meet an arab or indian shop owner that would massacre them. THEN things would get bad, it is almost like the looters want to be mowed down

Anonymous said...

Mr Rational, Michael Moore got devoiced and does not live on Torch Lake anymore.

I guess he found a new one. Except for his money no one would go with that fat ass, and lier.

Anonymous said...

OT I know but something Bogolyubski may have noticed:

Our overlords want YT to go back into Iraq ON THE GROUND and fight Iraq War 3.0. After atomising Iraq and Syria which was planned for years there are only two effective ground fighting forces left in Iraq, Peshmerga (Kurds) and ISIS.

Bi-partisan scumbags led by Rep. Engel (D. NY, TWMNBN) is planning to wave the American flag for YKW and introduce a third effective ground force, U.S. groud troops.

They first crack open the door a fraction of an inch to see what happens then push the door wide open. Every time. Is BHO going to oppose them ? Ha ha ha.

BTW, there are already U.S. ground troops fighting ON THE GROUND with the Peshmerga, just not enough apparently.

With BHO rapidly turning over control of the military to minorities/women/fags YT should just abandon the military, it hasn't served us for years anyway and let the vibrant diversity run the military in to the ground like everything else.

The Chinese aren't that fond of vibrant diversity and there may be unpleasant surprises awaiting the U.S. military in the Pacific theatre in the near future however.

Please, please YT, just this one time, don't eat the shit sandwich served up on FOX TV et al. and let vibrant diversity handle things, they are in charge anyway.
Let vibrant diversity fix things like they have been doing in Ferguson, Mo. and fight and run BRA's wars now. It's time for YT to stop participating just let it fail and take care of your own kind.

Anonymous said...

This is the first time I have made a comment on the SBPDL site, which, I only found a month or so ago. I feel like I have escaped the Matrix!

Welcome aboard!

Californian said...

Here's the thing about Rand Paul: if we lived in a White Republic, the militarization of the police would not be necessary. But we do not live in a White Republic. We live in a country which is self-destructing. We have de facto open borders. And we have gangs. And we have flash mobs. And we have "uprisings" over police shootings.

Older means of social control -- like families, churches and neighborhoods -- are falling apart. The only way to keep things under control is the heavy hand of the state. It's not something to look forward to, but what is a realistic alternative? To many people, a militarized police force is the one institution around which they can rally.

There is a risk here, and that is the police being turned against white people. Typical for BRA, it leads to lose-lose end states. You either accept the reduction of your liberties, or you end up with gangs terrorizing your neighborhood. This is why BRA has to be brought down. There's nothing in it for sane people.

To get back to Rand Paul. He is thinking in terms of the negative interactions that libertarian minded Americans have with the cops, such as a marijuana bust or the jailing of an otherwise law abiding citizen for carrying a firearm. He doesn't seem to get it that when dealing with urban gangs -- mainly "people of color" -- it's an entirely different ballpark. It is becoming low level insurgency in the Homeland. And a war on white people. This is so not only in the USA, but in South Africa, and increasingly Europa in the face of third world mass migrations.

If it's a war, what is Rand's response?

For more white Americans, it is--buy more guns and ammo.

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 15:15 Big negative there Slick there won't be any darkie ass kissing in these parts.
Check local listings for nog lovers but you won't find any around here.

Anonymous said...

You have no where to run, white people. The black undertow will follow, and with HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program, the federal government

The government, the system, is the problem, black thugs are just a symptom. The establishment uses black thugs in somewhat the same way as the Nazis used Brown Shirts. CNN and several other "news" organizations have virtually drawn a road map to the police officer's house.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....Because insanity has taken over America I would like to leave a couple quotes.......

"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it."
George Orwell.

"Something is happening here, but you don't know what it is, do you Mister Jones".
Bob Dylan.

"What if the Hokey Pokey is what it's all about."
Written on a fence surrounding a construction site in Key West, Florida in 2010.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Go outside the Kwanstain for journalism:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2727321/Conversation-recorded-bystander-just-moments-Michael-Brown-shooting-casts-doubt-claims-teen-surrendered-Officer-Darren-Wilson.html

August 17, 2014 at 2:46 PM

this is a good article
thanks for sharing

Anonymous said...

A few deputized citizens with rifles could have put down the riot and looting in Fergurason. But the last thing the Ruling Elites want is empowered, organized, and armed White men to learn that they can provide their own security. We might decide to go after the Ruling Elites next. The PTB uses the police to PROTECT black rioters and looters. That way they can justify the police state, which has always been targeted at the White Middle-class, and scare the benumbed American public into giving up more of their money and liberty for "security"

Anonymous said...

HUD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program.

For those people interested in pursuing possible political solutions while we stockpile ammo and food while waiting for the end, this program might be a place to get a toehold.

The legal justification for this program is probably to right all of those evils of slavery and ongoing discrimination against blacks. But obviously HUD disregards the damage caused by the mass relocations of non-productive and criminal populations to areas of prosperity and low crime rates.

I don't claim to be a lawyer, but what they are doing appears to me to be a taking of property without due process by the government. Although the actual rent for section 8 housing is paid by taxpayer money, only considering this cost does not account for the total actual cost of the program. For example, the total property value of Ferguson before section 8 was almost certainly far greater than it is today, and that value has been taken from private property owners who had no opportunity to object. The decisions to shift the property values of private citizens to an economic value for blacks via section 8 is done by unilateral decision made by a government agency.

Presently, the government, through the EPA, BLM or many other government agencies will not let persons or business entities build dams, drill wells, lay pipelines, alter the course of waterways, burn fuels, modify wetlands, conduct any activity which might affect animals deemed as endangered, or engage in many other activities without endless studies to prove that there will be no harmful side effects of the proposed activity.

I see no reason why HUD should not be held to the same standards regarding section 8 housing. They should be required to show that the benefits of their section 8 program outweighs ALL of the costs and that property is not taken from private property owners without just compensation. If the highway department wanted to build a road through a tract of land owned by a private property owner, the government would have the pay the owner the value of the land taken as well as the decrease in value of the balance of the tract. Just because the taking of value from property owners in communities such as Ferguson is less directly linked to government action than the seizure of property for a highway does not mean that it is not a taking.

We should all write letters of outrage to our state and federal lawmakers demanding that this problem be corrected. We should also encourage family members and friends to do the same. We need to become visible as a unified voice demanding justice. Expressing outrage works great for the blacks, and it could work for us. It should be well within the authority of Congress to enact laws recognizing the inevitable decline of property values due to government activities as a taking and require the government to compensate the property owners. Basically we demand the government to notify any city and its population of a plan for section 8 housing, the government would be required to obtain an independent study realistically estimating the anticipated loss of property value in the city, and property owners would be offered to challenge that estimate in court with experts of their own. Ultimately, the government would be required to compensate property owners for their involuntary loss of property value due to the government's activities. If the government had to internalize all of the costs of their section 8 party, it would find other alternatives. It might be less expensive just to build section 8 winners their own town to run as they see fit.

Anonymous said...

Some commenters here have repeated Saint MLK's comments about judging a man by the content of his character rather than the colour of his skin. This is the only thing Saint MLK said that I am aware of that I can agree with, he was correct.

Judging the nogs by their character leads to the exact same place as judging them by their skin colour. See Detroit, Baltimore, Camden and now Ferguson, Mo. for examples. Their ignorance, violence, childish, destructive behaviour is on display for the whole world to see. Again.

There certainly are bad white people who make the news but except for small numbers of the usual crazy DWLs most whites want evil white people executed. No excuses.

Anonymous said...



"Weaponizing Equality" HAHAHA Where do you come up with these phrases? They are so hilarious and great! Someday you need to come out with an "ironic" coffee table book full of your phrases with pictures and definitions. It would be a hit if you could make it ironic enough that hipsters think its some kind of joke.

Polar Bear said...

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/%3Emuh+whit+gilt_c209e4_4712488.jpg

seapeamp said...

"Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing" means HUD is chasing down White people.

"DIVERSITY" means no White escape!

Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White communities for EVERYBODY!

“DIVERSITY” is a code word for WHITE GENOCIDE.

Anonymous said...

Apparently the new magical HNIC in Ferguson had to pop tear gas and shoot a nog. That glorious bonding moment with the misunderstood gangs and other diversity didn't last long.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/17/police-try-to-disperse-protesters-defying-ferguson-curfew/?intcmp=latestnews

Anonymous said...

Anon 2:49pm- "But frankly I feel that this is a good thing. If what it takes to wake people up about the militarization of the police is these riots, then so be it."
I have to disagree with you here. If anything, the Ferguson Chimpout has vindicated the militarization program, to the average American. No matter if the media only report the opinions of the DWLs and show the R. Pauls passing out with the vapors; Joe Sixpack wants to see firehoses, German Shepherds, and 1919A4s. And if he's four-deep into his sixpack, possibly even flamethrowers. No rational citizen sees this demonstration of force (a Halloween dress-up party, really) as something that can happen to them and their neighbors. Why? Because normal citizens do not stage apeshit riots.

Anonymous said...

The heart of darkness. Joseph Conrad wrote on it in his novella of the same same. It is the story of a river boat journey deep into the jungle of colonial-era Africa. With each passing mile on the river, western notions of civilization, mastery, and order begin to fade and are replaced by scenes of chaos, decay, and death. When I read news from Ferguson, I see a place where emotion trumps reason and due process, where any attempt at truth is discarded for the self-serving lie. Savagery is met with savagery. I think of Conrad's story's emblematic phrase: "the horror....the horror."

Today, in west Africa, the same hordes that would loot in Ferguson are destroying clinics for the treatment of Ebola. Because it is the white-man's ju-ju, they think, that has brought this about. The white man's evil. If we all stop believing in it, if we burn it down, the thinking must run, we can will it away, it will be our turn to manage things. Only they can't manage things, so they loot the wreckage instead. They demand blood or, as with jesse and al, ransom. When buildings burn, so go the organizations and the ideas and the institutions that are bulwarks to chaos. When the white man retreats, he takes with him humankind's best measures, imperfect as they are, against the daily horrors that threaten to swallow us all, like an encroaching jungle, into its dark heart.

Shefali said...

I can see where Rand Paul is coming from, though, because a "militarized" police force is more dangerous to citizens of all colors. So is the all-powerful fed. Ruby Ridge and Waco are examples where white peoples' civil rights were violated. Though in this particular instance I don't see how "Andy Griffith" style policing would help.

One thing no one talks about - forced de-segregation also violates peoples' civil rights. If whites don't want to live with blacks, they shouldn't be forced to.

It is not rational to assume that blacks are equal to whites and then to force integration. If blacks are really equal to whites, then segregated black areas would be just as good as segregated white areas. Forced integration is an admission of black inferiority, just like affirmative action.

Interestingly, though, segregation was actually good for blacks in that in the old days of segregation poor blacks rubbed elbows with middle class blacks - and that was actually good for them. And affirmative action is actually horrible for blacks. Before affirmative action, blacks actually had to work harder to achieve the same goals as whites and that was better for their character.

Hard work and striving to achieve a goal is always better for one's character than getting a hand-out or stealing. Aside from the fact that stealing is wrong...

Ultimately, forced integration and using affirmative action has hurt blacks. It also fosters resentment from non-blacks because it isn't fair.

Off topic - I recently recommended this site to a couple of my friends, as well as Mr. Kersey's books.

Shefali said...

BTW, warning: The electrical grid is substantially taxed thanks to Obama's EPA regulations. If we get another extremely cold winter, this could mean blackouts in the Northeast, Midwest, etc. If you live in an urban center with a large black population... first off, don't live there. Second, be prepared. Imagine Ferguson writ large.

I lived in NYC in 1977 when there was a blackout. I was a little kid, but I remember the adults talking about the looting and arson. A friend told me about a similar situation in Atlanta, where his Dad guarded the family's store with a shotgun. In my neighborhood it was several of the fathers patrolling the area with baseball bats. I doubt that would stop the blacks today though.

Anonymous said...

Dear Leader Messiah King Hussein the Immaculate is in a real pickle here. You know he hates bombing his muslim brothers in Iraq to save the people on the mountain and if he cracks down on Ferguson the brothas will know their halfbreed bastard son of a communist gang bang whore doesn't give a shit about them.

Anonymous said...

Anon 6:21pm, I'm not a lawyer either; but if I'm not mistaken, Section 8 housing is not government-seized property, but privately-owned dwellings, rented out by private people/corporations who willingly accept Section Ape checks as payment. Obviously, those willing owners do not live next door to their tenants, so any damage they suffer will only be measured in non-monetary units called Hassles. Any damages and repairs to their property will have to be paid by Uncle Sambo, so money's not really an issue. It's the neighboring residents and property owners who suffer the real damages, in the form of lost equity, cars, televisions and daughters.
So how do you sue either the feral government or the landlords, for engaging in a consensual business deal -- and how do you sue them in the same courtrooms before the same black-robed YouKnowWhats that have dissolved your right to Free Association? All you can do, probably, is make an unrefusable offer to one of the parties who seek to destroy your neighborhood: either the govt, the landlord, the tenants, or the building.

Anonymous said...

Where are Al and Jesse:

http://www.myfoxchicago.com/story/26296044/2-killed-8-wounded-in-citywide-shootings-since-friday-evening

Enlightenator said...

A caller in Bill Cunningham's Sunday night radio show just tried to name -drop Paul Jersey and Charles Bronson.

Anonymous said...

Now you're talking

Soutrhon said...

Hundreds of people were moving out of their urban neighborhoods to this north St. Louis County suburb seeking a safe and affordable place to live. They found it in an isolated corner of Ferguson that was flush with sprawling apartment complexes.

They found it all right. They found it, and turned Ferguson into a cesspool when they moved in.

Anybody remember what apartment complexes used to be? For young whites, they were a waypoint on the path to owning a home.

Now, they have turned into a way to move the ghetto into the suburbs. A lot of cities won't allow apartments to be built, just for that reason.

Nobody wants to buy a nice home in the suburbs with good, safe schools, and then have Shitavious sitting next to your son or daughter in school because his mother got a section 8 apartment in your school district.

Today, an apartment complex is like an open sore, inviting blacks to come right in and infect the community.

Anonymous said...

@ Southron local apt complexes were almost all white in the 80s now they are no go zones for whites.
Get to work whitey those apartment rents aren't free.

Enlightenator said...

A caller into Bill Cunningham's Sunday night radio show just tried to name -drop Paul Kersey and Charles Bronson. Anyone else catch it?

Anonymous said...

Look at the picture of all the guys in/on the convertible. The car must belong to someone they know. One of their mamas who works maybe.

I doubt it belongs to the guy sitting on the windshield - he's just destroying those windshield wipers and he couldn't care less, it appears.

Others' property.

I wonder if he'll be asked to pay for the damage. I think I know how he'll reply (din do nuffin / don't have the money). Then what?

Anonymous said...

Nobody wants to buy a nice home in the suburbs with good, safe schools, and then have Shitavious sitting next to your son or daughter in school because his mother got a section 8 apartment in your school district.


I used to live in a very liberal area and they circumvented this problem with bussing. I'm not sure how they did it but the apartment building of section 8 kids that were in walking distance of the (cough) good school were bussed 15 minutes away. I suspect they had them all labeled as disabled then claimed the other school was better equipped to handle them. It was clear they were keeping section 8 blacks out of the school and probably never aroused suspicion since it was such a liberal area. This school also took pride in matching the reading scores of the local private school and the administration did not want to lose donations from the wealthy white liberals.

One thing I learned was that a lot of the wealthy white liberals in diverse areas are just keeping up with appearances. They don't actually want section 8 kids slowing down the classroom. It's the middle class white liberals in all white areas that are the bigger problem. They really believe what the tv tells them since they haven't experienced real diversity.

Anonymous said...

Nobody wants to buy a nice home in the suburbs with good, safe schools, and then have Shitavious sitting next to your son or daughter in school because his mother got a section 8 apartment in your school district.


I used to live in a very liberal area and they circumvented this problem with bussing. I'm not sure how they did it but the apartment building of section 8 kids that were in walking distance of the (cough) good school were bussed 15 minutes away. I suspect they had them all labeled as disabled then claimed the other school was better equipped to handle them. It was clear they were keeping section 8 blacks out of the school and probably never aroused suspicion since it was such a liberal area. This school also took pride in matching the reading scores of the local private school and the administration did not want to lose donations from the wealthy white liberals.

One thing I learned was that a lot of the wealthy white liberals in diverse areas are just keeping up with appearances. They don't actually want section 8 kids slowing down the classroom. It's the middle class white liberals in all white areas that are the bigger problem. They really believe what the tv tells them since they haven't experienced real diversity.

Anonymous said...

ATLBorn at 3:30PM said:

"This is the first time I have made a comment on the SBPDL site, which, I only found a month or so ago. I feel like I have escaped the Matrix! I am born and raised in the metro Atlanta area and am shocked at the truths that PK and the rest of you expose us Whites too. It is eye opening and very insiteful! I had spent the last 13 years living in All White Cumming,GA. That's where they threw rocks at Oprah and her crew when they tried to March there. Due to financial issues, I work for Dot Indians and the office is overrun by nogs, byt now I moved back to Conyers,Ga. OMG!! has it changed since I grew up here. Its a scumbag ghetto with trashed parks and nogs niggin around everywhere. I mean, where are they all walking around too? It is rough! Then I found out the same Oprah they hurled rocks at in Cumming,Ga. actually told all the darkies to move to Conyers!! I pine away for the day my own plight turns around and I can head back to YT town or once my daughters are grown head to the NW. Bless you guys for all the info on this site and down with the BRA!"

Yes, this site has certainly been a great eye-opener for me, as well. I live in Milton, GA, which has its fair share of nogs. My former neighbors were Section Ape renters, and I'm dreading the arrival of the next batch.

For 41 1/2 years of my life, I never fired (nor really touched) any sort of firearm. However, my eyes are now wide open, and I currently own 2 firearms (Glock G19 Gen 4/S&W MP 15-22). Times change, and I'm not going to be that dumb fuck you hear about in the news...you know, the one who "never thought it could happen to him".

Welcome aboard!!!

Anonymous said...

listening to these sub human savages talk on these cell phone vids is disgusting

Anonymous said...

Today, in west Africa, the same hordes that would loot in Ferguson are destroying clinics for the treatment of Ebola.

Excellent I can only hope that in Africa the Ebola virus will continue to do its good works.
If a negroe is so stupid to expose its self, friends and family to Ebola....

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 8:09 PM said ”Anon 6:21pm, I'm not a lawyer either; but if I'm not mistaken, Section 8 housing is not government-seized property, but privately-owned dwellings, rented out by private people/corporations who willingly accept Section Ape checks as payment. . . “

I did not understand how section ape housing worked. I carelessly and incorrectly assumed that it was something along the lines of a housing project. This does make a difference for the reasons you have mentioned. It would be much more difficult to characterized the government action of paying someone's rent to a willing property owner as a seizure. It is still an inevitable loss of property value that occurs directly from the government's actions – kind of a constructive seizure.

http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/constructive-taking/

It would still be worthwhile in my opinion to raise a stink about the effects that the practice has on private property owners and require HUD to publicize the true costs of their activities. I see no reason why this disclosure couldn't be required by law.

Perhaps restrictive covenants prohibiting property owners from accepting section ape funds would be constitutional. I don't believe that the government itself is yet a protected class. It wouldn't be difficult to show a valid economic reason for such covenants, but they would probably be deemed to have a disparate impact on minorities.

Back to the drawing board.

Anonymous said...

Now, they have turned into a way to move the ghetto into the suburbs. A lot of cities won't allow apartments to be built, just for that reason.

Even without cities pushing "mixed income condos" I doubt there is much profit in apartments thanks to Section 8. The stacked apartment building only works when you have people that are responsible and want to be good neighbors. And even then you get the occasional flooding or fire. An apartment building filled with undertow has to be made out of concrete and designed like a penitentiary. That screws the economics of the apartment complex which are purposely built out of wood with cheap materials to offset costs.

Slumlords today will own a bunch of houses or duplexes and just let them get gradually destroyed by Section 8 renters. The twisted part is that they actually like Section 8 because the paychecks are steady. But this is also part of the problem since the slumlords don't want to report any problems to HUD in fear of losing the checks. Remember if you suspect Section 8 you can verify and complain about problems to your local HUD.

Anyways there is something fishy going on with Section 8. I've seen S8 in high rent areas where an even a higher S8 payment still would not have offset the damage or hassles involved with the undertow.

There must be a tax break or federal requirement that I am unaware of. Either that or they plan on scamming insurance.

Anonymous said...

All you can do, probably, is make an unrefusable offer to one of the parties who seek to destroy your neighborhood: either the govt, the landlord, the tenants, or the building.

I don't think being reasonable is the answer. Payoff one slumlord and another will appear wanting the same deal.

That last thing you want to do is make anyone think you have a problem with your new neighbors. You need to be the last person they suspect. All complaints should be anonymous and from a pay phone or throwaway cell phone.

You can't play nice in this situation. Playing nice will be seen as a weakness by these people. These slumlords know exactly what happens to neighborhoods they infest. This is your money vs their money. And as with most cowards they will flee when there is any sign of resistance. Some of these slumlords are actually corporate entities that own thousands of homes. They will be scared shitless and move on if there is a problem they can't resolve with a lawyer.

Anonymous said...

One more addition:

I'm not implying that breaking the law is the only answer.

But you need to convince them that a highly intelligent white sociopath lives in the area and is not happy with their plans.

They'll shit their pants and rent to the old white lady or sell the place. It's not their only investment.

Anonymous said...

To get back to Rand Paul. He is thinking in terms of the negative interactions that libertarian minded Americans have with the cops, such as a marijuana bust or the jailing of an otherwise law abiding citizen for carrying a firearm.

He is also trying to score points with various groups and like McCain the libs will support his presidential run until they decide on their own candidate.

Then the libs will remind the minorities that libertarians want to cut off all welfare.

And conservatives will learn about how libertarians want to open the borders and legalize crack.

I'm sure the press at that point would also do a bio on Rand which would then expose the dirty details about her as an atheist and child killer admirer who opposed charity as a virtue. The only remaining libertarians would be 18-24 year old pot smoking atheists. Not exactly a world changing voting block.

Go ahead and run Paul, the whole libertarian outlook needs to be put to bed anyways. Dealing with BRA cannot be done with libertarian ideals. Legal crack and open borders will not solve our problems. And running on an "end welfare" ticket is a gimme for the opposition.

Dealing with BRA will take smart whites that have no compunction about using government in any form if it suits their goals. That is the reality of the situation. Libertarianism is not suited for our reality.

The American Notice said...

If the problem is militarization of the police, how come we don't see these problems in other racial communities? I mean militarized police could go there just as well. But there is no need to.

And didn't Detroit turn to shit BEFORE the militarization of the police?

The real problem is black reversion to their savage state.

Anonymous said...

"Trooper to stay 'as long as it takes' in riot-hit US town"

Love the title..."riot-hit"...like a tornado....a B4 or a B5 maybe.

Captain Ron apologizes to Brown's parents.......throw up.

http://news.yahoo.com/missouri-governor-declares-state-emergency-curfew-203706380.html

dondiego said...

G'day g'day, your ANZUS ally catching up on world news here.

I saw of this debacle on the telescreen at work Friday. Of course I came here, to SBPDL, to get the correct overview/rundown.

You guys (for now, pre- u.n small arms)have the second amendment. Don't waste it.
Can I repeat what anon @6:15 said:
"A few deputized citizens with rifles could have put down the riot and looting in Fergurason. But the last thing the Ruling Elites want is empowered, organized, and armed White men to learn that they can provide their own security. We might decide to go after the Ruling Elites next. The PTB uses the police to PROTECT black rioters and looters. That way they can justify the police state, which has always been targeted at the White Middle-class, and scare the benumbed American public into giving up more of their money and liberty for "security" "

Anonymous said...

Anon at 7:27 PM -

Stone cold sober and I'd still like to see flamethrowers. Hell, I'll run one.

As for Bill Cunningham, no I didn't catch that. He's like a bad Hannity clone who knows it so he name-drops on top of it anyone else in the business. So it's usually just more shit sandwiches.

Anonymous said...

Not around here either! Proud owner of a brand new AR15. The armoury officer of the local sheriff's office showed me how to break it down, clean and lubricate it. He told me now I'll be ready for when the SHTF.

Anonymous said...

I have not heard a single politician say what's going on in Ferguson is wrong. Oh they'll sneer at the looting and rioting but they all come back to "listening to the people" and "their right to assemble" and "their hard earned rights must be protected" . Not one politician has mentioned the fact that boy Brown had used his large size to commit a strong armed robbery. No politician has stood up and said a perpetrator does not have to be armed to be shot. There has not be a single politician stand up and say the only way to stop this bullshit is to use real bullets, although everyone knows it.
This riot, masquerading as a march for justice, is just showing blacks around the world, that the American police forces are a bunch of pussies that won't touch them. So expect more of this jungle behavior.
When a politician with some gonads stands up and says "no more" and the police forces of maybe just one state are released, then and only then will the standards of black behavior change. They won't live where they can't kill, rape, loot and of course, riot.

But don't hold your breath, too many female and black politicians and none of them want to be seen as being tough on crime, it may cost them a vote.

Mutant Swarm said...

Anonymous said...

This is the first time I have made a comment on the SBPDL site, which, I only found a month or so ago. I feel like I have escaped the Matrix!

Welcome aboard!

August 17, 2014 at 4:24 PM
___________________________

Hear hear! Welcome aboard. To quote one of the weirdest movies of all time, "It's always painful to remove the cassette."

And choose a username so we can keep up with your posts. You might as well; your IP address has already been logged. I've been posting here for a couple of years now, and nothing's ever happened to me. (POLICE GET DOWN GET DOWN GET DOWN GET DOWN GET DOWN!!!)

Just kidding.

Anonymous said...

The Patriot movement MUST take notice of the weaponized negro.

http://fredoneverything.net/Ferguson.shtml

Post race realist comments on Patriot blogs to spread the word.

WesternRifleShooters
III percent Patriots
Sipsey Street

Thank you!

Red Lights & Sirens. said...

PK, it may be time to re-visit an old pimple on the ass of America, David Sher & The Comeback town...

http://www.thecomebacktown.com/2014/06/17/a-4-letter-word-why-young-professionals-leave-birmingham/

I noticed that David would not answer either of your questions:

"Were you to magically remove all the white residents of Jefferson County, what would you get? What would you be left with?"

"Were you to magically remove all the black residents of Jefferson County, what would you get? What would you be left with?"

Red Lights & Sirens.

Anonymous said...

I read about HUD's Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing program
yesterday.

Quite naturally, I did not click any gov't site as Holder would charge me with a hate crime because I only looked at site 5 seconds and left in disgust!


Found a Fox link/video.

Interestingly, this has tied in to ads heard on the radio in rural areas on how one could open up their homes for Section 8 housing.

Don't we have the right to freedom of association? Picking our own friends, where we want to do business, who we want to go out and have a beer with, vote for?

I am a white male (God forbid) and is the day coming when I must marry a black man so as not to be racist or homophobic?

This stuff wouldn't be even thought of 15 years ago.

We don't have to go to Russia. It came here!

Anonymous said...

Re "The Chinese aren't that fond of vibrant diversity and there may be unpleasant surprises awaiting the U.S. military in the Pacific theatre in the near future however...."
By Anonymous.
How true. In the next decade or two, as Chinese influence spreads, so will ethnocentrism.
Our present dilemma, seems to me, is due to the confluence of large historic trends that are so large that they are not easily discernible. One is the remnant of British Left thinking, which gained enormous strength in the aftermath of WW One...yes the one that began a hundred years ago. At that time British Leftists, prodded by Woodrow Wilson, institutionalized self-blame for the wreckage and wastage. It was the era of the Oxford refusal of allegiance to King or Country. It may seems remote today, but that was the beginning of self-blame in the Anglosphere. The Left has tenaciously held on to that weakness as a source of its strength and we still see it display its arrogant hold on public sentiment in the White Privilege movement.
Neo-Ethnocentrism will displace the Anglosphere's self-doubt and self-hate once it becomes clear that East Asia has taken a decisive lead in the world economy and may indeed never be surpassed by us. That indeed the Anglosphere has been succeeded...the torch has passed. In my opinion, Americans will begin to jettison a lot of intellectual baggage as we question what went so wrong. One jettisoned piece of luggage will the very dubious idea that blaming your own country or culture is necessarily insightful. Since East Asians are, if anything, the quintessence of ethnocentrism will accelerate the change.

Anonymous said...

On the topic of section 8.

I live in McKinney TX. You see it on lists of bests small cities occasionally.

We've always had mexicans and a few asians, but in the last 9 months it's like a negro bomb went off.

Now we have signs about locking your vehicle.

Loitering is now normal.

Litter is widespread.

A whole lot of suburb walls being crashed into right across the street from the mega apartment complex that used to be white kids and mexicans.

I was propositioned - "Yo man you know bout dat lone star card?"

I'm fairly hostile to all people so he scurried away after laser eyes.

I bought my house at age 24. Paid it off at 30.

Any significant negro presence is a potential for detroit-ferguson syndrome. Long term of short term, the fucking termites will eat the foundation.

James Bondo said...

Not sure about the disparate impact crap.
Websters definition:
1
: containing or made up of fundamentally different and often incongruous elements
2
: markedly distinct in quality or character

If a black guy and a liberal are standing on a golf course and I hit one of them in the head with a nine iron and the other with a baseball bat, is that disparate impact?

Now if I could just get Bono on the golf course!

Anonymous said...

Section 8 incentives have been brought up in this blog thread.

They are two-fold:

1) Rents paid electronically by the Feds...

2) TAX CREDITS taken when filing ones 1040/1065/1120 etc.

Wiki:

Eligible basis

The "eligible basis" of a project is the cost of acquiring an existing building if there is one (but not the cost of the land), plus construction and other construction-related costs to complete the project.

^^^ Do note that any investor can purchase a EXISTING building and have it syndicated out. (Real estate investment partnership.)

&&&

Between the two, the TAX CREDITS loom large. Collecting timely rents is NOT a decisive issue for landlords. They expect to get their rents in every deal they touch.

$$$

The above mechanism quickly gets very complex.

But, simplified, there is a tight community of wealthy Americans that dips into this market, year in and year out. (Doctors are at the top of the list. Collecting rents, with someone else handling all of the paperwork and repairs, is considered an ideal doctor's investment. There is CONSIDERABLE pressure(professional)to keep doctors out of 'actively managed investments' -- like the stock market. While strictly speaking passive, stocks are so actively traded that they draw a doctor's attentions away from his professional responsibilities. Whereas going good for the poor while getting paid by HUD and the IRS goes over well. The other profession that just loves Section 8 is the legal profession. Indeed, attorneys just love to be landlords and terrible tenants.)

***

The ability to convert any existing housing into Section 8 means that YT had better split town the moment real estate values soften. For Section 8 'conversions' are soon to follow.

This goes double for any YT operating a retail location with a fixed place of business. (Exception: scrap yards, check cashing, body shops.)

The Holy Ghostbuster said...

PK wrote ... The policy is called, "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing." It will require HUD to gather data on segregation and discrimination in every single neighborhood and try to remedy it.

Moving blacks into white neighborhoods is the fastest way to accelerate miscegenation, which is already at historically high levels and getting worse every year. It's a frontal assault on what Kevin MacDonald would call "implicit" white racism, the tendency of whites to flee black criminality and aggregate together. What's next? Requiring every fertile white woman to bear at least one non-white chile, or merely a tax credit for doing it? And would white women comply if it were pitched to them as a way to end racism "once and for all"? Probably. The anti-racist collective called America has no more important goal than this: white genocide.

Anonymous said...

@9.49
There must be a tax break or federal requirement that I am unaware of

You're unaware of a lot of things about sec 8 like most of the people here and are confusing it with public and low income housing.
First, sec 8 is not easy to get.The program has to be open in your county where they're even accepting applications and the funding must be there because once a person gets a voucher they usually stay on it forever.Even if you get on the list you may never get the subsidy because certain people automatically go to the top, like senior citizens or disabled.In most states you just have to find the apt. on you own because there is nothing like a building that is just sec 8 tenants.If you're in a White area it is unlikely that some Negro with a voucher is going to come to the area and look around for an apt.and even on the rare occasion when this happens it would just be one negro alone and would not become a trend where the town's demographics would change.
The amount that the person pays themselves towards the rent is based on their income and is about 30% so an old lady living on a $1k SS payment would pay $300 for rent. The guidelines for the amount she can spend on the apt. have to do with local market values. So if she's in a better area that 1 bedroom that she qualifies for may be say, $1600 with her paying the $300 and HUD the rest.If she's in some cheaper area where the market rent is $800 for a 1 bedroom then she still pays her $300 and HUD the balance.
HUD sends inspectors once a year and they will fail an apt for the slightest thing so you're not going to find any crappy places.And yes, owners like it because the rent is guaranteed.
What you see on the outskirts of Ferguson is public low income housing that they managed somehow to squeeze in there, not sec. 8, although I guess that someone with sec 8 might go there if they were dumb enough to waste their voucher there.The housing problems mentioned on here are the low income being put into better areas and ruining the area.
Where I live it would be impossible to put any low income or apts.

Anonymous said...

They are two-fold:

1) Rents paid electronically by the Feds...

2) TAX CREDITS taken when filing ones 1040/1065/1120 etc.

I wouldn't particularly rely on Wiki for your information.

1. is correct and 2. would apply to any investment property sec 8 or not.
As far a doctors investing in properties (I'm a doctor) the benefits were much better in the 80's where I could deduct paper losses like depreciation from regular income.
You don't covert apts to sec 8, you simply rent to someone with a voucher like any other tenant and just get the rent from them and into your account from HUD for the bulk of it.Having some tenants with sec 8 vouchers does not ruin the town. They're mostly senior citizens or disabled.And since they also likely receive other benefits to pay other bills like utilities etc they have money to spend in town, probably more than a typical middle class person.
It's the public low income housing which is the problem and if you ever get one of these or more you can kiss the town goodbye.
There is a problem with HUD but it has to do with loans to low income people where they can buy a house in a lower- middle class area.Or even just banks giving loans to people who are really unqualified and don't understand the real costs of buying property.You end up with a lot of foreclosed and vacant properties, like in Zimmermann's neighbourhood and that leads to blight and with people trying to rent out their property with unsavoury types coming and going.

Anonymous said...

decisive lead in the world economy and may indeed never be surpassed by us.

The US will become the #1 energy producer in the world while China has neither the energy or natural resources the US has.
I'd like to see the pop. of the US reduced to 200m max.and you can guess where we will reduce it :o)
Abortion clinics and birth control clinics should be all over negro and Mexican areas.And give out free birth control pills and devices to all ghetto kids over 12.Obama needs to pardon Dr Gosnell so that he can continue his good work in Phila.
White women are producing enough kids so there's no reason we have to turn them into Mrs. Duggar in some race to outbreed others and bankrupt families. Just decrease the undesirables :o)

Anonymous said...

Absolutely outrageous and disgusting.The rival gang ought to go chat with him.
Richard Cranium