Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Joe Paterno and "No Snitching": He Did Want to be a Black Guy...

Joe Paterno wanted to be a Black person; he didn't snitch, so let's call him Black
I'm in the process of producing a long article for one of my favorite publications. It will detail the role that college football coaches (starting with those who tried to stop the tide of Black-Run America, like Jim Owens of Washington and Lloyd Eaton of Wyoming) had in legitimizing the concept of what we have dubbed BRA. The worst offenders are guys like Bear Bryant of Alabama, Barry Switzer of Oklahoma, Vince Dooley of Georgia, Bobby Bowden of Florida State (and guys like Mark Richt and Urban Meyer lately), and a man named Joe Paterno at Penn State.

In reading all of the books on Paterno, I came across a strange quote in the book Paterno: By the Book. On page 155, he writes:
That's why, in the late sixties, I identified strongly with black kids. It was a time when hatred against blacks was coming out in the open because of the civil right s movement. But it was also a time when black people were asserting and demanding their right to full citizenship and full humanity. I often said to friends at that time time that I wished I were black. Maybe some people thought I was some kind of overdramatic or sentimental bleeding heart. What they didn't get about me was that I always feel my best and highest when I have a cause, when I have have something to fight for, when I'm behind in the score and there's barely enough time to pull off a win. Being black and insisting on being fully a person was a cause.
This book was published in 1989. Flash forward to 2011. What does the curriculum of almost every major and minor university and college teach? That white privilege still permeates the land, though white males are routinely demonized in middle and high school (dead white males are attacked in elementary school history classes) as the source of all evil.

White males have no humanity unless they become fully fledged, card carrying members of the Disingenuous White Liberal movement, of which Joe Paterno so arrogantly belonged. More importantly, Joe Paterno wished he were a Black guy. Your wish came true JoePa, as all that you built at Penn State is crumbling to the ground because you found the Black proclivity of no snitching a solid course of action in dealing with the horrible charges of pedophilia, sexual abuse and assault against your former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky:
At age 84 and with 46 seasons as the Penn State head coach behind him, Paterno’s extraordinary run of success — one that produced tens of millions of dollars for the school and two national championships, and that established him as one of the nation’s most revered leaders, will end with a stunning and humiliating final chapter. 

Jerry Sandusky, a former defensive coordinator under Paterno, has been charged with sexually abusing eight boys across a 15-year period, and Paterno has been widely criticized for failing to involve the police when he learned of an allegation of one assault of a young boy in 2002. 

Additionally, two top university officials — Gary Schultz, the senior vice president for finance and business, and Tim Curley, the athletic director — were charged with perjury and failure to report to authorities what they knew of the allegations, as required by state law. 

Since Sandusky’s arrest Saturday, Penn State — notably its president, Graham Spanier, and Paterno — have come under withering criticism for a failure to act adequately after learning, at different points over the years, that Sandusky might have been abusing children. Newspapers have called for their resignations; prosecutors have suggested their inaction led to more children being harmed by Sandusky; and students and faculty at the university have expressed a mix of disgust and confusion, and a hope that much of what prosecutors have charged is not true.
 Millions of people across this nation derive their identity through the exploits of 18 and 22-year-old's and how they perform on the football field each Saturday. Their identity is tied into the winning and losing of a college football team, comprised largely of players from a race they consciously avoid in all other aspects of their life. If a coach is successful, they become a God.

Paterno was such a God; he also wanted to be Black. In so doing, he failed to snitch.

May the rest of these false idols start falling fast; they have done more to help power BRA than any other entity in America. Without sports, there are no positive examples of Black people in America.

Always remember that. And always remember that Joe Paterno got his wish; by not snitching to cover up a child molester, he became Black and ensured that his legacy would be forever tarnished.

Update: I'm working on a long article for my favorite website (or is it Web site?) detailing what an incredible scumbag Paterno is,was, and continues to be, and pointing out that virtually every college in America is coached by a man that is equally detestable (yet loved by the student body and alumni -- as long as they win). Don't believe me: read Scoreboard, Baby!, a tale about the biggest piece of (insert expletive here)in America, Rick Neuheisel and the corruption that followed him at Colorado and Washington. Read the Victory and Ruins story (what the book is based on) by Ken Armstrong and Nick Perry here.


Be sure to check out my new article up at Alternative Right: The Consequences of Majority-Black College Football and pay close attention to TakiMag for an article on the NBA lockout no one cares about and why that is. 

I call it the Opiate of America for a reason.That's sadly all college football is to me now.


136 comments:

Anonymous said...

What goes around comes around, JoeBitch.

Paleface 6

mr_evergreen said...

There is a reason the "no snitch" rule is so deep with the African-American community. It comes from distrusting the police and fearing the gangsters. If someone knows who committed the murder, that person won't speak. This is why. Few people trust the police to do their job, and if someone connected to the gangster finds out about the "snitching", that person will be the next murder victim. I'm not saying "don't do the right thing". I'm merely telling the roots of the "no snitch" policy. I would argue that Whites aren't afraid to snitch because they have more faith in law enforcement and see it as a community effort. Alot of African-Americans are distrustful of the police and are thinking in terms of "will I get shot by one of their associates later on?"

Stephen said...

To DWLs, the means justify the ends. They are so obsessed with what they consider is "doing the right thing" consequences be damned. They are so obsessed with helping "victims" of the White privilege power structure and pushed for snivel rights because it was "the right thing to do."

Well, what is the result of this (not so) Great Society? Hmm? Sad thing is these lunatics will always consider their actions a victory in themselves, even when it does lead to the collapse of society.

make it rain TRUTH said...

Evergreen, you say distrusting of the police as if it just "happens" that police are to be treated as the enemy of blacks for no reason. Blacks by and large don't trust the police because blacks by and large engage in a lot of criminality. It's only natural they don't like the people who are responsible for stopping crime.

I firmly believe many black people subscribe to the "no snitchiing" because they don't want to help put other black criminals in jail. They know that next week it could be them.. And they wouldn't want to go to jail as a result of some honest person telling on them... So they don't tell on this week's criminal.

Anonymous said...

A privileged university employee protecting someone accused of sexual assault?

Selena Roberts will get to truth!

Anonymous said...

mr. evergreen,

thanks for explaining no snitching. i'd like to inform you that nobody gives a shit.

White people are done with blacks. We don't give a shit what you do, or why you do it. Go back to Africa and do it there, pestilence.

Anonymous said...

A good characterization evergreen. Blacks don't snitch because at their core they are cowards who cannot be bothered with making hard choices to better their communities.

If only the "no snitching" policy contained a "no bitching" clause it would not bother me so much. If you want to cower in your section 8 hovel while the world burns around you, don't complain about how shitty things are.

mr_evergreen said...

"Blacks by and large don't trust the police because blacks by and large engage in a lot of criminality. It's only natural they don't like the people who are responsible for stopping crime.

I firmly believe many black people subscribe to the "no snitchiing" because they don't want to help put other black criminals in jail. They know that next week it could be them.. And they wouldn't want to go to jail as a result of some honest person telling on them... So they don't tell on this week's criminal."

No. Actually, most Blacks are not engaging in criminal activities. I am talking specifically about Black people who are obeying the law. The idea was because of historical abuse from the police, alot of Black people don't trust the police and are willing to let a criminal go free BECAUSE they fear retribution from the neighborhood criminals and don't trust the police.

Do you have any proof that most Blacks are involved in crime? There are 40 million Black people in the USA. Do you have any proof that a majority of them are involved in crime?

mr_evergreen said...

"White people are done with blacks. We don't give a shit what you do, or why you do it. Go back to Africa and do it there, pestilence."

I wasn't even born in Africa, so who are you to tell me where to go? I know you don't agree with me, but seriously, you can stop with the insults.

mr_evergreen said...

"A good characterization evergreen. Blacks don't snitch because at their core they are cowards who cannot be bothered with making hard choices to better their communities.

If only the "no snitching" policy contained a "no bitching" clause it would not bother me so much. If you want to cower in your section 8 hovel while the world burns around you, don't complain about how shitty things are."

What do you know about me?

Cowards? Well, this is the way I see it. If Black people are considered "cowardly", then there is a good reason. Criminals aren't afraid to commit murder in the broad daylight if they think they'll get away with it. The rule is often "mind your own business if you want to live". The rule is "snitching will get you killed". Basically, Black people don't snitch because they are afraid to die. Why else do alot of Black people who can afford it often leave their neighborhoods for safer neighborhoods?

Anonymous said...

mr. evergreen said:

"Why else do alot of Black people who can afford it often leave their neighborhoods for safer neighborhoods?"

To get continued access to White infrastructure after they have dismantled the White infrastructure in whatever shit hole they used to infest.

Stop lowering our quality of life, blackie.

Sheila said...

Mr. Evergreen excuses blacks' criminality and disregard for the rule of law on their fear and distrust of police. Well, I was raised to obey the law and respect the police. As the cops around here have come in darker and darker hues, and as their capriciousness becomes more evident, my "respect" for the police diminishes more and more. While the demographics in my area are changing, the percentage of blacks is still small overall, yet of the past dozen or so cops I have seen, fewer than half were clearly White. I don't trust them to make traffic stops based on public safety rather than inflating their ticketing numbers. I don't trust them to adequately investigate, solve, or prosecute crime (mostly burglary around here). I don't trust them to be unbiased if there is any sort of dispute with any non-White. Yet despite all this, Mr. Evergreen, I have not begun committing crimes, and I still call the police to report accidents I've seen or nonworking traffic lights or other uncivil behavior. How terribly strange - I don't trust the police to do their job - just like blacks! - yet it's never occurred to me not to report criminal activity, regardless of the perpetrator's race.

Anonymous said...

Snitching isn't "alpha".

Anonymous said...

Yet another sports article on this site...

josh(from iSteve) said...

I have long felt that the fascination of college coaches with black males was a weird,fetish bordering on outright homosexuality.The college coaching community is one big Homo Club. Acroos all Division 1 schools there is a rape epidemic. No one can doubt this. Ghetto blacks "gettin' busy wit da white wimminz" and doing whatever they pleae. When this is brought to light,INEVITABLY the coaches cover it up and make excuses for the black male and praise him:"he's a good kid". Obviously this Sandusky guy has molested a hell of lot more than 8 boys;8 in 15 years? he got "caught" nine years ago(!!!) and old Joe let him go. "Can you blame him," Old Joe may have mused,"all them fine young men on the cusp of manhood,in the shower,gleaming...". This same sickness applies to sportswriters who,like women,lavish praise and attention on their black males,and shrewishly dis the "unsexy" white guys when possible. "He's so slow!" (Unlike my black hero who glides like a cheetah." And dont ever mention jackie Robinson! Its like referencing Clark Gable among older women. They will swoon like teenyboppers. "Oh Jackie-sob-oh how he suffered. So noble. So good. Boo Hoo Hoo." Seems like one big Homo Club to me. I am not even the tiniest bit,not even an iota,surprised at Penn State.

Mr.Bean said...

Mr evergreen(or should it be Mr. everblack?) I dont mean to tell you your business,but it sure seems to me that the "No Snitch" movement is led by young black males. You know,the guys who wear white T-shirts. (To show their sexual purity,like Selena Gomez?Maybe not. )I agree that the ordinary people--i.e.,decent people trying to live and let live but also those who are older and past their physical prime,when engaging in gangsterism and/or sex WITH gangsters is a thing of the past--these people are surely afraid of gangsters. White guys are stupid if they think somehow Black life is one big partay. For many,fear rules their lives. Like it rules ours when THEY(Black Undertow) are around.

10mm AUTO said...

Groids don't snitch because of the interplay of fear and family. Fear because most criminal groids are truly sociopaths without remorse. This is seen in the truly huge numbers that are in jail, on probation or have a record or that abandon children. It is estimated that 1/3 of all groids will have a record in their lifetimes. Now add in "family". If every negroid sow birfs 5 or 6 niglets, then in every nest there must be at least several criminals. Add in extended families or Church groups and you have a lot of groids that will go after those for snitching on black to YT. It is wrong and ridiculous to expect Africans to assimilate and become little Englishmen and live in peace in a White Country. This dysfunctional pattern is not limited to local mobs mind you; Nation of Islam has been known to go after snitches both White and negroid for exposing their operations or making the organization look bad. (See: "Zebra" by Howard; See also: http://newsone.com/nation/associatedpress1/leader-sentenced-to-life-for-ordering-journalists-murder/). It is almost as though negroids are all part of a huge criminal "family" like the mafia.

The point is, some negroids like "mr evergreen" want a White community for the peace it brings, yet their presence insures its destruction. They must be excised. Only amongst themselves can they work out their own internal problems or fall into darkness, with all that is left of their kin.

10mm AUTO said...

Josh,

I thought the same thing when I read the snippet from Joe Paterno's book that Paul brought to light. Something bizarre about wanting to be black when you are a aging Itialian coach. It is like he is a kid raising litters of negroids and wishing he was a negroid too.

~AV~ said...

Mr Evergreen just proves that blacks can not and WILL not play buy common sense rules and or TRY to be functionable in a white society.

EXCUSE after excuse after excuse...for blacks employing the laws of the greedy savages...

Fayette White Guy said...

LOL, it's entries like these that crack me up. However, it's a very sad subject matter indeed. Truly shocking.

Anonymous said...

"10mm AUTO" is entirely correct. At work this Black woman said that her son knew a person who just got shot and killed in the Chicago papers.

Then sometime later, she said she had to go to court to give support for a Black friend/relative. When asked what he had done, she said he was accused of robbery.

Which explains the reason why Blacks are in lockstep with the Cosmopolitans vis-a-vis gun control. They want gun control so that Blacks can rule with impunity over non-Afros in the street. Blacks have no reason to fear bullets when attacking whites in the streets.

mr_evergreen said...

I was not making excuses for criminals. I was stating that the reason alot of Black people don't "snitch" is because they don't want to end up killed. How am I making excuses for criminals?

mr_evergreen said...

Sheila, alot of Black people are raised to obey the law and follow that tenet accordingly. I was raised that way and I obey the law. I also don't approach a police officer I don't know unless I absolutely have to. If I know a policeman personally, I will talk to that officer. FWIW,I have been a victim of Black on Black crime and I did call the police. I told someone and I was told that what I did was not a good idea. According to said person, if that person gets out of prison and finds me, I could get murdered. He is middle class and college-educated, and law abiding, but doesn't trust the police to protect me after the perps get out of jail. That is the mind set he operates under.

I have seen first hand what some crooked police officers can do. From personal experience, my father bought a really nice car, with his hard-earned money. No sooner did he get that car, he kept getting pulled over by the police for no reason. He wasn't violating any laws, but the police pulled him over. He was getting profiled alot. When he asked to speak with their Sgt, who is someone he knows, they quit messing with him.

Why do Black people don't trust the police as easily as Whites? Has alot to do with history. I am talking historically.

My beef however, is not so much with the police. It is often with the persons who call the police. People have called the police on me a few times for "suspicious person" calls. What really happened? I was suffering from insomnia and decided to go out at night, around 2AM. The first time I was just walking around campus. The second time the police were called, I was walking around my subdivision. The third time, I was riding my bicycle around campus. I just needed to go outside and enjoy myself.

To say the least, when I see a police officer, I wonder "who called the police?", and "what did someone THINK I did now?"

mr_evergreen said...

"Which explains the reason why Blacks are in lockstep with the Cosmopolitans vis-a-vis gun control. They want gun control so that Blacks can rule with impunity over non-Afros in the street. Blacks have no reason to fear bullets when attacking whites in the streets"

The roots of gun control go deeper than that

http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/cramer.racism.html

Anonymous said...

Cops haveing to deal with blacks have got to make what would normally be an interesting and rewarding career choice the absolute worst job in the world.

99.9% of negative encounters between blacks and the police are caused by the shitty, 'I'm a victim of Oh-preshun', you be stoppin' me cuz i be black' and Youse be Ray-sis' attitude that most blacks have to one degree or another.

danaigh said...

Mr. Evergreen:

When you are being given extra attention by the police while minding you own business to say that is annoying would be an understatement.
However this is guilt by association, you being black that is. What can you do about that? Nothing! But that I was told that 'I' stole the land from the indians, 'cause I'm white, so I should not complain about the Mexican invasion.
To get some perspective read the history of man from ancient times and on. The words; 'kind', tolerant' and 'fair' are NEVER used. That might give you a clue. Racism is as fundamental as gravity.

Doug said...

Mr evergreen, I can respect your desire for discussion,but when you describe things such as your late night walks thinking the police shouldn't be watching and checking you, you fail entirely to see what is going on in society. Blacks are very dangerous especially so at night. This is seen daily in our news. We want the police to profile.

Anonymous said...

"...I wasn't even born in Africa..."

Then tell us why you insist that your disgusting people are, as you put it, "African Americans"?

TNB

Dissident said...

I find the whole college sports scene (Pro, too.) to be rather strange. I mean, how can grown men idolize people that play a game for a living?

This whole obsession has always seemed weird to me. It's almost like they are living vicariously through these 'affletes'. What has happened to western man? Where has his masculinity gone. We are so damned effeminate that we have to worship black 'affletes'. What a sorry state of affairs that western civilization is in. The barbarians aren't at the door, man they're in the kingdom.

Get some gonads white men and turn this silly Negro worshiping, thug idolizing, shit off!

Anonymous said...

Ya man! Those cracker-trash pigs were profiling Mr. Evergreen for walking around in the middle of the night because he gets insomnia and for wearing a skimask because his little nose gets cold. He had the crowbar to drop off at his friend's house so they could install the new sink the next morning. Damn cops are so racist.

Anonymous said...

There are 40 million Black people in the USA. Do you have any proof that a majority of them are involved in crime?

It doesn't take a majority of a group behaving badly to make life miserable for everyone else. It only takes a tireless minority.

The figure that gets thrown around a lot is that somewhere between a third and a quarter of black males will-at some point in their lives-be "involved" with the criminal justice system. As in,either locked up,out of jail,but on probation,doing some sort of community service,released prior to going to court,etc.,etc.

Think about that,Mr. E. If the figure is anywhere near to being accurate,any time I,or anyone else,interacts with a black male,there's a one in four chance that I'm dealing with:

1)A criminal who's running around loose
2)A criminal who has been released from jail
3)Someone who is going to be a criminal.

Those aren't odds on which to bet one's life,liberty,and pursuit of happiness. Think about it-if the place you work has 4 black males working there with you,the odds favor at least one being a criminal.

Are there honest,law abiding,peaceable and productive black men out there? I'm sure there are,but I do my best not to meet them. Because,for every three that I meet,there's a fourth,who'll be happy to crack my head open,steal my cell phone,and empty wallet,and have his friends film the whole incident so he can upload it to World Star Hip Hop.

Anonymous said...

Who cares if the homo coach likes raping little boys? It's a small price to pay for doing the heavy lifting for BRA.

Penn State ought to be nuked, students, coaches and all - they all in some way took part in the glorification of that dumb ass sport that gave a fucking COACH the kind of power to break that kind of social taboo with IMPUNITY. And college football ought to be outlawed altogether. It's time we started taking things a bit more seriously for God's sake. Damn this pisses me off.

IT'S A SPORT FOR GOD'S SAKE. DO WE HAVE TO SACRIFICE THE INNOCENTS FOR THE GREATER GLORY OF THIS OUT OF CONTROL IDIOCY?

This country is in deep, deep shit.

Anonymous said...

Mr Evergreen said:

"My beef however, is not so much with the police. It is often with the persons who call the police. People have called the police on me a few times for "suspicious person" calls. What really happened? I was suffering from insomnia and decided to go out at night, around 2AM. The first time I was just walking around campus. The second time the police were called, I was walking around my subdivision. The third time, I was riding my bicycle around campus. I just needed to go outside and enjoy myself."

My God! The MAN is keeping you down! How dare they have the audacity to follow-up on a call and have the unmitigated GALL to talk to you, a black man, especially in the middle of the night! I hope the next time your subjected to this kind of obvious opression you get in the cops face and loudly claim racism and accuse him of every transgression ever inflicted upon blacks and don't forget to infuse several 'muddah fukkas' 'craka's and 'cap you white ass's in your dressing down of these obvious storm troopers. Lawdy Lawdy, where is Jesse and Al on this one.

Anonymous said...

Evergreen, blacks commit almost half of certain crimes and over half of other types of crimes. They are 13% of the population. Black males of prime crime age are maybe 5% of the population. Get it now?

mr_evergreen said...

"My God! The MAN is keeping you down! How dare they have the audacity to follow-up on a call and have the unmitigated GALL to talk to you, a black man, especially in the middle of the night! I hope the next time your subjected to this kind of obvious opression you get in the cops face and loudly claim racism and accuse him of every transgression ever inflicted upon blacks and don't forget to infuse several 'muddah fukkas' 'craka's and 'cap you white ass's in your dressing down of these obvious storm troopers. Lawdy Lawdy, where is Jesse and Al on this one."

In short, you think me having the police called on me was a good idea. I don't think it was a good thing. I have a few questions. How does it help me? How does it help me to be able to be myself and enjoy my night time bicycle ride or night time stroll in my subdivision?

mr_evergreen said...

"Ya man! Those cracker-trash pigs were profiling Mr. Evergreen for walking around in the middle of the night because he gets insomnia and for wearing a skimask because his little nose gets cold. He had the crowbar to drop off at his friend's house so they could install the new sink the next morning. Damn cops are so racist."

Actually, it was summer and I was not wearing a mask. I don't appreciate people making light of my experience. I don't make light of other person's experiences and I expect other people to behave accordingly.

mr_evergreen said...

"Racism is as fundamental as gravity"

How is racism fundamental? And you're right. It isn't fair for you to be judged because of what some Whites did in the past.

Now, I have a question: How is profiling helpful for ME if it is me being profiled?

Webster said...

"Joe Paterno and "No Snitching": He Did Want to be a Black Guy..."


LOL! Someone's desperate as hell.

Nice try, SBPDL. Picking a quote from his memoirs as a way to validate your humorous 3rd grade logic ("White man said he used to identify with blacks; some blacks believe in no snitching; white man covers up for a white pedophile; yep, he's black!") puts you on the same level as any other sleazy tabloid artist.

Not that I am surprised...

You can take Paterno back--he's nice and at home with you people; pederasty doesn't fly with blacks. Hell, if we can't even allow gay black men to be 'out and proud' what makes you believe a sick boy-lover like Sandusky would escape the heat?

If you can find evidence of this guy consulting one of us niggers on how to hide a pedo, I'll give you a cookie.

Your whole post is pretty humorous considering that you spend every waking hour of your life claiming blacks Blame Whitey. Talk about snow calling the cracker white.

You should change the title of this post to something that makes sense in reality: "Joe Paterno and 'No Snitching': He did want to be a Catholic..." (assuming he isn't one already--check the book!).

mr_evergreen said...

"Mr evergreen, I can respect your desire for discussion,but when you describe things such as your late night walks thinking the police shouldn't be watching and checking you, you fail entirely to see what is going on in society. Blacks are very dangerous especially so at night. This is seen daily in our news. We want the police to profile"

Which Blacks? The Blacks who are already criminals and are walking around with nothing to do? Or the college students who just want to enjoy themselves at night and don't want any trouble? The way I see it, it is a specific part of the Black population that does that stuff, and that portion is visible to a T. I don't appreciate getting profiled because then I can't live my life like a regular person.

Where I live, I've been out at night alone and I've been harrassed mainly by young White people. It has come mainly in the form of some young punk yelling at me from their car(while I'm walking home) or someone screaming obscenities at me while I'm riding my bicycle home. I don't go calling the police on every White person I see that's out at 2AM. Actually, I don't call the police on anyone who is out at 2AM. My reasoning is that I sometimes go out at that hour and I wouldn't want it done to me.

mr_evergreen said...

"Evergreen, blacks commit almost half of certain crimes and over half of other types of crimes. They are 13% of the population. Black males of prime crime age are maybe 5% of the population. Get it now?"

A large share of the crimes, of course. I get THAT part. But that is still not the majority of the young Black male population doing that.

Zenster said...

What does the curriculum of almost every major and minor university and college teach? That white privilege still permeates the land, though white males are routinely demonized in middle and high school (dead white males are attacked in elementary school history classes) as the source of all evil. [emphasis added]

Here is a little thought experiment:

How is it that no modern composers have been able to equal, much less noticeably exceed, the musical creations handed down to us by a bunch of DWM (Dead White Men)?

I refer explicitly to Bach, Beethoven and other Baroque or Classical composers like Scarlatti, Corelli, Handel, Chopin and Tchaikovsky.

There is the ready answer that such talents are no longer held in esteem or patronized by wealthy individuals as they once were. Still, as a composer myself, I cannot accept that someone of Bach's musical caliber would go entirely unnoticed, even in this admittedly uncultured day and age.

The same applies to such renaissance men like Leonardo da Vinci and William Morris. Where are their modern day counterparts?

Sidebar: Many may be unfamiliar with Morris. He was one of the last true Renaissance men. Among his numerous achievements were the following.

Inventor of the adult fairy tale which Tolkien would later capitalize upon. Morris even created a special blend of Modern and Old English to lend his stories greater authenticity.

Architect

Wallpaper Designs

Typographic Fonts

Stained Glass

Furniture

Fabric Patterns

Carpet Designs

Pre-Raphaelite Painter

Bookbinder

Tile Designs

Along with founding the modern Arts and Crafts movement almost single-handed.

I have sought to examine the phenomenon of such luminaries in my essay, "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants". The monograph deals specifically with Vannevar Bush (Vannevar rhymes with “achiever”), but also covers such geniuses as Jules Verne and Lady Augusta Ada Lovelace.

Again, how is it that there are very few who dare to pick up the gauntlet thrown down by these towering minds so long ago?

In a seperate and subsequent comment, I will address the profound oddity of what Paul Kersey rightly identifies as how "Joe Paterno got his wish; by not snitching to cover up a child molester, he became Black and ensured that his legacy would be forever tarnished."

Anonymous said...

"It comes from distrusting the police and fearing the gangsters..."

This is the behavior of blacks around the world. The black race is different. Our forefathers warned us about living in close proximity with Negroes and considering them to be our equals. We did not listen. The South tried to defend itself from Negro intrusion, but the Yanks forced integration and Negro rule on whites by force. The North deeply regretted this after reconstruction in the South. We should have listened, and sent the Negroes back to Africa for good. It would have been the best solution for all of us.

Mr. Evergreen, blacks and whites cannot live in harmony with each other in this white European western culture. Diversity is destroying this country. Blacks are so inferior as a race, that whites, who are generous and fair, are constantly tempted to "help" and "educate" them, and force morality and standards on them (BRA). This is a losing battle for whites.

Just as the presence of women in the workforce and military causes men to feel compelled to protect them, therefore causing a distraction for men in their duties, the presence of blacks in white society compels whites to provide help. This causes a distraction for whites who should instead focus on the maintenance of high standards in white society, and the betterment of white people.

Whites need to segregate themselves, to start protecting their own interests and finally let the Negro race fend for itself. Whites can and do live without blacks, but blacks cannot live without whites.

Please leave this blog and help your black people start weaning themselves from the white man's support. Encourage your black men to care for and feed their own offspring, instead of depending on the white man to do it. Encourage thrift, education, integration, and spirituality in the black community. Discourage black behaviors such as crime, illegitimacy, anti-intellectualism, sloth and laziness, and black victimology, and help them learn to speak the English language properly. These small things alone will make a huge difference in the future of blacks in America.

Anonymous said...

"There is a reason the "no snitch" rule is so deep with the African-American community."

Who cares?

whitelocust said...

Prole-Run America (PRA)
Nov 9th, 2011
by Brett Stevens.

From http://www.amerika.org/

When we go looking for solutions, we must sure we have correctly identified the cause of the problem we want to fix. Although that sounds obvious, most people confuse a problem for its cause.

Every problem that appears such that we recognize it has a cause and until we find that cause, we are treating symptoms but not curing the patient. To make matters difficult, these causes are often removed by time and distance from the point of impact.

As you wander through politics, you will eventually find that there is only one issue: the health or lack thereof of the civilization. Everything else is a method to that end. However, most of these end up being misdiagnosed causes and so even radical fixes do not in actuality fix anything.

For the heretical, a few examples:

Banks are not the cause of bankruptcy; bad regulation and mass irresponsibility are.
Bad government is not the cause of bad government; a clueless population that elects liars and demands unrealistic benefits is.
Crime is not the cause of crime, for example; degenerates plus tolerance for degeneracy causes crime.
Drug abuse is not the cause of drug abuse; misery, boredom and permissiveness causes drug abuse.
Degeneracy is not the cause of degeneracy; lack of will to make moral decisions plus lack of strong social standards is.
Pornography is not the cause of rape; a stultified desire for power over other human beings is the cause of both.

Note that cause/effect reasoning is abused in another way, also, which is the liberal tendency to blame social institutions and culture values for the failings of the individual. If Johnny drinks his way through life and ends up impoverished, the banks did it to him, in this view.

We have no shortage of mis-diagnosed causes of our decline, but here’s one example of a talented writer who has picked an intermediate cause and claimed it as the primary cause (in his defense, he never claims to have found a root cause).

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the reality of Black Run America; a nation where every institution is entirely devoted to protecting and promoting the interests of Black people above all others. – SBPDL

He has noticed something true, but it’s not the root cause. The truth of race in America is that all of our diversity-mania, anti-discrimination hysteria and perfervid rage for an egalitarian order is actually a method. This method aims to achieve something else, which is Total Equality (TE).

Since 1789, when the French Revolution overthrew the monarchy and created a republic based on equality, we have been living in an era without leaders. Instead, we are led by the People themselves, which by statistics means we are led by the most numerous group, the proles.

Today, we are living in Prole-Run America (PRA). It is run by proles, who vote, buy products and create social trends. Those votes, purchases and trends in turn determine what the power structure accomodates. The People are the focus of the society and its leaders, and the rest follow their lead.

Then, in order that we may see clearly what we are doing, let us imagine democracy to be divided, as indeed it is, into three classes; for in the first place freedom creates rather more proles in the democratic than there were in the oligarchical State.

Read the rest on amerika.org

Anonymous said...

One trip to Mr. Evergreens blogspot is all you need to know why this asshat spouts the stupidity that he does. And as to the "another sports article on this site" comment, This site was started as a response to the over-drafting of under-qualified blacks into the forays of NCAA sports so sports is where this sites' heart will stay and rightfully so. This Paterno article is not just another "sports article" however, this article is another indictment of the continuing problems created by hypocritical DWL's ( or DIL in this case) trying desperately to convince everyone that blacks have a "special" gift for sports and this ability should excuse their actions as people somehow. Paterno should be fired, the NCAA should remove any of his wins aquired since the time he knew about the sexual activities, Penn State should not be allowed to have a football program for the same amount of time that Joe (and others) allowed those attacks to take place, so 9 years no football PSU. And to Mr. Evergreen most of the points about violent crime statistics in North America are still based in non-european communities. You are a hack and an assclown. I don't care if you weren't born in Africa, go back anyway, catch aids and rot for all we care.

Anonymous said...

funny how many blacks come to this site desperate to be included in the discussion. Good the this site doesn't have the same rules as the Black Caucus and allows everyone of every color to have an opinion, even if its a really, really stupid one.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: I wasn't even born in Africa, so who are you to tell me where to go?

Your pissing and moaning about slavery is no different from someone wishing aloud that all slaves and their descendants could retroactively be sent back to Africa.

Capiche?

10mm AUTO said...

"Evergreen, blacks commit almost half of certain crimes and over half of other types of crimes. They are 13% of the population. Black males of prime crime age are maybe 5% of the population. Get it now?"

OH NO! It is far worse than that! Let's say the negroid population is 12%. So 50% of them are male. That leaves 6% Now, it is not the nigglets that are committing the crimes, so lets subtract 2%. That leaves 4%. But it is not the nursing home or old negroids busting out you windows or stomping on the 13 year old girl, so lets say 2%. The we have fine, upstanding citizens like "Mr Evergreen! He is at home, right? Then we have all the negroids in Jail! So let's take out another 1%. That leaves 1% young black males that are committing all these crimes. God God, "Mr. Evergreen" you want us to be calm when 1% of the population is literally hunting our race, raping our women, beating our men, cutting up our children, disrupting out cites and parks while half of the negroid race lives on Whities dime on Welfare! Your biggest gripe is that you have been questioned by police once in a while!

The only reason and I mean the only ONLY reason that we have not sent every one of you to the gas chamber is that we feel guilty and that is fading!

Anonymous said...

and yes racism is fundamental. Children will separate themselves along racial lines when left on their own. People naturally gravitate towards that which most resembles themselves. If you find yourself here and youre a black guy then I guess there a little white in your family you might need to look into. I for one am in favor of reversing the "one-drop" rule as I know how bad the treatment shown towards High-Yellows can be from the real blacks. So from here on, one drop of white makes you alright.

Netzach said...

Anon,

"A good characterization evergreen. Blacks don't snitch because at their core they are cowards who cannot be bothered with making hard choices to better their communities."

So, what do we oh-so-brave white people do when black crime wave washes over our communities? Fight back? Create civic guards cooperating with police to impose order? No. We run away like little bitches.

All people are cowards. Some individuals are not, and sometimes it's possible to mobilize huge groups to act bravely. Both are exceptional cases.

Sheila,

"Mr. Evergreen excuses blacks' criminality and disregard for the rule of law on their fear and distrust of police."

He explains it, anyway. Don't know about excuses. Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't. I care only about his explanations, as knowledge is power. To understand a problem is the first step towards developing means to solve it.

"Well, I was raised to obey the law and respect the police. As the cops around here have come in darker and darker hues, and as their capriciousness becomes more evident, my "respect" for the police diminishes more and more."

So, as police has become to consist less of your race, you trust it less. Hmm. Maybe you have more reasons for it than just racial diversity. I know a thing or two about African "policemen", and I've studied a study about the corruption rampant upon British Pakistani policemen. It's very possible than you have other problems with black police than them being black. Still, I suspect you would find it easy to sympathize with blacks who are policed mostly by non-blacks.

mr_evergreen,

"I have seen first hand what some crooked police officers can do. From personal experience, my father bought a really nice car, with his hard-earned money. No sooner did he get that car, he kept getting pulled over by the police for no reason. He wasn't violating any laws, but the police pulled him over. He was getting profiled alot. When he asked to speak with their Sgt, who is someone he knows, they quit messing with him."

So, what is crooked about this? Did these police officers demand bribes or use violence against your father? I guess not. They profiled. Most of the time profiling is just professionalism. Almost all rapists are men. Most white men hanging out with black men in ghettoes are there to buy drugs. And disproportionaly large part of black men driving really nice cars have stolen them.

The "harassment" stopped when your father asked to speak with the Sgt. That made the policemen to spread the message: This particular black man with that car is legit, so don't stop him. We don't want to waste our time, and certainly not to expose our department to charges of racial harassment, which our superiors would avenge upon us.

To an extent I sympathize with blacks suffering from the sins of other blacks. I suppose I should sympathize with men briefly suspected of crimes committed mostly by men, but to be honest I can't feel much self-pity.

Anonymous said...

as usual a sambolite defends his crimes and stupidity by blaming everyone but himself.....................evergreen :the self-regenerating title you choose is more appropriate than you might know. You really are always able to come up with a new excuse.

Anonymous said...

"...I don't make light of other person's experiences and I expect other people to behave accordingly..."

This, after calling us "fascists"

Stupid fucking nigger...

Zenster said...

10mm AUTO: It is almost as though negroids are all part of a huge criminal "family" like the mafia.

Perhaps the word that you are looking for is "tribe"?

Indianapolis / Ben N Indiana said...

Snitching can be understood when one considers that Whites are individualists and blacks are tribalists. As tribalists, blacks think in terms of the group; 'us vs them'.

Those of us who attended (or taught at) black high schools are familiar with large groups of blacks that move about in tandem, almost as if there were an invisible glue that held the mass of black bodies together.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (November 9, 2011 9:17 AM): Yet another sports article on this site...

You just don't get it, do you?

Either you are so upgefucked in the head or just plain dumber than a bag of hair. Same difference, really. But let's ignore that for the nonce. Emkay?

With complete and total justification, Paul Kersey is scrutinizing the ofttimes weird and all-to-frequently perverse obsession that American Whites have with Black athletes which those same exact admirers would not-so-readily admit as to how:

Their identity is tied into the winning and losing of a college football team, comprised largely of players from a race they consciously avoid in all other aspects of their life.

While rhetorical in nature; what sort of mindset can wholeheartedly cheer on an individual that those same exact persons would, most likely, not even give the time of day?

As Paul Kersey is so fond of noting; this level of cognitive dissonance upon the part of DWLs represents an almost primordial level of disconnect that, not just defies logic or reason, but is so counterproductive and anti-survivalist as to represent an almost voluntary form of suicide if only it will bring about a dismantling of the much-hated domination that White Males apparently enjoy with respect to all cultural or civilizational progress that has happened over the last few centuries.

Go figure.

Dissident said...

"This method aims to achieve something else, which is Total Equality (TE).
"

The egalitarians (as they pretend to be), are only interested in making us all equally poor-a la Animal Farm.

Yea, we'll be equal, just equally destitute. Welcome to the new feudalism.

Anonymous said...

I would at least respect a Negro if he would openly acknowledge the truth about his race and be grateful for the fact that he's here instead of having bugs picked off his back and digging for roots in Africa. Every Negro in America, if they had an ounce of integrity would be thankful that their ancestors were forced into slavery!

If Negros had even a modicum of intelligence they'd be honest about their own criminality, their own lack of accomplishment, their racial inferiority which was only escaped on the backs of benevolent whites.

Reverend Manning is such a man. If the world made ANY sense whatsoever, these tribal animals would be licking the hands that feed them. Instead, they bite the hands that feed them. Add ingrates to the nearly endless list of their deficiencies.

That's why I have so little sympathy for the abjectly ignorant Mr. Evergreen. He simply doesn't get it. He's a fool and much much worse masquerading as an intelligent observer.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: I was not making excuses for criminals. I was stating that the reason alot of Black people don't "snitch" is because they don't want to end up killed. How am I making excuses for criminals?

Paging Californian to the White courtesy telephone.

Mr. Rational said...

@mr_evergreen:

How does it help me? How does it help me to be able to be myself and enjoy my night time bicycle ride or night time stroll in my subdivision?

You would not stand out in a Black subdivision.  Why don't you go live in one, where your insomniac strolling wouldn't be questioned by the police?

You know the answer as well as I:  you would not be safe at night in a "Black subdivision", because that is synonymous with "ghetto".

Now to address your question directly:  you can only enjoy your night-time strolls because your neighbors are White people who call the police, not the Black Undertow who practice "no snitching".  The police presence and questioning is required to keep both them and you safe from criminals, who are overwhelmingly "people of color".  That helps you more than you are willing to admit.  You ought to man up like the counterjihadist Robert Spencer.  He's a Christian who has done more critical analysis of Islam and terrorist philosophy than just about anyone, but he's often pulled aside for extra screening at airports because he looks Middle Eastern.  He takes this in stride; as he says, the major threat does come from people who "look like him", and profiling is one of the essential elements of safety.

Now that this has been explained to you in detail, you have no further excuse for complaining.  If you continue, you ought to be deprived of the protection of White neighbors who call the police.  In that case you would be well and truly fucked, and you know it.  But are you honest enough to admit it?

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: Sheila, a lot of Black people are raised to obey the law and follow that tenet accordingly.

Yeah, right. That totally explains Black-On-Black violence and murder rates. Oops, I forget Whitey!

Too bad that there isn't an index of Crime-Stoppers' effectiveness per zip code. That would reveal a lot of what is in dispute.

Much as with the "food desert" mapping, why am I so confident that there would be an inverse correlation to the Crime-Stoppers index?

Anonymous said...

Paul I just read your article at Alt Right about college football and the SEC. You mentioned Vandy and Florida are the only AAU schools in the SEC. Mizzou and Texas A&M are members. So now the SEC will add two more of these institutions. However, I can't wait to see the changes that will happen to my local team, Mizzou, as they attempt to compete in the SEC. My guess is Mizzou's status as an AAU institution will affect the SEC less than the SEC will affect Mizzou.

Lee said...

"I was suffering from insomnia and decided to go out at night, around 2AM. The first time I was just walking around campus. The second time the police were called, I was walking around my subdivision. The third time, I was riding my bicycle around campus. I just needed to go outside and enjoy myself."

Mr. Evergreen: Either you are retarded or you are just pulling our collective leg with this comment. Nothing good ever came from a black man roaming around the general vicinity at 2:00 a.m. Hell, if ANYONE was roaming around my neighborhood in the middle of the night, I would call the police pronto. And if it was a black man, double pronto. As a woman who is often home alone, of course I would call the police, you idiot.

And your "But I'se a good nigger white peoplez" pleadings are nothing short of pathetic. You will never, ever convince me that blacks have anything good to offer society, so quit trying.

Silent Running said...

Marx was wrong when he said that religion was the opium of the people. Sport is.

It is also a replacement for nationalism. Men's love for their own people, culture, nation, etc has been supplanted by love of their favorite team.

I've noticed that the worse things get in this country, the more important sport becomes to the collective mind. Increasing unemployment and overall despair correlates to the increasing fanaticism of the black-worshiping, gelded Caucasian sports fan.

There is absolutely no reason for institutions of higher education to have sports teams.

Anonymous said...

"He wasn't violating any laws, but the police pulled him over. He was getting profiled alot."

Evergreen, do you ever stop whining?

Anonymous said...

"There is a reason the "no snitch" rule is so deep with the African-American community."

Translation:
Blacks are not capable of living like civilized human beings.

Zenster said...

Dissident: I find the whole college sports scene (Pro, too.) to be rather strange. I mean, how can grown men idolize people that play a game for a living?

Bravo, Dissident! One may as well base their life's outcome on a single game of checkers, if not (more admirably), chess.

What in Hell is so important about any given college-level ball game that can possibly inspire such a likelihood for (post-event) violence or imperil several million dollars in alumni funding and attendance?

Whatever happened to an overall societal reverence for scientists, authors and inventors? The celebrity and adulation of athletes (in general), is a searing indictment of modern popular culture.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (November 9, 2011 1:14 PM): It doesn't take a majority of a group behaving badly to make life miserable for everyone else. It only takes a tireless minority. [emphasis added]

Le bingo!

Just as with Islamic terrorism where the need for TSA profiling meets or exceeds police profiling of Blacks.

Think about that,Mr. E. If the figure is anywhere near to being accurate, any time I, or anyone else, interacts with a black male, there's a one in four chance that I'm dealing with:

1)A criminal who's running around loose
2)A criminal who has been released from jail
3)Someone who is going to be a criminal.


Capiche, mr_evergreen?

YIH said...

THIS JUST IN!!!
Paterno canned. Effective immediately.

I-RIGHT-I said...

There is only one expanation for Paterno's silence and that is Sandusky, one of the other conspirators or all of them have the goods on him. Fixing games, raping co-eds, fucking little boys something of that nature. Snitching wasn't an option for Paterno.

By the way, you owe me a book.

YIH said...

Webster said:
''If you can find evidence of this guy consulting one of us niggers on how to hide a pedo, I'll give you a cookie.''
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsUXAEzaC3Q
Chocolate chip please.

Anonymous said...

YES THE GRIM SLEEPER MAYBE WOULDA BEEN CAUGHT 50 MURDERS AGO IF
black folk had turned lonnie in for those stolen cars and other things he fenced.

Anonymous said...

What about writing about Newsweeks "How Racist is Yr baby' cover
or 'Is America Islamophobic' cover?

W74 said...

Mr Evergreen said:

"...Criminals aren't afraid to commit murder in the broad daylight if they think they'll get away with it. The rule is often "mind your own business if you want to live". The rule is "snitching will get you killed". Basically, Black people don't snitch because they are afraid to die. Why else do alot of Black people who can afford it often leave their neighborhoods for safer neighborhoods?"

Black people are afraid to die? Yeah the guy engaging in not snitching is, but wasn't the guy on the receiving end of some gangster's (i.e. African Warlord) wrath? Wouldn't the hard choice be to remove the criminal because they might be next, snitching or not? This is why for Whites stopping criminality is a community effort...starting with one's own children of course. It affects everyone around them.

And please. Please don't move to "safer neighborhoods" They aren't safe once blacks get there. It might start with a few of the better ones but then they bring over cousins, kids, boyfriends, friends, grandkids etc. And the kids that might come over as five year olds become 15 year olds, become lowlife 25 year olds....

Case example. Many blacks fled Baltimore along with Whites in the 60s and 70s to Randallstown (a Western Suburb) Randallstown became mostly black. It is now a shithole complete with TWO "chickn' n' trout" joints within a mile of each other. IT IS A SHITHOLE. They fled one geographical area and infested another. Now that Randallstown is a shithole they're moving north into a once white suburb called Owings Mills. Owings Mills used to be where Whites could live safely and commute to downtown. Now blacks are fleeing Randallstown (because they've made it unsafe) to Ownings Mills.

I can feel the creep. I can see the darkening, I can see more and more "female heads of household" with kids. I can see the school bus stops changing. These five year olds will grow up into fifteen year olds. Then crime will increase. Then Whites will be FORCED to leave. Then it too will be a shithole.


This used to be a White town: http://g.co/maps/a9zc5 It is over 80% black now. People who live in Randallstown, if they're on the border, try to advertise their homes as being in another town.
http://g.co/maps/ztfyq What you don't see pictured is the abundant wildlife due to the rain. You also don't (want to?) see this place at night.

More crap I don't want near me: http://g.co/maps/yq9du

Black undertow creeping in. http://g.co/maps/34wnx This is not warp 10. This is light compared to Baltimore.

Sure Signs of Undertow: http://g.co/maps/puq32

Whole block all Baltimorded Up: http://g.co/maps/gb7dd

Please introduce me to the people who destroyed these neighborhoods: http://g.co/maps/jt7ph

Not making this shit up: http://g.co/maps/hus43

Whiskey said...

You wonder why Nashville has a hockey team (watching Nashville vs. Ducks right now on FSW)? Hint: the players are all White guys, whom the fans can relate to. Same for UFC (now becoming really big with the move to Fox from Spike) and to a degree, Wrestling. White fans like to watch White athletes.

The NHL expansion to all these sunbelt cities, offering the only White sport domination, has been the untold story of professional sports.

map said...

You guys are missing the obvious. "No snitching" means "not being a rat." Not being a rat is the code of conduct of the criminal.

Black people don't say that they don't cooperate with the police out of fear of retribution or cowardice. They specifically say "not snitching" meaning, "not being a rat", meaning they are following the criminal's code.

If 10mm is right and 30% of black men have some kind of criminal record, then that means almost every black person has a friend or family member that has a criminal record.

Blacks are, for all intents and purposes, a mafia.

AnalogMan said...

Lots of good comments here, but for my money Silent Running gets the prize for this one:

There is absolutely no reason for institutions of higher education to have sports teams.

That's the nub of it, isn't it? It's an anomaly on the face of it, but then to support it by introducing the lowest, most anti-intellectual elements of society is simply mind-boggling.

I always say, chasing a ball is the kind of thing that amuses my dog, but even he wouldn't waste his time watching someone else doing it.

Whiskey said...

I know Paterno's attitude well. It is VERY common among Catholic Italians and Irish of a certain age, and plays well when they are in positions where power/status/prestige matter as much as delivering results. Yes Paterno had to win, most often, but his positioning and playing the moral superiority card bought him admiration in the Press (which loves to play the moral superior lecturer tone for its own entertainment).

It is interesting that say, Hedge Funds or Trading Desks at Ibanks don't care about anything but results. You can be the most upright moral guy with all the approval of being "Black" or whatever, but if you don't produce profits you're toast. Meanwhile you can scream racist abuse (real stuff) all day as long as you make your firm loads of cash.

College Football is not about wins, mostly, it is about looking good in the media, bringing in money (through TV exposure) and avoiding controversy. Paterno's views (as an Italian Catholic growing up he felt "an outsider" and in sympathy with Blacks he did not have to live around) typify that generation. Younger guys mostly just don't care, but find language denigrating Black or Hispanic people distasteful and low-class. Though they avoid Black guys mostly. It is interesting the Deon Sanders is pictured as a "funny fairy" in the NFL Sunday Ticket ads, now that Peyton Manning is out and can't hawk stuff. The NFL is using him as non-threatening as he can be (he's pictured as a tiny bug with wings like Tinkerbell) to sell their package.

Paterno sought to keep the thing quiet to avoid upsetting the money-making machine his PR and media handling had created. [He did not win that very much, comparatively.] Everyone else was afraid to cross Paterno and his crony Sandusky.

Whiskey said...

As to why White guys "worship" Black athletes, it is because Black guys are mostly better athletes when it comes to running real fast in short bursts, jumping, and running into people. In Basketball, and Football, Black guys are just BETTER. And not by a little. BY A LOT. A WHOLE LOT. Black receivers routinely make athletic plays in running and leaping that White guys just cannot replicate.

Mostly White teams can be competitive, BUT ... it requires "boring" stuff like teamwork, ball handling and passing and blocking out and defense (in Basketball) and short-possession passing, blocking, tackling, possession receiving up the middle, with lots of clock time burned, team defense, and no constant threat of break-away athleticism of some guy just streaking down the field impossibly fast. For a long time, basically since the mid-1960's to well, now (that's about fifty years folks) White audiences have lapped up the superior (and Black guys ARE athletically superior) performances of these athletes.

HOWEVER, everything is a trade-off. All that athletic prowess, that sheer explosiveness, the sweet spot of power, speed, and leaping ability are combined with poor team play, generally low IQ, high impulsiveness, and lack of any ability to execute scripted plays or recognized weakness in the opposition and adjust accordingly.

Younger people are fans of X-Game type stuff -- motocross, skateboarding, snowboarding, various skiing events, etc that demonstrate massive courage and arial skills. Hockey is a combination of massive strength, speed, team play, and above all ... SKILL. Skill is what increasingly, White fans are embracing over athletic (Black) prowess. To do the kind of snowboard flips, skateboard or BMX moves, motocross jumps, or hockey defense and scoring, takes skill. As does the UFC. Tens of thousands of hours of dedicated skillful practice, not just waking up being real fast that morning ... and every other.

Anonymous said...

I went to Penn State. Paterno is a god there. I got so fed up with it, I went into the Penn State bookstore where there was a life-sized cardboard cutout of the Penn State deity. I got down on my knees and bowed mockingly to it several times. People actually got mad at me. Don't disrespect Joepa for goodness sake! Players were demigods. I didn't realize how much until I had a group assignment with a young black football player. He was barely literate and had a full scholarship, off campus apartment shared by his girlfriend, car and who knows what else.

rae4palin said...

Hilarious tweet from the uber-awesome @AnnBarnhardt: If football coaches were allowed to marry they wouldn't molest children.

SwampThizzle said...

Some really good commentary here. Evergreen is still playing clueless, but I am starting to think he might actually be starting to get it. He spoke of young whites calling him names when he was out innocently minding his own business, which I will admit really isn't very nice (but not illegal, it should also be noted). But deep down he knows what would have happened to him had the races been reversed: he would be targeted for robbery, assault, murder, and/or rape, not necessarily in that order, and all of it because "he white." So what Evergreen did was equate young inebriated white kids being rude (verbally) with truly sociopathic blacks impulsively assaulting anyone who doesn't look like them (physically). As if the two are even in the same league. Apples and black jelly beans, Evergreen. Why "black jelly beans" and not "oranges" you ask? Because oranges are delicious and healthy and because nobody fucking likes black jelly beans and there are already too fucking many of them and they keep fucking making more of them, that's why.

Anonymous said...

There are 40 million Black people in the USA.

There are 40 000 000/.12 people in the USA?

Anonymous said...

Actually, I don't call the police on anyone who is out at 2AM.

Well Duh! you explained no snitching already.

Anonymous said...

"People naturally gravitate towards that which most resembles themselves."

Malcolm McDowell told of the filming of The Planet of the Apes that the actors dressed as gorillas, orangutans and chimpanzees all ate at different tables.

Dissident said...

"There is absolutely no reason for institutions of higher education to have sports teams."

To me it's asinine, but to universities it's not:

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. That is why there will always be sports in higher education. Higher education is big business and money talks, while bullshit walks.

Big education is in love with the black 'afflete', big education will fawn over the Negro as long as the $ keeps pouring in.

Big education is just like big government, wholly ineffectual and almost as worthless these days.

Anonymous said...

"There is absolutely no reason for institutions of higher education to have sports teams."

Sure, if we ignore the profit motive.

Desiree said...

"Anonymous said...

Who cares if the homo coach likes raping little boys? It's a small price to pay for doing the heavy lifting for BRA."



Wow! SBPDL, you should paste this sick ass, permissive, and offensive comment to your blog's banner!!

So, let me get this straight: pedophiles are better than blacks? And preferred?

Well, I get it, right?

Netherlands (or Denmark, or Sweden, or Germany) --> "safe". LOTS of pedophiles, no blacks...

Random African country --> "Not safe". No pedophiles but many blacks!

Yes, let's replace all the blacks in America with sick white pedophiles! Sounds like a great plan: no more looking at yucky black skin and NO BRA (which doesn't exist anyway)!!

*flatlines*

;-)

Anonymous said...

desree:
'Netherlands (or Denmark, or Sweden, or Germany) "safe".
LOTS of pedophiles, no blacks...'

Have you been to EuRabia?
Muslims..blacks
look at the amanda knox trial

mr_evergreen said...

"Well Duh! you explained no snitching already"

Actually, this doesn't explain "no snitching". This explains why I don't call the police. If a person is not committing a crime, what is the point in calling the police based on mere presence? I only call the police if someone is being harassed or if someone if being victimized.

mr_evergreen said...

"Some really good commentary here. Evergreen is still playing clueless, but I am starting to think he might actually be starting to get it. He spoke of young whites calling him names when he was out innocently minding his own business, which I will admit really isn't very nice (but not illegal, it should also be noted). But deep down he knows what would have happened to him had the races been reversed: he would be targeted for robbery, assault, murder, and/or rape, not necessarily in that order, and all of it because "he white." So what Evergreen did was equate young inebriated white kids being rude (verbally) with truly sociopathic blacks impulsively assaulting anyone who doesn't look like them (physically)"

Well, sorry if I don't see it the same way as you, but I do value my ability to be safe and secure. The very persons who have yelled obscenities at me, I assume all persons who are rowdy to be a threat to me. If you're yelling things at me, then I will go into fight mode. I have had experience with being assaulted by White youths. One White teenager even took a paintball gun and shot me with it while I was walking home one afternoon. I am aware of Black youths assaulting White people. That said, I have been on the receiving end of violence from White youths. The way I look at it, if I am to look at the acts of violence against Whites and consideration, I would expect someone to do the same for me. I am not saying "who cares?" if White people are getting attacked by Blacks. Why should a person take a "who cares?" tone when I mention the stuff that has happened to me??

And I don't appreciate being compared to a black jelly bean.

mr_evergreen said...

"Black people are afraid to die? Yeah the guy engaging in not snitching is, but wasn't the guy on the receiving end of some gangster's (i.e. African Warlord) wrath? Wouldn't the hard choice be to remove the criminal because they might be next, snitching or not? This is why for Whites stopping criminality is a community effort...starting with one's own children of course. It affects everyone around them"

Well, when a person lives in a ghetto, the main idea is to survive. The biggest problem I see is lack of trust in one another. Black people do have the ability to get the neighborhood safer. However, that process is harder because of the low level of trust. The main objective is to survive. There is no trust.

In the Atlanta area, there is a neighborhood called Cascade Heights. It is predominantly Black, affluent, and much safer than the surrounding areas. It is safer because there is a level of trust that is higher there than in other areas. People make a community effort to keep the place safer.

As for Black people moving to safer areas, this is how I see it. The crime levels go up when the Black CRIMINALS get there first, not ordinary Black people. Here is my question: Why is it whenever decent Black people moving to a predominantly White area, the criminals often follow those Black people, the very Black people who sought to escape criminal behavior?

Dissident said...

Desiree.

Here's the solution:

Castrate (or execute) ALL convicted pedophiles, now!

Ship all blacks back to Africa, now!

Give white liberals a mandate to change their ways or send them straight to Africa with their beloved pet Negroes.

How well do you think my plan would be recieved by your racial kinsman, I know how well the DWL's would like living with you people.

95% of Americas problems solved in three easy steps.

Anonymous said...

Glad someone called Desiree on her bullshit.

No blacks in the Netherlands? Or Sweden? Unfortunately, for now (and I stress, for now), blacks are in these places.

You can pack up your shit and leave any time you want, though.

Anonymous said...

Diarrhea, you twit. Don't you have some writing to do on your Michael Jackson blog? You must know an awful lot about pedophiles.

Of course we don't like pedophiles. But pedophiles are rare. Blacks and black crime are not rare, whites must experience black mischief and criminality on a daily basis.
Are you lumping blacks and pedophiles into the same category? Are you having problems getting attention?

We don't like blacks, and we like to talk about SBPDL on this site. Black people do lots of stupid things and we enjoy talking about them.

Anonymous said...

Is Diarrhea posing as a dreaded white girl now? I thought she was a proud BBBW. Hilarious. What a narcissist.

Anonymous said...

Diarrhea, please read up on BRA. From Occidental Dissent, Hunter Wallace says:

November 10, 2011 at 2:43 pm

To see what “BRA” is, look no further than South Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana, which the Union Army put under the rule of Negroid-Americans in 1868. Those three states were unnaturally and artificially run for the benefit of black people.

Again, BRA is the exact opposite of Southern tradition: in the Antebellum period, Negroid-Americans were slaves who labored on Southern plantations. The Negroid-Americans worked and created wealth that was redistributed to White people.

In BRA, it is the White taxpayer who works to subsidize Negroid-Americans who live on the EBT card, Section 8 housing, and the TANF welfare check. The White taxpayer renounces his own identity and limits his family size to pay taxes to support public schools for Negroid-Americans.

The Negroid-Americans get the public schools that are paid for by the White taxpayer. The White taxpayer has to move to an overpriced suburb and often times pay private tuition to raise a family.

Silent Running said...

I always say, chasing a ball is the kind of thing that amuses my dog, but even he wouldn't waste his time watching someone else doing it.

Exactly. I do think sports are a great way for young children (particularly boys) to learn teamwork and to test their own physical limits, to learn what they are capable of. But as the saying goes, when you become a man you put away childish things. Chasing a ball around is not a trade.

As to why White guys "worship" Black athletes, it is because Black guys are mostly better athletes when it comes to running real fast in short bursts, jumping, and running into people.

You have an uncanny knack for missing the point. Whether or not blacks make better ball-chasers is irrelevant. Worshiping men who put all their life's energy into playing a kid's game, whichever game that might be, is decadent and debasing.

Sure, if we ignore the profit motive.

There's a profit motive for selling methamphetamine, too. Spectator sport is the meth of Western civilization.

SwampThizzle said...

It was Roddy McDowell in "Planet of the Apes." Pretty sure they aren't related.

"There is absolutely no reason for institutions of higher education to have sports teams." (how do I quote in Italics?)

Agree 100%. Bottom line: organized sports are played by and viewed by dumb people (sorry, Paul). Like endemic black criminality, it's not just a mean-spirited stereotype, it is a fact. I could understand a profit motive for private universities to promote "spoats," but the large state schools who do this have never lowered their tuition because the feetsball or bakkabaw program has made money. It pretty much all goes back to the athletic department, so they can continue to undermine higher education on whitey's dime.

Paul, I understand you keep publishing Desiree's crazy sheboon comments because you want to demonstrate how crazy and dumb black people are, but you're preaching to the choir on this one; we get it. Their inferiority is readily apparent and any honest person would admit it. In this latest comment, she missed some pretty obvious sarcasm and went into straight-faced indignant rage. She is a moron. There is no reason to continue giving free publicity to this idiot. She brings nothing to the discussion. Indeed, she is incapable of doing so. So please stop publishing her dumbass bullshit.

D. Freeman said...

@evergreen

Let it go brother. You seem to have something of quality to add to the issues and discussions involving race, but by wasting your time here you are only going to exacerbate your energy.

I initially thought that there was something to be gained from this site, that maybe i could have an enlightening conversation here, but there just arent really any individuals here who want an honest conversation. The people here want to rant and vent about their frustrations and disdain for blacks. At most it is a quasi intellectual site for racist propaganda, and as is typical of most propaganda, the people who readily consume it are in no shape to actually discuss its meaning or confront the untruths behind it.

Seriously, anyone who can take the story about a bunch of rich white people using their power to cover up another rich white persons sex crimes and somehow use this to show how bad black people are is not really worth a whole lot of effort or thought.

Thats why I am not bothering with this site. Let them have their fun. Let them have their dreams and delusions of grandeur. These types of sites and groups have existed forever and they will not go away. By giving them time and attention you only serve to keep them around and give them the validation that they so desperately need. They will never change or accept any other view of the world that doesn't fit their narrow scope.

You are needed elsewhere Mr. Evergreen, stop wasting your time here.

Anonymous said...

Sir:

Love your superb writing, and what a gem you have ferreted out on this despicable coward and narcissist, JoPa.

The fact that his firing has engendered shameful rioting by the largely White student body is a case study in how successful the Cultural Marxists have proven in their indoctrination of students' in moral relativism.

Here's a case where a Black psychopath took their reviled "snitching" to unbelievable new lows:

Whites' were smeared for years and docudramas made aplenty by the anti-White controlled media over the rare-but-horrific murder of James Byrd, but I'd venture good money NOONE has ever heard about this nauseating Black-on-White crime over purported "snitching" by a man this MONSTER barely even knew:

Phoenix woman indicted in torture killing of disabled man over alleged "snitching"

Victim was stabbed 50 times, then dismembered, burned

A grand jury has indicted a Phoenix woman accused of stabbing a disabled man about 50 times before dismembering and burning his body.

Angela Simpson, 23, is charged with first-degree murder, kidnapping, and abandonment or concealment of a body in the murder of 46-year-old Terry Neely.

"The level of cruelty in this case is severe, and we will aggressively prosecute this case," Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas said. "It is a great concern to see victims treated this way and their lives ending this way."

The indictment was made public Thursday. Thomas' office will decide whether to pursue the death penalty against Simpson if she is convicted.

Firefighters in the early-morning hours of Aug. 5 found Neely's remains burning in a trash container behind Covenant of Grace Christian Fellowship Church near Seventh and Peoria avenues. An autopsy showed injuries that included a 3-inch nail hammered into Neely's skull.

Police said Simpson told them she held Neely for nearly three days, beating him and then dismembering his body. Simpson also said she pulled out his teeth and strangled him with a coaxial cable, police said. Phoenix police Lt. Joe Knott said investigators believe Neely was alive for most of the time he was tortured.

Simpson reportedly believed that Neely was "a snitch."

"I don't feel guilty," Simpson said in a jailhouse interview with Channel 3 (KTVK). "I'm a little upset I won't be able to kill more snitches. I have no remorse about killing him."

Simpson also said this was not the first time she has killed someone, a claim Phoenix police are investigating.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2009/08/28/20090828abrk-simpsonmurder28-ON.html#ixzz1dKtGdIPR

Stephanie

sakhtar3 said...

"No snitching" applies mostly to murders--either in cold blood or calculated--not to pederasty.

With pederasty, it's a case of turning him in. It's not snitching. That goes for all races and creeds outside of the Catholic Church.

Zenster said...

Silent Running: You have an uncanny knack for missing the point. Whether or not blacks make better ball-chasers is irrelevant. Worshiping men who put all their life's energy into playing a kid's game, whichever game that might be, is decadent and debasing.

It most certainly is to the extent that sports plays such a top-heavy role with respect to individual or community self-esteem, college budgets and broadcast airtime.

Scholastic-based recreational sports originated as a way of pulling students out of stuffy classrooms in order to breath fresh air and get some sunshine.

The nature of modern competitive sports involves society transferring over to professional athletes the role of surrogate warrior. Our astronauts once served this tole in a far more admirable capacity.

As society dumbed down, adopting role models whose activities could be marginally duplicated by the average man represented, not only a way to popularize these activities along with selling the equipment related to them but, also, a tremendous marketing lever with which to obtain massive revenues from advertisers and other promoters. One glance at Super Bowl ad rates seals all debate on this topic.

Getting people addicted to sports is one of the most easy and lucrative things imaginable. Not only among Whites but, especially, among lower IQ Blacks.

There's a profit motive for selling methamphetamine, too. Spectator sport is the meth of Western civilization.

The adrenaline rush people get from the vicarious "participation" experienced while attending or watching sports programs has an identical twin in the way that (c)rap "music" uses high amplitude sound and, specifically, loud low frequency signals to trigger adrenaline release and anxiety in their audiences as well.

Both of them are heavily invested in behavioral modification.

Pavlov. Does that name ring a bell?

Anonymous said...

From her Blogger.com profile:

Desiree

Gender: Female
Astrological Sign: Aries
Industry: Student
Location: Vegas, baby!

About Me

A 20-something black girl with things on her mind.

Sorry Des, if you're trolling for a White husband here you're wasting your time.

Zenster said...

Now that I have largely caught up with this thread's comments, it's time to address the behavior that Paul Kersey noted in Joe Paterno.

By his own admission, Paterno acknowledges that he exhibits some of Liberalism's most serious character defects and failings. Here is a short list of them:

e-Race: The voluntary abdication of one's racial legacy. Paterno's statement that, "I often said to friends at that time time that I wished I were black." is proof positive of this. It points to another similar-but-different and yet equally insidious Liberal trait known as self-loathing.

To an extent, SBPDL examined this issue of Whites being e-Raced in its coverage of the Disney film "Dolphin Tale" and the revisionism of how two White scientists were racially recast and consolidated into a role for Morgan Freeman.

Self-Loathing: This is a far more pervasive Liberal ailment and a direct manifestation of Cultural Marxism that has resulted in some 50 years of Communist subversion. It takes the form of demoralization. By willingly renouncing his race, Paterno displays this in full measure.

Stockholm Syndrome: Like many urban White populations, much of college sports is also being held hostage by Black thugs that continue to prey upon the people and institutions that fund their very existence.

Over-identification with one's captors is a common feature of those who have been held hostage for prolonged periods of time. This is a probable explanation for the numerous "whiggers" (White niggers), that emerge from many urban public schools. It is doubtful in the extreme that anywhere near the same number of such whiggers are produced in majority White communities.

Cognitive Dissonance: It is more than clear that Paterno actively sought to cover up wrongdoing by defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky.

As a supposed role model and source of guidance to the players on his team, Paterno knowingly and voluntarily failed them in the worst way imaginable. One of his primary and most important responsibilities was to provide leadership by example.

The young men that came under his tutelage were victimized and subjected to the exact opposite of everything that a team's coach is supposed to stand for.

Only the common Liberal trait of cognitive dissnonance can provide even a marginally satisfactory explanation for such abject betrayal and hypocrisy.

Zenster said...

Stephanie: The fact that his firing has engendered shameful rioting by the largely White student body is a case study in how successful the Cultural Marxists have proven in their indoctrination of students' in moral relativism.

Thank you for bringing up this crucial point. I have been reluctant to keep harping on Cultural Marxism despite its underlying role in facilitating Political Correctness and many other Liberal idiocies. It's gratifying to see that others deem it so obvious.

One related issue that is getting nowhere near the amount of exposure it deserves involves Black Liberation Theology. This vindicitve and racist movement is Marxist in origin. Its most easily recognized proponents are so-called Reverend Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright and no less than Barack Obama himself.

Black Liberation Theology remains one of the most virulently racist institutions in America today and advocates nothing less than pure revenge upon Whites without a trace of reconciliation or any pursuit of racial equality.

Anonymous said...

"Who cares if the homo coach likes raping little boys? It's a small price to pay for doing the heavy lifting for BRA."

Diarrhea then attempts to interpret this, and fails miserably. Let's read...

"Wow! SBPDL, you should paste this sick ass, permissive, and offensive comment to your blog's banner!!

So, let me get this straight: pedophiles are better than blacks? And preferred?"

You dumb fucking nigger. You honestly see that quote as a preference for pedophiles over niggers? Honestly? THAT is how your un-evolved, negro "brain" sees it?

And she is the kind of negro that just Wows! stupid, Liberal Whites. She is such a disgusting idiot, that she had no chance of understanding what the above quote meant.

I really am beyond this whole "negro as our equal" thing...

Irishmane017 said...

I'd say this incident has more in common with the Catholic Church then some ghetto black mentality...but then again the Holy See is well-known for reppin the thug life.

Californian said...

Random African country --> "Not safe". No pedophiles but many blacks!


Perhaps you are not familiar with the black African penchant for raping children and even infants in the belief that sex with a virgin will cure them of AIDS?

Or of the mass rapes conducted by black militias in the various civil wars in Africa?

Or of the impressment of boys by African warlords into their armies as child soldiers, often involving ritual killings and assorted unpleasantness?

Or of the high rates of sexual assaults in majority-rule-one-man-one-vote South Africa? And the high proportion of black-on-white rapes in the rainbow nation as opposed to the contrary?

Speaking of which, have you ever considered living in one of these African paradises? I mean, why live in the big bad racist USA when you could have all the joys of black majority rule as cheaply as the cost of an airline ticket and work visa?

Californian said...

D. Freeman, OK, I'll bite, what do you want to have a conversation about?

I initially thought that there was something to be gained from this site, that maybe i could have an enlightening conversation here, but there just arent really any individuals here who want an honest conversation.

Howard said...

@Californian

I appreciate the inv sir, but i dont have much else to say in this forum. Its too hostile of an environment for a productive discussion; by the time ive responded to one person 5 others have said something else and only 2 of them had anything of value to say.

I do have one question that has still escaped me, and i remember you being a bit less crass than some of your peers.

My question is this. What defines a "causal" relationship in terms of behavior. in my discussion with others about the unfortunate behavior of some blacks and Africans worldwide, all of my points about culture, poverty, environment, the impacts of slavery and imperialism, education, etc were dismissed because they were not "causal." So i ask what defines a "causal" relationship. Furthermore, how does prominent usage of the IQ theory for behavior pass the threshold of causality?

Lastly, if the IQ theory does pass said threshold, is the theory at all relevant to the well document history of "aggression" that whites have had against people of color for centuries, as well as their own kind at different times in history? And at the same time how could this be further reconciled with Asian cultures, who overall had a much less bloody/aggressive historical journey but also had higher IQs than that of whites?

In short i am trying to better understand the totality of the meaning/ramifications related to how IQ tests affect race and behavior. Any further explanation you can provide or other sources of research would be appreciated.

YT said...

"You dumb fucking nigger. You honestly see that quote as a preference for pedophiles over niggers? Honestly? THAT is how your un-evolved, negro "brain" sees it?

And she is the kind of negro that just Wows! stupid, Liberal Whites. She is such a disgusting idiot, that she had no chance of understanding what the above quote meant."

$50 says she's got a fat ass to go along with an "in your face" attitude too. A strong and proud Nubian princess that enriches our culture with her diversityness!

Prof. S. Thizzle, Ph.D. said...

Someone pointed out the nom de plume "Evergreen" and how appropriate it was. Let's etymologically parse it:

Ever: eternal, always
Green: naive, unlearned

Silent Running said...

how do I quote in Italics?

HTML. Here's a link to some of the more common elements, including bold & italic.

e-Race:

Oh, I'm definitely going to use that one.

It is doubtful in the extreme that anywhere near the same number of such whiggers are produced in majority White communities.

Probably not the same number, but suburbia does manufacture quite a few whiggers. What better way to get back at Mom and Dad?

mr_evergreen said...

"Let it go brother. You seem to have something of quality to add to the issues and discussions involving race, but by wasting your time here you are only going to exacerbate your energy.

I initially thought that there was something to be gained from this site, that maybe i could have an enlightening conversation here, but there just arent really any individuals here who want an honest conversation. The people here want to rant and vent about their frustrations and disdain for blacks. At most it is a quasi intellectual site for racist propaganda, and as is typical of most propaganda, the people who readily consume it are in no shape to actually discuss its meaning or confront the untruths behind it.

Seriously, anyone who can take the story about a bunch of rich white people using their power to cover up another rich white persons sex crimes and somehow use this to show how bad black people are is not really worth a whole lot of effort or thought.

Thats why I am not bothering with this site. Let them have their fun. Let them have their dreams and delusions of grandeur. These types of sites and groups have existed forever and they will not go away. By giving them time and attention you only serve to keep them around and give them the validation that they so desperately need. They will never change or accept any other view of the world that doesn't fit their narrow scope.

You are needed elsewhere Mr. Evergreen, stop wasting your time here"

I initially started posting because I thought I could offer something different. I needed to show a different side of things. I had a different view(still do) on things. I've quickly learned otherwise. I kept staying because I figured I could show that this doesn't even apply to the majority of Blacks.

My question is: Where am I needed?

mr_evergreen said...

"Someone pointed out the nom de plume "Evergreen" and how appropriate it was. Let's etymologically parse it:

Ever: eternal, always
Green: naive, unlearned"

Well, there is something you need to learn about my nom de plume(pseudonym). Evergreen refers to evergreen trees, such as the douglas fir, which grows in the state of Washington.

Dr. Mongo Lloyd said...

mr_evergreen said..."I am talking specifically about Black people who are obeying the law. The idea was because of historical abuse from the police, alot of Black people don't trust the police and are willing to let a criminal go free BECAUSE they fear retribution from the neighborhood criminals and don't trust the police."

Ah, the ol' "Blame Whitey(TM)" routine. Never saw that one coming!

Anonymous said...

Mr. Evergreen should continue to post here, from his/her profile, Student relocated to Atlanta for education, rides a bike and has the courage to defend own positions with apparent intelligence...I did notice ME was a big fan of the Anti-Apartheid movements success in South Africa and would suggest reading "Into the Cannibal's Pot" regarding the results of the Anti-A in present day SA.

Zenster said...

Californian: Perhaps you are not familiar with the black African penchant for raping children and even infants in the belief that sex with a virgin will cure them of AIDS?

Even if Desiree was familiar with the African epidemic of infant rape, do you think she would let that interfere with her hatred of America?

Your mention of Africa's AIDS-related rape epidemic is commendable, Californian. Now let's please take into consideration how ― due to corruption, incompetence and illiteracy ― accurate police reporting in much of Black Africa is laughable if not entirely nonexistent.

What tiny fraction of actual pedophilia and this AIDS-related rape is represented in whatever statistics that are being presented? Somehow, even 50% seems way too high of a number. And this does not even take into account the mass rapes and gang rapes associated with the routine ethnic cleansing that happens there.

Or of the mass rapes conducted by black militias in the various civil wars in Africa?

Does anyone honestly think that coroners are wandering around the battlefields of Rwanda, Sudan and the Congo with rape kits to determine how many of the surviving women, much less the female corpses, were sexually assaulted ante mortem or, even, after death which is frequently the case as well?

Or of the impressment of boys by African warlords into their armies as child soldiers, often involving ritual killings and assorted unpleasantness?

Let's not forget to include the near routine Muslim gang rape of young Sudanese boys:

(2002)Sudan Report: Widespread Gang-Rape of Boy Slaves

During a recent fact finding trip to Southern Sudan, Freedom Now World News discovered overwhelming evidence that young black, boy slaves are repeatedly gang-raped by their Arab masters. While previous reports on slavery have focused mainly on the gang-rape of female slaves, sociologist and investigative reporter, Maria Sliwa received testimony from numerous boy victims of rape.


Californian: Speaking of which, have you ever considered living in one of these African paradises? I mean, why live in the big bad racist USA when you could have all the joys of black majority rule as cheaply as the cost of an airline ticket and work visa?

Desiree's hatred of America is magically just not quite sufficient enough whereby it might inspire her to experience first hand the joys of surviving Black run utopias in Africa. Quel suprise!

Nonetheless, you can almost sense her exultation as she mentions (at November 8, 2011 7:35 PM), the Jerry Sandusky scandal in the "Black People + Southern Poverty = Violence in Montgomery?" thread.

Hypocrisy, Desiree be thy name.

Californian said...

mr_evergreen said...

The people here want to rant and vent about their frustrations and disdain for blacks.

People have tried to discuss these issues civilly at their schools, their jobs, their public forums. They have been shouted down, fired, ostracized, physically assaulted, and, if this were Europe, having to face "hate crime" persecution.

So yes, they want to vent their frustrations.

Wouldn't you want to do the same?

I would recommend you google "Professor Jean Philippe Rushton" or "Stephanie Grace Harvard" to see what happens when white people attempt to discuss these issues in the open.

Even the mildest discussion of how white people are discriminated against leads to mob violence by the minions of a liberal university: http://unamusementpark.com/2011/10/uw-madison-students-and-staff-support-racial-discrimination/

Why don't you explain to us why the liberal side is marked by extreme intolerance. Given this intolerance, a lot of race realists do not bother to even try being civil.

If you could arrange for a civil discussion of these issues to take place on a major university government commission, one in which race realists would be given an equal opportunity to promote their point of view in open debate without disruptions, then perhaps things would be different.

Let me ask you:

* Do you think it right that a student who makes a private communication in which she mentions that blacks have lower median intelligence than whites ought to be forced to grovel in apology?
* And do you think that black student organizations, the dean of the law school, and the ACLU should support such a student's free speech rights? (Again, google "Stephanie Grace Harvard").
* Would you support her free speech rights?

Californian said...

At most it is a quasi intellectual site for racist propaganda, and as is typical of most propaganda, the people who readily consume it are in no shape to actually discuss its meaning or confront the untruths behind it.

Race Realists have confronted the truths:
* Blacks are genetically different from whites.
* Black behaviors are the result of these genetic differences.
* This reality has been covered up by a liberal establishment.
* One outcome is that black run societies usually (but not always) are marked by widescale violent crime, illegitimacy, corruption, and economic decline. Again, look at majority rule Africa, Haiti, Detroit. (And please note that race realists have the stats to demonstrate all of their claims on this front are true.)
* Rather than confronting these issues, and perhaps working to solve the related problems, blacks and especially their liberal allies blame whites and then implement regimes which repress anyone who dissent from the prevailing party line. Again, you might ask yourself why liberals need to shout down the opposition, fire dissenters, put people in jail for "hate speech."

The thing is, mr_evergreen, you can only push people so far. Then they fight back. Then things get ugly.

Zenster said...

mr_evergreen: My question is: Where am I needed?

The only place that you are needed is, most likely, the one place you'd avoid like the plague.

Your relative level of education and articulation is desperately needed in the urban Black ghetto. Youth there are in dire need of even marginal leadership by example. A commodity that neither, Black athletes, (c)rappers or the ever present gangsters are capable of providing.

Ironic, isn't it, how you wouldn't last there much longer than a Corvette with the keys in its ignition?

As to whether you have any role within the precincts of SBPDL, that depends upon whether you can forsake your precious "Blame Whitey" attitude long enough to assimilate the numerous and justifiable reasons why so many here would answer: "Nowhere."

As always, Van's eternally unanswered question hovers above this exchange: (to paraphrase)

What essential skill, intellectual property, service or product is provided by Blacks which cannot be obtained elsewhere at a much reduced risk of encountering snotty-assed attitude, scamming, ripoff or outright physical assault?

When you can provide an honest and functional answer to that one single question, you might have earned some sort of place here at SBPDL. Then again, I'm sure there are many others here who would not even go that far.

In light of the near-constant TNB that issues forth from America's Black communities, I find it difficult to blame anyone for feeling such anger and, even, racism towards Blacks.

Californian said...

Howard said...

What defines a "causal" relationship in terms of behavior. in my discussion with others about the unfortunate behavior of some blacks and Africans worldwide, all of my points about culture, poverty, environment, the impacts of slavery and imperialism, education, etc were dismissed because they were not "causal."

Quite frankly, this sounds like a high echelon academic discussion. I suppose I can sum this up as being part of the old "Nature versus Nurture" argument which has been going on for some time now, though the "Nurture" schools seems to be in ascendancy among Western elites.

I can point out that other peoples have suffered from poverty, environment, the impacts of slavery and imperialism, education, etc., but still form functional societies.

Let me ask you a question: What if tomorrow, blacks in America:
* Stopped having children out of wedlock.
* Reduced their violent crime to a rate similar to that committed by whites?
* Stayed in school and studied as hard as, say, Asians?
* Had leaders who took all the energy they now use in blaming whites for everything and instead used it to provide some moral guidance on the above points?

Blacks, we are to presume, have free will. How much of their plight is due to the choices, yes choices(!) that blacks have made?

Anonymous said...

Blacks are the ones calling the cops constantly. It's not white people calling cops when a shooting goes down in the inner city, it's blacks. Blacks have a love hate relationship with the police. Blacks expect cops to be their husbands, fathers, marriage and family counselors. Blacks even call the cops when they want the cops to stop them from committing violence or a murder. I swear it. I know blacks who know they are getting ready to kill a relative with a cast iron frying pan and will call the cops and tell them, "You better come get this bitch out my house before I kill her!" I know people who will call cops and tell them to come and get their kids, "Come and get this nigga out my house!" They will say this about 8 year old kids. Half the police killings and brutality cases happen when a black person is scared of a relative who's high on drugs or not takng his meds and they call the police and the police end up choking, tasering or shooting the crazy ass relative. If blacks were really scared of the police they wouldn't be hopping in front of news cameras yelping about police brutality, cuz they'd be scared the police would take care of the witnesses. Black people are scared of black people and they are right to be, black people are scary.

Zenster said...

Breaking news from Mark Madden:

Sandusky allegedly pimped out boys to wealthy donors.

Let's see of the donors' names are ever brought to light. Any bets?

[crickets]

Netzach said...

mr_evergreen,

"I initially started posting because I thought I could offer something different. I needed to show a different side of things. I had a different view(still do) on things. I've quickly learned otherwise."

Let me clue you in about the one general truth about debates, especially those on Internet. Of course you do all you can to convince those arguing against you, but they're not the real prize, since they usually won't change their minds. The real prize are the listeners, the lurkers. They usually don't have as strong convictions as those who actively debate. They won't "lose" when changing their minds, either, a mentality which I must say I find a bit baffling. If someone shows me he has found a less flawed approximation of truth than mine, then I win when I replace mine for the better version, right? Sure, he won the debate, but he didn't leave it better off.

Anyway, if you actually wanted to have a shot at convincing other debaters, coming here and openly stating you're black wasn't exactly the smartest move. As this site attracts people who are, for one reason or another, bitter and angry towards blacks, it automatically earned you plenty of distrust and hostility. Not to mention that a lily white guy like me would get hard time for using your arguments.

"My question is: Where am I needed?"

As Zenster said, the obvious answer is black ghetto. It might not be what you want, though, and it's not an easy path. Certainly you should pick the neighbourhood very carefully, since some are simply beyond redemption as well as deadly dangerous, and prepare to take flak for "acting white" (black version of being DWL, so to speak).

Of course, you've been willing to spend time arguing on a WN blog about things, so clearly you have pretty thick skin and willingness to do things to better the lot of US blacks. You might have what it takes.

Zenster said...

Netzach: If someone shows me he has found a less flawed approximation of truth than mine, then I win when I replace mine for the better version, right? Sure, he won the debate, but he didn't leave it better off.

The debate's winner also leaves better off. They have refined and polished their forensic skills by yet another measure and this makes them even more competent at doing one of the most difficult things there is; changing another person's mind.

To your own credit, you have enough wits about you to realize that adopting a more sound version of reality is a personal win no matter what.

Unfortunately, many people exhibit "intellectual materialism" to the point where they become so attached to previously held beliefs that no amount of factual evidence will pry them loose from their cherished notions.

Charles Martel said...

@Netzach "As this site attracts people who are, for one reason or another, bitter and angry towards blacks, it automatically earned you plenty of distrust and hostility."

For one reason or another? The reasons are too numerous to list.

Bitter? More like frustrated at the lack of improvement in the mahogany community. This comes from their unwillingness to change anything and their continued reliance on the "White Man ruined everything, I'z a victum." defense.

Angry? Sure. You bet your ass. Angry about every crime, theft, beating, robbery, death, murder, kidnapping, rape and everything else ever shoved down Americas throats by these ungrateful goons.

The real problem is that there aren't enough people angry about all of this, yet. But that day is coming. When it arrives, I hope you find your balls and sew them back on in time. If not, find a whistle and blow it hard enough so that somebody that knows how to fight will come help you.

Mr. Rational said...

If I hadn't seen this cluelessness with my own eyes, I never would have believed it.

Up above, I told mr_evergreen

you can only enjoy your night-time strolls because your neighbors are White people who call the police, not the Black Undertow who practice "no snitching". The police presence and questioning is required to keep both them and you safe from criminals, who are overwhelmingly "people of color".

Yet long after he should have read and assimilated this, the ever-disingenuous (or just clueless-because-Black) mr_evergreen again bleated a question which I had already answered for him:

Here is my question: Why is it whenever decent Black people moving to a predominantly White area, the criminals often follow those Black people, the very Black people who sought to escape criminal behavior?

Stupid Black (but I repeat myself)!  They go to White neighborhoods for the same reason you do:  life is better where Whites and White norms rule.  But, as you lament, wherever Blacks are allowed to go without ruthless discrimination by content of character, Black criminality follows Blacks as inevitably as night follows day.

But most tellingly, he said this:

Black people don't snitch because they are afraid to die. Why else do alot of Black people who can afford it often leave their neighborhoods for safer neighborhoods?

This has been explained to you many times before.  A  Whites flee Black criminality and predation.  B  Blacks who can afford to move use "civil rights" law to move to the functional areas populated by fleeing Whites.  C  Black criminals follow other Blacks and use them as cover to prey on Whites.  Lather, rinse, repeat.  Since you don't understand this despite several people explaining it to you in different ways, I can only conclude that you are stupid.  You have internalized the fixed rules of spelling and grammar by repetition, but reason (fluid intelligence) is beyond you.

If you had a clue, you wouldn't complain about police making certain that you are not a Black criminal out at 2 AM.  Those police, and the White people who call them when they see you out in the wee hours, are the only thing between you and the Black criminals who want to follow you.  But, as I said, you are too stupid to understand this.

Had you a clue, you would thank White people for everything you have.  Sadly, if you tripped and fell face-first into a clue, you'd get up and walk away while complaining about your unfortunate experience.

Anonymous said...

"At most it is a quasi intellectual site for racist propaganda, and as is typical of most propaganda, the people who readily consume it are in no shape to actually discuss its meaning or confront the untruths behind it."

These black people who keep having to have standard deviations and kurtosis explained to them to no avail always fall back on this argument that anything they don't agree with is quasi intellectual.

ANYONE who holds an advanced degree know the extent to which black people are blindly coddled in academia, even awarding them degrees in political agendas like Black Studies.

To Howard, Freeman, Evergreen, here is our argument: blacks have different genes from the rest of humanity. Their behavior is vastly different from the rest of humanity. Poor white people do not commit the same level of crime as blacks.

Your argument is: blacks' behavior is due to white racism. You have no argument however as to why Asians or Latinos don't seem to suffer from the same racism. Whites should do more placate blacks.

Which is the more quasi intellectual position?

Californian said...

Let me clue you in about the one general truth about debates, especially those on Internet. Of course you do all you can to convince those arguing against you, but they're not the real prize, since they usually won't change their minds. The real prize are the listeners, the lurkers.

Yes!

And this is why it is critical that bloggers such as PK provide fact based information.

And for other posters to continue to post the stats on inter-racial crime, median IQs, illegitimacy.

And for still others to post about conditions in black run countries such as Zimbabwe.

You hammer home on the truth long enough, and more people will accept it. And will begin to realize how the system has been lying to them. And will start taking political action.

(Here's an interesting thing: back in the days of the old South Africa Sucks website, they had a map posted showing where the people logging on were located. There were people from as far afield as Afghanistan. The internet is a revolutionary means to reach global audiences. Keep up the good work, SBPDL!)

Zenster said...

Californian: And this is why it is critical that bloggers such as PK provide fact based information.

A resounding second to that motion. It is what truly distinguishes SBPDL from other race reality web sites that are overrun with hatred and racial slurs. The facts serve our ends in a far better manner.

And for other posters to continue to post the stats on inter-racial crime, median IQs, illegitimacy.

Among which you continue to shine like a beacon of intellectual honesty.

And for still others to post about conditions in black run countries such as Zimbabwe.

There is little other reportage that is more convincing than accounts from sub-Saharan Black run utopias. It is a damning indictment of Black Run Africa that Robert Mugabe continues to steal oxygen from far more deserving lifeforms like scorpions, lice and cockroaches.

You hammer home on the truth long enough, and more people will accept it. And will begin to realize how the system has been lying to them. And will start taking political action.

I appreciate your optimism and will do my best not to quell it. Unfortunately, we are fighting the Big Lie™ in an era where lies are much easier to swallow than the truth. As the old saying goes:

Better the ugly truth than a beautiful lie.

Again, sadly, the MSM is so adept at prettifying the most horrendous lies that there is an uphill climb before us of Everest proportions.

Fortunately, we are equipped with the most reliable climbing gear known; the truth. In combination with this incredible apparatus known as the internet, our goal is much closer than it otherwise might be.

There is no irony in the fact that the internet was invented by a bunch of White guys. This one tool may well be that which helps most to preserve White culture from the ravages of unlettered and computer illiterate savages.

Keep fighting the good fight, Californian.

Netzach said...

Zenster,

"The debate's winner also leaves better off. They have refined and polished their forensic skills by yet another measure and this makes them even more competent at doing one of the most difficult things there is; changing another person's mind."

Depends. For both the debate has no doubt been good practice, but often it's the loser who has greater incentive to look with critical eye upon his own performance. The only prize that the winner almost certainly wins is that of having demonstrated his intellectual superiority to others. I suppose this explains why pretty much all the people who really love debating for its own sake are males. These days you got to do something more sophisticated than beat others to show off to females and express social dominances over other males (unless you're boxer or something of course).

It's not like I haven't done some fairly extensive contortions to avoid giving the impression of losing a debate myself, but to lie to myself would be just... weak.

Charles Martel,

"Bitter? More like frustrated at the lack of improvement in the mahogany community"

Well, bitterness is much like chronic frustration without hope of things getting better. Kind of like the relationship between anger and hatred.

"The real problem is that there aren't enough people angry about all of this, yet. But that day is coming. When it arrives, I hope you find your balls and sew them back on in time. If not, find a whistle and blow it hard enough so that somebody that knows how to fight will come help you."

Maybe the day is coming. Maybe there's still time to solve these things in a civilized way. We'll see. I have my hopes and preferences, but it's not like they matter at all. As it is, I know the basics of using a gun and associate with some fairly serious enthusiasts each of whom owns several pieces. I loathe unnecessary or excessive violence, but I'm not particularly tenderhearted, either. I'm not too worried about myself.

Even if the day comes, though (God forbid), I won't go around beating my chest. I'll just do what I find necessary, whatever it is.

Mr. Rational said...

Maybe there's still time to solve these things in a civilized way.

I am all for rounding the mobs up at shotgun-point and hanging them publicly after conviction, with trials using rules of evidence, etc.  But if the mobs won't submit to arrest, deadly force on the spot is effective.

jeffwong said...

Wow, this blog is racist. I just landed on this blog from the current Paterno post, saw the FAQ, prepared myself with an open mind, "I might see things that appear to be unreasonably racist". But that's OK. I can sympathize with the idea cramming a foreign language down your throat for the sake of standardization and then "simplifying" the writing system— a policy that simultaneously tramples over tradition and makes it harder for the diaspora to communicate with our compatriot minorities, even when they get out! Also, we all moved to places where we are the minority and we still get marginalized by the Northerners when invade our communities. Mixed race couples always cause a bit of discomfort because you can see the beginning of the end of the culture.


Anywho, this argument that Joe Paterno is suddenly black because he didn't report a crime because he didn't want to help The Man is ridiculous and only makes it hard to take you people seriously.

The facts of his background make for logical associations, without all the metaphor acrobatics.

1. He's Italian. That means he is probably Catholic.

2. Even if he wasn't, he grew up in Brooklyn and probably knew a lot of Catholics and was probably influenced by the Italian Catholic culture.

3. The capital city of man-boy rape is in the HEART of the capital of Italy, which is also the capital of the Empire that Italians can brag about being descended from.

4. The Catholic Church has successfully survived the pedophile scandals so far. Moving pedophiles away from their current boy-sexing territory might contain the complaints and maintain their reputations.

5. You can't really say that Paterno is fighting The Man because he was The Man. And as far as Pennsylvania is concerned, he was practically God. If he had called the cops, they would be the first to talk about how to set things up so that Paterno would look good. Odds are high those prosecuting this case themselves admired Paterno growing up.

Oh also, the blacks aren't too happy even with legitimate adult homosexuality. (see California Prop 8)

Anonymous said...

Here's another anecdote about Paterno I haven't seen mentioned here. In 2000 Penn State's black quarterback, Rashard Casey, was charged with assualting a white off-duty cop (apparently because the cop was with a black woman). What really happened was never clear, but Paterno refused to bench Casey while the case was ongoing. I'm a Penn State alum but I've never forgotten the way Paterno pretended that Casey was a "good kid" and there was no reason to keep him off the field.

Discard said...

Seems to me that the premise of this article is pretty far fetched. Being silent when you ought speak out doesn't make you Black.