Thursday, March 22, 2012

The Kerner Report as Blueprint for Black-Run America (BRA)

It's time to reject the Kerner Report
The days of democracy in the Black metropolis of Detroit are dwindling, denoting a truth that pierces the heart of the esteemed Walter Williams theory that liberalism is at fault for the failure of Black people. Portland, Austin (Texas), Boulder (Colorado), Silicon Valley (California), Seattle, and Burlington (Vermont) all thrive while they have the same progressive liberalism that Williams believes is the root cause for the collapse of Black-run cities like Philadelphia, Cleveland, and Detroit.

But these Stuff White People Like (SWPL) run cities aren’t mismanaging hundreds of millions of dollars in state grants over a 20-year period; they aren’t having their credit rating downgraded by Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investor Services; no, they are some of the nicest places in America to live, in spite of the overwhelming whiteness and liberalism found in these cities.

In Detroit, the most homogenous big city in America (89 percent Black – at it’s height in 1950, it was 80 percent white), the state of Michigan is on the verge of repossessing the city:
A state-appointed review team unanimously agreed Wednesday that a "severe financial emergency" exists in Detroit and that some form of a consent agreement is necessary, but did not recommend a specific plan.
 The Rev. David Murray, a former Detroit school board member, said he feels sorry for the state panel because they are being used. 
"It's a racist attack. I don't care what color face they put in front of us," the Rev. Murray said. "We don't want a review team (or) a financial manager. We want our money. I'm asking if you will stand up against this tyranny and resign."

What money? Detroit lost all of its wealth-producing tax-base after the 1967 Rebellion, when 10 percent of Detroit’s 500,000 Black population joined in the five-day riot that cost the lives of more than two score people, convincing the white citizens that it was time to evacuate the city.

Since, Detroit has limped along via generous federal grants to sustain a city where the sons and daughters of those who comprise the majority of the police, fire fighters, civil servants, city employees, and government officials produce the lowest standardized test scores in all of the nation.

This is what happens when you have an entire city whose political power is entirely in the hands of Black people, with massive affirmative action policies in place since the early 1960s replacing actual merit-based hiring.

One need only look at the student’s performance in Detroit Public Schools (DPS) to get a glimpse of the intelligence of those actually running the city’s government and in charge of sustaining the economy.

But why was all of this allowed? Why is all of this tolerated? The Detroit Riot of 1967 (described proudly as an “insurrection” or “rebellion” by the Black residents against the occupying white political establishment, though Black people were the ones who colonized the city via wave after wave of The Great Migration and eventually forced whites out because of high levels of crime) was one of hundreds of Black uprisings in the 1960s, largely due to the perceived police brutality the Black communities in cities with nearly all-white police forces faced.

The reason for this extra-scrutiny: Black people were the ones, just as now, committing the vast number of the crimes:

Throughout December 1960 and January 1961 both the Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News focused heavily on “black crime.” The News reported, for example, that although “blacks con- stituted 26 percent of the city’s population, they were responsible for almost 65 percent of serious crime.” The paper also blamed African American leaders and their communities for not doing enough to stop crime.

When white cops (95 percent of cops in Detroit were white in 1967) raided a speakeasy in late July 1967, Black people in Detroit protested the incursion of law into a lawless part of their neighborhood.

"This is a racial incident... it represents one simple thing: black people want control of black communities,” the Rev. Albert Cleage, a Detroit religious leader proclaimed.

Well, Rev. Cleage got his wish; white people ceded power to Black Detroiters by voting with their feet. Now, the state of Michigan wants Detroit back because Black people defaulted on Martin Luther King’s dream. They have been judged by their collective inability to display quality fiduciary character (the average credit score in Detroit is 619) in administering the budget and maintain the infrastructure of the first major American Black metropolis – thankfully built by white people who only needed a riot and continued high rates of Black criminality to convince them all to leave.

But what keeps people from admitting the true reason for the failure of Detroit, and instead has them blame “liberalism” when this same ideology is practiced and espoused by the primarily white citizens of Boulder, Colorado as they walk down the pristine avenue of Pearl Street?


Why does Walter Williams continue to blame “Liberalism” for the failure of Detroit, when other cities flourish under the same political mindset?


To state otherwise, that the Black citizens of Detroit are responsible for the fate of the city, would invalidate the official mission of the United States of the America since the smoke was still clearing in The Motor City in 1967.

Lyndon B. Johnson, having already spent billions to improve the lives of Black people in major cities throughout the nation, commissioned a report on the root cause of the Black riots that swept America in the 1960s.

The Kerner Report.

To understand why we live in what we have dubbed Black-Run America (BRA), the starting point for researching why Black people’s failures (especially why the complete collapse of Black-run Detroit) must never be blamed – and their choices, actions, decision, and thinking - on them can be traced to this one document.

What does the Kerner Report actually state?:
“This is our basic conclusion: Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white – separate and unequal. Reaction to last summer’s disorders has quickened the movement and deepened the division. Discrimination and segregation have long permeated much of American life; they now threaten the future of every American.”

The future for every American is jeopardized because of the existence of what we call BRA; to continue to live under the delusion that Black people aren’t responsible for their actions threatens the future competitive nature of the United States, because of the misallocation of trillions of tax-dollars to fight so-called “white racism” as the fundamental cause of Black failure. This is what the Kerner Report blamed Black failure upon:

Despite the complexities, certain fundamental matters are clear. Of these, the most fundamental is the racial attitude and behavior of white Americans towards black Americans. Race prejudice has shaped our history decisively; it now threatens to affect our future.
 White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been accumulating in our cities since the end of World War II. Among the ingredients of this mixture are:  1.  Pervasive discrimination and segregation in employment, education, and housing, which has resulted in the continuing exclusion of great numbers of Negroes from the benefits of economic progress.
2.  Black in-migration and white exodus, which have produced the massive and growing concentrations of impoverished Negroes in our major cities, creating a growing crisis of deteriorating facilities and services and unmet human needs.
3.  The black ghettos where segregation and poverty converge on the young to destroy opportunity and enforce failure. Crime, drug addiction, dependency on welfare, and bitterness and resentment against society in general and white society in particular are the result.

 The document offers the blueprint for which our entire society has been based upon, going so far as to blame undesirable nature of the jobs available to Black people as the cause of poverty (instead of their intellectual ability, when the current vocations with the highest rate of Black employment 43 years after affirmative action went into overdrive to promote Black people above their station include barber, postal worker, taxi driver, and bellhop); blaming slavery and long periods of unemployment for the “Negro” family structure to be more matriarchal; and the criminality found in Black areas completely on poverty.

How many more cities must we lose?
From the ashes of American cities, the fires started by Black people upset that white police dared focus extra-attention on their communities because of higher rates of crime found within, spawned this report which findings still permeate throughout every level and operation of both the public and private sector life.

In 1988, The New York Times published an expose on how progress had been made to curb that white racism which was to blame for Black kids throwing bricks through windows and looting businesses all across the nation (burning them to the ground after absconding with stolen goods):

The National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, headed by Gov. Otto Kerner of Illinois, blamed ''white racism'' for the ''continued polarization'' of American society, and argued that only a ''compassionate, massive, and sustained'' Government effort could reverse the overall trend. 
Cleveland and other American cities show the mixed record that has been compiled over the two decades. The worst-case prognosis of the Kerner report - the division of American into separate but unequal societies - has not come about, but the general direction predicted by the report and the stubborn persistence of the race problem in America have endured.
 Black progress is a difficult thing to measure, particularly in the current paradoxical situation, where some succeed as entire communities descend deeper into failure. But among the ingredients of change most often noted by scholars is the extraordinary increase of black political power, in Congress and other parts of the Federal Government and especially in the major cities.About 300 cities, including many of the nation's biggest, have black mayors. The Rev. Jesse Jackson is a serious Presidential candidate. Mayor Andrew Young of Atlanta was the United States representative to the United Nations under President Carter. Representative William H. Gray 3d, a Pennsylvania Democrat, is chairman of the important Budget Committee.


Those big cities that Black people became mayor of have all largely collapsed (outside of Denver).

The New York Times would publish another article that relied heavily on the finding of the fabled Kerner Report to explain the Los Angeles Riots of 1992:

One of the report's most famous and controversial findings was its conclusion that: "White racism is essentially responsible for the explosive mixture which has been accumulating in our cities since the end of World War II." 
To some critics, the emphasis on racism, in both the report and the national civil rights debate, has obscured the degree to which the answers to the problems of the ghettos must come from within. 
"The assumption was that white America was the problem and therefore white America was the solution," said Robert Woodson, a black who heads the National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise in Washington, which calls for conservative, self-help solutions to inner-city problems. "It set up the proposition that the destiny of black America rested with what white America did." 
Representative Gary Franks of Connecticut, the only black Republican in Congress, said welfare dependency, crime and drugs are far more of a threat to the urban poor than white racism.

The destiny of America rests in the hands of the continued application of the findings of the Kerner Report or the outright rejection of them. It is Black individuals choice to take drugs, became a welfare dependent, or commit a crime; not the looming specter of white racism or slavery.

Black people were victorious in the 1967 Battle of Detroit, with white people fleeing the ashes of their city and awarding the Black rebels (colonizers would be the apt word) with the keys to “The Paris of the West” their parents and grandparents helped build.

It is in the decaying remnants of that city, one whose infrastructure that Black people were incapable of sustaining – even after they achieved total political power – that we see the fallacious nature of the Kerner Report findings.

But political power didn't translate into economic success. 

Brick by brick that falls to the ground in neglect while Black people complain of persistent racism for the failure of Detroit under their control is demonstrative that the Kerner Report got it wrong.

Completely wrong.

America has been held hostage by Disingenuous White Liberals and Black Rage (think Organized Blackness) for too long. To abandon the official position of the American government as delineated in The Kerner Report, which ascribes all Black failure to the legacy of white racism and slavery, would represent a complete capitulation to the reality that the past 44 years of attempted social programming to the deny that nature does trump nurture would represent an event on par with the collapse of the Soviet Union or the Cultural Revolution in China.

The dogma of equality dies with the fall of Black-run Detroit.

The Kerner Report acted as a shield to hide the truth that nature consistently throws back in our face with each report of racial disparities in any measurable test (save the 40-yard-dash for NFL skilled position players).

Had Detroit flourished in the absence of white people and under the august and benevolent rule of Black people, we’d have to conclude the Kerner Report was correct. Blaming barriers to education, housing, and employment all died when the city became more than 80 percent Black in the 1980s.

Black people should have flourished economically without the impediment of white racism keeping them from reaching their potential; the only thing that flourished in Detroit post-1967 Rebellion was Black crime.

But the city did not.

Democracy dies in Detroit, with the impending appointment by the state of Michigan of an emergency manager to preside of the budget of “The Mogadishu of the West.”

Not only Democracy dies, but the Kerner Report has been invalidated.

The legitimacy of BRA has always been through the voluntary belief that eventually Black people would succeed; for BRA to continue, millions of people will have to be involuntary forced to believe this now.


59 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey Paul,

II apologize for deviating a bit from your post.

Do you remember that video made by Alexandria Pelosi demonizing god fearing Republicans in Mississippi?

It turns out she decided to interview a few folks standing outside the welfare office in NYC.

Yeah, you know what to expect.

Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFeAFDh6dzk

PS - George Zimmerman was found with a bloody nose and grass stains on his clothing, a convenient fact that media leaves out. Oh yeah, Trayvon Martin was 6'3 and almost 18 years old too.

I really don't understand why Steve Sailer shifted the blame completely unto Zimmerman. It could be due to his "Citizenism" ideology, since Zimmerman was Hispanic.

Sailer: http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/03/trayvon-martin-rip.html

MuayTyson said...

As you have said Paul, black people love being black this means they also love black behavior and pathologies. White people especially DWL have no idea how the black mind functions it is low I.Q plus lack of impulse control.

I guess for a White person to feel like a black person you would have to have a heavy addiction of some sort and attended an Aerospace conference. This way you could simultaneously be drawn to destruction and feel extremely stupid all at the same time. Best analogy I could think of.

One thing that blacks are no ignorant of is emotional manipulation and they know exactly how to play to the Liberals emotions.

Anonymous said...

"PS - George Zimmerman was found with a bloody nose and grass stains on his clothing, a convenient fact that media leaves out. Oh yeah, Trayvon Martin was 6'3 and almost 18 years old too."

I'm sorry I failed to provide a source to this claim.

Here ya go.

Source: http://www.examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/zimmerman-was-on-the-ground-being-punched-when-he-shot-trayvon-martin

Anonymous said...

Detroit is a failure of liberalism--a failure to allow Detroit to fail.

Everything liberals do is an assbackwards, top-down approach to reality. They are the proverbial man who builds his house on sand, in this case, the sand being black people and their 80 IQ.

Californian said...

Once again, a hard hitting article. And you make a point which is rarely considered in public discourse--in fact, SBPDL is the first place I have seen it made: that it is not liberalism which made Detroit fail but rather the people who now constitute its citizenry.

I have a copy of the Kerner Commission. Interesting document, largely liberal ideology, but at least it was written in the late 1960s when liberals could argue that segregation was still a recent phenomenon (though one wonders how much segregation there was outside of the Deep South). Perhaps they could genuinely hope for a better future if only the government implemented the right policies.

Anyway, here we are in 2012, with half a century of liberal social engineering under America's collective belt. And what has been the result? Well, the results are well described on SBPDL and other websites, no need to repeat them in this post.

DWLs refuse to face the realities: either their programs for blacks failed, or blacks themselves failed. I've made this point with DWLs, and the usual response is something along the lines of: "There were 500 years of slavery-segregation-apartheid so it will take many more years to have true equality in America." i.e., when confronted with an unpleasant reality. DWLs respond with an ideological argument.

There's also a subtext there insofar as long as we have inequality in America (or anywhere else), we will need DWLs as a permanent managerial class for the welfare state, as well as controlling the media to ensure all citizens think proper thoughts re race.

The level of unreality gets greater every year, matching the level of pathologies which are to be found in cities such as Detroit. It's a race to oblivion.

Californian said...

...an event on par with the collapse of the Soviet Union ...

I was in Eastern Europe following the Fall of the Berlin Wall. When I discussed why communism collapsed, the most common answer was that people got tired of having to tell lies all the time. Telling the truth started with little things such as the samizdat underground press and eventually worked its way up to millions of people in the streets and squares.

There's an equivalent of the samizdat today, the Internet as well as every other manner of social media. The foundations of the DWL fortress are built on mighty fine quicksand. It's a question of how many people it would take to shout out the truth before that fortress collapses.

Something to consider...

Anonymous said...

We want our money.

That line is the funniest thing I've read all week. Your money? Don't you mean money extorted from the supposedly evil, white racists?

If he was honest, he would have said: "we want their money". As in, put your hands up, this is a stick-up.

Lily White said...

The irony is rich and inescapable: White people are to blame for every ill, real or imagined, suffered by any black person anywhere in the universe, merely by virtue of our existence. But when white people pack up and leave ("White flight"), we are to blame for all black problems and woes everywhere due to our ABSENCE. DWLs and blacks continue this drumbeat year after year with straight faces, and then scratch their heads in puzzlement that they aren't taken seriously by those of us who are paying attention.

YIH said...

I CAN SEE.
I used to buy into the DWL BS that black ''people'' can be just like Humans, yet as Detroilet keeps proving, they are not.
I've never accepted the ''animals=humans'' meme the so-called ''animal-rights'' idiots keep pushing.
Is as the ''animal-rights'' idiots keep saying, ''A boy is a monkey is a chicken is a rat''.
No, (sorry Zenster) but every religion makes a distinct demarcation between Humans and animals.
Paul, a Wolf roaming around CO, can get a dog in CO pregnant.
With fertile offspring. I used to know someone that bred ''wolf-dogs'', the offspring (would they be called 'puppies' or 'cubs'?) knew that wolves and dogs are quite different.
Yet they are genetically compatible, not unlike the parents of President Obama.
Even if it is ''Obamney'', I will vote 'NO' for Obama.
Even if it does not make any difference.

Anonymous said...

Governor Otto Kerner was so corrupt that he was actually sent to prison.

Anonymous said...

Walter Williams' rants against liberalism are from the perspective that the liberal mindset in terms of egalitarianism and integration have failed the black community. Walter Williams, being one of the black community's "talented tenth", grew up in an era when segregation kept a lid on the black community, kept it intact and kept it somewhat prosperous. Segregation also subtly conveyed the point that white people in the separate white world were capable of producing and being things that blacks weren't. And blacks didn't bother trying to be either. Segregation was reality. Liberalism tried to turn segregation on its head and its preachy egalitarianism attempted to make black people feel that they too could be astronauts, nuclear physicists, biochemists and the next Einstein, if it weren't for "conservatives" and "segregation" holding them back. Now, thanks to liberalism, we have a society full of angry blacks who think they should (or could) have been an astronaut, a biologist or a nuclear physicist if it weren't for "damn white people" holding them back.

map said...

Like the article, but you have one serious mistake: Boulder, Portland, Austin and other cities that you listed are not liberal cities.

They are not liberal because they have very few blacks.

The ideology of liberalism is the ideology of black empowerment. Where there is no black empowerment, there is no liberalism.

Blacks should be moved to these areas as quickly as possible.

So CAL Snowman said...

Another solid article PK. It's always funny to watch the Libs squirm when you bring up the fact that Detroit is 89% Black and about as functional as Mogadishu. According to Critical Race Theory and Liberals everywhere, Detroit should be launching space ships into low Mars orbit now that all those nasty white racists are gone and no longer keeping the bruthas down.....I wonder what went wrong?? Oh yes the SCHOOLS failed the kids! The same schools that turned out engineers, doctors and scientists for decades suddenly, somehow mysteriously failed. NEVERMIND the demographic changes (shhhh shhhh nothing to see here move along move along).

Slightly OT but I noticed that the article mentioned one ANDREW YOUNG.

"Mayor Andrew Young of Atlanta was the United States representative to the United Nations under President Carter"

Now here is a REAL piece of work. This Andrew Young was INSTRUMENTAL in putting Robert Mugabe into power and permanently sealing Zimbabwe's fate. I find the fall of Rhodesia and the rise of Zimbabwe to be absolutely fascinating and Carter and Young bear almost ALL responsibility for this massive failure. Check out this very good piece of journalism if you are interested in an honest, but slightly DWL assessment of what went wrong in Rhodesia. (Once the facts start rolling in the DWL bias drops)

How Tyranny Came to Zimbabwe

"It was not altogether unreasonable to protect the interests of the white minority, as the functioning of the Zimbabwean economy depended on the skills of educated whites who, by the late 1970s, were fleeing the country at the rate of 1,000 per month. To understand what sort of fate might befall a Rhodesia conquered by Marxist rebels, one had only to look to the former Portuguese colonies of Mozambique and Angola, which, when overthrown in 1975 after the fall of the Caetano regime a year before, witnessed the immediate mass emigration of Portuguese citizens (about a quarter of a million from each country) and the collapse of those nations' economies"

Benson said...

Who is George Zimmerman?

Anonymous said...

A bit off-topic, but I think Nashville just got Detroit-ed

http://cofcc.org/2012/03/unspeakable-hate-crime-in-nashville/

Anonymous said...

Sailer quotes from his 2009 review of Mad Men:
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/03/bad-men-new-pornography.html
While watching Mad Men, Weiner affords us ample opportunity to congratulate ourselves on how much progress we’ve made. For example, most of the black characters in Mad Men have servile jobs. Today, of course, things are infinitely better. Black men are seldom seen in servile jobs (unless they are African immigrants or gay). In fact, black men aren’t seen in any jobs as much anymore: ten percent of black men were out of the work force in Don Draper’s 1960 versus 24 percent in booming 2000. Indeed, black men aren’t even seen at all as much anymore because a million are now locked away in prison. (The incarceration rate of black male high school dropouts was one percent in the Bad Old Days of Dwight Eisenhower’s last year in office versus 25 percent in Bill Clinton’s glorious finale.)

IT'S TIME said...

SBPDL: Why haven't you posted my last two comments? I posted on two different articles and you posted niether.

Anonymous said...

BRA: Black Run-down America

W74 said...

"We don't want a review team (or) a financial manager. We want our money. I'm asking if you will stand up against this tyranny and resign."

"Hello Revered Murray, this is the Bank of the White Taxpayer calling. How're you doing today?"

[Murray shaking in his $300 preacher's Nikes] "Uh yesssuh, fine! Juss fine! Thank yah sah"

"Uh, yes lets cut to the chase. Reverend it seems like your city and your people haven't been paying their debts."

"WHAT! Preposterous! Why Mein Obama and Mr. Ben SHA-LOM Bernanke just the other day said dey'd be crankin' up da printin' presses again. We be gittin' you dat cash in no time once they give it to us."

"No what I mean sir, Rev. Murray, is that BofWT doesn't forsee any way for you to repay your debts or to work or create anything of value to be able to do so. This bank is not in the business of giving out more loans to repay old loans."

"I saiiiiiiddddd....Ben.....Sha.....Lom.....Ber....Nan....Ke. Don't dat mean nuffin' to you Mr. Banker?"

"No, no sir it doesn't. You see we're solvent over here. Our people create wealth and maintain it. We only make good loans."

[Shakes again]

"....We're.....Going to have to cut you off Reverend." [click]

"Nooooooooooooo..........!!!!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Let the Riots round two begin. [ding ding]

Anonymous said...

CNN has two articles trending heavily titled, 'why blacks don't trust the police' and 'what every black mother fears' -maybe slightly off on the titles. The comment sections have been overrun by 'people who can see.' Actually a quite refreshing start to the weekend.

YIH said...

Some Canadians CAN SEE:
Want a liquor licence? Ban rap and hip hop first, Quebec bar told.
Money quote: ''Having already run Le Pionnier with her husband in the 1980s and ’90s, she said she’s surprised how much influence police now wield when it comes to the operations of bars.

“I feel the police . . . they’re stepping out of their bounds,” she said.''
Wrong. Lady, they know what time it is, and if a bar caters to the kind of ''people'' that are attracted to (c)rap and (world star) hip-hop they are going to have much busier and more dangerous jobs.
And who can blame them for wanting to avoid that?

Anonymous said...

It looks like Obama is going to get involved in the Trayvon Martin case. Chris Krok, a radio host on 570 KLIF, has speculated that Obama is going to use this case as an excuse to enact tougher gun laws.

Krok did a show on the Trayvon Martin shooting earlier this week. He tried to be fair and present both sides of the story and he mentioned George Zimmerman's injuries (which were consistent with Zimmerman's claim that Trayvon had attacked him and that he shot him in self-defense) and some of the 911 calls from Zimmerman and from the other neighbors about Trayvon's suspcious behavior. He also mentioned that Zimmerman was Latino (not white, as had been erroneously reported elsewhere). It was amazing how many of the callers (many of whom said they were black) wanted to lynch Zimmerman and insisted that Zimmerman must have shot Trayvon because he was a racist.

YIH said...

Filming a (c)rap video.
In Killadelphia,
What could possibly go wrong?
And not only is it allowing comments (without having to go through Farcebook) most of the commenters CAN SEE!

Anonymous said...

Liberals run on faith, pure, unadulterated faith with no substantitaion whatsoever. Aparteid and segregation in themselves are not racist because each group would have the right to their own schools, restaurants, pools, shops, etc. I go as far as to claim that integration is racist because it assumes that blacks won't be able to produce what we have.

Anonymous said...

Refering to Obama's recent comments:

If Obama had a son, he would look like a Gay Steve URKEL!

IT'S TIME said...

Whenever I visit sbpdl I have to say it stresses me out. I come here to read others viewpoints, always finding that they usually line up with my own.

Everytime I leave sbpdl my mind contemplates how this country got into this mess. I am 40. A lot of the bad changes that happened to this country, happened while I was a child.

So I've started researching to find out "who voted for what?" "When did this get started?" and "who was in office when....."

So far I've found that in 1969 the National Black Caucus was founded--another group that is no longer needed and should be disbanded. Here is an excerpt of info I found on Nationl Black Caucus:

"White membership

Over the years, the question has arisen, "Does the caucus allow only black members?" Pete Stark, D-CA., who is white, tried and failed to join in 1975. In January 2007, Josephine Hearn reported in Politico that white members of Congress were not welcome to join the CBC.[8] Freshman Representative Steve Cohen, D-TN., who is white, pledged to apply for membership during his election campaign to represent his constituency, which is 60% African American. Hearn further reported that although the bylaws of the caucus do not make race a prerequisite for membership, former and current members of the caucus agreed that the group should remain "exclusively black." Rep. William Lacy Clay, Jr., D-MO., the son of Rep. William Lacy Clay Sr., D-MO., a co-founder of the caucus, is quoted as saying, "Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. He's white and the caucus is black. It's time to move on. We have racial policies to pursue and we are pursuing them, as Mr. Cohen has learned. It's an unwritten rule. It's understood." In response to the decision, Rep. Cohen stated, "It's their caucus and they do things their way. You don't force your way in." Clay issued an official statement from his office:


Quite simply, Rep. Cohen will have to accept what the rest of the country will have to accept—there has been an unofficial Congressional White Caucus for over 200 years, and now it's our turn to say who can join 'the club.' He does not, and cannot, meet the membership criteria, unless he can change his skin color. Primarily, we are concerned with the needs and concerns of the black population, and we will not allow white America to infringe on those objectives.

On January 25, 2007, Representative Tom Tancredo, R-CO., spoke out against the continued existence of the CBC as well as the Democratic Congressional Hispanic Caucus and the Republican Congressional Hispanic Conference saying, "It is utterly hypocritical for Congress to extol the virtues of a color-blind society while officially sanctioning caucuses that are based solely on race. If we are serious about achieving the goal of a colorblind society, Congress should lead by example and end these divisive, race-based caucuses."[9]"

So, is it just me, or should a lot of noise been made by our leading congressmen when this type of information was made public? Why did they look the other way? They are the ones elected to represent us. The guy that tried to join should have taken it all the way to the Supreme Court--but he didn't. Why?

Its the people that have been in Washington for years that are responsible for what is ultimately coming. And its the backbone of America that will ultimately pay the price.

Anonymous said...

Another Black on Black Killing. Where is the outrage? Blacks are racists and liars.

Man killed during Philly rap video shoot
http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=8591805&cmp=fb-wpvi-article-8591805

YIH said...

This just in:
Remember when Whitney Houston died we heard ''we wont disclose the cause of death until after the toxicology report''?
Well the results are in, it's what Charlie Sheen calls ''tiger blood''.
Her greatest (and final) hit (off the crack pipe).

Zenster said...

Lily White: The irony is rich and inescapable: White people are to blame for every ill, real or imagined, suffered by any black person anywhere in the universe, merely by virtue of our existence. But when white people pack up and leave ("White flight"), we are to blame for all black problems and woes everywhere due to our ABSENCE.

Welcome to the world of functional cognitive dissonance where such hypocritical and self-contradictory mental masturbation is passed off as gospel.

Thoroughly imbued with Cultural Marxism, DWLs and, to a lesser degree, Blacks think nothing of using the Zero Sum Game as a gold standard. If the Whites succeeded, it had to be due to what they stole from the Blacks, be it physical labor or the natural resources of their native lands.

In the grand tradition of blaming the real victim (and not the professional one), Whites who abandoned urban cores were blamed for taking away wealth. It is as if those who did not create any wealth were somehow deserving of it anyway. Which is exactly how many Blacks feel and also remains a core Marxist doctrine; as in "redistribution of wealth".

The violent and predatory nature of most Blacks prohibits them from looking beyond the zero sum game of gaining by appropriating (stealing, actually) the work or possessions of another. Finding the win-win solution requires a measure of future time orientation that consistently eludes the Black mind. It is a simple matter of projection that Blacks, therefore, view all success by others as somehow deriving from their collective loss. An abiding sense of entitlement and "gibsmedat" mentality are the logical consequences of such a worldview.

With DWL's it s a far more complex situation and one that largely derives from Magical Thinking™. However, there is also an ongoing subtext of insecurity and angst related to a fundamental evasion of guilt over not transmitting moral values their children and each other that drives much of Liberal pathology.

Thus, the denial of DWLs is of a much higher order than what amounts to sheer ignorance in most Blacks. Yet, the result remains largely the same. Devastating delusions of adequacy and a false sense of justification based on subjective emotional content instead of rational perception.

Zenster said...

YIH: I've never accepted the ''animals=humans'' meme the so-called "animal-rights" idiots keep pushing.
Is as the "animal-rights" idiots keep saying, "A boy is a monkey is a chicken is a rat".
No, (sorry Zenster) but every religion makes a distinct demarcation between Humans and animals.


Why are you apologizing to me? I've never said anything to the contrary an am a staunch opponent of giving animals Constitutional rights.

Curious that you should mention wolf-dogs as my own wolf hybrid, "Zen" (hence my screen name), just passed away the other week, a few days after his 14th birthday. He was nothing but an intelligent, sweet natured and good tempered creature that despised ill mannered dogs.

None of which ever permitted me to think of him as a surrogate child as so many Liberal loons are wont to do.

90404 said...

offtopic...more divisiveness from BHO:
CBS News) President Obama spoke out for the first time on Friday about the fatal shooting of an unarmed 17-year-old African-American boy in Florida named Trayvon Martin, calling it a "tragedy."

"I can only imagine what these parents are going through," Mr. Obama said from the White House Rose Garden, "and when I think about this boy, I think about my own kids, and I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together, federal, state and local, to figure out how this tragedy happened."

Mr. Obama said he is glad the Justice Department is investigating the shooting and that Florida Gov. Rick Scott formed a task force in response to the incident as well. The president suggested he was sympathetic to suspicion that the shooting may have been racially motivated.

"You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Mr. Obama said.

"All of us have to do some soul-searching to figure out how does something like this happen," he continued. "And that means that we examine the laws and the context for what happened as well as the specifics of the incident."

Mr. Obama was asked about the shooting on Friday during an event at which he announced the nomination of Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to be World Bank president.

Martin was shot in Sanford, Florida, nearly a month ago after a confrontation in a gated community with a neighborhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman.

Zimmerman maintains he shot Martin in self defense, and a Florida self-defense law has so far let Zimmerman remain free. But Martin's girlfriend, who was on the phone with him when it happened, says Zimmerman was the aggressor. Before he shot Martin, Zimmerman called 911 and told an operator an unfamiliar African American was in the neighborhood. The 911 operator told Zimmerman to stop following him.

In spite of the ongoing investigations, outrage over the incident continues to grow.

Martin's mother Sybrina Fulton said on "CBS This Morning" on Friday that she wants Zimmerman arrested. Thousands of people rallied in Sanford on Thursday to push for his arrest, and lawmakers on Capitol Hill have also decried the fact that Zimmerman remains free.

Democratic Rep. Frederica Wilson of Florida took to the House floor on Wednesday to call for justice for Martin, calling the incident "a classic example of racial profiling quickly followed by murder."

After Mr. Obama commented on the shooting today, the Martin family released the following response:

It is humbling that President Obama took time from his busy schedule to talk about Trayvon and offer the support of the Department of Justice and other federal organizations.

The President's personal comments touched us deeply and made us wonder: If his son looked liked Trayvon and wore a hoodie, would he be suspicious too?

We'd like to thank the President and the millions of people from around the world who have shown their support for Trayvon by participating in hoodie marches, rallies or through social media. We are all working together to not only get justice for Trayvon, but also to ensure that this kind of senseless tragedy doesn't happen to another child.


Stephanie Condon

Stephanie Condon is a political reporter for CBSNews.com.

617 Comments +

Anonymous said...

"The worst-case prognosis of the Kerner report - the division of American into separate but unequal societies - has not come about"

Only because of the abject illegality of segregation. Were that to change, our country would have white flight in addition to the old system. The Economic integration made possible in the past is gone, and the black community is largely hosed at this point, regardless of who started it.

It is a shame that the Kerner Report authors and their families were not required to live in their racial paradise.

90404 said...

offtopic..............

left is having a field day...
President wants less racism:

msnbc.com - ‎4 minutes ago‎

Martin's slaying rivets nation!

Washington Post



First in breaking news and analysis: Msnbc.com reporters and NBC correspondents bring you compelling stories from across the nation.
Related Trayvon Martin » George Zimmerman » Neighborhood watch »
Harvard Square protest mounted over Trayvon Martin shootingBoston.com
Trayvon Martin's slaying rivets nationWashington Post
From Florida:President Obama: Trayvon Martin case a 'tragedy'MiamiHerald.com
Opinion:Why black people don't trust the policeCNN International
Wikipedia:Shooting of Trayvon Martin

Anonymous said...

OT but you really need to see this political cartoon to see how warped the liberal mind is on the Trayvon Martin case...

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-trayvon-martin-20120322,0,5521159.story

Midwestern said...

Heather McDonald
Cincinnati Riots 2001

http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_3_what_really_happened.html

Anonymous said...

"we be lootin' fo trayvon ana sheeit"

It's clear Zimmerman will be exonerated, but the liberal media has whipped the niggers up, so how bad will it be if no charges are filed ? rodney king lived, oscar grant was a thug and most knew it was accidental, but treyvon was an innocent skittles eating young blak man kilt by a rassisst yt wanna be cop and he gots no justice from the rassisst popo. I can see the ows clowns taking up the cause, maybe it will be integrated looting, but the ows hippies will soon find that they are out matched by the niggers. liberals would love to see whites looting along side the niggers, it would show whites are just as bad as niggers, proving that we are all equal. It might be hard to predict the timing, you know the state is afraid of the niggers, so they might prolong the process so the niggers lose interest, but the niggers might launch some preemptive looting, not waiting for an official announcement of no charges filed, so keep on your toes!

Benson said...

Zenster on March 23, 2012 11:30 AM

Sorry for your loss. Losing a beloved pet is no small thing. :(

POST MFers said...

White racism, huh? Who knew? Now that Detroit is free from the racism, who is to blame? Rewarding unorthodox behaviors is what led to the mess. Rewarding unrestrained breeding is what causes it to expand. Excuse making for aberrant behaviors, indigence and violence, make those behaviors sacrosanct. The report was right in this respect - we do live in two America - one where no criticism is valid or tolerated. The other is expected to finance, absorb the societal costs, forfeit advancement and other professional opportunities, tolerate their families and property exposed to physical violence, and STFU... or else there are punishments.

Eustace Mullins said...

ZOMG whoever posted this thank you!

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/22/man-killed-during-philly-rap-video-filming/#content

I won't quote the small article out of copyright concerns, but a man in an amateur rap video filming got shot in front of 100 people.

Then he got run over by a car fleeing the scene.

Hiliarity ensued. He daid.

Fucking geniuses. I wonder if they were going to be pilots like Trayvon, too?

I love how the photos of the 'milllion' hoodie march don't show that it was the hundred something hoodie march.

There seriously is nothing they can do right in western society, except destroy it. They're nature's wrecking crew.

They never advanced past the stick age because they simply cannot manage more than that.

It's a disservice to them, and to us, to have them in a society they have no chance of competing in.

Magnifico said...

Zenster,

Off topic, I too lost our family pet beagle this Monday, her name was Puchi. A ten year old beauty of a creature. She loved to chase the lizards we have here in south Florida. Now, I no longer have a night watchman. Bad timing.

Artist said...

If BHO were smart he'd keep his powder dry on the Trayvon/Zimmerman episode. No good for BHO can come of this. Something will go wrong for him. I don't know what that will be, but it's inevitable it will cost BHO.

At the same time we need to fear the direction this thing is going to take. It could spin out of control at any moment anytime anywhere. Elements of BRA are ready to boil over. There will be blood.

The push against guns and self-defense is going to be intense. Just think about it, a push against self-defense. They are against your most basic right to preserve your life and health. The DWLs and allies want you to be totally helpless when payback time comes.

Those of us who can see come here to SBPDL, and the other sites who report the true news, and marvel at the slaughter that takes place every day and every week. Where is Sharpton and Jackson, BHO and Holder on all the other days? Killing is so common it is not remarked upon. Now we have this unfortunate thing and people are about to explode. Instead of confronting the massive crime and dysfunction amongst our privileged (BRA) class, the MSM, the race hustlers, the DWL establishment is freaking out about our racist society waging open deadly war vs. blacks. As if every day white guys are hunting down blacks and lynching and shooting them.

It always cracks me up when they talk about “an honest discussion about race”. If any non-black ever tried to tell the truth to a room full of do-gooders do you think you’d get to your car safely? Truth? We’re so far from truth in this world, at least the First World, that we’re all forced to live a huge fantasy.

-----------

A tip to “It’s About Time” and her request for info about who led us to this pass. Get two books. Dineesh DiSouza’s “The End of Racism”. In it you’ll learn of the connection between the father of modern sociology Franz Boaz and the people who founded the NAACP. You’ll see where it started.

Another great book is Thomas Sowell’s “Vision of the Anointed”. It was written a long time ago, in the late 80s I think. It describes the various fronts the cultural marxists have attack on. Much of it describes the rise of the “crisis strategy”, made famous by Rahm Emmanual’s quote “don’t let a crisis go to waste.” The chilling thing about Sowell’s is how long ago it was written. The enemy has pushed the front forward greatly sine the book was published. In fact, to use military terms, they have pushed the front forward to the point that the perimeter has been breeched and we’re flanked and encircled.

Who would have thought 21 years after the fall of the USSR that we’d be such a rotten termite infested edifice that is ready to implode?

-----------

In other news a bunch of BRA types went to Geneva in an attempt to have foreign observers come to “observe” our election. Talk about traitors, talk about selling the entire nation out! This is a step to having foreign troops on out soil. Yet, no one is upset.

Zenster said...

Benson and Magnifico, thank you both very much for your sympathies. Zen was a remarkable animal, half pure wolf and half Siberian husky, at 70 pounds he resembled nothing so much as a half-size white Arctic wolf.

He is sorely missed and each strand of his fur that I find around the house (on a nearly continuous basis, as any husky owner will tell you), blurs my vision.

Magnifico, please accept my sincere sympathy on the loss of your own little pal. The Scottish Sir Walter Scott said it best:

I have sometimes thought of the final cause of dogs having such short lives and I am quite satisfied it is in compassion to the human race; for if we suffer so much in losing a dog after an acquaintance of ten or twelve years, what would it be if they were to live double that time?

The misery of keeping a dog is his dying so soon. But, to be sure, if he lived for fifty years and then died, what would become of me?


― Sir Walter Scott ―

90404 said...

Paul....will a MILLION Hoods march? or riot?

Anonymous said...

Detroit mayor still in hospital as city financial deadline nears

Looks like Mayor Bing is sick n sheeit. End of BRA Detroit. Great leadership.

formerly no name said...

Curious that you should mention wolf-dogs as my own wolf hybrid, "Zen" (hence my screen name), just passed away the other week, a few days after his 14th birthday. He was nothing but an intelligent, sweet natured and good tempered creature that despised ill mannered dogs.

Have to comment that purebred dogs of that size generally only live (at best) to about ten years. This is no doubt due to the immune systems being compromised by too much inbreeding. IN addition some breeds (e.g,Bulldog, Pug, Neapolitan) are selectively bred to be be deformed and physically incapable of what a normal dog should be able to do.

I don't know the cause, but my six-year old purebred Siberian is already slowing down radically. She doesn't like more than perfunctorily walks and has stopped
running altogether. Two trips to the vet and all the relevant tests have turned up nothing. But I did put her on a low-cal diet.

P.S. Some people may not know that wolves and dogs are now considered the same species.

Anonymous said...

I have just watched the 11PM edition of chanel 6 action news and Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia (a black man out of Villanova) has claimed Trayvon a victim of assassination.I'm dumbfounded. When college educated blacks start bearing false witness and making false accusations like Mr. Nutter, it is time to stop the carousel.What the mayor said is a hate crime.
In light of all this hate speech going on, I would like to say at least for myself that a Disingenuous White Liberal is an incorrect description for these people.They are totally sincere in their depravity. I can keep the acronym and still call them what they really are; Disillusioned White Liberals.

Kylie said...

"...some breeds (e.g,Bulldog, Pug, Neapolitan) are selectively bred to be be deformed and physically incapable of what a normal dog should be able to do."

Yes, many bulldog bitches cannot free whelp. My bulldog drools so much that her chin is permanently broken out in a rash from always being wet (like diaper rash). I wipe her muzzle many times each day.



My bulldog did this at 2 y/o. Eventually we discovered he had a condition afflicting big-boned breeds: elbow incongruity. We caught it too late for corrective surgery to be done but managed to ease his discomfort with nutritional supplements and pain pills.

So I take it your vet has ruled out any joint problem. A dog can have that without limping and often dogs don't show pain as we do, they just slow down.

Kylie said...

Zenster: 'Curious that you should mention wolf-dogs as my own wolf hybrid, 'Zen' (hence my screen name), just passed away the other week, a few days after his 14th birthday."

I'm truly sorry, Zenster. I always dreaded losing my dogs. When it happened, it was even worse than I'd anticipated. I won't say I know how you are feeling; everyone grieves differently. But I know it must be very hard for you right now.

I didn't know your screen name is based on your dog's name. "Kylie" is the name of my bulldog.

Mr. Rational said...

On the Internet, nobody knows you're using the name of your dog.

Anonymous said...

Who would be so cruel as to name his dog "Discard"?

Zenster said...

Kylie: So I take it your vet has ruled out any joint problem. A dog can have that without limping and often dogs don't show pain as we do, they just slow down.

My vet, a genuinely noble soul, made a complimentary house call and even performed a cursory diagnosis of osteosarcoma (bone cancer), before euthanizing Zen with an overdose of phenobarbitol. Twenty seconds later, surrounded by friends and neighbors who loved him, Zen was beyond all suffering.

That he was so kind as to ensure my never having to wonder if Zen had any chance of surviving is a gesture of such astounding kindness that I cannot doubt why I have recommended my vet to, literally, hundreds of pet owners.

I can only be thankful that Zen went relatively quickly. He started to limp around Christmas and three months later was at the end of his rope. Before then, he lived a life of incredibly robust health and for that I am eternally thankful.

Imagine the coincidence of my neighbor across the street, who always took loving care of Zen while I was overseas, using the same vet. It comes as no surprise that she should hold him in the exact same esteem.

Zenster said...

Anonymous (3/23, 2012 9:14 PM): In light of all this hate speech going on, I would like to say at least for myself that a Disingenuous White Liberal is an incorrect description for these people. They are totally sincere in their depravity. [emphasis added]

This has become so apparent that I have been forced to conclude that Liberalism is a pathological form of mental disease.

Anonymous said...

the kerner report was made by Otto kerner ONE OF FOUR GOVENERS SENT TO FED PRISON FROM ILLINOIS.

Discard said...

Zenster: I have met leftists who are simply filled with hatred and cynicism, and those who are purely elloi, born prey for whatever predators may pass by. Both kinds are shocking when you realize that they are serious.
An example of the second type: He was on a canoeing trip in the Southwest, and found himself confronted by a snarling mountain lion. He shouted, and his comrades came to his rescue with...an emergency air horn! They chose to arm themselves with an overgrown rape whistle, rather than something that could, if the sound was insufficiently frightening, kill an attacker. These people were fully domesticated, ready for the slaughter.

Kylie said...

"I have been forced to conclude that Liberalism is a pathological form of mental disease."

Same here, Zenster. I think it's an extreme form of narcissism. I say that because I don't know of a single left-winger who doesn't take great pride in being morally, intellectually and culturally superior to those in the center and on the right. They are really really invested in their belief system.

It's not just that liberals hold views that make no sense at all; the smugness and condemnation are part and parcel of their peculiar belief system. The great amount of psychological and emotional satisfaction they get from their faith (and that's what it is) is what makes them so unwilling to relinquish it, even when confronted with inarguable facts.

This is why I see no point in Paul posting the comments of liberals. He wouldn't post the ravings of person with an untreated psychiatric disorder or the ramblings of someone delirious with fever. We already know how deluded liberal thinking (if you can call it that) is. And there is no point in replying to liberal comments, either, because you can't get anywhere countering feelings with reason or fiction with facts.

The only effective course of action regarding liberals I can think of is a policy of containment or exclusion.

Zenster said...

Discard: Zenster: I have met leftists who are simply filled with hatred and cynicism, and those who are purely eloi, born prey for whatever predators may pass by. Both kinds are shocking when you realize that they are serious.

In reality, they are two sides of the same self-destructive coin. Those who are "filled with hatred and cynicism" are usually Whites who typically direct those negative feelings towards other Whites in what can only be called self-loathing or self-hatred.

The Eloi types amount to nothing but a form of unilateral disarmament. A moronic proposition at best and a fatal one at worst. The axioms of nature are ignored by them as in:

The miracle of life is that it relies upon death.

Peace is most often obtained through war.


These grim realities are often too unpleasant for them to consider at length. In their aversion they blinker themselves and enter a state of tunnel vision on whose periphery the very worst elements can lurk undetected. All of us learned this the hard way in believing that Islam was the religion of peace [spit] until a fateful day in September of 2001.

Liberals, with their Pollyanna-like presumption of light and goodness everywhere, effectively bare their necks to the blade of evil. The ensuing slaughter is just a matter of opportunity and timing.

None of which would be so bad were it not for the way that Liberals are not satisfied with how they themselves are being sacrificed. All and sundry must fling their bodies along with them upon the pyre of their pseudo-morality.

Long ago Ayn Rand detailed this self-immolation in her writings and it is nothing but a polite and more socially acceptable form of cannibalism where the roasted flesh is daintily foresworn by those who hurl it to the ravening Morlocks.

Zenster said...

Kylie: Same here, Zenster. I think it's an extreme form of narcissism. I say that because I don't know of a single left-winger who doesn't take great pride in being morally, intellectually and culturally superior to those in the center and on the right.

I agree completely. You are spot on to identify narcissism in that Liberal ideology is so internalized in feelings and narrative instead of reason. Liberals are the political version of vegans. One wonders if vegans refuse to kiss so that they take no chance of swallowing another person's saliva.

They are really really invested in their belief system.

Regardless of how often Liberals denigrate religion, they just as frequently exhibit an even greater degree of blind faith in their own beliefs. While they will never admit it, this is out of sheer necessity as their entire ideology is largely based in Magical Thinking™.

It's not just that liberals hold views that make no sense at all; the smugness and condemnation are part and parcel of their peculiar belief system.

I would venture that is because their entire moral construct is so notional that, when challenged, their only recourse is to shout down or dismiss any disputation of their position. This is a common feature which all of us have witnessed in how Liberals almost instantly resort to name calling and insult during any debate.

Rationality and logic only make cameo appearances in the Liberal narrative and their limited walk-on roles are strictly for the purpose of propping up what is otherwise, too often, an incoherent utopian vision.

The great amount of psychological and emotional satisfaction they get from their faith (and that's what it is) is what makes them so unwilling to relinquish it, even when confronted with inarguable facts.

Exactly, nearly all of their psychological, moral and spiritual (if not physical), capital is invested in the Liberal cause such that the slightest questioning of it represents nothing short of a physical assault upon them.

This is why I see no point in Paul posting the comments of liberals. He wouldn't post the ravings of person with an untreated psychiatric disorder or the ramblings of someone delirious with fever.

Here I must disagree. It is vital that newcomers to SBPDL see the Liberal viewpoint deconstructed via reason and logic. Without such instructive demonstrations SBPDL would risk becoming an echo chamber like so many other over-moderated sites are. Little Green Footballs is a perfect example of what happens when opposing viewpoints are deemed heretical.

We already know how deluded liberal thinking (if you can call it that) is. And there is no point in replying to liberal comments, either, because you can't get anywhere countering feelings with reason or fiction with facts.

On rare occasions you can, but it will frequently turn out that you have encountered that rara avis, a Classical Liberal. Other than that, you are absolutely right about how so much of Liberalism is based in feelings. It's why Liberals become so defensive and are so ready to lash out when confronted with the unreality of their beliefs.

The only effective course of action regarding liberals I can think of is a policy of containment or exclusion.

Long ago there was the practice of "shunning" and that sort of social censure is sorely needed in terms of discrediting modern Liberalism.

Thank you for contributing such a great comment, Kylie. It's really enjoyable to dissect the opposition and its delusions of adequacy.

Discard said...

Kylie, Zenster: The value in arguing with leftists (They're NOT liberals) is not in convincing them, but in convincing uncommitted onlookers.
Yes, I know, I say this at least once a month.

Zenster said...

Discard: Kylie, Zenster: The value in arguing with leftists (They're NOT liberals) is not in convincing them, but in convincing uncommitted onlookers.

Yes, I know, I say this at least once a month.


Keep on saying it, brother. I'll gladly sign on to your viewpoint. Even honest Liberals should have more brains than the typical Leftist.