Monday, August 13, 2012

Ain't that America

Towns/Cities that are 90 percent or more white: targeted for destruction by feds and DOJ
A forgotten story has resurfaced, courtesy of a nudge from a story published in the Daily Mail that had the provocative headline, Connecticut town which is 94% white 'deliberately kept ethnic minorities out by denying them housing benefits' (Hugo Gye, August 7, 2012):
A town in Connecticut deliberately tried to keep out non-white residents from settling in the area, according to a lawsuit. 
Winchester, a rural town with a population of just 11,000, is 94.4 per cent white, and official statistics show that it contains no African-American families. 
The lawsuit launched last week argues that town officials directed housing subsidies to white families to avoid an influx of ethnic minorities.

The Winchester Housing Authority is charged with distributing federal funds to low-income households to enable them to afford the cost of housing. 
The authority is responsible for administering the benefit in Winchester and 16 surrounding towns, according to the Courthouse News Service. 
To be eligible for a grant, families must already be resident in one of the 17 communities. 
Since the towns are 91 per cent white, this requirement 'systematically and unlawfully' discriminates against ethnic minorities by making it unaffordable for them to settle in the area, according to the Connecticut Fair Housing Center. 
The organisation further argues that, as the programme does not allow families to move to Winchester, it is 'ensuring that overwhelmingly white communities remain overwhelmingly white'. 
If the challenge to the WHA is successful, it could open the door to more legal challenges to any subsidy programme which is open only to a community's existing residents. 
'These requirements are unlawful because in communities with populations that are disproportionately white and/or non-Hispanic they perpetuate segregation by excluding minority applicants who live outside those communities from obtaining housing there,' the lawsuit says. 
The Fair Housing Center has been joined in its legal battle by Crystal Carter, an African-American single mother of six who was denied the chance to apply for a housing subsidy by the WHA.
The federal government actively pursues a policy known as the "The Detroit Option": every city that has  a working government, high property values, thriving business district, quality school system, and an abundance of social capital and trust between the residents of said community (axiomatic that such a community would be over 90 percent white) must be targeted for diversification.

The federal government operates under a general operating procedure that assumes that anything being "too white" is inherently evil. In this case, the city of Winchester. Instead, the goal of the federal government is to dilute that social capital created by the 94 percent white residents of Winchester, with the same type of individuals who turned Detroit into the laughing stock of the civilized world (hint: Black people).

The sordid tale of Winchester's despicable whiteness that must be legally stamped out by the United States government jogged my memory regarding a the story of New Berlin in Wisconsin, whose citizens dared believe they lived in a nation where freedom of association still existed, and worse, one where the federal government actually cared about protecting the property rights (and property values -- the only important function of ANY government) of its citizens.

What happened in New Berlin in 2011? The AP Reported on June 24, 2011 Feds sue New Berlin for racism:
The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit alleging New Berlin city officials caved to pressure from their largely white community by deciding not to build low-income housing that could attract more black families. 
The mayor and other city officials voted in May 2010 to allow the construction but reconsidered following an immediate backlash from the community, according to federal prosecutors. Their lawsuit was dated Wednesday and released Thursday.
Messages left with Mayor Jack Chiovatero and City Attorney Mark Blum were not immediately returned. 
New Berlin is about 15 miles southwest of Milwaukee. The city’s website quotes 2000 census data that say about 96 percent of the city’s 38,000 residents are white. 
The lawsuit said MSP Real Estate Inc. of St. Louis Park, Minn., submitted an application in March 2010 to build 180 units of affordable housing in New Berlin. The units would be designated for low-income workers and seniors, and rents would be below market rate. 
The city Department of Community Development recommended that the application be approved. A few days later the city planning commission, of which the mayor is a member, voted 4-3 to approve the general application. 
Over the next few weeks, city officials were inundated with emails and phone calls, the majority of which voiced opposition to the project, federal prosecutors said. 
“Some of the opposition was based in part on fear that the prospective tenants would be African American or minority,” the lawsuit said. 
The communications included references to crime, drugs and gangs, and some included the N-word, according to court documents. 
The mayor also received threatening phone calls at home, his car tires were slashed, his car windows were shot through, and a sign reading “(N-word) lover” was placed in his yard, the lawsuit said. 
About two weeks later the mayor asked the planning commission to let him reconsider his vote, saying he was concerned about certain parking waivers included in the original approval. 
From that point, according to a chronology detailed by prosecutors, the commission sought reasons to deny the MSP project even as the developer argued that it had resolved or could resolve each issue raised. 
Both sides appeared to reach a compromise in January, and a modified project was given tentative approval. However, the Common Council blocked the compromise.

Coerced by the federal government to build low-income housing (which imports all problems associated with those who live in low-income housing to a virtually all-white city where those problems don't exist), the city of New Berlin saw construction begin on these Fair Housing Act-mandated units in September of 2011.

On April 12, 2012, the federal government (under the watchful eye of Attorney General Eric "My People" Holder") settled a suit with the city of New Berlin:
The U.S. Department of Justice says it has settled a lawsuit with the City of New Berlin that alleges race discrimination in connection with a planned housing project.
A New Berlin planning commission denied a project for a housing unit in the city's center. 
The federal lawsuit claimed that opposition to the project came partly from "racial stereotypes and fear that the project's tenants would be African-American," according to a Justice Department statement. 
The suit also said New Berlin followed public opposition and barred "affordable housing in the city center in its future." 
In the settlement, the city said it would adjust changes it made to zoning requirements, provide at least $75,000 for a housing trust fund, create a Fair Housing Outreach Plan and pay $5,000 to the U.S. Government. 
"The City continues to deny any liability or fault with respect to the allegations made by the Department of Justice," said New Berlin Mayor Jack Chiovatero in a statement.
Here's the press release sent out by the United States Department of Justice, which seeks to turn every city in America into Detroit circa 2012:
The Department of Justice announced today that it has settled its lawsuit against the city of New Berlin, Wis., for race discrimination in violation of the Fair Housing Act.
Filed in June 2011, the lawsuit alleged that the city of New Berlin blocked a 180-unit affordable housing project that a developer, MSP Real Estate Inc., had proposed for the city center area of New Berlin. The city’s planning commission initially approved the project, but reversed course and denied it weeks later, after hundreds of residents objected to it. The suit alleged that opposition was based partly on racial stereotypes and fear that the project’s tenants would be African-American. The lawsuit also charged that the city, in response to public opposition, changed its zoning and land use requirements to bar affordable housing in the city center in the future. 

Shortly after the United States filed a motion for preliminary injunction requesting that the court order the city to allow MSP’s affordable housing project , the city agreed to issue the necessary permits to allow MSP’s affordable housing development to be built. The settlement, filed today as a proposed consent decree in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, requires that the city not take any further action to obstruct or delay the affordable housing project. It also requires that the city take affirmative steps to provide for future affordable housing, communicate its commitment to fair housing and establish a mechanism to ensure open and fair housing in New Berlin.

As part of the settlement, the city agreed to modify changes it made to its zoning and land use requirements following public opposition to allow for future additional affordable housing in the city center. The settlement requires the city to provide a minimum of $75,000 to establish a Housing Trust Fund, which will finance projects that promote affordable housing, residential integration and equal housing opportunity. In addition, city officials must develop a Fair Housing Outreach Plan to encourage tenants and developers of affordable housing to come to New Berlin, appoint a fair housing compliance officer, and undergo fair housing training. It also provides for a $5,000 civil penalty to be paid to the United States.

“It is important that people have a choice about where they live and are not excluded from communities because of their race. This settlement makes clear that we will take action against municipalities that violate the law by blocking affordable housing developments not for legitimate reasons but to exclude people based on race,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Division. “Through this innovative settlement, the city of New Berlin will create greater housing opportunities for the people in the Milwaukee area.”

“The lodging today of the proposed consent decree is tremendously important not only for all of the residents of the Greater Milwaukee Area, including those in the City of New Berlin, but also represents the department’s commitment to ensure that the fair housing laws of our nation are enforced fairly and observed uniformly,” James L. Santelle, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. “All Americans benefit from the many positive consequences of providing affordable housing in our communities, including diversity within our populations and enrichment of the lives and livelihoods of our citizens.”
Your average piece of property in Detroit (90 percent Black population out of roughly 700,000 residents) was $11,000. The entire city is "affordable housing" -- just as the DOJ states, "All Americans benefit from the many positive consequences of providing affordable housing...."

Ain't that America?

84 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ironic that the ad which precedes the video shows a very upper income bespectacled black guy in front of his large suburban house, holding his two babies, trying to get into his BMW with his keyless entry.

Yeah, we see that all the time.

Baldowl said...

“Some of the opposition was based in part on fear that the prospective tenants would be African American or minority,” the lawsuit said.
That's a lie, of course. The opposition was based entirely on the knowledge that all the tenants would be African-American. Nobody wants to live around blacks. Not even blacks want to live around blacks.

Anonymous said...

New Berlin? Been there and it is a nice community. Funny that you can have communities that are approaching 100% black but have a 94% white community and there is a conniption fit from the racists in the federal government. Looks like multiple standards exist and white folks long term existence is threatened. Wondered about all of the blacks holding government jobs and how well that would work out. Why isn't the government held to the same hiring standards as are commercial entities?

SomeGuy said...

Africans in America are annoying (okay, violent and vile) hanger-ons. Their motto should be "How dare the whites not invite us!" I just do not understand this pathological insistence that wherever whites go, blacks MUST follow or it is automatically racist.

If we have a colony on the moon and the requirements are healthy, extreme intelligence, and lots of money, I'm sure they'll find some way to put a ghetto on the satellite as well, all in the name of diversity. The continued pressure to include them in every single part of white life is proof enough that they are parasites, hanging on for dear life so they can get fat and happy. Yet you'd never hear anyone of their hew admit that this is the case.

I'm so fucking tired of blacks don't have this and blacks don't have that, blacks are victims because of this or that. I simply cannot wait until the dollar collapses and their pathetic community reverts to their natural ways: pillage and loot, just like hunter-gatherers.

Musashi said...

Yeah, blacks are so wonderful that the government has to force non-blacks to live near them.

So CAL Snowman said...

So this lawsuit basically criminalizes thought! How can anyone prove WHO the residents of the new housing project will be (unless of course certain people were hand picked in advance - but that would NEVER happen right?). It's funny because the DOJ is actually saying some inferred racially insensitive things. They are basically calling all black people poor and unable to live in white communities without help.

"It is important that people have a choice about where they live and are not excluded from communities because of their race. This settlement makes clear that we will take action against municipalities that violate the law by blocking affordable housing developments not for legitimate reasons but to exclude people based on race,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Division."

A town such as Winchester, Conn. is a VERY EXCLUSIVE and WEALTHY town. There are not very many jobs or work opportunities, especially for a single mother of 6. This embarrassment to humanity wants to live in Winchester? Well guess what so do a LOT of other people. This bullshit about people having a choice about where they want to live is nauseating. IF they had the money they could live where they wanted to! Christ if everyone could just pick and choose where they wanted to live what does Mr. Perez think would happen? SUCH BULLSHIT! Little Quantifilladallius and Jose should absolutely get to live in a gated Manhattan Beach community right on the beach because that's THEIR CHOICE. To exclude them would be racist. What we need is more low income housing on the beach and definitely in Aspen, Lake Tahoe, Mammoth Lakes, Breckenridge, Vail, and Mt. Snow.

Anonymous said...

Ironically, this may kill BRA.

DWL bullshit only works when blacks live counties, towns, and stated away.

Connecticut Abolitionists: welcome to the hell you unleashed.

Anonymous said...

Love the commercial at the beginning of the vid. Bootlip buck carrying two obviously mixed-race sprogs to his brand new luxury car in a leafy suburb.

Niggers: They're just like us, but better. Grab one today!

Phalluster said...

What's funny to me is that these maligned Negroes will only receive 45% of the class action settlement. The other 55% of white taxpayer largesse will go toward the lawyer fees of their thin-lipped fellow minority.

Anonymous said...

So. Cal. Latinos keep blacks out of their neighborhoods. In fact they are displacing and ethnically cleansing Compton which was predominantly black. No cops, no judges, no lawyers, no lawsuits and no 'Latino Flight' involved.
The blacks who violate the designated areas are harassed and/or killed.

Porter said...

If we could but only defeat our implacable enemies in Tehran or Damascus or Pyongyang, our people's future would be secured.

I suppose that statement sounds logical on talk radio or National Review. But of course our mortal foes and their redoubts lie within our own open borders. New York, Hollywood, and above all Washington...delenda est.

Zenster said...

The organisation further argues that, as the programme does not allow families to move to Winchester, it is 'ensuring that overwhelmingly white communities remain overwhelmingly white'.

Oh, the huge manatee!

How have these people ever managed to survive while being deprived of all that vibrant, enriching dieversity?!?

The settlement, filed today as a proposed consent decree in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, requires that the city not take any further action to obstruct or delay the affordable housing project. It also requires that the city take affirmative steps to provide for future affordable housing, communicate its commitment to fair housing and establish a mechanism to ensure open and fair housing in New Berlin.

Too bad New Berlin's attorneys didn't have enough brains to insert a clause mandating that, as part of this settlement, the federal government provide compensation for all property damage, declines in property value, hospital bills related to increased criminal activity, victim's restitution and rehabilitation, increased demand for social services, overtime by emergency services plus whatever other escalating capital outlays which result from being desegregated at federal gunpoint.

Robert S. Oculus III said...

Dear residents of Winchester and New Berlin:

GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN

Don M said...

Took a little interwebs stroll over to the Connecticut Fair Housing Center's website and checked out the staff page.

More than half of these bastards have Juris Doctors from Ivy League schools!

After the last bit of butane ran out of the last disposable lighter while igniting a blunt, the animals wouldn't even be able to make the fire to cook each other with without our civilization.

And yet some of the best and brightest of our society devote themselves to helping the animals pull down every last vestige of a technologically advanced society?

When the time comes, save your ammunition on these bastards, they get the cold steel instead...


Anonymous said...

And people ask why Governor Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door...

fnn said...

“All Americans benefit from the many positive consequences of providing affordable housing in our communities, including diversity within our populations and enrichment of the lives and livelihoods of our citizens.”

What did the libertarians (snort) have to say about this obvious violation of libertarian principles?

Anonymous said...

This is about the deliberate, systematic destruction of the fabric of our communities...nothing less. It is an evil, nefarious plot hatched by dedicated leftists to erase any borders that might become a dividing line in a future conflict. How can you band together and block off a bridge when the people right next door are fighting for your destruction? Any area that you might wall off is already riddled with the cancer that will eventually prevail. I believe that this is the greatest threat civilization has ever faced...greater then both world wars, the bubonic plague, fall of Rome, etc...As they multiply exponentially and we shrink in the same manner, things will get much, much worse!

rjp said...

This stuff has to be built though to destroy any remaining America that exists.

There is only one option for the residents of New Berlin.

Burn the development down as it goes up. Make it unprofitable to build these shitholes in small close-knit communities. They start rebuilding, light it up again. Rinse and repeat. MSP will lose their insurance after enough claims. And the job will be done.

MuayTyson said...

I would love to see a study about these fucking block busting programs.

I grew up in small town PA we had the other side of the tracks but no section 8. About 10 years ago section 8 was built. Before this the town and surrounding towns had the number of blacks you could count on 1 hand. After section 8 more and more blacks started being seen. Not all the blacks lived in sect. 8 some where just boyfriends and baby daddies.
The first murder I am aware of happened a few years ago drug problems started to grow as did the domestic violence.

Thank you Section 8 with out you my little town had none of that wonderful diversity.

Tyrone shoelaces said...

Unincorporate the city. Start a new town in a year or so and do it all under the table. Apply for no federal anything. Eff them


The government over control of the people and markets results in black markets and secret rules.

Anonymous said...

Just a matter of time before every corner, every neighborhood, every aspect of our lives is taken over by these fucking nignogs.

Anonymous said...

According to Wikipedia, New Berlin CT is 39% Dem, 37% Ind. and 24% GOP. Their congresscritter is John B. Larson (D).

Serves them right.

bubo said...

James L. Santelle, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. “All Americans benefit from the many positive consequences of providing affordable housing in our communities, including diversity within our populations and enrichment of the lives and livelihoods of our citizens.”

Pure comedy.

I wonder what the racial makeup of Mr. Santelle's neighborhood is?

I wonder if he is being enriched by section 8 blacks roaming through his neighborhood looking for victims?

Anonymous said...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/06/winchester-housing-discrimination-minorities_n_1747777.html?ir=Business

Huffington Post has lots of choice comments on this. This hits the bleeding hearts where it hurts (home values)

UK Daily Mail article doesn't mention this inner city welfare mama with 6 keeds via X number daddies demanded that Winchester mail her a section 8 voucher. This lo-IQ breeder of 6 lo-IQ keeds was put up to this by some white lib lawyers no doubt

How soon before this gets on the Jerry Springer type shows

Anonymous said...

So it ain't enough to have Hartford, East Hartford, New Haven, East Haven, New London, Orange, Bridgeport, Waterbury, Thompsonville, New Britain, etc.? You gotta have this tiny town too!!!!???

Anonymous said...

Want to bust out of the ghetto wid yo six illegitimate spawn? Nationwide sec 8 rentals

http://www.gosection8.com

SomeGuy said...

Tyrone Shoelace has the right idea.

Anonymous said...

' Anonymous said...

Ironic that the ad which precedes the video shows a very upper income bespectacled black guy in front of his large suburban house, holding his two babies, trying to get int'
where? I looked at clip 2x

10mm AUTO said...

"If we have a colony on the moon and the requirements are healthy, extreme intelligence, and lots of money, I'm sure they'll find some way to put a ghetto on the satellite as well, all in the name of diversity. The continued pressure to include them in every single part of white life is proof enough that they are parasites, hanging on for dear life so they can get fat and happy. Yet you'd never hear anyone of their hew admit that this is the case."

Never. Space is for Whites. As Heinlein noted, The stupid or evil will have an "Accident" with their suit, or their pressure engineering, or their atmo mix, or the Airlock door controls. There are too many ways to get killed in space. If you are a bad neighbor (the very definition of a negro) it is too easy for an engineering accident to just happen, much more so if your neighbors, nursing their raped daughter, find a way.

Oh, speaking of Negros and Elderly White rape, a Bad one:

http://www.wsmv.com/story/19156283/woman-84-raped-husband-94-savagely-beaten-inside-home

It's excuse? "I didn't do nuffings!"

I don't have an answer to this one Paul. Winchester was trying to go under the radar after they finished your books. They probably all voted you Honorary Town Councilman and were determined to keep the town from being "Detroited". The only other answer if for the townsfolk to make it so unpleasant for groids to be there that they move, like the Latinos do.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here....About a year ago I saw something on the internet about the government doing the same thing in the San Francisco North Bay area. Some shit heads had decided that Marin County was to white. How that ended I don't know. Go West my friends. There are no blacks living in the Rocky Mountains. Move to any Mid-West area that is not densely populated. No traffic jam and no jungle man.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Lincolnite:

Remember, that in the same 1964 election that LBJ won in a landslide, the state of California voted overwhelmingly for an amendment to the state's constitution that mandated that barred racial preferences in housing.

I think America is ready for this to become a top flight issue again.

But then, Republicans are dopes too. I mean where was Scott Walker trying to defend New Berlin?

Don't forget falling property values and rising police costs associated with allowing our darker colored denizens run wild in our otherwise safer places.

I have said it before and I will say it again, get more than one tank of gas away from the coons. Even if it means living in the middle of nowhere, it's better than having malicious blacks try to move into your neighborhood.

Bogolyubski said...

We can thank the Republican party for keeping its pals in the real-estate racket well-subsidized with dollars seized under threat of violence from YT to move Shaniqua, Latavious and the sprogs plus not a few Husseins, Mohammeds and Omars to a nice neighborhood near you. The arch-conservative budget cutter Paul Ryan of course voted to keep shoveling the tax funds into this monster - which, as we can see - is used as an excuse by Eric "My People" Holder's DOJ (who remains in office and fully-funded by the Repuke House of "Representatives").

The Repukes controlled congress for a dozen years and the program only continued to grow - like a deadly melanoma. It never stops, it never slows down. The march towards turn-key totalitarianism proceeds forward inexorably. No opposition stands in its way.

Bogolyubski said...

Don M observes:

More than half of these bastards have Juris Doctors from Ivy League schools!

These, dear reader, are the real and genuine enemy. The ones who bring BRA into its full hideous reality with a self-righteous smirk. More than groids, more than Moose-Limbs. these are the folks who need to get a very good taste of bona-fide justice delivered by means cold steel and hot lead with extreme prejudice.

Anonymous said...

Usually, when a minority ethnic group faces *real* oppression in the form of violence, they do their best to segregate themselves from their oppressors or, in the worst cases, emigrate to safety.

Africans in the US continually claim to be oppressed by Whites. Why don't they emigrate? Why don't they segregate themselves to protect themselves from the endless onslaught of White-on-Black violence?

Why do they insist on following Whites everywhere? This is the first "oppressed" ethnic group in history that insists on following and attaching itself to their "oppressors" at every opportunity. This is the first "oppressed" ethnic group in history that pursues litigation if their "oppressors" try to distance themselves from them.

The reality is that Blacks, on their own, are not capable of sustaining the standard-of-living that they can benefit from when they insinuate themselves into White communities so they can leech off of welfare programs and "redistribute" wealth through crime.

Blacks are conscious of the fact that Black-run cities are total disaster areas with the lowest living standards in the US. In their eyes, it is "racist" to not protect them from themselves.

PK, as a regular reader, I am going to predict that the next city in your "dying/dead cities" trilogy (following up on Detroit and Atlanta) will be Chicago. It would be all too perfect with the election approaching and with Chicago at a very crucial tipping point, right on the brink of teetering into Detroit'ed territory. Here is a glimpse of another failed city, another victim of the Black Undertow: http://unlawfulassembly.blogspot.com/2012/08/union-backed-liberal-judge-gives-5-year.html

Those of you in the Northeast should read it, lest you think only cities in the South/Midwest are in danger of racial destruction.

Jay Santos said...

There's a book potential for this Section 8 impact on the nation. Doubtfully a NYT bestseller, but a real story nevertheless.

There's the history of the projects, their well known decay and then the destructively creative concept of dispersing the horror outwards.

It's all a classical modern liberal concept. Take dysfunction, spend any amount of funds to educate it. Education being the liberal's panacea to all human characteristics. That doesn't work, place the dysfunction in close proximity to moral, industries people. The functional, moral characteristics will "rub off" on the dysfunctional. Then something happens... lives are disrupted, people are killed, but, whatever. And, most importantly of all to the liberal mind, they'll feel good about it.

Wednesday said...

Seriously, exactly what are the positive consequences of providing affordable housing in our communities?

Seriously, you disingenious, crypto-marxist scum, what exactly are the positives?

Evidence please. And I don't mean tired propaganda memes such as "diversity" and "enrichment".

Show me the numbers. Show me the benefits.

Until then, rjp is exactly right: Burn it down. Vigilance.

Robert S. Oculus III said...

@rjp, August 13, 2012 5:58 PM: There is only one option for the residents of New Berlin.

Burn the development down as it goes up. Make it unprofitable to build these shitholes in small close-knit communities. They start rebuilding, light it up again. Rinse and repeat. MSP will lose their insurance after enough claims. And the job will be done.


Option 1: Commit arson, a federal crime. Kiss your life goodbye when they catch you.

Option 2: Move away and leave the town to the invaders.

Which do you think people will choose?

Brute said...

MuayTyson said...
I grew up in small town PA we had the other side of the tracks but no section 8. About 10 years ago section 8 was built. Before this the town and surrounding towns had the number of blacks you could count on 1 hand. After section 8 more and more blacks started being seen. Not all the blacks lived in sect. 8 some where just boyfriends and baby daddies.


That's how these Fed cocksuckers work. The actual section 8 "property holders" are going to be documentable non-criminals, usually a female, but that's all just official smokescreen. Notice how the officious lawyerscum always carefully document the psuedolegitimacy of everything meticulously. The problem is always the (undocumented and therefore invisible to bureaucrat)straphangers that come along with the sheboon. The endless parade of jockers, out of control chillens, other sheboons that are on the run from angry boo friends and the absolutely stereotypical constant moolie drama.

And the Feds know this, they're simply evil little bureaucrat cocksuckers. It's exactly the same sort of loathesome nerdy little weasel bureaucrats who always do the massive exterminations. The nazis and the communists who commited real organized genocides, look at them some time. The same pale, weasely, almost feminine lawyerscum you see as paper shuffling federal bureaucrats today.

Why is that Captain Ron?

Anonymous said...

The most direct and absolute way to ruin your town is to build low income housing. This has been proven time and again across America. Anytime Negro's are imported into a town it spell's the end of Utopia. They have been a curse the World over

Anonymous said...

In the UK minorities - not including the Chinese/Japanese/Koreans and Thais - have destroyed every town that they've occupied. And they've occupied every town thanks to White traitors in the establishment and fellow colonisers . Now TPTB are going to start building over our island to house more of them.

Anonymous said...

Eric Holder is basically the only reason to vote for Romney.

Anonymous said...

Americans want diverse togetherness so bad the government has to enforce it. Something the marxists in power forget is that you need jobs and income in order to have wealth to redistribute. Meanwhile we sink lower into third world irrelevance while the rest of the world laughs its ass off. BRA will fail.

Anonymous said...

Elections have consequenses.

Remember that when you do your part to keep the current White hating Marxist in office come November.

Just don't EVER say you weren't warned.

Anonymous said...

(North Ga)--- It's like a doctor going against all his principles for health & life. A perfectly healthy body lays on the table for an exam. Doc steps up with a syringe, and injects a virus, knowing full well the injection will soon be upsetting the natural order of the body's system. I mean, if a limb gets gain green you amputate and save the body. Here, it seems, the order is to keep the body alive so the gain green can live as long as possible before it kills the body.

Anonymous said...

"Funny that you can have communities that are approaching 100% black but have a 94% white community and there is a conniption fit from the racists in the federal government."


TPTB may try to find a way to force white people (or non blacks in general) to move to majority black areas, in a coerced exchange for_____ (????)


Actually, there's talk that they are going to (in essence) do just that : FORCE suburbs to "re incorporate" with the same cities from which the suburbanites fled. This is to grab the suburb's tax dollars. Couple this with the fedgov buying up foreclosed properties and moving Section 8 people into what had been nice areas, and you get a disaster in the making. It's called "nowhere left to run".


(I'll refrain from bringing up Agenda 21 from the UN, but yeah-that too. :-( )

Anonymous said...

10MM Auto said:

"
I don't have an answer to this one Paul. Winchester was trying to go under the radar after they finished your books. They probably all voted you Honorary Town Councilman and were determined to keep the town from being "Detroited". The only other answer if for the townsfolk to make it so unpleasant for groids to be there that they move, like the Latinos do."

I reply:

I think you have provided an answer. Latinos seem to be the only people who can clear out lowest class Blacks - we need to start making arrangements with certain Latinos. One idea is for our older Anglo men to marry younger Latino wives (long after their first Anglo wife divorces them). The children aren't bad - usually brown eyed beauties, look Italian. Then get to know some Latino associates, relatives of the Latino wife - neighborhood renewal starts with some Spanish.

Anonymous said...

If anyone believes that Black Run American Government is not doing all it can to destroy Whites then you have not been paying attention.

Anonymous said...

How can you band together and block off a bridge when the people right next door are fighting for your destruction?

After you pump 20 cubic feet of carbon monoxide through the crack under their door at 4 AM, that won't be any problem at all.  If this happens even a few times in one town, the rest will probably take sudden vacations.

The bonus of doing this as open hostilities commence is that after the air clears, you can use all their phones to learn their plans and send false info to their friends and relations.  That is, what you can't get on the public Twitter feed (they're dumb that way).

Option 1: Commit arson, a federal crime. Kiss your life goodbye when they catch you.

Option 2: Move away and leave the town to the invaders.


Where do you move to?

Be careful about warning people about the downsides of Option 1.  If they realize that they'd be no worse off if they blew up the building and killed everyone in it, they might do that instead.

Mutant Swarm said...

Brute said...

"That's how these Fed cocksuckers work. The actual section 8 "property holders" are going to be documentable non-criminals, usually a female, but that's all just official smokescreen. Notice how the officious lawyerscum always carefully document the psuedolegitimacy of everything meticulously. The problem is always the (undocumented and therefore invisible to bureaucrat)straphangers that come along with the sheboon. The endless parade of jockers, out of control chillens, other sheboons that are on the run from angry boo friends and the absolutely stereotypical constant moolie drama."

I am watching this process begin in a house right across the street from me. The woman and her two teenage daughters that moved in (to a foreclosure now listed as being owned by a couple of Chinese; I've never seen them at the property) seem nice enough. Quiet, kids are dressed nicely, not ghetto chic , etc. Sometimes it's so quiet, I have to look for cars in the driveway to see if anyone still lives there.

And then the visitors started showing up.

There's the two tall, skinny pants-saggers in the Dodge Magnum "rollin' on 22's, yo!" (A cop buddy found out that the car is registered in the "Iron Triangle" area of Richmond, Ca, a notorious hellhole of TNB.) There's the infrequent appearance by a sheboon (this one IS loud and ghetto) who routinely leaves the front door open, letting her three year old daughter run toward the street. I give it maybe a year before the kid gets hit by one of the Asian street racers down the block (the kid's not around that often, yet).

Maybe I'll sell my house to those same Chinese, and get the hell out of here before it's too late. Or just walk away from it, if it gets too bad too quickly. I know what that would do to my credit rating, but there's places in the Sierra Nevada where a fistful of cash under the landlord's nose would persuade him to rent to me. Especially when I told him why I had to leave. Off-brands tend to get followed by the police or locals in the place I'm thinking of.

Anonymous said...

Yes let's marry beaners and it'll save the white man.

You clearly do not live around these people. 1 step removed from Negro intelligence.

Not for my kids. Never. Ever. Ever.

Anonymous said...

This guy sounds exactly like you... here he's talking about UNC getting the death penalty over their academic cheating.

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2012-08-13/north-carolina-academic-scandal-mark-emmert-ncaa-penn-state

eah said...

Rather telling that they seem to need 'housing benefits'.

fnn said...

Predominantly white towns should not accept federal housing money. Would this have happened if they had taken that advice ?

Also a good idea for white school districts to reject federal funds. But local school boards tend to be controlled by the the local branch of the leftist teachers' unions. For more ideological diversity get together with Ron Paul fans and
the like and work to change the local school board so it's large (30 or more, no problem since there will be no salaries )and elected by PR-with as low a threshold as possible. There sorts of tactics are necessary to conduct non-violent guerrilla warfare against an enemy who is in control everywhere. The ruling elites are not popular among the white masses- but they think no alternative is possible.

10mm AUTO said...

"One idea is for our older Anglo men to marry younger Latino wives (long after their first Anglo wife divorces them). The children aren't bad - usually brown eyed beauties, look Italian. Then get to know some Latino associates, relatives of the Latino wife - neighborhood renewal starts with some Spanish."

My soon to be second wife, a 24 year old, extremely passionate, Beautiful, Grey Eyed, Redheaded, Ukrainian lady would disagree. She feels Americans need Russian Wives and I can not disagree with her. (Did I mention the Sex? Oh my God!). I have NEVER seen a negro in a Ukrainian neighborhood in the USA. NEVER.

Further, her ideas on negroids make mine look Liberal! Forced work for the Welfare ones ("Why are they not in fields?" is her usual question) and the criminals ones, well "Pas Humane" (Not Human).

Russians have no patience for the criminal Groid and no history of our version of PC. I tried to explain to her the liberal theory of negro behavior (oppressed, no power, poverty) She snorted, "What oppression?? They are fat and rude!"

Russia may have had a screwed up system, but they take pride in that they did not kill their Race like Western Europe has over it. Here, she literally has no fear of a Groid and when one cuts in line, she is perfectly willing to point it out loudly with apt descriptions. Her accent helps. Negroids eyes bulge, but they back down.

In Russia, Chimping (or as she says, "Barbarian") groids get tied to a chair in a dark room with harsh overhead light and beaten, then flown home hooded and in chains with their "Educational" visa canceled as "Persona non Grata"; and those are the lucky ones. Unlucky ones get "disappeared" by Russian Mafia or local cops and if a body is found, will not have hands, head or feet.

Large scale action is not unknown following a criminal action by groids. (See: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1051067.html ).

I knew it was a mistake the instant I told her about Elderly Rape here in the USA. She paled and her eyes shot sparks (almost literally). She was so angry that she lost her English for a while. Remember, Russian women are VERY family oriented (much more than the West) and the old grandmothers still alive in Russia all lived and got their children through the "Great Patriotic War" (WWII). The young know the hardships these older women went through, the losses of sons and fathers and husbands, the starvation and disease. Offenses against their person is sacrilege. (For anyone who wants to marry a Ukrainian woman, NO MOTHER-IN-LAW Jokes, really.)

After she calmed down, she asked why we let them live. "Drown them in bucket" is her idea of fixing the problem. When I responded jokingly that we did not have a bucket big enough for whole population of blacks, she quickly replied, "Use lake behind dam."

Now I don't talk about blacks and crime anymore with her. No PC and no understanding of tolerance for destroying venerated old women.

No, Anglos will have to look inside themselves for guts. Believe me, they have it. They just have to do it. A Russian/Ukrainian woman can help.

jaquie said...

OK how does this work. I am in a 99% white state and 99% white city, but I am seeing more negroes every day. More housing projects have gone up because supposedly the workforce couldn't afford to live here, but it seems the housing preceded the negroes.

Do social workers send negroes around the country with housing vouchers? Do they direct them to places like this because we're so white?

This is really fishy...I wish I knew someone inside the system.

kas said...

Don M observes:

More than half of these bastards have Juris Doctors from Ivy League schools!

These, dear reader, are the real and genuine enemy. The ones who bring BRA into its full hideous reality with a self-righteous smirk. More than groids, more than Moose-Limbs. these are the folks who need to get a very good taste of bona-fide justice delivered by means cold steel and hot lead with extreme prejudice.

----------

YAY! Totally agree and have said so in comments before but for some reason my comments do not get posted when I use the name of the real culprits of our demise. This has made me distrust this site. My comments have been censored several times when I mention the name of the real evil. Wonder why. Nothing I said was offensive, only TRUE. I am suspicious of this site because of the censoring of my comments.


Anonymous said...

In New Berlin,no one can hear you scream.

Pissed-off ER Doc said...

"Not all the blacks lived in sect. 8 some where just boyfriends and baby daddies."

Haven't you heard? Negroes don't "live" anywhere. They always "stay" somewhere. Just ask them where they live, the answer is always some variant of "I stay with Latisha" or "I stay in Springfield."

Concerned Citizen said...

“All Americans benefit from the many positive consequences of providing affordable housing in our communities, including diversity within our populations and enrichment of the lives and livelihoods of our citizens.”

When I read that line I just had to laugh at the textbook diversitycrat line. I bet this guy lives in a lily white neighborhood like the rest of the hypocrites.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous: Eric Holder is basically the only reason to vote for Romney.

What makes you think Capt. Underoos would even replace Holder as AG? I would not be at all surprised if he kept him on as AG in order to be a "uniter not a divider" - much in the same way Jorge W. Shruberon kept the loathsome Clintonoid Norman Mineta in office for years. That's not even to mention the large number of Holder acolytes who now occupy government legal jobs to the tune of six-figures-a-year. Note how effective the Repukes in Congress - Weepin' Johnny and the Brokeback Boyz - have been at dealing with Holder? He's an outright criminal but instead of impeachment - or at least defunding the DOJ - they slap him with a toothless "contempt" citation. As I stated above: there is no actual political opposition to this.

Bogolyubski said...

Jacquie: OK how does this work. I am in a 99% white state and 99% white city, but I am seeing more negroes every day. More housing projects have gone up because supposedly the workforce couldn't afford to live here, but it seems the housing preceded the negroes.

Do social workers send negroes around the country with housing vouchers? Do they direct them to places like this because we're so white?

This is really fishy...I wish I knew someone inside the system.


Read the article, first of all. Yes, it is a deliberate program to infest white areas with blacks, Moose-Limbs, and other forms of 'vibrancy'. It is funded with tax dollars you pay and its purpose is to destroy your quality of life. It's known as 'Section 8' and it is a form of welfare which has never been reduced, cut or even seriously opposed. There are several beneficiaries in the racket besides the obvious welfare recipients:

1) Leftist attorneys - usually white - who despise and hate white small-town and suburban America. These evildoers are paid quite handsomely to destroy entire towns. They typically sue under the civil right laws, under which property owners have no control or freedom of association.

2) The sneering, self-righteous liberal "Christian" or "moral" person, who takes tax dollars as an "advocate", or a "facilitator" to do things like advance the Islamic colonization and evangelization of places such as Minnesota.

3) The slimy real-estate 'entrepreneur' - actually a taxpayer-subsidized slumlord. When property owners are sued by the lawyers mentioned above, they usually sell - often for cheap - because only the wealthy could afford a long court battle (through courts which are completely rigged anyway). They make lots of money by a) owning or managing the 'low-income housing' (often built at taxpayer expense); b) buying and selling real-estate as the inevitable occurs once the animals are resident and folks get desperate to leave. This type of slime is frequently a big donor to Republicans and Democrats.

4) The ruling oligarchy who basically owns everything and controls both nominal political parties - which are really just two brand-names of the same party. Their overall objective is essentially genocidal - the elimination of whites as a race and the complete destruction of their culture - to be replaced with a shiny planet-wide utopia in which they will be a permanent ruling class.

If you're seeing increasing numbers of negroes in your formerly 99-percent white town and state, you can be absolutely certain that they are being payed to move in by the folks mentioned above - some of whom might even be attending your church or living near you. Section 8 is a powerful weapon. When negroes and other trash is imported, areas which formerly could have mounted some opposition to the agenda of the oligarchs are neutralized.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous said...
Elections have consequenses.

Remember that when you do your part to keep the current White hating Marxist in office come November.

Just don't EVER say you weren't warned.


I see we have another who cannot get past the two-party flim-flam. The Section 8 housing program was started under the Roosevelt administration in 1937. It has been expanded continually by both Republicans and Democrats for 75 years years now. There has been no serious attempt to destroy it, reign it in, or defund it. Housenigga Hussein and Eric "My People" Holder would not have this powerful weapon in their hands were it not for the long list of Republican "conservatives" who faithfully supported not only its existence - but its continual expansion for 3/4 of a century.

This very program was endorsed by the supposed "fiscal conseravtive" running mate just selected by Willard Mittens Obamney himself in 2003. Mittens approved all expansions and activities of Section 8 carried out whilst the nominal governor of the most overtly Marxist state in the country. How long is it going to take for folks like you to realize that there is no opposition. Repukes and Dhimmis are just two brand names of the single ruling party, which pays no attention at all to what zeks, proles and helots like you want irrespective of who you vote for or how many times you've voted.

Bogolyubski said...

rjp: There is only one option for the residents of New Berlin.

Burn the development down as it goes up. Make it unprofitable to build these shitholes in small close-knit communities. They start rebuilding, light it up again. Rinse and repeat. MSP will lose their insurance after enough claims. And the job will be done.


While the sentiment is absolutely understandable, you fail to understand where all the money comes from. This is not a case where a group of local investors have pooled their own money to build such housing for some twisted altruistic ideal. The regime and its friends have literally endless supplies of money thanks to the fictional-reserve banking system. Taxes collected by the lawless regime go to service debt - money borrowed from the ruling oligarchy which was literally created at the touch of a button. If the locals burn down Shebooniqua's shiny new pad, the overlords and their allies will simply build ten more. Simply put, they could care less how much money is up in smoke as it's "money" they created out of thin air which was borrowed at interest by the regime they own. The taxes of those who torched the place will go up to service the additional debt.

Think of the so-called "free-market economy" this way: If you had a Monopoly game in which one player was able to simply create money which everyone at the table was forced to accept as real money, there is literally no way that the player with the unlimited funds would not end up controlling everything regardless of how good or bad his actual skill at playing the game. The very best and most highly skilled of the other players (without unlimited funding) would only be able to stave off the inevitable takeover for a time. Sooner or later, the dice will roll against him.

SAVANT said...

Ironic that the ad which precedes the video shows a very upper income bespectacled black guy in front of his large suburban house, holding his two babies, trying to get into his BMW with his keyless entry.

Make that holding his two half-caste babies. The ad kills 2 birds with one stone there.

jeanne said...

Nationwide sec 8 rentals

Huh, not a thing for my state. I guess the landlords here don't use it yet. But we've had Section 8 stuff here for at least 30 years.

Anonymous said...

Large scale action is not unknown following a criminal action by groids. (See: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1051067.html ).


Interesting article.

Radio Free Europe/Liberty used to be CIA fronts. Looks like the racial situation in Russia is reaching the official radar screen.

The article gives the usual party line about third world students being the victims of "racism" and "xenophobia." As if this all came out of thin air.

One wonders what the crime rates among these students are, as well as involvement in drug dealing and anti-Russian radical groups. And how many of the targets of "xenophobia" are even students in the first place? (Anyone have any data on this?)

Consider the following statement, and the ones which follow it in the article:

"Never go out alone," he says, citing the common wisdom shared among Friendship University's foreign students. "Look around you. Stay alert. ..."

OK.

This is pretty much how students have to go to school in parts of America (or Europe these days) which have become dominated by "youths" or "cultural enrichers."

One wonders if Radio Free Europe/Liberty will show similar concern over law abiding Americans and Europeans who are the victims of flash mobs, gang crime, and urban rioting.


"The post-Soviet upswing in nationalism -- evident in the rise of white-supremacy groups and the recent parliamentary sweep of parties running on extremist patriotic agendas -- have brought the problem bubbling to the surface, often in the form of violence."

This is an interesting passage. Maybe I am reading too much into this, but is it saying that Russian nationalism and patriotism is a "problem" to the powers-that-be in the USA? That a strong national state might be standing up against the forces of globalism and mass third world migrations? And the fact that Russians are defending their national sovereignty is enough to cause them to be put on America's enemies list?

Does RFE/L also run articles about the problems brought by mass third world migrations (often illegal) into the Western world? Perhaps one can explore their website and see what kind of coverage is being given to this phenomenon.

Big Bear said...

www.gosection8.com

Nice. I typed in all sorts of ZIP codes for North Idaho, and then Spokane.

"Sorry! Your search returned no results"

I feel blessed.

Anonymous said...

Sorry to say it, but the DWL's deserve their fair share of diversity.

Anonymous said...

To Anon 8/14 3:36 PM, it's not just nationalism that TPTB have a problem with. Serbia isn't sufficiently gay-friendly.

Anonymous said...

The lawsuit said MSP Real Estate Inc. of St. Louis Park, Minn., submitted an application in March 2010 to build 180 units of affordable housing in New Berlin. The units would be designated for low-income workers and seniors, and rents would be below market rate. 

This explains a lot. A friend once described St. Louis Park, MN, as St. Jewish Park.

Anonymous said...

"... some reason my comments do not get posted when I use the name of the real culprits of our demise."

This has happened to me as well but I understand why. The exposure of BRA on this site is a "gateway" for understanding BRA. To get too much truth at once would overwhelm and perhaps discourage the newly awakened. Most here are fully aware of the power behind the throne. There are some here that are too focused on the Muslims which are a problem but also used for misdirection by you know who.

Just keep it discrete and factual and you'll be fine.

SwampThizzle said...

Winchester, a rural town with a population of just 11,000, is 94.4 per cent white, and official statistics show that it contains no African-American families.

Hell, there are no African-American families in 100% African-American neighborhoods either. LOL.

WTF said...

You can't call them by name here.
Paul doesn't want to be associated in that way.

Now go enjoy a bialy with lox from Milton's by the I-5 & via de la valle.

Anonymous said...

I live in a beautiful small Wisconsin town. It is tourist mecca in the summer. But the last few years there has been more and more blacks. I found out it is the damn lower income housing that is bringing them in. The locals don't have a clue (I moved here from the big city just to get away from the blacks) and won't have a clue until it's too late. There is just no way to get away from them.m

Anonymous said...

You can have the low income housing without it increasing crime... as long as the residents are white.

RobertB said...

Bogolyubski--

You weren't paying attention when I explained how Sec 8 housing works. What you wrote is completely wrong and totally misguided.

Sec. 8 housing is built using tax credits that are sold to wealthy investors who need a tax deduction and get DWL bragging rights to boot. While under construction, the property managers secure a construction loan and the property must be insured, just like any other.

Now, the original poster can figure the rest out for himself.

RobertB said...

Jaquie--

Short answer is, yes, they do ship them in. I'll give you an example.

In St. Cloud, Minnesota, there were no blacks. It's a college town of (formerly) 50,000 people settled by German Catholics in the 1830's. The city got a grant from the Feds to build low income housing. They found someone to build it using the matching tax credit scheme posted above. It got built--even though no one wanted it because the idiots elected to office were convinced they just couldn't pass up this Federal money.

No one moved in. The poor whites would rather live in a trailer park than live in subsidized housing. So, it sat empty for a bit. Then, the idiots in the local government advertised for "renters" in a city full of you know who. They got lots of diversity--Somalis are what mostly moved in. Courtesy of the local Catholic Diocese.

The next thing they got was a tax bill for having to hire 6 more deputies to patrol the complex and keep the crime down to a manageable level.

This is not a secret. Some time ago I posted a story on "Scattered site housing" and the drop in crime rates in the big cities where Democrats rule, and the rise in crime in small and medium sized cities. The article was about two academic studies that came to the same conclusion. Section 8 scattered site housing was responsible for the increase in crime in the small to medium sized cites as well as the drop in crime in the big cities. You see, the big cities, like Chicago and NYC, LA, etc. are using the Section 8 housing to relocate their populations--they are spreading the pain.

By the way, Teddy Mondale lives in St. Louis Park. Given that he is a monstrous Liberal, I would be real curious to see if he doesn't have ties to that development company. He is the son of the former VP.

Europeans with Functioning Testicles said...

"I think you have provided an answer. Latinos seem to be the only people who can clear out lowest class Blacks - we need to start making arrangements with certain Latinos. One idea is for our older Anglo men to marry younger Latino wives (long after their first Anglo wife divorces them). The children aren't bad - usually brown eyed beauties, look Italian."

You sound like a fabulous sort of a boy. In traditional Latino cultures, men are in charge of safety/battling the enemy. These are very macho cultures. Perhaps, you could find some large, masculine Latino woman (there's got to be at least one, right?) who can't get a Latino husband due to her physique and temperament, so she could protect you. Don't forget to change your last name to hers and have dinner ready on time. Why don't you shave your legs and wear a dress, while you're at it? But seriously, I've never heard of Latino women patrolling and defending their neighborhoods, and I live in a majority black Southern city with quite a few barrios. Your best bet is to befriend some bicurious meztisos, and accept their protection. However, if you're an older m,an, that could be a problem. After all, a passive bitch has to be young and pretty, regardless of gender.

Anonymous said...

Very well said. I'd like to point out this is a voice of major reason. All aspects need need to be fixed at once -- or the beast simply grows another head. Much like a hydra. Cut 1? 2 more grow back. Systemic issues must be treated systemically.

Anonymous said...

Sidney, Arkansas (zip code 72577) is probably the next place on their hit list. It's one of the whitest cities in America.

Anonymous said...

"latinos seem to be the only people who can clear out lowest class blacks" - because they have the consent of the media, which papers over their efforts. when the media shuts down or can't operate whites can and have done the exact same thing.

Bogolyubski said...

RobertB said...
Bogolyubski--

You weren't paying attention when I explained how Sec 8 housing works. What you wrote is completely wrong and totally misguided.

Sec. 8 housing is built using tax credits that are sold to wealthy investors who need a tax deduction and get DWL bragging rights to boot. While under construction, the property managers secure a construction loan and the property must be insured, just like any other.

Now, the original poster can figure the rest out for himself.


@RobertB,

Thanks for the correction about the exact details of the program's operation. So instead of the regime directly funding the erection of such housing (at a time when there is a housing glut, BTW), they instead give tax credits (actual credits - which are deducted from the taxes owed, or deductions?) to the connected one-percenters who "invest" in such properties - who are essentially guaranteed profits at taxpayer expense for as long as the regime and its numerous social-service minions can keep the shacks filled with Shebooniqua, Mohammed, Jamal, et al. I wonder how many of these lovely developments are located near the palaces of the one-percenters who are allowed in on the racket?

Anonymous said...

One-percenters or not, they still need to return a profit after expenses.

Losing their insurance due to loss history, and then losing the buildings, is likely to smart.

Anonymous said...

Here are three solutions to the problem of low-income housing destroying quality communities:

1. Make sure the local government protects the community by preemptively passing zoning laws which quash any possibility of building LIH. Make sure the local government never accepts any Fed handouts that could be leveraged into a requirement to build LIH.
2. Always advocate for smaller government at all levels. Starve the beast. Liberals only have the influence that they have in the US because they have managed to setup pipelines that funnel tax dollars both directly and indirectly into the support of liberal causes, organizations and individuals. The Obamas are great examples of leftist radicals who have been supported with tax dollars as they have agitated for destructive changes to society.
3. Employee the Alinsky rule of making your opponents live up to their own standards. Force LIH developments into areas populated with the most self-righteous liberals. Demand that Ivy League law schools impose strict racial, religious, sexual and ethnic quotas. Insist that government bureaucracies impose quotas to force the hiring of more whites - and then work within those bureaucracies to reduce their influence and, if possible, to destroy them.

The only time that I really wish to be superwealthy is when I think about filing a continuous series of lawsuits to force the policies advocated by libs onto the libs themselves.