Friday, August 10, 2012

After All, Tomorrow is Another Day

Voting Rights Act of 1965
Life in Occupied America -- Day 17,155. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 still requires the Department of Justice to oversee elections in a number of states for evidence of discrimination, including Alabama:
Shelby County took its challenge of the Voting Rights Act to the U.S. Supreme Court today, asking the justices to declare part of the 1965 law an unfair burden on states such as Alabama where the federal government still oversees elections for evidence of racial discrimination.
Shelby County is appealing two lower court decisions that upheld the constitutionality of the landmark civil rights-era law. If the Supreme Court justices agree to accept the case, they'll schedule it for oral arguments sometime after they return in October, and it would be one of the highest-profile cases of the court's 2012-13 term.
"This case presents the Supreme Court with an opportunity to strike down an outdated and unnecessary portion of the Voting Rights Act that punishes some states for voting transgressions that are long gone," said Edward Blum, director of the Project on Fair Representation. "It makes no sense today that Alabama, Virginia, and Arizona are subject to federal oversight regarding elections while Arkansas, West Virginia, and New Mexico are not."
Shelby County originally sued the Justice Department two years ago, and Blum's nonprofit is paying the legal bills on the county's behalf.
While the Voting Rights Act outlaws discrimination against minority voters across the country, only 16 states are required to have all of their election procedures reviewed by the U.S. Justice Department, meaning they can't move a polling place or change a district line without permission. It is this section of the law that Shelby County is challenging as unconstitutional, as well as the formula Congress used to determine which states are subject to the extra scrutiny.

Per the 1965 Voting Rights Act, the state of Alabama needs special approval for changes in elections -- being the losers of the Civil Rights struggle and all. How'd freedom work out for Birmingham again? Never mind. Having a discussion on the consequences of enacting freedom and handing over the keys of political power to some of America's greatest cities isn't permitted in proper, polite society.

It's outside the realm of acceptable political discourse. The state of Birmingham in 2012 is the fault of... the fault of........ the fault of............. gosh, in polite, proper society, we only talk about Birmingham in a pre-1965 manner. Eerily, post-1965 Birmingham and the world of the South after the Civil Rights movement successfully swept every last vestige of hate impeding Black progress and Black integration into society is.... isn't worthy of discussion.

At all.

But it's that pre-1965 world that must continually be brought up as justification for stopping any action in 2012 Occupied America, shaming white people from ever uniting in defending their interests. The Birmingham News reported (Alabama Legislative Black Caucus files lawsuit over redistricting plans;August 10,2012;Kym Chandler):
The Legislative Black Caucus and other black Alabama office holders filed a lawsuit in federal court this morning to try to block implementation of new legislative redistricting plan.

The lawsuit claims that the Alabama House of Representatives and Senate redistricting plans dilute minority voting strength, violate the principle of "one person, one vote" and unnecessarily and illegally split Alabama counties among multiple legislative district.


"The lawsuits asks the federal court to declare these two plans unconstitutional and order the Legislature to start over," said James Blacksher, a lawyer representing plaintiffs.


Blacksher said the plans together split 49 of the 67 counties in Alabama.


The lawsuit echoes complaints during the legislative session that the Republican majority was "stacking and packing" minority districts with more and more black voters and thereby reducing black voters' influence outside of minority districts.


"Sadly they were more concerned with segregating the parties and drawing plans that are racially gerrymandered instead of drawing constitutional plans," said Caucus co-chairman Sen. Bobby Singleton, D-Greensboro.

The Association of Black County Officials and several black county commissioners are also plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Blacksher said they are seeking to have the lawsuit certified as a class action on behalf of all voters, regardless of race, in split counties.


"We hope that the federal court will recognize that the plans which the Republicans passed aimed to pack and stack African-American voters into minority districts while drastically reducing minority influence in other districts," said Rep. John Knight, D-Montgomery."


"In this day, in this time, it is sad that people must still go to court to get justice for all citizens in our state," Knight said.
Only in a world where the Department of Justice (currently led by Attorney General Eric "My People" Holder) gets final say over the political destiny of 16 states and the people who reside in them, could the "Legislative Black Caucus" be able to hold court and complain of potential discrimination.

Only in a world where a candidate for state senate in Missouri - Jamilah Nasheed - could tell a newspaper, "I'm black before I'm a Democrat," and still win easily are you able to understand why the Voting Rights Act still ensures that so many people live under absolute despotism.

That tyranny is none other than Black-Run America (BRA).

What happened to Birmingham post-1965? What about Selma? What about Montgomery? This is the story that must be told, instead of constantly changing the discussion and talking about what happened in these cities prior to the "great" Civil Rights Movements.



54 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.wsmv.com/story/19156283/woman-84-raped-husband-94-savagely-beaten-inside-home

And they wonder why I won't send my kids to school with these animals. Private school tuition is a small price to pay.

Anonymous said...

You keep saying "freedom failed", in reality it LACK of freedom which is failing.

Blacks move into a neighbourhood, property values plummet. Whites move in, they skyrocket. This means that anarcho-capitalist, freemarket segregation is not only possible, it's an absolute guarentee.

The only thing which keeps integration going is section 8 housing and the public schule system (yes, "schule"...figure it out if you don't get it).

Eliminate gov't intervention, and you eliminate integration and the racial tensions that come with it.

You keep pleading for more gov't intervention, not seeming to realize that gov't intervention is the root of the problem. You may as well plead for your rapist to put on a condom. Even if he does, you still gonna get raped, boy.

Anonymous said...

Johnson - I would love to contruct an outdoor privy over his grave so we could piss an shit on that bastard for all eternity

Paul's Biggest Fan said...

Voting Rights Act of 1965 - effective as law on August 6, 1965.

Watts Riots of Los Angeles - begun five days later on August 11, 1965.

You really can't make this up. It's almost as if blacks in 1965 said in a Watts chorus, "And then?"

No more and then.

Zenster said...

But it's that pre-1965 world that must continually be brought up as justification for stopping any action in 2012 Occupied America, shaming white people from ever uniting in defending their interests.

Excellent contrast, Paul.

Like Apartheid, the era of Jim Crow was a heyday for Southern Blacks, be they African or American. Far be it from them to ever admit the connection as that would be a frank confession of, not only their utter incompetence, but near-total dependence upon White productivity in order to have anything remotely approaching a pleasant life.

As so many here have already noted, Blacks hate Whites with a viciousness and brutality that few non-Black people can imagine. Yet, time and again it is the Blacks who refuse to disengage with their hated enemy and, instead, follow Whites to the ends of the earth so they can leech upon wealth that they, just as often, have had no part in earning.

Don M said...

"The lawsuit echoes complaints during the legislative session that the Republican majority was "stacking and packing" minority districts with more and more black voters and thereby reducing black voters' influence outside of minority districts."

So, gerrymandering districts to increase black electoral power in predominantly white areas is good.

But, gerrymandering districts to further increase black electoral power in areas that are already predominantly black is bad?

And, increasing white electoral power via gentrification of predominantly black areas is likewise bad.

I think I have this Orwellian doublethink thing down.

Paul, your coverage of the incorporation fights of small white cities in metro Apelanta is highlighting the advent of micro-secessionist movements throughout the South. These micro/proto-secessionist movements are only going to gain steam as time goes on.

Eventually the enemy will tire of trying to keep us. Their resources aren't unlimited!

Anonymous said...

Off topic. Anyone else notice that Blacks are winning all the gold medals for America.

Anonymous said...

Excellent public schools demand the most intellectual children filtered through competitive applications. Your kids probably wouldn't make the cut. That is why you pay for private school. For private schools the only qualifier is the ability of the parents/guardian to pay tuition. I have had children travel down both avenues. Please be a realist.

Anonymous said...

Again off topic PK......I think Mr. Romney will pick Paul Ryan. We have hope. He is liked by many conservatives.

Anonymous said...

@Zenster: "but near-total dependence upon White productivity in order to have anything remotely approaching a pleasant life."

It was a revelation when I took all I knew about Black and White assets, skills, productivity, civic styles, culture, etc. and imagined all the Blacks suddenly free of any Whites...the 200 million of us gone, leaving the 40 million of them by themselves, without our skinny White cracker racist asses to keep them down...and what resulted was Detroit, Zimbabwe and Mogadishu. The sad truth is that they will always be second class in a White world,but without us, in chaos.

Anonymous said...

It could easily be argued that geographically and demographically contiguous districts are far more representative. That was the argument in California, where voters passed a referendum that took redistricting power away from the legislature and put it in the hands of a citizen-staffed commission. The goal was to end gerrymandering that resulted in extremely oddly-shaped, almost non-contiguous districts that were demographically engineered to ensure a particular outcome.

It doesn't really matter though because that isn't what this is about. If Black voters were equally distributed across multiple districts (which would also result in "vote dilution"), instead of being "packed and stacked", there would still be litigation. I promise you.

The goal is simply to use litigation, federal funds and federal political leverage to maximize the number of Black representatives. Period. The ideological underpinnings don't matter at all. Anyone who thinks that these Black political figures truly care about what is fair and what model best leads to representative outcomes is utterly naive.

By the way, PK, this may interest you: http://unlawfulassembly.blogspot.com/2012/08/why-liberals-hate-matt-drudge.html

Jay Santos said...

Lyndon Baines Johnson, there's your ground zero of the destruction of the nation. Odd that he was a Texan. The man was a magnificently destructive force. For those of you who like to blame the Jews, well Lyndon wasn't no Jew. A despicable coarse and corrupt being, he's got a fine presidential library you can visit. His offspring luxuriate while the seeds he nurtured so many years ago strangle us.

Old Lyndon believed that the nation was strong and rich. He was confidant that he could deal and steal and no great harm. Vietnam, the Immigration act, “civil rights” legislation, the Great Society welfare state, truly this ignorant red neck progressive did more damage to this country than his African Marxist successor Obama could hope for in one term.

At this point, I think we should just go full on Pol Pot “up in here”. Let the Feds confiscate all wealth, all of it; Checking account balances, savings accounts, Christmas club accounts, 401(k)s, IRAs, all personal property excluding only clothing. Confiscate cars, tools, jewelry, real estate (improved and unimproved), fishing equipment, kitchen items and children’s toys. We hire undocumented workers and H1B visa holders to inventory the whole collection of items. Once the Feds have a full inventory of anything worth anything, we distribute these items equally to anyone within the borders of the US at the time of inventory. For those who can demonstrate some African ancestry, the Feds will award those individuals $250,000 each, resulting from their association with slavery. This award is above the normal distribution they would have received of the nation’s cash and personal property assets.

Additional cash compensation will be provided to females, gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and trans-gendered individuals and anyone who can trace their ancestry to Spain, Portugal or anyone of native north or south American Indians. In a gesture of goodwill, Asians and anyone who practices Islam or who might be Jewish, Hindu or Buddhist would also receive additional cash compensation. Otherwise, wealth will be strictly redistributed. Anyone in the US would receive $35,000 yearly, regardless of his or her work status. All those within the borders will receive free health care and an automobile from General Motors.

So let’s go. Let’s get it done. Stop all the political bickering and just get it done.

Merit said...

Segregation kept blacks together, it forced them to at least TRY to be productive- there were more two parent black families, there were black doctors, lawyers, etc. Granted the services were generally inferior for a variety of reasons; lack of easy access to credit, poor quality of client pool, etc..

Segregation on the whole was good for the average black, which is precisely why BRA constrantly shows us the water hoses and the dogs and the burning crosses (despite no proof that any of the major Klan organizations actively took a center role in any violence).

Showing black communities where blacks are pretty much forced to provide for themselves, and manage to do a somewhat passable job at it would undermine BRA's message.

Equal protection doesn't mean enforced equality of results.. Good luck finding a black who understands that idea.

Discard said...

Jay Santos:If all the wealth in the country was divided equally among all its residents, the Darks would all be poor again within five years.

Anonymous said...

Aww, come on, give BRA another decade or two. I'm sure blacks will one day soon just suddenly get their collective shit together, and get over their centuries-old grudge against us. Have a little faith! Jeez.

Come on, White Man - just stay in that bent-over position a little bit longer. Keep that slimy ball gag of Political Correctness in your mouth. It won't hurt for that much longer. Things are getting better all the time .... just look at Detroit, South Africa, Haiti ...

Obama 2012!!!

WarriorClass III said...

Jay Santos has found a big part of the history of BRA and LBJs role in it, but the seeds were sown under Abraham Lincoln. The so-called civil war was in reality the Federal Government's war against the states. The states lost, both the north and the south. The Federal Government obtained the power to dictate to the States and made LBJs treachery possible. The reality is that the Founder's Republic was lost in the civil war, and the empire was born.

Anonymous said...

Anon., Off topic, no, I havn't noticed blacks rec'g all the Olympic gold. I don't watch or care. Even as a child, I don't know who to root for, my fellow "countryman" or a white person like myself.

Anonymous said...

It's not Black Run America(BRA) it's White America Conquered(WAC)or WACed.

Anonymous said...

I don't want a return to government sanctioned segregation. All I want is a return to real private property rights: the right to rent my apartment to whomever I wish, the right to exclude black thugs from my business, the right to hire who I like.

I work for an engineering firm in the South. All the "cognitive workers" (engineers, technicians, skilled trades, etc) are white or Asian. This gets us into trouble with the EEOC. Our only saving grace is that Federal law REQUIRES us to conduct pre-employment screening (both skills tests and background/drug tests). Even with strict government requirements to only pick those with a demonstrated ability to pass the entrance exams and a background check, we still are targeted. So, we create make work jobs for the 30% of the general population (the blacks) who cannot do any real work in the company.

Just let us be, and the problem will solve itself. 90% of whites (there are a few delusional types that place ideology above their family's well-being) will self segregate into nice white communities. We won't even need Jim Crow laws; the price system (sans Section 8) and private contracts will do the job for us.

Anonymous said...

PK: More grist for the mill:

http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2012/aug/10/lsu-dismisses-2011-heisman-trophy-finalist-tyrann-/

Anonymous said...

OFF-TOPIC, but...

In spite of 72% black out-of-wedlock birthrate and rampant black fatherlessness, the media continues to flog us with the blatantly dishonest image of the two-parent middle-class black household, and the dedicated black father.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TEfqGJR9kA

nameispointless said...

LBJ, a petty, cynical, racist in disguise, surely had it right when he said: "This bill will have those niggers voting Democrat for the next 100 years," as he signed the poison pen civil rights' act, and implemented the 'great society,' even though he hated negros, MLK, and worse, 'nigger loving' RFK.
I don't think LBJ could bear seeing adoring negros struggle to touch RFK's hem every time he visited their 'hoods.
Nor could he stand the fact that he would never measure up to the legacy of the martyred JFK and the disingenuous "Camelot" mythology assigned the Kennedy White House 'reign.' The Johnsons were low down hillbillies whom the Kennedys couldn't abide and he knew it.
Blinded by insecurity and jealousy, this low life Texan signed a gratuitous bill essentially stripping the hated negros of their independence, reshackling them to the white economy; those same whites who knew him for what he was: a rude, crude, coarse, and corrupt politician who knew where all the D.C. bodies were buried.
Don't think for a moment the civil rights act and 'great society' were born of compassion and care.
LBJ was a long in tooth Washington crook who knew exactly the destruction he was enacting.
It would be worth the air fare to spit on his grave

Anonymous said...

"I think Mr. Romney will pick Paul Ryan. We have hope. He is liked by many conservatives."

Conservatives have an unbroken record of "liking" politicians that end up stabbing them in the back.

Anonymous said...

A society has agendas and taboos. In the end, taboos may be more effective than agendas.

People may support or oppose an agenda, but agendas provoke open debate. Pro or con, it's a matter of rational discussion and argument.

A person might disagree with an agenda but may not find the agenda offensive or beyond the pale of discussion.
Taboos are different. Taboos are considered 'hateful' and 'foul' and 'noxious' and 'odious'. It's treated more like a nasty fart than an idea. It cannot even be debated. The reaction is visceral; it overpowers a person's emotions even before he or she gave it any thought. Certain words are loaded with 'taboos' via associations pushed by the media. So, the word 'racism' immediately conjures up Auschwitz, lynchings, KKK cross burning, bombed churches. But 'communism' isn't taboo because the media haven't associated that word with visceral images of murdered victims, razed villages, and etc.
So, communism is still considered an agenda than a taboo. Even as one rejects communism, it is not thought beyond the pale to propose communism as an agenda.

But taboos end debate. Indeed, taboos determine what can and can't be agenda. Since 'white racism' is taboo, there can be no pro-white agenda.

So, taboos control agendas more than vice versa.
Who controls the taboos of our country? And what are our taboos?

Anonymous said...

At a time when the middle classes face economic troubles and anxieties, what does the GOP give us? Romney and Ryan whose main convictions revolve around tax cuts for the super-rich.

Why doesn't the GOP appeal to the (white) middle classes(at least working outside government)? Partly, it's because much of the donations come from the superrich. But even more superrich money go to Democratics, so that alone can't be the reason.

The crucial difference is that Democrats not only appeal to the superrich(especially Jews) but also appeals to blacks, Hispanics, women, and gays because those brands of identity politics are permissible in our society. So, Democrats get money from the superrich but maintains the moralistic cachet of being for the 'little people'.

The 'little people' that the GOP should appeal to is the white middle class and working class, but such isn't allowed because white identity politics is taboo in American society. So, GOP has nothing left but 'free trade' and 'tax cuts for the rich', which the American middle class and working class have tired of. Tax cuts for the superrich is especially stupid for the GOP since 2/3 of the superrich are Democrats, and nearly 40% of the Forbes 400 are Jews, and most of them are Democrats.

Also, if Democratic Jews(the most powerful group within the Democratic party) eagerly push the party to appeal to identity politics among blacks, Hispanics, Asians, single women, and gays, it just happens that Republican Jews or neocons(the most powerful group within the Republican party) ardently push the party AGAINST playing to white middle class/working class identity. So, Democrats not only cater to the superrich but wrap themselves with the mantle of being for the underdogs. In contrast, the GOP caters to the superrich but cannot connect with underdog middle class and working class whites who are conservative for social and cultural reasons.

GOP has become spiritually separated from its mass base that increasingly feels unappreciated, ignored, taken for granted. The only identity politics left in the GOP is pro-Zionism. Romney visits Israel and supports its apartheid policies against Palestinians but doesn't even support Boys Scouts' Christian policy on gay scout leaders.

Neocon Jews see the white middle class and working class as potential pitchforkers--angry antisemitic mobs--, and so the GOP has become the party of abstract principles that serve the globalist rich. Its only identity politics is trying to appeal to the Hispanic vote and willing to start more wars for Israel.

Yes, Jews do control this country, and Neocon influence has been deadly to the GOP.

Zenster said...

Don M: Paul, your coverage of the incorporation fights of small white cities in metro Apelanta is highlighting the advent of micro-secessionist movements throughout the South. These micro/proto-secessionist movements are only going to gain steam as time goes on.

"City of Quartz" author and certified Liberal, Mike Davis, identified this phenomenon as "zipcode feudalism". A very fitting description even though Davis was probably intending it as a pejorative label.

Zenster said...

Anon (8/10 8:34 PM): Off topic. Anyone else notice that Blacks are winning all the gold medals for America.

Nuck off figger.

Zenster said...

Anon (8/10, 2012 8:44 PM): Excellent public schools demand the most intellectual children filtered through competitive applications.

The problem being is that "Excellent public schools" are the exception and no longer the rule. The public edumahcation system has been repeatedly dumbed down so that these semi-retarded porch monkeys can get a high school diploma (which they just as often don't get anyway). This makes all the teachers look as though they are doing their jobs instead of being the minority daycare assistants that they really are.

Zenster said...

Jay Santos: Let the Feds confiscate all wealth, all of it; Checking account balances, savings accounts, Christmas club accounts, 401(k)s, IRAs, all personal property excluding only clothing. Confiscate cars, tools, jewelry, real estate (improved and unimproved), fishing equipment, kitchen items and children’s toys.

What makes you think that, once in possession of this financial and material wealth, the government would actually return or redistribute it? Possession being nine points of the law and all that.

None of us would ever see a speck of that confiscated wealth ever again and all of our politicians would only be farting through extra layers of silk. I dare you to tell me otherwise.

Zenster said...

Merit: Equal protection doesn't mean enforced equality of results.. Good luck finding a black who understands that idea.

Which is precisely why an ever-more-desperate BRA is now seeking, not just equality of opportunity but equality of outcome. No matter that it's like trying to sledgehammer a Steinway concert grand piano into a three speed bicycle, 0bama and his gang won't give up until every last Black is riding one of those bikes.

Anonymous White Male said...

For any blacks that think their "struggles" or liberals' photo-ops brought about the Civil Rights Act of 1964, remember this:

“I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” —Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One -

“These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.”—LBJ

Oh, and for the Anonymous that said blacks have won all the gold medals for America: Is that an attempt to troll, an attempt at sarcasm, or do you actually believe that nonsense?

Celebrate Homogeneity said...

Anon 6:15 and "schule". Yep, wenhave it figured out nudge nudge wink wink. Except in your efforts to make your point, you messed up. The word "schule" , or, more properly "Schule" is German. Nouns are capitalized in German. The "YKW" word you meant was "schul". No "e". There is a reason I know.

Another thing: show some intestinal fortitude and come out from behind that anonymous tag. Others who have expressed similar sentiments have at least a screen name here. They aren't spineless cowards.

Anonymous said...

How about we just pay the blacks to leave?
Here is my proposal:
Each black family (husband, wife and at least 2 kids under the age of 18) gets, $500,000 to $1,000,000 to leave the US and never, under the pain of instant execution, ever come back. All citizenship must be renounced and descendents are never eligible for immigration to the US. The plan would take place over 5 years and the money would come from existing welfare, section 8 housing and other thefts of white wealth.
No one is forced to leave, but after the 5 years is up, there will be no more section 8 housing, no more affirmative action, welfare and the like, ever again. If a black chooses to stay and ends up on the street, that’s their problem, not the government’s. Maybe some charities will help, but not the taxpayers.
Sure it will cost a fortune, but not anymore that we are already spending on them. $5-10 trillion would get rid of 40-50 million of them. What happens to them after they leave isn’t our problem.
The outcome of all this would be many: livable large cities will little crime, minimal need for large mass transit systems, dramatic reduction in crime, many parts of the beautiful South would be safe, pleasant places to live again and the amount of money spent on public safety department would be able to be cut in half.
Wins all around!!

Big Bill said...

It's about power, not justice.

If a state/county/city/town/school district is 90% black and 10% white, blacks will fight to chop the white folks up and spread them around to the other black districts rather than let white folks elect their own representatives in their own, white, district.

On the other hand, if the ratio is 90% white and 10% black, blacks will fight to have all those black folks condensed and concentrated into a single district so black folks are guaranteed to get black folks elected.

The analysis is simple: what brings the most power to black people? Concentration of blacks where black numbers are small, and dilution of whites where black numbers are large.

They cannot survive without white money, yet they cannot stand white folks in a position of power over them. So the issue is simple: how to get close enough to the white folks to get their money, but not so close that black folks lose any power. This is the eternal Dance of the Negro: how to get their hands in the white man's pockets without giving any white man control.

danaigh said...

Jay Santos I admire your hyperbole! But that seems to be what is desired by so many so maybe 'your' exaggeration is to some only just.

Can you imagine another round of rage and riot in the cities as happened in the late 1960's? The difference this time would be the burning of buildings and destruction would actually improve things quite a bit. Picture it, if you can, square miles of burning Detroit, Camden, Birmingham or East St. Louis. A hell of a lot of rats are going to die for sure!

The coming temper tantrum will work out to yield it's own reward. Stay out of the way though. Self destruction takes it's own time and you don't want to interfere with nature's wrath anyway.

Dance...dance to the radio said...

I'm getting tired of this site.
You chronicle things but nothing else happens besides Chik-fil-A.
Where is the push back?
This is just a grievance pocket, or in Obama speak, paket, a la Pockeestahn, to occupy us while nothing gets done.
Take back your country you fucking Gomers.
I'm busy taking back mine.

Anonymous said...

Anon 10:42, here's a good example of the deadly neocon influence upon the GOP:

http://buchanan.org/blog/how-bill-kristol-purged-the-arabists-5085

BTW, a pity that PJ Buchanan's candidacy was derailed by these creeps.

Anonymous said...

Ex-Lincolnite here:

Well it is also stupid in extremis to think that these tactics aren't being used just to rig elections in favor of Democrats and their socialist sympathizers.

And so long as the parasite gets to eat and suck off the teat of the host, without causing undue burden the situation will continue. Now as we enter the fourth year of BRA White House style, the pain is getting closer to being a threat. Now what happens to the parasitic coons when the white people flat refuse to pay for their asses, they use laws like the Criminal Rights Act of 1964 and the VRA to commandeer our elections.

I see white liberal America as much like a drug addict. They need to hit rock bottom before they will wake up and understand the parasite, the black, is causing all the major problems in this country.

@ Zenster @ 11:03

Yes this is so true. I just talked to a gal who just stopped working in the Teach for America program. She is a self-proclaimed liberal feminist, and yet even she said that the average IQ among the coons she tried to teach was probably between 50 and 70. She said the job was soul ripping, and educating a bunch of niggers was a waste of time. I wonder when more people will see it as well?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous - "Each black family (husband, wife and at least 2 kids under the age of 18) gets, $500,000 to $1,000,000 to leave the US and never, under the pain of instant execution, ever come back."

Won't work. There's only about 14 blacks in the entire country that meet those qualifications.

Jay Santos said...

Zenster said

...None of us would ever see a speck of that confiscated wealth ever again and all of our politicians would only be farting through extra layers of silk. I dare you to tell me otherwise.


Of course it would be looted. But that's my point. The left has been after the total deconstruction of the nation for a century. Let's do it. Let's level the whole edifice and then afterward, instead of "debating" the course of society with some wild eyed lesbian communist and her black pets, we can settle things a little more, uhm, directly.

In the ashes, let the games begin.

Merit said...

Off topic. Anyone else notice that Blacks are winning all the gold medals for America

Blacks are winning medals in sports that other countries don't have a strong history of competition in- I went to the UK in 2009, and I didn't see a single b-ball court on the street all of London.

The actual top gold medal earners are as follows:

Michael Phelps- 4 gold
Missy Franklin- 4 gold
Allison Schmidt- 3 gold

Notice something? That's right, all in swimming. This is because black Athletes tend to compete in team sports, so if their team wins then everyone on the team wins a medal. In individual competition, Whites (and East Asians to a lesser extent) tend to dominate the contests. Blacks have more medals because they compete in sports where everyone on the team gets a medal; aside from the outliers like Usain Bolt, blacks getting gold medals as individuals is quite rare.

Anonymous said...

There is an amazing article on S. Africa's News24 website. The title is "Three Reasons Why S. Africa Will Fail." It was written by a woman named Claudia Meads. The amazing part is that was actually published. I found the article through the Ozzie Saffa blog. Everyone who reads SBPDL needs to check out Ozzie Saffa. The commentary following the piece is refreshing. We all know there is only one reason S. Africa will fail, and so does she. Ms. Meads has written something to good to miss.

http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Three-reasons-South-Africa-will-fail-20120809

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
Johnson - I would love to contruct an outdoor privy over his grave so we could piss an shit on that bastard for all eternity.

That would be a great act of protest. Yes, one would likely get thrown into prison for decades - much longer than the sentences for raping 84-year-old white women - but completely desecrating LBJ's grave or better yet the rotten he-goat carcass itself would be a superb act of political symbolism. I'm a little surprised the vampire-squid overlords didn't order his carcass to be waxified like V.I. Lenin's and placed on permanent display in some gruesome government temple for DWLs and negroids to go and worship every day.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon: Conservatives have an unbroken record of "liking" politicians that end up stabbing them in the back.

Amen. Paul Ryan - an open-borders, banksta-fellating, section 8 supporting "conservative" - is the absolute perfect pairing with Willard Mittens Obamney. But, hey, it's the mostest important erection EVVVAAAHHHH!

Anonymous said...

'Jamilah Nasheed '
gawd, with a name like that, help us all.

Jeff Faberman said...

Giving these rape apes the vote was the beginning of the end of the USA.

10mm AUTO said...

60 sec Commercial:

Clip of a sad young negress trying to reach someone on her cell phone. rain outside window. (soft violin music)

Gentle Voice: "When Shasquaninia found out she was pregnant by a unknown buck, she was devastated. She knew Life would be hard and she might never have the opportunities given to so many others. She knew if she gave birth, there might not be a convenient dumpster available to get rid of the niglet. Taking care of one would be costly.

(2 seconds more sad violin music, Shasquaninia shown with tear running down her cheek. Then she reachs for her phone book)

(Happier Music, Voice over clip): "We here at Planned Parenthood in Conjunction with The Phoenix Foundation have started a fund that will allow Shasquaninia to go to college or buy those rims for her buck or get that professional hair weave that will open doors for her and make her the envy of all her friends."

(Cut to clip of Shasquaninia on split screen talking on a cell phone, second screen show a older, professional looking negress giving her advice. Toward the end of 7 sec clip, Shasquaninia smiles nods vigorously)

(Voice over Clip) "PP will pay $5000 to harvest her ovaries for medical research, dog food or fertilizer after aborting her unwanted niglet, thus giving her the needed funds to really enjoy herself."

(Brief cut of her opening a letter with check. Her eyes go wide and she shows it to an older mammy who nods approvingly, background is lower middle class)

(Voice over) "Gone are those worries of where the next crack payment is coming from or how to bail Jamal out of jail. The Phoenix Foundation is a program that is making a difference in every community, Nationwide!"

(Clip 4 seconds) of Shasquaninia in what looks like a disco, lots of tall bucks are looking on approvingly followed by clip 4 seconds of her showing pregnant looking friend some printed materiel and friend is impressed and smiling. 2 second closeup of Shasquaninia opening an envelope next to a mailbox and pulling out a check and smiling contentedly.)

(Voice Over Clip) "Also, Shasquaninia is using the referral program to turn on her friends to all the advantages of living the "good Life" unrestrained by inconveniences such as motherhood. She can earn up to $500 for bringing in 5 friends of childbearing age for our prompt service and get paid THE SAME DAY!!"

(Final clip is Shasquaninia flinging herself into the arms of what looks like a professional negro football player, then cut to her getting out of a expensive car on a red carpet, expensive dress, jewelry with lots of flashbulbs going off, background fades to blur)

(Voice Over clip) Now Shasquaninia is living the good life and helping out her friends and YOU Can TOO. Call 1-800-no-moreNigs for free information. That's 1-800-nomoreNigs. Phoenix Foundation is licensed in all 50 States.

Cut

Zenster said...

Anon (8/11 12:32 AM): Keep that slimy ball gag of Political Correctness in your mouth.

Excellent turn of words there. Now, will you please adopt a regular monicker so that I can spot your comments? I'm positive that this isn't the first time I've made such a request.

Californian said...

The article at...

http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Three-reasons-South-Africa-will-fail-20120809%27

..."Three Reasons that South Africa Will Fail" is good. But! Why would anyone have thought any differently? Post-colonial Africa has been largely a record of failure if not downright debacle. And you add to this the Marxist-terrorist aspect of the ANC, as well as the usual delusions of the DWLs who supported it. The results in SA were stagnating economy, collapsing infrastructure, corrupt politicians, exploding crime.

And an honest appraisal of post-1965 America might show similar trends. But honesty seems to be an item in short supply in these days of "dialog" on race.

Anonymous said...

"Giving these rape apes the vote was the beginning of the end of the USA."

No, electing trash like LBJ was the beginning of the end. Whites are to blame for the condition of blacks in America because we have done everything to define their destiny and nothing to restrain their savage behavior.

If blacks had the wherewithal to shape their own destiny-- and they certainly could on their own terms, in their own territory-- it would be a different story. Blacks have been slaves (literally) to the Democrats in their program to control domestic politics for decades. Leftists are now stronger than ever-- perhaps at their zenith.

When you visit Tucson AZ be sure to see the Pima Air Museum. They have JFK's Air Force One, which Johnson inherited. The tour guide said that Johnson had his own gauges installed at his little window seat because he didn't trust the pilots. In the video here he looks like a sick individual without a soul. The face tells a lot about a person.

Anonymous said...

It's genes. Blacks' genes disproportionately provide them with greater speed and jumping ability than other races. Similary, it's blacks' genes that disproportionately provide them with lower intelligence, less impulse control, and more violent tendencies than other races.

MuayTyson said...

Off Topic,

http://sports.yahoo.com/photos/olympics-olympians-of-mixed-heritage-slideshow/

I thought race was a social construct? Since when is Italian and Argentinian a race? If the fucking Liberals want to brain wash me they best get their shit straight a child can see through this pathetic attempt at pandering to the Multicult.

Anonymous said...

Why the Media does want different races mixing? I read that races mixing will have many health consequences. For example, it affects in behavior problems such as excessive aggression. It increases drugs abuse and dependence, including heroin, cocaine or stimulant dependence. Present with migraine, skin problems, heart problems, depression and etc. Maybe the media wants different races mixing to be produce one mixing race, “brown hybrid” that will have same Brain capacity, same IQ and same other characteristics. I found that the world elites want create a slavery human race to be easily control them.

World_War_Me said...

Something tells me the United Airlines staff is not suffering from the horrors of being "too white." The story below leads me to believe this airport is crawling with the joys of diversity.

"A 10-year-old went missing in a CHICAGO airport on her way to camp."

Highlights:

- "United Airlines has put two parents through the wringer after their The girl was supposed to be under the supervision of an unaccompanied minor service, but no one helped her board her next flight."

- "The Klebahn's [parents] only found out about her missing status when the camp called to inform them of her absence."

- "More stress ensued after the parents called United Airlines wanting to know where she was, and the airline was repeatedly uncooperative. No one was able to find out information and no one seemed concerned."

HERE'S THE BEST LINE: In one telephone conversation with a customer service agent in India, the parents told the agent about the situation. They asked how Phoebe could have missed her flight since "everything was 100% on time," to which the agent replied that "IT DOES NOT MATTER, SHE IS STILL IN CHICAGO AND I AM SURE SHE IS FINE." What a comedian!

More:
- "Phoebe's parents got the run-around by several agents until one United employee finally agreed to help, only after some heavy persuading. AFTER THE AGENT TOLD THEM SHE WAS ABOUT TO END HER SHIFT, they asked her what she would do if her child went missing for 45 minutes. The agent said she "understood," and would do her best to help."

- "Phoebe apparently tried to ask for help several times and was repeatedly denied. Upon arrival in Chicago, Phoebe told the attendants that she was supposed to catch a flight for camp. They told her to wait. Then she asked to use a phone three times so she could tell her parents she was okay. They told her to wait. Once she missed the flight, she asked if someone could call her camp and tell them she would be late. They replied, 'yes, we will take care of it.'"


Rest assured, "United is currently reviewing the matter."

From the article:
"United Airlines Cares Only About Its Image - Loses Ten-Year-Old Girl and aefuses to Help Until Media Gets Involved"
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/249757-United-Airlines-Cares-Only-About-Its-Image-Loses-Ten-Year-Old-Girl-and-Refuses-to-Help-Until-Media-Gets-Involved