Monday, September 16, 2013

Could Marion Berry Smoke this Truth?: As the Black Population of Washington D.C. Plummets, Civilization Returns


 There's something happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear.”

Sorry Buffalo Springfield, it’s quite clear what’s happening.

Quite clear.
Will it be necessary when blacks are less than 10 percent of the population of D.C.?

With the removal of the black population from Washington D.C.,  - the racial population responsible for the crime, misery and blight found in the city - avenues and streets where vice flourished and commerce hid have been replaced with Caucasian Urban Renewal [Best Restaurants in Washington, D.C.'s 14th Street Corridor: A stretch of 14th St. N.W. is packed with trendy new restaurants and bars, Wall Street Journal, 8-30-13].

What was life like in D.C. just under 25 short years ago?

1989 [Battling for Customers : Crack Wars Leave D.C. Under Siege, Washington Post, March 26, 1989]:
New Murder CapitalAn anguished District of Columbia is America's newly crowned murder capital. Its homicide rate has more than doubled in less than 15 months. By Friday there had been 120 killings already this year in a city of only 650,000. 
An estimated 60% of the murders were drug related. "To suggest that the city is under siege is not an accurate reading," said H. H. Brookins, bishop of the district's African Methodist Episcopal churches, who came here last year after serving as AME bishop in Los Angeles. "Certain pockets, yes, but not all over." 
But among many blacks, who make up 70% of the district's population, and particularly among those who live, work or travel through the afflicted neighborhoods, an intense, hopeless kind of hand-wringing is taking place.  
Wrenching ReminderMore than anywhere else, Washington is a wrenching reminder that homicide is the nation's leading cause of death for black males between 15 and 34. Last year 90% of the victims and 80% of the suspects in Washington's murders were black, and one-fifth of the suspects were 18 or 19. 
Last November, after 19-year-old Vondalia Robinson was shot to death by cross fire between rival drug dealers outside a popular nightclub in a dangerous part of town, a local gospel station broadcast her funeral to try to stir citizen outrage."What can we do?" asked the station's commentator, broadcasting live from the funeral home. 
"What can we do?"Life now has disintegrated into "total chaos, a hopelessness that pervades every aspect of life," said Cathy Hughes, owner of another local radio station. "It means living in hell. The killings are taking place in the ghetto now. But the way the drugs were able to escape from ghettoes, so will the killing." 

What if “drugs” weren’t the problem? Flash-forward five years.

1994 [Washington Is No Longer U.S. Murder Capital, Washington Post, 12-31-1994]:
The number of people slain in the District of Columbia dropped 11% this year, the largest reduction in homicides since the mid-1980s, when the widespread advent of crack unleashed a seemingly unrelenting tide of violence in the eastern half of the city. 
As of Friday, 414 people had been slain in the city in 1994, down from the 467 homicides that occurred in 1993. The year ended with 780 nonfatal shootings, a reduction of 14% from the previous year. Overall reported crime dropped 8% in the district.

More than 90% of the homicides continue to involve young black men and teen-agers as victims and killers. Again, the vast majority of the year's homicides--82%--were committed with firearms. In most cases, the victim and killer were associates, and in many cases had one time been friends.

Four years later, and the trend remained entrenched.

1998 [Dubious Progress in a Deadly District, Washington Post, April 19, 1998]:

"The police department's performance in fighting homicide has been so bad for so long that it invites lawlessness," said Joseph E. diGenova, whose five-year tenure as U.S. attorney for the District ended in 1988. 
From 1987 through 1997, among cities of more than 400,000 population, Washington had the highest homicide rate in the United States. 
And black males stood squarely in the killing zone: Of the city's 4,390 homicide victims in those 11 years, 87 percent were African American men. A black male in Washington who turned 18 in 1989 had a 1 in 24 chance of being slain by 1995, the most extreme ratio in the nation, according to a National Institute of Justice study. 

"The police department's performance in fighting homicide has been so bad for so long that it invites lawlessness," said Joseph E. diGenova, whose five-year tenure as U.S. attorney for the District ended in 1988. 
From 1987 through 1997, among cities of more than 400,000 population, Washington had the highest homicide rate in the United States. 
And black males stood squarely in the killing zone: Of the city's 4,390 homicide victims in those 11 years, 87 percent were African American men. A black male in Washington who turned 18 in 1989 had a 1 in 24 chance of being slain by 1995, the most extreme ratio in the nation, according to a National Institute of Justice study.

What happens when you point out the obvious correlation of crime and race in Washington D.C., especially in an area that has remained (Hunter S. Thompson wondered if Georgetown would surrender to the black menace in 1972) solidly white throughout decades of intense blackness in other parts of the city?

Well, residents of white Georgetown would ‘wince’ at such a suggestion.
Not needed in majority-white areas of the city...

2006 [Police Chief Declares D.C. Crime Emergency, Washington Post, July 12, 2006]
D.C. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey reacted yesterday to a recent surge in homicides by declaring a "crime emergency," a move that gives him the freedom to quickly adjust officers' schedules and restrict their days off. 
Thirteen people have been killed since July 1 in the District, and police are being pressured to take action by residents at community meetings and vigils to honor the dead. The victims included a popular store owner slain at closing time, a community activist killed in a park and a British citizen whose throat was slit in Georgetown. 

The declaration came on the same day that Ramsey transferred a police official who was accused of making a racially insensitive remark at a community meeting Monday night in Georgetown. Ramsey temporarily reassigned Inspector Andy Solberg, who urged residents to report suspicious activity and said, "This is not a racial thing to say that black people are unusual in Georgetown." 

Police have linked robbery and homicide in the slaying early Sunday of Alan Senitt, 27, a British citizen who was caught by surprise while walking a friend home along a tree-lined street in Georgetown. Senitt's throat was slashed and his friend was nearly raped, police said. Four suspects are in custody -- including a woman who allegedly drove the getaway car and a 15-year-old who authorities want to prosecute as an adult. Senitt had been working in Washington with a political action committee set up for former Virginia governor Mark R. Warner (D). 
Two of the suspects in Senitt's killing -- Christopher Piper, 25, and Jeffrey Rice, 22 -- had criminal records. Piper was paroled this year after a prison term for armed robbery and a drug charge. Rice was released in May after serving time for a drug offense and probation violation. Authorities said the two are suspects in at least two robberies that took place in Georgetown in the weeks before Senitt's attack. 
About 400 people crowded into a church in Georgetown on Monday night to discuss the Senitt killing. Solberg, the commander of the 2nd Police District, was addressing that forum when he made his remarks about race. Senitt was white, and the suspects in the case are black. 
"They were black," Solberg said. "This is not a racial thing to say that black people are unusual in Georgetown. This is a fact of life." 
Bill Starrells, a member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission from Georgetown who was at the meeting, said he "winced" when he heard the comment.  
"Obviously it was out of place," Starrells said. "It was out of character for him. It was an unfortunate comment." 
“Out of character.”

From an evolutionary perspective, Starrells is mouthing the correct philosophy in Black-Run America (BRA), but such a flippant attitude to the reality of black crime won’t provide immunity from being the victim of black crime.

Yet it remains persistent in Washington D.C., even as CUR sweeps aside the rubble found in vacant lots, replacing it with overpriced restaurants and streets no longer abandoned after 6 p.m.


In 2012, more than 90 percent of the dead were African Americans and nearly seven in 10 were younger than 35. The city’s homicide rate has gone way down – the annual body count dropped from a record high of 482 in 1991 to a half-century low of 88 last year – but the casualties don’t change. Like David, many of the fallen loitered in the danger zone, in the vicinity of the killers and the killed, always in the shadows of trouble. 
Victims who aren’t perceived as innocent tend to draw scant public notice or sympathy, and the shooting of David Robinson appalled the civic conscience only briefly, owing to the dismal particulars of the crime: He had died in a gunfight after being robbed of his new Nike sneakers. 
“The circumstances are not only tragic, they are incredibly disquieting,” Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) said hours after the slaying as he appeared at a previously scheduled church vigil against violence.”A life for a pair of Nike tennis shoes? C’mon, ladies and gentlemen! It’s time for us to be able to end this tragic violence in our society.”
No, the circumstances are not tragic.

The tragedy is the story of Inspector Andy Solberg, who in merely mentioning the racial element of crime in Washington D.C caused white people to ‘wince’.

Still, the chords of Buffalo Springfield’s song echo throughout a D.C. undergoing CUR, providing an uncomfortable question that will need answering at some point soon.

R-A-C-E. 

Four letters that, when combined, explain everything.

Take away the 'r' and the 'e' and add a 'g' and 't', well, you then understand why for decades Washington D.C. was the murder capital of America, and why today it's on the verge of an unprecedented comeback. 

93 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gact? Gact is the answer?

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

greatwhites, e-dog "my peeps" holder will punish any white person for pointing out race in a public space. and did you guys see that they tried so hard to put the word out that a WHITE MAN had something to do with a mass killing. go figure!

Aaron Alexis is as black as coal! and somehow they probably would say he's a mulatto or he hangs out with white people. maybe he was related to treyvon St. martin? can't wait to hear the fucking spin on this top!

GODSPEED?SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, the crime problem -- because it is a gact problem -- is a zero-sum equation. By displacing the malevolent blacks from D.C. to outlying suburbs, the problem is merely hidden instead of eliminated, by transferring it onto nearby, previously-stable communities.
If a surgeon removed a tumor on your lung, you would expect him to dispose of it properly. Dissecting the tumor, then grafting the pieces onto your spleen, liver, pancreas and gall bladder, while it may extend the life of your lung, does absolutely nothing good for your overall health.
It is much preferrable to contain the cancer into major urban centers, where in cases of emergency, it can be quarantined. It is also preferrable, IMO, for the capitol of this country's rotten government to be addled with the very black blight it serves to protect and proliferate. D.C. deserves to be seen as a national embarassment.

Anonymous said...

90210
Yes, DC and groids:

http://angrywhitedude.com/2013/09/navy-yard-shooting-meet-shooter-aaron-alexis/

Discard said...

Off topic, but I'm glad to know that the latest mass shooter is Black. That means that we Whites are only guilty of having invented guns, instead of being the actual killers in this case.
OTOH, maybe we're all going to be charged with racism, which drove the poor Negro to make this desperate cry for help.

Shibes Meadow said...

Boy, talk about an ironically-timed post...

cdw said...

I was just in DC, downtown, just below Dupont Circle. The streets were clear of undesirables, and police just seemed to be at the right place at the right time. There were a number of homeless gentlemen who were polite, even with being on the street, and they did receive monies from passersby. The only time I was told to watch out was when I was at the University of Maryland and told not to go out of my way to get back to where I had been. And that was from the black bouncer at the Barking Dog Pub who told me that.

Anonymous said...

I don't get it. How are Georgia and Connecticut the problem?

Anonymous said...

Groid mass shooter at the Navy Yard in D.C.

As we all know, the media will soon start blaming gun-owning Christians in the flyover-states for creating a "gun culture" that "drove" this Negroe to kill some White people.

If he used an AR-15, expect another round of gun confiscation legislation pushed in Congress.

Anonymous said...

13 year old Mexican kid gunned down by Blacks in San Antonio.

The MSM reports that there may possibly be a racial motive, while they also tell us that the Blacks yelled out "F*** Mexicans!" as they opened fire.

http://www.woai.com/articles/woai-local-news-119078/racist-motive-in-murder-of-13-11656114/

I'm pretty sure that if a Black submitted a sworn affidavit saying "I killed that person for explicitly racial reasons" the police and the media would scratch their beards and say "Hmm, looks like there may possibly be a racial angle to this. Hard to say though. We'll have to investigate further."

So CAL Snowman said...

After reading this article all I could think about was Dave Chappelle's stand up where he talks about the changes in D.C. He talks about how DC is different today that it was in the 80s and about the "New White" people that are not afraid of blacks. Also Dave talks about how White people and black people behave differently around the police. Even though this stand up routine is from the year 2000 it still remains relevant today. It's also one of the funniest stand up routines of all time.

Killin' Them Softly Part 1

There is more stuff about D.C. in the other parts but it's kind of spread out. He makes a lot of references to drugs/crack in the black community. I actually think that Chappelle was black listed by Hollyweird because he told the truth about black people, albeit in a humorous and satirical way. He was destroying (through humor) the carefully constructed PC narrative about race. His stand up routines and show on comedy central showcased black people as seen through the eyes of black Dave Chappelle, not some Hollyweird executive.

Just check out this short skit about what happens when blacks in america are given reparations :

Dave Chappelle - Black Reparations

Anonymous said...

Careful, D.C. Don't make things too nice or too white or you'll have blacks hammering you from all sides with accusations of exclusion and racism. Blacks are predictably drawn to any white-created, prosperous society.

So CAL Snowman said...

Anonymous said ;

"Gact? Gact is the answer?"

I believe what PK meant is (to quote Shakespeare) :

"A Rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

You can call R-A-C-E problems G-A-C-T problems but that won't change anything. I'll admit it's a confusing passage.

Johnny See said...

Not GACT...

FACT!!!

All the facts about blacks we discuss here!

Do you get it now?

'G' is next to 'F' on the keyboard and we all know Paul writes so fast he doesn't always proofread or edit very well.

(However I must say you have gotten better about it, sir...)

Anonymous said...

Blacks kind of remind me of America's "Oobleck" (ala Dr. Seuss).

See Dr. Seuss's "Bartholomew and the Oobleck". Basically, some oobleck stuff got all over his roo,, and bartholomew tried to spread it out by pushing it out the house with fans, then it got out all over town. Some things 5 year-olds can understand better....

http://www.amazon.com/Bartholomew-Oobleck-Caldecott-Honor-Classic/dp/0394800753

james m said...

Perhaps PK should use Chell-Speck?

Stuff Black People Don't Like said...

Reference was way too meta: think G-A-T-T-A-C-A.

DNA.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
Careful, D.C. Don't make things too nice or too white or you'll have blacks hammering you from all sides with accusations of exclusion and racism. Blacks are predictably drawn to any white-created, prosperous society.

Not to worry, anon. Sodom-on-Potomac is filling up with squids, TWMNBN, DWL nomenklatura, apparachiki of the regime, jackboots, judges, lobbyists, Duranties, etc. - all of whom have money to burn. It's one of the wealthiest areas on earth now. As with NYC, they'll manage to somehow miraculously arrange things so that Shitavius, Turdquilla and all their budding patrician sprogs will soon depart for friendlier neighborhoods via enhanced section 8 handouts and better EBT opportunities, like yours and mine.

Anonymous said...

The DC black pop. may be plummeting, but as we've seen at the Navy Yard today, it only takes ... one ...

My prayers go out to the families.

Anonymous said...

LOL. I'm watching the news about the DC Navy Yard shooting. All the white women are speaking in sympathetic tones about the black shooter. "He was sick," they say. "PTSD," they said. They talk about him as if he were a baby crying for his mama. After all, if you've been watching TV for the past fifty years, you'd know he is the REAL victim here ...

Anonymous said...

My brain immediately thought "G A T E"
( I cannot explain why and I know it makes no sense given the letter selection ...but they do help :-D )

Anonymous said...

Friends say he was sweet and peaceful


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/shots-fired-washington-navy-yard-person-injured-fbi-article-1.1457156

Chuck Hammer said...

I'm probably the tenth person to point this out but PK was referring to DNA. G, A, C, T are the first letters of the nucleotides that make up DNA.

Anonymous said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACGT

It's Time said...

In my neck of the woods it's called "Neighborhood Watch" and I despise the ex military DWL that thinks he's in charge. I mean, for the sake of political correctness and white guilt syndrome, he will not call anything like it is. I don't even bother with it anymore. I look out for me and mine and screw the rest of them. You get what you get and you don't pitch a fit.

Jay in DC said...

A nig-nog shot up DC today about 8 minutes from my office. A navy contractor shot up one of the largest Navy Bases in the US. Like our buddy Nidal at Fort Hood. Can you imagine that ARMY and NAVY bases are “gun free zones”?? This is not fiction or theater, this is reality. In what fucking alternate universe full of faggots, women, sand nigger Islamicists, et. al can you just shoot up bases in the USAF? Well, apparently, our reality.

Also… on my commute into same city, I decided to cap a couple of pics. Gentrification looks like this… the HIGHLY hilarious part is, DWLs who are “uplifting minorities” are so fucking dumb they don’t realize that they are pushing them out of their homes via property tax. Every one of those high-rise / skyscraper cranes you see is demolishing 100 year old brownstones/rowhouses to make more room for Capitol Hill Staffers, DWL NGO employees, et. al. This is the pathology of the DWL. They bleat and weep for ‘underpriveleged yoof’ not realizing that unscrupulous commercial property developers are steamrolling these niggers back into southern PG County.

You see… DWLs have never opened a history book. They don’t know that as they continue to populate all neighborhoods around Capitol Hill, they are destroying black neighborhoods in the process. Their nigger pets H A T E them, but…. no DWL ever considers that because OBAMA, because PROGRESS, because Hope and Change.

Do you see why we need a nation wide reset?

View here, the construction of Mount Doom, coming soon, to a city near you…


The Face of DWL Gentrification

Anonymous said...

Crazzed hating black shooter in DC!

Remember the gay, black, muslim DC sniper?

expat said...

All I heard about this morning about the DC shooting was that they were looking for a 50 year old white male. When the tribe over at MSNBC got a hold of that hate fact they must have orgasiming all morning thinking they had another YT tea bagger gone nuts.

I had so much fun walking around my liberal place of work saying "I'll be a son of Obama, it was a white negro all along".

Anonymous said...

I've got to play devil's advocate on this. If the black population is going down in a major city like D. C., and overall the black population in USA is not dropping, then where are they going?

Has the hell spawn simple been driven and unleashed into the suburbs to replicate the hell they once created in the city, now into the countryside? This does not sound like good news. Seems better when they are all together for Humans instead of being spread out.

I dislike as everyone days that our beautiful cities have been turned into hell, but the problem is still there, its just been thinned to be less noticeable it would seem.

Anonymous said...

DNA determines IQ potential, and nuture determines result within that potential. DNA is composed of four, and only four, amino acids: guanine and cytosine bond together through three hydrogen bonds as do adenine and thymine. All the bonds in the DNA double helix are either g-c or a-t. Thus, Paul meant to say gcat.

He was saying it's not race, it's DNA . . . which is race. It's like the difference between a spade and a shovel.

Ape-people supporters will say that with so few differences between ape-people and real people, that there is no such thing as race. I say that human and chimp DNA is a 98% match, and that there is this thing called gene expression that determines how a gene results in living tissue, and there are very many switches that turn on and off during the development of an embryo. Thus it takes only minor deviations from human to render ape-people. Low impulse control, absolutely zero inner dialogue - read conscience, and a fondness for freshly butchered human flesh are a few of the tendencies we see. Neanderthals are often relegated to sub-human status, but recall they lived for 100,000 years in the frozen north (think future time orientation to get through the winter) in relative peace until a fresh wave of human savages migrated out of Africa and displaced them over a period of a few thousand years.

It is entirely possible that what makes us human is the 3-4% neanderthal DNA that groids lack!

In summary, race is all about a few differences, not skin color or the ubiquitous ugliness, but behavior that makes ape-people apes and us human.

If this all seems a bit technical, relax. I hear a Jamal and Sambo is on the way.

Anonymous said...

I got it PK. Took me a few seconds though.

Mr. Rational said...

G uanine
A denine
C ytosine
T hymine

(and yes of course I had it as soon as I saw it)

Anonymous said...

Blame crack, blame guns, blame bullets. Blame the neighborhood, blame poverty, blame the projects. Blame the schools, blame the prisons, blame the welfare state. Blame white people, blame society, blame racism, blame privilege...

The problem is Africans. It is always Africans.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

Greatwhites,

how much do you wanna bet that this black as coal serial killer in D.C. is a AFFIRMATIVE ACTION hire? just like the case in Texas at fort hood (not an Affirmative Action hire) but a political correctness hire! they new that mus-rat was going to pull that off. I know they didn't fire this coal NGR look-a-like winner just cause of his skin color. which by the way is the same shade as a loaf of human shit! gee, go figure!

the company that hired that spook has to do background checks. just like they are lowering test scores to let the stupid low I.Q. NGR's on the police force and fireman's jobs across America. this shit is killing innocent whites all over this country. and how dose a violent Ngr keep a job with the navy(sub-contractor) without being checked every year just like anyone else. something tells me this NGR is a black nationalist

maybe now these DWL's will understand why we WHITES need to protect ourselves! I wonder now if o'bummer would call us out for locking the car doors when a beauty like this comes strolling past your car on the way to the welfare office? I mean that could be barry's boy if he had one! right?

GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

TheAntidote said...

Very confusing news coming out of DC this morning. The negro shooter at the navy yard rampage has been described as a 9/11 hero, a Buddhist monk, an IT technician, and a gentle as a lamb cool guy. No mention of the victims nor whether one of his bruvas waved him through the high security gate. I guess I'll have to tune in to Rachel Madcow to have the entire episode explained to me.

Mr. Rational said...

how much do you wanna bet that this black as coal serial killer

A nit:  he was a mass killer, not a serial killer.  A serial killer has several victims over time; this was a one-time event.  (Accuracy in nomenclature is essential for clear thinking.)

is a AFFIRMATIVE ACTION hire? just like the case in Texas at fort hood (not an Affirmative Action hire) but a political correctness hire!

The chances you'd lose that bet are slim and none.  And the sad thing is that their "military service" makes them eligible for other civil service jobs like the USPS, which is going under due to the dead weight of their uselessness.  If the military had been kept White, so many of these "failures" wouldn't have failed.

These dangerous animals are brought on because of POLICY.  It's time for the victims and their relatives to start suing the government for damages because POLICY placed them at risk.  This applies especially to rape victims in the military.  If the perps were admitted under lower standards than Whites... jackpot.

Don M said...

Check this out!

Overseas adoptions rise -- for black American children
By Sophie Brown, for CNN

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/16/world/international-adoption-us-children-adopted-abroad/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

Nothing disingenous about these liberals. They are walking the walk. But DAMN are they stupid.

There is no amount of money you could pay me to take custody of a turdler. It would be 18 years of constant court appearances, legal fees, and restitution payments until the sprog matriculated to NU or was made good.

But hey, if the Dutch want 'em, I say they can have 'em all!

D-FENS said...

Don M - There is an export subsidy even I could support!

It's Time said...

Charity. Don't you just love going into a store and upon making your purchase they ask you "would you like to donate to (insert charity name meant to rob the public blind here) today? I always say "no I wouldn't but thanks for asking."

Want to know what my charity is? White people. My plumber. My telephone guy (yes I still have a land line). I am pretty good at judging character. I don't give to obvious wiggers. But there is a joy in greasing the palm of a local middle class white worker and telling them "have lunch on me, be proud that you are white. I am glad to have you as my (insert occupation here)." It is one small, but nice way to open the conversation and remind those people that they aren't drones. They should be proud of THEIR race and should never be ashamed of it. The looks are priceless. And you get the joy of giving to a worthy cause.

icerink said...

So my problem is Guanine,Adenine Cytosine and Thymine? I would find that quite stupid, and for this reason. I'm Black and I've never been involved in crime, and neither has anyone in my family. If my genetics are so messed up because I'm Black, then how did I get through life without being a criminal?

It's Time said...

icerink: You may be an exception. But there aren't enough exceptions in your culture. Your culture should be standing up and calling out what's wrong within your own race. Not enough blacks speak out against what you know is obviously wrong--why not? Why are you trolling a white persons website instead of fixing what is so obviously wrong with your own kind. Why would you even be here questioning us, unless of course, as usual--you care about what we think? Why, because the exceptions in your culture strive to be white. But you will never be. However, I encourage you to keep trying, its so much better for the rest of us.

icerink said...

To "It's Time", there are Black people standing up to thugs and miscreants in the underclass. Guess what? They don't listen. They don't care what someone like me, Bill Cosby, or Michael Nutter has to say. And one reason you don't hear more about Blacks speaking out against such miscreants is because of where they do it. They don't say these things within earshot of White people, or the general public. I've heard it more in church than anywhere else. Alot of people who behave like fools don't listen. Consider this. Whenever some Black kids were found studying and getting good grades, some other Black kids would make fun of them, claiming that they "act White". What do you do when someone makes fun of you like that? Blacks with means and an education vote with their feet and leave. And something else. I hardly consider myself an exception. I know plenty of Black people who are living without committing crimes or acts of violence. Most Black people aren't involved in crime. Those that are often don't listen to what others tell them.

icerink said...

To It's Time: Maybe I wouldn't care so much about what persons like you thought of me if I didn't have to hear about it. Maybe the reason I do care is because I am the one who has to worry about how I will be judged and treated.

Anonymous said...

2 questions for the regular posters:

1) What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?

2) Do most of you want an all-white country, or are some others races ok? To piggyback on that question, is "white" considered all of Europe, Russia and Australia?

Anonymous said...

90210

offtopik

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57603277/jesse-jackson-jr.s-celebrity-memorabilia-fur-coats-up-for-auction/

celeb memorabilia and fur lined clothing..

Remember its YT that makes this possible...taxes, inventions [from A as in Autos to Z as in zoology].

Melanie said...

@ It's Time

Want to know what my charity is? White people.



Amen, one hundred times amen, to that!

Anonymous said...

What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?

Blacks kill 8000? a year here.
Blacks are breeding.

Muslims are a billion and see
'naked sharia' site
'bare naked islam' etc.

Blacks have assimilated, somewhat.
fundamentalist muslims, NEVER.

MUSLIMS MORE POTENTIAL DANGER.

St Simon of Trent said...

Blogger icerink said...

To It's Time: Maybe I wouldn't care so much about what persons like you thought of me if I didn't have to hear about it. Maybe the reason I do care is because I am the one who has to worry about how I will be judged and treated.

September 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM


Stay in your own community and try to improve it.That way you won't have to hear about it.

It's Time said...

icerink: My life has been a long lonely rode except for that of my husband and my children. Don't whine to me about what you might have to do if you are made fun of or teased about trying to better yourself. In the world of "selfies" people absolutely do not know what to do if they are left alone with their own thoughts. They can't even begin to imagine being alone. Your cry of "what if" means nothing. Lets see something "nationally" from you who say you are black and are fed up. Are you saying that you are willing to continue down this road of destruction and let those take over who know no rules, regulations, morals or values? Why don't you start "here is what smart black people do" in the schools and this is what "stupid black people do" and refer to the prison system--instead of letting your culture continue to blame whites for the reason blacks are in prison. Why don't you and some of yours start a "this is what MLK really meant" if he is the truth that you believe he is. I don't. He didn't nothing for my white little boys and white little girls and I teach mine they don't have to hold hands with any other kind just because so many other people think they should. I don't teach hate. I teach mine to think on their feet and NEVER EVER let anyone else ramrod their beliefs down their throats. And its okay to be alone. It's sure as hell better to be by yourself and be true to yourself than it is to dance a dance and be someone you aren't because of what others may do to you. Why are you so scared to stand up for yourself?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

2) Do most of you want an all-white country, or are some others races ok? To piggyback on that question, is "white" considered all of Europe, Russia and Australia?


We are still debating that here among the best posters. It must be white, but there could be some Russians or Australians allowed, but they have to be completely white. You should start to get your paper work together for admittance.

Anonymous said...

Stupid is as stupid does. What you say is true, even blacks don't want to live around blacks.

You're an exception- a majority of black males are criminals

St Simon of Trent said...




Anonymous said...

2 questions for the regular posters:

1) What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?

2) Do most of you want an all-white country, or are some others races ok? To piggyback on that question, is "white" considered all of Europe, Russia and Australia?

September 17, 2013 at 11:12 AM


1) From my life experiences Blacks are infinitely more dangerous than Arab,White or Paki Muslims.I certainly don't think we need any more Muslims imported here,but the ones I've met and/or had to deal with professionally with have been polite,proper,intelligent and non criminal.Unlike practically every Black I've ever had the misfortune to meet.

2)I consider ALL European people White,regardless of their country of origin.I could live with a small minority of working,intelligent and well behaved HUMANS from Asia,India and carefully screened Middle Easterners.Blacks and for the most part Mestizos are low IQ,lazy,slovenly creatures that seem predisposed to criminality.They will bring down any culture.
TWMNBM or "Squids",are NOT European or White in my opinion and should never be considered welcome in a White country.

Anonymous said...

What good is all the standing up and asking gonna do when the people you're asking aren't capable of doing it?!?! You act as if blacks' dysfunction is somehow elective. It's genetic and involuntary.

Californian said...

1) What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?


Objectively speaking, blacks have committed far more acts of violence against whites in America than have Muslims. Blacks have wrecked far more cities than Muslims have. (The 9/11 attacks destroyed several buildings and killed several thousand people. Compare that to the pillage and carnage seen in Detroit, Newark, Birmingham, Gary, etc., etc.)

Mass Muslim immigration may be a cultural threat as it has the potential to displace the decadent Western culture we see in too much of Europe and North America.

Both blacks and Muslims are "tactical" threats: more symptoms than causes.

The real threat is the failure of will of white peoples which morally disarms them before designated victim groups. Much of this is connected to liberal ideology which, as James Burnham notes, is a rationalization for Western suicide.

Another threat comes from the low white birthrates, which are proving to be demographic disasters.

Ultimately, white peoples will have to start thinking like a race/civilization. That's the real challenge.

Anonymous said...

OT: END AID TO AFRICA: documentary

Libertarian Realist

See where we are headed...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPd8IGERDuE&feature=youtu.be

icerink said...

To St. Simon of Trent:

My community is a predominantly White area. And the Blacks who live here are living here peacefully. I don't live in the ghetto as you might have believed.

icerink said...

>>Anonymous said...
What good is all the standing up and asking gonna do when the people you're asking aren't capable of doing it?!?! You act as if blacks' dysfunction is somehow elective. It's genetic and involuntary.

If it's genetic and voluntary, then how come most Blacks elect not to commit crime or live violent lives? How come the Black people I live around are living decent and civilized lives? And don't give me that "you're the exception" crap. I've seen many examples of Black people behaving decently and choosing to do right. It is about choosing to do what is right.

D-FENS said...

"1) What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?

2) Do most of you want an all-white country, or are some others races ok? To piggyback on that question, is "white" considered all of Europe, Russia and Australia?"

1) Negroes, since there are more of them and they want to live in White areas. The mooslimbs are a problem but at least they want to keep to themselves and some even have an entrepreneurial drive. Nevertheless, we should allow no more in, weed out the terrorist prone and stay the hell out of the Jew's wars in the middle east.

2) An all-White country is not going to happen pending forcible relocation/expulsion. That means SOMEONE has to have the power to do this and to determine WHO is White. A few threads back, I asked WHAT the criteria would be for saying someone is White. I don't recall getting an answer. Any group that has the power to take the actions needed to create a White nation in the present day US would undoubtedly abuse and be corrupted by that power. No thanks. A system of local administrations similar to the New England town meetings would allow the problem to resolve itself at least to a nuisance level. Remember that BRA is imposed by a central government.

A nation or political area composed of numerous ethnic, racial or religious groups requires either an authoritarian central government (USSR, Yugoslavia, China) or a decentralized state such as the Swiss Cantons. A halfway system like we have is unstable which is why it is drifting to an authoritarian state.

My experience has been that highly educated people of different backgrounds can get along but there still must be a predominant culture. I prefer that it be White/Western.

Californian said...

2) Do most of you want an all-white country, or are some others races ok? To piggyback on that question, is "white" considered all of Europe, Russia and Australia?

I'll give a different perspective on this:

The USA has always had a number of races: whites, blacks (from slavery), Indians, some Mexicans after 1849. This was a manageable situation because US elites understood the racial situation and maintained white dominance. This was, in part, by promoting various racialist ideologies. (And these ideologies, unlike modern liberalism, had considerable basis in science.)

After all, there have been other multi-racial states in which whites have remained on top. Look at the Russian Empire. And there have been white ethno-states which have fallen apart. Look at certain Scandinavian countries which openly supported the anti-apartheid ANC in South Africa, and which now open their frontiers to third world mass migration.

It can be argued that a certain degree of racial "diversity" is healthy insofar as it makes people aware of inherent racial differences. Remember, it was northerners who beat the drum for integration and who refused to believe what white southerners were telling them about blacks. The recent rioting in Sweden just might have been a wakeup call to many former liberals who looked down their noses at white South Africans. Perhaps now that the third worlders are torching their cities, they will "get it." Perhaps.

The politics are critical. It started going "south" (ahem) in the USA with the Civil Rights Revolution, in which the racialist ideologies were displaced by egalitarian ones. You add to that the underclass black birthrate. There's a certain point at which sheer numbers start to play against you. Arthur Kemp has an article on this, "The Lie of Apartheid," about how white rule in South Africa was doomed by the demographics.

Supposing we had a USA in which its elites had a racial consciousness, and used it to promote white racial interests: say, by eliminating all affirmative action, supporting the growth of white families, dumping the MLK worship, promoting the immigration of white refugees from Africa, and having pro-white news in the media and racial science in academia?

That is, the situation you had a century ago.

As I say, it comes back to the politics.

(By the way, I recommend reading Kemp's essay because it does deal with the issue of the numbers:

http://www.arthurkemp.com/2012/03/lie-of-apartheid.html )

Anonymous said...

The Navy's IT supplier, The Experts, employed the shooter - check out their mgt page and expand Brian King, President who's responsible for the DC operation and recruitment:

http://www.expertsit.com/home/experts-management.php

Hmmm..

Jay Santos said...

The negro who shot 12 people in D.C. had all manner of criminal firearm behavior during and after his stint in the Navy. He worked for a company called The Experts. They did subcontract government work for HP.

Visit the website for The Experts. A negro is pictured front and center, surrounded by white women, using a computer. The company proudly says:

"The Experts, Inc. is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action (M/F/D/V) Employer. "

I guarantee you that this murderous monkey was given a fist full of special passes and deferred prosecution etc.

Anonymous said...

it's time thank you!! help your white brothers and sisters as long as they are not DWL's
Irish, English, German, Italian, we are all united and under non stop attack we are small minority on this planet hated because we invented almost everything.....green and blue eyed people are very very rare on earth let's love each other !

It's Time said...

Road instead of rode and "he didn't do ANYTHING for my white...."

Post this before the SBPDL grammar and spelling police get me!

I'll be the first to admit I can't type and cook at the same time:)

10mm AUTO said...

"I don't recall getting an answer. Any group that has the power to take the actions needed to create a White nation in the present day US would undoubtedly abuse and be corrupted by that power. No thanks. A system of local administrations similar to the New England town meetings would allow the problem to resolve itself at least to a nuisance level."

Ridiculous! Whites can easily tell Whites from others. Whites with a tiny admixture would pass. (I know a blazing redhead with supposedly 1/32 Cherokee blood. Not a problem.)

The Jews have an easy time telling jew from non-jew, they use blood tests and DNA. We could do that in close cases.

Worrying about the minutia of a propositional nation not currently in existence is simply a tool of dispiriting Whites from coming together to TRY. "It won't work, you will all fight amongst yourselves, who is White, Whites are a social Construct, etc" is all the speech of the left designed to distract and cause infighting.

What has been designed is a National pattern of the most successful White Nation, Switzerland; with the added benefits of no income tax and the mechanisms the the State (like Switzerland) totally focused with external issues and being a homeland for Whites.

The proposed Country area is divided up into counties already and they will pick their own sheriff. Other than that, "law enforcement" and State power will be practically invisible. The idea is not to build ANOTHER FUSA with all the mistakes waiting as seeds to grow, but to use a known successful pattern and add to it the best of what we have learned from the horrors here. Also, it will be a tiny area compared to the rest of the FUSA. Whites who don't find the NAR to their taste can always stay in the FUSA, just as now one can go live amongst the Amish and they are their own self contained people within the FUSA, but you can leave if you wish. Why not read the NAR's Constitution?

Only Communists and prisons build walls to keep people in.

Anonymous said...

ice rink you simply do not understand US whiteys we love being white and just want to be left ALONE, our eyes and shades of hair color are very important for us, WW2 arguably was a war about who was the whitest...so please just live in your blackness and we will GLADLY leave you alone

Anonymous said...

Well no shit, that contractor -- Tha Experts -- is EEO/AA/TNB. They have ONE client -- BRA, which employs EEO AA's at management positions who make purchasing and contracting decisions. You think they're going to do business with Whitey McKracker, LLC?

Anonymous said...

Amazingly, my lib friends (I'm starting to wonder why I keep them) have been DEAD SILENT about the nig invading a military establishment in the nation's capitol and shooting it up.

Apparently, the biggest threat to America right now is that a few twitter users made racial comments about Miss America, because that's all they will talk about.

Yes, they drank the Kool-aid. Completely insufferable.

Melanie said...

@ Californian September 17, 2013 at 12:40 PM-

I totally agree with you. It seems, at a quick glance, that your solution makes the most sense and is the most feasible, based on hundreds of years of history. Whites were able to tolerate a certain number of minorities in our midst, as long as the numbers remained small, were required to assimilate to some degree, remained mostly physically segregated, and whites governed. It angers minorities in historically-white created countries to admit it these days, but we were all better off when whites governed. I hate to put it like this, but it's fundamentally true, and history bears it out-countries are always most successful by every objective standard when whites hold the reins of government, are a fairly cohesive group, and have confidence in themselves as a race-confidence so ingrained that it's not even questioned, by themselves or anyone else.

Anonymous said...

icerink, it means nothing that "most black people" are not criminals. That is like saying "most muslims are not terrorists", or "most Jews are not globalist bankers", or "most Orientals are decent drivers". Everybody knows that.
What matters is that your people commit many more violent crimes than our people. Further, in any "black vs white" dispute, 90%+ of blacks will automatically side with "black" -- regardless of right or wrong. For those reasons, we don't trust any of you.
It means nothing that you talk about your problems behind closed doors, away from white ears; the end result is visibly: Nothing. The crime never stops. DNA or GACT does not determine behavior, but it does give tendency. You and your family pay your taxes and mow your lawn and go to school? We don't care. One of you is going to make friends with "One of the Bad Ones", and bring him into our neighborhood. Frankly, having your kind around is too much risk, not enough reward.

Dan said...

Disarm the blacks. Set about their Ghettoes and ransack their houses for contraband guns. Let the jackboot strike them in the face eternally.

Dan said...

Blacks? Avoid them. Don't hire them. Don't elect them.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous notes (about the protesting groid troll)
It means nothing that you talk about your problems behind closed doors, away from white ears; the end result is visibly: Nothing. The crime never stops. DNA or GACT does not determine behavior, but it does give tendency. You and your family pay your taxes and mow your lawn and go to school? We don't care. One of you is going to make friends with "One of the Bad Ones", and bring him into our neighborhood. Frankly, having your kind around is too much risk, not enough reward.

The fact that the troll mentioned that groids talk about the criminality in their "churches" is actually indicative of your previous point: Further, in any "black vs white" dispute, 90%+ of blacks will automatically side with "black" - regardless of right or wrong. 97% voted for a candidate who attended an openly black supremacist "church" for two solid decades (but never heard a sermon). Similar percentiles will side with a black defendant in any criminal trial, irrespective of how horrible the crime or how obviously guilty the black criminal is (OJ Simpson being the classic example).

Simply put, even the "law-abiding" blacks support and endorse the black criminals, which is why they endlessly vote for the same criminals over and over again (Marion Berry being the perfect example - among hundreds of others which could be cited). Race is everything to blacks, it trumps all other concerns - probably to a greater degree than any other ethnic group on the planet save one, who cannot be mentioned. Whites' problem is just the opposite. Race or ethnicity has been placed too low - to the point of complete elimination - in the hierarchy of white priorities. The new top of the white priority list is a fanatical new pseudo-religion of self-hate which has been created, stoked, promoted and sold by the all-time master salesmen of shit-sandwiches.

Anonymous said...

Blogger icerink said...

To St. Simon of Trent:

My community is a predominantly White area. And the Blacks who live here are living here peacefully. I don't live in the ghetto as you might have believed.

September 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM

Sounds like you don't like living near them either.

ricpic said...

Are blacks really all that concerned with crime? There's a lot of hand wringing and wailing but that's it, that's where it stops. There is NEVER support for the kind of no nonsense policing and sentencing that might make a difference. Because then the fathers, sons, uncles and cousins of the hand wringing wailers might be caught and then do actual time. It's all for show and it all is a show. That's the main thing: hand wring and wail. But DO? Actually do. Never.

Anonymous said...

You're black, and have never committed a crime, and therefore it is untrue to say that blacks' DNA makes them more criminal on average than whites and other races?

Dan said...

Crime is how the black put food on the table. I include EBT expropriation in that crime as well.

icerink said...

To answer Melanie's question:

Maybe you should consider this. Alot of middle class Black people want to be in White neighborhoods because White is considered the color of prestige. White is considered the standard for which everything else is judged against. There was a time when some Black people went off to start their own communities. Either the harvests failed, or there was some kind of violence from racists, such as what happened to Rosewood,FL. Why do so many White women perm their hair and wear weaves rather than wear it natural? It is because they are being taught that in American society, kinky hair on a woman is considered ugly. Basically, these are women trying to get as close to White as possible. Now ask yourself this. Where does that thinking come from?

icerink said...

St. Simon of Trent said:
Sounds like you don't like living near them either.


My response: Actually, I have Black neighbors as well as White neighbors. I get along with my Black neighbors, as well as my White neighbors just fine. I don't worry about getting robbed, jumped, or anything. Where I live it is peaceful.

Anonymous said...

Not for this to come out the wrong way...but I wonder when this blog might get away from the documentation of the decline of black run American cities and cover more far ranging topics (like it used to...) Culture, economics, literature, etc... It seems like it is stuck on one topic and one topic only...not that the topic is unworthy, but maybe just post after post about cities? Just a thought...I still think this is the best blog going.

Mr. Rational said...

Most Black people aren't involved in crime.

95% of Black voters voted for the Presidential candidate who explicitly identified with the Black thug over the Hispanic neighborhood watchman, youth mentor and anti-racist activist.  That means 95% of Black voters SUPPORT Black criminals over people of any other race, no matter how virtuous.  That is why you must go.

Blacks have assimilated, somewhat.
fundamentalist muslims, NEVER.

MUSLIMS MORE POTENTIAL DANGER.


Once the label of "racist" is defanged and one danger is recognized and dealt with, the other will be much easier.  I don't think it matters which one comes first, because "racist" is the label slapped those who call out the atrocities of either.

I asked WHAT the criteria would be for saying someone is White. I don't recall getting an answer.

Because there really can't be one until it starts being a political possibility.  There might even be "grades" of Whiteness, like White enough to be a guest worker but not to be a citizen (if they had children they'd have to leave).

Melanie said...

icerink said...

To answer Melanie's question:



Maybe you should consider this. Alot of middle class Black people want to be in White neighborhoods because White is considered the color of prestige. White is considered the standard for which everything else is judged against. There was a time when some Black people went off to start their own communities. Either the harvests failed, or there was some kind of violence from racists, such as what happened to Rosewood,FL. Why do so many White women perm their hair and wear weaves rather than wear it natural? It is because they are being taught that in American society, kinky hair on a woman is considered ugly. Basically, these are women trying to get as close to White as possible. Now ask yourself this. Where does that thinking come from?



September 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM




Yes, whites create these "prestigious" communities by dint of taking the investment risks, hard work, doing the work to draw other whites who share their values to the new community. Are you really admitting what we've been saying in these comments, that blacks lack the qualifications to create the same kinds of communities for themselves, and the characteristics to maintain safety, security, economic viability? To expect criminals to be dealt with as criminals and not "my baby di'in do nuffins" when he gets arrested for strangling a 12 yo girl for her bicycle, or shoots an 18 mo infant point blank in the face? Why are these white flight communities considered "prestigious", as you put it? Is it some mystical magical white mojo, or is the general white expectation that neighbors will take responsibility for doing their share to keep the neighborhood free of litter, graffitti, loud noise, people loitering in the street and ghetto drama and crime? Are you really saying that blacks would be incapable of creating such communities? Well, I'll take you at your word, especially considering that your word is backed by the evidence of not only former white neighborhoods which are now crime-ridden hoods, but whole cities, such as Detroit, which are black-run and follow that same pattern.



What you're missing, yet again, is that these "prestigious" white flight communities without fail lose their prestige when the first "good" black families, and then the ghetto second wave, follow whites into them (as usual, after whites have done the heavy lifting of moving and creating them in the first place). It happens without fail, as surely as night follows day. And then again we're back to the question, why should whites not be allowed a safe haven with our own kind, in light of all the brouhaha we hear about "chocolate cities" for which the black rulers openly declare their desire and intention to keep "chocolate"? Why should whites not have the same right to our "whitopias" especially when we are the ones who build them?



The black follow-up flight invariably eventually destroys the "prestige" of the white flight community anyway, so you might as well prove, if possible, that blacks can create "prestigious" communites instead of parasiting off the white flight communities unitl the invariable destruction occurs, and then whites flee and do it all over again.



And what in the world does weave have to do with this topic? Are you a black female? Because I've noticed that black females can rarely debate any racial topic without bringing their insecurities regarding "Caucasian standards of beauty" into it. We could be discussing the approach of a nuclear bomb towards us, and some black female would bring "weave" and "tanning" and "blue contacts" into the debate.

It's Time said...

Melanie:

Bombs, blue eyes and weaves...

LMAO!!!!!!

D-FENS said...

"Because there really can't be one until it starts being a political possibility. There might even be "grades" of Whiteness, like White enough to be a guest worker but not to be a citizen (if they had children they'd have to leave)."

So, in effect, we have to pass the bill to see what's in it?

Mr. Rational said...

Bombs, blue eyes and weaves...

Aping all the outward traits (save the lack of grossly excessive adipose tissue), while ignoring the necessary intelligence (or even pretensions thereto), peacefulness and morally upright nature which are the real essence of Whiteness.

It's like their brains cannot grasp it, or even that it exists.

Bogolyubski said...

Dan:
Disarm the blacks. Set about their Ghettoes and ransack their houses for contraband guns. Let the jackboot strike them in the face eternally.

Wrong. The jackboot has been constructed to be used against you and me. It will never be used against the groid. It will be the groid like yesterday's shooter (security clearance, racial-preference beneficiary, etc.) who will be stomping it into our faces, with the willing assistance of may DWL white "patriots", as directed by TWMNBN nomenklatura kommissars. The jackboot needs to be bankrupted and sabotaged, for its only purpose is our extermination.

Anonymous said...

Indian said...

@ st Simon of Trent

1) What is more dangerous to the US - Blacks or Muslims? And Why?

The answer is simple, Pakistan is the only muslim country (As far as we know) that has nuclear weapons. If they fall into terrorist hands they are ten fold more dangerous than blacks.

These are, as everyone knows, extremely dangerous weapons with sophisticated arming mechanisms. If a black mob got hold of a nuclear weapon, they wouldn't have the know how of how to arm it.

A Muslim terrorist would gladly arm it, load it into a van and, drive it into the middle of an American city and, you know the rest. Today's nuclear weapons are 100 times more devastating than the atom bombs dropped on Japan.

Conclusion is, a Muslim terrorist is much more dangerous than a black mob.

Anonymous said...

I bring your attention to the million 'ifs' that would lead to Paki nukes being transported to and detonated in the US..This big 'what if' pales in comparison to all the ruined cities all around the US due to nigs.Atomic bombs are no joke,no doubt,ask any Japanese person.Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed in less than a microsecond.Once the bomb went off,people thought that the land would be uninhabitable for centuries,due to radiation.Both of those cities are now doing just fine.The nig has ruined far more cities than 2.I argue that nigs are much more toxic than moose-limbs,at least in the US so far.
Another,unrelated point I wish to address is all this hair-splitting over who is white and who gets to join the New White Nation club..It is simple.If your skin is White and you don't like black disfunction,rap music,etc. that should be enough.(no albino nigs) .I respectfully suggest we stay on target and not meander aimlessly down 'what if alley'.Argueing over minutiae and endless hypothetical situations is a fool's game.Thank You for reading.Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

Actually they removal of black people from has solved the crime problem in DC although you're right that it merely transferred the problem somewhere else. Unfortunately that is the best you can ever hope for in a society awash with feral blacks.

Mich Mike

Anonymous said...

Its amazing how the media immediately reported the weapon as an AR15 the same weapon used in Sandy Hook. They repeated this over and over when in fact he used a shotgun and a handgun he took off a policeman.

Anonymous said...

Watch out, the military is hellbent on darkening up the population of military pilots. They are actually offering blacks incentives to sign up for pilot training school and pass. Ofcourse they will have to dumb down the class work. This will create a dangerous situation for everyone.

Anonymous said...

Exactly! Blacks will beat their chests at church and claim they must stop the black violence, when the government tries to enact laws to cope with the problem it is met with protest. Everything is racist if it affects blacks. Laws designed to affect criminals adversely seem to always affect blacks more than whites. Why is that? We all know, it is simple math.

Mich Mike

Anonymous said...

Just out of curiosity, Ice Rink, take a look at all your black acquaintances and how many work for a government agency or make a living playing around in black politics?

Mich Mike

Discard said...

Just to pile on, Ice Rink, why don't you flake off? Your people have simply done too much damage, no excuses accepted. The "good" Black is soon followed by the not-so-good brother, and then the perfectly wretched cousin. Sort of the domestic equivalent of chain migration. It's happened over and over. If you don't want a ghetto, don't let the seeds be planted in your neighborhood.

BTW, thanks for using a handle. It makes it easier to skip your comments.