Friday, June 6, 2014

'Chicago Magazine' Finds "Troubling" News Whites Victim of Non-Fatal Gun Violence at Rate of only 1.2 out of 100,000 (for blacks, it's 112.83 out of 100,000)

Statistically speaking, it's a true anomaly.

Seriously.

A complete anomaly.

Remembering the city of Chicago's demographics (33 percent black, 32 percent white, 29 percent Hispanic), take a quick peak at the breakdown of non-fatal gunshot victims by race.

Before you do, remember this one simple SBPDL truth: guns don't kill people, dangerous minorities do. [Chicago Gun Violence: Big Numbers, But a Surprisingly Small Network: There are lots of non-fatal gunshot victims in Chicago—and an astonishing number of them know each other. Sociologist Andrew Papachristos explains why that’s important., Chicago Magazine, April 15, 2014]
A little while back, I wrote something on the research of Andrew Papachristos, a Yale sociologist not long out of Chicago, on the small social networks of Chicago homicide. In short, how much of fatal violence in Chicago is contained within a comparatively small group of people, who are themselves linked by crime.
It was a fascinating paper, but it had its limitations. Chicago has high raw numbers of homicides and a relatively high homicide rate. But statistically speaking, homicides are a small sample of violence in the city, and in some respects a random one.
Recently, Papachristos followed up with a new investigation, and a much larger new data set: non-fatal gunshot injuries in the city.
The data in the new paper is equally fascinating, and on one level, as you might expect, quite troubling. To begin with, the dramatic disparities the rates of nonfatal gunshot injury: overall it’s 46.5 per 100,000 for the city as a whole from 2006-2012.
It’s 1.62 per 100,000 for whites; 28.72 for Hispanics, and 112.83 for blacks.
For all males, it’s 44.68 per 100,000; 239.77 for black males, and for black males from 18-34 it’s 599.65. As Papachristos and co-authors Christopher Wildeman and Elizabeth Roberto point out, that’s a staggering one in 200.
 "Guns don't kill/maim people, dangerous minorities do."

This article in Chicago Magazine would have believe there's something troubling with the fact white people aren't victims of non-fatal shootings at a rate anywhere near that of non-whites, particularly black people.

What's truly troubling is just how dangerous 18-34 black males are in the city of Chicago.

Well, in all of America.

Statistics don't lie.

Numbers help breakdown harsh realities of the world in a cool, strategic manner.

To the writers of Chicago Magazine, the troubling fact is white people aren't being targeted with bullets in a cool, strategic manner as non-whites are in the Windy City.

Statistically speaking, white people being a victim of gun crime is a true anomaly.

And that is troubling to our white liberal friends in the media. 

108 comments:

CENTURION said...

We simply need to kill more Whites.

Anonymous said...

This jus go to proove how prebalent racism be in da hood.We need mo money to solve dis disparitty an bring White numbas up to da lebels of peepul of cullah. Richard Cranium

drew458 said...

I don't see the issue.

White people don't start shooting unless the need is there to kill someone, which they do.

Also, they know enough to hold their guns the right way up, and how to use those awkward bumps on top called "sights". And that several bullets properly fired make a thing called "a group".

Whereas, ground apes can't shoot for shit.

Anonymous said...

Trial junkie here. I've seen this type of double talk and hand-wringing for decades.

Anonymous said...

What a mystery! What could possibly be the reason? There must be some way to correlate this anomaly to the evil legacy of slavery rather than something so racist that it cannot even be suggested. No one is surprised when a survey reveals that impaired drunk drivers or idiots make more judgment errors and have more car wrecks. Why is it so difficult to understand that a group of people possessing substantial future time orientation and an average IQ of 100 will have fewer mishaps when handling firearms than a group of Orcs with an average IQ of 85, zero future time orientation and a propensity for violence?

countenance said...

Emergency room and trauma techniques, technology and medicine has improved in recent decades. A big part of the recent decrease in homicide rates is merely a function of the ER saving the lives of the gunshot victim when it was not able to do that a generation to two ago.

I think that non fatal gunshot victim stats are indeed a better acid test for how violent places and people are, than just straight up homicide rate.

J. Hannibal Smith said...

I support gun control. For blacks and Hispanics.

Touch a firearm, 30 to life. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200 EBT.

Enlightenator said...

OT, but I must make the following observation:

70 years ago, the world saw the single greatest military operation carried out...an operation imagined, planned, organized, and executed by White Men. White. Men. White generals, White soldiers, and White heads of state. D-Day happened because of White Men, seeking to preserve the Western Civilization that Whites created.

D-Day would have failed under affirmative action.

D-Day would have failed under a token black president.

D-Day would have failed in an era in which a country spends four times as much to "uplift oppressed minorities" as it does on national defense.

Remember that.

To all those who fought...Thank You. We will remember you.

Mr. Rational said...

for black males from 18-34 it’s 599.65. As Papachristos and co-authors Christopher Wildeman and Elizabeth Roberto point out, that’s a staggering one in 200.

Stupid "journalists" can't do arithmetic.  It's 1 in 167.

Of course, what sort of numerical accuracy can you expect from people who can't even attribute agency correctly?  Small children can do that.

Anonymous said...

Maybe whites should be randomly rounded up and shot to eliminate this racial disparity. Since raising the behavior of blacks to that of whites is impossible, maybe whites should be dragged down to the level of blacks. Doesn't affirmative action require equality of outcome?

Anonymous said...

"Whites Victim of Non-Fatal Gun Violence at Rate of only 1.2 out of 100,000 (for blacks, it's 112.83 out of 100,000)"

My God, 1.2 vs. 112.8. These poor African-americans are dying at a much greater rate than White-americans. Couple of things are leading to this. White people are staying off the streets. They be scared. White people must be getting body armor from the gubermint. Chief McCarthy has got to address the inequality. He could increase arms shipments to the negroes. Could be the negroes are low on ammunition.

Whatever the situation, Chief McCarthy is the tough Irish cop to get it solved. He has the best of both worlds, the intellect of the negro and the pleasing white skin of the Caucasian. Best of all, he loves seeing white people killed. He calls them Pilgrims. Emanuel likely gives him a bonus for every white face in the city morgue.

Reverend Bacon said...

"Statistically speaking, white people being a victim of gun crime is a true anomaly.

And that is troubling to our white liberal friends in the media."

I'll never forget the vapid former mayor of San Francisco, now California's Lieutenant Governor, trying to put a positive spin on some negative crime statistics. Crime had gone up quite a bit, and had leaked out to white neighborhoods. But of course it was still all done by blacks and Hispanics, and mostly the former. Mayor Hairgel said something like "well, crime may be up, but black-on-black crime is down." All of his liberal acolytes jumped on this and said, "yeah, good point, Gavin." But those who know it's a zero-sum game realized that it meant that crime against white people had skyrocketed.

Anonymous said...

Non-Fatal Gun Violence. I guess that must mean murder-gone-wrong.

Anonymous said...

OT - Paterson residents protest at vigil for cat

Little negroes torture a cat. They corner the animal and throw bricks and concrete at the cat. Negroes like to torture animals. These negro children, ages 6 to 12, were just learning how to inflict pain. Just beginners.

Negro community protests the prosecution of the little negroes. They take to the streets with signs and make a lot of negro noise. A separate group of white people, cat lovers get into a screaming match with the negroes. Negroes claim they like cats, but love their children more and they should not be subject to any criminal action. After all, they are black and they need to create chaos and pain. No evidence has yet emerged that the negro children raped the cat. Though chances of a sexual assault having taken place are considered likely.

http://www.northjersey.com/towns/paterson/paterson-residents-protest-at-vigil-for-cat-1.1030239

AnalogMan said...

"That's a staggering one in 200."

Math be hard.

Anonymous said...

this is a continuation of June 5 comment on 'kindergarten brawl'...
Kindergarten graduation...please.

Blacks and other dummies believe in 'play skool gradyatun'

ed on Jun 2, 2014

A rush of punching and pushing during a kindergarten graduation ceremony Monday put a Mount Healthy elementary school on lockdown.

Police say Raymond Walker, 33, started the fight with another man during the event at North Elementary School. The brawl then spread from two to about 20 people, witnesses said.

"It was horrible," Kim Calai said. "I'm standing there, and all of a sudden this rush of people throwing punches is coming at me."

Calai's son was graduating in the ceremony when the melee broke out.

She said the children on stage witnessed violence between several parents.

"There was a gentleman who was carrying a newborn that got hit," she said.

School officials removed Walker and another man from the building at 2170 Struble Rd. at about 11:30 a.m. Officials said Walker is the parent of a child at the school.

Six police cruisers responded to the scene shortly after. The Mount Healthy City School District superintendent was also called.

Authorities said the school was placed on lockdown during the incident, and students were told to take shelter in their classrooms. Children taking part in the ceremony were removed from the gymnasium.

Police charged Walker with assault and felony inducing panic. Authorities said he is not in custody because he left the school before officers arrived.

"(Walker was charged) because it occurred on school grounds, created an alarm to all the individuals, caused the lockdown and caused the evacuation," Springfield Police Sergeant Scott Hughes said. "This was more than just a couple people fighting."

Stacy Liggett, who was at the event when the fight broke out, said people in the audience were pushing one another.

"You could tell from the beginning that something was going to happen," Liggett said. "It sickens me."

Liggett called the fight "scary," and said she was worried about the safety of the children nearby.

"These kids were robbed of their special day," she said. "Their kindergarten graduation. It's not right. I am not blaming the school one bit, but with that many students, you are going to have a lot of parents and family attending. It was out of control."

Calai said she heard from others at the school the fight started over a parent not being able to see his child.

She said her son had a lot of questions about the incident.

"When we were leaving, he kept asking me, 'Why are the police here? What are the police doing here? Why are they here?' Calai said. "To have something like that happen at a graduation is pretty pathetic."

Hughes agreed.

"This was a celebration for these kids who graduated," he said. "Clearly not the time or place to take out your frustrations on another parent."

Authorities ask anyone with knowledge of Walker's location call Crime Stoppers at 513-352-3040.

Anonymous said...

Someone,bless them,brought this topic up recently.I am sure we all know the short answer,but does it not seem that it would be very simple to track sail foams location,in fact it is done all the time but supposedly nobody puts all the data together to track crimes.This is ridiculous on many levels.If the national snoop agencies have enough 'brain power' to monitor anything and everything going on throughout the world,are we supposed to believe that nobody colates US crime data ? It seems a very simple thing to at least go speak to whoever (whomever ?) was in the vicinity of an 'incident' and question them,see if they have an alibi,etc.
People that get found near crime scenes could be tracked for awhile to see if they keep popping up at crime scenes.That is where statistics come in and quickly can show that Monchezious had a one in 89 million chance of being present near 12 murders in 2 weeks time if it were just random chance.It is quite possible to do,surely HAS been done for quite awhile.Why is this not used ?
Richard Cranium

Anonymous said...

Which gets back to the fact that minorities (non-Whites) inflict astonishing levels of violence within their own families... and anyone proximate.

This tick is driven by DNA.

The evolutionary shift between Blacks and Whites seems to be drastic -- probably tens of thousands of years in Darwinian selection.

This entirely explains why Whites are such a global minority -- and Blacks are a global majority.

The only race that comes close to the Black races is the Yellow race, or the Brown race.

Whites are quite the minority -- globally.

The best explanation as to why Whites have excelled: they, uniquely, domesticated virtually all of the farm animals that are known.

The Yellow race followed behind by domesticating all of the fowl now known.

The Blacks and the Red Indians domesticated (apparently) no animals at all.

Corn, and all of the rest, are apparently Solutrean (Europeans in the Americas) domestications.

The Red man apparently wiped out the Solutreans -- almost in historical memory.

Many of the 'Red man's' achievements are now suspected to be those of the Solutreans.

The crazy idea that Whites in the ancient New World were as advanced as Whites in the Old World is totally unacceptable in academe.

If any of these terms is novel: Bing or Google.



Anonymous said...

You forgot 'and shit'

rex freeway said...

If you could stop their birth rate, they could wipe themselves out in 10 years. 20 At tops.

D. Sterling-Trump said...

Statistically speaking, negro crime in Chicago should follow a predictable sine wave pattern: one w/ a slightly increasing amplitude over time. Starting w/ its current state, which you can consider the upwave, a downwave of crime will soon follow primarily due to the fact that there are simply less gangbangers walking the streets as a critical mass of black-on-black killings is reached.

However, this lull will of course only be temporary for many factors, the one w/ the strongest R2 value being, as others have noted here before, that Chicago is fast becoming the new Detroit.

In fact, to make the graph more accurate, you can replace the time axis w/ a % black axis.

Some years will be better than others, but one can say the black sine wave in Chitown has already gone uncontrollably off the charts.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry ... after 0bama starts resettling "urban refugees" en masse into white neighborhoods (probably after his third term starts), these numbers of dead whites won't be so low.

And then these media fist puppets won't be so troubled.

Anonymous said...

Hey, Chicago Magazine: since you're so "troubled" by the racial breakdown of the violence in your city, how about you have a dialogue on the issue in your rag? Let both sides make their case, and don't censor any of the comments from your readers - how 'bout it? I'll bet you'd learn a LOT if you just listened to the other side for a change.

D. Sterling-Trump said...

I Just Bought a Bugatti (I'm Happy)

A nice distillation of shitskin "culture" into 3.5 mins.

Anonymous said...

To be fair, they do get dissed a lot,and everyone knows that that is a cap bustin' offense.

Independent Accountant said...

This is news? That this is considered newsworthy shows how disconnected from reality many people are.

IA

Anonymous said...

"...quite troubling".....NOT!
Stay off their turf in as much as it's possible to do so and allow them to keep killing one another off. Works for me........

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

GREATWHITES,

Chi-Congo magazine finds it troubling news!

I find it a miracle from God above. Just goes to show you that the leftist dogs in America would prefer you GREATWHITES to get the "majority" of those black attack packs. Liberals suck and I despise them with all my being!

GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Anonymous said...

I think the Yale sociologist, whatever that is, must be wrong. All the nogs on TV are smiling, happy, funny, clever, have lots of white friends, drive nice cars with white guys carrying their bags into their big houses in the diverse suburbs and work as doctors, scientists and businessmen always being the ones solving the problem and dispensing wisdom by the pound. They are simply too busy, intelligent, important, clever and generous to ever engage in such unwholesome conduct, they are basically a group of Brady Bunch types with a tan.

Anonymous said...

Guns are racist!!! They should be charged with hate crimes!!!

D-FENS said...

The other day, I was helping my son find off campus housing while he attends a large state university in a southern state known for feetsball (SEC member). We were at a parent-new student orientation session and I was looking over housing brochures. The cute blonde girl sitting next to me mentioned that one of the apartments was close to a black area and that it wouldn't be safe.

So there IS some hope!

City resident said...

It's an important point to bring out, this breakdown of who is doing what. Usually it's all covered up by lumping everyone in together then railing on about the evil of guns or vague talk about stopping the violence. For every homicide that gets attention there's a large number of woundings that because they aren't fatal tend to get glossed over. The picture deepens even further were one to start taking into consideration stabbings and serious assaults. The black male population starts to look even more violent then.
Homicides, shootings, stabbings and serious assaults committed by the white population of Chicago is actually vanishingly small. A mental case here, a domestic there, the rate is actually very low and is close to zero.
The black-brown gang violence is not due to the usual socioeconomic explanations given. They do it because they like the excitement of the lifestyle. That some get killed is an acceptable hazard to them. It's their preferred way of life.

Anonymous said...

The many benefits of self-segregation.

Anonymous said...

Hey, I know this site is racist; but, I like this guys article. It challenges blacks - during this NBA Finals season - to do better off the court; to stop whining and improve their off court game.

Remember, black people, back in the day, segregation days to be sure, but back when our whole society was more civilized, used to do better. They will never do as well as YT, but they could do better, without so much protection.

Do you all see any hope in this calling a spade a spade via culture tactic?

Here's the article.

http://culturismnews.blogspot.kr/2014/06/a-culturist-challenge-to-black-men.html

Anonymous said...

I'm sure there are enough SWPLs to bring up the numbers. [SWPLs is a blanket term for yuppies, hipsters and all of the other white libtard filth, for those who may not know.] Hugh Jeffencoch

bernicegreenbaum said...

Yeah, this will definitely warrant more study before we can truly ascertain exactly what his finding means. More money needs to go to small "focus" groups, led by minority "think tanks" to analyze the statistical ramifications of the "culture of poverty" among minority (black) men. In addition, more resources ($$$$$$$) need to go to the black community which will be able to start intervention programs in the inner city. These programs will be run by (black) sociologists who have a true understanding of what the culture of poverty in the black community means. The focus groups can focus on persuading the "disenfranchised yoof" to brainstorm other, more efficient manners to resolve their disputes and provide an uplifting character to the community and a greater share of its resources.

That's the liberal response :D. In all seriousness, people claim that it's difficult to even out the black/white non fatal gun statistics. It isn't. Just put a "stupid" pill in the white's drinking water and before long whites will be just as stupid as blacks. (It'll have to be a mighty strong pill, though.)

Anonymous said...

OT:

FEDGOV's "dumping policy" with regard to illegal aliens is in the news. This action is being overseen by Jeh Johnson, the resident DHS groid.

"The illegal immigrants in question come from Central America and have flooded into Texas via the Rio Grande Valley. The number of apprehensions in the Rio Grande Valley has shot up in recent years, with south Texas now the main gateway for illegal immigration along the southwest border with Mexico."

"Most of the families apprehended so far in Texas have been flown to Arizona and dropped off by the busload at stations in Phoenix and Tucson. They've also been sent to New York and Maryland."

New York and Maryland? That's nowhere near the southern border! That's strange...it's almost as if FEDGOV is trying to redistribute Central Americans in Da Abyss A.

Naaaah...can't be.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/07/feds-say-no-end-in-sight-for-policy-dumping-illegal-immigrants-in-arizona-gov/

--NB with IPMS

D-FENS said...

"70 years ago, the world saw the single greatest military operation carried out...an operation imagined, planned, organized, and executed by White Men. White. Men. White generals, White soldiers, and White heads of state. D-Day happened because of White Men, seeking to preserve the Western Civilization that Whites created. "

The problem was that it was directed AGAINST White men.

Anonymous said...

I haven't called it "gun violence" in many years. I call it what it is--"nonwhite violence".

Another thought-provoking stat-is of the interracial stats-how many whites in Chicongo commit gun crimes on nonwhites as opposed to the opposite?

Regarding the post about how medical technology now saves many who would have died years ago--that's very true. I remember reading that in L.A, 20 years ago, not only were there many gun fatalities (drive bys, etc)in the 'hood, but many also get wounded-some serious some not--all paid for by us. Some become paralyzed. There were several cases where 'groid/latino gangbangers, paralyzed and in rehab facilities, would have their homies visit--if a rival gang member was also in rehab, fights would break out, among the able bodied animals and even in some cases with the wheelchair bound a/holes fighting each other. Security had to be beefed up---there were no arrests or penalties or fines as a rule after they broke things up-that's for a white man smoking a cigarette in a park, or commingling his recycling--for the "people of (fecal/urine) color", the kid gloves are used.

And all of it is on our dime.

Anonymous said...

Enlightenator said ”OT, but I must make the following observation:

70 years ago, the world saw the single greatest military operation carried out...an operation imagined, planned, organized, and executed by White Men. White. Men. White generals, White soldiers, and White heads of state. D-Day happened because of White Men, seeking to preserve the Western Civilization that Whites created.

D-Day would have failed under affirmative action.

D-Day would have failed under a token black president.

D-Day would have failed in an era in which a country spends four times as much to "uplift oppressed minorities" as it does on national defense.

Remember that.

To all those who fought...Thank You. We will remember you.”


Absolutely right. It is refreshing to hear someone praise those who fought rather than mock them.

If the American military had been run by the AA crowd including Obama, we could not have effectively participated in any part of WWII and would probably be speaking German or Japanese. Life would be very different because we would be singing praises to our Fuehrer or Emperor rather than spending time exercising our Constitutional rights. However, we wouldn't be dealing with the problem of the black undertow. The Germans or Japanese would have quickly purged that blight.

"Tant Que Je Puis" said...

In the late 1930s my father worked in a shoe store & witnessed a negro looking in the store window when suddenly another negro "buried" an axe in his head. The negro fled leaving the axed fellow still standing, blood pouring out of his head, with the axe buried into the top of his head. Police arrived, got a description of the other negro & said they would be back after a visit to "darkie town" in St Louis. Later that afternoon they arrived with the suspects in cuffs for identity, Dad said "that's him" & they left. The next day a detective came questioned my father for details, took a statement and then told my father it was strange a negro wandered so far from where HE BELONGED. The officer said "you would not believe what goes on in darkie town. We must keep them out of the decent parts of St Louis as they are savages". This is how St Louis took care of their negroes in the 1930s. Swift, efficient, & no hand wringing.

Anonymous said...

So now the DWLs have added “disingenuous surprise” to their bag of tricks. Come on, were they honestly expecting the rates of shooting injuries to be comparable for blacks and whites?

Perhaps the reason for the disparity is that most shootings involve head shots which are far more survivable for Orcs. An example of this fact is Marshall Coulter, a/k/a the 300,000 thousand dollar Orc, who received a bullet to the head and was back to robbing within weeks.

Anonymous said...

I'd rather my children speak german than deal with the groid infestation of our Nation. If Germany had won the war, our lives would be much different today.

Independent Accountant said...

Consider: if an Obama ran D-Day, who would not be speaking German. TWNBN. The German victors would have turned them into lampshades and soap. Guys like Chuck Schumer are fools.

Anonymous said...

Why are the three negroes, Obama, Holder and Johnson so keen to flood the nation with illiterate residents of Mexico and Central America?

They despise the America you knew, the white majority nation. They are going to change that and illegal immigration is the ideal tool. Anything of value, Negroes want to burn down. The hatred arises from deep jealousy, bitterness and ignorance. Don't dismiss those motivations, they are very powerful. There is no turning back from a majority Hispanic nation. Once it's done, nothing short of civil war is going to change the direction of the country. Negroes crave chaos the way you crave oxygen.

D. Sterling-Trump said...

A quick scan of available stamp designs on the USPS site shows just how much BRA has infiltrated what was once a prideful American organization:

Black Heritage stamps

On the first page alone, beside someone as great as Charlton Heston you find no less than 4 black faces. Plus a Kwanzaa stamp for good measure.

I try to avoid the Postal Service at all costs. On the rare occasions I have to use it, I dread it. I must mentally prepare myself to face a 30 minute line leading up to 1 incompetent baboon who is immune from any accountability. It is no surprise USPS is going bankrupt: the black undertow destroyed the postal service.

Anonymous said...

Russkies bee wayciss:

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/06/07/russia-bans-us-from-international-space-station-ho.aspx

Anonymous said...

Comrade anon @ 8:56 equality of results for all and diversity ├╝ber alles. Workers of the world unite, to each according to his need. Dem whitey crackaz be Emmanuel Goldstein and sheeit in the two minutes hates.

Anonymous said...

This article sounds like it is written by and for white people who truly believe almost all gun crime is committed by redneck card carrying NRA members, even the inner city gun crime.

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous:
Why are the three negroes, Obama, Holder and Johnson so keen to flood the nation with illiterate residents of Mexico and Central America?

For the same reason Juan McAmnesty, Miss Lindsay Graham, Rand Paul, Weepin' Johnny and Eric Cantor are so keen to do it. Just obeying orders.

Anonymous said...

These articles are funny. Always talking about blacks are the victims of gun violence without mentioning that other blacks are shooting then

Anonymous said...

the black undertow destroyed the postal service

Yes it did!

You see this with all Black govt employees. They are useless, a huge waste of resources, but don't notice them or mention how counterproductive they are, that's rayciss!!

The only way to shrink government and restore fiscal sanity would be massive government cuts, but that would end all these AA welfare "jobs" for over one million nogs or more.

We're stuck with Black Overlords. Thank goodness their IQs are less than 85 or we'd be in serious trouble.

Anonymous said...

""""""""""""""""""""70 years ago, the world saw the single greatest military operation carried out...an operation imagined, planned, organized, and executed by White Men. White. Men. White generals, White soldiers, and White heads of state. D-Day happened because of White Men, seeking to preserve the Western Civilization that Whites created.""""""""""""""""""""""


Wait, are you saying that the Tuskegee Airmen didn't single handedly win the battle of Normandy all by themselves? Or that the numerous all black battalions didn't contribute decisively to D Day? Not at all?

All whites. Winning the battle. How'd that ever happen?

Surprised the President didn't try to use the speech as a chance to praise the Tuskegee Airmen instead and how the US couldn't have possibly have gotten the job done were it not for De'marquius and LaShawntrequius's ancestors.

Anonymous said...

No need to disturb Prezmident Dwayne Herbert Mountain Dew Camacho's beauty rest, mom jeans selection, or golf practice, just put up huge telescreens with streaming epidsodes of Ow My Balls!
After hours put up Sweet Bang Tube on the telescreens and the problem is solved. Advertisements will be Comrade Jeremiah Wright sermon snippets about the devil crackers who won't get a ride on the mothership with Dayton rims and spinners that hides behind the dark side of the moon because of da terribule lebacy ov da ebil slabery. A little midnight bakkaball and some Brawndo and the precious pampered plantation pets playtime proceeds properly.

D-FENS said...

"If the American military had been run by the AA crowd including Obama, we could not have effectively participated in any part of WWII and would probably be speaking German or Japanese."

Let's dispense with this canard. The Germans and the Japanese had neither the goal or capability of invading and holding anything in the Western Hemisphere (outside of propaganda films). FDR did refer to a map for a "Nazi invasion so South America in one of his outhouse chats, but that map was a fabrication of British Intelligence, which FDR gave free reign to conduct operations in the USA years before WW2.

Hell, the Germans didn't even have the capability to cross the English Channel.

Anonymous said...

902

re.
All the nogs on TV are smiling, happy, funny, clever..etc

Oh Yes!
I avoid Tv [except at the gym] but my Youtube confirms that blacks
are there in all kinda ads...
all kinds...
fancy cars, happy, palatial homes etc...I SEE THEM SO RICH AND HAPPY IN UT ADS.

PB said...

"Russkies bee wayciss:"

America's AA astronauts would probably graffiti the place up and set fire to it.

Anonymous said...

http://goobingdetroit.tumblr.com/

File under: Detroit in time lapse.

Chicago is headed for this end game.

While the blogger involved ascribes the plunge to the financial crisis...

The reality is that the end-game is ALWAYS a chaotic, catastrophic decline.

This is what a city's death always looks like.

This city wasn't burnt out -- it was chimped down.

Anonymous said...

D-Fens. Enjoy your posts. The theme of your post is correct. However, Japan did invade and hold a part of America during WWII.

james m said...

Anonymous @ 12:35 LMAO! the best post of the thread.

Anonymous said...

Youse crackas be bad MoFos and sheet, hating on the brothas. Dontcha know them Tuskegger, er tokegeegee, er Tuskhugger Whatever ! airplane guys saved the USA ? Back around 1950 when the Russians and Germans were bombing Pearl Harbor in Texas them Tukeegee, er tokergee Whatever ! airplane guys shot all them MoFos down, else you be speaking English and shit. Dontcha know history ?

Sidebar: My father flew a P-40 then a P-51 in WWII. He said those fighter planes from the 1940's would kill the pilot if you weren't properly trained and careful, there wasn't much forgiveness from those high performance aircraft then, I would guess less so now. A question for anyone who might know: What was the accident rate for the Tuskegee airmen ? How many planes did they wreck outside of combat ?

europeasant said...

"If the American military had been run by the AA crowd including Obama, we could not have effectively participated in any part of WWII and would probably be speaking German or Japanese."



"Hell, the Germans didn't even have the capability to cross the English Channel."

The Germans did not even have the ability to overrun Russia. I'll check but I think more Germans died on the eastern front than anywhere else. The Germans dreaded fighting on the eastern front. The Russians had the greatest impact on beating Germany.

Look at what our country has turned into. No Go zones in large areas but the White people keep running farther and farther away. Soon there will be no place to run, running maybe not for them but surely for their children.

Anonymous said...

You have a better chance of getting shot by accident from a nog then being shot on purpose from a White.

Anonymous said...

Please remember kindergarten graduation (pronounced graj-eeee-ay-shun) is an important landmark in the negro culture and a very emotional time. Why? It is the only degree/diploma most blacks will ever receive

Anonymous said...

Maybe he just wanted to axe him a question?

AnalogMan said...

D-FENS said...

The cute blonde girl sitting next to me mentioned that one of the apartments was close to a black area and that it wouldn't be safe.

So there IS some hope!


I recently visited the USA, specifically Virginia. I often heard White people speaking in hushed voices about the latest criminal atrocity. I always laughed and said, "You know who's doing this stuff, but you won't say it!"

The response, in every case: "Oh, yes, we know".

It's no secret.

Anonymous said...

Lose your thorazine ?

aquasparky said...

No evidence has yet emerged that the negro children raped the cat. Though chances of a sexual assault having taken place are considered likely.

Silly niglets... don't they know that that is the wrong kind of pussy?!

Anonymous said...

Re: Obama, Holder et all inporting all these hispanic illegals into the nation:

http://www.examiner.com/article/mexican-gangs-trying-to-run-black-families-out-of-southern-california

The Mexicans don't like the blacks either. And they're not afraid of being called "racist" dealing with them.

Too bad they can't get along with us, either, but at least they're statistically somewhat less violent. Maybe there is a small bright side -

Anonymous said...

OT:

Rand Paul continues the Groid Placation Campaign on the way to Da Mostess Impotent Erection Evaaahh (TM):

"Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is helping open a “GOP engagement office” on Saturday in an African-American area of Louisville, part of a frenetic summer schedule aimed at reaching beyond the party’s traditional base, with explicit appeals to minorities and young people."

"At the end of July, the senator will speak to the annual Urban League National Conference in Cincinnati."

"Paul said his message to the Urban League will be 'the libertarian message that we must defend every individual’s rights …that individual rights need to be protected against majoritarian rule.' He said that notion is 'incredibly important if you’ve been part of any group that’s ever been persecuted in history, and that can be African American, that can be Jewish American, that can be Japanese American.'"

“'I’ve spoken with a lot of people who are open to the message — who are conservative black leaders, conservative black businessmen and [business]women,' Paul continued. 'They often say they haven’t seen anyone come to their neighborhood or make a real direct appeal to people involved from the minority community.'"

Give 'em hell, Rand!

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/rand-paul-summer-travel-foreign-policy-speech-107558.html#ixzz340egB3cm

--NB with IPMS

Anonymous said...

The headline should read "Chicago Magazine discovers big black elephant in the room" but they're not quite there yet. Maybe after a few more reporters are attacked, the media will grow a pair. Not going to hold my breath though.

Anonymous said...

You are far too lenient.

Anonymous said...

An Obama third term? Of course, that is not possible. Or is it? Look at how the Supreme Court helped him get his healthcare scheme through. I still say he becomes head of the UN and does even more damage to our former country. Also, the reason they won't release his school performance and IQ scores is because they are lower than George W. Bush. Could you imagine the uproar if that was made public? Hope and change, yet dumber than Bush.

I do my best to ignore blacks and black things. Sports are over for me. Hopefully they will end football in America due to the injuries. Then college can go back to being a place of learning and not a minor league for the NFL. Basketball is a game invented by a soccer coach due to an inclement winter. I mean, something blacks cherish so much was invented by a white man in a few days! Rap is nothing more than musical affirmative action. The amount of music literally stolen from old records and turned into millions of dollars for untalented black thugs is a crime. Older musicians (black and white) have had their songs butchered for profit, but not their profit.

This all doesn't end well.

Anonymous said...

There have been a number of posters who seem to feel that neither the Japanese or Germans ever posed any threat to the US. I feel like these folks have left the rest of us hanging. So what would have happened had the US not entered WWII?

The Germans were working on an atomic bomb before the US entered the war. They were far ahead of other countries in the development of rockets and jet aircraft as well as areas of technology. Our entire space program was based on the technology and the scientists that we salvaged from Germany after the end of the War. We didn't have the slightest idea how to launch a rocket until we appropriated Germany's knowledge and technology. Germany failed their primary goal of conquering Europe because the US destroyed and drained so much of Germany's military power. Germany initially failed to conquer Russia more because of the weather than the initial military might of Russia. So is it your position that Germany didn't want to do anything but conquer all of Europe to have access to all of Europe's resources so they could just settle down and be a great world citizen?

Do you honestly believe that if Japan had firm control of the Pacific and Germany had firm control of the Atlantic that the US would not have been affected? Neither the Germans or the Japanese were far from bringing war to the lower 50 states of the United States. German subs were sunk off of the east coast of the United States and they were working on bombers capable of crossing the Atlantic, and the Japanese had developed giant submarines that carried airplanes also capable of reaching the US. In fact, the Japanese planned to use these subs to destroy the locks at the Panama canal but had to divert the equipment to other projects. Germany and Japan simply ran out of resources before they could develop the technology to deal with us on a large scale. Left unchecked, the Germans for sure would have quickly developed the ability to place a nuke in the continental US.

So please finish your story. What would have happened if the US had not entered the War?

Len Boulter said...

If the magazine's analysis included under 18's- say 14 to 18 y/o- I warrant the ratio would be higher again than 1 in 167

Bogolyubski said...

Anonymous said...
There have been a number of posters who seem to feel that neither the Japanese or Germans ever posed any threat to the US. I feel like these folks have left the rest of us hanging. So what would have happened had the US not entered WWII?

The Germans were working on an atomic bomb before the US entered the war. They were far ahead of other countries in the development of rockets and jet aircraft as well as areas of technology. Our entire space program was based on the technology and the scientists that we salvaged from Germany after the end of the War. We didn't have the slightest idea how to launch a rocket until we appropriated Germany's knowledge and technology. Germany failed their primary goal of conquering Europe because the US destroyed and drained so much of Germany's military power. Germany initially failed to conquer Russia more because of the weather than the initial military might of Russia. So is it your position that Germany didn't want to do anything but conquer all of Europe to have access to all of Europe's resources so they could just settle down and be a great world citizen?

Do you honestly believe that if Japan had firm control of the Pacific and Germany had firm control of the Atlantic that the US would not have been affected? Neither the Germans or the Japanese were far from bringing war to the lower 50 states of the United States. German subs were sunk off of the east coast of the United States and they were working on bombers capable of crossing the Atlantic, and the Japanese had developed giant submarines that carried airplanes also capable of reaching the US. In fact, the Japanese planned to use these subs to destroy the locks at the Panama canal but had to divert the equipment to other projects. Germany and Japan simply ran out of resources before they could develop the technology to deal with us on a large scale. Left unchecked, the Germans for sure would have quickly developed the ability to place a nuke in the continental US.

So please finish your story. What would have happened if the US had not entered the War?


Just for fun, let's take everything in your above statement as gospel truth and separate WW II from the more important WW I (of which II was a continuation). I'll grant that both Hitler and the Japanese Junta had imperial ambitions. Even so, neither Hitler's regime or the Japanese combined had anything near the manpower required to actually invade and occupy North America.

Your fundamental error lies in assuming the regime of FDR ever had the interest of America in mind at all. A puppet regime of the squid banking cartel, like every one since Wilson (if not before), they confiscated gold (which is completely unaccounted for - as not even sitting congressmen can see what is allegedly stored at Ft. Knox), enacted the first gun-guntrol laws (NFA of 1934), first welfare system, and grew the Federal leviathan in order to undermine and destroy remaining liberties. BRA had its beginnings under the sneering visage of FDR, a loathsome psychopath. He won in 1940 by lying to stay out of another European war, just as Wilson before him.

If FDR had lost, it is unlikely there would have been a Pearl Harbor - the evidence being massive that he not only provoked the Japanese regime but actually allowed the attack to take place by ordering the Navy to stand down to an obviously advancing Japanese fleet. (Pearl Harbor was used to force a Congressional Declaration of War, the last time such a Declaration was issued, by the way).

So, if we'd never joined the squids' little party, the odds are high that we would be living in a much better place than we are now and not witnessing our own genocide on a daily basis. The Banana Empire was the result of the "victory" in WW II - a victory for a wicked, genocidal oligarchy who see the planet as their fiefdom, and its populations as mere cattle to be bred and slaughtered for their own benefit. Even Hitler was less evil than them.

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...
For the same reason Juan McAmnesty, Miss Lindsay Graham, Rand Paul, Weepin' Johnny and Eric Cantor are so keen to do it. Just obeying orders.


It would be easy enough to blame Obama for the current wave of mass third world migration into the USA, sort of a black-sponsored displacement of white Americans. But as noted, McCain et alia have been on this bandwagon for decades. Even if the GOP manages to reclaim the Oval Office in 2016, what is going to change? Nothing much.

This is why white people need to develop a real political movement which will fight for their own interests.

Anonymous said...

The GOP will win in 2016. The media will need someone to blame the collapse on!

Mr. Rational said...

We didn't have the slightest idea how to launch a rocket until we appropriated Germany's knowledge and technology.

Nonsense.  Robert H. Goddard pioneered liquid-fueled rocketry right here in the USofA; the Germans got their start from his work.  You can see one of his un-flown birds in the Smithsonian.

D-FENS said...

Absent US involvement (including Lend-Lease aid to the USSR), Hitler and Stalin would have had it out. There is credible evidence that Stalin was planning to attack Hitler in the summer of 1941. Hitler just threw the first punch a few weeks earlier. They probably would have fought to a stalemate with a static battlefront somewhere in the western USSR. It can be argued that Hitler prevented a USSR conquest of Western Europe.

Japan was focused on securing resources for itself, specifically the SE Asian oil fields. These fields were run by what Bogo's would call "Anglo-Dutch squids". For made a clandestine deal to protect these fields. Japan knew we would resist and struck the first blow. There is no difference between Japan's policy and the "Carter Doctrine" which declared any outside interruption of US Acess to the Persian a Gulf oil fields would be considered an act of

The threats posed by Germany and Japan were to the gangsters in charge of the us and Britain, not to the people.

The book, "Imperial Brain Trust" cited documents of the Council on Foreign Relations' "War and Peace Studies Group" which identified the minimum territory the us required for raw materials in the event Britain fell. This "Grand Area" overlapped with Japan's "Co-Prosperity Sphere".

Anonymous said...

Disparate impact, plain and simple.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Rational said ”Nonsense. Robert H. Goddard pioneered liquid-fueled rocketry right here in the USofA; the Germans got their start from his work. You can see one of his un-flown birds in the Smithsonian.”

I consider myself corrected. Perhaps I would have been more accurate to say that due to its lack of appreciation of the military significance of rocketry the US was far behind Germany by the time Germany was launching payloads by rocket, and the US used captured German technology and former German scientists to develop its missile and space programs.

Anonymous said...

Bogolyubski said ”. . . So, if we'd never joined the squids' little party, the odds are high that we would be living in a much better place than we are now and not witnessing our own genocide on a daily basis. . .”

Thanks for responding to my question of what would have happened had the US not entered WWII.

You responded with a litany of phrases involving squid banking cartels, the traitorous tendencies of FDR, gold confiscations by many presidents, welfare, gun control, the growing of the Federal leviathan in order to undermine and destroy remaining liberties, BRA being spawned under the sneering visage of a loathsome psychopathic president, the deliberate provocation of the Pearl Harbor attack, and probably some others.

Apparently based on the above perceptions, your conclusion turns out not to be a prediction of what would have happened had the US not entered WWII. Your conclusion, based on nothing that I am able to evaluate, is simply that we would have been better off. I presume that you believe that all of the ills mentioned in the previous paragraph would have simply disappeared had we stayed out of the war.

How would this work? Would the Germans or Japanese have won or lost? If they won would they have purged our country of the above mentioned problems through some means other than force? If they lost would our country have just spontaneously found its way? Stating that we would be better off is simply not an answer to my question.

It is human nature to blame anything but one's self for failure and mistakes. The Nazis blamed the Jews for their failure, the 85 IQ undertow in our country blames the whites for their failure, and the 100 IQ whites blame the squids and other amorphous all-powerful entities for their failure. I hear few names associated with these powerful squid entities, but I have heard references to the squid family Bush. If the Bushes are powerful squids, why was Obama elected? Perhaps there is an unfathomable struggle between the squids that regular people never see – similar to the struggles between the mythical Greek gods of the past. Also confusing is how one can believe that these squids are eagerly attempting to destroy the very economic machine that keeps them alive.

There are without a doubt people and organizations with strong political influence, but political success remains dependent on the support of the people. Even dictators who are quite willing to cause dissidents to disappear have extensive propaganda machines to maintain the support of the people. In the United States there is a reason why politicians put spin on everything that the public hears just as there is a reason why politicians spend millions of dollars and work so hard to garner the support of any group capable of voting – they want to get elected. Blacks are important because they vote as a 90% block on occasion, gays are important because they vote as a block, and Hispanics are important because they vote as a block. There is no level of irresponsibility to severe for a politician reaching out to a voting block. On the other hand, whites are not important because they won't vote as a block. Politicians know that they can take positions on a multitude of issues and they will receive about half of the white vote and their opponents will receive the other half. As long as a politician can lock in the voting blocks, it won't matter if the white vote leans a few percent either way from a 50/50 split.

We need to quit blaming anyone but ourselves for our failure to manage the problems in our country including the problem of an out of control black population. I'm very confident that if 90% of the white population would consistently vote as a block, the undertow problem as well as the related economic problems would quickly be solved. I have not done the calculations, but it wouldn't surprise me if a block far smaller than 90% would make the white vote an extremely important block.

Anonymous said...

D-FENS said ”Absent US involvement (including Lend-Lease aid to the USSR), Hitler and Stalin would have had it out. . .”

Thanks for responding to my question of what would have happened had the US not entered WWII. Your response is interesting and parts of it make a lot of sense. However, it doesn't answer my question.

Had the US not entered the war, I suppose that there would have been a possibility of a stalemate between Russia and Germany but it seems unlikely to me. Either country was interested in expansion and Russia remains so to this day. A stalemate would most likely have given either country an opportunity to develop weapons capable of delivering victory.

Obviously, if Hitler had defeated Russia the world would have a different landscape today. Without US involvement, It suspect that it would have been a step by Hitler towards conquering all of Europe. There is little doubt in my mind that Europe would have provided Hitler with the resources he needed to develop a stronger war machine including rockets and nuclear weapons. It would have been just as serious of a problem as Russia conquering all of Europe.

Conversely, if Stalin had defeated Germany, without US involvement, they would most likely have continued their expansion and we would have been facing a Soviet Union on steroids. The US was able to go toe to toe with the Soviet Union because of the war machine we built for the purpose of WWII. The Soviet Union didn't absorb Germany solely because of our involvement, and is doesn't make sense to me that they would have stopped at Germany given the weakened state of Europe at the time.

It remains my opinion that it would have been a foolish mistake for the US to sit back and watch WWII unfold without involvement.

Anonymous said...

'disparate impact'...of hollow bullets?

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:

You obviously haven't been here a terribly long time, but the power of the squid cartel would not be possible were it not for the majority of whites believing their endless stream of lies. The propaganda starts in pre-school and extends through the highest levels of graduate school. The media - all of which is owned by the connected - spews forth lies 24 x 7 x 365. Ninety percent of the churches attended by whites spew the very same lies. Yes, the squid oligarchs now do control just about everything at a totalitarian level that Stalin dreamt of, but they got there and remain there via the assent of a clueless, indoctrinated mass of whites, few of whom comprehend that they are being gradually exterminated. Even in South Africa, where the genocide is openly proclaimed by the ANC, the vast majority remaining whites continue to not believe their lying eyes and ears. That does not absolve the ruling squid-oligarchs of their moral responsibility for genocide - of which they are 100% guilty.

You also didn't pay much attention to the details of my earlier post as I stated that there was no way in which Germany or Japan combined could have occupied North America even if the FDR puppet-regime capitulated. FDR's regime confiscated the gold (likely for the sake of those they served), packed the Supreme Court (who in 1940 ruled that growing food to feed yourself on your own land is subject to government because it interferes with interstate commerce). FDR's regime likely would have been replaced with something more at ease with respective German and Japanese hegemony over Europe and Asia. I expect that even such expanded empires for Germany and Japan would not have been sustainable for long. The only victors of WW II were the squids - those who create money from farts in the air that everyone is forced to accept as payment. I stand by my earlier statement that whites who served in that adventure only serve the likes of the Bushes, Soros, Gates, Buffet and the rest of their slimy associates.

Anonymous said...

Germany spent more on it "V" weapons program than the US spent on the Manhattan Project. A nuclear weapons program is a massive engineering project, completely aside from the R&D aspects. The Germans simply did not have the resources to do both. The "V" weapons provided a very poor return on the investment; the same resources invested in a viable long range bomber and fighter program could have forestalled the invasion of Europe. Or perhaps made more significant advances into the USSR.

But the Germans(and Hitler) were always fascinated by gadgets, rather than viable mass produced weapons. The Soviets and the US were both much better at fielding huge quantities of equipment that was "good enough."

If the Germans had focused on mass production of good enough weapons, say a long barreled 75mm Mk4 tank and the FW-190A/D fighter, they would have been further ahead.

Still, nothing they could have done would have ever given them the resources to invade England before the US fielding of the A-bomb, at best they could have bombed the English into submission.

Regardless if England fell, by the late 1940, or early 50's at the latest, the US would have had a viable B36 fleet armed with atomic bombs which would have been able to effectively destroy Germany, basing out of the CONUS. Several hundred deliverable 50-100kt weapons.

Game over.

The US would have been much further ahead if we had done nothing, or fought Japan first, allowing the Germans and Russians to bleed each other white. Then we attack and destroy the victor, giving us global domination.

Anonymous said...

This is the funniest thing ever! One of Chattanooga's black anti-city violence leaders, chosen by the Mayor, has been arrested for driving erratically, with drugs, and a prostitute doing him! Ha ha ha ha ha !!!!

http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/25719534/non-profit-founder-working-with-citys-violence-reduction-initiative-arrested#.U5WkbWnRFRM.facebook

Anonymous said...

the jigs up

PK..check this


http://www.wmcactionnews5.com/story/25723815/man-attempts-to-steal-1500-from-make-a-wish-family#.U5TyfRZefvw.facebook

World_War_Me said...

The war between the Whites pushing for justice for Quattro (the cat tortured and murdered by those little shits) and the black community is heating up on twitter.

The blacks are mad - and I mean MAD - because the White Quattro supporters activists aren't worshiping their "chirren" and prefer justice for the cat over letting the little shits slide. The NAACP - who is siding with the no-integrity negroes has also reached it's tipping point with how much they can fool Whites.

The blacks are calling it "hate" and telling the cat supporters to "go the hell home." There are also disgusting caricatures of dead cats on the blacks' protest posters. You can see the pics here: https://twitter.com/sheepleunited/media

Please you gotta see these signs and the pissed off looks for yourself.

Credit to @sheepleunited

Also written on posters (I didn't edit them):

"UNO our kids dos parents trees our community comes before Quattro" (insert disgusting caricature of dead cat)

"Cats is not are future we are" <- This is not my grammar mistake, this was written word for word on a sign a little black girl is holding.

"Take your HATE home with you" <- Sign held by very angry-looking negro

"Go the Hell Home" <-also held by angry negro

"Stop the Violence of our Kids" <- Everything's gotta be about them!

"We like cats, but love our children more!" <- lies

"The cat is a diversion, the real problem is hate." Right, because it's hate that makes people want justice for Quattro.

"Childrens over cats" <- my favorite

These people are evil narcissists and I hate them so much.

I saw the pictures of Quattro before he died, and it made me want to kill myself javascript:void(0)of despair.

JUSTICE FOR QUATTRO! Please do what you can to support Quattro and other animals abused by these monsters.

CENTURION said...

I am afraid, I am of the opinion World Wars One and Two were planned.

Cull 50 Million White men. Make BILLIONS supplying the means to do so.

Kill the best and then move in.

Seems to me.

World_War_Me said...

CENTURION, for what it's worth, I agree with you about the motives behind World Wars One and Two.

Marc B said...

This is a good example to bring up whenever people claim that Whites commit crime in numbers commensurate with blacks, but get away with it because the criminal justice system has black males in it's cross hairs.

Anonymous said...

World_War_Me said ”The war between the Whites pushing for justice for Quattro (the cat tortured and murdered by those little shits) and the black community is heating up on twitter. . . “

We've got to decide as a society – which is more important, a cat or an orc.

Anonymous said...

This video of the Seattle Symphony being turned into a black culture ass shaking institution says it all. Classical music inspires the mind and leaves the body at rest. Our culture has become completely carnal. Look at what the black man has turned our culture and our women into:

https://music.yahoo.com/news/sir-mix-lot-takes-baby-got-back-classical-162206266-rolling-stone.html

DISGUSTING !!!

CENTURION said...

AS for the destruction of Classical Art, when the Rockefeller family began supporting the Museum of Modern Art in New York we had the collapse of dignity and meaning in art.

That was when we got the infantile cubism, abstract, etc garbage from such Marxist as Picasso, Dali, etc and more garbage from Klee, Jasper Johns, Warhol and Rauschenberg.

I knew Rauschenberg since he lived on Captiva Island, Fl...a place I would visit often. He was one old drunk homosexual but had a fabulous estate in the middle of the Island and when he and his boy friends were up to throwing a party....well, you had to be there. He had a fridge stocked completely with Jack Daniels.........Today the boyfriends and a charity are fighting over the estate and the millions that go with it.

D-FENS said...

Anon: The stalemate would have come from exhaustion.

Incidentally, victory DID allow the USSR to develop both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. They were aimed at US.

If Stalin had defeated Hitler without our help (doubtful, IMO), he would have been severely weakened to a point that Western Europe could have successfully resisted. If we were going to intervene, THEN would have been the time to do it.

By all accounts, Hitler admired much about western civilization, particularly Great Britain. However, he believed that they were controlled by TWMNBN (I don't know how he got that idea). Therefore he did not trust them to be at his back while he attacked the USSR. Several times he offered peace initiatives to GB. That's what the Hess mission was about.

Note that GB declared war on Germany to defend Poland. Yet the USSR became an ally despite making it possible for Germany to attack Poland (Hitler - Stalin Pact) and, in fact, participating in the dismemberment of Poland.

Anonymous said...

The blacks are calling it "hate" and telling the cat supporters to "go the hell home." There are also disgusting caricatures of dead cats on the blacks' protest posters.

Those blacks are some sick (uh) "puppies!" Calling blacks on their anti-animal behavior is smeared as being "hate." Then again, any attempt to call blacks for their behaviors--like flashmobs, torture-killings and rioting--is also "hate."

Question: do blacks seriously believe this? Are they so over the cliff that they can not understand a little empathy for animals? Or do they think that whatever they do defines morality--regardless of atrocity?

james m said...

Anon@ @9:53 I enjoy your posts, although sadly you've chosen to battle Dopey-N-loopy and his Injustice League of Squid-merica.
Their main HQ is called the "Fortress of Stupidtude" which is an echo chamber surrounded by a hall of mirrors. The entrance is of course down a rabbit-hole.
Good luck and godspeed your victory, Beware though as you will be tarred as a paid Z-Troll (I am still waiting for my check) and your best efforts will only result in a pathetic re-gurgitation of already insipid bile, but hey I am having fun watching it...

Anonymous said...

james m said ”Anon@ @9:53 I enjoy your posts, although sadly you've chosen to battle Dopey-N-loopy and his Injustice League of Squid-merica.
Their main HQ is called the "Fortress of Stupidtude" which is an echo chamber surrounded by a hall of mirrors. The entrance is of course down a rabbit-hole.
Good luck and godspeed your victory, Beware though as you will be tarred as a paid Z-Troll (I am still waiting for my check) and your best efforts will only result in a pathetic re-gurgitation of already insipid bile, but hey I am having fun watching it...”


Great description of the situation and thanks for the thoughtful post. I thought that I might be the only person on this blog having difficulty understanding the, uh, complex logic. Perhaps, as implied in an earlier post, I'll learn to understand and even relish the rants. I would prefer to characterize the exchanges as a quest to understand the incomprehensible rather than doing battle.

Anonymous said...

It is fun to think about what could have been.It is much more satisfying to tackle problems head on,in the present time,with an eye towards changing the future for the better.It all starts with YOU !

Anonymous said...

Hilarious! Hip Hop has Its own version of Weird Al!

Anonymous said...

Bits and pieces occasionally make sense,but the whole package is a muddled mess.If the guy would simply streamline his message,perhaps dumb it down for the masses,he may find himself getting more traction.Some people are just too smart to succeed.

james m said...

The "Battle" as I see is for control of the conversation. It is between those who are honest and make their points using data and logic and those who would 'hook" an audience with 1 or 3 facts and once hooked force feed a thousand lies down the intellectual throats of said audience.
Why? well obviously to be the white Jesse Jackson and gain for himself the wealth/ power/noteriety that Jesse or Al Sharpton have garnered for themselves.
Why does PK allow him to post? I thought originally he wanted to allow free speech ,but his imposition of speech restrictions in order the save his revenue stream kinda put the kaibosh on that theory.
So I am developing a different theory, one based on seeing young females riding in shorts and flip flops and a novelty helmet on the back of liter-class sportbikes whilst the rider wears full helmet gloves, jacket, boots. He rides recklessly, too fast in heavy traffic and "rolls the dice" with their safety (to show off) if he's wrong she gets far worse injuries than he.(roadrash-wise) As a motorcyclist myself I always ask as the A-Hole roars by " did she REALLY sign up for that?" my guess is she did not but instead is clinging on for dear life and hoping for the best.
I think PK is a bit more thoughtful than that.
And (lets for the sake of arguement) posit that PK is brave and courageous beyond what mere mortals are capable of. we know BRA can command an army of bloodthisty madmen.

Did his wife sign on for this? Kids? Parents, brothers, sisters? I think not.

And so he allows Dopey-N-Loopy and DUMBtureion ect to post to their hearts contet knowing full well that the minions of BRA will paint all of us as Keyboard Klansmen and conspiracy kooks based off their comments appearing multiple times on each thread.
But is safer that way.
And I do not blame him.

Anonymous said...

james m said ”. . . And so he allows Dopey-N-Loopy and DUMBtureion ect to post to their hearts contet knowing full well that the minions of BRA will paint all of us as Keyboard Klansmen and conspiracy kooks based off their comments appearing multiple times on each thread.
But is safer that way.
And I do not blame him.”


It is puzzling, but PK must believe that the rants provide a net contribution in readership or he wouldn't permit them. If the first couple of posts that I read when I first visited this site had been the rants, I might have written the site off as one for kooks and moved on. But I liked the topics and saw good posts and remained here just as you are here and as a significant number of others are here. It seems to me that the site is already controversial enough to draw the attention of BRA and its minions so I wouldn't think that appearing less kooky by filtering rants would make much difference. And of course, we don't know how many rants we have been spared from reading because of the censor.

Even with the rants, watchers for BRA would pick up on serious and rational posts encouraging action in ways likely to create problems for BRA. Perhaps the purpose of the rants is to suppress meaningful discussion but not in a way that will trigger censorship due to the rants having a negative net effect on readership. It is distracting when one knows that a solution oriented post not clearly in line with the unstoppable conspiracy theory will trigger a “flight of ideas” conspiracy rant. I'll always post what I want to post, but I can see how some people would prefer to avoid the hassle.

Bogolyubski said...

There's no control of the conversation, james. If you and the Anon who thinks his IQ is so high want to continue to believe in public edumacation fairy tales and mythology about the "land of the free and the home of the brave", that's fine. Go ahead and vote Republican, because it's worked so incredibly well for the past 50 years.

I frankly see little point in speculation about WW II since it is, after all, now history. It definitely set the stage for BRA, which I do hope you get to enjoy in its full, glorious disarmed diversity there in DeBlasio's little fiefdom - which seems just the perfect place for you - while celebrating all the glorious wars fought to make folks like Llord Blankein, George Soros, and Jamie Diamond into a permanent ruling aristocracy.

World_War_Me said...

Bogolyubski, as always, I'm right behind you.

gibmedat said...

I like the voter block theory because it would be true if not for voter fraud and counting fraud. There's enough evidence to suggest the last general election was fixed.
It really doesn't matter because party politics are a charade to keep mildly intelligent people distracted from what is really happening.
The elites use a variety of tactics and strategies to buy time while overt tyranny incubates.
An armed and organized citizenry is the only safeguard against our psychopathic rulers (bundy ranch).

If the militias start showing up with proverbial torches and pitchforks, it's over for the elites. This is a tyrant's worst nightmare. So they keep tyranny on a low simmer with propaganda, slowly picking away at our liberties, slowly taking power bit by bit instead of all at once.