Thursday, April 9, 2015

"I Am the Law"

Detroit fell, when the last gasp of white people in charge of the city attempted the Stop The Robberies, Enjoy Safe Streets (STRESS) program of policing.

It backfired, eventually creating a moment when black criminality morphed into black rebellion (the 1967 Black Riot "liberating" the city from white control and ushering in an era of black political rule).

This is why the video of a white police officer shooting a black person with an outstanding warrant (with a history of arrests going back decades) shouldn't be cause for fear of he how he will be viewed.

For all white people in America are now viewed as Brittany Watts was seen...

Because of a raid by white police officers of an after-hours drinking club in Detroit (a "blind pig") in 1967, blacks engaged in the most violent race riot seen in American history.

Since this revolutionary act, more than 20,000 black people have been murdered in Detroit (not to mention the Arsenal of Democracy collapsing under the stress of its new black rulers, incapable of sustaining the civilization whites abandoned) by other black people.

But in 2015 America, the country seems to be held hostage by what transpires when a black person has a negative encounter with a white person possessing some measure of authority.

Be it Officer Darren Wilson or the 'white' -  Hispanic George Zimmerman, all of America seems to be nothing more than Detroit in 1967, when white police officers trying to keep the some semblance of law and order stand on the precipice of inadvertently creating disorder and anarchy.

A country, a nation, cannot long endure when such conditions persist.

In the short term, police will cease patrolling areas where their presence could inadvertently trigger a race war (as happened in Detroit in 1967), and in the long run, these cities will see all legitimate economic activity, property values collapse and the trademark blight defining all majority black areas of America set in...

And without the state securing a monopoly on violence, a neighborhood, a community, or a city becomes uninhabitable to the law abiding.

Because the reality of black crime cannot be logical discussed in America, the only solution is the seemingly illogical blaming of white people for daring to arrest blacks at a rate far exceeding their percentage of the population.

But to those incapable of understanding the reality of black crime, any person using crime statistics to bolster their argument for why racial profiling should exist is only one step away from being a member of the Nazi SS.

It's not a matter of a white supremacist's fantasy to state without black people, Charleston, South Carolina would be free of gun-crime: it's simply an understanding of mathematics and aggregating the race of the individuals collectively making large areas of the city/county unsafe...*

The consequences of ignoring the negative impacts black criminality has on a neighborhood, community, or city ensures the same racial transformation which occurred in Detroit - and subsequent economic and ethical (collapse of morality established by white inheritors of western civilization and incapable of being sustained by blacks) collapse of the city - will be replicated nationwide.

You can consider what happened between Officer Michael Slager and the deadbeat sperm donor, Walter Scott, a tragedy, but in reality this story and video serves as a "teachable moment" for black individuals thinking of failing to cooperate with police.

Or, for that matter, an individual of any race who considers ignoring a police officer and being uncooperative a wise decision...

For the state must have the monopoly on violence, or else you have Detroit... which, paradoxically, was allowed to become synonymous with failure because white people capitulated their duty to maintain the monopoly on violence back in 1967 and instead began the Caucasian Trail of Tears across 8 Mile.


* - What I've never understood is this: if gentrification is bad because white people have the midas touch in turning formerly blighted black areas into tax-producing centers of commerce and increased property values, why shouldn't one question why this same real estate was virtually worthless when it was occupied by the now displaced blacks?



103 comments:

Ricky In Cali said...

George Zimmermans case really opened the Pandora’s box of all the race bullshit we see from the Media these days about animosity towards cops on a National level. With “White” Georgey being acquitted and an improper portrayal of Trayvon Martin when he was 5 years old and in diapers, the stupid people couldn’t understand how a Black child was chased down like a dog and shot while he begged for his life and drank iced tea.

When Darren Wilsons case played out, this was a lot more down the alley of Jesse Jackson and Sharpton. A REAL WHITE MAN kills a future teen scholar who was one day going to become a Champion for Human Rights and again the media took off with it. Even though Wilson was acquitted, again, it fuels the fire for the stupid people to think da youf are just being gunned down in the skreets by Police.

Now with Instagram and Twitter and better quality cell phone cameras, we get a message that is easy for anyone with two brain cells to rub together “Black Lives Matter”, or “Hands Up Don’t Shoot”. Makes stupid people believe they are “fighting for a cause” when in reality it’s all horseshit. Again, fanning flames of hatred and racism but this time, they are despising cops and looking for trouble when none is there.

Now we have the latest incident of this South Carolina Cop. This one looks bad and again, this was another one that Jesse Jackson and Sharpton have been waiting for. They probably knelt down and kissed the ground, crying and praying and thanking the Lord that a gift from Heaven dropped into their laps like this one. Now they can claim everything that’s came out of their monkey-ass mouths is true and so continues the flames of racism, YT hates up, police are bad, blah blah blah….

The last one is the cop in Florida (white man) who shoots black man who was mentally unstable. This is going to be the latest one on the news and if the South Carolina cop incident wasn’t big enough this would have been the horse to beat on. Regardless of what the facts are at this point white cop is considered guilty, we hate the police, do not trust them, black lives matter, rinse and repeat. April is here folks and the TNB is in full effect. Prepare for a long hot summer my friends…

Anonymous said...

No.

Fuck "Officer" Slagle.

He is a murderer.
Badge or not, shooting someone in the back multiple times as they are running away is murder.

There is no way to spin this. Slagle gunned somebody down for no reason. The video doesn't lie.

I couldn't give two shits about the victim.
Black lives don't matter to me one goddam bit.

What pisses me off is that this murder now falsely confirms every lie that Obama, Holder, Sharpton, Jackson, and every race pimp and negro grievance hustler has ever told.

Everyone knows Trayvon and Michael Brown were scumbags who got what they deserved.
Now the Negroes and their white liberal slave masters have a legitimate victim.
We will be hearing about this for a year. At least.

Goddam it Slagle. You fucked up and fucked us all over. Way to go gunslinger.

MMP said...

O/T

I commented on the thread on a news site today, only to receive a reply....

"You is racist"

After picking myself up off the floor, I replied

""You ARE racist" Not "You IS racist"....Now go get an education"

Woodsy InNYC said...

THIS is what REALLY happened. Look at the map and the links to slow motion video detailing what really happened BEFORE the shooting:

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/04/09/walter-scott-dash-cam-video-abc-version-1/comment-page-1/#comments

I'm not going to break it down for you. Watch it yourself. Take notes. Then read the comments.

Not guilty. Case dismissed.

(bangs gavel)

I KNEW something smelled fishy...

...and it wasn't my cat and it wasn't my girlfriend...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
What?! They both LOVE tuna!

paulmurray said...

What crime had he committed? Being in debt for child support that he probably could not possibly pay. Debtor's prisons are alive and flourishing in the lanbd of the free.

http://blog.angry-dad.com/2015/04/why-scott-was-running-from-police.html

MMP said...

Walter Scott

1. given a "Less than Honorable" discharge for dealing drugs

2. Warrant for non payment of support.
2a. SC suspends ones drivers license for non payment of over $500.00

3. Driving on a suspended license.

4. Driving without insurance.

Claims to have just purchased the car???????

5. Current registration?

SO.....He KNEW he was going to loose his new Hooptie, as it was going to go to impound.......Why the fuck not run?

And to quote his son "He didn't want to go to jail AGAIN"

Anonymous said...

21,000 blacks murdered in Detroit from 1969-2012. 43 years. How many murdered between 1927 and 1969? Can you even compare given the further back you go the fewer whites? Maybe restrict it to just the 20 years prior, post WW-II.

chattanooga gal said...

"The problem is, we will hear about this endlessly until the leftist media succeeds in whipping ghettos across America into a window smashing, hair weave stealing frenzy. Blacks will undoubtedly assault and perhaps kill innocent whites as "revenge" for Walter Scott's murder. Meanwhile, does anyone remember the white woman in Oklahoma who was beheaded by the black racist after he told everyone that he "hated white people? Or what about the countless other white victims of racially motivated attacks by blacks? Probably not, as they appeared as mere blips on local news and were then quickly brushed under the rug."
liked this comment that I read on another article

Anonymous said...

Let me tell you, the blacks were crowing about the shooting in South Carolina; and in their small minds continue to indict all (mostly white) police officers around the nation as being racist and picking on blacks.

Never mind the piles of dead white people killed by blacks each week; never mind the thousand of white women raped by blacks; a white police officer shot and killed an unarmed black man. Whites are shot all over their bodies each week by blacks, but their lives don’t matter to the media.

A point was made that the black man should have not fled. When he did so, he took the chance of being shot (which happened.) Should the officer have killed the Negro? Probably not! He could have easily shot the Negro in the ass and faced a lawsuit which is better than life in prison.

What happened to him? I think the police officer snapped. He probably had severe Negro fatigue. However, he did the white race no favors by shooting the Negro in the back as he was fleeing the scene. As whites try to take the high road and show that blacks are the problem, along comes a guy like this that gives Sharpton and company race baiting fuel for months. Blacks will use this ill advised moment of a white police officer to riot, plunder, and continue the destruction of YT.

This is the ONLY way I would shoot a fleeing Negro in the back (even if he were unarmed). I would do it ONLY if he had just committed a heinous crime (rape a child, kill somebody), and if I didn’t shoot him he would get away to commit more crimes. Keep in mind, Negroes now have the same rights as white people, so if one did that and it was on film, one could get prosecuted and die for killing the renegade ape.

Now, I have to ask the question: would I be given the same chance? I would not shoot a black in the back except in cases of fleeing from a “heinous” crime. Do I think the average ape would give me the same respect? The short answer is no!

As many have said already, the only answer is total segregation. They would have their mayor, their police, and their city to take care of. They could not point the finger of discrimination because they would be their own rulers.

This is going to be a hot summer; expect lots of blood to flow.

Whitefist said...

And without the state securing a monopoly on violence...

It is precisely this bolshevik principle which has led to the creation and imposition of BRA. Wasn't early "integration" accomplished quite literally at the points of US military bayonets???

There is no monopoly on violence, not if one actually believes in the natural right of self-defense...it is precisely because YT has subcontracted his monopoly on violence, as well as his monopoly on critical thinking, to the all powerful state, that he now faces racial extermination by "his" very own government.

Lets also consider in this the racial health of blacky here...he knows better then to cede any "monopoly on violence" to anyone, or any entity...oh, blacky might be incapable of sustaining, let alone creating, civilization, but he's at least genetically smart enough to never buy into the nonsense that there is some kind of monopoly on violence...consequently, if not put down violently, it is blacky who through the application of violence attains supremacy...are we not witnessing this play out now before our very eyes???

For Blacky, might is right, and the strong through victory create a "monopoly on violence"...that's much closer to natural law, and shows that Blacky, not YT is actually the healthy one here...

Oh, his may be a Pyrrhic victory, both because he's slaughetering the goose that lays his golden eggs, and also, because he's merely a pawn in a game he knows nothing about, and will most likely be discarded at some point in the future when his usefulness is outlived.

Nonetheless, it is blacky, not YT, who is healthy here. Nathan Trapuzzano is pushing up daisies now precisely because he ceded a "monopoly on violence" to an entity interested only in his demise, while Simeon Adams' applied violence ended Trapuzzano's continued existence...

PK seems to be an admirer of the White Man's magic, science and technology, so lets introduce an engineering principle called redundancy...because YT has voluntarily surrendered his right to self-defence under this bolshevik principle of the state's monopoly on violence, never mind who controls the state, he has abandoned that most important principle of redundancy, and thus we have BRA, and most likely our racial extermination to look forward to, because this cannot be survived, it will be defeated or it will consume us, the latter the safer bet now...

Lastly, there are ample youtube videos of the dangers of this bolshevik principle of the state's monopoly on violence played out when human bipeds are put in the state's halloween costumes (uniforms) and given their 00 licenses to kill...

Anonymous said...

Remember, facts don't matter to those people.

Anonymous said...

The properties were worthless, PK, because the orcs that roamed amongst them.... are worthless. Blacks do not create value; they absorb and destroy it.

In space they call it a Black Hole. That's not a coincidence.

Anonymous said...

If you're not doing at least something today to bring about segregation - no matter how small- you've wasted your day.

Separate.

bernicegreenbaum said...

I was living in Boston's South End in the late 1980's. The tiny apartment my roommate and I were renting was in a neighborhood that was primarily black in the '70s, a mere ten years prior to us living there. When I lived there, the gays were slowly taking it back, purchasing the handsome brick townhouses with the enormous windows and stately entrance foyers. There were still at that time a measurable amount of negroes living in the South End, hanging out on the street corners panhandling, getting drunk and high.

I remember one day leaving the apartment for a job interview which was early in the morning. I dressed to the nines with a severely tailored suit, high heels, the works. In addition to being nervous about the interview, I was still not certain of how to get to the downtown area via subway (what they call the "T". As I walked down the street a negro started to give me the eye and tell me how "damn fine" I looked. I tried to give him a quick nod and upped my pace, but in the back of my mind I questioned just how safe this new neighborhood would be. The day prior, my roommate and I were leaving and before we could even get the door to the building closed, a negro on the front steps was axing for a glass of water (maybe it was a quarter - it's hard to understand them). Thinking quickly, I lied, saying "I don't live here!" Leaving my poor roommate to lie also, saying "Yes, we're just visiting."

Later that day we discussed how disconcerting living in a neighborhood where you were constantly being hit up for something was very uncomfortable. In a month or so we vacated the apartment and moved to much safer, whiter Brookline. It was with a tinge of sadness that we left, because we could see the beginnings of what the gay investors were trying to do in the South End. Several streets many of which were derelict and boarded up were now finely restored to their late 19th century grandness.

In the back of my mind I resented having to move from a very convenient location in what was still an affordable part of Boston. Interestingly, at the time I learned about a new program spearheaded in Boston, similar to the Section 8 rentals, where large scale Pruitt Negro style buildings were no longer built, but set-aside, subsidized apartments for the negroes were planned for the newer upscale apartment buildings being built around Copley Square. I'd be interested to know how that all worked out for those of you who still live in the Boston area. The usual problem white progressives have when areas are being gentrified is "Where do we put the negroes?" Similar to "Where do we put the trash?" My roommate and I weren't making a lot of money back then but still managed to pay market rent, even for a closet sized apartment. Being able to live rent free in a fashionable neighborhood must be Black Privilege.

Anonymous said...

Zoologist Desmond Morris said it decades ago:

"As a species, we are not biologically equipped to cope with a mass of strangers who masquerade as members of our tribe"

Or people who masquerade as victims of bad fortune and constantly shuck and jive their way through life and around any foreseeable responsibility.

Bullies playing victims and we are still expected to buy it every time.

So tired of seeing black folk hanging around "protesting" with sour and surly looks on their faces along with the parade of whites and other non-blacks who take the "silent supporting role", standing around and waiting...waiting...waiting for the negro to be satisfied. Which brings us to our next subject, the black hole...

Mutant Swarm said...

PK, I have a small bone to pick: Please stop using the phrase "gun violence." There is no such thing as "gun violence," any more than there is "car violence (hit and run)," "hammer violence," or "lighter fluid violence."

The phrase "gun violence" is a hard left Marxist, passive voice piece of psychological disarmament.

People are violent, not guns. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, re Detroit, the further back you go the fewer blacks ....

Anonymous said...

I see the answer. This Summer they really need to start pulling back from policing negro areas. Let them cannibalize each other. Even the surrounding DWLs will finally see the unvarnished mayhem and start pulling back themselves, or at least stop their cheerleading for blacks. They'll just go silent.

As the mayhem peaks, the areas will simply need to be sealed off. Voila, segregation.

So, we need to let these things off their leash; STOP trying to interfere with their "black thing". If black cops want to go into the jungle and try and sort out the jaboonery, fine, send em in. But no non-blacks should patrol black areas.

How about anything above 25% black, and only black cops go in? We need some formula like that.

Hell, if I was a cop in Obama's America, I wouldn't go anywhere NEAR a negro; way too much trouble for no benefit. They hate cops, they hate Whites, and they will only cause trouble for you. Is your life worth it? Watch what happens to the Charleston cop now...

rent slave said...

The real Walter Scott did Ivanhoe.This Walter Scott did ho's.

ricpic said...

Ever hear the phrase I cope therefor I am?

The dying United States is paralyzed and cannot cope because we've reached the point where "All thought be racisss!"

Anonymous said...

They key to gentrification is that there needs to be valuable property or decent jobs in the area.

This is why gentrification has worked in SF and NYC but not Detroit.

The other problem with gentrification is that it doesn't solve the schools problem. If property values go up because of White gentrification the local district will just spread the funds around. It's not like they will create safe schools for White children with the funds. Thus White families in these areas end up paying twice through property taxes and for private schools. Only high-income White families are able to do it and even in those cases they normally aren't able to buy a large house with a backyard. It's a lifestyle that requires sending large amounts of money to governments that prioritize you below blacks. And you still put the children at higher risk since violent blacks will still wander in from tier-1 burbs through public transportation.

Anonymous said...

Everyone needs to internalize the fact that the game has changed with the advent of the internet and cellphones capable of good quality video. The media, police and others in power haven't caught up to that fact yet.

Negro fatigue is wider spread than we sometimes think. I live in KC and last weekend there was cellphone video (vertical, of course) of a group of blacks launching themselves onto car hoods. Their videographer was giving a running commentary with every other word being ni**a. The video ended with a cop tackling one or two of the vandals and also arresting their video guy.

I say all that because it's become impossible to find the video. It was you Youtube but removed more than once. It was on Reddit in JusticePorn but removed because it showed blacks being bad. Reddit is full of liberal youth who are still safe in their white suburbs and just love to love blacks but there were tons of comments that could have been written by anyone commenting on SBPDL. In fact, one comment mentioned TNB with the next comment asked what that meant. Yahoo is already filled with race real comments and Reddit is trying desperately to delete race-real posts but is coming under fire for their heavy-handed censorship. If those liberal dimwits can see what's going on, maybe there is hope.

I feel for the cop in SC - he'd obviously had enough and in the heat of the battle he probably thought the guy had his taser or his own weapon. Still can't shoot them in the back but it's open season on cops so I understand his no-win situation. To white cops I would like to say that it's past time for you to quit prostituting yourself to "the man" and police as your brain tells you to or get out of the business. It's no good for a white cop to hand out tons of bs traffic tickets to whites to even things up with blacks who never have a license, legitimately registered vehicle or insurance. I can't back up white cops if they prey on their own just because they're not allowed to enforce the laws on blacks. It's going to be a long summer.

Sheila said...

Paul, I have to agree with White Fist here, and take STRONG issue with your endorsement of the state's monopoly on violence, regardless of who's controlling said state.

Just as we know there are major differences in general personality, intelligence, and propensity to violence amongst the races, we also know these same differences exist among individuals of the same race. Why was there a need for "vigilante" justice among the settlers? Because there were some lousy White people. Even if we lived in a majority White nation, there would still be those who would want to harm you or take your property, merely because they were too stupid or lazy to acquire their own, or because they were simply born bad. Such people exist.

However, since the majority of Whites simply want to be left alone to live their lives as they see fit, they first took out some of these broken people individually (note I use broken to mean not properly functioning, or bad; it does NOT mean a poor victim). Then they banded together to take out some of the larger or more difficult broken/bad people. From there we all know how it proceeds: individual action, group action, rules/bureaucracies, government. Not necessarily bad in and of itself.

At the same time, however, too many also voluntarily gave up the right of individual action, whether for crime, or self defense, or mere honor. That is unacceptable. I don't mourn the negro shot in the back; I truly do not care about any of their lives. I do care, however, about myself and White people in general - and I don't want to be on the receiving end of the state's monopoly on violence. The state is no longer (if it ever truly was) the "servant" of the "people." It and its minions are our masters - and I acknowledge no master other than God.

Whites MUST retain not only the right to mere self defense. We must also reclaim our right to direct action in punishing wrongdoers. Why should someone who is legally armed and carrying have to call and wait for the official police if they witness a crime being perpetrated? Every legal gun owner who uses a weapon today in such an event is still "investigated" and criticized. We can and certainly should have an organized/cooperative form of response to violence - but whether this is a group stringing up someone who needs stringing up, or paying some among us to be our proxies (with the degree of trust and similar values that implies), it doesn't have to either/or. I say we need both - sure, if you're not doing something wrong you theoretically don't need to "fear" the police. But I no longer trust them - even the White ones, because they are not endorsing a set of standards and values I consented to - they are instead forcing me to conform to a twisted and sick society.

Let's be a bit more assertive here and demand not merely our legitimate right to self defense, but also the right to go on the offense, without the "authorities" giving us permission. I am not a subject or a servant. I am supposed to be a citizen (although I no longer claim allegiance to any country) and I will not submit.

Fed Up Firefighter said...

Brilliant work lately PK. I am so glad I found your blog a few years ago. The "Between the Lampshades" interview was excellent.

I could share personal experiences for days about the dysfunctional negro here in negroland below the Mason-Dixon. Those of us in the First Responder biz know the score. Michael Slager will be sacrificed on the alter of DIEversity, then likely offered up on a silver platter to General Population.

Fed Up FF

Anonymous said...



Concerning the poster who said "stop calling it 'gun violence'", you are absolutely right. I've been on the same page for a long time now.

When it's applicable, I call it what it is: "nonwhite violence". I recommend it-liberals heads explode when you do-and they can't refute it.

Anonymous said...

This Walter Scott video being shown by media outlets is clearly doctored to omit certain things. The plain footage with real time audio is here :

https://vimeo.com/124336782

Watch with the volume turned up, right off the bat you can hear that the taser is being deployed (repeated clicks) while the two are out of screen.

At 17 seconds, Scott turns to run and you can see that the wires are connected to the officers upper torso. This means that the officer was being shot with his own taser, wielded by Scott.

Make of that what you will.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Ricky In Cali said...
George Zimmermans case really opened the Pandora’s box of all the race bullshit we see from the Media these days about animosity towards cops on a National level. With “White” Georgey being acquitted and an improper portrayal of Trayvon Martin when he was 5 years old and in diapers, the stupid people couldn’t understand how a Black child was chased down like a dog and shot while he begged for his life and drank iced tea.


For me, one of the most telling moments in the Trashcan Martin case was watching the Piers Morgan show after the acquittal. He had Rachel Jeantel (AKA "Bleck" or "Black Shrek", as I call her)

She was chuckling and chortling-her neck fat shaking, talking about Trashcan giving Zim a "whoop ass" beat down.

The camera cut to some random 40-ish brain dead white woman-looking like atypical libtard-beady eyes behind glasses, receding chin schoolmarm type-her mouth was hanging open in shock as Bleck kept flapping her lips.

Obviously, her wet dream of some adorable negro toddler eating Skittles and skipping down the lane waving to bunny rabbits until the evil brown-colored "white" man sadistically gunned him down without provocation was shattered.

There are millions like her.

Also, another thing--seems like a stray dog can't take a crap without being recorded on a cellphone these days. I know there are/were 10 videos of the Ferguson incident with St. Stogies-it just happens they showed what happened, and that was 180 degrees out from the BS being peddled, so they never saw the light of day. Guaranteed.

Anonymous said...

I agree.

bernicegreenbaum said...

North Charleston has just been selected to join the ranks of Ferguson, Detroit, Camden, and Gary as the newest Negro hell hole. Anywhere negroes are found trouble is sure to follow. Let's review a typical, routine traffic stop in mythical Whiteyville, America.

Bernice Greenbaum is driving her sedan down Main Street. A cop car behind her turns on its lights and sirens, beckoning her to pull the car over.

Traffic cop: "License and registration, ma'am."

Bernice: digging in purse, "What's wrong officer? Was I speeding?"

Traffic cop: "Your back stop light is out."

Bernice: handing the license and registration over, "Oh, I had no idea! I'll get it taken care of immediately!"

Traffic cop: "I'm going to have to issue you a ticket. If you get the light fixed, send a copy of the receipt for the broken light and they'll waive the fee."

Bernice: taking license and registration back, "Thank you, officer."

Cop walks back to patrol car, drives off.

Now, using the same situation, put a negro in the driver's seat.

Negro: "I jes bought da cah and doan hab no regis- whatever it be you jes axed me fo."

Officer: getting suspicious, "Proof of insurance?"

Negro: "I doan hab none."

Officer: "Driver's license?"

Negro: "I doan hab none."

Officer: sensing he's being bullshitted, "Wait here."

Negro bolts.....

And once again we have a situation that needlessly spiraled out of control due to the negro and his inability to follow the law(s). In this case, driving without a license, no registration, no insurance, outstanding warrant, etc. The car may well have been stolen for all the cop knew. He was confronted with another lying scumbag of a negro. Granted, the cop didn't need to shoot the groid and was insane to do such a thing, especially given the past few years of parades supporting negro misbehavior and lawlessness. Now that young cop is looking to spend the next thirty years behind bars for killing an animal that sired no less than four additional burdens on society without benefit of paying for them.

Imagine, if you will, going to a stranger's home for a luncheon and asking to use their bathroom. Imagine the bathroom is tiled, clean, neat, with all the amenities you'd expect: toilet paper, clean towels, soap, etc. Now imagine dropping a massive amount of heat on the bowl, positioning your ass several inches above the toilet seat, letting fly with whatever you've got as you squat over the bowl. You then leave the bathroom without benefit of flushing and return to the luncheon, eat your fill and then some, pull yourself away from the table, belching and farting loudly, wiping your hands on the drapes, and calling the hostess a whitey bitch. Oh, and you also steal your Sterling silver place setting. Do you think you'd be welcome to come back? Do you think that person would look forward to future encounters with you? This is the situation white America has found itself in with the American negro.

Anonymous said...

Sadly, to fight all this madness we need the younger generations to be fully aware. What I see is the rampant ebonification of our youth via agitprop. Everything cool is black. They're being utterly disarmed. This needs to be addressed by the grownups in the room.

Anonymous said...

How many Human cops will be assassinated like the NYC cops were after Brown/Garner?

This video alone will trigger some crazed orcs into cop ambushes.

As the song goes "The silicon chip inside her head, was switched to overload".

A lot of chips are switching amongst the groid masses as you read this. Get ready for the attacks...

kevin jay said...

90210

y'day there was a story on Drudge, 'More Blacks in USA are immigrants'.

NY Girl said...

Two good things to point out:
1. Al Charletan and his ilk blew their wads on St. Skittles and St. Swisher, and people are probably going to tune it out after more than two years of BRA crying wolf, and
2. As you mentioned, Spring is on the way, there will be new and better Things To Ook About soon enough.

Anonymous said...

I feel for the cop in SC - he'd obviously had enough and in the heat of the battle he probably thought the guy had his taser or his own weapon

Someone in the last thread said he probably cracked just like a veteran of war. I think that is the best explanation. A serial killer or sociopath would have been more cautious. This was someone who was sick of it all and lost control.

Not everyone is cut out for war or policing BRA. Maybe we should start thinking about these areas as warzones and question if some of these positions require longer breaks and mandatory counseling.

Unfortunately this event will just embolden blacks even further. It will reinforce their belief that White society is indebted to them and that they are justified in running from the police.

MMP said...

Cop shot in Maryland

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/04/10/anne-arundel-county-md-police-officer-shot-critically-wounded/?intcmp=latestnews

I just love the "physical description" of the suspect.

"A police spokesman told reporters the suspect was considered armed and dangerous. He released a physical description of the suspect. He said the gunman was wearing a black hoodie and dark pants."


A BOLO has been issued for anyone wearing a black hoodie & dark pants...Give me a fukkin break.

Pat Boyle said...

The Slagle situation is unfortunate but something like that was bound to happen sooner or later. There are bad cops who shoot first and ask questions later. I wish there weren't but its a fact of life. Lock this guy up and forget about him. The much more serious issue is that the Obama Administration tried to create a scenario where good cops were considered bad cops.

The problem we have that is growing worse are 'violent black mobs'. Colin Flaherty has documented this trend. The problem is already far worse than most white people suspect. The criminal justice system has not been able to cope with the violent black mobs. Under US law it is unlikely that any blacks who beat up white people will ever be apprehended and punished. That's just the way it is.

The time for racial segregation is now. We need to begin to establish malls that do not allow black people inside. Physically this is very easy. You just put up some signs and post a couple mall cops at every entrance.

The real problem is legal. The Obama Administration Justice Department would spring into action. Obama would be on television talking about 'rights' and 'fairness'. Most Americans would listen to him because they would see mall segregation as a step backward.

There would be pictures of dual water fountains and separate movie theater entrances. Secured malls would be called 'apartheid'. The debate would be long and hard but we must make a start.

The alternative is ugly. Police departments everywhere will soon have more officer Slagles if we don't begin to offer white people some refuges from black violence. Cops will begin to shoot young black men on sight. If we don't achieve some physical separation from blacks we may evolve into a cop-oriented justice system like 'Judge Dredd'.

We want a society where the cops are circumspect in their treatment of the public. We want our cops to be invariably polite, well educated, and seldom seen. But if we let blacks run rampant as they are now we will empower the worst sort of cops - the ones like Slagle.

Pat

Anonymous said...

Meanwhile, 100 miles north of Charleston, a case of run-of-the-mill blackness that won't get on the evening news...

http://www.scnow.com/news/article_aec9deb2-dca1-11e4-a098-57bfee0bffde.html

Twisting the neck of cat & throwing it on the floor...all because a woman wouldn't give him a cigarette.

Animal rights activists...yet another constituency who not only have no use for blacks...have outright disdain for them & their dysfunction.

Anonymous said...

Because the reality of black crime cannot be logical discussed in America, the only solution is the seemingly illogical blaming of white people for daring to arrest blacks at a rate far exceeding their percentage of the population.

This is so true. Only last night on Fox I watched a rare logical sounding black man (Horace Cooper) attempt to explain to a freaky looking DWL (Alan Colmes) that the disproportionately high crime rate of blacks corresponds to a disproportionate number of contacts with the police. Cooper attempted to explain to Colmes that when the crime rate of blacks is taken into consideration it becomes clear that blacks are actually underrepresented in the number of arrests and there is no systemic discrimination against blacks. In fact they receive preferential treatment. Colmes was incapable of even considering the facts regarding black criminality, and he continually spewed his nonsensical DWL blather over Coopper's attempt to have a real discussion.

A meaningful dialogue on race will not occur.

Anonymous said...

I have to agree that negro areas should only be dealt with by other negroes. That includes cops, firefighters, paramedics, schools and teachers and so on.
Of course, they could never fund that themselves any more than they can pay water bills in Detroit. Or property taxes. Or keep the street lights on.
Even so, I don't care what the conditions they created for themselves would be nor do I care that their bastard offspring (their "chilluns") would live in the pathetic conditions their baby momma's and baby daddies created. Not my problem or concern and not my responsibility to find a cure. Let them live their sub-saharan third world existence and fund it themselves to whatever degree they can and suffer the consequences.
Of course, the perimeter of these areas would have to be heavily patrolled as the negroes would want to pour out into civilized areas to commit all their rapes, robberies and other crimes but the money saved by not propping up and subsidizing the negroes could be used for such a containment effort. That money would then be well spent rather than wasted on coddling the stupid and inept negro.
And no, I wouldn't give a damn how much they screamed racism and oppression or wailed and moaned about the shitholes they created and had to live in. It would be none of my business.
Negroes will always wail and moan and blame others(YT)for their incompetence, failure, ineptitude and impoverishment but it's their own doing. If there were no others around to blame it on, they'd blame evil spirits, bad juju or even leprechauns- anyone and anything but themselves.
I'm so sick of negroes and their neverending BS, all I want is to be utterly free of them.


Anonymous said...

Bernice Greenbaum said ” North Charleston has just been selected to join the ranks of Ferguson, Detroit, Camden, and Gary as the newest Negro hell hole. Anywhere negroes are found trouble is sure to follow. Let's review a typical, routine traffic stop in mythical Whiteyville, America. . . “

You consistently crank out some of the best and most entertaining comments on this blog. You probably make a great neighbor for someone.

Anonymous said...

@Ricky in Cali: Your comments are so right on the money. Enjoy reading them for their truth.

bernicegreenbaum said...

Probably doesn't need to be said, but I'll say it anyway. Walter Scott's fambly has just hit the negro lottery. Lots of cash to be collected out there for the famblies of errant negroes, something in no short supply here in the F'd up States of Merka.

chattanooga gal said...

"Of course, the perimeter of these areas would have to be heavily patrolled as the negroes would want to pour out into civilized areas to commit all their rapes, robberies and other crimes but the money saved by not propping up and subsidizing the negroes could be used for such a containment effort."
of course, they would immediately scream they were being profiled and harassed in those adjacent areas, which they happened to be just stolling through

Anonymous said...

I wrote earlier-here's one other thing I can guaran-damn-tee you:

Let's say that this went down different-the cop stopped St. Benz for a routine stop, but the black guy got out and, with no provocation, jumped the cop with a sucker punch and then got hold of the cop's gun.

Let's say the cop, stunned, got up and ran from the guy who now has his gun, and the guy shoots the cop in the back.

All on video.

For one thing, the video would probably have been erased or otherwise never saw the light of day in the first place, but let's say it was shown.

99.999 % of all 'groids, and an awful lot of white idiots would be saying that the black only did what any rational person would do, since the mean old cops were always so awful and all that.

I'll guarantee that, in their opinion, no charges at all should be filed against the black in such a situation. I'm serious. One day that'll happen-if it hasn't already, and you'll see (although, on this site, I'm guessing at least some would agree with me.)

MMP said...

@ Pat Boyle

I enjoy your comments.

On your last one though? If you look at the video link posted above, it sure as hell looks like 2 wires coming from the cops chest before he fires his weapon.

Seeing this has changed my mind, and I now call it a legit shoot.

More will come out, puncture marks in the cops uniform & vest?

Ricky in Cali said...

Woke up in the morning to read the comments and get my fix of SBPDL and was laughing so loud they could hear me downstairs!! Thanks for the vivid description! LOL!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

OK, this might be wrong, but here's what I'm starting to see. Correct me if I'm wrong:

Cop chases Negro. Cop either tackles orc, or is attacked by orc - ground wrestling/beating begins. Orc grabs taser and shoots into cops chest (see wires protruding from cop's chest as orc runs).

Orc still has taser and is giving it juice. Cop is under assault and shoots negro even though negro running. Negro's tasting of cop must be stopped by cop.

Cops legally drops orc. Returns to fight area and picks up taser holster and moves it to dead orc area so that all his stuff is together. Taser itself in orc's paw.

You see that too?
That seem right?

awakened white said...

pat boyle is 500% right, if we're so evil, then we should then have our living space far away as possible so no more SIMBA's don't suffer. sarcasm.

White homeland indeed!

Anonymous said...

Bernice is awesome, I wish I was in a position where I could buy her a beer (or glass of wine?)

Anonymous said...

Why are taser wires in cop's chest, and not Scott's?

Did cop move taser, or taser's holster?

We need crime scene photos and police report.

Who got shot with taser?

Where was taser found? Where was holster found?

If Scott was tasering cop while running this might very well be a "good shoot".

If so, Cat 5 Chimpout is here!

Anonymous said...

The only way to make segregation work is to give the blacks black only places first. They're not that smart, so lie to them, hell spend some money, give them a bunch of fancy stuff to destroy.

Then once they have black malls and other black holes, you put up some white only areas. When they chimp out over it, point out the hypocrisy since they have their black only places, and ask why they'd want to go in there anyways if whitey is so terrible.

That just might work.

Anonymous said...

Bernice...."Walter Scott's fambly has just hit the negro lottery"

how True :) big time winnerz in the lead lotto. Long as it's "official" lead you WIN !!!!

/H hypie out H\

Ex-Copper said...

First thought was bullshit. I gave the video another run, with the volume up as you suggested.

Mixed in the background noise: wind, keys or change jingling, the videographers panting, and noise from running the phones microphone against hands or clothing; the distinct crackle of a taser cycling can be intermittently heard.

The problem, and I'm viewing the video on a cell phone, is that when the guy turns to run I see the taser jerking to the side making me believe that the officer hit the offender with only 1 of the 2 deployed probes, possibly both wires on the offender but not a good enough connection to complete the circuit to zap the offender. The taser will still crackle as the secondary function of the device is the ability to press the taser against a person and apply a "drive stun". The voltage crackles between two metal studs, the charge is also what deploys the probes from the cartridge when fired. The officer didn't close the gap and drive stun the offender which would have completed the circuit from the deployed probe giving the full incapacitating effect.

The other reason I do not believe either went for a full ride is that both were standing when the taser hit the ground.

I'm a strong believer in the idea that someone grabbing an officers taser to use on the officer is a deadly force encounter as the 5 second charge can be cycled repeatedly, rendering the officer unable to provide any handgun retention and being potentially disarmed and killed with his own weapon.

The taser hitting the ground and mope running ceases the untested theory/assertion (by a court) of a deadly force encounter. It is the totality of circumstances involved. If the mope shot at the officer with a gun, the situation is different. If the mope took the officers ASP and struck him in a location considered "in the red areas" it would also be a different situation.

This additional bit of information, if it is shown the offender managed to get the officers taser and deploy it would definitely suggest and lend evidence that there is a lot more to the encounter than what has been made public. Especially if there are puncture marks on the officer or an expert can show marks on his uniform or ballistic vest of a taser deployed against him.

The observation coupled with the active warrant and family admission this individual had previous narcotics arrests (without the "it was just weed" minimization) and history of generally fleeing arrest rather than being compliant continues the building of a good defense platform. It just is not quite the linchpin needed to create a solid defense foundation.

Brooklyn born said...




bernicegreenbaum said...
Probably doesn't need to be said, but I'll say it anyway. Walter Scott's fambly has just hit the negro lottery. Lots of cash to be collected out there for the famblies of errant negroes, something in no short supply here in the F'd up States of Merka.


Exactly, sponsors will be lining up with scholarships for the kids, and gibs that they otherwise would have gotten from their baby daddy, oh wait...............

The funny thing is, Whites will pay, We always do. Empathy is inherent in Whites and completely devoid in African Blacks.

Have you ever seen a Black at ANY charity that does not directly benefit them or their peeps?

Yet some whites are "down with the struggle"....... at least until some ratchet breaks a brick over their head.


Do you remember the Easter movie mayhem I posted about?...... Sure 'nuff, Dindus involved:

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2015/04/teen_girls_give_pa_woman_black.html



TNB.........Always absolute..........Always predictable

Anonymous said...

Sheila said:
"But I no longer trust them - even the White ones, because they are not endorsing a set of standards and values I consented to - they are instead forcing me to conform to a twisted and sick society.

Let's be a bit more assertive here and demand not merely our legitimate right to self defense, but also the right to go on the offense, without the "authorities" giving us permission. I am not a subject or a servant. I am supposed to be a citizen (although I no longer claim allegiance to any country) and I will not submit."



Sheila. Come on. Most whites are not being gunned down in the streets by cops. When they ask you to pull over 'cause a tail light's out, then pull over. Pay the fine and end of story.

This BS 'I will not submit' is EXACTLY the rationale of the groid and hence the problems that occur on a daily basis with cops and more often, with one another in their own neighborhoods.

Like it or not, the cops represent the government. They're supposed to be law enforcers. Upholding the law and the law states that you pull over when a cop asks you to. Dont argue, don't pull out a gun and wave it around, and don't run away.

Post cop encounter, if you feel as though you weren't fairly treated, you can always call the ACLU which makes a living at safeguarding that your civil rights weren't disrespected.

Now as to self-defense, you're right on the money. That has to be maintained at all costs. If someone attacks you or your family you have a right to defend them or yourself.

FlowerBell said...

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."

Voltaire

Ex-Copper said...

MMP and Anon 9:43, you beat me to some of my assertions as I was responding to the original entry on the video. You have accurate observations and thought processes needed in a critical assessment and breakdown of such incidents.

Anonymous said...

Everyone knows Trayvon and Michael Brown were scumbags who got what they deserved.



Now that's a lie. That is an f'ing lie.

IF everyone "knew" that Skittles and Sweets were scumbags, then such sites as these would no longer be necessary.

Among blacks, these two are heroes and men to be admired.

Among whites, DWLs in particular, it isn't clear as to which side they should take. Yes, they weren't perfect, but who is? Therefore, there is some division among whites as to whether or not Skittles and Sweets were bad scumbags who got what they had coming to them or just merely innocent victims of the evil racist YT society at large. It's not entirely clear, in other words, regarding those two.


This new one will of course be given full attention for 2015. Scott will probably be Time magazine's person of the year.

This is their victory. Finally at long last they found a bad YT cop.

May take a really bad crime infested cities burning summer to divert attention away from Charleston.

Chuck Hammer said...

bernicegreenbaum
Bernice Greenbaum is driving her sedan down Main Street. A cop car behind her turns on its lights and sirens, beckoning her to pull the car over.


Very well done, Bernice.

I've been thinking more about why Scott is dead and it boils down to the fact that many blacks are just flat out unable to comply with the responsibilities of living in a first world civilization.

Scott, though probably driving his own car, apparently had no registration or insurance and very likely a suspended drivers license. On top of that he had inoperative equipment.

Our country is being eaten alive by various groups who demand the rights and privileges of citizenship but are unwilling or unable to live up to the responsibilities that come with those rights.

Scott was not a violent felon but by all accounts he was a felon, with drug problems and unpaid child support. If Scott had been able to live up to the responsibilities of citizenship he would have been able to sit in his car, receive his repair ticket and drive off.

The shooting still may not pass the fleeing violent felon test but now that more of what led up to it has been filled in, including Scott wrestling on the ground with Officer Slager, it's a lot more understandable.

Anonymous said...

"You see that too?
That seem right?"



Uh, no.

Maybe in whacky crazed conspiracy land. But in rational clear thinking land, no.

That's called wishful thinking.

Let it go, son.

Let it go.

Anonymous said...

I live in this area and have never had problems with the local police - always found them unfailingly polite even when I was in the wrong. I treat them with respect...and they me. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed that this Scott character had enough money to be tootling around town in a Mercedez, but couldn't be bothered paying any child support? I feel sorry for the officer in trouble but there's a silver lining - there will no more "little Scotties" hangin' round the 'hood that the rest of us get to support.

Gwoobus Harmon said...

MMP

On your last one though? If you look at the video link posted above, it sure as hell looks like 2 wires coming from the cops chest before he fires his weapon.

Seeing this has changed my mind, and I now call it a legit shoot.


==================================

So many things to get into with this one.

First, prepare for the mother of all chimpouts. At first glance when media first aired this story, it looked like an uncaged and cowardly cop, under no threat at all, is just firing into the back of a man for no real reason. Everyone is justifiably outraged and sickened by such a video.

When it comes out that the missing portion of the video would show that the black had gained control of the taser and used it on the officer during their "scuffle," and that there was no way for the officer to know that the stolen weapon was not still in the possession of the attacker as he fled, suddenly this shooting does not seem as unjustified. Scott is at that point armed, dangerous, has committed a series of violent felonies, and has the ability to continue carrying out more, especially if he was able to incapacitate the officer with the taser and acquire his firearm.

Should these facts come out in trial and the officer cleared --- all shit hits the fan nationwide. Guaranteed.

Second, how in the world does this passive voice crap get to casually announce "a struggle ensued" or "a scuffle took place" etc....? Brushing over it like that is a totally acceptable thing to do when police contact occurs. No negroes, you don't get to fight cops! You cooperate at the time of contact, and if you feel that it is an unwarranted arrest, you file charges AFTERWARDS. The time to challenge the arrest or the merits of the stop is not as it is happening. Eric Garner, Michael Brown, and Walter Scott all made these routine situations escalate to a violent and predictable ending. That is the easiest fix to these "cop kills unarmed black" situations --- stop justifying and omitting their initial fighting of the cops. Want blacks to stop dying in these kinds of things? Make sure they know which actions to avoid so they do not contribute to their deaths.

Third, why in the world does mass media insist on doctoring videos? From editing out things, voicing over them, speeding the footage up, leaving out things that contradict the narrative - it is obvious that they are trying to craft a conclusion. The conclusions that are being fostered are to create more racial tension. They are stoking the embers for some reason. They want to hammer this theme home. Why?

Nick A. Pinnie said...

Kersey, that was an especially well thought out and beautifully written column. I do not believe there is one sane person in the entire United States, black OR white, who could effectively refute one single argument you made therein. They might scream and shout, grab their crotch, call you a white mofo and act like a caged animal, but as we all know those are not the actions of sane, sentient, reasonably rational human beings.

Bernice, keep up the great writing on this blog. You're a jewel and pleasure to read. If you're not in fact already a paid writer, you certainly would have made a great one - that is to say, about 75 years ago when the country was filled with largely sane, rational human beings.

Today, no publication house would touch you or Kersey, and the MSM would label you as closet KKKers. So, how could you defeat such a brilliant "argument"?

Edward Blake said...

Excellent article, Paul. I feel the same way about the Walter Scott incident, and its amusing to see conservatives denounce "racism" and "bad cops" to clear themselves of any white guilt.

Who cares about what happened to Walter Scott? Comply with the cops and they won't have a reason to give you a hard time. If you owe child support and have been arrested 10+ times, then I suppose its a different story...

Anonymous said...

It's just beyond belief. They are so bizarre, so violent and stupid. Here is a beautiful little video that shows several obese negro women fighting in the street. It's filmed by other fat black women and men I assume. There's plenty of mother**ker this and that, weaves on the ground (your tumble weaves) and culminates with one of the lovely ladies being run over by a car.

Imagine living around this? The noise alone is incredible.

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2015/04/woman_accused_of_running_over_1.html

Anonymous said...

Pat Boyle-

The way to make your plan work would be to price them out. Once again Basketball Americans have ruined things for everybody in a shameless display for respect for the property/physical rights of other people in the community. Not caring leads to social sewage. The decaying of social capital needs to be pointed out, put on display, disparities and ruin for all to see day after day after day. Deep down it has meaning for people, as the price of gas or a candy bar is not much of a trade off for a dirty ugly community in which no one trusts or cares for one another.

So make an amazing, white-envisioned and engineered Mall that has all the hallmarks of efficiency, style, and utility. Like a cousin to Disneyland, a tourist's wet dream where you could spend your hard earned/saved money a couple times a year in a very well laid out and maintained (and costly) environment.

$30 Up front fee, additional details on how much you could recoup after buying a reasonable amount of merchandise. Photo and ID taken at door, possible signatures or other time consuming checks that are necessary for proper security.

Interesting rides to take kids and adults alike from shopping center to concession park to unique structures and attractions. A Vegas for kids and family alike, but mainly focused on kids, family, and of course, buying high-end and overpriced stuff. A shopping vacation of sorts. A vacation free of any groidal youth.

Think of all the things that you could easily maintain and make available to customers/community members if this one element is not allowed in to exploit it.

Your frontal lobe storming away again, Pat? Envision some of the best stores/shopping centers/experiences you had growing up, etc. and recreate some modern day, groid-free equivalent in your mind. If you control for that one factor, all kinds of things are possible.

Anonymous said...

This is from San Francisco TODAY:

Teen girls attack SF bus rider who had shushed them:

http://blog.sfgate.com/stew/2015/04/09/news-crew-catches-teen-girls-attack-on-s-f-bus-rider-who-had-shushed-them/

Teenager has life-threatening injuries after SF stabbing:

http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Teenager-has-life-threatening-injuries-after-S-F-6191815.php

Bystander shot while watching fight in Inner Richmond:

http://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_27887933/san-francisco-bystander-shot-while-watching-fight-inner

Man killed in Outer Sunset:

http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Man-killed-in-San-Francisco-s-Outer-Sunset-6191771.php

There's no race given for the last three stories, but I'd be shocked if any of the culprits turned out to be Chinese kids on the way home from cello practice.

Anonymous said...

Meanwhile, let us remember the brave Negro who was gunned down:

Less than two months before he was killed, Walter Lamer Scott turned 50 and wanted everyone around him to join in the celebration.

It was February, and Scott's family had taken him to dinner at a Japanese steakhouse. As waiters and other staff gathered around to sing "Happy Birthday," Scott jumped up on the table and started dancing.

"He had everybody in the restaurant laughing," Rodney Scott said of his older brother. "That's the kind of person he was."

http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Man-shot-by-police-had-much-to-celebrate-in-6191788.php

Anonymous said...

Gentrification will save NYC. Manhattan is a small area and as the demand increases for housing places like Haarlem which were all White will become non negro again. Those houses built in the 1800's are solid and just need renovation or interior gutting to return them to pre-negro condition and they'll look great again. The problem is negroes and all of the crappy businesses they attract.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=pictures%20of%20townhouses%20in%20haarlem%2Cny&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=pictures%20of%20townhouses%20in%20haarlem%2Cny&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=

Hopeless In Craplanta said...

I was just wondering if anyone else noticed that this Scott character had enough money to be tootling around town in a Mercedez, but couldn't be bothered paying any child support?.

"They baby mommas be's gettin welfare n sheeit,i ain't gotta pays no cheerun soppawt!Sheeeeeeeyit,maing!"

That's the hood mentality...make kids you can't afford,shack with/leech off numerous baby mommas,yet somehow have the $$ to buy a luxury car or other expensive bling(probably got the money from peddling drugs).And the baby mommas of course only want the child support to buy stuff for theyself's(hair weeves,shoes,Gucci bags etc).

Constantine said...

Dancing on the tables is usually frowned upon at restaurants. I doubt the whole place would be laughing.

Especially if it was a Benihana where the tables are where they cook the food! I would think some samurai swords would be waved about at the very least.

Nick A. Pinnie aka Buckwheat said...

"It was February, and Scott's family had taken him to dinner at a Japanese steakhouse. As waiters and other staff gathered around to sing "Happy Birthday," Scott jumped up on the table and started dancing."
---------------------------------

Isn't that precious! What a marvelous man, gunned down in the prime of his life for absolutely no reason.

Dayum dose white honkey debils!

Anonymous said...

"You can consider what happened between Officer Michael Slagle and the deadbeat sperm donor, Walter Scott, a tragedy, but in reality this story and video serves as a "teachable moment". . . "

They couldn't get black power play on Michael Brown being shot in the back, because even the DOJ proved that he wasn't. So they staged an overt event of a black man being shot in the back while running away from a white cop. Conveniently filmed video. No blood shown on the "body" immediately after all those bullets in the back. Videos can be as phony as Hollywood movies. Any time the major media and government officials promote the same "story," it is all lies.

Philadelphia Mike said...

When it's applicable, I call it what it is: "nonwhite violence". I recommend it-liberals heads explode when you do-and they can't refute it.

';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';

Why the play on words? Just call it what it is.

Black violence.

Philadelphia Mike

Shefali said...

I had no problems with Michael Brown getting shot. It was obvious from the forensics that he was a thug and attacked officer Wilson, who had the right to defend himself as well as the responsibility to keep people safe.

With Scott, though... you can't shoot someone in the back 8 times. That's just cowardly. Sorry to disagree with you.

I don't disagree with you re. black criminality.

I live in a mixed race neighborhood. I am Asian, my neighbors are Asian, white and Hispanic.

A lot of times if we are just running to the store we don't lock the door. My two closest neighbors have keys to my house and I have keys to theirs. One of these neighbors is white, the other Asian. We've had keys to each others' places for going on 5 years now. A few times they've asked me to go over and feed their pets or something, and vice versa, or borrow some milk, etc. When they are out of town I'll pick up their mail for them, and vice versa.

The only time we ever had problems in this neighborhood was when a group of blacks moved into one of the houses.

Next thing you know, we were kept awake with the loud base music playing at all hours, and then there were some obvious drug deals going on.... so one of my neighbors, who is a bit of a cowboy, went over with his gun showing and made it clear these thugs were not welcome, that this was a neighborhood, not a 'hood. The thugs moved out soon after and we were all quite relieved.

There are some people who don't like people from India and Asians. No problems. If we had segregation and I had to live in a Asian neighborhood - well, I like my white and Hispanic neighbors, but no biggie. But I don't want to live with blacks.

BTW, off topic - I just read that India evacuated about 1000 non-Indians from Yemen, including Americans that Obama just abandoned there. General Singh (the Indian general) said he wasn't going to leave anyone behind. Obama probably would have gone to save them if they'd been a thousand Bergdahls. Obama is the worst President we've ever had. He hates America, he hates whites and Christians...

Shefali said...

BTW, I have several white police officer friends. They are the most anti-black people I know. It's because that's who they are constantly dealing with.

I got to be friends with them because I used to be a gamer, and we'd get together once a week and game. I had a great time with them, they were great guys. But they really hated blacks.

It's because in a town that was maybe 9% black, 90% of the thugs they had to deal with were black.

So even though I think that cop should not have shot the fleeing black in the back - if all you deal with day and night is black thugs you might just snap.

Another thing I've experienced. I used to tutor low income kids. When I tutored poor white or Hispanic or Asian kids - I was always treated with respect. When I tutored the black kids - they were hostile to me. But here I was, volunteering my own time to try to help them. So why the attitude and rudeness? I got the feeling that they had this entitled attitude and they resented having to work to learn something, they had no idea that the whites who lived in nice houses, etc., had worked hard for those things.

I like kids but I don't put up with a lot of B.S. from them, so that might also have made me unpopular. I expect kids to say "please" and "thank you" and call me "Mrs." or "Ma'am". But I'm Asian, my Mom brought me up to respect my elders and that's what I expect from children.

Ricky Tucker said...

Yep.

Shefali said...

BTW, this is also off topic, but I got into a discussion the other day of how blacks are justified in their hatred of whites today because of slavery.

And I was like, well, slavery was bad, but that was, what, 150 years ago? How many generations does it take before you let the hatred die?

My parents were born in India and they don't hate the Brits and that was a lot more recent. Besides which, the way the Irish, Polish, etc., immigrants were treated in places like Hells' Kitchen in NYC was worse than the way blacks were treated in many ways. Immigrants were used up by the factory owners, and in the South they'd use "a Mick" instead of a slave to do the dangerous work of loading barges because no one cared if the Mick broke his back - he wasn't valuable property.

Yet you don't see the Irish raging against "the man". Even in Ireland (which I've visited and love) they don't go around beating up the Brits, and you don't have Jews beating up Germans despite the Holocaust, or Japanese beating up on whites despite the interment camps.

I know of plenty of groups of people who've had it just as bad or worse than blacks (American Indians?) and none of them hate the way blacks do.

What is up with that?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Sadly, to fight all this madness we need the younger generations to be fully aware. What I see is the rampant ebonification of our youth via agitprop. Everything cool is black. They're being utterly disarmed. This needs to be addressed by the grownups in the room.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I disagree. The young ones are seeing the violent behavior of feral negroes in the schools, in the streets and on the internet.

The younger ones are by far more aware of the true nature of the blacks than we were at the same age.

AnalogMan said...

Anonymous said...

Pat Boyle-

The way to make your plan work would be to price them out.


I'm not an American, let alone an American lawyer, so I may be off the beam here.

People with money to burn can usually buy what they want. Many White people are not in that fortunate position. And why should they have to pay premium prices prices for basic goods in order to shop safely among their own kind?

As I understand it, the main obstacle to free association is the provisions of the Civil Rights and associated Acts prohibiting discrimination in the provision of "public accommodations", the latter interpreted very liberally to include anything from a hotel room to a stick of chewing gum.

Nothing is stopping anybody from setting up cooperative societies for providing all those services privately to members only. They could include housing, shopping, social functions, schooling, legal services. I have no doubt such enterprises would be subject to legal regulation. Does it become a "public accommodation" when it grows to more than, say, 50 members? Then set up multiple smaller cooperatives.

There are some good, practical ideas on the web. Some of them are outlined in an article that is referenced in a comment to this article on The Irish Savant blog. Scroll down to the comment by Uncle Nasty at 21:33. Read his comment, then follow his link to the letter he quotes.

Putting these operations under glass is neither necessary nor sufficient to secure freedom of association. The main problems are legal and economic. Unless people are motivated to secure the blessings of liberty to themselves and their posterity, sufficiently to undertake the enterprises necessary to deliver them, they (we) will have to do without.

Anonymous said...

Scott tasted cop. Cop didn't know if Scott had a gun. Could have turned and shot cop. Split second decision is neutralize possible threat. Verdict? Good shoot. Cop should walk.

Anonymous said...

I think the cop justifiably shot the negro.
Hopefully an unintimidated jury sees it the same and has the guts to render that verdict to the judge.
And the officer walks away a free and vindicated man.

Then the bongo-party can boil over.
They are not like us and we can no longer pretend to co-exist with them.

Sheila said...

Anon at 10:19 AM - sorry, but I still disagree. Note I do cooperate with cops those times I am pulled over - but I no longer trust or respect them on the whole. Let's see - the last time I got a ticket it was because I passed a cop on the left, going the requisite 5 miles under the speed limit, while he was pulled over (not making an arrest - merely pulled over and parked) on the right side of the road. He ticketed me because I was supposed to pass him in the far left lane, not the immediate left lane. He essentially parked deliberately to entrap someone.

I'm just waiting to get arrested for pointing a finger at a vibrant (I do that now to let off steam while driving - instead of cursing a blue streak in my car, I make a "gun" with my fingers and shoot at them). Since White boys at school get suspended for doing so, I'm sure I will eventually be arrested for "threatening" someone.

Look, in a majority White country, you don't NEED a heavy police presence to keep order. Get rid of the enrichers and get rid of the police presence as well. If I am ever in genuine need of help or protection against a vibrant, I know better than to speak the truth or my mind. The police today are part of the apparatus of BRA, and I want no part of it.

Anonymous said...

Ha!love it. Drunken ape entertains at Japanese steakhouse. Has no regard for society, attacks or doesn't comply with police, and gets shot dead. Nothing to see here folks. Prayers with the ex-cop who has to sit in jail now and have his life thrown away.

Realist in MA

Anonymous said...

I don't.

Anonymous said...


A negroe was shot?!!! Oh My God we will have a shortage of EBT, Section 8 Housing, WIC, SNAP, SSI Income, Medicare, Medicaid, Earned Income Credit,and Head start using negroes in America. OH the Loss! Why I'm sure that this particular negroe was going to discover the cure for cancer and AIDS and perhaps design a permanent lunar base. Oh the humanity! Cough cough.

Californian said...


Third, why in the world does mass media insist on doctoring videos? From editing out things, voicing over them, speeding the footage up, leaving out things that contradict the narrative - it is obvious that they are trying to craft a conclusion. The conclusions that are being fostered are to create more racial tension. They are stoking the embers for some reason. They want to hammer this theme home. Why?


Because the media is not there to tell the truth. The media is there to keep people hypnotized by a cathode ray tube. The "narrative" that works in 2015 is that "racist" cops (or white-hispanics or whatever) are gunning down innocent blacks in the streets. This works in an era of BRA because it fits in with what hostile elites are promoting: playing blacks off against whites. Thus, the media rabble rouses to get blacks out in the streets, running amok, pillaging and having a good old time. This serves the usual ends of BRA: displacing YT, justifying more government programs, allowing DWLs to wallow in their usual guilt-dramatics.

The critical thing to understand is that the media is an agitprop front for hostile elites. This is why race realists must lead in the struggle to KILL YOUR TELEVISION.

Californian said...

To the media (and its string pullers), this case has nothing--nothing!--to do with a Mr Scott being shot. Truth is, they would care less about Scott were he gunned down in a driveby by gangbangers (in that event, Scott's death would be dismissed as being in the wrong place at the wrong time).

The media is promoting a "narrative" of Racist-White-Cop-Executing-Innocent-Black-Victim(c). They tried and failed with L'affaire Trayvon; they tried again with the Ferguson Fracas (that did lead to a riot, but the cop did not get lynched so BRA lost on points). Now the media has what appears to be an open and shut case. And no doubt, somewhere in the Homeland there is a case of a white cop gunning down an innocent black man. With 300+million people running around, the statistics would gin up such a case sooner or later.

Where the media is blatantly dishonest is that they take one case and make it the standard. Again, it is to support a "narrative." The same narrative projected on the telescreens featuring Klan bombings of churches, black scientists dispensing wisdom, noble civil rights marchers being attacked by cops, and liberals opening their arms and the national frontiers to Congo and Somali refugees.

The thing to grasp is that the media is a front for the enemy.

Anonymous said...

@Bernice
subsidized apartments for the negroes were planned for the newer upscale apartment buildings being built around Copley Square

That can never work in Boston or NY because no one is going to pay those high rents and want to live in an upscale building with the poorer (negro) tenants. They live in these places to get away from these people and certainly don't want to see them in the lobby, exercise room or laundry etc In NY they did this but the lower income section was almost another building the way it was set up and had a separate entrance. The liberal dummies called it the poor door lol Builders must get a tax break or subsidy for putting in some low income apts. but the problem is if they are in and use the same facilities then no full rent tenants would want to rent there.

Anonymous said...

There are ways around publishing houses. Learn about self publishing. Look at this site. Look at how the author markets his work. The best way to thank him for this blog is to purchase one of his books. I can only hazard a guess, but I don't think PK went the traditional publishing house route with his books. In a lot of ways, it is a new day.

Anonymous said...

I went down and hung around with my bartender friend last night. Watched a nog buy not one, not five, but 16 Hennesey and Red Bull drinks, plus like five beers and a couple shots... $92.50 of drinks. His tip? 50 cents. And I don't think he'd have gotten that if it had come up an even dollar amount.

Then he tells me after I left a fight started with around 15 nogs and hispanics, chairs throwing, spilled out onto the street and ended up way across the parking lot picking up to 100 or more invloved. A small scale riot. Most of the cops in the city (like 10 cars) had to show up for it.

I'd left because I just had that feeling something was coming. I don't know how they prevent it - all the usual suspects would come in and run them out of business if they banned nogs, and you never know who or what will turn up on a given night.

Well, I suppose if they canned the current DJ and brought in one that played more rave type music and less of the top 40 jungle beat shit that might help. It never used to be like this, just in the last few years has this gone on. Of course there used to be a few other places with a dance floor for the apes to chimp out at, but their monkeyshines got those places closed.

Persona Non Grata said...

Can we please leave the Waffen SS out of this.

Anonymous said...

When it's applicable, I call it what it is: "nonwhite violence". I recommend it-liberals heads explode when you do-and they can't refute it.

Why the play on words? Just call it what it is.

Black violence.

Philadelphia Mike


I'm the person who wrote the original post you're responding to- a sizable amount of violence is committed by Hispanics, Middle East Muslims, etc-and a lot of them are lumped in as "white" statistics-wise. I prefer "non white violence" for that type of thing-it's not meant to be a play on words.

NYC is a huge melting pot, or scrapheap or what have you of all sorts of people/races/nationalities and "whites" who are 35% of the population commit 2-3% of the murders-the rest are "people of color".

Californian said...

....I got into a discussion the other day of how blacks are justified in their hatred of whites today because of slavery.

Ultimately, what blacks hate is not slavery or discrimination or even YT...what blacks hate is themselves.

Blacks hate the fact that even when given everything they have demanded, they wreck everything they touch: education, civic order, utilities, "streets," cities, even entire countries.


And I was like, well, slavery was bad, but that was, what, 150 years ago? How many generations does it take before you let the hatred die?

* Many white people in America today had ancestors who were slaves (or indentured servants).
* Many other people have ancestors who were enslaved (slavery was a global institution until the 19th century).
* Many Russians had ancestors who were serfs, or were enthralled by the Gulag.
* Many Indians over the centuries had ancestors marched off as slaves via Afghanistan.
* Many white people had ancestors who were enslaved by Muslims, Mongols, Huns, and (disgracefully) other whites.
* etc.

These groups do not have the pathological hatred that blacks have today. But then again, these other groups have built civilizations. Or at least fit in to modern civilization. But blacks can not do the same. No matter what they do, territory they occupy ends up as Haiti, Congo and Detroit.

"Slavery" is the universal black excuse. High black crime rates? The terrible legacy of slavery! Blacks can't do well in school? The lingering effects of slavery! High black illegitimacy? Slavery destroyed the black family! Blacks riot in Ferguson? White cops remind them of slavery!

To some degree, this is an issue because DWL agitprop beats the drum on "slavery" via 500 channels of telescreen. I'd give you that a century ago--when slavery was much closer--blacks did not hate white as much. Maybe it was because blacks back then could look forward to a better future once segregation ended. Maybe it was because whites kept blacks in line. Maybe because there was less dysgenic breeding of low IQ demographics back then.

But these decadent days, white people are showing weakness. White people turn over their schools, their neighborhoods, their cities, even their children to BRA. And even with all that, blacks can not overcome themselves (i.e., their genetics) to become "equal." Making it all the worse is that they can see the great civilizations built by everyone else. They can see how they trash their own neighborhoods, and then go to the suburbs and see decent communities other peoples have established.

We can also note that when blacks run a country, you usually end up with Big Man rule, one-party states, human rights fiascoes and (yep) a return to slavery. Black rage is not about slavery per se; it is about black inability to form viable civilizations.

Anonymous said...

"With Scott, though... you can't shoot someone in the back 8 times. That's just cowardly. Sorry to disagree with you."

if you watch the entire video you will notice that after scott- who was discharged from the military for dealing drugs- is caught driving without a license, or insurance, or registration all while on an Arrest Warrant for abandoning his 4 kids commits another crime by running from the police. out of the camera shot you hear a scuffle and Officer Slager saying "STAY DOWN!" and "TASER" and you can hear what sounds like his taser going off.

I think what we will learn is that there was a wrestling match, scott tried to take the taser, and may have actually hit the Officer with the taser. It looks, in the famous video, that you can see taser wires hanging from the Officer's chest as he fires the shots.

He did immediately Report that scott tried to take the taser from him.

Remember after EACH of the high profile Cop VS Negro event we are initially told a story that details how a racist cop unjustly murdered an innocent negro. Michael Brown was "shot 10 times in the back while he had his hands up in surrender" and Trayvon was "just walking home with some skittles" and after the Trials we learned that the negroes were 1. Intoxicated 2. attacking 3. bystanders and witnesses were lying to protect the negro and vilify the cops.

I think we will learn that that scott did in fact at least wrestle with the Officer and tried to take his taser (weapon), which makes the shooting justified.

this immediate public backlash full of assumptions are ALWAYS following these events, even though time and time again when we hear the FACTS it turns out the negroes were WRONG and the cops are doing their best to police wild feral savages who simply refuse to obey the Law and respect authority (or anyone else).

kevin jay said...

301


subsidized apartments for the negroes were planned for the newer upscale apartment buildings being built around Copley Square

That can never work in Boston or NY because no one is going to pay those high rents and want to live in an upscale building with the poorer (negro) tenants. They live in these places to get away from these people and certainly don't want to see them in the lobby, exercise room or laundry etc In NY they did this but the lower income section was almost another building the way it was set up and had a separate entrance. The liberal dummies called it the poor door lol Builders must get a tax break or subsidy for putting in some low income apts. but the problem is if they are in and use the same facilities then no full rent tenants would want to rent there.

LOS ANGELES - PROBABLY IN MANY CITIES.

OBAMA IS MOVING NON WHITES TO AMERICA TO LIVE OFF THE WHITE MANS TAXES.

NEED I POST 'TAMERLAN AND HIS BROTHER'?

Anonymous said...

@April 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM

Charge a $30 fee to enter? I happened to be reading something about the new WTC opening soon and they are charging $32 to go to the observation deck etc The Empire State building charges and Museums etc charge.
Now, I didn't realise that any of these places charged and it's been a Very long time since I've been at them.But charging will actually keep them nog free since these people won't even tip a waiter. The better places also have these new expensive cocktails that may cost $15-20 and even though they may be a lot larger than drinks by 2-3x the nogs aren't too good at math and this too keeps them out."liberal" NYC does a lot of this downlow stuff to arrange that the nogs are nowhere in sight lol
Now, one thing that annoys me is lack of tipping by nogs even though I've never worked at a non professional job because tips are in effect a waiter's salary.Tipping should be eliminated and a flat 20% added to bills and this will be their salary.The better waiters that work in the expensive places will make more, and the ordinary waiters make what an ordinary place makes so everything will remain proportionally the same.
When nogs don't tip they are in effect getting a 20% discount, not to mention the trouble they cause even with the regular bill.Adding that 20% automatically on the bill for the waiter's salary may discourage nogs from even eating in ordinary places.

Anonymous said...

When do they grow up and take responsibility? He's 50 years old, has warrants for non support and instead of taking his medicine, he runs like a teenage "youf" caught with his hand in a cookie jar.
The Officer f**ked up but, 6 hits out of 8 shots wasn't too bad.

Whitefist said...

Anonymous said...
Sheila. Come on. Most whites are not being gunned down in the streets by cops. When they ask you to pull over 'cause a tail light's out, then pull over. Pay the fine and end of story.

This BS 'I will not submit' is EXACTLY the rationale of the groid and hence the problems that occur on a daily basis with cops and more often, with one another in their own neighborhoods.

Like it or not, the cops represent the government. They're supposed to be law enforcers. Upholding the law and the law states that you pull over when a cop asks you to. Dont argue, don't pull out a gun and wave it around, and don't run away.

Post cop encounter, if you feel as though you weren't fairly treated, you can always call the ACLU which makes a living at safeguarding that your civil rights weren't disrespected.

Now as to self-defense, you're right on the money. That has to be maintained at all costs. If someone attacks you or your family you have a right to defend them or yourself.

April 10, 2015 at 10:19 AM


The above comment represents everything unhealthy about YT's psyche...

Pay the fine and end of story.

Yep, thats the primary function/purpose of the kwops, revenue generation, or fleecing the sheep would be more accurate. As PK has shown in black localities it is the exclusive source of "revenue."

Let's put on our thinking caps YT, what do you think that revenue generation is for, your betterment??? Or are there many a hand in the cookie jar??? Seems like taxes can't go high enough or enough revenue is ever generated to satiate the "needs" of gubmint...

Like it or not, the cops represent the government. They're supposed to be law enforcers.

Yep, like it or not...so, again, when said gubmint says YT is to be swept into the dustbin of history, then what??? After all, like it or not...

If someone attacks you or your family you have a right to defend them or yourself.

And if the attacker is in gubmint costume (uniform) does this same right of self-defense apply??? Well, the answer is no in point of fact, because YT has ceded the "monopoly on violence" to any and all agents of the state, and once ceded, however that monopoly on violence is exercised YT has in principle ruled out any resistance to it.

Lastly, lets look at the great "crimes" that led to the latest shooting of another aspiring whatever:

Anonymous said April 11, 2015 at 11:54 AM...
if you watch the entire video you will notice that after scott- who was discharged from the military for dealing drugs- is caught driving without a license, or insurance, or registration all while on an Arrest Warrant for abandoning his 4 kids commits another crime by running from the police.


So, he sold dope, he didn't present a license from the almighty state to operate a motor vehicle, didn't comply with the state mandated extortion racket called auto insurance, didn't register his vehicle with the almighty state, and because the almighty state is involved in his procreating activities and prepared to cost the taxpayer more money by locking him up for failure to pay child support, we have a police encounter that ended with this arch criminal dead???

It is true that all this negro had to do was assume the position as the cuffs were put on, but why in the world are precious resources being spent on all of this "law enforcement"??? Nowhere in this encounter was this negro actually committing any acts of violence against anyone or any property...

Any of this making sense to you YT???

YT, you not only have a racial problem on your hands, your enemies are now in control of an actual leviathan to be ruthlessly used against you, until the last White is swept into that dustbin of history...

Anonymous said...

"Thus, the media rabble rouses to get blacks out in the streets, running amok, pillaging and having a good old time. "

Or is this just what they want you to think.

I suggest you re-read Negroes in Negro Land. Browse some more "diverse" cities' news sites.

The negro does not behave the way he does because of the tur'bul legacy ob da slabery, Jim Crow, the welfare state, Obama, the Democrats, too few basketball courts, economics, no fathers, hating YT, or media agitprop.... They behave the way they do because it is genetically hard wired. It's in their blood and bones.

Want more proof? Look at what they do to their own kin, look at what they do ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD with or without whites, with or without democrats, with or without Obama, CNN, fathers, role models, rap music, or any other outside stimulus. It is their natural state.

Hence, the media is merely attempting to make you think that they are agitating the negroes to act the way they do; this continues the paintjob theory by leading to the chain of logic which will say "If it weren't for _______ (Obama, MSM, Democrats, agitators) these negroes would not be so violent and anti-social". Anything you fill the blank with is patently untrue. There is nothing short of many generations of intensive eugenics that will "fix" the negro and it's doubtful that even that would work.

Anonymous said...

The hey days of Detroit have come and gone, with the 1940's and 1950's being the peak time. The likes of Henry Ford, Walter P Chrysler and General Motors are never to be repeated. They built and expanded and created a car empire. Too bad this once dynamic city has fallen.

Hopeless In Craplanta said...

When do they grow up and take responsibility? He's 50 years old, has warrants for non support and instead of taking his medicine, he runs like a teenage "youf" caught with his hand in a cookie jar.

I am certain that "growing up" and "taking responsibility" are nonexistent in the groid world,just as the word "NO" from a female is not a part of their world.

Anonymous said...

HAH 😃