Thursday, February 2, 2017

The Left is united in keeping implicit whiteness (what paved Trump victory) from becoming explicit whiteness... what paves road to true victory

PK NOTE: Start Black History Month off on the right foot. Pick up a copy of "The Truth About Selma: What Happened When the Cameras Left and the Marching Stopped" for paperback today! The Truth About Selma: What Happened when the Cameras Left and the Marching Stopped is also available for Kindle! You can secure your signed copy now by donating $25 (via PayPal link on right-hand side of site) today!  

You all saw the violence. 

You all saw the insanity. 

All because a Jewish immigrant from Britain, who happens to be a flamboyant homosexual constantly bragging about his non-white (primarily black) partners, tried to give a speech. [UC Berkeley scraps Breitbart editor's event amid violence at protest, CBS News, 2-2-17]:
Violence during a protest Wednesday night prompted University of California at Berkeley officials to cancel a talk by a polarizing editor of Breitbart News out of safety concerns. 
The decision to scrap the event was made two hours before the scheduled appearance of Milo Yiannopoulos. 
A crowd of more than 1,500 had gathered outside the talk’s venue. 
In a statement, the school blamed outsiders. But Yiannopoulos blamed left-wingers. 
And President Trump had his say, on Twitter. 
“Amid an apparently organized violent attack and destruction of property at the Martin Luther King Student Union, the University of California Police Department determined that it was necessary to evacuate Milo Yiannopoulos from the campus and to cancel tonight’s scheduled 8 p.m. performance,” the statement read. “The violence was instigated by a group of about 150 masked agitators who came onto campus and interrupted an otherwise non-violent protest.” 
Officials said the smaller group was dressed in black and in hooded sweatshirts and showed up as night fell to break windows with metal barricades, throw smoke bombs and flares and start a large bonfire outside the building with a diesel generator. Bricks were also used. 
CBS San Francisco reports at least four banks and a nearby Starbucks were vandalized.
Starbucks, mind you, is a company committed to opening scores of new stores in primarily black communities across the nation, gave significant contributions to the DNC, and plans to employ 10,000 refugees.

To put it bluntly, the various factions of the modern Left has only one commonality: intense anti-white hatred and a desire to see white people become a powerless minority in America (as atonement for their past transgressions against non-whites).

Milo, regardless of how dangerous he might or might not be, is another bridge for white people to travel to the truly dangerous world where implicit whiteness becomes explicit whiteness.

The Left senses this fact.

51 comments:

Bird of Paradise said...

And the continued riots and violence of the U.C. Berkeley hoods will turn many americas away from these dirty little bolshivek pigs and against the demacrats as well

Ex New Yorker said...

I watched all this stuff when it first started back in the 60's. Peace riots, protests and all kinds of weird shit. False prophets like Tim O-Thy Leary, Abbie Hoffman and those asshole from the Weather Underground (who are now college professors). Then along came Reverend Moon. If there was ever a magnet for whack jobs, Reverend Moon took the prize. Then there were the NEW AGE cults and the Hari Krishna zombies. Biker gang shoot outs and militant black groups. None stop insanity which mostly took place in L. A., Frisco and New York. I had nothing to do with any of it.

Now the current freak show makes the 60's look like "Leave it to Beaver". Thugs being paid to smash windows and start fires. Innocent people being assaulted on the street. I cannot recall anytime in the past where reporters, movie stars and other bottom feeders made comments about KILLING THE PRESIDENT. Who are these people and why are they being allowed to make death threats on a daily basis. Trump has not even been in office two weeks and the fucking crazies are on the warpath with no let up in sight. It seems things are just getting started.

Pat Boyle an I are the oldest guys leaving comments on this blog. I count my blessings daily that I am not living in any of these cesspools (cities) where this crap is taking place. I like spending my old age where it's nice and peaceful. The media supports these radicals and seems to be cheering them on. At this point in time Middle America still looks like a safe place to be. Too many hard working people busting their ass putting food on the table.

Based on what I've been watching these last couple weeks it looks like we're in for a nice long bumpy ride. The insanity gets worse by the day.

Anonymous said...

person of color caught stealing gold--up his ass,

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-02/canadian-mint-worker-sentenced-30-months-smuggling-140000-gold-his-rectum?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29

Jesus Christ said...

Democratic socialist anarchists are naturally violent; they espouse the use of force in their writings. So far, America's anarchists have been holding back, but they will probably begin to kill politicians and capitalists eventually, as they historically have done.

Remember that President William McKinley was assassinated by anarchist Leon Czolgosz. Anarchists have killed the leaders of other nations as well: French President Carnot in 1894, and Spanish Prime Minister Antonio Canovas del Castillo in 1896. They have engaged in much terrorism as well, including in America: on the same day, June 2, 1919, there were anarchist bombings in New York, Boston, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Patterson in New Jersey, Washington D.C., and Philadelphia.

Now the anarchists are back. Perhaps one lone anarchist who has mental illness will decide to assassinate President Trump. This is a very real danger. The government must act now to prevent it from happening. Antifa and related organisations must be declared terrorist groups, and their leaders arrested, immediately. Websites which advocate or facilitate anarchist violence, or any political violence, must be shut down.

I can see a presidential assassination in America's future if this is not done.

Anonymous said...

"Milo, regardless of how dangerous he might or might not be, is another bridge for white people to travel to the truly dangerous world where implicit whiteness becomes explicit whiteness."

It's nice to be optimistic, but what does explicit whiteness really amount to? Certainly not violence. White people revere and obey the law and abhor violence, particularly racist violence. They passed all those laws that double penalties for hate crimes to show their hatred for racist motives. They voted for Trump because they see themselves in him. He's someone who hates racists and racism as much as they do, and he honors the "great man" MLK just like they do. If the media had been successful in painting him as a racist, he would have lost big.

Sorry, but people who are more afraid they might be called racist than they are of their own death as a race will never become "explicitly white", especially since it means taking risks and having to sacrifice. To change the system they'd have to oppose it, even risk their lives to try to destroy it. They'd never do that. Somebody might call them a name! They could lose their job!

Brian in Ohio said...

The worse, the better.

Stay alert, stay alive.

Anonymous said...

The Milo incident only exposes the left's hypocrisy. BY all accounts I have read the left welcomes people like Milo who is openly gay and proud of it. The only problem with Milo is he is also conservative. He doesn't quite fit their paradigm of correctness; therefore he must go. The left is laughable at this point. Their hypocrisy if totally exposed. They do not now or have EVER cared about gays, women, blacks, or anyone else; they care about power only. They divide people to gain power. As far as Berkeley is concerned, the police's hands were tied. There were not any arrests after all that destruction. The anarchists are going to think they can do that anywhere (break windows, etc.) In some cities, they would be shot DEAD!

Anonymous said...

I've seen some outrageous commercials online put out by the AdCouncil of late. It's hard to browse the internet or watch something online without running into a few of these. One commenter yesterday referred to the awkward placement of blacks in commercials into situations you would never ever see them in in real life as "mud slinging".

In that vein, I give you a commercial promoting adoption. Even though it's done as a cartoon, racial identities are obvious. The poor orphan girl who has bounced from foster home to foster home is Hispanic. Then one day she gets adopted by a black couple (!). And pray tell me, what activities does she engage in with her wonderful new black family in suburbia? Well, first they are seen cooking a gourmet meal all together in their large kitchen. To wrap it up, they are all shown in a loving embrace on a camping (!) trip in the woods on some mountain.

I challenge you to come up with a more unrealistic commercial theme than, "rich married black couple adopts Mexican girl and takes her on a camping trip". If the people in advertising are willing to run this with a straight face, then nothing is off limits.

Anonymous said...

If was very easy to leave the left after they completely abandoned free speech and non-violence. They have turned into everything that they supposedly used to hate.

Michael Dean Miller said...

.

Antifa riots = Democratic Party rallies.

Start calling them such.

.

Mutant Swarm said...

The UC Berkeley building the self-described anarchists and other radicals assaulted was the Martin Luther King Jr. Student Center. Poetic justice.

Anonymous said...

Yes, the protest was peaceful. Until they started smashing and burning and beating, and the event was cancelled.

Got it.

Do they really not realize how blatantly ridiculous it is to insist on calling this a peaceful protest when all of the news footage clearly show a VIOLENT riot?

Ministry Of Truth at work.

D-FENS said...

"The only problem with Milo is he is also conservative."

"Milo" is also a BBC afficionado. And I don't mean British Broadcasting System. He is an attention-whore fag.

What does "conservative" even mean, anymore?

Bird of Paradise said...

The left itself is very violent just look at those jerks from U.C. Berkeley their totaly uncivilizd bunch of idiots and every one of these idiots needs to lose their american citizenship and all be deported to somewhere else perhaps they can go live with Cher on Jupiter

Anonymous said...

To anonymous @ 5:10am. These commercials that you refer to are indeed amusing. In the city of Detroit during the last week or so, 7 children were found randomly walking the streets alone. One little three year old had no coat, no gloves or hat. It was maybe 20 degrees out that day. One woman actually left her 8 year old in charge of her 6 month old. Go ahead ad men, make us all into Ward and June. To ex New Yorker, so envious when you write of your peaceful paradise. Good planning and decision making on your part. Enjoy!

Bill in St Louis said...

I saw this story, and laughed. And laughed and laughed and laughed. The irony of an openly gay, white c** dumpster for blacks, conservative or not having his speech burned to the fucking ground in Berkley, no less is just delicious. Add to it no arrests, (so the beast will be emboldened to try in civilized areas next) and Star- "We are gonna hire 10,000 muslim refugees to work in our new hood stores while we don't allow cops with guns in them"-bucks getting vandalized, I am positively giddy with laughter.
Of course, this won't wake up everyone. However, let us remember that white homosexuals, (men and women, and gay women can be MEAN), are still white. Therefore, things like planning, stockpiling food and ammo, training are not beyond them. Also, I have noticed that with certain types of SJW's, when their particular hobby horse is kicked over, tend to snap back like a rubber band, to the polar opposite. I have met a few gays, who, over the years have gone from "We need hate crime laws" to "Hey Bill. Just bought an AR-15. Gonna take it and my Mossberg 500 to the range Saturday, want to go? Got to prepare for when these ni**ers try and burn down my neighborhood."
Time will tell.

Gwoobus Harmon said...

Sorry, but people who are more afraid they might be called racist than they are of their own death as a race will never become "explicitly white", especially since it means taking risks and having to sacrifice. To change the system they'd have to oppose it, even risk their lives to try to destroy it. They'd never do that. Somebody might call them a name! They could lose their job!

That is where the real battle is - we have to shift the Overton window. Most people go along to get along and are not strident ideologues about anything. The left currently has the scales tipped in their favor as far as social norms go, because they control that soft, very pliable middle.

The average white American doesn't hold anti-racist convictions because they are true believers, they do so because of peer enforced customs and because society rewards them for repeating its creeds. This phenomenon is where "signalling" comes from. They are literally seeking approval and social standing by repeating society's messages. They know what views they are supposed to espouse in public, yet move away from diversity and keep largely white in-group friend circles. These revealed preferences show they don't actually buy into any of this crap at all, but recognize the consequences of not gesturing that they do. This is why we call them DWL - disingenuous white liberals.

The beautiful thing is because this opinionless middle are so socially pliable, all we really have to do is remove the shaming aspect that controls them. We need to make it where the opposite occurs, and the shaming/ostracism happens when whites take the side of non-whites. Remove the incentive/reward and the signalling ceases too.

This is where the accelerationist arguments make sense. As the white share of the population shrinks so does the currency for the sanctimonious SWPL bullshit. Less and less people will applaud and adulate a white taking anti-white positions, which is only possible when whites hold majority status. And as we all know that is waning.

Brian in Ohio said...

I think President Trump nailed it when he tweeted "these thugs and paid protesters are just proving my point." Spot on. The worse they behave, the more people they alienate.

Sporty times ahead.

Stay alert, stay alive.

Anonymous said...

Even though diversity may well be winning the politics of the womb they obviously aren't bringing any new tactics to the table. Maybe they will call Trump a sexist or a liar. They might even go out into the street and protest.

Just be glad these morons are doubling down- it's like watching a person stuck in a snow bank continue to attempt to drive their way out. That is part of the problem when you have a huge patchwork tent that includes and accepts EVERYBODY. The dead weight that is attached to their coalition will be their undoing- it failed its first major test by handing Trump the election by not getting out the vote.

While they are all about destruction, realize that real power comes from construction. Whites are constantly building and improving things. Most of these black and brown groups have come to rely heavily on whitey while going all out in criticizing us in the public sphere. No matter what they take, we can just build more. There is no "victory" in the cards for them- they don't have what it takes, not without massive outside help, that is.

Let them continue to scream, fail, and blame whites for their existence. Just stay away. They are slowly destroying themselves.

Anonymous said...

My prediction: It's inevitable that the red states and blue states( conservatives v. libs) are on a collision course where the likes of such has not seen since 1861.The break up of the USA is forth coming simply because the indoctrination has been ongoing for the last 50 yrs,how can you compromise with people that were never taught basic history or civics?, can anyone out there deny this . I'm 63, never seen such a divided group of Americans like this, even during the Vietnam war because you knew it was going to end , but this situation is way off from. Opinions out there??

Standup Broad said...

History lesson for those too young (or not yet born) to remember. Berkeley Campus, 1964, Mario Savio, leader of the "Free Speech Movement". Bet Mario is rolling in his grave.

How does "the left" reconcile protesting the self-proclaimed "Fabulous Faggot" Milo? What's next...burning down Subaru dealers?

Liberalism IS a mental disorder.

Anonymous said...

And Microsoft is bringing implicit whiteness to Detroit.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/detroit-city/2017/02/02/microsoft-opening-office-detroit-one-campus-martius/97399490/

Anonymous said...

Liberals are going absolutely nuts.

MUST WATCH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzFS1qLlULc

Anonymous said...

310
Ad Council. wtf?

In LA, I see posters for 'national parks' w a Black as the camper-hiker.
When I pass Fox Studio, all or almost all the huge billboards feature
Blacks. Fox offered'hidden black figures' film.

Michigan Jim said...

I have decidedly mixed feelings about Milo Yiannopolous. I believe on a personal level he is morally bankrupt (flamboyantly homosexual and brags about loving black dicks). But he is a political conservative and has been very effective at showing college students the evils of progressivism. So I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend as the saying goes.

Anonymous said...

Trump should say any country that doesn't allow visitors from Israel gets banned by USA. Keeps lots of Muzzies out, and has cover of being pro-Israel to get approved.

Anonymous said...

I watched all this stuff when it first started back in the 60's. Peace riots, protests and all kinds of weird shit. False prophets like Tim O-Thy Leary, Abbie Hoffman and those asshole from the Weather Underground (who are now college professors).

I would like to get your opinion on the zebra killings. Did the media try to ignore them or were they not as liberal then? Were liberals emotionally troubled by the killings or did they just live in denial? Did it affect the outlook of middle America?

Maybe Pat could add his opinions as well.

Anonymous said...

I challenge you to come up with a more unrealistic commercial theme than, "rich married black couple adopts Mexican girl and takes her on a camping trip". If the people in advertising are willing to run this with a straight face, then nothing is off limits.

I have seen a few (and I mean 2 or 3) Black people on the slopes but never camping.

If you want a guaranteed break from Blacks then go camping.

I used to live in a liberal city and not once did I see any of the DWLs there take a Black camping or anywhere for that matter. For all their love of diversity I rarely saw any liberals actually hanging out with minorities other than Asians.

Anonymous said...

The anarchists are going to think they can do that anywhere (break windows, etc.) In some cities, they would be shot DEAD!

That's why they do it in cities like Portland and Berkeley.

Ironically a lot of the business windows they smash are owned by liberals.

But at the end of the day most of them are confused and indoctrinated middle class Whites that have student debt from degrees like Sociology. They can't even seem to explain their ideology. A lot of them use contradictory terms like anarchist-communist. They protest the results of the election while waving red communist flags. Marx never supported democracy because he correctly believed that the middle class couldn't be talked into it. Of course he was also wrong in his theories but these indoctrinated Whites have no where else to go. They're indoctrinated to not question anything and just blame Whites/Capitalism/Racism etc.

Anonymous said...


It's nice to be optimistic, but what does explicit whiteness really amount to?


Acting in rational self-interest.

When White people learn that race is not merely superficial traits and that liberals have zero interest in equal treatment (because the results are unequal) they return to acting rationally. Why should they risk the safety of the children by living near Blacks? What is the gain? Why should we believe that liberal plans will work after DC and Detroit? These simple questions absolutely destroy liberalism. But Whites won't ask them if they believe they don't exist as a group that deserves to act in its own interest.

The Other Realist in MA said...

Gotta be honest - this obvious display of the schizophrenic hypocrisy of the current liberal mindset sorta redeems the story for me. It certainly shut up my liberal friends last night.

That and the fact that they took out the local Starbucks.

Mr. Rational said...

One commenter yesterday referred to the awkward placement of blacks in commercials into situations you would never ever see them in in real life as "mud slinging".

The BBC referred to it as "blossing", "Blacks On Screen".  I think it was Analog Man who referred to the Blacks themselves as GNOMEs, Gratuitous Negroes Obtruding to Mimic a European.

"Mud slinging" already has a meaning, but maybe it'll stick where the others haven't.

Anonymous said...

Brian has it pegged.

Paintjob Theory said...

4 (((banks))) and a (((Starbergs))) were vandalized.


Bwahahahahaha


At this point I'm actually getting even more suspicious that these riots by the odd alliance of negro and various other assorted Marxist untermensch are being staged for some other long game plan.

As I had pointed out many times during this past year or so, these events only served to cement Trump support; certainly among the faithful, but also among the more moderate and fence sitters who see the Democrat camp fully and publicly embracing these terrorists and rebels. How many folks do you think were neutral or left leaning but pulled that "R" lever as a "F*CK YOU!" to the pack of trans-whatevers and mud races that made them late to watch their son's baseball game by blocking highways?

It stinks of "poison pill" psi-op to me. Again, there are many useful idiots who really do believe in whatever it is they're "protesting" and there's the herd mentality that just go along to virtue signal with their friends to feel a part of something meaningful, but the people funding and organizing can't be that thick to actually believe this is helping their cause?

If we were to follow the money I'm sure we'd find the usual suspects, but ask yourself qui bono? How does anybody benefit from this? I'm really stumped, but I suspect time will reveal more.

That all said, thanks to Pat Boyle for the video link. I'll be sure to check your others as time permits and look forward to more of your black history month contributions. I must say you have a good voice and present facts well, but something is a bit off. Perhaps your pacing? Going off on so many slight tangents? Don't get me wrong, I couldn't do better, and I can't even put my finger on what feels "wrong", but I strongly suspect only those on the far end of the bell curve as far as thirst for knowledge and adult attention span will follow you.

Anonymous said...

San Franciscan here

Anyone for putting up stickers on the Cal campus "Bring back Kent State".

Anonymous said...

If whiteness is an abomination then what is blackness? Hidden figures Detroit style. One unbalanced book after another from 1973-2014. Do blacks really want whiteness to disappear? Doesn't seem like it. After the unbalanced books in Detroit led to a total bankruptcy whitey came riding in on a white horse. Every project, building, bridge, business, street car line is being developed because of and by white business men. Dream on black people. It is February and you have a dream. but if it's the demise of white people you might want to roll over and dream of something else. Mathematics perhaps.

Anonymous said...

I challenge you to come up with a more unrealistic commercial theme than, "rich married black couple adopts Mexican girl and takes her on a camping trip". If the people in advertising are willing to run this with a straight face, then nothing is off limits.


Funniest thing ive read all week

Anonymous said...

When you are morally superior sometimes you have to terrorize people to make them understand

Support or silence... great democratic slogan

Anonymous said...

per wikipedia Yiannopoulos was raised in a small town in Kent in southern England.[12] His father is Greek and his mother is British.[13][14][15] His parents divorced when he was a young child and he was raised by his mother and her second husband, with whom he did not have a good relationship. Yiannopoulos described his father as "terrifying" and remarking upon his family's wealth he said "I would think, if my dad is just a doorman, why do we have such a nice house? Then I saw it on The Sopranos." As a teenager, Yiannopoulos lived with his grandmother, who regularly took him for high tea at Claridge's.[14]

He is a practising Catholic; he has also said that his mother or maternal grandmother is Jewish,...

He'll say anything. Why you guys pick up and run with what he says is interesting. He sure ain't Bibi Netayahoo, that is for sure,

Anonymous said...

Bill in StL: "Of course, this won't wake up everyone. However, let us remember that white homosexuals, (men and women, and gay women can be MEAN), are still white."
A homo commenter on one Rightwing site says, most of the other homos he's talked to have learned absolutely nothing from the Orlando massacre of 50 gays (plus 50 others shot+wounded), and continue to be vehemently anti-anti-moslem.
Can't say I'm surprised. It's a rare individual who can do perverse things to their own body, and remain psychologically sound.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 9:14 am. Couldn't agree more. A year older than you and I also have never seen such a divide in this country. This is indeed different than the Vietnam era protests. It's like half the country has one type of soul and the other half something totally different. Never the two shall meet. Years ago I proposed 25 states to the left and 25 states to the right. People laughed, it was a silly idea. Waiting for my phone to ring telling me what states I can go to. That bad.

Anonymous said...

Another crank from Europe...I hate this game and this guy...Gregg Popovich says

If you were born white, you automatically have a monstrous advantage — educationally, economically, culturally, in this society and all the systemic roadblocks that exist, whether it’s in a judicial sense, a neighborhood sense with laws, zoning, education. We have huge problems in that regard that are very complicated, but take leadership, time, and real concern to try to solve. It’s a tough one because people don’t really want to face it.

This shithead was born in Chicago. He is really tall, as are many Croats / Serbs. This height advantage got him the center court, which got him the grades, which got him the adulation and the self esteem , which got him the entree into academia, which got him a degree in "Soviet Studies" which is...What? It sure as hell is not Physical Chemistry or higher math or Physics, so the idea he is some kind of really smart guy is questionable. He is not funny. He is just really sincere and knows where his admiring audience, that is, is worshippers, are. They are in the stands, where the fools are who part with their hard earned money to watch hugely tall men throw a ball around. At a basket which is not all that far away from them. I say, put the basket at 12 feet. Now see how spectacular they look.
"Sports" clowns and crybabies...they are sickening and uninteresting.
A question for our Serb/Croat hero from Chicago....you can point the finger at the USA...may we point the finger at the Croat Fascists who were burning Serbs alive in the recent war?
Notice how this creep constantly uses the word "we" when he discusses zoning etc. Where does this rich SOB live? Does he take advantage of any cultural biases?

Anonymous said...

Michigan Jim: "I have decidedly mixed feelings about Milo Yiannopolous. I believe on a personal level he is morally bankrupt (flamboyantly homosexual and brags about loving black dicks). But he is a political conservative and has been very effective at showing college students the evils of progressivism."
I don't get the adulation of the guy. Nothing he's said against "the enemy" has been earth-shattering revelation on any level. The question is, Why does it take a Dangerous Bundle of Firewood to "awaken" college kids? Why can't they embrace the anti-prog message from regular old White men who've held that position and prophesied against it for decades? My take on Milo Analopolis is that he's not a "conservative" or "right-winger" or "alt-righter", but a member of LGBLTPBJ who's pissed off that the other freaks and minorities have higher status than his letter of the alphabet.
It's entertaining that he can provoke Trigglypuffs, but we've got a better Face for our movement now, and he has glorious, non-peroxided, orange hair. Milo can get schools burned down, but he's powerless to stop it. Trump, on the other hand, has two iron fists inside titanium gloves, and he commands the biggest, baddest killing machine on Earth.

Anonymous said...

"Acting in rational self-interest. "

Acting in rational SELF-interest is what they are already doing in going along with their own racial demise; honoring MLK along with Trump, condemning racism. Acting in their own RACIAL interest is quite different, the direct opposite in fact. It could cost them something. This is where culture and worldview come in, and why they are more important than the false alternative of liberal or conservative. In a culture shaped by Christianity, in which race is held to be unimportant, neither liberal nor conservative will acquire a racial consciousness, and so are unable to see themselves as having a racial interest.

Race said...

I agree we are in danger of a revolution and have never been more divided and in a more perilous time including during our civil war. If I'm correct, then we face losing large swaths of white homelands for the first time since the hun invasions.

Race said...

So I guess the enemy of my enemy is my friend as the saying goes.

They consume themselves.

Brian in Ohio said...

Let them continue to scream, fail, and blame whites for their existence. Just stay away. They are slowly destroying themselves

The fact that they would loot a Starbucks and vandalize the MLK student center, of all places, over something a gay immigrant said shows how directionless and desperate they are.

They want to lash out at us, but they`re afraid to leave their safe spaces. So, they destroy THEM! It would be pathetic...if it weren't so goddamn funny! This is exactly what these smug, pretentious, self important little brats deserve! Keep shitting where you sleep, snowflake.

Stay alert, stay alive.

Pat Boyle said...

Donald Trump is nothing if not entertaining. He certainly has gotten the liberals dancing.

It may very well be that the Trump administration could have found language for his executive order delaying immigrants from certain Islamic nations, that been more clearly written. But I doubt if the liberals would have complied with it, no matter how it was written.

In my opinion Islam is not a valid religion. Islam is this nation's oldest enemy ("...the shores of Tripoli"). Both Jefferson and Franklin were told by the Islamic representative in London that Muslim nations had a right from the Koran to enslave white Americans whom they had captured. We had to invade and defeat the Muslim Barbary pirates to stop this practice.

Which President abolished slavery? (trick question) It was Jack Kennedy and the nation was Saudi Arabia. Kennedy forced the Saudis to repudiate slavery. They weren't going to do it on their own.

Mohamed was a war lord who preyed on caravans crossing the desert. He was not exactly a model of virtuous personal behavior either. Muslims have never had missionaries. They have troops who invade their neighbors and coerce the defeated into dhimmitude.

There are a number of celebrities who are Muslim. As it happens almost all of these Muslim celebrities who are not Arabs are black.

I believe in Freedom of Religion but the federal government defines which organization is a 'real religion'. The Feds, in the days when we had a military draft, wouldn't simply give any person a draft exemption for some religion they made up. My friend Donald was a bishop in the Universal Life Church. This bishopric he bought for $25. This was a scam invented during the sixties for tax avoidance. It didn't work. The Feds simply denied that it was a real religion.

All I'm suggesting is for some federal court to simply define Islam as a non-religion. Makes sense to me.

Pat

Bill in St Louis said...

Most. Oh well, more food for the orcs when shtf. As long as they are 1) awake, 2)aware and 3) capable of hitting a moving target, I could give a shit what they get up to in private.

Anonymous said...

Alt-righters who hate on Yiannopolis and Cernovich need to check themselves. For them, who's the "true" face of the alt-right? Richard Spencer? Baked Alaska? Emily Youcis? None of them have a tenth of the influence that Y/C have. No, Y/C aren't white nationalists but they are nationalists and that is at least half the battle that white nationalism is fighting.

Anonymous said...

Support anarchy, then you will be silenced. Dirt nap.