Tuesday, July 17, 2018

Black Criminal Asks for Change of Venue for His Criminal Trial Because a Confederate Statue is in Front of Court House (How Long Until a Black Criminal Makes Similar Case B/C Statue of White Founding Father is in Front of Courthouse?)

How long until a lawyer decides to copy this same legal argument, citing the precedent inevitably set here, when it comes to how a black person can't get a fair trial in a courthouse with a statue of a Founding Father or just any white American (regardless of their lack of association with the Confederacy) because of the white privilege/white supremacist society and structural inequalities they helped perpetuate? [Man says no fair trial in courthouse with Confederate statue, KATC.com, 7-17-18]:
A Louisiana man has asked for a change of venue for his criminal trial, claiming that as a black man he can't get a fair trial in a courthouse that has a Confederate statue out front.  
Ronnie Anderson, who is facing a charge of illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in East Feliciana Parish, filed the motion yesterday.  
Anderson says the Confederate statue in front of the 178-year-old courthouse "carries a message to African Americans of intimidation and oppression, communicating that justice may not be fair and impartial at a Courthouse that was nostalgic and sentimental over the institution of slavery that the Confederacy fought for in the American Civil War."  
The statue was erected in 1909, the motion alleges and is more than 30 feet high.  
"Defendant contends that the Courthouse is not a place for Confederate artifacts and political messages of any kind, and in the year 2018, a Confederate monument in the entryways of the Courthouse is a divisive political statement," the motion states.  
When the statute was erected in 1909, "there were no African American attorneys, judges, jurors or registered voters in East Feliciana Parish," the motion alleges.  
"The monument was erected at a time when Jim Crow became the "legal" way of life in East Feliciana Parish and all over the South and it symbolized a society that embraced racial intolerance," the motion states.  
Anderson says he's entitled to a change of venue for his trial because the parish forces African Americans to "walk into a Courthouse with a towering display of Confederate reverence."  
The motion was filed by Baton Rouge attorney Niles Haymer. 
Blacks across the nation will be entitled to a change of venue for a trial when their lawyers realize they can take advantage of the inherent anti-white nature of modernity to ensure their client is allowed to be tried in an environment free of the stain of white racism.

It won't end with Confederate monuments/statues/street names/builds or schools named in their honor being torn down or erased from history.

It won't end with America's white Founding Fathers monuments/statues/street names/builds or schools named in their honor being torn down or erased from history.

It will only end when any and all monuments/statues/street names/builds or schools named for a white person are torn down or erased from history.

57 comments:

Anonymous said...



 https://www.google.com/amp/s/people.com/crime/michigan-infant-falls-through-hole-floor-drowns-flooded-basement-mom-charged/amp/

Mich. Infant Falls Through Hole in Floor and Drowns in Flooded Basement; Mom Charged

BY ELAINE ARADILLAS•@ELAINEJA

POSTED ON JULY 17, 2018 AT 6:00PM EDT

A Michigan mother has been charged with involuntary manslaughter after her baby daughter drowned by falling through a hole in the floor of her home and landing in standing water in her flooded basement, according to multiple reports.

Ca’mya Davis, who was supposed to turn 1 on July 25, was declared dead from an accidental drowning, according to the Wayne County Medical Examiner’s office.

On July 6, the girl’s mother, Dasiah Jordan, 26, allegedly told police she had called friends to come to the house and babysit her daughter, but left before the 28-year-old and 31-year-old women arrived, according to a report in theDetroit News.

The baby was allegedly unsupervised at the time of the fall, authorities said, according to the Detroit News.

While Jordan was out, she received a message to go to the hospital where she learned her daughter was pronounced dead, according to local TV station WXYZ.

Detroit Refugee said...

I thought we'd achieve racial harmony once the Confederate Battle Flag no longer flew over State Capitals and a few statutes/ monuments came down.

You mean to tell me that the blacks aren't satisfied?

Anonymous said...

Not so loud...they'll hear you.

Anonymous said...

When I was a kid, my dad would take my sister and me camping, fishing and hunting. My sister would routinely moan about wishing she was born a boy, at which my father would snarl back, "Just be grateful you weren't born a dog, a n***er or a j**!" This would leave sister and I shocked and stunned.

My sister was always more prone to accept my dad's views, but it's taken me longer to realise that our negro population needs to be repatriated to other lands. Huge swathes of Brazil, Colombia and Peru are underpopulated.

Anonymous said...

Do negroes have abnormally high testosterone levels?

Are negroes louder, noisier and more aggressive than other races?

Do negroes have the same control over their behavior and impulses as other races?

Are blacks more likely to respond with violence and aggression over trivial matters?

Anonymous said...

So what about all of the blacks who were tried in that court & were found innocent?

Surely the magical confederate statue would've sent them to death row, right?

Anonymous said...

I'm sick and tired of this whole bizarre "Russia is evil" narrative. It's sickening and disgusting in it's artificiality. These (((folks))) are pushing for an all out apocalyptic war to turn back the clock to the "good old 90s and naughties", when no one dared notice their misbehavior. These deranged sand people can't cope with their sudden loss of power and privelege.

The only people who will go along with this s**t are backward Eastern Europeans and (((colonized))) Brits. Nobody wants war with Russia. Except (((those))) who salivate and froth at the innumerable riches and natural resources of Mother Russia.

Anonymous said...

We're getting a taste of the future now. In DC, the MLK statue and African-American History Museum went up and, as the orcs get the upper hand, all of YT's monuments will come down, aided by DWLs who will fall all over themselves in pleasing the orcs. Streets will continue to be renamed, as eventually will be cities and counties, until one day the surviving YTs wake up and find themselves in Wakanda.

Bastion Harm said...

Wow, that's a new one!!

That's some innovation right there...

Though I doubt Ronnie Anderson came up with it...

And I am kinda skeptical that Niles Haymer did too, though he does seem like a "talented tenth" type who, maybe, could've thought it up...

More than likely, however, Haymer got the idea from (((somebody else)))....

Anonymous said...

This article needs to be saved and indexed as a case study in how gun laws (and other laws for that matter) are merely a suggestion for Africans in America.

If you're a felon, don't have a gun on you.

But of course, rather than make him face the consequences for his stupid actions he is willing to drag the entire country through more race "discussion" bullsht, as if this ever would have come up if he simply followed the law.

Recently there was some kind of "ice bucket" type challenge in the hood where other dark denizens check to see if a black person is carrying. If they are not, they are socially shamed for "slipping".

The more people that get on the same page, the easier it will be to finally deal with these "people".

Bill in St Louis said...

No, in Wakanda, all the technology was invented and maintained by blacks. Once the cities are completely cucked, the only areas where anything works will be outlying rural areas. Obsolete farm equipment and DWLs have no clue how to actually DO anything, and the dindus will eat thier apologists, clearing the way for a great purge.

Mr. Clean said...

Segregation, repatriation, etc. would solve this. Negros would face negro judges, negro juries and, presumably, negro statues.

Mr. Clean said...

Anonymous July 18, 2018 at 4:23 AM said... If you're a felon, don't have a gun on you.

It's only illegal if you get caught. I don't know about you, but if I possessed a weapon illegally, chances are I would never get caught.

If you don't want to go to trial in a jurisdiction with evil YT statues out front, don't commit felonious monkeyshines in that jurisdiction. Better yet, stay out of that jurisdiction entirely.

Former Liberal said...

Oh those confederate statues are at it again. Never mind thar POS probably has a criminal record as long as my arm, he just can't it a fair trial because of that icky statue in front. Another e example of blacks' nonstop excuse making, magical thinking with low iq at work.

Anonymous said...

I wish someone would just grow a pair of balls and tell these delinquent, troublemaker lawyers 'no'.

Obviously, a word they don't hear much.

Jim in Jersey

Non PC Infidel said...

Take this to its natural conclusion~ blacks will claim they can't get a fair trial because there are whites on the jury and "everyone knows that whites are prejudiced/racist/bigoted and have it out for the black man." After all, Whites are automatically guilty of either overt racism or "unconscious racism." Even the laws that govern civilized society will be declared to be white man's law and therefore "oppressive" to "people of color." Just recall how they screech and complain that they're being mistreated and unfairly targeted when they're held accountable for violation of traffic laws and get tickets for speeding and other offenses. It's the white man using his laws to attack communities of color! Does anyone honestly think that in black controlled areas that even something as simple as traffic laws would be obeyed or even enforced? LOL!

I have to laugh at the idea of negro judges and juries. In black controlled areas, all the little laws that add up to creating a civilized, orderly and functional first world environment and society would quickly fall by the wayside. Or, if they were still "on the books" they'd simply be ignored. Only the most egregious cases of negro misbehavior would even be prosecuted. The rest would be left up to "jungle justice" on the streets by hordes of aggravated negroes. As in Africa, "offenders" would be chased down and burned or beaten to death in the street by a mob.

Remove the law (the salt of preservation) and the negro rot takes over and everything slides into third world conditions or worse. Of course, once they create such conditions they then howl about it as if it's someone else's fault but that's to be expected of such a low IQ population. You can't fix stupid. Even now, they screech about all the crime and violence in the hood but if anyone tries to do anything about it, they screech that it's a racist attack upon the community and just the white man tryin' to keep them down.

Left to their own devices, they'll create hell on earth for themselves even more so than they do now. All I'd say is, "You wanted it, you got it, now deal with it." That, of course, would be racist too because I "don't care about black folks or da chirruns" and won't open my wallet or help pay fo' programs and initiative to "make a difference."

Wakanda! Wakanda!


Non PC Infidel said...

www.yahoo.com/news/father-43-children-found-beaten-143044152.html

Negro with 43 children found beaten to death in his home. Best comment on the article, "It was the welfare department!"

Robin Naybors said...

The issue that ((they)) have with our monuments is simply a means to an end. The proverbial waters are being tested with the uproar and removal of these statues, etc.
The push to eliminate American history won’t stop with these “racist”, inanimate objects. Remember, our very founding documents were penned by white, “racist, white supremacist slave owners”, and there will be a push in the near future to have those rendered invalid and replaced.

Anonymous said...

"It symbolizes a society that embraced racial intolerance?"

That's just one anwser to the age old broken record stating: " We desperately need to sit down and put our heads together for some serious discussion and debate"

Just sit down, be quiet, I'll give you all the nesesary input on "my" perception of what constitutes racism and how to define it. I'll determine how much individuals can & should be held responsible.

I'll claim: "Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome" & "Battered Race Syndrome"

I'll write articles to reinforce "myths" that the white race deliberatly projects "psychopathic racial personality" on the people of color in the form of "priveledged obligation" as a "duty" each and every white person is taught to perform from birth.

What's the symbol of a person embracing racial intolerance?

Egghead said...

Can you spot the propaganda?

“...two dozen intact skeletons ... all had African American traits ....”

Note: Is race just a social construct, or not?

“[Black] prisoners ... helped rebuild the state of Texas in the ruins of the post-Civil War era ....”

“...we [black prisoners] built this state ... we all built this state.”

“In the convict-leasing system proliferated all across the south in the late 19th century and into the 20th, overwhelmingly targeting black Americans for offenses such as vagrancy, flirting with white women or petty theft....”

Note: The rate of rape in black Africa is astounding.

“[Black] prisoners ... built the entire Texas Capitol building from scratch.”

Note: Ok, let’s see blacks do it again - from scratch - anywhere in the world - without help from other races.

“...more African Americans died in convict leasing in the south in the same period than in lynchings.”

“...the district is exploring the possibility of memorials for the buried [black] prisoners....”

https://www.richmond.com/news/trending/bodies-of-black-forced-labor-prisoners-from-jim-crow-era/article_d16495ca-db43-550c-918f-0ac9b65fcb30.html?utm_source=RTD%20Email&utm_medium=_RTD%20Morning%20News&utm_campaign=_RTD%20Morning%20News

Anonymous said...

And who said blacks can't come up with intriguing, new and original ideas?

;)

Shitavious Demarcus Umbooga III said...

I wonder how much of his criminality is in direct proportion to his lack of acces to Programs. I bet he just didn't get enough midnight basketball.

Anonymous said...

Your post reminds me of an article I read this morning prior to coming here. It was a story on the amount of lynching in the sub(in)continent of India!

In the article it goes over some of their more recent lynchings while speaking of older ones which were impressive and how nowadays the "Whats App" phone app has been organizing rhe chsrge, so to speak. They have a short bit about how the British ruled them in such a way as to collect taxes on the cheap and left them with a bad government.

At the end of the day there are many in India who are incredibly intelligent, however their old culture seems to be pretty trashy to me. Dead cows and human bodies floating in "Mother Gunga" (Ganges River), a fallen culture whose high point (like ours) seems to have come and gone...

Anonymous said...

"What's the symbol of a person embracing racial intolerance?"

Ooh, ooh! I know! A brain!

Anonymous said...

It's quite likely it was one of his own children who did it. If he had that many kids, how many did he have that he didn't know about?

We know which race is much more likely related to each other because of their promuscuity, bastardy, X vs. Y child rearing strategies, inability to delay gratification, lower intellect, etc...

Like Sonny and Cher said... And the beat goes on!

Anonymous said...

I think a book could be written for negroes, 1001 excuses and complaints, called "DINDU NUFFINS WITH A SIDE OF GIBBS ME DAT"

D-FENS said...

Apoarently, it’s illegal to even call the cops on a negro, let alone try or convict one.

Actually, it’s now a great injustice to even ask a negro to have some consideration. A member of the Harvard faculty who specializes in disaster relief for third world shitholes (an obvious SJW), was telling a mudshark neighbor that she and her sprog were making too much noise and that her daughter could not take a nap. The Harvard SJW kept asking the mudshark if “she was living in one of the subsidized units”.

The Harvard SJW is now furiously groveling to keep her job.

Anonymous said...

(((Niles HAYMER)))?

Anonymous said...

ask for a change of venue?

she.........give him a trial in Africa and he can stay there..........that should get rid of all the racism....

Anonymous said...

It is agreed, by all Edukated and Lerned Lahwyers, that America is a White Racist Nation.

Correct? Is this NOT the way today.

Therefore, not being a Lahwyers, it makes perfect sense to me that this Sambo can not get a fair, impartial trial ANYWHERE in America. Can he? NO.

Therefor: the Lahyer needs to request a change of venue to Africa.

PB said...

These may well be the true target.

Anonymous said...

Not buying the slippery slope argument. As ridiculous as the SJW clamor is, and as far as the vocal minority of radicals want to take it, there's a line between 'Confederate' and 'Founding Father' that probably won't be crossed when it comes to tearing down monuments and moving courtrooms. They're not the same category. Confederates were traitors against the United States, who lost a war that they started over a completely immoral cause. They're the losers of American history, a joke, and they get no sympathy from anyone who wasn't raised to resent the Union and look back nostalgically at being poor serfs who could at least look down on blacks. No matter what you think of blacks (and if you're paying attention, then 'what you think of blacks' probably is disappointment at best), you can't pretend slavery is forgivable. Let blacks wallow in their degeneracy, keep them separate, fine, but enslaving people and seceding from the Union to protect your profits is fucked up, period. Washington, Jefferson et al. kept hundreds of slaves, of course, and had no intention of giving them up at any point, but their legendary reputations and their positive accomplishments will protect them and their peers from revisionism. Most liberals look the other way and apologize for the main Founding Fathers when it comes to their human rights record. Confederates, on the other hand, are basically irredeemable. It's bullshit to claim it's just 'history' like it's some neutral or innocent thing. Southerners should distance themselves from the Confederacy and let go of their dusty old resentment, but they just fucking hate blacks too much. They should also do a bunch of other things, like not letting Republicans take advantage of their predictable hysterical emotions so they can pass laws that benefit only the richest people who don't give the slightest whiff of a fuck about them or Christianity, but that there faggoty book learnin' ain't a good look.

Anonymous said...

Erase all whiteness from the world. Blacks will still be low man on the totem pole. Amazingly awful group.

Anonymous said...

Maybe they can hold trials at Starbucks(tm), since Starbucks(tm) is now open to all.

Brian in Ohio said...

It`s not the monuments themselves, but the fact that we`ve done things worth building monuments for.

Look at all we`ve done. All we`ve built. All we`ve accomplished.

Now what, in the recorded history of man, have blacks done worthy of a monument?

Stay alert, stay alive.

Anonymous said...

We don't hate the blacks. It was Yankees we killed by the hundreds of thousands, asshole.

Anonymous said...

Anon @3:17, aren't you special, giving us a history lesson and everything.
I doubt anyone on this blog will miss you.
Female in FL

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 3:17. Cut and paste your inane rant and send it to the countries in Africa that are still slave trading. Zeitgeist, idiot!

Anonymous said...

To anonymous at 3:17. Your last sentence speaks volumes. Tells us everything that we need to know. Another member of the free shit army. Ever saluting other peoples money.

Anonymous said...

@3:17

I can always tell a black person over the phone, even if they speak in proper English. Something in the voice always gives it away, the way certain sounds are pronounced. I can't do this so easily with any other race that speaks native English. Bilingual kids have perfect accents (or lack thereof) when speaking in either of their languages.

What is even more interesting to me is that I can actually detect it in writing as well. I'm surprised you didn't use the word ignorant, because that is their favorite word, period.

You seem to loathe southerners more than you do blacks... since my realist awakening I actually feel regretful for how I branded many of these whites, whites who lived around blacks their entire lives when I was sheltered from them.

The sterotypical black gay-hatred and use of the word 'ain't' didn't help either. Even without all of that, it just had the entitled and resentful tone that I would expect of a compassionless black.

Mr. Rational said...

Confederates were traitors against the United States, who lost a war that they started over a completely immoral cause. They're the losers of American history, a joke, and they get no sympathy from anyone who wasn't raised to resent the Union and look back nostalgically at being poor serfs who could at least look down on blacks.

I was raised in a state abutting Canada, and got the full measure of anti-South propaganda during my years of public schooling.  Only recently have I learned just how much of that propaganda is out-and-out lies.  The main casus belli was tariffs, not slavery.  Lincoln became president on a fraction of the popular vote that would make GWB blush.  Reconstruction was tantamount to attempted genocide.  I could go on.

No matter what you think of blacks, you can't pretend slavery is forgivable.

It eminently was, because EVERYONE DID IT.  Africans still do, to their own; it's so integrated into Arabic culture that it's part of the language.  If you want to commit suicide out of guilt over it, just get it over with and stop bothering us.  And if you're going to attack people over it, the Arabs and Africans are far more legitimate targets for your rage—and the only ones who are dangerous to attack, too.  Coward.

Anonymous said...

Meanwhile in Ontario Canada... another chimpout at a coffee shop..

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/crimeincanada/woman-accused-of-assaulting-brampton-tim-hortons-employees-arrested/ar-AAAhu03?li=AAggFp5

Anonymous said...

Anon @3:17 It takes a very limited intellect and an even more limited grasp of history to chalk up the Civil War to such a laughably simplistic “good vs evil” explanation as you seem to be doing.

No one who wasn’t “raised to resent the Union” has any sympathy for the Confederates? Really?

This quote from a famous American of that era seems quite understanding of and sympathetic to the South and their situation:

“Before proceeding, let me say I think I have no prejudice against the Southern people. They are just what we would be in their situation. If slavery did not now exist amongst them, they would not introduce it. If it did now exist amongst us, we should not instantly give it up. This I believe of the masses north and south. Doubtless there are individuals, on both sides, who would not hold slaves under any circumstances; and others who would gladly introduce slavery anew, if it were out of existence. We know that some southern men do free their slaves, go north, and become tip-top abolitionists; while some northern ones go south, and become most cruel slave-masters. When southern people tell us they are no more responsible for the origin of slavery, than we; I acknowledge the fact. When it is said that the institution exists; and that it is very difficult to get rid of it, in any satisfactory way, I can understand and appreciate the saying. I surely will not blame them for not doing what I should not know how to do myself. If all earthly power were given me, I should not know what to do, as to the existing institution. My first impulse would be to free all the slaves, and send them to Liberia, -- to their own native land. But a moment's reflection would convince me, that whatever of high hope, (as I think there is) there may be in this, in the long run, its sudden execution is impossible. If they were all landed there in a day, they would all perish in the next ten days; and there are not surplus shipping and surplus money enough in the world to carry them there in many times ten days. What then? Free them all, and keep them among us as underlings? Is it quite certain that this betters their condition? I think I would not hold one in slavery, at any rate; yet the point is not clear enough for me to denounce people upon. What next? Free them, and make them politically and socially, our equals? My own feelings will not admit of this; and if mine would, we well know that those of the great mass of white people will not." - Abraham Lincoln, Speech at Peoria, Illinois October 16, 1854

PvtCharlieSlate said...

“...two dozen intact skeletons ... all had African American traits ....”

Does that mean that the skull bones were an inch and a half thick?

PvtCharlieSlate said...

By act of Congress twice amended, Veterans of the Confederate States Armed Forces are United States Veterans and are entitled to the same benefits and considerations as any other Veterans.

PvtCharlieSlate said...

I think you’ll find these interesting:

The division of the United States into federations of equal force was decided long before the Civil War by the high financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds prevailed ... Therefore they sent their emissaries into the field to exploit the question of slavery and to open an abyss between the two sections of the Union." - Otto von Bismarck

"He obtained from Congress the right to borrow from the people by selling to it the 'bonds' of States ... and the Government and the nation escaped the plots of the foreign financiers. They understood at once, that the United States would escape their grip. The death of Lincoln was resolved upon." - Otto von Bismarck

"The death of Lincoln was a disaster for Christendom. There was no man in the United States great enough to wear his boots and the bankers went anew to grab the riches. I fear that foreign bankers with their craftiness and tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it to systematically corrupt civilization." - Otto von Bismarck

Blue Eyes Matter said...

If it wasn't for white men portrayed by statues, there wouldn't even be a court of law. All there would be is street justice. Just like in any majority black population. Except blacks think they all need to own a gun. Why do the anti-gunners never bring up the black mans obsession with guns?

Anonymous said...

PK, I gotta give it to you. Folks make mention about their posts not getting posted.

It's crap like this you let through that helps remind me that many whites seem to have no love or compassion for their own.

Gavin Newsome said...

"Southerners should distance themselves from the Confederacy and let go of their dusty old resentment, but they just fucking hate blacks too much."

Nonsense, you can never hate blacks too much. It keeps you awake and alive.

Anonymous said...

Fake news.

Everyone knows blacks are excellent parents.

Archie bunker said...

Stupid

Anonymous said...

When blacks think of the archetypical justice-giver I'll bet many of them imagine the Michelin Man!

K. O. said...

@ Rational...
well done. i have in-laws in Toronto. ages ago, early 90's when a movie 'Glory' Matthew Broderick, and cast of thousands of black soldiers premiered on cable... i had very interesting time in explaining the 'situation' inre black chattel slavery as economic model; the 'belief' that 'slaves were routinely beaten/tortured to death' was a fallacy in that, until the later years, black slaves were not cheap, depending on their skill set and housebreaking, commanded sums over $1000 then, which approximates w/inflation to over $14k/per, and as such an owner beating his expensive 'assets' to death would soon end in bankruptcy. they were 'mind blown'. it was nice to wipe the smug off their faces, as my ancestors did own a few. they also were astounded to learn there were also notable numbers of black Confederate soldiers, who volunteered to follow their 'masters' into battle.
another little brain bomb i got to share; following emancipation, many of ours stayed in the employ of the family, as they had no desire to leave what was left of their MS 'home' and continued their work at the turpentine farm (thankfully not razed by Sherman) for wages, which was superior to starving to death. there is at least one family in the area which still sports my family's Scot/Irish surname.

if you wish to further your deprogramming, may i recommend T. DiLorenzo's (Prof of Econ, Loyola/MD) archive on lewrockwell.com. https://www.lewrockwell.com/author/thomas-dilorenzo/

kikz

Ethan said...

Motion denied! Counselor, call your first witness.

AnalogMan said...

K. O. said...

... black slaves were not cheap, depending on their skill set and housebreaking, commanded sums over $1000

As a foreign tourist, I visited the Museum of the Confederacy a few years ago. I saw several invoices for the sale of slaves. The prices were all in the mid-$3000s. At a time when a typical wage for a White man was, as I understand it, a dollar a day, that represents about ten years' worth of wages. It seemed to me a helluva high price to pay for a dumb, resentful Babuntu who might not survive ten years. It made me understand why the slave-owners would try to maximise their return by breeding the slaves, instead of the rational practice followed by the Arabs of castrating all slaves.

How different America might be today if slave prices had been set at a level where use-once-and-discard were practicable.

Anonymous said...

Back to the original article: This is just one excuse of the long list of 'let's throw this at the wall and see if it sticks' blame game that allows these sub-humans avoid responsibility for their actions.

Blatant 'racism' accusations will always be the go-to but, it can get old. So, to change it up a bit, poverty and broken families excuse had a good run. Now the 'he/she had a long history of mental illness' is the new flavor and running strong but, will eventually run it's course. So, why not use a statue built it 1908 to continue the trend?

'Ronnie Anderson, who is facing a charge of illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in East Feliciana Parish, filed the motion yesterday.

Anderson says the Confederate statue in front of the 178-year-old courthouse "carries a message to African Americans of intimidation and oppression, communicating that justice may not be fair and impartial at a Courthouse that was nostalgic and sentimental over the institution of slavery that the Confederacy fought for in the American Civil War.'

Obviously. Because if there's one thing black felons in the south have inherently knowledge of is, how to file a court motion and vernacular behind it...

Anonymous said...

This is why we fought a war against you Yankees. We were (and still are) sick and tired of you trying to tell us what we “should” do, as if you have the first idea about what our heritage and ancestors mean to us. Leave us alone. Take your arrogant, condescending attitude and shove it up your ass.