So what did we learn this week?
Newsweek told us that unemployed, college-educated white males between the ages of 44 - 60 years-old are beached.
Jason Richwine of Heritage showed us that per pupil spending is greater for Black students then white students, thereby erasing claims by the NAACP that Black students don't receive enough funding in their pursuit of an education that leads many to find solace in the overfunded penal system.
TheRoot.com went berserk that New York Times columnist Russ Douthat has pointed out the obvious; that an aging white population will rely on an increasingly non-white population that will be taxed in a bid to pay for their Social Security and benefits:
"Historically, the most successful welfare states (think Scandinavia) have depended on ethnic solidarity to sustain their tax-and-transfer programs. But the working-age America of the future will be far more diverse than the retired cohort it's laboring to support. Asking a population that's increasingly brown and beige to accept punishing tax rates while white seniors receive roughly $3 in Medicare benefits for every dollar they paid in (the projected ratio in the 2030s) [pdf] promises to polarize the country along racial as well as generational lines."The fact that the Browning of America isn't a good thing when one considers credit history, home foreclosure rates and employment prospects for this young population is something the kind folks at theroot.com never consider. They must have degrees from an HBCU, which the New York Times pointed out were basically worthless.
Al Sharpton, at his National Action Network (NAN) conference - which receives major corporate sponsorship and a visit from Mein Obama himself - stated that construction sites that don't employ Black people should be shut down and that only Black people should educate Black children. He might have said something about Black people only buying from Black businesses - what is called "buying black" - but this is a risky proposition that has been tried before and failed.
Remember, And Then? is what you'll always get.
We also learned McDonald's and MARTA are, well, both 365Black.
Trust us, we want to write # posts. We want to talk about popular culture and sports, simple things that normal people talk about at bars and on patios of restaurants as they enjoy the outdoors, fine cuisine and fellowship of friends.
For the time being, we can't. In less than two years time, this blog - which started as a joke - has morphed into something else. Understanding the Blue Ocean Strategy, we have created a brand and, in so doing, have produced one book and have another one on the verge of publication (two more books are planned for release this summer).
We encourage new readers to this Web site to explore the archives and educate yourself. The Mainstream Media (MSM) has been doing the thinking for you for far too long; the only freedom you have in Black Run America (BRA) is the freedom to think for yourself.
Unplug from Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, ESPN, Time and Newsweek. Put down that National Review and The Nation. The paradigm of white people being solely capable of racism or prejudice in BRA is dying quickly.
All you have to do is watch YouTube, Worldstarhiphop.com or spend a few minutes on this Web site to understand what Truth, Justice, and the American way means.
Thank you, readers, for making this week at Stuff Black People Don't Like the most trafficked one on record. My thanks to Mencken for his continued efforts to help edit and make sure SBPDL is producing top-notch work and my thanks to readers who send in stories that can only make sense in a world governed by BRA. Thanks to those who posts links to our site on other Web pages. Don't stop! Traffic is increasing because people come here and post links on Facebook, Twitter and other news pages.
Also, more than 10 people sent in graphic designs for our "Boycott 365Black" campaign.
We are not Libertarians here; McDonald's is poison. In a sane world, such food wouldn't be fed to dogs.
Regardless of your religious views, have a blessed Easter. Spend time with your family; call an old friend, and just enjoy life.
We'll be back Monday.
YouTube won't allow us to embed this video, but we think it convey's something special.
Happy Easter.
85 comments:
Speaking of "My people,"....
OK viewers: Time to vote. Which cultural celebration is more advanced, high developed,and well....just plain superior??
Choice # 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LM3OEVfwUis
Choice # 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3y9u-dGDOg&feature=related
SBPDL,
It has been reported that the young woman beaten at the Baltimore McDonald's was trans-gender. Have you considered writing a post on anti-LBGT attitudes in the Black community? There is quite a lot of source material out there.
• I recall a few years ago black "leaders" were complaining that blacks were being locked out of home ownership by discriminating lending institutions.The catch phrase: "It's just another form of red lining."
Fearful of being labeled "racists" the blanks and mortgage companies went so far as to participate in "lending fair" events to attract black lenders.
Blacks got their loans and began defaulting in record numbers. Who do they blame? The very lending companies they once accused of being racists for NOT lending them money. The catch phrase: "It's predatory lending."
• The hits on my site were up by over 1,000 yesterday, due mostly to the McDonalds beat-down.
Another thought . . .
If all black Americans were to suddenly disappear, would America be better or worse off.
If all White Americans were to suddenly disappear, would America be better or worse off.
Congratulations on reaching ever greater audiences. I have been reading this blog from when it was a couple of months old, and it was love at first sight. You have a good grasp of reality, as well as a philosophical streak, and your site is a model of good journalism.
The progression this site has gone through is both natural and beneficial. Once you've read an article and had your laughs, you're left with a residue of truth, and after a while you start reading articles for the truth, not the laughs. The truth is ultimately more important than the laughs, and truth is what SBPDL is distilling in ever greater concentrations. People are interested in the truth, both those who want it and those who hate it, truth creates passion and there is plenty of that on this site.
Thank you "Paul" for this site, and remember, you can be a libertarian and still not like McDonald's, you just can't advocate for government to shut them down. I'd rather the marked did it, and in a sane world, it would.
This week in black run UK
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1379735/Black-headmistress-Shirley-Patterson-saw-lynch-mob-parents-poster-called-police.html
"Remember, And Then? is what you'll always get."
There's a balance of justice, like a set of scales and i think a lot of White people have those scales in their heads and are partially controlled by them.
One side of the scales is the "White guilt" side. The foundation of this is slavery and various forms of discrimination etc and this foundation is put on each new generation at school. This foundation is then constantly topped up to overflowing by the media. Any incident that can be manipulated to add more to the "White guilt" side of the scales gets a full blown media circus even if the story is a hoax or even if the attack, as described in the mortgage example, is on White people for doing something the media had attacked them into doing a few years before.
And the "black guilt" side of the scales? Empty. The same media that makes sure the white side is kept full to overflowing - even if they have to make stuff up to do it - keeps the black side of the scales empty by censoring the news. They sweep it all off and under the nearest carpet. The exception of course is when White people are attacked and multiple dead bodies make it too big to cover-up in which case black racist murders get blamed on White "racism" too.
This leaves White people like mice in a mouse wheel constantly running to pay a debt that can never be paid because the media have rigged the game. If the media told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth then within six months White people would realise the debt was paid years ago.
As a long time foreign reader,I would like to think that a few of your extra hits were from friends to whom I have recommended SBPDL
@NW European: Excellent, insightful comment.
@ Anonymous 9:19. Gosh, that's really a difficult decision to make. After watching both videos and giving the matter careful deliberation, I will have to cast my vote for Choice #2.
(Sorry, pseudo-traditional African booty-shakers!!)
I've linked to this site at various movement conservative ones; I think I just got banned at The American Spectator as a result (a comment at an article went through yesterday; another at their blog was blocked as spam - we'll see). That's the problem - those we're most likely to reach, who are at least part of the way awake and aware, are those right liberals who call themselves "conservatives." I'm routinely derided as a racist, an anti-semite, or a bigot when I put a carefully-worded or veiled comment at one of those sites. The people who claim to revere the founding documents (I read your disclaimer about the same) are just as quick as the leftists to use shaming language and shut off thought and debate if anyone breaches the impregnable fortress of "we're all created equal."
@ Snape aka Frazier:
Here ya go. Your ignorance grows daily.
"As to genetics: Care to explain why blacks in every area of the world are at the bottom of the barrel in IQ, self-restraint, etc. and highest in crime, out-of-wedlock births, etc? It can't be cultural because they're not all living in the same culture."
Paul,
You might want to think of creating a better comments system if at all possible, with, for instance, a "quote" function. Maybe a volunteer can help.
Is there anyway there can be a vote on comments like youtube has?
McDonald's might be fit only for a dog, but my puppy draws the line there. When I walk him through the neighborhood, he shows an interest in the detritus left behind from other dogs. The one time I went to McDonald's and tried to offer him a fry, he sniffed it once and then turned away.
My study suffers from an incredibly low sample size (1 dog) but let me unveil my findings here: Dogshit is not as nasty as McDonald's.
"It has been reported that the young woman beaten at the Baltimore McDonald's was trans-gender. Have you considered writing a post on anti-LBGT attitudes in the Black community? There is quite a lot of source material out there."
Not a good idea because if he does he will alienate the type of people like me who have race realist views and at the same time are kind of sexually conservative.
If SBPDL goes all "The blacks hate the gays and we need to the protect the gays! Stop 'homophobia'! Stop 'transphobia'" on me then I'm leaving and he will lose his reactionary and far-right audience. His blog will start looking like a right-liberal website filled with people who say they are "conservative" but have deep anti-traditional conservative views. Better yet we will only see leftists here.
Thankfully he himself has said he is not a libertarian or a liberal. Personally I don't like minority dysfunction and liberal moral standards. If I had the choice I would throw both the dysfunctional blacks and that transvestite in jail. They are both savages.
P.S. That is not to say that some blacks don't have dysfunctional primitive attitudes towards gays. I don't approve of homosexuality and don't associate myself with the LBGTQ community but yeah those crazy rappers do sometimes get on my nerves when they talk about the 'gays'.
SBPDL:
I noticed in that last comment thread you mentioned "CEBFs", or "college educated black females"...
I was shocked that you called these black women "losers". How is can that be so? If the consensus on this website is that blacks should "behave" and then they will be tolerated, why is it that these women are jeered?
I am not understanding your mentality.
It seems that you hate the skin color of blacks, and nothing more. If their skin was not black, they would be acceptable. I mean, you have derided the problems of black culture - white culture also has problems - and yet black women who are achieving are "losers".
Why pretend, man? To you, no black can do good and all blacks are Satan Incarnate; you make the presumptive conclusion that a beautiful black child will be a criminal, that black men will rape white women (it's only a matter of time), and that black women - even the college-educated ones - are worth less than your common street urchin. How very nuanced. What a shame.
I wish you luck in your endeavors and your books but, at least, let's not sugarcoat your goals...
Laz:
I answered you in the last thread. I hope you will be content to read it there. I will not duplicate my comments.
Sheila
I know what you mean. I read (well, will cease today) and comment at AWD. I began to get suspicious when he went all-in for Allen West for president. My opposition was met by him and other commentors, as...you guessed it "racist", with plenty of hints at White supremacist, and KKK type suspicions.
He is not alone. Lots of "conservative" sites can't wait to prove they aren't racist, instead of helping toss that tired old line out the window. They hint at protecting our country (code for Whites) but then can't throw in the "some of my best friends are black!" stuff fast enough.
These "conservatives" are not helping, and stunts like praying for an Allen West, only serve to marginalize White people that much more. They don't realize that he says all those courageous things because, UNLIKE WHITE PEOPLE, he is allowed to because of his color skin.
Thank God for this site. It is fast becoming one of the only ones I bother to read.
Joe
Snape: "It's whitey's fault blacks don't like gays."
Just guessing.
"It has been reported that the young woman beaten at the Baltimore McDonald's was trans-gender. Have you considered writing a post on anti-LBGT attitudes in the Black community? There is quite a lot of source material out there."
Bullshit, I don't think so. He could just as easily write a post about 2-3rds of his readers who hold the same views as those blacks.
I won't mince words here: you all may "claim" to like gays as a lesser of two evils but I prefer negroes.
Call me what ever you want but I like this blog. I think SBPDL is doing good work. I agree with Tamenry: if it goes the way of cheerleading homosexuals, I'll definitely read elsewhere.
I'll be honest because I'm an honest man: anyone thinking about demonizing negroes because they tend to have those sort of anti-homosexual traditional values, you're being hypocrites. The "she" was a "he," and you're eating crow and trying to find the moral highroad. Nah, blacks got it right in California.
Homosexuals are less violent, sure, but the MSM is as protective of gays as they are negroes. Diversity doesn't end with colors. It includes gays, too.
SBPDL, if you go the way of that PC crap you'll lose 2-3rds of your audience. That's a guarantee. I'll take the blacks given a choice. Enough of them are decent and enough of them can be taught.
"It seems that you hate the skin color of blacks, and nothing more."
Snape, you are like a broken record, please get some new material.
"Snape: "It's whitey's fault blacks don't like gays."
Just guessing."
Brother Anonymous, you ignorant schmuck. This Snape guy is probably as much a champion of gays as he is negroes. He probably thinks both groups are sacred cows. Should we blame whitey for making good Christian conservative men not like gays?
Let me guess: you're going to call me prejudiced? Hell, I don't give a rat's ass. I could throw it back to you. It's crazy to me anyone would choose an alternative lifestyle over a black, or a hispanic.
If you want to champion alternative lifestyles, I think you should start your own blog to do so. This, I think, is a good sensible blog by a sensible young man.
"...I am not understanding your mentality..."
NOW he tells us...
"...I wish you luck in your endeavors and your books..."
You REALLY wish luck to someone you find repulsive? Someone who is trying to "hurt" the very people you adore? Snape, you are AGAIN exposed as thoroughly full of shit.
Joe
"you all may "claim" to like gays as a lesser of two evils but I prefer negroes."
Who claimed to like gays??
Fact: A group of gays is significantly less likely to commit rape or murder than a group of negroes.
Sure, blacks helped to vote down the Prop 8. So what? So did Latinos. So did conservative whites. You don't see Jesse and Al taking to the streets. You don't see Obama trying to sign DOMA or make a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and try to pass it in Congress. Last time I checked, Obama repealed 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'.
Black people haven't actively tried to take rights away from gay people up until Prop 8 (Prop 8 was put to a vote to the people--the American way!); that's what white people do. Black people simply kept their feelings within the black community. And now you people are acting all haughty?
I bet there was a whole lot of gnashing of teeth when you all found out that woman was a MAN. I'm sure it's the same reaction when Fergus found out Dil was a man in the 'Crying Game'.
LOL!
You people are such hypocrites. Apparently, it's all about pigment (notice my name). All you guys care about is that black people are black. If it was white people beating up that guy, you'd say nothing. Most of you are conservative. This blog is conservative.
Well, at least the Sandman is honest.
Don't act righteously indignant. Please, save it the energy when it doesn't have to compete with hypocrisy. If SBPDL had known innocent Chrissy Polis was really Chris Polis with the long rap sheet, he wouldn't have posted that video.
This is all too funny.
For the anti-black 'Christians' reading, there's nothing in the Good Book that says 'Thou shalt not be black' but there are several passages that say don't fuck men if your a man, LMAO.
You seem to have a real bent for irrationality, Snape, and then projecting such back on the posters here. Black behavior is the problem. Black behavior is a product of black culture, which is a product of race. Those few blacks who behave in a more civilized fashion adopt some surface White values, while underneath cheer on and maintain racial solidarity with their underclass brothers and sisters. While skin color in and of itself is not the cause of White's preferring to marry and reproduce with their own kind, there are strong cultural and racial and historical reasons (plus IQ) for preferring lighter skin (this cuts across all cultural lines, read some Thomas Sowell for evidence), not to mention the logical desire of having one's offspring resemble one's genetic heritage. Finally, while I may admire the prose of someone like Sowell and agree with some of his arguments, that does not automatically translate into wanting my children to marry blacks, regardless of educational achievement (which is almost always due to affirmative action and thus suspect at best). Your version of tolerance and acceptance, on the other hand, is why so many Jews marry members of other races and religions and then raise their children as Jews anyhow (cultural, of course, because it doesn't suit your argument to claim the racial or religious part of the identity argument). Of course, you get to decide who's Jewish (or the orthodox rabbis in Israel do for immigration and marriage purposes), but it's racist for Whites to decide who's White - because Whites have White privilege, except Jews don't (because they're White when it suits them but they're also Jewish and eternal victims when it suits them).
I think that about sums it up.
SBPDL, please try to keep out Desiree's comments under various sock puppets - her version of what she thinks is standard English prose is quite easily identifiable. "All About Pigment" is obviously the resident CEBF (LOL, LMAO, etc. ad nauseum).
@Mr. Sandman
Um...what?
"Black people simply kept their feelings within the black community."
And occasionally bash someone's head in.
"Sure, blacks helped to vote down the Prop 8. So what?"
All "oppressed" groups are supposed to be united in their quest to destroy the white man. So any schism within the rainbow coalition is of value. If the victim really was a transgendered homosexual then the odds of hate-crime charges actually being filed just increased 1000%.
"For the anti-black 'Christians' reading, there's nothing in the Good Book that says 'Thou shalt not be black' but there are several passages that say don't fuck men if your a man, LMAO."
If you're following those parts of Leviticus, then you'll following a very strict interpretation of Jewish law. And I believe Jewish law takes quite a strong stance against sex with non-Jews, including blacks.
Hey, cool, now I have a by-line.
@PIGMENT
"several passages that say don't fuck men if your a man, LMAO."
Anything in there about stomping their brains out, ignoramus?
Fareed Zakaria pulling the race-card on Trump:
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/22/fareed-zakaria-on-the-donald-trump-fantasy/
"It seems that you hate the skin color of blacks, and nothing more."
"All you guys care about is that black people are black."
Congratulations.
You two unoriginal donkey-dicks managed to xerox each other.
All I saw was a bunch of black niggers beating up a white. Yeah it looked like she was a white female, you know those kind of females that black males rape at the rate of 36,000 or more a year. Yeah it looked like the average black on white crime, but it was not the average black on white crime, just black on white crime, as usual.
Some of you don't get it (especially "ALL ABOUT PIGMENT"). Both dysfunctional blacks and tranvestites should be thrown in jail. It's not an either/or.
Here at SBPDL we criticize SWPL whites (liberal whites) and blacks. Both of them are part of the immoral coalition of liberalism. They don't always agree but they all have a common goal. To ignore one part is to accept a strain of liberalism.
Which is worse the SWPL white or the black? Neither. Both of them are wrong. We can't ignore the effect one has on the other and how they work together to achieve destruction.
"Sure, blacks helped to vote down the Prop 8. So what? So did Latinos. So did conservative whites. You don't see Jesse and Al taking to the streets. You don't see Obama trying to sign DOMA or make a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and try to pass it in Congress. Last time I checked, Obama repealed 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'."
The point is blacks voted overwhelmingly against Prop 8. The liberals were quick to condemn Mormons for voting against Prop 8 but wouldn't do so for blacks. We're constantly told that we should be tolerant of other races but isn't it funny that the race we have to be most accommodating to is the most intolerant?
"You people are such hypocrites. Apparently, it's all about pigment (notice my name). All you guys care about is that black people are black. If it was white people beating up that guy, you'd say nothing. Most of you are conservative. This blog is conservative."
We've addressed this exact same point over and over. Just because whites commit some crimes doesn't detract from the fact that blacks commit most crimes. Of course it matters that the perpetrators were black, the site is called "Stuff Black People Don't.
If you'd be so kind as to post a few recent videos of a bunch of whites beating the shit out of someone I might take you seriously.
Snape, you are a monumental idiot. You prattle on and on about "hating the color of their skin." This is only one of the many strawmen floating around in the miasma you call a mind.
Here's for the record, Snape:
If their skin were of purest gold, I would still be disgusted (different from hate) by the statistically significant majority's low IQ (as a measure of predictability throughout life and adjusted for socioeconomic factors), high impulsivity, innate racism, victimology mindset, refusal to accept personal responsibility, theft from productive whites to support their career welfare hustle, their hate-filled envy of whites, their endless blame-game rationalizations (aided and abetted by DWL's like you), their magical thinking style, their inability to speak the English language, their criminality, their vile, feral, bestial behavior, etc., etc., ad infinitum, ad nauseum, all documented daily in the pages of SBPDL and elsewhere.
Stop endlessly regurgitating the mindless "color of their skin" banality. You don't engage in thinking, Snape, instead you have an endless loop of leftist narratives, semantic tropes, and fantasies, all wrapped up for delivery with reeking sanctimony and arrogance. There is ultimately no hope for you and your ilk. You will inevitably and voluntarily become a sacrificial victim on the state altar of multiculturalism. But you sure as h#*l are not taking me with you.
I laugh at blacks' and DWL's incessant mindless trope about 'white privilege'. What they call white privilege is instead the stored fair value of earned success over this and prior generations of white culture. They try to explain it all away by bleating it was never truly earned, but instead somehow stolen off the backs of blacks and other 'brown' minorities. But that leftist historical revisionism is absurd. Its rationalizations are nothing but thinly-disguised envy, jealousy, and greed, because:
1) There is no way to steal skyscrapers and advanced civilization from people who don't have it to begin with.
2) 95% of the work and 100% of the creativity was done by whites, regardless of whatever 'brown' race may have been idly standing by.
3) There was always fair compensation to 'brown' people for such things as raw materials and work, paid not only in wages but civilizing gifts like running water, sewage systems, modern medicine and treatment of historical diseases, all improving the local populace in ways they had never before dreamed of; i.e., major advantages to all parties far outweighed disadvantages (which is also to say, we all live in reality where each step can never be perfect, we don't live in some fantasyland).
4) Most of those minorities aided and abetted whatever aspect of the white system was presented without any qualms, such as capturing other tribes and selling them to white slave-traders.
5) Any quantitatively minor negative aspects of such a system were realized and amended by precisely the same white culture that initially started it.
6) White culture will still produce and create, and do it without any blacks or other 'brown' races. The only problem now is that blacks' incessant whining and victimization mindset are dragging down and trying to destroy the white culture, supported by evil DWL's who depend on their 'darkies' living on the progressive plantation. The white culture doesn't need to spend money on institutionalized welfare ghetto mothers, or try to find some token black astronaut... instead, all we have to do is be freed of them so that we can go to the stars, and otherwise create a civilization that advances into the future with a fantastic life for each of us.
Believe me, we don't need you, either for exploitation (what a laugh), or for affirmative action set-asides... we don't need you for anything, we certainly don't want you, we want to be free of your endless 'gimme' con game. DWL's and blacks want to keep the USS Gravy Train going forever... thank God it's finally coming to an end, ironically due to the inevitable breakdown of the redistributionist theft that started this madness in the first place.
Racism is solely in the eye of the be-Holder.
For the poster that commented that Paul should address the "LGBT" issue; I say, are you crazy?
We can get that point of view from any leftist blog. We don't need it here.
Also, I'm with the other posters; that if that were to happen the quality and legitimacy of this effort in journalism would diminish greatly.
Just my two-cents.
This isn't exactly on topic, but it's pertinent reading IMO.
Read as open letter to black America by Angry White Dude.
http://angrywhitedude.com/
It expresses the frustrations on many white people these days rather succinctly.
Professor Snake...I have always said that the line between naivete and stupidity is a very fine one. You somehow manage to balance yourself on it while writing windy posts that sound as if they are written by an earnest student for his junior high school newspaper, having lived all his life in a cloistered white suburb and being blissfully unaware of his intellectual limitations.
Northlander
"For the anti-black 'Christians' reading, there's nothing in the Good Book that says 'Thou shalt not be black' but there are several passages that say don't fuck men if your a man, LMAO."
It also never said anything about everyone being equal either. That was a misconception by the founders. Try again hypocrite.
People wake up....
the McNiggers attacked a Cracka Tranny....
Just like they will attack a:
Cracka SEIU member
Cracka preacher
Cracka teacher
Cracka liberal news commentator
Cracka conservative news commentator
Cracka politician
Cracka store owner
Cracka lesbian
Cracka gay
Cracka DWL
Cracka _______________________
fact remains...they see CRACKA first....
they don't care of the type of "membership card" you carry...
neither should you...cracka...
wake the fuck up!
To Sheila:
The 'Desiree' thing again? Really? Can one not use an LOL or an LMAO to demonstrate the overwhelming hilarity of this obvious hypocrisy?
Newsflash: Desiree does not have a trademark on the LMAO and the LOL. Get a clue, LOL.
________________________________________________
To Brother Anonymous:
Obviously you are the resident white nationalist homosexual on this website. Don't worry--there are many like you in the movement, although you might be met with dissension among men in THIS space. According to various media reports dead South African white nationalist crazy Eugene Terreblanche was one. I won't judge.
As for the passages in the Good Book, there is no violence allowed by way of God's Law. Those black girls were not living according to 'The Word'; people acting like fools and hurting others are not living by 'The Word'. People voting down Prop 8 were living and thinking according to 'The Word', though, whether you believe in 'The Word' or not.
Blacks were never a part of that Rainbow Coalition. White liberal 'herders' put black people in with gays and black people's voting trends in terms of Prop 8 proved that the Rainbow Coalition white liberals set up was nothing but a facade. Black people have no problem telling you this; black people are more spiritual than some whites and don't agree with homosexuality. None of that should have been a surprise.
Don't you all say it? White liberals have NO CONTACT with real blacks! If they did, they would have known.
The vast majority of white people reading this site--maybe except you, due to your possible LGBT status--agree with what the Latinos, blacks, Mormons, and conservative whites did with Prop 8. Whites have actively opposed homosexual rights for decades; they've actively opposed minority rights for centuries.
They've also beaten up many a young gay; the Brandon Shepherd and Brandon Teena cases, just for quick examples, resulted in DEATH! All of this recent gay teen suicide stuff has occurred in suburbia; last time I checked, black folks weren't allowed in suburbia.
Keep deluding yourself, hypocrite. If your delineation is based on 'videotaping' then all you can do is blame the dumb ass YouTube drones who like to watch people get their asses kicked.
Oh, and by the way, that was no hate crime. If white girls had beat up that guy, you wouldn't be singing the same tune; if it was a black transsexual, you'd be in a tizzy talking about PC this and that. Well, unless you are gay, and it seems that you are. 'No homo' on this end but good luck convincing the majority of SBPDL's readers to your lifestyle...
Oh, yeah: HYPOCRITE!
________________________________________________
I'm not going by Leviticus. If you want the new testament, check Romans, Revelations, Corinthians. All apropos seeing that it's Easter Sunday.
________________________________________________
To Laz:
'The Word' definitely speaks to equality, in Christ's Body. The Founders had a Judeo-Christian mindset when they wrote those docs so they saw things in terms of the 'New Word'. The Apostle Paul speaks of there being no Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free in Christ's body, which is the Church. All are one.
Galatians 3:28, dipshit. Try again. If you want the passages that say don't fuck men, use Google. I couldn't care less; Lawrence v. Texas was a good ruling. Gays can do whatever. My point is blacks aren't hypocrites, and all of this 'save the LGBT' is due to two-faced, self-righteous moral indignation and, of course, PIGMENT.
To Sheila:
The 'Desiree' thing again? Really? Can one not use an LOL or an LMAO to demonstrate the overwhelming hilarity of this obvious hypocrisy?
Newsflash: Desiree does not have a trademark on the LMAO and the LOL. Get a clue, LOL.
________________________________________________
To Brother Anonymous:
Obviously you are the resident white nationalist homosexual on this website. Don't worry--there are many like you in the movement, although you might be met with dissension among men in THIS space. According to various media reports dead South African white nationalist crazy Eugene Terreblanche was one. I won't judge.
As for the passages in the Good Book, there is no violence allowed by way of God's Law. Those black girls were not living according to 'The Word'; people acting like fools and hurting others are not living by 'The Word'. People voting down Prop 8 were living and thinking according to 'The Word', though, whether you believe in 'The Word' or not.
Blacks were never a part of that Rainbow Coalition. White liberal 'herders' put black people in with gays and black people's voting trends in terms of Prop 8 proved that the Rainbow Coalition white liberals set up was nothing but a facade. Black people have no problem telling you this; black people are more spiritual than some whites and don't agree with homosexuality. None of that should have been a surprise.
Don't you all say it? White liberals have NO CONTACT with real blacks! If they did, they would have known.
The vast majority of white people reading this site--maybe except you, due to your possible LGBT status--agree with what the Latinos, blacks, Mormons, and conservative whites did with Prop 8. Whites have actively opposed homosexual rights for decades; they've actively opposed minority rights for centuries.
They've also beaten up many a young gay; the Brandon Shepherd and Brandon Teena cases, just for quick examples, resulted in DEATH! All of this recent gay teen suicide stuff has occurred in suburbia; last time I checked, black folks weren't allowed in suburbia.
Keep deluding yourself, hypocrite. If your delineation is based on 'videotaping' then all you can do is blame the dumb ass YouTube drones who like to watch people get their asses kicked.
Oh, and by the way, that was no hate crime. If white girls had beat up that guy, you wouldn't be singing the same tune; if it was a black transsexual, you'd be in a tizzy talking about PC this and that. Well, unless you are gay, and it seems that you are. 'No homo' on this end but good luck convincing the majority of SBPDL's readers to your lifestyle...
Oh, yeah: HYPOCRITE!
________________________________________________
I'm not going by Leviticus. If you want the new testament, check Romans, Revelations, Corinthians. All apropos seeing that it's Easter Sunday.
________________________________________________
To Laz:
'The Word' definitely speaks to equality, in Christ's Body. The Founders had a Judeo-Christian mindset when they wrote those docs so they saw things in terms of the 'New Word'. The Apostle Paul speaks of there being no Jew nor Gentile, male nor female, slave nor free in Christ's body, which is the Church. All are one.
Galatians 3:28, dipshit. Try again. If you want the passages that say don't fuck men, use Google. I couldn't care less; Lawrence v. Texas was a good ruling. Gays can do whatever. My point is blacks aren't hypocrites, and all of this 'save the LGBT' is due to two-faced, self-righteous moral indignation and, of course, PIGMENT.
More sub-human negro violence/murder.
The Knock-Out Game
To AV:
Since it's ALL ABOUT PIGMENT with you yahoos, all you see is:
NIGGER mother
NIGGER father
NIGGER child
NIGGER teacher
NIGGER mailman
NIGGER cashier
NIGGER student
NIGGER preacher
NIGGER doctor
NIGGER neighbor
NIGGER politician (note your treatment of Allen West; note the Tea Party)
Hell, NIGGER mall Santa!
NIGGER _______________ (insert grievance)
The fact remains... you see NIGGER first...
SBPDL proves this with his attack against COLLEGE EDUCATED BLACK WOMEN who are productive members of society. He sees every black person as a NIGGER, unworthy of life.
Even though most of you people are sexually conservative and would not make a fuss over white girls beating up Chris Polis (the criminal with the LONG rap sheet) you just see NIGGER.
You don't care about if blacks carry a republican-conservative-limited government, etc., etc. 'membership card'.
Because it's ALL ABOUT PIGMENT.
Now let's quote Dr. Laura: NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER!
*breathe*
NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER!
Even CEBFs? Really? Wow! God, who's next?
@ AV
Yeah, exactly. Why pointing this out means one is "championing gay rights" is beyond me.
It would be perfectly possible for SBPDL to do a numbered entry titled "Gays" that discusses black attitudes towards gays, and conflict between the gay and black communities, without necessarily championing gay rights.
@ PIGMENT
I am not gay, but you are in idiot. Even if you really aren't Desiree.
I voted against gay marriage in the California election and don't support "gay rights," the repeal of DADT, etc.
However, I don't support bashing their heads in either. I guess this makes me some sort of queer-lover. Dumbass.
@ PIGMENT,
Did you have to breathe into a paper bag after writing that post?
Pigment is ANOTHER nigger who thinks anyone here cares. We don't. We have heard EVERYTHING before. Every excuse, rationalization, everything.
No one cares about you and yours. Your behavior has revealed your feral character.
You need to get together with the Snape's of the world, and lie to each other over and over.
Joe
@ PIGMENT
"They've also beaten up many a young gay; the Brandon Shepherd and Brandon Teena cases, just for quick examples, resulted in DEATH! All of this recent gay teen suicide stuff has occurred in suburbia; last time I checked, black folks weren't allowed in suburbia."
Then you haven't checked in awhile, moron. And who is Brandon Shepherd? The Matthew Shepherd case was perfect because it allowed an easy integration of the black/gay agendas -- not only was it "anti-gay," but the perps were Southern whites. So, it was a perfect opportunity for both groups to pretend to be united against "hate."
Prop 8 knocked a bit hole in this, as will this case. It'll be a Dantean mishmash of aggrieved groups fighting for dominance. Already, both you and Desiree (if you truly are different people) are pre-emptively insisting that it wasn't a hate crime. It'll be interesting to see how much cache the gay activists have in BRA, but I think we already know the answer: the black agenda will always take precedence. Look for lots of increasingly enraged "sit down and shut up" instructions from the blacks on this one.
"Pigment is ANOTHER nigger who thinks anyone here cares. We don't. We have heard EVERYTHING before. Every excuse, rationalization, everything."
Isn't it funny how these guys all say the EXACT SAME THINGS but apparently believe they're saying something new?
What an absolute waste of time.
Of course, trying to get black people to behave like civilized human beings is an even BIGGER waste of time.
Desiree
"Even though most of you people are sexually conservative and would not make a fuss over white girls beating up Chris Polis"
If everything was the same but the colors reversed this would be all over the media.
Hey Paul,
Reading Pigment's recent posts, I had an idea: how about instead of a captcha when people post, a brief IQ test?
That might help.
It's not all "about pigment" you juvenile sounding nitwit. It's got nothing to do with your color, it's about your attitude and your deplorable behavior, loudmouth.
STOP with the ad-hominen already, and address SBPDL's articles directly. Quit pissing & moaning and dissect his articles line by line, sentence by sentence. When you can do that then I'll listen to you, but until then you're just another loud mouth, prideful, arrogant, blow hard.
Refute his facts, debate his commentary; instead you just spout off with your incoherent babbling. If you can't do that then just shut up already, you're wasting precious bandwidth and server space!
To Pigment:
Nice insinuation that SBPDL believs that all blacks are unworthy of life.
You see, unworthy of life has the connotation of "Lebensunwertes Leben", the Nazi term meaning "life unworthy of life".
As we all know, any criticism of Blacks, multiculturalism or diversity leads to the gas chambers, nazis and more guilt.
And we have pigment to remind us of this eternal causality with his adroitly placed use of NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER.
When one talks about race like the proprietor of this blog, we must see his HATE HATE HATE.
I'm a libertarian (more or less, although I am opposed to legalizing obviously distructive activities) and I don't eat at Micky D's.
Also, great site.
Steve in Pittsburgh
I can't believe the degree in which Desiree is completely and utterly obsessed with this blog.
Amazing.
I can see her screaming at the computer screen when SBPDL blocks her long-winded tripe, and can see her snickering in pretentious excitement when her sock-puppet posts are approved, "under the radar".
You're not fooling anyone African - go vomit elsewhere.
Asian immigrant killed by ghetto blacks in St. Louis.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_65d02367-7e58-5589-a0ea-3093541c0a43.html
More proof these wild animals need to be caged.
When blacks and their DWL masters on the progressive plantation bleat about white privilege, it is a ploy to obfuscate reality. What they are desperately trying to prevent whites from realizing, is the arrogant conceit that blacks actually have something worthwhile to exploit.
Snape, you sanctimonious enabler of black disfunction...
Statistical studies have consistently and repeatedly proven that blacks have an IQ one standard deviation below whites.
1) These studies are pre-designed to compensate for both socioeconomic and cultural factors. After adjustment for all such factors (eminently doable because they are already built into the tests), the results reveal the difference in IQ.
2) The results are then successfully used as predictors of status and achievement later in life. They consistently and repeatedly prove that socioeconomic outcomes are the RESULT of IQ.
Try to shake yourself out of the stupor of progressive theories and narratives, and come back to reality. Please tell us, what specific part of this do you not understand?
@#$~!
In my previous post, it should have said "dysfunction", not "disfunction".
That's a guarantee. I'll take the blacks given a choice. Enough of them are decent and enough of them can be taught.
A few years ago at another blog, someone asked me which family I would rather donate money to: a white, working class family whose parents were drunks and whose children were criminals, or an upper-middle class black family, whose parents were professionals and whose children were college graduates. I replied immediately that I would give money to the white family. White misbehavior can be changed, if not in this generation then in the next one, but there is no magic currently known that will turn a black family white. Over time, both families will revert to the mean. That's good for the white family and not great for the blacks.
I also addressed the fact that the black "professionals" were very likely in non-technical fields where they could shuck and jive and pass for competent on the surface, and the fact that even well-to-do blacks despise whites with a smoldering hatred and will always support their ghetto brethren.
So your position on blacks vs gays is both shortsighted and illogical. It's whites who can be taught, not blacks. Ask your "decent" blacks about the profound anti-white nature of black criminality, and I doubt many of them will accept what you have to say; far more likely they'll dismiss you as a racist. Homosexuality is a big problem in this country, but the homosexual can be brought back into the fold. The black is not part of the fold.
A blog post showcasing the anti-homosexual nature ("homophobia" is a propaganda term, like "Islamophobia") of black culture is a far cry from advocating homosexual behavior or excusing the homosexual lifestyle. In fact, it is very important to understand that our enemies are only temporarily united in their hatred of us, and that this alliance was tenuous from the beginning. In many cases they hate each other more than they hate us.
Thanks to every one for commenting. Hope you all had a wonderful Easter.
This Web site is Stuff Black People Don't Like. That's it. We don't talk about anything else, but SBPDL.
I'm blown away by how much this site has grown since it started as a joke almost two years ago in late May 2009.
We are on the verge of publishing our second book, and have SBPDL Year Two in the planning stages.
All we will say is this: homosexual whites lead the charge for gentrification in major cities. This site does not discuss religion or sexual orientation. If you want that, go elsewhere.
We point out facts, that's it.
That's it.
We will never write anything but about SBPDL. No one will dictate what is published here, because we have one clear editorial policy and that is SBPDL.
We do attack DWLs and will begin to attack CEBF and CWP in earnest.
Just remember... this is SBPDL.
Silent Running-
I don't like blacks. I go out of my way to avoid them and I prefer my own kind. However I have never heard such complete and utter bullshit as this:
"A few years ago at another blog, someone asked me which family I would rather donate money to: a white, working class family whose parents were drunks and whose children were criminals, or an upper-middle class black family, whose parents were professionals and whose children were college graduates. I replied immediately that I would give money to the white family."
Blacks who can follow the rules of society are not going to cause problems. Hell, bourgeois blacks despise ghetto negroes. They avoid them like the plague.
As for homosexuals, gays don't want to be straight and actively spurn any attempt to "convert" them, so to speak. A black middle class well-behaved family is much better than a troop of homosexuals. Both of them are not going to commit crimes and one is not going to force their lifestyle down my throat.
I think you may be insane on this one. I hate to agree with Pigment but good is good to me. You're just seeing their skin color. If all colors could follow the traditions and foundations of this country, there would be no problem, regardless of a person's color. I understand your goal of trying to show dissension but SBPDL's post will turn into a "blacks hate gays" thing, which is hypocritical because 2-3rds of his white audience disagree with homosexuality. Including you.
It's fucking hypocritical. I'll read elsewhere if faggotry is trumpeted on this blog; I'm not alone on that one, I guarantee you.
Acronyms.
I have no idea what they mean.
DWL - Dumb White Ladies?
CEBF - Cancer-Eaten Black Female?
CWP - Colored White People?
How about an SPBDL, Microbrews.
Disingenuous White Liberal
College Educated Black Female
Crusading White Pedagogue
Black-Run America... BRA
Look, I'm a pretty normal guy. I started this site as a joke. I've come up with a few terms, nothing more.
But today, watching my young nephew pick up Easter eggs was one of the most humbling experiences ever.
Game on starting tomorrow.
Another negro animal commits senseless murder.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2011/04/24/2011-04-24_couple_arraigned_on_charges_they_stomped_an_elderly_man_to_death_amid_domestic_d.html
Just another isolated event, right?
Speaking of "complete and utter bullshit"...
I hate to agree with Pigment but good is good to me.
That's libertarian thinking. What you call "bullshit" is actually loyalty; loyalty to my own people (rather than mere preference). Regardless of minority behavior, I am staunchly against miscegenation and the establishment of nonwhite colonies on American soil (no matter how peaceful), and for maintaining the country's historic majority. If nonwhites were to peacefully and democratically become the majority and gently steer the country toward their own culture and way of doing things, I would still have a problem with it. And I'm not alone in this, I guarantee you.
Blacks who can follow the rules of society are not going to cause problems. Hell, bourgeois blacks despise ghetto negroes. They avoid them like the plague.
You don't know blacks nearly as well as you think you do. Those blacks who you think are following the rules are agitating for the tribe in the form of grievance lobbies and lawsuits over "racism." And yes, they do excuse ghetto behavior among their own, even if they prefer not to live near the problem. Breaking the law is not the only way to make trouble.
If all colors could follow the traditions and foundations of this country, there would be no problem, regardless of a person's color.
They're never going to, so the point is moot. I'd suggest you learn to accept reality on reality's terms.
It's fucking hypocritical.
I'm not sure you understand the meaning of that word.
I'll read elsewhere if faggotry is trumpeted on this blog; I'm not alone on that one, I guarantee you.
If SBPDL starts to espouse libertarian thinking, he'll lose readers. Since you have just as much a problem with ethnic loyalty being expressed here, it seems he's screwed either way, so you might as well split.
""But today, watching my young nephew pick up Easter eggs was one of the most humbling experiences ever.""
And THAT is what it is all about...
""I'll take the blacks given a choice. Enough of them are decent and enough of them can be taught.""
You can have them.
Taught? That's funny. Hmm we've been trying for over 400 years to teach. How's that working out? Not only that seems to be getting worse not better. On top of that most blacks stick up for their own. Even though the 'good ones' lament the thugs and TNB most of them still circle the wagons around their bruthas.
I'd like to state for the record that I'd never make the claim that black folks can't achieve, that's simply NOT true.
I come from a small Appalachian town with about 2,000 - 3,000 population. The percentage of people in that town that were black was probably about 3-5 percent of the people. I personally know one black that graduated Harvard Law School, and two others that graduated Virginia Tech in computer science, and one more in electrical engineering.
Clearly, given a good learning environment and a chance, many blacks can succeed and excel.
For people to say that blacks can't accomplish is disingenuous and simply not true: Let's give some credit when it's due,or else we look discredited and untruthful.
I've not seen any of them in years and would be curious to see if their attitudes have changed or whether they're still the same people that I remember from my childhood?
Give credit when it's due.
What a shitstorm in these comments!
Anonymous said:
1) These studies are pre-designed to compensate for both socioeconomic and cultural factors. After adjustment for all such factors (eminently doable because they are already built into the tests), the results reveal the difference in IQ.
2) The results are then successfully used as predictors of status and achievement later in life. They consistently and repeatedly prove that socioeconomic outcomes are the RESULT of IQ.
I've said before on this site that I don't question the numbers, in general, but I do question methodology, research goals (the truism is "If ye seek, ye shall find"), and provide context.
That things are allegedly adjusted for socioeconomic and cultural factors does not change the fact that these IQ tests are still written by the dominant culture and are based upon what the dominant culture believes is contributory to relevant IQ.
Bourgeois white society decided something such as IQ could be measured and created a measurement tool to measure what they wanted measured. This is why whites - not surprisingly - are the baseline average. I know blacks have brought this up before on SBPDL's website but such a "coincidence" is worth considering.
*
Sheila:
What gives you the authority to decide whose educational achievement is suspect or not suspect? Was this an arbitrary title you've drummed up in your head? "Sheila - Education Inspector"?
What if I called into question your education? After all, white women have benefitted from affirmative action more so than any other group.
Your presumptions about affirmative action are shallow talking points. Just because any traditional minority - that includes white women - have gotten any position due to affirmative action does not mean they are less qualified.
You'd think people would find that trope useless by now!
Dissident, I will give credit where credit is due, and the credit belongs to White culture that set up that good learning environment. Can blacks set up their own good learning environment? The answer is an obvious and resounding no. They have to leech off Whitey for it. It is folly to think that there is such thing as "good" blacks when they are all the products of White institutions strong-arming them into a way of life that they can never accomplish on their own. What happens when the White dominating culture suffocates and fades? They go back to the jungle in a heart beat.
In fact, thinking that there is such a thing as "good blacks" is the gateway to destruction. It causes people to be more liberal in who they accept in their societies. The result is Detroit, Memphis, St. Louis and every crime-ridden cesspool that has become majority black. Thanks again DWL!
@ Dissident:
And then you go to the Appalachian town I grew up in that had 20K-30K people and it's a microcosm of all the larger towns and cities. Yours is a rare example and not the norm. Too isolated and few in numbers to be a bother. As the black dude in class admitted to me- whenever there's 2 or more black people together there's going to be trouble.
John McClane said...
Asian immigrant killed by ghetto blacks in St. Louis.
http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/article_65d02367-7e58-5589-a0ea-3093541c0a43.html
Well John, Desi/Pigment has said that those that get their asses beat, deserve the beating. I guess this elderly Asian couple must have brought offense to the black youths.
Here's another trainwreck at the intersection of religion and blackness.
A 56-year-old grandmother was arrested on Easter Sunday on charges of aggravated assault, possession of a sawed-off shotgun and possession of a firearm by convicted felon.
According to a Jacksonville Sheriff's Office arrest report, Mary Croft got mad because she wasn't going to be able to take a shower before going to Easter services, and she pointed a gun in her daughter's face. One of the children told police, "Grandma was going to shoot mommy," according to the report.
http://www.news4jax.com/news/27661514/detail.html
Bubo
Yes, I'll agree that my town was an exception. I thought that I'd just state it matter-of-fact for the record.
I'll also agree with anonymous @ 7:07 in that the western/white society is beneficial to anyone that wants to learn and put forth an effort, just as those blacks that I mentioned.
I most definitely am NOT a DWL!
I'm a proud white civil rights activist, and a moderate/conservative, with libertarian leanings and I believe in a strict Constitutional framework, and rule of law society.
I believe in the concept of strict liability, as opposed to limited liability, and swift punishment for those that are clearly guilty.
Not the character traits of a DWL.
@ Snape:
"Bourgeois white society decided something such as IQ could be measured and created a measurement tool to measure what they wanted measured."
I've taken to simply scrolling past Snake's posts, but even so, it's hard not to catch a glimpse of some rhetorical horror. In this case, the above.
PROBLEM: Blacks have been shown to consistently score lower on IQ tests, including tests designed specifically to weed out "cultural bias." While these tests have had incredible predictive success, and been incredibly valuable generally, they dispute the modern conception of "equality."
SOLUTION: Invalidate the entire concept of IQ as a white racist concept. A "bourgeois" white racist construct.
PROBLEM SOLVED!
"Bourgeois white society decided something such as IQ could be measured and created a measurement tool to measure what they wanted measured."
"East Asians average a higher IQ and larger brain than Europeans who average a higher IQ and larger brain than Africans. Further, these group differences are 50–80% heritable. These are facts, not opinions and science must be governed by data. There is no place for the ‘‘moralistic fallacy’’ that reality must conform to our social, political, or ethical desires."
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/2008%20Med%20Hypotheses.pdf
Post a Comment