Sunday, September 21, 2014

"This is for Michael Brown," Scream Two Black Males in St. Louis as they rob Six Elderly Whites

PK NOTE: SBPDL still [really, really] needs your help.

You'll never see this story on CNN.

You'll never even see this story on Fox News. [Gunmen mentions Michael Brown as he robs three couples leaving a restaurant,St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 9-21-14]:
St. Louis Metropolitan Police are investigating an armed robbery of six people who were walking from a restaurant in the 1100 block of Mississippi Avenue at 11:11 p.m. on Saturday.
Police said the three couples, all of them from 59 to 61 years old, had just left a restaurant and were walking north on the west side of Mississippi when they were approached by two men. One of the men pointed a silver gun at the group and demanded their belongings.
After the second man grabbed items from the group, the first man said, "This is for Michael Brown," according to a police account. Both men then fled on foot.
One man was described at thin build about 5-feet-7 inches tall wearing a white tank top and blue jeans with medium length twisted braids armed with a small silver handgun.
The other man also had a thin build and was about 5-feet-8 inches tall, wearing all black clothing and a black ski mask. Both were black men in their early 20s.
Anyone who may have information regarding the armed robberies are asked to call CrimeStoppers anonymously at 866-371-8477.

32 comments:

Anonymous said...

I wonder if authorities have determined if the crime had anything to do with race.

Anonymous said...

Bogolyubski said...

[Thanks for your previous ref: http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2014/9/10/the-dobermans-of-political-correctness ]

"I'm amused by the 'concerned' anons who love to cite Stormfront. It's fairly well-known by most serious folks interested in preserving our race that Stormfront is essentially a honey-pot set up by the usual suspects to ensnare the gullible. Those foolish enough to hang around there get their careers destroyed, or worse."

Roger that. I think dude was outed as an FBI informant or something? If you see a swastika, either it's a honey pot (most likely), or someone with really poor public relations skills. Granted the nazihitlerholocaustoven schtick is growing really stale, but why even bother to help keep it on life support?


"One of the most interesting posts to appear on this site in the past year came out of the blue by someone wryly calling themselves "Shyster" in the wake of the series about the Shelley v. Kraemer ruling abolishing restrictive covenants. The post was basically a blueprint on how one could set up a whites-only neighborhood which could not be destroyed by the feds (maybe). This is the type of thing which needs to be explored in a serious way. It certainly offers more hope than voting over and over for the Adelson-Zuckerberg owned Repukes, whose never fail to thrust the knife into YT's back." September 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM


Thanks for the tip, it's indeed an interesting post. Constructive actions are more important that grousing and wailing. Here it is:

-------------------------------

The Shyster said...

In New York City, there are co-op apartment buildings where you have to submit to interviews, etc. They (resident managers?) control who can buy a unit. Here is my question:

Can somebody build an entire sub-division based on the same concept.

Yes you can. But it would require converting the property to collective ownership and giving up your right to sell to whoever you wanted.

And it isn't just New York City. This is what the Jews do in Israel to prevent Christians and Muslims from moving in.

NYC co-ops and Israeli Jewish housing complexes have committees that vote to decide whether the proposed new resident would be "compatible" with the existing residents. In both cases nothing is written down.

The problem with the Shelley v. Kraemer system using "restrictive covenants" is that the covenants were explicitly racist: the rules said "no blacks", and they were in writing.

In the committee arrangement the Jews use in Israeli Jewish housing complexes and NYC co-ops, they just vote on whether to let somebody new move in, count the votes and [magically!] no blacks, Christians or Muslims are permitted to live there.

You don't have to say WHY you don't want a new resident, you merely vote "no".

Here's how they did it back in 1900-1920: First, the city passes a law that people in a neighborhood can collectively decide to change property rights for everyone in a neighborhood.

Second, everybody in a neighborhood votes in favor of racial covenants.

Third, the property rights (e.g. the right to sell to blacks) are changed for everybody in the neighborhood.

Problem: what if not everyone in an entire neighborhood agrees?

Solution: you establish a threshold of (for example) 80% agreement.

Once you get 80% of the people in a neighborhood to agree, the law passes anyway.


-Beyond Hatred

Anonymous said...


"Shyster", Pt 2:

What happened? Neighborhoods in St. Louis (and many other cities) passed neighborhood property restrictions like the Shelley v. Kraemer restrictive covenants.

It is important to look at what the Supreme Court did NOT say in its Shelley v. Kraemer decision.

The Supreme Court did NOT challenge the right of the cities to pass a law ENABLING restrictive covenants.

The Supreme Court did NOT say that ALL restrictive covenants by neighborhood vote were invalid.

The Supreme Court said was that RACIAL covenants were unenforceable by the courts. Hence you could not sue in court to prevent a black person from buying into the neighborhood based on racially restrictive covenants.

So what CAN we do?

We can pass enabling laws in our cities permitting restrictive covenants by neighborhood.

Under these laws neighborhoods can pass neighborhood rules. The neighborhood rules can require neighborhood committee approval for any new resident -- just be sure that the neighborhood committee rules do not mention race. It is RACIAL rules and RACIAL rules ALONE which the Supreme Court said was wrong.

So, yes, we can do something. But it will require giving up some property rights (the right to sell your property to whoever you like).

The advantage, of course, is that by giving up those property rights, you increase the value of your property. NO panicked selling will ever happen again. No "white flight".

If two or three Negro families are (mistakenly) allowed to move in and they start trashing the neighborhood, the neighborhood committee will naturally recognize the problem and stop voting to approve any additional Negro residents. The neighborhood can "heal" itself. The problem is not change. The problem is the rapid, uncontrolled white flight as everybody scrambles for the exit doors. By establishing a committee to control new residents, this uncontrolled flight and neighborhood destruction can be prevented. August 29, 2014 at 4:36 AM
---------------------------------


-Beyond Hatred

Anonymous said...

I noticed the news story didn't mention the race of the armed robbers.

Bogolyubski said...

Anon:
I wonder if authorities have determined if the crime had anything to do with race.

Now c'mon. Don't tease us. You already know damned well what they're going to say. They probably have a printed cue card that they are ordered to read from if not memorize.

paul marchand said...

fake victimization yields fake justification.

Anonymous said...

As I always do with these stories, I dropped into google maps and I see another area that is not safe for whites. The streetview looks fine but the satellite view shows a huge black housing project just east of the whitened up area. That means you're an idiot if you're white and think you can park your car, walk to a restaurant, and have a nice time without the risk of being murdered. Hopefully 6 whites got a race lesson they sorely needed but since the women weren't raped and no one was murdered, I'm not betting on it.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....A town near by had a fund raiser for a local rancher. Working with horses and cattle does have it's risk. When a horse rolls over on you or you get gored by a bull the people join in to help with medical bills. That's how it is when you live around human beings.

We also had a couple funerals in the last few weeks and there weren't any shoot outs or fights.

Anonymous said...

For local context, the victims were almost certainly leaving 1111 Mississippi which is a very good and popular restaurant.

http://1111-m.com/

The restaurant is located on the edge of Lafayette Square, which is a neighborhood of St. Louis City that is considered one of the urban jewels of the city - populated by wealth professionals and wealthy alternative lifestyle types. I worked with a fellow whose wife was held up in broad daylight there getting out of the car with their infant inside. Quite liberal - didn't faze them. One of the themes we are told in St. Louis is crime is down, and what crime there is limited to the North Side - this is the near south side - very expensive area. Apparently the thugs haven't gotten the message.

Anonymous said...

The black youth's stealing, committing armed robbery on older white people in their heroes name, Michael Brown. I reckon they were too wimpy to simply commit strong arm robbery like their hero.
The mainstream news media will never broadcast the black on white criminal atrocities. On a slow news day, you'll hear of trivial events, more sports and weather news, before they would ever broadcast news of 6 white people being the victim's of armed robbery by 2 black youths.
How many people heard on the news 80 people were shot on the 4th of July weekend in Chicago? Because the media will not cover stories with white victims, I think they're just as guilty of covering up the crime as people who know the perps, but remain silent. It's disgusting what is happening in America.

Anonymous said...

http://www.vdare.com/articles/joyce-carol-oates-scorched-earth-campaign-for-a-nobel-prize


America is drowning in celebrities with no talent. Our music is a collection of third grade lyrics accompanied by over amplified guitars.
I published a fair bit of fiction in the Eighties and early Nineties, but abandoned all hope (and fiction writing) when the Lena Dunhams, ubiquitous and vastly Empowered, made it clear that WMs need not apply . . . for writing gigs, teaching positions, lit awards/publications, or anything else that long, long ago was decided by merit.
Twenty-five years later, the fact that they STILL are feted, sowfully enriched, and (did I mention?) Empowered in every sphere of American life confirms my decision to dump both fiction writing and participation in her corrupt, hate-fueled, and nauseating culture.

Here's the other scoop on Dunham: The black feminists hate the white feminists. (see: solidarityisforwhitewomen) As such, Dunham and her writers got a lot of slack for not portraying blacks in her show. Following this, Jezebel disowned Dunham and the internet went mental. Dunham responded like all good feminists respond in this scenario: she produced her p*ssy pass and played victim: "too many men controlling hollywood", "don't fat shame MEEEE", mocks mra's on snl.

Anonymous said...

Huzzah! The Revolution has begun! If African-Americans can't get justice in our perverted, white-skewed "justice" (more like "just us", am I right?) system, then they will have to go out and get it themselves. It's about time!

Go forth and seek justice, young brothers! Those crackers owe you for 400 years of suffering and rape! Trayvon and Big Mike are smiling down from Heaven.

-A Compassionate Oregonian

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

GREATWHITES,

Should we expect anything less from this race of people?

But when the first White man crime against the protected race say's anything in reference to the Honorable Darrin Wilson CNN will get right on that "Hate Crime".
Just look at the black barbarian that killed four Whites all in the name of islam/black pride. Two "Hate Crimes" in all four of those killings(religious-racial) and we have heard absolutely nothing about them. NOTHING!!!

First thing we change after the fall of America is the Marxist media outlets!

GODSPEED/SEGREGATION NATION!!!

Anonymous said...

Hello fellow SBPDL fans and PK;

First, thanks for all the comments and hard work from everybody. SBPDL, DRUDGE and ZeroHedge are three of my favorite sites. Second, I, like many here will contribute again but it will be cash in an envelope w/o return address, no internet. Third, everyone here must be aware that North, South, East and West, in every square foot of BRA there are those who get it, those who don't and never will and those who will learn the only way most people ever learn, the hard way. In the coming troubles there will be many surprises as to where people wake
up from the DWL nightmare and which places just collapse, it's not always what one anticipates given the current calm before the storm.

It has been said here many times but is worth repeating, our job is to survive the coming meltdown of BRA, not to reform it, an impossible task anyway. The way to survive is to become as self-reliant as possible before the storm breaks. Now is the time to have extra food and the means to cook it stored, to have real money, not just FRNs set aside, to have reliable people to help and whom you can help too. Excellent commenters such as 10 mm Auto have written about protection many times. Of course they are correct, I defer to them on this important subject.

We will have to survive and prevail where we are now. Also, the areas of BRA that will do well are those that are white now regardless of other factors; nogs and mexicans would destroy paradise and YT can make the desert bloom. If possible get yourself to a YT area now even if it isn't a place you would normally consider moving to, time is short.

Our hidden ally is actually BHO himself and his cronies. Before his term is over he will do invaluable service in revealing the truth about BRA and its true agenda through his gross incompetence and dishonesty. When BHO presides over the destruction of the financial system the JIT delivery system will break down. After a while YT will be forced by events to turn from his beloved football and negro affleets in the quest for fuel, food and protection. This is the only thing that will get the attention of YT, that and the possibility of periodic blackouts. This will especially get the feminists in a rage against BHO. When they are hungry, cold, dirty and in the dark they will learn that it's evil YT who brings the magic of electricity to their ungrateful fat asses. Fuck 'em. Oh the humanity !

To our European brethren in S. Africa, Europe etc. the same applies, bad times are coming, be ready. Don't concede one square inch, one square foot, one square yard or one square mile of your countries to the Moslems, nogs etc. It's your country, not theirs.

Anonymous said...

I just don't feel sorry for these "victims". What in the hell were they doing out so late in that part of town. They should have known better. I'd say they were enjoying diversity.

Anonymous said...

"NYC co-ops and Israeli Jewish housing complexes have committees that vote to decide whether the proposed new resident would be "compatible" with the existing residents. In both cases nothing is written down.

The problem with the Shelley v. Kraemer system using "restrictive covenants" is that the covenants were explicitly racist: the rules said "no blacks", and they were in writing."

Sounds good in theory, not workable in the real world. There's a reason the usual suspects can get away with excluding "non-compatible" residents and why YT will find himself in court again when it is shown that his residents aren't diverse enough...

The problem with trying to negotiate the rules is that the powers that be can ignore, change or modify them to suit their interests. Shyster did offer a creative idea, albeit from within the box, and that's its fault.

Anonymous said...

As a followup on Shyster's idea, one can easily see how YT will be thwarted within short order:

The "good negro" strategy is employed with good negroes sent in as prospective residents as part of an "undercover" operation by HUD or some such agency. A pattern of rejection is established when none of the "good negroes" is accepted.

It goes in to court, where it is alleged that YT is discriminating based on race...one of the usual suspects on the bench rules that even though nothing is written down, it is clear that YT is racially discriminating...

Shyster's idea sounds good in theory, but only if the rulers are playing by the rules, way too much to hope for...

D-FENS said...

"Our hidden ally is actually BHO himself and his cronies. Before his term is over he will do invaluable service in revealing the truth about BRA and its true agenda through his gross incompetence and dishonesty."

Bingo!

Ex-Brooklynite said...

@Anon3:48
Sounds good in theory, not workable in the real world. There's a reason the usual suspects can get away with excluding "non-compatible" residents and why YT will find himself in court again when it is shown that his residents aren't diverse enough...

Actually, it already works in the real world. There is a cooperative community of Irish, called Breezy Point. It completely burned in Hurricane sandy. To buy there, you pretty much have to know someone in there. Given that most of the residents are Irish, this keeps out blacks.

That would seem to be the major feature of the place to people around here, but it's not. The community is lower and middle class white, and prices are NOT out of control, this for oceanfront property in New York City. In other words, these whites have found a way to beat the Banksters, who use fiat credit to make people but houses with high mortgages, money that the house purchasers can easily lose if a neighborhood flips.

That's the real threat.

Anonymous said...

I can't get over the fact that the Director of Homeland Security for the United States Of America is named after a Liberian warlord. That in itself shows how utterly f*cked our country has become. You think 'Jeh" gives a black rat's ass about how secure the homeland is?! That's like hiring a KKK lifeguard at a black only beach.

Anonymous said...

a fitting tribute to a fellow robber who died in the line of....duty? and they took it up a notch by using a gun whereas michael brown only used his fists. from strong armed robbery to armed robbery they really gave us a moving tribute to one of america's heroes. i say well done fellas. well done.

Earl Turner said...

Since we are on the subject of housing and who lives where and among whom, this bears repeating.

Support the Obama Regime's efforts to make sure every neighborhood in the country gets its fair share of Diversity™

Why?

Are you kidding me? It's a win-win situation for everyone! Ok not for the Diversity™ of course, because as the saying goes, putting a teaspoon of horse crap into a gallon of vanilla ice cream doesn't improve either.

It's a win because as more people are exposed to True Blackness, more eyes will be opened. Inevitably the spreading of Diversity™ will reach the exclusive communities of the "diversity for thee but not for me" crowd and I call that justice!

Once the "diversity for thee but not for me" crowd starts getting a taste, you can expect some serious reforms to housing assistance.

Anonymous said...

when race of perp is not mentioned, you know the race :)

Anonymous said...

I know Compassionate Oregonian is sarcasm, but I would still kick your ass!!!

Anonymous said...

Too bad grandpa didn't have his CCP. He could have emptied his Glock and said "That was for Perry Renn."

10mm AUTO said...

"This is for Michael Brown."

One thing about the negro, it must justify it criminal acts. Every act is "caused" by something. Outside magic or some unrelated emotional state. Personal responsibility is nearly unknown.

Very short list of excuses for reduced responsibility for murder or prolonged, excruciating torture:

1. "He/she called me a name"
2. "He/she dissed me"
3. "I was doing it for Treyvon/Dr.Dre/Ice-T/MLK/Malcolm-X/Al Sharpton/Louis Farrakhan, etc.
4. I "lost it."
5. "I was Bored"
6. "400 years of slabery"
7. He stole my ......"
8. "It wouldn't stop crying."
9. "It needed punishment."
10. "It broke the playstation"


I am also sorry to report that Shysters idea is unworkable. Already communities and corporations are shaken down by EEOC, HUD and the Office of Civil Rights to destroy YT in ever finer graduations. Remember this quote on the article about AFFH?:

"The goal here then is to continue to prosecute at a high rate incidences deemed proactively segregationist – Donovan touted 25,000 individuals in the past 3 years being paid damages under cases reported to the agency or independently investigated by HUD – but to add in a mandate for diversifying neighborhoods.

The old way was to punish exclusion. The new way is to punish lack of inclusion. HUD wants a more even distribution of blue and green dots in the city and if you are planning a new subdivision or a realtor looking to sign potential buyers up for FHA loans, the dot distribution is something the Obama administration wants you to be mindful of. And your local zoning board, county commission or state real estate licensing bureau ought to be mindful too, since their funding could depend on it."

Donovan-Head of HUD

Any Whitopia would be hammered with as strong a vindictive as possible (fines of $25,000 a day for each day of non-compliance) and then "forgiven" if they accept Section 8 "special needs" families (in other words, the worst of the worst Congolese child soldiers, crack breeders and returning prisoners). The idea is to inflict so much fear on the communities that they will be broken that they will comply without fighting. Keeping you head down and trying to get by is no longer an option. Worse, the politically connected will be able to live in THEIR whitopias (After all, you have to be able to walk to synagogue) and will be able to send their children to private "Special Schools". It is just the Regs (regular folks) who have to have 19 year old 300lbs Jamal Shitrovontaus (Big Shit) Washington sitting next to their 16 year old daughter in High School English class.



Anonymous said...

"Anonymous Ex-Brooklynite said...
@Anon3:48
Sounds good in theory, not workable in the real world. There's a reason the usual suspects can get away with excluding "non-compatible" residents and why YT will find himself in court again when it is shown that his residents aren't diverse enough...

Actually, it already works in the real world. There is a cooperative community of Irish, called Breezy Point. It completely burned in Hurricane sandy. To buy there, you pretty much have to know someone in there. Given that most of the residents are Irish, this keeps out blacks.

That would seem to be the major feature of the place to people around here, but it's not. The community is lower and middle class white, and prices are NOT out of control, this for oceanfront property in New York City. In other words, these whites have found a way to beat the Banksters, who use fiat credit to make people but houses with high mortgages, money that the house purchasers can easily lose if a neighborhood flips.

That's the real threat.

September 22, 2014 at 5:02 AM"

And you leave out the pernicious negro threat immediately to the east of Breezy Point...there are still some White enclaves scattered about the $hitty City, so what?

The point in question is whether communities can create lawful covenants whereby racial criteria are omitted in writing but unofficially enforced through a community "compatibility" provision that will go unchallenged for YT...I think it borders on being Pollyannaish to assume YT would get away with it.

All that's necessary is several "good negroes" to establish a pattern of alleged racial discrimination and the jig will be up...

Whats more, lets not forget the refugee resettlement racket, if home grown diversity cannot be enticed in, just import it from abroad and resettle it where the demography is just too White...

Look for BRA to up the ante, now proving racial discrimination will not be necessary, if the demography of an area, whether it be a small town or an entire state, is overwhelmingly White that will be proof enough of racial discrimination/disparity requiring government action to remedy...the idea that legal contracts unofficially preserving White homogeneity will be permitted, let alone tolerated in BRA is unlikely at best...

Anonymous said...

I have a couple of big feral tomcats who live on my porch, or sit on my front fence posts all day.

That seems to work as well as a "restrictive covenant."

Anonymous said...

I say round up all these lowlife good for nothings and give them jobs...breaking large rocks into tiny ones, using sledgehammers. Lets give them some nice team colors, maybe striped shirts or neon orange, just to make them feel like they're part of a team.

There aren't enough prisons...

Annie Oakley said...

PK, I would there was a way to ignore posts, especially the dumb bitch Compassionate Oregonian. I bet CO lives in a lily white neighborhood and has a Negro or mud fetish. A paycheck whore who is getting his/her paycheck from some liberal think tank or some non-profit that doesn’t do jackshit for the community. Hey when the lights go out asshole and you’re shitting in a bucket, I hope all those evil racist Nazi rednecks pass you by when it’s time for help. Hopefully Bubba will let your car go over a cliff when the roads fall apart.

There was another poster that alluded that people like me (in an earlier article) eat squirrels and don’t wash our hair, as if I’m Ma and Pa Kettle. Another dumb ass I’d like to ignore. Just so you know anonymous pig, I have beautiful long rapunzel hair that my hubby loves, which I do wash daily. And we both WORKED for a living and saved all our lives so that we can eat healthy grass fed beef and free range eggs from a local farm, instead of buying them at Wally World like someone like YOU would. Idiot.

It never ceases to amaze how the little ankle biters constantly berate the south and any rednecks. Having lived and worked in major metropolitan cities for 30 years, I will venture to say city dwellers are the most fucked up, neurotic head cases I’ve ever worked around or lived near. The sitcom the office isn’t far off. Urban scenes are full of insipid little petty twats who for the most part haven’t been laid since Eisenhower who write catty articles on dating but only make love to their hands. Little snits, who have an opinion on everyone and make fun of everyone, but continue to live in a tiny dump that needs a pull chain to flush the loo. Yeah, real quality of life, huh.

I live in the country on a dirt road and its peaceful here. No blacks, no meth heads, no toothless hags, just a few families who are decent human beings who just want to be left alone. Nothing fancy, but wholesome. When it’s the dark of the moon, the stars are magnificent. I can sit on my front porch in the morning and see beautiful red birds, blue jays and other lovely creatures.

As far as the stormfront haters go? Go pound sand anti-whites. SF is a great site. Lots of intelligent, thoughtful people on there. I have many good white friends from that site who are intelligent, articulate, and attractive with beautiful white families.

Anonymous said...

I see that the few remaining white areas on the south side of Chicago are being enriched by the diversity crowd. I went grocery shopping tonight hoping that the majority of brain dead sports fans would be at home worshiping the Bears, but was sadly mistaken when I walked in to see the usual crowd with their NFL jerseys and backwards caps. They were not the worst offenders this time however. I was shocked when I encountered large numbers of blacks engaging in their usual shenanigans i.e. screaming on their blue toofs, harassing the employees with their frivolous complaints, rudely cutting in line, etc. I have been subjected to this behavior my entire life living in northern Illinois so I am accustomed to this, but what happened tonight floored me and forced me to recognize that my beloved neighborhood has fallen and it is now time to get my family out as soon as possible.

Tonight I witnessed their complete disregard for any civilized rules or manners that are expected in the white community. One of the sows rammed directly in to me literally pushing me with no "excuse me" or apology. She was with an entourage of course consisting of her home girls and multiple sprogs. The entire time she was flippantly cussing at the youngest (I am guessing around four years of age) calling her names and shaming her for touching a piece of fruit. Utterly disgusting.

As I mentioned earlier, I am very familiar with these types as I have attended school with them and worked with them, but for some reason tonight, it just hit me like a ton of bricks. I do not know if it is because my husband and I are thinking about having children or if I am just recognizing this more more, but my heart sank when I realized that we were no longer safe in our once Irish neighborhood and it is now time to leave.

At first I was angry and upset about the beast pushing me in the store, but after I returned home, the anger dissipated and the sadness and hopelessness emerged. Is this the way it ends? Everything we have built, all of our customs and culture, our communities, all destroyed by this cancer infecting every aspect of our lives? And what if we are finally able to move out and get away from this epic disaster? What about family and friends that cannot afford to just move away from their neighborhoods? Are they just left to be beaten, raped, robbed, or murdered by these feral creatures? Sorry for the rant. I just cannot contain my despise for the blatant destruction of my own people and community.

Dunnyveg said...

The problem here, along with all other liberal policies, is that traditional morality--i.e., do unto others as you would have them do unto you--has been replaced with a perverted liberal morality defined by three criteria:

1. The act or thought must be of personal benefit to the liberal.

2. The act or thought must make the liberal feel good about himself.

3. The act or thought must not cost the liberal anything personally even if it proves ruinous to everybody else.