Sunday, August 14, 2011

Green Week Starts Tomorrow; Desmond Tutu wants a 'White Tax' in South Africa

Quick note: Captain America and Whiteness is about to be available for purchase (in book form) on Amazon. It wasn't ready for the film, but it is incredibly topical. John Ridley at NPR said Hollywood Superheroes are losing the fight for diversity; in Captain America and Whiteness, you'll find out why that is a great thing.

Plus, you'll get to read an essay on why Frank Castle/The Punisher is the perfect Captain America for the 21st Century. All in all, it was a fun book to write and I'm just sorry it wasn't ready by the 22nd of July (when Captain America: The First Avenger came out). If you're interested, make a donation to the Paypal link in the left-hand corner for $50 or more and I'll send you signed copies of the book and Hollywood in Blackface.

For $75 or more, I'll send all three books (SBPDL: Year One as well) to you signed. I'm working  hard on formatting and editing SBPDL Year Two: 365Black Days of Judging by Content of Character and will have it ready by September 25.

Starting tomorrow, Green Week at SBPDL begins. It's not often you'll read the words sustainability, recycling, birth control, environmentalism, a love of nature, and an overzealous desire to combat "climate change" (we have different take on what that means; stay tuned) with Black people, but this entire week at SBPDL you'll learn about this and much more as we Go Green.

But for now, we must quote a story from South Africa that probably offers a precursor for a future tax in America, if Black-Run America (BRA) continues unabated. Remembering that South Africa already has hyper-Affirmative Action in the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), the universally loved Desmond Tutu has stated a "white tax" needs to passed immediately. That this clown - like the terrorist Mandela - is touted as some hero and a world-class theologian by BRA's sycophants tells me more about their character then his:
Johannesburg - Calls made by Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu for white South African's to be taxed were racist and thoughtless, the Freedom Front Plus said on Saturday.

"It borders on the emotional statements of [ANC Youth League president] Julius Malema and does not contribute to the debate on how to address the country’s economic problems properly," FF Plus spokesperson Anton Alberts said.

Tutu, who spoke at a book launch at the University of Stellenbosch in Cape Town on Thursday evening, said the damage apartheid caused was impossible to escape.

He said white citizens needed to accept the obvious: "You all benefited from apartheid."

"Your children could go to good schools. You lived in smart neighbourhoods. Yet so many of my fellow white citizens become upset when you mention this. Why? Some are crippled by shame and guilt and respond with self-justification or indifference.

"Both attitudes make that we are less than we can be."

The Cape Argus spoke to Tutu after the speech, where he expanded on his wealth tax call.

“There were many in the white community who were ready for this [at the time of the TRC process].

“It could be quite piffling, maybe 1% of their stock exchange holdings. It’s nothing. But it could have helped... maybe building new homes, and that would have been an extraordinary symbol of their readiness.”

Asked whether he was again calling for a “wealth tax”, Tutu said: “That’s what I’m saying.”

He then laughed: “What were you doing in there [the conference centre]? Were you listening?”

Tutu said he hoped whites themselves would “agitate” for it to be imposed upon them.

However Alberts said in a statement it was improper to single out white people as they have contributed disproportionately more to the fiscus than any other group for the past 17 years.

"The request for introspection and a greater moral contribution should instead be addressed to the ANC government itself."

Tutu’s race argument was so much more immoral if taking into account the fact that there were already more than 600 000 poor whites, he said.

"Taxes levied on white people will merely be damaging social cohesion and will not contribute anything toward a sustainable economy."


Is there a study that shows what percentage of taxes white South Africans pay, compared to Black South Africans? For that matter, what percent of white Americans pay taxes compared to Black Americans?

If America were a sane country, we would offer asylum to all white South Africans and relocate them to Detroit, Birmingham, Memphis, Milwaukee and other major cities in need of hard working, innovative and entrepreneurial (drug dealing doesn't count) citizens capable of creating, nurturing, and maintaining an economy. In one year, Detroit would be a world class city again, with thriving schools, a bustling economy and people clamoring to move there. Dilapidated houses would be rebuilt; neglected neighborhoods cleaned up; and graffiti removed, the reminder of the former inhabitants of the city washed away with primer and a fresh coat of paint. 

As if it happens, America is an insane country that grants asylum to Somalians and other Africans from war torn nations and Detroit's leaders have to pay people to move there, as they lack everything - save drug dealers - mentioned in the above paragraph.

Such is life when a concept like BRA governs us all; we already have a "white tax" here that pays for it too!

58 comments:

Anonymous said...

Apartheid needs to make a rapid return.

Anonymous said...

Whenever I hear that charlatan of an Anglican pontificate, I remember a billboard someone in SA once relayed to we Episcopal traditionalists in the States. The Native SA had written "I used to be an Anglican, until I put Tu and tu together."

That about sums it up. The man (midget as he is) is suffering from envy on all counts: his stature, his blackness, his lack of real Episcopal grace, his fallacious communism masquerading as ersatz Christianity, etc. etc.

The saddest part of this, is that he's still alive. Oh, wait. He's black, and in S.A. Never mind..... they haven't descended to devouring their own... yet!

- Fr. John+

Ryu said...

Hell, we've already got a white tax. Affirmative action, section 8, food stamps, crime, the list goes on and on.

I wouldn't be surprised if some whites, like DWLs, agitate and get in line to pay it.

Californian said...

"Your children could go to good schools. You lived in smart neighbourhoods.


1) The good schools and smart neighborhoods exist only because White (and some Asian) people built them. Let us note that prior to Whites coming to SA, there were no schools (or literacy!), nor neighborhoods consisting of permanent structures, nor cities, nor mines, nor power plants, nor hospitals, nor television, nor opportunities for the Tutus to harangue the world. The entire infrastructure of the country was build by White civilization. Why shouldn't Whites then enjoy its benefits?

2) Had White SAers not implemented apartheid, the country would have ended up like Uganda or Zimbabwe (I am not even going to say Nigeria, which at least had some level of sophistication pre-colonial times). Whites were a small minority. There was no way they could have brought the benefits of civilization to the black majority by simply opening up the schoolrooms to millions of members of pre-literate tribesmen/women. Especially when the various ethnicities of SA (Xhosa, Zulus, etc.,) were constantly at each others' throats (one reason for the current high murder rate, by the way).

3) Tutu and black SAers all benefit from apartheid. It gave them the highest standard of living in sub-Saharan Africa as well as a global forum from which they could get the support of the usual useful idiots in the West. What would Tutu have been had it not been for apartheid? Think he would be a high ranking churchman and global media celebrity? Imagine some alternative universe in which big bad ol' apartheid did not exist. Then think of where Tutu would be in it.

All this is one more reason why you can never, ever surrender power. Blacks in the rainbow nation of SA do not want equality. They want supremacy. And it looks like they are borrowing a page or three from the American race hustlers to further subjugate Whites. When the Tutus of SA get their way, they will have driven out the Whites and then they will be sitting among the ruins of a once first world country begging for foreign aid.

Indianapolis said...

I wonder of Tutu is willing to donate the proceeds from his book to poor blacks in S Africa.

Anonymous said...

Tutu said he hoped whites themselves would “agitate” for it to be imposed upon them.


Tells you what they think of us

submerged said...

Can Whiteys avoid the tax if they just give away their TV right to the blacks?


http://www.macon.com/2011/08/14/1665076/wpga-adds-black-focused-programs.html#disqus_thread

Anonymous said...

Uuuhhh, Desmond? I'll let you in on a little secret here ... the reason those schools were so good and those neighborhoods were so "smart" is that they didn't have any ....


(wait for it)





...NIGGERS!!!!

Dissident said...

I just saw an article in Outside magazine lamenting the fact that the wilderness needs to be more "diverse"!

Just thought to myself, that this is the PC crowds way of destroying what little solitude, what little serenity that white people have in this world. Yep! Since white flight has become so prevalent and pervasive then we'll take it it those whites wherever they're at.

Maybe Mars?

.....I forgot we've had to cancel space exploration to pay for Shaweeka's 6 kids!

I'll just crawl back into cyberspace then, and HOPE that I can find some peace of mind?

Anonymous said...

I'm one of the white south africans stuck in this whole mess and it's decidedly worrying. I understand that apartheid was a horrendous atrocity, and I whole-heartedly agree that it should have been abolished as soon as it started. I also agree that there should have been a period of adjustment during which an equal footing was established. But it's been going on for 17 years now, and there are calls for BEE to be re-evaluated and re-enforced 'because it wasn't effective enough'. Instead of uplifting people (black and otherwise) by providing decent education, social upliftment and job opportunities, the plan of action essentially just involved weighing down the white populace and replacing them with black counterparts. This is highly unfair to both parties, because we now have a situation where highly unqualified people cause lots of damage in organizations because they are assigned positions based on race rather than skill. A few months later they are fired, and another unqualified person takes their place based on racial profiles. I can honestly say that neither I nor any of the white people in my social circles mind working for any particular race or gender as long as that person has the skills and experience to deserve that position. Cultural or racial background shouldn't have a place in the business world, just skill, hard work and respect. A ludicrous system has been established in which policies such as BEE and race-restricted business practices, which are in direct contradiction to our constitution, are commonplace occurences. Furthermore, we have an average corruption rate of around 70% (I'm not even joking), and leaders who subcontract millions in government funds back into their own businesses. Wouldn't that be a more immediate concern than taxing a generation that wasn't even involved in apartheid? I'm 28, I was 11 when apartheid ended. And the other thing people forget is that many whites opposed racial discrimination, to the point of being imprisoned, but that doesn't exempt them from still being punished now. Also, keep in mind that whites form 9% of the south african population. In a democracy, total equality should be the goal, regardless of race, religion, or gender.

Anonymous said...

Tutu should be looking at it the other way,seeing that blacks payed hardly any taxes or contrbutions for two hundred years,apparently the majority didnt have jobs (were told),then isnt it time they DID now,

chuck said...

Here in Kansas City, the Black Mayor went to one of the few remaining viable tax base shopping areas, the Plaza, to address the ongoing mob violence this last Sat night.

SHOTS RING OUT!!! The mayor is trampled by a chaotic mob of African Americans and 3 people are shot.

Perfect.

Just perfect.

MrGJG said...

I like your idea about White South Africans relocating to Detroit.
The beauty of it is they wouldn't feel homesick.
They could even change the name to Johannesburg North to make them feel more at home.

chuck said...

Here is a comment I posted on a local blog in Kansas City. Its just my opinion.


chuck 09:50:25 AM - Sun. Aug 14. 2011

As reasonable people all over the United Staes re think the benefits of Plessy V Ferguson, it is way past time, to seek insight, guidance and sit at the feet of more evolved and realistic Oracles.

Its time to look at this African American heart of darkness and teh concomitant violence that rides into our cities and destroys, like black locusts everything in its path and resolve to rake for that heart, and stake that heart dead.

Stand by for sickening, sychophantic, superscillious shit from the 4th estate nationally, and the Kansas City Star locally which will place blame on, no "Nite Hoops", or "White Racism", or "disadvantaged youth" and pay homage and seek comments from African American community leaders, who have no more hope of stemming this tide of violence than our mayor did last night as he was trampled underneath the atavistic, chaotic mob of animals who are emblematic of a growing racial African American antipathy.

Listen for the usual calls for communication and understanding in the face of incessant violence, stupidity and high crime. Endure the 2nd partying of the blame, and exculpatory paens to 60 years old civil rights struggles which are galactically removed and have nothing to do with the African American murder, rape and theft that is tacitly condoned by our politicians, law makers and media every day.

African American mobs all across the nation commit hate crimes on a weekly basis, while individual African Americans inflict hate crimes on white people hourly. This African American penchant for wanton violence and lawlessness drives whites from cities, and leaves burnt out, "Thunderdome" neighborhoods which are ruled by feral thugs and crooked politicians.

As the African American undertow, reaches yet more suburban neighborhoods, whites flee and reconstitute new barbicans to repel the barbarians. Outside the walls, howling for more tribute in the form of misdirected and pernicious social engineering laws and programs to support African American dystopia, the increasing crescendo of chaos is matched by the 4th estate's calls for more Rainbow Down A Rat Hole cash for the very scum they refuse to report honestly on to the very folks they purport to inform.

Here is more bad news.

This ungovernable, uneducatable, unrepentant mob of "Dissadvantaged Youth" is beyond help of any kind. Their parents their grandparents and the horde of coming "baby mammas", and "baby daddys" will fill our streets with ignorant, violent thugs whose skills will consist of texting, cell phone use, 2nd grade rhymes and an evermore sophisticated ability for mayhem. Trillions have been squandered on programs designed to promote and elevate African Americans into jobs and positions that they are under qualified for, and compensate them unfairly at the expense of the rest of the populace.

The results of these efforts, are seen in our fair city last night, and in all major cities throughout the nation on a regualr basis.

There is one thing, one concept, one path to a solution of these problems.

Bloody constraint.

These animals, and animals they are, are modestly qualified to dress tehmselves and feed themselves (On your dime).

End the war on drugs and clear out the prisons to make room for violent offenders.

Incarcerate early and often, for extended periods of time, those violent offenders and leave them there to rot.

End social programs that encourage a lack of personal responsibility and reward a lack of accomplishment.

Its ok if people starve in the streets. We, as a nation, can no longer afford to prop up a phony black middle class, or their misanthropic, violent offspring.

Aquire a conceal and carry permit.

Shoot to kill.

logansix said...

Agenda 21 is population control.

I'm sure someone will figure out how the Georgia Guidestones fit into the plan somehow.

Anonymous said...

"I understand that apartheid was a horrendous atrocity"

No.

It wasn't.

It kept whites safe from negroes.

MrGJG said...

"I'm one of the white south africans stuck in this whole mess and it's decidedly worrying. I understand that apartheid was a horrendous atrocity, and I whole-heartedly agree that it should have been abolished as soon as it started."

My condolences on your plight.
I'm surprised you as a SAer doesn't realize apartheid was a necessary "evil".
You seem to believe that apartheid is the cause of today's black inadequacy.
The reality is, if not for apartheid, SA would never have become the shining city on a hill.

You seem to suffer from white guilt, which I guess is understandable after decades of unrelenting condemnation from the entire world.
You and yours did nothing wrong.

Anonymous said...

Could someone refer me to some reading, preferably online, about what apartheid was really about? I want to know what really happened. Dont want to use websites like WIKI because it will probably not be the real story.
Any help is appreciated.

-Canis Lupus

Baldowl said...

Chuck, I applaud you! A standing ovation right here in my office. Those sentiments need to be repeated, and often, all over the internet and, more importantly, out loud in public. The time to stand idly by as our society and civilization are ravaged by these beasts is over. They've had their chances, more than they deserved.

NW European said...

Whites in South Africa will never have a chance of changing the rules now that majority rule has been introduced there. There are over 40 million blacks to what, 3.5 million whites? What on EARTH made them think they would get fair treatment? Apartheid was immoral, but only because it was segregation through laws, not private regulations. Apartheid had to go, but to replace it with majority rule is like taking your hand out of the hot water and putting it in lava. White South Africans will in the near future have to fight to keep what little is left of their rights, and before long, their very lives. Just listen to what their black leaders are saying, "Kill the boer, shoot the farmer". These, and other such statements are typical wind-ups to good ol' fashioned African style genocide. Blood will run in SA, whites need to get ready.

Apartheid is no excuse for the way that country is run. The system was immoral, but so is majority rule, and the latter is FAR worse in terms of quality of life for almost everybody. What is needed, and I hope you'll still allow my advocating capitalism here Paul, is a system of laws that punish criminals properly, and let private citizens free to regulate themselves. In such a society every thug, rapist, murderer and thief would be under lock and key, and the rest of society would associate freely under protection of the government, even if it means some communities would be for whites only. These communities exist even today in small numbers, and they flourish, most notably Oranje in SA.

The state of the world today, the western world that is, is dismal. Post WW2 generations have turned our civilization from a forward looking, bold and adventurous white-male-dominated system of production and trade, to a sniveling, introvert, emotion-ridden, white-feminist-dominated crusade to distribute the immense power of production and trade from free men to the rest of society, and even to the whole world. I said power and not wealth, but the two go together, which is why government is involved in the economy. If the two were separate, if government was ONLY concerned with security, domestic and foreign, and private citizens were left completely free, SA wouldn't have any of the problems they have today, and blacks would be infinitely better off. The same goes for the USA and every other country as well, but for that to happen we need to be able to stand up and and accept that people are different, and that some people will never be fighter pilots, or CEO of a fortune 500 company, same as some people will never travel the world, or go scuba diving or mountain climbing. It doesn't matter if it's because of fear, ability(IQ) or lack of interest, the point is that people are different, and we need this to be more widely accepted, and we need to stop trying to make everybody and everything equal. These goons that run SA have a handy excuse so long as white people still exist, they can simply point the finger and say "they have more wealth, we need to tax them". The correct response is "this is how we want to live, create your own damn wealth if you want it". I don't think anybody should make any excuses as to WHY they have more, every time someone does it legitimizes the claim that they should be taxed.

NW European said...

Continued.

SA is a country with HUGE differences in wealth among citizens, and we all know the reasons for this, and yet nobody can stand up and point to these 100% NATURAL reasons without being yelled down with calls of racism, being socially ostracized, and possibly losing their job, only to make a pathetic apology to every black person on the planet just to get back in. Differences NEED to be recognized, all differences, including IQ, and sane policies that take these differences into account, like separation of state and economy, need to be implemented.

I've said it before Paul, and I understand completely if you don't want me advocating on your blog. I enjoy reading your posts, they constitute a sorely missed piece of the news picture that the MSM paints. The internet will save the west I believe, because here we can (for now) exchange ideas freely. We need to gather the threads, piece together a more accurate picture of the world, not the narrative the MSM gives, no SHOVES down our throats (like that bitch from the other post about the London riots), but winding up a lot of anger isn't going to do much if a goal isn't stated, and a direction given. If the white masses decide to "solve the problem" we might see a civil war before a massive and bloody repatriation occurs. Some people want that, some people want segregation by law, like Jim Crow or Apartheid. I think those days are behind us, we need a modern social system that doesn't discriminate individuals, but keeps criminals in check, and that accepts and RESPECTS diffences between peoples and races. The system of capitalism is the way to go because is fosters peace, and avoids large scale repatriation and war. Go private, let the state be local and let the different people of the world flourish in different ways. We are all different, and should be respected as such. Equality is what will eventually kill us if we let it go to far.

Anonymous said...

Once upon a time there was a productive part of Africa home to 1 million whites and 3 million blacks. Now there are 3 million whites and 35 million blacks and if the whites are forced to leave the blacks will starve.

Anonymous said...

"Could someone refer me to some reading, preferably online, about what apartheid was really about? I want to know what really happened. Dont want to use websites like WIKI because it will probably not be the real story."


Do you want the 'real story' or the whitewash, pardon the pun? LOL.

Wednesday said...

He said white citizens needed to accept the obvious: "You all benefited from apartheid."

"Your children could go to good schools. You lived in smart neighbourhoods. Yet so many of my fellow white citizens become upset when you mention this. Why?"

Dear Desmond Tutu,

Whites could go to good schools because they made them. Whites are intelligent. Whites could live in smart neighborhoods because they built them. Whites are industrious.

Pre-contact Africa never produced a written language nor architecture beyond mud huts. Most settlements were temporary anyway, as agriculture was likewise unheard of & settlements were frequently targets of raiding mobs of cannibals & slavers.

Whites don't want to mention the benefit of apartheid, because keeping feral Blacks from destroying everything is the only way to make civilization. Now we watch as South Africa descends into its natural state of savagery.

Sincerely,
The Civilized World

10mm AUTO said...

"Could someone refer me to some reading, preferably online, about what apartheid was really about? I want to know what really happened. Dont want to use websites like WIKI because it will probably not be the real story."


"Do you want the 'real story' or the Blackwash, pardon the pun? LOL."

Let me sum it up. "Da YT bez oppressing and sheet so we killed them. Please send food, mudderfukker."

Remember Rhodesia.

Anonymous said...

@canis lupus. Re apartheid description, just read a good one here. Short but very informative.

http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-bad-was-apartheid.html

Anonymous said...

Promoting white flight from South Africa to Detroit...pure genius, Paul. Inspired.

One question - would the whites moving to the United States (again, awesome) become "African-Americans?" Nah - blacks in America seem to hate immigrants from Africa.

We're Soooo White! Thank God! said...

THAT LONG CRY OF HELP: pathos for blacks only; whites not allowed to complain about suffering the destruction of their White Privilege- they can't call it suffering when they are atoning for the sins of segregation, when they are just "doing the right thing."

AND NO COMPLAINTS ALLOWED FROM WHITEY!


See what the White Ga. Taxpayers are funding with their White Privilege Tax:


Creativity and Equity: The Hidden Treasure in the Legacy of Dr. E. Paul Torrance, UGA Alumni Foundation Distinguished Professor Emeritus (Call Number: 52909)
Tuesday 12:30 - 1:45, Aderhold Hall (1060), Room 206
For decades at UGA, Dr. E. Paul Torrance’s scholarship on creativity responded to the long and loud cry for help by culturally diverse and low-income students to identify and develop their gifts and talents. During segregation, when it was professionally unpopular and personally threatening, Dr. Torrance championed a critical line of research and thought that interrogated biases of researchers, educators, policy makers, and others against students of color, particularly Black students. With a heart of compassion and the courage and determination of a warrior, Dr. Torrance rejected the accepted notion that culturally diverse students, namely Black students, were intellectually inferior to White students. From a social justice perspective, Dr. Torrance found that traditional conceptualizations of intelligence were biased and failed to adequately consider an important dimension of ability—creativity. This seminar will engage students in contemporary discussions of Dr. Torrance’s pioneering research, teaching and service on creativity and equity.


Instructor Information
Tarek C. Grantham, Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology
Tarek C. Grantham, Ph.D., is an associate professor, teaching graduate courses in the Gifted and Creative Education Program. He is an alumnus of the University of Virginia. Dr. Grantham’s research focuses on recruitment and retention of culturally diverse youth in advanced programs. Dr. Grantham’s co-edited book, Gifted and Advanced Black Students in Schools, will be released in 2011. He has served on the Education Commission for the National Association for Gifted Children.

https://fyo.uga.edu/BrowseSearchMain.aspx

Overcoming Stigmas: Workforce Development of the 21st Century (Call Number: 36574)
Tuesday, 09:30 AM-10:45 AM, Baldwin Hall (0050), Room 0101B
Cultural value systems are uniquely defined across the globe, relying on mutually defining terms. These determine cultural attitudes of acceptance or ostracism. Focusing on social stigmas allows individuals to understand how value systems affect our most intimate senses of self and inform the way we communicate and engage with people who we perceive as different. A central theme that has emerged in the organizational literature in corporate settings is the difficulties members of minority groups experience gaining significant and instrumental support in the workplace. This course will analyze theory and cases of stigmatized groups and what minorities can do to overcome such barriers in the workforce. Advocacy to empower devalued groups will be examined. Since stigmas change over time, strategies for fostering effecting change will also be explored. The changing population of America requires us to explore the impact on career development of these minorities, and what managers can do to support those perceived as “different.”


Instructor Information
Rodney Lee Parks, Vice President for Instruction
Engaging students to critically reflect on current events and social problems facilitates a Transformative Learning environment that challenges them as well as myself. I specifically focus my teaching efforts on the changing population dynamics of U.S. culture. Issues of diversity and social justice are not only talked about in my classroom, but rather internalized from a “walk in another person's shoes" perspective.

Anonymous said...

I remember a documentary about gangs. This particular episode was about gangs in South Africa. They called themselves the "Americans". They complained that things were better when apartheid was in effect. Now, they say things are worse for them.

-Canis lupus

Californian said...

Could someone refer me to some reading, preferably online, about what apartheid was really about? I want to know what really happened. Dont want to use websites like WIKI because it will probably not be the real story.
Any help is appreciated.


There used to be a really good if irreverent website called "South Africa Sucks" but alas, it got shut down. They posted many articles giving the White point of view on apartheid and the nature of the current rainbow nation of SA.

Arthur Kemp has done some intelligent commentary on apartheid. His point was that it was unworkable in the end as black numbers swamped Whites, and the only real solution was geographical separation of the two races.

http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/the-lie-of-apartheid-and-other-true-stories-from-southern-africa/6029216


His website is currently "down" but there is a copy of one of his essays at:


http://www.boerevryheid.co.za/forums/showthread.php?2347-Apartheid-interresate-stukkie!

Californian said...

I'm one of the white south africans stuck in this whole mess and it's decidedly worrying. ... there are calls for BEE to be re-evaluated and re-enforced 'because it wasn't effective enough'. Instead of uplifting people (black and otherwise) by providing decent education, social upliftment and job opportunities, the plan of action essentially just involved weighing down the white populace and replacing them with black counterparts. ... Furthermore, we have an average corruption rate of around 70% (I'm not even joking), and leaders who subcontract millions in government funds back into their own businesses. ... In a democracy, total equality should be the goal, regardless of race, religion, or gender.

These are noble sentiments, but sub-Saharan Africans do not quite seem to share them. They appear to want countries in which they or their tribe/ethnicity dominates. They use the myth of apartheid as a justification to loot and dispossess White people...just as in the USA the race hustlers use slavery-segregation as an excuse to exploit White Americans.

The point of affirmative action is not to provide uplifting or equality, it is to displace Whites. All the fine slogans are simply a mask for a power struggle, and it is a one sided struggle which only blacks seem to be waging. Then you toss in the black on White crime rate and farm attacks, and it all comes down to low level ethnic cleansing.

The affirmative action, corruption, and violence in the new SA are similar to to what we have experienced in the USA for the last several decades. The civil rights movement promised equality and an end to race based policies, but it simply exchanged the old pro-White system with a new anti-White regime. Consider how that even though Whites are a majority in the USA, there is very little in the way of serious challenge to the system. It's pointless to appeal to the race hustlers about "content of character" because they could care less about such things; they are interested in maintaining their own power and income. And let me note that some of the worst race hustlers are white liberals who have made rackets out of playing off minorities against the majority.

You need to drop the expectation that appealing to principles of equality will get anywhere. You have to see yourself in a struggle in which the issues are dominance and survival. It's something that all Western peoples have to recognize. Fortunately, we have the internet as an "underground."

Stay in commo with others of like mind, keep your eyes open, and be strong.

--Californian

suffering from NAACP thuggery said...

When blacks see an opening to further their gains against our White Privilege, they'll team up with the illegals, even when it's against the best interest of working class black. BRA is getting worse and worse for White Humanity.


"The good news is that Alabama and Arizona are still immigration policy outliers. While legislators in at least twenty-four states filed Arizona-like legislation this year, just five—Alabama, Utah, Georgia, South Carolina and Indiana—passed watered-down versions of SB 1070. In many states—Georgia, Alabama, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Nebraska and, most triumphantly, Mississippi—the threat of a viral SB 1070 has engendered and strengthened coalitions between immigrant supporters and African-American elected leaders who have played visible, pivotal roles in opposing, softening and defeating Arizona copycats."

http://www.thenation.com/article/162694/new-kind-southern-strategy

Anonymous said...

Will you allow your White daughter to suffer the Diversity Audit?

Now, White privilege is taxed by auditing school coursed for not "reflecting diversity".

If your daughter doesn't "reflect diversity" in her choices for boyfriends, what do you think her future will be? What will it be if she does?

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=417075&c=1

The need to reflect "diversity" in course content might seem obvious in the arts and humanities, but a new report from the National Union of Students argues that it is also essential in other areas, such as science, mathematics and engineering.

guilty as charged said...

Can we get a credit on our White privilege tax bill if we attend a viewing of this movie and then agree that "we are beginning the long overdue, painful, but necessary process of racial healing"?

http://www.flcourier.com/flnation/5890--documentary-on-white-slave-trading-family-spurs-racial-healing-


SPBDL: hearing White Humanity say in unison "HELL NO!" when the tax bill comes due!

Anonymous said...

The rich Whiteys in The ATL (nigtown) can't wait for Tutu's daughter to come and soften them up for the final assault on their White privileges.


http://goo.gl/vP1pV

Anonymous said...

This is how we forget to pay our White privilege tax bill-


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wQQEkhYGG0&feature=related

Reformed said...

Every so-called Great Society Program has been a White Privilege Tax. Blacks are more likely to be on every form of welfare than Whites and in many cases, like food stamps, are near enough equal in overall numbers despite being 12-15 percent of the population as compared to 60 some odd percent of the population. Section 8, federal jobs like Postal work and the military by and large, Affirmative Action in college admission and on the job, its all the White Privilege Tax.

Anonymous said...

News from Black Ruled Atlanta of the Apes (ATLnigtown):


The black run Atlanta Police Dept. has been negligent in keeping its officers' certifications current, causing multiple criminals cases to risk being thrown out.

Warning to Whitey Atlanta- if you stay in Atlanta, you will suffer the fate of South Africans, White South Africans.

Julie Love, Brittney Watts, the APS cheating scandal, and now this.

If you are White, STAY AWAY FROM ATLANTA- you'd be safer in New Orleans or Detriot.

White Privilege Atlanta Taxpayers are ripped off every day, and now the proof is there for all to see.

But don't stereotype nigATL, because that would make Jesus MLK to "feel pain in his heart".

Black must be protected from ever having one of their Civil Rights icons embarrassed by the total failure of black to ever become Europeans.

Anonymous said...

I'll slightly disagree with you on the issue of food stamps, lots of Whites use them including a good chunk of lily White Kentucky. Its one program that is pretty colorblind.

As for the topic at hand, if its possible for them the remaining White people need to get the heck out of SA. Sooner than later, they will be genocide against them and while most of them will put up a good fight, quantity has a quality all its own. Also the rest of the White world will benefit from them being in it.

As for Apartheid being a bad thing, I agree for a whole different reason. Its fairly stupid to take someones land and than decide to use them as a cheap labor. It degrades your own less smart members and leaves the people you displaced resentful and hungry to get back what they feel they lost.

Had the US not been fortunate enough to been able to basically wipe out 95% of the Amerinds, we'd have all manner of troubles now.

And yes the genocide of WW2, the hunger of the capitalist system for more cogs and of course the risk of global nuclear extirpation of the human race has uhm colored our views on this issue but if you study history you learn one thing

Its best if taking the lands of a race or culture too different than yours to wipe them out as much as possible instead of trying to exploit them. It will save you trouble in the long run.

Anonymous said...

These are noble sentiments, but sub-Saharan Africans do not quite seem to share them. They appear to want countries in which they or their tribe/ethnicity dominates. They use the myth of apartheid as a justification to loot and dispossess White people...just as in the USA the race hustlers use slavery-segregation as an excuse to exploit White Americans.

The point of affirmative action is not to provide uplifting or equality, it is to displace Whites.


White devils be gomne! Go whitey go!

Excuse me mister nice white guy could you give us some food as we do not know how to grow it.

(Nature b raycis'n'sheeit)

Marc B said...

"PWJs have tried to control the narrative of Flash Mobs in America, but it's too late."

The more bold their lie, the more aware the population realizes that the press and prosecution are working as PR agents for BRA. Just read the comments section of any one of these mahogany mob stories posted online just in case you doubt mainstream White Americans are waking up. The press is further soiling their already awful reputation by their dishonest reportage of these events.

Anonymous said...

Anon at 2:26 PM is Desiree, she can't restrain herself from reverting to her standard negro talking points, she's terribly predictable. Plus, she obviously knows nothing whatsoever about the history of South Africa.

Desiree, please pay attention...

You are entitled to your opinions, and even though not a single person here agrees with you, no one is trying to change your mind about anything. In fact, you are encouraged to continue believing whatever it is you believe.

Please have the common courtesy to show the same respect in return.

You are like a broken record, repeatedly posting the same tired, unoriginal negro talking points. No one is interested in your long-winded diarrhea, no one listens to anything you say, and in fact, everyone here dismisses everything you write.

The fact that you waste weeks/months/years of your life arguing with people who collectively think that you're a racist imbecile strongly suggests that you have a low IQ.

Anonymous said...

"1) The good schools and smart neighborhoods exist only because White (and some Asian) people built them. Let us note that prior to Whites coming to SA, there were no schools (or literacy!), nor neighborhoods consisting of permanent structures, nor cities, nor mines, nor power plants, nor hospitals, nor television, nor opportunities for the Tutus to harangue the world. The entire infrastructure of the country was build by White civilization. Why shouldn't Whites then enjoy its benefits?"

The ~30 thousand dutch colonists did not take over a nation of millions of blacks, there would not be anyone living there at all had they not landed in South Africa.

Anonymous said...

"I understand that apartheid was a horrendous atrocity"

What happened during the boer wars with the worlds first concentration camp was a horrendous atrocity. Apartheid doesn't rate.

AnalogMan said...

Anon Aug 15 3:11 "I'm one of the white south africans ..."

This is a sad example of the new generation of South Africans. They internalise the propaganda of the criminal black government and its allies among the traitorous white liberals. It's a form of Stockholm Syndrome combined with a necessity to go along to get along.

When I talk to young SA's, and tell them, "This is not how things used to be; this is not the way it ought to be", they reply that it's all they've ever known, and so to them it's normal. But it's so tragically much less that it should have been.

Listen to me, anon. I was there. We built a first-world colony in a third-world continent. We allowed the traitor FW de Klerk to throw it all away in the name of "justice" and "human rights". That was not the deal, but that's how it played out. Now SA is gone, Britain is dead, America is in critical condition and may not survive. To hell with justice, survival is the highest moral imperative. We owe justice to nobody but our own, especially when we are under attack by the others.

Africa is heading for catastrophe. Thirty years ago, the whole world sang "We are the world" and donated money to save 36 million starving Ethiopians. Result: now we have 80 million starving Ethiopians. When the charity runs out, we will have hundreds of millions of starving Africans. Daar kom kak.

Things are ramping up, the tempo is quickening, and there will be an explosion (Deo Volente). Try to hang on to your pride, learn who the enemy is, and keep your powder dry. You are wearing your uniform, even when you're naked.

And thanks to our American friends for the offer of Detroit. We'll have to think about that and get back to you.

Quarantine Africa!

Anonymous said...

I find it interesting that tutu wants to tax the whites but at the rate that the whites are being murdered in south africa since the end of apartid approx 30,000 soon there will be no whites left to tax tutu is nothing but a anti white communist

Black people said...

Dear White People,


Question: why is it more important for blacks to feel pity/sympathy/empathy for white South Africans and white Zimbabweans who are trying to keep and/or defend their homesteads than for whites to feel pity/sympathy/empathy for black South Africans and Zimbabweans who were displaced (and, as a result, radicalized) on their own homelands and cloistered into shantytowns because of the color of their skin?

Please explain this to me without answering a question with a question because I always thought that--given the course of human history and understanding Newton's Third Law--when people are violated and subjugated, they tend to fight back (e.g. the French Revolution, the American Revolution, several Indian uprisings, various Civil Wars across the globe....)


Question 2: why are you surprised?


Love,
Black People

Anonymous said...

Black People,

It's more important for Blacks to feel empathy for white south Africans because they provided you with the highest quality of life of any Sub Saharan African nation.

We're not surprised. Just as the African proverb says "The child hates the parent who gives him everything" Now that whites have surrendered power and given you the fruits of their labor, you hate them even more.

Anonymous said...

"Please explain this to me"

Fuck you, you disingenuous piece of shit, take your false analogy and shove it up your ass.

Whites VOLUNTARILY surrendered power in order to allow blacks to participate in democracy, and they are being repaid for this act of humanity/kindness by being murdered.

Whites BUILT a nation...a wealthy nation, with a high quality of life.

Negroes have DESTROYED a nation.

Murdering and/or displacing whites has NOT improved black quality of life, it has made it worse. South Africa is now another negro third-world shithole, leading the planet in murder, rape, and AIDS. Your question is so fucking stupid it boggles the imagination.

Am I surprised that the negro feels a sense of accomplishment at successfully slicing his own throat?

Not at all.

Anonymous said...

South Africa had the safest and most plentiful Goldmine in the entire world, up until the end of apartheid.

After apartheid, they started replacing the white workers with blacks, and soon the massive machines stopped and went into disrepair.

Now they pull gold out in buckets, climbing a 400 foot ladder and hoping they don't fall to their death.

And they've just sold the goldmine to the Chinese.

The Chinese don't view black people as humans. You can easily assume how they will treat their black "employees"

Black people said...

It's more important for Blacks to feel empathy for white south Africans because they provided you with the highest quality of life of any Sub Saharan African nation.

We're not surprised. Just as the African proverb says "The child hates the parent who gives him everything" Now that whites have surrendered power and given you the fruits of their labor, you hate them even more.



I would agree with you if this were true but it isn't. Why?

Because blacks were cloistered into shantytowns and couldn't move around their ancestral lands without papers under white people's system of Apartheid. They were never the 'child given everything' under Apartheid. It's history revisionism to think as such.

Do you think anti-Apartheid activists wanted to end that system because they didn't want Africans to be gluttons (as in your proverb), or because they didn't want Africans treated like prisoners and interlopers on their own ancestral lands? I believe the latter is in accordance with history.

When you have black South Africans not being able to benefit from what the whites allegedly brought to the table until after the whites were forced to expectedly share what had been developed with the resources and wealth of the ancestral land of the Africans, is it really a surprise you have a radicalized segment of blacks?

And this was the point of the question. Please take note of historical events; the colonization of white people on and the displacement of Indians from American Indian land parallels with all of this nicely. Also, I noticed you avoided explaining why white people shouldn't feel pity/sympathy/empathy for the black Africans who were displaced and forced into shantytowns, which, in turn, radicalized them.

I'm starting to think white people aren't very smart, just extremely emotional.


Whites VOLUNTARILY surrendered power in order to allow blacks to participate in democracy, and they are being repaid for this act of humanity/kindness by being murdered.

Whites BUILT a nation...a wealthy nation, with a high quality of life.



I take issue with the 'kindness/humanity' part. Why?

Because white people in South Africa would have never ended Apartheid unless they hadn't been forced to do so by other nations threatening to cut off SA's viability as a global economic player. 'Voluntarily' would seem to indicate that they ended in order to integrate fully into their society Africans and, more fully, Coloreds, as they always intended. This is simply fiction.

White people in South Africa built a very nice nation, I agree; conservative Jew Ben Stein made a great point about 1950s America: he said it was wonderful, like a shiny red apple; however, inside of that apple was a hideous worm called racism.

You see, I'd agree with white people about South Africa or Zimbabwe if it either were not so similar to (or worse than) Stein's analogy. However, that's not the case. These nations were prosperous--which is a fair claim--but to pretend black Africans should feel pity/sympathy/empathy because this 'prosperity' was provided to them? No, that's a mile-long stretch of your imagination. Access was granted when white people were forced to be human, something they would never have been if not forced.


By the way, white people, don't you find it incredibly ironic to feel so much passionate anger for the displacement of/seizures of land from white Zimbabweans when this is simply the same thing that happened to the Africans? Again, so why not feel pity/sympathy/empathy for black Africans who had lost their lands?

If you agree that that is hypocritical on your part, we can then move to agree that the seizure of land from the Boers is wrong, even if making sure that they do not control the country's wealth is right.


Thank you, white people, for the discussion.

Black people said...

South Africa had the safest and most plentiful Goldmine in the entire world, up until the end of apartheid.

After apartheid, they started replacing the white workers with blacks, and soon the massive machines stopped and went into disrepair.



See above comment, assuming it is approved, as it should be. That wealth was not shared, but usurped from the land at the expense of the people she'd nursed, and black people would appreciate if you end the history revisionism. I agree South Africa was wealthy; all of Africa is wealthy--Africa was known for it's wealth pre-colonialism.


And they've just sold the goldmine to the Chinese.

The Chinese don't view black people as humans. You can easily assume how they will treat their black "employees"



While many Asian leaders have demonstrated, in the recent past, ham-fisted foreign policy and diplomacy, if you believe that any one would allow the Chinese to inflict genocide on African people NOW, you've been smoking all day.

This is a different world and, in spite of anti-black Asian racism that does exist, no one will allow genocide; threatening such preposterousness in order to justify whites maintaining supremacy over native people on their own ancestral lands makes me question your intelligence.


Thank you, white people, for the discussion.

Anonymous said...

@ Black people

It'd be nice if Black people would stop killing Whites that keep SA running, wouldn't it?
The Boers are being, tortured killed & dispossessed by thugs like YOUR PEOPLE for no other reason than them being white. Maybe if you'd stop being so hypocritical you would allow us to present facts that don't sit well with YOUR AGENDA.

You won't find any race apologists here, you might be accustomed at being told how OPPRESSED you are by the DWLS, but the bullshit doesn't cut it here. And no, you're not discussing, you're ACCUSING ( it is a built-in reflex among PoC to wallow in their ENTITLED status ) us again of misinformation, i.e. unpleasant truths.

Anonymous said...

@ Black People/Diarrhea

Another one of your sock? Geez, you have more socks than a centipede! Why do you keep posting here? You're B-A-N-N-E-D you sick girl!

Anonymous said...

"I take issue with the 'kindness/humanity' part."

So what? I couldn't care less what you take issue with, no one has asked for your opinions, because no one is interested in what you think.

The fact that you waste your time writing long posts that no one will read suggests that you have a low IQ.

Thank you negroes for the discussion.

Anonymous said...

YOU WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH...

since the ANC has taken power this country is so CORRUPT it is unbelievable.

This country IS CLEARLY doomed to go the same way as Zim.

THERE ARE NO AND's IF's BUT's or MAYBE's

Anonymous said...

As a white south african i gotta feel that the only person conducting a civilised and intelligent argument here is Black People. Stupid? I don't think so. Might have started a decent discussion if you all didn't just shout people down when you can't answer them.

David said...

@ Black People:
"Because blacks were cloistered into shantytowns and couldn't move around their ancestral lands without papers under white people's system of Apartheid. They were never the 'child given everything' under Apartheid. It's history revisionism to think as such."

And what has changed now? Blacks cloister themselves (!) into shantytowns. They abandon their "ancestral lands" in favour of trying to make it in the big cities. Cities that, incidentally, ol' whitey built.

Another thing: If those shacks are so horrible, why not demolish them and build huts in their place? Are they not, after all, the vernacular architecture? Bet you'd love to trade in your (presumably) comfortable house and all the European perks for a nice ol' hut. Hey, why not a tent? At least it'll make it easier to move around while you explore your ancestral lands... Oh wait. You don't do that anymore, do you?

Black people stopped being nomadic the moment cities (with the associated amenities) went up.

So horrible that blacks where never given an education. Mean ol' whitey came in and tore down all the schools that existed before they came...oh wait. I forgot. The modern concept of "education" didn't even exist till ol' whitey arrived.

It's not history revisionism. Maybe the old whites didn't give you same things they gave themselves - that I will entirely agree with. But for what reason should they (a minority) be expected to arrive, develop and educate the majority? That's not only unfair, it's madness.