What is it you want us to do?

Soon, "conservatives" won't be able to win these states

Knowing that an executive order has been issued by Mein Obama basically barring the federal government from hiring white people in a bid to increase diversity - in federal agencies already bloated with disproportionate amounts of diversity - it is paramount that we ask where all of this headed. What is the end-game?

Before we get to that, here is Judicial Watch on the new Office of Diversity and Inclusion:

The economy remains in shambles yet President Obama keeps wasting taxpayer dollars expanding an already bloated U.S. government, this month launching a new office to help build a “diverse and inclusive workforce” at all federal agencies.

The new Office of Diversity and Inclusion will ensure that the entire U.S. government develops comprehensive strategies to drive and integrate diversity and inclusion practices. It will assist the different agencies in building a workforce that “respects individual and organizational cultures” by examining policy options, data trends and employee survey findings.

The goal is to eliminate demographic group imbalances in targeted occupations and improve workforce diversity. To attain this, special initiatives have been created targeting specific groups, including Hispanics, African Americans, American Indians, women and gays and lesbians. The idea is to create a workforce that truly reflects America’s diversity, according to the Obama Administration.

Wait, doesn't the public workforce on the federal level - and state - already reflect America's diversity? Aren't Black people already grossly misrepresented in the public workforce, since private companies are tasked with turning a profit to stay in business (meaning Black people must seek employment in less stressful vocations) while government employees are tasked with no directives or objectives other then consuming tax-dollars? Here's Pat Buchanan to answer that question:

 As reported here previously, African-Americans are hardly underrepresented in the U.S. government.

Though only 12 percent to 13 percent of the U.S. population, blacks hold 18 percent of all federal jobs. African-Americans are 25 percent of the employees at Treasury and Veterans Affairs, 31 percent of State Department employees, 37 percent of the Department of Education, 38 percent of Housing and Urban Development. They are 42 percent of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 55 percent of the Government Printing Office, 82 percent of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency.

According to The Washington Post, blacks hold 44 percent of the jobs at Fannie Mae and 50 percent of the jobs at Freddie Mac.

The EEOC, where African-Americans are overrepresented by 300 percent, has been asked to oversee the new “government-wide initiative to promote diversity and inclusion in the federal workforce.”

I’m not making this up.

Were it not for the army of contractors the federal government relies on to actually get work done, one wonders what type of productivity the disproportionately Black federal workforce would perform? Perhaps the failing US Postal Service offers that glimpse.

Black people are already disproportionately represented in federal employment

So what is the end-game again? The USA Today published a story heralding the mark of the minority-majority baby birth moment, when the percentages of non-white babies born eclipses the percentage of white babies born:

Only 50.2% of babies under age 1 are white and not Hispanic, according to the 2010 Census — a sharp decline from 57.6% just 10 years earlier.

"We are almost at a minority-majority infant population," says Brookings Institution demographer William Frey, who analyzed the latest Census data. "We probably have passed it since the Census was taken" in April 2010.

• STORY: Census tracks 20 years of sweeping change

The number of states where minority babies dominate has doubled to 14 since 2000. The balance has tipped in big states such as New York, Florida, New Jersey and Georgia.

Minorities have been the majority in Texas and California nurseries for more than two decades. In Texas, the majority of people under age 47 are minorities, in California, under 52.

The area's floor-covering industry has attracted so many Hispanics that the North Georgia Health District, based in Dalton, has brought in translators and prints materials in Spanish, says Jennifer King, public information officer.

The nationwide changes are redefining who is a minority and who is not.

"These little babies … by the time they get to be in their 20s and 30s, the current racial and ethnic categories … won't have anything close to the meaning that (they have) today," Frey says. "When they think about white majority, it'll be something in the history books."

Hate to burst your bubble Jennifer King, but many places in America have ceased being American and are, in essence, no longer part of the country. Having been to Dalton on numerous occasions, I'm aware that many white people have simply fled the city. It is one of the growing number of American cities that no longer resemble America.

A city, town, and a county ultimately reflects its majority population; hence why major cities with majority Black populations - thus Black people have a distinct voting bloc to control the city's government, schools, police, courts, etc. - all resemble Detroit, Baltimore, Newark, Atlanta, Birmingham, etc.

Look, the Black Undertow is always going to follow white flight. That's inevitable. What's increasingly obvious is that the Brown Tsunami - primarily illegal aliens - will follow white flight and participate in the construction of the new infrastructure that must support the erection of new suburban homes and strip malls.

Because white people (and successful non-whites who want to raise their family in stable, white areas) have no desire to live around Black people, they must rely on primarily illegal aliens (because white people have no problem relying on true free market labor, which basically equates to slave labor and drives honest competition out of business) to build their shiny new homes scores of miles away from the major metropolitan  areas that they must then drive too.

It turns out that white people don't enjoy living around Brown people - the real Brown people, those 5 feet or shorter Brown people that perform the jobs Black people on EBT Cards, TANF/Welfare and Section 8 Housing refuse to do - either.

So what is it those in control of Black-Run America (BRA) want white people who, to quote George Bailey,  "that this rabble you're talking about... they do most of the working and paying and living and dying in this community," so that BRA can be paid for by these same white people who are beginning to realize that their tax dollars go to pay for the rearing of primarily Black and Brown babies that Black and Brown males have no desire to care for after 'pumping and dumping' the Black or Brown (and sometimes white) mother.

Why will the new majority of Brown and Black people in the coming years decide to keep paying their tax dollars (what percentage do you gather will have the job qualifications to do anything other than flip burgers?) to support largely white retirees?

Conversely, why should white people - regardless of age - continue to pay taxes that primarily go to supporting and helping to proliferate the Black Undertow and Brown Tsunami? Sane social policies should do everything possible to lower the number of dependent humans on handouts from the hard work of an increasing minority of people.

BRA encourages that more and more non-whites find ways to drain the productive workers of America (the private sector is overwhelmingly white), even if it means creating an Office of Diversity and Inclusion - despite the existence of the EEOC and employees dedicated to increasing diversity in every company, private or public - in the process. 


We've stated before that Disingenuous White Liberals (DWLs) hate and loath Untouchable Whites (those whites who persist in voting Republican, waving the flag, attending Tea Party rallies, etc), and it is my belief that DWLs truly believe that the 'rising tide of color' will continue to tolerate DWLs leading them.

What is it that BRA - as it grows increasingly tyrannical and totalitarian in advancing the interests of Black people above all others - wants us to do? Well, keep paying for it with tax dollars of course, but eventually DWLs hope that laws are put in place to forbid white people from even holding certain positions as punishment for centuries of white privilege.

But this must be stated: white people in America, by tolerating the continued advancement of civil rights (in a vain attempt to make up for past discrimination, which is increasingly obvious that such inequities can never be amended) have helped Black people attain wealth and positions of power that no other country - not even nations indigenous to Black people - in the history of the world could afford them.

Black people have risen to power in many vocations and industries; been promoted in schools (though standards have been universally lowered to assure this academic advancement); promoted in entertainment and sports; and allowed to basically do whatever they want since the late 1960s, all with white people primarily fitting the bill.


In times of prosperity, perhaps this system of government known as BRA could continue moving forward. In times of austerity, the artificial creation of the Black Middle-Class has been exposed, revealing a people devoid of the ability to sustain cities, business infrastructure or school districts (well, if they cheat they can).

BRA is demanding more and more from white people (and members of other races only trying to make an honest living) to ensure that Black people - and increasing Brown people - that rely on the benevolence of the state to subsist are given continued preferential treatment above all others.

This is ending. The Black Tax is too much.

I do not know the event that will ultimately end the legitimacy of BRA; I do not know the precise moment when a series of events triggers a honest statesmen to finally state "enough" and defend the historic majority population of America; but I do know that the course BRA is sailing on is one that would turn the entire country - from sea to shining sea - into a permanent Detroit or Los Angeles, with DWLs safely in cities like Washington D.C., New York City, and Seattle coordinating and controlling the madness.

I am fully convinced that the event that triggers the de-legitimacy of BRA is coming; I am fully convinced that a series of unfortunate events (for those in control of BRA) is transpiring, and that an honest statesmen is grappling with the thought of finally saying "enough." But de-legitimizing BRA must come first.

What is it those in control BRA want us to do?