Saturday, April 6, 2013

America 2013 Defined

PK NOTE: Capital campaign is back on. Please consider making a donation via Pay Pal (on the right-hand side of the site) or - even better - make a donation to VDare at this link and it will be tax-deductible. Either way, I appreciate whatever you can give. For donations of $100 or more, you'll get four signed books. Two huge books are being worked on right now, and I need to raise capital to take care of marketing and for payments to the graphic designer. 

U.S. Civil Rights Commission praises Birmingham for renaming airport in honor of Fred Shuttlesworth, where a 300 lbs. sign fell and killed an obsolete white kid -- his three-day funeral in Birmingham back in 2012 still hasn't been paid for... welcome to America, land of the free, home of the brave
Remember the Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport (by the way - there are no international flights out of the airport, so calling it an "international airport" is a hilarious lie), where a 300-pound information sign fell and killed a white kid from Kansas?

Well, the airport was renamed in 2008 for "civil rights" icon Fred Shuttlesworth, a man whose greatest claim to fame was agitating for black equality [Airport name change OK'd; will honor Shuttlesworth, Birmingham News, 7-16-2008]. Of course, "black equality" in Birmingham means voting down support for the Honda-Indy Grand Prix because there are few black faces at the event [Birmingham withdraws request to support Honda-Indy Grand Prix, Fox 6 Birmingham, 4-3-13]
The Honda-Indy Grand Prix of Alabama will not get financial support from the city of Birmingham.
On Tuesday, Mayor William Bell withdrew a request for $300,000 to host and promote the race at the Barber Motorsports Park.

Steven Hoyt questioned why a city with a black majority should continue to give money to support the Barber Motorsport track, saying decisions at Barber were not made by anyone who "looked like him."
This is the beauty of the civil rights movement, with the victory of Fred Shuttlesworth's people making them completely immune from criticism.

Well, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights cares little for the actual civil engineering of the airport in Birmingham, but he's happy as a clam about it being renamed in honor of Mr. Shuttlesworth [Birmingham airport lauded as strong example by federal official in Huffington Post column, Birmingham News, 1-17-13]:
The Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport left a strong impression on a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights who cited it as a strong example of a city highlighting an important local figure.
In a column in the Huffington Post, Michael Yaki praised the city's renaming of the airport in honor of the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth.
Yaki was in Birmingham last summer for a Civil Rights Commission hearing.
Yaki wrote that seeing Shuttlesworth's name on an airport welcome sign last year made him seek more information about Birmingham's most prominent civil rights leader.

"I wondered what a "Shuttlesworth" was, and filed it away in the back of my mind. I knew the name was familiar, but in my three-flights-to-get-there fog I just couldn't access the right synaptic pathway," he wrote.
Yaki found answers later that day during a visit to the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute where an entire display was devoted to Shuttlesworth.
"He survived bombings, attacks and a constant barrage of death threats with dignity, grace, and unswerving courage," he wrote.
Birmingham officials in 2008 rechristened the airport to honor Shuttlesworth, who had recently returned to live here after decades in Cincinnati.
The renaming effort was the idea of then-Mayor Larry Langford and was quickly endorsed by the City Council and the Birmingham Airport Authority board.
''For the civil rights icon, there is no greater honor this city could give him than to make the Birmingham International Airport the Fred Shuttlesworth International Airport,'' Langford said at the time. ''I can't think of anyone outside of Dr. King who did more to change the climate in Birmingham, Alabama, than Rev. Shuttlesworth.''
Yaki noted that the name change was done while Shuttlesworth was still alive. He died in 2011 at age 89.
Yaki's column was written to support the remaining of San Francisco's airport to honor Harvey Milk, that city's slain councilman and gay rights activist. Yaki said his city should follow Birmingham's example.
"As Shuttlesworth was to Birmingham, so is Milk to San Francisco," his Huffington Post column concludes. "And both left legacies far beyond the borders of the cities to which they are both irrevocably linked."
 Luke Bresette is dead, but in the eyes of those who run the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, all that matters is the airport is named after one Fred Shuttlesworth.

But here's the best story: OD noted that the almost entirely black Birmingham City Council voted against giving the Honda Grand Prix $300,000 (which attracts $80 million in economic growth to the area), but they had no problem giving $20,000 for a three-day funeral - which was never paid - for Mr. Shuttlesworth funeral [Shuttlesworth funeral bill unpaid a year later, foundation asks city to keep promise, Birmingham News, 2-4-13]:

The funeral bill for the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth remains unpaid more than a year after the death of Birmingham's celebrated civil rights leader.
Meanwhile, the city refuses to pay the remainder of a $20,000 pledge to the foundation founded by his widow to memorialize his legacy.
Mayor William Bell and the City Council approved a resolution giving $20,000 to the Fred Shuttlesworth Foundation, a nonprofit group founded by Sephira Shuttlesworth shortly before her husband's death.
The foundation's namesake died weeks after the Sept. 2011 resolution. Three days of funeral activities followed.
The city paid $10,050 for catering and public relations expenses associated with the three-day funeral event. Shuttlesworth also was buried at Oak Hill Cemetery, a city owned burial ground. The remaining $9,950 authorized by the city remains unreleased.
Members of the foundation said they don't understand why Bell and his staff refuse to pay what was promised. Bell's office said the city has fulfilled its commitment and paid all allowable expenses associated with the foundation.
Rather than a direct cash contribution as stated in the resolution, Bell's office told the foundation to submit invoices for expenses, with the understanding that the city would contribute up to the agreed $20,000.
That commitment did not include funeral expenses, said Jarvis Patton, Bell's chief of operations. Patton, in an interview with al.com/The Birmingham News, said there were limitations on what was allowed to be paid with city money and the allowable expenses have all been paid.
Still, there was no contract between the city and the foundation specifying exactly how the money would be spent and a $19,000 funeral bill remains unpaid.
The city's resolution simply states the money would be used to "incorporate in the Legacy Project along the Birmingham Civil Rights Trail an honor designation for Reverend Fred L. Shuttlesworth..."
"We were under the impression that up to $20,000 would be made available for the memorial," said Douglass Petty, the foundation's president. "The understanding was you proceed based on the fact that you have that amount. From that point when an invoice was submitted, the thought was they would have provided the funds to the particular point. That did not happen."
Petty said it was city leaders who suggested a larger public funeral that spanned multiple days.
It was that event, which featured national figures and hours of memorials that justified the use of public money, Petty said.
 This is the state of Birmingham in 2013; this is the state of America in 2013; this is the state of "civil rights" in 2013, which completely shields blacks from any and all criticism.

And also from having to pay their bills for a funeral honoring one of their "heroes," which they renamed an airport ('international' in name only) for, where a 300 pound-sign - almost certainly hanged by a 'disadvantaged business" - fell and killed a 10-year-old white kid.

This is America in 2013.

62 comments:

Anonymous said...


Steven Hoyt questioned why a city with a black majority should continue to give money to support the Barber Motorsport track, saying decisions at Barber were not made by anyone who "looked like him."


Says it all about pavement apes. If they dont look like me then fuck 'em. Me, me me me me. All they know. Can the system crash faster please. I can take much more.
BV

blancdeseinesaintdenis said...

Hi, it's the frenchman, albertosaurus said yesterday that two things are bad for a country : socialism and islam, he's right and in france we have both!! The situation is worse here than in USA in my opinion. First you have black whoa re christians and live since 300 years with you, second you have latinos who are fot lot, spanish or portuguese and so christians. Here we have all the islam of the world, african, arabicans, pakistanes, turkish...all the shit of the wormd. And we have a president socialist who gives our money for them and let them do all they do...

Pat Boyle said...

I went to Washington-Lee High School. Warren Beatty went to Washington-Lee. So I will never be its most famous graduate.

A tragedy?

No - just trivia. Another form of trivia is the 'first'. Like the first woman to walk on the moon, the first Jew to be the Pope, the first Lithuanian to star in a porn film about bestiality, or the first black to do almost anything. These firsts are not real accomplishments. They are just mental flotsam and jetsam.

Many prominent people also have had as their accomplishments only self serving actions. A excellent example is Harvey Milk.

Milk was a promiscuous homosexual who knocked around the country doing his homosexual thing. He landed in San Francisco and ran repeatedly for public office on a platform of homosexual issues. He finally got elected and promoted his homosexual agenda.

National fame came to Milk when he was assassinated largely for being a homosexual.

I don't normally mind gays much but why are we required to think of Milk as a martyr? He liked the gay promiscuous life style and he worked all his life to promote it. Normally we admire selfless people who work for the greater good. But that wasn't Milk. He was only interested in gay causes.

It's the difference between running into a burning building to save a stranger's child and running into your own burning house to save your checkbook.

Al Sharpton is another one of these 'heroes'. Shuttlesworth sounds like yet another.
Black people who become famous for being a 'civil rights' or an 'activist' are really just people who are focused strongly on themselves and their own issues.

If you establish The Society for the Promotion of Lithuanian Pederasts, I can understand why you might be considered a hero by Lithuanian Pederasts but why would anyone else admire such a person?

Black people habitually think of race as a zero sum game - if you win I lose. So Shuttlesworth promoted black people, by his own line of thinking, if it was good for them it was bad for me.

White politicians usually promote causes that are good for everyone. Blacks promote causes that are good for blacks.

Albertosaurus

Anonymous said...

Why didn't they pay the remainder of the promised funeral expenses? Negroes are notoriously bad tippers.

Ryzzia said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Steven Hoyt questioned why a city with a black majority should continue to give money to support the Barber Motorsport track, saying decisions at Barber were not made by anyone who "looked like him."

In BRA, people are judged by the color-of-their-skin and not the content-of-their-character. This is a point which is completely lost on DWLs and mainstream conservatives. Come to think of it, maybe they do "get" it but lack the courage to point out the emperor has no clothes.

Californian said...

The black establishment naming airports, streets and other public places after civil rights leaders could be seen as analogous to other peoples naming the same after wartime or revolutionary heroes. The civil rights movement was a revolution, not a struggle for equality. With "revolution" meaning that it was a de facto seizure of power.

Here's the odd thing: we see more of these renamings in the 21st century, long after the civil rights era ended. Now contrast them to the reality of what PK terms BRA: the epic rates of black criminality, illegitimacy, economic failure, Detroiting, and etc., all scrutinized on SBPDL. What is there to celebrate in BRA? The hoopla over airport names covers up the sordid reality. Black governed cities can't maintain the economy or get violence down to civil levels. But they can put up new airport signs (sort of...).

Then again, the civil rights revolution benefited black elites more than the rank and file. Politicos, minority contractors, academics, race hustlers all cashed in. But there's not much of a payoff for the black underclass, or even the middle who is kept afloat via government programs. And there's little for white people to celebrate (other than deluded DWLs) as they are progressively taxed to keep the treadmills running--when not being forced out of their neighborhoods by the general trashing.

But BRA can rename an airport and bask in the afterglow of civil rights.

The glorification of black elites via public monuments is similar to what one might see in post-colonial African countries. Maybe things are not quite as elaborate in the USA as emperor Bokassa's coronation ceremony, or Ivory Coast's Basilica at Yamoussoukro. But it does point out the importance of image over substance in BRA.

Anonymous said...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/04/nuts-phoenix-to-recruit-minority-lifeguards-even-if-they-cant-swim/

Californian said...

Another thing to consider: ever since the civil rights revolution of the 1950s-60s, the USA has seen a marked decrease in actual civil rights. Look at:

* The end of freedom of association
* The massive expansion of the state bureaucracy to enforce "equal opportunity"
* Asset forfeiture, roving wiretaps, universal surveillance, no-knock raids
* Speech codes and "diversity" agitprop
* The TSA regime at airports
* The feds labeling as "terrorists" various veterans, libertarians, preppers and other groups
* The intolerance in the MSM and academia for any dissent re BRA
* The coming wave of gun control laws

I'll go out on a limb and state that one reason for the glorification of civil rights leaders is that it is a cover for the actual suppression of civil liberties throughout the Homeland. To get on an airplane at Birmingham airport, the traveler may have to submit to violations of the Fourth Amendment but one can always revel in the name of Fred Shuttlesworth and pretend to live in an era of civil rights.

It's sorta like some communist regime naming everything "People's This" and "Democratic That" while putting in the boot.

Anonymous said...

Suitable motto for the "international" airport.

Yo, we kill white kids.

Jim said...

Anonymous said...

Steven Hoyt questioned why a city with a black majority should continue to give money to support the Barber Motorsport track, saying decisions at Barber were not made by anyone who "looked like him."

Looked liked him? Let's see, big lips, wide nose, kinky hair, hat/hoodie, tennis shoes, baggy pants. How about IQ, number of legitimate offspring, felony record, down-low stuff, AA education/jobs, white women f***ed, etc.

And the White race has to constantly bail this species out throughout the world.

I truly believe this entire mess is coming to jab head.

The frightening part is that the MSM is building this North Korean BS into Obama's "Cuban Missal Crises". The greatest hero since JFK. Oh, f**k me!!

Anonymous said...

Shuttlesworth is honored for doing nothing honorable. Groid activism is organized gibsmedat and is no more honorable than Demarquis Elkins attempted robbery, and subsequent murder of an infant.

My People is trying to institute retroactive gibsmedat so that groids who commit armed robbery get out of jail faster and get jobs without background checks. Fancy that, background checks for Joe Suburb to buy a hand gun to protect his family, but no background check for Jamal Felon before he gets a job as a security guard.

It's organized groid war against the people (whites) who make civilization possible. This more than anything tells me groids will lose. They can't take over without more laws and the average groid is too busy getting his gibsmedat, either by job or by crime, to ease up on the crime rate. Meanwhile, the systems is about to collapse, and there won't be enough banking and organized commerce for these apes to rob, and they'll have start robbing the white neighborhoods, and that is when they'll learn why they were on the bottom to begin with. Never met a groid who had any staying power.

Moondoggie said...

Albertosauros, You are absolutely on a roll. Man I love reading your comments and insights. Please keep it up.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous here.

I have two observations.

The first is that blacks play the race card because it is the only card they have been dealt.

The second is that when a black complains, "That's racist!" (or "That be racist!"), often the appropriate reply is,

"Yes, and it's right."

Anonymous said...

Of course there won't be any revolution but there will be a resistance. This is the glorious equalocracy that suburban scrunts with gunts and oprahland rainbow bots have clamored for for years. Those who cannot be named and DWL will break out the iron fist after fooling the brain dead with the velvet glove of a rainbow utopia. Equal rights plus for a certain favored race in the glorious hopetopia.

Bogolyubski said...

Californian:
Then again, the civil rights revolution benefited black elites more than the rank and file. Politicos, minority contractors, academics, race hustlers all cashed in. But there's not much of a payoff for the black underclass, or even the middle who is kept afloat via government programs. And there's little for white people to celebrate (other than deluded DWLs) as they are progressively taxed to keep the treadmills running--when not being forced out of their neighborhoods by the general trashing.

But BRA can rename an airport and bask in the afterglow of civil rights.

The glorification of black elites via public monuments is similar to what one might see in post-colonial African countries. Maybe things are not quite as elaborate in the USA as emperor Bokassa's coronation ceremony, or Ivory Coast's Basilica at Yamoussoukro. But it does point out the importance of image over substance in BRA.


Yes, this is a good point. What you're missing are the biggest beneficiaries of all - the ruling oligarchy or plutocracy, which is largely white (or at least white-looking). Even more than blacks like Sharpton and Shuttlesworth, the one-percent have been massive recipients of the BRA looting scheme. That was one of BRA's chief purposes from the very start, and now we're seeing it brought to fruition before our eyes.

The fact that the one-percent controls the game so completely does create at least a degree of the hypergamic lust among younger white females which Whiskey is so fond of describing, which generates support for BRA among the DWL gamma-bunny males who chase them. Whatever the explanation, there is support for BRA not only among the oligarchy (who after all created and implemented the scheme) but also among non-elite whites. This support cannot be explained by any logical or rational argument about BRA having some sort of societal benefit. There has to be a non-rational motive or set of movtives which drive its support among whites.

Lorraine said...

I think it is high time that white politicians change their tune. White Nationalism and White Separatism is what needs to happen. Whites have been nice and inclusive and we gave gotten screwed.

Also, tried to post this earlier..,

If someone calls me a cracker, I call him a nigger.

Look, I am through giving a rip about offending people. You dish, you take. High time the turds understood this.


White Mom in WDC

Anonymous said...

Just shows how ignorant and racist these black politicians are. They can turn $300,000 into $80 million, but they don't want to until there's someone who has a blackface on Barber Motorsport.

This is the same reason why every single African country, even oil rich Nigeria, will always be a third world country.

Anonymous said...

Another bloomberg anti-gun mayor gets arrested:

http://freebeacon.com/mayors-for-illegal-activities/

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...Whatever the explanation, there is support for BRA not only among the oligarchy (who after all created and implemented the scheme) but also among non-elite whites. This support cannot be explained by any logical or rational argument about BRA having some sort of societal benefit. There has to be a non-rational motive or set of motives which drive its support among whites.

This is something worth exploring. Perhaps an entire (separate) topic can be created on why much of the white rank and file buy into BRA.

A longer post will follow...

Bogolyubski said...

OT somewhat but nonetheless proves my previous assertions about the nature of the MI Repuke 'white-knights' charging in to clean the Detroilet.

They be usin' a shiny turd to wipe up the toiletbowl. Looks like the Repukes found the BRA bloodsuckers some fresh eats - Whitey tax-slaves on the big MI plantation. They even found a fresh magic negro to put a grin on the looting party.

Make the world a better place today: Roast a Republican. - preferably on a spit, nice and slow over the flame.

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

hey p.k. as you've stated so many times "we owe blacks nothing" but to my point. how about Mr. Steven Hoyt! saying "why should a city with a black majority continue to give money to support a motor track speedway" saying "decision's at the speedway track will be made by someone that doesn't look like me" if this was the case Mr. Hoyt, then why should whites pay their city taxes? or pay city school taxes?(hardly one white goes to those future criminal schools.) the logic behind that statement is in fact the reason why Birmingham is stuck in 1968! what a joke. don't think for one moment that the real reason they don't want that fire hose city to overcome is because they want that old racism but this time it's old black racism that will lead the army of hatred towards whites. to deny your residents 80million annually is a crime. but with that 80 mil comes whites all around their city. it's that simple black people especially city council blacks hate whites period. and just think ole masta stevie hoyt doesn't like any other color to make the decisions. now the plot thickens! GODSPEED&SEGREGATION NOW!

NORDIC CAUCASOID said...

to anon@april6th.5:49! that is one of the best things I've ever read here on SBPDL--"background checks for Joe Suburb to buy a hand gun to protect his family!" but "no background check for Jamel Felon before he gets a job!" wow, is this world up-side down or what?

dieter said...

I would like to know how much federal money this airport receives to stay up and running.Birmingham does not seem like the hub of the universe

Dissident said...

Californian said that he thinks this the "Civil Rights Movement" was in all likelihood a "cover" for the overthrow of real civil liberties.

He is absolutely 100% correct. That is all this was ever about. While many idiot dupes, may have believed that they were doing the right thing, what in fact they were doing was slowly ratcheting up a socialist utopia of command and control and no civil liberties.

There are two kinds of socialists: The Fabian kind that wants a slow steady march to control and the hard liners that want to crush all opposition.

We've had the Fabians and we're going to see the other....if they are successful in getting the guns. Big if?

Gun talks have stalled, therefore, one needs to expect more shootings. Call me conspiratorial if you wish.

This whole "Civil Rights Movement" was a top-down design to make blacks think they were making progress while eroding the majority, white, middle class, society.

Take it to the bank that there will be more shootings. More carnage and more clamor for gun laws. They are going to wear us down with a constant hammering.

They are going to make everyone of us a criminal through legislation and onerous law.

They have their forward momentum and they'll be damned to let is slip away. Expect a Hillary run for President next time around. She'll seem to be a little more moderate on issues than the current occupant of 1600. Of course, she's not, but it's the ol' ruse that Bogolyubski is talking. Left-Right, Conserve-Progress, Republican-Democrat, ect.

He's exactly correct is saying that the Republicans are as useless as tit's on a bore hog. They are effectively castrated.

Demographics are destiny. Demographics are destiny.

Now rinse and repeat: Demographics are destiny.

Anonymous said...

DWL's are irrational and incredibly stupid in their support of blacks. Surely they realize that blacks themselves don't want them in their neighborhoods anymore than they want any other whites, asians or hispanics. Blacks don't want THEIR neighborhoods to be integrated and "multicultural." It's not about any of that for blacks and is supposed to be a one way street in their favor as they take over and ruin neighborhoods. It's about domination and control, the seizing of territory.
In the same sense, renaming streets, parks and airports takes place for the same reason. It's a symbolic takeover accomplished through putting a black face/name on it.
Does it surprise me that blacks won't support a motorsports event because it's white? Not in the least. Yet, at the same time, they'll howl for support for black events and expect non blacks to be all for it and cough up money etc.
With blacks, it's always a one way street and all about them, what they want and what they get.
In areas that are "too white," blacks howl about the lack of diversity, about companies not having enough blacks on the payroll etc- but in black areas, what do we see? Black domination and exclusion of all others so that every office, every department and so on is overwhelmingly majority black and they see nothing wrong with doing exactly what they were complaining about themselves.
Blacks are like that asshole you knew back when you were younger. You remember that guy- the one who always expected you to rush in and help him when he needed help, always expected you to loan him money when he was broke, always expected you to sympathize with him when something went wrong and lend him moral support etc-but when the shoe was on the other foot, the only response you got was "Hey man, that's your problem. I'm going to the movies!" Then, when they once again needed YOUR help and you refused (knowing it's a one way street) they act all aggrieved, mistreated, let down and abused. You get called selfish.
With blacks, you just get called a racist.
Collectively, blacks are that asshole you knew when you were younger and just like that asshole, they deserve nothing more than being kicked to the curb and left to their fate.
They are worth your time.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker here.....No race track in coonville is very good for white people. If the speedway was allowed to open it would have been used as a lure for white victims by the local predators. No white racing fans for prey is a positive. Now the local vipers can only prey on other vermin "that look like them" which is also a positive. Can you imagine how dangerous the track would have been if it was built by minority labor contractors. It would become a death trap.

As some of you know I strongly support BLACK SELF DESTRUCTION along with the stupid white fucks that allow this shit to keep happening. If someone is so dimwitted that they don't know DIVERSITY IS OUR DESTRUCTION then they deserve what they get. While on the street the big lesson I learned was not to hang out with stupid people. The dumb guys were the first to go down. I was safer on the street by myself than to be hanging with some stupid fuck that would get me killed.

Anonymous said...

Ex New Yorker again....Many people on this sight have talked about spreading the word and waking up their white brothers. At this point in time anyone who has not woken up is not because they are asleep, it is because they are BRAIN DEAD. I see these impaired people all around me. You cannot wake up a person who's brain is malfunctioning. Don't waste your time. Spreading the word has no effect on these people.

I have been down that road and gave up talking to the proles a long time ago. They believe the government will solve their problems. Many people have told me "Don't tell me about it. I don't want to know." My attitude now is fuck these dumb assholes. Remember, if they didn't hear about it on television it isn't happening. They have said to me "If that was really true they would tell us about it on the news." These people are pitiful.

They are pawns in a cosmic chess game and being played for fools. I removed myself from the game a long time ago. At this time all one can do is refuse to play the game. I still pay taxes because I know what will happen if I don't. I am not in debt to any one. Never had any student loans because the banker boys don't loan money to student that went to the "school of hard knocks". I have been free my whole life.

The best a person can do is get ready for the system to come crashing down. The economy is based on green paper and digits on a screen. When you hear terms like "trillions of dollars" you don't think that money really exist. It is electronic money floating around in cyber space. I think a giant solar flare will wipe out everything with an EMP. Good bye Wall Street. Get some food saved up. Also matches and candles. Make alliances with neighbors you can trust. When babel falls the Jungle Boys will be looting and killing each other. Keep your powder dry. Fate is a cruel master.

bubo said...

LOL, I have been watching the Indy race at Barber on TV. The announcer just called Birmingham a "progressive Southern city that has been embracing this place(Barber)for over a decade." I guess he wasn't talking about the black population.

I wish I could break in and run a video of that black buffoon ooking over and over about "dem people ain't look like me."

Lorraine said...

So true. I still encounter people who have not heard about the Santiago shooting and are incredulous when I mention it.

Numb, dumb, and scared of the truth.

White Mom in WDC

Anonymous said...

"They are worth your time."
Man, do we ever need a sarcasm font!

Anonymous said...

@DC Mom/Lorraine

I brought up the "teen" murder of baby Antonio to somebody and they flipped out saying that the news already reported so what's the big deal. The big deal of course is that he's a fuckin' baby and "teens" killed him deliberately and that this should dominate the news cycle and not the older story of Trayvon.

Anonymous said...

off topix:

http://gma.yahoo.com/kidnapped-89-old-her-captors-
htmlRondaiges A. Harper (17),
and

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/07/zoe-brown-abandoned-toddler-identified-_n_3032950.html?ref=topbar

I will read some huffpost comments and see if anyone mentions the
4 ton elephant of race

Anonymous said...

first, Yahoo is a negro worship site

second..boycott and girlcott
the lamestream:

I brought up the "teen" murder of baby Antonio to somebody and they flipped out saying that the news already reported so what's the big deal. The big deal of course is that he's a fuckin' baby and "teens" killed him deliberately and that this should dominate the news cycle and not the older story of Trayvon.

Anonymous said...

Fuck huffpoo, the daily KOS, pahoo, spoogle, almost online and all the other gov funded spying on you and tracking you night and day bullshit pages and services. Lamestream government stenography lapdog yellow whore press? Why would you let that enemy agitprop into your head space? They are your enemy and this is a war. The sooner you figure that out the more likely it is you will survive.

Californian said...

Bogolyubski said...Whatever the explanation, there is support for BRA not only among the oligarchy (who after all created and implemented the scheme) but also among non-elite whites. This support cannot be explained by any logical or rational argument about BRA having some sort of societal benefit. There has to be a non-rational motive or set of motives which drive its support among whites.

Some random thoughts. They're not intended to be a scientific exposition. But I'd like to see if I am not alone in my observations...

An acquaintance once asked me about race realism (he was not aware of my online persona). I gave him a balanced account of what it is about, using rhetorical tools to appear objective. He asked some intelligent questions and I gave him balanced responses (the good, the bad and the ugly, so to speak).

A couple weeks later he came back and told me that race realism was really "racism" and he could have no part of it.

Now let me explain this acquaintance: he is what Roissy might describe as a "beta herb." (For the record, I do not think that Roissy's use of the term beta male is anthropologically correct, but I'll use the term here for convenience.) My acquaintance is someone who subordinates himself to his circle of female acquaintances, and those females proceed to walk all over him. Sexually, he is constantly being shot down, but the more that women reject him, the more he idealizes them on the grounds that sooner or later they will reward him with access to their sexuality.

Nor is he the only one. I've observed that DWL males with whom I discuss politics frequently buy into a squishy male feminism. They see nothing wrong with any of the indignities that radical feminism has inflicted upon them. If anything, they promote feminism because they believe that in an "equal" society they will not have to face the competition of alpha males (again, using a very loose definition of alpha).

For example, they welcome women into the workplace because with women present, the more rougher men among them must watch their language. Thus, the more sensitive guys will also be protected (in theory).

This is all very sketchy. But it indicates there are underlying psycho-sexual forces at work. It seems as if the Western world is losing out on the alpha personalities (both male and female) who once provided the leadership.

Why is this so? Perhaps owing to birth control and the sexual revolution, reproduction patterns have changed among white people to the point where the natural leader type is pushed to the margins. Perhaps because the black underclass reproduces irresponsibly and thus the lowest common denominator among them expands exponentially (while marginalizing the responsible black demographic). Certainly the eugenic scientists of a century ago speculated that this is where the Western world was going. But they were just crazed madmen, right?

As I say, there is more going on here than the politics.

[continued]

Lorraine said...

Sad. Someone pointed out before that most Americans are rotten to the core. Sadly, I am beginning to believe this statement. Ex NYer is right. Most people are not worth the time. It is a blessing and a curse to 'see'.

White Mom in WDC

Mr. Rational said...

Most people are not worth the time. It is a blessing and a curse to 'see'.

Many truths are uncomfortable to behold.  Adulthood means taking them on and doing what needs to be done despite how you feel about it.

Californian said...

[continued]

Let me give you another example. On more than one occasion I have had debates on gun control with DWLs, the same people who idealize MLK, opposed apartheid and now glorify third world migrations into Europa and North America. The debate goes like this:

Me: "You need guns to protect yourself from criminals."
DWL: "The government will protect us."
Me: "What happens when the government can not? Say during the Rodney King riot?"
DWL: "If we took up guns and defended ourselves, we might get killed. Better to let the rioters burn down stores and take our property than risk getting killed."
Me: "What if it came down to you being beaten by a rioter, or a family member being sexually assaulted?"
DWL: "Better that than dying in a gun fight. At least we would still be alive"
Me: "Uh..."

I suppose one could respond: "Then you would die like a man."

But that point would be lost on them.

Again, it gets back to the personality type. It's why, I think, so many DWLs buy into a squishy male feminism. It justifies DWL behavior. They can reject traditional tenets of manhood by claiming to be "evolving" into sensitive feminized males.

Consider the Hegelian master-slave dialectic, brought to you courtesy of Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_dialectic

The Hegelian Myth describes DWLS: people who subordinate themselves to more powerful personalities and then invent ideologies to rationalize away their subordination. This is a point that James Burnham makes in his "Suicide of the West." Modern liberalism is a manifestation of underlying liberal drives. Instead of a will-to-power, it's a will-to-servility.

The funny thing is, in the long run you have a better chance of avoiding both the depredations of rioters as well as being killed in a gunfight by being willing to fight and die from the get-go. Once you put yourself at the top of the feeding chain, people are less likely to mess with you. But there's a mental leap to get there. You can call it alpha maledom or combat focus or whatever. DWLs just do not have it. Or rather, there are many people who do not have it and then rationalize it away by adopting liberalism.

Look at the Cold War era liberal nuclear disarmament slogan of "Better Red than Dead." It's stated right out in the open.

Compare it to the slogan of the American Revolution: "Liberty or Death!!" On one level, this sounds like a bunch of guys posturing in a tavern. But it encapsulates exactly what is needed to maintain both one's freedom and, in the long run, life and property. The willingness to struggle.

Again, these are all random thoughts.

But I'd like to discuss what other people have observed on this front.

Lily White said...

In the city where I live, schools that have been here for generations are being renamed for random black and Hispanic women who have been on the school board, and some who have been school administrators at some time or another. All black and Hispanic, all women.

Melanie said...

@ Anonymous April 6 2013 at 5:12 PM

Actually that's not a bad idea, considering that it's public pools and the majority of those who will make use of them will be their fellow minorities. So when one becomes a rockfish, YT will be nowhere to be found in the picture. Undoubtedly whites will pay the niggo lotto, but that's what they get for being stupid enough to implement this.

Lorraine said...

Freedom is not free. There is no such thing as a free lunch. The turds think that their gibs are free and that they are getting over on the system. They become dependent on the white initiated systems and then become modern day slaves. They resent their serfdom yet refuse to recognize how they contributed to it. DWLs are co dependent on the turds for ego strokes and jobs as social workers etc. They are in servitude too.

Struggle has been morphed into something that is negative when in fact it is character building.

Blacks do not struggle so they lack character. Or they do not wish to struggle.

White Mom in WDC

Silent Running said...

This support cannot be explained by any logical or rational argument about BRA having some sort of societal benefit. There has to be a non-rational motive or set of movtives which drive its support among whites.

Maybe it has something to do with being brow-beaten for six solid decades by virtually every organ available to government and, by extension, the corporate world? Perhaps GovCorp backing this propaganda with loss of livelihood and expulsion from respectable society also plays a role?

Most people support BRA in the same way a hamster "supports" the feedbar that doesn't provide an electric shock. And the ones who support it in earnest are always the ones who are the most insulated from it. How this all came about isn't terribly complicated and has been covered many times.

Roast a Republican. - preferably on a spit, nice and slow over the flame.

Nice. I'm actually much angrier at the GOP than I am at the Dems. I expect a party of cultural aliens to want to dismantle my civilization; I don't expect endless craven surrender by the "opposition." Cicero said something about the enemy within the walls. When the reckoning gets here in earnest, Republicans deserve to get theirs twice as hard.

Anonymous said...

Ask the US Indians how the government taking care of their needs has worked out.

Birmingham government passed up $60,000,000 + to snub an event that their predominantly white citizens go to for $300,000 in funding?

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

Was at a gun show in Tulsa today and was amazed at how few minorities there were there. Lots of guns, and lots of ammunition and not a (while I was there) single gun going off on a rampage. People were polite and obeying the law. Too bad the same thing can't be said when blacks gather together in similar numbers.

Silent Running said...

At this point in time anyone who has not woken up is not because they are asleep, it is because they are BRAIN DEAD. I see these impaired people all around me.

Are those who wake up after today also braindead?

By virtue of being a race realist in 2013, everyone here has shown himself to be somewhat extraordinary. It's a grave mistake to expect the extraordinary from ordinary people, particularly when the penalties are so severe and the rationalizations so ubiquitous. Patience is an integral part of leadership.

That being said, I don't necessarily advocate trying to convince anyone of anything. People need to feel before they can see. The insulation is melting, and a whole lot more Caucasians will be feelin it before long.

Mutant Swarm said...

Californian said...

"...This is all very sketchy. But it indicates there are underlying psycho-sexual forces at work. It seems as if the Western world is losing out on the alpha personalities (both male and female) who once provided the leadership.

Why is this so? Perhaps owing to birth control and the sexual revolution, reproduction patterns have changed among white people to the point where the natural leader type is pushed to the margins. Perhaps because the black underclass reproduces irresponsibly and thus the lowest common denominator among them expands exponentially (while marginalizing the responsible black demographic). Certainly the eugenic scientists of a century ago speculated that this is where the Western world was going. But they were just crazed madmen, right?

As I say, there is more going on here than the politics..."
________________________

Don't forget the millions of Whites killed in WWI and WWII. One of those people killed for the internationals bankers might just have fathered or bore the savior of our race, but never got the chance.

Silent Running said...

Why is this so? Perhaps owing to birth control and the sexual revolution, reproduction patterns have changed among white people to the point where the natural leader type is pushed to the margins.

I think widespread infiltration of women into traditionally male fields is the primary culprit here. All male military units almost always have higher morale than "coed" ones. But it's not just white people. Japan probably has more trouble with male herbivores than we do, though I'm not sure the natural leaders are marginalized there.

DWL: "Better that than dying in a gun fight. At least we would still be alive"

And all those home invasions where the occupants were gratuitously violated and butchered anyway? Channon and Christopher? His answer is predicated on the assumption that he'll be left alive. You can give him a list of cases where this didn't happen, but I doubt that will change his mind. He sounds like a breathing sacrifice. I've heard grown men say that they'd rather die than raise their hand against another person. When I become an outlaw I'll know who to stick up first.

Anonymous said...

"his support cannot be explained by any logical or rational argument about BRA having some sort of societal benefit. There has to be a non-rational motive or set of movtives which drive its support among whites."

BRA is all about control and rubbing our noses in it to show that we are under control.

JB said...

Kersey,

Well, congratulation.

You said this started as a joke site.

And after all this time, all these years, all your effort, all the hits, etc., you have come full circle.

This is a joke site.

Once again.

Nation of Cowards, indeed.

Best to you and yours.

Anonymous said...


Birmingham government passed up $60,000,000 + to snub an event that their predominantly white citizens go to for $300,000 in funding?

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

was it 300K or 30K?
either way stooopid is as stoopid does.

Californian said...

Maybe it has something to do with being brow-beaten for six solid decades by virtually every organ available to government and, by extension, the corporate world? Perhaps GovCorp backing this propaganda with loss of livelihood and expulsion from respectable society also plays a role?

Sure.

There's a massive machinery of egalitarian agitprop and repression. That can not be denied. But what I was looking at is why white advocacy disintegrated during the civil rights era and beyond. There used to be mass movements built around leaders such as George Wallace and the Dixiecrats. I was tossing out some ideas on why these movements failed to sustain white resistance.


Don't forget the millions of Whites killed in WWI and WWII.

Definitely. The loss of tens of millions of alpha warrior types did not do white nations any good. Their genes were lost for good.

And also look at how the US government used both world wars as an opportunity to push egalitarian policies.



And all those home invasions where the occupants were gratuitously violated and butchered anyway? Channon and Christopher? His answer is predicated on the assumption that he'll be left alive. You can give him a list of cases where this didn't happen, but I doubt that will change his mind.


That is so.

This personality type would rather play the odds, submit to criminal attacks, and hope for the best. There is a definite mental hurdle to overcome in being prepared to fight and die.

You have to wonder if blacks are sensing that more white people have given up their will to resist. And this is what leads to Central Park wilidings and Channon & Christopher cases. They sense the weakness and attack. Same thing on the political front. No matter how outrageous their demands, blacks know they can get away with them.


He sounds like a breathing sacrifice. I've heard grown men say that they'd rather die than raise their hand against another person.

There can be a principled pacifism. Often it works because there are the proverbial "rough men" who guard the pacifists while they sleep at night.

Anyway, I don't think the people I was describing were pacifists per se. They simply see their lives as being so important they would endure the worst degradation rather than risk death by fighting back against an aggressor.

Again, it takes a will-to-power which is lacking in a growing sector of white men and women these decadent days.

AnalogMan said...

Paul, congratulations indeed. Your site has grown to the point where it has attracted its own "internet warrior". These sad people are paid to disrupt discussions on race-realist blogs. Go to the Irish Savant for an example of how this works. You'll easily identify the troll.

Expect "John Brownstein's" posts to increase rapidly in volume and vulgarity. If he doesn't increase his output, his masters will replace him. Eventually, you'll have to ban him, or he'll ruin your site. It's what they do.

Lorraine said...

We are only under control if we allow ourselves to be . A system can only allow you to be under control if you engage in it. Disengage and it has no power over you.

White Mom In WDC

vis a vis said...

If portuguese and spanish are latinos so are you, cause french is a latin language!

Spanish portuguese italian and french the latin languages

Spanish and portuguese are more correctly called iberians.

Anonymous said...

There is no such thing as "oil rich Nigeria".

Nigeria is an African sewer. The OIL has value only because of the mind of the White Man. No White Man, no cars. No cars, no use for stinking oil that sat on the ground (close to it) in Niggeria.

It was the WHITE MAN that gave value to useless oil. If there were no WHITE MEN, the African would still be squating over it, while peeing and shitting on his ankles having NO CLUE there was such a stuff 1/2 mile down.

time machine said...

Imagine the gene switching that is taking place in white males, the fagotising of white western males.

If a woman prefers a feminised male, that feminised male passes his DNA onto his children, his daughters will prefer even more feminised males and his sons will be more feminised.

But gene switching can occur even in alpha males, altho the man is an alpha male, the stresses of the world we live in can switch his genes to feminised genes and those genes will pass on to his offspring, so even tho the woman has chosen an alpha male, is it alpha male genes she is allowing to pass onto her offspring.

This is what has happened to the black community, the civil rights has unleashed untold damage onto the very ppl that it was supposed to liberate. So blacks actually shackled themselves even more, gene switxhing has created an army of feral raping zombies, even the black women that don't have a penchant for thugs, and prefer a more homely type black man cannot be sure that the genes she will pass onto her offspring will be the homely type.

The agenda to dehumanise humans is well on track

The masses are slowly being devolved into morlocks

rex freeway said...

I am instructing my city to lure the race away from such a racist bigoted city. I believe our city council will have no problem with putting up $300,000 in return for an $81,000,000 dollars being brought into our economy. And 29% of my city is Negro. I wonder if the councilmen in Birmingham has an inkling of just how racist his comment was. Or if he even cares. It's obvious why Birmingham is a shithole now anyway.

Silent Running said...

But what I was looking at is why white advocacy disintegrated during the civil rights era and beyond.

I was replying specifically to Bogo's wording. I do think that among the majority of Caucasians support for BRA is a mile wide and an inch deep. But you pose an interesting (and vital) question. I was thinking on this last night and the first example that came to mind was Wallace himself, who recanted his opposition to segregation at the end of his life. His reason? Fear of Hell. Churches were hugely influential during the CRE, especially in the South.

The CRE saw the waxing power of liberalism, which set about attacking conservatism from all sides. In my opinion, a great weakness of conservatism at this time was that it was considered "common sense" and so could not articulate any rebuttal to the revolutionaries. I forget who it was, but some female liberal declared that simply asking "Why not?" would deliver power into liberal hands, and so it was.

Silent Running said...

You have to wonder if blacks are sensing that more white people have given up their will to resist.

Absolutely. It is known that sexual predators can "sniff out" those who have been victims of abuse previously, and who are therefore more likely to have a freeze response. In the case of blacks, the law is a little too even-handed: anyone who defends himself from assault will be disarmed, stripped, fingerprinted, and interrogated by police, and may even risk charges (BRA is reinforced from virtually every corner of society). Better to just take your beating so the cops don't look at you too closely.

This is one of those things that people would never admit to, but it's there just the same. I'm sure you've noticed that any time a black assaults/kills a Caucasian, the news article will always explore the possibility that the victim was a racist. If it happens that the victim used a racial slur, it is strongly implied that the assault/murder was justified.

Discard said...

Regarding these feminized men: Polygamy will make a comeback, as manginas will have forfeit their right to breed. Over at West Hunter, the idea of "truncated selection" has been mentioned, by which the average intelligence of a society is raised by sterilizing stupid people. Perhaps we ought give thought to getting cowards out of the gene pool as well.

Mr. Rational said...

Perhaps we ought give thought to getting cowards out of the gene pool as well.

Don't be too sure.  Selecting against aggression seems likely as one of the necessary steps for Western society to form in the first place.

Discard said...

OK, Mr Rational, I see your point. Perhaps we can select for a Goldilocks range of aggression, none too vicious, none too yellow. Unless perhaps the yellows have some other rare and useful attribute. "Yes, Mr Nobel nerd, we've selected a group of Wild Women for you to mate with. We hope to spawn a group of mathematically inclined skateboarders."